Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
[10:46]
Welcome everyone. I will call the
[10:47]
regular meeting of council for August
[10:50]
10th, 2026 to order at 6 pm. Uh I will
[10:54]
uh turn to councelor Bowman, please.
[10:57]
[clears throat]
[10:57]
» Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Moved by myself,
[10:59]
seconded by councelor Vanclutin Boston,
[11:01]
that the the August 10th, 2026 council
[11:05]
agenda be modified as follows. That item
[11:07]
17 audited financial statements be the
[11:11]
first staff report to be presented
[11:12]
immediately following delegations and
[11:14]
presentations.
[11:16]
» Thank you very much. Discussion on that?
[11:19]
Seeing none, all those in favor?
[11:21]
Opposed? That's carried. And councelor
[11:24]
use uh the amended agenda, please.
[11:28]
myself.
[11:30]
» Moved by myself, seconded by councelor
[11:32]
Heleroo that the agenda for the August
[11:34]
10th, 2026 meeting of the count uh of
[11:37]
the council of the corporation of the
[11:39]
town of Ingresol be adopted as
[11:40]
presented.
[11:42]
» Presented or as amended?
[11:44]
» As amended. Sorry.
[11:45]
» Thank you. I thought that was uh
[11:47]
discussion.
[11:49]
All those in favor? Opposed? That's
[11:51]
carried. Uh and uh disclosures of
[11:55]
pecunary interest. Do any members have
[11:57]
any disclosures?
[12:00]
Seeing none, uh, consent consent agenda,
[12:03]
councelor, please.
[12:05]
» Thank you. Um, moved by myself,
[12:08]
councelor Heleru, seconded by councel
[12:11]
Boston's that the items contained in the
[12:13]
August 10th, 2026 consent agenda be
[12:15]
adopted as presented.
[12:17]
» Thank you. Discussion.
[12:19]
All those in favor?
[12:21]
Opposed? That's carried. Um, council
[12:24]
minutes. Councelor Vancouels, please.
[12:28]
» Thank you. Moved by myself, seconded by
[12:30]
Deputy Mayor Wilson, that the minutes
[12:31]
from the July 13, 2026 regular meeting
[12:34]
of council be adopted as presented.
[12:37]
» Thank you. Discussion. All those in
[12:39]
favor? Opposed? That's carried.
[12:44]
Okay. I will turn it to Deputy Mayor
[12:46]
Wilson, please.
[12:48]
» Moved by myself, second by Councelor
[12:50]
Bowman. that council do know do now go
[12:53]
into a closed meeting at 6:01 p.m.
[12:56]
pursuant to section 2392 of the
[12:59]
municipal act 2001 as amended to discuss
[13:01]
the following matters. One 2392B
[13:05]
personal matters about an identifiable
[13:07]
individual including municipal or local
[13:09]
board employees and f advice that is
[13:12]
subject to solicitor client privilege
[13:14]
including communications necessary for
[13:16]
that purpose. Taxi license appeal
[13:18]
delegation. Thank you very much.
[13:20]
Discussion.
[13:22]
All those in favor? Opposed? That's
[13:25]
carried. We'll now reconvene in the JC
[13:28]
Herbert room, please. Thank you. Uh,
[26:44]
reports and we'll start with T-023-26
[26:47]
2025 audit financial statements and
[26:50]
surplus allocation. I'll turn that over
[26:52]
to our treasur for introduction, please.
[26:54]
» Um, thank you, Mr. Mayor. Um before I
[26:57]
provide my overview of the financial
[27:00]
statements, I would like to turn it over
[27:02]
to our auditor who is online to present
[27:05]
the 2025 auditor's report and then I
[27:08]
will follow up with my presentation.
[27:11]
» Thank you very much.
[27:12]
» Uh sorry,
[27:14]
this is Samantha uh Dextra from Millard
[27:18]
um Charted Professional Accountants.
[27:22]
» Welcome.
[27:25]
» Thank you. Thanks, Ireina.
[27:28]
Um, all right. So, good evening
[27:30]
everyone. Um, so Mardz has completed
[27:33]
the, uh, 20122 [snorts] audit again. Um,
[27:36]
and I'll just highlight a few items from
[27:38]
our report to council. Um, as well as in
[27:41]
the actual audited financial statements.
[27:45]
Um so in our report to the counselors um
[27:48]
we have a copy of our uh full audit
[27:51]
report uh that starts on uh page five of
[27:55]
the PDF anyways um and it goes through
[27:58]
that uh we have issued a clean
[28:00]
unfalified
[28:02]
audit opinion uh in all material
[28:04]
respects uh that states that the
[28:08]
financial statements are prepared in
[28:09]
accordance with Canadian public sector
[28:12]
accounting standards uh or PAB as we uh
[28:15]
typically refer to them. Um and then
[28:17]
there's also a copy of our full audit
[28:20]
report in the beginning of the full
[28:22]
financial statements. Um and just a
[28:25]
couple items to note, there is a
[28:27]
paragraph stating about that we've
[28:29]
restated some of the 2024 comparative
[28:31]
balances um which are detailed in note
[28:34]
one to the financial statements. Um and
[28:38]
we also do state the responsibilities of
[28:40]
management uh to prepare the financial
[28:43]
statements and our responsibilities as
[28:45]
auditors to conduct our audit in
[28:48]
accordance with Canadian accepted
[28:51]
auditing standards.
[28:53]
Uh so further in our report we also
[28:55]
confirm our independence with the town
[28:59]
um as we also issued at the beginning of
[29:01]
the audit uh our letter confirming our
[29:04]
independence. Um and then further into
[29:06]
the report we provide a bit more details
[29:09]
of our audit approach in our findings.
[29:11]
Um so just to highlight there were no
[29:13]
unadjusted misstatements that we
[29:15]
discovered uh during the audit. Um and
[29:18]
as part of the audit engagement so we
[29:20]
possess an understanding of internal
[29:23]
controls um and we did not discover any
[29:26]
significant deficiencies in internal
[29:28]
controls that um we need to report. Um,
[29:33]
we do want to uh note that we've
[29:36]
received excellent cooperation from the
[29:38]
finance team and management um at the
[29:41]
town and that there were no other
[29:44]
significant issues to report um in terms
[29:47]
of fraud, legal acts or any significant
[29:50]
other items of those matters.
[29:53]
Um and then at the end of our report,
[29:55]
we've also highlighted some upcoming PAB
[29:58]
standard changing changes that will
[30:01]
impact future years.
[30:04]
Um into the actual financial statements.
[30:08]
Um so the consolidated financial
[30:10]
statements of the town, they include the
[30:12]
operations of the town. uh and they also
[30:15]
include the Ingresal BIA and the uh
[30:18]
Ingresol Rural Cemetery Board that was
[30:21]
proportionately consolidated in at 87
[30:24]
12% as in past years.
[30:27]
Um so just to highlight so this uh
[30:29]
consolidated statement of financial
[30:31]
position. So that includes includes
[30:34]
financial assets um such as cash, taxes
[30:37]
and accounts receivable uh land held for
[30:40]
resale uh your general investments and
[30:43]
also the town's investment in Earth
[30:45]
Corporation. Um and just to highlight
[30:47]
you will notice that there was an
[30:49]
increase in the taxes receivable um that
[30:51]
mainly related to one specific account
[30:54]
and that was settled after Eren. Um and
[30:57]
one other note of there was a decrease
[30:59]
in the investments as there was a large
[31:01]
GIC that matured uh in the year and was
[31:04]
not reinvested. Um and also to note the
[31:07]
investments are now being reported at
[31:09]
fair value.
[31:11]
Um in terms of the financial liabilities
[31:14]
so they include your standard um amounts
[31:17]
such as accounts payable, acured
[31:19]
liabilities and deferred revenue um
[31:21]
along with uh long-term debt. And there
[31:24]
also some other liabilities such as the
[31:26]
employee benefits liability. Uh so that
[31:29]
includes the postemployment benefits. Um
[31:32]
that is determined by an actuary
[31:34]
valuation. Um and it's a PAB adjustment.
[31:37]
Um and other PAB adjustments that come
[31:40]
in are the boundary adjustment liability
[31:43]
which we've seen for the last few years
[31:44]
now and as well the asset retirement
[31:47]
obligation liability that came in a
[31:49]
couple years ago as well.
[31:52]
Uh so at the end of the day um at the
[31:54]
end of 2025 the town had net financial
[31:57]
assets of approximately 14.4 million. Um
[32:01]
and that fluctuation is further
[32:04]
explained in detail in the statement of
[32:05]
changes in net financial assets which is
[32:08]
on page five.
[32:10]
Uh and then finally at the bottom we
[32:12]
have non-financial assets which is
[32:14]
mainly tangible capital assets or TCA um
[32:18]
for your expenditure your capital
[32:20]
expenditures in the year uh less your
[32:22]
accumulated amortization. Um so detailed
[32:25]
breakdown of that is further described
[32:28]
in note 9 on page 20. Um and the other
[32:31]
non-financial assets include prepaid
[32:34]
expenses and inventory.
[32:37]
Um and then on the consolidated
[32:39]
statement of operations um so your
[32:42]
income statement for the year. So um
[32:45]
general revenues include taxation uh
[32:48]
user fees, service charges and transfers
[32:51]
from federal and provincial governments
[32:53]
uh as well as some other revenue
[32:55]
sources. Um, one of the larger changes
[32:57]
you'll see other revenues was down as
[32:59]
2024 included a one-time land sale um
[33:03]
that was not applicable for 2025.
[33:07]
And the expenses are presented um in
[33:10]
this statement of operations by
[33:12]
functional area. But in note 13, uh it
[33:15]
goes into more detail through the
[33:17]
segmented um breakdown that you can see
[33:20]
the composition of the individual uh
[33:22]
functional areas.
[33:24]
Um and also similar to the past we have
[33:27]
the budget column that presents um the
[33:30]
budget in accordance with PAB. Um so it
[33:34]
has been converted from the original
[33:35]
balance budget to PAP compliant. Um and
[33:38]
details of the conversion between those
[33:41]
two are ine 14. Um so at the end of 2025
[33:46]
uh the town had an annual surplus from
[33:49]
operations of approximately uh 3.16
[33:52]
million. Um and will talk a little bit
[33:55]
more on some of those details. Uh we
[33:58]
also have included this year a
[34:00]
consolidated statement of remeasurement
[34:02]
gains and losses uh which presents the
[34:05]
changes in the market values of
[34:06]
portfolio investments and uh following
[34:10]
that are the detailed notes. Um so we
[34:12]
just like to remind uh everyone that the
[34:15]
notes are an important component of the
[34:17]
financial statements and provide
[34:19]
additional disclosures on the accounting
[34:22]
policies used and also additional
[34:24]
details on some of the uh amounts
[34:27]
presented in the financial statements.
[34:30]
Uh so finally I'd like to uh thank the
[34:34]
town staff and finance team uh again for
[34:37]
their assistance and cooperation uh as
[34:40]
part of this year's audit. Again went
[34:42]
smoothly. Um so thank you uh to
[34:45]
management and thank you for your time.
[34:47]
[snorts]
[34:48]
» Thank you very much. Uh just before we
[34:50]
go to Arena, are there any questions
[34:52]
from uh council uh to the auditor?
[34:57]
I have just one and I ask it every time
[34:59]
is do you feel any need to meet with
[35:00]
council uh in close session alone?
[35:06]
» No, I don't have anything that I think
[35:08]
needs to go in camera. Thank you.
[35:10]
» Thank you. Um any further questions?
[35:14]
I will turn it over to Ireina. Thank
[35:16]
you.
[35:22]
» Thank you. Um so I will just provide a
[35:26]
little bit more detail on financial
[35:29]
statements.
[35:30]
So we as um you may remember back in May
[35:36]
we I presented report um estimating the
[35:40]
operating surplus at about $1.8 million.
[35:44]
It has been confirmed uh the operating
[35:47]
surplus in 1.8 8 um 1,862,000
[35:55]
and it's based on the the cash um
[36:00]
um modified um approval accounting
[36:03]
basis. So it's we used it for to budget
[36:08]
basically.
[36:10]
So uh the u the key contributing factors
[36:13]
were presented at that time in May in
[36:16]
the report. So the the surplus hasn't
[36:19]
changed ma much since May.
[36:22]
Um so this uh surplus basically presents
[36:26]
the difference between actual operating
[36:29]
revenues and expenditures compared to
[36:32]
the approved budget. The audit financial
[36:36]
statements report a consolidated surplus
[36:39]
of three million um $160,000.
