[2:51] You hear me?

[2:54] » Call to order uh at 3:59.

[2:58] Citizen speaker

[3:01] Any citizens to be heard?

[3:04] >> Is there anybody online?

[3:05] >> No.

[3:07] >> Okay.

[3:08] >> I motion and Chad probably can help.

[3:11] >> Motion to adopt.

[3:14] Approval of the minutes.

[3:27] » I make motion to approve the minutes we

[3:29] made for us 2026.

[3:31] >> I second.

[3:33] >> All right.

[3:37] Everybody in favor?

[3:39] >> And Bill has a roll.

[3:40] >> There she go.

[3:41] >> I

[3:44] » We're just approving minutes right now.

[3:46] So

[3:47] >> It's already It's already It's already

[3:49] been moved and seconded. We're going by

[3:51] that clock, so we're a minute end.

[3:52] >> You want the nice people in?

[3:54] >> AJ and Jason.

[4:01] » We got a little eager.

[4:05] » Yeah, everybody

[4:07] on favor.

[4:09] Thank you.

[4:11] That's the new middle school.

[4:14] All right, there you go.

[4:16] It's up to you, Bill.

[4:18] >> [laughter]

[4:19] >> All right.

[4:21] Who carried the change stadium?

[4:22] >> Okay.

[4:25] » All right.

[4:31] Biggest citizen to be heard on the

[4:33] agenda.

[4:35] All right, so airport director report.

[4:38] >> All right, let's do that.

[4:39] So, you've got um

[4:42] Yeah, what we're going to try and do

[4:44] here is track

[4:46] last year to this year with every

[4:48] statistical category that we can find.

[4:50] Couple of things

[4:52] um

[4:54] that jump out

[4:58] is the part where employments

[5:01] dropped from last year after a huge

[5:03] increase in March.

[5:06] Looks like we're down from last year in

[5:09] April.

[5:11] Going to our fuel

[5:14] flowage fees,

[5:15] we've got a similar situation where we've been down

[5:20] since March.

[5:22] >> Which What page are you on right now?

[5:24] >> Oh, sorry. I'm looking at this this this

[5:26] What is it? Uh

[5:28] a steady increase in

[5:30] >> I have a comment on the fuel flowage

[5:32] fees as well.

[5:33] >> Yeah, I wanted to get into that a little

[5:34] bit. There's a couple of a couple of

[5:36] issues

[5:38] um because we're seeing that our

[5:39] operations have not

[5:42] dipped significantly,

[5:44] and yet our

[5:46] uh fuel flowage has

[5:49] Yeah. Um

[5:51] And I I don't I don't know. I I don't

[5:54] know that it's coincidentally

[5:56] that both fuel and enplanements

[5:59] uh changed their trajectory right after

[6:02] the county uh made the announcement to

[6:04] recommend

[6:06] So,

[6:07] Yeah. If I may

[6:08] let me know when I can talk. I think you

[6:10] and Reston can both weigh in on this.

[6:12] Um

[6:14] Let everybody know the DOT is the one

[6:16] who's going to make that decision,

[6:17] though. And hopefully, they're going to

[6:18] look at our

[6:19] uh at the county's recommendation and do

[6:21] what the community want, but

[6:23] that decision has not been made.

[6:25] Um

[6:26] Contour could still be our carrier.

[6:29] And uh

[6:31] or Denver Air Connections could be our

[6:33] carrier for the amount. It's a DOT

[6:35] decision. The the money all came in

[6:37] pretty even. Denver Air Connections is

[6:39] actually about the lowest

[6:41] cost uh to the Fed.

[6:44] So, we're still waiting to see what

[6:45] they'll do.

[6:47] So,

[6:48] >> And that should be this week, right?

[6:50] >> It should It should It should have been

[6:51] already.

[6:51] >> Yeah.

[6:52] >> And it just hasn't come out. We check

[6:53] the docket every day

[6:55] to see

[6:56] if if it's happened yet. It still hasn't

[6:58] happened. So, it could very easily be

[7:00] that Contour is still our airline. So, I

[7:02] want I want to we want to try and

[7:03] maintain

[7:05] that relationship even if they aren't

[7:07] chosen by DOT to be our carrier.

[7:10] I'd still love them to maybe try one of

[7:11] the

[7:12] at-risk flights if they chose to do it.

[7:15] I mean, we can we can have more than one

[7:17] carrier

[7:18] um at the airport. We certainly want to

[7:20] encourage that any way that we can.

[7:23] Um

[7:24] until DOT kind of makes their decision,

[7:26] I've sort of intentionally stayed

[7:29] away. I haven't spoken to any of the

[7:31] airlines. I'm just going to wait for it

[7:33] to happen. I'm just looking at this

[7:35] notice. It It seemed like there was a

[7:37] pretty big drop or a pretty big change

[7:40] after

[7:42] um that that county's And I'm hoping

[7:44] Contour is is not.

[7:47] Um

[7:50] Yeah.

[7:51] Put my thumb on the scale, shall we say?

[7:52] » [snorts]

[7:52] >> Got it. We're showing more.

[7:54] >> I heard low bid.

[7:55] >> Yep.

[7:55] >> We're showing a low bid.

[7:56] >> All right.

[7:57] >> Operations are up.

[7:58] >> So, my plane is going up.

[8:00] >> Yeah, my comment on this is I'm

[8:02] surprised we're doing as well as we are,

[8:04] uh

[8:04] >> Jet A quite honestly. Our fuel purchase

[8:06] Our current carrier has dropped their

[8:09] fuel purchases year-to-date at this

[8:12] point by 69%.

[8:15] >> Right.

[8:15] >> And we are still close to last year's

[8:18] total. So, that tells me the airport's

[8:21] pretty strong from charter business

[8:23] that's coming in.

[8:25] >> A lot of traffic.

[8:26] >> traffic that's going way up.

[8:28] >> Otherwise, we'd be a lot worse off than

[8:31] we are now.

[8:32] >> But our current air carrier is down 69%

[8:36] year-to-date for what they purchased the

[8:38] previous week.

[8:39] >> Right.

[8:41] >> Um

[8:43] Yeah, it's noticeable. When your when

[8:45] your jet traffic goes up but your your

[8:47] jet fuel goes down,

[8:49] um yeah, there's an obvious,

[8:52] you know, correlation there.

[8:54] So,

[8:58] I guess I

[9:00] We're going to come up with some ways to

[9:01] keep everybody as whole as possible.

[9:03] >> Yeah.

[9:03] >> Keep all relationships intact because

[9:05] it's not unlikely that Contour continues

[9:08] to be our carrier.

[9:09] >> And will you have a discussion with them

[9:11] at some point about bringing their

[9:13] numbers more in line with what they used

[9:16] to be?

[9:16] >> Um we can. Um I'm happy to They're going

[9:19] to be here no matter what till the end

[9:21] of September.

[9:22] >> Right.

[9:22] >> So,

[9:23] uh like I said, I've tried to stay kind

[9:25] of agnostic about it just until DOT

[9:28] would make their decision because it's

[9:30] got to be coming any day now. But we can

[9:33] make a call to Boutique Air, uh

[9:35] and and talk about what's going on and

[9:37] that maintaining the relationship for

[9:39] the future is kind of important if they

[9:41] ever want to try you know um try a another flight.

[9:46] Well,

[9:46] so

[9:47] like I said, when when it gets out, from

[9:50] our perspective, the flight numbers

[9:52] aren't off that much. It's just they're

[9:54] not purchasing fuel.

[9:57] Yeah, and the employment at the same

[9:58] level the same data also is not at the

[10:02] same high trajectory it was going in

[10:04] that, you know, I just

[10:06] my first spring here, so I don't know

[10:07] I'm not sure what the patterns are.

[10:09] But um

[10:11] May didn't have the same kind of meteor

[10:13] drives that

[10:15] April did.

[10:16] And uh

[10:18] so just all those things tend together

[10:20] to paint a picture.

[10:21] Um and it's one that we're aware of and

[10:23] it's one that we need to to be

[10:24] monitoring and that we need to take

[10:26] steps to try and make sure that we're

[10:28] still going in the right direction.

[10:30] Um

[10:31] and we also need to make sure to your

[10:32] teammates the decision faster because

[10:35] they haven't decided by the way, it's

[10:36] not just us. They haven't made Earl's.

[10:39] They haven't done anybody.

[10:41] So, they're just behind and moving slow.

[10:43] I've talked to Mark Bragio who is our

[10:45] contact at DOT

[10:47] um

[10:49] dozens of times in the last 2 weeks and

[10:52] about a different topic.

[10:54] Uh

[10:57] and they they just haven't made the they

[10:59] haven't called you up. I don't know if

[11:00] they've reviewed all the proposals or

[11:02] what's going on, but they say they have

[11:03] 90 days.

[11:06] And that's this week.

[11:07] they hit their 90 days.

[11:09] So, hopefully we'll be having a decision

[11:11] pretty soon.

[11:13] And Luke warned warned me that they've

[11:15] been running so slow that it was

[11:16] probably going to go the full 90.

[11:19] So,

[11:20] I'm not necessarily surprised, but it is

[11:23] getting to the point where we need to

[11:24] know something because people are going

[11:26] to start booking flights for October and

[11:29] there's nothing there cuz we're in

[11:31] limbo.

[11:33] So, anyway,

[11:35] we're we're trying to push that as hard

[11:37] as we can. Of course, it's on the topic

[11:38] of honorable

[11:41] kind of stepped out on me.

[11:44] Uh one thing I wanted to discuss a

[11:46] little bit while I was

[11:48] uh

[11:49] something will be on the county

[11:50] commission tomorrow.

[11:53] So, if you remember, we we borrowed

[11:55] $700,000 from the county to build

[11:58] taxiway Foxtrot.

[11:59] Right?

[12:00] We're paying that back by per linear

[12:03] foot fees

[12:05] to people who build there. Right now, I

[12:07] have two leases out waiting to be signed

[12:09] and brought in.

[12:11] Um two leases already signed.

[12:14] One of them sitting here whose hangar is

[12:16] already done on the new building

[12:18] area, and then we have Skydive Moab

[12:21] whose lease is signed, and they should

[12:23] be starting um

[12:26] any day [clears throat] now, I would I

[12:27] would expect.

[12:28] We're going to have We'll get to this

[12:31] Okay, so we'll just stay on one topic at

[12:32] a time. So, the first one is we borrowed

[12:35] this $700,000.

[12:38] Because we did that test strip on

[12:41] Foxtrot,

[12:42] um

[12:43] we got basically 54 54,010 dollars of

[12:48] free pavement.

[12:50] So, we didn't use the 700,000. So, what

[12:52] I'm going on commission tomorrow for is

[12:54] to ask, "Can we

[12:57] keep that number because we've already

[12:58] calculated it in to the amount of money

[13:01] that we're charging back from people

[13:02] building on the hangars. So, we take

[13:04] that 54,000, still use it for pavement,

[13:06] but for use it for the 50 ft of pavement

[13:08] in front of hangars that the county owns

[13:12] that

[13:13] um need to be rehabbed, and it would be

[13:15] cheaper to do it during this rehab

[13:17] project that we've got coming up

[13:19] on Monday

[13:21] uh than it would be to wait and do

[13:22] mobilization later.

[13:25] Um so, that's what that's what that's

[13:27] about tomorrow. It's not to increase any

[13:29] money or ask for any more money, to ask

[13:32] for us to be able to use the saved money

[13:34] for another asphalt project that is also

[13:37] desperately needed.

[13:40] So everybody's clear on that. Clear as

[13:42] mud. Okay.

[13:45] So we're going to be doing that. Also

[13:46] coming up really soon

[13:49] the current project that is going on has

[13:51] had

[13:53] many failures.

[13:55] The concrete panels continue to fail.

[13:57] They haven't gotten the concrete mix

[13:59] right. They get cracks immediately and

[14:01] then it fails. The FAA won't accept it.

[14:03] I won't accept it. Um, so they have to

[14:05] tear it out. So they've been tearing out

[14:08] a lot of it and that's why that project

[14:10] is not done. It should be done, but it's

[14:12] not. So they're going to continue to try

[14:14] and pour at night to see if they can get

[14:16] that mix down right. I think they've got

[14:18] it dialed in, but we had to pull nine

[14:20] panels just last week. So um, they're

[14:23] still having some issues out there. Um,

[14:26] that project will get done eventually

[14:28] um, and we'll have some nice concrete

[14:29] stands um, if we ever have another one

[14:31] of these 737 events like we had.

[14:35] Um, and if we get a couple of those in

[14:37] we would we we had to chalk it out, try and make

[14:40] it fit. So this is going to be hell on

[14:41] us.

