[4:10] invite our community to participate. And

[4:12] so it's going to

[4:20] be a kidled uh market. As a matter of

[4:24] fact, one of our students uh homeschool

[4:26] students will be putting this event

[4:28] together. So, I'm here to get it going.

[4:30] I make you aware, but this student will

[4:33] be in charge of organizing it, dealing

[4:35] with our vendors and our if we if he

[4:39] decides to get sponsors or house,

[4:42] whatever he decides to do, the event

[4:44] will be put together by one of our uh

[4:46] the marketing as well by one of our

[4:48] students. So, I just wanted to make you

[4:50] aware of it because we're super excited.

[4:53] And we hope as you see it's that

[4:56] annual young entrepreneurs because we're

[5:00] homeschoolers but I do foresee it being

[5:03] open to just any young entrepreneurs in

[5:05] our city because we have participated in

[5:08] other children's market and it's just a

[5:11] super neat experience for children to be

[5:14] able to um promote their gifts, talents

[5:17] and it's it's very neat. So I think it's

[5:20] something that we really a lot of life

[5:23] to uh to our city. So, I'm excited about

[5:25] this. That's all I have for you. Thank

[5:27] you.

[5:35] » At this time, reports about community uh

[5:37] items of interest on which no action

[5:39] will be taken may be given to the public

[5:41] for chapter 551.0415

[5:44] of the government code. I know I don't

[5:48] see her normally lean on her. Uh we're

[5:50] having our chamber banquet um

[5:53] not this Friday but the next I'm not

[5:55] sure that date but it's going to be a

[5:57] week from Friday the 17th. Okay. Uh and

[6:00] that will be I believe at the Oasis over

[6:02] in Hartland. And so uh that's been a

[6:05] good event and uh if you are interested

[6:08] uh you can buy a table or come be a part

[6:10] of that. It should be a good night. Um

[6:14] I'm trying to think what else. David,

[6:15] can you think of anything the city has

[6:17] going coming up?

[6:24] » Okay.

[6:34] Anyone else? Anyone else have

[6:36] anything as far as community community

[6:39] interest?

[6:39] >> Yeah,

[6:42] you know, grass and weeds are starting

[6:44] to

[6:45] bring up neighbors helping neighbors.

[6:47] Yeah, you or anybody else in need of

[6:49] assistance mowing your yard, taking care

[6:51] of uh around your house, please reach

[6:54] out to Jason Brooks or the city or

[6:57] myself and we'll see what we can do to

[7:00] help you out there.

[7:02] Anyone else have anything?

[7:05] Okay, we'll move on to item number five,

[7:07] communications from mayor and council.

[7:09] uh receive council member requests for

[7:11] future agenda items, current and future

[7:13] items of community interest and other

[7:15] items of interest regarding the city of

[7:16] Crannle. Uh this is where if you would

[7:18] like to have an next agenda um for our

[7:22] meeting on May 20th, I'm sorry, April

[7:24] 20th, now would be the time to ask for

[7:26] that. So, did anyone have anything this

[7:28] evening?

[7:29] >> I have a few.

[7:30] >> Okay.

[7:32] start out with I was over at River Ridge

[7:35] at their new houses in that edition uh

[7:38] where they have their model homes. They

[7:40] have one empty lot that they would like

[7:42] to make a temporary parking lot. It kind

[7:44] of it's really dangerous pulling up down

[7:46] that street.

[7:49] Like to look see if we can award that or

[7:51] if not get it on the next

[8:00] And I would like uh

[8:03] I'd like to get requests that we look

[8:05] into time clocks for city hall and for

[8:09] our city employees like police

[8:10] department and stuff like that. So what

[8:12] the cost of that would be just to help

[8:15] out with tracking time.

[8:18] And then uh I'd also like to go ahead

[8:22] and request that we schedule for May 4th

[8:25] in executive session for our city uh

[8:28] managers uh quarterly review. Don't

[8:32] think we set that up yet. And I also

[8:34] would like to see if we can get the 360

[8:37] review out before that.

[8:43] And then also in that uh

[8:46] in that same executive sess, I would

[8:49] just like to put some on there for uh

[8:51] something about employee communications

[8:54] with the council.

[8:59] And then lastly, um our concrete gutters

[9:03] that we put in at the drainage, it's

[9:05] time to clean them. We can get that

[9:07] done.

[9:18] Okay,

[9:19] very good. We'll move on to item number

[9:20] six, updates and discussion by the city

[9:23] manager or staff. I'll have our city

[9:24] manager walk us through that.

[9:44] There you go. So, um the first update

[9:47] that I have for you tonight is

[9:53] if we can go to the next slide. There

[9:54] you go. Thank you. So, um I on our

[9:58] efforts on acquiring or applying for

[10:00] grants for the city. Uh we have applied

[10:04] for uh

[10:06] is just a a sample of what what we are

[10:09] trying to uh bring to the city. Uh the

[10:13] first one is so the earmark from our

[10:15] congressman I know that we attempted to

[10:18] apply for this last year and uh we were

[10:20] not successful but this year uh

[10:22] congressman has accepted our request is

[10:26] not what we were requesting last last

[10:28] year. Uh so congressman has accepted a

[10:30] request for an earmark of two and a $2.5

[10:33] million for the force main project. Now

[10:35] what this means is that now the

[10:37] congressman is going to go fight for for

[10:39] the city of Kandle to be able to get

[10:41] this approved uh through a review

[10:43] committee uh at a at a federal level. So

[10:47] um that is uh where that is. This is a

[10:50] great step in the right direction and uh

[10:52] we're very excited for this. This is

[10:54] going to help us get that uh uh lift

[10:57] station enforcement uh implemented and cons and constructed for to allow

[11:02] for are uh the expansion of the sewer

[11:04] capacity for the city. The next grant is

[11:08] the Texas Water uh development board

[11:11] clean water grant. This is a uh a

[11:15] request for $1.2 million. And we

[11:19] submitted this grant, completed the

[11:20] application. It was a very lengthy

[11:22] application. Uh we have made it through

[11:25] some steps in the grant process. Uh by

[11:27] this point 80% of the applications have

[11:30] been either kicked out or denied. So

[11:33] we're in the 20th percentile. So uh

[11:36] we're going to keep pushing forward and

[11:39] hopefully uh we'll be able to get this

[11:40] additional funding. This is also um we

[11:45] will utilize these funds to uh

[11:46] contribute the building of a force main

[11:49] and lift station. Um we have also

[11:51] applied for an EPA water tech grant. Uh

[11:54] EPA has accepted a request for

[11:56] assistance on the force main project. Uh

[11:58] what EPA is going to do for the city is

[12:00] going to fully fund the pre-engineering

[12:03] all the way up to the design phase uh

[12:05] and environmental for the project and

[12:08] there is no matching contribution for

[12:10] this. So the engineering and the

[12:12] environmental all that cost four

[12:15] $500,000 then the EPA will cover it uh

[12:18] 100%.

[12:19] Um, we've we have also applied for a

[12:22] cyber security grant. Uh, we submitted

[12:24] the application. They came back and

[12:26] asked for additional information. We

[12:28] receive uh some help from our IT uh

[12:31] person that we contract for the city and

[12:34] we answer all of their questions. So, at

[12:36] this point, we're just waiting to hear

[12:37] back. For this grant, we applied for

[12:39] $56,000. This one does have a matching

[12:42] contribution, which I believe, if I

[12:43] remember correctly, is about $15,000,

[12:46] but it's definitely worth it. This is

[12:47] going to help us secure the city u from

[12:51] ransomware attacks and just be able to

[12:54] avoid that. I've lived through a cyber

[12:56] attack at another city where I've worked

[12:58] and I do not wish that on anybody. It

[12:59] was a nightmare. Um and the last one is

[13:03] uh also a Texas Waterboard grant and

[13:05] this is to replace asbestous water

[13:08] lines. The city has requested $2.7

[13:10] million and we're also waiting to hear

[13:12] back. This is one that I'm hopeful that

[13:14] uh they'll be able to approve for for

[13:16] the city.

[13:19] Um and that is the up now. Um this last

[13:22] week, I believe it was LA last week, we

[13:24] had the opportunity to meet with Texot

[13:27] and a few other uh stakeholders in the

[13:29] community to discuss the service roads

[13:31] going in one direction.

[13:34] Basically the point that we were trying

[13:35] to make is that if we make boat boat

[13:37] service roads go in one direction it

[13:40] will create a traffic jam uh at the

[13:43] intersection of 148 and 175. So we were

[13:46] looking for alternatives to be able to

[13:48] leave at the very least a section going

[13:51] two-way. So this is what text that and

[13:54] the city and the other stakeholders have

[13:57] agreed and this is how

[13:59] and I'm going to try to describe this uh

[14:02] very uh carefully for uh the people that

[14:04] are not seeing me point this this laser.

[14:07] So the north service road 175 this

[14:11] service road is going to stay is going

[14:13] to go one way. This is going to be

[14:15] switched uh the time from Texas probably

[14:18] this summer. Uh the one thing that we

[14:20] did request is that we try and do it

[14:22] when school is not in in in session.

[14:24] That way they have time to educate the

[14:26] parents. And so this line uh orange line

[14:31] all the way up to here is going to go in

[14:33] one direction. The blue dotted line is

[14:36] going to remain two-way on the south

[14:39] side. So it will be from uh 748.

[14:45] This section of the service road will

[14:47] remain

[14:49] And this is just this will ensure that

[14:52] citizens uh and just people who drive

[14:54] through Crannle have another way in and

[14:57] out of the city to avoid uh traffic

[15:00] congestion.

[15:03] Yes.

