[0:14] Good morning, everyone did it a 9:04 and I would like to call this meeting of the commissioners court order.

[0:23] commissioner, baucom. So I will let commissioner rose

[0:31] introduced piers. >> it is my honor to introduce

[0:36] reverend eleanor l. Colvin, the senior pass there of westbury united methodist church. She made history as being

[0:43] appointed as senior pass there of westbury and she is a fourth-generation methodist and she is a houston native, a

[0:52] graduate of texas a&m and a masters in fine arts at the

[0:56] university of houston and a masters at the seminary in dc

[1:03] she lives out her faith in action and inspires actions those others to do the same. It is so moving that your churc

[1:13] is celebrating the 70th anniversary or last year celebrated its 70th anniversary and is our privileg

[1:19] to partner with you. The proclamation and during pride month and throughout the year, westberry umc continues t

[1:29] model what it means to show compassion and peace and love. So thank you for joining us today at commissioners court an

[1:38] for your service to the residents of harris county so

[1:49] thanks for being history maker and it is more loving and

[1:55] compassionate and just. Thank you for the invitation to

[2:05] be here today. Let us pray.

[2:10] god of love, we give you thanks for the gift of a new day give

[2:15] you thanks for the joy of being your children and for the

[2:19] privilege to partner with you s that your kingdom might come on

[2:23] earth as it is in heaven and fo the privilege of serving you so

[2:29] that others might come to know love of god and love of neighbor

[2:34] . We seek you this day.

[2:40] kronos with the wisdom for the work of the day.

[2:46] give us the insight to know whe to speak and to know when to be silent and help us to listen well, advocate well, give us

[2:58] your wisdom from on high god of justice, have your way in this

[3:05] court, this day boot your words teaches us to seek the welfare

[3:11] of the city for it in its welfare we will find our own prosperity. Help us to seek what is best fo

[3:18] the county. Help us to seek what is best fo

[3:24] all residents of the county and those with great means and thos

[3:30] pressed into the margins and al residents in between, lord god.

[3:35] god of justice, remind us that we are inextricably tied

[3:39] together in a web of mutuality and what impacts one, impacts

[3:46] another so help us to bear one another's burden this day.

[3:52] we have an agenda for the day but we are open to your agenda.

[4:01] may it be so respectful of the many names by which people pray

[4:06] to you all over the world and I pray in the name of jesus the

[4:12] christ, amen. >> thank you. >> thank you so much and welcome .

[4:19] we will not recite the pledge. I pledge allegiance to the flg

[4:32] of the united states of america and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Honor the texas flag.

[4:38] I pledge allegiance o thee, texas, one state under god, one and indivisible. >> before we get started I want

[4:53] to take a moment to recognize the start of the fifa world cup

[5:02] . That is very exciting.

[5:06] I have one at the fan fest so I is a big deal and we are all wearing our fifa pins. Hits a one on lifetime

[5:20] experience. Billions of people around the

[5:26] world would dream to be in the position we are to be hosting world cup. Commissioner ellis will be

[5:36] joining virtually. We will have a lunch recess

[5:41] between 1-130 since we have thi tight overlapping timeline and

[5:48] I've requested a break between 3 -4 because people lose court

[5:53] during that time. It is a privilege to honor the

[6:02] dean of the rice school of business and has taken it to

[6:06] incredible heights in terms of enrollment and prestige and he'

[6:11] he so good these been recruited to be its next president and

[6:16] sole if you would join us here at the microphone, I will reach

[6:24] your resolution and that I know you have a proclamation as well.

[6:29] so thank you for accommodating this personal privilege and you

[6:33] can imagine he is very busy managing his current roll in th

[6:39] future point so. Were as he's been named the 15

[6:46] th president university, a distinguished institution of higher learning. He's a respected economist and

[6:53] scholar and academic leader, jones graduate school of

[6:57] business and has led significan growth in business throughout his career he expands access to quality education and leadershi

[7:08] in the program and fostering students to lead in the global

[7:12] economy. During his leadership, price

[7:18] business expanded enrollment an increased faculty strengthen th development of new student success and opportunity.

[7:26] his appointment as president of wake forest university reflects

[7:30] his exceptional record, visionary leadership and

[7:34] dedication to institutional excellence and brings us great pride even though we lose you, brings us great pride to see yo

[7:42] as the president of wake forest and they are so lucky to have you. We are going to miss you here

[7:47] two that end, I do hereby designate june 11, 2026, being

[7:56] today, as dr. . Rodriguez today in harris county

[8:02] , texas. Congratulating him on his appointment as the 15th president of wake forest

[8:10] university and extend can see I congratulations.

[8:17] >> I can't thank you enough. We had wonderful years here in

[8:24] texas. I can tell you there's no bette place in the country to raise a family and I certainly have bee

[8:31] proud of that so it is with great pride that I received thi incredible honor and is the honorable life time.

[8:38] I will just say from my family, my great-grandparents moved to

[8:43] houston in 1915 and then left o navigation boulevards boulevard

[8:51] said to be back here, it's been a great privilege for me so I

[8:55] keep the county in the city nea and dear to my heart. Thank you very much for all tha you've given us.

[9:04] we got the appreciate at. >> congratulations bit it makes

[9:11] us so proud to act out that. Thank you for everything you have done for the future leadership of our nation.

[9:20] wake forest is blessed to have your vision and commitment and look forward to many more decades of seeing what you have

[9:27] across the country and speaking of students, I know we have many in the audience today so I you could raise your hands.

[9:37] and to so many. All think it to our students an everyone else whose lives you have touched.

[9:44] >> thank you. Thank you. So if you -- I am so sorry.

[9:50] >> thank you for all thieves done and I really want to take

[9:59] special attention to your trajectory to now becoming a

[10:10] national leader and thank you for making rice the diversity

[10:17] that it is, but in its capacity. So you also are among giants

[10:30] most recently and acknowledged him so very, very proud of you.

[10:46] I will just tell you what my da just told me. Congratulations. >> thank you very much.

[10:53] thank you. >> dean come if you have a moment, I'm hoping we can take pictures with both of the

[11:02] honorees. Go ahead, commissioner. >> the resolution is about -- do you want to call him up?

[11:22] county attorney, would you please join us.

[11:26] >> I say we take pictures with dean rodriguez and we both

[11:31] recognize him later. He's probably hard at work. Dry need to take a little break for this?

[11:40] >> excuse me. Take pictures. So if you will just humor is us here for a minute.

[13:53] we will now take the speakers. Yes, commissioner ramsey.

[14:00] recognizing the complexities of keeping everybody into corm

[14:04] today, I think there's been a couple of items we would like t look at first and I think it ha been mentioned 125 and 418 woul

[14:16] be executive session and 483 executive session items so I

[14:20] what ask that we take 125 and 418 and 483 and hear the

[14:28] speakers of those first and the take those items and obviously

[14:34] 125 well be the presentation by flood control and 418 and 43

[14:41] will be executive session and take those before we take the remaining speakers in today's -- commissioner ellis is on virtua

[14:48] and I want to make sure we don' lose him in the process.

[14:55] >> so we have a motion and a second to take only the speaker

[15:00] for 125, 418, and 483. Would have to take 419 also be

[15:07] diving there speakers on that. That should be brief is there a

[15:12] second, all in favor. Any opposed.

[15:16] all in favor and it carries unanimously. If you wouldn't mind please calling any speakers for item

[15:22] 125 and 418 or 419 and 483. >> speaking on item for hundred

[15:32] 83, you have one minute. >> depending on the articles

[15:46] I've been reading. At my name is mary. -- speck.

[15:53] and the articles are saying ite 12, only one is completed, you

[15:58] fire the person that was in charge when you took over and I took 18 months to hire a new person.

[16:04] did you not take that into account what all these things are due and not article two day ago you said you're going to

[16:12] reclassify it and put it under something dated 2028. These are 2027 february. Your succession ends every 21 o

[16:22] the person you hired is febrile and you gave her an $80,000

[16:29] raise last year for not doing her job.

[16:33] you are feeling failing the citizens. Seven years and one project done .

[16:41] thank you. 14 sessions you missed.

[16:48] 14 sessions you missed and he missed it. >> thank you comic your time is of.

[16:53] >> you need to be accountable. >> thank you, ma'am.

[16:58] any other speakers? >> that is all, judge. >> so it is 9:21. Will go to executive session on

[17:08] 125, 418 and 419 and 483. >> 125 should be done now.

[17:15] >> I thought I said 125. >> but not two executive session

[17:20] . It should be done now for presentation. So we will do 125, the public

[17:30] presentation. They are on their way.

[17:51] good morning, judge. We do have a presentation that

[17:57] has been submitted. >> dr. Peterson, I don't have

[18:09] the presentation. >> give us just a moment. We will get that over to you. In the meantime we will go ahea

[18:17] and start and really well we ar getting the presentation, I wil

[18:22] just start with the bottom line up front, so we are making

[18:30] progress and are delivering projects in this work is keepin our communities safe and we are here today to talk about a

[18:41] solution that will deliver the resolution of the cdbgr funding.

[18:58] it requires a full court press and the team is here with me today to demonstrate the commitment to get this work don

[19:06] so so I will go ahead and help everyone decides to go along

[19:12] with that but I will just be to the issues that we want to cover . So one of the things that we

[19:18] have included in the transmitta that we submitted in court is a map and an outline of the different funding sources that

[19:25] are associated with these dollars and certainly the

[19:30] program is a very complex program and a lot of different rules and regulations and it is administered and administered

[19:38] locally. There's two different funding

[19:46] sources, dr and mitigation. It's very important to know

[19:51] these dollars have some of the most complex regulations.

[19:55] and we need to make sure that w meet all the income requirements

[20:02] . There are a total of 20 project in both programs we are going t focus today cdgr.

[20:20] progress is happening. We're making progress.

[20:27] projects are under construction and this light shows you some o the work there are a total of seven out of the 11 projects

[20:33] that are under construction. Three more are moving to

[20:38] construction by the end of this month that we have one project

[20:42] that is still awaiting environmental clearance we have

[20:49] had two additional projects. And the goal of what we're goin

[20:56] talking about today is to keep that momentum going and make

[21:01] sure that these projects are protected.

[21:08] let's go to the next slide and let's talk about the plan that

[21:13] we have been executing. In late 2025, the district, the

[21:21] gl low, we sat down and agreed to a strategy for how we needed

[21:26] to move forward. We knew the most critical stuff

[21:30] in the process was getting thes under construction so we set a goal. We set a goal to make sure that

[21:35] we got all of the projects out by the end of the first quarter

[21:39] of this year and we set a goal to get all of the projects that

[21:44] were environmentally cleared ou to construction by the end of june and that required celebration and moving faster

[21:50] than the schedules showed and the projects moved and we are o

[21:55] track to get this done the othe thing that this included was an

[22:01] acknowledgment that we would be gathering data as a result of

[22:06] the information that we gained from the bids to fully understand the extent of what the opportunities were in this

[22:13] program and what were the constraints. Difficult of the next slide, we can talk a little bad about that

[22:19] . So we knew from beginning this program had constraints in term of very strict timeline so we

[22:25] knew that there were environmental regulations that had to be followed in the exten of the changes in those

[22:33] regulations could not have been anticipated and yet we have continued to stay focused on delivering this one.

[22:40] we did realize as part of putting these projects out of I that there was an opportunity. We had an opportunity because

[22:48] the market was coming in lower than our engineers thought it would. That is a good thing.

[22:53] that means we can deliver more for the residents of harris county with the information tha we were able to gather for all

[23:00] of the work that we have been doing, we have been able to

[23:04] leverage joel's strong relationship we have with the

[23:08] glo to problem solve to come up with a solution that was not on

[23:14] the table previously but based on the information we have, we

[23:18] were able to find a way to afford and achieve multiple

[23:23] goals so if we could go to the next slide the approach that we

[23:29] have laid out is one that involves different steps.

[23:40] we know we have to preserve the projects and we know who want t

[23:44] make sure to deliver more for the residents of harris county as a result of our project coming in lower than expected

[23:50] and it is critical that we also address the point where we are

[24:02] at. In involves three different steps. Phrasing the projects to addres

[24:10] the challenges and moving certain projects into dr to leverage all the dollars we can for the benefit of the resident

[24:18] of harris county and actively manage the capacity to ensure w are using as much of those dollars as possible to deliver

[24:26] fair and so scott is going to walk us through very quickly th

[24:32] details of this plan. >> thank you county judge and

[24:41] commissioners. We are still honoring the

[24:48] promise to the constituents of harris county. This is where the strategy becomes simple.

[24:54] were not changing the promise t the communities. For changing the delivery of th program the program are going t

[25:04] lay out during this coordinated program, cost agency funding

[25:10] alignment to protect funding dollars and maximize community benefits. For a longer duration projects,

[25:20] the plan is to define the paperwork they could be

[25:27] substantially completed with in the cdbg-dr deadline with remaining to be delivered by th cdbg-mit program.

[25:36] the key point is that the projects remain single projects under the current contract and with the funding source, clearl

[25:47] defined portions for each of those projects. Next slide. The most tangible example is th

[26:01] transfer of some projects, seve projects currently managed and operated by hcb and those can b moved and still maintained and

[26:13] operated by funding them out of the dr program, we can maximize

[26:24] the dr spending and get up but 125 million in additional

[26:30] projects eligible for harris county through the hcd program.

[26:36] next, please. We also have strategies to

[26:42] manage the remaining funds and we have spoken with glo from th

[26:47] very beginning of the program using construction incentives,

[26:52] those types of incentives have federal doubt, however, we are allowed to use acceleration strategy.

[26:59] for example, paying for additional crews to speed up projects on additional projects of looking at other celebration

[27:06] methods. One of those that we have already implemented is the use of competitive sealed proposals

[27:14] in the bidding process where we can take in time of completion

[27:18] in the award criteria. From looking at the possibility

[27:23] of upgrading our flood warning system and this would benefit all the residents of harris county by making them more

[27:30] reliable and more up-to-date in the system. We have a possibility of additional draining projects an

[27:40] the possibility of moving additional projects from the harris county flood control program and the dr program and

[27:49] recently a possibility of additional planning studies tha can be included in this program. So how does this all book when

[27:58] it comes to funding sources? If we go to the next slide --

[28:04] >> I think we need to have a motion to extend discussion.

[28:10] >> motion by kurt commissioner garcia and second by

[28:16] commissioner williams ep are carried unanimously.

[28:21] >> $322 million. So what we are looking at is about 105 of the existing projects that would be funded

[28:28] out of the dr program paid abou 23 million are existing under

[28:35] construction and that would be partial fully funded out of the dr program. The full scope of all the dr

[28:42] projects would be completed, were just looking at two source of funding and we would be completing these contracts unde

[28:50] the same contractors that are currently working there would b

[28:55] no stopping work and rebidding the contracts. About $127 million in harris county flood control funding th

[29:04] highline community development, seven projects, which with that

[29:09] open up that space for additional projects on the hcd

[29:17] program. About 40 million in acceleratio

[29:22] strategies on construction and then $27 million that were looking at on transferring either additional mid-projects

[29:31] or additional planning studies on the flood upgrades.

[29:41] >> so we will go to the next slide, please.

[29:50] sought this proposal to conside is one that does really focus o

[29:55] things that have to change. This a lot that won't have to

[30:01] change. We discussed the funding strategy of this program and changing the commitment of the

[30:07] community to get these projects done will not change not changing benefit and the accountability we have within

[30:16] these projects. Importantly this program that w are approaching and proposing a solution for is going to delive

[30:23] higher benefits and we have the opportunity for additional

[30:29] funding to benefit our most vulnerable communities pairs so the path we are on, we will go to the next slide, please.

[30:35] of the action we need today in court is related to really four

[30:42] motions and one is we do need a provost of the list so we can

[30:46] work -- and we need to be authorized an

[30:53] negotiate agreements both with hcd as well as yellow to implement these programs were talking about ever asking for

[31:04] double and triple assurance, approval that implements this approach. This approach I have to stress

[31:11] was developed in collaboration with the office but repented

[31:16] deep communication with them an freely extensively over the las

[31:20] several years of this program, specifically on this plan.

[31:26] we have been inviting their commitment that this plan will address the cdgr guidelines. Their artwork into the

[31:38] operational steps to get this done so time is of the essence

[31:42] and we appreciate the court's consideration of these moments

[31:46] that I believe we will end with a reminder of --

[31:53] we will go to the next slide please. We have a copy of the dr list additions on the next list is

[31:58] the mit list additions I would like to close with a reiteratio

[32:07] of exactly what this plan provides for the court's consideration. The proposal will meet the dr

[32:15] deadline and preserve the scope of the work of the benefits and they will protect the federal investment creekmore

[32:22] opportunities to deliver more for the residence.

[32:29] and we are delivering the projects and this plan will continue to help keep our communities community safe from

[32:37] flooding. >> I imagine, commissioner ellis

[32:45] , -- >> thank you for thank you for

[32:50] your presentation and congratulations on working to get us this particular plan. On that point, we always had

[33:05] issues with how this bond program came to be picked they

[33:11] had mixed failures and inefficiencies and it was not

[33:15] put together and was stopped together in a meaningful way,

[33:21] yet you have figured out how to unravel that big ball of yarn.

[33:33] and we just had some torrential rains this week and you do how

[33:40] many of water we got? >> I do not.

[33:47] what really mattered was the intensity and the amount of rai and you have very intense periods of rainfall.

[33:52] your. >> that is correct.

[33:58] any structures reporting flooding that you are aware of? >> not that we are aware of his. >> I am the balustrade

[34:05] balustrade of five counties and I have gotten zero reports of any structural -- don't work the flight control I

[34:14] doing is absolutely working. The prime example was after working, it is most comparable event in terms of water was a

[34:28] 2015 memorial day flood we had more than 3,000 structures that

[34:42] flooded and I think it around 12 .

[34:47] so the work that has been done is absolutely working.

[34:53] also I want to thank you and your team for her collaboration

[35:00] with the team this plan is not just an idea that you have and

[35:12] it is a plan that has been coordinated with and they are I

[35:22] agreement that this is a path forward and appalls with that all of the guidelines, all of the rules and ultimately it

[35:31] helps get to the timelines and they have long been absolutely

[35:39] concerned about. The recent conversations in these projects, they've gone from communication to projects

[35:50] that get under construction and whether projects will be delivered but the presentation you just made shows that what w

[36:03] should be most concerned about is whether things get done.

[36:11] and there is no perfection when you're bracing to a finish line

[36:17] so I appreciate all the work that you done to help us get

[36:22] there as quickly as possible an a meaningful way in which the

[36:31] office supports but I want to thank dr. Bellingham because of

[36:36] her. G --

[36:40] we need shovels we don't need scapegoat speed we need to communicate in unison so there' no confusion in the public.

[36:52] these recent conversations have had many of those calls come to me with what's happening but th project and I've communicated

[37:00] with them and nothing is happening in an adverse way.

[37:06] moving forward the plug control district is working and people at the helm, I again want to thank you for all the work you

[37:15] are doing now on this particula plan, are you confident the pla

[37:21] will meet that deadline. >> commissioner, based on the

[37:27] work we have done this far, just . We will have to break sure that we get our phasing why do we

[37:35] absolutely believe this is the path forward. >> and so these challenges that you face a going to be real

[37:43] careful. They were outside largely

[37:49] outside of the control of the flood district. As I mentioned from the very beginning, all of these plans,

[38:03] spoke to someone who led the campaign on this line and I ask

[38:08] them the question early on when I got here. I wanted to make more sense of the funding and investments.

[38:25] >> motion carried unanimously. >> I wanted to move to open up

[38:31] the bond program at least in th precinct that is $150 million

[38:35] that is currently going to be used just for the right-of-way

[38:40] acquisition. Not a project. I think there is some 50 odd houses that remain in benefit.

[38:49] I wanted to move that over to places that will support more

[38:54] structures and keep more families out of harms way. I lost that vote because there was a thought that there was --

[39:06] there were compliments made on these specific points. According to the campaign manager on this bond program,

[39:13] that was not true so they had a opportunity to make better sens

[39:18] of this. We have since found that there

[39:23] is at least, at least for me, some projects that were not

[39:29] feasible as they were recently because there is no separation of work the vilardi been done and as a result, community led

[39:41] project demonstrated of retention capacity made the bon

[39:50] program or project in my precinct unfeasible.

[39:55] so all of these things and they were largely outside the purvie

[40:03] so and for the residence you ha been asking what does all this

[40:15] plan mean and ultimately just t confirm it's going to mean that

[40:21] it creates the opportunity for approximately 125 million in

[40:25] additional litigation work and there is no protection work fro

[40:30] real neighborhoods. >> --

[40:35] and what would your message be going into those that feel frustrated to that. There's also been conversations

[40:44] about not following the framework.

[40:54] has any of that been accurate t anything. >> commissioner but I would say is I think an answer to the

[41:03] conditions that you were just talking about, I would say we

[41:09] haven't focused on solving problems. They've been long-standing problems but are sis no certain

[41:18] projects -- we also reprioritize the bond

[41:24] program based on the framework. >> so we followed it.

[41:29] we followed the framework. My role here is to be bullish o

[41:39] getting the projects done and his folks have heard me say, I

[41:46] don't care how you get there as long as we get there and we get there within the rules that wer provided.

[41:58] and so I applaud you for the work that you and your team hav done and unless week I want to just say to the public that all

[42:09] of this conversation has create an incredible amount of anxiety

[42:15] at the wrong time. We are in hurricane season and

[42:20] so folks are concerned and at the end of the day we should be

[42:25] getting out of your way so you can get the job done and I hope

[42:30] that we will understand the logic in that as we continue to move forward a lot of think the director of the land office for

[42:50] her support. Let's get the money spent so none of it has to go back and the plan that you have going

[42:57] forward gives us a pathway to accomplishing that.

[43:01] that is what she wants and that is the conversation we've had with her and that is what we want and ultimately that is wha

[43:09] the residence of my precinct I believe harris county wants to

[43:13] see. And they'll allow them to take

[43:25] that pathway forward. Thank you for your leadership.

[43:29] and I hope that we will be focused on results versus

[43:37] backroom deals are any politics but it is the residents that ar at risk and money, real money our make sure there were not

[43:53] doing anything -- >> commissioner ramsey and ellis

[43:59] . >> think you and your team for coming forward with this solution and thank you for your

[44:06] tireless efforts over these years.

[44:11] to mr. Williams and all your team, we appreciate you so very much and I am so grateful for commissioner dr. Buckingham

[44:23] pitch she has been fair collaborative partner and all

[44:28] her team prints I have deep gratitude. The reason this matters, for everyone listing, so in 1937

[44:37] harris county flood control district was created. Harris county, we all know we have a problem with flooding.

[44:44] harris county, we have 23 watersheds.

[44:49] harris county we have 2,500 miles of channels that we

[44:54] are responsible for taking care of in harris county would have billions of dollars in capital projects, new projects.

[45:01] and things to the harris county community, we have approximatel

[45:06] 100 million now invested to maintain the 2500 miles of

[45:14] channel. >> so today what you are asking the court to improve is a bold solution to make sure we meet

[45:24] that deadline and deliver the projects within the community and make sure we don't send the money back to the federal

[45:30] government so I call this the swap solution plan.

[45:35] for sake of ease I will refer t it as such periods of this plan

[45:40] is a solution and if we don't get any extensions, we will not

[45:47] get an extension, but this is a forkball, aggressive plan that

[45:53] we executed with urgency so tha we hit that deadline, which, by

[45:58] the way, the deadline for the deer projects is peppered 28,

[46:03] 2027. Is that what we are trying to

[46:07] achieve by swapping some projects in accordance with all

[46:13] rules and all regulations and w deliver to the people of harris

[46:17] county what we said we would. >> we are focused on the dr

[46:21] program and making sure we can spend those dollars within that program on that timeline. >> thank you.

[46:29] again, commissioner buckingham, those partners we have talked t

[46:34] before her letter and after her letter and I'm grateful for her leadership and I am 100% sure w need shovels and not scapegoats.

[46:43] this can be done as a team to protect texas.

[46:48] but just for sake of being crystal-clear, and I've gotten in my communications also, the clarity, but for everybody sake

[46:57] could you please going to more detail about the recent

[47:01] collaboration in terms of the swap solution plan that we are

[47:07] discussing today. >> there has been collaboration

[47:14] since the beginning and they've worked with someone closely coming on board to get these dollars.

[47:19] they were a tremendous partner in terms of having --

[47:26] to make sure we work together t drive this program. Over the last several months we have been in close communicatio

[47:35] laying out goals, accountability , in terms of what we deliver and targeting this time to be coming back to the

[47:42] table with a solution and a strategy for how we are going t

[47:49] complete this work and what we have been able to achieve is

[47:53] something that is greater than the sum of its parties.

[47:58] that's a very specific way of thinking of things. In we will put the entirety of the solution on the table based

[48:08] on the parts we were able to come up with something that neither of us probably would've come to the table but we were

[48:15] able to identify it going forward and it is really, reall

[48:20] fulfilling to me come in exampl love we can deliver this allow

[48:24] also just have to say -- >> can we motion to suspend the

[48:30] ten minute rule period. >> all in favor.

[48:37] aye. >> motion carries. >> I know you did not ask that specifically but I think that

[48:44] has been key to making sure we are thinking through the holistic solution, which I thin that is what we are able to

[48:50] achieve in partnership is not holistic solution.

[48:55] so but I am hearing and please correct me if I'm wrong, based

[48:59] on what you said today, I have read e-mails on the conversation

[49:04] . The glo has cocreated this swap

[49:10] solution and has every confidence if we continue meeting all the requirements, this will be --

[49:18] >> is that correct? >> yes. >> the other thing I wanted to talk about is what you just

[49:25] alluded to. Every courts patience is not a virtue, especially when we know that when hurricane season and

[49:32] we know that our families have waited for these projects, so m question as I know the court ha taken and approved several

[49:41] actions to help accelerate and speed up the work. For example the delegation of authority and for example,

[49:48] allowing alternative procuremen methods that have sealed bid

[49:54] proposals which you referenced and now the projects will be in construction and I know in term off delegation of authority to

[50:04] certain amount of change orders. So my question to you is would

[50:14] you please recap what we have already done to reduce

[50:21] bureaucracy and what other idea and how can this court support

[50:26] you because we want to support result want to interfere bid what else can we do to maximize success.

[50:35] >> I would say we have done a lot within the flood control district to advance this progra and we have stood up and focuse

[50:46] the team to deliver the program and deliver all of those with

[50:53] deliberate resources. We really embedded them altogether so that they can mak decisions quickly and if not ge

[51:00] caught up in decision paralysis. We have also made sure that we

[51:05] have a broad delegation of authority but the delegation of authority also fits within with the county attorney thinks is

[51:13] appropriate at terms of being able to move forward. That was the same thing as far as the purchasing.

[51:20] that was properly bounded periods of the sessions and the information that is coming to court are what should be coming

[51:28] to court and other things don't have to sew to your point about change orders, do you believe there is something to be workin

[51:36] on with the county attorney in terms of making sure that we ca

[51:42] properly train. The clarity that we have is we need to be clear about what the delegation is but I will also

[51:49] say there are other conversations we are having wit other county departments in terms of doing a similar thing

[51:55] about we have done with our tea and certainly purchasing in one

[52:02] area where we had a lot of activity early in our. Agreement stuff slowed during the execution because of change

[52:13] orders and lots of data and information that we are changin between the teams, and also at that close also also we are in

[52:22] conversation to bring to court plan to embed additional purchasing support and that is something I think will

[52:28] potentially make a big difference for us and we have t have a great partner in william and I think this will extend an

[52:38] improve our ability to work together. >> so I am hearing is we will both continue to meet every rul

[52:48] and regulation and be aggressiv and innovation.

[52:53] so that is why the engagement I so critical because we need a

[52:59] strong oasis that we meet that document because we know there

[53:04] are roles or requirements that we have to meet with those dollars as well and that is not negotiable I am smiling.

[53:13] miss abernethy has been shaping her head because I know how deeply you've been collaborating .

