[20:21] The Brian doesn't have the right to sell water or service for sewer. So the city of College Station is obligated to provide sewer.

[20:33] They have the privilege of providing sewer service. And the Wix and Creek Company has the ability to service this at the water. And of course all of that's going to come with the development.

[20:47] So, right now we're talking about this PD, we're talking about land use, on plating, that's when these.

[20:55] Yeah, and you tell yourself.

[20:56] Healing was going to bring it up, because when we looked at the blueprint of 2040 Future Land Use Plan,

[21:00] you had a floodplain cutting down exactly the way they had cut it.

[21:04] You had the retention area that cuts right down through.

[21:07] And then it goes through the major arterial, that you guys identified it, right?

[21:11] There's a major arterial road that you guys have put through there.

[21:14] Is that right?

[21:14] Well, it's a major collector.

[21:17] So when the water, the flood length cuts through that water, is there going to be storm drains running through down that age of collectors?

[21:25] That all comes during another stage of the development process where we'll see where what their storm water detention and how their storm water system is going to work.

[21:36] Obviously, they have to deal with, you know, whatever the proposed cover is and handle that stormwater in a way that fits our ordinance

[21:46] And because it's going to be in the city of Brian, if it's annexed, it has to, it has to confirm answer.

[21:53] But this one we're just talking about the use and they'll go through the PDG through the proper engineering channels and everything else for everything else.

[22:00] I said it for this is the first step and I said and I understand it's the first step

[22:05] and that's I'm going to talk about what I was going to talk about was a successful plan

[22:08] and a follow-up cut through. I get what this is but we still have a responsibility for

[22:14] trying to understand things that this guitar has to say right so I guess it's a little bit

[22:18] of skin in the game that's why. That's absolutely right.

[22:22] You know what I'm saying in a way where the road goes in on the map I think I wouldn't be

[22:29] It also provides to find that ultra-insightly because of physical conditions and things like

[22:36] it.

[22:37] Mr. Conno, do you have a comment?

[22:41] Thank you, Randy.

[22:42] Thank you, sir.

[22:46] Okay, at this time, we will open up the public hearing for this.

[22:48] If you'd like to speak on this item, come forward and give your name and address, please.

[23:00] Okay, seeing that, I will close the public hearing and entertain a motion.

[23:03] I move to recommend approval, the owner requested an organization of these 97.36 acres, including

[23:09] 3.25 acres of road away for Hardie Weedon Road and the property we assigned to PD and district zoning

[23:16] upon annexation to the Bryan City Council to adopt the written staff report analysis as

[23:21] the report findings and evaluations of this commission.

[23:24] Thank you.

[23:25] Thank you.

[23:28] Thank you.

[23:29] Thank you.

[23:34] Thank you.

[23:39] Okay, and we have a second.

[23:39] I think I wish as it could have Brian and dresses and I guess we have to take that up with someone else.

[23:46] I would just like to add to I like the diversity in the master plan, I like the diversity in that building.

[23:52] It's not just residential, I like that there's other flavor to that and I think that's what Brian needs in terms of actuals and everything else.

[23:58] So I definitely commend you for thinking about the total picture, not just the residential side, so thank you.

[24:05] I think it's a great development, I think it'll be a great addition to that side of town.

[24:10] And it's got to continue to go on record to say I just hope that staff and the developers, eventually we can get to a point

[24:16] and we can build a few affordable homes within these couple of hundred that were putting up, that we can come up some type of system to be able to allow folks

[24:26] that have grown up here that may be on being able to afford the 180s, 180s, 180s to still be able to buy some of these newer subdivisions, but beyond that, I think what we're doing is what the times are calling for.

[24:39] Excellent point, Commissioner Resby.

[24:41] We've talked about that.

[24:42] We talked about it upstairs.

[24:43] We talked about it all the time.

[24:45] Affordable housing for first time buyers and everything else.

[24:48] And I know the price point that you gave us on these things that we had talked about fits within the stuff that we're actually looking for within the city,

[24:55] to get that customer over here, the lot prices.

[25:00] We're very cognizant of how high they keep getting. The stuff that you develop, what makes these things easier,

[25:06] what we didn't have a whole lot of discussion, is because of the stuff that you've done previous to this.

