Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:00]
Anybody has any
[0:08]
» I have a feeling that we have such a
[0:10]
large interest level here tonight that
[0:13]
there so I'm electing to take item
[0:16]
number if you have an agenda with you uh
[0:19]
item number 7A
[0:21]
the add will move that up in the agenda
[0:25]
to after the commission and staff
[0:26]
reports section
[0:28]
>> mayor we need to Call the meeting
[0:30]
officially to order.
[0:31]
>> Order. Thank you.
[0:32]
>> Thank you.
[0:34]
>> We're call to order.
[0:36]
>> Three meetings, five minutes. It's a
[0:38]
lot.
[0:39]
>> All right. Um first we're going to start
[0:42]
off with a presentation
[0:45]
for our county.
[0:47]
>> I have um Daniel Anderson with Malden
[0:50]
Jenkins here. He is um our auditor who
[0:53]
does our financial statement audits and
[0:55]
he's here to do a quick overview of the
[0:57]
uh the fiscal year ending September 30th
[1:00]
2025 audit.
[1:03]
>> Thank you. Good evening, Mr. Mayor,
[1:05]
commissioners. As Heidi mentioned, my
[1:06]
name is Daniel Anderson and I'm the
[1:08]
audit partner with Baldman Jenkins who
[1:09]
had overall responsibility for the
[1:11]
town's 2025 fiscal year and audit. I do
[1:14]
a brief presentation this evening to go
[1:15]
over the audit results. In your agenda
[1:18]
packet, there should have been two
[1:19]
items. One would be the audit and
[1:21]
financial statements themselves. And
[1:23]
then the second is a document that we
[1:25]
refer to as our auditor's discussion and
[1:27]
analysis which includes some information
[1:30]
about the audit results as well as our
[1:31]
required communication to governance
[1:33]
that I'm going to highlight here this
[1:35]
evening. I don't know. Are you just
[1:37]
flipping through for me?
[1:38]
>> You have.
[1:38]
>> Okay. All right. Again, brief
[1:41]
information about Malden Jenkins. We are
[1:42]
a large regional audit organization with
[1:44]
offices throughout the southeast. Your
[1:46]
audit was performed from our Braden,
[1:47]
Florida office location. Our
[1:49]
governmental niche is the firm's largest
[1:51]
single niche serving almost 800
[1:53]
governments now in the southeastern
[1:54]
footprint. Your team was led by myself
[1:57]
as well as River Yang who serve 100%
[2:00]
governmental entities throughout the
[2:02]
year. So all we do is governmental
[2:03]
audits. Um so a lot of experience with
[2:05]
municipalities such as the town. We
[2:08]
perform an audit to issue our opinion on
[2:10]
the fairness of the presentation of the
[2:11]
financial statements. As part of our
[2:13]
audit process, we consider the town's
[2:16]
internal control structure for the basis
[2:17]
of designing our procedures um to help
[2:20]
us support our opinion. We are not
[2:22]
issuing an opinion on the effectiveness
[2:24]
of internal control. However, our audit
[2:26]
was performed in accordance with
[2:28]
generally accepted auditing standards as
[2:29]
well as government auditing standards to
[2:31]
provide reasonable assurance that the
[2:33]
financial statements are free of
[2:34]
material misstatement and ultimately
[2:36]
management does have responsibility for
[2:37]
the financial statements themselves. I'm
[2:40]
happy to report that we have issued an
[2:41]
unmodified opinion which is the highest
[2:43]
form of assurance that we can render.
[2:45]
Therefore, in our opinion, the financial
[2:46]
statements are free of material
[2:48]
misstatement.
[2:52]
In the back of the financial statements
[2:54]
are three additional compliance reports.
[2:56]
The first is a report that we refer to
[2:57]
as our yellowbook report and that's our
[2:59]
report of our test of controls and
[3:01]
compliance with significant with respect
[3:02]
to significant laws, rules, and
[3:04]
regulations. This is a negative
[3:05]
assurance report. So, we're not issuing
[3:07]
an opinion. This is where we would
[3:09]
identify material weaknesses or signific
[3:11]
significant deficiencies if we found
[3:13]
them in the audit process. I'm happy to
[3:15]
report that we have no current year
[3:17]
findings of material weaknesses or
[3:18]
significant deficiencies.
[3:21]
The Florida Auditor General requires us
[3:22]
to perform certain procedures in
[3:24]
accordance with the rules of the auditor
[3:25]
general and issue an independent
[3:27]
auditor's management letter with respect
[3:29]
to the testing that was performed. Happy
[3:31]
to report that we have no current year
[3:32]
findings or recommendations within that
[3:34]
report based on that testing as well.
[3:36]
And then lastly, we're required to
[3:38]
examine the town's uh investments of
[3:41]
public funds to ensure compliance with
[3:42]
town policies as well as Florida
[3:44]
statutes. No current year findings to to
[3:46]
report with respect to the investment of
[3:48]
any public funds as well. Uh the last
[3:51]
bullet that we have here, if the town
[3:53]
were to expend more than a million in
[3:55]
federal awards or $750,000 in state
[3:58]
awards, we would have to perform what's
[3:59]
called a single audit or a compliance
[4:01]
audit with respect to the spending of
[4:02]
those awards. that was not required as
[4:04]
the town did not exceed those thresholds
[4:06]
of expenditures for the 2025 fiscal
[4:08]
year. We hope to the future.
[4:12]
>> Um some of the required communications
[4:14]
that we have in accordance with
[4:15]
government auditing standards like the
[4:17]
financial statements, the accounting
[4:18]
policies are the responsibility of
[4:20]
management. We evaluate these policies
[4:22]
in the audit process to determine that
[4:24]
they're reasonable and appropriate. One
[4:26]
new policy change that was in response
[4:28]
to a new governmental accounting
[4:30]
pronouncement is with respect to how the
[4:31]
town accounts for compensated absences.
[4:34]
So the audit does include a prior period
[4:36]
restatement to properly implement that
[4:37]
standard so the town could follow the
[4:40]
guidance under the new standard and how
[4:42]
they're accounting for what that
[4:43]
liability is in your governmentwide
[4:44]
financial statements.
[4:47]
The financial statements do include a
[4:49]
few significant estimates. The most
[4:51]
significant estimate in your financial
[4:52]
statement is the depreciable lives of
[4:53]
your capital assets and determining what
[4:55]
the netbook value of those assets are at
[4:57]
the end of the year. Throughout the
[4:59]
audit process, we received full
[5:01]
cooperation from management to provide
[5:02]
information to us to perform the
[5:04]
procedures that we're required to in a
[5:05]
timely manner. We had no disagreements
[5:07]
with management over the application of
[5:09]
any accounting policies or procedures.
[5:11]
At the conclusion of the audit, we
[5:13]
obtained written representation from
[5:14]
management over the information provided
[5:16]
to us. We're not aware of management's
[5:18]
consultations with other accountants or
[5:20]
what we refer to as opinion shopping. No
[5:22]
significant issues discussed with
[5:24]
management to bring to your attention.
