Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
[0:02]
>> Good morning. Good morning,
[0:03]
everyone, and welcome
[0:05]
to this regular meeting of
[0:07]
Tampa Bay Water for Monday,
[0:10]
July 21. This meeting was
[0:12]
noticed in the Florida
[0:13]
Administrative Register and
[0:15]
on the Tampa Bay Water website.
[0:17]
The meeting is available
[0:18]
for viewing through live
[0:19]
streaming and a recording
[0:21]
of the meeting will be posted
[0:23]
on the agency's website. This
[0:24]
time I would like to ask Vice
[0:26]
Chair Hanewicz to lead us
[0:27]
in the Pledge of Allegiance.
[0:33]
>> I pledge allegiance
[0:34]
to the flag of the United
[0:36]
States of America and
[0:37]
to the republic
[0:39]
for which it stands, one
[0:40]
nation, under God, indivisible,
[0:42]
with liberty and justice
[0:44]
for all.
[0:51]
>> Commissioner Oakley,
[0:53]
Commissioner Peters and Mayor
[0:55]
Davis will not be
[0:56]
in attendance
[0:58]
for this meeting. Kathleen?
[0:59]
At this time,
[1:00]
could we please have a roll
[1:01]
call to determine if there is a
[1:02]
quorum?
[1:04]
[ CALLING ROLL ]
[1:20]
>> Mr. Chair, we have a quorum.
[1:23]
>> Thank you very much.
[1:25]
At this time, we are going to
[1:26]
open the regular meeting and
[1:28]
ask if there are any changes
[1:29]
to the agenda. And seeing none,
[1:33]
we will go to public comment.
[1:34]
Public comment is three minutes
[1:37]
per speaker. We have two people
[1:38]
who have signed up this
[1:40]
morning. The first is Mark
[1:42]
Clutho. Good morning. Ah, he's
[1:46]
walking in. Mr. Clutho, good
[1:50]
morning.
[2:07]
>> Mark Lutho, Largo. Oh, A5.
[2:12]
Yeah. You're talking here
[2:17]
about environmental conditions.
[2:20]
Yeah. Well, all you do is
[2:23]
degrade the environmental
[2:26]
conditions and your water wise.
[2:33]
Update A7. Well, how wise
[2:37]
is it that all these plants
[2:40]
that you have
[2:42]
around this building you have
[2:46]
to mutilate because there isn't
[2:49]
room for them to grow? That's
[2:54]
completely asinine. And again
[3:00]
today we're going
[3:04]
to have a heat index over 100
[3:09]
degrees. And all the fools are
[3:13]
wearing coats so we'll buy more
[3:18]
air conditioning so everybody's
[3:22]
comfortable. So what happens?
[3:26]
We have these headlines. We're
[3:29]
heading
[3:31]
into hurricane season.
[3:33]
Unprepared storms like Milton
[3:36]
will strike. Will we see them
[3:39]
coming? The flooding in Texas
[3:42]
is the future. We need
[3:44]
to prepare. What caused extreme
[3:48]
rainfall flooding in Texas
[3:53]
Hill country? Well, you're
[3:56]
complicit. The waters
[4:00]
in the gulf are often 3, 4, 5
[4:03]
degrees warmer than normal.
[4:06]
At one point this year,
[4:08]
sea surface temperatures
[4:10]
in the gulf of Texas and
[4:11]
Louisiana were more than 8
[4:13]
degrees above normal. As has
[4:16]
been shown time and time again,
[4:18]
event after event,
[4:20]
climate change is heading
[4:22]
to wetter. More extreme
[4:24]
precipitation events. Well, you
[4:26]
are doing your part ignoring
[4:35]
science. I mean, I just don't
[4:44]
see how you can be more stupid.
[4:50]
Get rid of the stupid coats.
[4:56]
Now. Maybe you need
[5:00]
to see a doctor. There's just
[5:05]
something wrong
[5:07]
with you idiots.
[5:11]
>> David Ballard Geddes, Jr.
[5:12]
Good morning.
[5:16]
>> Hi. Thank you, sir. David
[5:18]
Ballard Geddes, Jr. I live on
[5:19]
Georgia Avenue in Palm
[5:21]
Harbor. Thomas Jefferson's
[5:23]
Louisiana land purchase was
[5:26]
negotiated by three people.
[5:29]
Thomas Jefferson, Robert
[5:31]
Livingston and James Monroe.
[5:34]
Jefferson is accredited
[5:36]
with writing both the
[5:37]
Religious Freedom act,
[5:39]
where he juxtapositions
[5:41]
Almighty God in an attempt
[5:43]
at confusing us
[5:45]
with his deceptive dialogue,
[5:47]
coupled with the Declaration
[5:49]
of Independence, which
[5:50]
in perpetuity serves as
[5:52]
preamble to a second
[5:54]
Constitution. Evil
[5:56]
in its nature. Jefferson was a
[5:58]
sacrilegious scallywag and a
[6:00]
total fraud. Now, Robert
[6:03]
Livingston, he comes
[6:04]
from a family that profited
[6:06]
from the slave trade. He was
[6:08]
given the nickname of the
[6:10]
Chancellor
[6:11]
for his legal tenure in New
[6:13]
York. He was one of the
[6:14]
Committee of Five
[6:16]
in the framing of the
[6:18]
Declaration of Independence,
[6:20]
yet he never signed the
[6:21]
Declaration. Livingston
[6:23]
administered the oath
[6:24]
of office to George
[6:26]
Washington. Livingston was the
[6:27]
Grand Master of the
[6:29]
Freemasons, belonging to the
[6:31]
Society of the Cincinnati 13.
[6:35]
Livingston was a real fly
[6:37]
by night shady character. Then
[6:40]
there's James Monroe. He was
[6:41]
our fifth president. And oddly,
[6:44]
most of all,
[6:45]
he opposed ratifying the US
[6:48]
Constitution. Why would he do
[6:50]
that? As negotiated
[6:52]
by these three conflicted men,
[6:54]
the Louisiana land purchase,
[6:57]
in reality is the western half
[7:00]
of the Mississippi watershed
[7:03]
region. Irrespective
[7:06]
of the nation's borders, the
[7:07]
watershed region goes all the
[7:10]
way up into Canada. The
[7:12]
Louisiana watershed purchase
[7:14]
does not recognize the
[7:16]
arbitrary boundaries
[7:19]
between countries, states,
[7:21]
counties, cities or municipal
[7:24]
governments. You're not living
[7:26]
in Kansas anymore. You never
[7:28]
were. That was created as an
[7:30]
illusion. The western half
[7:33]
of the Mississippi watershed
[7:35]
region was sold by an entity
[7:37]
that did not have rightful
[7:40]
ownership
[7:42]
of the land or the water.
[7:43]
Thereby, the sale of such
[7:45]
stolen territory is null and
[7:47]
void. Thomas Jefferson's
[7:48]
assumption
[7:50]
in constitutionally doubling
[7:52]
down and furthering
[7:54]
in his piracy of both land and
[7:56]
water is invalid.
[7:59]
In its possession, the
[8:01]
territory as stolen must resort
[8:03]
back to the indigenous Indians
[8:06]
that first inhabited this land.
[8:09]
They need to be given a
[8:11]
justifiable and rightful say so
[8:13]
in the pursuings
[8:16]
of this government. Thank you.
[8:20]
>> All right. And that is our
[8:22]
public comment
[8:23]
for this morning.
[8:25]
At this time, we are going
[8:26]
to move on
[8:28]
to the consent agenda. Is there
[8:29]
anyone pulling anything
[8:31]
off consent before we go ahead
[8:33]
with a motion? I don't see any.
[8:35]
>> Move approval.
[8:37]
>> Second.
[8:38]
>> Okay. We have a motion
[8:39]
from Councilman Miranda,
[8:40]
seconded by Councilwoman
[8:42]
Hanewicz. Please record your
[8:47]
vote.
[8:52]
>> Mr. Chair, the motion passed
[8:53]
unanimously.
[8:55]
>> We are going to move now
[8:56]
to the regular agenda. And our
[8:58]
first item is item number B1.
[9:00]
And that is the General Manager
[9:02]
and General Counsel's report.
[9:04]
Mr. Carden, good morning.
[9:06]
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair, members
[9:07]
of the board, it's good
[9:08]
to see all of you. We had a
[9:09]
short break there and so now
[9:11]
we're back
[9:13]
to business. The first item or
[9:15]
the first slide I want to show
[9:18]
you is where we are using all
[9:20]
the sources and our targets.
[9:21]
And if you can go to the July
[9:23]
on the very far right,
[9:24]
you can see we're right
[9:25]
on target
[9:28]
with our projections. And you
[9:29]
can see the different various
[9:30]
sources with yellow,
[9:32]
which is the Desal plant. So,
[9:35]
it's been running and doing
[9:36]
well. Through June 30th, we
[9:39]
delivered an average
[9:40]
about just a little bit over
[9:42]
200 million gallons a day. And
[9:43]
that is less than the same
[9:46]
water delivery
[9:49]
for the same period last year.
[9:50]
It's about 1.5% lower. We did
[9:53]
receive about 7.42 inches. And
[9:57]
that is
[9:59]
about a half an inch shy
[10:01]
of the average,
[10:03]
but pretty close. Doing fine.
[10:04]
So, we are moving
[10:08]
through the next slide,
[10:11]
please. I'm going to talk
[10:13]
about the well fields. That is
[10:15]
the consolidated well field
[10:16]
slide. And as you can see,
[10:19]
the black line's the 90 million
[10:22]
gallon a day permit limit. And
[10:23]
it's taken an anomaly where
[10:25]
it's dropped down and there's
[10:27]
quite a cushion there
[10:28]
from that. We're about 75.93
[10:31]
million gallons a day. And that
[10:34]
was done on purpose. We ran the
[10:36]
surface water harder in May and
[10:38]
June than we normally would.
[10:41]
And that was anticipation
[10:42]
of doing some work at the
[10:44]
surface water treatment plant
[10:46]
which is going on right now.
[10:48]
So, we're running the surface
[10:49]
water a little bit lower than
[10:51]
we would at this time,
[10:52]
but they will balance out.
[10:53]
So, we just kind of flip
[10:55]
flopped our running scenarios.
[10:56]
The next slide shows you the
[10:59]
south-central Hillsborough
[11:00]
regional well field permit.
[11:02]
Again, the black line is the
[11:04]
limit of 24.95 and we are at
[11:07]
24.96. And it will. It'll
[11:11]
bounce around the black line
[11:12]
for a little bit. We do
[11:15]
anticipate the permit being
[11:16]
raised to 26.9 in October
[11:18]
of this year. So that should be.
[11:21]
The black line will go up. See
[11:23]
that coming soon. This is a
[11:27]
graph of how are we doing
[11:29]
with the reservoir. The blue,
[11:30]
all the blue is the actual
[11:32]
water that we anticipate. It
[11:34]
says 9.5 billion. That is what
[11:37]
we anticipate by the end
[11:38]
of this month to be in there.
[11:40]
And that is ahead of target
[11:42]
by quite a sum. Again, last
[11:45]
year at this time we were
[11:47]
hovering a little over 2
[11:49]
billion gallons
[11:51]
in the reservoir. So, it's
[11:53]
quite a different story. This
[11:54]
is generally the average year.
[11:56]
Last year was not and hopefully
[11:58]
we'll never see another year
[11:59]
like that. Here's some things
[12:02]
I'm going to chat with you
[12:04]
down the line. We'll start
[12:05]
with the Legislative
[12:06]
Appropriations update. As you
[12:08]
know, the session just ended
[12:09]
in June and the governor signed
[12:11]
the budget on June 30th. And we
[12:15]
did receive two awards. One for
[12:17]
the surface water treatment
[12:18]
plant, that's $650,000. And
[12:20]
then another project was
[12:22]
awarded a million dollars
[12:24]
for our SCADA Secure Ops
[12:26]
project. The bond refinancing.
[12:30]
We asked the board and the
[12:32]
board approved in May to
[12:33]
refinance the 2015A bonds and
[12:37]
we went to market. They closed
[12:39]
on July 3rd, I believe, and we
[12:41]
achieved a 4% savings which
[12:43]
equates to about $680,000 a
[12:46]
year and that is very close
[12:49]
to one penny off of our rate.
[12:51]
So that was very good news.
[12:54]
On water quality, we are still
[12:55]
watching closely the EPA and
[12:59]
the rulemaking that's going on.
[13:00]
They did make an announcement
[13:02]
early this spring that they
[13:04]
would increase the time
[13:05]
for being in compliance
[13:07]
with PFAS from the year 2029
[13:09]
to the year 2031. And they
[13:12]
dropped some or they raised
[13:15]
some of the parts per trillion
[13:17]
for the PFAS from 4 to 10
[13:19]
on certain PFAS elements
[13:21]
but not on there was two
[13:23]
of them that are the main ones.
[13:25]
They're still at 4 parts per
[13:26]
trillion. I do understand that
[13:28]
the litigation is ongoing
[13:29]
against them. American
[13:31]
Waterworks association and
[13:32]
others have filed litigation
[13:34]
and that is ongoing. So we're
[13:36]
keeping a close eye on that.