[36:45]
So the difference between the two
[36:47]
figures is uh primarily due to the
[36:50]
accounting adjustments required under
[36:52]
the PAS the public sector accounting
[36:55]
standards and that includes in uh
[36:57]
reserve um uh transactions that
[37:01]
principal payment amortization
[37:04]
um any other non-cash uh related uh
[37:07]
accounting items. So these adjustments
[37:11]
uh provide a complete picture of the
[37:14]
town's overall financial position
[37:17]
uh but they do not represent additional
[37:20]
available operating funds because there
[37:22]
is a lot of non-cash related
[37:25]
adjustments.
[37:26]
So looking at um key financial
[37:29]
highlights
[37:31]
uh there were several positive uh
[37:34]
financial outcomes in 2025.
[37:38]
Uh the town experienced strong
[37:40]
investment performance with investment
[37:43]
income contributing positively to the
[37:46]
year end uh results.
[37:49]
Um
[37:51]
uh we also maintain a very high
[37:53]
liquidity position uh allowing us to
[37:57]
continue funding operations and
[38:00]
advancing our significant capital uh
[38:04]
projects.
[38:05]
So from financial sustainability
[38:08]
perspective uh the town's financial net
[38:11]
financial assets increased by
[38:13]
approximately 1.9 million. Again it
[38:17]
confirms that our liquidity is um um
[38:22]
is very good. So the outstanding debt
[38:26]
has decreased. Uh we did not issue any
[38:29]
new debt in 2025.
[38:34]
uh reserve reserves and reserve funds
[38:37]
increased by approximately $1.4 million
[38:41]
reaching a combined balance of
[38:44]
approximately $27.4
[38:47]
million.
[38:49]
Uh we continue investing in our
[38:52]
infrastructure
[38:54]
um and community assets. During 2025,
[38:58]
we invested uh a little bit over 5
[39:01]
million in the tangible capital assets
[39:05]
uh during the year.
[39:10]
Uh so the town financial results all
[39:13]
also reflect the impacts of continued
[39:16]
growth and development. Uh we've
[39:18]
experienced increased assessment,
[39:20]
taxation revenues, investment income and
[39:24]
economic uh uh activity contributed
[39:27]
positively to the 2025 results.
[39:31]
At the same time, the town continues
[39:34]
experience increase increasing costs
[39:37]
related to service delivery and
[39:39]
infrastructure needs.
[39:43]
So um to find to uh in closing uh staff
[39:48]
is recommending allocating the operating
[39:52]
surplus of $1,862,000
[39:57]
to be transferred to the arena facility
[39:59]
reserve to support the construction of
[40:02]
the merc.
[40:04]
This allocation will help um to reduce
[40:07]
future financing
[40:09]
and ensure that there are available
[40:11]
funds generated so we can use it to to
[40:15]
fund this project.
[40:18]
An approval of the audited financial
[40:20]
statements and the surplus allocation
[40:23]
will conclude the 2025
[40:26]
financial reporting process.
[40:29]
And this concludes my uh presentation
[40:32]
and I will be more than happy to answer
[40:35]
any questions council may have.
[40:38]
» Thank you very much. Uh questions from
[40:40]
council on the report or the uh
[40:43]
statements.
[40:46]
Seeing none councelor please.
[40:50]
Thank you. Moved by myself, councelor
[40:53]
Hal by councilin Boston's
[40:58]
that the council [clears throat] of the
[40:59]
corporation of the town of Ingresol go
[41:00]
into sorry.
[41:04]
[snorts]
[41:05]
Okay, we're going to do this again. Move
[41:08]
on by myself, councelor by councelor Van
[41:11]
Boston's that the council of the
[41:13]
corporation of the town of Ingresol
[41:14]
receive staff report C-029.
[41:17]
Uh, sorry, counselor. I believe you're
[41:19]
looking for resolution 17.
[41:20]
» So, okay. So, this is
[41:23]
because we we flipped
[41:25]
» Yeah.
[41:26]
» Sorry. Moved by myself, councelor Haler,
[41:28]
seconded by Deputy Mayor Wilson, that
[41:30]
the council of the corporation of the
[41:32]
town of Ingresol receive staff report
[41:34]
T-23-26
[41:36]
as information and that the 2025 audited
[41:40]
consolidated financial statements be
[41:42]
received and approved and further that
[41:44]
council approves 1.862 862
[41:47]
um 1.862203.94
[41:52]
operating surplus to be allocated to the
[41:54]
arena facility reserve.
[41:57]
» Thank you very much. Discussion
[42:00]
» Uh councelor Hel please. I just want to
[42:03]
say sometimes may we may not appreciate
[42:05]
it but this on top
[42:08]
on top of everything budgeting and
[42:11]
allocating and just tracking makes
[42:13]
auditing so easy and makes us kind of
[42:16]
flow with the understanding and I can't
[42:17]
believe that we've come to this kind of
[42:20]
an amount that we can just transfer to
[42:22]
the merc so just makes me excited.
[42:25]
Thanks
[42:27]
» Further discussion.
[42:29]
Um
[42:30]
when it comes to roles of council, this
[42:33]
is one of our most important is
[42:35]
financial oversight and uh the financial
[42:38]
stability of of the organization. And so
[42:41]
I think this is a positive report uh of
[42:43]
the state of the uh the organization. Um
[42:47]
we can see you know when a budget is the
[42:49]
plan but the financial statements are
[42:51]
the result. They're the they're at the
[42:53]
end of the day that's that's what really
[42:55]
uh matters is is what's happened. And
[42:57]
certainly this is a is a positive uh
[43:00]
outcome. Uh and so some people may say
[43:02]
that well you've taxed this $1.8 million
[43:05]
too much. Uh but that's not the case.
[43:08]
These are uh these are funds that have
[43:10]
come from unexpected uh better results.
[43:14]
Uh and I think it speaks to what we have
[43:17]
the the financial planning and and and
[43:19]
the wisdom of our staff to be able to
[43:21]
put into uh the plan to have reserves.
[43:25]
Uh those high levels of reserves have
[43:27]
paid dividends now uh with the the
[43:29]
finances coming back. And with anything,
[43:32]
what it really truly is is we'll be
[43:34]
taxing residents less in the future. Uh
[43:37]
$1.8 million is less $1.8 $.8 million in
[43:40]
debt that we would have to do that way
[43:42]
and pay the in um interest on. So that's
[43:45]
a good thing. But the the main story in
[43:47]
in there as well is also that uh the
[43:50]
rest of the financial statements are
[43:52]
very healthy. It's not uh um we have
[43:56]
options going forward. Um there's a plan
[43:58]
there and it's it's a it's a good
[44:00]
healthy state. I know of looking at
[44:02]
others around uh it's not always a it's
[44:05]
not always a surplus. Uh, and then you
[44:07]
have to figure out you actually have to
[44:08]
take reserves out and then you really do
[44:11]
have to replenish those by taxing
[44:12]
people. So, this is a positive one. Um,
[44:15]
and I I thank all the staff for um that
[44:18]
have a part in that. And it's every
[44:20]
single member of staff because when it
[44:21]
comes to the budget and doing that,
[44:22]
that's what really uh where it hits the
[44:24]
road and this is a result of it is a
[44:26]
good is a good story where we'll be able
[44:27]
to um move forward with something a
[44:30]
little bit less uh without being
[44:32]
financially taxing. So appreciate that
[44:34]
and I certainly support where the
[44:36]
money's going.
[44:38]
Further
[44:40]
deliberation all those in favor opposed
[44:43]
that's carried
[44:48]
» And it was nice to start with treasury
[44:49]
for once.
[44:51]
[laughter]
[44:52]
Now everybody's tired when
[44:56]
» So now
[44:58]
we will move into committee of
[45:00]
adjustment and I will uh call upon
[45:03]
councelor Haler please. Yes. Thank you.
[45:07]
So now moved by myself
[45:10]
uh let's see seven. Yes.
[45:13]
Moved by myself councelor Harus seconded
[45:15]
by council of vanquit and Boston's that
[45:17]
the council of the corporation of the
[45:18]
town of ingresol go into committee of
[45:20]
adjustment meeting to consider the
[45:22]
following minor variance application
[45:24]
a02-26
[45:26]
85 temp street south applicant Dean
[45:29]
Hanlong.
[45:32]
» Thank you very much. Discussion.
[45:35]
All those in favor? Opposed? That is
[45:38]
carried.
[45:40]
Okay.
[45:43]
We are now in committee of adjustment.
[45:45]
Um
[45:47]
I didn't see any disclosure of pecuniary
[45:49]
interest, but uh this report did anybody
[45:51]
have a pecuniary interest on this item?
[45:53]
Member any member? No. Seeing none, uh
[45:55]
then I'll turn it over to Heather
[45:56]
Sinclair for uh report on this. Thank
[45:58]
you.
[45:59]
» Thank you, Mr. Chair.
[46:02]
The committee heard an application for
[46:04]
minor variance in July to permit a
[46:06]
reduction to the minimum required
[46:08]
dwelling unit area from 37 square meters
[46:10]
or 398 square ft to 19.9 m or 215 square
[46:16]
ft as it applies to the special central
[46:19]
commercial CC-1 zone to convert one of
[46:23]
two existing apartments on the second
[46:25]
floor on the building in the subject
[46:27]
lands into two apartments being 19.9 9 m
[46:31]
or 215 ft and 28.3 m or 305 ft in size
[46:38]
which would result in a total of three
[46:39]
apartment units on the second floor of
[46:41]
the building on the property. The minor
[46:44]
variance application also requested
[46:46]
relief from the parking provisions of
[46:48]
the zoning bylaw to exempt the proposed
[46:50]
new dwelling unit from the parking space
[46:52]
requirements which would estab which
[46:54]
would require the establishment of an
[46:56]
additional space on the subject lands.
[46:59]
The property is located on the east side
[47:01]
of Temp Street South, lying south of
[47:03]
Charles Street East, and it contains an
[47:05]
existing mixeduse building that has a
[47:07]
commercial unit on the main floor with
[47:09]
apartment units on the second and third
[47:11]
floors. The subject lands do contain a
[47:14]
parking area in the rear um which is
[47:17]
accessed from Charles Street and the
[47:19]
easterly portion of the property is
[47:21]
located within the Upper Temps River
[47:23]
Conservation Authorities's regulatory
[47:24]
flood limit due to the proximity of the
[47:26]
Hul Halls Creek drain.
[47:30]
Planning staff have reviewed the
[47:31]
application under the four tests of a
[47:33]
minor variance. The property is
[47:35]
designated as the central business
[47:37]
district in the official plan which is
[47:39]
intended for the full range of business,
[47:41]
cultural, commercial, and residential
[47:43]
uses. And it's the objective of the
[47:45]
official plan in this designation to
[47:48]
increase the residential population
[47:49]
living within and in the vicinity of the
[47:52]
central area.
[47:54]
In order to promote this objective, the
[47:56]
official plan does provide that town
[47:58]
council is to permit medium and
[48:00]
highdensity residential development
[48:01]
through the central area to support
[48:04]
residential intensification and the
[48:06]
creation of new infill residential units
[48:09]
through the development of appropriate
[48:11]
zoning standards. So based on this, we
[48:13]
are satisfied that the proposal meets
[48:15]
the intent of the official plan for the
[48:17]
central business district designation.
[48:20]
The property as noted is zoned as
[48:23]
special central commercial CC-1 zone in
[48:25]
the zoning bylaw and this sight specific
[48:28]
zoning was established in 1977 and
[48:30]
permits all the standard uses in the CC
[48:33]
zone which includes a wide range of
[48:35]
commercial uses together with a range of
[48:37]
residential uses uh which includes
[48:39]
apartment buildings and dwelling units
[48:41]
on the upper floors of existing
[48:43]
commercial buildings.
[48:45]
The special provision of the CC-1 zone
[48:48]
states that dwelling units on the second
[48:50]
floor of the building on the property
[48:53]
are to have a minimum gross floor area
[48:55]
of 37 m squared or 398 ft. And [snorts]
[48:59]
it also permits 12 bachelor apartment
[49:02]
units on the third floor of the subject
[49:04]
lands provided that they have a minimum
[49:06]
gross floor area of 18 1/2 square meters
[49:08]
or 199 square ft.
[49:11]
In this instance, the applicants are
[49:13]
requesting a variance to the lot or the
[49:16]
gross floor area of the second floor to
[49:18]
facilitate the conversion of one of the
[49:20]
two existing apartments into two
[49:22]
apartments for three units in total.
[49:26]
So, as noted, this existing sight
[49:28]
specific provision established in 1977
[49:31]
was essentially established to permit
[49:33]
the development of the 12 units on the
[49:35]
third floor. And the minimum gross floor
[49:37]
area requirement that's tied to the
[49:39]
second floor reference the standard
[49:41]
gross floor area for apartment buildings
[49:43]
at that time of 37 square meters or 400
[49:46]
square ft. And this has essentially just
[49:48]
been carried forward since that time and
[49:51]
has never been updated.