[5:26]
The only two audit adjustments that were
[5:28]
posted from the initial trial balance
[5:29]
provided were actually prepared by
[5:31]
management and given to us to adjust. So
[5:33]
we had no audit adjustments performed in
[5:34]
the audit. There was one uncorrected
[5:37]
misstatement where we proposed an
[5:38]
adjustment and management elected not to
[5:40]
post. This was an immaterial item so it
[5:43]
doesn't impact our opinion at all and it
[5:45]
was just to acrew about $16,000 of
[5:47]
additional payables. Um so again no
[5:50]
opinion modifi mod modification with
[5:51]
respect to that. We also evaluated the
[5:54]
footnote disclosures to intersure that
[5:56]
they had the required information
[5:58]
included within them as well. And then
[6:00]
lastly mold and Jenkins is independent
[6:02]
with respect to the town in accordance
[6:03]
with the AICPA professional standards.
[6:07]
So I mentioned that there were no audit
[6:08]
findings um that we were reporting
[6:10]
within the financial statement document
[6:12]
throughout the audit process. We do have
[6:13]
a few recommendations for improvement.
[6:15]
Uh the first one is with respect to the
[6:17]
purchasing card policy. Um we tested 25
[6:20]
purchasing card transactions during the
[6:22]
audit process and determined that one
[6:24]
transaction for about $20 didn't have a
[6:27]
supporting invoice to it. Um this was
[6:29]
for the postage meter. So a very common
[6:30]
expenditure that the town has. Our
[6:33]
recommendation is just to ensure we'd
[6:34]
have that appropriate backup for all
[6:36]
purchasing card documents. But we also
[6:39]
tested 25 cash dispersements just at
[6:42]
random throughout the fiscal year. We
[6:44]
noted two of those 25 had no
[6:46]
documentation of an independent review
[6:48]
and approval. These were recurring
[6:50]
transactions that management had. So it
[6:52]
was probably approved at the beginning
[6:53]
of the year to say, "Hey, we're going to
[6:54]
have this charge every single month."
[6:56]
Management just couldn't find the
[6:57]
documentation for that initial approval.
[6:59]
I'll make sure
[7:02]
>> that's I don't know the answer to that
[7:04]
off the top of my head, but I can get
[7:05]
back to you.
[7:07]
Uh the last item that we had is we
[7:09]
performed certain payroll testing as
[7:11]
well and we noted that four of the 13
[7:13]
employees tested for that pay rate
[7:15]
testing um were kind of approved at a 4%
[7:18]
increase by the commission. Um however,
[7:21]
there just wasn't documentation that
[7:22]
made its way to their file to support
[7:23]
that this 4% increase was approved by
[7:26]
the commission. Um, we were able to see
[7:27]
in the commission minutes the approval
[7:29]
though. So, it's just recommended that
[7:30]
each employee within their personnel
[7:32]
file have a documented pay to make a
[7:34]
judge be approval for. So, those are
[7:37]
just a few recommendations. Nothing
[7:38]
significant that we determined felt
[7:40]
needed to be reported as significant
[7:41]
deficiency, but we also did want to
[7:43]
bring those to your attention throughout
[7:44]
the audit process. The last thing that
[7:46]
you'll note in the auditor's discussion
[7:48]
and analysis is a list of upcoming
[7:51]
gadget pronouncements and some narrative
[7:53]
as far as what changes you might see. Uh
[7:56]
two specific changes that you're going
[7:57]
to see within the the 2026 financial
[8:00]
statements is a little bit of a change
[8:02]
to how the structure of the management
[8:03]
discussion and analysis is ordered and
[8:06]
then your general fund budget to actual
[8:08]
schedule currently shows the original
[8:10]
budget, the final budget, the actual
[8:12]
amount and then the variance between the
[8:14]
final budget and the actual results.
[8:16]
Gazby's asking us to add a column that
[8:18]
shows a variance between the initial and
[8:20]
final budget as well. And then
[8:22]
management will also have to footnote
[8:24]
any significant variations between those
[8:26]
budget amounts um from the original
[8:28]
budget the final budget as well as
[8:30]
variances between the final budget and
[8:32]
the actual results. That's all included
[8:35]
within that auditor's discussion and
[8:36]
analysis document.
[8:39]
That's the conclusion of the
[8:40]
presentation that I have for you. We
[8:41]
certainly appreciate the opportunity to
[8:43]
serve as your auditors. And with that,
[8:44]
I'll answer any questions that you guys
[8:45]
have.
[8:47]
>> You mind?
[8:50]
» No. Thank you.
[8:53]
I can add one.
[8:54]
>> I want to point out my favorite part is
[8:57]
that we um the audit confirms that we
[9:00]
put $792,000
[9:03]
towards our reserve through both um plan
[9:06]
savings and unexpected savings. This was
[9:09]
the budget that was built by uh the
[9:11]
previous personnel before I got here.
[9:18]
» Good. Thank you. Thank you. Have a great
[9:20]
night. Thank you.
[9:21]
>> Thank you.
[9:34]
» Ready?
[9:34]
>> Yeah.
[9:36]
>> I'm not on.
[9:48]
We're bringing up a presentation as part
[9:50]
of the town manager report.
[9:57]
» Thank you.
[9:59]
[clears throat]
[10:06]
» So, I'll go ahead and um get started.
[10:08]
Some highlights um from the uh town
[10:11]
manager report is we did submit for a
[10:14]
grant for the um beach management plan.
[10:18]
This is the first step on a long road
[10:20]
that gets us to one show that we are
[10:24]
allowed to receive sand from our
[10:26]
neighboring um districts and
[10:29]
municipalities. Uh the Army Corps should
[10:32]
sand become available through their
[10:34]
plans. And it also puts us in line for
[10:36]
future funding uh from the feds as well
[10:39]
as the state for beach reourishment to
[10:42]
address coastal erosion. So like I said,
[10:44]
this is the first step. The funding
[10:47]
level is pretty low um for us because
[10:51]
it's based on a percentage of our
[10:53]
coastally eroded beach as defined by the
[10:56]
state. So our total grant is um a little
[11:00]
over 300,000 with 42,000 expected from
[11:04]
the state um and um requirement of about
[11:10]
170,000 by us or 270,000 by us but that
[11:14]
would be over multi-year to do that.
[11:16]
This is a very scientific study of
[11:19]
basically the height width of our our
[11:21]
beach, what's needed, what type of sand.
[11:24]
So, it's the first step of getting in
[11:26]
line for it. There's no guarantee that
[11:28]
we'll necessarily get the grant, but it
[11:30]
was important to put ourselves in there.
[11:33]
Uh, on the screen, you can see uh some
[11:36]
changes that have taken place here in
[11:38]
town over the last couple weeks. Thank
[11:40]
you to the Colony Garden Club for their
[11:42]
donation. That donation has been uh
[11:45]
transmitted to the town. We've enhanced
[11:48]
our um entrance. Can you uh minimize
[11:53]
our people? Thank you. Uh you can see
[11:55]
we've enhanced our entrance through
[11:57]
plantings. It's been a very successful
[11:59]
project. The town has also updated its
[12:02]
irrigation and uh lighting. In fact, the
[12:05]
lighting contractor was still out there
[12:06]
today. I know we spent a couple trips
[12:08]
back to make sure everything is working
[12:11]
to highlight all of our new landscaping.
[12:13]
Um, I think it looks great and it was a
[12:15]
great partnership um with the garden the
[12:19]
colony garden club. Um, they have been
[12:22]
working towards this all year through
[12:23]
bake sales and other fundraisers and um,
[12:26]
I'm glad we could pull it off. Cindy Kim
[12:29]
as their president was instrumental in
[12:31]
the design and Laura Hutchinson was um
[12:34]
by me every day during the 95 degree
[12:37]
heat with the landscapers overseeing the
[12:40]
project and uh we've passed the baton
[12:42]
back and forth every day. On some other
[12:45]
um updates that have come out of town
[12:48]
commission direction and spending is
[12:50]
we've restriped all of the roads in the
[12:53]
town and this includes the reflectors.