[13:38]
We are working
[13:39]
on our water quality study
[13:41]
with Corolla engineers that
[13:44]
recently got all comments
[13:47]
from all of the members. We are
[13:50]
compiling those and we will
[13:52]
have a meeting with all staff
[13:54]
and then we will be bringing
[13:55]
forth some recommendations
[13:57]
to the board
[13:59]
in the next few months.
[14:03]
Hurricane resiliency, we are
[14:05]
in the middle of the hurricane
[14:06]
and I read somewhere today that
[14:08]
we are starting the peak season
[14:10]
and as we know, late August and
[14:11]
September is when a lot
[14:13]
of it starts.
[14:16]
After last year we went
[14:18]
through a variety
[14:19]
of meetings,
[14:21]
lessons learned and after
[14:23]
action plans and we've been
[14:25]
working hard to implement these
[14:27]
short and long term fixes. We
[14:30]
met with all the member
[14:31]
governments, all
[14:33]
of their utility, their
[14:34]
communications and their
[14:36]
emergency management staff and
[14:37]
we talked about improving our
[14:39]
coordination and communication.
[14:40]
We have implemented some
[14:42]
of the generator
[14:45]
Withlacoochee River Electric,
[14:48]
help us maintain and operate
[14:50]
the generators that run the
[14:52]
crossbar and the Cypress Creek
[14:54]
facilities. We've also updated
[14:55]
our fuel contracts
[14:59]
to stage a fuel tanker
[15:01]
at our regional site
[15:02]
to allow better access
[15:04]
for our workers in a more
[15:06]
central located place. And we
[15:09]
are working with Hillsborough
[15:10]
County and Pasco County
[15:12]
to come up with an MOU
[15:14]
to get some fuel as we need to
[15:16]
from them. We've done a lot of
[15:18]
tree trimming and we applied
[15:20]
sealants to most of all of our
[15:22]
buildings that experienced some
[15:25]
type of water damage last year.
[15:27]
We also hired a new emergency
[15:30]
management program manager. So
[15:31]
he started about two weeks ago
[15:34]
and we've been doing a lot
[15:36]
of training
[15:38]
for the last several months.
[15:40]
Lastly, we're going
[15:42]
to be establishing a schedule
[15:43]
to have a quarterly member
[15:45]
government meeting. It'll help
[15:48]
us enhance our communications
[15:49]
and prepare better
[15:51]
for the storms. And we'll be
[15:53]
meeting quarterly
[15:54]
during the hurricane season.
[15:56]
And I want
[15:58]
to mention purchasing. Our
[15:59]
purchasing department received
[16:01]
the Achievement of Excellence
[16:02]
in Procurement from the
[16:04]
National Institute of
[16:05]
Procurement. And that was the
[16:07]
first time they received that.
[16:09]
They're doing a great job.
[16:11]
Strong performance,
[16:13]
accountability, and they're
[16:14]
adding terrific strategic value
[16:17]
in our procurement here
[16:18]
at the agents. Next slide,
[16:24]
please. I want
[16:26]
to show you some
[16:27]
of the things we've been doing
[16:28]
out in the community. This is
[16:29]
the Girl Scouts of West
[16:31]
Central Florida's Water
[16:32]
Conservation Academy Camp. And
[16:34]
one of our staff members,
[16:36]
Aaron Hayes, was there and
[16:37]
helped the Girl Scouts
[16:39]
with some activities, learning
[16:40]
more about our aquifer.
[16:42]
>> They're all
[16:43]
drinking Sprite. They should be
[16:45]
drinking water.
[16:47]
>> They're making
[16:48]
an edible Aquifer. Needs
[16:51]
Sprite for a little kick. The
[16:55]
next slide shows three
[16:57]
of our purchasing team members.
[16:59]
They were
[17:01]
at a reverse trade show. And
[17:03]
then our chief operating
[17:04]
officer, Paul Stanek, helped
[17:06]
keep Pinellas beautiful. They
[17:09]
were evaluating environmental
[17:10]
action plans developed
[17:12]
by high school students during
[17:14]
a summer environmental
[17:16]
leadership workshop. And
[17:19]
Danielle Kersey, she is our
[17:21]
senior project manager. She
[17:23]
presented at the American
[17:24]
Waterworks Conference. She was
[17:28]
on a panel and she also did a
[17:31]
presentation. And lastly,
[17:35]
I will mention Pasco County
[17:38]
hired a new utility director,
[17:40]
Joseph Omoa. He's sitting
[17:42]
straight across
[17:44]
from me and welcome aboard,
[17:47]
Joseph. And that's my report.
[17:55]
>> Any questions
[17:57]
from board members?
[17:59]
Commissioner Mariano.
[18:00]
>> Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
[18:01]
You know,
[18:02]
a while ago we talked
[18:03]
about the Four Rivers
[18:04]
Project, about a reservoir
[18:05]
project that the Army Corps had
[18:07]
designed for years ago. And I
[18:08]
mentioned out in Dade City
[18:09]
where they have all sorts
[18:10]
of flooding going
[18:12]
on this past year because of
[18:14]
water that just can't drain and
[18:15]
it abuts right up to the
[18:16]
Green Swamp
[18:18]
in certain areas. I asked
[18:19]
Tampa Bay Water staff
[18:21]
to go work
[18:22]
with our county and talking
[18:23]
to Jason Mickle, who was
[18:24]
Joseph's boss. Even this
[18:26]
morning they haven't had a
[18:27]
conversation yet. So, I don't
[18:29]
know where we are going
[18:30]
with that, but I would love
[18:31]
to see it happen. And maybe
[18:32]
before Joe leaves, you can
[18:34]
actually start the conversation
[18:35]
because the reservoir is great
[18:36]
for water itself,
[18:37]
but it's also great
[18:39]
for stormwater. And you maybe
[18:40]
have the dialogue today
[18:41]
to get it rolling.
[18:42]
>> Yes, I'll ask Warren too.
[18:43]
He's been our lead on that --.
[18:45]
I have talked with Pasco staff
[18:49]
on a couple of occasions
[18:50]
to coordinate. They have asked
[18:53]
that we stand by
[18:55]
for future meetings with the
[18:56]
Army Corps in the district in
[18:58]
Pasco County. Your staff wanted
[18:59]
to take the lead so that we
[19:02]
didn't jump in and things
[19:04]
become a little jumbled
[19:05]
with multiple meetings. So, I'm
[19:06]
waiting to hear back from your
[19:07]
staff. I will follow up
[19:09]
with them this week
[19:10]
to see how we can engage
[19:11]
with them
[19:13]
in those studies.
[19:14]
>> So, what staff person did
[19:15]
you talk to?
[19:18]
>> My notes are upstairs.
[19:23]
Dr, the name eludes me,
[19:25]
but I will reach out
[19:26]
to them this week.
[19:27]
>> And Joseph is coming right
[19:29]
from that department. So, I
[19:30]
that they're going to start
[19:31]
the conversation a little bit
[19:33]
more intensely, but something
[19:38]
we're should be looking at and
[19:40]
should have been done months
[19:41]
ago. Thank you.
[19:43]
>> All right, we are going
[19:45]
to move on now to the PFAS
[19:46]
litigation settlement update.
[19:47]
Ms. Fernandez.
[19:49]
>> Thank you. I'd like
[19:51]
to introduce Augie Ribeiro. He
[19:52]
is with Ventura Law and he's
[19:54]
one of the attorneys that has
[19:55]
been aptly handling Tampa Bay
[19:57]
Water's involvement
[19:59]
in the PFAS litigation. He's
[20:01]
here today to provide you
[20:02]
with a brief history of Tampa
[20:03]
Bay Water's involvement and
[20:05]
also an update on where we are
[20:07]
at with the settlements.
[20:10]
>> Thank you. Morning, Mr.
[20:11]
Ribeiro.
[20:12]
>> Thank you. Good morning,
[20:14]
Mr. Chairman. And I just like
[20:17]
to say that I know you get
[20:19]
heaped
[20:21]
with praise often as a board
[20:22]
for all your decisions and
[20:24]
sometimes it's probably merited
[20:25]
because I stood
[20:28]
before you or came
[20:30]
before you. This is my fifth
[20:32]
meeting
[20:33]
before the board and some
[20:34]
of the new members may not
[20:36]
recall, but going back to
[20:37]
2019, we decided to review and
[20:39]
discuss the potential of a
[20:42]
litigation involving bringing
[20:43]
an action against the component
[20:45]
manufacturers
[20:48]
of PFAs and PFOA. And this
[20:50]
board, this board,
[20:53]
through legal counsel and
[20:54]
through the five subsequent
[20:56]
meetings that I presented,
[20:57]
made a great decision. In
[21:00]
2020, you allowed our law firm,
[21:03]
you retained us and you allowed
[21:05]
us to bring a lawsuit
[21:07]
against 3M Dupont and a number
[21:10]
of defendants who were the
[21:12]
component manufacturers
[21:14]
of PFAS and PFOA. And because
[21:16]
of that decision, we were one
[21:18]
of the leaders
[21:20]
in this litigation that brought
[21:21]
about almost a $13 billion
[21:24]
settlement
[21:25]
about a year and a half ago
[21:27]
for cities and water suppliers
[21:29]
across the country. But because
[21:31]
this board gave us authority
[21:33]
in 2020, the amount that we
[21:35]
settled for Tampa Bay water was
[21:37]
a 25% increase. And I want
[21:40]
to point that out. That is an
[21:42]
extraordinary great decision
[21:45]
by this board. So, I'm here
[21:49]
to announce that on a gross
[21:52]
settlement basis that we're
[21:53]
proud
[21:55]
to report that we have settled
[21:57]
for Tampa Bay Water, an amount
[21:59]
that will be, in the end,
[22:01]
about 23 to 24 million dollars
[22:04]
as a gross award,
[22:06]
and net somewhere between 17
[22:08]
and 18 million dollars. 90%
[22:10]
of that comes from the company
[22:12]
of 3M. 10% comes from Dupont
[22:15]
and other defendants that we
[22:18]
have brought litigation
[22:20]
against. That last 10% has not
[22:22]
been resolved,
[22:23]
but the first 90% has,
[22:25]
and that amount is estimated
[22:28]
at $21.7 million. And then we
[22:33]
anticipate another 10% against
[22:35]
the remaining defendants. And
[22:36]
that's why our estimates are
[22:38]
somewhere between 23 and $24
[22:41]
million as a gross award.
[22:42]
We're proud
[22:44]
to have represented Tampa Bay
[22:46]
Water. I'm just by way
[22:49]
of history, I was here almost
[22:51]
10 years ago. I had the
[22:53]
privilege of representing
[22:55]
Tampa Bay Water again as a
[22:56]
resident of Pinellas County
[22:58]
for the BP oil disaster. And I
[23:01]
was proud to present an award
[23:03]
at that time. I know
[23:06]
oftentimes, as board members,
[23:07]
you're criticized. Then your
[23:09]
team, your staff, the
[23:11]
engineers, the people
[23:12]
on the field that had
[23:13]
to cooperate with us throughout
[23:15]
the many years, we also went
[23:17]
through Covid. So the decision
[23:18]
to allow us
[23:20]
to bring the suit and
[23:22]
to cooperate with us
[23:24]
to allow us
[23:26]
to get litigation testing,
[23:28]
we did our own testing,
[23:29]
which supplemented our efforts
[23:31]
in this case. And I want
[23:33]
to point out to you,
[23:35]
because many of the general
[23:36]
public don't understand this,
[23:38]
that many cities,
[23:40]
many cities that we presented
[23:41]
to
[23:43]
over the last six years refused
[23:44]
to get involved
[23:47]
in this action. Refused
[23:48]
for one reason or another.
[23:50]
They didn't want to bring light
[23:52]
that there might be a problem.
[23:53]
Many cities and water suppliers
[23:55]
failed to receive any monies
[23:58]
from this settlement because
[24:00]
they didn't file timely. And
[24:03]
so, I think it's time that we
[24:05]
say thank you and hats off
[24:07]
to this board for making great
[24:10]
decision and funds will be
[24:12]
forthcoming. And I've supplied
[24:14]
a memo to that effect. And I
[24:16]
thank you for the privilege
[24:18]
of allowing me
[24:19]
to represent you
[24:20]
over these years. Thank you
[24:21]
very much. Any questions?
[24:23]
>> Well, Mr. Ribeiro, thank you
[24:25]
and thank you
[24:26]
for that wonderful report, you
[24:28]
know, Councilman Miranda and I,
[24:30]
when we were on Tampa City
[24:31]
Council, the Tampa recovered
[24:33]
money in the BP litigation.
[24:35]
And that at the time, a lot
[24:36]
of that money was used
[24:38]
to build, to rebuild Julian
[24:40]
B. Lane Park, which is a
[24:42]
tremendous park on the
[24:43]
Hillsborough River. And the
[24:45]
reason I mention that is
[24:46]
because these, these types
[24:48]
of verdicts,
[24:50]
the money that comes from them
[24:52]
can be transformative.