[25:11] The stuff that you've done on the side-back form, we've had the fire department here, we've had the, you know,

[25:16] fire chief in and talking to us about different ideas and different, you know, build the materials and everything else.

[25:20] Well, you proven that, so it's made it a lot easier to go forward whenever we have something like this.

[25:25] over for that. I'd like to say thank you and for that. I'd like to say thank you for

[25:29] doing those houses that we so desperately need right now.

[25:32] Commissioner's anybody else have anything?

[25:34] I just totally agree. I mean here in the citizens and seeing one of the needs for new home buyers

[25:40] and getting more families into the brine area, this is absolutely beautiful. Thank you for everything

[25:46] you do for our community.

[25:50] Okay, I'll refer you to the motion say aye.

[25:52] All opposed? Motion passes unanimously.

[26:00] Next, we have Reson and RZ-17-13-1983 Land Investments LLC request for a change of zone

[26:07] of confiscation from agriculture open AO, the Plan Development Mixed Use District PDM on 28.68 acres

[26:14] of vacant land out of the Maria Keegan survey after 28 located on the northwest corner of

[26:20] how I ate 30 FM-158, Hardy Weedon Road, and Brian Brasas County, Texas.

[26:26] Frank

[26:29] Behangs.

[26:30] Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

[26:31] I pretty much told you what I have to tell you about this.

[26:33] You have any other questions?

[26:35] I'm sure there's any other questions for Randy.

[26:38] Thank you, Randy.

[26:39] Thank you, sir.

[26:40] At this time, we'll open up the public hand for this.

[26:42] If you'd like to speak on this item, come forward and give your name and address, please.

[26:48] Seeing none, I will close the public hand and entertain a motion.

[26:52] I move to recommend approval of rezoning RZ-17-3 to the Brian City Council as requested and to adopt the written staff report and analysis as the report findings and evaluation of this commission.

[27:06] Commissioner Brisbane has another motion. Commissioner Crochet has a second and a discussion.

[27:13] on the fair of the motion say aye. Any opposed? Resonate passes unanimously. Next time

[27:21] we have our request for approval of zone and changes. The public here in the be held for

[27:25] each item. Commission makes recommendations. City Council has final approval.

[27:30] RC17-14, Brian Cotton Warehouse, a request for a change of classification for commercial

[27:35] C3, the planned development business district PDB, specificity allow warehouse operation

[27:40] on the 18.45 acres of land being 6.0 to a join in the east side of North Brian Avenue West

[27:47] between West 15th and West 18th Street. As well as 12.43 acres of land on North West

[27:55] Corner of West 15th Street in North Parker Avenue, Rocky Pine, Lot 1 in Block 107R in

[28:00] Lot 2 in Block 130 in Brian original town site, Brian Brassis County Texas.

[28:05] Thank

[28:09] you, Mr. Chairman.

[28:13] This is RZ-17-14 and it's a request to change the zoning on the property where the

[28:20] Brian Cotton Warehouse is.

[28:22] As you know, it's at the extreme north end of the Brian original town site.

[28:27] Very large facility.

[28:29] It's been there well over 100 years in one form and another cotton compress,

[28:35] Jen cotton oil seed, et cetera, et cetera, right now they only wear house uses. Within

[28:42] the last several years they've taken down two very old warehouses that had reached the end

[28:49] of their functional life and it's time to replace those. They came to us with a site plan

[28:56] and we realized that the zoning classification that was assigned to this in 1989 did not permit

[29:04] warehouse use. And because they had taken the other ones down, they couldn't put them back.

[29:10] So that presented kind of a problem. We felt a little silly about that. And so fundamentally,

[29:16] what this rezoning request is is we've designed a planned development that allows the Brian

[29:23] Cotton Warehouse to continue in its mission until they decide they don't want to do that anymore.

[29:29] It very tightly restricts what they can do to what they do.

[29:37] And it takes away roughly 120 some odd specific land uses

[29:44] that occur in actually 11 land uses that occur in C3.

[29:51] And another 20 some odd that would

[29:54] would incur a curve, be allowed in industrial.