[49:53]
In 2024, the town did update their
[49:55]
zoning bylaw to remove the minimum gross
[49:57]
floor area requirements for dwelling
[49:59]
units, instead leaving the minimum size
[50:02]
requirements to the standards in the
[50:04]
Ontario building code. So, given that we
[50:06]
no longer regulate gross floor area
[50:08]
requirements through zoning, planning
[50:10]
staff are generally satisfied that the
[50:13]
request to vary the minimum dwelling
[50:14]
size to create the third unit in this
[50:16]
instance can be considered appropriate.
[50:19]
The building department has reviewed the
[50:21]
proposal and they've reviewed the
[50:22]
preliminary floor plans and they did not
[50:24]
indicate any concerns with respect to
[50:26]
the proposal from a building code
[50:28]
perspective.
[50:29]
So based on this, we're satisfied that
[50:31]
the request for the third unit meets the
[50:34]
intent of the bylaw. With regard to the
[50:36]
parking variance, the town's clerk
[50:39]
department has indicated that they would
[50:40]
accept cash in loo for the parking
[50:42]
requirements in accordance with the
[50:44]
town's cashin and loo of parking bylaw.
[50:46]
And we are recommending that this be a
[50:48]
condition of approval for the variance.
[50:50]
So subject to the condition of the
[50:52]
payment of cash and loot, we're of the
[50:54]
opinion that the proposal meets the
[50:55]
intent of the bylaw. The UTRCA did
[50:58]
comment that the lands were regulated.
[51:00]
Um however, the proposed development
[51:02]
would be outside of their area of
[51:04]
concern. No other comments of concern
[51:06]
were received from public agencies or
[51:08]
neighboring property owners circulated
[51:10]
and overall we're satisfied that the
[51:12]
proposal does meet the four tests of a
[51:13]
minor variance and can be supported
[51:15]
subject to the condition for cash for
[51:18]
cash payment for parking uh which is
[51:21]
outlined in the report. Thank you.
[51:24]
» Thank you very much. Do any members of
[51:25]
the committee have uh any questions to
[51:27]
the report?
[51:30]
Seeing none, um I will call on member
[51:33]
Vancouin Boston's please.
[51:40]
» Thank you, chair. Um moved by myself, a
[51:43]
member of Vancouin Boston, seconded by
[51:45]
member mayor uh deputy, sorry, member
[51:48]
Wilson. Got to take the deputy mayor
[51:50]
right out. Sorry about that. uh that the
[51:52]
town of Ingresol Committee of Adjustment
[51:54]
receive planning report CP2024-244
[51:58]
as information and that the Town of
[52:01]
Ingresol Committee of Adjustment approve
[52:02]
application file number A02-26
[52:06]
submitted by Dean Hanland 85-93
[52:10]
uh Tame's Holdings Inc. for lands
[52:14]
described as parts 11 uh-12 block 37
[52:19]
plan 279 in the town of Ingresol being
[52:22]
municipally known as 85 Temp Street
[52:24]
South as it relates to
[52:28]
one relief from section 10.3.1.2.1
[52:32]
2.1 special central commercial CC-1 zone
[52:36]
provisions to reduce the minimum
[52:38]
required dwelling unit area from 37 m
[52:41]
squared or 398.3
[52:45]
um ft squared to 19.9 m squared or 215
[52:50]
ft squared to convert one of the two
[52:54]
existing apartments on the second floor
[52:56]
into two apartments 19.9 m squared um or
[53:01]
215 15 ft squared and 28.3
[53:05]
m squared or 305 ft squared in size for
[53:09]
a total of three apartments on the
[53:11]
second floor and two relief from table
[53:14]
5.19.2
[53:16]
parking standards to exempt the proposed
[53:19]
apartment dwelling from the parking
[53:21]
provisions of table 5.19.2
[53:25]
subject to the following condition. one
[53:28]
that the applicant shall enter into an
[53:30]
agreement with respect to the payment of
[53:32]
cash in lie of parking with the town to
[53:35]
the satisfaction of the town of Ingresol
[53:37]
as the proposed variances are considered
[53:40]
to be one minor variances from the
[53:42]
provisions of the town of Ingresol
[53:45]
zoning bylaw 04-4160
[53:48]
two desirable for the appropriate
[53:50]
development or use of the land and three
[53:53]
in keeping with the general intent and
[53:55]
purpose of the town of Ingresol zoning
[53:57]
County bylaw number 04-4160
[54:00]
and four in keeping with the general
[54:02]
intent and purpose of the county
[54:04]
official plan.
[54:06]
» Thank you very much. Discussion.
[54:11]
» Councelor Heroo, please.
[54:14]
» Thank you through your mayor. This is
[54:15]
one of those nice ones where we see the
[54:18]
provincial plan statement forcing us to
[54:19]
do certain things and um I just wondered
[54:21]
is there a timeline for this or are they
[54:24]
ready to go for it right away?
[54:28]
uh through you, Mr. Chair. Uh my
[54:30]
understanding is the applicants have
[54:32]
tried to apply for a building permit. Um
[54:35]
so which leads me to believe that they
[54:36]
are intending to move forward uh with it
[54:39]
right away. Um but there is no there's
[54:42]
no sunset clause on the variance. So
[54:44]
this um this approval would essentially
[54:47]
apply in perpetuity. Um and there would
[54:49]
be no um enforcement to make them um
[54:54]
establish that third unit. um
[54:56]
immediately.
[54:59]
» Uh further discussion?
[55:03]
Uh no, I think this is this is good.
[55:05]
It's been uh it been vetted to make sure
[55:06]
that it's safe, but uh also aligns with
[55:09]
the report we're going to see later on
[55:10]
our CIP program, which one of those is
[55:13]
to encourage units within downtown core.
[55:14]
So, it's good that that's uh aligning as
[55:17]
well. And maybe that can that CIP
[55:19]
program can be as of use to the
[55:20]
applicants.
[55:22]
Further discussion? All those in favor?
[55:24]
opposed. That's carried.
[55:29]
And I will call upon uh member Wilson,
[55:33]
please.
[55:34]
» Moved by myself, seconded by member
[55:36]
Bowman, that this committee of
[55:37]
adjustment meeting now be adjourned and
[55:39]
that the August 10th, 2026 regular
[55:42]
meeting of council come back into order.
[55:44]
» Thank you. Discussion. All those in
[55:46]
favor? Opposed? That's carried.
[55:55]
Okay, we're back as uh town council um
[55:58]
and we will go to our next planning
[56:01]
matter which is uh CP 2026250
[56:06]
extension to draft plan approval uh
[56:08]
approved plan of subdivision. Uh and
[56:10]
we'll go back to um planner Sinclair,
[56:13]
please.
[56:14]
» Thanks your worship.
[56:16]
The county has received a request to
[56:18]
extend approval of a residential draft
[56:20]
plan of subdivision which is scheduled
[56:22]
to lapse in October of this year. The
[56:25]
initial subdivision approval was granted
[56:27]
in December of 2021 and was approved for
[56:31]
a two-year extension in October of 2024.
[56:34]
The draft plan of subdivisions located
[56:36]
on the northeast corner of Holcraftoft
[56:38]
Street and Wanom Street as shown on
[56:41]
plate one of the staff report. And it
[56:43]
proposes the creation of seven lots for
[56:46]
single detached dwellings with frontage
[56:48]
on Wanom Street and five lots for semi-
[56:51]
detached dwellings with frontage on
[56:52]
Holcraftoft Street as well as two blocks
[56:55]
that would remain as open space.
[56:58]
Planning staff are generally satisfied
[57:00]
that the applicant is actively
[57:02]
continuing to work through their
[57:04]
conditions of draft approval with town
[57:05]
and county staff as well as staff from
[57:07]
the upper temps River Conservation
[57:09]
Authority. And at this time, uh,
[57:11]
services have been installed for the,
[57:14]
uh, proposed lots along Wanom Street. No
[57:17]
comments of concern were received from
[57:19]
any of the public agencies that were
[57:20]
circulated. And overall, we are
[57:22]
satisfied that the request for extension
[57:24]
to draft plan will continue to comply
[57:26]
with the relevant policies of the
[57:28]
provincial planning statement and the
[57:30]
county's official plan with respect to
[57:32]
infill development. And we are
[57:34]
recommending that council support a
[57:36]
two-year extension to the draft plan.
[57:39]
Thank you very much. Questions of the
[57:41]
report?
[57:44]
Seeing none, uh, councelor Bowman,
[57:45]
please.
[57:47]
» Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Moved by myself,
[57:48]
councelor Bowman, seconded by councelor
[57:50]
use that the council of the corporation
[57:52]
of town of Ingresil receive planning
[57:54]
report CP2026-250
[57:58]
as information at the the council of the
[58:01]
corporation of the town of Ingresil.
[58:03]
Advise count county of Oxford that the
[58:05]
town supports the 2-year extension of
[58:08]
draft proposal or approval for the plan
[58:10]
of subdivision file SP or SB21-01-6
[58:16]
as submitted by Reeves Land Corporation
[58:19]
for the lands described as part parks
[58:22]
lots 6A 8A block 30 plan 279 being
[58:27]
municipally known as 90 Halcraftoft
[58:29]
Street in ingresol.
[58:32]
Thank you very much. Discussion.
[58:36]
The only thing I'll say is that uh yeah,
[58:39]
there was they they
[58:42]
obviously they had to wait for
[58:43]
servicing. Uh but in general uh these
[58:46]
are going to be tougher to come by. Um
[58:48]
um certainly my view is is that we need
[58:51]
to uh crack down on speculation and if
[58:54]
people are not moving forward with it uh
[58:55]
certainly those allocations uh of of
[58:58]
water waste water and all the approvals
[59:00]
needs to be move forward and uh
[59:02]
hopefully we'll see that here. Um
[59:06]
but uh now there's servicing and
[59:07]
everything else there that's should be
[59:09]
able to so
[59:11]
further discussion. All in favor?
[59:14]
Opposed? That's carried.
[59:18]
» [clears throat]
[59:20]
» We will go to
[59:26]
if I turn my microphone on
[59:28]
C-028-26
[59:30]
the lease agreement for trails located
[59:32]
on Kuanas owned property. Uh Mr. Grace
[59:35]
[clears throat]
[59:36]
» Council will recall that uh this is an
[59:38]
agreement we have with Kuanas in order
[59:40]
to expedite the trail usage on this
[59:42]
particular property. This particular
[59:44]
trail has recently been paved and
[59:47]
signage is intended to go up shortly. Uh
[59:50]
the group has asked for some amendments
[59:52]
to the lease and so we have considered
[59:53]
those and I'll let the clerk go through
[59:55]
those details.
[59:58]
» Thank you. Uh so as Michael said, we're
[1:00:00]
just seeking council's approval to amend
[1:00:02]
the operational agreement between the
[1:00:04]
Ingresol Quanis Club and the town of
[1:00:06]
Ingresol uh to provide the Kuanas Club
[1:00:08]
with compensation uh annual compensation
[1:00:10]
for the public trail established on the
[1:00:12]
Quanzone lands. Um so the the club
[1:00:16]
recently approached the town regarding
[1:00:18]
the property taxes it continues to pay
[1:00:20]
on the lands. uh staff discussed several
[1:00:22]
options with the club, including
[1:00:24]
transferring ownership of the lands to
[1:00:26]
the town or having the club apply
[1:00:27]
annually through the community
[1:00:29]
development grant program for a rebate
[1:00:30]
of the municipal portion of the property
[1:00:32]
taxes. Uh the club indicated their
[1:00:34]
preference is to retain ownership of the
[1:00:36]
lands and as a result staff are
[1:00:38]
proposing an amendment to the existing
[1:00:40]
lease uh to provide annual compensation
[1:00:42]
to the club equivalent to the municipal
[1:00:44]
portion of the property taxes. So for
[1:00:46]
2026,
[1:00:48]
um the town's portion of property taxes
[1:00:51]
is approximately $1,200 out of the
[1:00:53]
approximately 2,000 in total property
[1:00:55]
taxes. So that doesn't include the
[1:00:56]
county portion or the schoolboard
[1:00:58]
portion. Uh the advantage of providing
[1:01:01]
compensation through the lease rather
[1:01:02]
than community development grant program
[1:01:04]
is predictability for the town and also
[1:01:06]
for the Quantis Club as uh community
[1:01:09]
development grant applications are
[1:01:10]
subject to council approval annually
[1:01:12]
through the budget deliberation process.
