[0:20] Heat. Heat.

[0:57] Down.

[1:04] Down. Down. Down. Down. Down. Down. Down. Down. Down. Down.

[1:08] Heat.

[1:28] Heat.

[1:45] Good evening everybody. I'll call the February 18th, 2026 Planning Commission

[1:50] meeting to order. May I have confirmation of posting and roll call,

[1:54] please? >> Thank you. The meeting was posted in

[1:58] accordance to Nevada open meeting law. All members are present with the

[2:01] exception of member Rudd who's participating via teleconference.

[2:04] » Thank you. Please stand and join me for the pledge

[2:10] algiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic

[2:16] for which it stands. One nation indivisible with liberty and justice for

[2:23] all.

[2:32] I will now open the first public comment period. This public comment period must

[2:37] pertain to matters on the agenda. You have three minutes to speak. Please come

[2:42] forward and state your name. >> Anything?

[2:47] » Is there any particular agenda items we're working with here or just what I

[2:50] want to say? It can either be regarding the minutes

[2:54] or it can be regarding the proposed zoning amendment item number two.

[3:01] » Um, uh, Chairrum, also just additionally for clarification, there is a specific

[3:06] public comment period for the item after this.

[3:09] » Yes. >> Yeah. So, you can do it now or you could

[3:12] wait. It's there's a public hearing on item number two, but this public comment

[3:16] period at the beginning is strictly for items on the agenda.

[3:23] Members viewing at home can also call in to 702-589-9629.

[3:47] There's still a 30 second delay at home, right? Okay. Once again, this is public

[3:52] comment. Anybody wishing to speak? Seeing and hearing none, I'll close the

[3:58] public comment period and move to item number one for possible action. Approval

[4:03] of the minutes of the January 21st, 2026 regular meeting. Do I have a motion?

[4:09] » Motion to approve. >> Second.

[4:12] » I have a motion and a second. All those in favor say I.

[4:17] » Any opposed? Motion carries. Item number two is

[4:22] matters pertaining to a proposed zoning zoning ordinance text amendment.

[4:27] City planner Nikishha. Uh good evening chair, members of the

[4:32] commission, Nikisha Lion, uh planning manager with the community development

[4:36] department. So item number two is for a public hearing and consideration on a

[4:41] proposed text amendment to recommend to the city council to authorize uh private

[4:47] helports as a conditional use within the R180 zoning district uh subject to

[4:52] certain conditions. Uh Casey Craig, the applicant and property owner of an R180

[4:57] zoned lot. Uh he's submitted this application for consideration by the

[5:01] city with the attent intention of if the zoning um tax amendment is approved by

[5:09] the city council that he would submit a conditional use permit for consideration

[5:13] by the planning commission to develop a private helicopter landing pad and

[5:17] accessory hanger on his property that's located at 10001 Villa Grande Way.

[5:23] Currently, the R1 single family residential zone does not permit or

[5:28] conditionally permit the use of private helports or any other similar aviation

[5:33] type uses. The H hospital zone is the only zoning district that conditionally

[5:38] permits helports. Uh these are used in conjunction with a medical facility.

[5:44] The Boulder City Hospital that's located at 901 Adams Boulevard is under the Hz

[5:49] zoning designation and has an approved conditional use permit for a helicopter

[5:54] landing uh area. Otherwise, the Boulder City Municipal Airport is the only area

[5:59] that allows for the operation of helicopters and helports as a public

[6:03] airport. as shown on the screen. Uh, currently the R180 zoning district

[6:09] applies to 36 lots within Boulder City. 34 of which are located um within

[6:14] Boulder City, subdivision number 11. This is east of Georgia Avenue and north

[6:20] of Vakerero Drive. Sorry. Uh, the remaining two lots uh includes the

[6:25] applicant's property that's at 101 Villa Grande Way. Uh that's the northeastern

[6:30] most parcel that you can see um at the top of the map on the screen as well as

[6:35] in the agenda packet. And then 1400 Utah Street uh to the east of the Boulder

[6:42] City Cemetery is also zoned R180. Uh to understand how the use is approached

[6:47] from a planning and zoning perspective, staff reviewed how other jurisdictions

[6:52] within Southern Nevada regulate this use in residential areas. Uh this is

[6:56] detailed beginning on page 12 of the agenda packet. To summarize, currently

[7:01] unincorporated Clark County allows for helports as a special use in their R80

[7:07] zoning district and there's certain conditions that apply to uh the special

[7:11] use permit and that's uh noted on page 13 of the agenda packet. Otherwise,

[7:16] there are no other jurisdictions in southern Nevada that permit by right or

[7:19] through a special or conditional uh permit. This type of use in a

[7:23] residential zone. This type of use is usually um a conditional conditional or

[7:29] special use uh that's allowed in commercial industrial or public

[7:33] institutional zoning districts and then subject to certain conditions.

[7:39] Uh given the proximity to uh residential areas with respect to specifically noise

[7:44] impacts, city staff retained uh Kaufman Associates to prepare a noise modeling

[7:49] technical brief. And this begins on page 32 of the agenda packet. This brief

[7:55] outlines uh Federal Aviation Administration, so FAA accepted

[8:00] methodologies for evaluating aviation noise and assessing land use

[8:04] compatibility. It also summarizes the FAA noise modeling requirements for

[8:09] public use airports and analyzes proposed noise levels based on different

[8:14] operational frequencies and times of day. Uh under the uh airport noise and

[8:19] capacity act of 1990, local jurisdictions are preempted from

[8:22] regulating aircraft noise uh in regards to public use airports. However, this

[8:27] federal um preeemption does not apply to private use facilities. So because of

[8:32] this uh specific proposal is for a private use helport. Uh it remains

[8:36] subject to local zoning regulations and so the city's noise ordinance would

[8:40] apply per city code. The maximal uh maximum permissible sound level for

[8:47] receiving residential or other noise sensitive use is 70 uh dBA LEQ. So

[8:54] dbaleq this refers to the average sound level that's me measured in a weighted

[8:59] decibb over a minimum 15minute period in accordance with national sound level uh

[9:05] meter standards. So sound levels at 70 dBA LQ represents a moderate constant

[9:12] noise level roughly equivalent to a washing machine, hair dryer, vacuum

[9:16] cleaner, lawn mower, similar um sort of noises. Uh the noise study evaluated

[9:23] three representative helicopter types, small, medium, and large to compare

[9:28] potential uh noise impacts based on aircraft size, including uh the specific

[9:33] helicopter that is proposed to be used on the property.