[24:55]
This is a huge amount
[24:57]
of money that is coming
[24:59]
into our hands in this case. I
[25:00]
know this board's going to act
[25:02]
very wisely and use the money
[25:03]
to make our water as clean as
[25:06]
possible. That's our top
[25:07]
priority. But, you know,
[25:09]
having the foresight
[25:10]
to follow this litigation
[25:12]
through to,
[25:14]
to have the courage to file it
[25:16]
to begin with and, and to. To
[25:17]
take the time and effort ne
[25:19]
really was very, very important
[25:20]
and will have a very meaningful
[25:22]
impact on this agency and
[25:24]
on the public that we serve.
[25:28]
So thank you. Is there any
[25:29]
other board members that would
[25:31]
like to. Councilwoman
[25:33]
Hanewicz.
[25:35]
>> Thank you. Chair, I just.
[25:36]
First of all, Augie, great
[25:37]
work. Thank you. Obviously,
[25:40]
five years is a long road,
[25:42]
and we had many meetings
[25:43]
on this, and it's come
[25:45]
to a good conclusion. My
[25:46]
question is in terms of when we
[25:48]
expect the money and then how
[25:50]
are we going to,
[25:52]
where are we going
[25:53]
to put the money in terms
[25:56]
of invest the money or put it
[25:57]
in a place where it earns what
[25:59]
it should earn
[26:00]
until we decide what happens
[26:02]
with it and what's going to.
[26:04]
What's going to,
[26:06]
you know what. Are there any
[26:07]
limitations in terms of how we
[26:09]
can use this money and what we
[26:10]
should use it for? So, I just.
[26:12]
There are a couple
[26:13]
of questions
[26:14]
in there that I would like,
[26:16]
and I don't know if Christina
[26:17]
can help
[26:18]
on the financial part. Sorry,
[26:19]
Christina, if I'm, like,
[26:20]
throwing you out there or
[26:22]
Augie, if you can help out.
[26:23]
>> The only thing I can say is
[26:25]
that, number one,
[26:26]
we've made a payment. One
[26:27]
payment was made last month,
[26:29]
and I have another check here
[26:31]
today to drop off. Okay. Which
[26:33]
is the second payment. And then
[26:34]
by the end of the year, we
[26:36]
expect another larger payment.
[26:37]
And so, we expect by the end of
[26:39]
this year that you will be
[26:41]
receiving 65% of this amount of
[26:43]
money that you're entitled to.
[26:45]
And then the next payments,
[26:47]
the next 35%, will be paid out
[26:48]
over the next four
[26:50]
to five years. That's our
[26:52]
estimates. So, by the end
[26:53]
of the year, you should have
[26:55]
about 65% of this award, and
[26:56]
there are no restrictions.
[26:58]
>> Okay, great. So, I would
[27:01]
just like to see if wherever
[27:02]
we're putting our money or
[27:04]
holding our money,
[27:05]
because it's going
[27:06]
to take a while anyhow, to make
[27:08]
sure we're earning the best
[27:09]
interest rates while it's there
[27:11]
until a decision is made,
[27:13]
I would assume in the future,
[27:15]
sometime.
[27:16]
>> So, we are setting up a
[27:17]
separate fund that we will be
[27:19]
able to track the money, and
[27:20]
then any interest that it earns
[27:22]
will stay with that fund. And
[27:24]
then once the board makes the
[27:25]
decision what
[27:27]
to spend those funds on,
[27:28]
then we will track it as well,
[27:29]
just like we do with any bond
[27:31]
proceeds we receive. We track
[27:32]
those separately, maintaining
[27:34]
the interest and where all the
[27:35]
money is spent. So, we'll do
[27:36]
the same thing
[27:37]
with these funds. We're
[27:39]
creating a separate fund
[27:41]
to do that with.
[27:43]
>> Okay, well, thank you very
[27:44]
much, and thank you, Augie,
[27:46]
for all you've done.
[27:47]
>> Any other comments,
[27:49]
Commissioner Eggers?
[27:50]
>> Yeah, just real quickly,
[27:51]
I wanted to second some
[27:52]
of the comments. You know,
[27:53]
these kinds of efforts are
[27:54]
like five years, sometimes
[27:56]
in the making,
[27:58]
sometimes longer. And the
[28:00]
attitudes can be, why bother?
[28:01]
But we do have an incredible
[28:03]
staff that brought it to, you
[28:05]
know, to a point where I think
[28:07]
everybody was pretty clear on
[28:08]
what could happen and why we
[28:10]
were doing it. So I just, you
[28:11]
know, the residents of Tampa
[28:13]
Bay region and why this board
[28:15]
was created some 25 years ago
[28:17]
couldn't be more apparent.
[28:20]
So, I'm really just proud
[28:23]
of the effort by staff. They
[28:25]
really are the folks that made
[28:26]
this happen. And thank you for
[28:28]
your efforts as well and past
[28:29]
board members that were up here
[28:31]
when we did all this work.
[28:33]
So, thank you again.
[28:35]
>> Thank you. It's so much
[28:37]
easier to not do anything,
[28:38]
especially
[28:39]
with a difficult decision.
[28:40]
>> There was a lot of talk
[28:42]
about it when we were
[28:43]
considering.
[28:44]
>> So thank you again.
[28:46]
>> Yes, I just want
[28:47]
to thank you. You know,
[28:48]
there's something to say. Why
[28:49]
not do it? Can you imagine if
[28:52]
it wasn't done from this agency
[28:54]
or any other agency where we
[28:55]
would be in 10 years?
[28:57]
>> Yes, sir.
[28:59]
>> So, money isn't everything.
[29:01]
It's a cutting
[29:02]
off a period where all
[29:04]
of society would have been in
[29:05]
deep trouble if these things
[29:06]
keep on perpetuating itself
[29:08]
for many years to come. So,
[29:09]
for that, money comes
[29:11]
in common goals. But people
[29:12]
lives mean more than money.
[29:13]
So, thank you and everybody
[29:15]
in the staff who voted
[29:16]
for all this and thank
[29:17]
everybody in the audience who
[29:18]
participated. Thank you very
[29:19]
much.
[29:21]
>> Thank you, Councilman
[29:22]
Miranda.
[29:23]
>> Commissioner Mariano.
[29:24]
>> I just want to thank you for
[29:25]
bringing it forward and thanks
[29:26]
for your great work on it.
[29:28]
Thank you.
[29:29]
>> Thank you.
[29:30]
>> Thank you. All right,
[29:31]
great. Thank you. All right,
[29:33]
let's see where we are here.
[29:36]
Thanks. Oh, we probably ought
[29:39]
to do that a little more
[29:41]
ceremonially the next time.
[29:42]
>> I will keep it. I promise.
[29:45]
I'll make sure it gets to
[29:46]
Christina.
[29:47]
>> At this time, we are going
[29:48]
to move on
[29:49]
to our action items. We have
[29:51]
two this morning. The first
[29:52]
will be presented by Maribel
[29:54]
Medina, Planning and Projects
[29:55]
Director, and that is
[29:57]
in relation to the South
[29:59]
Hillsborough Pipeline Segment
[30:02]
A. Good morning.
[30:03]
>> Well, Good morning, Mr.
[30:04]
Chairman and members of the
[30:05]
Board. Today I will request
[30:07]
your approval
[30:08]
for agenda items C1, C2 and C3,
[30:09]
which are closely related and
[30:11]
pertain
[30:13]
to the construction phase
[30:15]
of the South Hillsborough
[30:17]
pipeline project. With a
[30:18]
clearly defined construction
[30:20]
strategy now in place,
[30:21]
we have negotiated a schedule,
[30:23]
scopes and fees with the
[30:25]
respective engineering teams
[30:27]
that are helping us
[30:28]
with this project
[30:29]
to support the phase that align
[30:31]
with that strategy.
[30:32]
Specifically, I will be
[30:34]
presenting and requesting
[30:36]
approval for the following: the
[30:37]
third amendment
[30:38]
to contract 2021-024 with
[30:41]
WestRim Inc., the second
[30:44]
amendment to contract 2021-025
[30:45]
with Stantec Consulting
[30:48]
Services, and work assignment
[30:50]
number three amendment
[30:51]
under contract 2022-001 with
[30:56]
Black & Veatch. But
[30:58]
before diving into the details
[30:59]
of these amendments,
[31:00]
I will begin
[31:02]
with a brief project update.
[31:04]
And as a reminder,
[31:06]
this pipeline will span about
[31:07]
26 miles and will have a
[31:09]
diameter of up to 60 inches.
[31:11]
It is assigned to deliver up
[31:13]
to 65 million gallons per day
[31:15]
to South Hillsborough County
[31:17]
and this map illustrates the
[31:19]
pipeline route. To date we have
[31:21]
completed several milestones
[31:25]
and have reached the 90% design
[31:27]
for the pipeline while we
[31:30]
continue property and permit
[31:31]
acquisition design
[31:33]
of the points of connection and
[31:35]
continue our public outreach
[31:37]
efforts.
[31:39]
On the public outreach. We have
[31:41]
just completed a public
[31:43]
engagement activity that was
[31:45]
required by Hillsborough
[31:46]
County. The County's Board
[31:48]
Policy 09010101 requires BOCC
[31:52]
approval
[31:54]
of temporary road closures
[31:55]
by a public entity that exceed
[31:57]
30 days in duration. This
[32:00]
policy also requires public
[32:02]
engagement at least 14 days
[32:04]
prior to the BOCC meeting at
[32:07]
which this item will be
[32:08]
considered. At the direction
[32:10]
of Hillsborough county staff,
[32:12]
we had an online engagement
[32:14]
from June 20th through July
[32:15]
18th, and we had
[32:18]
in person meetings last week,
[32:20]
July 15th through the 17th, and
[32:22]
this engagement opportunity was
[32:24]
extensively noticed
[32:26]
with direct mail postcards,
[32:28]
emails
[32:29]
to our email subscriber list,
[32:32]
Facebook ads, Facebook posts
[32:33]
that were shared and pick up
[32:36]
by the community,
[32:38]
and news articles and more.
[32:40]
The project requires a total
[32:42]
of 29 permits. Today we have
[32:44]
submitted nine permit
[32:46]
applications, including the two
[32:48]
major environmental permits.
[32:50]
So far we have received one
[32:52]
permit and the remaining eight
[32:54]
applications are currently
[32:56]
under review
[32:58]
by the regulatory agencies.
[33:00]
Now that we have reached the
[33:02]
90% design, the engineering
[33:04]
team is preparing 10 additional
[33:06]
permit applications and as we
[33:08]
approach the construction
[33:10]
phase, Garney, our construction
[33:13]
manager at risk,
[33:15]
will be responsible for
[33:17]
applying and obtaining the
[33:19]
final term permits needed
[33:20]
for construction. We remain
[33:23]
on schedule to obtain all the
[33:24]
critical path permits prior
[33:26]
to the start
[33:28]
of the construction activities.
[33:29]
In addition to that,
[33:32]
the project requires a total
[33:33]
of 218 temporary and permanent
[33:35]
utility easements. The left pie
[33:37]
chart shows the current status
[33:39]
of easements acquisition. We
[33:42]
have obtained 89 easements
[33:43]
which represent 41%
[33:46]
of the total easements needed.
[33:48]
112 easements have been
[33:50]
included in the eminent domain
[33:54]
resolutions that have been
[33:55]
approved by this board and as
[33:57]
of today, three
[33:59]
of those parcels have been
[34:00]
filed in court while we
[34:02]
continue negotiations
[34:03]
with the property owners. The
[34:05]
remaining 17 parcels are owned
[34:07]
by Hillsborough County, ELAP,
[34:10]
the Fish and Wildlife and TECO,
[34:12]
and the right chart displays
[34:14]
the expenditures today and the
[34:16]
remaining budget
[34:17]
for easement acquisition.
[34:19]
We're on schedule and
[34:21]
within budget to get all the
[34:23]
parcels and easements by the
[34:24]
time that we begin construction
[34:26]
activities and
[34:27]
to date we have spent 15% of
[34:29]
our property acquisition budget
[34:30]
on that 41%
[34:32]
of the closed easements. This
[34:35]
slide shows the project overall
[34:40]
schedule. Construction is
[34:42]
tentatively scheduled to begin
[34:43]
as early as this fall pending
[34:44]
the final design,
[34:46]
property acquisition and
[34:48]
permitting,
[34:50]
and we're expecting
[34:51]
to have this pipeline
[34:52]
in service in late 2028. This
[34:53]
is a detailed schedule for
[34:57]
construction phase pending
[34:59]
obtaining those necessary
[35:00]
permits. We will begin with
[35:02]
trenchless or tunneling
[35:04]
crossing operations
[35:06]
for segment A this fall,
[35:07]
followed by segment B
[35:10]
in the summer of 2026. Open cut
[35:13]
pipe installation is scheduled
[35:15]
to begin in the spring of 2026
[35:17]
and in general we will be
[35:19]
completing restoration
[35:21]
activities as we follow the
[35:23]
pipe installation. These
[35:26]
activities include surface
[35:27]
restoration and addressing any
[35:29]
immediate impacts. The points
[35:31]
of connections which we have
[35:34]
three of them and associated
[35:36]
construction activities will
[35:38]
also begin in the summer of
[35:39]
2026 and then we will be
[35:41]
completing pipeline flushing,
[35:43]
disinfection and commissioning
[35:45]
which is planned to be
[35:47]
in the fall of 2028. The final
[35:49]
restoration and construction
[35:50]
closeout phase will continue
[35:52]
from the fall of 2028
[35:54]
through the summer of 2029. In
[35:56]
this slide we can see the
[35:59]
complexity involved in
[36:04]
constructing the 26-mile
[36:06]
pipeline over a period
[36:08]
of more than 36 months. The
[36:11]
construction effort will
[36:12]
involve a team of over 130
[36:14]
personnel with up to nine crews
[36:16]
working simultaneously
[36:19]
across different locations
[36:21]
at any given time. Segment A
[36:23]
will be the most resource
[36:25]
intensive with four tunneling
[36:27]
crews and four open cut crews.
