Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
Copy of a YouTube video held by the Internet Archive.
Captions were copied from the YouTube video.
Captions were copied from the YouTube video.
[1:17]
The time is 6 PM and it is Wednesday,
[1:19]
September 23rd, 2026.
[1:22]
And I am calling our regular board
[1:24]
meeting to order. I'd like to make a
[1:26]
couple of notes here. Um, first, HCTV is
[1:29]
having some inter intermittent
[1:31]
connectivity issues, so we are audio
[1:33]
recording the meeting tonight in case
[1:35]
they uh go down or have other issues.
[1:37]
And then I'm going to just apologize. My
[1:39]
computer crashed yesterday, so I am
[1:41]
going old school with papers in front of
[1:42]
me, so it might be a little rough. So,
[1:45]
we will get moving here. Uh, clerk
[1:47]
Milner, could you please um take
[1:49]
attendance?
[1:50]
>> Director Beer Meyer
[1:52]
>> here.
[1:53]
>> Director Michael Moulder
[1:54]
>> here.
[1:55]
>> Director Zuzac
[1:57]
>> here.
[1:57]
>> Vice Chair Dresley
[1:59]
>> here.
[1:59]
>> Chair Tate
[2:00]
>> here.
[2:01]
>> Director Bruns
[2:02]
>> here.
[2:02]
>> And director Milner here.
[2:05]
>> Thank you. Also in attendance this
[2:06]
evening, we have currently two of our
[2:08]
student representatives sitting at the
[2:09]
table. We will welcome our two new
[2:11]
students later and we also have our
[2:13]
superintendent or camp Herman.
[2:15]
>> All right, if I could please ask
[2:16]
everyone who is able to please stand and
[2:18]
remove your headwear for the pledge of
[2:19]
allegiance.
[2:22]
>> I pledge allegiance to the flag of the
[2:24]
United States of America and to the
[2:27]
republic for which it stands, one nation
[2:30]
under God, indivisible, with liberty and
[2:32]
justice for all.
[2:36]
Thank you. Could I please get a motion
[2:39]
to approve the agenda? Michael Moulder
[2:41]
moves to approve the agenda.
[2:43]
>> My second.
[2:44]
>> Oh, Beer Myer seconds.
[2:46]
>> Thank you. Any discussion?
[2:48]
>> All right, seeing none, all those in
[2:49]
favor of approving the agenda say I.
[2:51]
>> I.
[2:52]
All those opposed say nay. Motion
[2:54]
passes unanimously to approve the
[2:55]
agenda. And next, I am excited to invite
[2:59]
our two new students uh student
[3:01]
representatives up to the board table
[3:03]
here. If you would please just take a a
[3:06]
stand in front of the desk here for us.
[3:08]
We have uh Leighton Morgan and Samantha
[3:11]
Seaman joining us this evening. And I'm
[3:13]
going to ask you to raise your right
[3:15]
hand and repeat after me, please.
[3:18]
I swear that I will support
[3:20]
>> I swear that I will support
[3:22]
>> the Constitution of the United States.
[3:27]
>> and the Constitution of the State of
[3:29]
Minnesota
[3:29]
>> and the Constitution of the State of
[3:31]
Minnesota
[3:32]
>> and will faithfully discharge
[3:34]
>> and faithfully discharge
[3:36]
>> the duties of student school board
[3:38]
representative
[3:39]
>> the duties of student school board
[3:42]
representative
[3:43]
>> serving independent school district 200
[3:48]
>> to the best of my judgment and ability.
[3:54]
All right, welcome. Have a seat.
[3:56]
>> Congratulations.
[3:59]
[applause]
[4:02]
» So, next month we will start restart
[4:04]
with our student reports from the
[4:05]
buildings. So, excited to have you girls
[4:08]
join us.
[4:09]
>> Awesome.
[4:11]
And next up, we have um sorry uh I said
[4:15]
it was going to be [clears throat] a
[4:15]
little rough. Uh welcome to all of our
[4:17]
visitors in the room and everyone who
[4:19]
may be viewing online both now and in
[4:21]
the future. We appreciate your
[4:22]
engagement in Hastings Public Schools.
[4:26]
Next up, we have our Raider Spotlight.
[4:28]
>> So, I'd like to invite Principal Doranov
[4:30]
to introduce our recipient.
[4:36]
So, I'm lucky enough to have the actual
[4:38]
track coach here to do those honors,
[4:41]
Jason Cook.
[4:48]
Um, so this is Austin Elias. Austin was
[4:52]
um
[4:54]
awarded the state assistant track coach
[4:57]
of the year for um class AAA. He is the
[5:01]
3A representative. Um and this is his
[5:05]
eighth year being in the district. We
[5:08]
kind of had the COVID year where he
[5:09]
didn't get to coach, but his seventh
[5:10]
year coaching for us. He's made an
[5:13]
unbelievable difference in our program.
[5:15]
Um I know that for some of you, you
[5:17]
know, we had a lot of success on the
[5:19]
track and in the state meet this past
[5:21]
year and um he is a big reason for that.
[5:24]
So a welldeserving um individual just
[5:27]
puts a lot of heart and soul into just
[5:30]
the track program and then this
[5:32]
community as a whole. I mean he lives in
[5:33]
the community. His he's a teacher here
[5:35]
at the middle school and um just an
[5:38]
unbelievable human being and a super big
[5:40]
asset to our program and to our
[5:42]
community.
[5:45]
Thank you.
[5:46]
>> Thank you.
[5:47]
>> Would you like to say a few words?
[5:49]
>> Yeah. Yeah, sure. Well, thank you for
[5:51]
recognizing me tonight. Um, it's
[5:53]
awesome. Um, just kind of a first little
[5:55]
shout out and recognition of Coach Cook
[5:57]
as well. Um, I think he should be next
[5:59]
to me right now as this head coach of
[6:02]
the year as well. Um, but um, just huge,
[6:05]
we have a huge passion for track and
[6:06]
field and in this community. I think we
[6:09]
have um, kind of showed that through our
[6:11]
success on the track. Um, and then shout
[6:13]
out to our athletes as well. Um, we had
[6:16]
a lot of success last year, um, setting
[6:18]
state records, um, state titles, and
[6:20]
then the boys and girls both getting
[6:22]
third at the state meet, and that
[6:23]
wouldn't be, um, that's due to the
[6:25]
athletes that put the work in, uh,
[6:27]
especially in the offseason. So, um,
[6:29]
kudos to them as well.
[6:32]
>> Well, thank you and congrats. Um, thank
[6:34]
you for all the efforts that you put
[6:35]
into making this program amazing. Like,
[6:37]
it's really fun to watch.
[6:39]
>> So, appreciate that. Anybody have any
[6:41]
comments? Absolutely. Dr. Brunson,
[6:44]
>> uh,
[6:44]
>> I know that it's not always about the result at the end. Sometimes it's
[6:48]
about the time we spend with the folks
[6:51]
in our programs. Can you speak a little
[6:52]
bit to the work that Trent Hansen and
[6:55]
the entirety of the coaching staff put
[6:57]
into like that intentional connection
[6:58]
and what we hope to really get out of
[7:00]
athletics for our students?
[7:02]
>> Yeah.
[7:03]
>> Can we both answer?
[7:04]
>> Yeah.
[7:05]
>> Oh, gosh. Yeah. [laughter]
[7:06]
>> Yeah. You want to go for it?
[7:07]
>> Yeah. Uh I mean Trent has done an
[7:09]
unbelievable job. Obviously he has been
[7:12]
gotten some awards of his own but he has
[7:15]
changed our athletic program um for the
[7:18]
better and he has put in like our um
[7:22]
coaching stuff that we do with making
[7:25]
sure that you know it's all about making
[7:28]
a difference for these kids as we move
[7:30]
forward. Um obviously he says it like
[7:32]
this. Our goal is to win, but our
[7:34]
purpose is to to help these kids turn
[7:38]
into, you know, awesome human beings,
[7:41]
community members, things like that. And
[7:43]
you can definitely see a difference with
[7:45]
the initiatives that he's made and the
[7:46]
things that we've done as like a
[7:48]
coaching staff and then as our sports
[7:50]
programs and just how those things
[7:52]
affect the kids and making them or
[7:54]
helping them be quality human beings.
[7:56]
And I mean, you can see it. I'm going to
[7:58]
speak specifically about our track kids.
[8:00]
We had numerous kids last year that were
[8:03]
on the podium and there were athletic
[8:05]
directors from around the state that
[8:07]
help with like state events and things
[8:08]
like that and they made comments to
[8:10]
Trent and myself just about how good our
[8:12]
kids were and I think obviously um the
[8:15]
work that he's put in is the big reason for it and then
[8:20]
transferring that to each and every one
[8:22]
of the different sports programs is has
[8:25]
made a huge difference. So I think a lot
[8:27]
of kids would also say that you know the initiatives and the things that
[8:31]
we've done have made a huge difference
[8:32]
in their lives and for our our school
[8:34]
and our programs as well. So
[8:36]
>> absolutely nothing else to add.
[8:38]
Absolutely.
[8:40]
>> Yeah.
[8:40]
Thank you.
[8:43]
So, I made sorry I made this comment
[8:44]
before, but I I work out at the YMCA and
[8:47]
there's a ton of track guys that work
[8:49]
out with me and I hear them talk about
[8:50]
the two of you really often and I love
[8:52]
hearing good motivating things come out
[8:55]
of high school boys mouth. So, you're
[8:57]
doing it right. [laughter]
[9:00]
» I too want to thank you for your work
[9:02]
and congratulations on this honor. Um,
[9:05]
it's really important that we educate
[9:06]
the whole child and the work that you do
[9:08]
after school matters in that. And so I
[9:11]
just really want to personally thank you
[9:12]
and I have something from the district.
[9:20]
» Just a small tool, but we really want
[9:23]
>> to say thank you for all that.
[9:25]
Congratulations. [applause]
[9:26]
>> Thank you.
[9:32]
» Congratulations. [laughter]
[9:34]
Thanks for being with us tonight.
[9:36]
>> Yes, thank you.
[9:36]
>> If you could shut that mic off, that'd
[9:38]
be awesome. Thank you.
[9:41]
>> All right. Uh, next would be public
[9:43]
comment. Uh, but we didn't have anyone
[9:44]
sign up for public comment this evening.
[9:47]
So, uh, next up we have our
[9:49]
superintendent report.
[9:53]
>> Yeah, it's okay.
[9:55]
Sorry.
[9:59]
» Okay. Thank you. Um, first of all, I
[10:02]
would like to say we've had an awesome
[10:04]
start to our school year. Um, we had a
[10:07]
wonderful welcome back week for our
[10:08]
teachers and all of our kids got in
[10:11]
pretty well. You know, there's always
[10:12]
some glitches with busing, but I think
[10:14]
we worked through that pretty well. Um,
[10:16]
I also am excited to announce that this
[10:18]
week is homecoming week, so hoping to
[10:21]
see everyone at all the activities. Um,
[10:23]
we had the flag football opportunity for
[10:25]
girls Monday night. We have obviously um
[10:28]
home games for volleyball and soccer and
[10:30]
so please take time to come out and see
[10:32]
everyone and then of course the football
[10:33]
game on Friday with the dance on
[10:35]
Saturday. So just want to remind all of
[10:38]
our alums too to come out and share in
[10:40]
the wealth of celebrating our kids and
[10:42]
what they do. I also want to say um
[10:44]
September 15th was National IT
[10:46]
Professional Day and I want to thank all
[10:49]
of our IT staff. you know, those are the
[10:51]
folks that are behind the scenes that
[10:53]
you don't regularly see. And um but they
[10:57]
work so hard and without them, we all
[10:59]
know the importance of technology,
[11:01]
especially when you don't have it. And
[11:03]
so I want to thank them for all the work
[11:05]
that they do because we generally have
[11:07]
pretty smooth running uh technology use
[11:09]
in our schools. And so I want to just
[11:11]
say congratulations to them and a shout
[11:13]
out um and to Tim Buchanan as the
[11:15]
director. He's been with us now almost a
[11:17]
year and he's really doing a great job
[11:20]
in that leadership role. And then I
[11:22]
would also like to say that uh the month
[11:25]
of September is school board member
[11:27]
appreciation month. And so um I just
[11:31]
want to thank all the board members for
[11:33]
their time that you put in to serve our
[11:35]
school district and our community. Um, I
[11:38]
appreciate the thoughtfulness that you
[11:40]
put into our meetings and to asking good
[11:43]
questions and to giving opportunities
[11:46]
and ideas for improvement. Um, it's been
[11:49]
really wonderful and I know that again
[11:51]
it's a lot of hours. You certainly
[11:53]
aren't getting paid what one might think
[11:56]
for the amount of hours that you're
[11:57]
putting in, but you do it anyway. And I
[11:58]
just that is true service to our
[12:00]
community. And so I appreciate that. And
[12:01]
I want to thank the student members as
[12:03]
well. and I'm excited to have you at our
[12:06]
meetings for the full time this year.
[12:08]
And so in thanks from us, I have
[12:10]
certificates to hand out. So and I have the medallions
[12:18]
and medallions or pins.
[12:22]
Here's this. Thank you.
[12:32]
Huh?
[12:35]
» Thank you.
[12:47]
» [snorts]
[12:49]
>> Thank you.
[12:58]
[clears throat]
[13:04]
» Yeah.
[13:06]
>> I just want to say it's it's a joy
[13:09]
working with Dr. Wamp Herman. Um,
[13:13]
and I really think and I want to thank
[13:17]
the staff, the administration. Um, I
[13:20]
think this partnership is building and
[13:22]
it's been uh pretty enjoyable. The last
[13:25]
work session we had was was great and I
[13:28]
think we're building on good things and
[13:31]
thank you Dr. Workamp Herman.
[13:58]
So again, I'd like to thank you and just
[14:00]
know that um we all appreciate all the
[14:03]
work and we do function as a team and
[14:05]
that includes the board. And so you can
[14:07]
see many of our team members are out
[14:09]
here ready to present tonight and they
[14:11]
work really hard for our kids and I
[14:14]
really feel confident that everyone all
[14:16]
of you really have the best interest of
[14:18]
kids at heart and that's that's what
[14:20]
matters. So thank you.
[14:22]
>> Thank you.
[14:28]
» So now I'm going to give an update on
[14:30]
our data dashboard and vision card and
[14:34]
I'm going to kind of talk through. So
[14:35]
this is new for us and you want to show
[14:37]
bring up um the vision card first. So as
[14:43]
you know this we finally pulled together
[14:47]
by the end of last year and then as with
[14:51]
something new you have to figure out how
[14:54]
to keep up with things and who's going
[14:56]
to do what and when do you do it and so
[14:59]
actually I apologize before we do that
[15:01]
can we show the calendar? So, just based
[15:04]
on um learning when data comes in and
[15:09]
how to best time it for updating and
[15:11]
who's going to do that work, we've put
[15:13]
together this calendar and we're going
[15:15]
to hope that it works. And so, um the
[15:19]
data will be updated for the 2627 school
[15:22]
year based on this information. So, in
[15:24]
the month of October, we'll update we'll
[15:27]
get information on staffing um from our
[15:30]
human resources department and we'll
[15:32]
have ongoing professional development
[15:34]
data updated as well. As we have a
[15:35]
professional development day, we'll then
[15:37]
update that data. So, that could change
[15:39]
from year to year if our calendar
[15:41]
changes. Um we'll also be able to update
[15:44]
and by the end of October, and this is
[15:45]
all by the end of the month, the MCA
[15:47]
data from the prior year because it's
[15:50]
still embargoed to this day right now
[15:51]
from last year. we don't have that fall
[15:54]
fast bridge data consistent attendance
[15:56]
um that's a two-year leg student
[15:59]
conferences from the fall and then
[16:02]
administrator teacher ratios etc. So you
[16:04]
can see that and then in January we'll
[16:07]
update data from December. We can't
[16:09]
update financial information right now.
[16:11]
The audit isn't complete. So you still
[16:12]
have last year's audit. Once we get that
[16:15]
secured, we'll update it. Then you know
[16:18]
it's interesting about finance right
[16:19]
now. Jen's living in three fiscal years.
[16:23]
So [laughter]
[16:23]
it's complicated, but we'll we have it
[16:25]
on here to update based on once that
[16:28]
audit is complete and presented to the
[16:30]
board. And then we'll have the
[16:31]
perception data. Um, we're going to plan
[16:35]
to send that out if board approves and
[16:37]
all of that. The the calendar would be
[16:39]
November. So, by the time we get that
[16:40]
data back, likely won't input in uh
[16:43]
update or upload that to the vision card
[16:45]
until January. Um, March, we'll talk
[16:48]
about the winter data from FastBridge um
[16:51]
along with student conferences that have
[16:53]
taken place. Again, professional de
[16:54]
development data as the dates occur. And
[16:57]
then in June, we'll update the final
[16:59]
from May and then all of the final data
[17:02]
that we have from activity uh
[17:06]
participation, spring testing data,
[17:09]
support service data, and then
[17:12]
communications data. So Carrie will be
[17:14]
presenting later in the year um a whole
[17:17]
communications plan. She's got
[17:20]
You're going to love it. I'm just going
[17:21]
to say that.
[17:22]
>> I'm gonna leave it there.
