[6:37] >> I call this meeting to order. This is the special magistrate hearing for the

[6:40] city of Delray Beach. ? We know am I? Cases are going

[6:51] to call them the order which they appear on the agenda unless otherwise noted. When

[6:56] you hear your case call, go ahead and proceed down to the podium here on my left hand

[7:02] The city will put on its testimony evidence for still have an opportunity to review

[7:06] any evidence that the city presents or to ask questions of any of the city's

[7:08] witnesses. After which time you can present your own testimony and evidence and

[7:11] then I will make a decision. This is a cause either should hearing, which means the

[7:15] formal rules of evidence do not apply here all testimony is taken under oath under

[7:19] penalty of perjury. >> So if you're gonna testified today, are you

[7:24] thinking my testifiers possibility that you might testify and I see you rise and

[7:26] raise your right hand to warning. ?

[7:34] >> By the authority vested in me as a notary of the state of Florida. Do you swear or a

[7:39] fire? The testimony you're about to give? Is that true? and nothing but the truth.

[7:51] ? >> So Jenna. >> Requesting approval of the

[7:57] consent agenda as written so approved. Thank you. All right. We have the minutes

[8:05] from June 4, June 18th in July. Second thing they're here might be improved if you.

[8:11] >> All right, before we get started, just a quick note. This time. chamber's around

[8:17] large, right? But a town travels really well in here. So I'm going to ask if you if

[8:20] you need to have a conversation or something comes up, you need to call.

[8:24] >> Please take it outside the room because promise you the rest of us will here. If you

[8:26] take it in The first. >> Case. Number one. Cole. 26 0, 0, 0, 8, 5, 2, The property

[8:45] owners on Properties Inc. Where the resident agent is Bruce Shriver. properties of

[8:54] Delray Eek. We have the registered agent is John hoped the property address is 9, 7,

[9:02] 5 South Congress and the code officer on the case ishant how Jean Baptiste.

[9:10] >> Good afternoon. a mission team that he's code enforcement officer with the

[9:12] city of Derry Beach. This property 9.75 South Congress Ave was issue a notice of

[9:19] violation on July 7th 2026. service was accomplished by certified and ready in the

[9:27] mail on August. 20th 2026. In addition, both the property at City were posted on August.

[9:37] 20th 2026. in affidavits posting is attached to this case. Been in contact with on

[9:42] property. This property was cited for why 1, 0, 0, 2, business tax receipt vehicles.

[9:52] Vehicle warehouse storage. As of August 31st. 2026, the property has not come into

[9:59] compliance. >> A 4 ordered for photograph of the property. Into this

[10:06] cave that I would like to introduce. ?

[10:16] >> Exhibit shows the front of the business and the name of the business, the Platinum

[10:22] Collection photo taken on July 9, 2026. Exhibit 2. It's the posting on the property on

[10:30] August 2020. 26. Exhibit 3 is the affidavit of posting. Exhibit for is noncompliance

[10:39] affidavit. >> The city's vaccine to cease operations within 5 days,

[10:47] which will be September 8th Twenty-twenty 6. And so chain, a conditional use of approval.

[10:55] A business tax certificate approval within 120 days, which will be. First 2026. for

[11:04] them to come into compliance if they do not come into compliance in the city is

[11:10] asking for $250 a day and so compliance is achieved. >> The city is also asking

[11:18] these 4 exhibits be introduced into evidence. >> Certainly time your name,

[11:24] please. Yes, David mileage for the record. We just move. But 5, 5, 5, 0, escalates. We 6.20

[11:33] >> So listen what your position with the respondent? >> I represent the tenant. The

[11:43] violation we want to turn us >> the owner of the property know that you're here on his

[11:49] behalf? there be Yes, they should. You have any objections to the photographs

[11:58] are documents the city was trying to pin him and I have no objections to waters that

[12:01] objection. So it meant. All right, sir. The floor is Perfect. Thank you. Appreciate

[12:06] it. >> So this purpose of this unit has one existing BTR that

[12:10] was issued by by the city day applied for a new BTR for another portion of the

[12:16] property. It's a large. Are you at? So I think right now the contention with the city

[12:23] is just probably the rear. 3rd. Of the unit. We have submitted a conditional use

[12:32] application through development services that was submitted September 1st, we

[12:36] are asking for additional time. To process that application for the

[12:41] conditional use. Again, it was just a minute. So, you know, on how long things take Cipro

[12:49] say 9 months to go through the entire We are requesting some additional time. Get the 9

[12:56] months to get a conditional use permit. 12 months. I'm not being funny. That does take a

[13:03] very long time nowadays to process applications of these sorts. staff can up. I'm so I

[13:10] I spoke to Mister Million. She caught >> Up Damian, the status quo

[13:16] was going on with the property and his client. Additionally, I did speak to staff from

[13:23] development services and we don't know about 12 months. You know that we did make the

[13:30] recommendation for 120 days in consultant consultation with staff. development services.

[13:36] As far as the process of the conditional use, it will take some time, but not the year.

[13:42] >> been awful long time for the 2. >> Well, there's there's a

[13:48] process. It's not just a simple building permit, right? The conditional use based on

[13:52] our statute. believe this. This has to go to a phase one of our boards in the city. if

[13:58] they approve it or not, that it's it says by commission. So we we can't it's you know,

[14:05] they have to get the commission agenda, right? So that's 2 boards. Time periods,

[14:08] consultation with staff as I leave 120 days is appropriate. In the meantime, we want the

[14:15] business to cease operations within 5 days. >> To make a suggestion, maybe

[14:21] it's just 6 months and then we come back for a status update at that point. Just to

[14:27] determine where we are in the process of the application or we diligently pursuing it. So

[14:30] on so forth. as it relates to not doing light automotive maintenance that we're

[14:40] suggesting here. You know, I understand the city's position and how you know, it's.

[14:46] Against their policy to allow businesses to continue. I don't think that we

[14:50] necessarily have an issue. What not operating really are are one ask is just we have

[14:55] the locals. Sitting within backed one-third. We would like just to keep them there,

[15:02] but no work. no business channels or whatever will be there. So, you know, we can

[15:12] show that none of that work is going to take place is just the just going to sit there

[15:16] until we get the approval. >> And, you know, were hesitant to agree to allow him

[15:22] to culls on the property because that's that's a different section of the code

[15:26] that could potentially be violated. The storage of the vehicles outside of any

[15:30] approved use. Land developing regulations. So we're hesitant to even agree to that. You

[15:40] know, as far as the 180 days, we wouldn't agree to setting up for a status check either.

[15:48] you know, maybe another 30 days on the compliance, but not that.

[15:52] >> And this is what I'm going to do in 26 0, 0, 0, 8, 5, to make the final findings of

[15:56] fact in life. I'm notice is sufficient. I find the property in violation of one

[16:01] 10.0 2, which is an operation of the business without the business tax receipt. I'm

[16:04] going to give the respondent 30 days cease operation of the business and many of the

[16:09] respondent 120 days to obtain the appropriate business tax receipt with Senate for

[16:12] hearing. After that 120 days. If you're. You know, making good progress and it's not

[16:20] your fault or not there we can talk about them. >> I think the issue is that a

[16:24] specific date for Do we have we have several. >> For whatever the next

[16:31] available hearing is after 120 days, we have those things. >> I believe said that. one I

[16:38] have not. I'm sorry. I September 17. Is tearing? And after that, we need after 100.

[16:47] didn't know the line after xt, OK? So if you don't have, that's OK, just put it in the

[16:51] order that for the next available here in after the compliance deadline of 100

[16:56] where E? no, I don't have that. think you all make a note of Inc wake start? Yes, I

[17:03] like Millage also has case number 13. Yes, your cases? Well, I spoke to code

[17:09] enforcement staff and they're comfortable since since you're here. It's a code. 26 Dash, 0,

[17:19] 0, 0, 6, 8, 1, I'm yes. If we could call that case. Madam Clerk has a request.

[17:26] Absolutely. Case. Number 13. A 26. 0, 0, 0, 6, 8, 1, The property owners on Shine a

[17:45] case. London again, Living Revoke swish, Alan and again is the trustee. The property

[17:53] address is 2 to 6 South Ocean Boulevard. And the code officer on the case is code

[18:00] Enforcement Supervisor Latoya Thompson. It's cool. We have a presentation, but I believe

[18:07] Mr. Millage would like to make a request before we do What we are here to request a

[18:12] continuance of this hearing. >> We are actively trying to not only bring it into

[18:19] compliance, but we also have a pending application before the historical board. A

[18:25] certificate of appropriateness so again, we're we're working through that process with the

[18:30] city. We would appreciate an additional time to work that through. However. Well, based

[18:39] off our expert, who's here, from my understanding, that process is very Again. Giving

[18:45] him you're asked RSS 12 months again. ?

[18:54] >> And we we would not agree to the 12 months. We understand we have discussed

[19:00] this with historic and this is been going on for a long time. But they have acknowledged

[19:05] Meetings have been scheduled and work. So they've they're tempting. They're they're

[19:09] working with the city right? But 120 days, I just need one spoke with the code

[19:13] enforcement speaking the code enforcement officer. We're comfortable with a 90 with the

[19:22] understand that the fines will continue to of or their. This is the leading continue case.

