Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:19]
calling.
[0:30]
Agenda
[0:37]
is contract. for
[0:42]
324
[0:48]
clearance properties
[1:03]
building
associates
[1:08]
contract.
[1:21]
We will consider a permit.
[1:50]
All business will
[2:00]
council
[2:14]
members. We'll have a presentation.
We'll get to you for both this and your
[2:18]
next
[2:24]
question.
[2:36]
A to R2
and R2 R3
[2:43]
located on
[3:12]
two couns. ago. There was three items
that were on here. Two of those went
[3:15]
through plan commission. They were
approved at plan commission recommended
[3:19]
to come to you for approval. One of
those have been removed from your agenda
[3:23]
which is annexation and res or something
over on the west side of the circle.
[3:30]
That's been removed from your agenda.
The developers will come back to
[3:48]
planning commission recommendation for
approval of resust.
[4:12]
Then
authorize mayor to execute poly
[4:16]
incorporated treatment
construction engineering inspection
[4:21]
service associated with construction
sidewalk
[4:26]
state.
[4:30]
Highway
[4:44]
project on Belwood and this design's
been done and this is the next phase. So
[4:52]
we made recommendation to select
engineering gone through the contract
[4:57]
process with the state and it's here for
you
[5:01]
construction oversight through the rest
of this contractor here is a different
[5:08]
on the
[5:18]
authorized mayor to agreements
[5:34]
programs.
[5:41]
experience.
So this individual
[5:47]
success
[6:16]
All right.
Amend ABC license.
[6:34]
Italian restaurants.
[6:53]
Okay.
[7:05]
» Then we will set
[7:32]
essentially
at that time.
[7:38]
We wanted to revisit it. Make sure
[7:47]
he is
[8:02]
You recall.
[8:23]
The gates are allated.
[8:39]
As long as
[8:47]
you can still
[9:10]
A license request for
This is liquor.
[9:29]
Council member comments.
[9:49]
I'll
[9:53]
be sure.
[10:34]
Keep
[10:41]
your straight.
[11:14]
And then
[11:30]
we
Where you at?
[11:45]
» Why you just tell me
[12:07]
Frank
[12:37]
How you doing?
[12:53]
wash.
[13:33]
started
check.
[13:48]
Thank you very
[14:17]
much.
[14:29]
I hear
[14:55]
days.
[15:04]
He turns down.
[15:33]
What's the first one?
[16:05]
Somebody
[16:39]
613
[16:56]
of Here
[17:13]
we are.
[17:49]
Don't really know what it is.
[18:20]
Thanks. I was thinking
[19:00]
I need
[19:09]
to pray.
[19:27]
Well, I can say
[19:45]
I got to go watch.
[20:19]
What else?
[20:45]
I've heard something
[20:49]
like
[21:13]
How did you
[21:19]
go back?
[21:30]
houses.
[21:41]
She just looks at him.
[21:52]
This is
[22:20]
basically.
[22:50]
Crazy
[23:09]
days.
[23:53]
It's like
[24:01]
the biggest one you've ever seen.
[24:39]
Hurry.
[24:47]
app.
[24:58]
That's true.
[25:08]
appreciate
[25:24]
last night.
[25:59]
toast or whatever
watch last night.
[26:39]
Get out here.
[27:51]
Power
I know that
[28:17]
a little bit longer.
[28:26]
They don't
[28:48]
need to
[29:16]
I proud that I could ground
[29:39]
We should have crap
[29:44]
here.
[29:53]
I've been
[31:16]
How long is that?
[31:40]
pull up.
[31:48]
I don't talk
[32:00]
about
[32:42]
I don't
[33:03]
Is it
[33:13]
close?
[33:30]
Elizabeth
[33:52]
Yeah.
[34:09]
Target right now.
[34:36]
fanatic.
[35:00]
15.
[35:18]
We got some
[35:46]
Hallelujah.
[35:59]
already
[36:37]
sir.
[36:47]
Imagination.
[37:25]
Wow.
[37:57]
I
[38:10]
Maybe
[38:23]
it's only
[38:35]
pictures.
[39:02]
Did you
[39:08]
guys
[39:23]
kill me?
[39:35]
speech.
[39:47]
You can tell me that
[40:18]
literally
[40:56]
I said
[41:02]
layer.
[41:24]
I need to come out.
[41:37]
ground
[41:43]
still
Want to come back again? And those fruit
[42:28]
Travis
[42:45]
We got
ready.
[43:04]
All right.
[43:36]
student.
[43:55]
So I went
[44:17]
Did I have 25 seconds?
[45:18]
If we do that,
[45:31]
What do you think?
[45:53]
It's not
[46:27]
So what
we had
[46:48]
considered
[46:58]
Even
[47:47]
Share
[47:56]
I'm interested in
[49:12]
But
>> you know
[49:49]
Keep
[49:58]
going.
[50:12]
Yeah.
[51:11]
I'm watching
[51:45]
No, but I just figured
[52:57]
He said
[53:06]
yes.
[54:40]
Tracy
[54:52]
Father.
[55:48]
He just tilt back
[56:12]
No problem.
[56:20]
Hallelujah.