[17:23]
>> So now if you want to just I'll just
[17:25]
bring this. We won't go through
[17:26]
everything on the data dashboard, but
[17:28]
we'll start with the vision card. You
[17:30]
can see here that we have the data that
[17:33]
we have is updated. The data that we're
[17:35]
waiting on will be updated according to
[17:37]
the calendar. Um, and so remember this
[17:40]
is on our website for anyone to see. So
[17:42]
the dashboard right here um if you want
[17:45]
to pull that down is just a big summary
[17:47]
of aggregate data and that you can look
[17:50]
at from different uh trends around ACT,
[17:53]
graduation, college and career
[17:54]
readiness, other testing whether it be
[17:56]
MCA, Fastbridge and then we have those
[18:00]
highlighted survey data that tell us
[18:02]
about equity and belonging. Now remember
[18:04]
these are all aligned to our core
[18:05]
pillars and so this is where you get
[18:08]
safe and supportive engaging
[18:09]
environments from the uh the survey
[18:12]
data. Then along with empowerment and
[18:14]
retention comes from HR and then the
[18:16]
effectiveness of our operations meaning
[18:18]
your finance as well as some HR data. So
[18:21]
um I just wanted to show this to you. Um
[18:24]
you can look at that data on your own.
[18:26]
If you ever have questions feel free to
[18:27]
you know reach out and ask. Um, you can
[18:30]
see from the bottom of this, we do still
[18:32]
have definitions listed. So, if as we
[18:34]
know there's a lot of education speak
[18:37]
that if you're not in the field of
[18:38]
education, you may not know what these
[18:40]
terms or acronyms mean. I think there's
[18:42]
more acronyms in education than any
[18:44]
other field. Somebody will argue with
[18:46]
me, but there's a lot. And so, we have
[18:48]
all of our um definitions there for
[18:50]
anybody who may wonder. And then this
[18:53]
data, this aggregate data is pulled up
[18:55]
from the dashboard. And then the
[18:57]
dashboard data gets into more of the
[18:59]
disagregate data where you're going to
[19:02]
be able to see trends by grades. Um more
[19:05]
days the data around who's opting out,
[19:07]
how many are opting out of MCAs. Um
[19:10]
you're going to look at trend data
[19:12]
across five years. So all of that data
[19:15]
lives on the dashboard. And so you can
[19:17]
peruse that at your will. Now remember
[19:20]
some of this data we don't have yet. Um,
[19:23]
again, MCA data, we don't get that until
[19:25]
another couple weeks. So, actually, I
[19:27]
think it's unembargoed next week, I
[19:29]
think. So, yeah. So, any questions about
[19:34]
that?
[19:36]
I think it looks really great and I
[19:38]
think it's a huge asset for the
[19:39]
community to have a quick click through
[19:41]
that they can they can see the data
[19:44]
firsthand. So, thank you so much for
[19:47]
putting that together.
[19:48]
>> Yeah, I think I you know, and it's not
[19:50]
only the community, right? We've never
[19:51]
had anything like this before. So, it's
[19:53]
fantastic for the board, for
[19:54]
administrators, for for, you know,
[19:56]
teachers, everybody to kind of see,
[19:58]
okay, where where are we doing? Awesome.
[20:00]
What do we need to keep doing? And where
[20:01]
do we need to shore things up a bit?
[20:03]
>> Yeah, it is.
[20:04]
>> Is it on the agenda to um push it out
[20:06]
with the with the uh communications to
[20:11]
the community as well, just to make it
[20:13]
to reinforce?
[20:14]
>> No, that's a great input. We we can do
[20:16]
that. Thank you. Yeah, perfect. Didn't
[20:18]
think about that. That's good. We can
[20:20]
even add that to the Raider update as
[20:21]
well, periodically,
[20:23]
>> like every time we make an update or
[20:24]
something.
[20:25]
>> Fantastic.
[20:26]
>> Yeah, that's a great idea.
[20:27]
>> Yeah.
[20:28]
>> So, I just want to bring that to your
[20:29]
attention. That's where we're at. And I
[20:30]
want to thank Lindy and Andrew and Tim
[20:33]
for doing a ton of work to put this
[20:35]
together um behind the scenes and making
[20:38]
sure the data is accurate. And Andrew's
[20:40]
team um there, Bri and Ma, uh well,
[20:43]
Mattiey's gone now, but she last spring
[20:45]
would help pull together all that
[20:47]
testing data. It's important. Um Kelsey
[20:49]
will take that over now this year. And
[20:51]
so I just want to thank them because
[20:52]
that's a it's time that they're putting
[20:54]
in to make sure that we're transparent
[20:57]
with our information.
[20:59]
>> Yeah. Thank you.
[21:00]
>> Nice job.
[21:02]
>> All right. Anything else? Good.
[21:05]
>> All right. Uh next up we have a
[21:07]
presentation about uh moving to a block
[21:10]
schedule at the high school. Uh for full
[21:12]
transparency, the board got this
[21:13]
presentation at our work session. And I
[21:15]
want to say we had a lot of questions
[21:18]
and answers and great discussion. It was
[21:19]
about an hour and a half, so this would
[21:21]
be the abbreviated version here.
[21:24]
>> Welcome.
[21:25]
>> Sorry to interrupt. Is this something
[21:26]
that the new members needed to sign?
[21:30]
>> Okay.
[21:38]
» [laughter]
[21:40]
>> We want them to be official.
[21:44]
There we go. Oh,
[22:05]
Andrew is going to grab a new another
[22:07]
mic here for us.
[22:10]
So, uh, Chair Tate, members of the
[22:12]
board, Dr. War Campamp Herman and school
[22:15]
student school board reps. Uh thanks for
[22:17]
having us again. We're here to have a
[22:19]
conversation again repeat uh what we've
[22:21]
talked about at work session a little
[22:23]
bit of policy meeting but [snorts] again
[22:25]
we're going to go through this fairly
[22:26]
quickly and absolutely have questions
[22:29]
for us at the end um or interrupt us in
[22:31]
the middle that's fine too. So, um just
[22:34]
a little bit of history,
[22:37]
we had
[22:40]
a um directive five, six years ago that
[22:43]
said, "Hey, we need to look at secondary
[22:45]
programming. Uh where can we do better?"
[22:48]
Basically, um you know, we have
[22:50]
declining enrollment. What are we doing
[22:51]
to attract and maintain the student
[22:52]
enrollment that we have and really
[22:54]
provide a better experience for our
[22:56]
kids? So, we we spent a few years
[22:58]
looking at multiple models. there's a
[23:00]
few of us that have had uh multiple
[23:03]
years of experience in pathway work. So,
[23:05]
we went down that that road and have
[23:07]
really launched a really really nice set
[23:09]
of courses uh designing new courses. So,
[23:11]
all of that work is in in progress. What
[23:14]
came out of that and continues to come
[23:15]
out of that is how can we do that work
[23:19]
better and more effectively and
[23:20]
efficiently with kids and we're finding
[23:22]
that we need more time per class. We
[23:24]
need to be able to get out of the
[23:25]
classroom, break down those four walls,
[23:27]
and get out into the community. This is
[23:30]
a type of schedule that allows us to do
[23:32]
that. Um, again, we've had a number of
[23:34]
staff members in the building who have
[23:35]
come from districts on a block. I was an
[23:37]
administrator on a block schedule. It's
[23:39]
not perfect. Um, there are, you know,
[23:42]
you can make any schedule work, but for
[23:44]
the work that we're doing with the, uh,
[23:45]
pathways, business connections, uh,
[23:47]
internship opportunities, things like
[23:49]
that. It really allows us to, um, do
[23:52]
more work with the time that we have.
[23:57]
Again, these are the things that we're
[23:58]
working on within that pathway work.
[24:00]
I'll turn it over to Chris here to talk
[24:02]
a little bit about the skills for
[24:03]
success that we're focusing on.
[24:06]
>> Thank you. I'm Chris Moore, assistant
[24:08]
principal at the high school. And the
[24:09]
pieces that we have really been working
[24:11]
on with our business partners are the
[24:12]
skills that the soft skills that kids
[24:15]
need better.
[24:18]
Okay. Uh the soft skills that the kids
[24:20]
need uh once they graduate from high
[24:21]
school, making sure that they're ready
[24:23]
for employment. We can teach them the
[24:25]
content and do all of that, but our
[24:27]
business partners are saying we need to
[24:28]
make sure that they're dependable
[24:29]
people. They're on time. They're able to
[24:31]
communicate with their their managers.
[24:33]
They're able to communicate with the
[24:34]
public, vendors, clients, whoever it
[24:36]
might be. Um, and that they they're ready for the the job and that's
[24:42]
the pieces that they've really been
[24:43]
pushing with us. So, the pathway
[24:45]
development by us getting out and into
[24:48]
the community with our students help us
[24:50]
build those soft skills with the kids.
[24:53]
also help us uh have that opportunity
[24:56]
for kids to do some job shadow
[24:57]
experiences so that they can see what a
[24:59]
career as an electrician or a cook or um
[25:03]
engineer might be like to see is it
[25:05]
something that they really want to
[25:06]
pursue by the time they get into college
[25:08]
and go down [snorts] that path. So
[25:09]
they're not spending two to three years
[25:11]
realize they it's not the job they
[25:13]
thought it was and now they're shifting
[25:15]
and and have spent all that time and
[25:16]
money to to look at a different program.
[25:18]
So, that's the piece that we're really
[25:20]
excited about with the the schedule
[25:22]
change and the pathway development.
[25:25]
As we look at this, we know that there
[25:27]
are courses that don't fit well on a
[25:30]
block schedule. For example, music. We
[25:32]
have a very strong music program in
[25:34]
Hastings. And we don't want to to to
[25:36]
hurt that program. So, one way to do
[25:39]
that is to really look at skinny
[25:41]
courses, breaking the a block into two
[25:43]
different components so that they can
[25:45]
have a course all year long and it's not
[25:49]
uh giving up 25% of their schedule to do
[25:51]
that under a traditional block uh
[25:53]
schedule. So, we're able to do that and
[25:55]
then working with our our staff and the students looking at what courses
[26:00]
also pair nicely with that that skinny.
[26:02]
It could be a world language course, it
[26:04]
could be a math course, could be health
[26:06]
and PE. It's really looking at where
[26:07]
does it fit best for those kids in those
[26:10]
classes to to skinny with that so that
[26:12]
they're having a a nice cohesive
[26:14]
experience all the way through their
[26:15]
time here. And then for those that don't
[26:17]
[clears throat]
[26:18]
take uh music, they can take that full
[26:21]
block schedule. So it's we're running uh
[26:24]
two schedules at times with the skinnies
[26:26]
and with a traditional block for those
[26:27]
kids to meet all the needs that we have
[26:29]
for our students.
[26:32]
So this would be the example of the with
[26:34]
the skinny uh in music.
[26:37]
So you can see the depending on the
[26:39]
music whether it's band, choir or
[26:41]
orchestra, it would be the first block
[26:43]
or second block within that and then the
[26:45]
other one would be an offset block. Uh
[26:47]
the skinny also allows us to continue to
[26:50]
have kids to take two music. So if they
[26:51]
wanted to do band and choir, it also
[26:53]
allows them to do that without uh
[26:55]
without hurting the program.
[26:57]
>> And again, the ways to skinny those
[26:59]
together as well. So this is another
[27:01]
view of what a block could look like and
[27:04]
the different electives or the different
[27:06]
uh components that way uh on a four
[27:08]
period day with the skinny in 9th, 10th
[27:10]
and 11th and 12th grade. So breaks it
[27:12]
down to more of those elective
[27:14]
opportunities that the kids would have
[27:15]
as they progress as well. So uh like Mr.
[27:18]
Dorne was saying as our kids expand into
[27:21]
those more intermediate and advanced
[27:23]
courses, the block schedule also opens
[27:25]
up those elective opportunities for them
[27:27]
to to [snorts] dive deeper into some of
[27:29]
that content.
[27:30]
>> One of the benefits to I think we'll get
[27:32]
to it in a little executive summary. um
[27:36]
not quite there yet is uh really the
[27:40]
ability to right now we well I'll get to
[27:43]
in the executive summary just about our
[27:44]
staffing and our FTE and how how many
[27:46]
more courses we can teach during the
[27:47]
school year but if you take a look at
[27:49]
the the difference between a seven
[27:50]
period schedule where we've got six
[27:53]
classes at 46 minutes again one at 50
[27:55]
[sighs and gasps] uh 326 minutes of
[27:57]
instruction per day and then uh 360
[27:59]
minutes of instruction per day on a four
[28:02]
period block. Uh that's kind of how the
[28:04]
breaks down. It's a more time per
[28:06]
course. Uh we reduce a lot of those
[28:08]
transitions between classes. You know,
[28:10]
three passing times instead of six that
[28:12]
we have now. Uh it makes a difference.
[28:16]
>> And Chris was going to talk a little bit
[28:18]
about the comparisons here.
[28:19]
>> So, as we worked with our Pathways team
[28:21]
last year, we started looking at missed
[28:23]
opportunities with kids, too. So, if you
[28:25]
take a look at the left side of the
[28:27]
screen, the number of kids taking study
[28:29]
hall, student aid, senior release times,
[28:32]
uh we're missing opportunities with kids
[28:34]
to dive deeper into that that content
[28:36]
and and take courses that may better
[28:38]
help them uh prepare for their future
[28:40]
and and explore some of those things
[28:41]
they may like. So the nice thing about
[28:44]
the block schedule is it gives them the
[28:46]
opportunity to take more electives, more
[28:48]
courses, dive deeper into that content
[28:51]
and not feel the the stress of having to
[28:54]
concentrate on seven courses. They're
[28:55]
concentrating on four, maybe five
[28:57]
courses at a time. So it it frees them
[28:59]
up a little bit to to reduce some of
[29:03]
that stress that they're experiencing uh
[29:04]
and some of the reasons that they're
[29:06]
looking for that study hall during the
[29:07]
school day. Um, and so we're we're able
[29:10]
to capture more opportunities with kids
[29:12]
by switching to the block schedule. And
[29:15]
also, if we look at the class time, the
[29:18]
bell-to-bell time, if we look at the
[29:21]
four period day, on average there are 90
[29:23]
minutes. So the there's 3,780 minutes
[29:27]
per class per semester. Uh if we take a
[29:30]
look at a seven period day, the uh
[29:33]
comparison goes from 46 minute classes
[29:36]
so 3864 minutes per class. So pretty
[29:39]
comparable. But when you break down the
[29:42]
actual instruction time and you get rid
[29:43]
of those managerial skill things that
[29:45]
happen at the beginning, handing out the
[29:47]
uh the papers, taking attendance, making
[29:49]
some quick announcements, uh and you
[29:51]
subtract those those five minutes of
[29:52]
administrative practices at the
[29:54]
beginning of each hour, uh the four
[29:56]
period or block schedule actually
[29:59]
increases the minutes because you're gaining more time that way. So
[30:03]
when you reduce those managerial tasks,
[30:06]
the uh instructional time is roughly
[30:08]
3570 minutes compared to the 34 44
[30:12]
minutes.
[30:13]
>> And it might not seem like a big deal,
[30:15]
but that that's it's a lot of time.
[30:17]
That's a really that's a big advantage.
[30:22]
» So Lindy, if you can open up that
[30:23]
executive summary. So this is really
[30:25]
breaks it down. Um when we talk about
[30:28]
you know um finance and FTE and all of
[30:30]
the the benefits right now with a 7
[30:33]
period day where our staff are working
[30:35]
71.4% of their day is with kids. So you
[30:38]
think about that efficiency a block you
[30:41]
teach three out of four blocks per day
[30:43]
that would be 12 out of 16 per year uh
[30:45]
gets you at the 75% efficient level. So
[30:49]
really what that does it break if you
[30:51]
break it down mathematically that allows
[30:52]
us to have 2.6 6 2.7 FTE
[30:56]
more efficient. So I want to be very
[30:59]
clear with the board I think we I was
[31:01]
last time as well that we're not looking
[31:03]
to utilize this scheduling as a staff
[31:05]
reduction and a cost savings. Again
[31:07]
we've talked many times about the
[31:09]
financial um stability of the district
[31:12]
when we're talking about moving to our
[31:14]
really uh intermediate and advanced
[31:16]
level courses in the pathways. Those are
[31:18]
going to be a lot of ads. We're going to
[31:20]
be coming to the board with a lot of
[31:21]
requests for new course approval with
[31:24]
Andrew's help um development by the
[31:26]
teachers. Basically, we're able to move
[31:28]
from about 550 classes taught per year
[31:32]
to 660. So, an increase of 110 options
[31:36]
for kids in one year over the last. Um
[31:40]
it does help again spreading out a
[31:42]
little bit of the class size um piece,
[31:44]
but it it's really the the main focus is
[31:46]
that we're able to offer more at the
[31:48]
same staffing level.
[31:52]
And then with the efficiencies that this
[31:54]
does offer, we know that as we expand
[31:56]
our programming, we may uh need to run
[31:59]
some classes at a smaller number. So
[32:01]
that that class size is an average. uh
[32:03]
but with those efficiencies that we can
[32:04]
do, we may say in order to help this
[32:06]
program grow, we may offer a course at
[32:08]
15 to 20 kids knowing that we have that
[32:11]
opportunity to do that. So the class
[32:13]
size isn't average. It just helps us
[32:14]
with some of the efficiencies uh to be
[32:16]
able to offer more courses for kids. And
[32:19]
I know we've talked about this before,
[32:20]
but with the increase in college level
[32:22]
courses that we have, the class size
[32:24]
maximums that University of Minnesota
[32:26]
gives us soon to be uh Southwest State,
[32:29]
they're going to have those course
[32:31]
limits that's able to be absorbed. Um
[32:34]
instead of raising another class to 39
[32:35]
or 40 to get that 25 from the University
[32:38]
of Minnesota maximum, we're able to do
[32:40]
that and still maintain healthy class
[32:41]
sizes.
[32:50]
Hi, I'm Mindy Tavern, assistant
[32:52]
principal at the high school as well.