[15:05] Maybe prior to this happening,

[15:08] you know, if this is going to happen

[15:10] this summer, we need to start getting

[15:11] the word out now. Uh either through

[15:14] social media, through the city's

[15:17] website.

[15:18] So we don't take a lot of people by

[15:19] surprise. So

[15:22] >> I mean I start start the learning

[15:25] process now

[15:27] process

[15:28] >> and uh that is a discussion that we had

[15:29] with uh text. Text will help advertise

[15:33] this and uh it will be a collaborative

[15:34] effort between text the city the school

[15:36] district uh even our police department.

[15:39] We will advertise this change before it

[15:41] happens. And uh

[15:42] >> I mean even to the point of sending

[15:44] stuff home through the students to the

[15:46] parents and maybe we can reach out to

[15:48] the school district see if they could

[15:50] help.

[15:50] >> Yes. Yeah. We will definitely make sure

[15:52] we make a big communicate out this out

[15:55] to the the citizens

[16:01] » once the bypass was open and it went one

[16:02] way they would do do a traffic. That's

[16:04] my question too. That's what's

[16:06] >> So that is a great question and tax do

[16:09] in order from what we were told at the

[16:12] last meeting that we had in order for

[16:13] them to be able to add turn uh uh stop

[16:16] lights signals uh they need to have turn

[16:19] lanes. Uh they can only add those if

[16:21] there are turn lanes. Now at the

[16:23] intersection of 148 and 175 there's a

[16:26] developer that is taking on the

[16:28] financial burden to add which that comes

[16:32] with uh traffic traffic lights and uh

[16:36] we're hoping that Texas will approve or

[16:39] bless their proposal and their design so

[16:42] that we can get u stop lightss at that

[16:45] intersection.

[16:50] majority of the accidents at that yield

[16:52] sign. Yes.

[16:53] >> But there's still plenty of accidents at

[16:54] yield sign on this side and we're

[16:56] leaving it two direction. So

[16:57] >> yeah,

[17:02] » at some point when Eagle Crest Eagle

[17:04] Crest Parkway is actually built that bottom side will flip one way, but

[17:09] you just can't have everybody on the

[17:10] south side of town

[17:11] >> Yeah.

[17:12] >> not be able to get onto that 741 bridge.

[17:15] Uh

[17:16] >> so that's that's the reason for leaving

[17:18] it two-way.

[17:20] and stop lights would alleviate some of

[17:22] that traffic.

[17:25] >> Very good. Yes,

[17:26] >> the inconsistency.

[17:29] >> Yeah.

[17:33] If we can go to the next stop

[17:35] forever.

[17:38] >> Okay. And to give you an update on the

[17:39] audit, uh the audit is nearly completed.

[17:42] We're wrapping up the last few details

[17:45] and items. Um the expectation is to have

[17:50] this presented or for the auditor to

[17:52] come out and present their findings on

[17:54] the April 20th agenda or upcoming

[17:57] council agenda and it will be the same

[18:00] as last year. So I am uh I wanted to um

[18:04] praise our staff who have been working

[18:06] diligently. I know uh Miss Karen has

[18:09] just joined the city in the last three

[18:11] four months and she's taken on a big

[18:13] task uh taking on the audit and it's uh

[18:16] it's I know because I went through it

[18:18] last year and I know how much work work

[18:20] it is and uh she's been uh amazing at uh

[18:23] she's require very little to no help uh

[18:26] to be able to get it completed and

[18:28] forward for the auditors to come uh the

[18:30] next council meeting so that we can put

[18:32] it to rest and switch gears into budget.

[18:37] I would like to extend an invitation to

[18:39] all of council. Um there is a a uh Texas

[18:43] municipal town that will take place on

[18:46] May 21st and 22nd uh in Bassrop. I had

[18:51] the opportunity to attend the small uh

[18:53] city conference TML conference. It's not

[18:55] like anywhere near close as the big TML

[18:59] conference that happens in October. Um

[19:01] this is forations

[19:04] of 15,000 or less. I attended

[19:08] last year and it was a great experience.

[19:11] I I could relate better to those

[19:14] attending. Uh it was mostly elected

[19:16] officials. I'm going to be honest

[19:18] because some of these towns uh they

[19:19] don't have a staff like we do in

[19:21] inrandle

[19:23] and uh just hearing their stories and

[19:25] you know some of the struggles that some of their growing pains that they're

[19:29] going through uh they're going to sound

[19:31] very familiar if if you guys have the

[19:33] opportunity to uh attend this u so I

[19:36] just wanted to extend the invitation to

[19:38] everybody this is a great uh conference

[19:40] to to attend they have great speakers

[19:42] too um I do have uh well before I move

[19:46] to uh my last two items. Do you guys

[19:49] Does the council have any questions or

[19:51] comments uh on anything that I presented

[19:53] so far?

[19:57] >> Very good. And uh the mayor bit me to

[19:59] it. So I did have an update uh to remind

[20:02] everybody about the uh uh Crandle

[20:05] Chamber of Commerce uh banquet. So it

[20:08] will be on Friday uh April 17th at 6:30

[20:11] at the Oasis in Hartland. I hope uh we

[20:13] can see you all there. if you wouldn't

[20:15] mind just confirming your attendance

[20:17] with Miss Aberina so that uh we know how

[20:21] many seats we need to purchase. Um you

[20:24] can bring your significant other. Uh

[20:26] everybody's uh and the council is

[20:28] welcome to attend. And I also want to uh

[20:32] give our new public director an

[20:34] opportunity.

[20:36] Today was his first day. So this has

[20:38] been a marathon for him since he got

[20:40] here in the morning and and he has to

[20:41] stay for council meeting. So, uh, his

[20:43] name is Clayton, and I'll give him a

[20:45] couple of minutes for him to introduce

[20:47] himself to to the council.

[20:57] » For sure. Yeah.

[21:00] Well, I'm I've already I'm already

[21:02] beat to that, so we're I'm starting with

[21:05] no hair, so that's that's good. My name

[21:08] is Clayton Dickerson. Um, I uh I have

[21:13] of starting today. Um it's been a great

[21:15] first day. Um, you know, the before I

[21:18] start talking about myself, I I will um

[21:20] assure the council that um you know, one

[21:23] of the things that stood out today was

[21:25] the organization and um you know, the

[21:29] what I've seen obviously in eight hours

[21:32] of of working my first day. Um I

[21:34] couldn't have started at a better city

[21:36] that had, you know, very good

[21:38] organization and cleanliness and um

[21:40] seems like a very good running staff. So

[21:43] again, this is my first day, but uh you

[21:46] know, I from what I've seen, I I've I've

[21:48] worked previously at the city of Walks

[21:50] Hatchee in the city of Venice, um

[21:52] Gastonia Scurry and as well as

[21:54] Beckerhiba Water Supply, which is where

[21:56] I come from. I've been doing this since

[21:58] I was 18 years old. Um you know, this is

[22:01] all I know is uh public works, water and

[22:04] sewer, and so on and so forth. So, you

[22:06] know, I I I just want to thank you guys

[22:08] for giving me the opportunity to be here

[22:09] tonight. Um, and to come on board as

[22:12] your public works director. Um, and like

[22:15] I said, I'm going to do everything I can

[22:16] to pick up where Brad left off. And I'm

[22:19] more than lucky to already know Brad um

[22:22] before I started here. And just to have

[22:24] him here for a couple weeks before he

[22:26] retires officially um is going to be my

[22:28] biggest benefit. So, thank you guys. Um,

[22:31] I look forward to hopefully many years

[22:33] to serve you.

[22:36] All right. Thank you. Thank you.

[22:43] » Reminded that I missed a couple of

[22:44] bullet points on on my updates. Um, so I also wanted to let the council know

[22:49] that as part of our uh efforts to

[22:52] improve efficiency and the systems that

[22:54] we use uh in code for the court system

[22:58] uh we had our initial kickoff meeting uh

[23:00] this month and that is well underway and

[23:04] uh it's going to take uh if I remember

[23:06] correctly the lady that is going to help

[23:08] us with implementation mentioned that it

[23:10] will take uh around four to six months

[23:13] depending on how diligently we work on

[23:16] the implementation and also another

[23:19] system implementation that we're having

[23:21] is with IT works. So I works is a system

[23:24] used for permitting code enforcement uh

[23:26] planning and zoning uh those type of

[23:29] city functions and we're going to be

[23:32] implementing that. that implementation

[23:33] is not going to take as long. Uh the uh

[23:35] implementing team, we're going to have

[23:37] our first kickoff meeting uh first week

[23:40] in May and it should take about 60 days

[23:43] to have that implemented which is going

[23:45] to greatly improve the efficiency in

[23:47] that department. Thank you.

[23:56] Seven, we got two uh proclamations and

[24:00] uh I'll come down and do those. The

[24:01] first one uh will be for uh our public

[24:04] works director and then we'll have a

[24:05] proclamation for child abuse prevention

[24:07] month. So I'll come do those and tell

[24:09] you what Brad, if you want to make your

[24:11] way up here.

[24:34] Brad

[24:37] City public

[24:49] leadership will continue to have a

[24:51] revitalization growing impact

[24:55] Whereas these service have been marked

[24:56] by dedication

[25:04] system

[25:08] whereas on behalf of the policy I want

[25:10] to express my sincere app

[25:14] city

[25:20] mayor

[25:23] city

[25:30] director.

[25:32] Congratulations. Best wishes for

[25:51] Brad has been

[26:27] I'm keeping your cell phone number. I'm

[26:28] calling you for all kinds of stuff. Just

[26:30] let you know.

[26:56] proclamation for child

[26:59] state

[27:03] in their own

[27:05] critical assistance.