[9:38] So, as shown on the screen, these representative helicopters um sound

[9:43] levels would exceed the 70 dBA LEQ requirement up to a roughly 100 to a

[9:50] little over 200 foot radius from the uh perimeter of the helellipad uh dependent

[9:56] on the helicopter. And then specific to the applicant's

[10:01] property and the proposed helicopter that uh will be flown, the modeling

[10:06] software shows that the sound level will be expected to exceed that 70 dBA LEQ

[10:11] requirement up to a roughly 400 to 450 foot radius.

[10:16] So based on the modeling results, um maintaining a setback of up to 500 ft

[10:21] from the nearest noise uh sensitive receptor would allow a private

[10:25] helellipad to remain within that 70 dBA LEQ uh maximum threshold.

[10:31] Based on staff's uh analysis, the noise modeling brief, and the applicant

[10:36] submitt, the proposed amendment uh to title 11 chapter 3 would add a

[10:42] helicopter as a conditional use in the R180 zone subject to several conditions

[10:48] that's outlined in the agenda packet. Uh the first is that a letter of

[10:51] determination by the FAA must be provided which states that the proposed

[10:56] helicop um helport will not adversely affect the safe and efficient use of

[11:01] airspace. Uh that letter must state that there are no objections by the FAA and

[11:07] may list conditions or may not have conditions and any of the conditions

[11:11] that apply must be met and maintained throughout the duration of this use on

[11:15] the property. Um, all flight operations must be conducted in the daytime. So

[11:21] that's between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. So nighttime flights would

[11:25] not be allowed based on the proposed language.

[11:29] The uh perimeter of the developed helipad must maintain a minimum distance

[11:34] of 500 ft from any adjoining real property boundary of a residential or

[11:40] noise sensitive use. And then the private helport can only be operated by

[11:45] the property owner um or an occupant tenant. Uh commercial, public transport,

[11:50] charter or rental helicopter operations would not be permitted.

[11:55] Uh as proposed, the 500t minimum separation from the perimeter of the

[11:59] helellipad to any residential or other noise sensitive um property boundary

[12:05] would significantly limit where this use uh could occur within an R180 zoning

[12:10] district. Um, this standard would effectively limit eligibility to a

[12:15] single property that's currently zoned R180, which is the applicant's uh

[12:20] property at this time. Uh, if approved, the proposed tax amendment will solely

[12:25] establish regulatory standards under which a future conditional use

[12:29] application may be considered by the planning commission. Uh the proposed

[12:33] ordinance language is subject to change pending additional legal review by our

[12:37] city attorney and then any additional recommendations that's uh made by the

[12:40] planning commission uh here tonight if any. Uh chapter 33 of title 11. This

[12:46] provides the applicable standards and findings that must be made for a text

[12:49] amendment to evaluate the potential impacts of a private helport within the

[12:53] R180 zoning district. City staff utilize these standards to further analyze the

[12:58] proposed use. uh per city code, the factors for consideration in making

[13:03] findings for a proposed text amendment includes if the proposed amendment is in

[13:07] general conformance with the adopted uh city master plan and if the proposed

[13:11] amendment promotes the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the city

[13:15] through the consideration of impacts to existing land uses, adjacent areas,

[13:20] utilities, noise, drainage, and the character of the existing neighborhoods.

[13:25] uh staff finds that the proposed zoning amendment does not require amendment to

[13:28] the adopted master plan and does not conflict with the goals and objectives

[13:32] of this document as this specific type of use is not addressed within the

[13:36] city's approved master plan. Uh regarding promotion of health, safety,

[13:41] moral and the general welfare of the city. Uh usually the evaluation of these

[13:45] factors for consideration are not applicable to a general uh zoning text

[13:50] amendment as the proposed amendment does not authorize or approve a specific use

[13:55] on a specific property when we're looking at text amendments. However, due

[13:59] to the limited potential applicability of the proposed amendment in the R180

[14:03] zone and mitigation of factors through proposed conditions, staff provided this

[14:07] analysis uh forformational contextual purposes to the commission as well as

[14:11] the public. So, this is detailed starting on page 17 of the agenda

[14:15] packet. Just to summarize, as previously stated, the R180 zoning district applies

[14:21] to only 36 lots within Boulder City, 34 of which are located in one subdivision,

[14:27] and the majority of this subdivision is developed with the exception of four

[14:32] lots that are vacant. Uh, two lots that are located outside of this subdivision

[14:36] include the applicant's property and then um 1400 Utah Street. And as

[14:42] proposed uh with the proposed conditions, the 500 foot minimum

[14:46] distance requirement from the perimeter of the helellipad to any real property

[14:50] boundary of a residential or noise sensitive use would effectively limit

[14:54] the applicability to only the um applicant's property at this time. Uh

[15:00] currently zoning adjacent to the areas zoned R180 are residential or

[15:04] governmental. Uh at this time staff does not anticipate in anticipate any impacts

[15:10] to vehicular traffic. Um impacts to airspace would be regulated by the FAA

[15:15] regulations. The proposed zoning tax amendment

[15:19] includes the requirement that the applicant must obtain a letter of

[15:23] determination by the FAA as previously stated uh to determine that the proposed

[15:28] private HELA port will not adversely affect the safe and efficient use of

[15:32] airspace. As stated, that letter needs to state that there are no objections by

[15:36] the FAA um with or without conditions and then any conditions uh would that

[15:42] are required within that determination letter must be met and maintained

[15:46] throughout the duration of the use. Uh there are no anticipated impacts at this

[15:49] time to util utilities. And then regarding noise, as we've um previously

[15:54] discussed, uh Coffin Associates did evaluate potential noise impacts

[15:58] associated with the proposed private helport on the surrounding residential

[16:02] areas um and assess compliance specifically with the city's noise

[16:06] ordinance. And so based on those findings, again, that's where we came up

[16:09] with that 500 foot setback from the nearest noise sensitive receptor to um

[16:14] the uh landing pad or helipad. and that would allow the helicopter to remain in

[16:20] compliance with that 70 dBA LEQ threshold. Uh there are no anticipated

[16:25] impacts on drainage indicated at this time. The existing neighborhood that's

[16:29] near Villa Grande Way uh includes predominantly single family one-story

[16:33] residential homes that's located to the west of the property. Um and the uh

[16:38] adjacent properties to the north, south, and east are all vacant. The property to

[16:42] the east and the south are zoned uh GP uh government park and the property to

[16:48] the north is federally regulated. Uh further evaluation of uh sight specific

[16:53] impacts for each of these factors would occur through the applicable permitting

[16:57] process. So that conditional use permit, building permit, fire permit, uh

[17:02] drainage study if that was required, should a proposal be submitted for a

[17:06] specific property if this text amendment were to be approved. Uh during the

[17:11] applicable permitting process, uh compliance with building code, fire

[17:15] code, and other applicable provisions within title 11 and city code would be

[17:19] evaluated. Uh this item was noticed in conformance

[17:23] with city code and state law. We have received uh seven written public

[17:27] comments which have been provided to all the members of the commission uh roughly

[17:32] reflecting half in support of the proposed tax amendment and half opposed.