[32:54]
I'm just going to talk a little bit
[32:55]
about um overall in general, what
[32:58]
potential student outcomes can come from
[33:01]
this and our and staffing benefits as
[33:03]
well. So, we [snorts] talk a lot about
[33:04]
our failures and we're hoping that the
[33:07]
more time in class they get help. So,
[33:08]
Mr. Moore talked about those study
[33:10]
halls. We will be able to have time with
[33:12]
the specific teacher that can help them
[33:14]
with the content within that same day of
[33:17]
the content. So, it's not like we won't
[33:19]
have the time for kids to work on their
[33:21]
work. We would have it within the class
[33:23]
with that teacher. Also, discipline. We
[33:26]
talked a little bit um Mr. Dorne about
[33:28]
the passing times. Less times in the
[33:30]
hallways, more times in class, hoping
[33:32]
for less discipline. [snorts] Um, one of
[33:35]
our survey results was really of the
[33:37]
importance of teacher student
[33:38]
relationships. This provides more time
[33:41]
with students with their teachers, less
[33:43]
teachers. And on the flip side, I'll
[33:45]
talk about in a minute, but teachers
[33:47]
also have less students to build those
[33:49]
relationships with within that um
[33:52]
semester. Also, we talked about that we
[33:55]
want to get out in the community. This
[33:56]
gives us that time to do that. um like
[33:59]
the 45minute class getting out in the
[34:01]
community getting back it's you don't
[34:03]
have time while you're there. So this
[34:04]
provides that for us. Uh and increased
[34:07]
opportunities to take classes. We talked
[34:08]
about all the different types of classes
[34:10]
we can once you start to get um interest
[34:13]
in a field. You can start to take more
[34:15]
of that in one year um just to test out
[34:18]
see if you want to do that. Uh the
[34:20]
potential improved teacher retention we
[34:22]
talked about like in our strategic plan
[34:24]
the pillars an important thing is to
[34:25]
keep our teachers here. [snorts] Um,
[34:27]
this allows teachers to get to know
[34:29]
them, give more time, um, fewer classers
[34:32]
to plan, um, be more intentional with
[34:35]
the classes that they're teaching. Uh,
[34:37]
and then the big thing here we've been
[34:39]
talking about lately is the
[34:40]
collaboration time within the school day
[34:42]
for our teachers. We have lots of
[34:44]
teachers that work with kids before
[34:46]
school, clubs, activities, sports that
[34:48]
it's really hard before and after school
[34:49]
to get together. This provides our time
[34:51]
for our teachers to collaborate within
[34:53]
the school day.
[34:56]
One other additional benefit because I'm
[34:57]
always thinking about the student
[34:59]
experience as you think about managing
[35:00]
seven courses right now. You look around
[35:03]
the room with the schoolboard members
[35:04]
here, new and older. Um the course loads
[35:08]
that they take, managing seven courses
[35:11]
and then having, you know, an hour to
[35:12]
two hours of homework on every on top of
[35:14]
each one of those courses. Now, to break
[35:16]
that down to three to four, a senior
[35:18]
might be able to work in a study hall,
[35:19]
but basically four classes instead of
[35:21]
seven. And again, you're with the
[35:23]
teacher getting that help. the homework
[35:25]
assignments and quantity goes down on a
[35:28]
block as well. Behaviors go down,
[35:30]
homework goes down. Uh you do more in
[35:32]
class.
[35:37]
Also, there's challenges with any
[35:39]
schedule that you have. Um so we've been
[35:41]
thinking about that problem solving. Um
[35:44]
taking a lot of questions about how we
[35:46]
can get better with this too within the
[35:48]
schedule. Um a couple of the things up
[35:50]
listed here, AP courses. we need to work
[35:52]
with our EP teachers and talk how we can
[35:54]
make that work, what's best for kids
[35:56]
within the schedule. So an example, we
[35:58]
had said maybe they have three quarters
[36:01]
um within that class rather than just
[36:03]
the two. Uh again, the the gap if a
[36:06]
student has something first semester and
[36:08]
then doesn't have something second
[36:10]
semester, what are we going to do to
[36:11]
help support that? That's something that
[36:13]
we need to problem solve. We do have um
[36:16]
in that same vein that if they take a
[36:18]
class and they're interested they can
[36:20]
take another one for example math you
[36:23]
can take one and keep going higher level
[36:25]
and get to more math if you're in that
[36:27]
interested in that. So um both sides of
[36:29]
that shared staff we need to think about
[36:31]
that we share a lot of staff between the
[36:33]
high school and middle school. So being
[36:36]
creative within our scheduling we do
[36:37]
that already with this schedule. So um
[36:40]
just another way to look at it with a
[36:41]
block period in the middle school. Uh
[36:44]
again, this happens with any schedule,
[36:46]
any school, uh even within our own
[36:48]
district when kids move from
[36:50]
elementaryaries. It it doesn't always
[36:52]
align perfectly when you move in. So, we
[36:53]
will need to be aware of how to help
[36:56]
support students when that um when they
[36:58]
move to our district. Another big
[37:00]
barrier for us is that transportation.
[37:02]
We really find that this schedule will
[37:04]
allow for our students to get out and
[37:06]
experience more. The question is, how
[37:08]
can we get the transportation to do
[37:10]
that?
[37:12]
>> Yeah. wanting to eliminate the barriers
[37:13]
for all students.
[37:17]
So, when we talk about um kind of the board's work and we again we met in policy committee a month or so ago,
[37:24]
really the there's a a few things within
[37:27]
policy that would need to be addressed
[37:29]
if the recommendation goes through to
[37:30]
move to a block. Working with the
[37:33]
counselors, I know I've talked about the
[37:35]
um 56 versus 58 credits. Those are
[37:39]
required out of the 64 block classes a
[37:42]
student can take. We we have two
[37:44]
examples here where districts are at
[37:47]
that 58. The recommendation that we most
[37:50]
likely will move forward with is that
[37:52]
56. Kids aren't necessarily taking every
[37:56]
single course we're asking them to or we
[37:58]
have offered to them. But this provides
[38:00]
us with that room for those students who
[38:02]
might struggle, who might um have a life
[38:04]
event where it's just that hard, that
[38:07]
much harder to overcome to reach that
[38:10]
total to graduate. Again, with this
[38:12]
number, we have not an infinite amount,
[38:15]
but the number of electives that
[38:17]
students are able to take is going to be
[38:18]
expanded so broadly that we feel very
[38:21]
confident that a 56 out of the 64 is
[38:23]
definitely um attainable. 58 is on that
[38:27]
border of uh for some students to be a
[38:30]
little a little trickier. Uh might might
[38:32]
impact graduation. So, we're uh just
[38:35]
moving forward more than likely 56 would
[38:37]
be the conversation. Um teacher
[38:39]
contract, again, won't get into it too
[38:41]
much here, but there are minimal
[38:42]
language pieces in there that um would
[38:45]
need to be addressed. Um and then the
[38:47]
communication timelines. This is uh
[38:49]
pretty important for us moving forward.
[38:52]
You think about a six-year plan. So
[38:55]
starting now, this is like the decision
[38:57]
year whether we're going to do this or
[38:59]
not. Move forward. If we decide to, next
[39:01]
year would be a full year of staff PD.
[39:04]
You can't roll out a block and have
[39:06]
teachers assuming I can just cram two
[39:08]
lessons together and teach the same way
[39:10]
I've always taught. Those experiences
[39:12]
get a little muddled and and kind of
[39:14]
faded out if you do it that way. So lots
[39:16]
of PD professional development for our
[39:18]
staff [gasps] on how to teach on a
[39:20]
block. It's just it's a different look.
[39:22]
it's more impactful for students and
[39:24]
that would be an entire year's worth of
[39:26]
RPD time and then rolling that the first
[39:29]
uh year of block would be the 28 29
[39:31]
school year so graduated a year and a
[39:33]
half and the year after you guys are
[39:36]
probably done right sorry um but the
[39:39]
communication between now uh we're
[39:41]
obviously meeting with the board again
[39:43]
uh but our teachers having continued
[39:45]
conversations with them about how that
[39:47]
would impact what they do in their
[39:48]
course uh some of the uh skinny pieces
[39:50]
we need to work out and then our
[39:52]
students and community. We've had
[39:54]
conversations, not in a formal way, but
[39:56]
um gaining some traction. We just have
[39:58]
to formalize that conversation and allow
[40:01]
opportunity for our our parents, our
[40:03]
students, community members to to weigh
[40:05]
in on You look like you wanted to say
[40:06]
something.
[40:07]
>> Yeah. I just want to point one thing out
[40:09]
with the graduation requirements. It
[40:11]
would be phasing in over time. So, those
[40:14]
students who are like sophomores now,
[40:16]
right, because they'll be seniors then.
[40:18]
Um it wouldn't be like, "All right, got
[40:20]
a rough senior year ahead of you." Um
[40:22]
it's more about like phasing those in
[40:24]
over time.
[40:24]
>> That's the Yeah, sorry I didn't get to
[40:26]
that. That's the the last four years. So
[40:28]
the I think it's the class of 2032 would
[40:31]
be the first class to have all four
[40:32]
years of the block. And again, the
[40:34]
credits would start at 44 like they are
[40:36]
now, move to um 47, 50, 53, and then
[40:40]
eventually 56. So each class would have
[40:42]
a three uh credit increase over those
[40:44]
four years. Yeah. Thank you.
[40:51]
We've talked a lot. What questions and
[40:53]
students as well, if that's okay, can I
[40:55]
offer it up to them? Oh, thank you.
[40:57]
Yeah. What can we help answer?
[40:59]
>> Actually, I'd love to hear from our
[41:01]
students first. Yep. I want to hear your
[41:02]
impressions. Good timing for you to be
[41:04]
here.
[41:07]
I um as a senior I was in like all seven
[41:11]
classes and what four of them were
[41:13]
college and it kind of like with
[41:15]
everything going on it got to be a lot.
[41:17]
So I did take a study hall and I think
[41:21]
if we allowed students to only have four
[41:23]
classes and they were longer with like
[41:26]
teacher help and then time for homework
[41:28]
as well. I really like that idea because
[41:30]
it takes a lot of stress off of students
[41:33]
and allows them to do more outside of
[41:35]
school and especially for those seniors
[41:37]
that aren't going to be here ever again
[41:39]
and they want to enjoy their senior year
[41:41]
but don't want to fall behind in school.
[41:43]
I think this is just like a really good
[41:45]
helpful way to just support students and
[41:47]
also like the career readiness that
[41:49]
comes along with it and especially like
[41:51]
for colleges. I know a lot of colleges
[41:53]
do scheduling like this. You don't have
[41:55]
seven classes in one semester. So this
[41:57]
is just truly like a good way to prepare
[42:00]
students for the future.
[42:02]
>> Thank you for that. One other comment is
[42:04]
just I I neglected to mention last time
[42:07]
as well. So you think about right now we
[42:08]
have semesters that are 18 weeks long.
[42:11]
You think about a student who struggles
[42:13]
18 weeks is you've you've hit the cliff
[42:15]
about week five and then it's just
[42:17]
there's if you're not on a trajectory to
[42:19]
really absorb that help and and build
[42:22]
those skills and get to week 18, it can
[42:24]
be a a long haul. So nineweek courses,
[42:27]
you're in, you're out, you've got a
[42:29]
really intense experience, and then
[42:31]
you're able to hit the reset button
[42:33]
every nine weeks.
[42:35]
>> Um, I really agree with what
[42:37]
Representative or student representative
[42:38]
Henson was saying. I think personally in
[42:41]
my experience, junior junior year was my
[42:44]
hardest just given the amount of rigor
[42:47]
that was in the classes that I was
[42:48]
taking. I was taking all AP and college
[42:50]
courses and having, you know, a couple
[42:53]
APs and five college courses that I'm
[42:58]
taking got to be a lot of homework and a
[43:01]
lot of time spent at home up late
[43:04]
working on school work, you know, after
[43:07]
extracurriculars. So, I think this would
[43:09]
be a great time or a great thing for
[43:12]
students to be able to work with their
[43:15]
teachers and not having to, you know,
[43:17]
communicate over emails or spend late
[43:20]
nights doing homework and then get up
[43:21]
early in the morning to go in before
[43:23]
school to be working with their teachers
[43:25]
on topics they might be struggling with
[43:27]
or, you know, asking for extensions with
[43:30]
homework. So, I think this is just a
[43:33]
really great way of giving students the
[43:36]
opportunity to stay caught up with all
[43:38]
of their schoolwork. So, thank you.
[43:44]
» Um, I agree with everything. I think I
[43:47]
must have missed it. When would this
[43:49]
take place?
[43:51]
>> So, the fall of 2028 would be the first
[43:55]
year that the school would be on an all
[43:57]
grades would be on a block. The credits
[43:59]
would be phased in. So if you're a
[44:01]
senior that year, obviously you don't
[44:02]
have to earn, you know, you have to take
[44:04]
11 courses at a time to catch up with
[44:07]
the credits. So we'll phase it in
[44:09]
creditwise over four years, but the
[44:11]
school would go to a block a year and a
[44:14]
half from now.
[44:15]
>> So we barely miss it.
[44:18]
[laughter]
[44:18]
>> That's why I had to apologize to you.
[44:23]
>> Well, one thing too, we do um offer
[44:25]
these type of experience on a limited
[44:26]
basis with our Raider Connect time that
[44:28]
we do. Now, those classes are broken
[44:29]
down into um fairly close to the
[44:32]
schedule that we have here, 90-minute uh
[44:33]
blocks over a two-day period. We do that
[44:35]
six times a year. And what we're seeing
[44:37]
is a number of teachers really starting
[44:39]
to take advantage of those days, get
[44:41]
their [snorts] kids out of the building,
[44:42]
uh do some experiential pieces with
[44:44]
culinary, hospitality, tourism, uh child
[44:47]
care, uh opportunities, um trips to, um
[44:50]
you know, engineering, manufacturing
[44:52]
places. So, we're seeing a lot of people
[44:53]
take advantage of the extra time.
[44:59]
Where would advisory take place in this?
[45:02]
>> Advisory would be absorbed into one of
[45:04]
the classes in terms of announcements.
[45:06]
We would not have an everyday advisory.
[45:08]
We would have special events and some
[45:10]
pepfest type schedules and things, but
[45:11]
it wouldn't be an everyday event.
[45:15]
>> Good question.
[45:17]
Um, I think so. It's this year's seventh
[45:20]
graders who would have the full block
[45:22]
their entire experience and this year's
[45:24]
10th graders who would have their senior
[45:26]
year, but they would have a block. Um, I
[45:28]
just want to comment. So, one of my
[45:30]
biggest concerns that we talked about at
[45:31]
the work session was the like the math
[45:34]
and the and the the languages, right?
[45:36]
And it sounds like you guys are kind of
[45:38]
considering moving those to be skinnies.
[45:40]
um biggest concern is
[45:43]
with math especially and with languages
[45:45]
you lose it if you don't take it
[45:47]
sequentially and so we we had talked
[45:49]
about before having those be part of
[45:51]
blocks but missing things so it sounds
[45:53]
like you're definitely considering
[45:54]
moving those over into skinnies so it's
[45:56]
music math
[45:58]
PE it looked like health class
[46:00]
>> yep sorry to interrupt but u one thing
[46:03]
we have to be careful of is not
[46:04]
overkinning ourselves and then we turn
[46:06]
into an eight period day however you're
[46:07]
absolutely correct that there are are
[46:10]
conversations happening about what fits
[46:12]
best and there are times of the year you
[46:14]
can have a skinned uh Spanish and then
[46:16]
you could also have a regular Spanish on
[46:19]
a block as well. So and again like Mr.
[46:21]
Tavanir said if you have a student who's
[46:23]
interested in math and engineering and that kind of a track physics you
[46:27]
don't have to wait until the next year
[46:29]
to take that well I might you can't take
[46:31]
physics until junior year. Oh, you are
[46:33]
taking that second semester of that
[46:34]
sophomore year and then your advanced
[46:36]
level uh opportunities open up your the
[46:38]
last couple years for you.
[46:40]
>> Also, if a student doesn't pass a class,
[46:43]
they also can start it right away that
[46:45]
next semester instead of waiting for the
[46:46]
whole next year.
[46:48]
>> So, the thing I'd like to remind the
[46:51]
board of on this is why why I'm drawn
[46:55]
one of the reasons I'm drawn to this is
[46:56]
the the why we're doing this. We are not
[46:59]
doing this as a budget reduction because
[47:01]
we're not we're we're maintaining our
[47:04]
same number of FTE. So that provides us
[47:07]
flexibility. So if we go through this
[47:10]
idea of block schedule for a few years
[47:12]
and we find that this just isn't working
[47:14]
out what's best for Hastings, then we
[47:16]
can do something different because we
[47:18]
didn't do it because of money. We did it
[47:20]
because we think this is the best
[47:22]
opportunity for our kids and to really
[47:24]
grow our pathway work. [clears throat]
[47:26]
really in a way to grow our pathway work
[47:28]
without having to put so much additional
[47:30]
resource into it. Whereas if we try to
[47:32]
maintain our current schedule and add
[47:35]
additional coursework that would add
[47:38]
FTE. So I think the rationale behind
[47:41]
this is good because it's flexibility.
[47:43]
This isn't something that has to be
[47:44]
forever. Nothing ever is. So I just want
[47:47]
to just [clears throat] keep reminding
[47:48]
the board of that.
[47:53]
I'm a big time person and um the
[47:56]
efficiency of the time
[47:59]
to me is one of the exciting things
[48:01]
here. Um more time isn't always better,
[48:05]
but what's being done in that time is to
[48:07]
me. Um and I really think this this
[48:11]
lifts kids of all demographics and all
[48:13]
learning levels. I really think this is
[48:16]
I think it kind of brings kids
[48:19]
up. I think it's easier to bring the
[48:22]
kids up who are having struggles. So I
[48:25]
this is exciting to me. I'm just I think
[48:27]
this is going to be a great thing. So
[48:29]
thank you very much and thank the staff.