[53:19] up at the end of the day honestly, it goes back to needing a mom and I was super pregnant when harvey hit my

[53:27] whole neighborhood was flooded and I thought I was so grateful

[53:33] my home didn't flood but there were homes were flooded I was worried I was going to have to have my youngest daughter in a

[53:41] bathtub by the grace of god she stayed inside bn was born in a

[53:45] hospital but this weighs on me every day and not have the

[53:50] opportunity to represent wester harris county, which we have to

[53:54] a.m. You remember what happened afte harvey. And every day it waves on me.

[54:02] there is no room and you and your team are stepping on the

[54:18] gas. Think thank you as well.

[54:23] so in conclusion, we will get this project done for the peopl

[54:30] of harris county. That is the plan that we will

[54:38] accomplish. This is but were calling those

[54:44] swap solution. This is what we put told the

[54:51] people of harris county, is tha correct? >> that is what we are proposin at this point.

[54:56] under don't want to speak for m colleagues.

[55:00] we want to support in away that doesn't create more red tape.

[55:05] we want to be one of your partners in this action compare

[55:10] I appreciate you tremendously, dr. Peterson.

[55:15] god bless you. She keeps sneezing.

[55:19] we have to get this done. Commissioner buckingham and her

[55:28] team -- with that I have motions to rea

[55:34] and I will absolutely be supporting the solutions and I

[55:39] appreciate the solutions oriented commitment to protect the people of harris county. What we're about to enter into

[55:57] is the most difficult phase of the projects. In what would dennis sounds ver complicated.

[56:18] so I know a bit about getting the job done.

[56:25] preceding 3 is really the gateway to water coming into harris county for properties 75 plus the water comes in and is

[56:34] strikes first before it goes in other areas.

[56:43] I don't have questions but I do have remarks based on the plan will tell you that the framewor of this plan is put together

[56:51] four months ago. And to have it come this late I

[56:56] that discouragement to me is a concern to me so the framework

[57:01] was put together four months ag wanted took this long to get

[57:05] here and we can have those conversations and again the partnership of mr. Buckingham has been extraordinary as she

[57:17] issued a very timely manner, a letter to judge hidalgo

[57:28] expressing her concerns, I think .

[57:38] with munication medication from mr. Buckingham this week and

[57:43] here mr. Buckingham's concern related to harris county, flood

[57:50] control district and completing projects. And I quote, despite the extensive support, harris count

[57:59] missed deadlines and we prioritize projects repeatedly

[58:05] and that is a communication submitted incomplete and

[58:12] inaccurate documentation that failed to grant regulations.

[58:18] failed to respond to requests for correcting petrol processes but if you remember I came to court on april 16 asking for

[58:27] certain data related to these projects which was provided to

[58:32] kent on april 30. I didn't make up that data. That is what the glo was asking for that they could not get so

[58:40] it took a action to get down that the glo was asking for.

[58:50] commissioner buckingham and her office pointed out the

[58:55] experience significant employee turnover in terms of who is working with the glo, loss experience.

[59:03] in the last item that's referenced has failed to achiev timely design, environmental clearance, procurement, vendor

[59:13] contracting, and construction start. It is absolutely critical that we maintain our relationship

[59:23] with our significant funding partner, the glo. This is what they're saying about their concerns but in the

[59:30] context, were going into the most complicated things --

[59:35] the most complicated phase of the project. We better be on our toes and we better be able to not do six

[59:43] things that commissioner buckingham mentioned in her

[59:48] letter on monday. This plan come again, should

[59:54] have started this concept in this discussion and it should'v

[59:58] started months ago and I'm goin to go through a summary of

[1:00:08] engineering details. Here is the details, 87 million

[1:00:15] from the dr program to the mit program I know this sounds

[1:00:20] complicated and it is probably not as complicated as it sounds

[1:00:24] but these are details related t what we are going to have to do

[1:00:32] to add to the mit program of 52 million. A projects coming under budget, which has struck in the last fe

[1:00:39] months, that is what has been happening. Were going to have to figure ou how to spend that money and

[1:00:45] identify more projects. And let me give a shout out.

[1:00:52] raised your hand, thank you. Because of the seven projects

[1:00:59] you kept on schedule, forfeit those subprojects seven projects , we would not have a solution here because we are

[1:01:06] transferring those projects ove to even make this possible so

[1:01:10] thank you for keeping on schedule and making that part

[1:01:15] happened. Of the 325 million that they

[1:01:21] prepare to spend, that is less than a third.

[1:01:27] so we are working out all those details and is holding

[1:01:34] 67,000,040,000,000 are change orders. How do I do that math, the typical change order is roughly

[1:01:42] 25% that this is going to be roughly 27 million bits of

[1:01:46] recording have to work through that change order issue again.

[1:01:51] these are all issues we can wor on.

[1:01:56] we are going to need to come up with projects that we are going

[1:02:02] to again turn over and she's going to be packed tasks with doing the difficult thing of taking projects and being sure

[1:02:08] that they can meet hurt that plan, which is a year after

[1:02:13] these, so my point in reading through that, we have got to

[1:02:18] have leadership and we've got t have leadership that you can

[1:02:26] trust I'm glad it is here now. I'm going to agree with mr.

[1:02:47] briones and I noticed she's got a couple of motions spared

[1:02:52] know motion 1 I'm going to be obliged to. So I support the motion on the planet we've got to move overpa

[1:02:59] or I continue to have concern about the building with a plan that is on the table. >> thank you, commissioner.

[1:03:09] behalf commissioner ellis. >> then going support both

[1:03:16] motions. This what a particular thing that is almost a political cause , the county engineering

[1:03:26] particularly this will impact some of the projects pretty can

[1:03:31] be done but it is not the easiest thing to do.

[1:03:40] it is always a challenge. Is generally a line of strings

[1:03:49] and I think I made reference a couple of times when I was on city council that we would have come in and explain and it was

[1:04:00] always a big challenge. I appreciate the patience but I

[1:04:11] do want to make a couple of comments.

[1:04:17] I happen to be the only person come out will we put that on th

[1:04:26] agenda. It was a big deal. And any of the to zero to 54 counties in texas, harris count

[1:04:32] stepped up, the board. And they put $2.5 billion and I

[1:04:44] was a leap of faith. Evan I was still into texas,

[1:04:50] 2016 I had been sworn in. Your predecessor came in to tal

[1:05:03] about the cost-benefit analysis in saying that they thought tha

[1:05:08] because I been in the legislature, but it would be th

[1:05:13] one to get the message to washington. You should have talked to me some time ago to try to change

[1:05:22] that language. Everybody was agreeing on

[1:05:28] commissioners court what areas you represented and taking care

[1:05:35] of the wealthier neighborhoods first. It just makes sense so one of m staffers really crafted a littl

[1:05:42] bit of language but a staffer I particular, you ended up taking

[1:05:48] what you've got there. And then you crafted that

[1:05:53] language that we came up with s our framework was part of the

[1:05:58] process when the package was pu on in my judgment it was not

[1:06:05] followed until we really dug into it.

[1:06:12] we had asked the auditor go in and look at it. It is because of what we are being told was not happening.

[1:06:19] the first big change I remember making.

[1:06:32] and we get it. And we did it.

[1:06:37] I've argued against it but we kept moving forward.

[1:06:45] we had a presentations that at everybody says this is as good

[1:06:55] as the slice of bread. I do believe in this plan.

[1:07:00] I do think it could've been don along time ago.

[1:07:07] it is going to be a challenge t get it done.

[1:07:26] just added to the mix of that discussion was.

[1:07:36] and that has to go to voters countywide.

[1:07:51] they tried to come up with the process which is more inclusive and they have tried to track them.

[1:07:59] but that is behind us now. And they wanted to do direct

[1:08:09] allocations to every city and county because of you have to

[1:08:14] have a call back and you want t be put 50 states in the hundred or thousands around the country. And that is generally not the

[1:08:29] norm. I do think that we've got to move decisively and I do think decisively the issues would

[1:08:38] provide accurate data even to this body and I will close on this comment. This issue with flood control

[1:08:47] and I coined the phrase I have healthy distrust of the progres but normally those if that is something I want to say, I will

[1:09:03] say it in private. I don't think that is my nature but but I don't think that they have been transparent.

[1:09:10] I hope it does not happen again. If I don't have the three votes

[1:09:16] on the commissioners court, I have to live with that and I

[1:09:21] have stressed this to all department heads but if somebod

[1:09:26] does just say you've got some good points, rodney, but you don't have three votes and if you're in doubt about it, just

[1:09:34] put it on the agenda. Just make it clear.

[1:09:42] and I think going forward we would all be better served if w

[1:09:48] take that same approach. >> thank you.

[1:09:53] let me make my comments here before we circle back around.

[1:10:00] my verses for commissioner ramsey. You mentioned the change order. The project scopes bullet chain

[1:10:07] I want to understand what you'r referring to.

[1:10:11] >> part of the plan here, which I agree with plan.

[1:10:19] one a project comes in under bid , that lays some room for

[1:10:24] some change orders and this pla involves 40 million of change order so you need to define within scope of that project,

[1:10:34] other things you can do and deliver with the glo and others.

[1:10:42] but again can, you've got to have someone that is able to

[1:10:46] process that come, execute that make that happen.

[1:10:52] this is going to be a complicated plan to execute.

[1:10:57] so forgive me if I'm being dens but I'm trying to understand

[1:11:02] this so the funds, if the costs come under the estimates, that

[1:11:09] would go to making the project even better or over to go to

[1:11:16] some projects are portico to some of the projects that are

[1:11:21] paused. >> I think in general but I understand more trying to find as many areas as fast as

[1:11:29] possible within the guidelines within the own guidelines and

[1:11:36] requirements. It is investments, $40 million worth of investments on flood mitigation.

[1:11:42] that is the good news. We will pick exactly work goes.

[1:11:50] >> be affordably and dedicated to acceleration strategies as

[1:11:55] well as making sure that we hav enough money to complete this because as you know, construction is complicated and

[1:12:04] when we are accelerating and getting to construction quickly there are potential risks and s change orders help us make sure

[1:12:13] that we have the dollars to be able to manage any potential

[1:12:19] issues that come up in construction. Okay. Okay. It sounds like dynamic circle back because I would think that

[1:12:29] this means that things came under budget. I will circle back. Other questions.

[1:12:38] what I spoke to commissioner buckingham, moving the funds is possible in legal and it's stil a huge lift and so I want to

[1:12:48] understand from you and from purchasing folks, why is that a

[1:12:53] huge lift and can we speed that up and what can we do to make I

[1:12:59] less huge. >> that is a great question.

[1:13:03] the challenge with these dollar is there are a number of rules

[1:13:08] and regulations and processes, audits that will be required in

[1:13:13] terms of spending these dollars but it is a very complex progra

[1:13:18] and the glo has very tight controls over how they operate so we have to follow the processes they have laid out

[1:13:27] that are in alignment with hud, so we have steps that we have t

[1:13:31] taken they have steps they have to take it we have to be sure

[1:13:35] that all the documentation is I place that if and when an audit occurs we are solid. The complexity is something tha

[1:13:49] can be done. And I think the shift in our

[1:13:55] understanding in the pools that are made available was really being able to phase that projec or that was really a key so tha

[1:14:02] will take some effort to make sure we have discreetly defined

[1:14:07] the phase of work that will be completed because frankly we

[1:14:12] need to be accountable for what we deliver and so we have to be able to put on the table and this is what we delivered for

[1:14:19] these dollars and so that will take some engineering work and we have to make sure that our contracting mechanisms are able

[1:14:26] to accommodate the additional funding sources and we have one

[1:14:30] construction contract and that will reduce the paperwork tremendously for us we only hav to have one contract that finds

[1:14:39] two different funding sources for two different programs.

[1:14:45] >> I am not sure. And trying to get to more specific questions and that is when we switch the sources of

[1:14:54] funding, we switch these source of funding.

[1:15:01] what bureaucratic processes do we have to go through

[1:15:06] specifically. >> I could start and I will let

[1:15:10] you fill in. So basically there are dollars

[1:15:21] entered into our system and there is journal entries and

[1:15:25] different pieces, different processes that have to be done

[1:15:31] on the backside to facilitate those changes. That is my question. So you've got the dollars from

[1:15:37] the other part of the money, is that what you are saying?

[1:15:45] >> so every project has a project code in our accounting system along with the funded number that corresponds whether

[1:15:52] it is dr, a bond funding and essentially it creates a new

[1:16:00] project code with new funding code so it's a two-step process

[1:16:06] and one is moving it in existin expenses.

[1:16:10] the second part of it is moving all purchase orders or futures

[1:16:18] purchase orders into that new project. So on the who does the, creatin a project code and moving

[1:16:28] expenses and moving purchase order so who is responsible for those three steps. Though it's between the auditor

[1:16:36] and my office. So I guess this is a question

[1:16:41] for you guys. How quickly can you do this and

[1:16:49] if it is not fast, why, what is the obstacle.

[1:16:59] >> it is generally not timely and it is not a huge left.

[1:17:07] days and weeks. >> a week. >> okay. That is for step one.

[1:17:15] is that the funding codes. >> I would assume there are

[1:17:21] other layers of approval. >> so auditor post but thanks

[1:17:28] for joining us for so we are talking about as we look to mov

[1:17:35] the main sources for these projects to meet the deadlines coming trying to understand if this is going to cause a delay

[1:17:41] and so because of my -- it sounds like this is

[1:17:49] complicated. And so the steps that we just came up with, you create a new project code and then you move

[1:17:57] things to a new account number and then you move all purchase

[1:18:02] orders. Does your office have a roll in any of this and if so which one and how long does it take to

[1:18:08] ensure that. >> yes.

[1:18:12] we have a role in what you just laid out. So you are going to create, those can be created and once w

[1:18:25] have once we have that request signed and approved, it doesn't take that long once the documents get to us but would b

[1:18:34] responsible to take the requested action to create the

[1:18:41] new accounts and actually make that happen in our current

[1:18:46] system again if the forms the paperwork gets done with the

[1:18:59] approvals, there is approval by the departments budgets that ar affected, the actual mechanics of doing those transfers is

[1:19:08] quick and it is like a day. So to play a role, it does not

[1:19:14] take as long to do our part, bu it does require everything to b

[1:19:25] documented and requested in a proper way. That is hopeful. Salt flood control, is that

[1:19:35] purchasing, who does that. That would be primarily flood

[1:19:43] control. If there is some part of this that is in another department, howdy those housing the

[1:19:54] community development. We will work with the departmen

[1:20:05] and when they get us the proper requests with the proper

[1:20:10] approvals, the auditor can move very quickly to make those

[1:20:15] things happen. >> it sounds like legal but hav that as well. So just between the three of yo

[1:20:23] guys, how long do you think tha would have to halfstep proper

[1:20:29] workforce with the proper approval. I would tell you that we have started working on this and we

[1:20:37] had a call and you are not on the call but your staff are on the call with my finance team. >> I'm sorry to keep you.

[1:20:52] my colleagues have a certain amount of time.

[1:20:56] can you give me an answer, how long. A day, week, months. >> via working on it right now.

[1:21:08] and we are actively as of today putting a comprehensive list

[1:21:17] together to send over took them to maintain alignment. >> so there's not a number they are.

[1:21:22] I believe there is somebody here , perhaps they are not here to speak but is there any chance , would you be able to

[1:21:28] answer that question? So first of all, thank you so

[1:21:37] much for your support we are going over the main issue here

[1:21:42] that has been the ladies. And so right now there is this idea of switching the funding code so that we can meet that

[1:21:48] that line so we are on the same playing sure they are.

[1:22:02] and it is not as easy as switching a number on the computer putative is still a huge left.

[1:22:09] so it's a concern that we will find no delays in that huge lef

[1:22:14] so I'm asking the different parties what exactly other

[1:22:21] bureaucratic steps that we have to do that switch.

[1:22:25] so if I'm understanding correctly of the auditor's

[1:22:33] office can do that peacefully but the bulk of the work needs

[1:22:38] to be done within flood control county attorney and our housing

[1:22:44] office but so how long would this take. As she said it depends on the glo so that's what I want to

[1:22:50] know if you have an estimate of how long it takes to put

[1:22:54] together a proper request with the proper approvals to that send to the auditor in the budget office.

[1:23:00] does that make sense? >> I'm sorry.

[1:23:05] if you could at them speak directly into the microphone.

[1:23:09] >> I'm so society pages because we have to be on the record, would you mind joining us at th microphone.

[1:23:17] >> and just stating your name for the record, please.

[1:23:34] >> my name is georgina with the general land office.

[1:23:39] I'm not the grant administration .

[1:23:47] this is a very complex program. >> I will have my team check with you to see if they have an estimate at all by the end of

[1:23:56] today that I can sort of wrap m head around and the reason I'm

[1:24:04] trying to understand is to set expectations for the community

[1:24:09] because I think the way this is presented is it is good but I

[1:24:17] don't want to have any more surprises for the community.

[1:24:24] is there an extent that you guy can do to help us put in the brown it and then the next step from I'm doing.

[1:24:37] how can we speed up. Obviously we cannot speed this

[1:24:42] up that it's in their purview but how can we speed up the

[1:24:48] flood control, community, the county attorney piece because that seems to be worth the bulk the wait would be.

[1:24:58] >> I cannot speak for the count attorney but they are putting all their staff time and will b laser focused on their role jus

[1:25:08] to get to this point. Thank you.

[1:25:16] are there any other steps after that, director peterson.

[1:25:23] we have moved all the purchase orders. Really I think there are keys I terms of making sure we have

[1:25:31] proper contracting in place and that actually has to happen in

[1:25:36] some cases before we had fundin switches.

[1:25:40] in the good news is were alread working on it and coordinating with the g yellow and this change, the strategy and proces

[1:25:49] in the approach that has been laid out does not going to be

[1:25:54] dependent, the execution of the project is going to happen.

[1:25:59] that is happening now pay or projects are under construction I just want to be clear the projects are under construction

[1:26:07] and we are moving as fast as possible to get these administrative pieces in place so after the proper contracting

[1:26:14] is there anything else. >> and then when you talk about

[1:26:21] the projects are not dependent come is what you are saying, this huge left of switching the codes, you are saying that has

[1:26:29] no bearing on how long the project takes to deliver.

[1:26:37] I am thinking through your question to make sure going to answer it fully, judge. The intent here I can jump in

[1:26:50] there appear to think what she' saying is we are continuing

[1:26:56] based on the construction. Is that a one time, the expenses

[1:27:03] , we can always go back to the auditor so that the bill

[1:27:10] continue to get paid regardless. >> or just be more specific,

[1:27:17] there's 11 projects here, six that are really at risk of missing the deadline so if you pick one of them in that projec

[1:27:26] come if everything stayed the same, that the project was goin to be finished now that we are switching the codes, will it be

[1:27:34] done still in one year or a yea and six months.

[1:27:38] >> I can tell you the account codes does not have any bearing

[1:27:44] because of that point it is moving the expense to the

[1:27:51] appropriate place. >> so basically you would have to do it before the deadline, s before february.

[1:27:58] all the accounts are tied up by then. >> so I guess that is the question is can we make sure we

[1:28:06] can get that done. >> thank you for giving us a

[1:28:10] chance to ask those questions and that is all I've got.

[1:28:16] >> commissioners ellis, garcia, and briones.

[1:28:25] ellis just spoke so garcia and briones.

[1:28:31] >> thank you, director, for you response and the answers to the

[1:28:36] questions that are being provided. I'm going to begin with one question.

[1:28:47] this should have been done alon time ago by now.

[1:28:52] what is your response to that. >> we've been working on a plan

[1:28:58] and we have been working a lockstep with the intent to get

[1:29:04] these under construction. This information that we gained in terms of that we put not hav had until this moment.

[1:29:21] we have projects that are split between both programs.

[1:29:34] finding ways and that option an that was on the table.

[1:29:43] this comprehensive solution als is a comprehensive solution.

[1:29:47] thank you for that response. Just a bit of reflection.

[1:29:57] I was applying for money and grants and the consistent

[1:30:01] question I would get is are you sure you want to go after this.

[1:30:10] there are strings attached and requirements.

[1:30:16] a lot of times we didn't get to have fun with program because w had so much to do administratively.

[1:30:25] and right now aside from gettin to that construction, there is lot of digital threes and there's the administrative

[1:30:40] report. >> if I could clarify, I did just get some communication fro our funding partners and I do

[1:30:45] want to clarify on that point some of the things we do need t make sure. And I know I did articulate thi

[1:30:58] just to be super clear. Good deal, thank you.

[1:31:09] and, yes, it is a huge left and I appreciate you being willing

[1:31:16] to even make the effort. So it is the huge left so we do

[1:31:25] nothing and doing nothing is absolutely unacceptable soy do

[1:31:30] appreciate the effort to take o the task and that is what we

[1:31:36] expected to do so thank you. So there has been some points about missing data lines about the incomplete and inaccurate

[1:31:50] documentation then the failed response the glo requests and

[1:32:00] the environmental clearance, what is your response to those.

[1:32:07] >> but of things I would say, commissioner, is some of these

[1:32:13] issues like the missed deadlines , those have been solved for with this approach. We have to pray toward ties the

[1:32:21] project but with this approach that will not be necessary.

[1:32:26] the staffing certainly come we have a dedicated team for our

[1:32:33] program. And that she has been multiple

[1:32:43] levels of staff and certainly want to make sure that we have

[1:32:47] robust team and we also need to have the --

[1:32:55] this team turnover reflects turnover that is overall pretty

[1:32:59] the other thing and just the program.

[1:33:06] we have individual projects happening at a project level.

[1:33:12] conversations happening at the program level for projects we have regulatory conversations happy we have clients in

[1:33:19] purchasing an auditor's. So are not aware of any specifi

[1:33:27] issues that we can pinpoint we take pin --

[1:33:31] feedback like this seriously an we make sure there are no gaps

[1:33:36] but we have a dedicated compliance team who has focused

[1:33:42] on these issues. >> good deal.

[1:33:46] >> lastly I just want to reiterate this was a poorly

[1:34:06] constructed bond program from the very beginning.

[1:34:26] in those studies, no environmental impact or very

[1:34:32] little and probably we should say their little understanding.

[1:34:42] there is -- but because of the federal

[1:34:55] regulations, it took another year, year and a half.

[1:35:01] the federal strings attached to these points are very different

[1:35:05] from what we could do at the local level. And then right away we didn't know how much right-of-way

[1:35:14] position we were going to acquire enemy just say you don'

[1:35:22] always -- and that takes time, generally

[1:35:32] what I hear, the first thing we do at the beginning of projects.

[1:35:51] so you've got two major time-consuming steps to take

[1:35:55] before any other meaningful work .

[1:36:01] and then cost estimates. We didn't know real cost

[1:36:06] estimates for any of these projects.

[1:36:20] thankfully renegotiations have been able to have some impact o those. But again things we did not kno

[1:36:27] fully when we engaged so, we started with a two-year hiccup.

[1:37:03] and we got everything we needed to give that confidence and

[1:37:15] things that don't happen easily. I would just say that I would g

[1:37:29] back to the lines in dr. Buckingham's letter.

[1:37:35] we need shovels, we don't need scapegoats and this is not --

[1:37:44] this is about people and we are going to make a decision.

[1:37:50] but don't really -- we just care about protecting

[1:37:55] people. I agree wholeheartedly.

[1:38:05] we could be sitting here making excuses with ears on the clock.

[1:38:17] we could be talking about relitigating years of challenge

[1:38:24] and problems but the end of the day this is highly complicated

[1:38:29] and incredibly complex and this is hard. But what I appreciate about you dr. Peterson come as you are no

[1:38:39] sitting here making excuses and relitigating this past. You are here today saying we ar taking decisive action.

[1:38:46] we owe it to the people of harris county to get it done an

[1:38:50] I respect that tremendously and I think you for how

[1:38:55] collaborative they have been paid so think you.

[1:39:01] I have two motions that I would like to lead --

[1:39:05] read. Motion 1, I move the

[1:39:10] commissioners court approve the additions to the cdbg-dr and

[1:39:18] cdbg-mit project list, authoriz the harris county flood control

[1:39:23] district and housing and community development to negotiate any agreements necessary to advance projects.

[1:39:31] to authorize the two department to coordinate with the texas

[1:39:36] general land office on contract amendments, program updates, an

[1:39:41] related approvals. And direct the flood control

[1:39:47] district to implement the phasing facing and funding realignment strategy. >> do you want to vote on them

[1:39:56] separately quick. >> I thought we would just vote on both of them. >> thank you, colleagues.

[1:40:04] moved to direct a flood control district to work with county

[1:40:09] attorney's office and other relevant departments to compile

[1:40:13] a list of vetted recommendation on what commissioners court can do to help expedite projects under the cdbg-dr and cdbg-mit

[1:40:25] programs a return to commissioners court with recommendations for consideration and possible

[1:40:30] approval. >> so we have two motions and a

[1:40:35] second by commissioner garcia. Any oppose?

[1:40:40] motion carried unanimously. Thank you.

[1:40:45] an ipo say on the point about the glo, I've got to give credi

[1:40:51] where credit is due but commissioner ellis and I went

[1:40:56] and sat with secretary marcia fudge and got a $750 million investment for harris county so that is saying the funds did no

[1:41:08] arrive until later is the alternative fax and obviously w

[1:41:14] worked with commissioner busch to hold back the 300 million

[1:41:21] because of community projects were not moving fast enough so that came back later as flood control as promised so I think

[1:41:28] obviously people work a lot better but commissioner buckingham and we would've had to do that but it is one of my

[1:41:36] proudest achievements to bring 750 million here and really 350

[1:41:41] more that we had held back for flood control, which did end up

[1:41:47] arriving thanks to commissioner buckingham. Commissioner ellis -- commissioner ellis.

[1:41:58] >> they did a tremendous gift t all of us.

[1:42:02] >> 100%. It was a shared effort and unanimous bipartisan outreach. It helped us well on

[1:42:14] commissioners court. >> we will go to executive session. >> yes, commissioner garcia.

[1:42:20] >> I just want to make one fina point paper with all of the complexities of what it has taken to manage this particular

[1:42:28] program, all of the things that are outside of the flood contro

[1:42:38] purview, all of the unknowns that we know now and I didn't

[1:42:44] know then at the very beginning of this, the structure of how

[1:42:51] this bond was put together, the idea of how many changes this

[1:43:02] particular court has made, to not forgetting that aside from

[1:43:12] glo, you have received both additional state earmarks, whic

[1:43:18] brings all whole other level of complexity in addition to the

[1:43:23] complexity of the existing cdbg dollars.

[1:43:33] all of those do not have dr. Peterson's name on and they have nothing to do with the performance of your

[1:43:40] administration and the flood control district. They have everything to do with the bureaucracy of what is

[1:43:49] typical between federal and state and local governments and it is frustration by example of the frustration by people say

[1:43:56] why can't you just get it done. It is not that easy.

[1:44:01] so I just want to make sure to make the point, you have

[1:44:06] delivered and put together a plan, hard, heavy left, whatever

[1:44:15] . It makes no sense because we as for a plan you've been working on this plan for months and if

[1:44:23] things were copacetic, as they say months ago, this would've

[1:44:30] been approved and was set because there compromises and

[1:44:34] what was originally been as the that could not be done so I jus

[1:44:41] want to say this is not about performance. This is about governmental bureaucracy and absolutely

[1:44:51] better reform. Thank you. >> I actually do have one more thing, which is commissioner

[1:45:00] buckingham's. One of the main points here is

[1:45:07] that regardless, compelling to repeatedly address the court fo

[1:45:17] every minor change, and there I chance of success and that is I the first paragraph and in the second of the last paragraph, m

[1:45:24] vices simple, get it out of the way.

[1:45:29] I know this is based on conversations that the glo had

[1:45:35] with flood control and flood control must be end of the impression that we are requesting they come to meeting

[1:45:42] to address the court for every minor change. I am not aware of that so I would like to know what that is

[1:45:50] about so that we can indeed get out of the way.

[1:45:55] >> that is not any information that the flood can dress -- flood control district would've shared and our job is to bring

[1:46:06] information and when we need court action, we work with county attorney to make sure th court actions made and we bring

[1:46:12] it at the appropriate time. >> but are we delaying your ability to take action question. >> be followed the process.