[56:44]
We will convene our
[57:02]
Let us pray. Gracious God, we thank you
for this day, this time. We thank you
[57:06]
for the rain, the sun, work through bold
for growth. We thank you for these
[57:09]
people, their wisdom, the different
giftedness for each one of us. We thank
[57:13]
you, Lord, for the freedom to gather to
decisions to raise children, to educate
[57:18]
them, to have business. We pray you
prosper this community. We pray you give
[57:21]
you the thanks in glory. We pray for his
wisdom to make good decisions well into
[57:25]
the future. In Christ's name, amen.
[57:32]
To the flag of the United States of
America and to the republic for it
[57:37]
stands. One nation,
indivisible, with liberty and justice
[57:43]
for all.
[57:54]
Call for a motion to approve the agenda
of the meeting as submitted.
[57:57]
» I move to approve the agenda of the
meeting.
[58:02]
Discussion. All in favor say I.
>> I.
[58:05]
» All
motion carries.
[58:10]
Now consider the consent agenda. All
matters listed within the consent agenda
[58:14]
have been distributed to each member of
the council for years are considered to
[58:17]
be routinely enacted by one motion
council with no separate discussion.
[58:22]
Separate discussion desired on the item
may remove the consent agenda and place
[58:26]
on the regular agenda by request of the
city council for a motion to approve the
[58:32]
consent agenda as presented. I move to
approve the consent agenda as
[58:39]
further discussion.
All in favor say I.
[58:42]
» I. Same sign. Motion carries. Call for a
motion to approve the following request
[58:49]
as submitted bill celebration 2026.
Event time date to 4 p.m. Saturday
[58:56]
December 5th 2026.
Rain date Saturday December 12th 2026.
[59:02]
Street from 6 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Closure
areas east and west college street
[59:15]
Edward Street Main Street East Street
Edward Street Main Street West Street
[59:21]
main street
[59:27]
Harrison
[59:29]
I have a motion
to approve
[59:35]
discussion.
>> Say I
[59:40]
sign. Motion carries.
Part of meeting where anyone in
[59:45]
attendance tonight wishes to address the
council may do so for three minutes.
[59:50]
There's a public hearing on the agenda
for the topic you concerned with. Please
[59:53]
wait until that public hearing opens to
address the rest of council. If they
[59:57]
choose, staff, mayor, and council will
respond to your comments during the
[1:00:01]
appointed time later in the meeting
[1:00:06]
tolerated.
[1:00:11]
Does anyone wish to address?
[1:00:37]
» Come on.
[1:01:12]
Memphis council, we have before you this
evening your quarterly white elimination
[1:01:18]
program update. Want to give you a few
highlights from this program, how we
[1:01:23]
have progressed since quarter one, your
last update in March. Want to This
[1:01:28]
presentation with a look at residential
growth. Uh I want to present this to you
[1:01:32]
with each one of our black presentations
to give you an idea of what growth is
[1:01:35]
doing right now as far as residential is
concerned within the community. Um we
[1:01:40]
started this year on a on a record pace.
Last year was a record pace and the year
[1:01:44]
before that was a record pace. Uh you
can see the uh light blue uh line. You
[1:01:51]
see we had a bit of a down month in the
month of May. We didn't issue a ton of
[1:01:54]
permits and so actually we got a little
bit behind the pace of where last year
[1:01:58]
is. Expect that's probably a bit of an
anomaly but expect that will probably
[1:02:04]
resume the pace that has been going on.
Uh but nonetheless keep in mind we're
[1:02:10]
still at a record pace growth u all the
way up until the end of last month this
[1:02:16]
month.
Like I said, we anticipate that that
[1:02:20]
line moving direction has you can see
even last year there were there were a
[1:02:26]
few months in June and July that uh that
leveled off. So that's not unexpected.
[1:02:32]
Um but nonetheless, just want to give
you an idea of what growth is looking
[1:02:35]
like as of beginning of this month. So
why elimination program just to give you
[1:02:42]
a little little bit of review, we do
have an ordinance that um that deals
[1:02:45]
with dangerous buildings in the and
establishes them as public nuisances
[1:02:50]
requires abatement. Um, of course, the
intent is to create a safer and more
[1:02:56]
pleasing community through the
remediation and demolition of these
[1:03:00]
unsafe structures in the community. So,
the objective of the program objective
[1:03:05]
is to eliminate white in the community.
Uh, we also through eliminating white
[1:03:10]
look to ensure structural stability and
integrity of all of our structures that
[1:03:15]
we have within the community whether res
commercial or industrial. And through
[1:03:19]
this program, we do hope to establish
and cultivate a healthy relationship
[1:03:23]
with public, not just with those owners
that we are dealing with uh who have
[1:03:27]
these dangerous buildings, but also with
those other property owners within the
[1:03:32]
community who invest so much on a daily
basis in this community and in their
[1:03:36]
property.
[1:03:46]
Okay.
So pie chart here uh this is an update
[1:03:51]
from your first quarter here and you can
see the uh the kind of teal color shows
[1:03:56]
the number of properties that we have
within the city initiative itself. You
[1:04:01]
can see from first quarter second
quarter we went from 77 units down to 68
[1:04:06]
units. But if you look at the orange
there, you see that 53 units in reme in
[1:04:12]
the remediated category increased to 61
units in the second quarter. So we have
[1:04:18]
uh we have remediate remediated some of
the structures and I'll go through with
[1:04:22]
you some of those properties that
specifically have been remediated in
[1:04:25]
second quarter of this year.