[48:31]
Everybody's done a great job.
[48:35]
>> All right. Anything else? Question.
[48:37]
Director Bruns. I think I only have a
[48:40]
couple, but one of them on a slide it
[48:42]
says with the graduation policy
[48:44]
accepting 56 out of 64 credits as
[48:46]
opposed to 58 out of 64. Some folks
[48:49]
without background or knowledge of where
[48:50]
we currently are might say that that's
[48:52]
choosing the lower standard, but can you
[48:55]
speak to how this actually lifts the
[48:57]
standard that we're setting for our
[48:58]
students right now?
[49:00]
>> Yeah, I'll have the team correct me if
[49:01]
I'm wrong, but I think with our seventh
[49:03]
period day where we're asking kids to uh
[49:08]
minimum to graduate would be 44 out of
[49:11]
the 56 that we offer. I think what's 81%
[49:13]
or no 70
[49:14]
>> 78
[49:15]
>> 78% is what we're is the ask. So we're
[49:18]
basically allowing kids almost uh 25% of
[49:21]
the courses that we have to offer them.
[49:23]
Ah we don't need those. We don't need to
[49:25]
grow in our academic, you know. So it's
[49:28]
u the efficiency it's I mean it's it's
[49:31]
pretty impressive. Yeah.
[49:38]
un unrelated because it's probably too
[49:40]
early in the process, but thinking about
[49:42]
collaboration with the special education
[49:43]
or special services department and some
[49:45]
of the unintended awesome positives that
[49:47]
come with work-based learning and those
[49:49]
experiences that can be done in support
[49:50]
with community partners. Uh but then the
[49:53]
complexity or dynamic ability to think
[49:56]
about service provision, but it might be
[49:58]
so early in the process that we're not
[50:00]
totally sure what that looks like.
[50:02]
>> I would agree with you. We're not
[50:03]
totally sure. However, the system that I
[50:05]
came from, my last district, the we we
[50:08]
also utilize the skinnies for our
[50:10]
special needs uh students that had
[50:11]
resource classrooms, [sighs and gasps]
[50:13]
90 minutes can be again a drag and
[50:15]
that's, you know, that that's a long
[50:18]
time. So, to be able to uh be creative
[50:19]
with the schedule and break that up so
[50:21]
they're receiving multiple services in
[50:23]
different formats, different rooms,
[50:24]
transition breaks, movement breaks. Um
[50:26]
it it can be built into the schedule as
[50:28]
well. I was gonna just with that um it's
[50:32]
also beneficial for our EL services. Um
[50:35]
our Bana Deetsz does an amazing job at
[50:37]
the high school. Um she has kids from
[50:40]
9th grade to 12th grade ranging in
[50:43]
newcomer to the country through like so
[50:45]
close to like being um per how we rate
[50:49]
it the proficient in in English and all
[50:52]
the levels. And so she is balancing that
[50:54]
right now on a seven period day where
[50:57]
she is bouncing around a whole lot to do
[51:00]
it. And it's I'm not saying it's not
[51:01]
good work cuz it is. But this could make
[51:03]
it better because if you think of her
[51:05]
work in skinnies across five days where
[51:09]
some kids right now at high school only
[51:11]
need two days of service. They don't
[51:13]
need five days of 25 to 45 minutes of
[51:16]
service. It allows more flexibility to
[51:19]
do that where then they're not missing
[51:22]
an AP US history class they want to be
[51:24]
in or they're not missing um healthcare
[51:26]
professions they want to be in because
[51:28]
those classes are only offered here and
[51:30]
here you know so it allows us a little
[51:31]
more flexibility with meeting needs like
[51:33]
that.
[51:36]
» Um just I I want to affirm that that
[51:39]
from my experience I think that 56 out
[51:42]
of 64 is really close to the sweet spot.
[51:44]
You know, remember that for those
[51:46]
high-flying students that want to get
[51:48]
the most out of school,
[51:51]
that's the minimum standard. I mean, if
[51:53]
you're taking 64 courses, you're fully
[51:55]
booked for the entire uh year year for
[51:58]
all four years. So, 56 out of 64 allows
[52:03]
an amount of grace that I think is
[52:05]
critical. And then secondly, I just want
[52:08]
the board to understand and the
[52:09]
community to understand that transitions
[52:11]
like these are overwhelmingly complex. I
[52:15]
just they're so,
[52:19]
you know, there's a there's a lot of
[52:20]
human decisions to be made, but there's
[52:23]
so many mathy things. Like just as as a
[52:25]
sidebar, if you take the 835 study halls
[52:30]
that kids are sitting in right now in
[52:32]
any given year and you try to calculate
[52:37]
how many butts and seats that would be,
[52:40]
it would be 119
[52:42]
students in a semester course because is
[52:45]
that that a semester it would be a
[52:47]
semester study hall. Correct.
[52:49]
>> Correct.
[52:50]
>> Okay. So that that's still
[52:53]
60
[52:56]
ADMs or average daily memberships or FTE
[53:01]
uh full-time students. That that that
[53:03]
would be that would equate to 60
[53:05]
full-time students. And I didn't do
[53:06]
anything with student aids and I didn't
[53:09]
do anything with early release or late
[53:12]
starts.
[53:15]
At the same time, if you move to eight
[53:19]
periods, you've got teachers teaching
[53:21]
six of eight periods. So, the the adult
[53:28]
in front of student portion of the day
[53:30]
increases considerably. Those numbers
[53:33]
are it's it's going to be fun to watch
[53:36]
it work out and it will work out. But I just want us to recognize how hard
[53:42]
this is for the team to do this and the
[53:45]
community to recognize how hard it is to
[53:48]
think like this. It's it's a great deal
[53:50]
of fun if you like that stuff. But um
[53:54]
but but I I just I appreciate what
[53:56]
you're going into.
[53:58]
Mindy did get a a really cool new
[54:00]
scheduling board to help out with this.
[54:02]
And I did tell her this this move
[54:04]
equates from doing like a year of
[54:06]
scheduling at a time to like two years
[54:09]
of scheduling at a time.
[54:11]
>> That's right.
[54:11]
>> So, she's super pumped.
[54:13]
>> But but it's only it's really like doing
[54:15]
two four period days instead of one
[54:17]
seven period day. So,
[54:18]
>> and again, back to the basics. What
[54:20]
we're talking about is having you know,
[54:21]
now we get a semester credit over those
[54:23]
18 weeks. Now you get a still the same
[54:25]
semester credit for nineweek because you
[54:28]
there are twice as much time in the
[54:29]
classroom. So every co quarter is a
[54:31]
semester's worth of that those 56
[54:33]
credits.
[54:34]
>> And I do want to quote student
[54:36]
representative Leightton over here. Uh I
[54:38]
don't know if you all heard it. She said
[54:39]
I wish we had that.
[54:43]
» I just want to say thank you. It's
[54:45]
really awesome. It's a strategic
[54:46]
investment in our student outcomes. So I
[54:49]
really appreciate that and I really
[54:50]
appreciate all the work you guys did on
[54:51]
this. Thank you.
[54:53]
And I just want to highlight one thing.
[54:55]
You you did mention it, but I just want
[54:56]
to really highlight it. This gives us
[54:58]
the opportunity to expand our pathways
[55:00]
programs with kids having opportunities
[55:02]
for internships because you think about
[55:03]
it today, right? We've got 46-inute
[55:05]
classes and there's no way for a student
[55:08]
to effectively get to a job site where
[55:10]
they're going to do an internship and
[55:11]
come back and get anything out of it
[55:13]
really, right? And thinking about the shed that they built at Tilden, too.
[55:17]
I mean, I can't imagine how difficult
[55:18]
that was even to accomplish that with the current kind of schedule.
[55:22]
So just really looking forward to the
[55:25]
possibilities that our students are
[55:26]
going to have through this. So
[55:27]
appreciate the work and the effort.
[55:28]
Thank you.
[55:31]
>> Nicely done.
[55:32]
>> Thank you.
[55:37]
» Right. Next on our agenda, we have an
[55:39]
ice arena discussion with Miss Suber.
[55:43]
Welcome.
[55:53]
Thank you. Uh thank you, Chair Tate,
[55:55]
directors of the board, superintendent
[55:57]
work camp Herman. Um tonight I am going
[55:59]
to provide an update on the ice arena
[56:02]
discussion. So we've had this at a work
[56:04]
session and now we are just bringing it
[56:07]
forward here.
[56:09]
Okay. So, as we work with our joint
[56:12]
powers committee and the city of
[56:14]
Hastings, an additional contract has
[56:17]
been brought forward related to the
[56:19]
locker room at the ice arena. So, we
[56:22]
currently have exclusive use of that
[56:24]
locker room. And there's an agreement
[56:26]
that goes back to 2001 that defines kind
[56:30]
of the terms of it. It's all linked into
[56:33]
this document. And I'm going to show
[56:34]
some screenshots of the um relevant
[56:38]
information. There's also some
[56:40]
supplementary emails and memos that go
[56:42]
back to about that same time period that
[56:45]
they're all linked in here if people are
[56:47]
interested, but those are not like
[56:50]
contracts or anything formal. They're
[56:52]
just some additional emails and memos.
[56:55]
So, within that um locker room
[56:57]
agreement, the first kind of area that's
[57:00]
important to understand is the payment
[57:03]
terms. So within that, it basically says
[57:06]
that the school district is going to pay
[57:08]
$8.50
[57:10]
per hour that we rent the ice um for
[57:14]
that locker room agreement. And then it
[57:17]
also states that there would be an
[57:18]
automatic increase each year of 2.5%.
[57:23]
Um I have linked in here a rate history
[57:26]
and while if you'll scroll down a little
[57:29]
bit, Lindy, thank you. there hadn't
[57:31]
always been those 2 and 12% increases.
[57:35]
Um, however, we are now caught up to
[57:37]
what that rate would be had those 2 and
[57:40]
12% increases happened each year. So,
[57:44]
for 2526,
[57:47]
um, we're at $15.76
[57:50]
an hour that we pay for the locker room.
[57:56]
Um the next piece in that agreement is
[57:58]
the city responsibilities.
[58:00]
So in consideration for the hourly
[58:03]
payment, the city agrees to do the
[58:05]
following things and it's basically that
[58:07]
they provide the weekly maintenance for
[58:09]
those locker rooms including the
[58:11]
cleaning of them. Um heat and
[58:13]
electricity to those locker rooms and
[58:15]
then cleaning supplies and equipment.
[58:18]
As far as the school district
[58:20]
responsibilities, um we kind of clean up
[58:23]
the room after use. So, sweeping it,
[58:25]
just keeping it orderly. Um, we secure
[58:28]
it during our practices. And then if
[58:31]
there were ever damage or repair needed
[58:34]
associated with negligence or vandalism,
[58:37]
we would be responsible for that. And
[58:39]
then we also provide insurance on the
[58:42]
property in there as well as workers
[58:44]
comp on our personnel.
[58:47]
The kind of ending of that agreement
[58:50]
talks about a donation. So the school
[58:53]
district acknowledges that it has no
[58:55]
ownership interest in the locker rooms
[58:56]
at the Hastings Civic Arena and the
[58:59]
school district's only interest in these
[59:01]
locker rooms is the interest created by
[59:03]
this agreement. So there were donations
[59:07]
um kind of funneled through a booster
[59:08]
club at the time that paid for these
[59:12]
locker rooms. But it's important to
[59:15]
understand that we have no ownership
[59:17]
interest in these locker rooms at all.
[59:21]
So from there, um, we've been having
[59:24]
discussions with the city about some
[59:26]
upcoming projects related to the civic
[59:29]
arena. And these are kind of rough, um,
[59:32]
timelines as well as dollar amounts. The
[59:34]
dollar amounts, this is what they had
[59:36]
provided us at the time, but they are
[59:39]
um, a year to two years old. So they're
[59:42]
just intended to be ballpark amounts.
[59:44]
But the varsity locker room area needs a
[59:47]
new roof. Um the estimated cost that the
[59:50]
city was looking for the district to um
[59:53]
participate or to provide is
[59:55]
approximately 215,000.
[59:59]
And then for the HVAC is about 30,000.
[1:00:03]
And then they also talked about a east
[1:00:05]
rink board replacement project that at
[1:00:08]
this point we haven't seen a cost on.
[1:00:11]
And then just out of transparency, we're
[1:00:13]
sharing that back in 2022, the district
[1:00:16]
did help contribute to a scoreboard. Um
[1:00:20]
the city provided a contribution, the
[1:00:23]
booster club, the hockey booster club
[1:00:24]
provided a contribution and then the
[1:00:26]
school district also provided a
[1:00:28]
contribution.
[1:00:31]
So, we have been working with our legal
[1:00:33]
counsel on the um whether it's legally
[1:00:38]
advisable or allowed for us to
[1:00:42]
provide funds to pay for these
[1:00:44]
improvements.
[1:00:45]
And I provided the legal opinion here
[1:00:48]
and I'll just kind of quickly summarize
[1:00:50]
it. But the agreement is silent on which
[1:00:53]
party is responsible for replacement or
[1:00:55]
repair of structural parts of the
[1:00:57]
property andor replacements
[1:01:00]
um that are capital expenditures. So
[1:01:02]
like the roof. And then in the
[1:01:05]
agreement, the city is responsible for
[1:01:06]
heat and electricity to the locker
[1:01:08]
rooms. So there's an argument that that
[1:01:10]
would include a functioning HVAC system.
[1:01:13]
And then as far as the roof, um the
[1:01:15]
agreement makes it clear that the city
[1:01:17]
owns the locker rooms. So all rights and
[1:01:20]
responsibilities of ownership are with
[1:01:22]
the city including costs associated with
[1:01:25]
repair and replacement of components of
[1:01:28]
the structure.
[1:01:30]
So in addition to that um school
[1:01:34]
districts have have school districts
[1:01:36]
have to follow public purpose meaning
[1:01:38]
that the funds that we receive from
[1:01:40]
taxpayers need to benefit the public and
[1:01:44]
with this facility the city owns it. Um
[1:01:47]
the district has no ownership interest
[1:01:49]
or maintenance responsibility for it.
[1:01:52]
And essentially funding a roof
[1:01:54]
replacement would be improving another
[1:01:56]
entity's capital asset. So if we think
[1:01:59]
about, you know, if by chance the ice
[1:02:01]
arena were sold or something and we
[1:02:03]
invested in it, there would really be be
[1:02:06]
no way for the district to get any of
[1:02:08]
those funds back. In addition, we re we
[1:02:11]
lease the ice time that we use just like
[1:02:14]
any other um person that rents ice time
[1:02:18]
at the arena. So we're paying that.
[1:02:22]
So looking at our current rate
[1:02:24]
structure, so these are the 25 26 rates.
[1:02:27]
We don't have the 26 27 rates yet, but
[1:02:30]
we would anticipate for the October
[1:02:33]
board meeting that we would have those.
[1:02:36]
So, the prime rate that the district is
[1:02:38]
charged is $270 per hour. Non-prime,
[1:02:43]
which typically doesn't happen, but
[1:02:45]
that's $180 an hour. And then the
[1:02:48]
district is charged a premium of $55 per
[1:02:52]
hour, which to our knowledge, we're the
[1:02:55]
only entity that is charged that
[1:02:57]
premium. It is specific just to the
[1:02:59]
school district. And then the locker
[1:03:01]
room usage that we talked about kind of
[1:03:03]
in the beginning, the $15.76
[1:03:06]
per hour. And then for any games that
[1:03:09]
are hosted there, there's an additional
[1:03:11]
fee of $225 per event. and that is for
[1:03:15]
providing cleaning and personnel. And
[1:03:18]
you can kind of see all the additional
[1:03:21]
things that are included in that. So
[1:03:23]
then as we look at a few examples, the
[1:03:26]
practice costs for like a boy's practice
[1:03:29]
that goes from 315 to 430. Um, by the
[1:03:32]
time you do the prime plus the premium
[1:03:35]
plus the locker room usage, it's $425.95
[1:03:40]
for that block of time.
[1:03:42]
>> [snorts]
[1:03:42]
>> Um, some of our practices r a little
[1:03:46]
different in time. So like a 440 to 550
[1:03:48]
that's strictly in hours 396.
[1:03:52]
And then a game by the time you do the
[1:03:55]
prime, the premium, the locker room
[1:03:58]
usage plus the 225, you get to 99171.
[1:04:04]
And then you can see the same example
[1:04:06]
for the girls.
[1:04:09]
As we look at our annual costs over
[1:04:11]
time, um you know, 2122 we were at
[1:04:14]
74,000.
[1:04:16]
Um by the time you get to 2425, we were
[1:04:20]
at 82,000
[1:04:22]
approximately. 2526 was 111,000.
[1:04:26]
And for 2627, we're estimating 116,000.
[1:04:32]
That is using just a straight 5%
[1:04:35]
increase. Um, like I said, we don't know
[1:04:38]
yet what those rates are for 2627, but
[1:04:41]
that's what we currently have estimated.
[1:04:45]
And then just to do some comparison, um,
[1:04:48]
we did look at other ranks just to see
[1:04:51]
what the rates are that they're
[1:04:52]
charging. So, TRIO was one that was
[1:04:55]
readily available. Um, you can see those
[1:04:58]
dates are November of 26 through 27, so
[1:05:01]
a year after the rates we were looking
[1:05:03]
at. And then the premium rate is 265
[1:05:08]
an hour. So if you kind of think about
[1:05:11]
how that compares back to our prime of
[1:05:14]
270, but then we have a premium on top
[1:05:17]
of that and the locker room usage on top
[1:05:19]
of that. So that's one example. Um we
[1:05:23]
also provided some additional examples
[1:05:25]
in here. Um again, if this is 2026, if
[1:05:31]
we look at the 2027,
[1:05:34]
um you can see the the highest one on
[1:05:36]
there is Apple Valley at 295 and that
[1:05:40]
again is for prime ice time.