[12:55]
um they were very faded, kind of looked
[12:58]
broken, so everything was scraped up and
[13:01]
relayed. We've also introduced two
[13:04]
concrete um
[13:06]
barriers um one at the corner right out
[13:09]
here of the club and the other at
[13:11]
Lighthouse and Colony on the JIP Club
[13:14]
side of the corner. So that should help
[13:17]
with messing up the grass in the town's
[13:19]
rideway, which is also the front yard of
[13:22]
our residents.
[13:24]
Some other highlights. As of today,
[13:26]
we've collected $501,000
[13:30]
for our pay in full opportunity. That's
[13:32]
43 properties. We um I've spoken to um a
[13:37]
few other people. I'm expecting checks.
[13:39]
We'll be doing a reach out, a more
[13:41]
personal reach out um by the end of this
[13:44]
week, reminding people of the
[13:45]
opportunity and just answering any
[13:48]
questions, doing kind of a FAQ based on
[13:51]
some questions that I've received um
[13:53]
over the past uh couple weeks. This was
[13:56]
launched about 3 weeks ago. So, I think
[13:59]
the response has been great. Everyone I
[14:01]
have spoken to and walked them through
[14:03]
this um has ended the call with saying
[14:06]
they would be sending us a check. So,
[14:08]
it's like I said, been very positive.
[14:10]
Um, congratulations to Vice Mayor Schula
[14:12]
for being the second chap coming in and
[14:14]
the first from the commission.
[14:16]
[laughter]
[14:18]
Not that we were like waiting by the
[14:20]
door that day, but we were pretty
[14:21]
excited for this. Um, I'm glad we have
[14:23]
so many people here with us today. Um,
[14:26]
the first budget workshop is Wednesday,
[14:28]
August 19th at town hall. I hope you can
[14:31]
be there. The meeting's at 5:30. I'll go
[14:34]
through at the end of this um the other
[14:36]
dates for the budget. It's important to
[14:38]
be involved. This is when a lot of the
[14:40]
decisions that take place throughout the
[14:42]
year are laid. Um so get involved. It's
[14:45]
important. Uh skipping down, I attended
[14:48]
a city manager roundt
[14:50]
um where other um municipalities from
[14:53]
all up and down the treasure coast
[14:54]
talked about the potential impacts to
[14:56]
property tax revenue and best practices
[14:59]
for community communication, whether it
[15:01]
passes or fails. um what we need to do
[15:04]
next. I've been attending the Jupiter
[15:06]
Inlet District meetings um that the
[15:09]
Fshaw project seems to be going forward
[15:12]
from their point of view, but they
[15:14]
really need the Army Corps of Engineer
[15:16]
to approve it and I don't that doesn't
[15:19]
seem positive right now. The roadway for
[15:23]
forensic engineers have been on site. I
[15:25]
am awaiting their report. Um but they
[15:28]
have done two site visits to look at the
[15:30]
condition of all town roads. And year to
[15:33]
date in your backup we had some
[15:35]
financials. Year to date we have made
[15:37]
$43,000 in interest and diversifying our
[15:42]
investments. Uh speaking of financials,
[15:44]
we're at 75% of the year. You might have
[15:47]
seen this big number jump off the page
[15:49]
at you of 278%
[15:52]
over budget for or of budget for the
[15:56]
building and zoning. That includes the
[15:58]
510 that we um expended to um hold on to
[16:03]
the building permit excess funds for the
[16:07]
renovation partial renovation of town
[16:09]
hall. If you back that number out, we're
[16:12]
actually at 188,000, which puts us right
[16:15]
on target at 75% of our budget, as you
[16:18]
saw in your backup as well, we are about
[16:21]
90,000 behind of our estimated revenue
[16:24]
for building permits. But overall, when
[16:27]
you take that number out, instead of
[16:29]
being at 83% of our expenditures, we're
[16:32]
at 72%. So, we are still trending on
[16:36]
budget um a little below as we expect.
[16:39]
This is the most difficult time of year
[16:41]
because we have less revenue coming in general. We've already collected 99%
[16:46]
of our tax revenue. Our fiscal year ends
[16:48]
September 30th. So, we have more money
[16:51]
going out than coming in, but we are in
[16:53]
a a good cash position for that. And and
[16:55]
like I said, we remain on budget. Again,
[16:59]
upcoming budget meetings. Uh next
[17:01]
Wednesday at town hall, we will have our
[17:04]
final budget workshop. The budget should
[17:06]
be released either Wednesday or Thursday
[17:08]
this week. The uh draft budget for um
[17:12]
your review as well as um the public's
[17:15]
review. The first budget hearing is
[17:18]
Tuesday, September 8th at town hall and
[17:20]
the final budget hearing is part of the
[17:24]
uh September commission meeting which is
[17:27]
September 14th in this building. am
[17:30]
finally taking advantage of so many
[17:32]
people being with us today. I want to
[17:34]
remind everyone that our website has
[17:36]
been updated this year and we have right
[17:39]
on the front page starting on the left
[17:40]
agendas, the inlet outlet newsletter, a
[17:44]
calendar, the town code, and what I'm
[17:46]
calling the transparency portal. And if
[17:49]
you click on that transparency portal,
[17:51]
it takes you directly to all of our
[17:53]
current year budget planning
[17:55]
information, which will be updated
[17:57]
Wednesday or Thursday this week. the
[17:59]
current budget that we're working from,
[18:01]
the monthly budget summary reports that
[18:04]
go in the back of every agenda, all the
[18:06]
town manager monthly reports, the
[18:09]
approved town commission project list,
[18:11]
which tells you everything that's
[18:13]
happening in the community, and then
[18:15]
links to all of our inside the town
[18:17]
weekly newsletters. Um, and finally, we
[18:20]
are planning for our fall festival,
[18:23]
which will be a combination of the
[18:24]
welcome back party and Halloween party
[18:27]
for Sunday, October 25th in the late a
[18:30]
afternoon. Uh, we'll be getting more
[18:32]
information out, but I just wanted
[18:34]
everyone to save the date. And last, I
[18:37]
have our intern here, and because of the
[18:39]
length of the meeting, she's just going
[18:41]
to wait, but talk Diana
[18:44]
way in the back. There she is. Um, she,
[18:47]
as you recall, was our intern through
[18:49]
the Florida City Manager Association. We
[18:51]
received a stipen to host her as our
[18:54]
intern, and she has been helping behind
[18:56]
the scenes with budgeting, public
[18:58]
records management, and communication.
[19:00]
She is on her way to FSU next week to
[19:03]
start not only her grad program there
[19:05]
and public administration, but also she
[19:08]
has a fellowship through their program
[19:10]
there. Um, so we're very proud of her.
[19:13]
She's Jupiter born and raised and um I
[19:16]
hope [clears throat] uh she'll be back
[19:17]
with us one day. So she's great.
[19:19]
>> So thank you Katiana.
[19:25]
» And I'm happy to answer any questions
[19:26]
from the commission. If not, I'll hand
[19:28]
it off to the chief.
[19:34]
>> Thank you.
[19:41]
I skipped the town clerk. I was just
[19:43]
advis
[19:56]
» without further ado.