[14:42] >> Will that concrete stand be usable as

[14:45] soon as before we start this next phase?

[14:48] >> No.

[14:49] >> How long before that happens?

[14:51] >> the whole problem. It It's going to have

[14:53] to cure and I wish I could give you a

[14:54] date. It is supposed to be done. Well, I

[14:57] know this.

[14:58] By Monday we'll have full access to to

[15:01] um,

[15:02] taxiway golf cuz we have to cuz we have

[15:05] to be able to get move around. Those

[15:07] concrete stands will now be done.

[15:09] Um, so it's going to be

[15:12] tight and we can talk about that when we

[15:14] get Dorsett and everybody on during the

[15:17] con- during that

[15:18] conversation cuz Cuz not the only

[15:20] project that's going to be going on.

[15:22] There's the potential of having three

[15:24] hangars under construction at the same

[15:25] time.

[15:26] There's uh the potential of two major

[15:30] asphalt projects going on on the front

[15:32] ramp. Well, that's not a potential,

[15:34] that's for sure.

[15:35] Right after that, we're get we've got um

[15:39] seal coat and crack seal

[15:41] that's going to be going on.

[15:43] And then right after that or maybe

[15:44] before that, we've got the entry road

[15:46] project

[15:47] that's that's going to start. We rebuild

[15:49] the whole entry road.

[15:51] So,

[15:52] there's a lot going on.

[15:54] Um

[15:55] there's there's a lot going on and we're

[15:56] fortunate because we've received

[15:59] a lot of good grants um

[16:01] this last year or two.

[16:03] Uh

[16:05] but it doesn't it makes it challenging.

[16:07] >> Yeah. Yeah, I agree. Long term, it's

[16:08] going to be really nice to have all that

[16:10] space. I am worried about this summer

[16:13] the impact we're going to have if we

[16:14] can't use that new concrete.

[16:16] >> able to use it before the I Well, I I

[16:18] won't talk to the horse in the or Chad

[16:20] if you need one. We'll get there, guys.

[16:22] Let's Let's hold off and let those guys

[16:23] talk.

[16:24] >> I just don't want to be turning traffic

[16:26] away at some point cuz we don't have

[16:28] parking.

[16:29] >> I agree. Well, we'll get we'll get to

[16:30] that point, but we're skipping ahead

[16:32] here. So, are there any other questions

[16:34] about about

[16:36] what's going on with the airport and

[16:37] what we're trying to do? I tried to give

[16:39] you as much data as I can give you.

[16:41] >> Could you walk us through these charts

[16:43] one by one and give a little more

[16:45] explanation? It says operations. Just

[16:48] break that down a little more for us.

[16:54] » Okay, so if we start with the first one,

[16:55] operations is any takeoff or landing at

[16:58] the airport is an operation. Uh so,

[17:01] we're just tracking them year to year,

[17:03] how many we're doing.

[17:05] Um and you can see where where the

[17:06] growth is and where we've dropped off

[17:08] just a little bit in total operations

[17:11] um

[17:12] from last month, but we're still ahead

[17:14] of where we were last year.

[17:16] Just not as significant

[17:17] >> or this last year.

[17:19] >> Both these data sets from virtual tower

[17:21] from the past. So, are we comparing

[17:24] apples to apples?

[17:25] >> Yes.

[17:25] >> It's all about the data, not just

[17:27] numbers, people.

[17:28] >> No.

[17:29] >> Okay.

[17:29] >> So, it's These are actual operated

[17:31] operations counted.

[17:33] >> Okay. Thank you.

[17:34] >> So,

[17:35] that's the first one. Operations take

[17:37] off or landing. Then we just have

[17:39] operation broken down a lot of different

[17:41] ways. You can see the data people don't

[17:44] like flying.

[17:48] Um it is interesting to me the visiting

[17:50] versus base.

[17:52] Uh we are definitely an outside-in

[17:54] airport.

[17:55] A lot more people come in than go out.

[17:58] At any other airport, well, I won't say

[18:01] any other, but at the other airports

[18:03] I've ever been at or looked at the data,

[18:05] it's always the opposite of this.

[18:07] Your your base aircraft, they're doing a

[18:10] lot more operating than your visiting

[18:11] aircraft, but that's not the case for

[18:13] us.

[18:14] So, it tells us a little bit about what

[18:15] kind of airport we are. We're a

[18:16] destination airport.

[18:19] Um take off per runway and just which

[18:22] direction the wind is blowing

[18:24] most of the time

[18:25] uh and very few over on our uh

[18:28] crosswind.

[18:29] That's mostly just the taildraggers.

[18:33] Don't give me that look.

[18:34] >> And I think just a point to make between

[18:38] runway three and number uh runway 21 for

[18:41] takeoffs, it's just the way out of the

[18:43] airport, too.

[18:44] >> Okay.

[18:45] >> favors two one for takeoffs. Uh nobody

[18:48] really wants to taxi for a mile and a

[18:51] quarter.

[18:52] Uh

[18:53] so

[18:53] >> So, it shows a lot of the runway that

[18:55] >> If the wind is calm, people

[18:56] >> calm wind option for takeoffs

[18:58] >> and two one.

[18:59] >> Yeah.

[19:00] >> That's why they're landing runway three,

[19:01] so

[19:02] >> Yeah, that's why you'll see a spike

[19:03] >> Same the opposite for actually.

[19:05] >> When it's calm winds

[19:06] >> has to do with the layout of the

[19:08] airport, really.

[19:09] >> Calm winds and that 737 that landed, I

[19:11] sure wish they had landed

[19:13] the other direction.

[19:14] But I think we just had to land They

[19:16] landed too long and then had to taxi. Um

[19:19] but it would have been so much slicker

[19:20] if they'd just come in in three and

[19:22] rolled it out, you know.

[19:24] Or either way. So, yeah.

[19:26] Uh it also lets us know that

[19:28] winds are calm most of the time if they

[19:30] can switch where they're taking off or

[19:32] they're landing.

[19:33] That hasn't been true last month or two,

[19:36] but

[19:37] they generally

[19:38] Then your fuel flow which is the next

[19:40] one, 100 low lead.

[19:42] As compared to last year, you see we're

[19:44] making pretty significant jumps in 100

[19:46] low lead.

[19:48] Fuel is moving well.

[19:50] And then if we switch over to fuel flow

[19:52] which is for Jet A,

[19:54] uh you can see the opposite thing

[19:55] happening starting in March.

[19:57] Um

[19:58] which

[20:00] again, directly coincides with

[20:03] when the county

[20:04] made a recommendation.

[20:08] And you're right, it is amazing when

[20:10] it's up as high as it is considering

[20:12] Yeah, that's changed.

[20:13] >> I mean, the difference was 21,900

[20:17] gallons last year year-to-date. This

[20:19] year it's 6,000 gallons. Yeah, so you

[20:21] can see what the difference is there.

[20:24] >> And the employment data kind of bears it

[20:26] out as well. It's down.

[20:27] Um

[20:28] instead of going up the way that it was

[20:30] going up before.

[20:33] I don't know. Just it just paints a kind

[20:35] of a picture that we can

[20:37] look at and debate and discuss

[20:39] uh what we think it means, what we

[20:40] think's going on, what we what we might

[20:42] be able to do about it.

[20:44] Um

[20:45] My first thought is that that it's

[20:48] um

[20:49] it's contra or

[20:53] not putting into it what they were

[20:54] before the county

[20:57] suggested a different airline.

[20:59] Which in some ways you kind of get. And

[21:01] they've only got 9 months here or they

[21:03] think they've only got 9 months here.

[21:04] That might might be true. They could

[21:05] still be here.

[21:07] Um

[21:08] >> Yeah, I don't think it has anything to

[21:10] do with it.

[21:10] >> I don't think so.

[21:11] >> I don't know.

[21:11] >> Okay.

[21:13] She just was going so slow.

[21:15] >> I would hear it from the pilots if they

[21:16] were distracted or something. You know

[21:18] what I mean?

[21:19] >> Um

[21:19] >> Open with me.

[21:20] >> What are we doing anything about the uh

[21:23] on time and

[21:25] uh for the Concord this morning?

[21:27] >> We can track it.

[21:27] >> I I don't It is We do have that track. I

[21:31] don't have those numbers in front of me

[21:32] right now, but I can get them.

[21:34] >> I just wanted

[21:35] >> the service because you know, I don't

[21:37] think I don't know if fuel and

[21:38] >> Anecdotally

[21:39] >> related that it's you know, it is the

[21:41] service still

[21:43] good?

[21:45] >> Last night, we had a long delay till

[21:48] about 10:00.

[21:49] Um 10:30. There have been a few of

[21:51] those.

[21:52] Um we had

[21:54] we've had anecdotal reports of service

[21:57] dropping off.

[21:58] Um

[21:59] more lates.

[22:01] More delayed departures, more canceled

[22:02] flights.

[22:03] Um

[22:05] The hard numbers we will take a look at.

[22:07] We don't have them right now.

[22:09] >> Yeah, I I think that it would be good to

[22:11] monitor that information.

[22:14] Make sure we're still getting good

[22:16] service, you know.

[22:18] I had an 11-hour layover with them the

[22:20] other day.

[22:22] Uh and then I had to hear everything

[22:24] down there and down there.

[22:26] It was a long day.

[22:28] Um so, yeah, I I I don't know if that's

[22:30] typical. I mean, they had there was

[22:32] weather and all kinds of things going

[22:33] on, but

[22:34] >> I don't know.

[22:35] >> [clears throat]

[22:35] >> But

[22:36] I think it'd be I think it'd be nice to

[22:37] just talk to them.

[22:38] >> Rachel's really good to um always shoot

[22:41] out texts to a group of us when things

[22:43] are getting delayed so that we can plan

[22:45] for our flight and what we're going to

[22:46] plan for. And I can tell you the flights

[22:48] to Denver, I just expect it.

[22:51] >> I tell people, if you wanted to go

[22:53] somewhere on time, you fly to Phoenix

[22:55] because Denver afternoons are hellish.

[22:57] >> The Denver flights I've come to just

[23:00] expect that there's going to be

[23:02] a delay. And anything I can tell you

[23:04] right now that would be would be

[23:06] anecdotal and a passenger's experience.

[23:08] >> Well, she had passengers are talking

[23:10] like it's it's happened more

[23:13] » Okay, for the future.

[23:14] >> Yep.

[23:15] >> Believe it.

[23:17] » Any other questions?

[23:20] » Any other problems?

[23:21] >> So, like being putted.

[23:24] >> The

[23:26] date coding scheme

[23:28] uh

[23:30] I'm just wondering how I couldn't get in

[23:32] the other day and so

[23:33] >> Okay.

[23:34] >> I I don't know what the

[23:36] >> Hey.

[23:36] >> I don't know if I did something wrong or

[23:38] not.

[23:38] >> You didn't.

[23:39] >> Here's what happens. The the one gate

[23:41] we're we're working on getting it done.

[23:45] We're trying to figure out a way for

[23:46] trucks to be able to get in and out of

[23:47] the airport during the next phase of

[23:49] construction, which we can talk about

[23:50] during that, but we'll cover it here.

[23:52] So, we decided can we leave that gate

[23:54] open and still have a way to confirm

[23:56] whether people have valid codes or not.

[23:58] In so doing, we tried to do a couple of

[24:00] things. One of those things was to turn

[24:01] it off. Open it, turn it off.

[24:04] Problem is as soon as we turned it off,

[24:06] turned it back on, we lost every single

[24:09] code.

[24:10] So,

[24:11] Alyssa spent most of the day

[24:15] um

[24:16] inputting codes. So, then you look to

[24:18] say, "Well, all of these things have

[24:20] some sort of battery backup, a little

[24:22] 9-volt or something that it stores that

[24:24] information."

[24:26] Apparently, this gate has does not have

[24:28] that.

[24:29] Um every other gate on the airfield

[24:31] does. You can turn them off, turn it

[24:32] back on, the codes are saved.

[24:34] This particular gate,

[24:36] turn it off,

[24:38] why? You'll lose it all. So, we figured

[24:40] another way to keep it open, and you

[24:43] know, it gets a little into the weeds,

[24:45] but so there might have been a time when

[24:47] we didn't get your code in yet. So, it

[24:50] Is it still not working?

[24:51] >> No, I I I I haven't been back.

[24:53] >> Okay. But, just call us and let us know

[24:55] if it's ever not, because she actually

[24:57] manually

[24:58] She I we looked to see if it's possible

[25:01] to

[25:02] >> Is this like a really important game?

[25:04] >> We'd have to kind of like rewire it to

[25:06] do it. So, what we're going to do is

[25:07] just not shut it off. But, if there's

[25:08] ever a power failure

[25:10] >> Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, yeah.

