Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
Copy of a YouTube video held by the Internet Archive.
Captions were copied from the YouTube video.
Captions were copied from the YouTube video.
[0:00]
Okay, buddy.
[0:01]
Okay, thank you. Um, I'm
[0:03]
going to call a
[0:04]
meeting of the
[0:05]
full Committee for
[0:07]
Monday, September 28,
[0:08]
2026. Um, Madam
[0:09]
Secretary, could
[0:10]
you please announce the list
[0:11]
?
[0:11]
Mayor Russ, Deputy
[0:12]
Mayor Sheffield, Councillor
[0:13]
Miguel Roy, Councillor
[0:14]
Piazza, Councillor Jones.
[0:15]
Present.
[0:16]
Thank you. Um, the first
[0:17]
item on the
[0:18]
agenda is the Giordano Family Foundation
[0:19]
. Um, we have the
[0:22]
Eastern
[0:23]
Connecticut Community Foundation here tonight. If you
[0:24]
guys want to
[0:25]
come up, we have Megan
[0:26]
Brown, the COO
[0:28]
, and Lauren Parda, our
[0:29]
immediate
[0:30]
development director,
[0:31]
not ours, but theirs. Um, and
[0:33]
Director Juhasz
[0:34]
will provide an overview. Thank you,
[0:38]
ma'am.
[0:41]
Good.
[0:42]
Thank you.
[0:50]
So, I believe the
[0:51]
board may have known
[0:53]
about it, but, um, if
[0:54]
not, we were a
[0:55]
beneficiary or a
[0:56]
trustee of, um, the
[0:58]
Sharon
[0:59]
Giordano Trust. Um, this
[1:01]
trust was set up by
[1:02]
Sal, um, with
[1:04]
her daughter, who
[1:05]
was the
[1:06]
trustee. Um, Sharon
[1:09]
died in March
[1:11]
2026, which was then
[1:12]
entered into the
[1:13]
probate case, and
[1:15]
the city ended up receiving
[1:16]
approximately $3.8 million
[1:17]
, the interest and
[1:18]
dividends of which
[1:19]
could be
[1:20]
used for certain,
[1:22]
um, things that were
[1:23]
designated in the trust:
[1:24]
meaning training
[1:25]
programs for city
[1:27]
employees, um,
[1:28]
tuition assistance
[1:29]
for
[1:30]
city residents,
[1:31]
improvements to
[1:32]
Eastern Point Beach, and
[1:34]
recreation programs
[1:35]
and improvements to
[1:36]
Washington Park. The way it works is
[1:42]
that the money
[1:42]
is transferred to the
[1:44]
Community Fund,
[1:45]
which will control
[1:46]
it, and then they, in
[1:47]
turn,
[1:48]
will pay
[1:49]
dividends to the city annually from the
[1:51]
interest accrued on that money
[1:52]
. Now I have
[1:55]
more to say about this
[1:56]
.
[1:58]
Of course. So, we
[2:01]
call this a
[2:01]
trust fund, which
[2:03]
means it's what
[2:04]
we call the
[2:05]
spent
[2:07]
fund balance. Am I
[2:08]
okay?
[2:09]
Yes, we have a
[2:12]
spent
[2:13]
fund balance that will be there
[2:14]
every year. Our board
[2:15]
sets our
[2:16]
spending rule
[2:17]
each year. It is usually
[2:20]
between 4 and 6%.
[2:22]
You can now
[2:23]
expect about 4%
[2:24]
of the fund's value.
[2:27]
It works so that
[2:29]
at the end of the year,
[2:30]
our
[2:31]
investment
[2:32]
return is calculated and all of
[2:33]
our investments are
[2:34]
pooled together. After
[2:37]
calculating
[2:38]
the return, each
[2:39]
of our 650 funds
[2:41]
receives a share of the
[2:42]
income based on the
[2:43]
size of their fund.
[2:46]
And it will be the same with
[2:47]
this fund. Typically,
[2:50]
you know, our investment returns
[2:53]
fluctuate from year to
[2:54]
year, but over a 10-
[2:55]
year period, you
[2:57]
can expect a
[2:58]
7 to 8% return.
[3:01]
This will be the median
[3:03]
rate. So, when the
[3:08]
year-end investment return is calculated, we
[3:09]
usually do it in
[3:11]
January, and you can
[3:12]
expect to receive a
[3:13]
grant check
[3:14]
around the beginning of
[3:15]
February for that 4%, depending
[3:17]
on the value of the trust.
[3:20]
This will probably be
[3:21]
a little over 100,000 per
[3:22]
year indefinitely. And
[3:25]
the fund will be in the fund, and
[3:26]
then it will be
[3:27]
financed and
[3:28]
grow indefinitely
[3:29]
. So, this amount
[3:31]
will only increase over time.
[3:35]
Do you have any questions or
[3:36]
comments? Um,
[3:41]
Council Love joins us at 6:08. Are there any
[3:45]
questions?
[3:46]
Greetings. Um, I'm here
[3:48]
. I apologize for
[3:49]
the delay. Um, between
[3:51]
switching
[3:52]
phones, it says 5
[3:53]
hours.
[3:55]
Thank you. We work for the
[3:58]
Giordano family trust. Um, we just
[4:00]
got a review of the sums.
[4:04]
Um, deputy mayor.
[4:09]
Um, yes, that is, um, out of, I
[4:11]
think, 3.8 2 million,
[4:13]
um, that is, dividends on
[4:15]
average 4% of this
[4:17]
3.28 will be, um, for
[4:19]
each January, I think,
[4:21]
going to the city. Yes,
[4:26]
continue.
[4:27]
And the goal is to keep
[4:29]
that 3.8 growing over
[4:31]
time.
[4:31]
Good.
[4:32]
So as it grows,
[4:33]
the amount you
[4:34]
receive will likely
[4:35]
grow as well.
[4:37]
Good. And your
[4:38]
dividends, um, are they, I
[4:40]
think, annual or, you
[4:41]
know, quarterly
[4:43]
dividends? How is the
[4:45]
trust financed, guys?
[4:48]
Yes, the investment
[4:50]
return
[4:50]
is calculated
[4:51]
annually, and then we
[4:52]
send, um, what
[4:54]
we call the
[4:55]
expense portion of the
[4:56]
fund. We usually
[4:57]
do this around the
[4:59]
first week of
[5:00]
February. So you can
[5:01]
plan for this check
[5:02]
every year, and like
[5:03]
Megan said, it will grow
[5:05]
over time.
[5:06]
Good. And to you, Ron,
[5:08]
I wonder if this money will go
[5:10]
into the general
[5:11]
fund or something, or you
[5:12]
said that...
[5:13]
Uh, the plan right now
[5:14]
is to create a
[5:16]
special
[5:17]
revenue fund in the city. So
[5:18]
these dividends
[5:19]
will come in, and it
[5:20]
won't be a budget
[5:21]
fund in the general
[5:22]
fund as such, but this
[5:23]
money will
[5:24]
be in a
[5:24]
special revenue fund
[5:26]
designated for the
[5:27]
purposes that the trust has identified
[5:28]
. This way,
[5:29]
if a larger
[5:30]
project arises for which we
[5:31]
want to accumulate
[5:32]
dividends over a couple of
[5:33]
years, we can
[5:34]
do so by leaving
[5:35]
them in a special
[5:36]
income fund.
[5:39]
Thank you.
[5:41]
Are there any more questions?
[5:43]
Councilor Piazza.
[5:45]
Thank you. Thank you.
[5:46]
Yes, um, more of a
[5:47]
comment. Um, I just
[5:49]
want to thank
[5:50]
the family for being
[5:51]
so kind and generous
[5:52]
to the city of Groton. I
[5:53]
think it just
[5:54]
shows the love that, um
[5:55]
, the family has for the
[5:56]
city of Groton, and that in
[5:57]
itself speaks volumes
[5:59]
. So I just want to
[6:00]
thank them. You know, I mean
[6:01]
, money is a
[6:03]
wonderful gift. I
[6:04]
mean, but I think it
[6:05]
all comes from the
[6:06]
heart, obviously, and
[6:07]
their kindness. So I
[6:08]
just want to
[6:09]
thank my family. Are
[6:11]
there any other
[6:12]
comments? Question?
[6:16]
Advisor Bois. Uh,
[6:20]
thank you, Madam Mayor. Uh, I
[6:25]
apologize for not being here
[6:26]
on time, but,
[6:28]
um, I think, looking
[6:29]
at our agenda package
[6:31]
and what
[6:33]
this community fund can be used for, is
[6:35]
it the community, uh,
[6:36]
fund that will determine what
[6:38]
happens, or
[6:40]
should the city, uh, council, uh, meet
[6:41]
to determine what
[6:43]
action plan we're going to
[6:49]
use these
[6:50]
funds for in the future? The
[6:54]
trust document
[6:55]
outlines how these funds are to
[6:56]
be
[6:57]
used. Uh, yeah, I
[7:00]
forgot your name. As you
[7:03]
said, uh, it
[7:05]
outlines how these funds
[7:06]
should be
[7:07]
used. The
[7:08]
trust document
[7:09]
is always the lead
[7:10]
document and the
[7:11]
Attorney General
[7:12]
will contact the
[7:13]
Public Trust
[7:14]
so that we can
[7:15]
report to them that
[7:16]
they are
[7:16]
being used
[7:17]
appropriately when
[7:19]
we provide them to you. So
[7:21]
we ask you to report this to us,
[7:22]
perhaps annually
[7:24]
. We provide, uh,
[7:26]
send you
[7:27]
grant funds. You
[7:30]
determine how you
[7:31]
use them, and
[7:32]
then if you
[7:33]
report back to us briefly, we
[7:34]
can share
[7:35]
that with the
[7:36]
Attorney General.
[7:41]
Good, because, again
[7:43]
, what I see in the
[7:44]
documents provided
[7:45]
are the curriculum
[7:46]
and
[7:47]
information, the
[7:48]
tuition assistance,
[7:49]
these recreational
[7:50]
programs at
[7:51]
Eastern Point Beach in
[7:53]
Washington Park. That's a
[7:55]
summary of what
[7:58]
these
[7:59]
funds can be used for, right?
[8:01]
Yes.
[8:04]
Okay, so I think
[8:05]
one thing I'm asking
[8:07]
through the mayor is do
[8:08]
we need to determine as a council
[8:09]
and mayor
[8:10]
what our action plan is
[8:11]
for using
[8:12]
these funds? Again
[8:18]
, should we
[8:19]
reach out to the
[8:20]
finance department
[8:21]
to see what
[8:22]
our action plan is for
[8:24]
using them? I wouldn't
[8:27]
want these things
[8:28]
to drag on and then
[8:29]
say, "Oh, suddenly
[8:31]
we have money."