[1:46:22] >> is the answer yes, no. See, this is the issue I have

[1:46:27] come a director, will you pleas just answer my questions that there are no delays. There are no delays.

[1:46:35] 16 gets to court, are you waiting for it to get the court.

[1:46:40] by can't you just say there are no delays because I'm not aware of them anything that needs com in a time sensitive manner has

[1:46:51] improved at business court and I'm not aware of the items on contracts, on changes that have been flagged for regular court,

[1:47:00] so I know there are very professional office or they wer not a put this in there if they'd not gotten it from

[1:47:07] somewhere. I'm not saying it is you but I just want to set the record straight that we are not asking

[1:47:12] every little thing, certainly I'm not everything that happens

[1:47:22] purchasing, whatever it is, tha gets addressed at a consistent

[1:47:28] path in a copacetic manner so I am not sure of examples from

[1:47:37] this letter. >> so if you are okay, can be

[1:47:42] adjourned to executive session. Didn't we vote already?

[1:47:47] thank you, director and dean. Didn't leave vote already? So can we go to executive session now.

[1:47:53] all right. So we are going to executive

[1:47:58] session on 125, 418, 419, and 483 to consult with attorneys a

[1:48:10] well as personnel matters. It is 10:52 a.m.

[1:48:16] >> you are not going on 125, ar you?

[1:48:22] it already passed >> it's 12:04, we are back from

[1:48:34] executive session. We will go over the items we

[1:48:39] took to executive session, we will go over them in order. The first one that is item 418 -- I did not receive the

[1:48:49] language for that. I'll go grab --

[1:49:13] we asked to codify what commissioner ellis had pres

[1:49:20] presented. >> it should be option b -- I

[1:49:25] don't know what level of specificity want to get the working group or steering committee.

[1:49:31] >> I said I would do that but then you said you were going to draft something, do we need to wait or do you guys want me to

[1:49:37] read it? >> I have it.

[1:49:42] >> I know you have it, I'm just asking about the motion, we all have it. Thank you.

[1:49:55] I have it, the question is you guys said you were going to give

[1:49:59] me a particular motion, what do you want me to say -- >> you can read the whole thing or you can just read the first

[1:50:07] part. >> the chair: motion to establish a reliant parking negotiations governance

[1:50:13] structure that includes the steering committee and the working group. The reliant park steering committee should be responsible for developing recommendations

[1:50:19] and elevating key issues related to reliant park for

[1:50:23] consideration. The steering committee should be

[1:50:28] composed of court members, chief of staff, of precinct one of the county administrator as a nonvoting member pick up a chair

[1:50:32] shall work with the steering committee and reliant park working group to develop key county goals and positions to be

[1:50:38] approved by commissioners court for all negotiation matters and

[1:50:45] serve as lead negotiators and set the negotiation strategy based on the direction provided by commissioners court.

[1:50:50] the lead negotiators reps at the county in negotiations between the tenants and serve as the main point of county staff

[1:50:56] contact for the executives of rodeo.

[1:51:05] escalation to commissioner court matters for requiring policy direction for my financial commitments are material changes

[1:51:11] negotiation strategy will be elevated to commissioners court to the scheduled briefings or formal agenda items.

[1:51:17] the reliant park working group will be established by the steering committee and it shall be composed of relevant county

[1:51:23] departments and consultants responsible for conducting research, providing relevant information, and evaluating a

[1:51:29] developing recommendations related to reliant park under

[1:51:35] the guidance of the steering committee at commissioners co court. >> I'll make the motion and

[1:51:41] stress that I think it's a good process and we should use that

[1:51:46] on projects in all commissioners precincts. As the commission happens to represent reliant park and proud

[1:51:51] to make a motion. >> second.

[1:51:57] >> the >> I was just going to ask is

[1:52:01] there anything -- >> I think this looks fine.

[1:52:05] >> thank you commissioner ellis. >> the chair: we have a motion

[1:52:10] and a second, all in favor? Any opposed? Motion carried unanimously. Item 419, we need a motion to

[1:52:20] approve that settlement as presented.

[1:52:26] motion by commissioner briones. Any opposed?

[1:52:31] motion carried unanimously. 483, commissioner ramsey.

[1:52:39] >> no action? >> I think that was the understanding. >> the chair: no action on

[1:52:49] that item? >> correct.

[1:52:56] >> the chair: all right, that is 483.

[1:53:03] let's move on -- okay. Let me move on to -- we should

[1:53:13] move out of the speakers, right? If that's okay? Let's keep going with the speakers, tiffany, please.

[1:53:27] >> items to 29 at 2:30 for, christopher rivera items to 20 died in 2:30 four, you each have one minute.

[1:53:57] >> thank you, my name is christopher rivera I work with the texas civil rights project and I'm here opposed to

[1:54:04] contracts for forensic logic contracts, items 229 into 34.

[1:54:14] we already had a contentious debate a couple weeks ago in regards to this, it's very disappointing to see the county

[1:54:25] continue to invest in these software, to give you information about vigilant solutions they have already been

[1:54:30] partnering with ice since 2018 to facilitate over 1.5 billion

[1:54:37] data points for them to facilitate their deportation efforts. There is over 9,200

[1:54:42] I.c.e. Agents who have access to vigilant solutions database. If you continue to partner with them you're effectively building

[1:54:47] out the database for them to facilitate these deportations. Instead of funding this, you should support item 481 to

[1:54:55] support lgbtq community and at 4:30 three -- >> thank you your time is up. >> the chair: thank you.

[1:55:05] >> oh one rock on item 140, maximilian diaz.

[1:55:17] jasmine gonzales, item 229 and jake implemented should item

[1:55:25] 328. >> good afternoon, I'm from

[1:55:40] precinct one. I'm an intersex organizer, I

[1:55:46] want y'all to vote yes to all of the first, fourth and 14th

[1:55:53] amendment rights of every resident of harris county and the world cup visitors and the way you do that is by saying no

[1:56:00] to 229, noted 2:30 four and yes to 433 to support all residents

[1:56:09] of harris county. >> my name is jasmine gonzales I

[1:56:19] work on the policy team, we are a legal and social services

[1:56:25] organization that serves survivors of gender-based violence. Al p.r. Cameras do not prevent

[1:56:31] violence but what we see in the do was enable and perpetuate

[1:56:35] violence against survivors, immigrants and against all of us. The price for safety cannot be

[1:56:40] contingent on the separation of families and the oppression of another group of innocent people.

[1:56:45] vigilant solutions allows for data collected for one purpose to be exploited for a completely unrelated unaccountable and

[1:56:53] immoral purpose. Does harris county give bikes access to the solutions database, if anyone from dhs

[1:56:58] asks a constable or sheriff access for a database or to run the license plate will harris county comply?

[1:57:04] we deserve to know how our data is being used? I'm a resident of precinct 4 to urge the court to vote no to

[1:57:11] renew the contract with vigilant solutions. Please don't contribute to mass surveillance dragnet the targets

[1:57:16] our families. Thank you.

[1:57:43] >> good afternoon, on tuesday I was set the convention port and

[1:57:53] there I ran into a publisher. I have this thing to give to --

[1:58:09] today is -- the month is june, also known as black history

[1:58:17] music month. It's party time.

[1:58:24] ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪

[1:58:45] [laughter] >> thank you, your time is up.

[1:58:50] >> let's celebrate. >> thank you, your time is up.

[1:59:02] ♪ ♪ >> we could keep it on if it

[1:59:09] brings down the temperature a little bit. [laughter] thank you, that was really nice.

[1:59:19] >> next is julia on item 383, item 4:30 three.

[1:59:28] you each have one minute. >> I live in precinct two and

[1:59:47] I'm here to speak on agenda item for 33.

[1:59:52] as a kid who had to quickly learn how to interpret and translate important documents for my parents I was 25 years

[1:59:58] ago support like what the language access coordinator

[2:00:02] positions provide two key departments and harris county had existed to. When language barriers exist

[2:00:08] residents miss out on important information, expense delays and services and are unable to fully access programs funded by their

[2:00:15] tax dollars. I ask for a "yes" vote on item

[2:00:19] 4:30 three but I also ask on agenda items 221 and 234.

[2:00:35] >> I am the houston policy manager with the justice center

[2:00:41] I'm here to speak in support of ongoing funding for the language access office and the vital work they do in the community.

[2:00:49] language access is critical for survivors safety and healing from being able to understand what is happening in court to

[2:00:55] getting information about public services to being informed of

[2:00:59] disaster operations and even including the ability to make your voice heard on the issues you care about.

[2:01:05] all of these things help a survivor heal and to build a life of dignity. We have made good progress in

[2:01:11] insuring interpretation is available that staff know how to access it and limited english proficient committee members

[2:01:16] know it exists. There is still work to do

[2:01:21] ensuring the language access office remains staffed and is able to continue working towards its goals means we can continue

[2:01:28] to close gaps. Language access isn't optional, its baseline to make sure our our county programs function

[2:01:33] efficiently and effectively. >> thank you, your time is up.

[2:01:43] >> julia or dona on item 383. Brandon mack on item 481, you

[2:01:52] each have one minute. >> good afternoon, commis

[2:02:07] commissioners. I'm the founder of we the people organize, I'm speaking about the river oaks district constable

[2:02:13] contract for 48. This is not anti-police.

[2:02:19] this is pro-taxpayer, pro-transparency and pro-public

[2:02:25] safety. Before harris county creates nine dedicated law enforcement positions for a private luxury

[2:02:31] district, please table this item today and give the public more time to review the contract to full costs and legal risks.

[2:02:41] county deputies are not mall cops. They carry public authority. If something goes wrong,

[2:02:47] harris county may be pulled into a lawsuit two county lawyers and

[2:02:53] public resources may be used to defend the case and a sworn officers may raise legal defenses that private security

[2:03:00] guards do not have. This is a much bigger than the posted contracted price. >> thank you, your time is up.

[2:03:18] >> I live in precinct one and I previously interned at the travis county public defender's office where I saw firsthand how

[2:03:26] critical language access is. I worked with clients for the

[2:03:30] moments of registration through investigation of the cases. I remember one client who spoke only spanish she was always

[2:03:36] grateful our team could communicate with him in his native language and help them understand what was happening at

[2:03:41] every stage of his case. Many times he told us how much it meant to be informed and heard showing how important

[2:03:48] language access is to making sure the system treats all people with dignity. Being able to understand and

[2:03:54] communicate in the language you feel most comfortable in is essential especially in situations that can affect your

[2:04:00] freedom, safety, and future. I hope the stories and experiences of this community stay with you as you consider

[2:04:07] continued investment in language access services. Thank you for your time. >> thank you.

[2:04:16] >> my name is brandon mack, I'm speaking as chair of the harris county alta b to ia commission.

[2:04:24] president of the political caucus to urge an update to the

[2:04:28] facilities design manual requiring at least one single occupancy restroom and all new constructed county facilities.

[2:04:34] this is a practical low cost steps that strengthens access,

[2:04:40] safety, dignity and public buildings. For many transgendered and nonbinary residents, restroom

[2:04:44] access can determine whether a public space is usable at all. Single occupancy restrooms also support broader community needs.

[2:04:53] parents with young children, caregivers assisting someone of a different gender, older adults and people with disabilities all

[2:05:00] benefit from flexible, private facilities.

[2:05:04] national accessible guidance increasingly recognizes single-user restrooms as a commonplace inclusion measure,

[2:05:09] not a specialized accommodation. On behalf of the commission I

[2:05:13] respectfully ask the harris county commissioners court to adopt the standard for all.

[2:05:17] >> thank you and welcome. >> thank you.

[2:05:23] >> item 481, maria gonzales. You each have one minute.

[2:05:39] >> I maria gonzales, I am here to speak on behalf of the single

[2:05:46] occupancy restrooms at the university of houston, it's had such a proposal for many years now that all new constructions

[2:05:55] and renovated buildings now have single occupancy restrooms.

[2:06:01] this is really valuable. Of the easiest, quickest example I can give you is our security personnel can now have some

[2:06:08] privacy when they need it and can take their equipment off

[2:06:14] their bodies when using the facilities.

[2:06:18] I encourage you all to consider the rolling effects, ripple

[2:06:24] effects of such a solid plan, and to update the design manual

[2:06:35] to acquire this in all new buildings and if possible

[2:06:39] rebuild buildings, thank you. >> thank you.

[2:06:52] >> I am intersex and nonbinary and I don't know which restroom the state wants me to use anymore.

[2:06:57] I'm here to speak in favor of item 481.

[2:07:01] last session house bill 229 defined male and female and state law it said intersex texans may receive disability

[2:07:08] accommodations under state and federal law. The biggest federal accommodation lobbying the

[2:07:13] american with disabilities act. During the same session, senate

[2:07:18] bill 8 past regulate and shared restrooms by states defined by but it does not outlaw single occupancy gender-neutral

[2:07:25] restrooms and recognized the disability accommodations still must be made to pick out at a gender-neutral restrooms

[2:07:31] and county facilities is an accessibility issue and it keeps the county on the right side of both laws.

[2:07:36] I'm tired, y'all I'm tired of not feeling safe in a restroom I'm tired of not knowing was restroom the state wants me in.

[2:07:43] adding this restrooms going forward protects the county and it makes gender diverse restaurant mike residents safe

[2:07:49] at home. >> thank you so much and wel

[2:07:55] welcome. >> my name is jake markell and I'm just a dad in precinct 2. Thank you commissioners for the

[2:08:05] opportunity to support item 481 which is not only needed, it's

[2:08:09] such a simple, inexpensive way of having a great, positive impact on our community in the face of bizarre, cruel, and

[2:08:17] capricious state bathrooms laws this will not only help ensure our transgender and intersex community's have safe base

[2:08:24] accommodations in harris county supported buildings which is paramount, it will also benefit a wide diversity of people

[2:08:30] including parents and caregivers, elders, and people with disabilities. I'm here as a cisgendered man

[2:08:35] and a father of us is gender child to voice the safety and

[2:08:40] well-being of transgender and intersex committees is central to all of our safety and well-being.

[2:08:45] I'm grateful and proud to have a commissioners court that advances pragmatic, easy and hugely impactful initiatives

[2:08:51] like this, thank you. >> thank you.

[2:08:59] >> I'm speaking on behalf of the harris county ltb to q ia

[2:09:05] commission, urging the court to update the blueprint require at least one single occupancy restroom in every new county

[2:09:10] facility. This is a safety and dignity measure for transgender or nonbinary restaurant though mike

[2:09:15] residents restroom access can determine whether a public building is usable. Anointed aptitudes between civic

[2:09:21] participation and personal privacy. Restrooms serve parents with young children, caregivers

[2:09:25] assisting someone of different gender, older adults and people with disabilities. As a father of a 6-year-old I

[2:09:30] know what the value of a private option to help families feel

[2:09:34] safe, comfortable and respected. I will no longer have to say baby girl close your eyes. I respectfully ask the

[2:09:44] harris county commissioners court to adopt and ensure every new county facility reflects safety, dignity and equal access

[2:09:49] for all, thank you. >> thank you.

[2:09:59] >> I am here to speak in support of this agenda item. It is a great agenda item that has a low financial lift, it

[2:10:07] helps everyone -- one senate bill 8 came out it was a

[2:10:13] horrible bill and we can't change that here but we can make sure there is somewhere safe to use the restroom in as many

[2:10:19] county buildings as possible and I would urge you to go further than just new construction but also major renovation.

[2:10:25] any certificate changes that will affect things like layout and plumbing that we still include adding a single

[2:10:31] occupancy restroom because this does help everyone. The bill was unspecific and asks that you enforce this bathroom

[2:10:40] bill but realistically the only way to check people's internal sex organs is with an ultrasound machine outside of every

[2:10:48] restroom, that sounds expensive and invasive. I would encourage you to take this step instead and hopefully we can feel safe or go to the restroom and all of our county

[2:10:54] buildings because there's a lot of them and we use them, thank you. >> nonagenda speaker michelle

[2:11:10] blackwell, you each have 1 minutes.

[2:11:21] >> I am here asking for the court to respectfully consider

[2:11:25] an adjustment to the nonconsent towing fee. We are facing drastic times in our community.

[2:11:33] our operators are there 24 hours a day, seven days a week. We are in inclement weather, out there in dangerous traffic

[2:11:40] situations. We invest in specialized equipment, we spend money on training and we ensure we have

[2:11:46] the most professional drivers and employees on the roadways.

[2:11:54] it becomes a gruesomely difficult to continue to absorb the rising operational cost while delivering the same level

[2:12:00] of services that's expected by the county. Our industry is facing the pain and rising costs but all

[2:12:06] consumers and businesses are facing come everyone of us in this room have felt the price the gas pump.

[2:12:12] businesses are telling the increase in wages that are necessary. Not to mention equipment.

[2:12:17] >> can you state your name for the record?

[2:12:25] >> amy milstead. >> the chair: which item is

[2:12:29] this on again? >> 482. >> the chair: the issue is to update the fines and fees?

[2:12:40] you're concerned that fees for your industry will change? >> I did get my point but we have not had a rate increase in

[2:12:48] 15 years for the nonconsent towing and all the other costs have gone up drastically. >> the chair: what would you

[2:12:56] like to see? >> we would like to see a rate, review and increase that reflects today's economy and

[2:13:03] reality that we are operating in.

[2:13:09] >> the chair: this is still under negotiation, we aren't voting on an actual rate today? It's a study to come up with the

[2:13:27] rates and right now -- >> I'm asking you all to

[2:13:34] consider and please review. >> the chair: perfect I need to inform myself more, than thank you.

[2:13:48] >> my name is ms. Blackwell I live in precinct 2, I'm a

[2:13:53] stakeholder on the advisory committee for the early learning coley network. I did get permission to use the

[2:14:02] slogan what we did matter. It was community driven, we are

[2:14:06] giving people a seat at the table. We address child care deserts. A lot of resources benefit of

[2:14:14] the families, the children, also the children of special needs,

[2:14:19] day care facilities and anyone benefited with the resources, thank you. >> the chair: can you share a

[2:14:23] little bit more of exactly what you did and when the program will expire and what that will mean for your community?

[2:14:34] >> what I did was for instance I thought a lot of volunteer work

[2:14:41] within the schools from elementary, middle school, high school, I even got chance to work in a special education

[2:14:48] classroom from pre-k to mac fifth grade to. I got to use although experiences helping to make

[2:14:55] decisions when they have different breakout groups. The group I was in dealt with a lot of difficult tasks, trying

[2:15:02] to make sure those resources that would benefit the families.

[2:15:09] you were mentioning about when this program will end and the

[2:15:15] impact -- we have two people here that can speak more on that if you would like for them to come up, I don't -- I'm always

[2:15:21] taught if you're not going to say something -- if you're going to say something if it's incorrect you don't know if it's

[2:15:27] whatever, bring somebody to the podium that will help you.

[2:15:32] if I can look back and call on them to come forth they can explain more about this. >> I would appreciate that,

[2:15:40] because there are some discussions about early childhood -- end of the greater houston partnership has those

[2:15:47] discussions as well. That's fine and good but the

[2:15:52] fact is that programs for tens of thousands of kids and

[2:15:57] families and parents are ending. To me, it is necessary that we

[2:16:04] shine a light on what is ending rather than get distracted on a

[2:16:13] discussion of this idea frankly overlaps with what we had to.

[2:16:20] >> I'm sorry the reason why you came here today I was reflecting

[2:16:24] on -- I was giving some reflections on what I felt during the time I was on the program, I was giving comments

[2:16:31] on a reflection of what I felt. I was happy to be here. I know I scheduled three months in advance to come here and talk

[2:16:37] on it. That is what I was coming here to reflect on. If there's anything else any

[2:16:42] further, I know there's someone here that represents it, they can speak more on this. >> the chair: would you mind

[2:16:50] if state your name for your record, however you would like to join you. The reason I ask this I was

[2:16:55] visiting with a community leader just yesterday maybe two days

[2:17:00] ago. He's part of one of the programs

[2:17:05] that is taking place and he told me the moms are crying when they

[2:17:10] found out the program would end. I need that to be front and

[2:17:15] center. The story shouldn't be where their kids here or not -- the story needs to be you're taking

[2:17:22] education away from those kids. If you wouldn't mind speaking to

[2:17:30] the program -- she's behind you. >> I'm going to let her come up

[2:17:37] here. I'm sorry, I'm also stating the

[2:17:41] reason why I came here today was just to reflect on what I

[2:17:46] thought about the program. I came here to mention about the

[2:17:51] positive things, what we have done and what we have accomplished. I'm just reiterating and making

[2:17:56] it straight that this is why I came here today, I'm reflecting

[2:18:01] on the positivity. Reflecting on the hard work that was done during the time I was on here.

[2:18:07] this is not something positive. >> the chair: it was hard

[2:18:13] work, it's positive. My disappointment is that

[2:18:17] something positive is being allowed to just end and we can still save it. The positivity can continue.

[2:18:26] >> I'm the program -- with a local organization for

[2:18:35] precinct 2. We are in charge on the child care deserts in that area which is -- I didn't prepare

[2:18:43] anything I came here for moral support for ms. Blackwell.

[2:18:48] we did create an advisor committee that is consistent from the committee members from the communities that we are

[2:18:55] trying to serve to inform the decisions and initiatives that were created through the program.

[2:19:01] one of them being emergency and temporary care which is coming to an end this summer. There are parents who are

[2:19:11] panicking at the fact that the program funding is running out in the program is coming to an end.

[2:19:16] it is set to end later this year, november 2026 and parents

[2:19:23] and family members, stakeholders come everybody's asking what's

[2:19:28] the plan, what's going to happen once funding is running out. It's very hard for us to see -- not having an answer prepared

[2:19:36] for these families need this early childhood care and not

[2:19:44] just that but quality childhood care and like I mentioned they

[2:19:50] are in child care deserts. There is not enough child care providers available for the number of children that are in

[2:19:57] desperate need. >> the chair: would you share

[2:20:01] a bit about what the program is about, how does it work?

[2:20:06] >> we did take out a number of children out of the wait-list

[2:20:12] and we were able to provide months -- we paid off their

[2:20:18] child care for a period of time for the emergency, whether

[2:20:22] families are going through a time of crisis we were able to cover child care for them. If a loved one died or unplanned

[2:20:33] unemployment. >> thank don't act on my can.

[2:20:40] >> the chair: the answer is values can only take you so far. The values to say we care about the children, we are parents,

[2:20:47] therefore we care about the children, that's a value.

[2:20:52] but you need money behind the value.

[2:20:57] what happened at the city -- they have spent all this money they couldn't afford and now they are having to charge

[2:21:05] residence a trash fee -- what happened at the county is some members here spent all this money we can't afford and now

[2:21:13] they are forcing and refused to put this question on the

[2:21:18] ballots, that's really the biggest sin here, refused to let the voters decide whether or not they wanted early childhood

[2:21:27] programs to continue and instead they are ending the programs. What's the answer? I know folks don't like feeling

[2:21:35] uncomfortable when members of the community came, but that's

[2:21:40] it. You can try to change the story

[2:21:45] into -- what they call it? A censure or something but the

[2:21:51] fact the matter is -- had you and I talked before, had asked

[2:21:58] her to come here and speak? This is not prepared to. If you are hearing from a real member of the community who is

[2:22:05] agonizing trying to answer why are these successful programs

[2:22:10] ending? There is this proposal here. Let's talk to the community, talk to the organizations, we

[2:22:16] already talked to the community, that was the whole program. We talked to the community at organizations years ago,

[2:22:21] literally years ago. Look: I think just like those

[2:22:27] kids that came, I said to your parents work, all of them raised

[2:22:31] their hands. Up one of those parents supposed to do? You can focus on I didn't want the kids here but that's not it. I invite you to help me shine a

[2:22:40] light on the fact that in every country, early childhood is

[2:22:47] obvious. What's not something we even debate whether it's good, bad, we studied this, it could still

[2:22:52] go on the ballot. We can still ask people whether

[2:22:56] they want to continue these programs instead of just pulling the rug from under these people. It costs more money, you can

[2:23:04] look this up and I did it cost more money to send a kid to

[2:23:08] early childhood education that it does to put them through the university of houston. You know the folks that voted

[2:23:16] against asking the voters, they put their kids in early childhood education. But they are cutting other

[2:23:22] people's early childhood education would only need to do is ask the boaters. The programs are going to end

[2:23:30] because we didn't ask the voters last year, inconceivable to me, irrational. How hard can it be to just let

[2:23:34] the people vote yes or no? People want it, we did a poll.

[2:23:40] you can still do it this year it may then you will talk to the children next time they come -- less time they didn't even dare

[2:23:46] agree to them. I'm sorry, hearing you speak, it

[2:23:50] is beautiful and that's what breaks my heart for it to end and even more for there to be a conversation about our shiny new

[2:23:57] object over here about a new program when all of this is

[2:24:02] collapsing. Thanks and I hope folks here I see a lot of folks and nodding please help us draw attention to

[2:24:08] this. It's totally irrational, thank you. >> item 433, nonagenda

[2:24:27] speakers -- go to have one minute. >> I'm president of the wingate forest view homeowners

[2:24:34] association a community up over thousand homes in the west side of the county. Our main road is the north-south

[2:24:42] road that runs between westpark and westheimer used by many people to shortcut cut from one to the other and holds two's

[2:24:50] topsides. Nonresident street this road like a racetrack often driving more than 50 miles per hour and ignoring our stop signs. One stop sign is next to our

[2:24:58] playground and pool. On numerous occasions we called hcf so to get some relief, they sent out a cop, the patrol for a

[2:25:04] half an hour and they leave. I understand speed bumps are no

[2:25:13] longer approved -- allowed in the county. The argument is they slow emergency vehicles but the

[2:25:17] speeders are going to strike another vehicle or worse, a

[2:25:22] child's. I'm asking to consider an exception to this rule and install speed bumps to the

[2:25:26] stop signs in open areas to help control traffic in our neighborhood. Thank you for your time.

[2:25:33] >> I want to point out the county now has a speed bump

[2:25:39] program it's a matter of reaching out to your respective commissioner's office if you live in the unincorporated area

[2:25:44] of the county -- we do not have a program. I worked on that for almost two years but we now have it.

[2:25:54] >> thank you commissioner garcia and commissioner briones, this is yours. >> I'm a resident in precinct

[2:26:05] one here to support item 433 funding like which excess office. As a language researcher working

[2:26:11] with many multilingual students and communities, and immigrants myself I know how accessing basic rights is a daily str

[2:26:22] struggle. My family and other language minority has committees often express miscommunication play

[2:26:27] feeling misheard or disrespected and overall ineffective to

[2:26:33] medication services. Every semester of a class that I teach I have students who have to miss the class to translate

[2:26:38] or interpret for their family members because there isn't a

[2:26:43] reliable or trustworthy interpretation or translation available or know ai can do this job precisely with full cultural

[2:26:50] nuances. Students should have to commit

[2:26:55] their time and effective care and services. Please continue funding and expanding language access in

[2:27:02] harris county. >> the chair: thank you.

[2:27:13] >> good afternoon emmett district 3. I have questions regarding texas regulation 822 and

[2:27:19] harris county's variation of that.

[2:27:23] there's been laws that make it illegal to have dangerous and wild animals as they are quoted but I can't find any of the

[2:27:32] commissioners records showing that any of this was elected,

[2:27:36] voted on but animal control seems to think they can change

[2:27:41] the rules to fit their directive and not allow people to have

[2:27:48] permits but the state texas allows. Let's all I have. >> we'll have someone follow up

[2:27:56] with you. >> unincorporated precinct

[2:28:12] three. I'm writing to ask if you will explain in detail where my property tax dollars are being

[2:28:16] allocated to. They are not visibly being put back in the community to which I pay.

[2:28:24] I own property in a neighborhood whose sewers and streets are not maintained at all by the county to which I pay taxes.

[2:28:33] the sewers do not drain, the leaf standing water for many

[2:28:38] days. Even after a moderate rain, the water will block access to residents leaving them to trek

[2:28:43] through a cesspool to reach their door.