[25:11] >> we're going to be out there manually

[25:13] inputting every single one of these

[25:15] codes.

[25:16] >> That didn't sound right.

[25:17] >> Which is what we're doing right now. I I

[25:20] we will look into getting some sort of a

[25:22] uninterrupted power supply.

[25:24] Um

[25:25] It's odd. I haven't seen one like that.

[25:28] >> That's just very odd.

[25:29] >> It just has no

[25:31] backup, but it didn't

[25:33] >> Okay.

[25:35] >> So sorry. Uh

[25:36] you're not the only one that experienced

[25:37] that, but

[25:39] props to Alyssa. She went through and

[25:40] inputed every single code um that day.

[25:45] Okay, I'm done.

[25:46] What?

[25:47] >> I'll go after you.

[25:48] >> Okay. One more thing I wanted to bring

[25:50] up really quickly is we just completed

[25:51] our part 139 certification inspection.

[25:55] And for only the second time in my more

[25:58] than 30 years of doing this,

[26:00] I saw a no findings.

[26:03] So, our 139 inspection went flawlessly.

[26:08] Um so, that's props to our whole ops

[26:11] staff. They worked their tails off.

[26:13] Uh that's uh Mark Markham. That's JP.

[26:17] That's Alyssa.

[26:19] Just out there really busting it to make

[26:21] sure that stuff

[26:22] is good. Like I said, that it's

[26:25] highly unusual

[26:27] to get zero findings

[26:29] on your 139 inspection. So, props to

[26:32] Mark.

[26:33] >> Can we see all their control? Can we get

[26:35] a list of everything they run through? I

[26:36] guess I could probably Google it.

[26:37] >> Yes. 139 checklist.

[26:39] >> Yeah, they

[26:40] there's a million things they check.

[26:42] Your paint your

[26:43] You know, they could have had findings

[26:44] on our paint on our runway, but they

[26:46] know that we're going to seal coat,

[26:47] crack seal, and repaint that. So, why

[26:50] give us a finding when it's already for

[26:52] a repair. Standard.

[26:54] Um rubber removal. I mean, you could

[26:55] have gotten a finding for that, but it's

[26:57] already scheduled in to be fixed, so

[26:59] it's not a finding.

[27:00] Um he thought he had a finding. He

[27:02] thought we had some of our lights

[27:04] incandescent and some of our lights

[27:07] um LED. So, we went out and popped the

[27:10] tops out to show him they're all LED.

[27:12] So,

[27:13] um

[27:14] yeah.

[27:15] >> Wasn't it the same thing on the rubber

[27:17] removal or the rest

[27:18] >> Yeah.

[27:18] >> you little back and forth

[27:19] >> Yeah, we got this.

[27:20] >> Those kind of things he already knows

[27:22] are scheduled in, so it doesn't make

[27:24] sense to give it a finding.

[27:26] But, they look for things like anywhere

[27:27] there's a 3-in lip.

[27:30] They look If they really get technical

[27:32] on it, they can go to your lights and

[27:34] make sure all of your bolts are torqued

[27:36] to the proper torqueage.

[27:38] >> Right.

[27:39] >> Um they check your training records.

[27:41] Have you done your training every 12

[27:43] consecutive calendar months? They do a

[27:45] test to see if you can get in your ARFF

[27:46] truck and get to the farthest point on

[27:48] the airport within 3 minutes.

[27:50] Um there's there's a lot of things. It's

[27:53] usually a 3-day process at an airport

[27:55] like this.

[27:57] Uh it was done in two. He's There was

[27:59] just love nothing there to dig in on.

[28:03] So, yeah.

[28:05] To C-Mart, Elizabeth JP, give him a pat

[28:08] on the back.

[28:10] Okay, that's all I've got. You were

[28:11] going to say something, Casey?

[28:12] >> Yeah, I just wanted to clarify um

[28:14] just let everybody know like the

[28:15] chemicals you They're Those are gross

[28:18] sales, not um rent paid to the airport.

[28:21] So, all that. So, I just wanted to make

[28:22] sure

[28:23] >> Oh, thank you.

[28:23] >> Yeah, and and I I would imagine that um

[28:27] Enterprise is the same thing. That's

[28:28] their the rent paid to the airport, not

[28:30] their gross sales.

[28:32] >> It's the information. Yeah, that's It's

[28:33] the information that is submitted to us.

[28:35] >> Yeah, okay.

[28:36] >> We'll clarify.

[28:37] >> I sent it to Kenny Beth.

[28:39] >> Yeah, we can clarify on future ones

[28:40] exactly what that

[28:45] Yeah. Anything else?

[28:49] I think All right, number three is

[28:52] airport members who was this is a catch

[28:54] all for the people that aren't listed

[28:55] below. If any of the board members have

[28:57] any comment this would be the time that

[29:00] aren't

[29:01] uh listed below.

[29:03] Anything?

[29:05] All right, County Commissioner. Well,

[29:08] I don't have much of anything.

[29:10] I do know that I've talked to Steve.

[29:13] We're working on the

[29:15] CIB planning grant for the utility

[29:18] infrastructure but I'm not real sure

[29:20] where that is but Well, we do have an

[29:23] update along Just got the email from

[29:26] John and he can cover it a little in

[29:28] more detail cuz I haven't had a chance

[29:29] to really go through it yet but I've got the what we requested the scope

[29:35] of work

[29:37] from John.

[29:39] >> Yeah.

[29:39] so

[29:40] >> I'm just trying to keep that moving

[29:42] along because we've got to so yeah, see

[29:45] what I talked about that this week.

[29:47] That's really all from the county side

[29:48] of it and once we get the application in

[29:52] to CIB then it can

[29:55] go before the board and it won't make

[29:56] the June cut off so

[30:01] it'll be the next one the next meeting.

[30:02] >> be July.

[30:05] >> Yeah, I'd have to look at it

[30:08] if it can be

[30:10] put in in July. It might be August so

[30:15] » But we do have a scope of work to give

[30:16] them now as part of that.

[30:18] >> So that's really all I've got with the

[30:19] county is just trying to keep some of

[30:21] that stuff moving along out there.

[30:24] >> [clears throat]

[30:25] >> City?

[30:26] >> Uh not about the city. We're working on

[30:29] still working on speed limits in town,

[30:31] um

[30:32] budgets and

[30:34] we have started the holiday planning

[30:36] process for

[30:38] December. So we have to see what we're

[30:40] doing for events but other than that, um

[30:43] we have some stuff coming up.

[30:45] It's going to take a bunch of time, but

[30:46] we haven't quite got to it yet.

[30:48] >> Are you working on those speed limits up

[30:49] or down?

[30:51] >> Yes.

[30:53] >> [laughter]

[30:54] >> Some are going up, some are going down.

[30:55] So, it's it's kind of

[30:57] um

[30:59] you know, we kind of looked at it as

[31:00] we're doing um kind of street by street,

[31:02] you know, which ones are major arteries

[31:04] and which ones are

[31:05] you know, you know, can be reduced

[31:07] without impacting traffic flow. But, I think um for the

[31:11] most part, you know, the kind of key

[31:14] thing is we're getting rid of

[31:16] um

[31:16] the OHV 15 mph and um

[31:19] and probably bumping that up and then

[31:21] bumping in some streets that

[31:24] um

[31:25] most streets will be 20 except for main

[31:27] arteries will be 25, you know, so like

[31:30] um I don't know, I think I don't know.

[31:32] We're not really

[31:33] as we're not finished yet, but

[31:34] >> They have this another topic for this

[31:36] meeting, but I think you'd I would do it

[31:38] seasonally.

[31:39] >> Yeah.

[31:39] >> Move them up when they're when the

[31:40] crowds are gone.

[31:42] >> Yeah, but it's um anyway, that's the way

[31:44] >> Absolutely.

[31:45] >> I could take them up a little bit of

[31:46] time, surprise.

[31:50] » Okay.

[31:51] Travel counselor is on with us?

[31:53] >> Yes, he is.

[31:55] >> All right, go ahead.

[31:56] >> Snuck in.

[31:58] Um not much to report. We um set aside

[32:02] and if commission approves some spending

[32:04] for the um summer months,

[32:06] um July and August specifically, which

[32:08] are showing a pretty significant

[32:10] downturn in bookings thus far. And

[32:13] obviously, we're eager to hear the um

[32:15] decision on the essential airlines so we

[32:18] can work to get some marketing in place

[32:21] before the launch.

[32:22] That's about it.

[32:25] >> So, along with that, uh the money that

[32:28] was allocated for Contour this year for

[32:31] advertising, has that all been spent?

[32:33] >> I cannot answer that question, but the

[32:35] office could verify that. I'm not sure

[32:37] if they spent it or not.

[32:39] >> [snorts]

[32:41] » I believe that I'm I'm not sure of it.

[32:43] Who would I Who would we ask?

[32:45] >> Our CFO Allen can probably find out.

[32:48] >> Well, actually we probably should have

[32:50] your admin check with our admin Harris

[32:52] County and see what

[32:54] or that went or because then it'll go

[32:56] through the proper channel over to the

[32:58] travel.

[32:59] >> Yep, we'll do that.

[33:00] >> So, we'll we'll do that then. Admin to

[33:02] admin we'll find out.

[33:04] >> Yeah.

[33:04] >> If that's

[33:05] Cuz now is the time we want to I think

[33:07] focus on getting that money have it out

[33:09] there totally.

[33:11] >> Great.

[33:11] If there's any left.

[33:12] >> Yeah.

[33:13] >> Okay.

[33:17] » All right,

[33:18] construction.

[33:24] Judge you up there or Thorson?

[33:24] >> Judge you up there or Thorson?

[33:26] >> I'm up here and Thorson's actually out

[33:28] at the airport.

[33:29] >> He's on the inspection.

[33:30] >> Yep, can you guys hear me okay?

[33:32] >> Yes, Thorson.

[33:33] >> Yes, yes.

[33:34] >> Okay, great.

[33:36] Uh, cuz I'll start off here where I'm

[33:38] over here by this apron. We're wrapping

[33:41] up on the asphalt. They should have

[33:43] asphalt all completed by the end of the

[33:45] day tomorrow.

[33:47] Um,

[33:47] looking really good. Asphalt is been

[33:49] coming in great. Had Had no issues with

[33:52] the asphalt over the past I guess we

[33:54] started last week.

[33:56] Um,

[33:57] tonight is the we're getting wrapped up

[34:00] with the concrete. They're going to be

[34:01] pouring tonight, tomorrow night, and

[34:03] possibly Wednesday night if needed.

[34:07] Um, honestly I'm looking at it right now

[34:09] and I can kind of see them getting this

[34:11] done within a couple nights for the rest

[34:13] of the concrete. Uh,

[34:15] like Steve had said there was a little

[34:16] slogan started trying to get the mix

[34:18] down, but we have been seeing very very

[34:21] favorable results in those last few

[34:23] pours.

[34:24] Uh, they were going to be finished up

[34:25] last week, but due to weather, wind, and

[34:29] issue other kind of meteorological

[34:32] issues they decided to push the pour

[34:34] back. Uh, Forecast tonight looks great.

[34:36] Looks like we're going to have a really

[34:37] good night for concrete. They're going

[34:39] to be busting out as much as they can

[34:41] and then we will

[34:43] get with that. I did have a chance to

[34:45] look at the specification and it calls

[34:49] for port

[34:51] to open the concrete. It calls for 14

[34:54] days after paving unless there's the

[34:57] passing flexural strength. We do do a

[34:59] 28-day break so it will have to be that

[35:03] 14 days which means concrete should be

[35:05] open mid-June.

[35:07] Which is exciting.

[35:11] » Good.

[35:12] Are your breaks then coming in good?

[35:16] >> Yes. Yes, the first few lots the breaks

[35:19] have been coming in well within spec

[35:23] over spec which is always good to see.

[35:27] No, everything on the test results we've

[35:29] seen thus far have been very favorable.

[35:33] >> And

[35:35] just to add in some context on the

[35:38] pavement. As Steve said, we've been

[35:41] rejecting a lot

[35:44] due to

[35:45] poor mix.

[35:47] Um

[35:49] there is a mix that they have to meet to

[35:51] a specific standard

[35:53] and that standard then should provide a

[35:55] good final product. Obviously, if

[35:57] something goes wrong or they don't have

[36:00] it tweak correctly, you get cracks and

[36:02] it's up to us to be the bad guys and

[36:04] say, "Great.

[36:06] That looks really pretty. Now tear out

[36:07] that $200,000 worth of concrete." Um

[36:11] and we've done that multiple times. Now,

[36:13] recognize that that is on the the

[36:16] bearing of that cost falls on the

[36:18] contractor. It doesn't mean even though

[36:21] they're pouring

[36:22] 40% 50% more than what they had bid,

[36:26] um, on them.