[8:32]
Let's spend them
[8:34]
on this. Let's
[8:35]
spend it on that." I
[8:37]
think it would be
[8:38]
prudent for us
[8:39]
to have an action plan
[8:40]
or at least identify
[8:41]
some need in these
[8:42]
four areas. Um,
[8:48]
so that we have a
[8:49]
strategy for the
[8:50]
future, so that we
[8:51]
can determine
[8:52]
what we want to
[8:53]
use these
[8:54]
funds for with the trust that has
[8:56]
been, um,
[8:56]
blessed to the city of
[8:58]
Groton.
[9:01]
Hmm, thanks for
[9:03]
the question. So the idea
[9:04]
was that,
[9:06]
um, the money
[9:06]
would come to the
[9:07]
city. As soon as they
[9:09]
come to the city,
[9:10]
um, before that, we will
[9:11]
create a committee in the city of
[9:13]
non-partisan, um,
[9:14]
parties, so that the people who will
[9:15]
not
[9:16]
benefit from this
[9:17]
will consider all the
[9:18]
options, um, and then
[9:20]
we will be happy
[9:20]
to inform you of
[9:22]
what that committee
[9:23]
proposes to
[9:24]
give you
[9:24]
recommendations on
[9:25]
how this money
[9:26]
will be used. And
[9:29]
then the idea is to
[9:32]
budget it every year so you
[9:33]
know exactly where that money is
[9:34]
going. But we want to
[9:37]
make sure that
[9:38]
we can review
[9:39]
all the information and
[9:40]
all sorts of requests from
[9:42]
department heads about
[9:43]
how this could be
[9:44]
used
[9:45]
before we develop a plan
[9:47]
for council consideration.
[9:50]
And Madam Mayor, will you be the one
[9:52]
to organize this
[9:53]
committee?
[9:54]
Yes.
[9:56]
What are your considerations
[9:57]
regarding the structure or
[10:03]
people who would be
[10:04]
involved in the work of
[10:05]
such a committee?
[10:09]
These will be our
[10:10]
employees. We
[10:14]
will ask if
[10:15]
they are interested in
[10:16]
being part of this
[10:17]
committee, but we
[10:18]
want to make sure
[10:19]
that these are people who will not
[10:20]
benefit from
[10:22]
this money so that we
[10:23]
have a broad idea
[10:24]
of how this can be
[10:25]
done.
[10:31]
And we have an
[10:32]
ethics committee, so that gives us a
[10:33]
certain amount of
[10:34]
safety net to
[10:35]
make sure that
[10:36]
individuals are not
[10:37]
benefiting from
[10:38]
this conflict of
[10:39]
interest or anything like
[10:41]
that, so I
[10:46]
would agree with your
[10:47]
point on that,
[10:48]
Madam Mayor.
[10:49]
Absolutely. Thank you.
[10:52]
Madam Mayor.
[10:53]
Yes.
[10:54]
I also want to briefly
[10:55]
note that many
[10:56]
trust documents
[10:58]
actually name
[10:59]
the amounts or percentages to be
[11:01]
used for
[11:02]
each item.
[11:04]
Since this
[11:05]
trust document
[11:06]
does not do this, it
[11:07]
means you can
[11:09]
use it
[11:10]
at your discretion,
[11:11]
deciding how you
[11:12]
want to
[11:12]
distribute it. So in
[11:14]
certain years you may
[11:15]
want to do all
[11:16]
four things, in other
[11:18]
years you may not
[11:18]
want to, but we don't
[11:20]
mind you
[11:20]
using your
[11:21]
discretion, for the city
[11:22]
to use its
[11:24]
discretion.
[11:24]
Thank you. Thank you for this
[11:26]
clarification.
[11:27]
To the Deputy Mayor.
[11:28]
Um, and Ron, again
[11:30]
, the money that
[11:31]
comes in every year doesn't
[11:32]
need to be spent.
[11:33]
Right. They
[11:34]
remain in this
[11:35]
special fund.
[11:36]
They don't need to,
[11:37]
you know, be spent
[11:38]
every year.
[11:39]
Right. This would be the
[11:40]
purpose of contributing to a
[11:41]
special
[11:41]
revenue fund so that it can
[11:42]
accumulate if there is a
[11:43]
larger project.
[11:44]
But as the mayor said, we will
[11:45]
make sure that these
[11:46]
amounts are
[11:46]
presented
[11:47]
during budget
[11:48]
season, just to be on
[11:49]
schedule.
[11:50]
They won't be
[11:51]
part of the
[11:52]
general fund budget
[11:53]
because of the timing of
[11:53]
dividends and
[11:55]
just the timing of
[11:56]
anything that can be
[11:57]
cut with the budget.
[11:59]
But, like I said,
[12:00]
if we want to
[12:01]
do a bigger
[12:02]
project on the beach or in a
[12:03]
park, that could
[12:04]
take a couple of
[12:05]
years. But we want to
[12:07]
make sure we
[12:08]
use it
[12:10]
according to the trust
[12:11]
and distribute it
[12:12]
according to the
[12:13]
wishes and purpose.
[12:15]
And just to
[12:16]
clarify, you said
[12:17]
that the community foundation
[12:18]
doesn't mind if we
[12:19]
send a note
[12:20]
saying that we're
[12:21]
saving this money
[12:22]
for a special
[12:23]
project in the
[12:24]
future.
[12:25]
I think if there is a
[12:27]
plan, of course.
[12:28]
Good. Thank you. Are there
[12:31]
any other questions or
[12:32]
comments? Okay, not
[12:35]
seeing any, I'll make a
[12:36]
motion
[12:37]
to move this to the
[12:38]
mayor and
[12:39]
council meeting. I do this
[12:40]
every year in October. Is it
[12:44]
October 5th? Let
[12:45]
me make sure
[12:46]
I understand everything correctly
[12:47]
. October 5.
[12:49]
So, it is proposed.
[12:50]
So, the proposal.
[12:52]
Second.
[12:52]
And the second. Hmm, are there any more
[12:54]
questions or everyone
[12:56]
who is "in favor", sorry.
[12:57]
Yes.
[12:58]
Is
[12:59]
anyone against it? Did anyone
[13:01]
abstain? Most of
[13:02]
the proposals were adopted
[13:03]
unanimously. Hmm,
[13:04]
next–update of
[13:05]
data from
[13:06]
traffic cameras.
[13:07]
Captain, thank you very much for being
[13:08]
here.
[13:10]
Captain Lita and
[13:11]
Officer Rosa.
[13:23]
Good evening.
[13:25]
Madam
[13:27]
Mayor, you're welcome. As you
[13:31]
know, our program
[13:32]
was a kind of
[13:33]
aggressive campaign
[13:34]
to inform
[13:35]
the public and
[13:37]
make them aware of the
[13:38]
condition of our cameras; but
[13:39]
I thought it would be appropriate to
[13:40]
reach out to you
[13:41]
to make sure
[13:43]
you understand what's
[13:44]
going on, because
[13:45]
sometimes residents
[13:46]
come to you with
[13:47]
questions. Our
[13:52]
cameras started
[13:53]
working on October 11 and 14
[13:55]
. So, on October 11th
[13:57]
, I believe it was
[13:59]
Thames Street and
[14:00]
CBS Highway, and then
[14:02]
Mitchell Street went live on
[14:04]
October 14th. Or
[14:05]
September 14th, sorry.
[14:07]
Running ahead. Er,
[14:09]
so it's September. This is our
[14:11]
notice period,
[14:12]
our 30-day
[14:13]
notice period, okay?
[14:16]
Uh, so on October 11th and 14th,
[14:17]
violators
[14:19]
will be issued
[14:20]
fines, okay? Uh,
[14:25]
right now, I think we've
[14:26]
observed
[14:28]
about 11,000
[14:29]
violators. Uh, so
[14:33]
together, uh, at all
[14:35]
intersections, so
[14:37]
in 2 weeks?
[14:38]
3 weeks. In 3 weeks,
[14:40]
okay? So, as you can see
[14:44]
, hopefully, and
[14:45]
again, our goal is to
[14:46]
reduce the number of
[14:48]
violators.
[14:51]
I hope as soon as
[14:53]
people start
[14:53]
getting
[14:54]
warnings. They,
[14:57]
um, haven't received
[14:58]
any yet due to
[14:59]
fixing some
[15:00]
bugs in the system.
[15:02]
So, they should be
[15:04]
getting...I think
[15:05]
Officer Rosa just
[15:06]
looked at a few of
[15:07]
them. So, they're out
[15:10]
this week. And, once
[15:12]
they start
[15:14]
getting
[15:14]
warnings,
[15:15]
hopefully they'll
[15:16]
reduce the number of
[15:17]
speeding violations
[15:19]
. And from October 11 and 14, there will be
[15:24]
no more warnings. Violators
[15:27]
will receive fines at
[15:29]
that time. Good?
[15:32]
Do you have any questions or
[15:33]
comments? Councilor
[15:34]
Jones, thank you. We've
[15:42]
met a few times about this
[15:43]
, and I think the
[15:45]
board as a collective has a
[15:46]
pretty good understanding of
[15:47]
the goals and, um, the
[15:48]
importance of this. But
[15:53]
just for the heck of it,
[15:54]
could you do
[15:55]
me a favor and
[15:56]
explain, because I think
[15:58]
the public
[15:59]
might be a little
[16:00]
confused about
[16:01]
what exactly the difference is between a
[16:03]
speed camera and a
[16:08]
speed enforcement camera?
[16:09]
Please.
[16:15]
Speed cameras are
[16:16]
only active when there is a
[16:17]
violation, if you
[16:18]
exceed the
[16:19]
speed threshold. We are
[16:23]
recording data at this
[16:24]
time.
[16:26]
Speed cameras are
[16:27]
more of an
[16:28]
investigative tool. They
[16:32]
record license
[16:33]
plates that
[16:34]
pass through a
[16:35]
certain location. OK? And
[16:37]
this is constant. This is an
[16:39]
investigative tool and is
[16:40]
not related to
[16:42]
speed cameras. He is
[16:43]
separate. It is
[16:45]
governed by, ahem,
[16:46]
different laws than
[16:48]
speed cameras. OK? It's
[16:52]
not like
[16:53]
people think, it's not our
[16:54]
attempt to track
[16:55]
people unless they've
[16:56]
committed a crime using a
[16:58]
speed camera.