[2:28:47] the health hazard there is a real concern. I've put in a call to the health department, no reply.

[2:28:54] the streets also are not maintained. Many filled with potholes that will very soon become

[2:29:01] undrivable. There's no parking restrictions on the streets, parking on both sides of the streets --

[2:29:09] >> the chair: go ahead if you would like to conclude.

[2:29:14] speak of this parking on both sides of the streets makes not only driving between impossible for large vehicles but it's an

[2:29:21] accident waiting to happen as kids play and pets play between the cars and run into the streets.

[2:29:29] I believe routine sewer maintenance, street repaving and

[2:29:34] strategically placed no parking signs will alleviate these

[2:29:39] issues. I'm asking why are these issues not being addressed? Taxes are designed to sustain a

[2:29:45] community, not neglect it. That's it.

[2:29:50] >> the chair: thank you, we'll visit with you.

[2:29:56] >> nonagenda speakers quincy collins, eric sanchez, ramesh

[2:30:06] kapur, and richard hyde. >> my name is eric sanchez.

[2:30:21] in november of 2025 detective john patrick morello rated my

[2:30:25] home with a dozen officers after tracking my vehicle using flock for 30 days in regards to false allegations of aggravated

[2:30:32] assault with a deadly weapon from 2023. They broke my door down and pointed rifles at me and my

[2:30:38] family including children. I was arrested and interrogated but he wasn't interested in the alleged crime he was interested

[2:30:45] in my facebook posts regarding attorneys rusty harding and a

[2:30:51] murder connected to a funeral home and a dozen other cases I

[2:30:56] wrote articles on being murderers falsely ruled as suicides by the chief medical examiner.

[2:31:02] I was no build on the charge but detective marella needs to be

[2:31:07] investigated and the cover-up of all this footage and records needs to end of the citizens are expected to put their trust in

[2:31:13] the public. And the police. Please show the public if you have nothing to hide.

[2:31:20] thank you. >> the chair: thank you, we'll visit with you. >> my name is quincy collins, I

[2:31:32] am the founder of families helping families. For 13 years families helping families has been dedicated to

[2:31:38] ensuring hardworking families have food on their tables during the thanksgiving season. What began with helping just one

[2:31:45] family has grown into a community-wide movement. Today every family we serve receives a full week of

[2:31:51] groceries including a complete thanksgiving dinner. Including 35 grocery items such as 5 pounds of ground beef,

[2:31:59] 10 pounds of chicken leg quarters, 9-pound turkey breast,

[2:32:04] 32-ounce bag of frozen fish, pantry staples like canned goods, bread, pasta, pasta sauce.

[2:32:10] all of our food comes directly from the distributor allowing us

[2:32:14] to maximize every donated dollar. Last year we served 1700 families across eight locations

[2:32:21] distributing nearly 80 tons of food.

[2:32:26] three of those locations were and commissioner briones' precinct, one was in commissioner ellis' precinct.

[2:32:31] >> your time is up. >> the chair: go ahead and close out your cap. >> along the way we have an

[2:32:36] honor to receive proclamations from the city of missouri city.

[2:32:42] this year we have raised emma we are looking to serve 5,000

[2:32:49] families in 16 locations including four and

[2:32:53] commissioner -- four in the commissioner briones commissioner briones' precinct, one of commissioner garcia, ls,

[2:33:01] and ramsey. We are able to accomplish this through partnerships with 12 local law enforcement agencies,

[2:33:08] five school districts, one church all working together to serve the community. Threesome I'm coming here today

[2:33:14] is because we are raising awareness about what we are doing and the impact we have of the community but also

[2:33:21] soliciting the help of the commissioners that we have in

[2:33:27] our speech to help us with raising funding to continue our growth. Thank you so much.

[2:33:35] >> thank you for your work. >> richard hyde northeast corner

[2:33:45] bear creek village, the 100 year floodplain against the floodway to go on rest of the neighborhood -- placed at drive

[2:33:57] measuring 16 feet wide, exiting into a 30-foot wide swell.

[2:34:09] despite major storms including a july 20th storm, elder 2019,

[2:34:20] bear creek drainage project has no mention of floodgates in the

[2:34:27] 50-year-old neighborhood resulting in plans to -- and

[2:34:33] causing permanent increase in noise from clay road.

[2:34:37] I asked the engineering department cease department cease and desist plans behind mill holland drive until this

[2:34:41] matter can be properly -- >> the chair: go ahead.

[2:34:47] >> I am for flood control I'm definitely for dr. Tina

[2:34:52] peterson's work that she wants to do over in the golf course,

[2:34:56] about 400 feet away. This particular project is

[2:35:04] unnecessary in this area because we already have the floodgate if they want to build the canal and connected the floodgate and take

[2:35:13] it up that way, because we don't flood.

[2:35:19] harvey got us -- I have 6 feet of water in my house.

[2:35:23] I am pro-flood control. I lost everything. I took everything out of the house, everything.

[2:35:30] sheet rock, plumbing, wire, air-conditioning, lamps.

[2:35:38] all my photographs from the amazon and from new guinea, all

[2:35:44] lost. I'm pro flood control, but this isn't it. There's a better way to do this.

[2:35:53] >> the chair: thank you, we'll visit with you.

[2:36:01] >> thank you. >> nonagenda speakers ruby

[2:36:07] garza, christopher mcki mckinney, --

[2:36:13] >> good afternoon, honorable commissioners and honorable

[2:36:19] judge. My name is dr. Kapur I'm here to

[2:36:25] report a critical breakdown in judicial integrity keeping with the public rest or act electronic record-keeping.

[2:36:38] in our digital court system, litigants can no longer see a

[2:36:47] judge's physical signature, we rely entirely on the clerks

[2:36:53] electronic -- this has created a dangerous point of -- emesis and

[2:37:01] designer, I will help no charge. The case number is 20201294 in

[2:37:13] district court. >> the chair: go ahead to.

[2:37:19] >> as documented in the file the honorable judge granted my

[2:37:29] motion to reinstate my case -- instead of recording this

[2:37:41] accurately, and it that completely falsified records

[2:37:48] dating the motion was denied. >> the chair: we'll visit with you. Thank you.

[2:37:53] speak of this is a very important points. An electronic document directly contradicts a judge's actual

[2:38:02] ruling the public record is compromised. I brought this special evidence to the district clerk but no

[2:38:13] corrective action or investigation.

[2:38:18] it's very important in the digital world.

[2:38:23] I'm asking the court what safeguards are being implemented

[2:38:33] to order these entries? And how will we ensure clear --

[2:38:46] >> the chair: I get people to slow bit of time to wrap up but will make visit with you. I'm afraid I need to ask you to

[2:38:52] to go and visit with my staff right now so they can get the rest of the details. Thank you.

[2:39:04] >> they'll find you in just a second. Director. They are right there.

[2:39:18] >> I'm the texas chapter president and we are here today

[2:39:22] because we are tied up used in workers being left behind, houston being the fourth largest city in the country over the

[2:39:28] years we've seen our city transform into a world-class tourist destination with more and more major events coming

[2:39:35] here but the workers across the city that make these events

[2:39:39] possible or living check to check working multiple jobs to get by. We know the companies can have

[2:39:46] more than enough to pay the workers what they deserve, we seen workers, members of our union fight over last year and

[2:39:53] go on strike and win races like they never have before across

[2:39:57] the airport, setting a new standard for the hospitality

[2:40:06] industry. The reality is different for stadium workers, stadium workers are falling further and further

[2:40:11] behind us by the pricing of the food and drinks going up at the

[2:40:16] stadium, workers do not see an increase in their check. Many of them continue to make $12 or less in 2026, how can you

[2:40:28] survive and provide for your family? Used in workers deserve better and we will continue to take

[2:40:32] action and call attention to this issue, thank you. >> the chair: thank you so much.

[2:40:41] >> my name is ruby garza on a vendor at some of the stadiums. I've been working at the stadiums for over 20 years

[2:40:49] already. 11 and $12 does not help me out at all. I have a grandson that she is

[2:40:57] autistic and I help my son out a lot.

[2:41:03] there is times, there's events in one place, an event in

[2:41:08] another place and we can't make our ends meet because there's a

[2:41:13] lot of medical bills with my grandson.

[2:41:18] I'm there to help making 11-$12 is not making it to help them

[2:41:25] with their medical bills. I would like a lot of respect

[2:41:33] and dignity for us to get more than 11-$12 an hour.

[2:41:41] thank you. >> thank you all for coming down

[2:41:46] I appreciate y'all speaking up. >> the chair: I want to make a

[2:41:52] comment on this or is is one of the ones I can't? Is is nonagenda? I had brought this up before I'm

[2:42:01] a little confused. Any other speakers?

[2:42:16] >> christopher mckinney. >> good afternoon, my name is

[2:42:22] chris for mckinney, that's my wife, we are residents here in

[2:42:30] harris county, we are business owners and true believers and potential of the astrodome, we believe the astrodome deserves a

[2:42:43] future where the of its history. I am currently with that understanding now developing a privately funded concept that

[2:42:53] focuses the preservation and structure at whole scale while creating long-term economic value for harris county.

[2:42:59] I know the future of the astrodome is greatly complex and talked about for many years. I'm here to simply introduce

[2:43:07] myself and let you know there are citizens here that are

[2:43:12] currently working towards private solutions, thank you for your time. >> the chair: thank you so

[2:43:29] good afternoon. I am from precinct 2.

[2:43:36] I'm ed teacher in the houston chapter and we has an organization bring awareness to two teenage deprivation.

[2:43:43] school starts at the summer clock hour. In texas the houston area has the largest cluster of early

[2:43:50] start times in the 7:00 hour. Now it is summertime.

[2:43:54] students stay up late and rathe wake up late the arno terrace

[2:43:59] night foul's. Many have activities in the

[2:44:03] mornings that their parents wan them to attend like swim practice. I'm here to request

[2:44:08] commissioners and judge hidalgo to provide awareness through

[2:44:15] education for communities than public service announcements to the importance of sleep for our teenagers for them to sleep

[2:44:21] adequately rather than pop and energy drink. Now there's too many available of those energy drinks and to

[2:44:29] bring awareness and to bring awareness to instructors to

[2:44:37] start no earlier than 8:30 for the physical and mental health and academics and safety of our children.

[2:44:42] thank you for starting court at 9:00 a.m. And not at 7:15 am.

[2:44:49] thank you. >> thank you for your work.

[2:44:58] thank you to all the speakers purely continue here. Specter would please do the resolution he's back.

[2:45:08] okay, commission or ellis. >> we are honored to be honorin

[2:45:16] the county attorney. I'm going to read the resolutio

[2:45:20] that was read by the officer teams because it is powerful

[2:45:25] with everything you have accomplished in the way you advance just as for harris county bird this is resolution.

[2:45:36] during the attorney's office an generally 2020. He dedicated himself to the pursuit of justice on behalf of

[2:45:41] of the more than 5 million residents of harris county.

[2:45:47] and whereas during his tenure h served as both the deputy count attorney and assistant assistan over former county attorney now

[2:45:57] congressman he led legal strategy ends elected officials

[2:46:02] and department heads and high-profile litigation from

[2:46:09] public law, challenges to complex, corporate and

[2:46:13] environmental places, whereas o january 8 matt, 2026, he was

[2:46:20] appointed county attorney any unanimous vote by commissioners

[2:46:24] paid as county attorney he manage the office of over 300 attorneys and staff who represent the county and its 60

[2:46:32] elected officials and more than 18,000 employees in all matters

[2:46:38] while maintaining the highest standards the office has known. And, whereas, as county attorney , he committed himself

[2:46:48] to advancing environmental justice, protecting workers rights and fighting for opportunities.

[2:46:53] and whereas he secured a settlement that brought two

[2:47:01] concrete plans into compliance, recovered hundreds of thousands of dollars of penalties during states and counties and cities

[2:47:12] challenging the us environmenta protection agency's attempt to

[2:47:16] we said that 2009 engagement line which serves as the legal

[2:47:22] foundation for regulating greenhouse gases, seeking to

[2:47:27] extend community petitions and permit. And whereas, county attorney bonbon achieves significant wind

[2:47:38] 's, depending harris county 's contractor safety record policy to protect the rights and safety of harris

[2:47:44] county workers and fighting to restart texas is historically

[2:47:51] underutilized business program, reversing changes that remove many minority women need for eligibility for state

[2:47:59] contracting opportunities and challenging the attorney general

[2:48:04] 's attempts to force local district attorneys to tur

[2:48:10] over sweeping prosecutorial those prosecutorial data and wears a strong defender of immigrant communities my he

[2:48:17] successfully had efforts to end of the services had enjoyed the

[2:48:21] national coalition proposing us customs operation metro search

[2:48:28] and whereas harris county commends him for his service,

[2:48:36] dedication, and leadership and recognizes the profound and

[2:48:41] lasting contributions he has made during his tenure as harri

[2:48:45] county attorney. Now there for be it resolved that the harris county commissioners court hereby

[2:48:51] respectfully honors jonathan bonbon and this was a joint

[2:48:56] resolution between the -- and commissioners office and my

[2:49:01] office I will say you are lawyer 's lawyer, one of the most

[2:49:08] brilliant lawyers I've ever met and you have justice in your

[2:49:14] veins and, by the way, he is always a renaissance man paid h plays music and is a chef and speaks french fluently.

[2:49:25] soccer, band, you can go on and on preview are really an ambassador. Thank you for making harris

[2:49:30] county in the state of texas an the united states a better plac

[2:49:35] because of your brilliance and putting that into action for

[2:49:40] people. For that we honor you. [applause] we will hear from commissioner

[2:50:01] garcia and commissioner ellis. >> thank you for that resolutio

[2:50:11] I'm going to make an amendment. We just learned that he plays

[2:50:20] french music so what is that famous song.

[2:50:30] there you go, you knew that one. Lesson.

[2:50:39] all it that was said is absolutely true and I will

[2:50:44] reflect back, congratulations for having become the county

[2:50:53] attorney but I understand you guys were partners or colleague

[2:50:58] with the firm and I want to thank you for your willingness

[2:51:06] to take a leap of faith and to join him in this endeavor. You could've stayed there and made a ton more money but you

[2:51:20] chose public service and we are absolutely grateful.

[2:51:27] I just want to thank you for about whether you are with your

[2:51:34] kids are on the road you been traveling somewhere, he and you

[2:51:40] number happens to be the fun thing thinking about calling to be always trim up and return th call and you did your very best

[2:51:46] to help answer the question I can't thank you enough on behal

[2:51:52] of our constituents and our staff because of those

[2:51:57] respective issues sometimes do have a sense of urgency. John, thank you very much. I know everyone of our offices

[2:52:07] sometimes has our hair on fire and undoubtably the county

[2:52:11] attorney it's office probably has an ongoing sprinkler in their because there's always a fire going on but you've never

[2:52:22] been out of sorts without time to answer question or have a

[2:52:33] conversation. You've always been willing to meet and talk and you have just click the easy.

[2:52:42] and let me say this, coming fro the private sector, I would

[2:52:52] venture to say maybe more often than not.

[2:53:09] you may have had more ability t plan your life for especially I

[2:53:24] times of disaster in times of emergencies. Issues that come up and were in litigation with any anyone of

[2:53:33] our respective entities, your family has suffered so I just

[2:53:39] want to say your family think you for their support of you an

[2:53:47] I want to thank you for your willingness to sacrifice becaus it is a big ask that you have accepted when christian invited

[2:53:56] you over. I can tell you how much better

[2:54:04] we are because of your presence here.

[2:54:11] and I'm going to do my best to keep you here.

[2:54:23] commissioner ramsey. >> thank you again produces a

[2:54:28] common a common thing. That's important you do address

[2:54:37] things in a very bipartisan don't misunderstand that.

[2:54:56] I was hoping you would certainl be end-of-the-year.

[2:55:03] thank you for being that calm source of direction when we

[2:55:08] needed from time to time. >> commissioner lesley briones.

[2:55:21] >> I'm so glad you decided to walk away from making all that money to do something I think was rewarding for you.

[2:55:38] this has been a pleasure to wor with.

[2:55:49] commissioner briones, thank you john, to your family and your amazing team so I think your phenomenal team paid can you

[2:56:02] also stand up, please. We appreciate you tremendously.

[2:56:13] [applause] and we look forward to what is

[2:56:21] to become I know there's variou folks who think you.

[2:56:38] I want to say something. Were you going to say something.

[2:56:49] please go ahead. What if I learn something important. Go-ahead you all, go ahead.

[2:57:05] >> I'm trying to figure that ou right now.

[2:57:13] >> my name is jamie mcmahon. Of course there are somebody

[2:57:28] tremendous accomplishments externally we are down here

[2:57:33] today about the joys of living. Is an incredible leader and

[2:57:42] builder of teams and builder systems on the office and the

[2:57:48] plans that have been built over the last five years and establishing the culture that I based on integrity and service

[2:57:57] and community and justice. You see that played out in the office but that lives and breathes inside the office.

[2:58:07] and we had our staff acknowledging him yesterday and

[2:58:11] we were all inspired by reflecting on a folktale and my

[2:58:22] colleagues drew beautiful metaphors to the story about

[2:58:27] friendship and curiosity in cultivating love and empathy fo

[2:58:34] each other and for what is right .

[2:58:39] was secret at the end the story in the secret that was revealed to all of us and it is a very simple secret and is only with

[2:58:50] heart that can see rightly and what is essential is invisible

[2:58:59] to the eye. People's hearts are one on thei

[2:59:03] sleeve. Thank you.

[2:59:11] [applause] good afternoon.

[2:59:20] I had the pleasure of working with john when he started in a different capacity in my role a division director.

[2:59:31] there's two things that stand out for me.

[2:59:37] what is his support for the staff and unparalleled support

[2:59:43] getting us a new building, resources to modernize the office, creating an office that was supportive of staff when

[2:59:53] they had significant events in their lives such as having children and bereavement. It gave us a wonderful morale

[3:00:00] and a place that we were proud to come to work.

[3:00:09] on the also created a structure to meet critically and creatively and wasn't afraid to take a chance often leading fro

[3:00:21] the front. Those are things that will be I place long beyond john is gone with thank you for your

[3:00:29] leadership and the staff. Many of us are better off

[3:00:33] because of your time. >> thank you. [applause] good afternoon, commissioners o

[3:00:43] the court, and the managing counsel for the harris county attorney's office and I've had the pleasure to serve underneat

[3:00:50] the county attorney as my count attorney and his assistant.

[3:00:58] he let the office during a time of transition and change but understood the importance of public service on the commitmen

[3:01:07] required to serve the people of harris county. What I remember most is his passion for public service

[3:01:15] throughout his time. He brought energy, passion, dedication, and a strong committed serving county and it

[3:01:24] residents been his news he had them for work was evident and helped move the office forward. We are especially grateful for

[3:01:33] the collaborative soirit. Your collaboration has set a

[3:01:40] positive tone in the county attorney's office.

[3:01:47] thank you and good luck that's about 110 people in the office.

[3:02:09] I will repeat what everybody else said it I will just say it is a pleasure to be able to com to work and actually smile and

[3:02:17] so some people say tiffany smells of the time but I don't

[3:02:22] really like this morning I passed john out of the state ba

[3:02:29] meeting and it's a good feeling to book for people you like.

[3:02:35] and I like you. And I like that you just like

[3:02:43] christian and gene foster an environment for us to be innovative and for us to come u with trainings that are

[3:02:49] different and you never tell me know and you listen and I

[3:02:54] appreciate it and I think you and I know you will go on to do great things. [applause]

[3:03:05] >> good afternoon, commissioners , judge.

[3:03:11] john has truly been as betty trusted partner but especially

[3:03:17] for iga. He was deputy county attorney

[3:03:25] and county attorney. He has always been there for iga

[3:03:35] . The broad range of issues that come across my-sometimes are scary but I know that john is

[3:03:42] always a phone call or a text o an e-mail away and I appreciate

[3:03:47] that of most support and the partnership or you are going to

[3:03:51] be missed and I do know that you're going to do great things and I hope you stay in contact but I don't think that any of

[3:04:00] the successes at iga has accomplished would've been possible without that partnership so thank you.

[3:04:13] >> now we will hear from our budget director.

[3:04:18] >> thank you. John, thank you for everything. I can't tell you the amount -- pretty much everybody I work

[3:04:29] with when they knew you were leaving. I still remember I came here four years ago knowing

[3:04:35] absolutely anybody in texas beauty don't know who you can

[3:04:39] trust and who you can rely on. And I remember meeting you on day one and I don't know if you remember but I remember being o

[3:04:50] the phone with you and all I could think about was thank god

[3:04:54] there is a letter that understands bath.

[3:04:58] we almost got the budget passed. Thank you for everything for

[3:05:04] natalie being my attorney but m friend and confidant.

[3:05:09] >> I just wanted to know whethe I could still say if there is something that was going to com up.

[3:05:16] thank you. I love what everybody said.

[3:05:21] you've got something special going. People felt like you and you ar smart and easy to talk to.

[3:05:30] to be able to explain things a human and not get bogged down I

[3:05:37] the legal language. Whenever I have a question, I

[3:05:42] know I can call you and you're going to have a clear response yes, no, I don't know, this is the answer.

[3:05:48] or that matters a lot just the attitude and obviously the

[3:05:59] values that you carry it means lot and I'm going to go watch

[3:06:10] the piano playing before I agre with the renaissance comment.

[3:06:18] thank you so much. Expect everyone is hungry so I

[3:06:24] will go real quick if I can fin this on my phone.

[3:06:34] thank you so much. Thank you for this resolution.

[3:06:40] it means a great deal. I understood the assignment.

[3:07:00] and make sure the office kept running.

[3:07:13] I think we did that but honestl this county has had my heart fo

[3:07:18] a lot longer than that it I had the privilege of helping build something, you heard from our folks who were instrumental in

[3:07:25] doing that when christian asked me to come overcome a few thing attracted me and one is I -- I had a lot more in private

[3:07:34] practice owed to be able to begin a place what I could actually spend more time with m family, which I had been,

[3:07:40] although I didn't say it was less stressful. That was one piece of that on the other was to help

[3:07:48] professionalize this office. There are incredible people in the office but I think they nee at the rate structure and I

[3:07:55] think that is what we were able to boring and looking back took

[3:07:59] what we are now and I think we have really achieved that and w can hear from some of those folks at the day.

[3:08:08] and that is the biggest thing w wanted to achieve.

[3:08:12] so I am really proud of that. I've been really lucky to work

[3:08:17] along some of the most dedicate public servants.

[3:08:22] some people do things we don't talk about much for you can't put it in a press release because it's not something that

[3:08:28] people want to talk about. Some of our protective work is heart heart-wrenching but incredibly important.

[3:08:35] our job is to collect money for the county that helps the count

[3:08:39] run. Knowing the things you see in the media but things that are important to the county.

[3:08:44] so I leave knowing that this office is well prepared with

[3:08:50] this group of folks to continue leading the way unwell staff an well-positioned. In the county attorney is going

[3:08:59] to have a great staff in her hand. On the last thing, I was thinking something of a less

[3:09:04] generic to say and I want to talk about something that is going to sound weird coming fro me, talking about diversity.

[3:09:14] we talk a lot about how day versus county is.

[3:09:18] one of the most diverse places in the country. What makes our diversity work I our openness page you can be a

[3:09:26] tenth generation texan here or you can be a guy who was dragge from new york to texas against their will because their wife

[3:09:32] got a job at rice university. And you will come here and

[3:09:37] you're willing to work hard and people will help you and suppor you and you will achieve great things.

[3:09:45] so I think we were only able to do what we were able to do --

[3:09:50] I don't think I could've done this in dallas, for example. I'm really grateful here. You are all incredible public

[3:10:01] servants. You can call me anytime. Those conversations may not be privileged anymore so be carefu

[3:10:10] what you tell me. Out really stay in touch.

[3:10:14] it's been an honor to work with you. [applause] why don't we take a picture rea

[3:10:30] quick, if that is okay. We do need to go through the

[3:10:37] consent before we break for lunch. Or should we do that and then d a picture?

[3:10:44] >> so just very quickly here, colleagues, any corrections,

[3:10:52] item 12 request no action. Item 137 no action and 176 no

[3:10:59] action. 219, performance versus versus

[3:11:04] detailed in number 25 through april 27, 2026.

[3:11:10] can retrace six through december .

[3:11:15] this moved. Through december 31, 2026.

[3:11:33] justification for 0% participation goal exempt in th local cooperative agreement. 345, no action.

[3:11:41] 373 no action. 383 no action.

[3:11:46] 420 remove precinct rule number three met. So now it reads a request for commissioners precinct 1 and 2

[3:11:52] and 4 and then for hundred 36, so it now reads two requests

[3:12:02] budget for approval and paper finding for county engineer et

[3:12:08] cetera et cetera. 437 request no action and then

[3:12:15] the public hearings, let's begi with 367.

[3:12:30] consider approval of the subdivision plat and tighter bedford creek section 5 bid the commissioners court hold a

[3:12:37] public hearing for the proposed plot precinct 4 pitt is there

[3:12:42] anyone here to speak for or against this item? Since there are no speakers or discussion, I now close this

[3:12:50] public hearing it is their motion on this item?

[3:12:55] >> motion. >> motion by commissioner brion z. All in favor good any oppose

[3:13:00] opposed. Motion carried unanimously approval of the subdivision plo entitled creek section 6 to

[3:13:09] proceed at commissioners court in the public plat three --

[3:13:16] this is for item 368 pitt is there anyone to speak forget

[3:13:21] this item. Its rainy discussion? To close this public hearing. Is their emotion?

[3:13:27] >> make a motion. >> motion by commissioner ramse

[3:13:33] and second by commissioner briones. All in favor. Any opposed.

[3:13:39] motion carried unanimously. Vinyl final 1369.

[3:13:44] consider approval of the subdivision plat of eagles cove

[3:13:49] and hold a public hearing for the proposed plat 232 points 009

[3:13:55] c-1. As anyone to speak on this, any

[3:14:01] discussion. I close this public hearing and

[3:14:05] is there discussion on this item . Motion by economic commissioner garcia.

[3:14:11] second by commissioner ramsey. Any opposed? Motion carries unanimously. So were going to be talking

[3:14:18] about the discussion items so item 1 remains discussion and

[3:14:23] item two -- item 5?

[3:14:29] >> 6? >> yes.

[3:14:34] >> 7. >> yes mac. >> forty? >> 125 we already discussed and

[3:14:43] we chatted about it, so that is done. 140. That is commissioner ellis'.

[3:14:53] 145. >> yes. >> 151. Healthy in harris county.

[3:15:00] with you like to just vote on those? >> yes. We can just vote.

[3:15:06] motion on both. All in favor.

[3:15:11] any opposed? All in favor, motion carries.

[3:15:17] >> we can do 152 as well. >> motion by commissioner garcia

[3:15:24] . Any opposed? >> motion carries 4-1 on 152. 198.

[3:15:31] commissioner ramsey. >> we just need a vote.

[3:15:38] I think that we can -- all in favor.

[3:15:45] any opposed. Motion carries 4-1. That is item 196. So if there motion for item 189?

[3:15:57] >> yes. >> motion by commissioner garcia . Second by commissioner ellis.

[3:16:02] all in favor. Any opposed. I thank you for that one. It is without row 24.

[3:16:09] you've got it. >> yes pierce out that carries unanimously. Is their motion for 124?

[3:16:18] >> yes. >> motion by commissioner garci and second by commissioner ellis .

[3:16:23] all in favor. Any opposed. Motion carries 4-1 pete is ther a motion for item 200.

[3:16:32] motion by commissioner ellis, second by commissioner briones. All in favor. Any opposed.

[3:16:39] motion carries unanimously. As their motion for row 74?

[3:16:43] >> you don't want this one. >> are you sure.

[3:16:50] >> you want it? >> precinct 2 pulled at. You just want to discuss it? >> no.

[3:16:55] I want to vote against it. >> commissioner by mc and secon

[3:17:02] by commissioner ellis. All in favor. Motion carries 4-1. And then 215.