[1:01:14]
Uh so the proposed compensation terms do
[1:01:18]
represent an unbudgeted amount for 2026.
[1:01:21]
So we are proposing if council approves
[1:01:23]
this amendment that it comes into force
[1:01:25]
for 2027 but otherwise happy to answer
[1:01:28]
questions.
[1:01:31]
» Councelor please.
[1:01:33]
» Thank you. The question I have is so
[1:01:36]
usually we get Kanis coming for those
[1:01:39]
grants at the end of the year. I'm
[1:01:41]
wondering is this a stable thing that
[1:01:43]
makes more sense to have them
[1:01:45]
automatically get every year and then
[1:01:47]
they don't have to come for those or do
[1:01:49]
they still have the option of coming if
[1:01:50]
they need money for something else?
[1:01:53]
» So to answer your question um yeah for
[1:01:56]
predictability purposes for the town and
[1:01:58]
also for the Kuanas Club uh we have
[1:02:00]
recommended amending the lease agreement
[1:02:02]
so that they don't have to pursue a
[1:02:04]
grant um through through the community
[1:02:07]
development grant program. uh if they
[1:02:09]
were to apply it wouldn't mean that they
[1:02:10]
couldn't apply for any other grants.
[1:02:12]
There's uh multiple grant application
[1:02:14]
categories. Um but because we have this
[1:02:17]
agreement in place um it the trails are
[1:02:20]
now established um we thought it would
[1:02:22]
be appropriate to bring this to council
[1:02:23]
for your consideration.
[1:02:27]
» Thank you. Any further questions?
[1:02:30]
» Seeing none uh
[1:02:33]
council use please.
[1:02:35]
Thank you mayor. Moved by myself,
[1:02:38]
councelor Yu, seconded by councelor
[1:02:39]
Heleru, that the council of the
[1:02:41]
corporation of the town of Ingresol
[1:02:43]
receive staff report C-028-26's
[1:02:46]
information and that council approve an
[1:02:49]
amendment to the Kuanas trail lease
[1:02:51]
agreement to establish annual lease
[1:02:53]
compensation equal to the municipal
[1:02:55]
portion of property taxes for the lands
[1:02:58]
associated with pin 001590323
[1:03:04]
and further that the mayor and clerk be
[1:03:06]
author authorized to execute an amending
[1:03:09]
agreement attached to report C-028-26.
[1:03:16]
» Thank you very much. Discussion.
[1:03:18]
Just have one question of clarification.
[1:03:20]
Uh um is it just for the $1,200 or is it
[1:03:25]
for the full property taxes of 2,000 on
[1:03:28]
the property?
[1:03:29]
» It would just be for the municipal
[1:03:30]
portion that we would write off. So just
[1:03:32]
the 1200 the anchor sal specific portion
[1:03:34]
» And follow up the uh club is aware of
[1:03:37]
that and they're in agreeance
[1:03:38]
» Correct.
[1:03:39]
» Okay perfect
[1:03:41]
further discussion.
[1:03:44]
» I think this is a win-win. I had the
[1:03:46]
opportunity to to walk the trail the
[1:03:47]
other night and I think it's a it's a
[1:03:49]
great thing win for a community where
[1:03:50]
it's you know uh takes some liability
[1:03:53]
off of them and puts it uh to public
[1:03:55]
use. So, it's pretty cool partnership
[1:03:57]
that way. And I think that's a pretty
[1:03:58]
fair price for uh it's about $100 a
[1:04:01]
month, so it's pretty good.
[1:04:04]
All those in favor? Opposed? That's
[1:04:07]
carried.
[1:04:12]
Okay, that takes us down to uh the joint
[1:04:15]
audit compliance committee and I will
[1:04:17]
turn that over to the clerk, please.
[1:04:19]
» Thank you. Uh this report was authored
[1:04:22]
by the deputy clerk uh but she's asked
[1:04:24]
me to just present. It's an election
[1:04:26]
housekeeping item. Uh so we are seeking
[1:04:28]
council approval for the town of
[1:04:30]
Ingresol to continue participating in
[1:04:32]
the joint compliance audit committee
[1:04:33]
which will serve all lower tier
[1:04:35]
municipalities in Oxford County. Uh and
[1:04:37]
further to appoint members to the
[1:04:39]
committee for the 2026 2030 term of
[1:04:42]
council. So the municipal actions act
[1:04:44]
requires every municipality to establish
[1:04:46]
a joint compliance audit committee
[1:04:48]
before October 1st of an election year.
[1:04:50]
Uh since 2010, the town of Angresol has
[1:04:53]
met this requirement through the joint
[1:04:54]
compliance audit committee with the
[1:04:56]
other lower tier municipalities in
[1:04:58]
Oxford County. So this joint approach
[1:05:00]
allows the municipalities to share
[1:05:01]
recruitment and administrative costs
[1:05:03]
while providing access to a broader pool
[1:05:05]
of qualified candidates and it's worked
[1:05:07]
very well for us in the past. Uh the
[1:05:09]
Oxford County clerks recently conducted
[1:05:11]
joint recruitment process and are
[1:05:13]
recommending the appointment of six
[1:05:14]
members to the committee. Four of whom
[1:05:16]
are returning uh for or who are
[1:05:19]
returning from this current term and two
[1:05:21]
new members with backgrounds in
[1:05:22]
municipal administration, law and
[1:05:24]
accounting and auditing. Uh the bylaw
[1:05:27]
attached to this report establishes the
[1:05:29]
committee and adopts its terms of
[1:05:30]
reference and rules of procedure and
[1:05:32]
staff are recommending that uh council
[1:05:34]
does approve the town's continued
[1:05:36]
participation in the committee and the
[1:05:38]
appointment of those members listed.
[1:05:40]
Happy to answer questions.
[1:05:42]
» Thank you very much. Questions of the
[1:05:43]
report council use please.
[1:05:46]
» Thank you mayor. Through you to the
[1:05:47]
clerk. Um so I see they have a predium
[1:05:50]
of $150. Is that per meeting or per day
[1:05:54]
per how is that how's that working out?
[1:05:57]
» So that would be per meeting. There will
[1:05:59]
be a perdem paid for the mandatory
[1:06:01]
training that we will require the
[1:06:03]
members to participate in and like an
[1:06:05]
orientation session. Aside from that,
[1:06:07]
there'll be no costs incurred unless
[1:06:08]
there is a compliance audit requirement
[1:06:10]
for the town. So each municipality uh
[1:06:13]
incurs that $150 per DM for their
[1:06:16]
members if there is a compliance audit
[1:06:18]
within that municipality.
[1:06:22]
Further questions?
[1:06:24]
See none. Councelor Hillary, please.
[1:06:27]
» Thank you.
[1:06:30]
moved by myself uh councelor Heler is
[1:06:32]
seconded by councelor Van Boston's that
[1:06:35]
the
[1:06:37]
town of Ingresol that the corporation of
[1:06:39]
the town of Ingresol receive staff
[1:06:40]
report C-02926
[1:06:43]
as information and that council approve
[1:06:45]
participation in the joint compliance
[1:06:47]
audit committee for the 2026 to 2030
[1:06:50]
term and that council appoint the
[1:06:52]
following individuals to serve on the
[1:06:54]
joint compliance audit committee for the
[1:06:56]
2026 to 2030 term. David Morris, Carol
[1:07:00]
Simmons, Keith Rying, Reebling,
[1:07:04]
Christine Scringmore,
[1:07:06]
Springore, apologize if I said that
[1:07:09]
wrong, David uh Nusco, and Kyle Krueger,
[1:07:13]
and that the bylaw attached to the
[1:07:15]
report C-02926
[1:07:18]
being bylaw to establish the joint
[1:07:20]
compliance audit committee terms of
[1:07:22]
reference for the 2026 20 to 2030 term
[1:07:25]
be adopted by council.
[1:07:28]
Thank you very much. Discussion.
[1:07:30]
Oh, oh, sorry,
[1:07:33]
» Councelor.
[1:07:34]
» Yeah, I I just I wasn't very aware of
[1:07:37]
how this came about in the first place,
[1:07:38]
but it's just really nice to see that
[1:07:40]
this is um something that is in place
[1:07:43]
and to see the kind of candidates. I
[1:07:45]
mean, the quality of of candidates on
[1:07:48]
here uh just makes us feel like, yeah,
[1:07:50]
this is we're in good hands from the
[1:07:52]
auditor to this kind of committee. I
[1:07:53]
think that's an amazing thing to keep us
[1:07:55]
all doing public service awesomely.
[1:07:57]
Thank you.
[1:07:59]
» Excellent. Any further discussion?
[1:08:02]
All those in favor? Opposed? That's
[1:08:05]
carried.
[1:08:08]
» Okay, that takes us down to um community
[1:08:12]
improvement plan uh ED 013-26.
[1:08:17]
We'll turn that over to our economic
[1:08:18]
development officer, director, sorry.
[1:08:21]
» Thank you, worship. Uh the CIP has
[1:08:22]
served the town well for the past 9
[1:08:24]
years. However, there's been much
[1:08:25]
progress in that time and uh this report
[1:08:28]
is to propose updates that are required.
[1:08:31]
Uh this report looks at to update the
[1:08:33]
CIP to incorporate recommendations from
[1:08:35]
the strategic plan, the downtown
[1:08:37]
enhancement plan and the health
[1:08:38]
strategy. It will al also authorize the
[1:08:40]
mayor and clerk to enter into an
[1:08:42]
agreement with SWAKs to extend the tax
[1:08:44]
increment equivalent grants to the
[1:08:46]
boundary adjustment lands to continue to
[1:08:47]
attract industry. Uh there I will note
[1:08:50]
there was one minor typo in the report.
[1:08:53]
I referenced ED-00002
[1:08:56]
as the as
[1:09:00]
a report that uh was prior to this. It
[1:09:03]
was ED-004.
[1:09:05]
However, the substance of the report
[1:09:06]
wasn't compromised, I don't believe. So
[1:09:08]
I'm happy to answer any of council's
[1:09:10]
questions on the report and
[1:09:11]
recommendations.
[1:09:14]
» Thank you very much. Uh questions of the
[1:09:15]
report.
[1:09:18]
Uh, councelor use, please.
[1:09:22]
» Um,
[1:09:23]
it's actually I I guess statements as
[1:09:25]
opposed to uh to questions. Um, it's
[1:09:28]
good to see that we're updating this,
[1:09:29]
keeping a breast of what's going on out
[1:09:32]
there within the community. It's great
[1:09:33]
that we're utilizing the U
[1:09:37]
community health uh report as well as
[1:09:39]
the uh downtown enhancement plan that we
[1:09:42]
paid for and we are garnishing
[1:09:44]
information from that and using the
[1:09:46]
direction and suggestions from those to
[1:09:50]
uh tailor
[1:09:52]
this moving forward, you know, to be
[1:09:54]
more beneficial to m uh the businesses
[1:09:57]
within the municipality.
[1:09:59]
And thank you
[1:10:03]
questions of the report.
[1:10:06]
Uh, seeing not, I'll call on councelor
[1:10:08]
Vancou's, please.
[1:10:10]
Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Moved by myself,
[1:10:12]
seconded by Deputy Mayor Wilson, that
[1:10:14]
council direct staff to implement the
[1:10:16]
additional amendments proposed to
[1:10:18]
appendex two of the town's community
[1:10:20]
improvement plan.
[1:10:23]
» Okay. Uh, thank you very much.
[1:10:25]
Discussion.
[1:10:29]
Um what I'll say is like uh we've had a
[1:10:32]
I got to thank our our neighbors in in
[1:10:34]
Southwest Oxford. Uh we've built up a
[1:10:37]
very good relationship uh through the
[1:10:39]
boundary adjustment process and and
[1:10:41]
going forward. And so uh the good thing
[1:10:43]
is we can go to them with any uh
[1:10:44]
conversation whether they agree or not.
[1:10:46]
But certainly uh they see the benefits
[1:10:49]
of why they entered it into the boundary
[1:10:51]
adjustment agreement and giving this
[1:10:53]
tool to be able to expand to that that
[1:10:55]
area to that uh and agree to their
[1:10:57]
portion will will benefit them as well.
[1:10:59]
So uh they were uh were the willing and
[1:11:02]
uh um to do that and to enter in that
[1:11:05]
agreement. So that's a good thing. Um it
[1:11:07]
helps us in what we need to do and and
[1:11:09]
helps them. So strengthens that
[1:11:11]
partnership and the benefits of that uh
[1:11:13]
that relationship as well. So
[1:11:16]
any further discussion?