[36:29]
We will also have front end and
[36:33]
back end teams handling the
[36:35]
preparation and restoration
[36:37]
work. And we have in this
[36:39]
segment significant maintenance
[36:41]
of traffic. Coordination due
[36:43]
to its location and impacts
[36:44]
on the roadways. In Segment B,
[36:46]
while less intensive, will
[36:50]
still require two trenchless
[36:54]
tunneling crews and one open
[36:56]
cut crew support from front end
[36:58]
and back end teams and increase
[36:59]
attention to environmental
[37:03]
considerations throughout the
[37:05]
construction process. This
[37:07]
level of coordination
[37:09]
highlights the scale and
[37:11]
complexity of this project,
[37:12]
requiring careful planning,
[37:14]
sequencing,
[37:16]
management and communication
[37:18]
across all teams. I would like
[37:20]
to pause now and give you an
[37:22]
opportunity
[37:23]
to ask me any questions
[37:25]
before I move on
[37:26]
to the action items.
[37:28]
>> Commissioner Eggers.
[37:29]
>> Yeah. Thank you
[37:30]
for that summary. That's good
[37:31]
to kind of always go back and
[37:33]
visit and kind
[37:34]
of get some updates. One of the
[37:35]
most important things that we
[37:37]
do at Tampa Bay Water is manage
[37:39]
projects. So, we assign
[37:41]
experienced project managers
[37:43]
to this. And my understanding
[37:45]
is that we have perhaps gotten
[37:46]
a little thin in that area and
[37:48]
that we are using Black and
[37:52]
Veatch even more. So maybe you
[37:54]
could speak to that,
[37:56]
to the thought process behind
[37:58]
when we do that versus using
[38:00]
our own folks. And is there a
[38:04]
possibility of kind
[38:07]
of switching back
[38:09]
to our own personnel? So, thank
[38:10]
you.
[38:11]
>> Sure. Yes. That's one
[38:13]
of the key mandates of my
[38:14]
department and my division.
[38:16]
So, when we select project
[38:18]
managers, they're based
[38:19]
on the risk complexity
[38:21]
of each one
[38:23]
of these projects. We determine
[38:24]
that for this particular
[38:27]
project we need a really
[38:29]
seasoned and experienced
[38:31]
project manager that is able
[38:33]
to handle a half. This is half
[38:36]
a billion dollar project when
[38:37]
you account for all the cost,
[38:40]
including property acquisition
[38:42]
and design and construction
[38:44]
services. We have a multiple
[38:46]
consultants working
[38:48]
in this project. We have two
[38:49]
engineering firms. We have a
[38:51]
construction manager at risk
[38:54]
with multiple construction or
[38:56]
guarantee maximum packages
[38:58]
involved. And we have a complex
[39:00]
permitting strategy and
[39:03]
property acquisition. So, we
[39:05]
determined that we needed a
[39:07]
good and experienced candidate.
[39:09]
Although we do have really
[39:11]
talented team members
[39:15]
in my department.
[39:17]
>> How many? I'm sorry.
[39:18]
>> We have four project
[39:20]
managers. Well, sorry,
[39:21]
three project managers in my
[39:23]
team and we have two
[39:25]
construction managers
[39:27]
in my division.
[39:28]
>> And that's fully staffed
[39:29]
right now?
[39:30]
>> Fully staffed. I'm missing
[39:32]
one project manager.
[39:33]
>> Okay.
[39:34]
>> But we have a lot of capital
[39:36]
projects that are ongoing.
[39:37]
We're managing about 30
[39:39]
projects in addition
[39:40]
to the pipeline project. And we
[39:42]
needed somebody
[39:43]
with that capability
[39:45]
of handling this large,
[39:46]
complex project. That
[39:48]
individual from Black and
[39:49]
Veatch has been selected to
[39:50]
help me and the agency manage
[39:53]
these projects
[39:55]
through the closeout phase. We
[39:56]
did have one staff person a
[39:58]
year ago that left the agency
[40:00]
and had the experience
[40:01]
to manage this project. He
[40:03]
returned back home
[40:04]
in another state. And
[40:06]
unfortunately we have not been
[40:08]
able to find, to find a fit
[40:10]
that have that experience.
[40:13]
>> Okay. All right,
[40:15]
I appreciate that. And is
[40:16]
there, the added cost
[40:19]
to doing that included
[40:21]
in the original approval?
[40:24]
>> Absolutely. The project
[40:26]
includes, our budget is half a
[40:27]
billion dollars.
[40:29]
For the entire project we made,
[40:30]
we had budget line items for
[40:33]
program management and project
[40:34]
management and construction
[40:36]
management, support services.
[40:38]
And to date, we are forecasting
[40:40]
that we will spend less than 1%
[40:42]
for that role. That will be
[40:45]
supporting Tampa Bay water,
[40:46]
actually 0.67%.
[40:49]
>> Okay, so no additional funds
[40:50]
requested?
[40:51]
>> No. Not at this point.
[40:55]
>> Thank you. Appreciate the
[40:56]
detailed summary. Thanks.
[40:58]
Thank you.
[41:01]
>> Okay, Commissioner
[41:02]
Mariano.
[41:03]
>> So, looking at the easement
[41:04]
acquisition status with 85%
[41:06]
of the budget remaining,
[41:07]
is that just way ahead of what
[41:09]
you thought and it's gone much
[41:10]
better than you expected?
[41:11]
>> Well, as we. It's a good
[41:13]
observation that as we are
[41:14]
entering into the eminent
[41:15]
domain process,
[41:16]
we're expecting that we're
[41:18]
going to be burning that money
[41:19]
at a higher rate
[41:21]
for the remaining parcels. So
[41:22]
we still think that the budget
[41:24]
is sufficient to cover those
[41:26]
additional easements that will,
[41:27]
we'll be negotiating
[41:29]
with attorneys and
[41:30]
in court.
[41:32]
>> Okay, so you're not
[41:33]
optimistic that you'll have a
[41:34]
huge surplus there?
[41:35]
>> I'm going
[41:37]
to keep my fingers crossed,
[41:38]
yes.
[41:39]
>> All right. And I think, I
[41:41]
think your next slide's coming
[41:42]
up. You're going to show
[41:44]
construction costs are actually
[41:45]
higher than we expected,
[41:46]
so.
[41:47]
>> Well, so far we have
[41:48]
received two guarantee. We do
[41:50]
have approved two guarantee
[41:51]
maximum packages. GMP number
[41:52]
one was where we saw
[41:54]
significant savings when we
[41:55]
purchased the pipeline
[41:56]
materials almost a year ago.
[41:59]
And then the second GMP,
[42:01]
which was taken,
[42:03]
I believe earlier this year as
[42:04]
well, was for the tunneling and
[42:05]
trenchless operations that we
[42:07]
are planning to be beginning
[42:09]
October. We are currently
[42:10]
in the phase of advertise for
[42:11]
the third guarantee maximum
[42:14]
package, which is
[42:16]
for the open cut installation.
[42:18]
We will be back in October and
[42:20]
hopefully we are still
[42:22]
within budget. We have three
[42:24]
prospective bidders that will
[42:26]
be providing bids and we hope
[42:27]
to be within budget.
[42:30]
>> Thank you.
[42:32]
>> Okay, so this is C1. Why
[42:33]
don't we go ahead and have a
[42:36]
vote
[42:38]
on this and then we'll move on
[42:40]
to the next.
[42:41]
>> Sure. We're going
[42:42]
to brief two slides on C1.
[42:44]
So, C1 is
[42:45]
for the third amendment for
[42:47]
construction phase and design
[42:48]
services
[42:49]
to Wade Trim and Wade Trim
[42:51]
is the engineer of record
[42:53]
for segment A. And their scope
[42:55]
during the construction phase
[42:57]
includes the key service areas
[43:00]
shown in the slide. They will
[43:02]
provide construction oversight
[43:03]
services
[43:04]
for segment A activities.
[43:06]
They will provide engineering
[43:08]
services and inspection
[43:09]
services,
[43:11]
environmental support and
[43:12]
public involvement,
[43:14]
and will support the cathodic
[43:15]
protection, construction,
[43:18]
engineering services and
[43:19]
inspection of those corrosion
[43:20]
protection systems. And
[43:22]
in addition to that, we'll
[43:23]
support the project pipeline
[43:25]
portion of it
[43:27]
through the closed
[43:28]
out phase and verification
[43:30]
of any as built drawings. The
[43:32]
scope
[43:34]
of this segment is funded by
[43:35]
Tampa Bay Water. And we will
[43:37]
plan to request reimbursements
[43:38]
from the Southwest Florida
[43:40]
Water Management District. And
[43:41]
also we negotiated as part of
[43:44]
our amended joint project
[43:46]
agreement with Hillsborough
[43:48]
County, a scope of work to
[43:50]
design the jard piping
[43:53]
modifications that
[43:55]
Hillsborough County's Lithia
[43:57]
Water Treatment Plant will need
[43:59]
to receive the water from
[44:00]
pipeline segment A Wade Trim
[44:03]
will be providing the
[44:05]
engineering services
[44:06]
for design. And the scope is
[44:08]
highlighted on the slide. And
[44:10]
this is totally funded by
[44:12]
Hillsborough County. And
[44:15]
at this point, I'm ready
[44:16]
to request your approval
[44:17]
for C1.
[44:20]
>> Anything else
[44:21]
before we move forward?
[44:23]
>> Move approval.
[44:25]
>> Second.
[44:26]
>> We have a motion from
[44:27]
Commissioner Wostal seconded
[44:30]
by Councilwoman Hanewicz.
[44:32]
Please record your vote.
[44:41]
>> Mr. Chair, the motion passed
[44:42]
unanimously.
[44:44]
>> Okay, thank you very much.
[44:45]
We will move on now
[44:46]
to item C2.
[44:48]
>> All right, so agenda item C2
[44:51]
is for the corresponding scope
[44:53]
of work
[44:55]
for engineering services
[44:56]
for construction
[44:57]
for segment B, which is going
[44:59]
to be provided by the engineer
[45:01]
of record, Stantec. And this
[45:03]
scope is very similar to the
[45:05]
scope that I highlighted
[45:07]
earlier today
[45:08]
for Wade Trim. And this scope
[45:10]
will be totally funded by
[45:11]
Hillsborough County. And
[45:12]
with that,
[45:14]
staff requests approval
[45:15]
for the Second Amendment of
[45:16]
Stantec in the amount of $6.9
[45:18]
million.
[45:21]
>> Move approval.
[45:22]
>> Second.
[45:23]
>> We have a motion from
[45:24]
Commissioner Mariano, seconded
[45:26]
by Commissioner Wostal.
[45:28]
>> It was me.
[45:30]
>> Oh, excuse me. It was
[45:31]
Commissioner Eggers. I'm sorry.
[45:33]
>> We sound alike. --
[45:38]
>> I'm honored that you all
[45:40]
want to support for my
[45:43]
>> There we go. There we go. All
[45:44]
right,
[45:45]
please record your vote.
[45:48]
>> Mr. Chair. And the motion
[45:49]
passed unanimously.
[45:50]
>> All righty. And item number
[45:51]
C3.
[45:52]
>> Okay, so the final agenda,
[45:53]
item C3 is
[45:55]
for the third amendment
[45:56]
of work assignment number three
[45:58]
for both program and project
[46:00]
management services to Black
[46:01]
and Veatch. And as I briefly
[46:03]
touched on earlier today,
[46:05]
Black and Veatch has been
[46:07]
supporting the Tampa Bay water
[46:08]
team through their integrated
[46:10]
program management contract.
[46:12]
Their services continue
[46:13]
to be a key to the success
[46:15]
of this pipeline project. The
[46:16]
additional scope includes
[46:18]
program management and
[46:20]
coordination. Black and Veatch
[46:22]
would also continue to serve as
[46:23]
our owner's advisor. And they
[46:25]
will also provide staff
[46:27]
augmentation services to cover
[46:28]
construction management and
[46:30]
project management
[46:31]
for this project. This
[46:33]
amendment is only
[46:34]
for the first 12 months
[46:36]
starting this August. And we
[46:38]
anticipate, as we burn out the
[46:40]
money and see how things go,
[46:41]
to come back for future
[46:43]
amendments and request
[46:44]
additional funds as needed.
[46:47]
The scope of work for this
[46:48]
particular work scope is being
[46:51]
funded by both Tampa Bay Water
[46:54]
and Hillsborough County and any
[46:56]
reimbursements that we receive
[46:57]
from the Southwest Florida
[46:59]
Water Management District. And
[47:00]
with that,
[47:02]
staff requests approval
[47:03]
for this Third Amendment
[47:05]
to work assignment number three
[47:07]
with Black and Veatch.