[17:02]
OK? We have one
[17:05]
speed camera in the city of
[17:06]
Groton. Speed cameras
[17:09]
capture violators.
[17:11]
Anyone going
[17:12]
11
[17:13]
miles over the
[17:14]
speed limit. Does
[17:17]
this answer your
[17:18]
question?
[17:20]
Yes, and I asked about
[17:21]
this a few months
[17:22]
ago, but just so
[17:23]
we can get it on the record again
[17:24]
. We do not
[17:27]
collect license
[17:28]
plates. This is not something that
[17:30]
is stored. We can't
[17:33]
really
[17:34]
dig in and
[17:35]
see that, oh, there was a
[17:36]
suspect or
[17:37]
someone who committed
[17:38]
something other than a
[17:41]
speeding ticket here, right?
[17:43]
We can't
[17:44]
use these
[17:45]
images to
[17:46]
piece something bigger
[17:47]
together or anything like that
[17:48]
for
[17:49]
investigative purposes,
[17:50]
right?
[17:50]
This is only related to
[17:51]
speed. Speed cameras are
[17:54]
not used
[17:55]
for investigations.
[17:56]
Good. Thank you very much.
[17:58]
Good.
[17:59]
I appreciate it.
[17:59]
Something else? Deputy
[18:03]
mayor? Have
[18:06]
you been approached by
[18:07]
people outside of the city of
[18:08]
Groton about these cameras
[18:10]
and, you know, their
[18:11]
impact on, you know,
[18:12]
they say you
[18:13]
guys shouldn't
[18:15]
do this and,
[18:16]
you know, our community that
[18:17]
we're fighting with, like
[18:19]
East Lyme, I think is a
[18:20]
perfect example. Is
[18:24]
there a comparison like,
[18:26]
you know, like the city of
[18:27]
Groton and so on? Is this
[18:31]
some kind of negative
[18:32]
reaction, I should
[18:33]
say?
[18:36]
For the residents of the city of
[18:37]
Groton, the majority of
[18:38]
residents are “in favor.”
[18:41]
OK. Every now and then
[18:44]
we meet
[18:45]
someone who is
[18:46]
against cameras, and they
[18:47]
cite
[18:48]
privacy–that’s the
[18:49]
most typical
[18:50]
argument. Again
[18:53]
, we are not looking,
[18:54]
these
[18:55]
speed cameras are not
[18:56]
for
[18:57]
investigative purposes. Your
[19:00]
license plate
[19:01]
only appears
[19:02]
if there is a violation.
[19:04]
OK. Speed cameras
[19:06]
are something else entirely, and
[19:07]
like I said, we
[19:09]
only have one camera in the city of Groton
[19:10]
, and it's
[19:11]
for
[19:12]
investigative purposes, so...
[19:13]
Okay.
[19:14]
So we also... We were
[19:15]
told that the cameras wouldn't
[19:16]
even turn on.
[19:18]
They are turned off
[19:19]
unless a radar-
[19:21]
triggered event occurs
[19:22]
. So at this
[19:23]
point, the
[19:24]
vehicle that violated the
[19:25]
rules will be
[19:26]
tracked.
[19:28]
So the advisor, um,
[19:29]
activates the camera,
[19:30]
essentially.
[19:31]
Right. Yes.
[19:32]
OK. Yes. OK.
[19:36]
Councilor Piazza.
[19:37]
Thank you, Mayor. Um, on the
[19:38]
cameras themselves, so is there
[19:39]
something that actually
[19:41]
flashes, otherwise the person would
[19:42]
n't even know
[19:43]
they were taking a picture of the
[19:44]
back of a
[19:44]
vehicle
[19:46]
?
[19:46]
So, we have
[19:46]
warning
[19:47]
signs in advance.
[19:48]
Good.
[19:49]
Uh, there
[19:50]
are several
[19:50]
warning
[19:51]
signs in front of each camera.
[19:52]
Hmm.
[19:52]
Um, there might be
[19:53]
a flash or
[19:54]
overexposure,
[19:55]
but I'm not sure
[19:56]
they meant to
[19:56]
set them up next
[19:57]
to the
[19:58]
light poles.
[19:59]
Good.
[19:59]
Reason.
[20:01]
And how long does it take, uh,
[20:02]
if someone breaks the
[20:03]
speed limit for
[20:05]
it to actually
[20:06]
record it? So, the camera
[20:08]
is in one
[20:09]
place, how long does
[20:10]
it take to capture the
[20:11]
vehicle?
[20:12]
It captures the rear of the
[20:13]
vehicle
[20:14]
, so you drive
[20:15]
past the camera.
[20:16]
Good.
[20:17]
And then she fixes
[20:18]
you. I don't know the exact
[20:20]
distance.
[20:21]
Good.
[20:21]
Um, but it
[20:23]
captures the rear
[20:23]
license plate.
[20:24]
Good. And I know
[20:26]
when the public
[20:27]
here was debating
[20:28]
their pros and cons
[20:29]
on this,
[20:30]
some people were
[20:31]
concerned, especially
[20:32]
in Clarence B, about two
[20:33]
cars together, are
[20:34]
they really going...
[20:35]
Yeah, so
[20:36]
get the right
[20:37]
car? So if you
[20:38]
could just
[20:38]
explain that. Sorry?
[20:40]
The system
[20:40]
is calibrated for
[20:41]
this. The stripes
[20:42]
are measured.
[20:42]
Good.
[20:43]
Uh, and then there's a
[20:44]
computer program
[20:45]
that, you know, you
[20:46]
input
[20:46]
the measurement into, and it
[20:48]
calibrates itself for
[20:48]
that.
[20:49]
Good.
[20:50]
So Clarence B has
[20:51]
two cameras, one
[20:52]
for each... That
[20:53]
's right. Yes, I
[20:55]
noticed that. Uh, I have
[20:56]
one more question. What is the
[20:57]
approximate
[20:59]
monetary penalty?
[21:01]
The receipt itself costs
[21:03]
$50. There is a
[21:09]
$15 processing fee, which
[21:10]
makes the total $65. A second
[21:11]
violation costs
[21:13]
$75, and again
[21:14]
, that processing fee
[21:17]
is added to it as well.
[21:20]
Okay, so the total
[21:21]
penalty amount that
[21:22]
a person will see on
[21:23]
their bill will not
[21:24]
be
[21:25]
$50, it will
[21:26]
include a
[21:30]
$15 processing fee, so that's an
[21:32]
addition.
[21:33]
And you can
[21:33]
pay for all of this online, right?
[21:35]
Uh, you can do it
[21:36]
online, completely
[21:37]
online.
[21:38]
Okay, thank you. Are there
[21:41]
any more questions?
[21:43]
Mr. Councilor Jones.
[21:45]
I would just like to
[21:46]
have one more comment
[21:47]
. If, theoretically, as
[21:53]
you know, the same
[21:54]
people who complain
[21:55]
about violations, maybe
[21:57]
with these cameras,
[21:58]
maybe they can
[21:59]
track themselves
[22:00]
much more effectively
[22:01]
, driving with a cell
[22:03]
phone, because
[22:04]
they bounce
[22:05]
off cell towers
[22:06]
and all sorts of
[22:07]
other things... We
[22:09]
track
[22:10]
geolocation quite easily
[22:11]
with GPS. Just
[22:15]
wanted to let you know.
[22:17]
Could you
[22:18]
confirm this as well?
[22:21]
Yes, that, and we were just
[22:22]
talking about easy
[22:23]
passes. You know,
[22:26]
right before
[22:27]
this...
[22:27]
Your cell
[22:28]
phone
[22:28]
will track you
[22:29]
much better than a
[22:30]
black camera or a
[22:32]
speed camera.
[22:32]
Yes, it's more like
[22:33]
point-to-
[22:35]
point tracking.
[22:36]
Yes. Stay tuned to
[22:39]
Dateline, thank you.
[22:44]
Are there any more questions? Oh,
[22:47]
Councilor West.
[22:51]
Uh, Captain Officer,
[22:53]
thank you for providing this
[22:54]
information. I think
[22:58]
the update will be
[22:59]
important
[23:00]
moving forward,
[23:01]
at least in the
[23:02]
initial stages. I
[23:05]
appreciate you bringing
[23:06]
attention to the
[23:07]
back of the
[23:08]
car, because I know
[23:09]
that during the public
[23:11]
hearings, people were
[23:11]
worried about
[23:13]
seeing mobile
[23:14]
spaces and other
[23:15]
things like that.
[23:18]
Hypothetically, if
[23:19]
someone was caught speeding on the
[23:20]
Gold Star Bridge
[23:23]
and
[23:24]
received a warning
[23:25]
, that would include the
[23:26]
rear of the
[23:27]
car. The only thing that
[23:31]
concerns me, and Officer
[23:32]
Rose Rose, you've already
[23:33]
raised this
[23:34]
issue regarding
[23:35]
calibration. I
[23:37]
just want to
[23:38]
make sure we are
[23:39]
ensuring the
[23:40]
correct
[23:40]
calibration. I don't
[23:41]
think it's up
[23:43]
to you all, is
[23:44]
it? Does it depend
[23:45]
on the firm that
[23:50]
actually holds
[23:51]
the cameras? And the reason
[23:54]
I mention this is because
[23:57]
we have a big
[23:58]
problem with
[23:59]
traffic on the Gold
[24:00]
Star Bridge right now, and one of the things
[24:02]
I see is that the
[24:03]
traffic cameras
[24:04]
are working when the
[24:05]
traffic lights are flashing. And if it
[24:09]
happens
[24:10]
north, and it doesn't
[24:12]
happen. So,
[24:16]
if some people
[24:17]
see that they
[24:18]
have been issued a
[24:19]
warning or a
[24:20]
fine for a
[24:22]
traffic violation, I pay attention every day to see
[24:23]
if that
[24:24]
light is flashing. And we don't have
[24:31]
that problem
[24:33]
because you gave
[24:33]
the public two
[24:34]
warnings before
[24:36]
going
[24:37]
north and south
[24:38]
on Clarence B.
[24:39]
Sharp Highway to say, "
[24:40]
Hey, you're going to get hit
[24:41]
if you cross the
[24:42]
threshold." Is that correct?
[24:48]
Yes.