[19:57]
>> Thank you, mayor, commission. Uh, I
[19:59]
don't have a formal report tonight. Our
[20:01]
monthly report was sent out. Uh, we did
[20:03]
recently have a promotion, though, and
[20:04]
I'd just like to introduce Sergeant
[20:07]
Nelson Bario. He comes with a very
[20:09]
diverse background in law enforcement
[20:10]
leadership and I think he's going to be
[20:12]
a great fit for the town and he's
[20:14]
already done tremendous work for us in
[20:16]
the police department. So
[20:21]
>> first of all, mayor commissioners rest
[20:25]
it's my pleasure to serve you and thanks
[20:28]
for having me. Uh I come with like I
[20:31]
said 41 years of law enforcement
[20:33]
experience and private
[20:35]
experience as well. So, uh, with that,
[20:39]
you know, you have a terrific police
[20:41]
department. Not looking to change much,
[20:43]
but trying to enhance as much as we can.
[20:46]
So, you all know where to find me.
[20:49]
>> Thanks, Char.
[20:50]
>> Thank you,
[20:58]
» Matt. We are up to you now.
[21:00]
>> Okay. Um I was just going to mention
[21:03]
that as I had emailed to all of you
[21:04]
before the um judge Frank Palahassie
[21:07]
found in our favor with respect to the
[21:09]
challenge go because you love
[21:11]
>> that's not part of
[21:13]
>> the same presentation
[21:17]
>> um found in our favor with respect to
[21:19]
the the challenge to the language to uh
[21:21]
the amendment three ballot and found
[21:23]
that it was biased, it was misleading,
[21:24]
it was factually inaccurate. Uh the
[21:26]
attorney general has until Thursday to
[21:30]
provide new language for it. It was new
[21:32]
proposed ballot language. He's already
[21:34]
expressed that he has no intention of
[21:36]
appealing the decision. So we'll have to
[21:38]
see what he comes up with by by
[21:39]
Thursday.
[21:42]
That's all I have for now.
[21:43]
>> Okay. Thanks, Matt.
[21:46]
>> Commissioner reports.
[21:49]
Anything? No, no.
[21:57]
» Is this where we do the installation on
[21:59]
the
[22:15]
Excellent.
[22:26]
So the um the mic with you.
[22:33]
We had a Oh, I can't u commission had a
[22:37]
discussion earlier uh in previous
[22:39]
meetings about enhancing the safety uh
[22:42]
between our our walkways as you cut
[22:45]
across the north um walkway and then the
[22:48]
south walkway. Also, just to distinguish
[22:51]
between the difference of the pathway
[22:55]
and then the road. If you look in this
[22:57]
top example here, you can see that the
[23:01]
red brick goes all the way across the
[23:03]
road. And if you're if you're walking
[23:05]
along, in fact, if you're at the beach
[23:08]
on the north walkway and you're looking
[23:09]
west all the way across to the inlet, it
[23:12]
looks like one continuous path. And the
[23:15]
concern there is that other than this
[23:17]
one dark colored mat um which
[23:21]
distinguishes the the brick from the um
[23:25]
and and gives some kind of notification
[23:27]
or provides awareness that that um
[23:31]
you're about to cross the road. Other
[23:33]
than that, there's there's nothing that
[23:35]
tells you that. So, the concern is that
[23:38]
folks walking uh at dusk or at night uh
[23:42]
we're not supposed to ride our bikes on
[23:44]
the walkways, but people do. Um we've
[23:48]
heard in the past from some of the
[23:49]
residents that live near these
[23:51]
intersections that there's been near
[23:54]
accidents uh because of that crossing
[23:56]
without paying attention. Um, so the
[23:59]
idea was to, and thank you, uh, town
[24:02]
manager for showing a a Photoshop um,
[24:06]
rendering, so to speak, of what it would
[24:08]
look like at each corner with the yellow
[24:10]
mats, tactile mats. Um, they're easy to
[24:13]
walk over. Um, they exist as you are
[24:17]
coming across the bridge, the KO Bridge
[24:21]
on Beach Road from the entrance to our
[24:24]
neighborhood. Um, they're there. you may
[24:26]
not even have noticed it. Um,
[24:29]
been hearing from residents, um, my wife
[24:33]
included, about the importance of
[24:35]
maintaining the, uh, the integrity, the
[24:37]
ambiance of our neighborhood. Totally
[24:40]
get that. Understand that. Um, but I
[24:43]
just feel we have an opportunity to
[24:45]
provide a um a safety uh
[24:51]
provide safety for folks that are are
[24:53]
using the walkway and um could prevent
[24:56]
potentially prevent an accident. So
[24:58]
that's why this is being
[25:04]
» Thank you. Can I hear
[25:06]
so? Yeah. So I think my one concern so I
[25:09]
do safety and ADA work but so the ADA
[25:12]
doesn't require yellow and the research
[25:15]
shows that it's the bumps is tactical
[25:17]
healing. It's not color. So uh in most
[25:21]
cities use a red there's some
[25:23]
distinction that it doesn't need to be
[25:25]
bright yellow for a community. So would
[25:27]
you consider it's the same price the
[25:29]
bricks available? Would you be opposed
[25:31]
to just making it more, you know, not
[25:34]
the yellow, but maybe more of a red
[25:35]
colored red brick, but still? Yes.
[25:44]
» All right. Um,
[25:48]
>> yes. Go ahead.
[25:50]
>> This is somewhat an agenda item. So, is
[25:53]
there She asked if he
[25:55]
>> You want to do that, right? Yeah, we can
[25:56]
do that. Sure. That makes sense. We're
[25:58]
here,
[25:59]
>> right? All right. So
[26:02]
>> through the commission
[26:04]
>> any preference? Yellow, red,
[26:06]
>> pink,
[26:08]
>> purple,
[26:11]
>> fine.
[26:11]
>> Yeah, like a red.
[26:12]
>> Yeah, I'm in favor of the red as well. I
[26:14]
kind of like what we had the one piece
[26:16]
that is tackled there.
[26:19]
>> Red's fine.
[26:20]
>> Okay. So then I guess in that case, make
[26:24]
a motion here.
[26:25]
>> Do we need a motion to this? Yeah, there
[26:28]
was somebody name
[26:36]
ask questions.
[26:38]
>> Um, we're not quite up to our uh tell
[26:41]
you what is this specifically for the
[26:44]
tactical colors.
[26:47]
We'll come up to public comment in a
[26:49]
minute.
[26:50]
>> Oh, mayor, if I may. Um, so when you all
[26:53]
approved it, it's with a contractor.
[26:56]
Before we brought it forward, I had
[26:58]
asked them for the prices. The prices
[27:00]
are the same. So I feel like we're well
[27:02]
within our spending differential that I
[27:05]
don't think it's
[27:06]
>> You did sign a sign a contract. This is
[27:08]
a material change that I can make.
[27:10]
>> All right, that sounds good. Did someone
[27:12]
tell us what the price is?
[27:15]
>> Bucks.
[27:16]
>> 31.
[27:18]
No.
[27:20]
Um, we'll have to get back to you on
[27:22]
that question. As far as the actual
[27:23]
price, we had a combined pricing if I
[27:25]
remember right for the striping as well
[27:27]
as this. So, we don't have that at our
[27:30]
fingertips tonight.
[27:32]
>> What was it approximately?
[27:34]
You had some rough idea could let us
[27:37]
know. I'm sure you know something.