[17:37] Uh so the request before the commission tonight is to hold the public hearing,

[17:41] deliberate and make a motion to either recommend approval or denial of the

[17:45] request using the draft motion language that is on page 19 of the agenda packet.

[17:50] city staff um including the city's airport manager, Marissa Dub, we're

[17:55] present. We can answer any questions that the commission may have. The

[17:59] applicant and property owner, Casey Craig, um and legal counsel, Rod

[18:03] Woodbury, they're both present and they can answer any questions that the

[18:06] commission may have. Also, they do have a short presentation for the commission.

[18:10] Thank you. >> Thank you, Nikesha. Um does the

[18:16] applicant want to come forward and present? I do.

[18:20] » Come on up. >> I would love to. Thank you so much.

[18:26] » And uh I was telling some of my friends here, I

[18:31] feel like I'm at a job interview. I put on a tie

[18:35] and got all fancy. Um but uh

[18:42] uh it's great to be here and thanks for having me tonight. Thanks for the

[18:45] opportunity. Um, I'm uh privileged to be here with you as the

[18:53] planning commission. Thank you.

[18:59] » Just just in case. >> Yeah. Privilege to be here at the

[19:02] planning commission. Staff, friends, neighbors, and all who have come to the

[19:08] meeting tonight. Thank you for being here. Um, I am Casey Craig. I'm here to

[19:12] explain my application for the text amendment to allow a pathway

[19:18] for the application to receive conditional use permit for a private

[19:21] helicopter pad. Um

[19:25] slideshow we've got upgrade. Thank you for doing that.

[19:29] » And uh this is where I switch. >> Yes.

[19:33] » So I first moved to Southern Nevada 25 years ago. Uh since we moved here, we've

[19:38] always wanted to live in Boulder City. We did that just uh two and a half years

[19:42] ago. We moved to Boulder City and we've just absolutely loved it. And we bought

[19:46] this property uh in uh the spring of 2022, in February of

[19:51] 2022. Um speaking to this slide, uh the

[19:58] resolution, I think it's really really uh simple. Um and as we go through my

[20:03] presentation, I'm going to speak directly to these items. Uh must have an

[20:07] FAA approval. Just makes sense. uh only operate between 7 am to 900 pm. Perfect.

[20:13] 500 foot required setback. No problem. And no commercial traffic. It's for

[20:19] limited use of the owner and occupant only.

[20:22] So I'll let that be our guide. Uh let's go to slide number two.

[20:27] On slide number two, uh we own the property through my family trust and

[20:31] like I said, we bought it uh in February of 2022. It's 11.65 acres. It's zoned

[20:37] R1-80. Currently, we're building one single

[20:41] family residential home and it's our hope that someday our children would

[20:45] come live by us and could occupy some of the land that's there. So, until that

[20:51] would happen, we are holding on to the entire piece of property to uh chase

[20:55] that dream. Uh I'm really happy to be here and the reason is because I think

[21:00] this amendment really works. The amendment achieves sensible

[21:05] protection of everyone's property rights. The amendment ensures compliance

[21:09] with all current ordinances and rules. And because

[21:14] uh isn't that really the question? Can this be done and at the same time

[21:18] preserve the property rights of everybody around us? And the answer is a

[21:21] solid yes, it can be done. So this topic tonight, which is the text amendment, it

[21:28] would define the rules upon which a parcel of property like mine could apply

[21:32] for the private use helicopter landing pad. So while the text amendment isn't

[21:36] specific to just my property alone, my location which was shared by by Nikisha

[21:43] by staff is the only one in the entire city that can comply with the proposed

[21:49] text amend amendment as it's written and that was done strategically and and

[21:53] intentionally. Um this is important.

[21:58] So it means we're not going to have private helicopter pad proliferation all

[22:02] over. Right? We'll talk about that a little bit more. So, ever since I was a

[22:06] young boy, I've always wanted to fly like many, many others. And when I was

[22:10] able to, I went and got my pilot's license and I um quickly transitioned

[22:15] into flying helicopters. And earlier in 2025, I was standing at

[22:20] the property at the the far the far uh north.

[22:25] Yes, that would No, that would be my southeast corner and I was looking out

[22:29] across the the vastness of the desert and I thought, you know, this property

[22:35] is so unique. You could probably put a helicopter pad

[22:39] here and it could probably comply with all

[22:44] FAA requirements and you could probably it's far enough away you could probably

[22:50] contain the noise on the property. So I looked at the Boulder City Code

[22:57] and uh the very first requirement was to go to the FAA

[23:02] which makes sense. The FAA is all things aviation, so we need to get their

[23:06] approval on it. And uh we made an application. Uh Sean Fleming, who's here

[23:12] tonight, is my civil engineer, and he helped me lay out the plans and uh we

[23:16] put a package together and uh we followed all the guidelines and we gave

[23:21] it a try and happily the FAA, it took about 5 months, but they sent us back an

[23:26] approval, which was a a little victory for us. So

[23:31] what does that mean? And it means that it passed all their requirements of

[23:33] proximity, airspace analysis, noise requirements, which for the FAA is

[23:39] actually 5 dB more stringent than Boulder City

[23:44] and uh environmentals. So that brings us here to tonight to be in this very room

[23:49] and the next step is how do we navigate through the requirements of Boulder

[23:53] City. So let me throw up slide number three.

[23:58] Um, so my intent tonight in sharing this

[24:02] presentation with you is to really clear up some rumors and misunderstandings

[24:07] because we don't know what we don't know until we learn otherwise. We're just

[24:10] guessing. Um,

[24:14] I intend to share the correct facts and uh we'll use the text amendment for the

[24:19] road map like I discussed. So FAA approval number one, that's done and the

[24:24] approval is on file with the city and I hope that you have had a chance to look

[24:28] at that and we'll come back to that because it's very very important. It has

[24:32] to do with flying over neighborhoods. Hours of operation 7 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.