[1:05:44]
So, at this point, we can just open it
[1:05:46]
up for discussion. Um, but all just kind
[1:05:50]
of in the anticipation of next month's
[1:05:53]
board meeting hopefully with the new
[1:05:56]
rates in hand just so we're kind of
[1:05:58]
aware of what's coming and if anybody
[1:06:01]
wants to comment.
[1:06:05]
Um, one thing that was discussed during
[1:06:07]
the work session that I I would say
[1:06:09]
would be valuable to bring up was we
[1:06:11]
discussed um
[1:06:14]
with Trent as well talking to the
[1:06:16]
different families about how this this
[1:06:18]
situation might increase fees for hockey
[1:06:21]
players and how it would be super
[1:06:24]
valuable for him to get in front of that
[1:06:27]
conversation. And part of that
[1:06:29]
conversation was also recognizing that
[1:06:31]
we want to be equitable to our sports
[1:06:33]
and realizing we want the opportunities
[1:06:35]
there. But with these [clears throat]
[1:06:37]
outlier costs, um there's not much
[1:06:40]
there. I mean, it warrants a a different
[1:06:43]
discussion about fees. I don't know if
[1:06:45]
anybody else wants to comment on that,
[1:06:47]
but I just [laughter] wanted to get that
[1:06:49]
before the public.
[1:06:52]
Yeah, I guess along with that if if we
[1:06:54]
were to increase uh student fees for
[1:06:59]
this when what is the timing on that?
[1:07:01]
Like what
[1:07:02]
>> I don't we wouldn't we'd likely have to
[1:07:04]
do that for next year.
[1:07:04]
>> For next year this year we would they've
[1:07:07]
already
[1:07:07]
>> they've already and collected.
[1:07:09]
>> Yeah. And also it's published
[1:07:10]
everywhere.
[1:07:11]
>> Right. Right.
[1:07:13]
>> Okay. So, I mean, and honestly, you
[1:07:15]
you're estimating a 5% increase, but if
[1:07:17]
they truly expect us to invest in
[1:07:21]
their roof through our fees, it'll
[1:07:23]
probably be higher than that. So, we'll
[1:07:25]
see it when we see it. Um, okay.
[1:07:30]
Any uh Director Beer Meer?
[1:07:34]
>> I think at the work session, didn't you
[1:07:36]
tabulate like the Could you go back to
[1:07:40]
the 21
[1:07:42]
right there?
[1:07:43]
Didn't you tabulate it was like 57%
[1:07:46]
increase since this whole
[1:07:50]
series of years have come about? That's
[1:07:53]
a pretty big increase. Um
[1:07:58]
I've said it, this has been kind of a
[1:08:00]
painful conversation because we're kind
[1:08:02]
of at an impass with the city on it, but
[1:08:04]
I really feel we're
[1:08:07]
we are doing everything contractually
[1:08:10]
that we're obligated to right now. and I just I think we're doing enough
[1:08:15]
now. I think this increase is going to
[1:08:18]
be interesting and but we'll know soon
[1:08:21]
and um but I I don't think any more
[1:08:24]
monies should be put into this than what
[1:08:27]
we already
[1:08:29]
are obligated to do and and it has been
[1:08:33]
a tough conversation. It has. We did
[1:08:35]
have a meeting with uh the men's uh
[1:08:39]
varsity coach Dustin and then we did we
[1:08:41]
also talked to uh the uh the youth
[1:08:46]
one of the youth directors from the from
[1:08:48]
the youth programs. Um we would like to
[1:08:51]
talk to the girls program. Um haven't
[1:08:53]
heard back on that yet, but hopefully
[1:08:54]
we'll hear something. Um they did get
[1:08:57]
the information. Um, so I don't know
[1:08:59]
what they've done with it. And I I did
[1:09:02]
put a request in, hey, do you want to
[1:09:04]
meet with us or not? He uh had TJ hasn't
[1:09:07]
responded yet. And uh like I said to
[1:09:10]
him, that's totally fine. But
[1:09:12]
[clears throat] uh we would kind of like
[1:09:13]
to have that conversation with them
[1:09:15]
also. But uh we're just trying to be
[1:09:18]
transparent here in in what's going on
[1:09:20]
and we are on the right side of this.
[1:09:24]
>> Dr. Zusa,
[1:09:26]
>> unfair question to ask. So I for the
[1:09:29]
time being I just want this to be um
[1:09:32]
theoretical and rhetorical and I don't
[1:09:35]
expect an answer but you know one of the
[1:09:37]
hurdles that we have is that by law we
[1:09:40]
can't spend money on something that we
[1:09:41]
don't own. Um so that that's just the
[1:09:44]
way it is. And so it looks like the only
[1:09:48]
way that they can get money out of us is
[1:09:51]
by increasing the lease rate or the
[1:09:54]
rental rate or some special fee rate and
[1:09:58]
put it in that rate structure. And I
[1:10:01]
understand that at this time we have no
[1:10:03]
owner interest,
[1:10:05]
but rhetorically
[1:10:08]
I just wonder if maybe we don't have an
[1:10:10]
interest in ownership
[1:10:13]
of the locker room. If indeed the locker
[1:10:16]
room we're the only tenant that ever
[1:10:18]
opens the door, ever walks into that
[1:10:21]
room, is there a way that it makes sense
[1:10:24]
that we own the locker room? And it's
[1:10:28]
rhetorical right now. I don't want the
[1:10:29]
answer. Sorry. I I think it's better if
[1:10:32]
we wait.
[1:10:35]
>> I'll let the [clears throat] board
[1:10:36]
ponder that and I want you to think
[1:10:37]
about the joint maintenance facility.
[1:10:41]
>> Mhm.
[1:10:42]
>> Situation
[1:10:43]
>> and it's just I I do believe this. Um
[1:10:47]
it's just how life goes. I think it's
[1:10:49]
challenging for two public entities to
[1:10:52]
try to share an ownership of property. I
[1:10:54]
just think it's really challenging
[1:10:55]
because you we don't we're not at
[1:10:57]
liberty to do things like the private
[1:10:59]
sector. Um the state is very clear what
[1:11:02]
we can and can't do with our funds and
[1:11:05]
it's not always the same requirements
[1:11:07]
for public entities that meaning they're
[1:11:10]
not always equal in their ability to do
[1:11:12]
things. So I just really don't feel
[1:11:15]
comfortable um well you don't want my
[1:11:17]
answer so I'll just let leave it at
[1:11:19]
that. I can infer.
[1:11:22]
>> Okay, [laughter]
[1:11:23]
>> just just for context, uh the city and
[1:11:25]
the the district co-own a maintenance
[1:11:28]
facility here. We own 45%, city owns
[1:11:30]
55%. So there is a joint partnership
[1:11:32]
there. So for folks who aren't aware of
[1:11:34]
that, that's the reference. All right.
[1:11:37]
Any other comments, questions, anything?
[1:11:40]
Director Bren also Oh. Oh, I was just
[1:11:43]
going to say uh there, you know, there
[1:11:45]
was discussion we we will be charged
[1:11:48]
this. Um so we did have discussion about
[1:11:52]
what what would other opportunities and
[1:11:54]
options be and obviously they're they're
[1:11:56]
more easily ruled out because we have a
[1:11:59]
beautiful arena that everybody loves
[1:12:01]
going to.
[1:12:02]
>> So this isn't to say that we're trying
[1:12:03]
to get rid of that. are just trying to
[1:12:04]
find other options to still make the
[1:12:08]
payment that they're requiring for us to
[1:12:10]
make.
[1:12:13]
>> One second on that because that was
[1:12:15]
discussed and uh the varsity coach said
[1:12:21]
very adamantly that we're staying at
[1:12:23]
they want to stay at the arena. So that
[1:12:26]
was discussed at uh our meeting with the
[1:12:29]
hockey program.
[1:12:32]
» And then in the work session, we kind of
[1:12:34]
highlighted some of the ability of the
[1:12:37]
city to to maintain the facility on
[1:12:40]
their own. We think about the ability to
[1:12:41]
raise taxes and treat it like a public
[1:12:43]
parks resource that they truly own and maintain that at the same level that
[1:12:49]
it would be CPA Adams Park or anything
[1:12:51]
um of that nature. And given the
[1:12:54]
timeline that we're aware of for the
[1:12:57]
roof replacement and some other pieces
[1:12:59]
that there were even opportunities maybe
[1:13:02]
to lobby uh for bonding monies from the
[1:13:06]
state through the um advocacy work of
[1:13:08]
the house rep or state senator. So there
[1:13:11]
are some levers that can be pulled and
[1:13:14]
some of them aren't a guarantee. Bond
[1:13:15]
dollars are not anything that's going to
[1:13:17]
be prescribed to you um as a guarantee.
[1:13:19]
But the power to raise tax is something
[1:13:21]
we don't have. So, we know that this is
[1:13:22]
going to come from a pool that's
[1:13:24]
relatively fixed for us, and it just
[1:13:26]
squeezes it even tighter. Kind of makes
[1:13:29]
it a lot harder for us to manage that
[1:13:31]
over time.
[1:13:34]
>> All right. Anything else?
[1:13:37]
>> All right. Thank you. Uh, next up, we
[1:13:40]
have our building construction fund
[1:13:41]
update.
[1:13:43]
Okay. We continue to work to close out
[1:13:46]
these projects. So, we currently have
[1:13:48]
just two projects in process. It's the
[1:13:50]
high school concession stand and the
[1:13:53]
district-wide security project for
[1:13:55]
exterior door hardware. Um we have
[1:13:58]
337,000
[1:14:00]
approximately in this fund that at one
[1:14:03]
point was approximately 49 million. Um
[1:14:06]
and we do know we have an arbitrage
[1:14:08]
payment. So we'll be using some of those
[1:14:10]
funds for that. But no major updates
[1:14:13]
since last month as far as projects.
[1:14:16]
>> Thank you.
[1:14:18]
Uh, next up we have the legal uh data
[1:14:21]
request update.
[1:14:22]
>> All right, that one's me, too. So,
[1:14:24]
private citizens, uh, we had four new
[1:14:28]
requests since our last board meeting,
[1:14:30]
and we currently have six total open.
[1:14:33]
And then from commercial and financial,
[1:14:35]
uh, we had two new ones since our last
[1:14:38]
board meeting, and we currently have
[1:14:39]
four open. As far as legal bills, there
[1:14:42]
were no legal bills paid in this last
[1:14:45]
month related to data requests.
[1:14:48]
>> Thank you.
[1:14:50]
Uh next up, we have our uh schoolboard
[1:14:53]
representative and committee updates.
[1:14:55]
We'll start with ISD 917 with Director
[1:14:58]
Zusk.
[1:15:01]
» You'll see a bunch of hires. Uh this is not surprising. ISD 917 ran into
[1:15:07]
the same dilemma that we ran into with
[1:15:09]
our uh we call ours paraprofessionals or
[1:15:12]
PSAs. They referred to them as ESPs. Um
[1:15:18]
and and the same thing happened at the
[1:15:20]
end of the year. They knew that they
[1:15:21]
were going to have a number of people
[1:15:24]
leave and uh surprise us with their
[1:15:27]
departure. And so they they backfilled
[1:15:30]
behind a lot of vacancies just as the
[1:15:33]
new school year starts. And th this is
[1:15:36]
kind of an interesting thing. As you
[1:15:38]
know, we have students on a wait list
[1:15:40]
for 917. And that's problematic for
[1:15:43]
Hastings. It's problematic for any
[1:15:45]
school district that has um a number of
[1:15:48]
students on the case on on the wait
[1:15:50]
list. And so what's going to happen is
[1:15:53]
throughout the year, they've got a model
[1:15:55]
in place where every month kids can be
[1:15:58]
joining at a faster rate. And that
[1:16:01]
requires hiring more pair of
[1:16:03]
professionals, hiring more teachers. I
[1:16:05]
think the plan will work. Um it won't
[1:16:07]
work perfectly, but it will work better.
[1:16:09]
So I think that the weight list will be
[1:16:11]
reduced. I'm real proud of what they're
[1:16:12]
doing right now.
[1:16:15]
>> All right. Thank you. Uh next up, we got
[1:16:17]
AMSD again with Director Zusk.
[1:16:20]
>> Yep. If uh Miss Humble, if you can
[1:16:23]
please open up that first document, the
[1:16:24]
election guide. And there's just three
[1:16:27]
pages I want to point to. Um, you'll see
[1:16:29]
the pages come up as you as you uh
[1:16:32]
scroll down, but please go to page 13.
[1:16:41]
This shows data from all of the areas of
[1:16:46]
the state by operations areas and it
[1:16:51]
talks about the teacher shortage.
[1:16:54]
The metro area somewhat
[1:16:57]
counterintuitively
[1:16:58]
has less of a problem hiring teachers
[1:17:02]
right now than outstate. If you look at
[1:17:05]
the very bottom, that's the educational
[1:17:08]
district 8 in southwest Minnesota.
[1:17:12]
They're 25%
[1:17:14]
higher in the number of of hires that
[1:17:18]
they have as compared to the metro. that
[1:17:21]
the challenge of them filling classrooms
[1:17:23]
with licensed teachers is overwhelmingly
[1:17:27]
hard and they've got more teachers
[1:17:29]
teaching out of out of placement
[1:17:32]
lensures and on on um tier three tier 4
[1:17:37]
licenses because of it. So then if
[1:17:40]
you'll jump to the next slide please.
[1:17:41]
>> Can I ask a question?
[1:17:42]
>> Yeah.
[1:17:44]
So, can we infer from that that um
[1:17:47]
staffing and retention might be a
[1:17:50]
Minnesota statewide problem?
[1:17:54]
>> No, we should infer that it's a
[1:17:56]
nationwide problem.
[1:17:56]
>> Okay.
[1:17:57]
>> And and it it goes lure group by lure
[1:18:00]
group, meaning um on the next slide
[1:18:02]
we'll look at how challenging it is for
[1:18:04]
ESL, but that that map really tells us
[1:18:07]
that hiring teachers is hard. And right
[1:18:10]
now, like we've had a good hiring cycle
[1:18:12]
in Hastings. We filled early. We filled
[1:18:15]
smart. And thanks to the leadership team
[1:18:18]
in HR. I mean, it it went very well. The
[1:18:21]
principles in HR did a great job. But I
[1:18:24]
don't want people to think that there's
[1:18:26]
not a teacher shortage. There is still a
[1:18:27]
teacher shortage. In particular, um high achieving math and science classes.
[1:18:35]
Think physics, think calculus. Very hard
[1:18:37]
to hire a calculus teacher, a physics
[1:18:39]
teacher. It's very hard to hire um
[1:18:42]
teched teachers. It's very hard to hire
[1:18:44]
fax teachers. Um special ed teachers or
[1:18:48]
not just special ed teachers but uh
[1:18:50]
occupational therapists, physical
[1:18:52]
therapists, uh speech language
[1:18:55]
therapists. Those are those are really challenging. So we it it is a
[1:19:00]
national problem teacher shortage and
[1:19:03]
it's it's a much more it's much more
[1:19:06]
exasperated out in outstate than it is
[1:19:08]
in metro. Mhm. Thank you.
[1:19:09]
>> Yeah. Thanks. Th this this is worth a
[1:19:13]
read. I I won't read it to you, but um
[1:19:16]
look at page four uh 14 in this booklet.
[1:19:19]
It talks about the the resources for
[1:19:22]
English language learners and how really
[1:19:25]
it's uh it's very challenging right now
[1:19:29]
for um for our ESL students because we
[1:19:33]
can't find enough ESL teachers. And then
[1:19:35]
just the last page I want you to to look
[1:19:38]
at is the next page. And this chart
[1:19:41]
specifically,
[1:19:43]
this chart shows the enrollment
[1:19:46]
throughout the state. And it talks about
[1:19:49]
[clears throat] the um
[1:19:53]
the different risk categories. So free
[1:19:56]
and reduced lunch students. uh what is
[1:20:00]
it throughout the state this year going
[1:20:02]
into uh or pardon me last year 20 202526
[1:20:07]
the number for the state is if I'm
[1:20:09]
reading it correctly 39% and at in the
[1:20:13]
7count metro area it's 52%. So we have
[1:20:17]
more than half of the students that
[1:20:19]
would qualify for free and reduced lunch
[1:20:21]
although every student is getting free
[1:20:22]
lunch right now.
[1:20:24]
English language learners, again a
[1:20:27]
discrepancy. When you look uh statewide,
[1:20:30]
it's 10%. If you look throughout the
[1:20:32]
metro area, it's 63%. Special ed, the
[1:20:35]
discrepancy isn't quite as great, but
[1:20:37]
those numbers are still high. And
[1:20:39]
homelessness is is just a remarkable. Uh
[1:20:42]
it's a tale of it's a tale of two
[1:20:44]
realities. If you look at it uh at
[1:20:47]
percent statewide 1.1% but if you look
[1:20:50]
at it for the 7count metro area the AMSD
[1:20:54]
uh school systems 69.9%.
[1:20:57]
I mean that's a lot of homelessness.
[1:21:00]
>> Um 69.9%.
[1:21:03]
65. Pardon me. Couldn't see it from
[1:21:04]
here. But so I just I we sometimes we
[1:21:10]
because we're looking just at our
[1:21:12]
district, I think it's it's a good idea
[1:21:14]
to look a little broader.
[1:21:17]
>> I'd also like to comment that the free
[1:21:18]
and reduced price lunch percentage is
[1:21:20]
likely low or lower than what it's
[1:21:23]
actually at because we truly never
[1:21:25]
capture that in reality. So just keep
[1:21:29]
that in mind, too.