[27:39]
Someone has to know something.
[27:41]
>> We can get back to you if that's fine.
[27:43]
All right. Thank you. That way we'll
[27:45]
give you the exact number.
[27:47]
>> And how many are there? How many?
[27:50]
>> 13.
[27:52]
>> There are 13 on the north
[27:56]
>> and four on the south.
[27:59]
>> Okay.
[28:02]
Very good. Thank you.
[28:03]
>> We I just as a one reason I'm here. I
[28:07]
like the look of not really knowing
[28:09]
where our paths are. So it was for the
[28:13]
recording.
[28:14]
>> We're not at the point of
[28:17]
having comments.
[28:19]
>> I'm saying for our recording it's easier
[28:21]
for the microphone.
[28:23]
>> Um let's if you will we'll hold off
[28:25]
until we're to the point of doing our
[28:28]
commentary which will be shortly. Okay.
[28:30]
And we won't shut any of the subjects
[28:32]
out. Come back without a problem. That
[28:34]
way we can keep the meeting moving.
[28:36]
>> I just didn't hear what you said. What
[28:38]
was the solution?
[28:40]
be to eliminate the yellow
[28:43]
and go to a red tone for the the still
[28:47]
being tactical. So you feel it as you're
[28:49]
coming to it.
[28:52]
>> Okay. And if you follow your bleeding
[28:54]
and then red comes out that'll be just
[28:57]
part of it, right?
[29:00]
>> Okay.
[29:01]
>> Everybody's a comedian.
[29:02]
>> Yes, everybody's um and I have a a
[29:05]
statement that I am going to read. Um,
[29:09]
so good evening to all. It's impressive
[29:12]
to see as many of you all here tonight.
[29:15]
That's great. Um,
[29:17]
I know that our uh previous mayors have
[29:20]
made some statements from time to time.
[29:22]
So, I'm going to follow Chip and Ed's
[29:23]
example and do the same.
[29:26]
Please bear with me as I am uh not going
[29:28]
to be as eloquent as they. The normal
[29:31]
process for doing town business under
[29:33]
our new charter is for our town staff to
[29:36]
work issues under the policies and
[29:37]
directions set up by the town
[29:39]
commission. The commission brings topics
[29:41]
and issues to our meetings for our open
[29:43]
discussion and a vote when necessary and
[29:46]
the public so that those votes can
[29:48]
include input from the town's residents.
[29:51]
No town business is done without that
[29:53]
opportunity of the residents to provide
[29:55]
their inputs for all items under
[29:57]
consideration. So, it's nice, as I said,
[29:59]
to see so many of you here in attendance
[30:01]
tonight compared to our regular five or
[30:03]
six bases that we've gotten used to
[30:05]
seeing. So, that's the end of my little
[30:07]
civics lesson. Um, over the past several
[30:10]
months, the town staff has been working
[30:12]
to incorporate the very generous gift
[30:14]
from the Stewarts for placement of AED
[30:16]
devices around town. This was all
[30:19]
presented and discussed at several
[30:21]
meetings and duly voted upon by the
[30:23]
commission.
[30:25]
As the stapling amended the guidance
[30:26]
from the commission, there was a a
[30:28]
disscent made for the acceptance of the
[30:30]
gift, the installation of the gift, and
[30:33]
the looks of the gift. All after the
[30:35]
back of approval by this commission.
[30:37]
However, as a result of this resident
[30:39]
input, several of the Eve added posts
[30:43]
were removed from the placement plan and
[30:45]
several of the others are under
[30:46]
consideration to be moved slightly so as
[30:48]
to alleviate some of the objections. Uh
[30:51]
later this evening, the commission will
[30:53]
be reviewing the already approved plan
[30:55]
so as to finalize an update of the
[30:57]
placement of those units that will be
[30:59]
incorporated in this AED installation.
[31:03]
Our chief will also provide a
[31:04]
presentation shortly on this subject.
[31:07]
Some of the complaints concerning the
[31:08]
placement of these devices is on their
[31:10]
impact on the aesthetic of our town.
[31:14]
While it is now and will always be in
[31:16]
the future, the objective of this
[31:18]
commission to maintain an unchanging
[31:21]
community
[31:23]
and
[31:25]
keep that piece of paradise as part of
[31:27]
our our our diction. As an example, we
[31:31]
are not exclusively made up of little
[31:33]
bungalows and small homes that initially
[31:35]
were built here. So, our town has grown
[31:37]
as we've moved forward into the 21st
[31:39]
century. So there have been changes and
[31:41]
we've attempted to maintain our field of
[31:43]
paradise via the updating of our codes
[31:46]
and ordinances backed by this in
[31:48]
previous commissions to ensure our
[31:51]
building process maintains as much of
[31:53]
our paradise as is possible. In keeping
[31:56]
with that move into the 21st century, we
[31:58]
are now looking at the town's resilience
[32:00]
in the face of potential stronger storms
[32:03]
and weather storms from a changing
[32:04]
environment that may impact us. That's a
[32:07]
look to the future. We may need to make
[32:10]
revisions to our building and zoning
[32:11]
codes to ensure the safety and
[32:13]
survivability of our piece of paradise
[32:16]
that may result in a little different
[32:17]
look than we have today.
[32:21]
As we move forward, we will see what the
[32:23]
results of the study for which we are
[32:25]
awaiting the final results will
[32:27]
recommend for our consideration. Also,
[32:31]
but keeping the safety and well-being of
[32:33]
our neighbors in mind, this generous
[32:35]
offer was accepted so as to provide the
[32:38]
potential of life-saving capabilities to
[32:40]
support the health of our residents.
[32:43]
Earlier, I used the name Eve when I
[32:45]
addressed the installation designs of
[32:46]
the units. Some of you as parents or
[32:49]
grandparents may have watched with your
[32:51]
youth the Disney animated movie Wall-E
[32:54]
with your young ones. In that movie of
[32:57]
the future, there was a robot character.
[32:59]
reminds me of the base of our AED
[33:01]
installations.
[33:03]
That is a movie of the future and we are
[33:05]
at our future now as we continue to move
[33:09]
forward while always looking to maintain
[33:11]
our community to the utmost as our
[33:14]
paradise.
[33:15]
Having been at a CPR and eventually the
[33:18]
use of an AD instructor, I've watched
[33:20]
the improvements of these devices to the
[33:22]
point that almost anyone can
[33:24]
successfully deploy them with minimum
[33:26]
training in boarding. The systems are
[33:29]
now basically self-use. They just need a
[33:31]
set of hands to make it work. Even so, I
[33:35]
would recommend everyone take training
[33:37]
that will be easily made available so
[33:38]
that if unfortunately you are faced with
[33:43]
a life and death situation, you'll be
[33:45]
there to assist one of your neighbors in
[33:48]
their grave gravest time ugly. To be
[33:51]
successful in such a situation, timing
[33:53]
is everything, as you will see the chief
[33:55]
explain. In closing, the town is run by
[33:58]
a professional team that takes its
[34:00]
direction and guidance from our resident
[34:03]
volunteers who have stepped forward to
[34:04]
give of their time and strive our town
[34:08]
keep it the best it can be.