[1:04:30]
All right. So uh go back Jonathan
um
[1:04:36]
two programs that we use to demolish
structures. One's city initiative and
[1:04:42]
the second is CDBG. CDBG is a voluntary
program uh requires owners to give us
[1:04:48]
the right of access and um allows us to
be able to dedicate uh those funds that
[1:04:55]
are designated by the state to demolish
those properties and ultimately bring
[1:05:00]
those properties into compliance. Uh you
can see on here the CDBG program phase
[1:05:06]
one uh nine properties phase two 10
properties. We updated you in the first
[1:05:11]
quarter on some of those properties that
had have been demolished uh in or
[1:05:16]
through that particular program. You can
see phase three is developing. We're
[1:05:19]
close to close to being able to allocate
funds
[1:05:30]
of the CDBG program, the voluntary
program that designates the state funds
[1:05:35]
to properties. But the other is the city
initiative. That's the program that is
[1:05:40]
supported by the ordinance that you all
have adopted to establish those
[1:05:45]
dangerous buildings and establish the
process for abading them. So, city
[1:05:50]
initiative phases one and two. Um, I'm
happy to report to you tonight that
[1:05:55]
these are some of the first buildings
that have been demolished as a part of
[1:06:00]
the city initiative program. So phases
one and two uh we have um I believe it's
[1:06:07]
eight seven or eight structures that
specifically have been demolished. So
[1:06:10]
I'll start with here 07 drive
100 Dixie Drive apartment 73 through 80.
[1:06:18]
Some of you will be familiar with these
properties specifically, but these are
[1:06:21]
before and after photos that that we
have for each. 204 West Adam Street,
[1:06:31]
208 Wilkerson Street,
[1:06:37]
402 Geneva Highway. You can see that's
the same building on the far left of the
[1:06:43]
before photo and then the building that
you can see clearly in the after photo.
[1:06:47]
Um those are that's the same building
but uh obviously the building in front
[1:06:52]
of the four of the foroto you can see
where it used to be
[1:06:57]
501 West Adam Street
[1:07:04]
430 Daleville Avenue
[1:07:09]
and that's that's actually the
conclusion of the city initiative
[1:07:13]
properties that were removed. The last
one that I wanted to show to you is 143
[1:07:18]
South Carol. That is one that uh we
missed in the last presentation to you,
[1:07:24]
but wanted to make sure you were aware
that that one had been remediated as
[1:07:27]
well as a part of the CBG program uh in
phase two of that program.
[1:07:38]
All right. So current statuses, city
demo initiative phase one. The
[1:07:43]
anticipated completion of the project is
July 2026. We've got one property left
[1:07:49]
in that particular phase that we're um
that we are looking to move forward with
[1:07:54]
demolition on. Uh and that project will
be complete or that phase will be
[1:07:58]
complete. Phase two, we have uh one or
two properties there that still need to
[1:08:04]
be uh fully demolished before that is
complete. We would anticipate
[1:08:08]
participate uh that will be completed
soon as well. Uh phase three, you can
[1:08:14]
see 15 units haven't been identified as
dilapidated. Uh only one has been
[1:08:19]
demolished. Uh as best as testing has
been completed and I can tell you as
[1:08:24]
well that we are looking to put those
properties out for bid for demolition
[1:08:29]
here within the next week or two. Uh
phase four you're all familiar with. At
[1:08:34]
your last meeting, you actually
identified all of those properties as
[1:08:38]
being dilapidated. It um impacted 16
different buildings and specifically 42
[1:08:46]
different residential units. So, those
were all declared as nuisances on um at
[1:08:52]
your last meeting on June 2nd.
We are in a bit of a 20-day period which
[1:08:57]
we're not taking any action but we will
be uh coming back to those within the
[1:09:01]
next week or two to keep those
properties moving forward as well. We
[1:09:06]
are anticipating remediation plans on
some of those uh partic particular
[1:09:12]
properties. Uh but we are continuous
communication with those property owners
[1:09:18]
on uh some of those issues that they
have. And then finally phase five You've
[1:09:23]
not seen this before. Uh we are
currently in the process of of
[1:09:28]
identifying a list probably around 15
structures is what we will end up coming
[1:09:33]
up with uh to implement phase five of
the city's demo initiative program. And
[1:09:39]
we are looking at beginning the
beginning that particular phase in third
[1:09:45]
quarter. So we will be bringing some of
that information back to you as soon as
[1:09:48]
we can.
[1:09:52]
And that should be
all that I have. I'll take any questions
[1:09:57]
that you have.
[1:10:06]
Thank you.
[1:10:32]
Moving to old business. I call for a
public hearing consideration ordinance
[1:10:40]
providing for
[1:10:49]
resist.
[1:11:05]
Mr. Chairman, um staff report for you
for this particular reasoning request.
[1:11:10]
This is a request by Cynthy Cington
Scott. We're re looking to reszone from
[1:11:15]
R2 medium density uh single family
residential to B1 uh business district
[1:11:21]
on this location.
[1:11:25]
Subject property map. You can see where
this is. It's on the eastern portion of
[1:11:30]
the city limits along US 84. You can see
the um the top left portion of that map.
[1:11:36]
You can see where Cottonville Road comes
in. So you have some of that commercial
[1:11:40]
area that's right there at that
intersection like Copper and I believe
[1:11:44]
there's a uh antique store there as well
if I remember correctly. Um so there is
[1:11:49]
some commercial businesses but this
would be directly across the street
[1:11:52]
where Cington Street is. Everybody know
where we're talking about?