[27:23] Each year in the month of April

[27:24] dedicated to recogniz

[27:48] children

[27:51] of everything Those agencies in our

[27:54] community

[27:55] department services

[28:16] found

[28:19] abuse prevention cannot be passed to one

[28:22] symptoms.

[28:30] I encourage all to learn more about the

[28:32] aspects of our community.

[28:40] Together we create a broader future for

[28:41] our children.

[28:49] Therefore, I David Mayor City,

[28:58] Texas.

[29:45] County is a rural little county where

[29:47] nothing bad ever happens. Uh

[29:49] unfortunately growth is changing that.

[29:51] But um we do have a lot of need in

[29:54] Coffin County. And so if you would like

[29:56] to get involved in helping our kids, uh

[29:58] there's there's plenty of need. So I

[30:00] would encourage you to to do that. So

[30:03] all right, we'll move on to item number

[30:04] eight, the consent agenda. all of the

[30:06] following items on the consent agenda.

[30:09] I'm going to skip that paragraph. We

[30:10] have four items on the consent agenda

[30:12] this evening. Item A is to consider an

[30:14] act on approval of city council minutes

[30:16] from March the 2nd, 2026.

[30:21] Item B, that's right, we had that that

[30:24] little special meeting. Item B, consider

[30:27] and act on approval of city council

[30:28] minutes from March 24th, 2026. Uh item

[30:33] C, consider an act on approving

[30:34] resolution number 04062026,

[30:38] authorizing membership in the Atmas City

[30:40] Steering Committee and authorizing the

[30:42] payment of 4 cents per capita uh to the

[30:44] Atmas City Steering Comm uh committee to

[30:47] fund regulatory and related activities

[30:49] uh related to the Atmas Energy

[30:51] Corporation. And then item D, consider

[30:53] an act on approving resolution number 04

[30:56] 062026A

[30:59] adopting an electronic signature and

[31:01] electronic seal policy uh providing for

[31:03] related matters and providing an

[31:05] effective date. Uh you should have a

[31:07] copy of those minutes in your packets.

[31:09] Uh hopefully you've had a chance to

[31:10] review those. Um

[31:13] David, I don't I don't need you to say a

[31:15] whole lot, but that the atmosphering,

[31:17] this is something we do. We partner with

[31:18] other communities. Uh we we renew this

[31:21] every year and it's we're part of a

[31:24] group that that acts on our behalf to

[31:26] try to keep our our rates down with

[31:27] Atmas and and negotiate with them. Uh

[31:30] that's item C. And then item D. Um I

[31:33] read through a little bit of that. Why

[31:35] don't you give us just some of the you

[31:37] know I know these are for items less

[31:38] than $100,000. Um give us some of the

[31:41] guard rails I'll say on on what this

[31:43] electronic signature policy will have.

[31:48] And I don't mean to put you on the spot.

[31:53] » Yeah. So, basically what it is is just

[31:56] to be able to modernize

[31:58] uh our efforts. Uh right now the way

[32:01] that city secretary is essentially

[32:03] putting a seal or approving any official

[32:06] records for the city. She's doing all of

[32:07] that manually. Literally putting a a

[32:10] stamp on a document for any ordinance or

[32:12] anything that is approved by the uh by

[32:15] the city council. So what this will

[32:17] allow this will allow city secretary to

[32:19] be able to do some of those same

[32:21] functions but electronically.

[32:26] » For example would be ordinance

[32:28] resolutions um contracts

[32:32] um and

[32:35] minutes from my understanding. Sorry, I

[32:37] don't have the policy in front of me.

[32:39] Um, but it would allow that. And um, I'm

[32:42] working with Molita on finalizing the

[32:45] electronic city seal to be able to um,

[32:49] allow to utilize that because as David

[32:51] mentioned, I use a stamped one

[32:53] currently. Um, so in the event it better

[32:56] helps um, signatures if in the absence

[32:59] of anybody and I can send those

[33:00] electronically.

[33:02] >> So you're not just trying to write

[33:03] yourself checks?

[33:04] >> No. Okay. [laughter]

[33:07] All right. Anybody have any questions on

[33:08] any of the any of the four items under

[33:10] the consent agenda?

[33:13] >> Approve

[33:15] item C and D and abstain from A and B.

[33:18] >> Okay.

[33:23] I've got a motion to approve and your

[33:25] abstension will be during the vote.

[33:26] Correct?

[33:30] » If his motion includes

[33:33] >> the items A and B on the minutes.

[33:35] >> Okay. So,

[33:36] >> somebody needs to approve, Andy.

[33:38] >> Yeah, I've got a motion on C and D. Can

[33:40] I Can I get a second on that? I got a

[33:42] second on that. Um, can we do two

[33:44] separate votes? Is that okay? Correct.

[33:46] >> Okay. So, let's take the vote on C and

[33:48] D. All those in favor?

[33:50] Okay. Now, if I can get a motion on

[33:52] items A and B. I've got a motion from

[33:55] Adam

[33:56] >> and a second from Caleb. All those in

[33:58] favor? Okay. And uh abstaining be Scott.

[34:02] Okay. All right. Very good. Let's move

[34:03] on to item number nine. uh presentation

[34:06] by Shawnberg and Pulk. Uh the

[34:07] engineering regarding the south streets

[34:09] and drainage rehabilitation for the city

[34:11] of Crannle

[34:23] manager.

[34:37] My name is Matt Alonzo. Um, good to see

[34:38] you folks again. I'm from Shamburg and

[34:40] Poke and we're here to talk about the

[34:42] South Street and drainage improvements

[34:44] uh just north of us or actually south of

[34:46] us.

[34:48] Um this evening I'm just going to talk

[34:50] about um the project location, discuss

[34:52] the existing conditions, some proposed

[34:55] um some proposed so proposed

[34:57] improvements we're going to do and the

[34:59] schematic costs

[35:04] as you see here. Uh I'm trying to Okay,

[35:07] so the city of Cranle's there in the

[35:08] star. The the streets highlighted in

[35:11] magenta, that's considered our north

[35:14] streets on the bottom there and the gold

[35:16] golden rod, that's considered our south

[35:18] streets.

[35:21] The next slide here, we're just taking a

[35:22] closer look at the north streets between

[35:24] Maro and Maui. Um we didn't um we

[35:27] decided not to do improvements in this

[35:30] location because currently you folks

[35:31] have a contract for um improvements on

[35:34] Maui Street here which is the um is

[35:37] going to be a concrete pavement um curb

[35:40] and gutter with a closed storm drainage

[35:43] uh system. So because of those

[35:45] improvements, we s we thought that the

[35:47] benefit would be better observed in the

[35:49] south the south streets

[35:52] and as you can see here in the in the

[35:53] yellow or golden rod. Uh this is the map

[35:57] just tilted on its side. Um the reason

[35:59] for this map is because um currently you

[36:03] folks have a drainage system that's in

[36:05] this red line that runs from north to

[36:08] south on First Street and there's a 42

[36:11] inch um reinforced concrete outfall

[36:13] there. So this project in the south is

[36:16] to utilize um that drainage improvement

[36:19] and um we wanted to include in improve

[36:23] the drainage on church and vansston as

[36:27] well as Gleon um connecting to in the

[36:30] next slide it'll show you what we're

[36:31] connecting to these um drop inlets. So

[36:34] all of those at each of those cross

[36:36] streets we have these drop inlets and

[36:39] their proposed improvements are going to

[36:40] connect to this existing feature there.

[36:49] Okay. So, uh this is just an existing

[36:51] view of the pavement on church. Um as

[36:54] you can see, I'm just going to go

[36:55] through these slides. Um it's a asphalt

[36:57] pavement which is about 20 ft wide with

[36:59] bar ditches.

[37:10] Okay. This is another view on Vansston.

[37:13] Again, you can see that the

[37:14] deterioration of the pavement here. This

[37:15] is again a 20 foot wide asphalt pavement

[37:18] with um sorry, my hands are a little um

[37:22] with the bar ditches as you can see with

[37:24] standing water here.

[37:26] Uh this is on um Second Street between

[37:30] Church and Vanson. This is uh Second

[37:33] Street between Vansston and Gleon. And

[37:35] then this is a view of Gleon after

[37:38] Brookures.

[37:40] So currently on South Main Street, you

[37:42] folks have a um as um Scott Rogers

[37:46] mentioned that you had these concrete

[37:48] gutters here. Um and this is just a

[37:50] closer view of what that looks like.

[37:52] It's a full concrete. It almost looks

[37:54] like a concrete channel. What we're

[37:56] proposing is to do and to save some

[37:58] money is to propose um a concrete flume

[38:01] here which is about 2 feet wide with um

[38:04] grass slopes at 4:1.

[38:07] So I just wanted to show part of the

[38:09] proposed improvements here. This is the

[38:11] first picture on church

[38:16] and you'll see that um this one here and

[38:18] the proposed improvements is going to in

[38:20] increase the lane width to 11 ft. So

[38:23] instead of 20 feet of asphalt, it's

[38:25] going to be 22 feet of asphalt with the

[38:28] um the grass shoulders with a two foot

[38:30] wide concrete V channel. This is another

[38:33] picture of um Danston.

[38:38] So you'll see that this is a 22 foot

[38:40] wide um asphalt pavement with some grass

[38:42] shoulders and the two foot wide concrete

[38:44] um V channel.

[38:49] This is on First Street.

[38:52] I like this picture because it shows you

[38:53] at the driveway connections. We're going

[38:55] to be improving the driveways as well as

[38:57] putting um an 18inch reinforced concrete

[38:59] pipe with uh concrete headers. This is

[39:02] another view of um Second Street just a

[39:05] little north. Again, you'll see that.

[39:07] And then this is Gleman.