[24:38] which is number two. Uh absolutely not a problem. Um that's as easy as we just

[24:44] follow that rule. Uh I'm going to go to slide number four to talk about number

[24:49] three which is the 500 foot setback required to comply with the noise

[24:52] ordinance.

[24:56] So talking about the 500 foot based on the noise study done by the city for

[25:02] which uh I'm grateful the staff did that. Thank you. It's important because

[25:06] it establishes the correct sound distance. Minimum distance set back of

[25:10] 500 ft from the nearest property inside of a sensitive noise use area. We comply

[25:15] with that. We don't have a problem with that at all. Um so let's talk about that

[25:21] noise because that's probably the biggest concern that's been voiced is

[25:24] this going to be really loud. So what are the facts? Well, requirement three

[25:28] of the proposed tax amendment surrounds being able to comply with the noise

[25:32] ordinance in residential zones. The noise ordinance test and rules are to

[25:36] maintain an average sound level of 70 dB or less in a minimum of a 15-minute

[25:42] period which I believe uh you all are familiar with to give you an idea that

[25:48] is city traffic or it's conversation at 3 feet. Um it also means that in that

[25:55] 15inut minute period you are under 70 dB more than you are over 70 dB. That's

[26:02] important to consider. So, what does it take for a helicopter landing or

[26:08] departing to comply with 70 dB average? Well, based on the noise study,

[26:14] and that's the correct science, you need a 500t setback.

[26:20] It means with a 500 foot setback, the 70 decel limit average stays 100% on the

[26:26] property. That's really important. We keep that that red perimeter line which

[26:32] is the the uh the 70 decibel limit inside of a

[26:38] 15-minute period taking off and landing stays inside of that red line and that's

[26:44] at 450 ft. The the extra 50 ft to make 500 was given as a buffer.

[26:51] What also is very important is to note that on the noise study we got kind of a

[26:56] strange ice cream cone shaped looking thing there. Um that was because there

[27:02] was a misunderstanding. Uh the consultant thought that we would be

[27:05] approaching from the south along that red line and landing and then departing

[27:10] to the north along the blue line. That's not what the FAA approved us for. Um we

[27:16] are we are what we asked for and what we intend to do is depart according to the

[27:21] blue arrows on the slide there and that keeps us um away from the neighborhoods.

[27:27] So uh let's see slide number five.

[27:33] So I've got some additional asurances when we actually get to where we're

[27:38] applying for the conditional use permit. They are to minimize impact. I've gone

[27:43] to great lengths to establish visual and sound barriers between the pad, the

[27:48] landing pad, and the nearest homes. This additional noise reduction from a

[27:52] barrier was not factored into the noise study. The noise study doesn't take into

[27:57] account that my house is being built. We have a very large concrete wall being

[28:01] built and a a helicopter hanger being built. Um the US Department of

[28:08] Transportation sound wall barrier standards and it's like the all the big

[28:12] sound walls built along the freeway in Henderson

[28:15] indicate that we will reduce the noise by another 20 to 25 dB.

[28:21] Also, additionally, we're not just providing 500 ft, we're adding another

[28:27] 142 feet, which is 642 feet. That is

[28:34] » over two football fields away >> with as much as a 30- foot tall

[28:39] structure between anybody else and the helicopter pad. So this is like hold out

[28:45] your thumb two football fields away and the whole

[28:49] thing's gone. But you won't be able to make go away

[28:54] because there's a building in between you and the pad. Right? So yard crews

[28:59] running their blowers next door are louder than this.

[29:04] We're talking about two football fields. So,

[29:09] » this is a view from a couple of the closest homes

[29:16] and we've got my picture on top of it, so I can't quite

[29:21] but uh yeah, 111 Stone Canyon, 113 Stone Canyon.

[29:25] And uh this was my architect's best

[29:31] uh take at trying to stand at the property line and look back at the

[29:36] proposed at at what would be the hanger and what the the house will be. And uh

[29:42] it's all blocked from view. So here's another positive about 500t

[29:48] setback. And this is the facts. While yes, the text amendment would allow

[29:52] anyone with a property zoned R1-80 to apply for a conditional use permit,

[29:57] there's only one parcel, and we've talked about this in the entire city

[30:00] that will qualify, and that is my property.

[30:05] So really, we're making a pathway for one private use helellipad in the entire

[30:10] township. That's just it. further with the slow growth ordinances we follow or

[30:16] no growth ordinance. I don't see another situation like this

[30:20] in my lifetime. What more if you were at the very edge

[30:24] of town? If you're not at the very edge of town,

[30:29] you would have to fly over something to get to your pad, which means you also

[30:35] would not be qualified. So the 500 feet is very important.

[30:40] » Slide number seven. Um,

[30:45] » so coming back to the FAA and what I'm

[30:51] trying to demonstrate with this picture is any worries that the helicopter is

[30:57] going to fly over residential areas. If anybody says that,

[31:02] it's fear-mongering because it's just not going to happen. We got approval to

[31:07] fly out into the great wide open just like you see on this slide. Um you never

[31:13] have to go over the neighborhood for any reason. Uh so that's why this works. The

[31:18] property is very unique. You can come and go without ever having to fly over

[31:23] anything but desert. Uh I like what the noise report says at

[31:27] the end of the recommendation. It also says that uh a lot of the noise is

[31:31] subject to pilot technique. I don't know if you read that little nuance at the

[31:36] end of the recommendation. And uh that's a big deal. Um because of the way this

[31:41] sits, you don't have to come in really steep to come over a mountain or a big

[31:45] hill and drop in. You come up very nice and slow up to the pad and you set down

[31:50] and it mitigates noise as much as possible because you maintain a barrier

[31:53] between you and the neighborhood the whole time. So,

[31:57] um, uh, visual and a sound barriers, um, an

[32:04] additional 142 feet. And I've heard it also mentioned that there's going to be

[32:08] massive dust problems in the neighborhood from it. Well, 642 feet is

[32:13] a pretty good dust distance barrier. And uh I'll tell you the dust has been

[32:18] mitigated because the helicopter pad we had to follow FAA standards when we made

[32:23] that that application. It's a concrete 40 by 40 pad

[32:28] and then it has another compacted earth and gravel perimeter that is 20 ft on

[32:33] all sides. So it gives you 80 feet across. And uh I believe you me the dust

[32:40] has been mitigated cuz that's in my backyard and I don't want it dusty

[32:45] either. So, we're going to make sure that's not a problem.