[24:49]
we have it
[24:50]
24/7. So we
[24:53]
don't need
[24:54]
flashing lights to
[24:55]
tell you the
[24:56]
camera is working. She
[24:59]
works constantly. Um, the
[25:02]
bridge was actually
[25:02]
blinking this
[25:04]
morning when I
[25:04]
arrived. So it
[25:06]
seems like it's
[25:08]
active now. Um, regarding
[25:12]
calibration, uh, we
[25:13]
have received
[25:14]
calibration certificates, which we
[25:16]
will publish on the
[25:17]
website. So we will
[25:19]
also
[25:19]
be posting
[25:20]
updates, any
[25:21]
updates that we
[25:22]
can, will also be
[25:24]
posted on the
[25:25]
website. Uh, because
[25:26]
we want to
[25:26]
ensure complete
[25:28]
transparency. So we
[25:30]
will publish the reports and the
[25:32]
calibration documents will be
[25:33]
there. Also, when you
[25:36]
get a quote, uh,
[25:37]
there will be a link
[25:38]
to check the
[25:40]
calibration certificate, uh.
[25:43]
Good. And again,
[25:44]
uh, just as a
[25:45]
follow-up to this,
[25:47]
uh, thank you. I
[25:48]
mean, 11,000
[25:49]
speeding violations
[25:50]
over a 3-week
[25:52]
period is pretty
[25:53]
significant. Uh, I have to be
[25:56]
honest, it was a big
[25:58]
cue for me to
[25:59]
step on the pedal,
[26:00]
seeing those two
[26:01]
signs there, and that camera
[26:02]
there, even though it was during the
[26:04]
warning
[26:05]
period. Uh, but
[26:08]
some people, I can see
[26:09]
why they're having a hard time
[26:11]
, but
[26:12]
hopefully this will
[26:16]
solve the problem
[26:17]
that the
[26:18]
camera was supposed to create, which is what we
[26:19]
talked about from the
[26:20]
beginning, which is to
[26:21]
increase safety
[26:22]
on the highways of the city of
[26:24]
Groton. So, uh, thank you
[26:27]
all for that. I appreciate it.
[26:29]
Yes, sir.
[26:30]
Good. Thank you. Are there
[26:32]
any more questions? Yes.
[26:35]
Thank you, mayor. Uh, the same thing as
[26:37]
losing my train of
[26:38]
thought. Uh, what did I want
[26:42]
to ask? What would...Are there
[26:50]
any...Well, I'm
[26:51]
sure there would be,
[26:52]
but what would be the
[26:53]
typical argument that
[26:55]
someone gets a
[26:56]
violation? Whatever the
[26:59]
argument is, they'll
[27:01]
say, "Oh, it's not me,"
[27:02]
either it's because of that, or
[27:03]
we had a storm up
[27:04]
north, you know, that
[27:06]
came in during the
[27:07]
storm and maybe
[27:08]
adjusted the
[27:09]
calibration. I'm
[27:11]
just wondering what
[27:12]
you think would be the
[27:13]
main argument
[27:14]
that someone could
[27:15]
say that could
[27:16]
make us
[27:17]
reach out to the
[27:18]
company and say,
[27:19]
"Hey, we get
[27:20]
a lot of the same
[27:21]
questions about this
[27:22]
."
[27:25]
So, there is an
[27:26]
appeal procedure. The first step of the
[27:29]
process is for
[27:30]
them to
[27:30]
call the
[27:31]
number and explain
[27:32]
their reasons. Hmm, that
[27:34]
will be tested at
[27:35]
this level. Hmm, then
[27:36]
they have the option to
[27:37]
actually come in to
[27:38]
talk to
[27:39]
the inspector who
[27:40]
is conducting the hearing
[27:41]
to appeal it.
[27:42]
OK? And if they're
[27:44]
still not satisfied,
[27:45]
then they can
[27:45]
go to...it
[27:46]
can be appealed to the
[27:48]
state courts.
[27:49]
OK? The vehicle owner is
[27:52]
responsible for the
[27:53]
fine. OK? So,
[27:56]
here's how it works.
[27:58]
OK?
[27:59]
And my other question is, uh
[28:01]
, will there be a report that
[28:02]
you're going to put out on the
[28:03]
website about the
[28:04]
benefits of it, like,
[28:05]
"Since we
[28:06]
installed the speed cameras,
[28:08]
we've had fewer
[28:09]
violations and
[28:10]
fewer
[28:11]
accidents," and will
[28:12]
any of that be
[28:13]
published so
[28:14]
the public
[28:15]
can see the benefits of it?
[28:18]
So, now we are
[28:18]
looking at what
[28:19]
reports we can
[28:20]
generate
[28:21]
using this
[28:22]
system. Uh, I can
[28:24]
track
[28:26]
first-time offenders
[28:27]
and repeat offenders
[28:30]
or more.
[28:32]
The goal, obviously, is to
[28:34]
reduce the number of
[28:35]
these habitual
[28:36]
offenders, first.
[28:38]
And then, you know,
[28:39]
see a decrease in
[28:40]
the number of first
[28:41]
violations. So,
[28:43]
overall, the goal is to
[28:44]
reduce
[28:46]
speeding,
[28:46]
to
[28:47]
enforce, uh,
[28:48]
speed limits.
[28:50]
And, uh, but what if,
[28:51]
by reviewing and
[28:53]
studying the various reports,
[28:54]
we published everything we
[28:56]
could. Just
[28:58]
so the public
[28:59]
can see what's
[29:00]
going on, uh, and
[29:02]
how it works.
[29:04]
Thank you.
[29:05]
Yes.
[29:08]
I will say that I have received,
[29:09]
ahem, quite a few phone
[29:10]
calls from
[29:11]
residents who are still
[29:13]
concerned about
[29:14]
speeding in their
[29:15]
neighborhoods. Hmm, some of
[29:17]
them concern these
[29:18]
areas, some of them concern
[29:19]
nearby or other
[29:21]
areas. Hmm, people who
[29:22]
asked, "Can
[29:23]
I install speed cameras
[29:25]
on my side of town
[29:26]
?" Hmm, so in total, I
[29:28]
think I've gotten two
[29:29]
phone calls
[29:30]
from people who are
[29:31]
concerned about, um,
[29:32]
cameras, mainly
[29:34]
flood control cameras.
[29:35]
Hmm, hmm, no, when I
[29:36]
was explaining about
[29:37]
speed cameras,
[29:38]
it wasn't as
[29:39]
big a
[29:39]
concern as
[29:41]
flood cameras. So, um, that's the
[29:42]
feedback I have on this
[29:44]
. There are
[29:47]
no other questions. This was
[29:48]
just informational,
[29:49]
so thank you.
[29:50]
Okay, please.
[29:51]
Thank you. Good.
[29:55]
Hmm, next–acceptance of
[29:56]
state guarantees.
[30:00]
Hmm, so
[30:01]
the backstory is
[30:03]
that in February
[30:04]
2025, um, GG GZA, um,
[30:06]
noticed that the pier at
[30:07]
Grizold Point was in a
[30:09]
state of distress. So
[30:13]
the city, um, asked
[30:15]
them to assess its condition,
[30:17]
um, um, and on October 6, 2025,
[30:19]
the city received
[30:20]
that assessment. The assessment
[30:22]
showed that the pier
[30:23]
was in very
[30:25]
poor condition. Hmm,
[30:27]
we were offered
[30:28]
three options for repairing the
[30:29]
pier. Hmm, just
[30:32]
to make repairs–that’s,
[30:33]
um, let me
[30:34]
make sure I’m
[30:35]
calculating
[30:37]
these numbers correctly. I should have
[30:39]
re- Hmm, the first
[30:42]
option was to just
[30:44]
repair the pier. Hmm, and it
[30:47]
was worth between
[30:49]
$700,000 and $900,000. Hmm, it
[30:55]
cost between $1 and
[30:57]
$1.5 million to clean up the pier and do nothing. And
[30:59]
then to replace the pier,
[31:00]
they estimated it at
[31:01]
$3.5 million. From
[31:03]
2 to 3.5 million
[31:05]
dollars. Hmm, so I
[31:06]
got this report
[31:07]
shortly after I
[31:08]
became mayor. Hmm, and
[31:09]
I knew we didn't have
[31:11]
$3.5 million to
[31:12]
repair the pier. Hmm, I
[31:14]
felt like it was us,
[31:15]
as a team, that felt it was
[31:16]
very important
[31:17]
to replace this pier.
[31:18]
It has quite
[31:19]
historical significance.
[31:20]
It was part of the
[31:21]
original
[31:23]
Griswold Hotel. Hmm, so I started
[31:24]
looking into
[31:25]
financing options. Um,
[31:27]
after a while, um, the
[31:29]
initial request
[31:30]
I made was
[31:31]
rejected. Um, I
[31:33]
went to the state and
[31:34]
had to ask for
[31:35]
$3.5 million. Um,
[31:37]
but it didn't work. It
[31:39]
was because of the bonds.
[31:43]
Um, and so I continued to
[31:44]
, um, work with
[31:45]
our
[31:45]
state representatives
[31:47]
, um, with the Democratic bondholders
[31:49]
in the House of
[31:50]
Representatives and um, with the
[31:51]
governor's office
[31:52]
and a lot of people in the
[31:54]
state. So, um, a
[31:56]
huge thank you to
[31:58]
everyone. Um, but we
[31:59]
found out, um, a few
[32:00]
weeks ago that we
[32:01]
received $3.5 million
[32:03]
from the
[32:08]
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, um,
[32:09]
through grants and
[32:11]
state bond assistance.
[32:14]
Um, and I'm here to
[32:15]
ask for your
[32:16]
approval to
[32:17]
accept this
[32:18]
grant. Um, the steps
[32:20]
are that
[32:21]
we need to
[32:22]
approve this grant.
[32:24]
This will be the first step.
[32:25]
We need to
[32:26]
get some
[32:27]
paperwork done for...Um,
[32:28]
while we're looking for
[32:29]
grant funds. So,
[32:30]
additionally we are looking at,
[32:31]
we have applied for
[32:33]
, um,
[32:34]
$150,000 in a
[32:36]
small vessel improvement grant, a
[32:39]
small harbor improvement grant
[32:40]
through the
[32:41]
Connecticut Port Authority
[32:42]
for design,
[32:43]
engineering,
[32:44]
environmental
[32:45]
review and permitting
[32:46]
for this pier. Um, and once
[32:48]
we
[32:48]
know that, um,
[32:50]
hopefully we'll
[32:51]
get it. This is a
[32:52]
matching grant.
[32:55]
The goal is to
[32:56]
do all of this and
[32:57]
then consider the
[32:58]
groundbreaking work.