[19:34] Today. There's a crew final right? Initially wanted to ask the property, be laned in the

[19:39] fight continued to accrue. But based on the fact Israelis representations in our

[19:43] conversations with staff and that historic staff more comfortable with. If you want

[19:50] know this is this I'm just going to reset this for 90 days. What's the what's

[19:53] hearing? And it is from that. >> Thank for this one. our December. We have the summer

[19:59] here. ? >> I have a 12, 3, Carol. 12 3

[20:14] Thank you. remaining order still in effect just to re sentence? Thank you.

[20:23] >> Madam City attorney, we moving back to my yes, we start back at the top. I just

[20:27] wanted to call the case that he lived Thank ?

[20:32] Case number 2. ? Called 26 0, 0, 0, 9, 5, 4,

[20:45] >> The property owners are pm tax and Multi Services LLC. The registered agent is

[20:52] business filings incorporating the property address is 5, 8, 0 snap away and the officer on

[21:01] the case ishant Baptiste. >> Good afternoon. My name is Chantel team at T's going

[21:09] officer for the city of Derry Beach. property 5, 0 snapper way was issued a notice of

[21:16] violation on July 22nd. It's 2026 service was accomplished by certified and signed on

[21:25] July 24th 2026. In addition, both the property and post on July 24th 2026. and affidavit

[21:33] of posting is attached to this case. Have not been in contact with the property owner. This

[21:40] property was cited for 4002.13, subsection B for building permit. Required for

[21:49] 2 additions property and it extended driveway. And it was cited for 1007.5 numbering of

[21:56] character on the building structure as of August 31st. 2026, the property has not

[22:02] come into compliance. Attached live a photograph of this property to his case that I

[22:08] would like to introduce. It's evidence. ?

[22:16] Exhibit one. >> shows the front of the property taken on July. 21st

[22:24] 2026, as you can see to the south of the property, the mission. Exhibit 2, it's a

[22:30] close-up photo of the property taken on July 20st 2026. With the addition to the south in

[22:39] the rear of the property. Exhibit 3, it's another photo taking on the north side of

[22:46] the property showing mission. Taking on July. 21st 2026. Is for a close-up photo from the

[22:56] same angle taken on July? 21st 2026. Exhibit 5, a close-up photo. From the property and

[23:03] missing character numbers. On the structure. Exhibit 6 is where posted the notice of

[23:11] violation on property on July 24th 2026. Exhibit 7 is the affidavit of posting on July

[23:19] 24th 2026. On August 8 are respected the property and showing the extended driveway

[23:27] and additions. The president on the property. Exhibit 9. Another photo taken from the

[23:34] front of property August 31st. 2026. Exhibit Another photo taken of the property. No side

[23:44] of the property on August 31st. 2026. Exhibit Levin is affidavit of noncompliance.

[23:55] >> August the 6th 2026 to own a property. For permits. For building permits. However, on

[24:02] August 12 know was updated that of property need to resubmit the permits due her

[24:10] builder. They were able live on the builder. So the city is aksing for an additional 30

[24:17] days which will be October. 3rd, 2026. for them to come into compliance if they did

[24:23] not come into compliance, then city is Aksing. I did not as the day into compliance is

[24:26] achieved. >> We'd also ask that 11 exhibits be introduced into

[24:32] evidence. >> Certainly tell me your name, please treatment. This

[24:38] one. Can you say it again? And it's a little bit louder than to the mic. Was that but on

[24:44] spire last names. then Istanbul. This monitor. What is your position with the

[24:56] respondent PM tax and mobile some religion. start on their own. You're the monitored over

[25:05] the objection to entry the evidence, the photographs and documents that the city just

[25:08] this point. objection so admitted. your turn. Enjoy it, too. You know, put right to

[25:24] be. >> know and know, if they knew that you the

[25:27] >> How much time do it, sir? 90's? >> wouldn't agree to 90 days.

[25:47] We would agree to 60 because there are 2 additions and extended driveway.

[25:49] >> But >> or yes, I'd be fine. >> a 16 this work.

[25:59] ? case. 26, what is 60 days? we're doing? Dates or killer.

[26:08] ? And then put this on for. Once the first November here.

[26:19] November 5. So the person for All right. Here's 26 0, 0, 0, 9, 5, 4, make the following

[26:29] findings of fact in life. I notice is sufficient. I find the property in violation of

[26:31] code sections. 4002.1, 3, BN 1007.5 or the respondent to come into compliance by

[26:37] obtaining the building permits and putting the numbers on the structure by November. 2nd,

[26:42] 2026 or a fine of up to $100 per day may suffer. Find assessment hearing within 5,

[26:45] 2026 if necessary. Thank >> Case number 3. A 26 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 3, the property owner

[27:02] is a list Andrews. The property at versus 29. 87 angling drive. And the code

[27:09] officer on the case ishant how Baptiste. >> Good afternoon. I'm on a

[27:14] mission. So gene, he's code enforcement officer for the city of Derry Beach, this

[27:20] property. 29 87, a blood drive was issued a notice of violation on left. 2026

[27:26] service was accomplished by certified ever Now on August 12, 2026. In addition, both

[27:33] the property as City Hall were posted on August 13, 2026. And that's David of posting is

[27:39] attached to this case have not been in contact with the property owner. This property

[27:45] was cited for 1007.5 numbering of building. On structure and 6004.16 subsection eyes,

[27:58] subsection one landscape maintenance, which complied on August 31st. 2026 as of August

[28:06] 31st. The property has not come into compliance with 1007.5 numbering a building on

[28:11] structure. Have 9 photograph of this property down like introduce into evidence.

[28:19] ? Exhibit one. >> Photo taken August 11, 2026

[28:31] so on a property has over group overgrown landscape as well. Ms and the property

[28:34] number on structure. Exhibit to second photo taken to the front of the property.

[28:40] overgrown grass. On the property. And right, Ali, it's taken on August 11, 2026.

[28:47] Exhibit. Is another photo. Take you to the front of the property. Showing property.

[29:00] Exhibit 4 know the foe from the front of the property. Missing care. The numbers.

[29:04] Exhibit 5. Posted the notice of violation on property August. The 13th 2026. Exhibit

[29:14] 6. This affidavit most and 7 is the re inspection of the property photo taken August

[29:23] 31st. 2026 wouldn't have come my way stay maintenance. Exhibit A is another photo

[29:31] taking property on first 2026. with the property The number is not on the building.

[29:39] Exhibit 9 is a noncompliance affidavit. >> The city is for an

[29:47] additional 14 days which will be October the 17th 2026. For that to come into compliance.

[29:56] they do not going to comply, stunned the city is aksing for $50 a and so compliance is

[30:00] achieved. I'm axing these photos be submitted as >> So you would have to have

[30:08] the respondent Louis Andrews. Seeing no one without objection on Sept in evidence

[30:13] given tree. filed putting the photographs and documents submitted by city. So they

[30:19] fixed the. But they didn't put the correct. >> And that the landscape

[30:27] maintenance. But they didn't want property house them around the building structure.

[30:33] >> And you had no contact at all with the owner. Know that my last respects. didn't even

[30:36] know for Just in case they didn't understand. You notice of violation to place

[30:41] numbering on the property. >> Working Day seems like more than enough time to put some

[30:48] numbers on a building. >> 26 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 3. Make the fine finds effect in life

[30:56] and notices fission and the property in violation of 1007.5, the numbers have to be

[31:01] on the building. Spotted has until October 17, 2026 to bring the property plant are

[31:09] fine of up to $50 per Mission. >> Thank you. Case number 4. Called 26 0, 0, 0, 9, 0, The

[31:27] property owner Otis Williams. The property address is 3, Southwest Avenue. Cases. Code

[31:37] Enforcement Supervisor Latoya Thompson. >> Good afternoon. Special

[31:43] Magistrate. My name is LaToya Thompson, code Enforcement supervisor with for the city

[31:46] of Delray Beach here regarding property 3, 1, Southwest 6th case number to 0, 0, 9, 0, 8,

[31:58] The property was issued a notice of violation on July 14th, 2000. 26 service was

[32:04] accomplice complex by certified mail regular mail in positive City hall, July 16,

[32:12] 2026. addition, the property was posted on 7/16/2026 an affidavit of posting emailing

[32:20] and first affidavit of noncompliance is attached to the case. I have not been in

[32:24] contact with the property owner. The property was cited for. Drywall removal, which is

[32:31] work without permit. Landscape maintenance. 6004.16 subsection. I'm subsection one

[32:42] 6004.16 subsection e subsection 3 vehicle encroachment which came into

[32:47] compliance on 8/26/2026. And 8007.3 building required which came into compliance on

[32:56] 8/26/2026. As of 9/3/2026, the property has not come into the minds with the outstanding

[33:06] violations, which is the building permit. 4002.13 Subsection B for the removal

[33:11] of the drywall and also for point 6.16 subsection high one for the landscape maintenance.

[33:24] Attached. 13 photos of the property to the case that I would like to introduce into

[33:26] evidence. Exhibit one taken on 7/13/2026. Is a photo of the vehicle. Encroachment. Bill

[33:37] Wilson on the property. Also in the city's right away. You have trash and debris. And

[33:44] also on the property of Frey. trash and debris. Said Noem. Exhibit to taking on 7/13/2026

[34:01] is the landscape as he conceded prom freinds overgrown grass. Exhibit 3 is

[34:08] a close-up of the property. with the trash and debris outside. Exhibit for is the

[34:21] drywall is outside of the door along with trash and debris. >> I was just a close up of

[34:29] the drywall in the trash. Exhibit 6 is a photo taken in. >> There's a reflection. Of

[34:40] the outside. However, the drive along inside the law was removed. This area. Exhibit 7

[34:55] taking on July. 16th is the affidavit. >> Correction the posting the

[34:59] notice. violation. Just for clarification. >> What exhibit, 6, 7, And

[35:12] that's what this little bit of a glare on the window. But when you are physically on the

[35:16] property could see through the window and see what you are describing. Correct?