[32:48] So, that takes us to number four, which is operation limitations on on the

[32:53] proposed text amendment. Um,

[32:58] oper operation limitations only to be operated by the owner occupant. Cannot

[33:03] be a commercial helport. So, this is part of the FAA approval and staff

[33:08] alluded to this. Um, what we requested and what was granted

[33:13] is what the FAA calls a prior permission required to land.

[33:19] That's a fancy word for saying it's private and restricted to only the owner

[33:24] of the property. Right? So, what does this really mean? It means that the

[33:28] frequency and cadence of helicopter coming and going is very limited.

[33:33] And I'll be completely honest with you all.

[33:36] We may fly two or three times in a week when we're really excited and I have

[33:41] grandkids here from out of town and friends and family around and say,

[33:45] "Let's go for a ride. Let's go. Let's go um go explore."

[33:51] Then there's going to be other times when it doesn't fly for five, six, seven

[33:55] weeks at a time. It just won't. I mean, who in here has a boat? Do you use your

[33:59] boat every week? You just don't, right? So, also worth mentioning, and this

[34:07] could be important at some point, the landing pad does become an emergency

[34:12] landing and medical evacuation location on the FAA charts if ever needed.

[34:20] So, if there's a a uh an emergency and they need to get someone out, it shows

[34:26] up and it is open to uh medical evacuation if that was or emergency

[34:31] evacuation, which which will that ever be needed? I don't know. But it's uh it

[34:36] didn't cost the city anything and it's available.

[34:40] So, that covers the text amendment, right? 1 through four. And um I do want

[34:46] to address what's going on in the neighborhood because I know that's

[34:49] important to everybody. I personally have taken the time

[34:55] to visit every neighbor's home on the adjacent street to thoughtfully share

[35:00] what we are doing and speak to concerns except for one household whom I was not

[35:06] able to contact because they're going through medical challenges and I was

[35:10] told they could not meet. We've very thoughtfully done our best to address

[35:14] concerns the best way we can while working to still accomplish our goal.

[35:19] Even to the extent of redesigning the entire site plan, changing our driveway,

[35:25] moving the hanger around almost 100 ft to further hide any visual and block

[35:30] sound. So, we've really really tried to be uh courteous in trying to uh arrive

[35:36] at this this uh destination. So this is slide number eight. In

[35:42] visiting the property owners, I was able to prepare a map

[35:46] and I obtained initials of those who have no objections to the proposed

[35:51] amendment or helicopter pad. There's 21 property owners. You'll see there's I

[35:56] think 24 actual numbered homes, but there's 21 property owners.

[36:03] Um 17 of the 21 neighbors for a total of 81%

[36:08] expressed no objection. 62% were willing to initial the map.

[36:15] There are three households I did not ask to initial as I know they are less

[36:18] supportive. Four households said they would rather

[36:22] not initial but were not opposed. And the 13 were happy to initial.

[36:29] Those who preferred not to initial, I have put the date of my visit down and

[36:33] marked them in yellow. But I would like to share with you what

[36:37] those individuals told me. And um this is

[36:43] this is the map here

[36:51] so you can see it. And it is slide number eight in your handout.

[37:03] So of those four, this is what I was told.

[37:08] I won't initial, but I also won't object or come to any meeting and complain.

[37:14] Honestly, I'd rather you build the helicopter pad and not your house

[37:18] because the helicopter of pad affects me less.

[37:23] So long as it doesn't fly over my house and the noise is contained in the

[37:26] distance, I have no problem. But I rather not initial because I have been

[37:30] neighbors with somebody for many years and I know they are not supportive. So

[37:34] I'll just pass. But it doesn't affect me. I have no problem.

[37:40] I'm for property rights and if the noise is contained, I think you should be able

[37:44] to do whatever you want. It's your property.

[37:47] I don't have a problem with it. But I've been neighbors with so- and so for many

[37:50] years. I just don't want to be in the middle of anything. Fair. Fair.

[37:56] I don't have any problem and would be happy to initial, but since my spouse

[38:00] isn't feeling well and could not be there be here to listen, I'll just wait

[38:04] till then. I followed up twice to see if that spouse is feeling better and they

[38:08] I've been unable to get that appointment. That's 82% of households.

[38:14] Okay. Um,

[38:20] moving on. Slide nine. So,

[38:25] super excited like I said and uh I've managed to calm down

[38:32] because of our unique unique location and the surrounding circumstances along

[38:36] with neighbor understanding support. It works. We can comply with every rule and

[38:41] therefore enjoy this dream that I have while not infringing on the rights and

[38:45] dreams of others. Everyone gets the same right to enjoy their property within the

[38:49] same code that we all adhere to. >> So in summary,

[38:56] um FAA approval for the helellipad is received.

[39:01] Uh we will comply with the 7 a.m. to 9 9:00 p.m. hours of operation.

[39:07] will exceed the 500 foot required setback per city noise study

[39:14] thereby enabling even a greater reduction in noise

[39:19] and we are putting up the barriers 30 ft tall and 20 ft tall above the landing

[39:24] pad. So it's going to be a distant car on the

[39:29] highway for a moment and it's gone. Um, for the limited use of owner and

[39:36] occupant only, it will be an FAA private landing pad that's already been granted.

[39:40] No commercial traffic and I talked about total of 81% neighbors expressed no

[39:45] objection, 61% initial, no objection. I personally met with everybody that was

[39:50] available. So, I would be happy to answer some

[39:53] questions.

[39:57] » Thank you, Mr. Craig. Um, if the commission is okay, I I think I would

[40:03] rather open the public hearing first and then come back for questions to the

[40:08] applicant and or andor staff just in case a matter is brought up that we

[40:14] would need to address. Does anybody have any objection to that?

[40:18] So, thank you very much for your presentation and at this time um I would

[40:23] like to open the public hearing on proposed zoning ordinance text

[40:27] amendment. >> Thank you.

[40:29] » Thank you. >> Yeah. And I I look forward to coming

[40:31] back at the end. >> Yes. Thank you. Anybody wishing to

[40:35] speak, please come forward and state your name.

[40:43] Before

[40:49] I become shy, I thought I would get up. Shyness is a big problem.