[3:17:11] 259. Precinct 3.

[3:17:16] 284, precinct 2. 322.

[3:17:22] yes. 330. >> yes. >> 322.

[3:17:31] >> yes. >> 322 or 3?

[3:17:35] >> excuse me, 332. >> 344.

[3:17:41] 370. >> yes. >> 408. >> yes.

[3:17:47] >> 418. >> yes. >> 435. >> 449.

[3:17:53] 481. Do you want to just vote on tha one? No.

[3:18:04] >> 482. That was commissioner ellis and

[3:18:11] gracie. And then these items were not

[3:18:16] added to the special list. For 28 and 424.

[3:18:21] 434. Those are approved as presented.

[3:18:33] so I will say I still am runnin down some questions on 229 and

[3:18:41] 234. Those of the ones at the speake was concerned about. I will get those back if that's

[3:18:47] okay. So let me discuss and go over the list one final time. No executive session items, 1

[3:18:55] and 2 and 5. >> can you add 4.

[3:19:00] >> 4? Okay. Alright, I've 4 is on mw b disparity study.

[3:19:07] 4 is now in there. So we are looking at items 1, 2

[3:19:15] , 4, 5, 6, 7, 40, 140, 215, 229, 234, 259, 284, 322.

[3:19:39] 330, 332, 344, 370, 408, 415, 435, 449, 481, 482, and 484.

[3:19:58] >> and one other, 421. >> okay, 421.

[3:20:11] that is a joint resolution on national immigrant heritage month. Okay, 421.

[3:20:20] all right, anything else before we take a look at the consent

[3:20:25] agenda? >> motion. Motion by commissioner garcia, second by commissioner ramsey.

[3:20:34] all in favor, motion carries unanimously.

[3:20:41] second by commissioner ramsey. So, okay, so we were going to take a 30 minute lunch since time is tight.

[3:20:49] dq one to be back at like 2:15? So we will take a picture with

[3:20:54] john and we will be back.

[3:22:37] we had two football players las year and as simple winner and

[3:22:43] very meaningful to help these big strong guys.

[3:22:48] in fact my friends ex-husband just died and he was depressed

[3:22:55] and whatnot seek help. This happens, which is why it I

[3:23:02] important if your work and your feeling anxious, whatever those

[3:23:22] mental health related, just continuing on and powering

[3:23:28] through is not going to make it better. Eventually it's going to come out and so the idea is if there

[3:23:37] is an employee, they're having really hard day, this may be,

[3:23:44] there was just something that happened in their life that is making them sad. Maybe there have been in this

[3:23:52] issue that is causing them anxiety, whatever it is, they can say to their colleagues, hey , I'm feeling really anxious

[3:24:01] about this project and the colleague could say you know what, here's what I think and here's how I'm handling it just

[3:24:08] like today, I am so stuffy and somebody said it is allergies,

[3:24:13] why don't you take this. Like that.

[3:24:18] instead of suffering in silence. So let's say the solution, so

[3:24:25] you're not having to take a health day.

[3:24:31] not two go into a facility, but to reset and make sure that I

[3:24:39] can power through, so to speak and we don't have that that wil

[3:24:46] be really mean, you know, other people, people that are not

[3:24:54] performing and more likely than not come all the idea is to do,

[3:25:02] so the panelists had a professo from rice university.

[3:25:11] and that would've been top psychiatry, moore over at menta

[3:25:18] health and then we had differen people so they all said the way

[3:25:23] to do this is to have around three mental health days each

[3:25:28] year and I found out the public health does this end we have

[3:25:34] proof of concept in many departments deal with trauma, whether you're working with foster kids or whether you're

[3:25:41] working with victims of domesti violence, with the elderly

[3:25:49] veterans. That stuff is heavy. You might need a day just to clear your mind.

[3:25:55] so I think we ought to people. So that is this.

[3:26:03] and the proposal is not to pass anything, it is just to ask

[3:26:10] county attorney, et cetera to draft a policy and this is goin

[3:26:14] to come out during budget. Bottom line, doing nothing

[3:26:22] because more than those doing something means more than doing

[3:26:32] nothing. And this takes away the stigma as well. I am not doing right people end

[3:26:46] up dying when they don't take care of this stuff. I would appreciate it just a couple of questions.

[3:27:05] are we doing a financial impact. >> we will do a financial impact . The cause will largely depend o

[3:27:18] throws or are we designating tw existing days.

[3:27:23] in terms of our overall lead. Its new.

[3:27:32] and that is the difference between nsp flick at the option

[3:27:47] right now, we are pursuing options.

[3:27:57] so that they fully understand what their options are so if

[3:28:04] you're asking to take a mental health day, how is that different than being sick leave. Is there a pool somewhere?

[3:28:16] there is a lot of different parts to our benefit problems

[3:28:26] and I think it needs good context for our complete packag

[3:28:30] and how it compares to others t some degree.

[3:28:36] I think we are probably on the top of the list as benefits. Just how are we dealing with it now in terms of people being

[3:28:45] able to take time off so the action today is simply if we ha

[3:29:28] august 6 and we could discuss I in july 15 and then it would be

[3:29:34] ready. I would respectfully ask for

[3:29:39] august 6. >> sure. Or change the date to august 6. I propose we change it to augus.

[3:30:01] and then coming back in their recommendations. And that would be a good approach.

[3:30:09] thank you. And this is an item that I care

[3:30:15] about. And there is still a stigma in

[3:30:32] types of this. Employees only had I think it

[3:30:50] was two paid opportunities in insurance.

[3:31:08] in the conversation I had my staff at the time was and

[3:31:22] they're afraid it will get back to the sheriff.

[3:31:26] and so and do they turn it into paid time off description.

[3:31:56] maybe that would help folks mak better decisions about how to

[3:32:01] use those that time that way people cannot have to think

[3:32:08] about it as well. This is I feel differently

[3:32:16] versus ill. So maybe I would just ask you t think about that or just change the description of the sick

[3:32:25] leave may be may be more supportive and more helpful.

[3:32:33] >> we will definitely look into that. That there is another thing tha actually made me think of, whic

[3:32:40] is just looking at other jurisdictions than our own. So here they have mental health leave and their utilization of

[3:32:50] the mental health leave has -- from 2068 in 2023 to 10,038 in

[3:32:59] 2025 so I think that is something about the need, which

[3:33:04] is totally logical but also I think about the fact that this can reduce the stigma, which I think is a goal in and of itsel

[3:33:14] and then also, so there is more normalization of the policy in

[3:33:22] dallas has a mental health leav and then they had sick leave fo

[3:33:30] wellness days in cook county's sick leave for mental health, think that just taking a look a them and seeing why did you

[3:33:38] create a separate docket is tha helping and is that helping wit

[3:33:46] the stigma. >> I agree if things aren't going to make a difference, that's one thing.

[3:33:52] I think it will appear at obviously we need to look at th

[3:33:57] data. Commissioner ellis?

[3:34:01] >> I was going to raise a concern.

[3:34:05] >> I would like to make a motion , commissioner.

[3:34:10] all in favor. Any opposed? Motion carries. 4-0.

[3:34:21] >> that is correct. And just to be clear for the

[3:34:26] record, presented with the change to august 6. Thanks for clarifying. Cell thanks for that.

[3:34:33] and then let me, so we did not want to discuss item one yet.

[3:34:39] do dupont to discuss item two? >> did I hear that?

[3:34:49] >> that was part of it. >> I think were doing it when she comes back I think. When she comes back, I'm

[3:34:58] probably going to be calling. Let's move to item to make a

[3:35:02] list he would like to do anothe item.

[3:35:08] >> so who is presenting that one .

[3:35:12] thank you. >> I got slides but I would hav

[3:35:17] to go through all of them. I can just do highlights. This proposal, of course is tha come on board, not only

[3:35:26] statutory, each of you cares deeply about ensuring all of ou

[3:35:38] departments could so we have fo to develop a performance

[3:35:42] committee and this would help -- in 2025 through over 680

[3:35:50] projects led by our infrastructure department. Next slide. Sorry.

[3:35:54] which included the county of engineering.

[3:35:59] >> I just want to make sure we are on the same page.

[3:36:03] it is to create that? >> this is to create a committee

[3:36:07] . There is a separate number 6 on a designation. >> so 2 goes along with 6 and

[3:36:14] they can be taken separately. >> I just want to make sure we are on the right item. We are item two.

[3:36:19] thank you. Harris county flood control

[3:36:26] district. Next slide.

[3:36:31] so considering all those projects in 2025 and left for

[3:36:36] billion dollars it was spent on infrastructure and our project

[3:36:41] totals are much, much more, thi committee, make sure we stay

[3:36:47] laser focused and we would try to have more consistent protocols and we want to make sure constant budgeting

[3:36:58] schedules had reduced bureaucracy and red tape and we

[3:37:02] put look at our delivery speed and of course an overall rating

[3:37:10] of excellence. Next slide. These would be the primary functions.

[3:37:15] I'm not going to go through all of them but I want to highlight

[3:37:21] getting a better form and operational challenges. Each department has a lot of areas where they excel and have

[3:37:30] ideas in a strategic form in place for that.

[3:37:38] and there's a different infrastructure department.

[3:37:43] a little bit more consistent. We have course want to keep

[3:37:50] focused on the fire roles. And that would be the departmen

[3:37:56] heads and the three infrastructures that we are

[3:38:02] reporting. And then sending your

[3:38:06] infrastructure league. At the other thing after that

[3:38:20] slide that I want to point out is that there are a lot of infrastructure transportation related communities and

[3:38:26] workgroups and there's no clear way to receive questions from

[3:38:32] each each of you. When is the updated one is that coming. By this I think they would allo

[3:38:39] a clear place to point out a making sure it is properly

[3:38:43] elevated to the court as needed and the decision-making, so thi

[3:38:48] would not be a decision-making body, just to have more clarity

[3:38:56] together because sometimes ther are topics that are actually related. Thank you.

[3:39:05] that was my last slide. Thank you. >> thank you. >> thank you, administrator for

[3:39:13] your presentation and thank you for giving this some thought. This is something you have been talking about for quite some

[3:39:20] time and I do believe by having them work together that we will

[3:39:28] be able to improve on standardization I don't want to

[3:39:38] bother them right now but I do want to have conversation to ensure it is not create more bureaucracy and it is absolutel

[3:39:53] to affect the efficiency and more timeliness so that we can

[3:39:58] get more things done sooner rather than later. So thank you for the presentation.

[3:40:03] I'm going to be making a motion on this item.

[3:40:07] >> commissioner ellis and commissioner ramsey.

[3:40:21] >> any others? >> those are the members of tha

[3:40:25] committee. >> and two questions.

[3:40:33] does any other county do it. And have any of them had any

[3:40:44] concerns about slowing down? >> I would say not in this exac

[3:40:54] format. Our infrastructure is not set up

[3:40:58] . And that will slow down work.

[3:41:09] that is not like and every step of the way approval committee.

[3:41:16] I like the concept. I might beyond vacation.

[3:41:37] on the commissioners on the webex.

[3:41:52] so are they familiar with that? Loosely.

[3:42:02] I would say on my check-in and my conversation, no one asked

[3:42:10] especially but all the various workers and committees, they also have a lack of coordinatio between that committee.

[3:42:21] >> I have been talking about this for quite some time.

[3:42:32] and there is obviously a question because this is something new. But what I get from them is as

[3:42:40] long as it is the process, things move along faster and

[3:42:47] previously was about how many they could generate over

[3:42:53] something that others were trying to figure out so I think

[3:42:57] you're going to have a lot better coordination.

[3:43:02] >> I'll put like to hold this one until I hear from somebody

[3:43:06] in engineering. There he is there he is.

[3:43:18] sorry, my camera is not working. >> you are in pretty good shape.

[3:43:31] this committee will hinder our speed of the project. I have not seen the proposal myself.

[3:43:40] to make it smooth that way paid. >> I just want to know what I

[3:43:46] want to make sure we get on record. I don't want us to go do wood and then I hear from people

[3:43:52] later. I think it is a good

[3:43:58] administrative card. I see you doing that more perks

[3:44:09] we need to slow down a little bit so the left hand knows what the right hand is doing. >> thank you.

[3:44:30] so are we moving on that one? >> sorry, commissioner ramsey.

[3:44:38] >> anytime we get the broome to talk about infrastructure, the committee that needs to have representatives from the three

[3:44:47] major infrastructure groups, an then you have folks in core offices, just come up the infrastructure.

[3:45:04] >> one official person. And what we don't want is peopl

[3:45:14] waiting for the next infrastructure committee meetin to meet before we make a decision.

[3:45:19] as long as the committee is as long as I haven't been agenda

[3:45:31] and are providing feedback were not waiting for them to make a decision, those sorts of things I find our core offices, the

[3:45:45] court offices are working well together on infrastructure

[3:45:49] issues so there is I will call it an ad hoc group, if you will.

[3:45:58] it could be county engineering related. It could be and as we taught before I met interested in doin

[3:46:12] a lot of committee meetings and our people spending a lot of time doing that. I think there is great benefit

[3:46:19] and when they leave the meeting they should say we solved three problems today, not I can't believe we just met for two and

[3:46:29] have hours and I'm not sure what's happening.

[3:46:35] you are monitoring that making sure. The other thing is we've got items 6 and so we as we conside

[3:46:44] the infrastructure, it seems like this would be a complement

[3:46:48] of that. These should not be two separat ideas, and nation it be two separate functions and the chie

[3:46:57] infrastructure officer should b weighing in on this as well we

[3:47:05] would like to see that input from that side of it once we ge

[3:47:13] that set up and probably need a little bit more information on that before I'm ready to move forward with that.

[3:47:19] I get the concept but I just want to know who is going to be

[3:47:26] on that I see a listing general just my concern in general abou

[3:47:35] committees, if they are a great resource committee, great.

[3:47:43] it is a great source. Our folks, I think I speak for

[3:47:51] our court offices in that department or maybe we are just

[3:47:57] weaning out and we haven't even started the budget process. So just a good idea, would like to know how this compliments

[3:48:06] items 6 and you'll probably kno before I.

[3:48:12] >> I think that is fine. >> did you want me to comment o

[3:48:22] that? >> originally I had those together because I did think if it as a pair designation.

[3:48:33] we had multiple meetings with your staff and there was a lot of questions and comments so I chose to do this separately.

[3:48:48] and at least my feedback, there was a lot of concern from the

[3:48:54] people that were part of that call.

[3:49:04] so is the thought to bring it back now I think by virtue of

[3:49:16] the boy it's been laid out as the administrator, I don't want

[3:49:23] that committee run like this committee.

[3:49:30] an the principles meet and ther is some refinement and there's

[3:49:38] two other entities. And I think I think having that

[3:49:51] would absolutely speed along those projects. And making sure will help resolve a lot of issues is all.

[3:50:08] and he will try to find his little hand on that thing. What makes sense to ask the administrator with some plan

[3:50:21] that does both. And they have some consensus to

[3:50:26] it and select when it brought back a reminder, I just want to hear it. You just have to have some hot

[3:50:34] old heartburn about it. And in the administrator would

[3:50:44] meet with them and hear them out , including the two

[3:50:50] departments and then bring it back to them.

[3:51:00] and you can bring in that business court.

[3:51:06] so for now, no action. That is the direction and that

[3:51:13] is what we heard the three of them say.

[3:51:18] and obviously it would not be delayed.

[3:51:26] I understand. And looking to item 3, excuse me

[3:51:30] , item 4. >> that is not one that I pulled

[3:51:38] . I just want to be, accent polic

[3:51:50] to continue the program through june 20, june 30, 2027.

[3:51:56] it looks like we are putting an aunt -- and end date on there. >> since that time you will hav

[3:52:10] been doing various extensions and understanding the middle

[3:52:18] right now. And so far the motion and and

[3:52:34] then you could decide to have another kind of a date in there.

[3:52:43] just make sure you get that taken care of that would be

[3:52:56] defensible in court. >> okay.

[3:53:06] I know that this is not a goal. It is a mandate because we are

[3:53:10] currently turning contracts dow and they are determined that they don't meet. So I guess there are still

[3:53:22] questions related to how we are implementing the program in general and I've only worked on projects for the last four year

[3:53:30] so I get it and I am supportive of it.

[3:53:39] and so we are making decisions on the policy.

[3:53:51] so I could see going through june 30, 2027, mainly for the

[3:54:03] disparity study. My support is going to be with concerns related to how we are currently managing that because

[3:54:10] there is judgment and discernment in that and I

[3:54:15] questioned the judgment discernment and what we are doing. >> may be some days it is

[3:54:23] impaired. >> all I would move for an make

[3:54:31] sure they are be repaired for discernment sticks.

[3:54:35] >> of that is all in favor?

[3:54:41] any opposed? Motion carries 4-0, that is item

[3:54:46] four. Colleagues, I have to go to my commitment. >> that was presented?

[3:54:52] >> so I have to go to my commitment. So commissioner, we are on item five.

[3:54:58] >> commissioner, I may try to do it from over here. I'm having trouble trying to get the thing to raise the hand.

[3:55:05] so lead us through it. >> so commissioner, one, two,

[3:55:11] three, for, five, six, seven items are being held for when she is back. I'm requesting to hold four.

[3:55:19] number 1 -- I will request three.

[3:55:23] so if you guys would please do the courtesy -- >> just as a reminder, if there is not three people in the room,

[3:55:30] we are just going to take -- we're going to lose coram.

[3:55:35] so I think -- what I understood, commissioner, we will be back at four? >> she said she will be back at

[3:55:45] four but then his living at five which seems odd. >> if we take a break --

[3:55:51] >> I thought there was an hour break. >> that's what I'm saying we need to get moving on this

[3:55:56] stuff. I didn't know that she was going to leave for two different things.

[3:56:02] so everybody knows about that. >> just if you would all make

[3:56:06] sure somebody calls me to let me know and I will hop back on when

[3:56:11] she comes back. You want to set a timer you want

[3:56:15] to try for a time and if it doesn't work --

[3:56:19] >> we are effectively out of coram. So you are being censored, commissioner.

[3:56:25] [laughter] >> unfortunately the meeting is now -- >> just call me.

[3:56:33] obviously we knew this was going to happen.

[3:56:38] >> the meeting is called at 3:01. >> at 3:01 the meeting is adjourned.

[3:56:47] we are >> it is for 29:00, it is back

[3:57:03] in session. Commissioner garcia, where did we leave off? >> I think item one, judge.

[3:57:13] >> we will go to item one. That is -- go ahead.

[3:57:21] >> good afternoon, judge, commissioners, justice innovation and the officer county administration.

[3:57:26] do we have the presentation? Next slide, please.

[3:57:34] next slide. Next slide.

[3:57:39] we will go through some of this, go ahead. So as of 63, the popular asian was thousand 800 and 84.

[3:57:48] of note on the slide, there individuals in custody or 65

[3:57:54] years old and they really good point is that there were only

[3:58:00] 167 people with stays over 1000 days which is down 52 from

[3:58:05] december 2025. So we are still having meaningful impact on some of the backlog.

[3:58:10] next slide, please. Here we are looking at the

[3:58:18] average daily population comparing 25 -- fiscal year 25 to fiscal year '26. And at the bottom we have the

[3:58:25] average stay with the same comparisons. As we all have been noting and enjoying throughout this year,

[3:58:33] we have continued to enjoy the decreases from 25 and had an

[3:58:37] incredibly stable jail population so far in 2026.

[3:58:42] that is by way of a significant decrease in the custody average length of stay. Through june third, we were at

[3:58:50] 141 days in custody with the average length of stay in jail which is outstanding. Back in september of last year,

[3:58:59] as we are implementing sb nine, that my team had done some analysis to understand what we would need to stabilize the jail

[3:59:07] population. And with sb nine being in effect and having an average length of stale was what we needed to help

[3:59:14] us stabilize the jail population we have been able to manage

[3:59:19] that, that has been good. Next slide, please.

[3:59:25] here we are looking at the felony case backlog. It continues to decrease, it is down 28% from december, down to

[3:59:33] 600. It is about a 29 person decrease. There are 128 people with

[3:59:37] undisclosed charges in custody over 1000 days.

[3:59:43] that is down 57 from 10085 in december report.

[3:59:49] still really good work by all the courts, there are a few courts that you see at the top end of the scale that really

[3:59:56] need to try to focus on some of those 1000 day cases in the backlog cases. Next slide, please.

[4:00:06] so intakes have been the thing we have been watching a little bit this year. And then the next slide I will

[4:00:12] expand on why it is concerning. But right now we are projecting

[4:00:16] to see a 4% increase in bookings in fy26 over fy27.

[4:00:22] it is an increase in intakes. You can see we spent most of 26

[4:00:29] over bookings over 2025. The bottom part of your screen,

[4:00:37] you are looking at releases compared to last year. Releases have been higher in some months then last year,

[4:00:43] which has been good. But one of the things you have heard me say, probably every single jail update I give is

[4:00:49] that in order for us to have a meaningful impact on managing

[4:00:53] the jail population and reducing the jail population, releases must outpace bookings. And we have a net of releases

[4:01:01] over bookings of only seven so far this year or through this point this year. So it is getting dangerously

[4:01:08] close as the intakes go up. The releases are not keeping pace with the increase in intakes so we will want to

[4:01:16] monitor that pretty closely. Next slide, please.

[4:01:23] so here is a new slide. I'm calling this emerging trends to monitor. The capacity at the gpc is 300.

[4:01:32] so when we start seeing months like may or april and may over

[4:01:37] 300 for the monthly average, it kind of becomes concerning.

[4:01:41] so I have added at the bottom, a 30 day running average or you can see we had days at 399. What happens when we are flying

[4:01:50] that close to the sun is we run the risk of creating some

[4:01:55] operational impact to the jail and the jp c. Where in order to maintain capacity, they are likely moving

[4:02:01] inmates to housing areas to turn around and move them back very

[4:02:06] shortly thereafter. So it is creating a lot of unnecessary movement. If this trend continues, it will

[4:02:11] be imperative that all of the stakeholder processes like probable cause hearings, determinations and all of the

[4:02:18] other stakeholder engagements of the jp c run like clockwork. We cannot have probable cause hearings being three or four or

[4:02:25] five hours behind. It will cause capacity issues at the jp c. Next slide, please.

[4:02:34] this has been one of my favorite slides.

[4:02:39] the green represents the jail case backlog and you see the steady decrease that really took a steep turn down since

[4:02:46] january 2025. That has been incredibly helpful to controlling the adp -- the reason this is been one of my

[4:02:54] favorite slides is the period between about january 20252

[4:03:03] really october of 2025. Maybe a little after was the separation between dispositions, total felony dispositions and

[4:03:11] new filings. That separation is why we have enjoyed the dramatic decreases we have seen in the jail

[4:03:18] population. And that separation is starting to narrow or thin, again with the increase is coming up,

[4:03:23] particularly those that are felony intakes that have potential staying power. We will want to monitor pretty

[4:03:29] closely, that we are keeping dispositions and releases over

[4:03:33] intakes. Next slide, please.

[4:03:39] I won't spend a whole lot of time here, other than this is your look at -- this court made substantial investments in

[4:03:46] reducing the jail backlog, it predates my tenure with

[4:03:53] harris county. There was a substantial increase made in both felony bond cases and felony jail cases.

[4:04:02] across that time period. The orange line is representing the bond cases. You can see that it fell

[4:04:07] dramatically faster than it did the jail cases. The piece -- and again, looking at beginning in january 2025, we

[4:04:16] can see a marked decrease in jail cases. That is where we started enjoying the relief of the jail

[4:04:22] and we will want to see that trend continue. Next slide, please. So to wrap up, this may be my

[4:04:30] shortest general update ever. Overall, things are working like

[4:04:36] we wanted them to work in the jail. We have had tremendous collaboration and good-faith

[4:04:41] partners throughout the justice system that has also dug in and rolled up their sleeves and try to find ways to help us have an

[4:04:47] impact on the jail population so that we can have reducing

[4:04:51] outsourcing and reduce cost of the system and that has worked.

[4:05:00] we had great partnerships with the district attorney's office, courts back public defender office.

[4:05:05] and so all of this has been possible as a result of that

[4:05:09] collaboration and partnership. The things to watch going forward are going to be the intake increases in both the

[4:05:18] jail and criminal court cases. And again, keeping and I on things being as efficient as they can with the gpc for that

[4:05:25] capacity. But also, the dispositions have

[4:05:31] a cadence. There is a finite resource and district courts. So those cases have a cadence

[4:05:38] and as intakes go out, we can't necessarily expect that the dispositions are going to follow.

[4:05:43] what we will want to watch for will be the converse of what we saw with the decrease. We saw the income city average

[4:05:50] of the state come down, which pulled the average daily jail population down. Going forward, we want to watch

[4:05:57] the adp leading. So we want to watch for the average daily jail population to start creeping up on us.

[4:06:05] it will be followed by an increase in the average length of stay because we're seeing so many new entrants into the

[4:06:10] system that some are felony level cases. Next slide, please. Judge, you had asked in february

[4:06:20] that we bring back mental health initiatives that we expected to

[4:06:24] see whether they were from the sea jcc. We added some that will be included in the budget this

[4:06:31] year. Some of things being worked on related to mental health is hard expansion.

[4:06:38] this will be a budget submission through public health. It is a budgets mission through public health this year.

[4:06:44] there's a mental health public defender pilot that has been spearheaded out of the system processing improvement committee

[4:06:52] that is a low-cost no-cost pilot being done, there is not a budget solution for it, it is being done internally.

[4:06:59] this pilot is mimicking on the district court side, what has been effective in in the county courts with ensuring

[4:07:05] appointments to the pdo. It is automated and there is an algorithm that helps identify cases that should be appointed

[4:07:12] and it will prioritize mental health cases. And then the civil commitment pathways, the d.a.'s office has

[4:07:18] been working very astutely on that.

[4:07:24] we are seeing a large increase in the number of folks who are getting a civil commitment rather than staying in jail.

[4:07:33] on the sheriff's office side, there are three programs that they have submitted in the budget this year, connect and

[4:07:39] protect, attention crisis response unit, this is additional clinicians to expand on the sheriff's office

[4:07:45] receiving a grant to start this program, they have seen successes with it. This ensures that clinicians are

[4:07:50] going and responding to calls in the jay so that a clinician is there to try to talk folks down, see if they are decompensated

[4:07:57] and, see if we need additional resources. It has been highly effective and they are asking for resources to

[4:08:02] expand that. They mental health care coordination, they are asking for case management support.

[4:08:10] I don't know if anybody has ever court watched, but there is a guy from the sheriff's office that runs from courtroom to

[4:08:17] courtroom answering questions for judges and finding resources when they need to get somebody out, but they need resources

[4:08:22] when they want to have somebody out in bond and they need resources. He is connecting,'s name is gary

[4:08:28] , he is a legend in the courthouse. He is getting them connected. This is to expand on that and

[4:08:33] provide some support and expand the reach.

[4:08:39] in the last is an idd identification program that they are asking one clinician and one case manager.

[4:08:45] >> is there a motion to continue discussion?

[4:08:49] >> almost done. >> questioned by the commissioner. Is there a second?

[4:08:54] second. All in favor? And a? Motion carried unanimously.

[4:09:00] rodney, are you on there? Commissioner ellis? I guess it is 4-0. He is there, yes.

[4:09:07] go ahead. >> so these programs in the

[4:09:13] sheriff office submission, as they got put into the budget software, they were rolled up in one case management reentry

[4:09:22] program. So it is a little hard to distinguish these. But if at any point, and if you

[4:09:27] would like the specifics on the costs for the individual or to break them out, we can do that with the budget.

[4:09:35] >> commissioner ellis, did you have your hand up or is this from before? >> must be an old hand.

[4:09:43] >> okay, commissioner briones and then ramsey. >> thank you for these updates. A few quick questions.