[1:11:19]
All those in favor? Opposed? That's
[1:11:21]
carried. And then there's a second
[1:11:23]
portion to this which uh
[1:11:28]
it was just to separate the the first
[1:11:29]
part which is the expansion and then uh
[1:11:31]
the other items that are in there. So
[1:11:33]
Deputy Mayor Wilson, please. moved by
[1:11:36]
myself, seconded by councelor Bowman,
[1:11:38]
that council receive report ED-13-26
[1:11:41]
as information and that council approve
[1:11:43]
the amendments to appendix one of the
[1:11:45]
town's community improvement plan CIP to
[1:11:48]
amend the map of the CIP area to
[1:11:51]
identify the central area and reflect
[1:11:53]
the current town boundary for relevant
[1:11:55]
programs contained in the CIP. [snorts]
[1:11:57]
and further that council approve the
[1:11:59]
amendments to the tax increment
[1:12:01]
equivalent grant program contained in
[1:12:03]
appendix 2 to a 5-year step- down
[1:12:06]
schedule for industrial investments
[1:12:08]
within the town boundary and further
[1:12:10]
that the mayor and clerk be authorized
[1:12:12]
to execute the agreement with the
[1:12:14]
township of southwest Oxford to match
[1:12:16]
these incentives on boundary adjustment
[1:12:18]
lands as attached to the staff report.
[1:12:22]
Thank you very much. And I apologize. Uh
[1:12:25]
the the things are switched.
[1:12:29]
So no, no, no, no, you're good. Uh the
[1:12:31]
resolutions are switched. So that's why
[1:12:33]
uh yeah. So uh again, this was supposed
[1:12:36]
to be for number one and the other one's
[1:12:37]
for number two. So if there's any
[1:12:38]
confusion, it's on me. So I apologize
[1:12:40]
for that. Uh discussion.
[1:12:44]
I repeat the statements I said earlier.
[1:12:46]
Uh, and what I'll say is on this one is
[1:12:48]
is that again I uh appreciate the the
[1:12:51]
feedback that we received over the time
[1:12:52]
and that staff have looked into that to
[1:12:54]
try to update those to make them uh
[1:12:56]
people take advantage of them. Uh
[1:12:58]
certainly uh um I have personally taken
[1:13:01]
advantage of them which I've I've
[1:13:02]
cleared and and that and it does make a
[1:13:05]
difference. When we first did these, we
[1:13:07]
didn't know about that interest rates
[1:13:08]
were low. Uh, and certainly how big of
[1:13:12]
advantage was it to have zero like to to
[1:13:14]
get that 0% uh loan and then have that
[1:13:17]
come back to uh the grant. But as
[1:13:19]
interest rates rose, uh, you know, that
[1:13:22]
became a better and better deal and
[1:13:23]
we've seen a lot of, uh, people take
[1:13:25]
advantage of that in the downtown core
[1:13:27]
with their buildings and it's it's
[1:13:28]
certainly approved. But again, uh, you
[1:13:31]
know, to keep that going then we'll be
[1:13:33]
able to have better that way. and again
[1:13:35]
try to get those things done that uh
[1:13:36]
were part of that program uh and maybe
[1:13:39]
get rid of some of the ones that haven't
[1:13:41]
haven't fixed. So further discussion
[1:13:45]
all those in favor opposed that is
[1:13:48]
carried.
[1:13:51]
All right, that does conclude that. Um
[1:13:55]
so I will go to uh Mr. Grace for OP01526
[1:14:01]
for our village on Clare Creek. Thank
[1:14:03]
you. As our director of infrastructure
[1:14:05]
and development is away, I'll take this
[1:14:07]
one today. Uh, as council's aware,
[1:14:09]
sometimes developers are not quite at
[1:14:11]
the process to have their subdivision
[1:14:12]
agreement approved and so they would
[1:14:15]
like to capitalize on the weather and to
[1:14:17]
doing construction. So, they enter into
[1:14:19]
a pre-ervicing agreement. Whenever they
[1:14:21]
enter into this kind of agreement, it is
[1:14:24]
at their own risk, but they are trying
[1:14:26]
to build it to the standard that will
[1:14:27]
eventually be adopted. So, they have to
[1:14:29]
comply with that. One of the main ways
[1:14:31]
that we ensure that they are in
[1:14:32]
compliance is to take a large amount of
[1:14:35]
security for this. And this individual,
[1:14:37]
this particular pre-service agreement
[1:14:40]
has a large number attached to it for
[1:14:42]
security. Uh because they are willing to
[1:14:44]
do that, staff are willing to agree to
[1:14:46]
the pre-ervicing agreement and so we're
[1:14:48]
recommending that council adopt that.
[1:14:51]
» Thanks very much. Uh questions of the
[1:14:53]
report.
[1:14:55]
See none, councelor Bowman, please.
[1:14:58]
» Thank you, mayor. Moved by myself,
[1:15:00]
councelor Bowman, seconded by councelor
[1:15:01]
use that the council of the corporation
[1:15:03]
of the town of receive staff report op-1
[1:15:07]
or 015-26's
[1:15:09]
information and that the council of the
[1:15:11]
corporation of the town of authorized
[1:15:14]
the mayor and clerk to enter into a
[1:15:16]
pre-servicing agreement with Fair
[1:15:18]
Village on Clark Creek Incorporated upon
[1:15:21]
receipt of all outstanding documents,
[1:15:24]
securities, fees, and any other
[1:15:26]
remaining requirements to permit install
[1:15:28]
Installation of underground services and
[1:15:30]
roadway infrastructure for phase one in
[1:15:33]
relation to the draft plan approved
[1:15:35]
subdivision SB21-17-6
[1:15:39]
Frera Village on Clark or Clare Creek
[1:15:42]
Moffett Avenue subdivision.
[1:15:46]
» Thank you very much discussion.
[1:15:49]
I certainly have no problem with this.
[1:15:51]
I'm still confused as to where Clare
[1:15:52]
Creek is. Uh but hey, you can name
[1:15:55]
things what you want. So further
[1:15:57]
discussion all those in favor opposed
[1:16:01]
that's carried.
[1:16:04]
Um and with that we've uh we'll go down
[1:16:08]
to our other treasury report which is
[1:16:09]
T00 022-26
[1:16:12]
uh the operating budget variance.
[1:16:16]
» Thank you Mr. Mayor.
[1:16:17]
Uh this is to provide council with an
[1:16:20]
overview of the town's financial
[1:16:22]
position and capital project uh progress
[1:16:26]
for the first six months of 2026.
[1:16:30]
Uh so as of June 30th, 2026, the town is
[1:16:35]
reporting a net favorable variance of
[1:16:38]
approximately 200 223,000
[1:16:43]
um compared to budget. uh this uh
[1:16:47]
favorable position uh is the result of a
[1:16:50]
combination of stronger than budgeted
[1:16:55]
revenues and lower than budgeted
[1:16:57]
expenses.
[1:16:59]
So overall revenues are trending
[1:17:02]
approximately $123,000
[1:17:05]
above budget while expenses are
[1:17:08]
approximately $99,000
[1:17:11]
below budget.
[1:17:13]
Uh so several revenue categories
[1:17:17]
are performing positively. So membership
[1:17:20]
revenues at the Victoria Park Community
[1:17:23]
Center continue to exceed expectations
[1:17:27]
uh due to stronger than anticipated
[1:17:29]
enrollment.
[1:17:31]
uh user fees. Um revenues also trending
[1:17:36]
uh over budget uh with increased
[1:17:38]
revenues from areas such as um marriage
[1:17:42]
licenses,
[1:17:43]
civil wedding ceremonies, parking
[1:17:46]
permits, duck certificates, uh summer
[1:17:49]
camps, and also some um programming uh
[1:17:54]
aquatics programming as well.
[1:17:58]
And we also were able to recover some uh
[1:18:02]
HSD from the government
[1:18:05]
uh for the Clark Road Industrial Park uh
[1:18:08]
servicing. And uh another uh contributor
[1:18:12]
is a new um fee introduced by the
[1:18:15]
engineering department
[1:18:18]
uh for the review of subdivision
[1:18:20]
agreements.
[1:18:23]
Um the interest revenues are also
[1:18:25]
trending over budget
[1:18:28]
um
[1:18:30]
mainly due to the higher than projected
[1:18:32]
interest on the overdue taxes.
[1:18:36]
Uh there are some areas currently below
[1:18:38]
budget. So that includes permit revenues
[1:18:42]
and supplementary taxation.
[1:18:44]
uh permit building permit revenues are
[1:18:47]
lower due to slower than anticipated
[1:18:50]
industrial construction
[1:18:52]
and supplementary taxation has been
[1:18:55]
delayed due to some uh system transition
[1:18:58]
that EMPAC is currently uh undergoes. So
[1:19:01]
we're expecting that supplementary
[1:19:03]
taxation is um will improve as um um as
[1:19:09]
they complete the transition.
[1:19:11]
So looking at expenses
[1:19:14]
um as I mentioned uh they are trending
[1:19:17]
favorably. Uh however there are some
[1:19:20]
areas where costs are exceeding the
[1:19:23]
budget. Um so that would relate to
[1:19:27]
winter maintenance uh activities and
[1:19:30]
also professional fees as they relate to
[1:19:33]
planning
[1:19:35]
um legal matters and also higher uh uh
[1:19:39]
contracted services associated with
[1:19:42]
paratransit
[1:19:43]
um services.
[1:19:45]
So other um areas such as utilities,
[1:19:49]
operating expenditures, program costs
[1:19:53]
um the variances are primarily time uh
[1:19:57]
timing related and we'll um and we will
[1:20:00]
continue monitor them. So looking at the
[1:20:04]
capital program uh the town is um
[1:20:07]
managing
[1:20:09]
uh 60 um uh projects this year. So out
[1:20:14]
of the 66
[1:20:16]
projects have been completed,
[1:20:19]
31 projects are currently in progress,
[1:20:23]
13 projects have not yet started and 10
[1:20:26]
projects have been awarded but work as
[1:20:29]
of June 30th. So things have changed
[1:20:31]
since uh uh have been awarded.
[1:20:34]
» Uh just uh we do have a separate report
[1:20:37]
for that one for the capital program. Is
[1:20:40]
that the one you're speaking to now?
[1:20:41]
that the separate report is for 2025.
[1:20:46]
» This is 2026.
[1:20:48]
» Thank you very much. I just didn't
[1:20:49]
» A little reversed.
[1:20:50]
» Yeah, thank you.
[1:20:50]
» Story is quite similar though. You
[1:20:52]
[laughter]
[1:20:53]
» My bad. I just didn't want to get ahead.
[1:20:55]
» It's not going to be as long. Um so
[1:20:57]
there are no um projects that identified
[1:21:01]
on hold or delayed in 2026.
[1:21:05]
So and of course the main pro the major
[1:21:07]
project would be in merc construction of
[1:21:10]
the multi-use recreational center and
[1:21:13]
the project is advancing construction
[1:21:16]
activities and also um internal land
[1:21:20]
servicing is being underway.
[1:21:23]
Um, so we have the construction budget
[1:21:26]
for 2026 of almost $23 million
[1:21:31]
and as of June 30th we spent only
[1:21:34]
824,000
[1:21:36]
but the main activities has just have
[1:21:39]
just begun.
[1:21:41]
So overall the town remains a stable
[1:21:44]
financial position
[1:21:46]
um at the mid midpoint of the year and
[1:21:51]
um
[1:21:53]
we'll be more than happy to answer any
[1:21:55]
questions council may have.
[1:21:57]
» Thank you very much and I apologize for
[1:21:59]
that. Um councelor Her please.
[1:22:02]
» Um I'm glad you finished with the um 800
[1:22:06]
and something thousand versus the
[1:22:08]
budgeted amount. The question I have is
[1:22:10]
there's a lot of um projects here that
[1:22:13]
are in progress, but I see that the
[1:22:15]
budget is very it's quite high and then
[1:22:18]
the expenses are quite low. Is it
[1:22:20]
because of the season we're in and most
[1:22:21]
of it will be spent towards the end of
[1:22:23]
the year because there's no percentage
[1:22:26]
of progress here. I don't know if it's
[1:22:27]
up to halfway finished or just starting
[1:22:30]
for it to be such a significant gap in
[1:22:33]
August for something that we've budgeted
[1:22:35]
for. So I just want to
[1:22:38]
» Um well each project will have to be
[1:22:40]
reviewed individually. So, but overall
[1:22:43]
um I know that some of the projects
[1:22:47]
tended came under budget. So, that could
[1:22:50]
be a contributing factor, but a lot of
[1:22:52]
the activity is in the middle like we
[1:22:55]
are in the midst of construction and
[1:22:57]
typically invoices come once the
[1:23:00]
project's complete and we we tend to see
[1:23:03]
them at the yeah the end of the year.