[33:00]
Um, the goal is to
[33:01]
complete
[33:03]
this by October 2028.
[33:05]
Um, but my first
[33:06]
step is to get a $
[33:08]
3.5 million grant
[33:10]
from the state. Are there
[33:12]
any questions?
[33:15]
To the Deputy Mayor.
[33:16]
Again,
[33:17]
these are not bonds. This is a
[33:19]
grant. I just want
[33:21]
to make sure of
[33:22]
the decision.
[33:22]
Grant.
[33:23]
Good. This is great.
[33:27]
Yes.
[33:28]
I know it's far in
[33:29]
the future, but once
[33:30]
it's
[33:31]
completed, um, because I don't
[33:32]
think anyone will
[33:33]
actually be able to
[33:35]
access it right now.
[33:36]
Right?
[33:36]
You cannot
[33:37]
access the north
[33:38]
part of the pier. You
[33:39]
can
[33:40]
access the southern
[33:41]
part of the pier.
[33:42]
So what do we plan to
[33:42]
use in
[33:43]
the future regarding the
[33:44]
pier?
[33:44]
Hmm, it
[33:45]
will continue to be a
[33:46]
fishing pier.
[33:47]
It will be
[33:48]
ADA compliant. That was
[33:49]
one of my main
[33:50]
push points, um, is that
[33:51]
this is really our only
[33:53]
accessible
[33:54]
fishing pier in the city of
[33:55]
Groton. In addition, it is an
[33:56]
incentive for
[33:57]
economic
[33:58]
development. Hmm, I
[34:00]
spoke to the
[34:00]
owner of Ken's Tackle who
[34:02]
said that between
[34:03]
the closure of Streeter Pier
[34:04]
and the partial
[34:05]
closure of this one, and
[34:06]
it was closed for
[34:08]
quite a while
[34:09]
during the
[34:10]
seawall project, um,
[34:11]
her business was
[34:12]
struggling and she
[34:13]
reported it to
[34:14]
the governor, um, and I
[34:16]
think that
[34:16]
helped. Um, um, and that
[34:21]
it
[34:21]
will definitely meet
[34:23]
ADA requirements. This will be a
[34:24]
place where you can
[34:25]
fish. You can
[34:27]
have a relaxed,
[34:28]
passive vacation,
[34:29]
um, on this pier.
[34:30]
Perfectly.
[34:31]
Hmm.
[34:31]
Thank you.
[34:32]
Yes.
[34:34]
Councilor Jones.
[34:37]
Yes, I just wanted to say
[34:38]
hello. I know
[34:41]
you lobbied for this, as did
[34:42]
, um, you know, other
[34:44]
people in our
[34:45]
district. So, um, thank you.
[34:50]
Um, and I know, you know, I
[34:51]
understand that there's probably a little bit of
[34:53]
concern when
[34:55]
people hear that we're
[34:56]
going to do some
[34:57]
building there. Um, but as
[35:01]
for the grant, I
[35:05]
fully support it.
[35:06]
Um, I think it's going to be
[35:08]
really good for
[35:09]
the area, and, um, I
[35:10]
think this council might
[35:12]
be a little more
[35:13]
knowledgeable about
[35:14]
some of the questions that
[35:15]
we're probably going to need to
[35:17]
ask when it
[35:18]
comes time for
[35:19]
engineering work, and,
[35:20]
um, but yeah, I'm a little
[35:21]
excited about it. So
[35:24]
congratulations.
[35:25]
Thank you. Are there any other
[35:27]
questions or
[35:28]
comments? Mr.
[35:30]
Councilor Embry.
[35:32]
Thank you, Madam Mayor. Um,
[35:34]
again, I, um, echo
[35:35]
the sentiments of, um, Councilor
[35:37]
Jones, and, um, thank you to
[35:38]
our
[35:39]
state representative
[35:40]
for, um, getting
[35:42]
this
[35:43]
grant funding, and also to you for
[35:46]
working hard to
[35:47]
try to solve
[35:51]
this problem. We, um,
[35:53]
solved one
[35:54]
problem. We
[35:55]
needed to
[35:56]
solve this other
[35:57]
problem. I guess the
[35:58]
question I have
[35:59]
now is, will
[36:03]
this solve the problem
[36:05]
with this grant that we're
[36:06]
getting? And if
[36:11]
there are some
[36:12]
anticipated
[36:13]
cost overruns,
[36:14]
who will bear the
[36:15]
burden of those overruns
[36:22]
if for some reason
[36:23]
we have to
[36:24]
revisit what
[36:25]
we have dealt with in the
[36:26]
past in this area
[36:27]
?
[36:32]
So when we
[36:33]
look at the
[36:34]
design and
[36:35]
engineering of this
[36:36]
project, um, it's well
[36:37]
known how much
[36:38]
money we have for this, and we're going
[36:40]
to support it, we're going to
[36:41]
do it a little bit in
[36:42]
reverse, in that this is what
[36:43]
we have, and we're not
[36:44]
going to
[36:46]
go over that amount.
[36:48]
Hmm, so what can you
[36:49]
do with that
[36:51]
amount of money?
[36:53]
Good. Hmm, my
[36:56]
follow-up on this is
[36:58]
that I would like
[37:00]
this pier, as
[37:01]
historic as it is
[37:02]
, to be extended,
[37:03]
if possible, in
[37:04]
some way, for
[37:05]
example, at this
[37:07]
stage of design.
[37:13]
Hmm, and the reason I
[37:14]
say this is on the
[37:15]
southwest
[37:16]
point, if you
[37:17]
throw out the moorings
[37:18]
for casting, you
[37:19]
deal with
[37:20]
rocks and a lot of
[37:21]
other, um,
[37:22]
problems. If we
[37:32]
could extend this,
[37:33]
uh, southern point of the
[37:34]
dock further, it could
[37:35]
reduce the impact of
[37:36]
stormwater,
[37:37]
at least on the
[37:39]
Shore Avenue side that has been
[37:40]
restored and
[37:41]
replaced. I'm not saying
[37:51]
that on the
[37:51]
southernmost point
[37:53]
we still have
[37:54]
issues with where there's
[37:55]
some
[37:56]
stormwater runoff that
[37:57]
runs onto Shore Avenue from
[37:58]
that end, but I, I,
[38:00]
if there's an opportunity for
[38:01]
us to extend that
[38:02]
pier, uh, further, I would
[38:03]
fully support
[38:05]
it for a couple of reasons.
[38:09]
Fishing, and also, uh
[38:11]
, the environment.
[38:12]
Good.
[38:14]
Thank you.
[38:15]
Of course. Are there any other
[38:16]
questions or
[38:17]
comments? Okay, not
[38:19]
seeing any, I will make a
[38:20]
motion
[38:21]
to move this to the
[38:22]
mayor and council on
[38:23]
October 5th.
[38:24]
So, it is proposed.
[38:25]
Second.
[38:26]
So, the proposal and the
[38:28]
second. Everyone who is "in favor"?
[38:30]
Yes. Yes.
[38:31]
Is
[38:32]
anyone against it? Did anyone
[38:34]
abstain? Adopted
[38:35]
unanimously. Okay,
[38:37]
moving on to the
[38:38]
Planet
[38:39]
Fitness donation. Uh, the city of Groton
[38:42]
has had
[38:44]
exercise machines in our
[38:45]
basement for quite some time. Uh-huh. Um, it
[38:48]
was in pieces, I would
[38:50]
say, um, that's the
[38:51]
best way to put it
[38:52]
, brought,
[38:53]
um, from different
[38:55]
people's homes, different places.
[38:57]
Um, but after all,
[38:58]
most of it is
[38:59]
already out of
[39:00]
service. Um,
[39:04]
our, um...So one
[39:06]
day
[39:06]
someone
[39:08]
from Planet Fitness called me, a manager from
[39:09]
Planet Fitness, and um, in a
[39:10]
follow-up
[39:11]
email,
[39:12]
asked if
[39:13]
they would ever get rid of
[39:14]
, um, the
[39:15]
exercise machines. This
[39:20]
started a very
[39:21]
long conversation between the
[39:22]
two of us, and, um, we were
[39:27]
offered, um,
[39:29]
some, fitness
[39:30]
equipment. Um, the city is
[39:33]
currently finalizing its
[39:36]
equipment usage policy. Um, it's
[39:38]
not
[39:39]
finalized yet, um, but it
[39:40]
will be done before
[39:41]
we bring
[39:42]
the equipment into the
[39:43]
building. We're working
[39:44]
on a place in the basement,
[39:46]
um, to house
[39:47]
this equipment, um,
[39:48]
and also on
[39:48]
the possibility of
[39:49]
putting some of
[39:50]
the equipment in our
[39:51]
fire stations
[39:52]
so they don't have to
[39:53]
come here to
[39:54]
use it
[39:55]
because they have some of the
[39:56]
equipment at the
[39:57]
fire station.
[40:01]
So, we're asking for, um,
[40:02]
a resolution, um,
[40:03]
approval of the will
[40:04]
from the board to accept a
[40:06]
donation from Planet Fitness
[40:07]
in the form of exercise equipment.
[40:12]
To the Deputy Mayor.
[40:14]
Um, it won't be
[40:15]
specific dollars, it's
[40:16]
pure equipment. It's
[40:17]
just
[40:18]
pure equipment. Yes
[40:20]
, they don't donate
[40:21]
money, they donate
[40:22]
equipment. Yes, the
[40:26]
council square.
[40:27]
Thank you, mayor. So, will there be
[40:29]
any
[40:30]
equipment testing? Would anyone
[40:31]
really jump on a
[40:32]
treadmill or
[40:33]
elliptical trainer
[40:34]
to make sure
[40:35]
it works? Does
[40:36]
it have to go through this
[40:37]
process before we
[40:38]
receive it, or do we
[40:39]
just take it as
[40:40]
is?
[40:42]
Um, we can
[40:42]
confirm that everything
[40:44]
works. Absolutely.
[40:51]
Mr. Councilor Ambo.
[40:54]
Thank you, Madam Mayor. Is this what
[40:56]
we want? I
[41:03]
think I...Is it something that's
[41:05]
needed and wanted,
[41:06]
or is it something that, uh, you
[41:07]
know, we just
[41:09]
perceive as...uh...I
[41:10]
...I...I do it all
[41:11]
the time. This...I love the
[41:15]
grant. I love all
[41:17]
things gift-giving, but
[41:19]
, uh, is this something that's
[41:20]
needed or, you know,
[41:21]
requested?