[36:28] And so, there has been a lot of, uh,

[36:31] having to pour concrete, bring out whole

[36:33] crews for nights, and then a couple days

[36:37] later rip it all out. Um, so, recognize

[36:39] that is occurring, but also keep in mind

[36:43] that uh,

[36:44] that's us to be the bad guy and tell

[36:45] them to rip it out, and you it that is

[36:49] coming at a no cost for you.

[36:51] So.

[36:53] >> Is Lochner actually the QC on this job, or do you have a

[36:57] third-party contractor?

[36:59] >> Uh, for this we are have a an

[37:03] independent. It's a third-party. It's

[37:05] one that's done a lot of the work out

[37:07] there with us in the past for the last

[37:09] decade or more.

[37:11] And then, so, there's well, and they're

[37:13] actually the QA. So, quality control is

[37:16] done by the contractor. There's actually

[37:17] two testing firms out there when they're

[37:20] doing the work. The quality control is

[37:22] on the contractor. It's basically them

[37:25] internally telling themselves, this is

[37:27] good, this is bad.

[37:29] And, but [clears throat] our QA is the

[37:33] final say in it of saying, is this good,

[37:37] is this bad? Um, 99% of the time all of

[37:40] the tests agree with one another, even

[37:43] if it's one of those 1% where it does

[37:45] not,

[37:46] ours is the final say.

[37:49] We definitely work well with the

[37:50] contractor,

[37:52] um, because these are testing firms.

[37:53] There's only

[37:55] uh,

[37:55] a handful, a couple three firms that are

[37:58] qualified to do this type of testing in

[38:00] this portion of the country and area of

[38:02] the state, and, uh, so, they've all been

[38:04] working together

[38:06] for years.

[38:09] So, it but technically speaking, it's

[38:11] the quality assurance that works with us

[38:15] and does the testing that we will then

[38:19] say pass or fail. Other things we can

[38:21] just we've outright failed just on

[38:23] visual inspection. You've got a big

[38:25] crack across a brand new

[38:27] panel. We don't have to wait for a

[38:28] testing. Hey, go rip it out. And after

[38:31] the first couple of times of that, they

[38:33] started doing it before we even had to

[38:35] go be the bad guy and tell them to rip

[38:37] it out. They were

[38:39] seeing their poor work.

[38:42] And that's the subcontractor of LeGrand

[38:44] Johnson. So, LeGrand Johnson's the

[38:46] overall, but it is they've hired another

[38:49] company that is actually doing the

[38:51] paving the concrete portion.

[38:55] The asphalt is themselves and

[38:57] they're obviously experts at that and do

[38:59] it all over the

[39:00] county and the state.

[39:03] >> Thank you.

[39:06] Uh last piece I want to mention on this

[39:08] apron over here,

[39:09] uh

[39:10] this is expansion concrete. We I have

[39:12] confirmed that Gulf is complete. Uh it

[39:15] does need that center line marking, but

[39:17] that will be open

[39:19] by the time we start this next project.

[39:22] Um segway into this project. I put this

[39:24] document together here as you're seeing

[39:27] up on the screen. This is showing

[39:30] uh the apron we're working on. Those

[39:31] it's uh right there by the fuel and the

[39:34] Redtail Hangers. Uh

[39:36] we it is a phased project, so uh

[39:39] basically I guess quick quick rundown. I

[39:41] have some dates on there. I won't get

[39:43] too much in the minutia, but so the plan

[39:45] here is milling the entire project area.

[39:48] Uh

[39:49] starting next week. So, they'll mill

[39:51] both P1 and P2.

[39:53] And then

[39:55] to the it's full depth uh that 50 ft in

[39:57] front of hangers getting a 2-in mill.

[40:00] The rest of it's getting a full depth

[40:01] mill of asphalt.

[40:03] From then, we will be starting on phase

[40:07] one area. So, they will excavate and

[40:10] they're going down pretty good amount of

[40:13] 3 or 4 ft.

[40:14] I have to check the spec, but uh so

[40:17] they'll be starting that work. They're

[40:18] going to do the dirt work up to P1.

[40:21] Then, they'll move over to P2,

[40:24] excavate that all down, bring it up, and

[40:27] then once all the dirt work is complete,

[40:30] they'll do the same and they'll pave the

[40:33] entire area, P1 and P2, in one go. So,

[40:39] with that that was kind of a

[40:41] originally it was planned to do

[40:43] basically the same thing twice, but

[40:46] given that we're working with this

[40:48] contractor and allowing them to do the

[40:50] one mobilization for mill and one

[40:51] mobilization for the

[40:54] um

[40:55] paving, we did get a reduction in price

[40:57] on the locally funded schedule.

[41:00] Uh but um that

[41:03] Uh that's a side conversation, but as

[41:05] far as phasing on this one,

[41:07] uh hopefully this document helps make

[41:08] sense.

[41:10] Uh there will be times

[41:12] with and uh we had a meeting with

[41:14] Redtail the other day and kind of got

[41:16] that all

[41:17] squared away what's going on, when it's

[41:19] going on. That's kind of what's in here.

[41:22] Um it will be available during the

[41:24] project of um

[41:25] coming out here.

[41:27] >> I would like to comment on this, though.

[41:29] So, originally we were supposed to be

[41:31] able to be operational in one of those

[41:33] spaces for the other ones. So, this

[41:36] takes us non-operational in both of

[41:38] those

[41:39] for the whole project, which from our

[41:42] perspective

[41:44] uh the biggest impact is self-serve in

[41:46] there.

[41:47] Uh we were always going to have when P1

[41:49] was going on, self-serve would still be

[41:51] open. Now, it's going to be closed

[41:54] because of this milling. And uh it

[41:57] represents uh significant business uh

[42:00] for us not to have that. We were also

[42:02] supposed to be able to

[42:05] not a huge impact here get airplanes in

[42:07] and out of hangars, which we can still

[42:09] do. Uh we just can't have airplanes

[42:13] across this space because of that

[42:16] Yeah, we're going to have to tow things

[42:18] back and forth.

[42:18] >> Well, they are going to put and don't

[42:19] forget they are going to put the the ramping in so it's not just a 2-in

[42:24] drop-off it. The reason you wouldn't

[42:26] power across it is more because of

[42:28] picking up

[42:31] >> things like that.

[42:32] >> Yeah, we don't still flow.

[42:33] >> And I'm guessing this is an active

[42:36] construction zone during this time, too.

[42:38] So, we can't have transient or base

[42:41] aircraft on their own going through this

[42:44] space, right?

[42:45] >> No, it's only it's only meant to allow

[42:47] you to be able to move your hand in and

[42:50] out of maintenance site.

[42:51] >> Yeah.

[42:52] >> And that keeps everything going.

[42:53] >> Which we appreciate. We'll still have

[42:55] access to the second hangar in this

[42:58] space uh, to use. I think the biggest

[43:00] impact is really loss of self-serve fuel

[43:03] purchases and I don't know what that's

[43:05] >> We're still going to have trucks.

[43:07] >> We will have trucks, but there's a

[43:08] significant price difference, obviously,

[43:11] between the two and I'm just worried.

[43:13] Uh, last year over this same time

[43:16] period, uh, self-serve generated about

[43:19] $30,000, $28,000

[43:21] to be accurate. We're probably going to

[43:24] lose that. We'll recover some of it, to

[43:26] your point. Uh, but I just I'm a little

[43:29] worried about having that NOTAM'd

[43:32] as out during this whole project.

[43:35] Originally, it was

[43:37] only supposed to be NOTAM'd out for half

[43:40] of the project. Now, it's the whole

[43:42] term, so uh,

[43:44] it will have an impact on the airport

[43:46] flowage, fuel flowage, and other things.

[43:48] >> Can that NOTAM be worded that

[43:51] you do have fuel service via truck?

[43:54] >> Yeah, it will Yeah, we'll make sure

[43:55] we're careful with that. A lot of times,

[43:57] we've seen this in the past. We've had a

[43:59] couple instances in the last year where

[44:01] our self-service gone down for a day. We

[44:04] put a NOTAM out. A lot of pilots

[44:06] interpreted it is there's no fuel.

[44:09] >> Right, that's what I

[44:09] >> And so we're going to have to be really

[44:11] careful with the wording.

[44:13] >> Okay. Make sure

[44:13] >> We'll sell for you.

[44:14] >> We'll work with you on this.

[44:15] >> And I think even the note of we need to

[44:18] even state fuel fuel still fuel is still

[44:21] available.

[44:22] >> Right.

[44:23] >> So we can mitigate this a bit, but this

[44:26] is

[44:27] a little bit of a, you know, change of

[44:29] plans. It is going to have a negative

[44:31] impact.

[44:32] >> Which is why we had that meeting with

[44:33] you a few days ago so that to see if we

[44:35] could make it work.

[44:36] >> Yeah.

[44:37] >> Because at the end of the day we get

[44:38] better product, a cheaper product, and a

[44:40] faster build.

[44:42] >> Yep.

[44:42] >> Can I Can I ask a

[44:44] >> Sure.

[44:44] >> Like where you were planning to do like

[44:48] unloading and offloading of passengers

[44:49] and both

[44:50] >> Yeah, this is

[44:51] >> And is that in a like happening the

[44:53] contour area, you

[44:54] >> No, we worked We worked out a way to do

[44:57] that. They have another hangar on the

[44:58] field, you might remember from previous

[45:01] meetings.

[45:02] We're going to have an access point that

[45:05] uh runs

[45:07] I don't know what you call this. I don't

[45:08] know what this point is. Behind the

[45:09] fuel.

[45:11] And then you can come in down to their

[45:13] other hangar.

[45:15] There's a bit of a roadway there. So

[45:17] they'll be loading uh most likely on

[45:20] Echo.

[45:20] >> Right.

[45:21] >> Yeah, so Jason, just across from where

[45:24] uh Skydive is, that taxiway, we're

[45:26] probably going to stage out of there.

[45:28] We'll just have your bus be delivered

[45:30] [clears throat] people. We have a hangar

[45:32] there.

[45:32] >> Right. Yeah, cuz I'm just thinking like

[45:34] well if you

[45:35] For you guys, you know, like you guys

[45:37] are running

[45:38] a lot of old people and yeah, you know,

[45:41] and then

[45:42] like continuously planes coming in and

[45:44] loading people and you know, and how you

[45:45] can do that. That actually efficiently,

[45:47] yeah.

[45:48] >> The other thing that's kind of along the

[45:50] same lines is transient GA pilots too

[45:53] are going to have to now navigate a new

[45:56] path off the ramp. There's going to be a

[45:59] lot more probably escorting uh that

[46:01] we're going to have to do than normal uh

[46:04] make this work as well.

[46:06] Um

[46:07] but yeah, we it's not going to be ideal

[46:09] obviously in game. This is going to be

[46:12] really nice when it's all done.

[46:14] But we are going to have some

[46:17] additional you guys are going to have to

[46:20] you know, go down a little further and

[46:22] drop your bombs.

[46:22] >> to be able to use the other taxiway, the

[46:25] new taxiway?

[46:28] >> Yeah, now I haven't talked

[46:30] >> He's in fact

[46:31] >> but you told me he's agreed to this

[46:32] because if he still operates on the east

[46:35] side where he is today

[46:36] >> No, we talked to him we talked to him he

[46:38] wants to operate on both sides. Yeah, so

[46:41] people will be going down there.

[46:42] >> Yeah, so then we have a horseshoe path

[46:45] or U-shape.

[46:46] >> Right, and then everybody and then spin

[46:48] around and then stop.

[46:49] >> This project and the impact that it's

[46:51] going to have on the airport is almost

[46:53] 100% the reason

[46:55] we got the U-shape taxiway money.

[46:58] This project is why.

[47:00] And it was only because

[47:03] uh this would have prevented us from

[47:04] getting the ARFF vehicle.

[47:06] >> Oh, yeah.

[47:07] >> Yeah, so because of ARFF

[47:09] is why we got all that beautiful new

[47:11] taxiway is because of the pain that this

[47:13] is going to cause them to the airport.

[47:15] So and as painful as this is going to be

[47:18] and we're not ready to talk about this

[47:19] one yet, entry road is going to be

[47:24] equally

[47:25] this

[47:28] » Brutal I believe is a good adjective.

[47:29] >> You just bite the bullet

[47:32] and and and get through it the best you

[47:34] can and we're going to provide access

[47:35] points everywhere we can as much

[47:37] wayfinding signage as we can

[47:40] to try and make sure everybody knows

[47:42] where they're going.