[39:13] So with what we are proposing are for

[39:16] the main bid for the Texas um CDBG grant

[39:20] uh is highlighted in this golden rod um

[39:22] streets. This is Church and Bansen. Um

[39:24] the total cost for these um streets is

[39:28] about $68,000.

[39:30] Um this next slide I'm going to show

[39:31] you. These are the bid alternatives. So

[39:34] that's the alternative one connecting

[39:35] the two two streets, Vansston and

[39:37] Church. the second alternative, third

[39:40] and fourth.

[39:47] And this is just a summary of a

[39:50] preliminary cost of these improvements.

[39:52] So again, this is $68,000.

[39:55] Um, and the overall total is about short

[39:57] of $1.2 million. And so, um, just today,

[40:00] I just wanted to present that to you

[40:01] folks to describe what the South Street

[40:03] and drainage improvements would be, um,

[40:05] for this CDBG project. And I know I saw

[40:09] you folks um the last panel was here. I

[40:11] just wanted to remind you folks that

[40:12] this is our commitment to provide the

[40:14] service to you all. And um as you have

[40:18] any questions

[40:21] is there way out different concrete

[40:24] plume and the paving for street.

[40:27] >> We currently do that. We do have that.

[40:29] >> So you're giving us like alternate to

[40:31] you give us one price. is I'm looking

[40:34] that if if we can't afford to do the

[40:36] asphalt pavement, what if we go ahead

[40:38] and do the concrete plume? Now,

[40:39] >> we do have the price broken out. Um, we

[40:42] do do have bid items items for that.

[40:44] >> That's

[40:49] Hold on, Mike. I'm going to I'm going to

[40:51] use Brad since I can't use him very much

[40:53] longer. Is this I mean, you're as

[40:54] familiar with this as anybody. The these

[40:56] flumes and I know you obviously you're

[40:58] familiar with what we did down here. Is

[41:00] that gonna I'm just asking you because

[41:02] you know is that going to work what

[41:04] what's what we're looking at here.

[41:40] require

[41:45] some of

[42:00] finish off.

[42:10] » Okay.

[42:13] So, this

[42:17] I know it all ties together. Uh,

[42:20] but what we're looking at tonight ties

[42:22] into what we did on Maine. It helps

[42:25] continue that process. I'll say

[42:38] those streets.

[42:51] » Yeah.

[43:02] Y

[43:09] » yeah. And if you drive through there

[43:10] when it rains or after it rains and you

[43:12] can drive through most of downtown

[43:14] unfortunately, but but over in that area

[43:16] it's it's pretty bad in some places.

[43:18] >> Yeah. And the concrete will just keep it

[43:20] from settling.

[43:21] >> Yeah. It might hold water while it's

[43:23] raining or right after it rains, but it

[43:25] it'll dry out a lot better than

[43:28] >> the best way to do it would be total

[43:29] underground system, but that's

[43:31] astronomical impress.

[43:35] » All right. Any any questions?

[43:37] >> Do have one more. Um, have we

[43:40] >> Oh, sorry, Mr. SL. Go ahead, Scott.

[43:42] >> Have we verified that the 48 inch at the

[43:44] end of that is the rack capacity and

[43:47] we're not overfilling that? When we do

[43:49] when we enter the design process, we

[43:51] will have to consider that.

[43:54] >> Yes sir.

[44:11] Yes. Um so currently um because this is

[44:13] a preliminary cost we do have

[44:14] contingency but as we enter into the um

[44:18] design and get to the final design then

[44:20] we we naturally turn into a well we we

[44:23] shrink that contingency because of the

[44:24] unknowns are a little bit better known

[44:27] and then any leftover money we turn into

[44:29] an owner's allowance

[44:34] that that's

[44:37] >> that's that's set up at the front and

[44:39] what we are being contracted

[44:42] Um,

[44:44] not that number, but yeah,

[44:48] » those are construction costs. Yeah.

[44:50] So, but I just I'll just say it

[44:54] for the record. Our engineering cost is

[44:56] to to design the full um system as you

[44:59] saw in the south streets even though you

[45:01] may only construct just church and vans.

[45:03] >> Sure.

[45:07] » Any other questions?

[45:10] All right. Thank you, sir. Appreciate

[45:11] it.

[45:14] All right, we'll move on to item 10. Uh,

[45:16] item number 10, a presentation by

[45:17] Burkoff, Hendricks, and Carter regarding

[45:19] the new force main project.

[45:23] » Good afternoon, mayor, council members.

[45:26] And Burkoff, Hendricks, and Carter. And

[45:29] let me turn this.

[45:34] Okay.

[45:37] So, um, currently what you have is a

[45:39] lift station that that's under proposed,

[45:41] as you all know, a lift station down at

[45:43] the wastewater treatment plant with a

[45:44] force main that's going to be parallel

[45:47] to the Eagle Crest all the way to the

[45:50] North Texas Municipal Water District's

[45:52] lower east fork interceptor system, the

[45:56] Leis that we're going to connect and and

[45:58] u we had been asked by city staff to

[46:00] revisit that, reook at um due to the the growth projections and the patterns

[46:06] concerns. We've been asked to go ahead

[46:08] and look at it to see what is there

[46:10] another feasible opportunity to be able

[46:12] to maximize those dollars, make it more

[46:14] financially feasible for the city. And

[46:17] we've uh vetted that with city staff. We

[46:19] met several times, did some workshop

[46:22] meetings, uh looked at all the

[46:23] projections costs timewise, and we came

[46:27] up with this alternate, which

[46:29] surprisingly was the original one, but

[46:32] instead of having two, one lift station,

[46:35] we broke it up into having a north and

[46:37] having a south lift station. So that as

[46:40] you have the the growth that is coming

[46:42] in now, uh that would be conveyed to

[46:45] this north lift station and then be able

[46:47] to be conveyed over to the left to be

[46:50] able to to start into the regional

[46:53] system if you may. Um, so the blue

[46:57] lines, the blue box, that would be the

[46:59] north infrastructure and the red box and

[47:02] the red line that would continue to stay

[47:05] as the the southern lift station,

[47:07] southern infrastructure.

[47:10] Some of the work can still remain a as

[47:12] you see where those two lines combine

[47:14] going west. The city has already

[47:17] approached property owners as you may

[47:19] already know. So that that that

[47:21] alignment, those easements, those are

[47:24] still good. uh and useful, but

[47:26] everything to the east um would have to

[47:29] start again from from new. Um the city

[47:31] staff has also been approaching the that

[47:34] we understand um has been approaching

[47:37] the the property owners where this new

[47:39] north lift station would be. So there's

[47:42] some some incentives for that. So the

[47:44] city communications are ongoing on that.

[47:52] So what we did is we we broke up the

[47:55] north projections and the southern

[47:56] projections time-wise. And we know that

[47:59] this is a a lot of numbers here, but

[48:02] basically on the left is is all the

[48:04] developments that are going into the

[48:06] northern lift station. And then we have

[48:08] about 4,300 uh lots that would be

[48:11] conveying that influent to the north

[48:13] lift station.

[48:18] This cost is a breakdown comparing the

[48:20] north and the southern lift station.

[48:22] Initially, we had the 13 million gallons

[48:24] a day infrastructure on the south. And

[48:27] so now, by breaking it up, we we're able

[48:29] to account for about approximately 5

[48:33] million gallons a day of effing going on

[48:35] the north and then leaving the remainder

[48:38] 8 million gallons a day continuing to go

[48:40] to the south.

[48:45] Um, here's a snapshot of the timeline.

[48:48] The intent would be to try to get the

[48:51] these projects advertised in the fall

[48:54] and given a the contractors

[48:57] about a year year and a half of next

[49:00] year to start uh to be able to complete

[49:02] this. This project would the project

[49:06] will be broken up into two bids. one for

[49:08] the utility contractors for the force

[49:10] main and one for the facility

[49:12] contractors to build that lift station.

[49:19] So the next steps um are are to try to

[49:23] proceed and and get an acceptance, get

[49:24] an approval from council, I believe is

[49:26] my understanding what we're trying to

[49:28] achieve, and then proceed with the

[49:30] design of the changes and then move

[49:33] forward with the uh getting this

[49:35] advertised in the fall.

[49:38] >> Do we need both of these at the same

[49:40] time?

[49:40] >> We do not.

[49:41] >> South and the north.

[49:41] >> We do not.

[49:42] >> We need the south right away. Right.

[49:45] Yeah, the change if you don't mind going

[49:47] back to the the uh where it shows the

[49:50] two stations.

[49:53] >> The uh original plan when I came in was

[49:56] to build one massive lift station and

[49:58] force main on the south. Uh but that was

[50:01] assuming full build up for for the city.

[50:04] Market has taken a turn and just

[50:06] realized that is not quite financially

[50:08] feasible. So, the idea that we came up

[50:11] with was to break it up into two

[50:14] different smaller lift stations, right?

[50:16] Uh we're not saving any money. It's

[50:17] going to cost about the same, but it's

[50:20] more financially feasible because I

[50:22] don't have to come up with 30 $33

[50:24] million for one massive police station.

[50:26] I I only have to come up with half of

[50:28] that. And mo most of the growth that

[50:30] we're seeing in the city, it's happening uh over over in the north

[50:35] area here. So, we really need a a lift

[50:39] station here to be able to serve where

[50:41] the growth is happening. Now, in the

[50:43] future, what what this is what this is

[50:45] going to do is gonna free up uh capacity

[50:49] at the wastewater treatment plant. And

[50:52] we're also working on another project to

[50:54] be able to reduce the water info in

[50:56] infiltration into the the system so that

[50:59] we can also recover some of the lost

[51:01] capacity as well. And the second or the

[51:04] southern lift station is still going to

[51:06] have to be built, but it's going to

[51:07] allow us to be able to grow our tax base

[51:09] so that we can afford it in the future.