[35:19] >> Yes, ma'am. The original officer who took it, yes, ma'm. Exhibit A is the

[35:27] affidavit of posting. Exhibit 9 is taking on August. 24, the reinspection where the

[35:37] landscape is still over room has not been cut. Exhibit TN is a photo of the drywall and

[35:44] other trash that was removed. Taken August 24th. Exhibit 11 is the right away where trash

[35:54] was previously there. But it was removed and also the address of the building of

[36:02] >> we still some of the world's current. Yes, over over the right way August. 24,

[36:11] the vehicle was removed. However, still see that the landscape need to be trimmed

[36:14] and cut. And exhibit 13 is the affidavit of noncompliance. >> The city is asking for an

[36:26] additional 30 days which will be October. 3rd, 2 down. 26 for them to come into

[36:32] compliance and they do not come into compliance than the city's asking for $100. They

[36:37] would find until compliance is achieved. >> Thank you. And what what

[36:43] still outstanding. >> Outstanding is the permit for the drywall removal and

[36:46] also the landscape maintenance. Thank you. >> So one here and they have

[36:51] to respond in this case voters, Williams. Seeing no without objection of 7

[36:57] evidence, chains mission by the city, including the photos and documents. City no contact

[37:03] with this own property owner. No, But those been trying to come mind, but some of it

[37:08] aren't partial games. outstanding. Is the building permit for the removal of the

[37:19] drywall. just still needs to be maintained. Yes, sir. And you believe 30 days special.

[37:23] time to do this. >> Because of the permanent process.

[37:30] >> And you believe they can get that permit within 30 minutes.

[37:33] >> If they follow all instructions, yes, case 26 0, 0, 0, 9, 0, 8, 5, times a fact

[37:42] notices fish from the property violation 4002.1, 3 being the building permit for the

[37:46] removed. Right. 6004.1, 6. I won the maintenance of the landscaping respondent has

[37:52] until October 3rd to bring the property compliance or fined up to $100 per day. Mission.

[37:56] >> Thank you. Case number 5. Called 26 0, 0, 0, 9, 1, 9, the property owner is Target

[38:12] Corporation. The registered agent is CT Cooperation systems.

[38:16] >> The property address is 1200 West Linton Boulevard and the code officer on the case

[38:21] is Rendell Stron. >> Thank We're going to our first witness said that you

[38:27] please state your full name spire last. Even tell us which department you work for the

[38:31] city. >> Yes, my name is Jonathan Clause that cla us. I am an

[38:36] inspector to more specifically a mechanical inspector in plan review or for the city of

[38:39] Delray Beach. And I'm currently employed. >> a familiar with the

[38:43] property located at 1200 West Linton Boulevard. That's the target. Yes. And could you

[38:48] tell how did you become aware of the AC lack of AC permit violation? So on July 15th, I

[38:56] was on target premise for a different permit for a different scope of work and

[39:01] well on the roof or that permit. I noticed that there were 12 new AC units.

[39:08] >> further inspection of them, they were serial numbers of 2025. Then they went ahead and

[39:13] checked all existing permits. There was no permits since 2023 so that it was turned

[39:18] over to code enforcement. >> Okay. Is that can clear involvement in the case. It's

[39:23] all right. Thank you. At this time with the calmest are strong.

[39:26] ? >> We got to know when the phone here for 12 was it was a

[39:35] little more regardless the storm. the permits. This part of property was issued a

[39:42] building permit violation service come comes by certified sent on 7/17/2026.

[39:52] recall does not cite. In addition both. The problem it helps post on the property.

[39:57] And on July, 17th 2 done to assist affidavit opposing also test with the case files. I

[40:03] have been in contact with the property with the property store manager. This public

[40:10] side for his AC units on 7/17/2020 says the court officer most it was a former

[40:15] to see the very beach development services. making reduce total store with the

[40:23] promise of insulation. Lacey knew wasn't about is the 2.4 3.13 To pay for 13

[40:28] association. Be. And as of September 6 to do to assist the probe has not come into

[40:37] complaints at time is a permit as those that will hold Senate. grants. But

[40:42] appropriate. Let's introduce as evidence. >> Thank you. So you say that

[40:48] this was turned over to you Biden. Specter for the 12 AC units that were installed at

[40:55] that apartment, correct? And investigated. And you are able to obtain photographs from the

[41:02] inspector, correct? Yes, all right. So we're going to have him come back at top. The

[41:04] photographs that he took an observer on the property. Thank you. It exhibits one.

[41:12] >> This is one of the few new AC units with a new permit after York unit. This is the

[41:19] serial number and model number of the union, which is a 2025. And that was exhibit exhibit

[41:27] to exhibit 3 is another unit. Exhibit for is a separate unit. Exhibit 5 is another

[41:34] unit that's there was a total of 12 new units on the roof. All right. Thank you so much.

[41:42] >> Officer, they all had the serial numbers from 2020. yes, they all have been replaced at

[41:45] the >> If you would like to be here for Damascus to Sean.

[41:52] ? >> says is a photograph taken on last 17. To witnesses of

[42:01] the post that front. And this is a this is a cover. The affidavit of opposing the also

[42:12] this incident. Is it 8 is a response within bone. And this is another part of the

[42:19] affidavit stated that from has not come life. >> Coming to comply. Thank

[42:25] you. At this time, let's introduce exhibits into evidence.

[42:31] >> Anyone here on behalf of Target Corporation. Seeing no one without objection, accept

[42:38] exhibits and evidence. ? What is the city seeking

[42:46] recommendations? >> Recommendation, please see in 14 days for plans by

[42:49] September 17. If the plans as $400 5. Well, complaints. >> Officers traumas, 14 days

[42:59] enough time to obtain the permits necessary. Yes, it is. ?

[43:10] >> That the building's vectors and shaking his head as well. That he believes that 14 days

[43:14] is enough time. If you want to come on the record. >> They have started the

[43:18] process but have not finished. You know, with the delay of we are waiting on them to

[43:24] register their contract with the city for a business license.

[43:26] ? >> I'm gonna make it 21 days just because I know these

[43:33] things. Alright case, 26 0, 0, 0, 9, 1, 9. Make find findings of fact. In life I notice a

[43:41] sufficient amount property in violation 7.8 This is not pursuing some 0. 8.3, right in

[43:45] and testify to. >> Is there a violation for the maintenance of Bell dings?

[43:56] yeah. comply chose leave standout that was complied. >> Thank you, State. This in

[44:02] case. 26 0, 0, 0, 9, When make the point findings of fact, my to sufficient from the

[44:06] property violations, 4002.1, 3 B, the missing building permits on installed on the

[44:12] roof. The respondent has 21 days. Anyone do the calculation? I-24 9.24 To

[44:19] bring the property into compliance or fine of up to $100 per Mission. Thank you.

[44:26] Case number 6. >> 26 0, 0, 0, 9, 3, 8, the property on or is. Andrew on

[44:36] track? And proto. The property actress is 14, 19 Hummingbird, the code officer on the case

[44:48] is wrapped all strong. >> doesn't Windows role here for case number 20 says that

[44:55] it refers to property 14, 19 hummingbird, Dry. What about for a number of business and

[45:05] structures of church structures and landscape maintenance. But son was. But

[45:07] to the property. Service comes by certify rid of the missing on July 23rd to done to. This

[45:14] is a great that site in addition, both to see the old property explosion on July

[45:19] 24th. one says after David is also posted to case files. I have not been in contact with

[45:29] the property owner at time. The problems cited for mission address numbers and they upon

[45:32] tree. Wasn't a 22 between us is going off. Some of are Haitian and trees on the

[45:41] property was the bodies of 4.0 6 is teams association. I association one. Missing

[45:47] numbers on the residence was 7.5 As a symptom of a sick it to those witnesses. There

[45:55] probably has not talked to the players and have says photographs. Left for probably

[45:59] the case to news as evidence at this time. Is it want to take the one's a lot. 20 of

[46:07] 2026. it right here? Is that. Photograph of the of vehicle on the property.

[46:20] >> story which has now come to the place. My last visit will. >> So that is probably that

[46:27] particular part of houses the price. Exhibit 2 shows. The problem from a different

[46:34] country. Taking to that one the Twin cities. President Bush told the Post another

[46:42] property taking on to floor to Twin Cities. This affidavit of posting. war. This is the

[46:50] players they did was in a fight. The ad that front, there's not a night plans at

[46:57] this time. Was it it shows. Taking I just want to still don't want see it. So that

[47:09] property is not coming to the plans at this time. And also the is no number 8 on the

[47:12] list. This is said. >> outside stores in the I says a number of it has been

[47:21] removed from the prophet. This was taken on 32 Well, this is this is it said.

[47:25] ? >> We like to introduce 7 exhibits into evidence.