[40:56] Hi, my name is Mike McKe. I actually live uh on Villa Grande about a block

[41:02] from Casey's place. Casey and his lovely wife's place. Uh also fly and have

[41:08] looked at what he's doing there. It looks to me like he's

[41:13] uh worked pretty hard to dot his eyes, cross his tees, and I have no objection.

[41:18] I've been asked to read a neighbor's letter into the record if uh that would

[41:23] be okay. This is from Brent Buckner. Dear planning commissioners, my name is

[41:29] Brent Buckner. My family owns 107 Stone Canyon, right next door to the proposed

[41:34] private helicopter landing pad at 10001 Villa Grande Way. My backyard looks

[41:40] directly into the applicant's property. I want to express my strong support for

[41:45] this project. The applicant has gone out of his way to position his house in the

[41:49] plan hanger, so they act as a natural sound and sight barrier between the

[41:54] helicopter pad and my property. As well as for all the other neighbors whose

[41:58] land directly abuts his, I really appreciate the extra thought and care

[42:03] that has gone into reducing any potential impact on us. Further, based

[42:09] on the city's noise modeling report, it's clear that the proposed operations

[42:13] daytime only and infrequent flights keep all the noise levels well within the

[42:18] Boulder City noise ordinance. If we are honest with ourselves, a report shows

[42:23] full compliance with the local and federal rules. Because of this, I

[42:28] believe the applicant should be able to enjoy all of his property rights and not

[42:32] violating anyone else's in the process. I'm in favor of approving this

[42:36] application. Unfortunately, I'm uh won't be able to attend the February 18th

[42:42] meeting, but I would appreciate it if this letter could be read into the

[42:45] record on my behalf. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Brent

[42:50] Buckner. Thank you. >> Thank you, Mr. McKe.

[42:59] » Hi, my name is Kevin Seavor. I live at 110 Stone Canyon and I have no

[43:05] opposition to the private helport. Uh my neighbor who couldn't be here

[43:12] tonight uh asked if I could read his statement into the record. Dear members

[43:17] and planning commission, I'm writing to express my full support for the proposed

[43:22] private helport on uh Villa Grande Way in Boulder City.

[43:29] As a dulylicicensed physician practicing medicine in both Nevada and California,

[43:36] I have resided at 116 Stone Canyon for over 5 years and and am a neighbor to

[43:43] the proposed site. I have reviewed the city's independent noise modeling

[43:48] report, including the 15minute weighted continuous sound level contours.

[43:55] The science presented in the report is clear and compelling. Under the modeled

[44:00] conditions, daytime only operations, limited flights per day, north south

[44:06] flight tracks from subject property. Sensitive noise levels are expected to

[44:13] remain entirely on the subject property and will not exceed the city noise adort

[44:19] ordinance limit of 70 dB. The contours depicted in exhibits 2

[44:25] through 4 confirm that no significant noise exposure is anticipated for

[44:31] neighboring homes. As a medical professional, I'm particularly attuned

[44:36] to the community health and quality of life considerations.

[44:41] I'm confident there will be no adverse noise impacts on me, my family, or any

[44:47] other residents in the vicinity. I believe the proposed helport represents

[44:52] a responsible low impact private aviation use that is fully compatible

[44:58] with the Boulder City Code. I regret I'm unable to attend the February 18 meeting

[45:04] in person, but I respectfully request that this letter be read into the record

[45:09] on my behalf. Sincerely, Dr. Michael Stowe.

[45:17] » Thank you, Kevin.

[45:25] Good evening. My name is Steve Hampton. Um,

[45:30] I'm opposed to the helicopter coming in and I've submitted a letter to you all

[45:36] or a package. I assume you've all read it or seen it.

[45:40] Um,

[45:43] we requ, you know, we we we are not in favor of the cup or the zoning change.

[45:48] We came to Boulder City because we like quiet and a nice neighborhood to live

[45:53] in. Mr. Craig's helicopter is a twin turbo shaft B105,

[45:59] basically a jet engine helicopter. Its decibel rating by the FAA is 91.

[46:06] When it's doing its thing at a steady rate,

[46:10] it'll reach over 106 dB when it's taking off and probably when it's landing.

[46:19] Any of that exposure at the 106 level is a in is not permissible by ocean noise

[46:25] landing noise ratings because it was built prior to 2002. The

[46:31] helicopter that Mr. Casey has does not meet FAA stage three or stage four nose

[46:36] compliance uh levels, noise compliance levels.

[46:42] After his helicopter, if he's taking off, after it clears that 20 or 30 foot

[46:47] wall, we're going to get the full brunt of everything that helicopter is putting

[46:52] out. Even as he's flying away, the noise is coming back at us, as is the wash and

[46:58] everything else. Um,

[47:02] we just don't want to have to deal with that. We are the closest property. I'm

[47:07] at 111 Stone Canyon. So, our property is the 642 ft.

[47:13] If you look at this picture, it's in your package. It It looks close, doesn't

[47:20] it? It's It seems when we're standing there, they're very close. When his

[47:25] construction construction team is out there, we can hear almost hear them have

[47:30] conversations when they're using their saws and their equipment and waking us

[47:35] up at six o'clock in the morning with their backup alarms, which I understand

[47:39] is code. Um, the noise is there. The helicopter is not going to be quiet.

[47:47] Um, on November 2nd of last year, we were in our backyard and Mr. Craig's

[47:53] helicopter did fly in to the area and it would be somewhere in this point of this

[47:59] picture and he hovered for 15 20 seconds. We couldn't hear ourselves talk

[48:05] to each other. There was four of us in the backyard.

[48:08] Now I you know I know there's going to be a more of a of a distance is 500 ft

[48:14] but I think that noise gets out of that 500 ft. We would like to request the

[48:19] planning commission come to the residence, have Mr. Craig fly his

[48:24] helicopter over, and you all listen to how loud it really is because this noise

[48:28] study doesn't do it. Real life is what does it

[48:34] in in in closing, you know, we request we want to request to keep the

[48:41] residential neighborhood in a nice quiet environment.

[48:46] Um, we don't want it. >> Mr. Hampton, your time's up. If you

[48:50] could just wrap it up within the next few seconds, please.

[48:53] » Um,

[48:57] we urge the planning commission to look at everything that needs to be looked

[49:02] at, but we would really appreciate you going the other way. I have one final

[49:07] point, if you'd let me make that. The Boulder City Airport is a less than

[49:12] a 10-minute drive away from his property and my property.