[51:15] » Correct. That is correct.

[51:16] >> Right away,

[51:17] >> correct?

[51:17] >> Eventually, you'll outgrow your

[51:19] treatment plant and you're surrounded by

[51:22] a flood plane where you can't expand

[51:24] that. You could, but it's very limited.

[51:27] And so, the the dollars to be able to

[51:29] invest in the treatment plan is just not

[51:31] feasible. instead of going regional with

[51:34] the

[51:35] >> eventually being a customer of the

[51:36] district is is the the goal.

[51:39] >> And and one thing that we will need to

[51:42] do as staff and council will need to

[51:44] approve. I know that we just went

[51:46] through a u impact fee study. Well,

[51:50] we're going to have to go we're going to

[51:51] have to revise it or amend it because

[51:53] the north lift station was not part of

[51:55] that uh study. So, we're just going to

[51:58] have to go ahead and add it and

[51:59] recalculate our impact fees so that we

[52:02] can utilize impact fee funds to be able

[52:04] to uh pay for some of it. I'm working on

[52:06] getting uh assistance grants uh from

[52:09] other places, but it's it's only going

[52:11] to get us so far. We're going to need to

[52:13] find other ways to be able to fund it as

[52:14] well.

[52:17] David Carr Ranch will still go down to

[52:20] the southern. I know they're on the

[52:22] north side of the highway, but they're going to go down to our current

[52:25] like they would they would use the north

[52:27] lift station.

[52:28] >> They they wouldn't. Yeah. Carpite Ranch

[52:30] will still go down to the wastewater

[52:32] treatment plant and then eventually when

[52:34] the lift station is built on the south,

[52:35] it will get it'll go there. Correct.

[52:38] Yeah.

[52:39] >> Is there any This is not tied to this

[52:41] specifically.

[52:42] Anybody in here that might know, um, is

[52:45] there any idea on where the new

[52:49] the big North Texas uh,

[52:52] plant is going to be? Have they figured

[52:55] out a site yet for that?

[52:57] >> So, they they have plants. They're going

[52:58] to expand it.

[53:01] >> Yeah, but I thought they were putting in

[53:02] a new

[53:03] >> They're bu building one in the in the

[53:04] region. And uh there are uh they haven't

[53:07] officially announced where I mean but if

[53:10] we connect the dots uh we kind of have a

[53:12] idea of of where it's going to be built

[53:15] uh just from conversation that I've had

[53:16] with other cities and other uh

[53:18] stakeholders in the area.

[53:20] >> Okay.

[53:22] Very good.

[53:23] >> Which it's in the direction that we're

[53:25] putting our forcements towards. So yeah,

[53:29] >> which is a yes.

[53:32] It would really suck if they built in

[53:34] the in the opposite direction.

[53:36] >> Yeah.

[53:37] >> All right. Any other questions on this?

[53:40] I I think it's a good idea. I think it's

[53:43] a good way to go. I thank you guys for

[53:44] putting that together.

[53:46] >> Well, we we'll keep going and we'll keep

[53:48] you posted of all the progress through David.

[53:51] >> Okay.

[53:51] >> Thank you.

[53:52] >> All right. Thank you, sir.

[53:54] >> All right. We'll move on to item number

[53:56] 11, a presentation by Kimley Horn

[53:58] regarding the Eagle Crest Plan

[53:59] Development Commercial Signage Amendment

[54:01] Request.

[54:03] We have anyone here from Kimley Hornton?

[54:14] » Hi y'all. Uh my name is Mike Feather.

[54:16] I'm with Kimley Horn.

[54:18] So

[54:20] I am here today to talk I guess we'll

[54:22] start with the first item. I'm here

[54:24] today to talk about the uh Riveridge

[54:26] plan development uh district the zoning.

[54:29] So, I'm here on behalf of uh JWS Land.

[54:32] Um they are proposing a current

[54:35] amendment to the existing zoning that is

[54:37] in place for the Riveridge PD. Um as you

[54:39] guys know, it kind of encapsules a lot

[54:41] of the residential portion and there's a

[54:43] commercial piece along 175 on the west

[54:46] side of town. So, um what we proposed

[54:49] here along it is Walmart and alongside

[54:51] with JWS. Um with the commercial

[54:54] development that is planned to happen in

[54:56] this area, um you're seeing a lot of

[54:58] need for signage along the highway. Um

[55:01] our goal here today and regarding both

[55:03] of these proposed amendments is related

[55:06] to um a type of mixed use or a type of

[55:09] multi-tenant signage that is allowed

[55:11] along the highway. With the way that the

[55:13] current sign ordinance is allowed, um

[55:16] there isn't a stipulation for

[55:18] multi-tenant signage. Um, and that kind

[55:20] of it causes tenants to come in, put in

[55:24] their own sign, and then you've got a

[55:25] bunch of different signs leading up

[55:26] along the highway. Um, what we're

[55:28] proposing here, um, you can see this is

[55:31] what Walmart is currently proposing for

[55:34] their property on the north side of 175.

[55:37] There is also, um, some signage that is

[55:41] proposed along 741.

[55:44] at these two locations. Um if 175 is on

[55:47] the left side of this screen, um you can

[55:49] see there's multi-tenant signage planned

[55:51] at the corner of Spring Creek and 175 is

[55:54] shown in blue and then the other side of

[55:57] Spring Creek and 741 shown in blue on

[56:00] the north side. So, um to give you guys

[56:03] an idea of what this signage would look

[56:04] like, um

[56:07] this is what's kind of being proposed uh

[56:09] along the highway. And what it does is

[56:11] it it allows for um day and night

[56:14] signage that really doesn't dice up 12

[56:17] different users into 12 different signs.

[56:19] It allows for multi- multi-tenants to be

[56:22] able to go in and um have their signage,

[56:25] have their highway frontage um signage

[56:27] when it comes to a lot of these

[56:28] restaurant users that are exploring the

[56:30] area is really important. And so

[56:32] >> on the anchor

[56:34] >> absolutely

[56:35] >> the little tabs below for each

[56:36] individual store that's in the mall.

[56:38] >> Yeah, 100%. So, um, this kind of gives

[56:40] them an opportunity to have one cohesive

[56:43] design, one cohesive layout, and allow

[56:45] for, um, everybody to get that signage

[56:47] they need along the highway.

[56:51] » I think that is it on the

[56:54] So, this is in combination between the

[56:56] Walmart development and the JWS

[56:58] commercial allin-one,

[57:02] right? And

[57:05] David, I'm sure you've looked at this

[57:07] some and some of you guys that are

[57:08] familiar with this industry. Is this I

[57:11] mean I'm thinking of our UDC and and you

[57:14] know how we want city to look. Um

[57:17] is this something that's common? I guess

[57:19] I mean I know Scott

[57:22] >> it's pretty common signage among

[57:28] signage.

[57:30] Okay.

[57:32] We've already put two in there and it

[57:35] only makes sense that for the height off

[57:37] of 175 to see them, we might as well do

[57:39] it all the way down.

[57:40] >> Yeah.

[57:40] >> That way we don't have the individual

[57:42] ones on the high.

[57:43] >> Okay.

[57:43] >> We can address

[57:44] >> I I know we did an amendment for uh I

[57:47] think McDonald's for their height.

[57:49] >> McDonald's and Taco.

[57:52] >> Okay. Okay.

[57:53] >> And so it it I would agree. I think it's typically common to allow for

[57:58] multi-tenant signage. With the way that

[58:00] the current ordinance a lot cleaner

[58:03] >> and with river the river PD, this just

[58:05] allows for it to be cohesive.

[58:07] >> Sure.

[58:07] >> We'd have we'd have 15 signs out in

[58:10] front of

[58:10] >> Yeah. No, I wanted the road if you don't

[58:13] allow this.

[58:13] >> Yeah.

[58:14] >> All right.

[58:16] >> Um, now this just says presentation. Are

[58:19] we are we supposed to take action or

[58:21] >> Not tonight. What I wanted to do is give

[58:23] a a council a chance to see this, be

[58:26] able to understand it and before it goes

[58:29] to the planning and zoning and then

[58:30] eventually the council for final

[58:32] approval just um have the developer give

[58:35] them a chance to present it to the

[58:36] council.

[58:40] » Because this development agreement is

[58:41] from 2021.

[58:42] >> Sure.

[58:43] >> David wasn't here. I wasn't here.

[58:45] Normally I would have been a part of

[58:47] some of those discussions about signs.

[58:49] So, I felt it was important that city

[58:51] council

[58:53] gets to see it, gets to weigh in. If you

[58:55] have something you don't like, say it,

[58:58] let us know, you know, because you

[59:00] always do have the ability to say, "How

[59:03] about something else?" Or, you know,

[59:08] >> we not have been that planned

[59:09] development just a few years ago.

[59:13] So development agreement right now

[59:15] states that the signage is going to

[59:17] comport with your UDC.

[59:20] >> Yeah.

[59:20] >> Um your PD ordinance alters that a

[59:22] little bit, but basically that's the

[59:24] problem that it's taking you back to

[59:26] what your ordinance says about signs and

[59:28] it really doesn't your UDC really

[59:31] doesn't think about this type of

[59:33] shopping center, right?

[59:34] >> So we're going to have to amend that

[59:38] ordinance.

[59:38] >> Okay.

[59:40] Well, I know we're just on item 11, but

[59:43] I think you've kind of walked through 12

[59:44] as well. Um,

[59:48] I don't need to go. In fact, I'm going

[59:49] to go ahead and go to item 12. U,

[59:53] presentation by Kimley Horn regarding

[59:55] Riveridge plan development commercial

[59:56] signage amendment request. Um, does

[1:00:00] anybody have an issue on council with what with what he's proposed or or

[1:00:04] the renderings we've seen?