[47:33] >> So what here on behalf of the respondent, Andrew Andra and Amanda Schroder. Seeing

[47:39] none without objection, accept the 7 make exhibits into evidence. The city's composite

[47:42] exhibit. >> So March on the 2 outs violations 4.6, 1, 6, I

[47:50] landscape maintenance for the tree issue and some 1.5 for the lack of numbering on the

[47:54] property through home. Thank you. >> So the landscape, just that

[48:00] deterring. yes. And then the moon. Officers from what requesting here.

[48:16] >> A question is what the players about 2.30 Put it front. places too.

[48:23] >> probably going to need a tree removal >> they want to take Is that

[48:28] this? ? >> Either way, do you think

[48:34] they can get this done within 30 days? >> Yes, on action.

[48:41] >> Alright case. 26 0, 0, 0, 9, 3, 85 findings of fact in life and notice official from

[48:46] the property in violation of 6004.1, 6. I won winds. Get me. specifically branches

[48:52] hanging from that tree and 1007071.5, the numbering on the building respondents 30

[48:58] days to come to plants are fine of up to $100 per day. May issue 30 days would be.

[49:03] >> 10 to 10, 3, 10, 3. Thank you. Case number 7. >> Called 26 0, 0, 0, 8, 3, 5,

[49:20] The property on his art and religion. Stacy, real CC bail. is 18, 20 South Ocean

[49:28] Boulevard unit. 2 AF. The case is practiced Jenks. >> Good afternoon. My name is

[49:36] Travis Jace, Code Enforcement. Officer City of beach here regarding proper Tea, 18, 20

[49:41] South Ocean Boulevard 2 F. Case number 0, 8, 3, 5, the property was issued violation

[49:49] August 12th 2026. service was comes certified mail was Post City 30.0 26. In addition, the

[49:59] property was posted on August 12, 2026. able to post and milling first affidavit. I'm

[50:04] not apply to the test case. >> I've been in contact with the property owner. And right

[50:10] now they are in process of paintings prints. They were property cited for violation.

[50:17] 2 points. 1.1, 3 building permits. As of 8/6/2026. The property has not come to

[50:25] compliance. I have attached 10 photographs of the property, public interest Evans.

[50:29] ? >> We have July 19. June 17, 2026. Here part of the many

[50:41] split that's in the property. Here on July, June 17th, there is another mini split. And the

[50:48] property as well. Is another photo exhibit 3 for that bathroom that's being done.

[50:58] That's it for is that many split that was installed outside the property. Unit. 5

[51:03] is where the people with a win in 2. Install the property of the Winslet's. is 6 is the

[51:13] affidavit of those violations Well. Exhibit 7 is affidavit of posting. Exhibit A is a

[51:21] noncompliance. Exhibit A to say images. I want to put evidence.

[51:32] >> Circa, tell your name, please. Andrew Bail. And you're one of the owners of

[51:38] the properties are that's correct. Given injections to the photographs are documents

[51:43] coming into evidence. I do know. Direction, so admit it. So tell me what's going on.

[51:50] >> Okay. So we bought the unit. Approach, the president of the H.O.A. Brandon to let

[51:57] him know that we making some renovations to the unit time. introduced him to the

[52:07] contractor that we had on his comment was you do not be to get comments. So we went ahead

[52:12] with the construction as you saw from the photos. And at some point, the H.O.A.

[52:19] president lead to a permit Julie President under >> State that again, the

[52:24] H.O.A. President Brendan Kelly told me that I didn't want comment. So anyway, so we went

[52:30] ahead and started, you know, this doesn't help you now, but that's a question better

[52:36] directed at the city them in an H.O.A. president. Exactly. Well, the hindsight is 2020

[52:43] time subsequently we as you saw from the photos you so that we can many splits. We

[52:53] put the contents condenses where you them notated. >> The president did not like

[52:58] where they were located. He wanted us to move Initially we did not because there was a

[53:03] tree in the way. And then he decided, well, if you're not going to do that, then we'll

[53:08] go ahead and the compliance of this is witch is why we had today subsequently. As soon we

[53:17] received the notice ahead and the plight of promise. Unfortunately, initial

[53:25] contract walked off the job on station interaction with H.O.A. president. We had a new

[53:29] contract when the prices of getting permits and moving ahead with the job.

[53:34] >> The correct? How much time do need to obtain your permits? I'd like I'd like 120

[53:39] days just so that I'm not and front of you again. If that's okay, we're in the process of.

[53:44] We do have a in place. do have I think to comment in place. We're waiting for

[53:53] >> the city's asked for 90 days. >> You are comfortable within

[53:58] 90 days. The 90 days it is. a fine of $50 per day. If not. Thank you.

[54:07] >> I do have one final question. we're doing everything that we can to get

[54:11] everything in place and the 90 days comes in. >> The fine doesn't happen

[54:15] automatically. What would have to happen is if if you go past the 90 days, the city will set

[54:19] fine assessment hearing. And so you'll come back here and like a hurricane came through.

[54:24] It's not fair A reasonable a stunt. So I would generally say that city probably would

[54:32] not. Particular hearing that. The point is there's another. Alright. Ksat. 26 0, 0, 0, 8,

[54:44] 3, 5, make the following findings of fact that my friend notices sufficient I

[54:46] from the property violation. 4002.1 3, which is construction without a permit,

[54:49] including the many split bases in the bathroom. Respondent has.

[54:51] >> 90 days. We want out for me. We're 12 to bring the property compliance or fined

[55:00] up to $50 per day. Mission. >> Thank you. Case number 8 Koch. 26 0, 0, 0, 9, 5, 5, The

[55:15] property on I Club Inc. The registered agent IS C T Corp system. The property address

[55:24] is 2, 0, 0, won South Ocean Boulevard and the cold for on that case is Travis chains.

[55:32] >> Good afternoon again. My name is Travis Jenks, code Enforcement officer City of

[55:37] Delray Beach. We regarded property to 0, 0, 1, South Ocean Boulevard. Case number

[55:42] 2, 6, 0, 0, 0, 9, 5, 5, The properties issued notice of violation on July 24th 2026.

[55:49] So was accomplished by certified mail? And post to city Hall in July 24th 2026.

[55:55] In addition, the property was posted. July. 24 2026. and that to be able to posting

[56:02] mailing first affidavit, not appliances, attach it to the case. I have been contact with

[56:06] the property manager. changes case popular site for 6004.1, 9 subsection l primitive

[56:14] species removed. Violation. 6004.1, 9 subsection Kate nuisance, species removal

[56:22] permits violation. 6004.1, 9 subsection e subsection one that Haitian removal commits

[56:27] as of all the 22nd 2026 to prop has not come into compliance. I would Texas

[56:35] photographs of the property of the like to introduce into evidence.

[56:38] ? On 7/11/2011. Here are some photographs of a string of

[56:44] pine trees. Is another happened to the 2 July live with some. they put into go

[56:55] down to the parking down toward the beach. It's not a close-up of that photo for big

[56:59] 3. Is the posting of the notice of violation on July. 24 2026. 5 affidavit of

[57:11] posting July 24th 2026. David. I'm not compliance for 6. Says asking for additional 60 days

[57:27] which would be on November. Second, 2026 for them to come into compliance state did not

[57:31] come to compliance. Cities asked $50 per day Let's Could you please introduce my

[57:39] exhibits photos evidence. Certain time. Your name, please. My name is David Shane

[57:47] Rose in the facility director for doing just >> Shang rose change chain?

[57:53] Yes, or like the like the Western. Shane Rose. It's okay. Given injections, the

[58:03] photographs are not going like number No objections. Without objection. So admitted.

[58:08] Officer. What is compliance in this case? One of the they have to a ply for the permits

[58:16] and have >> stream pine trees removed, Dr in the face of treat.

[58:24] ? >> And you believe 16 is a special for them to accomplish

[58:30] that. Yes, So you think? The first off we 100% be in compliance with the city.

[58:41] However, it's a good place to start. However, it is almost 800 linear feet of Australian

[58:47] paws are invasive. we all agree that they do need to go, however, with the north and

[58:53] southbound relies there's there's some dispute on the ownership of the Pines

[58:55] themself. Currently right now we've engaged and retained a surveying company, too. I get

[59:03] is mapped out to ownership of those trees. But with that being said, with the H.O.A.

[59:09] communities to the north and to the South, it's a shared property line. Either or it's

[59:15] going to require some poor nations to meetings to, you know, be thoughtful in the

[59:21] replacements and so on and so forth. And I'm also kind of time for if think what we're

[59:27] asking the city request to 12 months to plan design and ultimately executed within

[59:33] that time frame with the hopes of doing it sooner. We hope to have final cad joins Apds all

[59:44] the bodies pines by the end of the So hopefully that will give us a store.

[59:48] >> In the interim, we have separate harvest report and also supplementary estimates

[59:52] from 3 different contractors for the removal and some replacement options. This is

[59:57] going to take some coordination parts. >> Of our neighbors, you know,

[1:00:05] Dana 5, the species that was replaced says as well as the look along with, you know,

[1:00:10] some privacy concerns as well. >> As well. Our season is effective. November first,

[1:00:16] which not excuse, but there's also logistics and operational concerns.

[1:00:20] >> trying to get that accomplished. >> So considering it seems

[1:00:26] like there trying to move forward, we're comfortable, you know, along for additional

[1:00:28] 90 days. So baby, 30 days. So recommendation will be 90 days to lease obtain the permits

[1:00:37] that the work doesn't have to be completed within 9 days is just of painting the permit.