[47:43] >> Yeah, I I think signage is a key thing.

[47:44] I don't think in the existing project

[47:47] there

[47:48] there's [clears throat] any signs at

[47:48] all.

[47:50] Uh so I think that it it'd be really

[47:51] important in this project to have

[47:54] signs saying you know, you know,

[47:56] for GA guys, you know, park down there.

[47:58] >> Yeah, we talked about moving the sign

[48:01] off of the current gate cuz they won't

[48:02] have access to that current

[48:05] >> But people are going to get on the other

[48:06] gate.

[48:07] >> I'm worried about moving it down. I'm

[48:08] concerned about getting people out of

[48:09] the airport at night. Right now, there's

[48:11] one gate that can do that, and that

[48:13] gate's not going to be available.

[48:15] So, we're going to have to put some

[48:16] wayfinding to get them over to the gate

[48:18] by the fire station,

[48:19] um so they can use that one to get out.

[48:22] >> So, that gate you're going to have to

[48:23] put in a code that's going to be

[48:24] temporary

[48:25] >> 28 temporary 12280

[48:27] >> It's going to have a zero.

[48:28] >> It has to be five on that gate.

[48:30] >> All right.

[48:31] >> So, it'll be 12280, which we're actually

[48:33] just going to put a placard up on the

[48:35] outside,

[48:36] um saying that that's what the code is,

[48:38] so they can get out because there's just

[48:39] no other way to get people out. So,

[48:42] um because that one main gate's going to

[48:44] be open, the contractor is also going to

[48:46] have to have a person stationed at that

[48:48] gate at the gate not letting people

[48:51] through until they punch their code in

[48:53] and it goes beep.

[48:55] If it goes beep, they get to go in. If

[48:57] they punch their code in and it

[48:59] doesn't,

[49:01] he's got to kick them out. So, that's

[49:02] going to be the contractor on that.

[49:06] >> I have a question. You mentioned that

[49:08] because you're doing this all in one

[49:11] piece now that it was a cheaper for

[49:14] Who's Who's seeing the savings here?

[49:18] You said that because we're we only have

[49:20] one mob, I think, and you're allowing

[49:22] them to do the entire

[49:24] grinding in one piece here. Where's the savings going?

[49:28] >> I don't know, to be honest with you.

[49:30] >> Well,

[49:31] >> It was the

[49:32] funded We the mobilization cost is what

[49:35] they were able to get down for the

[49:37] locally funded section.

[49:38] >> funded portion.

[49:40] >> Um

[49:43] The area of the

[49:45] >> Yeah, who's who's seeing the savings?

[49:48] >> We are.

[49:49] Because we're not going to have to pay

[49:51] extra for the locally funded portion.

[49:54] This reduced the cost of the locally

[49:56] funded portion.

[49:57] >> what I was looking at.

[49:58] >> Okay, sorry. This is saying

[50:00] >> It's And it's unlike

[50:02] >> project.

[50:03] Because it's There's no seam.

[50:06] >> The overall project

[50:09] it let's take out the locally funded.

[50:11] The overall project with the exception

[50:13] of the locally funded

[50:14] is your normal FAA split. In this case,

[50:17] 95% FAA, 5% local.

[50:21] The locally funded portion in front of

[50:23] the hangars is 100% local.

[50:27] So, every dollar that the cost is

[50:29] reduced, it's reduced a dollar for the

[50:31] county versus

[50:34] on other the overall large portion of

[50:37] the project for every dollar reduced, 5

[50:39] cents is reduced on the county.

[50:41] So,

[50:42] for any dollars saved, it's 100%

[50:46] reduction of local funding.

[50:49] >> Thank you. I understand now. Appreciate

[50:52] it.

[50:58] » All right. So, the

[51:01] I was a little unclear on the roadway

[51:02] coming in. I think last meeting we we

[51:05] didn't know if it was funded. We didn't

[51:06] know a lot about it. Where are we at

[51:08] with that project, the entry road?

[51:12] >> We're working through the design. We're

[51:14] actually putting final touches on it.

[51:16] Uh, getting with Steve here on the last

[51:19] couple of pieces, but we do have uh, I'd

[51:22] call it a 70% 70 to 80% drawing. And we

[51:27] have had it gone through the FAA a

[51:29] couple times as far as the specs go and

[51:32] the the other reports, the CSPP and EDR.

[51:35] So, uh, hoping to get that buttoned up

[51:37] here shortly. Uh, before that happens,

[51:39] we will get the uh, other project out,

[51:42] the pavement preservation of all the

[51:44] remaining asphalt. That's at call it 90

[51:48] 95%

[51:49] Uh, just waiting for final sign off from

[51:51] the FAA and get that advertising bid and

[51:54] hoping to get that construction going

[51:57] and I would think August time frame

[52:01] August uh

[52:03] maybe end of July but

[52:06] as far as the entrance road goes that

[52:08] one's a little more intensive obviously

[52:09] there's a more pavement more design

[52:13] but yes that is underway and getting a good

[52:17] uh attention from our side.

[52:19] >> And for the first part of your question

[52:22] the funding Steve had gone to the county

[52:26] and did get the because there had been

[52:28] some questions about the local funding

[52:30] aspect Steve was able to

[52:33] acquire the local funding

[52:35] matches for

[52:36] >> When will we When will we see that

[52:38] design?

[52:40] >> Like Thorson said it's at the

[52:43] uh 79% we were out there with overviews

[52:46] with Steve Thorson can get more into how

[52:50] much

[52:51] um I don't know Thorson if you have the

[52:53] ability to share a screen or not I could

[52:55] probably pull it up since I'm in the

[52:56] office.

[52:57] >> Uh yeah I'm not available for that

[53:00] sorry.

[53:01] >> Okay.

[53:02] >> You well you find it out.

[53:05] >> I think we'd like to take a look at that

[53:07] if we could uh when it's ready.

[53:11] >> Sure thing.

[53:13] >> It'll we'll present

[53:15] >> All right we got time to do that before

[53:16] yeah.

[53:17] >> We got time to do that?

[53:18] >> Yeah we'll

[53:19] If he's at 79% we'll probably have it

[53:21] for next meeting.

[53:23] >> Yeah I would say we can

[53:24] at minimum get exhibits to show

[53:27] uh project area. We have uh

[53:32] we're kind of the last piece we're

[53:33] dealing with right now is

[53:36] uh the the actual asphalt section but as

[53:39] far as layout we and then as well

[53:42] uh

[53:42] markings uh for the roundabout area.

[53:45] Uh but yes, by the next meeting we'll

[53:47] have uh some exhibits to share.

[53:51] >> Great. Great.

[53:56] What else you got?

[53:56] >> And

[53:57] I would just follow up that they are

[53:59] there. They're definitely not in a

[54:01] location to be shared at the moment, but

[54:04] we are taking into account um especially

[54:07] the roundabout. It's actually been quite

[54:09] the uh

[54:10] process to figure out how to deal with

[54:12] the roundabout that's in front of the

[54:14] old drop-off for the terminal, but

[54:17] recognizing people still use it. So,

[54:19] making it both a combination of a road

[54:22] and still providing a

[54:24] turnaround or a pullout in front of the

[54:26] side

[54:28] terminal entrance.

[54:29] >> and a drop-off only lane

[54:31] >> and a bus turnaround as well.

[54:33] >> and a bus turnaround is the way we're

[54:34] trying to put it together.

[54:37] >> Yeah, for that we're getting a little

[54:39] bit

[54:40] making it a little wider. Uh actually,

[54:42] it was convenient the day we were out

[54:44] there with Steve, a bus had come by and

[54:46] we watched him have to make a

[54:48] three three- or four-point turn. So,

[54:50] that gave us a real good idea of hey, if

[54:52] we bump this pavement out a little bit,

[54:54] they'll be able to do it in one swoop,

[54:57] if not a three-point turn.

[55:00] >> Yeah.

[55:01] I mean, he almost made it, but

[55:03] >> Almost.

[55:04] >> Yeah, he could have made it if he did a

[55:05] little bit of Moab off-roading.

[55:08] >> But, we kind of figured out a way so

[55:09] they'll be able to make that turn and I

[55:11] think it's important that we have that

[55:13] drop-off and pick-up zone right there.

[55:15] Um so, that'll all still be there as

[55:17] part of this project. It won't be what

[55:19] you would consider a roundabout.

[55:21] Cuz a roundabout with nothing in the

[55:23] middle of it is

[55:24] kind of silly. So, it's just going to be

[55:26] a road with a drop-off zone that comes

[55:28] out. When that design's ready, we'll bring

[55:31] >> You should have a really pretty statue

[55:32] in the middle of the roundabout.

[55:33] >> So, yeah.

[55:35] No, they're they're part of the artwork

[55:37] thing.

[55:37] >> Yeah, no, That's That's what I hear. I

[55:39] mean the the roundabout and something in

[55:40] the middle of it is pretty cool.

[55:43] But where the unpaved roundabout is now will

[55:48] be a marked line. So we won't

[55:50] necessarily mark the edges of the road

[55:53] for the whole length of the road, but in

[55:54] that corner, it'll be a combination of

[55:57] solid and dashed white and yellow lines

[56:00] that you would see that would meet more

[56:02] of the standards that you would get on

[56:03] road traffic.

[56:12] All right, is that it?

[56:14] >> Yeah, unless there's any other questions

[56:16] I can answer.

[56:18] >> Uh yeah, if I you guys don't mind me

[56:20] chiming in here. Um I'm wondering is

[56:22] there any way that we can get

[56:25] landside access to Hangar 118?

[56:29] >> Our our new hangar

[56:31] >> Yeah,

[56:33] you'll have a landside access.

[56:37] Um

[56:38] cuz that's where we're going to bring

[56:39] people. I don't know if there's

[56:42] I'll go back there and see what it would

[56:43] take. But yeah, we would like you to

[56:45] have landside access.

[56:46] >> Which one is 118 by

[56:49] Is that the large

[56:51] hangar to the south of the

[56:54] uh snowmobile building?

[56:57] >> Yeah, that's correct.

[56:58] >> Okay.

[56:59] >> The one that we acquired.

[57:01] >> Yeah, unfortunately. Nick gained a

[57:03] little weight.

[57:05] It's much better.

[57:08] So yeah, we would we Alvin, we would

[57:10] like you to have access to that and

[57:13] whatever we can do to help make that

[57:14] happen is going to help make all of this

[57:16] go smoother. So

[57:18] >> Yeah.

[57:18] we'll try and get that.

[57:20] >> We'll probably need ground to that

[57:22] airside too, which we will

[57:24] obviously have to

[57:26] watch and you know

[57:28] shuffle that.

[57:29] >> But The gates going to be there. We have

[57:32] going to do a bit of that now already.

[57:34] That works very well for us. We'll just

[57:36] have to extend it down that taxiway.

[57:39] Now, I guess my concern is too is how do

[57:42] we stay out of the way of the

[57:43] construction and

[57:46] where

[57:47] >> When you mean when you're tugging or

[57:49] >> Yeah. We'll We'll

[57:51] work very clearly or we have safety

[57:53] meetings every week. So, attend those

[57:55] meetings. Okay. Yeah. Cuz we will have

[57:57] to have

[57:58] >> And we could.

[57:59] >> front hangar access from the ground side

[58:02] as well.

[58:03] Back there similar to what we have

[58:05] today.

[58:06] >> Okay.

[58:06] >> So.

[58:08] >> And

[58:10] I just want to make one thing very clear

[58:13] on the entrance road project.

[58:15] It will be

[58:18] a significant difficulty for everybody

[58:22] on the airport. We are working through

[58:25] many different iterations of phasing and

[58:29] uh as Bill said, wayfinding and signage

[58:33] will be key.

[58:34] But, please recognize that with the only

[58:37] one entrance road and we're paving it

[58:39] from the start to the finish, there's no

[58:41] way that we're not going to disrupt

[58:46] the

[58:48] flow of the airfield. So, we're trying

[58:51] to look at it in any possible way to

[58:52] minimize that, but

[58:55] please recognize there's no way to fix a

[58:57] road without shutting down that road.

[58:59] And it's there's not a second entrance

[59:02] to the airport. It's not a four-lane

[59:04] wide road that we could take out two

[59:06] lanes and then do two lanes.

[59:08] It is a

[59:09] >> So, so is Why is it not a four-lane

[59:11] road?

[59:13] >> Uh

[59:14] >> Probably because of the access to the

[59:16] 191.

[59:19] >> Well, I mean if you if you if you had a

[59:21] four-lane road, you could keep two open

[59:24] and two open and

[59:25] pave two and you know,

[59:27] go

[59:28] Is Is there any chance of doing that?

[59:32] >> Uh definitely not with this funding.