[4:09:50] first, can you talk about some of the key factors we see in the

[4:09:57] bookings we are seeing? And then the sb nine impact specifically, if any? >> let me pull up the dashboard

[4:10:06] real quick. >> and then my next question is for you, chief, if you were on. >> commissioner, I think the

[4:10:15] intakes -- sb-9 would necessarily have an intake

[4:10:19] impact, right? I think the impact would have

[4:10:23] more people coming to jalon moore people being arrested and brought to jail. Where sb-9 is having an impact

[4:10:29] is we have watch pretty closely, the number of people who are

[4:10:33] released in less than three days. So almost my entire time here prior to sb-9, it has been right

[4:10:40] around 61% of everybody booked into jail was released in less than three days. That percentage has gone down

[4:10:46] to, as of today, 55.2%. So what we're seeing is the fast

[4:10:52] releases, those people being released at the last bonding opportunity has declined after sb-9.

[4:10:57] now we are seeing that some of it is just a slowed process.

[4:11:01] we're seeing it pick up and some of the other days, three and 30 days, that has been an increase. It is just taking a little

[4:11:08] longer to get it out. We have seen a modest increase in the number that were ultimately detained.

[4:11:15] so I don't know that sb-9 has a direct impact on people coming into the system, but it has changed how quickly people are

[4:11:21] released. >> thank you. One other quick question for you.

[4:11:26] my understanding is that even though we approved additional hearing officers so that we could be having the hearings on

[4:11:33] parallel tracks to be more efficient and deliberate, my understanding is that we haven't been able to hire and/or keep

[4:11:41] the folks that we hire. So essentially right now we are not having the hearings, is that correct?

[4:11:48] >> that is correct. >> what are we doing to fix it? Because we are burning so much time on the clock.

[4:11:55] >> I know that the county courts expect to have a request -- a

[4:12:01] budget request expected to raise the salary of the officers so

[4:12:06] that we can convert the staff attorneys that were hired to

[4:12:10] hearing officers that would allow us to run both of those courtrooms at the jp see. That would be a game changer for

[4:12:16] capacity issues. I understand, and the county

[4:12:23] court since probably speak better to this, but we are having issues hiring existing officer positions.

[4:12:29] so I think that some of that has to get -- my understanding is

[4:12:36] there a pretty big disparities between what the hearing officers make and even what an attorney in the d.a.'s office

[4:12:42] that has similar experience to what is required to be a hearing

[4:12:46] officer. And then the hearing officers have to work 24/7 in jail. So I think there is going to

[4:12:52] have to be some work on the hearing officer salaries. >> and please work together, know you were talking to

[4:12:58] mr. Wells but we need to solve for this because this was improved a long time ago. I have many other questions but

[4:13:04] I will save them for next time, I'm especially interested in the emerging issues dockets and the progress we are having there.

[4:13:10] but very quickly, in terms, could you please provide a quick

[4:13:14] update on outsourcing and when we can expect to see the next

[4:13:18] set of reductions? Thank you.

[4:13:30] >> if chief is not on, I can answer those.

[4:13:37] so the plan for this year is a total of 250.

[4:13:43] their jails in the process negotiating the first 100 to come back, that was the amendment that was put on the

[4:13:48] contract very recently to account for the number of

[4:13:52] individuals we expect to bring back in and this year it will be a total of 250 this fiscal year. 100 in around june and about 150

[4:14:00] in december. There is a staff request submitted in the sheriff's office budget to accommodate for

[4:14:10] the 150 in december. Then in calendar year 2027 there will be another 400 coming back. It will be into buckets.

[4:14:17] it will be from spring to summer, 200, and then again late in the calendar year, another 200.

[4:14:24] that will close the contract in louisiana and have our

[4:14:29] outsourcing cut in half. We will then be in a holding pattern and believer -- either need the variance back or the

[4:14:35] construction beds back online to continue to reduce outsourcing.

[4:14:39] >> thank you for the update and I look forward to hearing about it, especially on the improvements construction and

[4:14:44] how that interplay is. So thank you.

[4:14:49] >> commissioner ramsey? >> , commissioner briones asked

[4:14:55] most of my questions. You are monitoring many different parameters related to our jail population.

[4:15:02] could be related to the d.a., could be related to the courts, it could be many other factors. So you gave the numbers that you

[4:15:13] are looking for, that you should be able to accomplish.

[4:15:17] and even if we get through 2020, you say seven, you bring in 400

[4:15:23] back in 2027. That will leave how many outsourced? >> it would cut it almost in

[4:15:28] half. It would be just under 600 still up. >> so as we look at -- and some

[4:15:36] of that is related to continued pushes in terms of a lot of

[4:15:45] these other issues. You really haven't gotten to the point to say in 2028, I think that we can be done.

[4:15:52] >> I think we will. If the construction is back online, I think we will be there.

[4:15:57] >> so it leads to being realistic, working and trying to get as much done as you can. There are other factors that

[4:16:03] could help or hurt it. But 2028 would be a number --

[4:16:07] that is the first year we have had a number to work for. That is good. >> commissioner, one of the

[4:16:15] things we are working on collaboratively with the jail and director mills office is kind of a cash flow.

[4:16:22] so what it looks like when we are bringing on staff, where we are bringing back the inmates so we have a very clear picture on

[4:16:30] how much outsourcing is going to cost us over the next two years.

[4:16:35] >> one issue I continue to focus on is this step forward. We've got a date of july, and we will talk again in july and the

[4:16:43] talk again in august. But I think that us being aware

[4:16:49] that the renovations are going, that is the first floor redo and then I think there are four or five more force that we do.

[4:16:56] and I think just stay on top of those details in terms of what is being done. And the last thing, I want to

[4:17:03] really acknowledge, chief, he has done a great job.

[4:17:10] he has created a geriatrics group, and mental health group.

[4:17:20] so what I like about that, he has taken the circumstances he is in, he is making it better for the people that are there.

[4:17:28] so even though we have resources and there are other things going on, he is making improvements just by the separation by age

[4:17:37] and by mental health. Just a great job. Just can't say enough good things about the chief.

[4:17:43] thank you. >> thank you. >> quick question. In terms of the courts that have

[4:17:51] the significant number of more than thousand day backlog, what

[4:17:59] is the conversation with those particular judges?

[4:18:05] >> so we have actually worked with the administrative judge

[4:18:11] and she is starting to bring more data to all of the judges.

[4:18:15] we have had some judges that have reached out individually and work with us. But I think she is working with

[4:18:24] the felony board and the judges to continue to highlight and leverage things that are happening in some of the courts

[4:18:32] that are managing their dockets pretty well. And seeing what can be implemented in the courts that

[4:18:37] are -- that still have pretty significant backlogs.

[4:18:43] one of the things that I think the system process improvement committee will bring up -- and the judges talked about it, is

[4:18:50] starting to set targets on what we think will be appropriate as

[4:18:55] active cases pending in any court, that number is about 150.

[4:18:59] if we can get all courts with their active pending showcases to be a 150 or less. >> all in favor?

[4:19:08] and imposed? Motion carries. Go ahead. >> if we could get all courts to

[4:19:15] have 150 or fewer active pending jail cases, that would really go a long way to help manage the jail population and really keep

[4:19:22] us out of being back in a position where we are backlog.

[4:19:27] >> so what is the -- is there hope that the judge can get them

[4:19:34] in line? >> absolutely. She will be a part of the system process improvement committee to

[4:19:43] leverage that work. And I think she is the right person for the job. There's a lot of judges that are

[4:19:49] trying to impact change across the courts.

[4:19:56] >> I will be looking for a very specific conversation on your

[4:20:00] next report. Additionally, of those -- redo

[4:20:05] the capital cases sit? Do they sit in those particular courts were there somewhere else , more spread out?

[4:20:12] >> shameless plug on the jail population dashboard, I can tell you right now we have 207 capital cases.

[4:20:20] and they stretch along many of the courts, but the ones you would expect, some of the courts at the higher end have the

[4:20:27] higher number of pending capital cases. >> and I'm glad I asked that question.

[4:20:33] so in fairness, I would suggest a different way to see that.

[4:20:38] because it is not fair to those judges to have 1000 plus days

[4:20:44] listed on their dockets and not know that they are capital

[4:20:49] cases. I think that is important to understand. >> we can highlight within the

[4:20:54] 1000 day pending, the number of capital. >> thank you. >> I agree.

[4:21:00] very briefly, I agree. It will be so helpful and agree

[4:21:05] with commissioner ramsey on his comments. Very quickly, director mills, you have just been one of the

[4:21:11] mvps of harris county. I understand this is your last term before you transition to work at the sheriff's office, is

[4:21:17] that correct? >> yes, ma'am,. >> I'm happier staying in the harris county family.

[4:21:21] and to this next report that I know we are all eager to hear about, all of these different metrics.

[4:21:27] administrator, can you please share with us will be providing the next update? >> it might be a outstanding

[4:21:36] data team that helps feed into this report with a lot of

[4:21:40] expertise, we will have the data, will have the conversations and some managers under her that help.

[4:21:45] it is a team effort, even though she has been the face. So as long as I get your questions, over you can give me

[4:21:52] seven days and we will have answers. >> thank you for staying with the harris county family.

[4:21:59] thank you. >> thank you. What is the next item? >> house show no item on action

[4:22:06] one. >> may I please cast my vote for the items when I was gone at the state bar of texas conference?

[4:22:13] for items four and 322, I vote yes. Thank you. >> item five, commissioner?

[4:22:20] >> item five was pulled by judge and commissioner ramsey.

[4:22:29] this is the request for approval to establish a purchasing optimization procurement speed and service project led by the

[4:22:37] county administration and purchasing stakeholder committee

[4:22:43] from each office and the department of economic equity and health services at county engineer, the tax office and

[4:22:53] county attorney's office to provide input and support for

[4:22:58] project findings, recommendations and the rest. >> county administrator and I had a good conversation on this

[4:23:03] earlier in the week. I will not go into a lot of

[4:23:08] details. I was good little nervous we are about to hire consultants, what they're going to be and if

[4:23:14] they're going to come in and fix everything.

[4:23:19] so one, I think the very diligent on who we picked to

[4:23:24] come in to quote, unquote help us. Obviously, center if that director, as gauld go through

[4:23:37] the process of evaluating what you want to do, who you want to help you, just be sure it is helpful and doesn't end up

[4:23:43] creating more confusion than we had. So I'm assuming you are on board with this?

[4:23:54] >> yes commissioner, we are on board. And we appreciate the partnership with the county

[4:23:58] administration's office to facilitate.

[4:24:04] it is signed to be a sprint, using lean six sigma processes

[4:24:10] and techniques. So we don't anticipate that this is going to be an expensive endeavor and we will have a very

[4:24:18] focused consultant helping us with that. >> the hour or so you came to our office to give us on update

[4:24:24] on where you're headed was quite impressive. Thank you for what you are doing.

[4:24:29] hopefully this will help, in terms of moving forward with it.

[4:24:36] in an efficient speed. >> appreciate it, thank you. >> thank you miss williams. Next item is?

[4:24:45] >> of where we vote? I don't know if we were waiting for the judge or not. >> we can reconsider it.

[4:24:52] do you want to make a motion? >> I make a motion.

[4:24:57] >> all in favor? All oppose? The motion carried unanimously. >> marker absent until she comes

[4:25:08] back. >> item six, this is the infrastructure officer. >> I think we had that

[4:25:14] conversation, commissioner, we want to have more conversation.

[4:25:20] so no action on that one. And next is item seven.

[4:25:29] item seven has been called by commissioner briones. Looking for action on the county contract control program.

[4:25:37] >> yes, I pulled item seven to essentially say thank you for

[4:25:42] the cross county departmental collaboration in the collaboration with our law enforcement partners, are

[4:25:49] constables as well as our sheriff's office. As you may recall, and house bill 26, passed in 2025, it

[4:25:57] allows our law enforcement agencies to enter directly into any contracts. So I really appreciate the

[4:26:02] collaboration that balances ever desire to make sure we are

[4:26:06] enhancing public safety across harris county, making sure we are implementing the pay parity that we passed, as well as

[4:26:15] access to contract patrol services that is affordable.

[4:26:20] so what this essentially does, this is based on months of collaboration and agreed-upon floor rate rate of 60 5:30 five

[4:26:29] and for underserved neighborhoods, then there could

[4:26:34] be a hardship exemption. And I have two motions that

[4:26:38] essentially -- and I'm happy to read them now, unless my colleagues have any feedback. But the bottom line is that I

[4:26:47] appreciate that it gives quite a bit of poetic license.

[4:26:52] and I appreciate everybody working as a team. So we have the collaboration, the foresight, the planning and

[4:26:59] coming up with processes together. So the two motions are a motion amended the counties policy

[4:27:07] allowing for 65% contractor and 35% county split contracts, the

[4:27:12] motion requesting that the county attorney's office and the office of the county administration, and consultation

[4:27:19] with the and consultation with the office of management and budget and county law enforcement agencies returned to court with a proposed process and eligibility

[4:27:25] criteria, allowing -- this is the hardship exemption, the six

[4:27:31] de40 contract patrol agreement in cases where neighborhoods are significantly economically disadvantaged.

[4:27:36] so those are the two motions, and an ecosystem that there was

[4:27:40] still be the 70 have been 30, a-20 and the 30%.

[4:27:45] that will and it oessentially other adopts

[4:27:49] the floor of 650, 35, as well as helping to create a exception

[4:27:56] forunder served neighborhoods. Thank you to all of the stakeholders who helped us reach the solution.

[4:28:02] >> two motions is there a second? >> the second has been made. Discussion.

[4:28:06] I in tend to vote for your first item, commissioner.

[4:28:10] I do have concerns about the second motion. My only concern is that we do want to help underserved areas.

[4:28:19] however,iun served areas may not be able to afford the 60-40.

[4:28:24] I would just ask for a friendly amendment to look at other and

[4:28:31] include other strategies in addressing thoseunder served areas outside of a contract program.

[4:28:37] >> yes, absolutely accepted. >> thank you, commissioner. >> commissioner. >> yes, sir.

[4:28:42] >> if I might. I'm going to vote no at this-point on both motion. Until something comes back to

[4:28:50] benefit the low income communities. I just vote no. At this time.

[4:28:55] >> james d you vote for the amendment? >> no, that a additional strategy be concerned for

[4:29:03] underserved areas, outside of the contract program. >> okay, I will allow that to the end of the second motion.

[4:29:11] >> alright, motion on both second by commissioner ramsey. All in favor? >> aye.

[4:29:16] all opposed? >> commissioner ellis is opposed I would assume judge hidgo would oppose, it would be, 3-2.

[4:29:26] >> vote, until she comes back. That motion was by commissioner

[4:29:30] brownis. >> made by me. Seconded by commissioner ramsey. >> voted by the three of us, 3-

[4:29:36] 1 until amends our votes. Thank you. >> all right, next item is item 40, is that correct?

[4:29:43] >> that is correct, sir. This is pulled by commissioner

[4:29:47] brownis. Request to purchase a certain track of neighborhood price for the harris flood control

[4:29:54] district for public project known as keegan storm water detention basis phase three. I won't read the rest of the

[4:30:01] numbers, which is 250,000 over the appraised value.

[4:30:06] >> yes, I just, flagged this item to community my gratitude

[4:30:10] to flood control, and the community. This keegan storm water detention basin is in the heart

[4:30:17] of a leaf. So, in this keegan bay ow over

[4:30:21] 1000 structures flooded during harvey. And the first basin is in progress.

[4:30:27] this will help implement the second and the third basin compartments. This is really amazing.

[4:30:32] just to drive home the point, this project consists of three

[4:30:36] base thanes will be spread over 63 acres

[4:30:42] just how in tense and complicated and vast these projects are. Each of the three basin also

[4:30:49] hold 400 acre feet of water to put it in a lay person's term,

[4:30:53] each basin will hold 200 olympic-sized pools worth of

[4:30:58] batter. Think about the protection that will offer our community and beyond.

[4:31:10] construction is underway and allow us to build the two additional contention basin. In sum this keegan project will

[4:31:17] reduce the flooding risk for over 23,000 residents and over

[4:31:24] 500 structures I'm very grateful to harris flood district, for

[4:31:29] their work driving this progress protecting our families from

[4:31:36] flooding is our top priority. And will be laser focused. As such I proudly and thank youfully move item 40, as

[4:31:44] presented. >> second. >> second. All in favor, aye. >> motion carries. All right.

[4:31:50] next item, I have 140, is that correct, jake?

[4:31:55] I this has been pulled by commissioner ellis request for approval of the selected census track for nomination of

[4:32:03] opportunity zone 2.0 for the sd tracks. Either support dynamic areas of investment or seek to attract

[4:32:10] investment to economically depressed communities. And authorization to submit the nomination packet to the texas

[4:32:17] governor's office of economic development and tourism for potentials designation by the u.s. Treasury.

[4:32:22] commissioner ellis you've got a motion? >> yeah, a quick motion. I think I sent around to direct

[4:32:29] iga to work with deeo to assure alignment between opportunities

[4:32:35] zone 2.0 for potentials submission of harris census track to be considered. At the 625 business court.

[4:32:43] I move it with that friendly miami. Yeah. >> I'll second.

[4:32:48] the motion. All in favor? >> aye? >> opposed? >> the motion passes unanimously.

[4:32:54] >> just to be clear for the record. The the motion that was spoken what was approved?

[4:33:00] >> correct. >> that's what what is approved I'm sorry. >> thank you.

[4:33:06] >> okay. So next item 215.

[4:33:11] that is the arpa general fund. And this has been pulled by

[4:33:17] commissioner brunis and I. So commissioner, this is request

[4:33:22] by the office county administration to approve request to reallocate the total up to five,624,299.21 in funds

[4:33:36] to support the fiscal year 2027 general fund budget.

[4:33:42] >> yes, I second that. >> okay. Motion has been made. And, let me check here.

[4:33:48] I also have a motion to direct omb to include in the proposal

[4:33:54] fiscal year 2027 budget a proposal to increase funding for the domestic violence assistant fund by $900,few for 2027 and an

[4:34:07] additional $9 20,000 for 2028, using 1.8 million.

[4:34:14] >> I second that. >> two mission advise been made. Second have been made. All in favor?

[4:34:19] >> aye. >> all 70 posed? >> motion is carried unanimous. >> need to get clarification.

[4:34:26] the item itself was approved? >> yes, and the second motion to the item. >> so it was gasser yaw.

[4:34:33] you made the second by the commissioner brownis. >> all right. Thank you.

[4:34:38] next item is 229. This is pulled by the judge.

[4:34:44] we'll hold that one. 234 has also been held.

[4:34:49] we'll pull that for the judge. 259 is pulled by commissioner

[4:34:55] ramsey. Request for approval for a renewal option and the order permitting the assignment of a

[4:35:02] contract with horn llp a signer to be bdo government llc a

[4:35:09] signee for compliance services for the texas solar for alogical

[4:35:14] lition for harris county for the period of june ten, 2026,

[4:35:19] through june nine, 2027 at cost of $694,000.

[4:35:26] n wbe is 14 spoken 3%. Commissioner ramsey.

[4:35:31] >> it is still, some of this is related to grant. I know it is no budget impact. But we're still getting a

[4:35:39] commercial pieper. We just need to vote. >> commissioner, thank you. I just want to say that on this,

[4:35:45] particular item t represents for me, another important step in building out the access to health program in precinct 2 as

[4:35:54] a hub for community-based care and support. At the newly launched channel complex, the gustava, it is 284,

[4:36:08] I'm sorry. You should have caught me on that one. Commissioner ramsey it needs a

[4:36:12] vote. Is there a second? >> 259, I will move 259, as presented and happy we're moving

[4:36:18] the solar for all work forward. It is critical to help our

[4:36:22] underserved communities and critical to community the energy

[4:36:27] transition so, we can continue dominating and make sure we're protecting and preserving the environment I move as presented.

[4:36:33] >> second, all in favor? >> aye. Opposed? >> no.

[4:36:40] >> which item is it 259. >> yeah, that's fine. So, I will say, I requested kindly of my colleagues that we

[4:36:48] hold 250, 240, and 344. >> I did?

[4:36:53] >> it doesn't sound like it. >> yeah. >> so let's go to 215, then. >> all right, 215--

[4:37:04] real quickly, judge. For your clarification. James there's a couple of votes that we took.

[4:37:10] I indicated that judge would likely vote against one.

[4:37:16] and would vote and support another. Could you give her that information. >> but see, you didn't hold it is the point.

[4:37:22] so I want to go back to item 215. >> no these are prior to 215. >> I'm concerned about 215 right

[4:37:29] now. >> all right so, 215 the

[4:37:41] shifting of arpa funds. Is that a ramos thing?

[4:37:51] >> yes, judge. This was a directive, a court motion that the oca do the arpa work with each of your offices.

[4:37:59] the initial effort was to try to find up to $10 million of

[4:38:05] reallocation that would have minimal or almost no programattic impact. As arpa winds down each month

[4:38:11] they check with each program to understand how well they're spending in each category. Working each of your offices

[4:38:18] they found $5.6 million, that would have minimal or almost no

[4:38:23] impact that received consensus. That is what the proposal was

[4:38:27] from the court for consideration.

[4:38:37] >> okay. Commissioner elis? >> so, just to make sure, I think we did vote on this one.

[4:38:42] so you came up with a consensus that you would have $5.6 million

[4:38:50] to put towards the deficit? >> yes, put back in the general

[4:38:54] fund. >> and so, what we just did a

[4:38:58] second ago, so we agree to the $5.6, but took $1.6 out of it?

[4:39:07] we earmarked $1.6 million to go somewhere else?

[4:39:11] >> yes. >> so, so that means you really

[4:39:17] end up with $5.6 towards the deficit minus the 1.8.

[4:39:25] >> I'm sorry commissioner, it is $900,000 for next year.

[4:39:29] >> yes, so my preference would be we just decide, when we go through the budget process. The domestic violence is a major

[4:39:36] issue. I'm for it, my preference would

[4:39:40] be, I don't think I caught it. It is a little late where I am. My preference would be, we just decide that in the budget

[4:39:48] process. Because if we had a consensus on $5.6 million towards the deficit, that we know we have to

[4:39:58] live with. I would be for the $900,000py

[4:40:03] but my preamps would be when we get to it in the budget.

[4:40:07] my preference would be when we get to it in the budget. >> so has 215 been voted on yes, or no?

[4:40:15] >> but I just heard we didn't go over it. So just for the record. >> no, I said I wanted 2 15 I

[4:40:23] said 215. So, but the commissioner ellis I'm not catching you. Are you saying you want to

[4:40:28] change your vote? >> yeah, I would like to vote to bring the item back up and prefer when we go through the

[4:40:34] budget process. I think that's how we ended up sort of the in the position that we're at.

[4:40:39] just go through the budget process. I'm pretty sure I would be for the $900,000 on domestic

[4:40:46] violence. But we want to see what elsewhere want to apply some of it toward.

[4:40:51] instead of now. If not, why don't we divey it all up? I would make a motion to send

[4:40:55] the rest of it somewhere, if we will do it without going through the budget process. But the motion I'm making is to

[4:41:02] bring that back up. >> mr. Ramos, this goes through

[4:41:07] a committee process, correct? >> the arpa reallocating.

[4:41:13] that's correct. >> this has been an ongoing process? >> correct, since our committee

[4:41:19] was formed. Then, this, particular was a direct from court in april, I believe.

[4:41:25] >> and we've already taken other votes on reallocating arpa

[4:41:31] correct? >> yes,. >> I stand behind my initial vote.

[4:41:37] >> I will stay with my vote. >> I just want to understand the initial vote. You know I did assume that you

[4:41:44] would have the colleagues would have the courtesy to wait for me, as requested. I'm just catching up here.

[4:41:51] and my understanding is that there was a motion--

[4:41:55] there's basically a motion to take funds from certain arpa

[4:42:01] projects and then give them to the budget?

[4:42:08] >> essentially close the deficit. >> to close the deficit. >> right.

[4:42:12] >> that was the initial motion, commissioner gasser yaw made and commissioner made the subsequent motion.

[4:42:18] >> yeah, so okay. So I see here. Harris public health said we could release up to $35,000

[4:42:26] without effecting performance. Cool. I'm for that. Led screening advertising and

[4:42:32] conference-related costs. No impacts to services. Fine. Abaitment to travel and medical

[4:42:38] supplies. Fine. Frankly I still think it is important and the people should

[4:42:42] have been allowed to decide, whether they wanted to cut medical supplies and better train personnel, but fine.

[4:42:50] reproductive access fun. No impact expected food and nutrition surplus remaining after a vendor close out. Early

[4:43:00] reach I'm just kind of really puzzled by that I'll come back to it. Then, so the people were not in

[4:43:11] favor elqn disparity. Allocated to lone star college.

[4:43:16] lone star has declined okay. Harris hub expected surplus,

[4:43:21] okay. Rapid ec survey, expected surplus okay. Women empowerment center, no

[4:43:29] impact. Detention officers no impact. That's fine. Pre-trial analytics no impact.

[4:43:35] so fine. Voter outreach inform impact surplus from a closed program. Fine.

[4:43:40] affordable housing administration. Equivalent to two positions in admin and compliance.

[4:43:45] confident we can maintain service levels all right. So I have concern on two of these.

[4:43:51] domestic, taking money from domestic violence and taking

[4:43:56] money from children education slots.

[4:44:01] so I think on the domestic violence my motion would be to

[4:44:10] allocate the entirety of these funds to domestic violence.

[4:44:16] to initiatives around domestic violence no matter where it is.

[4:44:23] >> you said, the whole. >> second motion. Can you walk through the court asked to find $10 million.

[4:44:30] the arpa committee met and came back with $5.6.

[4:44:34] it is approving $5.6 to move to general. The history, and please add to this.

[4:44:39] that the short version of the history is the the houston area

[4:44:44] women center was not able to spend is the arpa grant funds. So they returned them what the second motion gasser yaw read is

[4:44:53] taking the grant funs never used and putting them in the harris

[4:44:58] domestic violence occurred fating council because they can deploy them and put them to work in our community.

[4:45:03] that is what was achieved by the second part of the motion.

[4:45:18] houston area women center came on they working closely with our

[4:45:23] arpa team pmo and their spending was not able to get off the

[4:45:28] ground at the speed neated to make the strict deadlines. They presented about that. They apologized perfusely that's

[4:45:36] why the $3.8 million is available. >> that's correct. >> okay.

[4:45:48] what was it reallocated to? That would be the motion.

[4:45:54] clerk do you want to read the motion? >> so the first motion was to approve the item, as presented

[4:46:01] for the $5.6. >> I'm sorry, what you mean

[4:46:07] $5.6. I need complete sentences james, because I'm catching up here. >> sorry, the motion I have was

[4:46:13] to basically approve item 215 as presented on the agenda.

[4:46:18] >> approve item 215 as presented. Well what is as presented? >> as presented was to

[4:46:27] reallocate $5,625,299 in funds to support the f y general 27

[4:46:35] budget. >> right that sort of general, but specifically there's darrenriesy 3.8 million for

[4:46:41] domestic violence supports. So, I get it. Hawk was not able to work on that.

[4:46:47] so all of the $3.8 million are going to what, exactly?

[4:46:52] >> with that motion it would just be money that you all could then make particular. But that is just going into a

[4:47:00] broad bucket for f y27. That was the first motion.

[4:47:04] >> if I might. >> commissioner, I'm sorry, I'm trying to catch up here, too you'll let me.

[4:47:09] then what was the second motion? >> the second motion was motion

[4:47:15] to direct omb to include in the proposed physical year 2027

[4:47:19] budget a proposal to increase funding for the domestic violence assistance fund by $900,000 for fiscal year 2027

[4:47:31] and additional $900,000. For 2028. Using up to $1.8 million in allocated funds.

[4:47:38] >> no, I'm not okay with that. Basically you're saying you will take $3.8 million from domestic violence.

[4:47:45] then you're going to give less than $2 million over two years,

[4:47:51] instead of having this as a reoccurring expense for domestic

[4:47:55] violence. I believe that's a really, big issue. And the fact that one

[4:48:00] organization for whatever reason wasn't able to see it through. I mean there's so many worthy organizations in harris county

[4:48:07] that work to support mostly women, who are victims of

[4:48:12] domestic violence. Harris county, fox 26,

[4:48:18] october 20, 2025. Harris county shows disturbing rise in murders tied to domestic violence.