[1:23:08]
» I just I was going to say something
[1:23:10]
similar. A lot is due to seasonality,
[1:23:11]
but we have had good success with
[1:23:14]
tendering uh because of the timing when
[1:23:16]
council approves the capital budget. We
[1:23:18]
have had good success with going out
[1:23:20]
early and getting our tenders in. So,
[1:23:21]
that bodess well for us, but we never
[1:23:23]
really know when the uh these types of
[1:23:25]
capital projects until the end of the
[1:23:27]
season because a lot of those bills do
[1:23:28]
tend to come in towards the end. So, at
[1:23:30]
this point, always halfway through the
[1:23:32]
year, it's a little hard to read, but
[1:23:35]
has done the best job she can to say,
[1:23:36]
"Here's where we're at. [clears throat]
[1:23:40]
And just to add, sorry, uh none of the
[1:23:43]
projects have been identified as as a
[1:23:46]
risk at at risk of running over budget.
[1:23:50]
» Yeah.
[1:23:53]
» Any further council use please?
[1:23:55]
» Thank you. Through you. Um are any of
[1:23:59]
these um projects in
[1:24:03]
possibility that they will be carried
[1:24:05]
over into 2027?
[1:24:08]
Well, a number of them will be uh a
[1:24:11]
multi-year pro uh project. So, for
[1:24:14]
example, the multi the merc uh so that
[1:24:17]
will be over the next two years. Um I
[1:24:24]
at this point I'm not aware of the
[1:24:27]
projects like I said there are no
[1:24:29]
projects identified or as being delayed
[1:24:32]
to the next year. Um but you know as we
[1:24:37]
progress um
[1:24:39]
as we progress to the end of the year we
[1:24:42]
may see some some delays but at this
[1:24:45]
point we don't I I believe the
[1:24:49]
engineering department has been was very
[1:24:51]
proud of being able to complete a lot of
[1:24:54]
their work
[1:24:56]
um a little earlier this year. So,
[1:25:04]
» Uh, councelor Vancouin Boston, please.
[1:25:06]
» I I I really feel that the merc kind of
[1:25:08]
skews that that number for for our
[1:25:12]
capital in that respect because that is
[1:25:14]
definitely a multi-year, right? So, I
[1:25:16]
mean, there's 30 million sitting right
[1:25:18]
there. And so I I think that we need to
[1:25:21]
be proud of our engineering department
[1:25:23]
for what they're doing considering I
[1:25:25]
almost would like to see that merc come
[1:25:27]
out of that number although I know you
[1:25:30]
can't but it it just it it skews it so
[1:25:33]
bad. Um I mean but again we've almost
[1:25:36]
spent almost spent a million dollars on
[1:25:39]
the merc already you know in just in the
[1:25:41]
first few stages of it and I I think
[1:25:44]
that you're doing a great job. Thank you
[1:25:46]
for the amazing report. It's nice to see
[1:25:48]
it all laid out. I just think we need to
[1:25:50]
remember that 30 million is uh is
[1:25:53]
sitting right there too. So,
[1:25:55]
» Mr. Graves,
[1:25:56]
» Uh most of council will recall that when
[1:25:59]
we did the industrial park, um the
[1:26:01]
development was sort of similar. The
[1:26:02]
front end was very sort of slowgoing and
[1:26:05]
getting it going and there was a lot of
[1:26:06]
backend costs that ended up getting
[1:26:09]
developed. So, it's when you take on
[1:26:10]
these large projects that's they're
[1:26:12]
often multi-year. Um but uh yeah and it
[1:26:15]
does skew your numbers considerably. Uh
[1:26:18]
but I think we're doing everything we
[1:26:19]
can and I think I applaud uh Treasury
[1:26:22]
and engineering because they're managing
[1:26:23]
this very well and uh and also I think
[1:26:27]
engineering is doing a good job of
[1:26:28]
getting some other projects out of the
[1:26:30]
way so that we can make way for the merc
[1:26:32]
project. [clears throat]
[1:26:35]
» Any further questions?
[1:26:38]
See none. Councelor use please.
[1:26:42]
Thank you, mayor. Move on myself
[1:26:44]
councelor U seconded by councelor
[1:26:46]
Heleroo that the council of the
[1:26:47]
corporation of the town of Ingresol
[1:26:49]
receive staff report T-022-26
[1:26:53]
as information
[1:26:55]
much any further discussion
[1:26:58]
all those in favor opposed that's
[1:27:00]
carried
[1:27:03]
okay and that takes us down to uh our
[1:27:06]
last uh special staff or or staff report
[1:27:08]
sorry is T24-26
[1:27:11]
which is the 2025 capital project you're
[1:27:13]
in status and I'll turn that back over
[1:27:15]
to treasurer, please.
[1:27:16]
» Thank you, Mr. Mayor. So, the purpose of
[1:27:19]
this report is to provide council uh
[1:27:22]
with an update on on the status of
[1:27:25]
capital projects approved through the
[1:27:27]
2025 capital budget. Uh the report
[1:27:31]
provides an overview of capital project
[1:27:34]
progress, financial performance,
[1:27:36]
completion status, and outstanding work
[1:27:38]
remaining at her end.
[1:27:43]
Um
[1:27:45]
in 2025
[1:27:47]
the town um man or the 2025 capital
[1:27:52]
budget included 50 capital projects uh
[1:27:57]
representing a total um budget of u
[1:28:01]
approximately $14.4
[1:28:04]
million.
[1:28:05]
As of December 31st, 2025,
[1:28:09]
23 projects were completed or
[1:28:12]
substantially completed. 15 projects
[1:28:16]
remain in progress and will continue
[1:28:19]
into are continuing in 2026
[1:28:23]
and future years. and 12 projects were
[1:28:27]
delayed due to factors such as design uh
[1:28:30]
changes, approval and uh coordination
[1:28:34]
with in our case with the county
[1:28:38]
with the upper tier.
[1:28:41]
So looking at completed projects, um the
[1:28:45]
town successfully completed um nearly
[1:28:48]
half of the projects um budgeted for
[1:28:52]
2025.
[1:28:54]
Uh so the projects had an approved
[1:28:57]
approved budget of approximately $4
[1:29:01]
million
[1:29:02]
and we were able to complete them
[1:29:05]
$841,000
[1:29:07]
under budget.
[1:29:09]
So the remaining funding will remain in
[1:29:12]
within the regional funding sources. In
[1:29:15]
our case, it's the uh applicable
[1:29:18]
reserves.
[1:29:20]
And this approach ensures that funds uh
[1:29:24]
originally committed for capital
[1:29:27]
purposes remain available to support our
[1:29:30]
future capital priorities.
[1:29:35]
Uh so some of the projects as I
[1:29:37]
mentioned are continuing into the future
[1:29:39]
years
[1:29:41]
and um
[1:29:44]
that accounts for approximately $7.3
[1:29:48]
million
[1:29:50]
and um out of [snorts]
[1:29:53]
the 7.3 4.8 eight relates to the
[1:29:57]
multi-use recreational center to the
[1:30:00]
merc
[1:30:01]
um but this remaining balance is
[1:30:04]
primarily timing related. So these
[1:30:07]
expenses are expected to occur this year
[1:30:11]
and 2000 and the next two years.
[1:30:16]
So overall uh the year end review
[1:30:19]
confirms that capital projects remain
[1:30:21]
appropriately funded. They all were
[1:30:24]
fully funded. Um
[1:30:27]
they are um consistent with appro
[1:30:31]
approved capital budget and com uh
[1:30:34]
completed projects have generated
[1:30:37]
favorable variances. So we were able to
[1:30:39]
deliver 23 projects under budget
[1:30:43]
and I'm available for any questions
[1:30:46]
council may have.
[1:30:48]
» Thank you very much. Questions of
[1:30:49]
council on the report?
[1:30:52]
See none. Uh, council Vancou, please.
[1:31:00]
» Moved by myself, uh, seconded by deputy
[1:31:02]
mayor Wilson that the council of the
[1:31:04]
corporation of the town of Ingresol
[1:31:06]
receive staff report T-24-26
[1:31:09]
as information.
[1:31:11]
» Thank you much. Discussion.
[1:31:14]
Uh, councelor Vancouver Mus
[1:31:15]
» I just want to say well done the all the
[1:31:18]
staff like I mean everything that they
[1:31:22]
I'm only seeing like one or two things
[1:31:24]
that came in above budget and I'm sure
[1:31:26]
that there was reasons but like
[1:31:28]
everything else was below and I think
[1:31:30]
that is kudos to our staff. I mean
[1:31:33]
you're doing a great job. Thank you for
[1:31:35]
bringing all this to towards us and uh
[1:31:38]
to us and thank you thank you to the
[1:31:40]
staff.
[1:31:42]
further discussion.
[1:31:45]
» Uh this goes to uh we're talking about
[1:31:48]
the the surplus as well. Uh when there
[1:31:51]
is a a project that comes under budget
[1:31:53]
and that money is returned to the
[1:31:55]
reserves, that's again something we
[1:31:56]
don't have to ask future rate payers to
[1:31:58]
to fund. Uh we have those those funds
[1:32:00]
available and certainly the process uh
[1:32:03]
where we get that capital budget out
[1:32:04]
there early uh to be able to prove and
[1:32:06]
put that out for tender has real real uh
[1:32:08]
real results in in in in savings. And a
[1:32:10]
lot of this stuff that we see that's
[1:32:12]
carryover has now been completed uh in
[1:32:14]
this year already. Um which again we
[1:32:17]
just had a report that says that we're
[1:32:18]
not over budget in there either. So
[1:32:20]
that's that's good that it's continuing.
[1:32:22]
Um and certainly uh I think we should
[1:32:25]
all be very proud of our capital
[1:32:26]
program. Um and uh and how it performs.
[1:32:30]
Again, that's not always the the
[1:32:31]
scenario out there. Um you look around
[1:32:33]
and you can see reports coming to
[1:32:35]
council that oh, we got to go back for
[1:32:37]
more. We got to go back for more. Um,
[1:32:39]
I'd rather have it this way. And uh,
[1:32:42]
yeah.
[1:32:44]
Any further debate? All those in favor?
[1:32:47]
Opposed? That's carried.
[1:32:51]
» Okay. Would anybody be interested in in
[1:32:53]
a short recess? Councelor use would like
[1:32:56]
to move a motion.
[1:32:58]
» Move to take a re uh, five minute
[1:33:00]
recess.
[1:33:01]
» How about 10? How about 10?
[1:33:03]
» 10 minutes. Good.
[1:33:03]
» Okay. Seconder for that. Deputy Mayor
[1:33:05]
Wilson. Discussion. All those in favor?
[1:33:09]
Opposed? That is carried.
[1:42:53]
Okay, we will call the meeting back to
[1:42:55]
order
[1:42:57]
» And this will take us down to
[1:42:58]
correspondence and resolution. Uh the
[1:43:01]
first one, uh Deputy Mayor Wilson for
[1:43:03]
the Ingressville Diversity, Equity, and
[1:43:04]
Inclusion Committee resolution.
[1:43:07]
moved by myself, seconded by councelor
[1:43:09]
Bowman,
[1:43:10]
unless he disagrees. Uh that the council
[1:43:13]
of the corporation of the town of
[1:43:14]
Ingresol receive the resolution from the
[1:43:16]
Ingresol diversity, equity, and
[1:43:18]
inclusion committee regarding hosting a
[1:43:20]
bi-annual sunrise ceremony as
[1:43:22]
information and that staff be directed
[1:43:24]
to bring the request forward as part of
[1:43:26]
the 2027 to 2031 budget deliberation
[1:43:30]
process.
[1:43:31]
» Thank you very much. Discussion.
[1:43:34]
Deputy Mayor Wilson. Thank you, mayor.
[1:43:36]
Through you, um, the committee had
[1:43:39]
discussed bringing this forward as a
[1:43:41]
more consistent opportunity that the
[1:43:44]
community could come to expect to happen
[1:43:47]
regularly over time rather than just
[1:43:48]
kind of a one-off. Um the clerk was able
[1:43:52]
to attend, Mayor Petri was able to
[1:43:54]
attend. And I think something that
[1:43:56]
surprised the committee was how much it
[1:43:58]
meant to um indigenous residents to get
[1:44:02]
to attend a ceremony like this without
[1:44:04]
having to leave their community. Because
[1:44:06]
I think when we wanted to put this
[1:44:08]
together, we were obviously hoping, you
[1:44:10]
know, education, opportunity to learn,
[1:44:12]
all of those things, which certainly
[1:44:13]
happened. Um but we really um
[1:44:16]
underestimated how important this was to
[1:44:18]
indigenous residents. So that is kind of
[1:44:20]
where the consistency came from. Um but
[1:44:23]
building it into the budget process
[1:44:26]
makes more sense at this point. Um so
[1:44:28]
that it can be considered you know twice
[1:44:31]
a year every year um at the time that
[1:44:34]
the budget's considered. So those are my
[1:44:36]
thoughts.