[49:16] So I I guess why do we need another

[49:21] helicopter pad in Boulder area when it's a 7 and 12 to 10 minute drive to go get

[49:27] your helicopter and take the kids flying and take them home whenever you get back

[49:31] to the airport. Other than that, I guess I don't have

[49:35] anything else. Thank you for your time. >> Thank you, Mr. Hampton.

[49:49] I'm Barry Gold. I live at 103 Stone Canyon Road. My property also faces the

[49:57] uh Craig's property and I am wholeheartedly supportive of his

[50:03] endeavor. Uh I never met Mr. Craig or Mrs. Craig until after they started

[50:10] moving dirt. and you know he I kind of feel like

[50:15] we've uh dodged a bullet. There have been many efforts to build

[50:20] uh five homes which is basically uh zoned for currently but there have been

[50:25] efforts by the realators to try to reszone this property to have up to 20

[50:31] homes. And luckily uh we've dodged a bullet and uh

[50:38] you know as I said I never met him but most of the the concern centers around

[50:43] noise. Uh all of these charts were kind of based on the fact that we're talking

[50:50] about flat terrain. It's not flat. Where he's positioned the helport is below his

[50:58] home. Maui's got uh walls and a home and an office that block the sound. And when

[51:05] you uh look at some of the online available

[51:10] sound propagation calculations, you come up with a sound at his property. Uh

[51:18] that's basically about the sound of uh of a refrigerator.

[51:24] And that's outside. No one's talking about inside where most of us are. And

[51:29] inside you're probably not even going to be able to hear the helicopter and you

[51:35] won't see it because it's below the ridge line. It's not going to be flying

[51:38] over the wall. It's going to be flying away from the wall and down. If if

[51:43] you're going east or northeast, it's away from the houses. So scientifically,

[51:50] I don't believe there's any reason to say that the noise is going to be

[51:55] excessive. I mean, OSHA allows 85 dB for an an 8h hour workday. So, I mean, what

[52:02] we're talking about is the noise level in a quiet residential community such as

[52:08] we have. Uh, I'm also kind of surprised, Steve, that your Facebook photo is you

[52:14] next to a helicopter. But nonetheless, I'd like to uh close

[52:19] and saying there's no reason to not support it. When I flew F4s in Vietnam,

[52:27] » people talked about the turning JP4 into noise and we made a lot of noise. But in

[52:33] those days, people said that was the sound of freedom. Now we've gone full

[52:37] circle and people are suggesting that the noise is a problem even if they

[52:43] can't hear it. So, I'd like to close and say thank you for your time and I urge

[52:48] the commission to wholeheartedly support this request and recommend approval.

[52:55] Thank you. >> Thank you.

[52:59] Again, this is a public hearing. Does anybody else please come forward and

[53:03] state your name? >> I'm not going to do a repeat. Just got

[53:08] my

[53:18] I'm Kurt Goodfellow, a longtime resident of Boulder City over 35 years almost.

[53:24] And um I don't live over there where that's going to be. And so I'm not

[53:29] really qualified to speak about that. But I just wanted to say something about

[53:32] the character of Casey Craig and Courtney Craig. These are people if they

[53:36] say they're going to do it, they're going to do it. I've known them for a

[53:40] long time and uh and as as you've heard here,

[53:45] they make every effort to exceed what they say they're going to do. And and I

[53:50] just want to let you know, they are the kind of people that do that. And I've

[53:54] been really grateful to be able to to work with them in a few different

[53:57] things, especially in the aviation world. And obviously, I I support what's

[54:02] going on there, just because I believe I believe in property rights. I believe

[54:06] that they've made every effort to uh to mitigate any issues that people have. I

[54:11] think they've gone far above that and um and so if I were a neighbor over there,

[54:16] I would 100% support it. Thank you,

[54:26] » Bridget. Is there somebody on the phone waiting to speak?

[54:29] » Okay. Yes, please come forward.

[54:36] Good evening. Uh Matt Reagan at 108 Stone Canyon Road. Um I'm right across

[54:42] the street from it all and and I support the uh building of the helellipad. Um I

[54:47] I think that although I'm not a helicopter person, I

[54:52] am an aviator and I I think that the noise level actually I thought of all

[54:58] helicopters, it's not a very noisy helicopter. I'm out at the at the

[55:02] airport daily. Of course, you know, a lot of these noise I would assume are

[55:07] very close up is where you're getting it. But now that you're at a distance,

[55:10] we've lived in our house for almost 13 years. So, I'm very familiar also with

[55:15] the pro property. It's, you know, this property is very unique. It's probably

[55:20] one of the largest land properties that we have here in Boulder City. And so, we

[55:25] do have a lot of distance. I've hiked it ever since 2012.

[55:28] And I've just been, you know, I've been out there just recently and so there is

[55:32] there's the distance. It's it's um and I believe that it will be

[55:39] um right within the limits of the sound. Now, one of the things that I also like

[55:43] to add is that, you know, every day as living in a neighborhood, you're, you

[55:48] know, you hear noises that we're not free of, you know, a vacuum blower or a

[55:53] weed blower or the car, you know, someone has a race car or a race boat or

[55:58] whatever the noise is. So, the fact that we'll hear a noise does not mean that

[56:02] it's, you know, the end of the world. We all have to just accept that we live in

[56:07] close proximity to somebody else. We don't live out in the woods someplace.

[56:11] So I really don't think that. So as far as my own personal opinion, I say a

[56:16] little bit of noise is that if I hear something,

[56:20] I hear it and that's not going to be the end of the world if I just happen to

[56:23] hear a helicopter, an airplane or a boat start or my dog, you know, a dog barking

[56:28] or anything else. There's no more irritant than that. So it's just the

[56:32] fact of just living in a neighborhood. So but and so I do urge the passing of

[56:36] this. Thank you. >> Thank you, M.

[56:41] Thank you, Mr. Reagan. Anybody else?

[56:49] » Afternoon. Thanks, guys. Sean Fleming, 1588 Carnushi Court. Um, I'm vested in

[56:56] the project because I'm Casey's engineer. But, uh, two things I wanted

[57:01] to say was one, I'm a fax base manager. I'm an engineer. I just can't get away

[57:06] from it. I think you guys did a wonderful job and faxes on a paper. You

[57:11] should use the facts and I think the facts support themselves.

[57:16] Also, if you go to your 22, the zoning map up there,

[57:23] there's three parcels. I happen to live right across the street from the other

[57:27] parcel that is zoned R180. I would still be supportive of this change if one of

[57:35] those properties or if someone buys the lot south and makes it available based

[57:41] on the facts. I'd be totally supportive of this. So, thank you.