[29:59] They obviously...

[30:00] And we want to zone the north end of downtown to an industrial district. But we did want to allow warehouse, and that warehouse distribution type use. We also propose some development standard changes,

[30:18] that elements eliminated some of the standards that didn't make a lot of sense.

[30:22] like, you know, if you're going to cover up a block with a building with a bit for a warehouse,

[30:30] our parking ratios didn't make a lot of sense.

[30:33] So we took out parking, we took out some, we took out landscaping, things that we didn't

[30:39] feel like were a good investment for this north end of downtown.

[30:42] But the comprehensive plan says is that the north end of downtown should, at some point

[30:48] time to redevelop and become more urban. But it also says that before that happens, it needs

[30:55] to be studied and needs to be a careful process. We believe that that is in the future,

[31:01] we don't know how long, but for now, for the foreseeable future, we think of the Brian

[31:07] Cottonware House, and continue to fulfill their mission. And so that's why we propose these

[31:13] development standards. We of course recommend approval and I'll be happy to answer any questions you might have.

[31:20] Thank you, Randy. Commissures. We have any questions from Mr. Heinz.

[31:27] Thank you, sir.

[31:27] Thank you. Okay. This time we'll open up the public here.

[31:31] And if you'd like to speak on this item, come forward and give your name and address please.

[31:42] Being on our close public here in an entertainment motion.

[31:51] I moved to recommend approval RZ 17-14 to Bride City Council's request.

[31:55] And new to other written support and analyses as a report and findings evaluation of this commission.

[32:00] Mr. Regan has a motion to have a second.

[32:02] Second.

[32:03] Mr. Regan, don't have a discussion.

[32:05] I just want to say that I'm glad that we were able to work with these property owners.

[32:09] I'm glad that we're keeping some of our industry

[32:11] that they haven't been flexible with these guys.

[32:14] We're not forcing to do anything.

[32:16] On the other hand, there's shown to be willing partners.

[32:18] And I think they support about 200 jobs.

[32:22] So I'm glad that we're able to work with them

[32:24] and let them keep doing business.

[32:27] Anybody else?

[32:29] Randy, I too would like to say thank you for staff's work on this thing here.

[32:36] You're absolutely right, we know there's going to be things that are going to happen years

[32:38] to come with the new redevelopment of downtown and everything else, and this is a big part of

[32:43] our history, the cotton is still is a big part of our history, and we'll remain a big part

[32:48] of our history.

[32:49] But to work with somebody, to let them continually do their business and not put undue burdens

[32:55] on them to continue on. I think is great. Great news to hear from the city of Ryan. I appreciate

[33:00] what you guys did. And thank you guys for staying in Brian and continuing to hire everybody

[33:07] and employ people here. Anybody else? Okay. All in favor of the motion say aye. Any opposed? Motion

[33:18] passes.

[33:20] Okay. Next on the agenda is nine. Request for approval of variances to the standard

[33:24] article four, they'll just setbacks and a lot of standards to land a site development ordinance,

[33:29] Ryan Kudner vortices, chapter 62, a public here will be held for each item.

[33:34] Commission has final approval after this may direct appeals to the City Council.

[33:38] First, we have as PV 17-18, David Earl Mickens, a request for approval of a variance from

[33:43] the minimum 25-foot front building setback, generally required on property zone, mixed-use

[33:49] residential district MU1 to allow proposed installation of a carport plan to extend all

[33:54] way to the front of the property line on property located at 1230 Chigr Street, join in the

[34:01] north west side of Chigr Street, approximately 250 feet to 350 feet west from the intersection

[34:07] of Wacos Street, being locked 27 in block 2 in the Candy Hill subdivision phase 2 in Ryan

[34:14] Brass's County Texas. Mrs. Lindsey Hackett.

[34:21] Thank you.

[34:25] There we go.

[34:29] So planning variants, PV-17-18 for

[34:32] Mr. David McKins.

[34:34] As you stated, this is a variance request for 25 foot variance

[34:39] to the minimum required front building setback,

[34:41] which is traditionally, it's generally 25 feet

[34:45] in this zoning district.

[34:48] The applicant has constructed a manufactured home

[34:55] on the lot.