[1:00:48] >> As long as we can identify with who the ownership of the ponds or uncoordinated with

[1:00:53] that. And now Madonna contractor. >> Well, as Paschall matter, I

[1:00:57] can order you to remove trees that are not yours. That's I mean, to the extent that, you

[1:01:03] know that I do in order here, which I will momentarily. But I can only compel you remove.

[1:01:14] Nooses are prohibited, remission, species that are existing on your property. So

[1:01:18] to the extent that there on your neighboring property. I mean, you may want to

[1:01:22] coordinate with the removal of neighbors, but I can order you to remove those.

[1:01:26] >> No, no, sir. And that's that's the biggest question where these pies or on the

[1:01:31] bench. A lot of the shared we own half of them to be 75 1% of them to 25 1% of them. This

[1:01:37] is determine who has the ownership of those trees. And then there's easement to the

[1:01:40] South. Of that property line as well. could whatever individuals that could be a

[1:01:47] concern as well. >> So that's what I would also say is, you know, again, 90

[1:01:53] days. But this is the type of situation they would have to work early State Department.

[1:02:00] >> 2 to application process coming up with the plan things like that. So it is something

[1:02:06] like that does arise just should let them know sooner than later in the coat

[1:02:09] inforcement staff know so that, you know, if we have get it bring this back in the war,

[1:02:14] we just we can. >> I did. I did speak to one of this. inspectors for the if

[1:02:21] they did inform me that. It wants to. Go to the process of getting a removal permit.

[1:02:27] Also, replacement has to be in place as well. You know, with that and then are some

[1:02:32] questions that I haven't done enough try to contact DP that. >> Just see where the of

[1:02:38] construction line property that require an additional permit from the state as well.

[1:02:48] >> All right. they me to case, 26 0, 0, 0, 9, 5, 5 make the final findings of fact from

[1:02:54] our fine notice a fish and I find the property violation was a code section

[1:02:56] specifically. They're prohibited. Australian pine trees within 90 days and where

[1:03:03] the respondent to obtain permits from moving any of these invasive trees that are

[1:03:05] on their property. going to ask that they identify which trees are on their property in

[1:03:13] which trees are not. Present. That at our hearing in 90 days and then come up with a plan

[1:03:18] for the removal of the remaining trees. At that point. So year to comply with

[1:03:25] this order result in a fine of up to $50 per day will set So this will done by 12 to at

[1:03:30] this for hearing Vo 5 right? >> All right. That you want to as we normally do, said the

[1:03:35] hearings that you want to a status check on path. >> There's from going into

[1:03:40] room. >> So I have a 12, 17. I know fi 5, the 12 3 and then a 12,

[1:03:48] 7. >> I think literally sent something for 12, 5 earlier in

[1:03:52] this hearing. >> No, you haven't. You haven't. Well, 3, and what was

[1:03:55] the compliance date with the next 2 days? to, you we can still have of that

[1:04:03] >> All right. We'll meet up in a few months and sewer thank you, sir. Present. Thank you.

[1:04:08] ? Case number 9. >> Cole, 26 0, 0, 0, 9, 5, 7,

[1:04:21] The property owner is Louise Spence's. The Louise Spencer estate. The property at recess

[1:04:28] Till 3 for no want the 7th Avenue. The code officer on the case is Travis James.

[1:04:33] >> Good afternoon. One more time. My name is Travis code Enforcement. Officer it here

[1:04:41] regarding property to 3 for North East 7th Avenue case. Number 2, 6, tests, 0, 0, 0,

[1:04:47] 9, 5, 7. The property position was a violation. Once my 24th 2026. service was accomplished

[1:04:54] by certified regular mail and post City Hall July 27th 2026. In addition, the property was

[1:04:59] posted on July 24th 2026. and definitely posting. And Millie first affidavit, not

[1:05:05] compliance is attached the case. I have not been in contact with the property

[1:05:09] owner the property was cited for violations. 6004.1, 6 subsection subsection, minimum

[1:05:18] means required. And sir, I listen. 8007.3 minutes of the building. As of August 22nd.

[1:05:27] The property has not come into compliance. I haven't had a text and photographs. The

[1:05:30] property like to introduce into evidence. It's a new one is the front structure of the

[1:05:38] You see the wall as many, many cracks in it. The front section. As long as on the

[1:05:43] South side as well. You see some face aboard. Ride it out into 2 in July. 22nd. July

[1:05:53] 22nd as well as in the rear of the property. The seemed like a garage. That's that. from

[1:05:58] skating in was caving in. also at the behind the scenes like on inside the property to the

[1:06:05] alleyway is full bees. I item for the year is the hosting of the violation. It's 6 is the

[1:06:17] affidavit of posting for July 24th 2026. Exhibit 7 is another photo. Of the

[1:06:24] building. Also. Exhibit E for inspection. This was on the 24th 2026. is again, the work

[1:06:33] being done at all. It has to be out again because every night on the 24th and the

[1:06:40] respect the 2026. like to introduce these 10 photographs and tapes. is my plans for as

[1:06:47] well. >> So even here on behalf of the respondent.

[1:06:52] >> Luis Spencer estate. Seeing no without objection, accept the documents. The exhibits in

[1:06:59] evidence as cities composite incident. >> What is your recommendation

[1:07:06] of the city's asked for additional 30 days which would be August 3rd, 2026? for them

[1:07:10] to come into compliance the I think that I come to the plant city is asking for $100 per

[1:07:19] day until compliance is achieved. believe these are things that they can

[1:07:28] accomplish within 30 Getting the process started for sure. I mean that we have debate on

[1:07:35] the topic with it. >> It's been a think it's been going on almost 3 months. The

[1:07:42] dissent, 2 months that has been happening. So. >> And they also want to say

[1:07:48] these are is little bit of a health safety concern, correct with the bees and the

[1:07:51] condition of the property. Yes, sir, do you feel like they at least obtained the

[1:07:55] permits within the 30 days? >> should be supply for sure. ?

[1:08:04] >> And let me do it like this. The case. 26 0, 0, 0, 9, 5, 7, to make the fight. Findings of

[1:08:13] fact, my friend and a sufficient from the property in violation was a cause.

[1:08:15] Section 8007.3 6004.1, 6. I I were the respondent to obtain the permits within 30 days to

[1:08:22] repair. bring the property into compliance and finish. All repairs within 60 days,

[1:08:29] failure to meet either deadline subjects, the proper to find $100 per day.

[1:08:32] >> Thank you. Case number 10. Call up. 26 0, 0, 0, 9, 6, 1, The property owner is De

[1:08:46] Laurentiis. I'm a the property actresses, 102, south with 8 straight and the code officer

[1:08:54] on the case is Travis James. >> Good afternoon. For the last time findings, Travis

[1:09:00] Sinks code enforcement officer the city. That would be some here regarding property

[1:09:05] Windsor to Southwest 8th Street case. Number 2, 6, 0, 0, 0, 9, 6, 1, this property.

[1:09:12] You see the curse, you know, July 10th for me to building and outside storage. The

[1:09:16] property was given 5 days to come to compliance. And especially was conducted on

[1:09:23] July. 27. 26. The property was still noncompliance. Notice of violations posted on July. 27

[1:09:29] 2026. service was a consequence or different regular mail post to City Hall

[1:09:33] on July. 30th 2026. addition, the property was posted on August 5th 2026. nothing but a

[1:09:41] posting and milling first affidavit. I'm not a plan to touch the case. I have I have

[1:09:45] been in contact with the property owners, family with her directly due to a language

[1:09:49] barrier. Unresponsive. Since then. The property was cited for into building an outside

[1:09:58] storage. As of August 1920. 26. The property has not come into compliance. I have a

[1:10:08] tense night photographs of the property. I would like to just into evidence. It's a one. Is

[1:10:13] outside of the building taken on July 10th 2026. It's a bit, too. Is close-up of the under

[1:10:20] the carport, bookshelf, some pain on the shelf. >> items as well. Behind that

[1:10:28] car is a washer or take a look at drive because of the event that's been so they covered

[1:10:32] over the. With cover. Exhibit 3 is another area thankful of you and you see on the ground

[1:10:41] at some other items as well. Taking July 10. On July 27th inspection since conditions

[1:10:49] with the bookshelf, pain and other items. It's 5 is supposed notice of violation

[1:10:55] on the Is 6 is the affidavit of posting. 7 is another photo where did remove the

[1:11:05] bookshelf, but believe the. dryer the grille and a few other things as well. Here's a

[1:11:16] close-up of Florida today. is. It's a big night is the fate of noncompliance.

[1:11:24] ? Could you please introduce those? It's a

[1:11:33] >> Anyone here on behalf of the respondent, Dolores current Seeing none without

[1:11:37] objection. Accept Exhibits and evidence the city's composite. >> So the most some of the

[1:11:46] stuff. But there's there's some stuff left essential him. >> Yeah, spoke to her. It came

[1:11:51] out to the property with her and I showed or was it to move so okay as we see it still?

[1:11:56] It's a conditions. >> Women >> He's asking for additional

[1:12:02] 15 days would be which would be 9/18/2026, for them to come to compliance and it's not

[1:12:10] pass and $50 per day. capacity. >> During his 26 0, 0, 0, 9,

[1:12:18] 6, want to find funds back to life sufficient for the property in violation of some

[1:12:22] 20.3, which is items documented by code officer in the carport respondent has 15

[1:12:32] days until September 18th 2026 to bring the property compliance.