[47:08]
>> Okay, thank you,
[47:10]
Commissioner Eggers.
[47:11]
>> One clarifying question back
[47:13]
on the project manager. Be
[47:14]
quick. So, the staff that we
[47:16]
have,
[47:17]
the one that we're looking
[47:18]
to replace, one of those
[47:20]
positions would give us that
[47:21]
ability to do projects
[47:23]
like this normally.
[47:24]
>> Correct.
[47:26]
>> But because we had one
[47:27]
person leave,
[47:29]
we didn't have the level
[47:30]
of expertise
[47:32]
for a project this size.
[47:33]
>> Correct. And it's very
[47:34]
difficult to find a project
[47:35]
person that have that level
[47:37]
of experience as well.
[47:38]
>> Yeah. Perfect. Thank you.
[47:40]
Appreciate it.
[47:42]
>> Move approval.
[47:43]
>> Second.
[47:45]
>> Okay. We have a motion
[47:46]
from Commissioner Wostal.
[47:48]
Commissioner Mariano, is that
[47:49]
you seconding it?
[47:50]
>> No, it was. It was you,
[47:52]
Commissioner Eggers.
[47:54]
>> You know, sorry. We're going
[47:56]
to let you do the next one,
[47:58]
so mess them up. All right.
[48:00]
Please record your vote.
[48:05]
>> Mr. Chair, the motion passed
[48:06]
unanimously.
[48:07]
>> All right,
[48:08]
thank you very much. We are
[48:09]
going to move on now to Item C4
[48:10]
and Michelle Stum.
[48:19]
>> Good morning, Mr. Chair.
[48:21]
Members of the board, I'm
[48:22]
Michelle Stum, your chief of
[48:23]
staff and chief strategy
[48:25]
officer. Item C4 is a request
[48:26]
for approval for the firm
[48:27]
to perform the agency's 2025
[48:29]
performance audit and
[48:31]
management study. The
[48:34]
interlocal agreement requires
[48:35]
that the agency conduct a
[48:37]
performance audit and
[48:38]
management study every five
[48:39]
years. This is an important
[48:41]
project because it gives the
[48:42]
agency the opportunity
[48:44]
to have a national firm look at
[48:45]
our programs and our governance
[48:47]
and offer us recommendations,
[48:50]
let us know what we're doing
[48:52]
well and what maybe we could do
[48:54]
better. The last performance
[48:55]
audit was completed in 2020.
[48:56]
The recommendations for that
[48:59]
audit have been reported
[49:01]
to the board as task updates on
[49:02]
the consent agenda regularly
[49:04]
and
[49:06]
through the annual presentation
[49:07]
on strategic plan progress.
[49:09]
In March, the agency advertised
[49:11]
a request for proposals
[49:12]
for firms
[49:14]
to perform the audit and study.
[49:15]
We received nine submissions,
[49:17]
and a selection committee
[49:18]
comprised of agency staff
[49:20]
scored and selected Baker
[49:22]
Tilly Advisory Group LP as the
[49:23]
top ranked firm
[49:25]
to perform the audit. Staff
[49:27]
subsequently negotiated a final
[49:29]
scope and fee,
[49:30]
which is attached
[49:31]
to your agenda item. I'd now
[49:33]
like to introduce Caitlin
[49:34]
Humrickhouse, a principal
[49:36]
with Baker Tilly, to provide
[49:37]
some additional details
[49:39]
on the firm and its approach
[49:40]
to this project.
[49:46]
>> Good morning, Mr.
[49:47]
Chairman. Members
[49:49]
of the board. So, Baker Tilly
[49:50]
is a national professional
[49:52]
services firm. We have about
[49:53]
11,000 employees nationwide and
[49:55]
my team in particular works
[49:57]
in the public sector. So,
[49:59]
at any given time we have
[50:01]
about 2,500 Utility Special
[50:02]
District Energy clients and
[50:04]
another 3,000 city county
[50:06]
government clients. We
[50:09]
specialize
[50:10]
in management consulting. So,
[50:11]
process improvement,
[50:13]
organizational design,
[50:14]
strategy, projects like Just
[50:16]
like this. We've done a number
[50:17]
of management studies
[50:18]
across the country for those
[50:21]
in the water industry. So, I'll
[50:22]
go a little bit into the scope
[50:24]
of what we plan to do. We are
[50:26]
going to couch our analysis in
[50:27]
the EPA's effective utility
[50:30]
management framework as updated
[50:32]
in 2024. So, it looks at 10 key
[50:34]
areas of operations and then
[50:36]
five overarching principles
[50:38]
related to leadership,
[50:41]
continuous improvement. And so,
[50:43]
as we go
[50:45]
through our analysis,
[50:46]
we'll be using different types
[50:47]
of benchmarks,
[50:49]
metrics associated with that
[50:50]
framework as applicable
[50:52]
to your organization. So, I
[50:53]
won't go through these, but
[50:55]
this is a little bit more
[50:56]
detail of each of those
[50:57]
different areas that we will be
[50:59]
looking at. Our project
[51:00]
approach goes through six key
[51:02]
activities which I'll go
[51:03]
through in detail
[51:05]
on the next slide.
[51:06]
But you know, we really sort
[51:07]
of start with some in depth
[51:08]
project management all the way
[51:10]
through reporting and lots
[51:12]
of feedback in between. So, our
[51:13]
first activity is to assemble
[51:15]
the project steering committee.
[51:17]
We plan to include individuals
[51:18]
from multiple levels
[51:21]
of the organization. We feel
[51:22]
like we get really rich
[51:24]
feedback on our deliverables
[51:25]
from your team when we do that.
[51:27]
And it also gives people a
[51:30]
chance to step up
[51:31]
in an important project
[51:32]
like this
[51:34]
into a leadership capacity.
[51:35]
We'll be finalizing our work
[51:37]
plan and schedule and issuing,
[51:38]
asking the staff
[51:40]
for information in order
[51:41]
to complete our study. So, any
[51:42]
types
[51:44]
of plans or reports you have,
[51:45]
data that you have in place and
[51:46]
we'll establish a regular
[51:48]
status reporting schedule.
[51:50]
Then we go into sort
[51:52]
of the meat of the project
[51:53]
which is really looking
[51:55]
at that data, obtaining input.
[51:56]
So, we'll be doing lots
[51:58]
of data analysis. We'll issue
[51:59]
an employee survey
[52:01]
to get feedback. We'll also be
[52:02]
doing in person interviews and
[52:04]
focus groups,
[52:05]
including interviews
[52:07]
with members
[52:08]
of the board and members
[52:09]
of your member government,
[52:11]
representatives
[52:12]
from your member governments.
[52:14]
And then what we do is we
[52:15]
document our initial
[52:16]
observations. So, sort
[52:18]
of our first take
[52:19]
at what are we seeing
[52:20]
in the data,
[52:22]
what are we hearing
[52:23]
from our interviews and sort
[52:24]
of giving the opportunity
[52:25]
for the steering committee
[52:26]
to give us feedback on those.
[52:28]
Then we go into peer
[52:29]
benchmarking and best practices
[52:30]
research. So we will establish
[52:31]
a group
[52:32]
of benchmark agencies. We
[52:34]
like that to be a mix of best
[52:35]
in class and then people that
[52:38]
are, you know, organizations
[52:39]
that are comparable
[52:40]
to you. I always like to say,
[52:42]
just because someone looks
[52:43]
like you on paper doesn't mean
[52:44]
they're doing things the right
[52:45]
way necessarily. So, we like to
[52:47]
make sure we're including the
[52:49]
best of the best
[52:50]
around the country. And then we
[52:52]
do a lot of industry analysis
[52:53]
and best practice research
[52:54]
pulling in from AWWA and other
[52:56]
industry associations. Then we
[52:58]
get into, you can think
[53:00]
of this as a gap analysis.
[53:01]
So, we understand, we have a
[53:03]
really good understanding
[53:04]
of your current operations,
[53:05]
we have a great understanding
[53:07]
of the industry and the peers.
[53:08]
And then we're saying, where
[53:09]
are the gaps that we're seeing?
[53:10]
Either where you're ahead
[53:11]
of that gap,
[53:13]
you're doing something best
[53:14]
in class, or there's an area
[53:15]
for you to improve. We couch
[53:17]
all of that
[53:18]
in as much data as we can,
[53:19]
as much feedback as we can,
[53:21]
and we're looking here
[53:22]
at things
[53:23]
like what is the effectiveness
[53:24]
of your processes? Where are
[53:26]
you using technology
[53:27]
appropriately
[53:28]
to support your operations? Do
[53:30]
you have any challenges with
[53:31]
succession and workforce
[53:33]
planning? What is the risk?
[53:34]
What are certain risks to the
[53:36]
organization that you should be
[53:37]
aware of? Again, we're getting
[53:39]
feedback throughout
[53:40]
from the steering committee
[53:42]
on that. And then we go
[53:44]
into preparing a draft report.
[53:45]
So that's, you know,
[53:47]
including everything we've done
[53:49]
for the project. We'll get
[53:50]
feedback
[53:51]
on that and then we'll go into
[53:52]
presenting the final report.
[53:54]
And I imagine that final report
[53:56]
will be presented
[53:57]
to this group as well.
[53:59]
After that, we prepare what we
[54:00]
call an implementation action
[54:01]
plan. So that is basically a,
[54:03]
to implement these
[54:05]
recommendations. Here's the
[54:06]
step by step,
[54:07]
here's who's accountable. We
[54:08]
want these to be implemented
[54:10]
after we leave and our project
[54:11]
is done so that you can
[54:13]
implement the change you need
[54:15]
in your organization. We
[54:16]
anticipate starting this month
[54:19]
if the project is approved with
[54:21]
a kickoff call and then going
[54:23]
through February. So you would
[54:26]
have that implementation action
[54:28]
plan and final report in
[54:29]
February. And that is it
[54:31]
for me.
[54:36]
>> Okay, thank you, Caitlin.
[54:38]
With that staff recommends
[54:39]
approval of the contract with
[54:40]
Baker Tilly Advisory Group
[54:42]
in a not to exceed amount of
[54:44]
125,000 to perform the 2025
[54:46]
performance audit and
[54:49]
management study.
[54:50]
>> Commissioner Mariano?
[54:52]
>> Yeah. When I first was
[54:53]
reading this,
[54:55]
I was a little suspect to it,
[54:56]
but actually I
[54:57]
like the fact that we want
[54:58]
to take a look at ourselves,
[55:00]
go see what we're doing
[55:01]
in there. You know,
[55:02]
the question we talk about,
[55:03]
are we contracting, setting up?
[55:04]
I think it's a good idea.
[55:06]
>> You know, I agree with you.
[55:07]
I think it's a really smart
[55:09]
thing to always be evaluating
[55:10]
ourselves and making sure that
[55:12]
our processes are up
[55:13]
to snuff.
[55:17]
>> So move.
[55:18]
>> Second.
[55:19]
>> Okay, who else? Anyone else
[55:21]
want to talk before
[55:24]
>> I do.
[55:25]
>> Yes, Commissioner Eggers.
[55:26]
>> It wasn't,
[55:27]
I don't think he said.
[55:29]
>> Oh, okay. I haven't said who
[55:30]
yet.
[55:31]
>> I haven't said who yet.
[55:32]
>> Yeah, well, yeah, you have.
[55:34]
>> I don't even know. I just
[55:35]
anticipate.
[55:37]
>> I think this is extremely
[55:39]
important project. And when I
[55:40]
came on board in 2015, an audit
[55:42]
had been finished. And
[55:44]
subsequent
[55:45]
to that we had a lot
[55:46]
of issues,
[55:47]
not only that were brought
[55:49]
forward,
[55:50]
but that weren't being
[55:51]
addressed in a timely manner.
[55:52]
And that was more
[55:54]
about the top leadership
[55:55]
at the time. And then
[55:57]
subsequently
[55:59]
to that the projects got done.
[56:01]
The communication was perfect.
[56:03]
So, I really commend staff for
[56:04]
all the work that they did and
[56:06]
I want
[56:08]
to separate those comments out.
[56:09]
But this is extremely important
[56:11]
and it is. It is important
[56:13]
to be timely, it's important
[56:14]
to be critical. It's important
[56:16]
for us to take that criticism
[56:18]
and improve on it. And was your
[56:21]
organization been a part of the
[56:23]
last bidding process or not?
[56:25]
Okay, well, good to have you
[56:27]
on board. Look forward
[56:29]
to that. Have you had a chance
[56:30]
to look
[56:32]
at the last audit yet? Okay.
[56:34]
Any general comments
[56:35]
on that or are you going
[56:37]
to reserve that? I mean, I'd
[56:39]
like to just hear your
[56:40]
thoughts.
[56:41]
>> I thought it was very
[56:42]
thorough. I think what you'll
[56:45]
find in ours is you might see a
[56:46]
little bit more data and
[56:48]
advisory components. So, we
[56:50]
tend to be a little bit more
[56:53]
forward looking of.
[56:54]
For example, we'll do a five
[56:56]
year retirement analysis
[56:57]
to let you know what percentage
[56:58]
of your workforce is eligible
[57:00]
to retire
[57:01]
in the next five years.