[34:57] And since this property is in the floodplain,

[34:59] It is honest.

[35:00] An engineered foundation which makes it difficult to move the home. And this home was built, as you can see, it was built directly adjacent to the minimum 25 foot front set back, leaving little room for development, no room for development in front of the manufactured home itself.

[35:20] At this time, the property owner is requesting to place a carport, which is approximately 12x20 feet,

[35:28] into entirely into the 25-foot front setback, a approval of this variance would allow for a 100%

[35:38] variance from the minimum setback in the front, which would allow for any structures to

[35:43] be developed to the front setback at any time. The neighboring properties on this street

[35:48] have, uh, complied with the minimum 25 foot front building step back and, um, uh,

[35:58] approving this variance in this particular case without any special circumstances is not

[36:04] something that, uh, staff is recommending approval of with staff recognizes that there

[36:10] would be no hardships for the property owner. If this were not approved, the property

[36:15] are stated in their application that there would be no hardships on themselves if it weren't

[36:19] approved. You can see that in your staff report.

[36:24] It's important to note that if this were

[36:25] approved, it would set a precedent that would be difficult to enforce other front building

[36:32] step-back variants request. It would be difficult to enforce non-compliant structures in the future.

[36:40] And for these reasons, staff is recommending denial of the requested variants, and I am happy

[36:48] to answer any questions that you may have.

[36:51] I'm sure we have any questions for Mrs. Hackett.

[36:55] Can you go back to the Google Earth view or else the property lines on this view are not

[37:03] lines up exactly?

[37:05] They can vary from what's actually there.

[37:07] The survey is about a representation of where the property lines fall in relationship to the building.

[37:15] The applicant here too.

[37:17] I do not believe so.

[37:21] Another thing to consider is that based on the location of the manufacturer come on the property,

[37:28] it does appear that there may be other areas on the property that the applicant would be able to

[37:34] or could potentially be able to place a covered car storage if this were not approved.

[37:42] You said there is another area?

[37:44] There appears to be space behind the manufacturer.

[37:48] You can see that there is some open space on this spot.

[37:55] Any other question?

[37:57] Thank you, guys.

[37:58] Thank you.

[37:59] Okay.

[37:59] This time we'll open up public hearing for this item.

[38:01] If you like to speak on this item, please come forward and give your name and address.

[38:08] Seeing that, I'll close the public hearing and entertain a motion.

[38:13] Chairman, I moved to the Dipleting Variance PV-17-18 and to adopt the written staff report

[38:20] and analysis of the findings of this commission and the facts upon which those findings

[38:25] are based.

[38:28] Thank you, Commissioner Conley.

[38:29] Commissioner Regan, Motion and Second, any discussion?

[38:40] All in favor of the motion say aye.

[38:42] Aye.

[38:43] Any opposed?

[38:45] Motion carries.

[38:48] Okay.

[38:48] The next item on the agenda is 9B Planner Variance PV-17-19 J. Cody Whitten, a request for approval

[38:55] of a variance from the minimum five foot sets that builds and set back generally required

[39:00] of property zone staff college. This is district SCB to allow proposed construction of a

[39:05] building edition as well as installation of proposed walking cooler plan to extend within 2.5

[39:11] feet from the northwest side property line on a property located at 3610 staff college avenue between

[39:17] South College Avenue in Old College Rose,

[39:19] being a lot one in block one of the Beltrans subdivision

[39:23] in Brian Brass's County Texas.

[39:25] This is K.

[39:26] Thank you.

[39:27] As stated, the applicant is requesting a 2.5-foot variance

[39:31] from the minimum 5-foot side-building setback,

[39:35] which is generally required on property

[39:37] in the zoning district.

[39:39] And the proposed new additions that you reference

[39:42] are playing to extend within 2.5 feet

[39:45] the properties north-west property boundary.

[39:49] And the applicant is also proposing to build a six foot tall wood screening fence

[39:53] to prevent the additions from being visible from the public right away.

[40:00] This is just an aerial view of subject property. In April 2017, a BTO electrical easement was dedicated on the adjacent property.

[40:10] And this easement runs along the same property line that the applicant's proposed additions will be located near.