[57:49] » Thank you, Mr. Fleming. Again, this is a public hearing. Is

[57:54] there anybody else wishing to speak? You can also call in. The number is

[58:00] 702-589-99629.

[58:17] Hello, my name is Casey Gallagher. I live at 117 Stone Canyon Road. I also

[58:24] own the lot of 115 Stone Canyon Road. I'm worried about lowering my property

[58:32] value because all of a sudden I have an airport next door to me. Now there's a

[58:39] perfectly good airport 10 minutes down the road and I'm worried about lowering

[58:44] my property value. I have my family has lived there for 26 years.

[58:53] They we bought the property in 1999 and this has driven a wedge in this

[59:01] entire neighborhood. You have got neighbors against neighbors looking at

[59:07] who wants to have a helicopter pack, who wants to make nice with the guy building

[59:13] the compound here and who doesn't want to make nice with the guy building the

[59:18] compound. And the whole thing is getting out of

[59:22] hand and it's totally ridiculous and it's horrible for the neighborhood.

[59:29] And this is the biggest problem that is confronting the neighborhood right now

[59:35] is it's tearing it apart because this guy wants to put a helicopter when

[59:40] there's a airport right down the road. And that is the basis of this whole

[59:46] entire problem. Thank you for your time. >> Thank you, Miss Gallagher.

[59:54] Anybody else wishing to speak in this public hearing?

[1:00:02] The phone number to call in is 702-589-9629.

[1:00:12] Seeing and hearing none, I'll close the public hearing and bring it back to the

[1:00:16] commission for any questions or comments uh with with staff or the applicant.

[1:00:28] Go ahead. >> I'd just like to say that um when I

[1:00:32] first moved to Southern Nevada in 1986, my first job was uh as an engineer for

[1:00:39] use aviation, which at that time was at the south end

[1:00:43] of the the strip. So I even though I'm not a pilot pilot I have had experience

[1:00:50] being around um fixed wing and helicopter aircraft

[1:00:56] and uh from I think the application is very

[1:01:00] well done and it's uh you know it's complete and I commend the city for

[1:01:05] bringing in a third party consultant because when anybody hears the the word

[1:01:10] helicopter the first thing they think of is noise. Um, but I think that that uh

[1:01:15] noise issue has been uh I think it's been addressed very well.

[1:01:21] Um, so I u I'll be supporting this. Thank you.

[1:01:28] » Thank you, Commissioner Deresa. Any other commissioners want to comment or

[1:01:32] have any questions for the applicant or staff?

[1:01:42] Um, I don't have any questions either. I think staff did a phenomenal job. I

[1:01:46] think um, Mr. Craig did a phenomenal job. This is very difficult because um,

[1:01:52] I'm a big believer in property rights, but I believe in everyone's property

[1:01:56] rights. So, I really sympathize with um, Mr. Hampton and um, that that is a very

[1:02:06] nice neighborhood. However, based on the facts, this is a I just want to remind

[1:02:11] everybody this is a text amendment. There's many many steps to take before

[1:02:17] it would be allowed. One of the things that um a conditional use permit if it

[1:02:23] gets that far, um it's a it's a it's under conditions. So if there were um

[1:02:32] noises that exceeded the decibel level, it could be revoked. So I think at this

[1:02:38] initial stage, I I will also support it. Um I believe that Mr. Craig, I I walked

[1:02:45] the property. I am going to make my decision based on the facts and um and

[1:02:54] support this initial step. And I just want to thank Mr. Craig

[1:03:00] and staff as well for the thorough um information that was provided.

[1:03:14] With that being said, do I have a motion?

[1:03:18] » I'll make a motion. I move to approve resolution 1277

[1:03:23] which is in performance of the findings as section

[1:03:28] 339 of the Boulder City ordinance.

[1:03:34] » I'll second. >> All those in favor?

[1:03:37] » I >> I. Any opposed?

[1:03:42] » Motion carries. Item number three is monthly progress

[1:03:48] report on development aotments. Um, so on January 27th, the city council

[1:03:55] approved the six replacement allotments for the remaining vacant lots in the

[1:03:59] Beaser Homes development. So that's a Diamond Ridge subdivision, Boulder City

[1:04:04] uh, subdivision number 114. Thank you. Thank you, Nikesha.

[1:04:10] Our final agenda item is public comment. This can be on any matter. um prior to

[1:04:16] opening it up, I just wanted to mention that Fritz McDonald was a longerving

[1:04:22] planning commissioner and um ended up moving to Texas and I

[1:04:28] just wanted to send our regards and wish him well. And it was unfortunate that it

[1:04:34] was so fast we didn't have an opportunity to thank him and present him

[1:04:37] with a certificate of appreciation. But I would like to just acknowledge Fritz's

[1:04:42] service to the city of Boulder City and the planning commission and wish him

[1:04:45] well. With that being said, I will open final public comment. This can be

[1:04:50] regarding any matter. You can also call in at 702589

[1:04:56] 9629.

[1:05:10] I I'll have to wait for the third I was told last time I talked too fast. I have

[1:05:13] to wait for a 30 second delay. >> Okay.

[1:05:17] 7025899629.

[1:05:30] » Can I share one more thing? >> Absolutely.

[1:05:32] » It's just it's just eating at me. >> Absolutely. Mr. Craig, go ahead. It's

[1:05:35] public comment. You have three minutes.

[1:05:42] It's been said that

[1:05:46] » this is just a this is on principle. It's been said it was put in a letter to

[1:05:51] all that uh on November 2nd, 2025, I did flyovers of the property. That was a

[1:05:59] Sunday. I was uh with my clergy, my community

[1:06:05] church. My daughter thought she was going into

[1:06:09] labor. We took her and my son-in-law to the hospital

[1:06:13] and uh we took care of our grandson for the night. I don't know why Mr. Hampton

[1:06:18] keeps saying that I did that and I sat in his living room and I told him

[1:06:23] it wasn't me. I don't know who it was, but I didn't fly that day, but he keeps

[1:06:26] putting it in writing. So, I just just on principle. I just I just want to

[1:06:30] clear that up and thank you for the motion, the second, and the the uh um

[1:06:37] affirmative vote.

[1:06:42] Any other public comment?

[1:06:47] Seeing and hearing none, meeting adjourned.

February 18, 2026 Planning Commission meeting

Transcript