[57:02]
>> None. Well, kidding.
[57:05]
>> Yeah, well, that would be
[57:06]
wonderful if that was the case,
[57:08]
you know. So, we'll do a little
[57:09]
bit more forward thinking
[57:10]
things like that. I think
[57:11]
you'll see that come through
[57:13]
in our report.
[57:14]
But I thought it was well done.
[57:15]
And I think the part as I was
[57:16]
actually preparing to bid
[57:18]
on this project, I went through
[57:19]
and I did. I could see very
[57:21]
clearly where your team had
[57:22]
addressed some of the findings
[57:24]
in that report,
[57:25]
where staff had addressed them.
[57:27]
And I was very impressed
[57:28]
at the level of transparency
[57:30]
there because you don't always
[57:32]
see that. So, I thought that
[57:34]
really stuck out to me about
[57:36]
you as an organization.
[57:38]
>> Well, the baton is yours now
[57:39]
and that transparency is
[57:40]
because
[57:42]
of the leader that we have down
[57:43]
here and the staff that we
[57:44]
have. So, I really appreciate
[57:46]
that. Look forward
[57:47]
to your work.
[57:48]
>> Thank you.
[57:49]
>> Chair.
[57:50]
>> Yes, Ms. Hanewicz.
[57:51]
>> I just was going to say,
[57:52]
you know,
[57:53]
sometimes when you have these
[57:54]
studies, some employees get
[57:56]
very apprehensive about it.
[57:57]
And look, we do it in the city
[57:59]
of St. Petersburg. City
[58:00]
Council can actually pick
[58:01]
different departments to act
[58:03]
to decide. Okay, we need
[58:04]
to do a management study. And
[58:06]
it's always a great thing.
[58:07]
Good things always come
[58:10]
from the management studies
[58:12]
in terms of resources that are
[58:13]
maybe necessary changes that
[58:15]
may be needed. And it's really
[58:17]
for the best with everyone.
[58:18]
So, I just wanted
[58:20]
to throw that out there,
[58:21]
that I agree
[58:23]
with everyone else. These are
[58:24]
always good. And so,
[58:25]
I'm very excited
[58:27]
to see what the results are.
[58:28]
Thank you, Chair.
[58:29]
>> Okay, now I believe the
[58:30]
motion was from Councilman
[58:31]
Miranda, who was the second?
[58:34]
>> Me. Oh, no.
[58:37]
>> Commissioner Mariano is the
[58:38]
second.
[58:40]
>> I don't think I can do a
[58:43]
third on this.
[58:47]
>> She can have it. Sorry.
[58:48]
>> All right,
[58:50]
please record your vote.
[58:55]
>> Mr. Chair, the motion passed
[58:56]
unanimously.
[58:57]
>> Thank you very much. We have
[58:59]
two presentations this morning.
[59:00]
The first is going
[59:02]
to be our rotation
[59:05]
of utility departments. And
[59:07]
today the city of Tampa is here
[59:09]
and Rory Jones from the water
[59:11]
department will give the
[59:13]
presentation. Good morning.
[59:16]
>> Good morning. I'm Rory
[59:17]
Jones with the city of Tampa
[59:19]
Water Department. Always
[59:21]
appreciate the chance
[59:22]
to share what we've got going
[59:23]
on over in Tampa. We have some
[59:25]
exciting projects we'd like
[59:26]
to highlight along
[59:27]
with a short video. And
[59:29]
like many of you,
[59:31]
we're juggling pipes, progress
[59:33]
and public expectations all
[59:36]
along the way. So, I'll try
[59:37]
to keep this brief and real.
[59:40]
You know, we have a large
[59:44]
footprint, 220 square miles and
[59:46]
a service population greater
[59:49]
than 725,000 people that rely
[59:50]
on us daily. We manage over
[59:52]
2,200 miles of pipe that range
[59:54]
in size from 2 to 54 inch. And
[59:56]
we're working hard to maintain
[59:59]
an ageing system that requires
[1:00:02]
proactive investments, pipes,
[1:00:04]
funding and bonds,
[1:00:07]
and long-term planning. We have
[1:00:10]
a one central treatment plant,
[1:00:13]
the David L. Water Treatment
[1:00:19]
Facility. It has recently or
[1:00:20]
getting ready
[1:00:22]
to hit the 100-year mark. And
[1:00:23]
believe it or not,
[1:00:25]
we have some
[1:00:26]
of those components still
[1:00:28]
in play today. Originally, this
[1:00:29]
was designed for a $7.6
[1:00:31]
million, 7.6 million gallons
[1:00:33]
per day facility. Although our
[1:00:35]
source water hasn't changed,
[1:00:39]
this campus has drastically
[1:00:40]
changed
[1:00:41]
over the last hundred years.
[1:00:43]
Today we draw 82 million
[1:00:44]
gallons per day on average.
[1:00:50]
And
[1:00:52]
with the regional partnership
[1:00:53]
of Tampa Bay Water, along with
[1:00:54]
our aquifer storage recovery
[1:00:55]
system, we're serving. Well,
[1:00:57]
more than that. Our
[1:00:58]
distribution is a mix of
[1:01:01]
elevated and ground storage
[1:01:03]
tanks and strategic locations.
[1:01:04]
You know, we have four ground
[1:01:06]
storage tanks and three
[1:01:08]
different pumping stations and
[1:01:09]
a couple
[1:01:10]
of elevated storage tanks.
[1:01:12]
Also, we have two interconnects
[1:01:14]
with Tampa Bay water and we're
[1:01:16]
grateful to have that
[1:01:17]
flexibility and resiliency
[1:01:18]
you've built
[1:01:20]
into our toolbox here. One of
[1:01:22]
our most recent projects is
[1:01:23]
wanted to highlight. Here is
[1:01:26]
our high surface pump station
[1:01:27]
project. We've added eight new
[1:01:29]
pumps, 140 million gallons per
[1:01:30]
day capacity and it now
[1:01:32]
includes a new chlorine contact
[1:01:35]
chamber. And we were able to
[1:01:38]
completely rehabilitate all our
[1:01:40]
clear wells. This was a
[1:01:42]
critical step for us in
[1:01:44]
improving our reliability and
[1:01:46]
resiliency. We've got a quick
[1:01:48]
video to show you here that
[1:01:50]
highlights the order of
[1:01:51]
magnitude and really the scale
[1:01:54]
does a good job
[1:01:56]
of humanizing these projects.
[1:01:58]
This was a project that was
[1:02:00]
just over $100 million. And
[1:02:02]
we're very pleased
[1:02:03]
with the product that Jacob's
[1:02:05]
design build team delivered
[1:02:07]
for us. There is some audio
[1:02:09]
with this if you wouldn't
[1:02:19]
mins. Someone's controlling
[1:02:20]
behind the scenes. Give me a
[1:02:21]
second here.
[1:02:28]
[VIDEO PLAYING]
[1:05:29]
>> We've got a
[1:05:30]
couple other projects we want
[1:05:32]
to highlight. We have our
[1:05:33]
chemical system improvements
[1:05:34]
project where we are
[1:05:36]
implementing hypochlorite
[1:05:37]
generators on site.
[1:05:38]
Essentially this is a low
[1:05:40]
strength bleach, a little less
[1:05:42]
than what you can buy at
[1:05:43]
Publix. This is going to give
[1:05:45]
us a safer facility and we're
[1:05:46]
going to rely less
[1:05:48]
on chemical deliveries
[1:05:49]
to continue delivering water.
[1:05:52]
Another is our filter
[1:05:53]
improvements. We're adding
[1:05:55]
additional 20 mgd
[1:05:57]
of capacity. These upgrades
[1:05:58]
will provide critical
[1:06:01]
redundancy and are part of our
[1:06:02]
long-term capacity planning.
[1:06:04]
Construction started this year
[1:06:07]
and is expected
[1:06:08]
to be completed in 2027. We do
[1:06:13]
have some challenges though,
[1:06:15]
and I think this is common
[1:06:16]
across all our work here. We,
[1:06:18]
like many others, are
[1:06:20]
experiencing significant
[1:06:22]
increases
[1:06:23]
in construction costs, in many
[1:06:25]
cases more than doubling,
[1:06:27]
especially with our pipeline.
[1:06:28]
These cost pressures are real
[1:06:30]
and force us
[1:06:31]
to rethink schedules,
[1:06:32]
scopes and delivery methods.
[1:06:34]
So, a couple years ago,
[1:06:36]
to help offset some
[1:06:38]
of these costs, we developed a
[1:06:40]
conservative business case
[1:06:42]
for our own construction crew.
[1:06:44]
The team structure equipment,
[1:06:46]
compared actual numbers to
[1:06:49]
projected rates and ultimately
[1:06:51]
received approvals
[1:06:53]
from our leadership and
[1:06:54]
from our council. So we started
[1:06:57]
first by hiring a great team.
[1:06:59]
It starts with that we ordered
[1:07:01]
equipment built, temporary
[1:07:04]
construction yards and
[1:07:06]
construction trailers and we
[1:07:08]
got to work. And their results
[1:07:11]
are impressive. You know, the
[1:07:14]
projects are completed faster
[1:07:19]
and significantly lower cost.
[1:07:21]
Matter of fact, we are seeing
[1:07:23]
roughly 70% savings compared
[1:07:25]
to a more traditional approach.
[1:07:27]
And today we've saved over
[1:07:30]
$1.4 million. And there's
[1:07:33]
opportunities to expand this
[1:07:35]
further and each this continues
[1:07:36]
to rise. So what's next
[1:07:39]
for us? We've got some major
[1:07:41]
capital work underway.
[1:07:43]
Suspended ion exchange is
[1:07:45]
going. We're going to start the
[1:07:47]
design this year and we're
[1:07:49]
going to shoehorn that
[1:07:51]
into our campus there. Now, we
[1:07:52]
are currently negotiating GMP
[1:07:55]
for a new raw water intake and
[1:07:57]
a new and rehabilitated ozone
[1:07:58]
system as well as site wide
[1:08:02]
electrical improvements where
[1:08:04]
we're going to modernize our
[1:08:07]
electrical delivery system and
[1:08:09]
add some, some generators. We
[1:08:10]
have some master plan updates
[1:08:12]
across distribution,
[1:08:15]
treatment and
[1:08:16]
in our resource planning. And
[1:08:17]
with that I will wrap it up.
[1:08:20]
You know, we're grateful for
[1:08:21]
the support and partnership
[1:08:24]
that we have with Tampa Bay
[1:08:25]
Water and each
[1:08:27]
of the member governments. We
[1:08:28]
recognize our unique position
[1:08:29]
and remain committed
[1:08:31]
to a regional collaboration.
[1:08:32]
We appreciate the relationship
[1:08:34]
we built with the team. Thank
[1:08:35]
you.
[1:08:37]
>> Thank you. Any questions or
[1:08:40]
comments? Commissioner
[1:08:41]
Eggers.
[1:08:43]
>> First of all, I just want
[1:08:44]
to say congratulations on that
[1:08:45]
commitment a few years back to
[1:08:47]
doing what you're doing today
[1:08:48]
and
[1:08:49]
for your continuing commitment
[1:08:52]
to Tampa Bay Water. I know when
[1:08:53]
I first got on the board there
[1:08:55]
was a little more acrimony
[1:08:57]
between some of the partners.
[1:08:58]
And I can't thank the city and
[1:09:00]
the staff and the leadership
[1:09:02]
for that continued commitment.
[1:09:06]
It's really, really important
[1:09:07]
that we all work together at
[1:09:09]
Tampa Bay Water. Really commend
[1:09:11]
you for that work. And I know
[1:09:12]
that distribution challenge is
[1:09:14]
just over the top when you get
[1:09:16]
that old of a system. So
[1:09:17]
anyway, good work. Appreciate
[1:09:19]
your presentation today. Thank
[1:09:21]
you.
[1:09:22]
>> Commissioner Mariano.
[1:09:24]
>> What a great project. Great
[1:09:25]
engineering. Question
[1:09:26]
for you, the Howard Curren
[1:09:28]
plant, is that with the City
[1:09:29]
of Tampa?
[1:09:30]
>> It is with the City of
[1:09:31]
Tampa. That's our wastewater
[1:09:32]
department.
[1:09:33]
>> Okay. Later on
[1:09:35]
in committee reports, I want
[1:09:36]
to talk a little bit more
[1:09:37]
about the Howard Curren plant,
[1:09:39]
Oldsmar Largo, and what's going
[1:09:40]
on in old Tampa Bay. I've got
[1:09:42]
some ideas. I think there's
[1:09:43]
something we can look at,
[1:09:44]
especially hearing what we
[1:09:46]
heard from our attorney,
[1:09:47]
talking about how we went
[1:09:48]
after something to make
[1:09:50]
something better. I won't hold
[1:09:51]
you up for that one.
[1:09:52]
>> Thank you, guys.
[1:09:54]
>> Councilman Miranda.