[34:11]
If you are not satisfied with the
[34:14]
results of decisions made, you can
[34:16]
volunteer to run the town commission to
[34:19]
be on the town social committee or as we
[34:22]
will see later this evening
[34:24]
to be a member of our building and
[34:26]
zoning committee. But always remember,
[34:29]
those of your neighbors who have stepped
[34:31]
forward to do this are also residents
[34:34]
who are working to make this place we
[34:36]
call home its very best while
[34:38]
maintaining Perry Coml's quote about our
[34:41]
peace of paradise for all. So with that,
[34:45]
we'll move forward. Now I mentioned
[34:47]
we're going to move item number 7A. So
[34:50]
we're going to move forward from this
[34:51]
point
[34:53]
to that on the chief.
[35:14]
» Thank you, mayor. I appreciate that. Um,
[35:16]
I just want to thank everybody for
[35:17]
coming out tonight. This is an important
[35:19]
conversation for our town and I
[35:21]
appreciate everyone taking the time to
[35:23]
be here. Um, I'd like to begin with a
[35:25]
short video, but before we do that, I
[35:27]
want to recognize something that has
[35:29]
really stood out to me over the past
[35:30]
couple of weeks, and that's I've heard
[35:33]
from a number of residents, some who
[35:35]
have expressed support for the program
[35:36]
and others who have raised questions or
[35:39]
concerns. I really do appreciate both.
[35:42]
And in fact, the concerns are especially
[35:44]
important because they give us an
[35:46]
opportunity to better explain the
[35:47]
project, listen to the different
[35:49]
perspectives, and make sure that we're
[35:51]
carefully thinking about how we move
[35:54]
forward.
[35:55]
What has resonated with me most is that
[35:57]
the people that I've spoken with have
[35:59]
been thoughtful, reasonable, and sincere
[36:02]
in their concerns.
[36:04]
While we may not all begin this
[36:06]
conversation in the from the same
[36:08]
perspective, I believe that we share the
[36:10]
same goal and that's doing what's best
[36:11]
for Jupiter and Lake Colony and
[36:12]
preserving the qualities that make this
[36:14]
community special. My hope tonight is
[36:16]
that we can provide good information,
[36:18]
answer questions, improve the dialogue,
[36:20]
and perhaps better understand one
[36:22]
another's perspectives. Ultimately,
[36:24]
conversations like this help us make
[36:26]
better decisions, and as we look forward
[36:28]
to the toward the future of our town.
[36:31]
Um, and with that, I'd like to start the
[36:32]
video.
[36:44]
The Jupiter and Lakeland Colony Police
[36:45]
Department prides itself on the level of
[36:47]
public safety and service we provide to
[36:49]
our community. While our crime rates
[36:51]
remain low, we always look for strategic
[36:54]
ways to make the community safer and
[36:55]
more accessible, not only for our
[36:57]
residents, but for our contractors,
[36:59]
landscapers, and visitors that frequent
[37:01]
the community. The community AED program
[37:03]
is a collaboration between the town and
[37:06]
Earl and Nancy Stewart that wanted to
[37:07]
put life-saving devices in the hands of
[37:09]
our residents when seconds count. When
[37:12]
someone's heart stops, every second
[37:14]
matters. An AED in the first 3 to 5
[37:16]
minutes can be the difference between
[37:18]
life and loss. Our officers carry AEDs
[37:21]
and they're close by, but they can't be
[37:23]
everywhere at once. Publicly accessible
[37:26]
AEDs put help right where it's needed on
[37:28]
your street near your neighbors ready
[37:31]
before first responders can arrive.
[37:33]
These devices are simple, safe, and
[37:35]
designed for extraordinary people an
[37:37]
extraordinary moment. This is about
[37:40]
giving our community the best chance in
[37:42]
those first minutes. The goal of the
[37:44]
community AED program is to place AED
[37:46]
units in public spaces throughout the
[37:48]
community, which will allow easy access
[37:50]
to life-saving equipment when it matters
[37:53]
most. Six outdoor locations were
[37:56]
selected to allow quick access from
[37:57]
anywhere in the town. When someone
[38:00]
suffers a sudden cardiac arrest, time
[38:02]
becomes the most important factor. The
[38:04]
ambulance may be minutes away, but those
[38:07]
minutes matter. Publicly accessible AEDs
[38:10]
give ordinary people the ability to help
[38:12]
before emergency crews arrive, turning
[38:14]
bystanders into lifesavers and giving
[38:16]
victims their best chance of survival.
[38:19]
>> The rotate AED is designed with easy
[38:22]
access in mind. Simply approach the
[38:24]
unit.
[38:26]
Turn the cover counterclockwise
[38:29]
unit. You'll see the AED and pull out
[38:32]
the AED and get to the person that needs
[38:35]
help. Remember, always call 911.
[38:38]
>> Hi, my name is Andre Dodd and I'm a
[38:40]
lieutenant and a representative for
[38:42]
Toquesta Fire Rescue. We wanted to
[38:44]
congratulate you on your community AED
[38:47]
program. The American Heart Association
[38:49]
states that there was roughly 350,000
[38:52]
sudden cardiac arrests in 2025. With
[38:56]
quick access to AEDs, this increased
[38:58]
survivability for these patients. As a
[39:01]
professional rescuer and a CPR
[39:04]
instructor, I've had more success with
[39:06]
patients who receive bystander CPR. It
[39:09]
truly gives the highest chance for
[39:11]
survival.
[39:12]
As you move forward with this program,
[39:14]
the life you save may be your own loved
[39:17]
ones. Congratulations.
[39:27]
All town police officers and
[39:29]
professional staff are trained in basic
[39:31]
CPR and AED operations. However, police
[39:35]
officers are not advanced emergency
[39:38]
medical providers and do not carry or
[39:40]
administer emergency medications. Our
[39:43]
role is to begin life-saving care until
[39:46]
a fire rescue can arrive. Although
[39:48]
formal training is not required to
[39:50]
operate an AED, the town will offer
[39:53]
training to any resident who would like
[39:55]
to become more knowledgeable,
[39:57]
comfortable, and confident using one.
[40:00]
With an average EMS response time of
[40:02]
approximately 5 to 7 minutes, immediate
[40:05]
access to CPR and ADD can help bridge
[40:09]
the critical gap between cardiac arrest
[40:12]
and the arrival of advanced medical
[40:14]
care.
[40:17]
So whether you're working, playing, or
[40:20]
simply enjoying walking through our
[40:22]
beautiful community, you can take
[40:24]
comfort in knowing the life-saving
[40:25]
equipment is always just steps away.
[40:34]
So thank you. That video is just 4
[40:37]
minutes long. And if we think about fire
[40:40]
getting here, we would have been doing
[40:42]
CPR for almost four minutes now. and
[40:45]
having an AED to advise a shock and get
[40:47]
a rhythm back could potentially
[40:49]
[clears throat] relieve one of the
[40:50]
responsibility of having to continue
[40:51]
that CPR if it brings the heart back
[40:53]
into rhythm. So having people that have
[40:57]
access before first responders can get
[40:59]
there is is paramount and I don't think
[41:02]
there's a person in this community that
[41:04]
would not help another person if they
[41:06]
saw that they were in need. I've seen
[41:08]
the way people love this community, the
[41:10]
way they treat this community, and I
[41:12]
value and respect that. But in terms of
[41:15]
public safety, this initiative, I think,
[41:17]
is very important for us. And I'm asking
[41:20]
us to to overlook the look of this, but
[41:23]
I do want to show you what this AED does
[41:25]
and how simple it is to use it.