[1:21:32]
Uh, Chair Tate sent out the next slide,
[1:21:34]
the next slideshow, please. Their slide
[1:21:36]
deck is um in that. Thanks. Uh, Chair
[1:21:41]
Tate talked about this in her note to
[1:21:43]
us. If anybody's available to go to this
[1:21:46]
amplifying student voice, this is what
[1:21:48]
used to be the student schoolboard
[1:21:51]
representative forum in instead it's
[1:21:54]
about amplifying student voice. And the
[1:21:55]
reason that they did that is they found
[1:21:57]
out that there's a lot of school
[1:21:58]
districts that have different schemas
[1:22:01]
for amplifying student voice instead of
[1:22:03]
having uh student schoolboard reps. So I
[1:22:06]
hope that all four of our student reps
[1:22:08]
can go on October 28th. Um I I really do
[1:22:13]
and um I I hope that we have board
[1:22:15]
members that can go. If nobody else can,
[1:22:17]
I will. But um it's in Chaza if
[1:22:21]
anybody's interested. Um, but so as we
[1:22:24]
get closer, we'll figure out how to do
[1:22:26]
that. But what we would do for the
[1:22:27]
students is we would have a van. We'd
[1:22:29]
leave from the middle school parking lot
[1:22:31]
where you guys parked over on that side
[1:22:33]
of the building and we'd drive up
[1:22:35]
together and we'd be back. And if you're
[1:22:36]
in an after school activity, you'd be
[1:22:38]
back almost in time because the
[1:22:40]
conference ends at 1:30 in Chaza. So
[1:22:42]
we'd be back 2:45ish.
[1:22:45]
So Yep. Excellent. Excellent. Great.
[1:22:50]
Bye.
[1:22:51]
All right. And then just the last one,
[1:22:56]
we're not even going to open it up in
[1:22:57]
the interest of time, but look at slides
[1:23:00]
20
[1:23:02]
to 29. They're about school perceptions
[1:23:06]
and data about schools.
[1:23:09]
And then if you
[1:23:13]
I was going to make a joke, so I'll make
[1:23:15]
the joke. But if you're into Kelshi and
[1:23:17]
you want to make a bet on the on who's
[1:23:20]
going to win what races statewide, the
[1:23:23]
last third of this is about what it
[1:23:26]
looks like as of last Friday or pardon
[1:23:30]
me, a week ago, Friday.
[1:23:32]
But anyhow, so what slide are you on
[1:23:36]
now, Miss Humble?
[1:23:39]
>> Oh, okay. Okay.
[1:23:41]
>> Number
[1:23:42]
>> Okay. Yeah. But but look at uh yeah when you get to this look look at slides
[1:23:49]
20 through slide 29 and it's all about
[1:23:53]
schools.
[1:23:56]
» Okay. Thank you.
[1:23:58]
>> Thank you. Any questions?
[1:24:02]
All right. Thank you for that. Uh next
[1:24:04]
up we have community collaboration
[1:24:05]
committee update.
[1:24:07]
>> Yeah we actually did meet today before
[1:24:09]
this meeting. I'll prepare a summary for
[1:24:12]
next meeting to include in the report.
[1:24:14]
But uh just some highlights. We
[1:24:16]
determined that we'll plan an event
[1:24:19]
after uh we receive this perception
[1:24:22]
surveys back. Um I think that will get
[1:24:24]
us a lot of ammo um for what we're
[1:24:26]
looking to accomplish within the
[1:24:28]
community collaboration events. Um
[1:24:31]
[clears throat] we're hoping to gain
[1:24:32]
some clarity from the more focused
[1:24:34]
questions that we'll be offering this
[1:24:36]
time around. Um and given the timing in
[1:24:39]
late later in November, um we're just
[1:24:43]
going to go ahead and move the event out
[1:24:44]
that we had talked about before. Um but
[1:24:46]
as a followup to previous
[1:24:49]
uh feedback we received from the
[1:24:51]
community and um action items that we
[1:24:53]
discussed at our last meeting um that I
[1:24:56]
brought before the board. Um we it's our
[1:24:58]
intent to um continue to find times for
[1:25:03]
all of us to get into the schools. Um
[1:25:06]
and uh Lindy is assisting with that
[1:25:10]
calendar. Um, and then two, uh, we
[1:25:13]
talked with Carrie Gore about making
[1:25:15]
sure we get little Facebook briefings
[1:25:16]
out on, um, board topics and board
[1:25:19]
snippets of what we discussed, um, just
[1:25:21]
for for just for a little snippet for
[1:25:23]
the community to see, um, what we're
[1:25:26]
talking about on top of, uh, the
[1:25:29]
published meeting minutes. Um, and then
[1:25:32]
also we discussed the um, uh, putting
[1:25:35]
out emails to staff about board agendas
[1:25:38]
um, policies um, and just making sure
[1:25:40]
that they're perpetually aware of what
[1:25:43]
we're going to be discussing um,
[1:25:45]
policies that we're going to be working
[1:25:46]
through um, to give them ample time to
[1:25:49]
give feedback on those. Thank you.
[1:25:52]
>> Thank you.
[1:25:54]
All right. Uh, next up, facility or
[1:25:56]
finance and facilities committee.
[1:25:58]
>> Yep. There was there's not been a
[1:26:00]
facilities meeting um in the last uh
[1:26:03]
since our last meeting and we don't have
[1:26:05]
one on the books right now. We need to
[1:26:07]
get get one on the books now that I
[1:26:09]
think about it. But [snorts] uh the the
[1:26:11]
finance report is going to be really
[1:26:13]
brief because we will hear from Director
[1:26:16]
Subert later in this meeting about the
[1:26:18]
two things that um I that I've noted.
[1:26:22]
One [snorts] is a presentation about
[1:26:24]
four uh three different vendors for the
[1:26:27]
perception survey and another one is um
[1:26:31]
a way of investing money that the
[1:26:34]
district will be that we have a
[1:26:36]
recommendation for you to consider.
[1:26:40]
>> Thank you. All right. Any uh any
[1:26:43]
questions? Okay. Next up, we've got
[1:26:45]
Joint Powers Committee update. Director
[1:26:48]
Milner.
[1:26:50]
>> Yeah. So, I don't have a whole lot to
[1:26:51]
add other than Director Suber's
[1:26:54]
presentation we went through with the
[1:26:56]
Hastings hockey boosters and um I think
[1:26:59]
they were surprised at some of the
[1:27:01]
additional costs that we have been
[1:27:02]
paying. I don't think they realized that
[1:27:05]
we already are being charged that $55
[1:27:08]
premium on top of the rates. Um and so,
[1:27:13]
you know, just knowing that we probably
[1:27:14]
face another large jump was surprising
[1:27:17]
to them. But I like having the open
[1:27:20]
lines of communication. I think that
[1:27:21]
piece of it is really important so that
[1:27:23]
there's no surprises and if we do end up
[1:27:26]
having to increase fees for our hockey
[1:27:28]
families, um that that's going to be
[1:27:30]
communicated well and and why this is
[1:27:33]
happening. So if anybody's really
[1:27:35]
interested, our next meeting with the
[1:27:37]
city is next Wednesday morning at 7:30
[1:27:40]
in the morning at Tilden. Um and those
[1:27:42]
are open meetings. So, if anybody wants
[1:27:45]
to be there to see what the city's
[1:27:47]
decision is going to be for our
[1:27:49]
district, you know, and what what those
[1:27:51]
fees will be, they're already different
[1:27:53]
than all of the other users that use
[1:27:56]
that civic arena. And uh it's going to
[1:27:59]
be interesting to see what the city
[1:28:01]
presents to us and what the discussion
[1:28:03]
will be. So, join us next Wednesday for
[1:28:05]
our next meeting if you'd like to.
[1:28:07]
That's it.
[1:28:10]
>> Any questions? All right. Next up, we
[1:28:13]
have NEPAC the NAPAC committee update
[1:28:15]
with director Bruns.
[1:28:16]
>> Yeah, the things I'll draw your
[1:28:17]
attention to u the intentional work
[1:28:19]
around reposting our language and
[1:28:22]
cultural positions. They they're
[1:28:24]
integral to achieving kind of the first
[1:28:27]
vote of concurrence we've had in in a
[1:28:29]
really long time. And it's not for a
[1:28:31]
lack of trying. Um the positions are
[1:28:33]
posted all all the monies whether that
[1:28:35]
was coming from the grant which we got
[1:28:37]
so that's awesome or from the general
[1:28:39]
fund they were going to exist. So, it's
[1:28:40]
just about finding the people starting
[1:28:42]
with one and hopefully two to be able to
[1:28:45]
fulfill those roles. So, there's also a
[1:28:46]
connection with John Johnson down um at
[1:28:48]
Prairie Island and try and leverage
[1:28:51]
contacts there.
[1:28:54]
» Put it out to his people. So, I I did
[1:28:56]
reach out. we've got. So, I'm hoping.
[1:28:58]
>> Excellent.
[1:28:59]
>> Hoping
[1:29:00]
>> and and it's it's exciting to see what's
[1:29:03]
coming out of teaching and learning to
[1:29:04]
support learners because when director
[1:29:05]
Hajes brings that data, it is
[1:29:07]
disseminated by students identified as
[1:29:09]
Native American and we can see that
[1:29:10]
growth and we're finally seeing that and
[1:29:13]
we see what it's doing for all learners.
[1:29:14]
The literacy work that's been done and then the commitment to math like we
[1:29:18]
are seeing students grow and in
[1:29:20]
particular those that are targeted for
[1:29:21]
interventions and they happen to be
[1:29:23]
Native American are excelling. Um the
[1:29:26]
I'll draw your attention to to events
[1:29:28]
that are hosted by NAPAC that are
[1:29:30]
hopefully upcoming. They are open to
[1:29:33]
everyone. So it's not that you have to
[1:29:34]
be a member of anything. They are open
[1:29:37]
to the public. It's cultural education.
[1:29:39]
It's also participation because it's
[1:29:41]
super rad. And this impacts over 100
[1:29:44]
students in our district and it's a
[1:29:45]
connection to them and also for them to
[1:29:47]
connect to history and tradition. Uh but
[1:29:50]
moxin making October 3rd through the 4th
[1:29:52]
9 to 3 p.m. each day uh at the
[1:29:54]
curriculum center ribbon skirts and
[1:29:56]
ribbon shirts. What's cool about this is
[1:29:58]
that it can have that connection to what
[1:29:59]
students wear at the graduation ceremony
[1:30:01]
in May. So it'll be February 20th to the
[1:30:04]
21st again 9 to 3 p.m. each day at the
[1:30:06]
curriculum center. And then there's some
[1:30:08]
work being done around professional
[1:30:10]
development and planning for Indigenous
[1:30:11]
People's Day uh in October.
[1:30:15]
Next meeting is October 1st at the
[1:30:17]
curriculum center. Any questions about
[1:30:21]
Oh, I I should add that one thing that
[1:30:23]
they were we've been working on is h
[1:30:25]
just like the tribal nations flags are
[1:30:27]
hanging in the commons area of the high
[1:30:29]
school, they have been purchased and are
[1:30:31]
awaiting where they will be situated in
[1:30:34]
buildings across the district. So, they
[1:30:36]
have been ordered. They are on campuses
[1:30:38]
and in a walkth through last spring, the guiding principles to have them in
[1:30:42]
the cafeteria. that seems to make the
[1:30:44]
most sense in some of those other
[1:30:45]
spaces, but they are that process is
[1:30:49]
happening and the trying to develop how
[1:30:52]
to then honor that when those go.
[1:30:56]
>> All right, thank you.
[1:30:59]
Next [clears throat] up, uh, student
[1:31:00]
schoolboard committee update with again
[1:31:02]
director Bruns.
[1:31:04]
>> The only thing I was going to share, we
[1:31:05]
have not met, but was to share the
[1:31:06]
opportunity about student voice. So,
[1:31:08]
follow the link currently is busted, but
[1:31:10]
just let Lindy know and then we'll get
[1:31:11]
it all taken care of.
[1:31:13]
All right, thank you. Uh, then we have
[1:31:16]
our school perception survey ad hoc
[1:31:18]
committee update from Director Zuzac.
[1:31:21]
>> Yeah, much thanks to Chair Tate and
[1:31:24]
Director Beerm for for their good work
[1:31:26]
on this. Um, we basically looked at all
[1:31:29]
three of the surveys, spent I more than
[1:31:32]
half the time on the staff survey, and
[1:31:34]
part of what happened was as we would
[1:31:35]
make changes on the staff survey,
[1:31:37]
similar uh changes would trickle down to
[1:31:40]
the parent survey and to the student
[1:31:42]
survey. So, it was it, you know, we
[1:31:45]
started with the one that we thought
[1:31:46]
would be most challenging. Um and just
[1:31:49]
the the precepts that that went into it
[1:31:52]
um that are worth noting. One is that we
[1:31:54]
really wanted to get data that was
[1:31:57]
useful and so we looked at questions
[1:32:00]
that were providing useful data and if
[1:32:03]
it wasn't useful data then we were
[1:32:05]
trying to change some of the questions
[1:32:09]
uh in order to get the data to be
[1:32:11]
useful. I'll talk more about that in a
[1:32:12]
moment. The second thing is whenever
[1:32:15]
there's an open-ended question like when
[1:32:18]
we asked for comments, we talked about
[1:32:20]
how it's important that that they don't
[1:32:22]
target a person or a position, but
[1:32:24]
instead uh talk about processes
[1:32:26]
throughout the district so that we
[1:32:28]
really can change what needs to happen,
[1:32:30]
but people people aren't targeted. Um
[1:32:33]
because we we felt like like that that
[1:32:35]
was more fair and reasonable for staff.
[1:32:38]
And then
[1:32:40]
we we did a a a big aha came up and and
[1:32:46]
it's this one of the things is that many
[1:32:50]
of the questions made great sense but
[1:32:53]
weren't providing good data because we
[1:32:55]
didn't know why. And so what we said was
[1:32:59]
if you say disagree or strongly disagree
[1:33:02]
in your answer when you're filling it
[1:33:04]
out, whether you're a student or you're
[1:33:06]
a staff member or you're a a parent,
[1:33:09]
we're asking that you go then after that
[1:33:12]
category of questions. You know, there's
[1:33:14]
10 to 12 questions in a category. Then
[1:33:17]
you go down below and when it says, do
[1:33:20]
you have any comments? Please tell us
[1:33:22]
why you said disagree or why you said
[1:33:24]
strongly disagree. just so that the data
[1:33:27]
is useful. That that's really the goal.
[1:33:29]
And basically, we got through the whole
[1:33:30]
thing in two meetings, which was
[1:33:32]
terrific. We sent the the data out to
[1:33:34]
Darren. We got more information back
[1:33:36]
today.
[1:33:39]
It's a little messy. Do you mind if I
[1:33:41]
comment on it? The gist of it is this.
[1:33:45]
Um, if you have a student at Pinerest,
[1:33:47]
the middle school, and the high school,
[1:33:50]
and you complete the survey, and you've
[1:33:52]
said that you have a student at
[1:33:54]
Pinerest, at the middle school, and at
[1:33:55]
the high school, and you make a comment
[1:33:58]
that, well, maybe it's a very, very
[1:34:01]
affirming comment, or maybe it's a very
[1:34:04]
delletterious comment.
[1:34:06]
How do we know which school you're
[1:34:09]
really proud of or which school you're
[1:34:10]
really struggling with? And so we asked
[1:34:12]
Darren if there's some way to clean up
[1:34:14]
that and it it doesn't seem like it's
[1:34:16]
easy. So we have a little bit more
[1:34:19]
talking to do about it.
[1:34:21]
>> I'd like to add just a little bit of
[1:34:22]
context. Thank you so today and as a
[1:34:24]
parent with students in multiple schools
[1:34:27]
you go today it's framed that first you
[1:34:29]
go through every single question for say
[1:34:31]
example Pinerest and then you have to go
[1:34:34]
through all of the questions again for
[1:34:36]
the middle school. So it seems like
[1:34:38]
you're answering the same qu you're
[1:34:39]
reading the same question over and over
[1:34:42]
again. And so we had asked and and this
[1:34:45]
is where I think there there was a
[1:34:46]
disconnect between what was in my brain
[1:34:48]
and what we discussed at the table. But
[1:34:50]
we need to go back to Darren again
[1:34:52]
because I suggested or I'd like to
[1:34:54]
suggest that we say, "Okay, for example,
[1:34:57]
my child feels safe at school and then
[1:34:59]
have boxes set up for Pinerest and boxes
[1:35:02]
set up for the middle school so that you can you can say which school it's
[1:35:06]
in, but you're only reading the question
[1:35:08]
once and responding once instead of
[1:35:11]
reading twice, responding twice." Um, so
[1:35:14]
yeah, so we're seeing if we can just
[1:35:15]
change the structure of the survey to
[1:35:17]
make it quicker for parents with the
[1:35:18]
hopes of it being faster. Um, and then I
[1:35:22]
had a I had an idea and I thought, you
[1:35:23]
know, we had 14% of parents respond this
[1:35:26]
time. What if we sent out a a first uh
[1:35:31]
survey and it says, I'm happy with
[1:35:33]
everything. I don't want to respond to a
[1:35:35]
survey. Yes. [laughter]
[1:35:38]
Right. Like that would be helpful
[1:35:40]
information. or I just don't have time
[1:35:41]
to respond to us. I don't know
[1:35:43]
something. But uh yeah, we just we want
[1:35:45]
to get the parent responses up, right?
[1:35:47]
So do any I even suggested gift cards
[1:35:50]
for provided by board members,
[1:35:52]
[laughter]
[1:35:53]
>> right?
[1:35:54]
>> Not the district.
[1:35:55]
>> Board member will chip in on gift cards.