[1:00:07] >> Yeah, I think so. I I don't want it to

[1:00:08] look

[1:00:09] like a hundred signs, you know, every 100 yards. So,

[1:00:14] >> yep. And so, it the reason it's split

[1:00:15] out into the Eagle Crest and River

[1:00:17] Ridge, it's kind of north and south

[1:00:19] side. Sure.

[1:00:19] >> So, um we're ultimately proposing

[1:00:21] similar items on both sides. That's why

[1:00:23] there's two items.

[1:00:28] » An agreement that uh on the Eagle Crest

[1:00:31] development, your development agreement

[1:00:33] says that you guys get to inspect the

[1:00:34] signs. The city does. So even though

[1:00:37] we're doing all of this, there's still

[1:00:39] all these other

[1:00:40] >> safeguards in place. So

[1:00:42] >> yeah. No, I'm glad you suggested. I mean

[1:00:45] it the sooner we know, the sooner we can

[1:00:46] talk and make sure everybody's on the

[1:00:48] same page. So I appreciate that.

[1:00:49] >> Yeah. And I'm glad you brought it up

[1:00:51] that it's two different sides because we

[1:00:53] definitely want both sides of the

[1:00:54] highway to look the same.

[1:00:57] >> Okay.

[1:00:58] All right. Any other questions?

[1:01:00] >> All right. Thank you, sir.

[1:01:01] >> Awesome. Appreciate it.

[1:01:03] >> He's got something.

[1:01:04] >> Oh, I'm sorry. Yes, sir. Just wondering

[1:01:07] looking at the sign there's like room

[1:01:08] for three vendors.

[1:01:14] » I think he was just showing a rendering.

[1:01:16] I think that sign could have 10 vendors

[1:01:18] underneath it.

[1:01:19] >> Yeah. Obviously, we don't want to we

[1:01:21] don't want to drown the sign, but the

[1:01:22] goal is to really just all those users

[1:01:24] that are coming in for the shopping

[1:01:25] center. I mean, it's it's a hot

[1:01:27] commodity, so we want to be able to

[1:01:28] serve them how we can. That's it.

[1:01:30] >> And I've seen them where they do like

[1:01:31] the Walmart in the middle and then

[1:01:33] smaller signages and they're stacked

[1:01:35] side by side.

[1:01:36] >> Exactly.

[1:01:37] >> All right. Thank you, sir. Appreciate.

[1:01:40] >> All right. We'll move on to item 13.

[1:01:42] Discuss and possible action on approving

[1:01:44] resolution number 04062026B

[1:01:47] authorizing city representatives in

[1:01:49] matters pertaining to the city's

[1:01:50] participation in the Texas Community

[1:01:52] Development Block Grant Program.

[1:01:55] >> Good evening.

[1:01:55] Mayor and Council. Uh I'm

[1:01:57] Jake McAlls with public management. Uh

[1:02:00] we are the grant administration firm

[1:02:01] that is assisting the the city with this

[1:02:03] grant. Um so just kind of recap

[1:02:08] everything. Uh this is $750,000 grant uh

[1:02:13] that the city is receiving from applying

[1:02:16] to the Texas Department of Agriculture.

[1:02:19] This is federal HUD money uh but it

[1:02:21] routes through the TDA. It's $750,000.

[1:02:24] This is a matching grant. Uh the city's

[1:02:26] MAT share is $37,500.

[1:02:29] And so this is a total quote unquote

[1:02:32] project budget of $787,500.

[1:02:35] Okay. This goes back to the uh street

[1:02:38] reconstruction uh and and ditch

[1:02:40] reconstruction project that uh Matt with

[1:02:43] SPI presented to the council a couple

[1:02:45] minutes ago.

[1:02:47] Uh so this application is due on May 15.

[1:02:52] Uh the the the big thing is just

[1:02:55] figuring out what are we going to do

[1:02:57] within budget. Uh and so with with Brad

[1:03:00] and David and SPI

[1:03:03] as Matt presented, we we went through a

[1:03:05] variety of iterations. Okay. and

[1:03:09] ultimately

[1:03:11] um reconstructing Church Street and

[1:03:13] Vanston Street as Matt presented

[1:03:17] uh staff decided was the absolute most

[1:03:21] uh practic practicable,

[1:03:24] most effective uh and most u

[1:03:27] conservative-minded approach to proceed

[1:03:30] with at this time. and all of those

[1:03:33] other street sections we're going to

[1:03:35] proceed as as alternates. Okay? And so

[1:03:39] our current plan as of now is that

[1:03:41] Church and Vanston's are going to be the

[1:03:43] base bid. All right. I went out and I

[1:03:45] did the beneficiary surveys. Make sure

[1:03:48] that those two uh streets and all the uh

[1:03:51] residents there qualify for this grant.

[1:03:53] They certainly appear to uh there's

[1:03:55] papers on the the mayor's desk that we

[1:03:57] intend to submit to the TDA tomorrow for

[1:04:00] them to sign off and and agree with all

[1:04:02] that. Uh and then those will be the base

[1:04:05] bid. And then as we get closer to

[1:04:07] bidding this out, we'll rerun the

[1:04:09] opinion of cost. Uh evaluate with with

[1:04:13] staff kind of how they want to prepare

[1:04:15] the the bid schedule. Uh, and hopefully

[1:04:19] we we may be able to award some of those

[1:04:21] additive alternate sections as well.

[1:04:24] Okay, this item before you tonight is to

[1:04:28] approve uh designated individuals. Okay,

[1:04:32] there's there's a couple of different

[1:04:33] positions with this grant. Uh

[1:04:35] specifically, there's the authorized

[1:04:37] official, which uh I I recommend that be

[1:04:43] uh the mayor, the the chief elected

[1:04:46] official, as well as a senior staff

[1:04:49] member. Okay. the authorized official is

[1:04:51] authorized to sign contracts but also to

[1:04:54] do other tasks within the online

[1:04:57] um grant management software that that

[1:05:00] we have which which is really the reason

[1:05:02] that I recommend a staff position and

[1:05:05] then we also have designation uh two

[1:05:07] additional positions to uh authorize

[1:05:09] payments submitting the draw request

[1:05:12] forms require two individuals to approve

[1:05:15] those uh draw submissions in the system.

[1:05:17] Okay, so there's four positions that are

[1:05:21] included on the resolution tonight. Uh

[1:05:24] if you have comments, questions about

[1:05:25] that, certainly happy to address it. Uh

[1:05:27] as well as the rest of the application

[1:05:29] uh process, assuming that you approve

[1:05:31] this resolution tonight, we'll be

[1:05:34] finalizing this application and getting

[1:05:36] that in by the May 15 deadline. Uh the

[1:05:40] contract though, I I will warn you, the

[1:05:42] contract is not expected to officially

[1:05:44] begin until February of 27. Okay. Um

[1:05:50] hopefully

[1:05:51] we'll be able to do the reconstruction

[1:05:55] in that 27 uh paving season. Obviously

[1:06:00] being so close to the school, we're

[1:06:02] going to want to kind of coordinate

[1:06:03] around that with design and everything,

[1:06:06] but construction is going to be a while

[1:06:08] out still. Okay. So, uh that's kind of

[1:06:12] the long and short of it. If you have

[1:06:14] questions about the project, about the

[1:06:16] process, about the resolution. Yes, sir.

[1:06:18] >> David

[1:06:20] council meeting. Um, didn't we discuss

[1:06:23] this grant also a little bit about uh

[1:06:28] the rehabilitation andor new

[1:06:30] construction of sidewalks? Is that

[1:06:36] » another grant?

[1:06:38] Okay. So, this this grant

[1:06:39] has not Okay.

[1:06:45] » Anything else?

[1:06:46] >> Any other questions? Okay. beside

[1:06:51] who's on this the signers and stuff he

[1:06:54] was talking

[1:06:58] other

[1:06:58] >> I I did draft this uh this is my

[1:07:01] recommendation to council it is

[1:07:03] absolutely council's prerogative if you

[1:07:05] want to change so this is TDA's

[1:07:08] resolution and it's basically fill in

[1:07:10] the positions that that you want if

[1:07:13] council wants to designate different

[1:07:16] positions to serve in these roles you

[1:07:18] can serve certainly do that. Again, it

[1:07:20] is my recommendation and only a

[1:07:22] recommendation to have um well, as

[1:07:25] presented. Uh but if y'all want to

[1:07:27] change that, we absolutely can.

[1:07:34] » Doing this right now. The only thing

[1:07:36] that I see different in my other cities

[1:07:37] is on that second one, they've added the

[1:07:39] finance director. Um but like you say,

[1:07:43] they all pretty much all these

[1:07:45] resolutions look the same. And the

[1:07:47] reason being is that that second

[1:07:49] paragraph is when it's crunch time and

[1:07:53] you need the right person in city hall

[1:07:55] at the right time. Um, and sometimes

[1:07:58] >> somebody's out on vacation or

[1:08:00] unavailable

[1:08:01] >> city manager's busy somewhere. So, I

[1:08:03] would just say that if you were thinking

[1:08:05] about anything that you know that might

[1:08:07] be something you want to do is add an

[1:08:09] additional person um should any grant be

[1:08:13] funded because once you once you're

[1:08:14] funded and you probably already know

[1:08:16] this so I'm sorry about repeating it

[1:08:18] once you're funded you got to go you

[1:08:20] don't have time to they they tell you

[1:08:22] the deadlines they tell you when you

[1:08:23] need to do it and um so kind of live

[1:08:26] that pain in other cities

[1:08:35] Okay, I've got a motion from Adam,

[1:08:38] >> second from Tim. All those in favor?