[1:12:03]
moving forward. So, our current zoning
is R2. Proposed zoning is B1. And we do
[1:12:09]
have B1 and A2 and R2 immediately to the
north. We have R2 to the west and south
[1:12:15]
and then R2 in Coffee County,
specifically to the east. Uh we did send
[1:12:21]
out four letters to adjacent property
owners. Uh we did receive one comment
[1:12:25]
from a property owner from a neighboring
property owner who was in support of
[1:12:29]
this particular request. Uh use of the
property uh is a residential building at
[1:12:35]
this time. You can see the zoning map
and what the zoning looks like here. You
[1:12:39]
can see this adjacent to US84 and you
can see some of that B1 zoning that's
[1:12:43]
across US84, but this is very close to
the city boundary line itself.
[1:12:50]
So if we're reszoning from R2 to B1, you
need to know what the intents of each
[1:12:55]
zoning district are. Uh purpose of this
district of R2 is to provide
[1:15:08]
USA
is a target area for future annation
[1:15:12]
including future businesses along the
highway corridor itself. And the comp
[1:15:17]
plan also does anticipate business
growth along those major corridors
[1:15:23]
within the city limits itself. not just
circle but also 84 east and some of the
[1:15:27]
other major corridors outside the
circle. Uh existing commercial across
[1:15:32]
US84 acts as a small commercial hub that
allows for future growth immediately
[1:15:37]
along the corridor. We have quite a
number of those kind of uh hubs within
[1:15:42]
the community that have been identified
by our comprehensive plan or are already
[1:15:47]
in existence at this time. So as a
result of those particular compliance
[1:15:53]
um portions of the comprehensive plan or
areas of comprehensive plan which this
[1:15:58]
resoning request complies. Staff is
recommending that um that the council
[1:16:04]
approved the resoning request here from
R2 to B1 subject to the provisions of
[1:16:11]
the zoning ordinance. Uh planning
commission also unanimously recommended
[1:16:15]
approval of this result. questions
[1:16:26]
here.
[1:16:34]
Guess
[1:16:46]
See, is there anything else signals
follow?
[1:16:53]
And we will close this hearing and call
ordinance 1926.
[1:16:59]
Motion
[1:17:06]
» discussion.
All in favor say I.
[1:17:10]
» I.
Motion carries.
[1:17:14]
Call for a public hearing consideration
ordinance 05926A
[1:17:19]
providing for the reszoning of 82.02
acres of land owned by the estate of
[1:17:24]
Senator Elizabeth Hutchinson Charles
Vickers Eel Jr. from a Agriculture
[1:17:30]
District and R2 medium density single
family district to R3 high density
[1:17:35]
single family residential district
located along the north side of Old
[1:17:40]
Salem Road and east side of US 84.
[1:17:46]
One more time, I'll come and speak to
you all here this evening. Uh, this
[1:17:49]
particular request involves two
different properties. Uh, one property
[1:17:54]
is around 40 acres and involves entire
is entirely zoned as agriculture. The
[1:18:00]
second property is just over 40 acres
and involves um two different zoning
[1:18:05]
districts R2 and a as well. Applicant is
wanting to reszone both of those
[1:18:10]
properties to R3. So going from
agriculture and medium density
[1:18:16]
residential to R3 which is high density
single family residential.
[1:18:21]
So here's the subject property US 84 uh
heading west towards New Broxton and
[1:18:28]
Ela. This is also very close to the city
boundary line on the opposite end of
[1:18:32]
US84
um near Old Salem Road. Old you can see
[1:18:36]
Salem Road and Old Salem Road down at
the bottom of the screen there. This
[1:18:40]
also has close proximity to Highway 51.
You can see there to the north and east
[1:18:47]
of this property.
So the zoning map, you can see the um
[1:18:53]
the light yellow color that's at the
bottom of this proposed property being
[1:18:58]
reszone. That's your R2 district. And
then the bulk of the property uh that
[1:19:03]
remains to the north is all agriculture
in green there. And all that's proposed
[1:19:08]
to go to R3
R2 to R3. We do have M2 industrial
[1:19:14]
zoning to the north of this property,
agriculture to the east, R2 medium
[1:19:20]
density residential to the south, and
then uh Coffee County is immediately
[1:19:24]
adjacent to this property to the west.
We did send out letters to eight
[1:19:29]
property owners and the current use of
this property is vacant.
[1:19:33]
So if you're if should you decide to
reszone this property, what are the
[1:19:37]
intents of the district? I want to point
out something specific within this
[1:19:40]
agriculture zoning district. It is
designed to provide space within the
[1:19:44]
city to continue agriculture in forestry
operations preserve and to preserve land
[1:19:50]
also for future urban use when the
demand for land for such development and
[1:19:55]
availability of services warrant such
development. Uh, in that case,
[1:20:00]
the code specifically says that the
property could be reszoned for a more
[1:20:05]
intensive use. It's a district that's
designed to invite a reszone to a more
[1:20:11]
intensive use. That's about the only
district with that the city has in which
[1:20:16]
you'll find that particular language.