[4:48:23] from a public safety standpoint, from a just basic human at this

[4:48:30] standpoint. No way. I'm a no on that one. And then, so the other one is

[4:48:40] take what is this-- I would like to vote on these

[4:48:44] individually. I'm for some and I'm against some. I don't think we can just vote

[4:48:49] on them in bulk. So can I please take each of

[4:48:54] them? So I can express my vote?

[4:48:58] >> so I think we will need a motion to reconsider the item, since it has already been approved.

[4:49:04] and. >> but if they don't want to reconsider it, then I don't get to vote the way I vote.

[4:49:09] I requested it is on the record. I requested that this be held. >> I understand that judge. >> so I would like to record my

[4:49:15] vote and my vote is not for or against all of them. It is for some, and against some.

[4:49:22] so how do I do that? >> I think unfortunately the way the motion was voted on was, essentially in totem.

[4:49:28] so it is either yes, or no to that can be added. Or we need to reconsider the whole item some that needs to be

[4:49:35] a motion to reconsider it. >> but they're not going to reconsider it. I do appreciate all of you guys

[4:49:41] are, you know going on with this clearly. It is an important issue. Not only are we taking money

[4:49:48] away from domestic violence and early childhood but not allowing

[4:49:52] me to be in the room when we do that and enheard my request. So is there a motion to allow me to vote no on two of these?

[4:49:59] and yes, on the rest? >> you can make the motion.

[4:50:08] you just need a second. >> there's an a motion. There's not a second. >> you can make the motion,

[4:50:15] judge. >> I'm making the motion. >> I'll second it. >> okay. >> all right, so I'm trying to be able to vote no on taking

[4:50:25] money from domestic violence and from early childhood education.

[4:50:30] I would like to be able to record my vote per my duty and

[4:50:35] responsibility, as an elected official, that represents all of

[4:50:40] the residents of harrisco county. So all in favor? >> aye.

[4:50:46] >> any opposed? >> part of the money is being reallocated to domestic violence?

[4:50:51] >> it is the little part. >> but I want to vote. >> if you could be more specific that would be easier to vote.

[4:50:58] >> I would like to be able to vote the way I would like to vote. >> I'll vote, so you can vote

[4:51:04] and we will move on. And with-- and you can vote. >> motion carries for me to be

[4:51:10] able to vote, yes,. >> thank you. >> it is agreed to. >> so then, let's move to, so

[4:51:17] access harris is there a motion to take 246 from access harris

[4:51:24] without impacting program performance? Just to be clear though, it is not just some of them.

[4:51:29] some of them the work hasn't been done. Can you give the reasons? I know the committee spent

[4:51:36] countless hours. >> but my representative voted no. So, everyone can vote their own

[4:51:42] way, but some of the programs, unfortunately haven't begun so, with the arpa deadline, know we having until the end of the year

[4:51:49] what is viable and not viable. Could you police give us

[4:51:54] actually facts to make actually decisions. >> I'm okay, with access harris, they don't need it fine,

[4:52:00] reallocate it. I'm opposed to reallocating funds that go to children, and go to battered women.

[4:52:07] that's all. Irrespective the majority of the

[4:52:11] committee representatives might have thought it wise to

[4:52:15] reallocate, to take funds from domestic violence and early childhood programs. My staff and I do not.

[4:52:21] that's it. If you want him to go every, single one we can. If you would like to express.

[4:52:27] >> just, in the interests of san at this. >> like ■me, I votea lot. I'm the only one voting no.

[4:52:35] and I'm recorded. I support every one of the ones

[4:52:41] listed here I think we have a majority supporting it.

[4:52:45] >> we can record your vote to officially be on record.

[4:52:53] but all of these have been approved already.

[4:52:57] so you can record your vote, much like I do every meeting on

[4:53:02] there's some of these I don't agree with and record the vote. Which one are you no. We don't have to talk about it.

[4:53:09] >> no, but I think I have a right to talk about it. It is a really, really important item.

[4:53:15] I mean, representatives from all of our offices voted to give

[4:53:20] over $140 million to initiatives supporting early childhood

[4:53:27] education. So I think that was--

[4:53:32] when we made that promise and we made the promise to then figure

[4:53:37] out a way to continue them, we reneged on that promise last year. When we decided that we didn't

[4:53:45] want to trust the voters. At the may be the majority

[4:53:49] didn't trust the voters as much as I did. To see if they were willing to pay a penny more to keep these

[4:53:55] successful programs going. You know-- I for one happyilly live with the verdict of the voters of

[4:54:01] harris county. But certainly if we're going to default on the promise we made, when we decided to support these

[4:54:07] programs. Let us now accelerate the damage by ending programs, once earlier than was originally planned.

[4:54:15] so that is my statement for that reason, I vote no on ending the

[4:54:22] early childhood program earlier, national teamed to not letting it go to the voters. Motion to extend discussion?

[4:54:30] >> nope. >> ah, I'll make a motion to be

[4:54:35] able to extend discussion? >> so people, so how am I going

[4:54:42] to record the vote, if I can't have discussion. >> look I'll second to extend the motion.

[4:54:47] I want to say on some of these funds the issue is, we couldn't spend it to meet the deadline. >> right, that's not this

[4:54:53] though. That's not this. >> yes, it is. >> I think it is.

[4:54:59] >> it is. >> that's why I said. >> commissioner ellis, on this one --

[4:55:06] >> I think this is money that our staff members got together. The money has to be reallocated because we couldn't meet the

[4:55:13] deadline. We would apply it towards the deficit what we did, then what we did early

[4:55:18] year was go and say, okay, but we're not going to put it all towards the deficit. That was a motion to say, carve

[4:55:26] out x amount to go to domestic violence. When you were not in the the room, I said, I think I'm for

[4:55:33] that, but I prefer we do it, when we get to the budget process. Because we do have a deficit,

[4:55:38] that we have to deal with. And this $500 million is only a

[4:55:44] drop in the bucket for the deficit we have to deal with. Look, the houston area women center is my neighborhood.

[4:55:52] so I'm going to be supportive, but I think it would be better for all of us f we just did it when we go through the budget

[4:55:59] process. >> but you already voted yes, on all of this. And didn't give me a chance to

[4:56:05] vote. I thought james, you said that the people voted for this entire reassignment?

[4:56:12] >> yes, mam. >> how am I to believe what comes out of here f it is literally, we just heard that it

[4:56:18] was voted. I'm hearing no, we didn't. I said, you guys didn't wait for me.

[4:56:23] you said yes, we did. So yes, we voted for it. Commissioner if you would like to wait, until the budget, we

[4:56:30] would have to vote again. And the majority would have to vote no. Maybe I'm just really not.

[4:56:37] >> to get us off the here this evening. Colleagues, I would successful goaling, I think the votes will

[4:56:41] be there to put into domestic violence. I was asking earlier and didn't have the votes.

[4:56:47] I said let's do it when we get to the budget process. What's the budget mr. Ramos, what is the shortfall.

[4:56:54] >> $129 million, commissioner. >> out of $129 million, I know that's a leap to say where we get something today.

[4:57:01] trust me, that's $129 million we will have to cut. The question is, do you want to cut that down to $124 right now

[4:57:12] and figure it out later or cut it to $120, you want to leave,

[4:57:19] $800,000 off of the table right now? That's really the crux am I right mr. Ramos or not?

[4:57:26] >> yes, sir. >> james for the record so everyone is level setting could you please read the votes for

[4:57:31] the first motion on 215, and the second? Then if anyone wants to vote differently they can.

[4:57:40] >> I show. >> they record their own vote. >> the first motion was 4-0. Judge you were absent.

[4:57:46] >> right, that's why I'm saying let's go through each of them. That's what I've been asking for.

[4:57:51] >> and the second motion was also 4-0. >> but going over it doesn't do anything, if I'm not allowed to

[4:57:58] record my vote, james. >> I need to go every each one. >> point of order, we have, we have not voted on the motion to

[4:58:05] extend the time. >> okay make a motion to extend the time. >> all right.

[4:58:10] second. >> all in favor of tensioning the time to allow discussion? Any opposed?

[4:58:15] >> no. >> yeah. I just, you know. So judge, I think at this stage,

[4:58:23] what probably needs to happen as you said. Go through those individual items and the body can vote on

[4:58:30] each, individual item. Then following those individual items, the motion that commissioner garcia made that

[4:58:38] commissioner brinoa related to the $900,000. >> I'm not okay. Want to go item by item.

[4:58:45] >> you can start on each individual item. >> that's what I'm trying to do. On public health this does not

[4:58:52] impact current performance? >> are we? We didn't vote. We voted no to extend the time.

[4:58:59] >> I know this is a vote. I think we're actually taking the vote now as I understand it? >> it is just so fiduciary not

[4:59:05] to allow the county executive that represents 5 million people

[4:59:09] to speak. It is fiduciary. It is not the first time, you guys.

[4:59:14] you know. Just putting that out there. >> all right. You realize all of this is

[4:59:18] recorded. >> okay, so then screen nog

[4:59:23] impacts to services. So I'm for that one. Let abaitment it says, reduction to travel and training.

[4:59:31] some medical supplies. I'm not for that. I don't want to reduce travel and training and medical

[4:59:38] supplies it. Seems pretty important. Then, reproductive health fund. No expected impact.

[4:59:44] not expected to impact program performance. I'm for that one. Food and nutrition surplus

[4:59:50] remaining, after vendor close out. I'm for reallocated those

[4:59:54] funds. Early reach on, this impact to

[5:00:01] childcare providers. Staff layoff, as I said, I think it would really be adding injury to insult to not only put this

[5:00:07] to the voters, but end it earlier than it is means to.

[5:00:12] so I would call attention to this later. Then, elqn. >> judge is that a yes, or no?

[5:00:19] >> it is a, it is absolutely a no.

[5:00:24] you'll see this isn't going to go away. >> elqn. Minimal impact on but would

[5:00:30] reduce check in conducted by children. I mean I think children at risk, as someone abused as a child, I

[5:00:36] think that's pretty important. I don't want to reallocate check

[5:00:40] in with children, who have been sexually abused.

[5:00:45] disparity fund emphasis on funds that lonestar college has design

[5:00:51] loined yes, we reallocate. Harris hub an expected surplus, so yes, I'm okay to reallocate that.

[5:00:58] rapid e survey. There is a surplus.

[5:01:02] so yes, lie reallocate that. Women empowerment center. No impact to performance, sure. We'll reallocate that.

[5:01:10] the detention officer no impact. Yes, to reallocating pre-trial

[5:01:15] analytics no impact surplus. Yes, to reallocating voter

[5:01:19] outreach from a closed program. Agree reallocating affordable

[5:01:24] housing, confident can maintain service levels equivalent to two positions in administration and compliance.

[5:01:32] okay. We'll reallocate that I think compliance is pretty important. And another sort of adding

[5:01:40] injury to insult no, pun in tended to battered women, the

[5:01:47] program this program, in particular has not been successful. But it can be $3.8 million

[5:01:53] reallocated to domestic violence. Only $1.8 is reallocated and only over the course of several

[5:02:00] years. So, to cut $3.8 to $900,000 for

[5:02:05] domestic violence, absolutely no way. Absolutely no way. Those are my votes.

[5:02:09] commissioner ellis you had your hand up. >> judge, just to clarify. I just want to make sure.

[5:02:15] those were individuals motions on each item.

[5:02:20] so, it really should be motion to this allocation, because the

[5:02:25] rest of the court members we did a motion considering everyone

[5:02:29] needs to revote effectively. >> so motion to reallocate?

[5:02:36] >> no, if you can read what you just said on each one.

[5:02:40] >> I am voting for each one of those. And she voted against some of those it is our recorded vote.

[5:02:46] >> it is hard to tell. What do you want me to read for each one? What would you say for the

[5:02:53] access harris one. >> motion to approve. >> okay. >> all of them, except for the

[5:03:00] specific ones you're voting against. >> motion to approve all of the reallocations, except for elqn,

[5:03:08] check ins on sexually abused children.

[5:03:14] and domestic violence supports funding for domestic violence

[5:03:23] initiatives severely reducing that. And then the early reach curting children's education programs

[5:03:35] earlier than everybody was expecting. Is there a motion to approve all of them, except for those three?

[5:03:48] >> executive motion. >> sure that, can be my motion. >> I'll second it. >> make a motion seconded by

[5:03:53] commissioner ellis? All in favor? >> aye. >> no. Because again, these dollars are parts of programs that otherwise

[5:04:00] are not going to meet the spending deadlines and our arpa

[5:04:05] committee be spent countless hours reviewing each program I stand behind the initial 215, motion one and two.

[5:04:13] >> no. I think we're voting to

[5:04:18] reconsider. So you've deleted what we already did. But that's gone.

[5:04:22] >> we're voting. >> so your not approving all of the other reallocations? You just voted nonon reproductive

[5:04:31] health, nutrition. >> point of order, judge. We have already considered the item.

[5:04:35] the vote has been taken. Can we please take another item. >> commissioner garcia I think what's happened is there a vote

[5:04:43] to reconsider all of the votes, in order to do the individual some the motion was, that's now on the table.

[5:04:48] that the specific items that two past things that I believe that

[5:04:54] the judge would vote for some then those items that are left are the ones she would not vote for.

[5:05:01] so, baited on the way we have done it in the past. You could all approve those. And then, and then go back.

[5:05:08] >> and the remainer could be voted on in which she could record a no vote, if that makes sense.

[5:05:14] >> if you want to do the same before, you needed to vote yes. Otherwise you're saying you don't want to reallocate

[5:05:20] anything. I'm fine, thatz what commissioner ellis and I want to do it in the budget.

[5:05:25] okay, I'm a no. She's a no, he's a no. So we do not want to reallocate anything so, that motion

[5:05:33] carries. >> was the motion to reconsider. >> it was the motion to reconsider the whole item n

[5:05:39] which it was 4-1 vote some the motion come back. So she's now, we're now taking them individually.

[5:05:46] she's identified the three that she would support and the two she would not. >> the three, the three that I

[5:05:52] would not support and the nine. >> and back on the docket but it

[5:05:56] is the way you want to structures it. The way you have done it in the the past.

[5:06:00] >> and I made that clear earlier. That her vote would be recorded. So, do we have her listed as a

[5:06:11] vote earlier, james? >> which because I put her down

[5:06:16] voting the way rodny would vote. >> no, we made it clear, that at

[5:06:21] the time that she was absent, she would have to come back and voice her vote. >> I mean you can't vote for me,

[5:06:29] commissioner, as much as you wish I weren't here. I'm afraid I was elected twice and don't get to vote for me.

[5:06:36] right so, we both, our votes weigh the same. And I have a right to vote on behalf of my constituents.

[5:06:43] so I was making a motion for all of these, but to reallocate the

[5:06:50] funding for all of these. Except for the visits to

[5:06:56] sexually children sexually abused children. The cutting of the earlier childhood programs, earlier, and

[5:07:03] the reduction in money for battered women. So, if people would like to have those reallocations to the

[5:07:10] general fund, they should vote yes. I would like for it all to go to budget.

[5:07:17] I would vote no. If you guys want to agree with

[5:07:21] me. That's fine. I feel very, I commit to letting you guys vote.

[5:07:27] >> yes, commissioner. >> I think commissioner ramsey. >> again, there are, when we vote on instead of voting on

[5:07:35] every, one of these, historically what we've done is pulled one or two out. >> that's what I'm trying to do.

[5:07:41] >> and voted what I'm saying is I support the reallocation as

[5:07:46] state I'd should be recorded as a yes, on all of these. That's what I would be. Yes, on all of these.

[5:07:53] >> yes, so commissioner ramsey. >> my recorded vote. >> do I have a second. I made any motion already

[5:07:59] before. Do I need a second again? Or does commissioner ellis second?

[5:08:04] >> I seconded it before. So we're fine. So all in favor we're doing what you've said.

[5:08:12] we're smart people. It is not complicated. >> commissioner ramsey. >> doing exactly what you're

[5:08:18] asking. So right now we're voting for all of them, but the ones that I'm concerned about.

[5:08:24] and you are voting yes, to reallocate all of them, but the

[5:08:28] ones I'm concerned about. And presumably once those three I'm concern beside you will vote yes, and I will vote nos.

[5:08:36] so right now I've made the commission, commissioner ellis. >> just to be clear, judge this is a motion for all of the items

[5:08:42] except for the led abaitment. >> no. Except for, except for elqn that check in conducted by children

[5:08:51] at risk. On sexually assaulted children.

[5:08:56] and then, early reach, judge, can you please refer to them

[5:09:02] under the rca. >> it just says early reach. My table says, the name of the program.

[5:09:10] >> yes, what am I supposed to be looking at? >> what I have right now it is called for the kids with the

[5:09:22] sexual assault. That one is called elqn.

[5:09:27] that's what I have written here. What am I supposed to call it?

[5:09:32] >> answering that, can I ask a legal question, please. If this motion by motion, if it fails, then we can just reurge

[5:09:40] the motions as originally presented and just vote for clarity so, that the record is clear.

[5:09:45] >> sure, you can. I understood that the, this was going to be on the way we normally do for example travel

[5:09:52] and training. We vote on the ones that, and

[5:09:56] just in order for her to record a no vote. >> if she wants to record a no vote.

[5:10:01] it is not just a value proposition. These were programs that cannot meet the spending deadline and

[5:10:06] the money will be lost e virusus repurposing it proactively to

[5:10:10] put it to work for the people of harris county.

[5:10:15] so it doesn't to quote unquote save is it lose it because they

[5:10:20] are identified as not able to be completed so let's be superclear

[5:10:24] I would rather be clear and just vote on the original motions to make it straightforward. >> understood.

[5:10:34] you can do it either way you want to do it take it the way we do travel or training or as you successful goalinged.

[5:10:40] it is your choice. >> so, if I might.

[5:10:45] I've been real quiet. If we vote the way the judge is troying to have a vote. We can let her record her vote.

[5:10:53] when we go back and vote are we at risk of losing any of this

[5:10:57] money. I'm not going to vote to lose any money. So I think we get there, but we

[5:11:01] can move on. >> so do the texas two-step

[5:11:06] commissioner. >> I see the confusion we have with james. The table he has nowhere on the

[5:11:11] table does it say elqn. So what, where is that one on

[5:11:16] his table? >> that was not, when the

[5:11:21] steering committee came to their final recommendations elqn was

[5:11:26] not on there. >> I'm only opposed to two. That was the confusion. Let's then, making a motion to

[5:11:33] approve all of these reallocations, except for the

[5:11:39] reallocation called early reach, which would end early, children,

[5:11:44] babies education early. And, the one called domestic violence supports, which would reduce the money going to women,

[5:11:52] who have been beaten. All in favor of all of these

[5:11:57] other ones? >> I second that.

[5:12:02] I think we're going to get to the same place everyone is trying to get. >> we are.

[5:12:06] we are doing what we always do. >> look. I'm not making the motion. I'm actually opposed I think it

[5:12:13] should be done through the budget, commissioner ellis I'm with you. I don't think it has to be done

[5:12:18] today. >> that would get the work. I'll make that motion you just stated to get-going.

[5:12:23] >> commissioner ellis makes the motion to approve all of but those two. >> all but two?

[5:12:28] is that what the motion is? >> yes. >> yes. >> so commissioner ramsey, can I

[5:12:33] put you down as a second? >> second. All in favor. >> aye.

[5:12:38] >> aye. Any opposed?

[5:12:42] so garcia and brunis are you in favor?

[5:12:47] >> passed unanimously, I think. >> they're not. >> the thing it is highly contradictory.

[5:12:53] if you were to carve out the $3.8 million, so it is not to

[5:12:57] reallocate it. But then, at the end of the day, we know the $3.8 we're really allocating because the grant tee

[5:13:07] could not do the work. It is contradict arery and does not make sense. I'm vote no, because I want to

[5:13:13] vote on clear, sensible motions to reallocate the money not used per the countless hours of analysis by the arpa steering

[5:13:21] committee and I am prepared to vote as before with regard to

[5:13:26] domestic violence, because that we can put to work immediately with the domestic violence coordinating council, which

[5:13:32] works with over 15 mon profits and keep doing that work, because the initial grant tee could not.

[5:13:37] in sum, I don't think it makes sense the way she's doing it. I'm sorry, it is not like travel and training it is not that

[5:13:44] straightforward. >> I just don't know we're on

[5:13:50] the same page commissioner. We're not talking about domestic violence. We're talking about everything

[5:13:55] but domestic violence. And childcare.

[5:14:00] >> the motion. >> the arpa money is moving to the general fund. We don't want to reallocate

[5:14:08] domestic violence. The arpa grant tee could not use the money. So we will lose it.

[5:14:13] we're making a motion. >> see, we can be smarter than that. Because my motion on domestic

[5:14:19] violence would to be allocate all of the $3.9 million.

[5:14:23] I don't believe we should only keep $900,000 one year and

[5:14:28] $900,000 the whole year. I believe we should keep $3.8 million in domestic violence. >> so judge there was a vote.

[5:14:35] it is 3-2, is that correct? Passes 3-2 is there a motion.

[5:14:41] >> to approve everything but those two. >> is there a motion for the other two items?

[5:14:45] >> yes, please. >> I think we should take them separately, because I have a motion. Okay, fine. >> could you read out the two?

[5:14:52] >> so the first, so the first item is early reach on my table and james' table. So it is the motion to take out

[5:15:00] money that they will spend to have the childcare programs end

[5:15:10] early. Is there a motion. >> that's too ambiguous of a motion.

[5:15:14] >> to end the programs early. >> motion dies for lack of

[5:15:21] second. >> and then, there is, is there

[5:15:27] a motion to take the $3.8 million from hawk, and only

[5:15:35] reallocate $900 million this year and next year to domestic violence? $900,000.

[5:15:45] that means that domestic violence. >> that was the original motion made.

[5:15:49] I will second that. Correct, james that was the

[5:15:56] original motion? >> I'm unclear what this motion is at this moment. >> so am I.

[5:16:03] judge, just so I'm clear in the original motion or the, what the

[5:16:09] arpa steering committee and oca presented are lists. You have identified all, but two that you are in favor of.

[5:16:17] >> correct. >> so we need a motion for those two. >> right. >> we did. >> we did, right.

[5:16:22] so there was no, there was no second to the motion for the

[5:16:26] first one fine. For the second one I'm trying to figure out if there is a motion.

[5:16:31] I believe one of my colleagues made the motion, if you don't mind saying it again. >> if I can read the motion, as

[5:16:37] it was presented earlier. The motion is to direct omb to include in the proposed fiscal year 2027 budget a proposal to

[5:16:47] increase funding for the domestic violence assistance fund by $900,000 for fiscal year 2027, and an additional $900,000

[5:16:55] for fiscal year 2028, using up to $1.8 million in the

[5:17:01] reallocated funds. >> I will second that. >> that was the original motion. >> okay.

[5:17:06] so, I have, I have a really important voice on the phone. It is alicia newsy with the coordinating council.

[5:17:15] my question is can you use all $3.8 million on domestic

[5:17:19] violence funding or only capable of using $900,000 this year and

[5:17:24] next year, full stop. So $2 million divided over two years? Is there a reason why you will

[5:17:32] giveaway $1.8 million in domestic violence funding to other programs? I've got you on speaker here at

[5:17:39] court. Miss newsy.

[5:17:48] >> jay, I think we're way out-of-bounds. >> well, she. >> judge, there's a motion and a

[5:17:52] second on this item. >> and the discussion is that

[5:17:56] alicia newsy can you hear me. >> yes, I can. She has been asked whether she could use $3.8 million in

[5:18:05] domestic violence funding towards domestic violence. Or does it have to be kept at $2 million.

[5:18:12] in other words is there a reason you want only nine00,000 this

[5:18:18] year and next year and surrender the opportunity to have $3.8

[5:18:22] million this year and possibly future years. Is there not enough need? Is there not enough capacity?

[5:18:28] >> I think there is judge, first we would be grateful for any

[5:18:33] kind of allocation, whatsoever. I know what you're asking is a large sum of money. Our system, our dv system, in

[5:18:39] general is very much in need for whatever can be allocated to the

[5:18:44] system overall. And to our providers and obviously to survivors. So your question of the $3.8, is

[5:18:52] that something that we can insure that we build

[5:18:59] partnerships and use. We will definitely do our best to be able to do that, for sure. It is desperately needed.

[5:19:07] for many of our, for many of our partners and in the system of

[5:19:13] law. >> thank you. Okay we're just making a motion whether to keep the $3 spoken 8

[5:19:20] million on domestic violence projects or only keep $2 million spread across two fiscal years I dib want to fight for the $3.8

[5:19:28] if I was going to hear from the leaders in the field. You know we don't have the ability to use $3.8.

[5:19:34] we don't have the need or capacity. >> jay, are speakers supposed to be on the video?

[5:19:41] >> no, unless she's not employee, she doesn't have to be on. It can be a call in.

[5:19:45] but there's a motion on the floor right now that made by commissioner garcia and second by bryanis on the $900,000

[5:19:55] allocation. >> all right. We're cutting money that these domestic violence organizations

[5:20:00] can use some there's a motion and a second. All in favor to cut their allocation by $1.8 million.

[5:20:08] >> aye. >> aye. Aye. >> so the motion that will be

[5:20:15] recorded in the minutes is the motion that commissioner garcia read, because we have to finish voting on that points of order.

[5:20:21] then subsequent motions can be taken, correct. By the way alicia newsy and barbie, thank you and taliyah

[5:20:29] morris and team. I know they talked extensively with my team and other members of the arpa steering committee.

[5:20:36] they committed to us for the capacity support grant that, the $1 spoken 2, to $1.9 is what they could confidently execute

[5:20:45] on. >> we just heard from the woman herself, I'm sorry. Please vote on reducing the

[5:20:50] fund. >> we already did. Thank you. >> we have a motion, a second to in favor. Commissioner ramsey aresy are

[5:20:56] you in favor? >> okay I am opposed to

[5:21:00] reducing domestic funding commissioner ellis? >> I will vote no. Because I prefer we do it in the

[5:21:05] budget process. We should not look at $127 million shortfall I prefer, as I said earlier I didn't vote that

[5:21:13] way. Just do it in the budget process, I vote no. >> thank you for all of the

[5:21:18] ammunition guys. All right let's that. Let's go on the next item. >> we still need to do the two

[5:21:23] items removed. >> we just did that. >> no, we did not do the two. You did the motion to

[5:21:30] reallocate, you. The two remaining. >> the motion to define the two. >> early reach.

[5:21:37] >> you've allocated the $900,000. You have passed on. You've done it for the three or

[5:21:42] four of the items you voted yes. This is the ones that remain.

[5:21:48] >> domestic violence. >> to reallocate. Second. >> I thought that's what we just

[5:21:54] voted? >> what did we vote on? We voted on reallocating to the general fund it was no on one

[5:22:00] and yes, on the other. If it was not that, then what were we voting on administer? >> it is not this hard.

[5:22:07] >> the one you went three is all of them and removed two.

[5:22:12] >> now the next one was a motion. >> no, no if you go back to james we did all of them and

[5:22:18] removed two. One was early reach. One was domestic violence supports.

[5:22:23] we got to early reach. We took a vote on that did we not? >> so the the first vote is all

[5:22:28] of them, except for early reach and domestic violence.

[5:22:33] >> we took another vote, and another vote. We have three votes. >> the early, the early reach

[5:22:39] died for lack of a second. >> and then what about the domestic violence supports? >> the next motion I have is

[5:22:47] commissioner garcia making his motion, second by commissioner bryanis and it passed 3-2 with us, guys, I know commissioner I

[5:22:57] know, you went to stanford. But come on. >> not like that. I think we're done with this

[5:23:03] item. >> thank you so much

[5:23:11] miss brasher and newsy for your partnership. We appreciate you taking baton and execute only this investment

[5:23:17] for the protection of those being victimized thank you.

[5:23:22] >> all right. We have a few more items to vote on. >> yes.

[5:23:27] >> let's move on to the next item. >> judge, 229 is the next item. >> all right, 229.

[5:23:35] so 229 is competitive bid for vigilant solutions.