[59:37] » Hey.

[59:38] >> I would say not with available funding.

[59:40] >> At least double the cost.

[59:42] >> Um and also we'd have to figure out a

[59:44] place to put those other two lanes.

[59:49] A lot of places there's not really a

[59:50] spot to put another lane in.

[59:53] But yeah, well that's not part of this.

[59:56] >> And

[59:57] >> But But Bill brings up a good point

[59:59] though. Shouldn't we be looking to the

[1:00:01] future here? Or are we and that just is

[1:00:04] so far out that we aren't going to need

[1:00:06] those four lanes?

[1:00:08] What Where is our future projection

[1:00:11] there?

[1:00:12] >> There really is not the volume of

[1:00:14] traffic to justify.

[1:00:18] I don't think that's where we're looking

[1:00:20] for that future larger traffic.

[1:00:23] I think we're looking for that traffic

[1:00:25] to be back on the road that goes behind

[1:00:27] the hangars.

[1:00:29] I think we're going to have a higher

[1:00:30] volume of traffic there than we're going

[1:00:31] to have coming down to the fire station,

[1:00:33] if that makes sense.

[1:00:36] >> Mhm.

[1:00:36] >> It does.

[1:00:37] >> Once there are parking lots back there,

[1:00:39] you're you're going to have four lanes.

[1:00:40] It's just going to be a two and a two.

[1:00:42] >> Mhm.

[1:00:43] >> Um

[1:00:45] Yeah, we're ways off from having that.

[1:00:47] >> Well, so you

[1:00:48] So the entrance to the behind all those

[1:00:50] and future hangars uh would be having a

[1:00:53] different entrance than the one we're

[1:00:55] talking about here.

[1:00:56] >> Yeah. Well, no. Not We all still have to

[1:00:58] enter off of the same thing off 191.

[1:01:00] You'd just have some of the cars that

[1:01:02] split down the first one that's your

[1:01:03] hangar row and the rest would go up to

[1:01:06] either fire station, back of Redtail, or

[1:01:11] >> Terminal.

[1:01:11] >> Yeah, the terminal and the still skydive

[1:01:13] would all still be going down to the new

[1:01:14] skydive.

[1:01:16] So it'd just be two and two.

[1:01:17] >> Yeah, but it's still just two coming off

[1:01:19] the road.

[1:01:20] >> Yeah. Yeah.

[1:01:21] >> And then it splits.

[1:01:22] >> It's still the bottom neck is the part

[1:01:24] from the road to that.

[1:01:25] >> Yeah, we can certainly look to design

[1:01:27] that road to be wider

[1:01:29] in the future, for sure. It's all just a

[1:01:31] matter of money.

[1:01:33] And what we can get funded and what we

[1:01:35] can justify by traffic. We can't justify

[1:01:38] it with the traffic.

[1:01:38] >> way we can offset it now?

[1:01:41] You know, to

[1:01:42] you know,

[1:01:43] build the new road or the the new

[1:01:45] pavement, if you will, to to a little

[1:01:48] bit to the side and allow us to dirt or

[1:01:51] the existing road to exist or to you

[1:01:54] know, to keep traffic to flow on it.

[1:01:57] » They still going to have to cross it cuz

[1:01:59] it's going to be cut off. It's going to

[1:02:01] be a cut off.

[1:02:02] >> be a short short distance of cut off,

[1:02:04] though.

[1:02:05] >> I don't know how much we'd gain with

[1:02:06] that. And next time you're out there,

[1:02:07] walk out to kind of explain what we're

[1:02:09] talking about.

[1:02:10] >> Well, if you

[1:02:11] >> So, you're talking about grading out a

[1:02:13] piece so that traffic can drive further

[1:02:15] down. Still couldn't get to the parking

[1:02:17] spaces.

[1:02:18] >> Well, well, well, during the

[1:02:21] construction.

[1:02:21] >> Yeah. I'm just thinking that

[1:02:23] >> if we want to if we're thinking about

[1:02:25] widening that to three lanes or

[1:02:28] four lanes, you know, could we the new

[1:02:30] road that we're putting in there,

[1:02:32] could we just, you know,

[1:02:35] uh

[1:02:35] put that to the side of the existing

[1:02:37] road as opposed to paving over paving

[1:02:39] over the 50 ft

[1:02:40] of road.

[1:02:47] » I don't think under this project we can.

[1:02:49] Because we already have an entrance to

[1:02:52] um

[1:02:53] the highway.

[1:02:54] We

[1:02:56] have new built pavement there and we

[1:02:58] have failing pavement where we are. In

[1:03:00] some places we're not we're not going

[1:03:02] down to full depth to rebuild this. This

[1:03:04] is going to be in some places we're just

[1:03:05] going to mill and fill. And in other

[1:03:07] places we have to go full depth.

[1:03:10] So, if we moved it and said, "Oh, we're

[1:03:12] just going to build a completely

[1:03:14] separate road over here so that we get

[1:03:15] two for the price of one." and two, the

[1:03:17] things we're saying

[1:03:18] uh that would be full depth the whole

[1:03:20] way, and we would not have money to do

[1:03:23] that.

[1:03:24] >> Okay.

[1:03:25] >> And environmentally, that is different

[1:03:27] than what was uh cleared at at this

[1:03:30] point. Uh it would definitely

[1:03:33] be a long process to do

[1:03:35] what you're talking about.

[1:03:38] >> Calvin does have a question. Um when is

[1:03:40] the entrance project proposed dates?

[1:03:44] >> Well I don't know if if they've got

[1:03:46] something updated for Mark, then they

[1:03:47] can let us know, but we're we're looking

[1:03:49] at that in the fall. Um but until they

[1:03:52] get it designed and bid,

[1:03:54] um it's hard to nail down a precise

[1:03:57] date.

[1:03:58] >> Okay then. When do you think

[1:04:00] >> My answer would be

[1:04:02] >> What?

[1:04:03] >> My answer would be fall time frame. I

[1:04:05] agree, sorry.

[1:04:08] » Yeah, just now when can we expect the

[1:04:10] board we can actually see our

[1:04:12] >> As soon as he gives me something, I'll

[1:04:14] send it out, but we'll discuss it at the

[1:04:15] next meeting.

[1:04:16] >> Yeah, he he said he thought he'd have

[1:04:18] some

[1:04:19] drawing into the next meeting.

[1:04:20] >> Okay.

[1:04:21] >> Yes. One month

[1:04:23] from now

[1:04:26] >> And we will also have a meeting with

[1:04:28] airport users at the bid. Just kind of

[1:04:30] like we did with this project.

[1:04:33] Well we'll where we'll just all talk

[1:04:34] through what are the best ways to make

[1:04:37] this as least painful as possible.

[1:04:39] There's no way to make it not painful,

[1:04:41] but to try and minimize it.

[1:04:43] >> I think um

[1:04:45] we'll also develop a we can easily

[1:04:47] develop an exhibit that could be put up

[1:04:50] on the airport's Facebook page, airport

[1:04:54] county webpage, on the county news, um

[1:04:57] if even going so far as being published

[1:05:00] in the newspaper, so that

[1:05:02] people

[1:05:04] there's no way you're not going to get

[1:05:05] complaints on this one.

[1:05:09] But

[1:05:09] >> Say like is there any way they could

[1:05:11] considered like doing it at night, you

[1:05:12] know?

[1:05:14] >> I mean, it's taking We're talking of

[1:05:15] weeks and weeks of work.

[1:05:18] So.

[1:05:23] Doing it at night

[1:05:25] doesn't necessarily save us any way

[1:05:27] because we've got a hole.

[1:05:30] So, we can dig a hole at night, but

[1:05:32] people still can't drive from over it

[1:05:34] cuz the hole is still going to be there

[1:05:36] all day.

[1:05:37] So, I mean, there are some kind of like

[1:05:39] runway projects that makes a lot of

[1:05:41] sense to try and do at night,

[1:05:42] obviously.

[1:05:44] Which is what we're going to try and do

[1:05:46] with the seal coat project. We're trying

[1:05:48] to do it at night so that

[1:05:49] so that's when there's not traffic flow.

[1:05:52] But some other projects

[1:05:55] night doesn't help us with this one.

[1:05:57] Doesn't doesn't buy us anything.

[1:05:59] >> I do.

[1:06:05] » Anything else from blogger?

[1:06:13] » I'm good. Thank you.

[1:06:18] » You're breaking up. You said

[1:06:20] >> Did we do

[1:06:21] >> [clears throat]

[1:06:21] >> I'm sorry. With all of that, I can't

[1:06:23] remember did we talk about pavement

[1:06:24] preservation?

[1:06:26] >> We did briefly.

[1:06:27] >> Other than briefly.

[1:06:29] So.

[1:06:31] That will be an airfield pavement

[1:06:32] preservation. That will involve

[1:06:35] runway closures.

[1:06:37] With that, we will work

[1:06:42] » Those seal a lot faster, so it's not

[1:06:44] going to be like

[1:06:46] a lot of runway closures for a long

[1:06:48] time. And with that one, we've got to

[1:06:50] coordinate

[1:06:52] closely with you guys as soon as we

[1:06:53] possibly can. So, yeah.

[1:06:55] >> Yeah.

[1:06:56] >> I don't know if we need to be

[1:06:57] >> He was right in that

[1:06:58] >> Hopefully, what we're going to try and

[1:06:59] do is do that at night as much as

[1:07:01] possible. It does not take 48 hours for

[1:07:04] that to to cure up and be ready to go.

[1:07:07] As soon as it's not tacky

[1:07:10] over there.

[1:07:11] >> Yeah.

[1:07:18] » All right.

[1:07:21] Uh

[1:07:22] any other reports?

[1:07:26] Need to talk about?

[1:07:28] All right.

[1:07:29] Uh

[1:07:31] So, discussion I had planned number nine

[1:07:34] Uh

[1:07:34] I think that's

[1:07:37] several different things together.

[1:07:40] Uh marketing and website design.

[1:07:43] Whose is that?

[1:07:44] >> I requested it be on here.

[1:07:47] >> We can give you a slight update on the website. We we do now have access

[1:07:51] to the county's airport website, which

[1:07:53] we haven't had. IT has now given us

[1:07:56] access both uh

[1:07:58] original and the south. So, we

[1:08:01] can now start making updates and changes

[1:08:04] to that. Things like putting on this project plan,

[1:08:08] uh showing future future issues that

[1:08:10] might come up, or pictures of cool stuff

[1:08:12] that happens at the airport. We've had a

[1:08:13] few really cool things lately that that

[1:08:16] we've got lots of pictures of, so we're

[1:08:17] ready to

[1:08:18] try and get those up there as well.

[1:08:21] So, hopefully you'll start seeing a a

[1:08:23] pretty decent change to what's on the

[1:08:25] county's website

[1:08:26] as it is now.

[1:08:28] >> What are we doing for social media?

[1:08:31] >> Well, we have we have a Facebook page.

[1:08:33] >> Yeah, that's what

[1:08:34] >> Somebody maintain it?

[1:08:35] >> We have it. We're putting pictures up on

[1:08:36] it and and trying to keep that as

[1:08:38] current as possible. Um then we have the

[1:08:40] county's webpage. We don't have

[1:08:43] um any of the other social media to the

[1:08:45] best of my knowledge. We don't have any

[1:08:46] Instagram.

[1:08:47] >> Okay.

[1:08:48] >> Do we have any Instagram? Have we been

[1:08:49] posting on it?

[1:08:50] >> I don't think I was supposed to be

[1:08:51] posting, but I don't know for sure.

[1:08:53] >> Okay, I I didn't even know we had it.

[1:08:55] >> Yeah.

[1:08:56] >> Instagram.

[1:08:56] >> Sorry.

[1:08:57] >> All right.

[1:08:58] We're better on it than I thought.

[1:09:00] So, yeah, we're we're trying to maintain

[1:09:02] some of that presence, and we're trying

[1:09:03] to get more on top of things as well.

[1:09:04] >> have suggestions, please let me know.

[1:09:07] Uh,

[1:09:08] cuz I'm open to putting, you know, I

[1:09:11] wanted to I wanted to look really well,

[1:09:13] you know, doing

[1:09:15] for our for our airport. I want it to be

[1:09:18] up-to-date. I want cool stuff that's

[1:09:19] going on that involves the airport. If

[1:09:22] you guys have pictures, send them to me.

[1:09:24] And then we're going to put some

[1:09:25] pictures like SkyDive Moab. Just they

[1:09:28] did some Utah State records over the

[1:09:30] weekend for some of their their stuff.