[41:28]
Actually, Lieutenant Andre Dodd from
[41:30]
Sequestifier did come out tonight, and I
[41:33]
think he might be able to speak on an
[41:35]
AED use even better than I can.
[41:38]
Good evening everyone.
[41:39]
>> Good evening.
[41:40]
>> Can you go back to the podium though
[41:42]
because of the camera?
[41:43]
>> I sure can.
[41:44]
>> Thank you.
[41:46]
>> Right there.
[41:52]
» There was a young lady who said that it
[41:54]
really there was a young lady here who
[41:56]
said that it's really easy to use and it
[41:58]
is. They've made it relatively dummy
[42:00]
proof.
[42:02]
Simply like she said, open the cabinet,
[42:05]
pull it out. It's going to activate the
[42:07]
officers. It's going to let them know
[42:09]
that, hey, somebody's pulled out this
[42:10]
AED, which great, it's still very
[42:13]
important. Call 911. When you call 911,
[42:16]
put it on speaker because the dispatcher
[42:18]
is going to go ahead and guide you
[42:20]
through actually using the AED. In
[42:23]
conjunction, the AED is also going to
[42:25]
speak to you. Go ahead and open it up.
[42:29]
Very first thing you want to do is
[42:33]
look at that. They gave pictures.
[42:40]
» How sweet. So remove clothing. Two.
[42:44]
You're going to go ahead and pull this
[42:45]
open.
[42:46]
>> Reveal pads.
[42:48]
>> Look at pictures on pads.
[42:51]
>> And there it is.
[42:53]
>> More pictures.
[42:54]
>> Exactly as shown in the pictures.
[42:58]
>> Press pads firmly.
[43:01]
So, so long as you follow the
[43:03]
instructions very clearly
[43:05]
>> red handle to reveal pads,
[43:07]
>> it's going to tell you exactly what to
[43:09]
do
[43:10]
>> on pads.
[43:11]
>> Even to the point where the patient
[43:13]
needs to be shocked, it's going to say
[43:16]
they're better shock.
[43:20]
>> I don't know what more to say about the
[43:22]
AED. I think the AD program that you are
[43:24]
looking at is phenomenal.
[43:27]
Absolutely phenomenal.
[43:30]
breathing. Okay.
[43:34]
» So, if they're breathing and and let me
[43:36]
say this first I am a CPR instructor in
[43:40]
the village of Questa. Anybody who wants
[43:42]
a class, please come please. I'll give
[43:44]
you the information freely. Uh if the
[43:47]
patient is breathing, can you use this?
[43:50]
You can absolutely put this on the
[43:52]
patient still.
[43:55]
>> Sure. Absolutely. just in case
[43:59]
it So if if it's it's going to say shock
[44:02]
not advised start CPR. So if I was to
[44:05]
put this on me right now and I'm talking
[44:07]
to you
[44:10]
it's still going to say shock advised.
[44:12]
So
[44:14]
>> I have one in my house. So if you want
[44:17]
to take the one
[44:20]
door
[44:25]
sound is the issue of how
[44:27]
>> sound
[44:27]
>> you won't be able to get the comments
[44:30]
>> the comments right
[44:32]
>> we'll get to comments here in a second
[44:34]
>> so I well let me thank uh Lieutenant
[44:37]
first for coming out I I really
[44:38]
appreciate the the fact that he thought
[44:40]
enough of this program to to spend his
[44:42]
free time here with us tonight. Uh, you
[44:45]
know, the other thing I would say about
[44:46]
this is we we really did put a lot of
[44:48]
thought into this um into the aesthetic.
[44:52]
And I know the aesthetic is a hard thing
[44:53]
for us to use in this room right now in
[44:56]
terms of terminology, but I think the
[44:58]
town manager will show share with you
[45:00]
what the other possibilities were. And I
[45:03]
think it's important for us, you know,
[45:05]
my hat as a police chief is to look at
[45:08]
public safety matters. And this is
[45:10]
something that's important to the
[45:12]
community. And when I looked at this and
[45:14]
we had the opportunity to have this
[45:16]
donated to us, I I really thought that
[45:19]
this would be something great for us.
[45:20]
And, you know, I I didn't expect, you
[45:23]
know, the push back that we got, but I
[45:25]
appreciate it because it allows me to
[45:27]
look at projects through a different
[45:28]
lens as we move forward. You know, I'm
[45:30]
new to the town and that's something I
[45:32]
can share with everybody here. As we
[45:34]
look at projects in the future, we will
[45:36]
share what a rendering of it looks like
[45:38]
before we ever bring the discussion to
[45:40]
the table so everybody can see it and
[45:42]
then we can get the community involved
[45:44]
even broader. And the other thing I
[45:46]
would encourage is to get involved with
[45:48]
the community stuff. We put it out on
[45:50]
the websites. It goes out in email
[45:51]
blasts on Wednesday. Get involved early.
[45:54]
That way we don't have to have all of
[45:56]
this, you know, animosity toward a
[45:58]
project because, you know, we really are
[46:00]
here trying to do the best thing from my seat, from the town manager
[46:03]
seat, and even from where the commission
[46:05]
is sitting. They're doing what they feel
[46:06]
is the most important for this
[46:08]
community. So, I'll end with that and uh
[46:12]
I'm open for any questions.
[46:13]
>> Before we get to questions, I just if I
[46:16]
can wrap up our staff presentation with
[46:17]
just a couple more pieces of
[46:19]
information. So, the chief talked about
[46:22]
um
[46:24]
kind of the value of the AED program. I
[46:27]
just want I have three quick slides or
[46:29]
four quick slides. Just a little I'm
[46:31]
sorry.
[46:32]
>> Perfect. Yeah.
[46:33]
>> Okay. Um just a little history on how we
[46:36]
got here as well. Um on October 25th, um
[46:41]
the former mayor received or who was
[46:43]
sitting at the time received a letter
[46:46]
offering the public donation of the AED.
[46:48]
We brought that to the October 14th,
[46:51]
2025 meeting. Um, between October 20 and
[46:55]
we were given the go-ahehead to start
[46:56]
running with the project. From October
[46:58]
2025 to March 2026, we worked with the
[47:02]
donors and identified the project cost
[47:04]
because there it was an unknown. When we
[47:07]
landed on about $96,000,
[47:09]
they agreed and provided a check for
[47:12]
that. May 11th, we brought forward um
[47:16]
three different agenda items. one was
[47:18]
formally accepting the donation. The
[47:20]
other was the purchase of the AEDs and
[47:23]
all the equipment plus the software and
[47:26]
then the actual inst installation. So
[47:29]
that was the three different and then
[47:31]
just to kind of cover it broadly twice
[47:34]
in October and twice in May this project
[47:37]
was in our Wednesday inside the town
[47:40]
emails.
[47:41]
So, this isn't a an eitheror or a gotcha
[47:45]
or whatever, but it it gives history of
[47:48]
how we ended up today. This is what a
[47:50]
public AED installation generally looks
[47:53]
like. Um, we pushed back. These are all
[47:56]
over the country. These are web source.
[47:58]
These are not necessarily ones we went
[48:00]
and saw. You could see some of them look
[48:02]
like small town small towns. Some look
[48:04]
like bigger towns. Um, so the one on the
[48:08]
bottom left is like the one we have, but
[48:11]
it is red. The other one that we saw
[48:14]
from the manufacturer that provides our
[48:17]
unit is like on the left. So the
[48:20]
difference between what we have and most
[48:23]
likely all of these just based on how
[48:25]
they look is ours are 100% solar because
[48:28]
of the way the community is laid out.