So allowable uses with the within the a
[1:20:22]
zoning district are are what you would
expect does allow for single family
[1:20:26]
homes but also farming forestry uses
livestock sales those are the uses that
[1:20:32]
are allowed right now on the bulk of
this property
[1:20:37]
should you decide to re okay and also R2
I'll hit that as well we've already hit
[1:20:42]
that with your last one medium
residential mostly allows for single
[1:20:46]
family residential uses
So should you decide to reszone our
[1:20:52]
three districts purpose is to provide
preserved land for high density single
[1:20:56]
family glowing units in other compatible
uses in areas that are geographically
[1:21:01]
defined and protected from the
encroachment of incompatible uses. Um
[1:21:07]
only difference with this is within R3s
it does allow for cottage developments
[1:21:13]
but otherwise it's still mostly single
family dwellings that are allowed within
[1:21:17]
this district
[1:21:22]
future land use map. You can see similar
to your last request that came before
[1:21:26]
you. This mostly uh calls for
agriculture and single family or medium
[1:21:33]
density residential.
[1:21:37]
We have received a concept plan for this
particular request. They are proposing a
[1:21:44]
256 block subdivision to cover this 80
acres of land. And you can see the
[1:21:49]
preliminary plat that has been already
reviewed and approved by the planning
[1:21:55]
commission subject to your review here
this evening. But this is a copy of the
[1:22:02]
PL of the most recent flat that staff
has received and has on file for this
[1:22:06]
particular development.
So how does this apply to the comp plan?
[1:22:11]
Uh, this development would provide a
smoother transition from that industrial
[1:22:15]
zoning that I showed you to the north um
to the low dens to the low inensity
[1:22:20]
residential that is on the other sides
and also within Coffee County and higher
[1:22:25]
density residential areas should have
access to major roadways. This does have
[1:22:30]
a frontage on US84. They are not
proposing to tie in to US84, but they
[1:22:36]
are proposing two separate entrances.
one entrance on Old Salem Road and the
[1:22:41]
other entrance to the north and east of
this property to connect into Alabama
[1:22:46]
State Highway 54. That is their proposal
at this time.
[1:22:52]
So, just a picture of the public notice
signs that were um that were put out for
[1:22:56]
this property.
And then staff recommendation is that
[1:23:00]
the council approve the reszoning for
the 82.02 2 acres uh located on the east
[1:23:06]
side of US 84 and north side of Old
Salem Road from A and R2 to R3
[1:23:13]
uh with a couple of contending subject
to the provision of two access points to
[1:23:19]
public streets for the subdivision
itself. The planning commission also
[1:23:24]
recommends approval of the request. They
actually had a few more contingencies
[1:23:28]
that they uh recommended as a part of
their approval of the preliminary flat,
[1:23:34]
which included the two access points
that I mentioned to you, but also the
[1:23:40]
upgrade of Old Salem Road, which is not
in real good shape right now, but also
[1:23:46]
it's subject to your approval here this
evening.
[1:23:51]
That's all I have for staff from staff
on this particular Few questions.
[1:23:58]
» Question is
how much of the acreage
[1:24:05]
was?
>> It's probably I don't know the exact
[1:24:10]
number but it's uh it's about 34 of the
property. So somewhere in the 60 acre
[1:24:16]
range
[1:24:19]
» and then fire do we know fireach
[1:24:27]
» they they are aware of this project I
don't know the estimated time fire chief
[1:24:31]
may speak to that a little bit better
than me but uh but we have been um have
[1:24:36]
been talking with them a little bit uh
to confirm the main thing main
[1:24:41]
conversations we've had are fire
accessing
[1:24:45]
those two points.
[1:24:56]
» Yes, they are proposing a bridge across
the smaller feeder creek, but at this
[1:25:00]
time there's a larger uh creek that
actually runs along the west side of
[1:25:05]
this property, and they are they are not
proposing to cross that at this time.
[1:25:13]
question was
big
[1:25:20]
about what fire first responder response
time
[1:25:26]
» as most all of you know our goal is that
our first unit get to any calls
[1:25:35]
within 320 seconds 5 minutes and 20
seconds. Um we have one recently that
[1:25:42]
ended up being in the seven minute
range. So we did not meet our metric. Um
[1:25:49]
uh
[1:25:53]
conversation that we had
is the interest in building closer to
[1:26:02]
um
the further the longer it takes for us
[1:26:07]
to get anywhere. Obviously that can a
ISO. You guys
[1:26:12]
probably don't think about that.
[1:26:17]
This metric is designed for that. So
obviously the further away from fire
[1:26:23]
station build,
the harder time we will have that
[1:26:29]
minimum.
[1:26:36]
Correct. Yes.
[1:26:44]
I can't tell you that that's normal.
That day was a busy day.
[1:26:58]
They were going.
So if you were to say, did they all
[1:27:04]
leave from their
obviously that's north side.
[1:27:09]
I can't tell you. I don't I don't know
the answer to that
[1:27:14]
pretty much everybody that
central fire station
[1:27:22]
that would be fairly accurate
as far as
[1:27:30]
both.
>> Yes.
[1:27:33]
The additional units that are supposed
to be there are supposed to be there in
[1:27:36]
5 minutes and 60 seconds or 9 minutes
and 20 seconds
[1:27:41]
for that's the entire measure the first
arrival unit and then the remainder that
[1:27:47]
those are the two we did meet the
secondary so the the unit coming from
[1:27:52]
central fire station did need it in the
second
[1:27:57]
primary that makes sense so I mean again
the thing is we can hand we're going to
[1:28:03]
handle what your fire department has
made
[1:28:08]
no claim that
um we'll do and take care of whatever we
[1:28:14]
got to take care of but it is true
obviously that the further we are the
[1:28:19]
further we build away from the longer
and that's part of what we're doing with
[1:28:24]
the session that we're working Any
[1:28:33]
others?