[1:44:37]
» Thank you much further discussion. Uh
[1:44:39]
councelor use please.
[1:44:41]
» Councelor Hower.
[1:44:42]
» Thank you. Yeah. Um just following up
[1:44:45]
and agreeing with what council um deputy
[1:44:47]
mayor Wilson said, the committee
[1:44:49]
definitely felt excited at the
[1:44:50]
opportunity to put this in and so that
[1:44:52]
any other um other committee members
[1:44:55]
don't have to deal with this. We have
[1:44:56]
seen and we've understood the importance
[1:44:58]
and also when it comes to the action
[1:45:00]
plans we've now achieved one of them
[1:45:02]
right where we have something on the
[1:45:04]
agenda on our docket that we we take
[1:45:06]
care of every year. So that's the
[1:45:08]
significance.
[1:45:09]
» Excellent. Uh councelor use.
[1:45:11]
» Yes. Thank you. Uh just looking for some
[1:45:14]
clarification. So in the um uh letter
[1:45:17]
from the DEI committee initially it says
[1:45:20]
uh by annual sunrise ceremony around
[1:45:23]
around June 21st and September 30th. Now
[1:45:26]
I believe on the resolution it says
[1:45:28]
September 22nd.
[1:45:32]
Is that an incorrect statement?
[1:45:35]
» The motion that was written did not have
[1:45:38]
a date or that was read that's on the
[1:45:39]
floor did not have a date.
[1:45:40]
» Okay. because I thought I seen something
[1:45:42]
in there was September 22nd so wasn't
[1:45:45]
quite sure for clarification but that's
[1:45:47]
fine no problem perfect thank you
[1:45:50]
» Councelor heler
[1:45:51]
» Yeah so for clarification there's two
[1:45:53]
dates of the year that we had discussed
[1:45:56]
and it was I think the original one is
[1:45:58]
June and then again in September when we
[1:46:00]
do the uh reconciliation so we didn't
[1:46:03]
want to put specific dates because the
[1:46:05]
calendar dates change and that's
[1:46:06]
basically based on activities that dates
[1:46:09]
can be set but at least we recognize
[1:46:11]
that it's banano like twice a year.
[1:46:13]
» Yeah.
[1:46:14]
» Yep. Excellent. Further discussion?
[1:46:18]
All those in favor? Opposed? That is
[1:46:21]
carried.
[1:46:22]
Uh,
[1:46:24]
municipality of Southwest Oxford
[1:46:26]
pesticide use in public recreational
[1:46:29]
spaces. Councelor Bowman, please.
[1:46:32]
Moved by myself, councelor Bowman,
[1:46:33]
seconded by councelor use, that the
[1:46:35]
council of the corporation of the town
[1:46:36]
of Ingresil receive the correspondence
[1:46:38]
from the municipality of southwest
[1:46:40]
Oxford regarding pesticide use in public
[1:46:43]
recreation spaces as information.
[1:46:46]
» Thank you very much. Questions or
[1:46:47]
comments?
[1:46:50]
Um disc uh sorry discussion. All those
[1:46:54]
in favor opposed carried. Temporary lost
[1:46:58]
where I was there for a second. Uh,
[1:47:02]
councelor the Oxford County Library
[1:47:04]
annual report.
[1:47:06]
» Thank you. Moved by myself, councelor
[1:47:09]
Haler, seconded by council of Van
[1:47:11]
Boston's that the council of the
[1:47:12]
corporation of the town of Ingresaw
[1:47:14]
receive the Oxford County Library 2025
[1:47:17]
annual report as information.
[1:47:19]
» Thank you very much. Discussion
[1:47:22]
say as an Oxford County Library Board V
[1:47:25]
uh member, I encourage you to read the
[1:47:26]
report and uh participate with your
[1:47:28]
local library. Very good library card.
[1:47:30]
It's great. Further discussion. All
[1:47:32]
those in favor? Opposed? That's carried.
[1:47:38]
And I will number uh council member
[1:47:42]
requested item severed from the consent
[1:47:44]
agenda. Municipality of Kardan
[1:47:46]
Heritage Properties Council use please.
[1:47:49]
» Yes. Thank you. Um did you want to me
[1:47:51]
did you want me to speak to this or read
[1:47:53]
the motion first?
[1:47:54]
» Uh why don't we get a motion on the
[1:47:56]
floor?
[1:47:56]
» Sure.
[1:47:58]
» Perfect. Move myself uh looking for a
[1:48:00]
secondary that the council of the
[1:48:01]
corporation of the town of Ingresol
[1:48:03]
receive a correspondence from the
[1:48:05]
municipality of Kardan regarding
[1:48:07]
extending the deadline for notice of
[1:48:08]
intention to designate listed heritage
[1:48:11]
properties and that council support the
[1:48:13]
resolution to extend the deadline for
[1:48:16]
notice of intention to designate listed
[1:48:18]
heritage properties and that the
[1:48:20]
resolution be forwarded to other
[1:48:22]
municipalities in Oxford Ernie uh Oxford
[1:48:25]
MPP Ernie Hardman and all relevant
[1:48:27]
ministry ries and provincial government.
[1:48:30]
» Thank you. Is there a seconder for that?
[1:48:32]
Uh councelor, please.
[1:48:35]
» Thank you.
[1:48:36]
» Uh so basically, uh the end of this
[1:48:38]
year, if it wasn't the end of this year,
[1:48:40]
um the or the beginning of this year
[1:48:43]
where any property that was listed as
[1:48:46]
potential heritage sites, um if it was
[1:48:49]
listed would be taken off. Um a lot of
[1:48:53]
municipalities, I don't believe we have
[1:48:55]
a list started. However, we have uh
[1:48:58]
being a member of the heritage
[1:48:59]
committee, we have looked at some of the
[1:49:01]
municipal uh sorry miss uh some of the
[1:49:03]
buildings here in um Ingresol and
[1:49:06]
potentially putting them on a list as a
[1:49:08]
potential for designation. Uh the
[1:49:11]
province did change designation
[1:49:14]
uh regulations considerably uh in the
[1:49:16]
last goround. Um, so it's just something
[1:49:20]
that if we were able to have an
[1:49:23]
extension of time with these houses or
[1:49:25]
properties or anything would of heritage
[1:49:29]
value, uh, we would have an opportunity
[1:49:31]
to explore further and, uh, potentially
[1:49:34]
have them list or designated as a
[1:49:36]
heritage value.
[1:49:39]
» Excellent. Uh, any further deliberation?
[1:49:44]
Seeing none. Oh, councelor Hower,
[1:49:46]
please. I just kind of agreed with that
[1:49:49]
because if we don't have something like
[1:49:51]
this, we tend to lose the face, the
[1:49:53]
facade, the history, the culture of some
[1:49:55]
places and I think this is very
[1:49:57]
important. So very well supported.
[1:50:00]
» Yeah. And this is just another example
[1:50:02]
where the province has stepped in under
[1:50:03]
municipal control and uh taken it away.
[1:50:06]
Um you know our what we consider our
[1:50:08]
heritage is important is should be up to
[1:50:10]
us. Uh and so I imagine the development
[1:50:14]
community in some areas do not like
[1:50:16]
this. But again, that's uh once you lose
[1:50:18]
a heritage uh building, you can't get it
[1:50:19]
back. So it's one of those ones where um
[1:50:23]
you know uh they province requires you
[1:50:25]
to have a heritage committee. Uh but
[1:50:28]
then they've they've kind of handicapped
[1:50:29]
that effort to be able to to do that. So
[1:50:31]
certainly support of that.
[1:50:34]
Uh all in favor? Opposed? That's
[1:50:37]
carried.
[1:50:40]
Uh
[1:50:42]
and council member requested item
[1:50:43]
severed from consent agenda. Town of uh
[1:50:45]
Plimp Plimpmpton, Wyoming. Uh vacant
[1:50:48]
commercial storefront tax councelor use.
[1:50:51]
» Yes, thank you. Uh reading through the
[1:50:52]
resolutions that were received here a
[1:50:55]
week or bit ago. Uh this one also stuck
[1:50:58]
out to me. I know there are uh Oh,
[1:51:01]
» Just so we just before can we just have
[1:51:03]
read and then we can see if there's a
[1:51:04]
second before.
[1:51:05]
» Sorry. Uh and I'll be looking for a
[1:51:06]
seconder on this motion as well. Moved
[1:51:09]
by myself, councelor use that the
[1:51:10]
council of the corporation town of
[1:51:12]
Ingresol receive the correspondence from
[1:51:14]
the town of Plimpmpton, Wyoming
[1:51:16]
regarding vacant commercial storefront
[1:51:18]
tax and that the council support the
[1:51:20]
resolution regarding vacant commercial
[1:51:22]
storefront tax and that the resolution
[1:51:25]
be forwarded to the uh to other
[1:51:26]
municipalities in Ontario, Ernie Hardman
[1:51:29]
uh sorry Oxford MPP Ernie Hardman and
[1:51:32]
all relevant ministries uh and the proh
[1:51:35]
provincial government.
[1:51:38]
Is there a seconder for that? Councelor
[1:51:39]
Haler. Thank you.
[1:51:42]
» Thank you.
[1:51:44]
» Uh proceed, Mr. Councelor Use. Thank
[1:51:47]
you. Um yeah, so so basically I know
[1:51:50]
there is uh certain downtowns that have
[1:51:54]
um consistently vacant uh commercial
[1:51:57]
storefront properties. and with our
[1:51:59]
community improvement plan kind of falls
[1:52:01]
in nicely here uh that we approved it
[1:52:03]
earlier this evening uh or approved the
[1:52:06]
amendments. Um, this kind of just
[1:52:10]
helps with the I'm going to say
[1:52:12]
incentive side of it because now if you
[1:52:15]
don't want to rent out your commercial
[1:52:18]
storefront, uh, you potentially could
[1:52:22]
see an increase in your taxes as I don't
[1:52:25]
want to say a penalty, but that's if you
[1:52:27]
can look at it that way. Um, and
[1:52:30]
hopefully that would push businesses or
[1:52:34]
sorry uh property owners to start
[1:52:37]
renting these uh problematic storefronts
[1:52:40]
out that uh have been consistently um
[1:52:44]
unoccupied.
[1:52:46]
Uh so yeah, that's what we're looking
[1:52:48]
for and it's the the motion in uh that
[1:52:51]
Plimpmpton uh Wyoming has pushed through
[1:52:54]
is to have uh staff look at the
[1:52:58]
potential for doing this. This isn't
[1:53:01]
we're not saying that we're going to do
[1:53:02]
it, but it's to investigate it um and to
[1:53:06]
uh you know have a conversation with the
[1:53:09]
province to try and
[1:53:11]
help develop that. Uh, councelor
[1:53:14]
Haleroo.
[1:53:15]
» Thank you. If you all remember 2022 when
[1:53:19]
we newly got elected, this was one of my
[1:53:21]
first motions. Um, I was rough around
[1:53:23]
the edges and I was trying to propose
[1:53:25]
this and because Woodstock had just done
[1:53:26]
that. Um, so this was nice to see it
[1:53:29]
come back in a way that others are
[1:53:31]
exploring it and like you said it's for
[1:53:32]
staff to take a look at it because I
[1:53:34]
mean we are doing a wellrounded job now
[1:53:37]
maybe with the CIP where our downtown
[1:53:40]
looks nice and it's been occupied more
[1:53:42]
but I remember at the time I came here
[1:53:44]
it was just everywhere was empty and it
[1:53:47]
didn't look good and I remember even
[1:53:48]
Woodstock struggling to get people to go
[1:53:50]
back in there. So, it is an incentive
[1:53:52]
for landlords to keep things open,
[1:53:56]
accessible, affordable to people who are
[1:53:58]
willing to to risk it. And I hope it
[1:54:00]
does help at some point. I think staff
[1:54:02]
will come up with something quite
[1:54:03]
reasonable. We trust that. But I think
[1:54:05]
it's worth exploring because again,
[1:54:07]
economies go up and down and you want to
[1:54:10]
have something that keeps your downtown
[1:54:11]
active all the time. So, I support it.