[40:17] And the electrical easement ensures that no structures will be built within that 10 feet.

[40:21] The presence of this ten-foot electrical easement creates the special circumstance that is typically not found on properties in the zoning district.

[40:31] And in the circumstance reducing the minimum building set back to 2.5 feet, we'll still leave at least 12.5 feet of separation between buildings on a job and joining sides.

[40:44] Based on these considerations, staff recommends approving this requested variant, and I'd be happy to answer any questions that you may have.

[40:54] I'm sure you have any questions from Mr. Skate.

[41:00] Any of the other joining property owners, all or talk or anything on this?

[41:04] No, sir.

[41:08] Thank you.

[41:09] You're welcome.

[41:10] Okay, this time we'll open up the public hearing.

[41:12] If you'd like to speak on the side of please come forward and give your name and address.

[41:19] You guys want to come forward?

[41:23] As I have any questions, they have to get

[41:28] them.

[41:28] Okay, seeing none, I'll close public here in an intertain emotion.

[41:35] I moved to approve planning variance PB 17-13 into adopt the written staff report analysis

[41:40] as a support findings and evaluation of this commission.

[41:44] Second, I'm ensuring that I don't have to commission a colleague of the second.

[41:47] I need a discussion.

[41:49] I'd like to see businesses growing. This is great. Thank you.

[41:55] I also want to tell you thank you for the many, many years of service that you provided.

[41:59] not only here, but our whole community and thank you for everything you do for downtown

[42:03] Bronis Association and everything to give. Congratulations on your new deal here, apparently.

[42:11] Okay, all in favor of the most staff. Hi. Any opposed? Motion passes unanimously.

[42:18] Thank you guys. Next we have nine C. Plano-Various PD17-20 TDG Management LP, a quest for approval

[42:26] of a variance from the minimum 50 foot lock, generally with generally required on a proposed

[42:31] property zone residential district, RD5, to allow proposed subdivision of 11 new lots each of

[42:39] which was proposed to have a lot with of no less than what is that state like it would be.

[42:46] 48, 48 feet, 8.25, 8, I'm sorry, 8.259 acres of land currently addressed at help, currently

[42:57] and vacant land at a casino philips lab extract number 45,

[43:01] a joint in the northwest side of Autumn Lake Drive,

[43:04] generally east from its intersection with Mountain Windleute,

[43:08] been lots 11 through 21 in Block 1 of the proposed

[43:11] Autumn Ridge subdivision in Ryan,

[43:13] Razzes County, Texas, this is Lizzy Hackett.

[43:19] Thank you, Chairman.

[43:21] The planning variance PV 1720 for proposed Autumn Ridge subdivision.

[43:28] So, this variance is a request for nine lots to reduce the minimum lot with the variance

[43:38] request ranges from one foot to approximately two feet per lot for these nine lots.

[43:45] All lots still will meet the minimum lot depth with the lot depth ranging from 105 feet,

[43:51] although you have 235 feet for these lots, they will still meet and exceed the minimum

[43:57] lot area requirements,

[44:01] this variance is being requested so that there can be space for the

[44:08] developer to comply with our city public trails system. As you can see, in between

[44:14] lots 17 and 18, there's the trail passing through in between those lots with common area.

[44:21] And in order to meet the width requirements for a trail,

[44:25] they have had to take some area away from the lots,

[44:29] and they have spread it out through lots 11 through 15,

[44:32] what 17, 18, and 19, and a lot, 21.

[44:37] It is important that the developer complies with our trail system

[44:43] so that we can have connectivity for pedestrians

[44:46] that are walking from the parks.

[44:48] a park located just to the southeast of this development that they're trying to connect to.

[44:55] Staff contends that the nine lots to be slightly below the lot with reform.

[45:00] Would not cause any calm public harm in the area that it would still meet the minimum lot areas, and would still have sufficient green space and sufficient building space for need developments.

[45:13] And with arranging lot depths from 155 feet, this is still exceptional space for the wants and for the development.

[45:22] And for these reasons, and the aforementioned considerations, staff is recommending approval of this experience request.

[45:28] have you to answer any questions that you may have?