[1:09:33] So, we're going to, you know, post them

[1:09:35] on there. I want to make sure all the

[1:09:37] businesses that are on on the field have are represented on

[1:09:43] our website because I mean that's, you

[1:09:45] know, they're part of the airport.

[1:09:47] >> It's moabairport.com.

[1:09:49] I think we have a redirect on it right

[1:09:51] now.

[1:09:52] >> Okay.

[1:09:52] >> That throws you to the county's website.

[1:09:56] So, I forgot we did have an actual

[1:09:58] website out there.

[1:09:59] >> We we own the website.

[1:10:00] >> What's the name?

[1:10:00] >> It's moabairport.com.

[1:10:02] >> Okay.

[1:10:02] >> Is that what was it? Moab what?

[1:10:04] >> moabairport.com.

[1:10:05] It will be fine but it still redirects

[1:10:07] to the county site and we just have to

[1:10:09] improve not just to the county site but

[1:10:11] the airport's page on the county site

[1:10:14] cuz then we'll keep this updated.

[1:10:16] >> Yeah, he's just got to redirect from it

[1:10:18] to the county.net or whatever it is.

[1:10:19] >> Okay.

[1:10:20] >> So, he can take that off and wherever

[1:10:21] the remnants of that moabairport.com

[1:10:23] are, he's probably Matt probably has

[1:10:25] them archived or stored somewhere and

[1:10:28] give you access to what is there.

[1:10:29] >> Yeah.

[1:10:30] >> As for what goes on it, the two examples

[1:10:33] I pulled up that I liked were

[1:10:35] Vernal You'll figure.

[1:10:37] >> Okay.

[1:10:37] >> And Rifle.

[1:10:39] They're kind of two different approaches

[1:10:40] at it. Rifle seems to be a lot more GA

[1:10:43] oriented. I mean, it has some cool stuff

[1:10:46] about the CareFlight they've got out of

[1:10:47] there with helicopter rescues.

[1:10:50] It's definitely more tailored towards

[1:10:51] pilots. Runway information, NOTAMs that

[1:10:53] are all right across the top on the

[1:10:55] banner. I mean, they got a whole of bush

[1:10:58] planes right there, so Turnagain is very

[1:11:00] sweet.

[1:11:01] That's one way to go. The other way is

[1:11:03] Bernal. That's definitely more oriented

[1:11:05] towards tourism. I mean, right on their

[1:11:07] homepage, they call it a a hero web

[1:11:10] part. It's got how to book a flight,

[1:11:12] hotels and lodging, car rentals. So,

[1:11:14] you're just firing right into when you

[1:11:16] get four options down before you're at

[1:11:18] service and pilot information. So,

[1:11:21] I think those are good kind of two

[1:11:23] different takes to take on this thing

[1:11:25] and maybe a meld somewhere in the middle

[1:11:27] of two.

[1:11:28] >> And if you looked at the download mean,

[1:11:29] I don't know,

[1:11:30] like just

[1:11:32] you know, maybe guide me on what you

[1:11:33] guys are thinking.

[1:11:35] >> I'm absolutely

[1:11:36] >> open to that.

[1:11:37] >> But Jay, would you be able to willing to

[1:11:39] help on, you know, getting there and

[1:11:41] then help with some of that work?

[1:11:43] >> Absolutely.

[1:11:44] >> Perfect.

[1:11:46] >> Thank you.

[1:11:46] >> Absolutely.

[1:11:47] >> Probably want to make sure we're working

[1:11:48] with our economic developers.

[1:11:50] >> Yeah, I would think so.

[1:11:52] >> I would say the same, too.

[1:11:54] >> Yeah, let's see if we can get that tool

[1:11:56] back up and get it working really well.

[1:11:59] With some of these other approaches.

[1:12:00] Sounds like a really good idea because

[1:12:02] surprising number of people

[1:12:04] buy their information that way.

[1:12:07] There isn't any other way, really.

[1:12:10] » A fancy sign would help.

[1:12:14] » Yeah.

[1:12:15] >> For those that are already there, it

[1:12:16] definitely would. For those passing by.

[1:12:18] >> Sign, website.

[1:12:20] Out here.

[1:12:23] >> All right. That's it.

[1:12:24] >> Yeah, I think that's good. Thank you.

[1:12:26] >> Thank you.

[1:12:28] So, uh the next thing is kind of mine is

[1:12:31] airport sign.

[1:12:33] I thought that since we're uh

[1:12:36] yeah, we've been batting around the idea

[1:12:38] of some kind of entrance sign, monument

[1:12:40] sign at the beginning of the

[1:12:42] airport.

[1:12:43] Uh so, in order to flush that out and

[1:12:46] come up with

[1:12:48] kind of a a real

[1:12:50] view of a sign, I came up with a concept

[1:12:53] that seems to be a common concept for

[1:12:55] the for airport signs.

[1:12:57] Uh, you know, the idea here was just to

[1:13:00] use some of the stuff that I've heard at this meeting

[1:13:03] uh that has to do with, you know, a

[1:13:05] digital sign and and a a monument sign

[1:13:08] and entrance sign.

[1:13:10] Uh, so in order to

[1:13:13] make that work

[1:13:14] or actually, you know, put together

[1:13:17] uh something where we could find out how

[1:13:18] much does it cost and how difficult it

[1:13:21] is and you know, that kind of stuff. I

[1:13:23] put together the idea of this B-shaped

[1:13:25] sign.

[1:13:26] Uh,

[1:13:27] it's sized according to this distance

[1:13:30] from the highway.

[1:13:33] Uh, there's a sign there now that

[1:13:35] the you guys have that's just a vertical

[1:13:38] and it's

[1:13:39] perpendicular to the highway.

[1:13:42] Uh, and and the you know, lettering on

[1:13:44] it is is, you know, is the right size

[1:13:46] for that distance.

[1:13:48] Uh, in order to maximize the

[1:13:51] viewing time on a sign,

[1:13:53] uh it's particularly a digital sign, it

[1:13:56] had to be tilted into a B-shaped

[1:13:58] arrangement so you get more viewing

[1:13:59] time.

[1:14:01] Uh, you get

[1:14:03] this sign proposes a a 6 to 10 6 to 10

[1:14:07] second viewing time, which is more than

[1:14:09] enough for a for messages

[1:14:12] for a single uh you know, message or

[1:14:14] messages. Probably two in that length of

[1:14:17] time.

[1:14:18] Uh, surprising how quick people, you

[1:14:21] know,

[1:14:22] if the the letters are big enough, right

[1:14:24] now, okay, you can see it.

[1:14:26] So anyway, uh what I wanted to do is it ended up being about a

[1:14:30] uh

[1:14:31] a B-shaped sign about 14 ft

[1:14:34] high and about 13 ft long uh on the on

[1:14:38] the two sides.

[1:14:39] And this this proposal basically looks

[1:14:42] at putting a digital sign on the

[1:14:45] southbound lane so people coming in

[1:14:47] would see the sign, the digital sign.

[1:14:50] Uh

[1:14:50] and then also with the digital sign

[1:14:53] would be a uh

[1:14:55] monument sign or a uh billboard sign and

[1:14:58] you know, whatever it is, some kind of

[1:15:00] other thing cuz the the digital sign

[1:15:02] would only be about 3 ft tall and 12 ft

[1:15:05] wide.

[1:15:07] And that's big enough to put on two

[1:15:08] lines two two lines of of characters and

[1:15:12] be able to see them from the road.

[1:15:14] Um the idea is is that

[1:15:17] the other part of the sign would just

[1:15:19] say

[1:15:20] airport and it could be anything from

[1:15:23] fixed advertising

[1:15:25] to just an airport sign. I mean, there

[1:15:27] there's a lot of possibilities there and

[1:15:29] I don't know

[1:15:30] what the that would be more for for the

[1:15:32] advertising folks or the airport folks

[1:15:34] to decide what should be on. Now, the

[1:15:36] south side of of this V-shaped sign

[1:15:39] would be a fixed sign.

[1:15:41] You know, just a a a sign that said uh

[1:15:45] "Thank you for visiting our airport" or

[1:15:47] you know, whatever else you want to put

[1:15:48] on. If you've got the food display

[1:15:50] >> Here's the road.

[1:15:51] >> Yeah, right. This is the road, so this is the

[1:15:55] >> Why would we do a fixed on the one and

[1:15:58] digital on the other road? You could

[1:15:59] just do

[1:15:59] >> Well, it's

[1:16:00] it could be. It absolutely could be.

[1:16:02] This is The question is cost.

[1:16:04] A digital sign such as this uh

[1:16:07] it would good good daytime viewing and good resolutions about 22,000.

[1:16:14] And so, uh

[1:16:16] certainly there could be a digital sign

[1:16:17] on both sides.

[1:16:18] >> I think if we're going to do it, it

[1:16:19] should be digital on both sides to catch

[1:16:21] people coming and going and and it would

[1:16:23] be a better for the advertiser because

[1:16:26] um

[1:16:27] This is so stupid to say. My

[1:16:28] undergraduate degree was in in

[1:16:30] advertising. What you What you want to

[1:16:32] do is get them all on 100 show. Um and

[1:16:34] the idea is 7 seconds and no more than

[1:16:37] seven words. That's kind of the standard

[1:16:39] in the phone.

[1:16:40] Um

[1:16:41] And so, if you do digital on both sides,

[1:16:45] you'll get closer to a 100 show, which

[1:16:47] is just everybody who passes that road

[1:16:49] will see it. They'll see it. So, um you

[1:16:51] cuz you're doubling your chances for

[1:16:53] that. Plus you increase the the

[1:16:54] marketing avail- marketability of it. I

[1:16:57] mean, I don't know when we're going to

[1:16:58] build this sign, but um

[1:17:01] I definitely think we we should have it.

[1:17:04] I like the V idea. You're right, that's

[1:17:05] the best way to do it cuz drivers will

[1:17:07] have to crane their head to see it

[1:17:09] certain directions.

[1:17:10] >> Yeah, you can see it about uh 700 ft

[1:17:12] down the road. Uh you know, which gives

[1:17:15] you a pretty long viewing curve.

[1:17:17] Yeah.

[1:17:18] >> And

[1:17:19] so

[1:17:20] >> So I

[1:17:20] >> Yeah, we should be thinking bigger about

[1:17:22] that.

[1:17:23] >> Yeah, I think that absolutely. And I

[1:17:25] again I'm not proposing that we do it

[1:17:28] exactly exactly what the staff committee

[1:17:29] says. What I was trying to do was find

[1:17:31] out, okay, but how much is going to cost

[1:17:34] and and and how do we finance it?

[1:17:37] And so the things that that uh

[1:17:40] that stand out on on this

[1:17:43] uh report, I think

[1:17:45] is that if you scan down after you look

[1:17:48] at all of the other things, you start

[1:17:50] looking at the financial summary.

[1:17:53] And the financing options

[1:17:55] for the sign that I proposed here, which

[1:17:57] digital on one side, if we do it, it'll

[1:17:59] be another 20,000 on the other but

[1:18:02] uh our financing option

[1:18:05] uh if we have five advertisers paying

[1:18:07] $200 a month

[1:18:10] uh for

[1:18:12] you know, some presentation on the on

[1:18:14] the digital sign we're talking about.

[1:18:16] Let alone what you could do on the other

[1:18:18] sign.

[1:18:19] Uh

[1:18:20] I think that that uh the way this works

[1:18:23] out is is that you have a positive cash

[1:18:26] flow if you could get five advertisers

[1:18:28] to $200 a month at about $2,000 a year

[1:18:32] during the financing period.

[1:18:34] And then And the financing period of 5

[1:18:36] years,

[1:18:37] uh

[1:18:38] you you know, you'd be making 74 grand a

[1:18:41] year.

[1:18:42] Which is quite a bit considering the uh

[1:18:45] sign has a lifespan of at least 12 years

[1:18:47] and and maybe longer.

[1:18:49] Uh

[1:18:50] depends on what you how long the digital

[1:18:52] signs are made to last about that long.

[1:18:55] Uh

[1:18:56] Now, if you go for the cash option,

[1:18:59] uh

[1:19:00] and you just charge if you can find

[1:19:03] so find the cash somewhere, you could

[1:19:05] pay off the sign in about 3 years.

[1:19:08] And uh and then, you know, make

[1:19:11] significant money uh 20 20 grand and

[1:19:14] then, you know, for the whatever it is

[1:19:16] to the sign, make a lot of basically or

[1:19:18] at least enough to pay for everything.

[1:19:20] And these estimates here assume uh

[1:19:24] everything that's involved with the with

[1:19:26] the maintenance of the sign, the power

[1:19:28] for the sign, uh the upkeep of the sign,

[1:19:31] uh

[1:19:32] it even puts in some money to hire a

[1:19:35] professional outfit to program it.