[41:24]
Hmm, that's what they asked for. Hmm,
[41:27]
there were comments that
[41:29]
our training
[41:30]
equipment, which
[41:31]
was used
[41:32]
primarily by our
[41:33]
police department but
[41:34]
also by other departments,
[41:36]
hmm, had seen better days.
[41:40]
Hmm, besides, there
[41:41]
was a
[41:42]
renovation there, and part of
[41:44]
it was covered in, hmm,
[41:45]
just garbage, and
[41:46]
now it's just not
[41:47]
in very good condition
[41:48]
. Also, our
[41:51]
fire stations
[41:52]
have simulators, but
[41:54]
I don't know how much of
[41:55]
it has been purchased, and
[41:56]
how much...sorry, I'm
[41:57]
looking at our
[41:58]
firefighters in the
[41:59]
back row and
[42:00]
how much of it
[42:01]
has accumulated in the
[42:02]
process. Hmm, so
[42:05]
hopefully we
[42:06]
can give
[42:07]
employees
[42:08]
the opportunity to
[42:09]
train, hmm, to
[42:10]
improve their
[42:11]
physical fitness
[42:12]
for work. Councilor
[42:17]
Jones:
[42:19]
Yeah, I can't not that
[42:21]
I'm not that I'm
[42:25]
plugging Planet Fitness,
[42:26]
but I go there
[42:27]
a few times a
[42:28]
week and they just had
[42:30]
all their
[42:31]
equipment inspected. So
[42:33]
I guess
[42:34]
a lot of
[42:35]
things come from there. They
[42:37]
replaced everything, and I
[42:38]
mean, I've been working there for
[42:40]
years, and
[42:41]
before they
[42:42]
replaced it, everything was in
[42:43]
pretty good
[42:44]
shape. Yeah, back then,
[42:46]
you know, there were a few
[42:47]
weird exercise machines
[42:48]
that, you know,
[42:48]
needed repairs,
[42:50]
but it's not that
[42:51]
we don't get
[42:52]
junk, you know. That's exactly what it is
[42:58]
.
[42:59]
Planet Fitness regularly
[43:00]
replaces its
[43:01]
equipment. So, that's how
[43:05]
this conversation started,
[43:06]
that they reworked the
[43:08]
equipment in Groton,
[43:09]
and unfortunately we didn't
[43:10]
get it. We didn't know it was
[43:13]
happening
[43:15]
until they
[43:15]
invited us to the
[43:16]
grand opening.
[43:19]
So, but that's exactly where the
[43:20]
conversation started. Yes
[43:26]
, Councilor Piazza.
[43:27]
Thank you, mayor. I just
[43:29]
think it's a great
[43:30]
idea, especially if the
[43:31]
staff reaches out
[43:32]
to us. And I
[43:33]
mean, who can
[43:34]
fight? Like,
[43:35]
health above all else,
[43:37]
you know? We
[43:38]
don't have healthy people,
[43:39]
otherwise we can
[43:40]
do our
[43:40]
job, you know? I
[43:41]
mean, the physical
[43:43]
turns into
[43:43]
the mental when you
[43:44]
do the exercises.
[43:45]
So, I think this is a
[43:47]
great benefit for
[43:48]
employees.
[43:49]
Thank you.
[43:49]
Hmm. Are
[43:52]
there any other
[43:52]
questions or
[43:53]
comments? Seeing
[43:55]
none, I will make a
[43:56]
motion to defer
[43:57]
this matter to the
[43:58]
Mayor and Council on October 5th.
[44:00]
So it's included.
[44:01]
Second.
[44:01]
There is a second proposal.
[44:03]
Everyone who is "in favor"?
[44:04]
Yes. Yes.
[44:05]
Is
[44:06]
anyone against it? Are there those who
[44:08]
abstained? This
[44:09]
was adopted unanimously
[44:10]
. Good. Next, um, Graton
[44:14]
Sub Vets asked for
[44:15]
donations. Hmm,
[44:18]
Ron, can you explain
[44:20]
that?
[44:21]
I will explain.
[44:22]
You can explain not just the
[44:27]
donation request itself, but
[44:28]
where the
[44:29]
money comes from.
[44:34]
So, in your package of
[44:35]
documents was the
[44:36]
initial resolution
[44:37]
that established
[44:39]
donation procedures, um,
[44:40]
for this city council
[44:42]
, which allocates
[44:43]
$5,000 annually for
[44:44]
donations to
[44:45]
be distributed
[44:46]
upon your approval.
[44:49]
This can be up to 20% per
[44:50]
donation,
[44:51]
so the maximum
[44:52]
donation can
[44:53]
reach thousands of
[44:54]
dollars for any
[44:55]
one donation.
[44:56]
As I said, it is
[44:57]
limited to 5,000 per
[44:59]
fiscal year. This
[45:01]
money, ahem, comes from the
[45:03]
community development fund,
[45:06]
whose source of income is the
[45:07]
C-Max generators. This
[45:09]
money goes there,
[45:10]
so it's not money that
[45:11]
comes from the
[45:11]
general fund. This is
[45:12]
money that is
[45:13]
set aside in a
[45:14]
special
[45:15]
revenue fund. So that's where the
[45:16]
money comes from, and
[45:17]
then I, the mayor, can
[45:18]
look into this
[45:19]
donation request in more detail. And
[45:20]
one more quick
[45:21]
question before I
[45:22]
sit down at your desks, and
[45:23]
we can also
[45:23]
send this via
[45:24]
email.
[45:25]
This is the history of all
[45:26]
the donations we have
[45:28]
made from these funds
[45:30]
since 2015. So, you'll
[45:31]
see all the
[45:32]
organizations we
[45:33]
donated to, in
[45:34]
dollars, for each year up to the
[45:35]
current one. And
[45:36]
so far, in 2027, we have
[45:38]
only made one
[45:39]
donation, and that
[45:40]
was for a $
[45:42]
500 bus to the Carter Art Museum
[45:43]
. So there are still $4,500 in donations left for the
[45:44]
fiscal year
[45:48]
.
[45:48]
Thank you. So, if
[45:50]
you look back,
[45:51]
starting in 2019,
[45:53]
we gave, um, veterans -
[45:54]
Saturday workers, we gave
[45:56]
them $300, then
[45:57]
again in 2021 we
[45:59]
did $500, and then
[46:00]
over the last 2
[46:01]
years we did
[46:03]
$1,000. Um, and
[46:04]
actually the
[46:05]
donation amount is up
[46:06]
to you. Um, the request was
[46:07]
made to
[46:08]
their
[46:09]
Gratitude,
[46:10]
Caring, and
[46:11]
Sharing Committee. Each year, the
[46:12]
Groton
[46:13]
Subbotniks
[46:13]
host a
[46:15]
Thanksgiving dinner at
[46:16]
their club for
[46:18]
active duty sailors, their
[46:19]
friends and family, as well
[46:20]
as veterans,
[46:21]
rescue workers and
[46:22]
others during the holiday. In
[46:23]
2025, they provided
[46:26]
over 2,700 meals.
[46:28]
Councilor Piazza and I were
[46:29]
there in the distribution line.
[46:31]
It's just a constant
[46:32]
stream of "yes-yes-yes-yes." Um,
[46:34]
and how great that it
[46:35]
gets to everyone
[46:37]
who can't
[46:38]
come there, they
[46:39]
deliver. Um, they
[46:41]
also deliver it to
[46:43]
the rescuers and
[46:44]
then, um, serve the food right
[46:45]
there. Therefore. Are
[46:48]
there any
[46:49]
discussions about this
[46:50]
? Yes.
[46:52]
Well, like I said,
[46:56]
$1,000 last
[46:57]
year, was that
[46:58]
enough to
[46:59]
cover
[47:00]
food costs, or were we,
[47:02]
you know, short,
[47:03]
you know?
[47:04]
So they get
[47:05]
donations from other
[47:06]
people besides, um, the
[47:07]
city council.
[47:08]
The most we
[47:09]
can give them is
[47:10]
$1,000. You have a choice
[47:12]
whether you want to give them something
[47:13]
or not. So it's
[47:14]
really a council decision.
[47:16]
1000 dollars is a fine.
[47:19]
We're doing it again
[47:20]
this year, so...
[47:21]
Any other comments?
[47:23]
Yes.
[47:23]
Just a note:
[47:25]
I really
[47:25]
like it. We
[47:26]
do this with my, um,
[47:27]
kids and I, and I
[47:29]
think it's an
[47:29]
amazing thing.
[47:30]
And the people who
[47:31]
run it are amazing.
[47:34]
They are a well-oiled
[47:35]
machine. A
[47:36]
well-oiled machine,
[47:37]
that's true. So
[47:38]
if anyone here wants to
[47:39]
help, it's you who won't
[47:40]
get into chaos. It's a
[47:42]
very well-oiled
[47:43]
machine and it just
[47:44]
moves, moves, and
[47:45]
moves, moves, It's a great
[47:48]
thing, and then
[47:48]
getting ready for
[47:49]
dinner, it's really
[47:50]
nice. Therefore.
[47:52]
I will say that, um, it's not
[47:53]
worth completely
[47:54]
overshadowing Subvets, but
[47:55]
they are also always
[47:56]
looking for
[47:58]
Thanksgiving desserts. So, if
[47:59]
you don't have a free
[48:00]
Thanksgiving morning
[48:01]
and can't
[48:02]
volunteer, you
[48:03]
can always donate,
[48:04]
um, pies or other
[48:05]
Thanksgiving desserts
[48:06]
. Um, and they
[48:07]
also accept
[48:08]
monetary donations for
[48:10]
this. So, um, if this is
[48:11]
something that anyone in
[48:12]
the public
[48:13]
is interested in. Any
[48:16]
other questions or
[48:17]
comments? If you
[48:19]
want to do...Oh,
[48:20]
yes. I
[48:20]
just want to
[48:21]
make sure before that that we
[48:22]
reach a consensus
[48:23]
on the dollar amount
[48:24]
because at this
[48:24]
point we don't have anything
[48:25]
. I know I've heard
[48:26]
some numbers, but
[48:27]
just to
[48:28]
make sure. Is
[48:29]
there any other amount
[48:30]
you would like? Okay,
[48:33]
then I'll ask you
[48:34]
to make a donation, um,
[48:36]
you'll make a donation.
[48:37]
If you want to
[48:38]
make, um,
[48:39]
an offer.
[48:40]
Um, yes, for $1,000.
[48:42]
Yes, I will make this
[48:43]
suggestion.
[48:44]
Bring this up for
[48:45]
consideration by the mayor and council on
[48:47]
October 5th?