[1:35:57]
But anyway, that was a good
[1:35:59]
conversation. We'll go more into the
[1:36:00]
questions and the survey proposal in our
[1:36:03]
October work session.
[1:36:04]
>> Thanks.
[1:36:04]
>> So, anything else you had to add?
[1:36:06]
>> I didn't.
[1:36:07]
>> Sorry.
[1:36:07]
>> No, thank you.
[1:36:07]
>> Kind of jumped on your jumped on you
[1:36:09]
there.
[1:36:10]
Um, all right. Next up, we have policy
[1:36:12]
or I should say, anybody else have
[1:36:14]
questions? Okay. Uh, next up we have
[1:36:17]
policy committee update.
[1:36:19]
So, this month we went over policy 506,
[1:36:23]
student discipline. This was an annual
[1:36:25]
review policy. So, the changes that you
[1:36:27]
that you'll see below, I'm not going to
[1:36:29]
read through every single section
[1:36:30]
change, but um they're all referenced in
[1:36:33]
statute or they're to provide clearer
[1:36:35]
language in the policy. Um, we're
[1:36:37]
recommending first reading for this
[1:36:38]
policy tonight. Okay. Policy 806, crisis
[1:36:42]
management, is also an annual review
[1:36:44]
policy. There are some changes that we
[1:36:47]
made to this one that were hasting
[1:36:49]
specific that weren't in the model
[1:36:50]
policy or statute um like that for
[1:36:54]
section 4A after dialing 911, they would
[1:36:59]
then um contact the superintendent for
[1:37:02]
our crisis response. So yeah, you call
[1:37:05]
the cops first and then you call the
[1:37:06]
superintendent, not the other way
[1:37:08]
around. So those those kind of language,
[1:37:10]
it's just mostly about our processes.
[1:37:13]
And then
[1:37:14]
um 806.1PR,
[1:37:16]
cardiac emergency response plan. That is
[1:37:19]
something that was dictated by statute
[1:37:21]
this year. Um establishing a new
[1:37:23]
requirement for school districts to
[1:37:24]
develop a cardiac emergency response
[1:37:26]
plan and have it in writing. This plan
[1:37:28]
does not have to be
[1:37:30]
adopted every year, but it does have to
[1:37:32]
be reviewed every year. So this review
[1:37:34]
will come through when we um do our
[1:37:36]
annual review of 806 and it'll just be
[1:37:40]
go through that just it'll go through
[1:37:42]
like that. This um 806.1 PR is a
[1:37:45]
administrative procedure so it does not
[1:37:47]
need to go through multiple meetings. It
[1:37:48]
can be adopted tonight in a single
[1:37:50]
meeting. Any questions about any of that
[1:37:52]
or did Christine did you want to say
[1:37:54]
anything about the emergency? Okay.
[1:37:56]
>> Okay. Yep. All right. Thank you.
[1:38:00]
>> All right. Any questions, comments?
[1:38:04]
Yep.
[1:38:05]
>> Our next meeting is October 1st and at
[1:38:07]
12 p.m. in the district office,
[1:38:09]
conference room A.
[1:38:11]
>> Thank you. Anyone is welcome to come and
[1:38:14]
enjoy policy fund with us. Um, all
[1:38:17]
right. Next up, we have our action
[1:38:18]
items. Could I please get a motion on
[1:38:21]
the consent agenda?
[1:38:25]
» Motion to approve the consent agenda.
[1:38:27]
Zuzac.
[1:38:27]
>> Michael Moulder seconds.
[1:38:29]
>> Any discussion? Right. Seeing none, all
[1:38:31]
those in favor of approving the consent
[1:38:33]
agenda say I.
[1:38:34]
>> I. All those oppos say nay. Motion
[1:38:36]
passes unanimously to approve the
[1:38:38]
consent agenda. Now we move into our
[1:38:40]
individual action items. And first up I
[1:38:42]
have a max levy limitation. Could I
[1:38:44]
please get a motion on this?
[1:38:53]
Michael Moulder moves to approve the max
[1:38:56]
levy limitation and wave the reading.
[1:39:00]
Is that
[1:39:00]
>> it's not a
[1:39:04]
» dressley seconds. Any discussion?
[1:39:07]
All right. All those in favor of
[1:39:08]
approving the max levy limitations say
[1:39:11]
I.
[1:39:11]
>> I.
[1:39:12]
>> All those say oppose say nay. Motion
[1:39:14]
passes unanimously. All right. Next up
[1:39:17]
we have our school perceptions survey
[1:39:20]
vote to administer the survey. So first
[1:39:23]
up we have a presentation I believe. No
[1:39:26]
>> no not for this.
[1:39:27]
>> Not for this one.
[1:39:27]
>> This is the next one. Michael Moulder
[1:39:30]
moves to approve to administer the
[1:39:34]
school perception survey.
[1:39:36]
>> Zuzac seconds.
[1:39:37]
>> All right. Any discussion?
[1:39:39]
>> All right. Seeing none, all those uh in
[1:39:41]
favor of approving the administration of
[1:39:43]
the school perception survey say I.
[1:39:46]
>> I.
[1:39:46]
>> All those oppos say nay. Motion passes
[1:39:48]
unanimously to administer the survey.
[1:39:51]
All right. And then we have a
[1:39:52]
presentation uh regarding the
[1:39:57]
uh referendum survey consultant.
[1:40:01]
>> So I'm going to start this off here for
[1:40:04]
us and I have Carrie and Jen with me um
[1:40:07]
to answer questions as well. The three
[1:40:09]
of us worked um at uh finding a
[1:40:13]
consultant uh to enter into this um idea
[1:40:16]
of surveying. So, this is what we're
[1:40:18]
talking about here is utilizing a survey
[1:40:20]
company to go out and ask our community
[1:40:24]
members what they think about if we were
[1:40:26]
to go out for a referendum to revoke and
[1:40:29]
replace our two current operating levies
[1:40:33]
into one and then potentially is there
[1:40:36]
support for increasing those? We are not
[1:40:38]
currently at the max and we could
[1:40:41]
depending on tax tolerance of our
[1:40:43]
community members potentially go to the
[1:40:44]
max. So what we did is we talked with
[1:40:47]
three companies. Morris Leatherman uh
[1:40:50]
well-known uh company across the that
[1:40:53]
works with uh Minnesota doing surveys
[1:40:55]
for AMSD one you just saw there. They
[1:40:58]
conducted it. Donovan Group also very
[1:41:00]
well known. They are contracted with
[1:41:02]
NASA to do communication survey uh
[1:41:04]
communication services uh for member
[1:41:06]
districts like us. If we were to need
[1:41:08]
their support, they can do that for us
[1:41:09]
for free. And then we have the school
[1:41:11]
perceptions company which we use right
[1:41:13]
now for that school perception survey.
[1:41:15]
So three companies that are well known
[1:41:17]
that we uh both uh we interviewed all of
[1:41:20]
them and then they also provided us
[1:41:22]
documentation. So we can go to the next
[1:41:23]
slide.
[1:41:27]
So just quickly our purpose is to
[1:41:29]
understand the level of support from our
[1:41:31]
community if we were to go for
[1:41:33]
additional operational funding. Um our
[1:41:36]
goal is to get reliable feedback while
[1:41:38]
also helping residents understand what
[1:41:40]
our needs are. And so we wouldn't just
[1:41:42]
go out for a survey without telling them
[1:41:44]
what the money would be used for. And
[1:41:46]
then we would select the survey approach
[1:41:49]
tonight. The board is going to decide
[1:41:50]
whether you want to do this. Um and if
[1:41:53]
so, uh who would you choose to survey?
[1:41:57]
And so they would we design the survey,
[1:41:59]
we'd gather feedback, we'd review the
[1:42:00]
results, and we'd share the findings. So
[1:42:02]
once we go out for the survey, you get
[1:42:03]
the results, then we make the
[1:42:05]
determination, is this something we want
[1:42:06]
to do? Do we want to go out for a
[1:42:08]
referendum uh at the next November, not
[1:42:11]
this coming the following November.
[1:42:15]
So we looked at these three companies
[1:42:17]
and we looked at the approach, the
[1:42:19]
target audience, the strengths,
[1:42:20]
considerations, and then their fees. And
[1:42:22]
so you can see here that Morris
[1:42:24]
Leatherman does a random telephone
[1:42:27]
survey. They've been doing that for
[1:42:28]
years. They continue to do so. They have
[1:42:30]
400 randomly selected district
[1:42:32]
households. Um, which is statistically s
[1:42:35]
uh significant for the work that they
[1:42:37]
do. Um, just a consideration, it's a
[1:42:39]
smaller number of people that
[1:42:40]
participate. Their fee is $25,000.
[1:42:44]
Um, the Donovan Group does an online
[1:42:47]
survey and that dependent who gets that
[1:42:51]
survey is going to require work from us
[1:42:53]
to find all of the community members to
[1:42:56]
get the email so that they can send out
[1:42:57]
the survey. to our parents would be
[1:42:59]
easy. We have those. Um but for other
[1:43:01]
community members that don't have kids
[1:43:03]
in school, we would have to do some leg
[1:43:04]
work. Um they have very strong
[1:43:06]
communication support and their quick
[1:43:09]
turnaround time with reporting. The
[1:43:12]
success I guess would depend
[1:43:14]
consideration is do we get a broad mix
[1:43:16]
of residents? That would really depend.
[1:43:18]
For example, can you get the elderly? We
[1:43:20]
would probably go to the senior center
[1:43:22]
get you know that way. But how do we get
[1:43:24]
other constituents that don't attend
[1:43:26]
that for example? Their base fee is
[1:43:29]
10,000. So other uh services that they
[1:43:31]
would provide like communication support
[1:43:33]
etc would be at additional cost. And
[1:43:36]
then school perceptions now they do it
[1:43:38]
with they mail a a survey to every
[1:43:43]
resident in our district and on that so
[1:43:46]
you can either fill it out on paper or
[1:43:48]
there's a QR code so you can actually do
[1:43:50]
it on from your phone if you chose to as
[1:43:52]
well. So you have two options, but it
[1:43:54]
goes to every district household. So it
[1:43:56]
does have a very broad reach. Um, and it
[1:43:59]
has a really strong paper access, which
[1:44:01]
the other two don't. Um, however,
[1:44:03]
printing and postage increase the total
[1:44:06]
cost. So their base cost is $11,000.
[1:44:11]
Um, some things that stood out with
[1:44:14]
Morris Leatherman, um, they have a very
[1:44:16]
traditional scientific polling model. um
[1:44:19]
and they give us a final report, major
[1:44:21]
findings, and they've been doing this
[1:44:22]
for years. It's a strong reputation.
[1:44:25]
The next group, the Donovan group, um
[1:44:28]
they combine um an online survey with
[1:44:30]
communication material support. So,
[1:44:32]
they'd be willing to conduct focus
[1:44:33]
groups with you, that kind of thing. Um
[1:44:36]
their online survey, their introduction
[1:44:38]
letter, etc., social media, um is
[1:44:41]
included in that basic uh survey cost.
[1:44:44]
that original cost of I think was 10,000
[1:44:46]
or 11,000. Uh school perception every
[1:44:49]
district this is a little different is
[1:44:51]
every district household receives an
[1:44:53]
invitation to participate in the survey
[1:44:55]
and they have an opportunity to do it
[1:44:57]
both ways online or by paper. Um also
[1:45:01]
include strategy development. So they'll
[1:45:03]
help us formulate the conversation first
[1:45:05]
like here's how you're going to uh to
[1:45:07]
start the survey out. If we were to
[1:45:09]
approve this uh agree with this we would
[1:45:12]
use the dollars for such and such. we
[1:45:13]
would give context and they would help
[1:45:15]
us in writing that context. Um, again,
[1:45:19]
there would be a unique access code. So,
[1:45:21]
when they do that QR code, you can only
[1:45:23]
use it once. So, you can't have multiple
[1:45:25]
people. You can't have one person using
[1:45:27]
that QR code seven times to give you, know what I mean? It's so that's
[1:45:32]
nice. And then, um, they also can, um,
[1:45:35]
give us a virtual presentation. They
[1:45:37]
don't have to be on site if we don't
[1:45:38]
need them to be.
[1:45:40]
Um when we added in the costs for with
[1:45:45]
the postage to the school perceptions it
[1:45:47]
does increase the overall cost to 20
[1:45:50]
anywhere between 20,300 to 23,700.
[1:45:54]
So you can see it's far more in line to
[1:45:56]
Morris Leatherman with Donovan Group
[1:45:58]
being the least costly.
[1:46:01]
Um, here's some [clears throat] of the
[1:46:03]
details of how it works with an
[1:46:04]
eight-page booklet versus a four-page
[1:46:06]
folded with envelope and just how the
[1:46:08]
costs work. And then it shows the
[1:46:10]
different organizations that we've
[1:46:12]
reached out to um that would could
[1:46:14]
support this and what their costs would
[1:46:16]
be. I just want to have you note graphic
[1:46:18]
design would be local.
[1:46:21]
>> So here's some pros and cons. So Morris
[1:46:24]
Leman traditional scientific is a pro
[1:46:26]
clear independent polling methodology
[1:46:28]
written report. It is the highest base
[1:46:31]
cost is a con. Um only 400 households
[1:46:36]
participate. It's a phone only model. So
[1:46:39]
cons wonder wondering about other
[1:46:40]
audience members who probably aren't
[1:46:42]
going to pick up the phone maybe. Um we
[1:46:45]
don't also have we have less built-in
[1:46:47]
communication support. And then you look
[1:46:49]
at Donovan Group lowest base fee at
[1:46:52]
10,000 communication materials are
[1:46:54]
included and that's a a strength of
[1:46:55]
theirs. Weighted reporting by voter
[1:46:57]
group. Um, and then the cons,
[1:46:59]
participation depends on outreach.
[1:47:01]
District would need a strong, we would
[1:47:03]
have to figure out a way to really get
[1:47:04]
to the people that aren't just parents
[1:47:06]
with the emails we already have. And um,
[1:47:09]
if we were, they do have another full
[1:47:11]
engagement package you could purchase,
[1:47:14]
which would increase it. Um, that would
[1:47:16]
include um, a lot of different um,
[1:47:18]
communication services that includes
[1:47:20]
focus groups, all of that kind of thing.
[1:47:23]
Um the school perceptions pros every
[1:47:26]
household has an opportunity to
[1:47:27]
participate in the entire district. Um
[1:47:31]
best access for residents who prefer
[1:47:33]
paper and then um the unique access code
[1:47:37]
reduces that duplicate issue that you
[1:47:39]
might think could be a concern. And then
[1:47:41]
the cons, printing and postage add to
[1:47:43]
that overall cost putting it much closer
[1:47:45]
to the Morris Leman cost. Um and paper
[1:47:49]
entry comment analysis may add cost if
[1:47:52]
we were to ask them to do some you know
[1:47:54]
summaries of comments could potentially
[1:47:56]
add some costs and then um we just have
[1:47:59]
to do a little coordination with post
[1:48:00]
office on our part.
[1:48:04]
So um I leave it open to questions
[1:48:07]
discussion.
[1:48:08]
>> What's your recommendation?
[1:48:10]
Well, based on this, we've talked a
[1:48:12]
great deal and we really like the idea
[1:48:15]
of every household having an opportunity
[1:48:18]
to participate and also hearing what
[1:48:21]
this means, the real truth. Um, and so
[1:48:26]
for example, they would know what
[1:48:28]
dollars are used for, um, potential
[1:48:32]
impact to their taxes because people
[1:48:34]
could make a lot of assumptions around
[1:48:37]
what this means, but we're actually
[1:48:39]
going to have different examples that
[1:48:41]
Ellers would provide us to show what it
[1:48:43]
would mean. And we can even look at
[1:48:45]
different levels of of asks and get
[1:48:48]
their perception on their feedback on
[1:48:50]
different levels. So you could ask the
[1:48:52]
question of going to the max or or going
[1:48:54]
up by an additional 50%. Or you know we
[1:48:57]
can stagger that and get their responses
[1:48:59]
and then help us inform our decisions.
[1:49:01]
So I really do recommend school
[1:49:04]
perceptions I feel that even though that
[1:49:07]
cost is higher than Donovan I think by
[1:49:10]
ensuring that we've given the
[1:49:12]
opportunity to respond. We don't know
[1:49:14]
who all will of course but we've at
[1:49:16]
least provided the opportunity. I I feel
[1:49:19]
strongly about that as a as a positive
[1:49:22]
enough to make a school with them. M
[1:49:25]
>> that stood out to me as well and I'm in
[1:49:27]
agreement with that.
[1:49:30]
>> I I would comment that I I like school
[1:49:33]
perceptions and there's two reasons. one
[1:49:37]
is it it gets to every every home and
[1:49:43]
I think that we would have well over 400
[1:49:46]
households responding if you consider
[1:49:48]
that there's I think 14,000 homes just
[1:49:51]
in the community of Hastings. So
[1:49:55]
yeah. Yeah. So
[1:49:57]
>> hey, can you put that on?
[1:49:59]
>> And the benefit is to get out to the
[1:50:01]
townships as well.
[1:50:02]
>> Yep. And then the second thing which is
[1:50:04]
actually bigger in my mind is that if we
[1:50:07]
decide to move forward in the fall of
[1:50:09]
2027 with a levy referendum, it's
[1:50:13]
critical that we start educating the
[1:50:16]
public. And that educational piece, I'm
[1:50:19]
sure, is going to be very well done
[1:50:22]
because we'll be we'll have our eyes on
[1:50:24]
it and we'll we'll be approving it
[1:50:26]
before it goes out. So, I think that
[1:50:29]
that's a first big step to seeking
[1:50:33]
support is, you know, informing, right?
[1:50:36]
We got to get everybody to first base.