[1:28:49]
» Good evening, council. My name is Josh.
I'm with Group.
[1:28:56]
did a great job.
[1:29:06]
I think one thing that makes this
development unique in the R3 density
[1:29:12]
allows for
proposed
[1:29:22]
on the side. There's a lot of wetlands
and streams on the site that we're
[1:29:27]
trying to minimize.
We have one stream crossing that you
[1:29:31]
mentioned just to connect secondary
access but outside of that leave all the
[1:29:37]
existing vegetation that we can
especially those are
[1:29:44]
happy to answer any
[1:29:56]
members.
[1:30:03]
» Good evening to the city council. My
name is Richard. I live at 3391
[1:30:07]
road. I live on the northeastern most
portion of this request. I don't have
[1:30:13]
any opposition to this. not super happy
about it, but people need homes and we
[1:30:18]
understand that. Um,
obviously there's a big need for smaller
[1:30:25]
homes. I think it's problem across the
country. Our ask is that the city help
[1:30:30]
us maintain the natural existing
on this side and really around the whole
[1:30:35]
thing. And we have been working with the
planning commission and with Stanford
[1:30:39]
group. So, I want to thank everybody so
far that has taken interest in this.
[1:30:45]
You know, it's our forever home. We
don't plan on leaving it, but one day
[1:30:49]
the property value could be seriously
negative be affected if that natural
[1:30:53]
existing buffer is. And then for our
quality of life while we're there, we
[1:30:58]
just want some noise pollution, light
pollution protection. And this existing
[1:31:03]
buffer, myself and my neighbor, these
are 25, 30 foot tall trees. I mean,
[1:31:09]
there's there's no way I can replace it.
What group has that approval shows that
[1:31:16]
existing buffer. Um, I'm not sure
they've made a real firm commitment on
[1:31:21]
that, but I do ask the city that if they
change that that they justify it. I
[1:31:27]
don't think it's going to come to that.
They know that we want to eventually own
[1:31:30]
that tree line and we're working toward
that and they're being very cooperative
[1:31:35]
of that.
The follow through is the most important
[1:31:39]
part. Approved, it's going to get final
approved. So, here and there. Let's just
[1:31:44]
try to protect as much as the existing
citizens
[1:31:53]
work for university. I drive that road
every single day. Which home is yours?
[1:31:57]
There's two that sit far off the road on
the left.
[1:32:00]
» Exactly. Mine is the one to the right of
the flag.
[1:32:04]
» Yeah. And so that back side
is
[1:32:11]
kind there. And we don't ask for
[1:32:34]
that again. I just want to go on record
[1:32:40]
those properties.
[1:32:56]
Good evening, council. My name is Jeff
Luther and I I live here at Enterprise.
[1:33:00]
My wife and I own the uh portion to the
west of the property in the county we
[1:33:06]
own. There's 46 acres that sit out
there. So, uh there's no home out there.
[1:33:11]
I live in your district.
>> Okay. Uh but uh that property in the
[1:33:16]
county is basically uh grass land. It's
uh
[1:33:21]
crop pay off it and that's about the end
of spend some time out there. But along
[1:33:25]
with the the concerns that have been uh
been voiced. We had an opportunity to
[1:33:30]
look at the map where the wetland is
from there to the west. And at the last
[1:33:33]
meeting, the representative that was
there from Sanford indicated to me there
[1:33:37]
was no plans to develop the um the
property from the wetland between the
[1:33:42]
wetland and my property line. Is that
still the same judge? Okay. Yeah. I
[1:33:46]
guess along with the that finally I want
to go on record too is asking that as
[1:33:50]
much of that buffer that that natural
buffer those pine trees and the the
[1:33:54]
green space that is there be retained
for the mutual benefit of both parties.
[1:34:00]
Thank you.
[1:34:19]
Yes. Um this is something that we talked
to
[1:34:24]
about
[1:34:32]
the engineering side. We'll do
everything we can to
[1:34:36]
out the slopes.
[1:34:46]
» Just one additional comment that I'll
make. Um any approval that you provide
[1:34:50]
tonight would uh would allow the
approval of the preliminary plat by the
[1:34:55]
planning commission to move forward uh
would allow this project to move
[1:35:00]
forward. But the approval of a
preliminary plately
[1:35:04]
locks in the developer to the plan that
they submitted. So any any major changes
[1:35:11]
to the preliminary plat as far as the
design are concerned would have to come
[1:35:15]
back before the planning commission for
review would require us to notify those
[1:35:19]
property owners all all over again. So
the design the general design that you
[1:35:23]
see that you saw here this evening they
would largely be locked in. They've made
[1:35:28]
some um um some arrangements as far as
that buffer is concerned. That wouldn't
[1:35:33]
be a major change to the flat. Uh we can
continue to move that project forward,
[1:35:39]
but developing across the wetlands
across that main stream would in my mind
[1:35:44]
be a different issue.
[1:35:49]
Yeah, my question was
[1:35:53]
it is not it's just a general reasoning
from from a R2 to R3
[1:36:04]
questions.
[1:36:10]
We will close this public hearing and
call
[1:36:14]
ordinance 1926.
[1:36:25]
discussion.
>> All in favor say I.
[1:36:29]
» All those things I motion carries.