[48:48]
So, a suggestion.
[48:49]
Second. Do you have any
[48:51]
questions or comments?
[48:52]
Okay, I see, no.
[48:54]
Everyone who is "in favor"? Hmm, yes.
[48:56]
Is
[48:57]
anyone against it? Is there anyone
[48:58]
who abstained?
[48:59]
Adopted unanimously
[49:01]
. Good. Next on the
[49:05]
agenda is the
[49:06]
donation we
[49:07]
received. So, you
[49:09]
accept the donation.
[49:11]
Um, we talked about this
[49:13]
at the last
[49:14]
Committee of the
[49:15]
Whole meeting, that we
[49:16]
were having a holiday
[49:18]
light parade and that
[49:19]
we went out, um,
[49:20]
to solicit donations from
[49:21]
local businesses
[49:23]
, and we got
[49:24]
$1,000 from Karn's Automotive
[49:25]
Sales and Services, and we
[49:26]
got a
[49:28]
sponsorship in the form of
[49:29]
candy and treats.
[49:32]
And then we also
[49:33]
received a
[49:34]
$500 donation
[49:36]
from Outer Light Brewing Company. Are there
[49:39]
any questions or
[49:40]
comments about this
[49:41]
? No, I would like to
[49:48]
thank them both
[49:50]
. Hmm, that's really
[49:51]
great. We are very happy about
[49:53]
this. Hmm, this will be our
[49:54]
first holiday
[49:55]
light parade and
[49:56]
tree lighting.
[49:58]
So we are happy to do
[49:59]
this with the help of our
[50:00]
local businesses
[50:02]
. Um, no questions or
[50:04]
comments, I'll
[50:05]
make a motion
[50:06]
to move the donation
[50:08]
from Karn's Automotive to the
[50:10]
October 5th Mayor and Council meeting.
[50:12]
So, a suggestion.
[50:14]
Second.
[50:15]
Everyone who is "in favor".
[50:17]
Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Is
[50:22]
anyone against it? Are there any
[50:25]
abstainers? Mr.
[50:27]
Councilor Embosse, I did not
[50:28]
receive your
[50:29]
vote.
[50:32]
Maybe he moved away
[50:34]
.
[50:36]
Mr. Councilor Emboss?
[50:39]
Sorry, I'm in favor.
[50:41]
Oh, thank you. And then I
[50:44]
make a motion
[50:45]
to move the donation
[50:46]
from Outer Light Brewing Company to the
[50:49]
October 8th Mayor and Council meeting.
[50:51]
So, a suggestion. On
[50:52]
October 5th, I lied.
[50:54]
So, a suggestion.
[50:55]
Thank you.
[50:56]
Second.
[50:57]
There is a second proposal.
[50:58]
Everyone who is "in favor".
[50:59]
Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Is
[51:03]
anyone against it? Are there any
[51:04]
abstainers?
[51:05]
The proposal was adopted
[51:06]
unanimously. Thank you.
[51:08]
Um, next up, we have
[51:09]
Chief Tompkins,
[51:10]
fire
[51:11]
truck repair.
[51:22]
Good. Good evening
[51:24]
.
[51:24]
Good evening.
[51:26]
Uh, I believe
[51:27]
your packages include, um,
[51:28]
a list of repairs
[51:30]
we need to make
[51:31]
to the ladder cart. Um,
[51:35]
this is G15. It's probably
[51:37]
written here. Uh, every year
[51:38]
we do, um,
[51:39]
preventive
[51:40]
maintenance on our
[51:42]
carts. Um, and for a
[51:44]
ladder cart, they
[51:45]
also check the
[51:47]
ladder part of it.
[51:50]
Um, during this
[51:51]
time they discovered, um,
[51:52]
many, um, shortcomings,
[51:54]
um, that needed to be
[51:56]
fixed. Um, here's a
[51:58]
list of various,
[52:02]
um, things that
[52:03]
needed to be
[52:04]
addressed. Um, the reason
[52:05]
we packaged this
[52:06]
as a single unit, and I'm here
[52:08]
before you today, is because
[52:09]
it
[52:10]
costs over
[52:11]
$20,000. And therefore it
[52:12]
needs your
[52:13]
approval. Um, that's not
[52:16]
something we can
[52:17]
choose because it's, um, a
[52:19]
Pierce ladder cart. And that
[52:22]
's why Firematic is the
[52:23]
Pierce dealer in the area. Um
[52:26]
, and they, um, are the ones who
[52:27]
will do the work.
[52:30]
Uh, most of this
[52:31]
work here is on the
[52:33]
ladder itself. If
[52:34]
you look down at the
[52:35]
hydraulic cylinders
[52:37]
, the pulleys are part of the
[52:38]
system that raises
[52:40]
the ladder and extends it
[52:41]
, etc. So, they would have to
[52:44]
do the work. As
[52:46]
you can see, that's
[52:48]
over $29,000 in total.
[52:50]
We have operating
[52:51]
funds. The budget includes
[52:54]
expenses for
[52:56]
truck repairs and maintenance. So,
[52:59]
for now, we will
[53:00]
use
[53:01]
these funds to
[53:02]
pay for this. Are there any
[53:04]
questions?
[53:07]
I'll just repeat, these are
[53:09]
essentially budget
[53:10]
expenses for repairs.
[53:12]
Good. Yeah, that's...
[53:15]
out of my
[53:16]
budget, but yeah. I have
[53:17]
about
[53:18]
$50,000 that I've already
[53:19]
spent. But
[53:20]
last year we
[53:21]
were obviously in a
[53:22]
difficult position.
[53:25]
So, we put off
[53:26]
a lot of things that we
[53:27]
could have put off, uh
[53:28]
, on this budget, and
[53:29]
now it's starting to
[53:31]
catch up with us. So, but,
[53:33]
uh, we're on budget right now
[53:34]
, and you
[53:35]
know, I'm going to need to
[53:36]
save in
[53:37]
other places, if anything
[53:38]
.
[53:40]
We have done most of the
[53:41]
preventive
[53:42]
maintenance. So
[53:43]
now, when something
[53:44]
breaks, we have to
[53:46]
fix it.
[53:47]
So...
[53:48]
Okay. Just, uh,
[53:50]
wondering how long it
[53:51]
will take to
[53:52]
repair? How long
[53:54]
will it be out of
[53:55]
service?
[53:57]
Uh, I don't really know.
[54:00]
We...we'll plan it
[54:01]
...Hopefully, we'll,
[54:02]
you know, go through this
[54:04]
process...Uh, we'll
[54:05]
plan it. They'll, uh
[54:06]
, gather the materials
[54:07]
and everything so that when
[54:09]
we get it there,
[54:10]
it takes as
[54:11]
little time as possible. We will be
[54:13]
on schedule. They'll have
[54:14]
everything they need, and
[54:16]
they'll, uh, and they'll
[54:17]
do the repairs. But
[54:18]
, I think, a week. But
[54:21]
it happens, uh,
[54:22]
regularly for us and
[54:23]
for our
[54:25]
mutual aid partners. So,
[54:27]
we have
[54:27]
mutual aid, and we
[54:28]
will call
[54:29]
them as needed.
[54:30]
That was my question
[54:31]
. I'm sure there's a
[54:32]
backup plan, who do
[54:33]
you know...
[54:34]
Yeah. We don't have a
[54:35]
backup engine, uh
[54:36]
, ladder, but we would
[54:37]
call Beacon Bridge
[54:38]
or New
[54:39]
London Mystic Subbase. Yes.
[54:40]
We have...We have
[54:41]
contingencies that we
[54:42]
take advantage of
[54:43]
all the time.
[54:43]
Good. Good. Thank you.
[54:45]
Councilor Piazza.
[54:47]
So, this does not currently
[54:48]
disable the ladder truck
[54:49]
. Right?
[54:51]
The ladder is working.
[54:53]
She was taken up for
[54:53]
preventive
[54:54]
maintenance. These are
[54:56]
the drawbacks, and, uh, it's
[54:58]
working now.
[55:00]
Good. Thank you. Anyone else
[55:05]
? Good. Seeing no
[55:10]
other issues, I make a
[55:11]
motion to move
[55:12]
this to the
[55:13]
October 5th Mayor and Council meeting. So,
[55:14]
it's done. Second.
[55:16]
Friend's suggestion. Who is
[55:17]
for it?
[55:18]
Yes. Yes. Is
[55:19]
anyone against it? Did anyone
[55:21]
abstain? Adopted
[55:22]
unanimously.
[55:23]
Next step. Um, we're
[55:25]
bringing you an update
[55:26]
on the
[55:27]
West
[55:28]
Pleasant Valley Fire District. You are here.
[55:33]
Um, so, as you guys
[55:34]
know, we passed
[55:36]
an ordinance
[55:37]
establishing
[55:38]
fire
[55:39]
marshal meetings in the city of
[55:40]
Groton. The next
[55:43]
step was
[55:44]
to talk to West
[55:45]
Pleasant Valley,
[55:46]
as we provide
[55:47]
fire services and
[55:48]
fire
[55:49]
marshal services for West
[55:50]
Pleasant Valley.
[55:53]
Chief Tompkins,
[55:54]
Director Juhasz, and I
[55:56]
met with the
[55:58]
West Pleasant
[55:59]
Valley Fire District Board of Directors. They were
[56:04]
satisfied with our
[56:05]
demands and
[56:06]
signed the agreement. It
[56:10]
stated
[56:12]
August 26, 2026. It's
[56:15]
in your package. Is there
[56:18]
anything else? So basically,
[56:22]
when someone in West
[56:23]
Pleasant Valley
[56:24]
goes to the
[56:26]
city's building department, they're told
[56:27]
that they also
[56:28]
need to go
[56:29]
to the
[56:30]
city's building department, and they
[56:31]
can pay, they'll
[56:32]
eventually be able to
[56:33]
pay them right
[56:34]
online. Currently, online
[56:38]
services are still
[56:38]
being refined, but
[56:40]
they can
[56:40]
calculate how much you
[56:41]
will need to
[56:42]
pay. Did I
[56:45]
miss something? Good.
[56:50]
Any. Yes, Counselor
[56:52]
Weiss.