[1:50:44]
» And I'll just say I really like the idea
[1:50:46]
of getting it out to every household. I
[1:50:48]
know um when we did this last time that
[1:50:50]
was a really big concern because it only
[1:50:52]
went out to certain demographics of um
[1:50:56]
residents that didn't have students in
[1:50:58]
the school district and so it was like
[1:51:00]
why are we getting only feedback from
[1:51:03]
them? I mean that might not have been an
[1:51:04]
intent but that's what we got back for
[1:51:06]
people who were at home answering the
[1:51:08]
phones during the day. So,
[1:51:11]
>> yeah, I think I like school perceptions
[1:51:13]
and and yes, the cost is is higher, but
[1:51:15]
I think it's worthwhile because when
[1:51:16]
you're talking about actually having a
[1:51:18]
separate election, these the the
[1:51:20]
elections are expensive in themselves.
[1:51:22]
And so, I think it's worth doing the due
[1:51:25]
diligence and and spending the the money
[1:51:26]
up front to get the feedback to know
[1:51:29]
that we're confident in what we're going
[1:51:30]
after on the ballot to spend the money
[1:51:32]
on the election.
[1:51:40]
students have anything any thoughts on
[1:51:42]
this?
[1:51:44]
I like the idea of getting out to
[1:51:47]
everybody because I know in sociology we
[1:51:49]
talked a lot about like biases and like
[1:51:52]
if you don't get out to everyone it can
[1:51:54]
kind of create that thing like someone
[1:51:56]
said like only the people are answering
[1:51:59]
like when they're at home and like
[1:52:00]
obviously they're like most of those
[1:52:02]
people aren't like they're usually
[1:52:03]
retired so
[1:52:05]
they're obviously going to have like
[1:52:07]
certain biases towards stuff. So if we
[1:52:08]
get out to everybody and I think the
[1:52:10]
concept of being able to have like paper
[1:52:13]
and online allows more people to do it.
[1:52:15]
So like like the more elderly people who
[1:52:18]
don't have like the online stuff can do
[1:52:21]
the paper and then the people that just
[1:52:23]
don't feel like sending in a piece of
[1:52:25]
paper can do the um online stuff to do
[1:52:28]
that.
[1:52:31]
>> I really agree with student
[1:52:32]
representative Henson. I'm also in the
[1:52:35]
sociology class that we offer at HHS.
[1:52:39]
And one of the things that we talked
[1:52:40]
about in that class was a book. And
[1:52:43]
there was a sociologist who sent out a
[1:52:45]
survey to 14,000 people, but the survey
[1:52:48]
response was 2 to five pages and only
[1:52:52]
400 people responded because those were
[1:52:55]
the people that really had something to
[1:52:57]
say. So I think being able to make this
[1:53:00]
very easily accessible to more people
[1:53:03]
would be much more helpful to get a
[1:53:05]
larger sample response.
[1:53:10]
All right. Anything else?
[1:53:13]
Okay. Thank you. All right. Uh moving.
[1:53:16]
Did you guys have anything else you want
[1:53:17]
to contribute? Okay. Sorry. Forgot to
[1:53:19]
look that direction. Um all right. With
[1:53:21]
that, could I please get a motion on
[1:53:22]
this item? Michael Moulder moves to
[1:53:25]
approve moving forward with the school
[1:53:28]
perceptions
[1:53:30]
survey.
[1:53:35]
I'm trying to think of the name.
[1:53:37]
>> Yeah, the for the levy referendum.
[1:53:39]
Dressley seconds. All right. Any
[1:53:42]
discussion? All right. All those in
[1:53:44]
favor of approving school perceptions
[1:53:46]
for the survey say I.
[1:53:48]
>> I. All those opposed say nay. Motion
[1:53:50]
passes unanimously to approve school
[1:53:51]
perceptions. All right. Next up, we have
[1:53:54]
a presentation regarding an investment
[1:53:56]
recommendation, Miss Subbert.
[1:53:58]
>> All right. Thank you. So, this had
[1:54:00]
previously gone to the finance committee
[1:54:03]
um and we worked through some questions
[1:54:04]
and discussion there and now we're
[1:54:06]
bringing it to the full board. Um so,
[1:54:08]
I'm going to share a little bit of
[1:54:09]
information about our current investment
[1:54:11]
strategy. So, we invest our funds
[1:54:14]
through Mislaf, which is the Minnesota
[1:54:16]
School District Liquid Asset Fund. So,
[1:54:18]
it's a a banking structure that's
[1:54:21]
available just to school districts. Um,
[1:54:24]
and right now we have our funds in three
[1:54:26]
different categories. So, we have the
[1:54:28]
liquid class and the uh interest rate as
[1:54:32]
of oc or I'm sorry, as of August 31st
[1:54:35]
was 3.54%
[1:54:38]
and then we have the max class which
[1:54:40]
requires a 14-day investment period. Um,
[1:54:44]
so that has a little bit higher interest
[1:54:46]
rate of a 3.64%. 64%
[1:54:49]
and then we also utilize the term
[1:54:51]
program um and I've listed the weighted
[1:54:54]
average yield there which is a 3.81%
[1:54:57]
and then we strategically have those
[1:55:00]
maturity rates uh kind of laded from
[1:55:02]
October 2026 through March of 2027
[1:55:07]
um with individual rates ranging from
[1:55:09]
3.62 to 3.93%.
[1:55:14]
Um, a longer term opportunity that we
[1:55:18]
want to talk about tonight is doing a
[1:55:20]
proposed investment of $5 million that
[1:55:22]
we would designate um to put into
[1:55:25]
Mislaf's certificate of deposit program.
[1:55:29]
And you can see on there the current
[1:55:31]
730day
[1:55:33]
certificate of deposit rate is 4.25.
[1:55:37]
Um, again, that was as of August 31st.
[1:55:40]
So that's the yield. And then one
[1:55:43]
important thing is just making sure that
[1:55:45]
we are in compliance with the FDIC
[1:55:48]
insurance. So that would require that we
[1:55:50]
only purchase each bank in quantities of
[1:55:54]
$250,000
[1:55:56]
so that we're sure we still have that
[1:55:58]
insurance available to us. So, as we
[1:56:01]
kind of look at the rate uncertainty,
[1:56:04]
um, because nobody knows in two years
[1:56:07]
from now what interest rates are going
[1:56:09]
to be, um, if the interest rates
[1:56:11]
decrease, locking in at the 4.25%
[1:56:15]
will benefit the district. Um, and if
[1:56:18]
interest rates increase, we will have
[1:56:20]
given up some potential earnings. Um but
[1:56:24]
the idea would be that you know like
[1:56:26]
just staggering this out over time would
[1:56:29]
give us another uh investment
[1:56:31]
opportunity.
[1:56:34]
So the recommendation is that we
[1:56:36]
designate up to $5 million for
[1:56:38]
longerterm investment. They would the
[1:56:41]
funds would be invested in certificates
[1:56:43]
of deposit available through mislaf with
[1:56:46]
maturities of up to two years.
[1:56:49]
investments would be generally staggered
[1:56:51]
at approximately six-month intervals.
[1:56:53]
So, we would look to see what's
[1:56:54]
available every six months. And then
[1:56:57]
this would also allow the district to
[1:56:59]
respond to changing interest rates uh
[1:57:02]
diver diversify the maturity rates and
[1:57:04]
maintain periodic access to the invested
[1:57:07]
funds. And then we would continue to
[1:57:11]
consider safety or the preservation of
[1:57:14]
the the principal liquidity and the rate
[1:57:17]
of return.
[1:57:19]
So I would just open it up to questions
[1:57:21]
and discussion.
[1:57:27]
» Sounds great. I was just going to say I
[1:57:29]
love that you're always looking forward
[1:57:30]
for looking out forward for us in our
[1:57:32]
financing and it it's great. I love it.
[1:57:34]
Thank you. Well, this one was brought by
[1:57:36]
Director Zuzi through another district,
[1:57:38]
but it's a good opportunity. So, yes, we
[1:57:40]
want to look at it also.
[1:57:43]
>> Yeah. Uh, Director Subert mentioned
[1:57:46]
yield and liquidity and security.
[1:57:49]
is number one. Whatever we do
[1:57:51]
has to have security uh statutoily has
[1:57:54]
to have a high security rate. And so
[1:57:57]
we're not losing anything in security
[1:57:59]
because at the moment that you buy a CD,
[1:58:02]
you know what the maturation rate is
[1:58:04]
going to be. So there's not a risk
[1:58:06]
involved in that. If the markets turn
[1:58:09]
and the interest rates over a long long
[1:58:14]
interval like two years goes down, we
[1:58:17]
just don't have to buy at the time. If
[1:58:19]
the markets are such that it's not
[1:58:20]
appropriate to buy it, we wouldn't buy
[1:58:22]
it. But buying this in that laddered way
[1:58:26]
also gets us the liquidity that we mean.
[1:58:28]
Liquidity means that the money is
[1:58:30]
available when we need it. And every six
[1:58:32]
months, given this concept, every six
[1:58:35]
months some of the money is is
[1:58:37]
available. And then the the last one is
[1:58:40]
yield. And you can see that the yield is
[1:58:42]
considerably higher. uh for the public
[1:58:45]
to know and for our students to know,
[1:58:47]
this comes from, there's a there's a
[1:58:50]
part of the district's budget that is
[1:58:52]
called a fund reserve. And it's the
[1:58:54]
money that we have in the bank to uh
[1:58:57]
safeguard for a rainy day. And it is
[1:59:01]
that fund balance that we'd be portions
[1:59:04]
of that fund balance that would be
[1:59:05]
invested in this structure.
[1:59:09]
>> And to be clear, this is a percentage of
[1:59:11]
the fund balance. This is not the
[1:59:13]
entirety.
[1:59:13]
>> No.
[1:59:15]
>> Yeah. No.
[1:59:16]
>> All right. Anything else?
[1:59:18]
All right. Thank you. Uh, next I'm
[1:59:21]
looking for a motion on this item.
[1:59:24]
>> Zuzac makes a motion to move forward
[1:59:26]
with this proposal.
[1:59:28]
>> Mike Moulder seconds.
[1:59:29]
>> Any discussion? All right. All those in
[1:59:32]
favor of moving forward with the
[1:59:34]
investment proposal say I.
[1:59:36]
>> I. All those opposed say nay. Motion
[1:59:38]
passes unanimously.
[1:59:40]
Next up, we have a field trip approval
[1:59:42]
for every eighth graders's favorite,
[1:59:44]
Eagle Bluff. Could I please get a motion
[1:59:46]
on this item?
[1:59:48]
>> Milner moves to approve the field trip
[1:59:50]
to Eagle Bluff.
[1:59:51]
>> Michael Moulder second.
[1:59:52]
>> All right, any discussion?
[1:59:54]
>> All right, seeing none, uh, all those in
[1:59:56]
favor of approving the Eagle Bluff field
[1:59:58]
trip say I.
[1:59:59]
>> I.
[2:00:00]
>> All those opposed say nay. Motion passes
[2:00:02]
unanimously.
[2:00:04]
All right. Next up, we have another
[2:00:05]
field trip approval for the high school
[2:00:08]
band jazz festival in Appleton,
[2:00:10]
Wisconsin. Could I please get a motion
[2:00:12]
on this?
[2:00:13]
>> Michael Moulder approves or moves to
[2:00:15]
approve the field trip for the high
[2:00:18]
Hastings High School band to the Jazz
[2:00:20]
Festival in Appleton, Wisconsin.
[2:00:23]
>> Milner seconds.
[2:00:24]
>> Any discussion? All right. All those in
[2:00:26]
favor of the Appleton, Wisconsin Jazz
[2:00:28]
Festival trip, say I. All those oppos
[2:00:32]
say nay. Motion passes unanimously.
[2:00:35]
All right. And then finally this evening
[2:00:37]
we have a donations acceptance
[2:00:39]
resolution. Could I get a motion on this
[2:00:41]
item, please? Michael Moulder moves to
[2:00:44]
receive the donations
[2:00:47]
and wave the resolution. Wave the
[2:00:50]
reading of the resolution.
[2:00:55]
» Dressley second.
[2:00:56]
>> All right. Any discussion? All right.
[2:00:58]
Once again, I just want to thank our
[2:01:00]
community for their generosity uh as
[2:01:02]
every month we do this and it just
[2:01:03]
astounds me how much uh we take in from
[2:01:06]
donations from our community. So, thank
[2:01:08]
you again. [gasps]
[2:01:09]
All right, with that uh could we please
[2:01:11]
do a roll call vote on this resolution,
[2:01:15]
>> Director Beer?
[2:01:17]
>> I.
[2:01:18]
>> Director Michael Moulder,
[2:01:20]
>> I.
[2:01:20]
>> Director Zuzac,
[2:01:22]
>> I.
[2:01:22]
>> Vice Chair Dresley,
[2:01:23]
>> I.
[2:01:24]
>> Chair Tate,
[2:01:25]
>> I.
[2:01:25]
>> Director Bruns,
[2:01:26]
>> I. Director Milner, I
[2:01:29]
>> thank you. All right. Uh, next up, our
[2:01:32]
future meetings. We have a, as was
[2:01:35]
mentioned earlier this evening, we have
[2:01:36]
a joint powers committee meeting at 7:30
[2:01:39]
a.m. in Tilden in the Tilden Building.
[2:01:42]
October 1st, as was also mentioned, we
[2:01:45]
have a noon meeting, noon policy meeting
[2:01:47]
at the district office conference room.
[2:01:49]
October 7th, we have a work session at 6
[2:01:52]
PM right here in the middle school media
[2:01:53]
center. And at that meeting ten, this is
[2:01:56]
the tenative agenda. We'll be discussing
[2:01:58]
the black heritage trail request. Uh we
[2:02:00]
have an outside presenter coming in to
[2:02:02]
give that presentation. We have the
[2:02:04]
principal reports that we get on roughly
[2:02:06]
a quarterly basis. We have the Minnesota
[2:02:08]
State High School discussion. Um this
[2:02:11]
has to do with possibly making a change
[2:02:14]
to the Minnesota State High School
[2:02:15]
League uh rules. Uh more to come on
[2:02:18]
that. We're kind of I think we're
[2:02:19]
waiting for information from the
[2:02:20]
Minnesota State High School League on
[2:02:21]
that. And then we will be as mentioned
[2:02:24]
already also the discussing the school
[2:02:27]
perceptions survey uh questions
[2:02:29]
specifically. All right. And then moving
[2:02:32]
on to the regular board meeting will be
[2:02:35]
October 21st at 6 p.m. again right here
[2:02:37]
in the middle school media center. And
[2:02:40]
on that agenda tentatively at this point
[2:02:42]
we have the a pathways update from Chris
[2:02:45]
Moore and Scott Dorne. We have the
[2:02:48]
impact teacher feature. This is going to
[2:02:50]
be a new thing that we've added to our
[2:02:51]
board meetings this year where we have
[2:02:52]
teachers come in and tell us about all
[2:02:54]
the cool things that they have going on
[2:02:55]
in their classrooms. Uh and then we'll
[2:02:58]
be talking hopefully we'll have the
[2:02:59]
ITime rental agreement as was discussed
[2:03:01]
earlier and reviewing or possibly
[2:03:05]
approving the Black Heritage Trail
[2:03:07]
approval um that we'll be getting again
[2:03:09]
the presentation on at the work session
[2:03:11]
approving those survey questions and
[2:03:13]
then um looking at a referendum survey
[2:03:17]
vote. So, uh, that is what we have going
[2:03:21]
on for the next month.
[2:03:22]
>> Quick question.
[2:03:22]
>> Yes.
[2:03:24]
>> So, we were going to talk about the 2026
[2:03:26]
state of the county if people are going
[2:03:28]
for Dakota County if anybody is
[2:03:30]
available to go. I know all board
[2:03:32]
members got that invitation, but I
[2:03:34]
>> I didn't know if anybody's available to
[2:03:36]
go.
[2:03:36]
>> Do you have the date and time in front
[2:03:38]
of you?
[2:03:38]
>> It is September 29th at 7 or Wait,
[2:03:42]
>> 2:30.
[2:03:43]
Yep.
[2:03:44]
>> Yeah.
[2:03:44]
>> 29th.
[2:03:45]
>> Yep. There's a tour of the Vikings
[2:03:47]
facility after it.
[2:03:48]
>> Y,
[2:03:49]
>> but you have to RSVP by the 25th. So,
[2:03:53]
>> thank you for bringing us up.
[2:03:54]
>> All right. Do we have board members who
[2:03:56]
are available and willing to attend?
[2:03:59]
>> I intend to go.
[2:04:00]
>> Okay. Thank you.
[2:04:02]
>> Excellent. Excellent.
[2:04:03]
>> All right. We have three board members.
[2:04:04]
I think that's good. We don't need to
[2:04:06]
send a quorum.
[2:04:06]
>> No.
[2:04:07]
>> All right. So, we have directors beer,
[2:04:08]
Meer, Zuzi, and Dresley. Thank you.
[2:04:12]
Okay. Anything else before we adjourn
[2:04:14]
here?
[2:04:16]
>> Okay. Uh, thank you student school board
[2:04:18]
reps for coming back and for joining us.
[2:04:21]
I hope I hope this is enlightening and a
[2:04:23]
whole lot of fun for you. Um, [laughter]
[2:04:25]
look looking forward to getting your
[2:04:27]
reports again next month. All right,
[2:04:29]
with that, could I get a motion to
[2:04:30]
adjurnn, please?
[2:04:31]
>> Motion to adjurnn.
[2:04:33]
>> Michael Moulder seconds.
[2:04:36]
>> Any discussion? Seeing none, all those
[2:04:39]
in favor of adjournment say I.
[2:04:40]
>> I. I. All those opposed say nay.