[1:09:56]
>> Thank you, Mr. Cohen,
[1:09:57]
Chairman. I just want
[1:09:58]
to thank the whole City Tampa
[1:10:00]
government, the mayor,
[1:10:01]
the city council, and Brad
[1:10:02]
Baer, your super department
[1:10:03]
head, yourself, for thinking
[1:10:05]
outside the box and doing
[1:10:06]
things today that were really
[1:10:07]
needed yesterday and taking the
[1:10:09]
step forward to make sure
[1:10:10]
everything is done right
[1:10:11]
at a lesser cost
[1:10:12]
by doing it yourself. Thank you
[1:10:13]
very much.
[1:10:15]
>> Thank you, Councilwoman
[1:10:16]
Hanewicz.
[1:10:17]
>> Thank you, Chair. And thank
[1:10:18]
you for all the work. Look,
[1:10:19]
in the city of St.
[1:10:21]
Petersburg, just like we all,
[1:10:22]
we all have the investments
[1:10:23]
that we need
[1:10:25]
in our wastewater systems. And
[1:10:26]
our water systems and all the
[1:10:28]
infrastructure. And a lot
[1:10:30]
of times I feel for you all
[1:10:32]
because it's never enough money
[1:10:33]
and you really do a great job
[1:10:35]
with trying
[1:10:38]
to maximize what you do with
[1:10:40]
the money that you have. I see,
[1:10:42]
when I look at the challenges
[1:10:45]
and I see the cost per mile
[1:10:47]
of pipe installed doubled in
[1:10:49]
2022 and then
[1:10:52]
>> Just continue to rise.
[1:10:53]
>> It's continuing to rise and
[1:10:55]
that is a huge challenge
[1:10:57]
because when you did a plan
[1:10:59]
which was back in 2019 or
[1:11:01]
whatever, and there was a plan
[1:11:02]
to pay for all, you know, all
[1:11:04]
these costs and infrastructure
[1:11:05]
and then this comes
[1:11:07]
in and it doubles. And so I
[1:11:09]
just want to put out there.
[1:11:11]
It's always very challenging
[1:11:12]
when it comes to making sure
[1:11:14]
that we upgrade our
[1:11:16]
infrastructure, but that you
[1:11:18]
all are really doing a great
[1:11:20]
job and trying
[1:11:21]
to do the best you can with
[1:11:22]
what you have and the resources
[1:11:24]
you have to give the level of
[1:11:25]
service that your constituents
[1:11:27]
are looking for.
[1:11:29]
>> Thank you.
[1:11:31]
>> Well, I just want to thank
[1:11:32]
you and I know that you owe
[1:11:34]
everything to past Tampa city
[1:11:35]
councils,
[1:11:38]
that that made it all possible.
[1:11:40]
So. But again, no,
[1:11:42]
in all seriousness,
[1:11:43]
congratulations because this,
[1:11:45]
this represents an awful lot
[1:11:47]
of hard work.
[1:11:48]
>> None of these could happened
[1:11:49]
without that proactive
[1:11:51]
investment. Thank you.
[1:11:56]
>> Kidding. Kidding.
[1:11:57]
>> Of course you are.
[1:11:59]
>> South Hillsborough County
[1:12:00]
Program update.
[1:12:06]
>> Okay. Agenda item D2 the
[1:12:07]
South Hills is for our South
[1:12:09]
Hillsborough County program and
[1:12:11]
is a status report. This agenda
[1:12:13]
item is for informational
[1:12:14]
purposes only and no action
[1:12:16]
will be requested today. As a
[1:12:17]
reminder, the South
[1:12:20]
Hillsborough County program is
[1:12:22]
a multi-approach initiative
[1:12:24]
designed to meet the demands
[1:12:26]
of South Hillsborough county
[1:12:27]
and the program includes three
[1:12:29]
major areas. The first one is
[1:12:31]
water supply management, water
[1:12:32]
conservation and infrastructure
[1:12:34]
projects. We have worked to
[1:12:38]
maximize our existing
[1:12:39]
infrastructure
[1:12:41]
by increasing the south-central
[1:12:43]
Hillsborough regional well
[1:12:44]
field permit limit. The permit
[1:12:46]
limit was increased by 850,000
[1:12:48]
gallons per day back in July
[1:12:49]
2022 and as the general manager
[1:12:52]
indicated earlier today,
[1:12:55]
it will be increased to 26.92
[1:12:57]
million per day by October this
[1:13:01]
year. Staff continues
[1:13:03]
to work closely with
[1:13:05]
Hillsborough County staff
[1:13:07]
on demand management actions
[1:13:09]
to educate the public and how
[1:13:12]
to use water responsibly. The
[1:13:13]
county helps to promote our
[1:13:15]
Tampa Bay water wise rebate
[1:13:16]
program and educate their
[1:13:19]
customers on water restrictions
[1:13:20]
and best landscape and
[1:13:22]
irrigation practices. And the
[1:13:24]
water management district issue
[1:13:26]
outdoor activities restrictions
[1:13:29]
last year to help us get
[1:13:31]
through a very dry time and
[1:13:34]
demands back then were greatly
[1:13:36]
reduced with their help.
[1:13:38]
Infrastructure projects are the
[1:13:41]
major component
[1:13:42]
of this program. The stars on
[1:13:44]
this map shows the general
[1:13:45]
location of the projects. Under
[1:13:47]
this program we have completed
[1:13:50]
three projects all of which
[1:13:52]
have increased the delivery
[1:13:54]
capacity in the in this area of
[1:13:55]
the county and as presented
[1:13:57]
earlier today
[1:13:59]
with agenda items C1
[1:14:00]
through C3, we continue
[1:14:02]
to work on the South Hills
[1:14:03]
Water Pipeline Project and
[1:14:05]
staff has been working
[1:14:06]
on getting ready
[1:14:08]
to request your approval
[1:14:09]
in a future Board meeting
[1:14:11]
to move forward with the
[1:14:12]
South Hillsborough well field
[1:14:14]
project. The South Hillsborough
[1:14:16]
well field is a new water
[1:14:18]
supply project that was
[1:14:19]
shortlisted in both the 2018
[1:14:23]
and the 2023 Master Water Plan
[1:14:26]
updates. The feasibility study
[1:14:28]
for this project was completed
[1:14:30]
back in 2021 and this new well
[1:14:32]
field will include eight
[1:14:34]
production wells and could
[1:14:36]
yield between 6 to 12 million
[1:14:39]
gallons per day as early as
[1:14:41]
2030. The project will require
[1:14:44]
ozone treatment
[1:14:46]
for the removal
[1:14:47]
of hydrogen sulfide, about 4
[1:14:49]
miles of collection mains,
[1:14:51]
a new point of connection
[1:14:53]
with Hillsborough County and we
[1:14:56]
are estimating capital costs
[1:14:58]
for these projects to be
[1:15:00]
about 126 to 160 million
[1:15:02]
dollars. Part
[1:15:04]
of the quantities
[1:15:05]
of this well field will come up
[1:15:07]
from our acquisition
[1:15:09]
of water use permits. The
[1:15:10]
Board may recall that it
[1:15:12]
previously approved staff to
[1:15:14]
acquire five water use permits
[1:15:15]
from five parcels owned by
[1:15:17]
Land Reserve and Farmland
[1:15:19]
Preserve. The capacity is
[1:15:21]
estimated to be 3.9 to 5.9
[1:15:25]
million gallons per day and we
[1:15:27]
are currently working
[1:15:28]
on a permit application
[1:15:30]
to transfer these quantities
[1:15:33]
to this location just like the
[1:15:36]
other permits we have purchased
[1:15:37]
and transferred. 10%
[1:15:39]
of the impacts from the donor
[1:15:40]
permit will go back
[1:15:42]
to the environment as part of
[1:15:43]
the transfer and those permits
[1:15:45]
plus the aquifer credits we
[1:15:47]
hope to acquire from
[1:15:49]
Hillsborough County will be
[1:15:51]
used for the South
[1:15:52]
Hillsborough well field if
[1:15:54]
approved by the Board
[1:15:55]
in the upcoming months. The
[1:15:57]
proposed well field will be
[1:15:58]
located at the ACMAR property
[1:16:00]
in the Balm area of South
[1:16:02]
Hillsborough County. This map
[1:16:04]
shows the proposed well field
[1:16:06]
layout. The western portion
[1:16:08]
of the ACMAR parcel is owned
[1:16:10]
by the Environmental Lands
[1:16:12]
Acquisition and Protection
[1:16:13]
Program of Hillsborough County
[1:16:15]
and the parcel is now known as
[1:16:17]
the Stacy R. White Nature
[1:16:20]
Preserve and wells 1 through 4
[1:16:22]
will be located in this area.
[1:16:24]
Well number five is our test
[1:16:27]
well which is shown
[1:16:29]
in the upper left corner
[1:16:32]
of this graphic and Wells 6
[1:16:34]
through 8 and the associated
[1:16:36]
water treatment facility will
[1:16:37]
be located
[1:16:39]
in the eastern portion
[1:16:42]
of the parcel. This well and
[1:16:44]
water treatment plant will be
[1:16:46]
co located with Hillsborough
[1:16:48]
County South Drinking Water
[1:16:50]
Facility and next
[1:16:52]
to the new BOEM point
[1:16:53]
of connection associated
[1:16:55]
with the South Hillsborough
[1:16:56]
Pipeline project. At the
[1:16:58]
April Board meeting I provided
[1:17:00]
an outline
[1:17:01]
of the upcoming war actions
[1:17:03]
for the potential new South
[1:17:05]
Hills Water well field and
[1:17:06]
these include approval
[1:17:08]
of an agreement with ELAP and
[1:17:10]
Hillsborough County Water
[1:17:12]
Resources Department to acquire
[1:17:13]
well sites and easements
[1:17:15]
on the ELAP owned part
[1:17:17]
of the ACMAR property
[1:17:19]
in exchange
[1:17:20]
for water development rights
[1:17:22]
on the former Cone Ranch well
[1:17:24]
field. This agreement will
[1:17:25]
include the four well sites,
[1:17:27]
associated collection main
[1:17:30]
easements and access. And
[1:17:31]
to date the county Department
[1:17:33]
of Real Estate has developed
[1:17:36]
the draft documents which are
[1:17:37]
undergoing their internal
[1:17:39]
review and soon will be shared
[1:17:41]
with our team
[1:17:43]
for our own review. Also, we
[1:17:44]
will work on the acquisition
[1:17:46]
of property from the Water
[1:17:48]
Resources Department
[1:17:50]
for the construction of the
[1:17:51]
three well sites and the water
[1:17:53]
treatment facility. And we
[1:17:54]
continue to work
[1:17:56]
with county staff
[1:17:57]
on a long-term agreement
[1:17:59]
for aquifer recharge
[1:18:01]
along the coast
[1:18:02]
to support the issuance
[1:18:04]
of a freshwater use permit
[1:18:06]
at this well field location. To
[1:18:07]
date we have drafted a term
[1:18:09]
sheet and county staff is
[1:18:11]
currently reviewing it. We have
[1:18:14]
a public meeting coming up on
[1:18:16]
August 5th at the South Shore
[1:18:18]
Regional Library and we
[1:18:20]
anticipate returning back
[1:18:22]
to this board
[1:18:24]
to request approval for early
[1:18:26]
implementation later this year.
[1:18:27]
And finally, we will proceed to
[1:18:29]
negotiate a joint project
[1:18:31]
agreement with Hillsborough
[1:18:33]
County where the county will
[1:18:34]
construct some
[1:18:36]
of the components
[1:18:37]
of this project. This is the
[1:18:39]
timeline for these upcoming
[1:18:41]
board actions. We will be back
[1:18:42]
late this summer
[1:18:44]
to request your approval
[1:18:45]
for the Cone Run exchange for
[1:18:47]
the ELAB own parcel easement's
[1:18:49]
rights. In late 2025 or early
[1:18:50]
2026, we will be requesting
[1:18:54]
approval
[1:18:56]
for a long-term agreement for
[1:18:57]
the reclaimed water recharge
[1:18:59]
and a joint project agreement
[1:19:02]
with the county. And finally,
[1:19:04]
we will return back
[1:19:05]
to request approval
[1:19:07]
for the acquisition
[1:19:08]
of the property
[1:19:10]
in the water resources parcel.
[1:19:11]
And this concludes my brief
[1:19:13]
presentation. I will be happy
[1:19:14]
to take any questions.
[1:19:16]
>> Any questions.
[1:19:17]
Commissioner Mariano.
[1:19:18]
>> Could you explain exactly
[1:19:19]
what the reclaim water credits
[1:19:21]
are and how that works?
[1:19:23]
>> Yes. So, you may not
[1:19:24]
remember, but I will try
[1:19:27]
to explain it back in when we
[1:19:29]
conducted the feasibility study
[1:19:31]
for this potential well field,
[1:19:33]
we contemplating needing a
[1:19:35]
water use permit
[1:19:38]
in the southern portion of
[1:19:41]
Hillsborough County relying
[1:19:43]
on the injection
[1:19:44]
of reclaimed water
[1:19:46]
in the county's south
[1:19:49]
Hillsborough County recharge
[1:19:51]
program. Basically, the
[1:19:52]
injection of reclaimed water
[1:19:54]
by the county five miles
[1:19:55]
along the coast in
[1:19:57]
Hillsborough County will
[1:19:59]
provide a net benefit for us
[1:20:01]
to pull water, fresh water
[1:20:03]
in this location in
[1:20:04]
Hillsborough County and obtain
[1:20:07]
up to 6 million gallons
[1:20:09]
of fresh water from their
[1:20:11]
reclaimed water injection,
[1:20:14]
which could be 10 million
[1:20:16]
gallons per day
[1:20:18]
of reclaimed water injected
[1:20:19]
in the aquifer.