[1:08:42] >> Thank you, sir.

[1:08:43] >> Thank you all very much.

[1:08:45] >> All right, we'll move on to item 14.

[1:08:47] discuss and possible action on the

[1:08:48] proposed fiscal year 2026 agreement for

[1:08:51] fire protection uh excuse me fire

[1:08:53] protection and suppression services

[1:08:55] between Kaufman County Emergency Service

[1:08:57] District number seven and the city of

[1:08:59] Crannle for Fire Services. Um

[1:09:04] I know we got some ESD folks here uh and

[1:09:08] I know we were waiting. Did you get a

[1:09:10] copy of the contract from Aaron or

[1:09:16] and I had a conversation last week and

[1:09:18] we talked about revisions and um some of

[1:09:22] them I agree to some I sent it back to

[1:09:24] her today so I know we are the attorneys

[1:09:27] are in the process of finalizing the

[1:09:30] document

[1:09:30] >> okay

[1:09:31] >> we're very close for me the one thing

[1:09:33] that's hanging is I didn't get any

[1:09:35] objection to the contract commencing on

[1:09:38] May 1st so I'm assuming that the

[1:09:41] contract commencing on May 1st was

[1:09:43] acceptable

[1:09:45] >> but I just don't have a final clean

[1:09:46] copy.

[1:09:47] >> Okay. Um

[1:09:51] Okay. So, we're

[1:09:55] from the bones of the agreement, we're

[1:09:56] good. There's just some attorney stuff.

[1:10:00] >> David and I had a meeting on it, too,

[1:10:02] which I'll let David talk in a minute.

[1:10:03] Um but, um there's nothing major at this

[1:10:08] point, but you know, David and I came to

[1:10:10] the agreement that since we don't have

[1:10:11] it in front of us, we'll just bring it

[1:10:13] back to the next meeting for final

[1:10:14] approval. Okay. Does that work for you?

[1:10:28] » Uh the main thing that we wanted to

[1:10:31] discuss with the council was just to

[1:10:32] make sure that we were okay to start it

[1:10:34] on May 1st. And the reason behind it is

[1:10:36] just so that we can have a clean start

[1:10:38] because the existing agreement that we

[1:10:40] have with the volunteer fire department,

[1:10:42] it's a it goes monthto month. That way

[1:10:44] we give them their final payment and

[1:10:46] then following month we start paying the

[1:10:48] ESD directly.

[1:10:52] » So we'll have it it should be buttoned

[1:10:54] up by

[1:10:55] >> I should have a clean copy this week and

[1:10:57] I I'll have Sabrina share it with all of

[1:10:59] you because I really do want you all to

[1:11:01] look at it. Um and then we'll bring

[1:11:04] we'll come back with this item for

[1:11:05] approval in the next meeting.

[1:11:11] » That'll be good. Okay, go ahead.

[1:11:14] >> Make a motion table uh item number 14

[1:11:17] possible action on the ESD agreement.

[1:11:19] >> Okay, I've got the April

[1:11:22] >> What's the next meeting? April

[1:11:23] >> 20

[1:11:24] >> April 20th meeting council meeting.

[1:11:26] >> Okay, I've got a motion to table from

[1:11:28] Adam

[1:11:29] >> a second from Caleb. All those in favor?

[1:11:33] >> Okay, we'll move on to item 15. Discuss

[1:11:36] and possible action on adding speed

[1:11:37] bumps to Trunk Street between Trinity

[1:11:39] and North First.

[1:11:42] I think

[1:11:45] are we gonna have our new new ser new

[1:11:47] guy walk us through this or

[1:11:52] » it might be a team maybe a team effort

[1:11:57] » get it prepared anyway

[1:11:58] >> you just said it was the last time you

[1:11:59] were coming back up here I knew

[1:12:03] >> you missed us already

[1:12:05] >> yeah I did miss you I am I am gonna miss

[1:12:07] you here

[1:12:10] >> I am going to miss y'all. I I've uh been

[1:12:12] doing this 26 years and been through

[1:12:15] lots of councils and been on a city

[1:12:18] council and y'all are working hard for

[1:12:20] Granville. I appreciate it. But for uh

[1:12:24] trunk street

[1:12:36] all right so on uh trunk street I know

[1:12:39] that

[1:12:40] when I was asked about this there are um

[1:12:43] some special requirements for um to put

[1:12:46] speed bumps they you can't put speed

[1:12:49] bumps in the road you got to they have

[1:12:51] to be speed humps

[1:12:52] So, um, with putting these speed bumps

[1:12:55] or speed humps in other places in town,

[1:12:59] um, the council had to do change some

[1:13:01] ordinance and change some speed limits.

[1:13:03] Um, there are limits to, um, the speed

[1:13:08] posted speed limit on the street to be

[1:13:10] 25 miles an hour or less to be able to

[1:13:14] um, put speed humps on there. and um the

[1:13:18] there's a sight distance requirement and

[1:13:22] signage. So in order to uh slow the

[1:13:28] traffic on uh Trump um came up with poss

[1:13:32] four for sure but possibly five just

[1:13:34] depending upon um those sight distances

[1:13:38] and um the distance between each one of

[1:13:42] those because what what happened in um

[1:13:46] Willow Lake, we put speed humps in there

[1:13:49] and um it caused most of the people in

[1:13:53] there to go from slowing down at the

[1:13:56] hump and then being able to get 45 40

[1:14:00] miles an hour between the two and then

[1:14:02] slow down and then jump that one. And so

[1:14:04] we ended up having to add some

[1:14:05] additional ones in um Willow Lake around

[1:14:08] the park. Um that's why there's so many

[1:14:11] in front of the park because everyone's

[1:14:14] trying to cut the corner and beat the

[1:14:15] traffic. um

[1:14:17] >> not fast.

[1:14:19] >> That's true.

[1:14:21] >> And there and those speed humps also

[1:14:23] have um

[1:14:25] for the way they're the way they're

[1:14:27] rated and the uh um tra the traffic laws

[1:14:32] is what regulates those so that you're

[1:14:34] not um getting them so far apart that

[1:14:37] somebody's going can get going that fast

[1:14:39] and hit them and lose control. um

[1:14:42] because once you put these down, you're

[1:14:45] liable for a lot of stuff. So, just have

[1:14:48] to be careful where where they're

[1:14:50] placed. And then um on Trunk toward

[1:14:53] Trinity,

[1:14:55] um the roads in pretty bad shape on the

[1:14:59] north side of it. So, they may or may

[1:15:01] not stay.

[1:15:04] Um you anchor them best you can and

[1:15:07] cross your fingers.

[1:15:09] But the other option um and the these

[1:15:12] are um

[1:15:16] pretty expensive

[1:15:18] um for each for each one of those uh

[1:15:20] speed humps for the speed bump material

[1:15:26] itself. Um and the signage requirement

[1:15:29] um they're about $2,000 a piece for each

[1:15:33] one of those. We did them in the other areas. The street wasn't

[1:15:38] quite as wide, so they were a little bit

[1:15:40] less, but the it was $1,910

[1:15:46] is what the the price would be for each

[1:15:48] one of those because each one of the

[1:15:50] speed bumps

[1:15:53] requires a um speed hump sign ahead or a

[1:15:57] speed bump um on either side of it. so

[1:16:00] that um eastbound traffic and westbound

[1:16:04] traffic can see those far enough in

[1:16:07] advance to slow down. The other option

[1:16:11] was um the radar feedback speed limit

[1:16:15] signs. Um I know that they're getting

[1:16:18] more and more popular. They have them in

[1:16:22] a lot of neighborhoods to uh help show

[1:16:25] your speed. Um,

[1:16:28] sometimes those visual signs like that

[1:16:31] help. Sometimes they people use them to

[1:16:35] check their speedometer to see if it's

[1:16:37] working or see just how fast they can

[1:16:39] go.

[1:16:40] >> So,

[1:16:42] oh yeah,

[1:16:44] >> especially with no red light or speed

[1:16:46] cameras allowed in the state anymore,

[1:16:47] they're pretty much uh there's no

[1:16:50] consequence. Yeah, but it um it is an

[1:16:55] option for

[1:16:58] that area. And if you wanted to uh limit

[1:17:01] that space where the road where trunk

[1:17:06] goes from

[1:17:08] the west side of that bridge all the way

[1:17:11] to First Street where the road narrows

[1:17:13] to uh start those um speed humps at a

[1:17:17] different area, a different spot just to

[1:17:20] get you slowed down before you get to

[1:17:22] the bridge and then all the way to First

[1:17:24] Street where the um school kids are

[1:17:26] walking.

[1:17:33] It's already 25 mph speed limit. The

[1:17:36] city ordinance is 25.

[1:17:38] >> What if we just what if we just increase

[1:17:40] increased police presence on that road?

[1:17:42] I mean 148 15 years ago when I moved

[1:17:45] here there was always somebody there.

[1:17:47] Everybody knew it. So when they hit town

[1:17:49] they slowed down. If if we put somebody

[1:17:52] over there now and just made everybody

[1:17:54] aware, hey you're going to speed down

[1:17:55] the road you're getting a ticket. Chief,

[1:17:57] buy a couple Harleyies and start a

[1:17:58] traffic unit.

[1:18:01] >> Yeah.

[1:18:05] » Caleb's driveway.

[1:18:06] >> Be sneakier.

[1:18:08] >> I seen Louisiana's using drones now.

[1:18:11] >> Yeah.