[1:12:34] >> For fine of up to $50 per day mission. >> Thank Thank you.

[1:12:42] >> We move on to noncompliance cases, an assessment fines. Case number 11. All 26 see

[1:12:52] Rose 0, 0, 6, 5, 8, >> The property owner is calyx us. The property addresses 33

[1:13:01] 20 boulevard ship to lean and the code officer on the case ishant out. Baptiste.

[1:13:09] >> Does men of clerk? appears that he needs an interpreter. Mister. X and test. Do you

[1:13:17] understand what I'm saying to? You need an interpreter? >> Exist of zoom with that

[1:13:21] with that rule. >> Okay. So if we can, we're going to put us where the

[1:13:29] interpreter as well as recall the case so that he could hear everything that's happening in

[1:13:33] absence. a ? >> Do you swear or affirm that

[1:13:46] Google translate the year? Interpretation? It's >> if we can swear in the

[1:13:53] respondent now just had interpreter interpret the actions of Clark. When did I

[1:13:59] want ? >> By the authority vested in

[1:14:08] as a notary of the state of Florida. >> I would have too good in

[1:14:15] the sense you know, got to get new one similar I I would of course, if needed week.

[1:14:26] >> testimony you are about to is true? Don't call it nothing but the truth to someone you

[1:14:33] love and so >> did not give up. What city us. Thank you.

[1:14:41] ? >> And if have the interpreter speak closer to the mike as

[1:14:50] well. fun moment. ? >> Number 11.

[1:15:03] >> A 26 0, 0, 0, 6, 5, 8, >> do see You was court 0, 0, 68.

[1:15:18] >> Property owner think how examples kinda see. >> To census.

[1:15:26] >> Property address. 33 20 checked Elaine. >> And it. Couldn't walk fame.

[1:15:32] Shotgun. >> Code officer on the case patient out. Jean Baptiste.

[1:15:41] >> Well, if you sit in on to CS says doesn't want to >> Good My name is code

[1:15:49] enforcement, Chantel team that he's with the city of every age.

[1:15:52] >> Most wide open with social to solicit a few sea port beach.

[1:16:01] >> Property 3, 3, 2, 0, Boulevard, Shadow Lane. >> And just kind of a sitcom

[1:16:07] 12 with a >> Originally was found in violation oath the case and

[1:16:18] >> on May 21st 2026. Not vet May. >> difference

[1:16:30] >> For unpermitted addition structure a pool, a psycho did with different kindness and to

[1:16:34] put himself. Given 60 days to come into compliance. And of course, was some June with a

[1:16:41] couple what we or $100 a fine. some of Area spec Shun was conducted. I don't even do

[1:16:53] famous book Co. On July 23rd 2026. Not that the event was Defenses where the property

[1:17:04] was found still out of compliance. I do know that good would it do ICU? On

[1:17:12] September first 2026. Not would be a symptom. Didn't even see snow. Or inspection

[1:17:21] was conducted prior to is the CEO of that Jody, a and the property is not in compliance.

[1:17:31] Just a freeze on the what we should forgive Have 6 photograph so present a

[1:17:39] special magistrate. I don't even do. is 4th look at what was additional debt. I And I

[1:17:43] would like to introduce into don't to do so come if you don't

[1:17:49] ? As of September. The 3rd, I 2 12 symptom 2026 fence, there

[1:18:02] isn't that you would find that the gauge of cuts did not show. And the amount of $4,400

[1:18:08] not conceded. got some cut me to do a lot. The city is suggesting on decision of it,

[1:18:19] the property out of 4,400 government did the meeting so kind enough cut some kind

[1:18:29] 4,000 lives 4,004 Andre got me to cut some and continued a daily fine of a I know in the

[1:18:36] day I hope you got you need, the 2 Senate action. But I what I I will now show photos.

[1:18:46] I I'm going the 4. Do not. >> Exhibit one visited I respect to the property on

[1:18:57] July. 23rd shouldn't even need to that to Kyler Ducks. You didn't You even That mission

[1:19:03] is still present. I don't come up with tissue and even it going look resolve. Exhibit 2.

[1:19:15] It's gotten connect. posted notice on a party on July 25th. He did he did not get

[1:19:24] what you got to know, not when the 26 not duck defense saying she had been Exhibit exhibit

[1:19:30] North is the affidavit of posting Sonseeahray. I think kids you can The Wilson up on

[1:19:38] September. First know miss it. I respect the property? the Exhibit 5. It's a big a photo

[1:19:48] of the property. addition to the side of the house with plenty room for keep guy with

[1:19:55] something different. Exhibits 6, not compliant afternoon Do we should that? I would like

[1:20:09] to say don't of property applied for permits on August 8.

[1:20:16] >> 2026 killed It turns out aapi people been me. >> did. Was it to the 28 2026

[1:20:26] defended not He in did defenses and on August 31st. 2026 August 31st. about 2026

[1:20:41] even says the on a property has to make corrections to the documents which was submitted

[1:20:49] book in Did do what you you take He's with the cup which is like baby. So I'd like to

[1:20:58] introduce these photos. None of candidates would for to us. I it

[1:21:02] ? or can you tell me your name, please? This is at the school.

[1:21:07] Got to Should get the It isn't >> Do you have any objection to these photographs and

[1:21:22] documents being put into evidence as too? >> I want to let this cool

[1:21:27] again issue it. If don't do that, we will get It's the difference was I when I say

[1:21:33] for yes. >> Without objection, all except those amendments. It's

[1:21:41] a go. I knew that. got it. I them to know to it's his turn to speak, to suceed government

[1:21:50] India. ? >> new lot. Ewing

[1:22:05] >> Since the last time tended to the >> sorting SWAT team with

[1:22:10] people >> soon as I left the I hired contractor think should pick.

[1:22:25] Was action time. They had the not the the. >> Not not. not. I love him

[1:22:36] >> put the put peak the you cite biz. city Abby's went it. >> according to the statement,

[1:22:46] he said that the contract it. Inspected the property. And since then.

[1:22:54] >> the the the the the cop out with the cool the Psaki shipment didn't know. should

[1:23:08] be back you no point CT bees. you down give court are much costs and so you can with.

[1:23:15] >> we can have interpreter interpreted verbatim exactly what he's saying or give up

[1:23:22] points to out got that would be. >> We we moving by dumped on

[1:23:34] needed and And I I did. >> much does that cost. >> The

[1:23:44] >> south should be something good. Has he disciplined, failing the ceiling would CTA

[1:23:49] and Ian for you what needs to be done based on the sequel? Is that cool? and women with

[1:23:58] insurance on We didn't mean speak the the the informal everything. And I put one

[1:24:02] state Blue Blue Sea to one one week when you put this immense sometimes 2 weeks when you we

[1:24:18] give that. last shot. Here is we get to move in. and I informed him and have

[1:24:30] >> It Put ads the Got the Black >> 5th, we the new web that

[1:24:35] I've >> of the talk to The is it his job. What he has to right

[1:24:47] now. >> It leaves something we see the men could not be then

[1:24:57] that's what I can Nothing with what they come to the state. It and left soon will lit and

[1:25:05] I'm asking meets live it. Uh, Shi'ite key key swing with >> If you can help me with

[1:25:13] what I'm going to wait now. >> Ask you. See by William shake up in Because these has

[1:25:22] nothing to do with it. That's not my You impact they had stop decided No one has to be

[1:25:30] done. I've done. >> think no one? Yeah. >> Right now as of right now.

[1:25:38] >> push looked wants live. I would like you to grant me. >> But 90 days, please. If you

[1:25:51] governor out, they pull one seem to know that I love about 15

[1:25:54] >> If nothing is not you good to action against. >> we we understand that it

[1:26:02] sounds like he's saying he's had some delays because of his contractor.

[1:26:07] >> We'll get a new one. This dig a local blend talk to >> However, we cannot agree to

[1:26:14] 90 days to put by got Doc, what government is one law. ?

[1:26:21] understand >> We're comfortable. >> I understand the

[1:26:32] circumstances. An understanding that comments were just sent back from staff

[1:26:37] 3 days ago. >> I want did that. Come with that. Fed

[1:26:41] >> That's just a few watching up. >> To resetting this hearing

[1:26:46] for 30 >> made go vote. Here port call.

[1:26:57] >> Wouldn't you so noelene today? But the fines will continue to So something about

[1:27:04] me can lead pilot May. >> Lashawn the meme. Do you what you love, what cuts did

[1:27:08] not. ? We've got 5 We'll something.

[1:27:18] ? >> former super he should. the lot Sisseton women get the

[1:27:31] option. >> Yes, since this. >> Most of week, summit for

[1:27:38] >> do you dishing 15? Some tough. If I was doing it and it would not take too. say.

[1:27:53] >> See that did it national clock. He he's he's the catch that.

[1:28:03] >> You got get asked the posting to will some I do have a new white nights. Stu,

[1:28:13] youngest, Bosque. See, we'll if we shot. see it. You'll keep keep up Ask to the

[1:28:21] signing of just pass ? ?