[45:32] Mr. Jones, any questions for Mrs. Hackett?

[45:34] How far away is that park?

[45:38] It is.

[45:40] Located just adjacent only to the east.

[45:44] So it's adjacent.

[45:47] So this path is going to...

[45:48] Would connect to the park?

[45:49] We'll connect directly to the park park.

[45:53] Thank you.

[45:54] Welcome.

[45:55] So I just have a question that if you go back to the schematic, there you go.

[46:00] So we see that dark hatched area, that kind of is the path, right?

[46:04] I would assume that that's the new walking trail to get to the park.

[46:07] Right, you can see it.

[46:08] Can I say the sidewalk below the street?

[46:10] Yep.

[46:11] And in paths, passes through.

[46:12] So my question was actually, there's actually a darker shaded gray area that I put in steep.

[46:19] That does go on to this property line.

[46:20] What is that?

[46:23] You see that so you have the path that leads into the park and then there's the wreck.

[46:27] Oh, the drainage. That's a drainage area.

[46:30] Okay. Yes.

[46:31] Okay.

[46:33] That's

[46:37] it.

[46:37] Any other questions?

[46:43] I'm just confused.

[46:45] So this path is going to go lead to the park.

[46:48] But then is there any a path in the park?

[46:50] Yes.

[46:51] You

[46:54] can kind of see it on the screen into the right.

[46:59] And I believe it runs pretty close to the property as well.

[47:06] This might be an issue for Parks and Rec, but I can tell you I'll have right next to that park and

[47:12] That soil and that grass is all torn up and everything like that, so somehow formally I'd like to put in requests that we're going to have 15 new homes or

[47:20] But you know, was that how many new homes we're doing?

[47:23] 4444 total so they're all going to have access to this park

[47:27] Yes, okay, but that's going to create

[47:29] Okay, so that's just my two cents because I live right there and this foot traffic

[47:33] I'm a problem with the variance.

[47:34] I'm just saying I'm not going to put traffic.

[47:35] That's going to be there.

[47:37] I'm going to increase that.

[47:38] So, work the load of that park.

[47:40] I know it sounds silly, but if you live right next to it, you can see the trash.

[47:43] How far or not that park is, and it shares with elementary school.

[47:47] Two.

[47:47] Right?

[47:47] Merry branch element.

[47:48] Yeah.

[47:49] So, I'm glad that you're doing it.

[47:51] Don't don't get me wrong.

[47:53] But probably wrong for me to bring it up in.

[47:55] But it's nothing to be in.

[47:56] Okay.

[47:59] Yeah.

[47:59] The questions?

[48:05] Okay.

[48:05] And Lindsey, you're going to make sure that, uh,

[48:08] This is Lord Gibson, who sent us this letter, knows that this is, it was a one foot one and a half foot.

[48:13] Claire, it's a whole decent to her first thing.

[48:16] Thank you so much, because I think that is, as Commissioner Conley said upstairs,

[48:20] probably wouldn't have written this letter, she thought it was less than the 30, 30,

[48:25] to 8.7.

[48:26] Yes, sir.

[48:31] You have the question, Commissioner.

[48:33] Okay.

[48:35] Thank you.

[48:36] This time we'll open up the public here, and if you'd like to speak on the side,

[48:39] please come forward to give your name and address, please.

[48:45] Seeing that, I will close public hearing and entertain a motion.

[48:52] I move to approve planning variants, PV, 17, dash, 20, and to adopt the written staff report in the analysis as the report findings and evaluation of this commission.

[49:04] Mr. Brisbane, has a motion to have a second?

[49:07] Mr. Crochet's second? Any discussion?

[49:27] Any other discussion?

[49:34] Thank you. Congratulations on your new development here.

[49:37] looks like it's going to be a great thing here and I like your lot sizes. You

[49:40] stay within the boundaries of everything that we asked for and do a little

[49:44] extra so we appreciate that. All in favor of the motion say aye. Aye. Any

[49:49] opposed? Motion carries unanimously. Okay. Next one is generally we are adjourned. Thank

[49:57] you gentlemen.

Planning & Zoning 09/07/2017 - Sep 11th, 2017

Agenda

Transcript