[1:54:14]
» So, so just for clarification, this
[1:54:16]
motion that's been put on the floor does
[1:54:18]
not direct our staff to look at it. it
[1:54:20]
is for uh supporting the the the
[1:54:22]
resolution that was was coming. So just
[1:54:25]
I wouldn't expect anything back from our
[1:54:27]
staff
[1:54:27]
» From this resolution.
[1:54:29]
» No
[1:54:30]
» Further discussion.
[1:54:33]
» Uh I won't be supporting this uh just
[1:54:35]
because I don't believe their resolution
[1:54:37]
provides enough information on the
[1:54:39]
implications of of what they're seeking.
[1:54:42]
Um, I think that uh um
[1:54:46]
you know what it takes to create a whole
[1:54:48]
new tax class as far as and then
[1:54:52]
implementing and and doing that I would
[1:54:53]
want to see more information at that
[1:54:55]
time uh to see if it's something I would
[1:54:57]
support. Um the we did get rid of the
[1:55:00]
vacancy tax on commercial properties. So
[1:55:03]
that's something that that's that was
[1:55:05]
was done. Uh and so they are paying full
[1:55:07]
taxes. Um, I don't know
[1:55:12]
if this would not be challenged as an
[1:55:14]
unfair tax upon
[1:55:17]
uh from a property owner of uh, you
[1:55:20]
know, I know they've had some vacant
[1:55:21]
housing taxes and stuff like that, but
[1:55:22]
again, how do you implement that? But
[1:55:24]
again, I I think the idea I can support,
[1:55:26]
but as far as what they're I don't think
[1:55:29]
there's enough information for me to
[1:55:31]
support what they're they're trying to
[1:55:32]
do because it's at this point it's just
[1:55:34]
an idea. But I get where you're coming
[1:55:35]
from.
[1:55:37]
uh council use.
[1:55:39]
» Yeah. No, I understand that and and you
[1:55:41]
know, doing some research into this,
[1:55:43]
you're absolutely right. There is
[1:55:44]
potential for um litigation and
[1:55:48]
challenges. Um and and that's the whole
[1:55:51]
part because the the municipality that
[1:55:54]
that we're supporting is is to is to do
[1:55:57]
with looking into how it can be
[1:56:00]
developed, how it can how it would look,
[1:56:03]
you know, parameters and that type of
[1:56:05]
thing. Uh and again working with the
[1:56:07]
province to uh maybe do that work for us
[1:56:12]
and then it's just a matter of us having
[1:56:14]
to be able to implement it as opposed to
[1:56:17]
basically create this whole program and
[1:56:20]
then say to the province here let's do
[1:56:22]
this um which we know where that would
[1:56:25]
end up.
[1:56:26]
» Absolutely.
[1:56:28]
» Deputy Mayor Wilson.
[1:56:30]
» Thank you Mayor Through. I'm just
[1:56:31]
wondering if we could have the motion
[1:56:32]
reread.
[1:56:34]
» Thank you. uh as it is here is that the
[1:56:37]
council of the corporation of the town
[1:56:38]
of Ingresol received the correspondence
[1:56:40]
from the town of Plimpmpton, Wyoming
[1:56:42]
regarding the vacant commercial
[1:56:43]
storefront tax. Uh and that council
[1:56:46]
support the resolution regarding vacant
[1:56:48]
commercial storefront tax and that the
[1:56:51]
resolution be forward to other
[1:56:52]
municipalities Ontario, Oxford MPP,
[1:56:54]
Ernie Hardman and all relevant
[1:56:56]
ministries in the provincial government.
[1:57:01]
Any further discussion? All those in
[1:57:04]
favor?
[1:57:06]
Opposed? That's carried.
[1:57:09]
And that leads us to our final uh
[1:57:11]
council member requested item separate
[1:57:12]
from consent agenda, town of Blue
[1:57:14]
Mountains OLT and municipal planning
[1:57:17]
decisions. Council use.
[1:57:19]
» Thank you. Looking for a seconder on
[1:57:21]
this as well. Moved by myself, councelor
[1:57:23]
use that the council of the corporation,
[1:57:25]
the town of Ingresol receive the
[1:57:27]
correspondence from the town of Blue
[1:57:29]
Mountains regarding uh review of OOLT
[1:57:32]
and enhancing deference to municipal
[1:57:35]
planning decisions and that council
[1:57:37]
support the resolution regarding the uh
[1:57:40]
review of the OOLT and enhancing
[1:57:42]
deference to municipal planning
[1:57:44]
decisions and that the resolution be
[1:57:47]
forwarded to other municipalities in
[1:57:49]
Ontario. Oxford MPP Ernie Hardman uh all
[1:57:53]
relevant ministries and the provincial
[1:57:56]
government.
[1:57:57]
» Uh seconder for the motion. I will
[1:58:00]
second that.
[1:58:05]
» So basically uh as we seen earlier this
[1:58:08]
year the uh uh there was some issues
[1:58:11]
taken to the OOLT and uh we thought we
[1:58:14]
had a good case in regards to the
[1:58:16]
parking aspect. Um and the OOLT
[1:58:19]
basically passed.
[1:58:21]
» Just one second. I don't believe the
[1:58:22]
clerk was comfortable with chair
[1:58:24]
seconding. So
[1:58:25]
» Oh, okay. Sorry. [laughter]
[1:58:30]
» I was
[1:58:31]
» My apologies.
[1:58:34]
» Go ahead, sir.
[1:58:35]
» I can. Okay. Perfect. So, as we said
[1:58:38]
earlier this year, um the OOLT um
[1:58:41]
overturned one of our local decisions in
[1:58:44]
regards to parking bylaw. um and then
[1:58:48]
arguably forced us to uh accept what was
[1:58:52]
presented at the OOLT. Um a lot of that
[1:58:56]
happens within the within the province
[1:58:58]
basically somebody sitting in Toronto
[1:59:01]
overruling what we are here in a
[1:59:03]
municipality and who knows best about
[1:59:05]
what your municipality needs is your
[1:59:07]
local council. Um, and I think that
[1:59:10]
review to have them look at the province
[1:59:13]
look at the OOLT and start making some
[1:59:18]
changes to better offset or better
[1:59:20]
support municipal uh, decisions as
[1:59:23]
opposed to going against them and
[1:59:25]
pushing forward.
[1:59:29]
» Mr. G,
[1:59:30]
» Thank you. Uh, council's heard me
[1:59:32]
complain about this a fair bit. So, it
[1:59:34]
uh, and municipal government uh, misery
[1:59:37]
loves company. So, we're delighted to
[1:59:39]
hear that others are complaining about
[1:59:42]
it because we need more to speak up and
[1:59:44]
say this is a concern. Um, this cookie
[1:59:47]
cutter mentality from the province I
[1:59:49]
don't think is right. It should be
[1:59:51]
municipal planning decisions, not
[1:59:52]
provincial planning decisions.
[1:59:55]
[clears throat]
[1:59:57]
» Further discussion? Deputy Mayor Wilson.
[1:59:59]
» Thank you, Mayor Tho. I will support
[2:00:01]
this because I agree with all the other
[2:00:02]
statements that have happened. But I do
[2:00:04]
fear that this correspondence sent to
[2:00:06]
the provincial government will be they
[2:00:08]
will interpret that as success like this
[2:00:11]
is actually what they aim to achieve to
[2:00:13]
have less uh uh municipal control by um
[2:00:18]
making those changes to the OOLT. But
[2:00:20]
nonetheless, it's always worth a try.
[2:00:22]
Like Mr. Grave said, maybe more
[2:00:24]
municipalities um share that stance. it
[2:00:27]
will become um better understood by the
[2:00:29]
public and we'll do our best.
[2:00:33]
» Thank you. Further discussion. Uh you
[2:00:36]
certainly have my support on this. Um uh
[2:00:39]
I think the the role of the OOLT has I
[2:00:43]
don't want to use the word corrupted but
[2:00:47]
when they can overturn
[2:00:49]
an official plan that's been approved by
[2:00:52]
the province
[2:00:54]
and then say that that something does
[2:00:57]
meet the official plan when it doesn't
[2:00:58]
or it does when it doesn't when it does.
[2:01:00]
Uh when that's already been approved by
[2:01:02]
the province, that's overstepping
[2:01:03]
boundaries. Um, and really, uh, to me,
[2:01:07]
you know, when you we take the test of a
[2:01:09]
bylaw is it's it's not reasonless, it's
[2:01:12]
whether it's legal. And I think a lot of
[2:01:14]
those other decisions that we get to
[2:01:16]
make, we we we are elected a body and
[2:01:18]
that doesn't mean we have to make always
[2:01:19]
good decisions. Uh, but certainly uh
[2:01:23]
those are decisions that people elected
[2:01:24]
us to make and I think that has to be
[2:01:25]
respected. I don't think it is as much
[2:01:27]
anymore. And and we've seen that uh when
[2:01:30]
the the the item that you're referring
[2:01:31]
to is that we didn't get to make a
[2:01:33]
decision on that. It was appealed uh
[2:01:36]
before we got to do that, which is which
[2:01:38]
is not right. Uh to me, I think the OLT
[2:01:40]
should have sent that back for a
[2:01:42]
decision. Um and so I certainly support
[2:01:44]
this because it is uh you need balance
[2:01:47]
and we've lost that local uh those um
[2:01:51]
you know we if we go through a process
[2:01:54]
we set an official plan we set our
[2:01:56]
zoning and all that stuff that should
[2:01:57]
mean something and it doesn't seem to
[2:01:59]
mean anything anymore. Even right now,
[2:02:02]
you could have a private entity
[2:02:05]
appeal to the OOLT to bring land with is
[2:02:08]
outside the settlement boundary in
[2:02:11]
with no plans for the municipality to do
[2:02:12]
so. And who gets to pay for that in the
[2:02:14]
end? We do. So there's there's got to be
[2:02:16]
more balance there. That's not the plan
[2:02:18]
that process that should be happen. So
[2:02:20]
fully support you on this one.
[2:02:23]
Further discussion? All those in favor?
[2:02:26]
Opposed? That's carried.
[2:02:28]
Okay, that'll take us down to uh close
[2:02:31]
session. Um, and so I will call upon
[2:02:35]
Councelor Vancouver Boston's, please.
[2:02:37]
» Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Moved by myself,
[2:02:39]
seconded by Deputy Mayor Wilson, that
[2:02:41]
council do now go into closed meeting at
[2:02:44]
7:51 p.m. Uh, pursuant to section 2392
[2:02:48]
of the Municipal Act 2001 as amended to
[2:02:51]
discuss the following matters. one,
[2:02:53]
minutes of a closed session, March 13,
[2:02:55]
20 25. Uh, minutes of a close session
[2:02:59]
July 13, 2026. and three uh 2392B
[2:03:04]
personal matters about an identif
[2:03:07]
oh my gosh identifiable individual
[2:03:10]
including municipal or local board
[2:03:12]
employee close session report C-030-26
[2:03:17]
taxi license appeal under section 9 of
[2:03:19]
the Ingresell bylaw 25-5429.
[2:03:23]
» Thank you very much. Discussion
[2:03:26]
all those in favor?
[2:03:28]
carried and we will reconvene.
[2:24:46]
or something, right?
[2:24:47]
» He must
[2:24:59]
open session. And I will turn to
[2:25:01]
councelor use please.
[2:25:05]
» Okay. Moved by myself councelor use
[2:25:07]
seconded by councelor heleroo that the
[2:25:09]
council of the corporation the town of
[2:25:11]
ingresol receive staff report c-030-26
[2:25:15]
as information and that council uphold
[2:25:18]
the licensing officer's decision.
[2:25:20]
» Thank you very much. Discussion. All
[2:25:23]
those in favor opposed. That is carried.
[2:25:27]
Uh, councelor Vancouin Boston's bylaws,
[2:25:30]
please.
[2:25:31]
» Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Moved by myself,
[2:25:33]
second by Deputy Mayor Wilson, that the
[2:25:35]
bylaws 26-5479
[2:25:38]
to 26-5484
[2:25:41]
be approved subject to section 284.114
[2:25:45]
of the Municipal Act.
[2:25:47]
» Thank you very much. Uh, discussion.
[2:25:51]
All those in favor? Opposed? That's
[2:25:53]
carried.
[2:25:56]
and Deputy Mayor Wilson, please.
[2:25:59]
» Moved by myself, seconded by Councelor
[2:26:01]
Bowman, that the council of the
[2:26:02]
Corporation of the Town of Ingresol
[2:26:04]
adjourn the August 10th, 2026 regular
[2:26:07]
meeting of council at 8:14 p.m.
[2:26:10]
» Thank you. Discussion. All those in
[2:26:13]
favor? Opposed? That is carried. Thank
[2:26:16]
you everyone for a very efficient
[2:26:17]
meeting.