[1:28:34] ? Anything further 7 now. >> Okay. This is what I'm

[1:28:41] going to do. I good work. That will enough. First. While I do understand your frustration,

[1:28:47] we too. It's a it's not the contractor who's responsible hot. Talk it's the owner of

[1:28:59] the property settlement came. It happened. The contractor works for talk even it at my

[1:29:04] movement. And there's no authority of mind to talk to your contractor. I don't do

[1:29:09] that. With that sent. excited. I'm going to stay the fine for 30 days. My

[1:29:20] >> can be constant not come Oman. >> reset this hearing for.

[1:29:25] >> mobile. >> What's the next hearing? After 30 days? It's going to

[1:29:29] be up. We set this for October. 15th suggest. With that time you should encourage

[1:29:45] or contractor to do whatever they can to bring this property into compliance.

[1:29:49] >> Two-run of come. We them. Thank you for coming. Thank you. Storm. the sip impact.

[1:30:07] soup with that. Confident. >> It said stories. You they lead the point that speak to

[1:30:23] sense, a new boom fan know that I stated please them know. The event are hearing is

[1:30:26] over. But if you'd like, you can talk to the code, officer counts.

[1:30:30] ? >> Case number 12. Cop. 26. >> 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 2, The

[1:30:46] property owner is Smith. The 3rd. The property actress is 10. 33 Brooks Lane. Case is

[1:30:56] called enforcement supervise Latoya Thompson. >> This case was originally

[1:31:02] found to be in violation of Section 100.0 4 subsection a through C sea walls and 7.1

[1:31:13] points, 7 subsection, the subsection 4 in 5. See what requirements on March 17, 2026

[1:31:20] due to the deteriorating seawall in need of repair. On 5/7/2026, the ruling was. Was

[1:31:30] issued requiring the property owner to bring the seawall into compliance with the

[1:31:34] current requirement of the land development regulation and the city cold by July 7,

[1:31:40] 2026 or be subject daily fine of $100 a day. On 7/8/2026, the magistrate ordered

[1:31:49] inspection was conducted. The during the inspection. It was observed. application has been

[1:31:55] submitted on 6/26/2020 state. However, the current status of the application was respond

[1:32:02] and resubmit their for the violation remain outstanding. And the daily fines begin

[1:32:05] accruing. July 22nd 2026 noncompliance hearing was email because the property

[1:32:14] owner lives in Germany. And a notice was also posted to City Hall 7/24/2026 the notice.

[1:32:24] Violation was posted to the property as of 9/3/2026, the violation remains outstanding.

[1:32:32] And crew finds remain unpaid. For evidence. I have full for new photos to introduce along

[1:32:40] with 4. >> All previous photos to present from the initial

[1:32:43] hearing. ? ?

[1:32:55] ? >> temps in the 40% just a couple minutes and this was

[1:33:03] posted and city hall and the property correct? Yes, ma'am. The you email the notice as

[1:33:09] well because they respondents in Germany, correct? Did obtain a response confirming

[1:33:15] that the respondent was aware of this here? Yes, Thank you. These are the previous photos

[1:33:24] that I'm go through. Quickly. >> Exhibit one is a screen shot of the respond and

[1:33:34] resubmit for the contractor. >> To resign or is meant to comments that the city needed

[1:33:38] him to apply Exhibit 2 is the affidavit, a noncompliance. Exhibit 3 is the posting on

[1:33:48] the property for non compliant hearing. Exhibit for is the affidavit of posting. The city

[1:33:57] recommends placing a lien on the property and the amount of 5700. And continue the daily

[1:34:04] fines of $100 a day until on the property market and Complaints.

[1:34:11] ? >> Certainly time your name put him on every floor and

[1:34:18] Robbins. I own docks and seawalls. We're a general contractor. And I was alert

[1:34:22] about this problem. And she said and the wall differ his work. But were no work has

[1:34:30] been done. We jumped on it immediately. We've had engineers there great expense.

[1:34:37] use a When did you jump on? Almost almost immediately after Here. And here they were

[1:34:45] told they were we we started this permitted. ?

[1:34:56] read a lot. commencement. Brought in engineers, pay them, got everything ready. We

[1:35:05] put The Advocate now, Ivan successfully fully is from its in the area 40 years. We

[1:35:14] submitted. And then after we submitted what we had. We were told that the city of Delray

[1:35:20] Beach. They have a Marine structured review and that wasn't going to happen till

[1:35:27] 7.29 So that we lost a whole month. So need submit your permit. A 26. I was to 6.26 I

[1:35:37] it would be the usual 10, 12, 14 days to get it done. And then we were told that this

[1:35:42] very structure of you. What we've done, everything we can we guy they quote, requested

[1:35:51] in a letter from the DPA >> And they've to DP responded and the letter is you're a

[1:35:59] system that no, it's not just started when you're just doing repairs, not changing the

[1:36:03] footprint. Well, unfortunately, the Army Corps of Engineers has been shut

[1:36:10] down. It was just now reinstated on the 17th because they had their agreement with

[1:36:18] ADP had expired. So we weren't able to get a letter from them telling the same because we're

[1:36:22] not changing wall. We're just we're doing work now. I've had problems. Can understand. By

[1:36:32] the way, you have ploy. David Herbert, who is a for instance, the the plans

[1:36:38] resubmitted. This way, not that way. So we had to figure out how resubmit them.

[1:36:48] rotated. And then, of course, when you rotate the his signature is official

[1:36:54] signature did not come. you know, we've got all that done. call several times 2, they

[1:37:00] they're requesting. am. They have a question about Backfilling, but this is not

[1:37:08] we're not building a C one of the lot. It's in front of a the house has been there for

[1:37:12] many years and day, by the way, that picture that shows a wall which definitely needs

[1:37:22] work on it as far as bait is that big opening belong to the city? That's a city grate ago

[1:37:27] to the street, which is probably cause of the problem with the owner who wants to

[1:37:33] sell this place and is ready doesn't really care. That's why we spent the money for the

[1:37:36] engineer we're just blindsided. But the fact that we had these problems making

[1:37:44] this thing go quickly as it does. And I thought that I was appropriately and must be an

[1:37:47] average or because we're restarted that we just couldn't get this permit or

[1:37:53] through. I would say we anticipate. I you know. I'm sure will be if I can, if the

[1:38:01] city will. And I called and called. I would just like to have one quick meeting with

[1:38:08] somebody from the city probably in the building department to explain this one

[1:38:12] issue about backfill. And could have this permit 30 days I thought I was going to have

[1:38:19] 15 or 18 days a couple months ago. But like I said the order he has no problem spending

[1:38:26] money. He wants to get this done. Also whether that there's I guess they feel that

[1:38:34] the water on the street is coming from underneath this know that and anybody street,

[1:38:43] it's probably that city, Andre, but that's that's not a question. He just wants to get

[1:38:46] this trying to get this permit. Been doing these permits for a long time, very

[1:38:52] successfully. So I would say now that the court is back. Their reinstated. I would say.

[1:39:01] And if I can meet just one person from the city of the building department that

[1:39:05] explain exactly what they want because we've been there many times. We could have the same

[1:39:12] week. Another permitted 30 days and commence the construction. How long do you

[1:39:14] think it'll take you to the war? It's probably about. I'm gonna it's probably. 15, 18,

[1:39:25] 20. Probably 25 man days. So it'll be almost a month to do the work they want do. So your

[1:39:35] position is that I you've tried to get this thing done, but the delays are not. you're

[1:39:40] with vision. We failed miserably with the city's far as doing it is part

[1:39:44] >> We hear from the sun. >> So we were able to obtain the comments from For the

[1:39:55] department. There's a couple need to be responded to some go far back. It is July. It's

[1:40:02] just if he's having some of the comments. For instance, one of the comments was

[1:40:05] provide verification of the Army Corps of Engineers. Approval is not required. If

[1:40:10] that's something it's an outside agency, they needs to comply live. But we will say

[1:40:14] this delay is not on the part of the city so our position after speaking with Ms

[1:40:24] Thompson is comfortable with 3 setting this for 30 days. As long as fines continue to

[1:40:30] accrue that will give him the opportunity to contact the engineering department, which

[1:40:35] is probably a more appropriate department here that he would need to contact.

[1:40:37] >> If they would climate reply. A full time. All of us. an email, you know, it's low.

[1:40:48] Somebody reply. We called several times of many messages. So it just so at the

[1:40:54] engineering department are. >> Bol Bol. >> Respon make an appointment.

[1:41:01] My office is what we're land. 10 Only 25 minutes away at any time we can make world's that.

[1:41:06] We've got plans. The better approved by the engineer were all set to go.

[1:41:16] >> I'm not gonna make finding on the find at this point. But I'll just reset this for him.

[1:41:22] Was in October. The 55th 15. >> I will see where we from American thank you.

[1:41:32] ? >> Case number 14. Co 26. >> 0, 0, 0, 6, 9, 1, The

[1:41:49] property owner is Joseph Lamont, who knew? The property at Frances 2049, something

[1:41:56] 30th Avenue, the code officer on case Group Inc indicating. >> Good The U.S. Special

[1:42:06] Magistrate, I'm here before you fall, a compliance court case. 26 Zoo is the will 0, 6,

[1:42:13] 9, 1, Always uni found in violation on 6/6/2026 and approved driveway given 30

[1:42:25] days to come into compliance $100 as find. expect that on 7/5/2026 where the property

[1:42:38] was fine still oath. Compliance and all 6, 2026. the said conducted a

[1:42:50] recession. Part 2 hearing. And the property is still not in compliance. I have Seven's for

[1:43:00] those to present to the special magistrate and I would like to introduce those photos

[1:43:05] as evidence. As of September. dozen. 26 the is cool fine. And the amount of 6,000 on

[1:43:17] those. And the city suggests Lynne proper the and do out of $6,000 and continue the 100

[1:43:27] those deadly fight. ? ?