[5:23:42] is there a motion on 229? Who pulled that one?

[5:23:50] >> I did commissioner, because the community was against it. I didn't have the chance to explore it.

[5:23:57] motion by commissioner garcia. >> second. >> second by commissioner ramsey all in favor, aye.

[5:24:03] >> any opposed the same thing I will abstain. The motion carries, 4-0. All right.

[5:24:11] and then so he said 4-1. What is the final vote?

[5:24:19] >> the final will be 4 yes,s, zero no, one abstention.

[5:24:24] >> okay, got it. 234.

[5:24:32] >> 234. >> alright, 234.

[5:24:38] commissioner garcia makes a motion. Second by commissioner ramsey. All in favor.

[5:24:44] >> aye. >> any opposed? >> I am abstain for the same reasons.

[5:24:49] motion carries, 4-0,-1. Thank you.

[5:24:55] all right, 259. Okay, 284.

[5:25:07] that is flagged by precinct 2. >> okay this item represents

[5:25:13] another important step in building out the capacity at access to health program in precinct 2 as a hub for

[5:25:22] community-based care and support at the newly launched channel pod complex. Gust afterra pearl women

[5:25:29] outreach will provide support for individuals impacted by domestic violence. With a particular focus on

[5:25:36] survivorship. These are critical services that can have a lasting impact on health, safety and wellbeing of

[5:25:42] our residents. By greating into the wellness pod complex. We creating a stronger cont um

[5:25:49] of care where residents can access support and a trusted and

[5:25:53] community-base based setting and be connected to additional resources when needed this partnership also compliments the

[5:26:00] deployment of heart, from the channel view campus. The collocation of these services creates a natural

[5:26:06] referral pathway. Insuring individuals, who come into contact with heart, can be checked with specialized

[5:26:13] support, while clients receiving services through gustaffa pearl

[5:26:19] can be linked to other county row sources as appropriate our goal is to continue building a model that brings behavioral

[5:26:26] health and support services together in one place. Making care more accessible better coordinated for the

[5:26:33] communities we serve and also like to give a shoutout to director barton and the entire harris public health team.

[5:26:40] as this vendor was a previous partnant their capacity

[5:26:45] strengthening program. This item makes it evident that when communities are invested the return is greater for all.

[5:26:51] I move on this item as presented.

[5:26:56] >> second by commissioner brownis all in favor? >> any opposed? >> no.

[5:27:00] motion carries, 4-1 in favor. Congratulations, commissioner. Moving on to item 330. Have we gone through that one

[5:27:09] already? Precinct 4 asked for us to wait for her. April 16 direct us to reduce

[5:27:15] strengthen support for early childhood providers for families in harris county. >> so that one, commissioner

[5:27:24] garcia is the 330 and 344. Do you want to go first.

[5:27:29] >> sure. Thank you. This is item follows up on the april 16 action this court took

[5:27:37] to strengthen the harris county early childhood system.

[5:27:42] we now have initial reports back on childcare provider navigation, family outreach and provider business support.

[5:27:48] the report shows the same, basic issue from different angles harris county has resources but family and providers still have

[5:27:55] to navigate too many disconnected systems. On the provider side, the process map gives us a practice

[5:28:02] tool to help childcare providers understand childhood county

[5:28:07] committing. Inspections and common delays. On family outreach oca identified clear next steps a

[5:28:14] centralized early childhood resource hub. Ber use of 211, and 311 employee those services.

[5:28:22] as well as employee outreach through hr it, and a standing

[5:28:27] internal coordination work group on provider support deo has

[5:28:32] owled a business accelerator model and stay open.

[5:28:37] my ask that we keep moving on the next steps I have the

[5:28:43] following motions to keep this momentum going.

[5:28:47] I want to say thank you to oca and deo for their collaboration

[5:28:52] and their insight to help this program move forward. Especially on the business accelerator side.

[5:28:59] I also want to think commissioner for the work being

[5:29:07] done everyone is spending many hours to come one these viable solutions to help us really move forward and bring things to the

[5:29:14] community in a very structured, planned studied and program

[5:29:20] matic way to have maximum impact and maximum success. So my first motion is to direct deo to work with precincts 2 and

[5:29:31] 4 to monitor and evaluate the u of h, ure to identify best

[5:29:43] practices and components to a childhood business accessrator

[5:29:47] with providing quarterly updates with the draft recommendation by

[5:29:57] december 17. Thank you again. That's my first motion. Coordinate across departments

[5:30:06] and transmit a status update to court by september 17.

[5:30:11] and on this let me just add this administer.

[5:30:17] a lot of times when we make in relative departments it is never

[5:30:32] expressed that purchasing being thought of as we say all relevant departments that purchasing always be included

[5:30:42] based on conversation with miss williams it is a critical

[5:30:47] conversation we have I want to say that those are my two motions to help us move forward.

[5:30:55] I second your motions and have two, additional ones to add. Thank you, again. First of all commissioner you

[5:31:02] ask your team are phenomenal to work with. I appreciate your leadership. I think all of the court

[5:31:07] members, as you all may recall in unanimously we have by part

[5:31:13] salju san support for a package of items aimed at reducing barriers for family and providessers.

[5:31:18] by finding ways to already use as we he local progress as we

[5:31:27] prepare for this next legislative session. So we launched the harris coalition with public-private

[5:31:34] and philanthropic and community partners in january. They have been regularly and making marked progress in

[5:31:42] identifying actions. Specifically in april with the court unanimously approved I'm so thankful to administrator

[5:31:51] carter a phenomenal quarterback working and coordinating with all of the departments really looking for challenges in the

[5:31:57] permitting and inspection process. We have so many entry points for family and providers how can we

[5:32:05] harness to provide clear, concise information to navigate current resources? As well as precinct 2, and

[5:32:11] precinct 4, we're using our own dollars. We already do business accelerators.

[5:32:16] now partsnerring with u of h we will do business accelerators

[5:32:21] focused on on the providers and working iga and all of our

[5:32:26] community and harris county partners to develop a bipartisan

[5:32:30] pathway and asks for this state. So, I have a few, quick

[5:32:34] questions. So I'll read my motions and then I will ask administer carter some questions, because there's

[5:32:40] some really exciting progress. Again I appreciate you and all of the departments. At the end of the day we know

[5:32:46] there's over 90,000 kids in texas on the waiting list we

[5:32:50] need to be accessible and affordable and high quale. We're taking local solutions, as we continue to work up the plan.

[5:33:00] so my motions to compliment the two that I second of

[5:33:04] commissioner garcia is move that oca finalize and post the oca

[5:33:09] drafted provider guide that explains county permitting. Fire review inspections and common delays so it is clear

[5:33:19] when navigating the approval process. And two, move that oca coordinate communications across

[5:33:25] departments to better connect families with availablable early childhood education and care resources using existing county

[5:33:32] touch points. >> second. And so administer carter could you please give a brief update

[5:33:40] on the initial findings you have worked on in coordination with

[5:33:45] all of our fabulous departments? >> sure, thank you again to the court for your unanimous support of this effort and departments

[5:33:53] took that very seriously. On the entry points to potentially new or expanding childcare permitting I want to

[5:34:00] thank engineering and fire marshal office, chief

[5:34:04] christensen and public health, for really developing a template to lead to your guidebook. There are various licensing fees

[5:34:11] ranging from $300 to, $800. We will have that listed out in

[5:34:16] kind of a job-aid format with visuals to help those smaller

[5:34:21] businesses that don't have the time or capacity. We were able to do a survey. We had 16 departments that

[5:34:28] responded, ranging from, of course, the fire marshal. Veteran services and of course our great library, our sheriff,

[5:34:35] public health. You things you wouldn't think of and pre-trial community service those individuals may have among

[5:34:42] children. We touch over 300,000 not touch

[5:34:47] them, but have interactions with those families with over 300,000

[5:34:52] children zero to five. Whether it is actually coming into the library, or engaging with their parents.

[5:34:57] but they spoke a lot of the silos. So, I think this efforts, which you all understand will help us

[5:35:04] to continue continue to break it down. You have a long report some may read and can share with

[5:35:12] stakeholders ideas anddition to the motions include repository, a website to insure we're cataloguing areas that families

[5:35:20] can access of county programs. Of course, a quarterly meeting,

[5:35:25] to make sure and create a space optional. Commissioner ramsey, but want to get our departments together.

[5:35:32] and some have already started. What they put in the packets, how they community. Just that spark that you all

[5:35:38] gave. They already started to execute. >> thank you so much for your lead sheri administer carter and

[5:35:44] all of the departments harnessing current resources to make it easier, clearer and help navigate.

[5:35:50] thank you. As such I second commissioner garcia. Thank you for seconding mine.

[5:36:04] >> okay, so do you guys want to vote for them all at the same

[5:36:10] time? >> yes. >> okay since you guys, who would you guys want to have made

[5:36:14] all of the motions? And the second?

[5:36:21] in that case, I think we need to take them separately. How would you like to do it? >> would you like us to reread

[5:36:29] them? >> okay. Commissioner would you like to to go please.

[5:36:37] >> my two motions are, direct the eo to work with precinct 2

[5:36:43] and 4 to monitor and evaluate u of h and sure and sure plus

[5:36:48] pilot programs to identify best practices and components to inform a county-led childcare business accelerator. Deo

[5:36:55] providing quarterly updates with oc, and court offices with a draft recommendation to commissioners court by

[5:37:02] december 17. That's the first motion. >> second. >> the second motion is, move that oca coordinate across all departmentses and transmit a

[5:37:10] status update to court by september 17. >> second. >> all right so, we have a

[5:37:16] motion and second on those two. Any discussion?

[5:37:23] I would like to add that this early childhood proposal is

[5:37:28] innocuous, if repetitive addition to harris county early education work it does no harm but proposes initiatives that

[5:37:36] already exist and does not allocate any significant funding to continue those initiatives. To be clear, the proposal last

[5:37:44] august was to let the public decide, up or down, whether they, the public would support a penny tax to continue early

[5:37:51] childhood programs. I have records here from talking transition in 2019. The partners we worked with back

[5:38:02] eight years ago, so you know we already did that. Have been doing that have spent money on that

[5:38:08] in fact we're at a deficit. I don't think it makes sense to repeat work we have already done.

[5:38:14] we have catholic charity classic center for unit urbanism and

[5:38:19] houston, good government support first three years texts anyway, what you have and more. We did that in 2019.

[5:38:27] so created early childhood business early outreach include

[5:38:33] acquellen development for providers and conduct, review and identify opportunities to stream line requirements and

[5:38:39] reduce delays and potentially lower cost. The coalition on early childhood education and care leaves out

[5:38:46] respective community partners interested in leading similar efforts then better connect families with childcare by

[5:38:53] identifying gaps in outreach in awareness of childcare. The fact is harris county outreach program identified gaps

[5:39:01] and developed a plan years ago it directly connects families to care by offering additional childcare slots to the

[5:39:08] community. Early learning quality network does that too. Number four, create a plan to

[5:39:14] advocate at the state level I'll defer to my colleague at the legislature for decades. But state currently does not

[5:39:21] include any representative from harris county on the governor tax force on early childhood education and care.

[5:39:28] any investments have been min mull with only $100 million to the whole state. That's why years the ago the

[5:39:34] court decided to allocate $150 million to early childhood

[5:39:39] program with the taking the proposal to the voters we have been waiting on colleagues to the state would give us money

[5:39:49] and harris county 16 zip codes are considered deserts and three times gater than the supply of working families according to

[5:39:56] the 2023 for airlinely education research I will support this.

[5:40:00] frankly I think it is not a good use of resources and we should focus on revisiting the conversation we had last year.

[5:40:08] and letting people decide whether a penny is too much for early childhood programs to continue.

[5:40:14] anyway commissioner ellis how do you vote? >> yes. >> okay

[5:40:18] I'm in favor. So motion carries unanimously I guess we have two more motions. >> we have two more motions.

[5:40:29] motion that oca finallyize and post the oca drafted simple

[5:40:34] provider guide. That explains county permitting fire review inspections and common delays.

[5:40:47] >> the fourth and final motion move that oca coordinate

[5:40:51] communications across departments to better connect to families with available early childhood education care

[5:40:58] resources. Using existing county touch points. >> second.

[5:41:02] >> all right. Two motions by commissioner bryanes all in favor. >> any in favor in opposed

[5:41:09] motion carries unanimously. All right let's move on to 332. My comments on the first and the second one too.

[5:41:26] >> take we're taking an important stop bring more investment and resources to communities by entering into

[5:41:33] four, new agreement was the city of houston to participate.

[5:41:42] >> to regrowth and reinvest back into the neighborhoods where

[5:41:47] they're generated for residents means improvements they can see and use every day. Better roads, sidewalks,

[5:41:54] drainage, parks, and other public infrastructure that supports safer and more connected communities.

[5:41:59] these agreements also help attract private investment, support local businesses create jobs.

[5:42:06] while insuring public improvements keep pace with growth. By working together with the

[5:42:11] city of houston, we can stretch taxpayer dollars during and

[5:42:16] deliver projects that improve quality of life for families across precinct 2. I want to thank the county

[5:42:22] attorney office and omb for the hard work on these agreements

[5:42:27] and our partners at the city of houston for their commitment in

[5:42:31] making strategic investments that will create lasting benefits for residents for years to come.

[5:42:36] I move on these items, as presented. >> second. >> motion by commissioner garcia

[5:42:42] and bryan necessary all in brioness. The motion carries unanimously. Congratulations, commissioner.

[5:42:48] now we're moving to 370 flagged by commissioner ramsey.

[5:42:55] am I making a mistake here? >> it is 370. Just looking at this is a transmittal by the office of the

[5:43:02] county administer on changes in pre-trial outcomes under reform

[5:43:07] and pandemic conditions. I think there's been recent

[5:43:11] incidents, including the realed to anchor monitoring. And just a comment. We don't have time to deal with

[5:43:18] it tonight. But can administer if you could get an update on that whole program of our ankle monitoring

[5:43:27] program. I know that we had funding issues before. And I would just like to know

[5:43:34] where we are, on the number of ankle monitors out there.

[5:43:39] are they being monitored? What are the issue there's? >> I don't want to portray something to the public that

[5:43:46] we're actually doing something, when in fact no one is

[5:43:50] monitoring those issues. Just transmittal reminded me

[5:43:56] that issue is out there. If you could look at that and

[5:44:00] give us a bit or just update me at some-point. >> understand, thank you. >> is there a motion on that

[5:44:09] one? >> transmittal note. >> all right h08, commissioner garcia.

[5:44:14] >> yes, I'm excited to announce upcoming street improvements

[5:44:18] within the beaumont place subdivision. This project is part of the precinct 2 better streets and

[5:44:24] neighborhoods which is focused on improving drivability and creating a safer driving environment for our residents.

[5:44:31] through this effort, we will repair approximately 13 miles of

[5:44:36] the deteriorated roadway across 25 streets.

[5:44:40] representing a $5 spoken 5 million investment in the community. Construction is set to begin in

[5:44:45] august and is expected to be completed within one year. Safe, reliable roads should be a given in every community.

[5:44:53] residents shouldn't have to worry about impassable streets or damage to their vehicles. Just to get where they need to

[5:44:58] go. I'm especially excited to see the repair move forward as part of the revive to thrive. Reinvesting in our

[5:45:05] infrastructure. It is one of the most important ways we can strengthen neighborhoods.

[5:45:09] it improves quality of life and insure our communities continue moving forward in a positive manner.

[5:45:15] I want to thank my engineering team, faultino byron and

[5:45:20] everyone in the public works department, as well. Thank you guys for all of the incredible work that you do.

[5:45:27] this item will justep us do even more. So thank you very much. It is transmittal.

[5:45:33] no action. >> so we accept the transmittal.

[5:45:40] >> now we're going to 415 by commissioner ramsey. >> just a quick comment. I notice this on the agenda.

[5:45:46] I'm not sure why it is on the agenda. But it is a public hearing. Notice of a public hearing by

[5:45:53] the board of directors at the harris galveston district at

[5:45:57] 10:00 am on wednesday, june ten, yesterday. So I don't know what the reason for putting a notice the day

[5:46:09] after. Is there some legal reason why they send that to the commissioner court?

[5:46:13] and we postit on our agenda? >> I'm not sure.

[5:46:17] I would assume that sounds right. >> just look at that. >> absolutely.

[5:46:23] >> their expectation, in terms of satisfying some rule, in

[5:46:27] terms of them having to post it. >> understood, thank you, sir.

[5:46:31] >> so, no action on that, correct? >> no action. >> all right, thank you

[5:46:35] commissioner. 421 flagged by commissioner ramsey. >> just need to vote.

[5:46:43] >> so moved. >> motion by commissioner brioness. Second by commissioner garcia.

[5:46:47] all in favor aye. >> any opposed? No. Motion carries, 4-1. >> 435, commission ramsey.

[5:46:59] >> we just need to extend the vote. >> so moved. >> motion by commissioner

[5:47:03] brioness and second by commissioner garcia all in favor? Any opposed? No, the motion

[5:47:11] carries, 4-1, 449 commissioner garcia. >> yes, on this item, you know I have supported our constables

[5:47:21] and respective work. That support was based on the understanding that in return, we would pursue operational

[5:47:28] efficiencies and cost-saving measures that would benefit harris county taxpayers. Two, key areas were identified

[5:47:34] as opportunities to achieve those efficiencies. The consolidation of property room operation and consolidation

[5:47:42] of dispatch services I want to commend the constables for their work on the property room initiative.

[5:47:48] most officer advise already enter into agreements with the sheriff's office. And the remaining offices have

[5:47:54] made significant progress towards that goal. I appreciate, I really do appreciate the collaboration.

[5:48:00] and commitment shown by everyone involved. Unfortunately we have not achieved the same progress with

[5:48:06] the dispatch consolidation initiative side of things. Many of the constable advise toured the sheriff's office

[5:48:11] state-of-the art dispatch center and have seen firsthand, the

[5:48:16] technology, staff and capable and operational efficiencies it provides and can provide. The fast analysis was designed

[5:48:23] with the capacity to accommodate additional dispatch operations and has the infrastructure necessary to support a

[5:48:31] consolidated model. Given the significant investment

[5:48:35] already made by harris taxpayers I believe we have an obligation to dont maximize its use, before investing in additional public

[5:48:44] dollars and coupe katetive services and systems and facilities at a time when we're asking tax payers to support

[5:48:50] critical county service infrastructure needs it is

[5:48:54] difficult to just funding a separate dispatch request when a

[5:48:59] viable existing alternative is already available. So for those reasons, while I appreciate their work on this,

[5:49:07] particular item, because of conversations I've had. I am unable to support this item at this time.

[5:49:15] >> is there a motion for 449? >> yes, I would move as presented I too, commissioner garcia I look forward to our

[5:49:23] coordinated, centralized emergency dispatch system. And we know realistically that could be potentially several

[5:49:30] years of continuing working group to get there I really hope

[5:49:35] everyone collaboration continues. In the meantime, so constable herman is one of my constable

[5:49:40] partners. His office and team is the largest constable office in the country. And they answer over 600,000 calls, 9-1-1 calls directly and

[5:49:49] rolled over from the sheriff's office. This work basically it is construction work has already

[5:49:54] started. And so this is their first time coming to court for cip funding to the dest of my knowledge

[5:50:02] director confirm that. >> I can only confirm for while I have been here. >> so, he is constable herman

[5:50:09] has already made investments this work is ongoing it is a very cramped room. Basically this would breakdown a

[5:50:16] wall and create a larger space so, they can answer more calls

[5:50:20] and hopefully more rollover from the sheriff. I will support it and hopefully we have the votes.

[5:50:26] I will move item 449, as presented. >> I'm going to second. Thank you commissioner for going

[5:50:32] out to the site. Sometimes these 400 items we

[5:50:36] don't really get to put our eyes on it. Thank you I'll be happy to support is.

[5:50:44] >> motion by commissioner brioness. Second by ramsey. All in favor.

[5:50:48] oppose? I'm in favor the motion carries 4- 1. 481 commissioner garcia. This is the lgpq commission.

[5:51:04] you know our own commission on lg lgbtq+ brought this this item

[5:51:15] in particular. I was proud to put it on the court agenda. They brought it because there's

[5:51:21] been a lot of fear of transgender people using public

[5:51:26] restrooms. There's no one the fear has impacted more than transgender people. The simple act of using a public restroom can be dangerous for a

[5:51:34] transgender person. Or at the very least induce extreme anxiety. A single occupancy restroom can

[5:51:42] relieve that anxiety it. Isn't just a good change for transgender people. These restrooms are good for

[5:51:48] parents of small children. They are good for people with certain disabilities by adopting this today, we are working

[5:51:55] towards a harris county that will be more welcoming to all

[5:51:59] people. So, I'm excited to move on this item. This item motion is to direct

[5:52:04] the office of county engineering to include in the next update to

[5:52:10] the facility design guidelines and standards, a specification that all new harris county facility also include one,

[5:52:17] single occupancy restroom and that in family outreaches with a

[5:52:21] public-facing aspect, the single occupancy restroom will be in a public area. And, motion to direct the office

[5:52:29] of the county engineer to make best efforts to include the

[5:52:34] above specification in new construction. That is developed prior to the completion of the next update of

[5:52:40] the fast analysis design guidelines and standards. >> second. >> those are my two motions and

[5:52:45] want to thank our commission for their incredible work and my commission, in particular. >> yes.

[5:52:51] I proudly second it commissioner. I too thank our lgbtq+ commission.

[5:52:55] we were proud to start the first harris lgbtq+ commission three

[5:53:02] years ago and thank you for bringing forward actionable recommendations to make harris county a more fair, inclusive

[5:53:09] respectful place. Not only will the single occupancy restrooms remember minutes of our lgbtq+ community

[5:53:15] and as commissioner garcia said. It will help, I know as a parent

[5:53:19] of three, sometimes when you're trying to change diapers or having some interesting moments with sick kids, it is really

[5:53:27] helpful, caregivers existing family members. People with disabilities I know I'm having trouble sometimes

[5:53:32] with the walker. So I just think again it continues to advance our commitment to justice and

[5:53:38] fairness and inclusion. And again, thank you to our commission. And thank you to dr. Roman I see

[5:53:44] you here. You seem excited is there anything you wanted to say? If not we're happy to vote.

[5:53:52] >> thank you commissioner. We will implement as directed.

[5:53:56] >> thank you. >> thank you so much. >> drug users for your work. >> so we have two motions by

[5:54:01] commissioner garcia second by commissioner brioness, all in

[5:54:06] favor any opposed no. >> motion carries 4- 1 thank

[5:54:12] you colleagues dr. Roman and your team everyone and involved. >> moving on to 484. Commissioner ramsey.

[5:54:18] >> 482 was also on the list. >> I thought it was 482.

[5:54:23] >> 482 is over the past, several months I received numerous concerns from towing operateos, regarding harris county

[5:54:31] non-consent towing fees. Upon review I learned these fees

[5:54:36] have not been updated in approximately 16 years. During that time, the towing industry has experienced

[5:54:44] significantly increases in operating costs, including fuel prices, equipment expenses and insurance costs, and labor, and

[5:54:52] broader inflationary pressures. While commissioner court recent

[5:54:57] lived a county wide fee review policy in february. Noncontent towing fees were not included in that process,

[5:55:03] because these fees are not directly collected by the county. Given the length of time since

[5:55:10] the lasted justment and the importance of maintaining a fair and sustainable fee structures, I believe these fees should be

[5:55:16] evaluate ad long side other county established fees and finds. Therefore, I've got the

[5:55:21] following motion. The motion is to direct omb to

[5:55:27] return to the july nine court with an updated fee policy that

[5:55:31] includes all fees, and finds set by harris county commissioners

[5:55:36] court and the july nine give you enough run way? >> we can come back with the policy.

[5:55:42] it will take us a little bit to actually do the work of update

[5:55:47] coming with recommendations on this in particular, my staff from hso has already coordinated and ready to make a

[5:55:54] recommendation on that much faster than some of the other

[5:55:58] ones. >> thank you for that. And I, I also want to thank the sheriff's office and my team

[5:56:06] roberto villa franka in particular, for catching this and I want to thank the towing industry.

[5:56:14] look, whenever you have a crash on a freeway, you want a tow

[5:56:19] truck there as fast as possible. And this has me reflecting on my

[5:56:24] time on city council when we created the safe clear program. A program that has actually reduced significantly the

[5:56:33] secondary crashes. Making our roadways safer for everyone involved. And then, you know the sheriff's

[5:56:40] office has the motor assistance program. I want to thank those deputies. They're out there in all weather

[5:56:47] conditions. When it is freezing, when it is hot, and sizzling, and when it is raining.

[5:56:53] those guys are out there helping people get a gallon of gas to

[5:56:58] help them get moving or changing a flat tire. You know they're just out there doing some very, very important,

[5:57:05] but also very dangerous work. So, I want to commend them for

[5:57:09] their dedication and keeping our roadways safe. But overall I just want to say that this is not raising of the

[5:57:17] fees. But rather the creation of a policy. I move on the item.

[5:57:23] as presented. >> second. Thank you, commissioner garcia. >> motion by commissioner garcia

[5:57:28] and second by commissioner brioness. All in favor? Aye. Any opposed carries unanimously. >> final commissioner ramsey.

[5:57:39] >> the work site policy is scheduled to go into effect

[5:57:43] july one. I know that it is phased. I know that we've got a lot of different departments involved

[5:57:49] with it. I see some our folks here at the

[5:57:54] deo and others. We don't need to go into a lot

[5:58:00] of discussion tonight related to it. But I would like to know the status of the implementation

[5:58:08] plan. This effects a lot of training from harris flood control district to dr. Ramman's group

[5:58:18] as well. Is july one still a realistic

[5:58:22] date for implementation? Should we consider a more phase ad approach? So just an update on the

[5:58:31] program, without a lot of detail. And you may need to take time to really, see where we are, but it

[5:58:37] is scheduled to go into effect july one. So something is going to happen on july one.

[5:58:42] it would be nice to know what the deaf next of that something is. >> thank you, commissioner.

[5:58:47] >> I'm going to turn it over to mark pearla leading that effort to give you a brief summary. >> yes, just for an update for

[5:58:57] july one we will have everything ready time implement work site

[5:59:01] safety policy we're working on a long-term solution in

[5:59:06] procurement. Short-term solution we already have that in place already. And that is not going to cost

[5:59:11] the county any money, because that's already in place. We have ongoing meetings with all infrastructure leadership.

[5:59:18] we have ongoing implementation meetings that are still ongoing. We also using our consultant. We're right now in the final

[5:59:27] phases of completing the work blows the sops and the safety

[5:59:31] monitor forms. And the safety inspection forms. Those are been completed. Those have been reviewed by

[5:59:37] infrastructure leadership. They are align and in agreement regarding those process as to. >> if you could provide our

[5:59:44] offices just a brief summary in writing of where we, what is being implemented on july one? And I suspect there will be a

[5:59:53] few other thing we have to do on july 1 but putting that helps

[5:59:59] us understand where we're coming from. >> sure I'll give you the full run down for july one the

[6:00:05] implement of the work safety policy that the operation begins. The recommendations will be

[6:00:12] submitted to commissioners court for there will be four

[6:00:16] recommendations slighted in july court. Those will be done in the annual review that happens august six.

[6:00:21] those are the pending contingencies we have. >> thank you for your work. Appreciate you all.

[6:00:27] >> thank you. >> I too just wanted to say thank you. We wanted best support so your

[6:00:32] best position for success in implementation. We know it is another harris county team effort between the

[6:00:38] key engineering group. Your group and beyond please

[6:00:43] clearly community the updates and progress and what we can do to support. The safety of our residents,

[6:00:49] workers ask team members and contractors is of paramount importance. Thank you for being on the front

[6:00:55] leans. We appreciate it. >> thank you. >> thank you.

[6:00:59] all right I believe that was the last item. >> no action. >> no action.

[6:01:03] all right, anything else? All right, it is 6:33

[6:01:09] commissions court is now

Jun 11, 2026 Commissioners Court

Agenda

Transcript