[1:36:40]
Enterprise planning to approve following
request property request by Good luck on
[1:36:51]
3.48
[1:36:55]
district
highway commercial district located
[1:36:59]
101 circle
introduce ordinance 061626
[1:37:05]
providing for the res of 3.448
acres of land owned by James Otis. James
[1:37:12]
Otus Family Trust from the Agricultural
District P3 Highway commercial district
[1:37:18]
located at 21101 for Circle. Call for a
public hearing to be held at the record
[1:37:22]
meeting scheduled for July 21st, 2026.
[1:37:29]
Call for a motion to authorize the mayor
to execute an agreement with Poly
[1:37:32]
Incorporated for construction,
engineering, and inspection services
[1:37:36]
associated with construction of a
sidewalk along Bwood Road from SR 192
[1:37:42]
US84 bypass to SR27 Geneva Highway and
George C. Wallace Drive from Bellwood
[1:37:49]
Road to the Enterprise Multi-Purpose
Recreational Complex
[1:37:53]
project number TA PU-St25
[1:37:58]
partheses 923 close parentheses at a
cost not to exceed $88,500
[1:38:06]
motion. I'll move to authorize the mayor
to execute a brief incorporated cost not
[1:38:10]
to exceed 88,000 $88,500
for construction engineering inspection
[1:38:16]
services associated with
[1:38:23]
any further discussion.
All say I
[1:38:28]
» all same
motion carries.
[1:38:32]
golfer motion to authorize a mayor to
execute an agreement between the city
[1:38:36]
enterprise and vinyl floor record store
incubator located at 123 South Main
[1:38:43]
Street. Per the terms of the lease
agreement.
[1:38:46]
» I move authorize.
[1:38:52]
» Any further discussion?
All in favor say I.
[1:38:56]
» I
sign motion carries.
[1:39:02]
Call for a motion to amend the
previously approved ABC license for hot
[1:39:07]
incorporated doing business as Italian
restaurant due to a scriptur's error.
[1:39:12]
The amendment corrects the business name
of hot incorporated doing business as
[1:39:18]
Italian restaurant or retail retail
liquor license located at 116 South Main
[1:39:24]
Street.
[1:39:29]
Any
[1:39:33]
further discussion?
All in favor say I.
[1:39:37]
» I. Same sign.
Motion carries.
[1:39:44]
Call for a motion to set up public
hearing for July 7th, 2026 at 6:00 p.m.
[1:39:49]
on the matter of issuing a temporary
business license
[1:39:53]
and recycling located at 9:30.
[1:40:02]
for July 726
is temporary business.
[1:40:15]
» Any further discussion?
All in favor say I.
[1:40:19]
» All same sign. Motion carries.
Introduce a request from Eagle Club LLC
[1:40:27]
doing business as Eagle Liquor for a
retail alcohol patch package
[1:40:34]
retail liquor class package license
located at 1110
[1:40:41]
Circle.
Call for a public hearing to be held at
[1:40:45]
the regular schedu.
[1:40:52]
» Yes, Mr. President. I'd like to remind
everyone that the city office will be
[1:40:58]
closed this Friday, June 19th in obser
Jun. Garbage collection will be adjusted
[1:41:05]
because of the holiday.
I encourage the residents to take the
[1:41:10]
city face page for the updated
collection schedule. I also want to
[1:41:15]
thank everyone who came out to s
downtown.
[1:41:22]
It was great to see So many people
celebrating together. Thank you to
[1:41:27]
everyone who helped make the event a
success.
[1:41:31]
This is our last council meeting before
America's 250
[1:41:37]
commemoration on the 4th
of July.
[1:41:42]
Enterprise are proud to participate in
Freedom Fest at Fort Rucker on June 26
[1:41:50]
as we celebrate our nation's history and
the partnership our community share
[1:41:57]
within Fort Ruck.
Over the next several weeks, you will
[1:42:02]
notice America's 20050 banners around
town along with
[1:42:10]
commemorative coins, coloring, sheets,
stickers,
[1:42:14]
pans, and other items that help mark
this milestone.
[1:42:19]
We hope these reminders inspire sense of
pride as we celebrate 250 years of our
[1:42:27]
nation's story.
I also want to remind everyone that our
[1:42:32]
part and break department sound of
summer concert series began this
[1:42:37]
Thursday evening at the Johnny Henderson
Park if weather permitted.
[1:42:44]
We would invite everyone to come out
enjoy the music, spend time with family
[1:42:49]
and friends.
Finally,
[1:42:53]
we had our share rain today with more
expected this week.
[1:42:57]
You know that summer weather can change
quickly.
[1:43:02]
If you're attending outdoor events,
please keep an eye on the forecast to
[1:43:07]
stay weather aware.
Thank you to our city employees for
[1:43:12]
everything that you do each day to serve
our community.
[1:43:17]
Thank you to our citizens for your
continued support.
[1:43:22]
Hope everyone have a safe holiday
weekend. We look forward to celebrating
[1:43:27]
with many of you throughout the summer.
Thank you.
[1:43:43]
I know about five on that list that I
probably got calls on immediately after
[1:43:49]
joining the council citizens asking for
our help to
[1:43:55]
make their surroundings look better. So
I really appreciate that moment. Um,
[1:44:01]
thank you to the gentleman that came to
us tonight. to have our citizen
[1:44:24]
and hope something
great as I drive by every day of what
[1:44:30]
got out there. Hope you can still
maintain
[1:44:34]
privacy
and they seem to be
[1:44:42]
that everything works out.