[1:20:20]
>> Right. And if you,
[1:20:21]
if that did come up for,
[1:20:22]
I would have voted
[1:20:23]
against that. So not a fan
[1:20:25]
of that, but I just wanted
[1:20:27]
to understand the credits.
[1:20:28]
>> Okay.
[1:20:29]
>> So, that explains that.
[1:20:30]
Thank you.
[1:20:32]
>> Okay.
[1:20:33]
>> Anyone else? Commissioner
[1:20:34]
Eggers.
[1:20:36]
>> I think as we go forward,
[1:20:38]
that whole idea of injecting
[1:20:40]
reclaimed water just anywhere
[1:20:41]
is different than what we're
[1:20:43]
talking about here. I mean,
[1:20:45]
this is along the coastline.
[1:20:46]
It helps keep the saltwater
[1:20:48]
intrusion and there's a lot
[1:20:50]
of benefits
[1:20:52]
to that and benefits of
[1:20:53]
utilizing excessive reclaimed
[1:20:56]
water that would otherwise go
[1:20:59]
into the bay at this point.
[1:21:00]
So, I think it's a great
[1:21:02]
project. What I, you know,
[1:21:04]
continue to. Since
[1:21:06]
Hillsborough has all the
[1:21:08]
growth, it's easy for somebody
[1:21:09]
from Pinellas to ask, you know,
[1:21:11]
the critical challenges, but I
[1:21:12]
really hope that we're able to
[1:21:14]
work that reasonable agreement
[1:21:16]
on those credits, the costs of
[1:21:19]
that system so that we can do
[1:21:22]
this project. I think this is
[1:21:24]
an exciting project, has real
[1:21:26]
potential, less capital cost
[1:21:28]
than others might. So, I mean,
[1:21:33]
I know we've got capital costs.
[1:21:35]
I'm not saying that, but I
[1:21:36]
think this is a really great
[1:21:38]
opportunity and really
[1:21:39]
appreciate the work and the
[1:21:41]
summary. But I think
[1:21:42]
along the way, if we can have
[1:21:44]
maybe some little tutorials
[1:21:45]
for all of us, reminders about
[1:21:48]
the different technologies that
[1:21:49]
we're talking about,
[1:21:51]
I think it helps put things
[1:21:53]
in perspective, or not,
[1:21:54]
depending. But thank you.
[1:21:56]
Appreciate all the work.
[1:22:01]
>> Thank you very much. And I
[1:22:02]
agree about this is very much a
[1:22:03]
saltwater intrusion program.
[1:22:05]
So perhaps we could,
[1:22:07]
we could talk about that again
[1:22:09]
at some point.
[1:22:11]
At this point we are going
[1:22:13]
to move on to other
[1:22:14]
administrative matters, old
[1:22:16]
business and any new business.
[1:22:18]
If there's anyone that has
[1:22:20]
anything before we move on
[1:22:22]
to receive and file.
[1:22:23]
Commissioner Mariano.
[1:22:25]
>> So, I've got several points,
[1:22:26]
so bear with me,
[1:22:27]
but it's something I want
[1:22:29]
to talk about a big,
[1:22:30]
big thought
[1:22:31]
about the whole region
[1:22:32]
from a high level. First
[1:22:34]
question I have is, we asked
[1:22:35]
like we have a lot of wells
[1:22:37]
in Pasco county
[1:22:38]
along the coast that we've
[1:22:40]
like capped, taken
[1:22:41]
over and have it used. I asked
[1:22:42]
Chuck to go
[1:22:44]
through and he was going
[1:22:45]
to look at, not only that,
[1:22:46]
but then he was going to look
[1:22:49]
at other wells up and down the
[1:22:50]
coast as well. I wonder if we
[1:22:52]
get any update on that.
[1:22:53]
Chuck.
[1:22:54]
>> Yes, again, Warren's taking
[1:22:55]
the lead. He's met with them
[1:22:57]
and we're currently compiling a
[1:22:58]
list
[1:23:00]
of the inventory that you have,
[1:23:03]
and I believe you've enlisted a
[1:23:05]
consultant to help and if you
[1:23:07]
have anything,
[1:23:09]
you can color it.
[1:23:11]
>> We're looking
[1:23:13]
at comprehensively
[1:23:15]
across the county at permits
[1:23:17]
and wells that are owned
[1:23:19]
by the county for public supply
[1:23:20]
as well as other entities other
[1:23:21]
than the county. When we do
[1:23:24]
that, we'll find out the water
[1:23:25]
used the permit quantities and
[1:23:27]
compile that database. Sit and
[1:23:29]
meet with your staff to find
[1:23:31]
out where those systems are
[1:23:34]
with respect
[1:23:36]
to your and our systems. And
[1:23:38]
for those that are logical,
[1:23:39]
we would work
[1:23:40]
on acquisition agreements
[1:23:41]
to bring back. There's a real
[1:23:43]
potential that we could harvest
[1:23:45]
some of those quantities. Some
[1:23:47]
may be unused quantities
[1:23:49]
for consolidation
[1:23:51]
in our current, current permits
[1:23:53]
and use our existing
[1:23:54]
infrastructure and pipeline
[1:23:57]
system to bring a cost benefit
[1:23:59]
for the region.
[1:24:01]
>> Okay, so again, waiting
[1:24:02]
for that, but should go on.
[1:24:03]
All right. You know, years ago
[1:24:05]
we had the BP's consortium
[1:24:06]
settlement where Florida was
[1:24:09]
very smart about having 23
[1:24:11]
counties take over it. So, a
[1:24:13]
lot of the money went back
[1:24:15]
locally directly
[1:24:16]
to the state,
[1:24:17]
to the counties, at least on
[1:24:18]
the part one money and state
[1:24:20]
expenditure plan. We had
[1:24:21]
control over that, too, with
[1:24:22]
putting a plan together where
[1:24:24]
the county got the money direct
[1:24:25]
instead of going
[1:24:26]
through the state.
[1:24:28]
But there's a giant pot that's
[1:24:29]
out there called pot 2 that's
[1:24:30]
out there currently,
[1:24:32]
if you look at it
[1:24:34]
from what I'm hearing
[1:24:36]
from just coming
[1:24:37]
from a NACO conference,
[1:24:38]
that a lot
[1:24:40]
of the money that's being spent
[1:24:41]
along the coast,
[1:24:42]
it should be the big coastal
[1:24:43]
areas, Texas, Louisiana and
[1:24:45]
Florida. And being that we have
[1:24:46]
that,
[1:24:47]
we should be looking heavily
[1:24:49]
to go after that money. You
[1:24:50]
know, beaches, fishing, number
[1:24:53]
one,
[1:24:55]
tourist development things in
[1:24:56]
Florida. I don't know if you
[1:24:57]
guys know, but in Okaloosa
[1:24:59]
County, we had a consortium
[1:25:00]
meeting up there in August and
[1:25:02]
July. They have the largest
[1:25:03]
tourist development numbers
[1:25:05]
because of that. And I know as
[1:25:06]
we check our coast,
[1:25:07]
especially Pinellas County, the
[1:25:09]
beaches are critical
[1:25:10]
to what's going to go on. The
[1:25:12]
image that's out there. There
[1:25:13]
was a presentation from
[1:25:15]
Governor DeSantis coming down
[1:25:17]
to the environmental conference
[1:25:20]
that was just down on Marco
[1:25:21]
Island. And that conference was
[1:25:23]
all
[1:25:24]
about how much they're spending
[1:25:26]
in South Florida
[1:25:27]
to protect local Okeechobee,
[1:25:29]
the Everglades, like $500
[1:25:30]
million a year
[1:25:32]
with different projects. Part
[1:25:33]
of it is to take the
[1:25:35]
Kissimmee River and do
[1:25:37]
treatment there. Part of it's
[1:25:38]
to take the two side rows going
[1:25:39]
east west that go out that,
[1:25:41]
you know, we cause a lot
[1:25:43]
of algae bloom down
[1:25:44]
to the south. So, if they're
[1:25:47]
going to spend,
[1:25:48]
and this is federally backed as
[1:25:50]
well,
[1:25:51]
it was a big accomplishment
[1:25:52]
to get it funded with the
[1:25:54]
Trump administration. Make it
[1:25:55]
happen. And having that happen
[1:25:57]
is kind of eye opening. How
[1:25:58]
much money is out there that I
[1:26:00]
think we should be looking
[1:26:01]
at a big project? Now, the
[1:26:03]
project that was just mentioned
[1:26:04]
here, we talked about looking
[1:26:06]
at probably reclaimed water
[1:26:08]
lines running out there. And
[1:26:09]
when we've got the old Tampa
[1:26:11]
Bay that was doing great
[1:26:13]
replenishing seagrass
[1:26:14]
for a while,
[1:26:16]
we should really look
[1:26:17]
at a project to take. There's
[1:26:19]
at least two cities in the
[1:26:20]
Howard Curren plant that are
[1:26:22]
putting money into that bay.
[1:26:24]
So, it's not just one thing.
[1:26:26]
And there may be more. And I
[1:26:27]
sit in the estuary project,
[1:26:28]
the estuary program,
[1:26:30]
actually chair
[1:26:31]
of it this year, even though
[1:26:32]
Pasco County's probably got the
[1:26:34]
least impact to the estuary.
[1:26:37]
But I think we should work
[1:26:39]
with the estuary. Let's go
[1:26:40]
study the issue and find out
[1:26:41]
how we can take those reclaimed
[1:26:43]
water things. And whether it be
[1:26:44]
from the BP pot money too, or
[1:26:45]
from the feds to say Tampa Bay
[1:26:47]
is very important,
[1:26:48]
that we want
[1:26:50]
to protect our bay,
[1:26:51]
and here's the way we need help
[1:26:52]
to get it done, I don't think.
[1:26:54]
I think it's just as important.
[1:26:55]
It is for, let's say Miami is
[1:26:56]
for this region to have Tampa
[1:26:58]
Bay thriving,
[1:26:59]
because as water goes out,
[1:27:00]
the cleaner it is, it's going
[1:27:01]
to keep algae bloom down and
[1:27:03]
keep our beaches clean. We
[1:27:05]
don't have to worry about. Do
[1:27:06]
we have a notice coming up. So
[1:27:07]
I'd like to see Tampa Bay water
[1:27:09]
work
[1:27:10]
with the estuary directly,
[1:27:12]
with Swift Mud and the Army
[1:27:13]
Corps as well, to kind of find
[1:27:15]
out what can we go do
[1:27:16]
to make it. And as
[1:27:18]
Hillsborough is expanding down
[1:27:20]
to the south with all that, the
[1:27:21]
more reclaimed water you guys
[1:27:23]
can put in lines, the better
[1:27:24]
off you'll be as far as being
[1:27:26]
able to move that water less
[1:27:28]
expensively than going, let's
[1:27:29]
say, up to Pasco, where I think
[1:27:31]
we could probably take a huge
[1:27:32]
chunk
[1:27:34]
of reclaimed water up there.
[1:27:35]
We had a gas plant that we put
[1:27:37]
up in an area that actually
[1:27:38]
used a lot
[1:27:40]
of our reclaimed water,
[1:27:41]
which we didn't anticipate.
[1:27:43]
So, we've really got
[1:27:44]
overcapacity
[1:27:45]
of pipes up there.
[1:27:46]
But I think it'd be great
[1:27:47]
to take a look
[1:27:48]
at all that that's out there.
[1:27:49]
There's a federal impetus
[1:27:51]
about water, and especially
[1:27:52]
in Florida, I think it's a good
[1:27:53]
opportunity for us
[1:27:54]
to start a conversation.
[1:27:57]
>> Commissioner Wostal.
[1:27:59]
>> I think that that's a great
[1:28:00]
segue for me to say that.
[1:28:02]
>> I would support any future
[1:28:04]
item to use tourism dollars to
[1:28:06]
protect our water rather than
[1:28:07]
subsidize rich people
[1:28:09]
in their expensive stadiums.
[1:28:10]
Thank you.
[1:28:16]
>> I want to supply my water,
[1:28:17]
but I'm going
[1:28:18]
to protect it also
[1:28:20]
from everyone,
[1:28:22]
including reclaim.
[1:28:25]
>> Okay, is there any other
[1:28:28]
business
[1:28:30]
before we entertain a motion
[1:28:31]
to receive and file?
[1:28:33]
>> Yes.
[1:28:34]
>> No. Just move approval
[1:28:36]
of receiving file.
[1:28:37]
>> We have a motion from
[1:28:39]
Councilwoman Hanewicz.
[1:28:40]
Seconded by Commissioner
[1:28:41]
Eggers, I believe. Please
[1:28:43]
record your vote.
[1:28:54]
>> Motion passed unanimously.
[1:28:56]
>> All righty,
[1:28:57]
our next meeting will be
[1:29:00]
Monday, Aug. 18, at 9:30am and
[1:29:03]
until then, have a good rest
[1:29:04]
of the summer.