[1:18:15] » So, that was the um I mean the

[1:18:18] consideration for for those. And

[1:18:23] if we wanted to just reduce that reduce

[1:18:26] that down a little bit and put a few in

[1:18:29] there to slow you down before you get to

[1:18:31] the bridge. Um the bridge slows most

[1:18:34] everybody down a little bit. But

[1:18:36] >> once you get past that bottleneck, it

[1:18:39] speeds back up.

[1:18:40] >> I'm more for the signage than I am the

[1:18:42] pumps. I think pumps are

[1:18:47] they're a maintenance nightmare,

[1:18:48] especially if you're trying to put them

[1:18:50] on a that's hadn't been designed for it.

[1:18:54] >> The from

[1:18:57] um River Ridge South, the first entrance

[1:19:01] to there from there all the way to First

[1:19:03] Street. Um the streets in good enough

[1:19:06] condition it would they would you could

[1:19:08] maintain them there pretty easy.

[1:19:10] >> Can you and you think your thing said

[1:19:12] 8,000 for a hump? And then

[1:19:14] >> it's they're 2,000. It's $2,000 a piece

[1:19:18] for $1,910

[1:19:20] for those speed hubs and signage.

[1:19:23] >> So that road's wide enough you're going

[1:19:24] to have to have three probably or

[1:19:26] they're just going to drive around them.

[1:19:27] >> Um, no. It's that that $1,900 includes

[1:19:32] from edge of pavement to edge of

[1:19:34] pavement. There's no way There's no way

[1:19:35] you're getting around it.

[1:19:37] >> So, but then you have to stripe and you

[1:19:40] have to do signage.

[1:19:41] >> Um, only signage. The the hump itself

[1:19:44] comes with retroreflective material that

[1:19:48] if you went through Willow Lake or over

[1:19:50] by the park, it's those um we put in the

[1:19:53] same ones

[1:20:12] that

[1:20:14] have to drive slow because

[1:20:22] stop there.

[1:20:25] We're always

[1:20:34] slow on that road. That road is not a

[1:20:37] nice smooth road

[1:20:42] » for but for every one person that's

[1:20:44] driving the speed 25 miles hour over

[1:20:47] there from us doing a waterline project

[1:20:49] over there. For every one that's driving

[1:20:52] the speed limit, there's 10 that are

[1:20:54] going forward.

[1:20:57] >> David, have we got a lot of complaints?

[1:21:06] So, just to let you know, I uh

[1:21:11] requested the agenda and I wanted to add

[1:21:13] it to be able to have a discussion just

[1:21:16] to see what the council how council

[1:21:18] would like to move forward if everybody

[1:21:20] was okay with the speed. I'm sure you

[1:21:22] got you guys wanted to see a different

[1:21:23] uh potential solution.

[1:21:26] >> Many of the citizens called and said,

[1:21:28] "Hey, you got to do something to slow

[1:21:30] these people down."

[1:21:31] I would like to do a poll or something

[1:21:33] in that neighborhood over there just to

[1:21:34] see how many citizens are

[1:21:37] >> on her side and how many people

[1:21:39] >> I'm the one who asked for the request so

[1:21:40] I'm going to speak my mind. Um and I've

[1:21:43] talked to my neighbors most of them

[1:21:45] directly. We we especially we're right

[1:21:48] there by the bridge. It is not

[1:21:54] traffic's one thing because you got

[1:21:55] people passing back and forth but there

[1:21:57] are a lot of people who do walk that

[1:21:59] road in the evening. And there are a lot

[1:22:00] of kids that walk home between and they

[1:22:02] cut from Metal Creek across the gas

[1:22:05] easement onto Trump. And it is amazing

[1:22:09] how fast people get going in the

[1:22:11] afternoons especially because it's

[1:22:13] usually the traffic coming from Trinity

[1:22:15] back towards Spurs. It's well over 40

[1:22:19] while back. I know Chief tried to set up

[1:22:21] over there a couple times. It's

[1:22:23] difficult. It's wide open. You can see

[1:22:25] them. But I mean I can be standing in my

[1:22:27] driveway and I have a 8-year-old. I

[1:22:29] never let him out on the street unless

[1:22:30] I'm standing at the end of my driveway

[1:22:33] and I can yell distance-wise for him to

[1:22:35] get off the road or get back the

[1:22:37] driveway. It it is it's highly

[1:22:39] dangerous. I mean, I'm I'm being honest.

[1:22:41] And it's just they they see the open

[1:22:43] road and it's it's gunn it 100%. So, it

[1:22:47] was my ask and I believe it's a safety

[1:22:50] issue and I don't know any other way to

[1:22:51] slow it down. There's foot stop signs

[1:22:54] whole stretch. I mean it it's limited

[1:22:57] options as far as what we can do to try

[1:22:59] to reduce the the speed through there.

[1:23:01] >> When when the uh police department

[1:23:05] trailer was over there, did it help any?

[1:23:07] >> Didn't help at all.

[1:23:08] it. You I mean, you know, people look at

[1:23:10] a couple times they all know like Adam

[1:23:12] mentioned zero consequences kind of like

[1:23:15] the signs that uh is my you know I put

[1:23:18] bigger tires on my vehicle and doing 25

[1:23:21] according to the sign in my you know my

[1:23:23] speedometer type situation but

[1:23:28] >> you can hear

[1:23:29] >> still some grand

[1:23:31] >> you can hear them coming. I mean that's

[1:23:32] kind of the deal too. It falls to that

[1:23:34] valley and you can hear them from one

[1:23:35] end to the other. And I don't care if

[1:23:36] it's truck or car.

[1:23:48] » Too bad. Um let's let's look at maybe

[1:23:51] placing some of the bridge. Would that

[1:23:54] help?

[1:23:56] >> I agree. Some people go to the speed

[1:23:58] limit, but there's a lot that man, it's

[1:24:00] just

[1:24:00] >> and it and it uh might be it might be

[1:24:03] the point where once you get past

[1:24:06] Sabine, that first entrance, if we could

[1:24:09] just slow them down, slow them down

[1:24:11] before the bridge, right,

[1:24:12] >> and then after the bridge, and then that

[1:24:15] one before First Street, and I can look

[1:24:17] at those distances and find out if if

[1:24:20] that's feasible.

[1:24:21] >> I mean, I'm I'm open to 100% settle

[1:24:24] anything, but it's just becoming

[1:24:28] It's an increasing danger,

[1:24:34] you know, out of tolerance. Let's take a

[1:24:37] 5ft section of that road and put it in

[1:24:39] tolerance before we put them in. And

[1:24:41] that that uh on the

[1:24:44] CIP on the CIP list, that is one of the

[1:24:47] um roads that western section past the

[1:24:50] bridge is one of those that um would be

[1:24:53] is on the um would be on the CIP list

[1:24:57] for reclaim and replace. So

[1:24:59] >> yeah, but it's probably going to be a

[1:25:01] little while away. And and I know we're

[1:25:03] fixing to start doing the Mallerie Road

[1:25:05] project and stuff like that. We could we

[1:25:07] could get those guys to throw in a 5ft

[1:25:10] strip over there

[1:25:13] cheap cheaper than mobilizing a whole

[1:25:16] brand new company.

[1:25:24] » Speed humps along street

[1:25:28] pending an evaluation of the tolerance

[1:25:30] of the roadway.

[1:25:36] Second from Tim. All those in favor.

[1:25:43] » You can vote.

[1:25:50] [laughter]

[1:25:56] » All right. Thank you, sir. Um, move on

[1:25:58] to item 16, executive session. Council

[1:26:01] will hold executive session pursuant to

[1:26:03] the provisions of chapter 551, the Texas

[1:26:05] Government Code, in accordance with the

[1:26:07] authority contained therein. Executive

[1:26:09] session, Texas Government Code section

[1:26:11] 551.087.

[1:26:13] Uh deliberation regarding economic

[1:26:15] development. Uh TUR 6 and Project Grand

[1:26:19] Slam. If I can get a motion to go into

[1:26:22] executive.

[1:26:22] >> Motion.

[1:26:23] >> We got a motion from Adam.

[1:26:25] >> Second.

[1:26:26] from

[1:26:28] those in favor.

[1:26:30] All right. And that is at 7:57.

[1:26:38] Are you good to go back there? Stay

[1:26:39] here.

[1:26:41] >> I'm good.

[1:26:42] >> I'm supposed to walk.

[1:26:43] >> Okay.

[1:26:43] >> That's one thing I'm supposed to do.

[1:26:47] >> Doing what?

[1:26:51] » Hey, is he supposed to be crouching down

[1:26:53] putting cords into outlets? Running

[1:26:55] cords into outlets.

[1:27:00] Not supposed to carry that.

[1:27:02] miles.

[1:27:12] Two gallons of

[2:38:25] No,

[2:38:27] >> but I'm aware.

[2:38:29] All right, let's move on to item 17,

[2:38:31] open session. Council will now adjourn

[2:38:33] from executive session, reconvene into

[2:38:34] open session pursuant to the provisions

[2:38:36] of chapter 551 of the Texas Government

[2:38:38] Code, and take action, if any, on items

[2:38:41] discussed during closed executive

[2:38:42] session. Uh, if I could get a motion to

[2:38:45] adjurnn from executive session and uh

[2:38:47] reconvene open session.

[2:38:49] >> Motion.

[2:38:50] >> I got a motion from Adam and a second

[2:38:51] from Scott. Um,

[2:38:54] I don't believe there's any any action

[2:38:56] on item 17. So, I'm going to move on to

[2:38:58] item 18. If I get a motion to adjurnn,

[2:39:00] I've got one from Adam and a second from

[2:39:02] Caleb. All those in favor?

[2:39:05] >> Thank you.

[2:39:07] >> You read that last one.

[2:39:10] >> You didn't got to give me a chance.

Regular City Council Meeting, April 6, 2026

Agenda

Transcript