[1:43:44] >> first pictures keep going. This is the These are the original photo correct that

[1:43:53] you're flipping through quickly. Great akb can go to the new photos, please. And

[1:43:59] exhibit number one, just this is just showing that I was to depart for on Thursday, August

[1:44:06] 6 26. >> Exhibit number 2, this is just showing the posting a

[1:44:12] David. I was thinking on. 8/6/2026. Exhibit number 3, that is just showing the

[1:44:25] properties not in compliance and the photos was September. First 2026. This is just did

[1:44:40] not comply and something was taking on September the 2026. >> assume you want to submit

[1:44:53] those a number. >> Would you like to some of pictures and place? Yes.

[1:45:01] >> Without objection. So it meant is that everyone here and have to respond. What is

[1:45:06] the city asking for? >> She Lynne of property and the amount 6,000 on those and

[1:45:17] continued the 100 in fight. >> Any contact with responding it?

[1:45:25] >> I have for last couple weeks and I think of the property on the department at

[1:45:32] one your friend called me full of the last month. And she was asked many questions about

[1:45:37] time it and I was would give it to the point >> In at this time, the last

[1:45:43] time you check, no building permit has been >> actually permit does one do

[1:45:49] with you right comments? Well, given tool on they need to submit proper documents.

[1:45:57] >> how long? They've been waiting on comments. >> I I can do with Well, part

[1:46:06] what sometimes they have a lot of comments that needs to just.

[1:46:12] >> All right, 26 0, 0, 0, 6, 9, want to make fun findings of fact in my This is fish

[1:46:16] find a property continues to be in violation or 4002.1, 3, be the missing building

[1:46:21] permits I hear. But in the proper amount of $6,000 continue at $100 per day into

[1:46:24] the property comes to that point. >> Thank you. Thank you. We're

[1:46:29] moving on old business. >> Thank you. Madam Clerk, if you can call up all 3 of the

[1:46:37] cases. >> Please. ?

[1:46:45] Case number 15. 2025. 0, 0, 4, 6, 8, 5, >> The property owner is 3, 0,

[1:46:58] to knock the 6th Avenue LLC. And the property at crisis 302, not East 6th Avenue. This

[1:47:05] is a status hearing. Case number 16. 2025 0, 0, 9, 0, 8, The property owner is 3, 0, to

[1:47:19] knock the 6th Avenue LLC, property address. Same 3, 0, to North East 6th Avenue.

[1:47:31] Case. Number 17. Called 25, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, The property owner is 302, not the 6th

[1:47:46] Avenue LLC, property is 302. The 6 Avenue NE. Ken, this is a status hearing. Good

[1:47:58] afternoon. Magistrate Wagner. So this these 3 cases came back on mandate from the court

[1:48:06] and the 15th judicial serving on appellate review. >> It requires the that you

[1:48:13] supply amended final orders for all 3 cases. We're asking that each of the order set

[1:48:18] forth the specific findings of fact, conclusions of law and the actual border that was

[1:48:25] identified during those in debate. He rings based on the evidence The standard that you

[1:48:34] use to make those rulings for all 3 matters. >> As I understand it, mend

[1:48:43] from the circuit court is requiring a written findings of fact and conclusions law

[1:48:45] based on the existing evident re record. Together with consideration of the notice.

[1:48:50] Issues identified in the appellate opinion. >> There's no one. Is there

[1:48:56] anyone here and we have to respond. Worthy opponent. >> What will moment?

[1:49:07] >> This was properly noticed. So let me just get the code enforcement officer. If if

[1:49:11] you're asking, if we this in testimony on how this was noticed.

[1:49:14] ? >> Could you please state your name for the record? So

[1:49:19] correct. Code Enforcement minister. Mr. Carter Wright, are you familiar with these 3

[1:49:24] cases that were here for today regarding 302, North East, 6th Avenue LLC. Yes, I am. And

[1:49:31] were these problem was the property owner notice for the hearing? Yes, he was

[1:49:35] registered agent and owner. >> is that noticed? It was hand delivered. To both

[1:49:46] separate addresses one to 16, 15 farm place. >> In West Palm Beach and the

[1:49:50] floor and the other to Mr. Merrill art to able to northeast 6 avenue camera on

[1:49:57] the mayor and 5.20, Clematis street government as corrupt. Yes, we do also posted on the

[1:50:06] property here and are property and Gary Beach, it was actually delivered, hand

[1:50:08] delivered Thank That was a 302, Northeast 6 Saturday. That's correct. Okay. And for

[1:50:15] the record I did email the appellate attorney that was representing Mister Mayo.

[1:50:24] Jennifer, just get it this occasion. Put it in ?

[1:50:34] ? ? I didn't email MS around a

[1:50:51] courtesy copy of the notice as well. And that was on Sept upper first.

[1:50:56] >> And we heard from the response at all. >> I believe we did get a

[1:51:02] call. Ms can't got a call. can't can calm. she was sworn in. This can't please come to

[1:51:10] the microphone. ? This can do. What is your

[1:51:18] position with the city code enforcement coordinator is a part of your position. Are you

[1:51:25] the one prepares and assist with directing the orders and letters to be sent out to

[1:51:29] respondent's the incident the person that prepare these notices. The letters that

[1:51:32] wasn't correct, correct. And your phone numbers of the it is indeed receive any

[1:51:36] communications from the property owner on my received communication from a David

[1:51:39] Ware. >> Who was asking why we were having the hearing and what we

[1:51:44] were. But it was for basically so Mr. Where did he indicate that he was agent or

[1:51:51] representative represents the owner? Okay. he called that means he received it Indeed,

[1:52:00] you advise them that you need to be here today thank you. ?

[1:52:08] ? ? >> I was also advised on staff

[1:52:21] that Mr present here early. I know he stepped out. If you want check the hall to see

[1:52:26] these outside. >> We'll check. But he did sign in and he was sitting the

[1:52:28] corner over there. >> Akp just got checked to see these on time. Thank you.

[1:52:32] ? ? ?

[1:52:47] ? ? >> does seem a little odd to

[1:53:00] me to go through all the trouble appealing this decision and then not being

[1:53:04] here, sir, argue. ? ?

[1:53:17] ? ? >> I just checked outside of

[1:53:27] us are only said that he left. spoke to me says, I don't know how you guys do this all day

[1:53:31] and any left. So. >> So I guess you and I both agree that the Pirates of the

[1:53:46] mandate are any written, a finding of fact and conclusions of law based upon

[1:53:50] the existing avid entry record. And they believe the city is submitting. Proposed

[1:53:57] orders. guess what I probably would like to do is give the respondent opportunity to

[1:54:05] submit were comment on or submit their own proposed orders.

[1:54:10] >> So would you like us to individual propose orders or would you like me to reach

[1:54:14] out? >> I'm not sure provided courtesy, you know, a copy of

[1:54:20] the order that I prepared. want to create the event, but we're going to be back in the

[1:54:24] circuit court because they're going to claim they didn't have an opportunity to

[1:54:26] respond. >> Even though I I think the city has properly noticed

[1:54:32] this. So you are here, but when you know, yeah, in in a caution because, you know, I'm

[1:54:41] sure the judges don't want to be bothered by this one a second time. I do want to make

[1:54:44] sure that we give them an opportunity to be heard. Mister? We're left, maybe he

[1:54:51] misunderstood something. But maybe I would give You know, maybe 7 days to file their own

[1:55:00] papers. >> So do you still want to announce your findings record?

[1:55:03] And then we submit the proposed waters or what set We're back in what 2 weeks?

[1:55:10] Yes, on the 17th. What's to this? let's give them 7 days to submit whatever documents

[1:55:17] they want to submit either argument or proposed orders. >> And and then will issue the

[1:55:23] final orders at the hearing on the. When we say the 15th. 77 >> case of a clarification.

[1:55:31] Both parties are to proposed orders to you and then you will have well, some of them

[1:55:35] to the city's. to me I'm I'm I'm used to the city and then you'll make your final.

[1:55:41] >> You know, I know wish every morning orders on the 17th. All right. Thank you. net

[1:55:46] presence. Are >> kind of presents to burned? >> Now, I can't really

[1:55:53] required, but I mean, they're welcome to be where they can to submit their doctrines.

[1:56:01] Maybe they don't like this. If there are hearings Is that immigrants, No further

[1:56:07] business before us word. ? ?

[1:56:17] ? ? ?

[1:56:32] ? >> Thank. Thank You.

[3:15:35] >> Testing testing. ? They should be fine.

[3:15:44] ? ? >> There was a meeting 2 hours

[3:15:57] ago. ? Someone testing.

[3:16:07] ? ? ?

[3:16:22] This one looks good. ? This one

[3:16:32] ? this one was also off. ?

[3:16:43] Testing testing. ? ?

[3:16:55] It'll keep o'clock. ? ?

[3:17:09] ? ? ?

[3:17:24] ?

Special Magistrate on 09-03-2026 1:30 PM - Special Magistrate

Agenda

Transcript