[1:19:37] Although, it it appears to me that's not

[1:19:39] necessary.

[1:19:41] The the web pages that the thing that

[1:19:43] these sign guys have are,

[1:19:45] you know, really really good and you you

[1:19:47] can do anything you want. It's It's

[1:19:49] actually easier than building a website.

[1:19:51] So, it's it's not something that

[1:19:53] is very

[1:19:54] They're They're tools that are actually

[1:19:55] really good.

[1:19:57] Uh

[1:19:59] Problems with it uh obviously uh have to

[1:20:03] do with uh meeting

[1:20:06] uh

[1:20:07] environmental concerns.

[1:20:09] You know, what would we what would we do

[1:20:10] with the digital sign at night?

[1:20:12] Uh what would we do? Uh what are what

[1:20:15] are the dark sky standards if if those

[1:20:17] apply to us?

[1:20:19] Uh

[1:20:20] and

[1:20:21] other things like wind and, you know,

[1:20:23] considerations like that have to be

[1:20:24] engineered for that. Right now, this

[1:20:27] sign is is is planned to have three

[1:20:30] vertical steel posts.

[1:20:32] Uh

[1:20:33] and you know, set in concrete

[1:20:35] uh with concrete foundations and then

[1:20:37] have the signs

[1:20:39] uh on the each side of that. That seems

[1:20:42] to be the uh

[1:20:43] least expensive way to build such a sign

[1:20:46] and have it strong enough to you know,

[1:20:48] do what it needs to do.

[1:20:50] So, based on

[1:20:52] uh based on that

[1:20:54] those kind of numbers uh

[1:20:56] financing options

[1:20:58] uh there's a couple ways to do it

[1:21:01] that I that I thought about and and one

[1:21:03] way would be to have uh

[1:21:06] our advertising council

[1:21:08] you know, buy into it as a advertising

[1:21:11] feature and finance it as as part of

[1:21:13] their their budget or at least part of

[1:21:15] it out of their budget.

[1:21:17] Another way to do it would be to uh find

[1:21:20] a private company

[1:21:22] uh that would be willing to front the

[1:21:24] money in exchange for profits off the

[1:21:26] sign.

[1:21:27] >> Can Can we hold up for just 1 second?

[1:21:30] Howard, are you still with us?

[1:21:33] >> Yeah, I'm still here.

[1:21:35] >> I I really think this would be something

[1:21:37] to take back to your

[1:21:39] tourism board, right?

[1:21:41] >> Um

[1:21:42] >> at least to start some discussions there

[1:21:44] and see what we can do.

[1:21:46] >> I really think that funding could come

[1:21:49] from the TRCCA fund

[1:21:52] to basically not need to finance it and

[1:21:53] just buy it.

[1:21:55] But that would probably not occur until

[1:21:56] next year, Bill. So, um I think that

[1:21:59] >> Yeah. Which would sure.

[1:22:00] >> But I could certainly bring that

[1:22:03] >> with them for sure.

[1:22:04] >> for sure, for sure.

[1:22:05] Um and also bear in mind that there was

[1:22:08] um beyond this sign, there was a an

[1:22:10] appeal from the Spanish Trail Arena for

[1:22:12] something similar. So, for the

[1:22:13] commission to know that, too, it might

[1:22:15] be something possible for both. I don't

[1:22:17] know.

[1:22:19] >> Yeah. Yeah, there I think that there's

[1:22:21] also, you know, like I said, there's

[1:22:23] private funding where

[1:22:24] companies will front for some for build, build board signs or whatever.

[1:22:29] There's also, you know, fundraising

[1:22:31] activities that could be done.

[1:22:34] You know,

[1:22:35] >> I wouldn't want to give it over to

[1:22:37] private. I mean,

[1:22:38] we are selling but we don't need

[1:22:41] >> Yeah, so I so I think

[1:22:43] I I get the out

[1:22:46] >> No, it's a great idea.

[1:22:46] >> The idea here is

[1:22:49] just doing some preliminary work. It

[1:22:51] appears like it can be really feasible

[1:22:54] for costing and running space on it for

[1:22:58] it to pay for itself in a reasonable

[1:22:59] length of time.

[1:23:01] And if we can just find the money up

[1:23:03] front then it's then obviously it's pure

[1:23:05] profit.

[1:23:07] Or

[1:23:07] at least more profit on it.

[1:23:10] So I thought there'd be the next thing I would like to do if would be go to the

[1:23:16] advertising council and to the county

[1:23:20] and just start talking.

[1:23:22] And you know, just start saying, "Okay,

[1:23:24] we want to do a sign I think,

[1:23:26] you know, here's kind of what the basics

[1:23:28] of it are. It's about this big and it's

[1:23:30] going to have digital sign maybe on both

[1:23:32] sides. You know, and it's going to cost

[1:23:34] 50

[1:23:36] 54,000 dollars, some number like that.

[1:23:40] If we put digital sign on both sides

[1:23:42] and just start going easy to round so

[1:23:45] that with the target of having a budgetary number in place for next

[1:23:52] year.

[1:23:53] Whoever's going to budget for it.

[1:23:56] Or even having some ideas along those

[1:23:58] lines.

[1:23:59] But I think it's important to do this

[1:24:02] for a number of reasons. One of them, I

[1:24:04] think the airport image.

[1:24:06] Right now we don't don't really have

[1:24:09] any image. I think the entrance way, you

[1:24:12] know, the new pavement will add greatly.

[1:24:14] But I also think we need to have

[1:24:16] something that is really stands out. And

[1:24:19] I think it needs to not be tacky or

[1:24:22] whatever. I think so. I agree. It needs

[1:24:24] to It needs to be looked like a

[1:24:25] permanent kind of a thing, you know,

[1:24:27] like it's a

[1:24:28] uh

[1:24:29] real ongoing cuz all these image things

[1:24:32] is what people take away. It's what they

[1:24:34] think about. Cuz when they think about,

[1:24:36] "Oh, that's a real airport and they got

[1:24:38] they've got, you know, all these

[1:24:39] services there. They've got airlines.

[1:24:41] They've got uh

[1:24:43] you know, all kinds of flight scene

[1:24:46] things going on. Whatever all those

[1:24:47] things are, uh

[1:24:49] people will then remember it and check

[1:24:51] into it. You know, and actually involve

[1:24:54] themselves more in the airport. The

[1:24:55] other thing I believe it will do is

[1:24:57] attract

[1:24:58] uh more

[1:25:00] uh pilots. A lot of pilots drive by.

[1:25:01] They don't know if it's private or not.

[1:25:03] So, they I think that that becomes a a

[1:25:06] reasonable kind of a thing.

[1:25:08] They're going to let alone the

[1:25:09] advertising uh you know, possibilities.

[1:25:13] >> Yeah, I don't think anybody here needs

[1:25:14] any convincing. We'll have a sign up. We

[1:25:17] need to get sign.

[1:25:18] Um

[1:25:19] I'd love to have a single pole so I'd

[1:25:20] love to see it. Concrete columns would

[1:25:22] be

[1:25:23] um

[1:25:24] >> Well, they they can have a they can have

[1:25:25] a facade on them. I mean, I'm not saying

[1:25:27] what the design should be.

[1:25:28] >> Right.

[1:25:29] >> I think that that The idea is that I

[1:25:31] think

[1:25:33] with you guys' approval, I think what

[1:25:35] I'd like to do is take this to a

[1:25:37] professional sign company.

[1:25:39] You know, somebody that somebody could

[1:25:41] recommend and say, "Okay, here's the

[1:25:42] concept. What is it really going to cost

[1:25:45] to build this and what are your

[1:25:46] recommendations?" Maybe

[1:25:48] >> It'd be good to bring back like some

[1:25:50] mock-ups or something.

[1:25:52] >> yeah. I'd like to do some I'm sure do

[1:25:53] some real artwork and

[1:25:55] >> some video of what it would look like.

[1:25:58] >> I mean, Steve didn't like my last

[1:26:00] design.

[1:26:00] >> I thought it was a little busy is all. I

[1:26:04] thought it was tacky. But, you know,

[1:26:05] about

[1:26:06] >> No, but I I think a professional would

[1:26:08] do good on it. You know, something. And

[1:26:10] so, if

[1:26:11] I'm I'm hoping that we have some maybe some of you guys know of somebody

[1:26:16] uh that has put signs up in town and

[1:26:18] they're really happy with the signs

[1:26:20] they've had made.

[1:26:22] >> Yellowman Elementary School

[1:26:23] just put a new sign up.

[1:26:26] I know where they're at. They're under

[1:26:27] construction right now.

[1:26:29] >> Yeah. So, I would like to to uh

[1:26:32] you know, kind of give a basic

[1:26:34] engineering

[1:26:36] paper to somebody that recommends and

[1:26:38] say, "What would it take to do this?"

[1:26:40] Right. Does that Does that make sense to

[1:26:41] you?

[1:26:42] >> Yeah.

[1:26:42] >> I'm going to get it get it get it

[1:26:44] >> What? Talk to

[1:26:45] >> Talk to him a little bit about that.

[1:26:46] >> Okay.

[1:26:47] So, uh that's really all I had. I I was

[1:26:49] really surprised, to sum it up, that it does look financially

[1:26:56] uh pretty good for you.

[1:26:58] know, I would I would probably

[1:27:00] you know, if I was in that business, I'd

[1:27:01] probably go build and sell.

[1:27:05] But anyway,

[1:27:06] thank you.

[1:27:08] >> Thank you.

[1:27:11] » All right.

[1:27:12] Um

[1:27:13] New leases and hangar construction.

[1:27:16] >> Yeah. I've got two leases uh that are

[1:27:18] out with someone right now. Um they're

[1:27:21] reviewing them. I was hoping I'd have

[1:27:22] them to come back. It's Laurel Padgett.

[1:27:24] She met with us last week. She wants to

[1:27:27] go forward with both of her hangar

[1:27:29] proposals.

[1:27:30] So, she's looking over the lease right

[1:27:32] now. Uh but I I didn't get it back from

[1:27:35] her in time for this meeting. Um but

[1:27:37] we've at least got those two. And she

[1:27:39] might want to move faster, so we may

[1:27:41] have to call a

[1:27:45] mid-month

[1:27:46] forum

[1:27:47] uh to get it moving once she is done

[1:27:49] with these paperwork cuz I don't want to

[1:27:51] slow anybody down. I want to keep it

[1:27:53] going.

[1:27:53] >> Let's do that.

[1:27:54] >> Yeah.

[1:27:58] » So, if the I suppose the the question I

[1:28:01] had after this meeting and all that is

[1:28:04] uh is the

[1:28:06] is our current lease template, if you

[1:28:09] will, uh lawyer approved and we all

[1:28:11] happy with

[1:28:13] what we have.

[1:28:14] >> It's been approved by Steven Stocks.

[1:28:16] Including uh,

[1:28:18] the new addition that I put in for the

[1:28:20] one time

[1:28:22] uh, linear footage fee. So, it's been

[1:28:25] attorney approved.

[1:28:26] Uh,

[1:28:28] I think we need to have a discussion

[1:28:30] about different types of leases.

[1:28:33] We need to add that.

[1:28:35] I'll put that on the agenda and have

[1:28:36] something ready for it.

[1:28:38] >> So, so future then, new types of leases?

[1:28:41] >> Well, you've got different types of

[1:28:43] operators at the airport. And I would

[1:28:44] like to have similar operators on

[1:28:46] exactly the same lease, not hold them to

[1:28:48] different leases. Personally used

[1:28:50] hangars should all be on the same lease.

[1:28:52] Um, FBO should have a different type of

[1:28:54] lease.

[1:28:55] >> Okay.

[1:28:56] And then, uh, so items nine and 10,

[1:28:59] uh, nine and 10 will just continue as

[1:29:01] discussion items.

[1:29:02] I'd like to separate marketing and web

[1:29:04] design into a

[1:29:06] item 11 or whatever.

[1:29:08] >> Yeah.

[1:29:09] >> So, it's a different subject.

[1:29:10] >> You guys got a part.

[1:29:11] >> Uh, and then,

[1:29:13] any other future considerations?

[1:29:16] We can get those on to Sarah when you you know, when you get them in

[1:29:20] 5 days before the meeting, that works

[1:29:22] really well.

[1:29:25] Uh, close sessions, anything necessary

[1:29:27] there?

[1:29:30] All right.

[1:29:32] So,

[1:29:34] 5:27, we're adjourned.

[1:29:37] We'll meet back here Monday night.

[1:29:40] >> Okay.

[1:29:41] >> The meeting was very much

[1:29:45] » Thank you.

[1:31:57] » Mhm.

Airport Board 6.1.26

Transcript