[56:54]
Thank you, Madam Mayor, and I
[56:56]
will say it again. Thank you
[56:57]
, Madam Mayor. Thank you,
[56:59]
Chief Tompkins,
[57:01]
you know, you eradicated
[57:02]
it. This is something that
[57:08]
our
[57:09]
public
[57:10]
safety and
[57:10]
public works committee has been working on in
[57:11]
another area to
[57:12]
try to improve
[57:14]
our fire protection
[57:15]
and bring in more full-
[57:16]
time
[57:16]
employees, and we
[57:18]
were trying to find a
[57:19]
source of revenue that
[57:20]
we didn't really
[57:21]
have. We haven't
[57:26]
used it before. And I'm
[57:28]
grateful to you guys
[57:29]
for all of this hard
[57:30]
work, and to the
[57:31]
committee members for
[57:32]
having these
[57:33]
discussions to
[57:34]
try to get to
[57:36]
this point. Hmm, that
[57:41]
includes not only the
[57:42]
West
[57:43]
Pleasant Valley Fire District, but also the
[57:44]
new developments at Fairview
[57:46]
Homes, right?
[57:51]
Yes, any permits
[57:52]
currently coming in
[57:54]
West Pleasant Valley,
[57:55]
including Fairview,
[57:56]
will be subject
[57:57]
to fees.
[57:59]
Right. And again
[58:03]
, I
[58:04]
support this 110%. Um, you
[58:11]
know, you guys, you
[58:12]
and your deputy
[58:13]
chief, you've
[58:16]
worked hard over the years to
[58:17]
make sure that
[58:19]
any buildings that
[58:20]
are built or
[58:21]
renovated
[58:22]
meet the
[58:22]
fire
[58:24]
safety parameters of the city of Groton.
[58:29]
Hmm, and ensured that
[58:32]
they were safe
[58:33]
and secure. And I'm
[58:36]
grateful that you guys are
[58:37]
now getting a
[58:38]
source of income for the
[58:39]
hard work that you
[58:40]
do, based on the
[58:43]
Connecticut General Statutes, which we
[58:44]
determined were, you
[58:49]
know, designed to ensure that
[58:50]
you
[58:51]
get these
[58:52]
sources of income for the
[58:53]
work that you
[58:54]
do. So,
[58:55]
thank you for that. I
[58:56]
appreciate it.
[58:59]
Are there any other questions
[59:01]
or comments? Again
[59:03]
, this is just
[59:03]
informational
[59:04]
material, so we don't
[59:05]
need to
[59:06]
transfer anything. We just
[59:07]
wanted to make sure
[59:08]
you know that this
[59:09]
matter has been finally
[59:10]
agreed upon and that we are
[59:11]
moving forward. Oh
[59:13]
Councilor Mbuwa.
[59:15]
Sorry. I I I I just a
[59:16]
quick
[59:17]
follow-up question. Hmm
[59:18]
, do we need to
[59:19]
hold a public
[59:20]
hearing on this
[59:21]
, or will this
[59:22]
be
[59:23]
brought up at our
[59:24]
next, uh,
[59:25]
mayor and
[59:26]
council meeting and then we'll
[59:27]
just approve it
[59:28]
and then it'll be
[59:29]
passed.
[59:30]
He doesn't need to be
[59:31]
approved by anyone on the
[59:32]
council because he's approved by the
[59:33]
West
[59:34]
Pleasant Valley Fire District, er,
[59:35]
West Pleasant Valley.
[59:41]
So it's not
[59:41]
brought before
[59:42]
the mayor and then before the
[59:43]
council. Good.
[59:47]
Right. Seeing this,
[59:50]
um, I make a
[59:51]
motion to
[59:52]
go into closed
[59:54]
session pursuant
[59:55]
to Connecticut General
[59:56]
Statutes
[59:56]
1-206 a,
[59:58]
regarding personnel and
[59:59]
appointments for the
[1:00:00]
fire department,
[1:00:01]
including the council, the mayor,
[1:00:03]
um, Chief
[1:00:04]
Tompkins, Michael
[1:00:05]
Page, and Richard
[1:00:06]
Russo.
[1:00:09]
So it is proposed.
[1:00:10]
Second.
[1:00:11]
Proposal and second.
[1:00:14]
Everyone who is "in favor".
[1:00:15]
Yes.
[1:00:16]
Okay, we're in
[1:00:17]
closed session.
[1:00:18]
It is 7:05.
[1:00:20]
Uh, Madam Mayor, I won't be
[1:00:22]
able to attend
[1:00:23]
because I have someone
[1:00:24]
delivering documents.
[1:00:26]
So I'll leave it to you
[1:00:29]
, if you have the
[1:00:30]
quorum. If not, then
[1:00:32]
I have a quorum. I have a
[1:00:33]
quorum. Everything is fine.
[1:00:35]
So, Councilor Amboise
[1:00:36]
leaves the meeting at
[1:00:37]
6:05, and there's nothing, well, there
[1:00:39]
will be something from the closed
[1:00:40]
session, but that's
[1:00:41]
okay. We have a
[1:00:42]
quorum.
[1:00:43]
Thank you, Madam Mayor.
[1:00:44]
Thank you.
[1:00:45]
Good night.
[1:00:46]
We
[1:00:49]
need to wait a
[1:00:50]
minute. We
[1:00:52]
need to wait a
[1:00:53]
minute. We're still on
[1:00:54]
...Can we
[1:00:55]
do this? Um, we'll
[1:00:56]
do them separately.
[1:00:57]
Recording stopped.
[1:00:58]
We will make them. Oh, do
[1:01:00]
we need to
[1:01:01]
go in and out
[1:01:02]
if we...
[1:01:03]
Yes, I suppose so.
[1:01:06]
Oh, okay. Remind
[1:01:09]
me. Hmm,
[1:01:10]
I don't know if it's
[1:01:11]
necessary.
[1:04:05]
Thank you for noticing this. It's
[1:04:10]
a shame I didn't
[1:04:11]
notice either.
[1:04:15]
Recording is in progress.
[1:04:16]
Okay, we're back
[1:04:18]
at 7:09. I'm going to, um, move to
[1:04:21]
overturn
[1:04:21]
the motion that's currently under
[1:04:23]
consideration to go into
[1:04:24]
closed
[1:04:25]
session because we
[1:04:26]
added both people
[1:04:28]
together. So if you
[1:04:29]
can, um, if the
[1:04:30]
deputy mayor, if
[1:04:31]
you agree to withdraw
[1:04:33]
your proposal.
[1:04:34]
Yes.
[1:04:35]
And Councilor Piazza, if
[1:04:36]
you agree to rescind
[1:04:38]
your second
[1:04:38]
offer.
[1:04:39]
Hooray.
[1:04:39]
Good. Um, so this
[1:04:41]
proposal has been canceled
[1:04:42]
. So I'll take
[1:04:43]
the offer. Let's
[1:04:44]
try this a second time.
[1:04:46]
I make a motion
[1:04:47]
to go into
[1:04:48]
closed session
[1:04:49]
pursuant to
[1:04:51]
Connecticut General Statutes 1-206 a,
[1:04:52]
personnel appointments,
[1:04:54]
fire department,
[1:04:55]
including mayor, council, chief
[1:04:57]
Tompkins, and Michael
[1:04:58]
Page.
[1:04:59]
So, it is proposed.
[1:05:01]
Secondly.
[1:05:01]
There is a proposal and a friend
[1:05:03]
. Everyone who is "in favor"?
[1:05:04]
Yes. Yes.
[1:05:05]
Is
[1:05:05]
anyone against it? Are there any
[1:05:06]
abstainers? 7:10.
[1:05:09]
We are now moving into
[1:05:10]
closed session. Just
[1:05:11]
a moment until we
[1:05:12]
get out of the cell.
[1:05:15]
Recording stopped.
[1:09:04]
Mhm.
[1:10:59]
Good.
[1:11:27]
Okay, we left the
[1:11:28]
closed session
[1:11:30]
at 7:16. I make
[1:11:31]
a motion to
[1:11:33]
move to a closed
[1:11:34]
session pursuant
[1:11:35]
to CGS 1-206 a, personnel
[1:11:36]
appointments and
[1:11:37]
appointments for the
[1:11:39]
fire department,
[1:11:40]
including the Mayor,
[1:11:41]
Council Chief
[1:11:42]
Tompkins, and Richard
[1:11:43]
Russo.
[1:11:44]
So, it is proposed.
[1:11:46]
Secondly.
[1:11:46]
This is a proposal and a
[1:11:47]
friend. Have questions or
[1:11:49]
comments? No, everyone
[1:11:51]
who is "in favor"?
[1:11:52]
Yes.
[1:11:53]
Is
[1:11:54]
anyone against it? Are there any
[1:11:55]
abstainers?
[1:11:56]
Unanimously. We'll
[1:11:57]
return to
[1:11:59]
closed session
[1:12:00]
at 7:16, 7:17, sorry.
[1:16:44]
Ahem.
[1:18:35]
Good. It is 7:23, and the
[1:18:37]
closed session
[1:18:39]
is over. Um, I will make
[1:18:43]
a motion to
[1:18:44]
submit to the mayor and
[1:18:46]
council on October 5th
[1:18:47]
a motion to
[1:18:48]
appoint Michael
[1:18:49]
Page as fire chief.
[1:18:51]
So it is
[1:18:53]
proposed.
[1:18:55]
Secondly.
[1:18:55]
This is a proposal and a
[1:18:56]
friend. Have questions or
[1:18:58]
comments? Everyone who is "
[1:18:59]
for"?
[1:19:00]
Yes. Yes.
[1:19:02]
Are there any objections? Are there any
[1:19:04]
abstainers? Seeing
[1:19:07]
that there is none, it is carried
[1:19:09]
unanimously, and I will
[1:19:10]
make a motion
[1:19:11]
to appoint, um,
[1:19:12]
Richard Russo as
[1:19:13]
fire chief at the
[1:19:15]
October 5th meeting of the mayor and council.
[1:19:18]
So it is proposed.
[1:19:20]
Secondly.
[1:19:20]
There is a proposal and a friend
[1:19:22]
. Have questions or
[1:19:23]
comments? Everyone who is "
[1:19:24]
for"?
[1:19:25]
Yes.
[1:19:27]
Are there any objections? Are there any
[1:19:28]
abstainers? Seeing
[1:19:30]
that there is none, it is adopted
[1:19:31]
unanimously. I will make
[1:19:32]
a motion to
[1:19:33]
postpone the
[1:19:34]
meeting.
[1:19:34]
I will make a motion to
[1:19:35]
postpone the
[1:19:36]
meeting.
[1:19:36]
Second.
[1:19:37]
Everyone who is "in favor"?
[1:19:38]
Yes.
[1:19:39]
The meeting
[1:19:40]
has been postponed.
[1:19:41]
Thank you very much.
[1:19:42]
Thank you.