Thanks to all city employees. We had a
[1:44:47]
lot of things going on past weeks
downtown. Saw a lot of y'all out there
[1:44:53]
state baseball and softball tournaments
in town and so it takes a village to
[1:44:59]
kind of pull all those things together.
So everyone
[1:45:03]
perspective
who makes all things happen behind the
[1:45:07]
scenes.
>> Thank you. Thank you.
[1:45:16]
Thank you very much.
[1:45:27]
Thank you very much. Thank you so
much.
[1:45:36]
Thank you
[1:45:39]
all
[1:45:42]
so
[1:45:59]
So very good to be up close and person
with all you guys very thankful that we
[1:46:05]
have a city that developers want to
develop. Very thankful that we have a
[1:46:09]
community that want to live in a parts
here.
[1:46:21]
It's just a great
fact here.
[1:46:28]
the home for sale.
[1:46:32]
Personally, obviously I'd love to see it
more in closer where the city services
[1:46:39]
are already at
strain
[1:46:44]
but thankfuls
[1:46:57]
everybody.
[1:47:03]
Thank you all for coming.
We have a request for a
[1:47:09]
session for
[1:47:14]
anticipating
action that session motion.
[1:47:39]
actually.
[1:48:00]
Last
[1:48:28]
month.
[1:48:41]
I wonder just like
[1:48:58]
it.
[1:49:08]
You guys
[1:49:28]
might be a broken
[1:49:32]
Hey,
[1:49:56]
excuse me.
[1:50:07]
He says first year offer
[1:50:50]
Yes.
[1:51:04]
New York.
[1:51:21]
All right.
[1:51:55]
I'm not
from the south.
[1:52:03]
probably
[1:52:10]
down.
There was
[1:52:34]
There is a
[1:53:00]
Well, back
up here to the church. Take a left.
[1:53:08]
That's where you see there are four
houses.
[1:53:15]
That perspective
[1:53:22]
behind
out here
[1:53:43]
a lot
deep.
[1:54:09]
I do think probably.
[1:54:25]
Yeah.
[1:54:40]
It's bad.
[1:54:47]
That's
honestly
[1:55:02]
actually
[1:55:14]
So
[1:55:27]
many times
back.
[1:55:43]
deep
[1:55:47]
breath.
[1:55:57]
I want to make sure nothing
raise
[1:56:14]
There's
[1:56:29]
» all right back home. I am the
[1:56:42]
Goodbye.
[2:01:03]
I got some slit up in there to see where
it is, but
[2:01:09]
the lights.
[2:01:17]
» I'm going to lock this door back
>> so that I don't forget.
[2:01:22]
» Will they still be able to come?
>> They'll come out. They can come in here,
[2:01:26]
but you can't come in from here to your
office.
[2:01:28]
» Yes, sir. That's fine.
>> So, they get up, prop it open or
[2:01:33]
» Okay.
[2:01:47]
I don't forget
you got to court
[2:01:52]
walking right to the mayor's.
[2:01:57]
» Do you think we ought to um since we're
getting something talked about putting
[2:02:02]
pas
court. I hear a lot of people
[2:02:07]
complaining that
[2:02:23]
» it doesn't have to be like
nice
[2:02:31]
commission. They're here and we see
microphones that we
[2:02:40]
Yeah,
>> we need nine of them and we need one at
[2:02:44]
the micro at the
10
[2:02:50]
basic speakers. I think
I'm see
[2:03:14]
have a witness and witness box. So the
judge and see
[2:03:36]
I think we could do it.
[2:03:41]
Question is, can we get the microphones?
[2:03:46]
We could actually live with fewer. We
could probably live with five
[2:03:49]
microphones. Put one
between those two seats there. Put one
[2:03:54]
between these two seats. One between
these two seats. They can share.
[2:04:07]
Yeah.
[2:04:21]
You can't hear when I'm over there. I
can't hear.
[2:04:28]
to do about TVs.
[2:04:34]
Honestly, what I think we do is put
TV TV
[2:04:40]
all four together.
[2:05:12]
Okay. Talk about
[2:05:35]
Just plug numbers
[2:05:48]
here.
[2:05:52]
I said every
[2:06:24]
She can't hear the answer.
[2:06:56]
Can see
[2:07:19]
of Of course.
[2:08:23]
Holy
[2:08:38]
crap.
[2:09:41]
I really
[2:09:50]
bless
[2:09:58]
again next year.
[2:10:22]
that just
[2:10:33]
shoots.
[2:10:56]
This thing is
[2:11:01]
beautiful.
[2:11:26]
It's
[2:11:36]
texture.
[2:12:21]
tonight. It's
[2:12:24]
to Houston.
[2:12:28]
» Let's go to Panama City.
[2:13:33]
She's she's
[2:14:04]
interest.
[2:14:35]
She says something.
[2:15:21]
And we have
[2:16:34]
As soon
[2:16:53]
It helps me keep up.
[2:17:09]
That's what
[2:17:17]
you know it takes place all day for two
or three people.
[2:17:44]
stuff.
[2:17:48]
Say,
[2:17:55]
right?
[2:18:03]
I make
[2:18:07]
sure
[2:18:27]
you are
[2:18:39]
She's got them all lined up.
[2:19:09]
Thank you.
[2:19:13]
All
[2:19:21]
right, speaking is a journal.
[2:19:41]
» I'm kidding.