[48:30]
It's not in commercial corridors.
[48:32]
There's no electric necessarily running
[48:34]
to all of them. And to save cost, we
[48:37]
went with a solar option. So what is on
[48:40]
the right, as everyone knows, is the one
[48:43]
that's at Komo Park right now. And that
[48:46]
is um how we got there. So it was a
[48:49]
design to be able to accommodate the
[48:51]
solar as well as all the wiring and
[48:54]
telecommunications that feed the system,
[48:56]
which is in that bottom part of the box
[48:58]
that looks kind of like a lock box um
[49:00]
where the red AED is. So that's how we
[49:03]
got here. So, let's how are we going to
[49:05]
move forward? Yourself, myself, we've
[49:08]
heard from our residents over the last
[49:10]
couple weeks. Staff is bringing forward
[49:12]
a recommendation of the following, which
[49:16]
would include to remove the installed
[49:18]
unit along the south walkway at Collins
[49:20]
and Pirates. And as I said in my staff
[49:23]
report, we approached this um this
[49:25]
project initially from public access was
[49:28]
our mindset. hearing from the community.
[49:31]
We're readressing our recommendation to
[49:34]
public gathering spaces. That's our
[49:37]
where we are coming from with our
[49:38]
recommendation. We are recommending to
[49:41]
do not install the unit intend intended
[49:43]
for the town entrance area. We are
[49:46]
proposing to shift the proposed location
[49:49]
of the north beach access unit from the
[49:53]
doom walkover to closer to the existing
[49:55]
bike rack. You can see that in the
[49:57]
bottom left hand side where we're
[49:59]
proposing to put it right now. There's
[50:01]
an orange stake out there that is
[50:03]
photoshopped in on the right of what the
[50:05]
unit would look like there. And then
[50:07]
shift the proposed location of the south
[50:10]
beach up towards the fence, closer to
[50:12]
the fence. So, it's next to the
[50:13]
lifesaving device as well as the dog um
[50:17]
station. So you can see it on the top
[50:19]
picture on the left uh where we're
[50:21]
proposing to push it back away from the
[50:24]
walkway and what it looks like
[50:26]
photoshopped in there. So we again we
[50:29]
offer this as a recommendation and we
[50:31]
will go forward with the the
[50:33]
recommendation or the decision of the
[50:35]
commission.
[50:36]
Thank you.
[50:38]
>> That was it.
[50:39]
>> Good.
[50:39]
>> Thank you.
[50:40]
>> Thanks comments.
[50:42]
>> Paul I think I'd like to hear all one
[50:45]
sec. Any comment from the staff first
[50:47]
from the commission?
[50:48]
>> Um I like Thank you. So one thanks to
[50:50]
the stewards. I appreciate their
[50:52]
generosity. Um I feel I didn't ask the
[50:54]
right questions. You know, I was
[50:56]
imagining this not a not a large entire
[50:58]
so I'm surprised
[51:00]
information I I like the gathering
[51:03]
places and I would maybe using that as a
[51:05]
definition maybe question
[51:08]
but we also that
[51:18]
» yes I think um I want to thank everyone
[51:21]
for all the comments that they put in
[51:23]
and I think you all should know that we
[51:25]
all saw them and read them and um we
[51:27]
thought long about what you're asking or
[51:31]
suggesting and um I think that from the
[51:34]
original plan that was made down to what
[51:37]
the latest compromise would be that this
[51:40]
is a good this is a good thing. I think
[51:42]
it's going to be okay. I think that
[51:44]
we're going to put them in and we're
[51:45]
going to landscape them and we will be
[51:47]
used to them because our neighborhood is beautiful despite these poles. these
[51:52]
neighborhoods, our neighborhood, our
[51:54]
beach is beautiful, our our landscaping
[51:56]
are beautiful, and our residents make
[51:58]
this place who it is. So, I I I feel
[52:01]
that
[52:02]
we are making a good compromise. We are
[52:04]
not going to put all of them in as
[52:06]
originally suggested and that we are
[52:08]
going to do this and I believe that this
[52:09]
is a good thing going forward and I hope
[52:11]
that everyone can can come together on
[52:14]
this and not you know not not let this
[52:17]
become something that is an ongoing
[52:20]
problem for our attempt.
[52:23]
>> Yeah. A couple questions for Chief. Um
[52:27]
so Chief when you when you open the
[52:29]
bubble of cover does that automatically
[52:32]
dial 911? It does not dial 911. The the call will go to the the the JIC
[52:39]
police officer phone that we have on
[52:41]
duty. What it's going to do is alert
[52:43]
that officer that one of the devices has
[52:45]
been opened. So when that officer gets
[52:47]
that notification, they start heading in
[52:49]
that direction. That's why it's
[52:50]
important to make sure that you do call
[52:52]
911. The thing is we do have a lot of
[52:54]
people that walk in the community. They
[52:55]
don't have their cell phones or other
[52:57]
devices. the minute that's turned, at
[52:59]
least we have a notification of some
[53:01]
type and we're we're moving in that
[53:02]
direction whether or not somebody has
[53:04]
the ability to to call 911 or not.
[53:06]
>> Rick, and then I had a question for our
[53:09]
town attorney. Um, people have said to
[53:11]
me that if I start this procedure and I
[53:14]
screw it up, that somebody dies, then
[53:16]
I'm liable.
[53:18]
>> There there is a statute that addresses
[53:20]
that specifically uh provides immunity
[53:23]
from liability for a person who does it
[53:25]
in good faith. Um there's that same
[53:27]
statute also provides immunity from uh
[53:31]
civil case for uh uh the town for
[53:34]
putting these in.
[53:35]
>> So that that is addressed specifically.
[53:37]
>> You want to see what it's called?
[53:38]
>> That's the good Samaritan. Yeah.
[53:41]
>> Yeah. There's a requirement to keep it
[53:43]
maintained. Yes. And yes.
[53:48]
>> And I'd also like to echo Anna's
[53:50]
comments. Thank you so much to everyone
[53:52]
here. Um, we have a town that cares
[53:54]
about where we live and our community.
[53:57]
Um, many of you have lived here most of
[53:59]
your lives. Some of you grown up here.
[54:02]
Um, as Anna has, and uh, just want you
[54:04]
to know that we respect that. We hear
[54:06]
you. Um, I've responded uh to everyone
[54:10]
that's directly emailed or or or sent a
[54:14]
letter uh, to me. And uh, I just want to
[54:16]
say that and we're looking forward to
[54:18]
hearing what all of you have to say.
[54:20]
Thank you.
[54:21]
>> Thank you. Um, Brian, do you have
[54:24]
something from Earl?
[54:26]
>> Yeah, Mr. Stewart,
[54:28]
>> we'll open up now to public comment.
[54:30]
We'll start, but
[54:33]
>> So, Mr. Stewart could not be here
[54:35]
tonight, so he requested that we read
[54:37]
this for him. Um, and this isn't his
[54:40]
voice. I'm reading it exactly as he's
[54:41]
written it. So, good evening. Uh Earl
[54:44]
asked me to read this statement on his
[54:46]
behalf of him and Nancy who very much
[54:48]
wanted to be here tonight but are unable
[54:51]
to attend in person. Nancy and I are
[54:53]
sorry we cannot be with you tonight. I'm
[54:55]
dealing with a heart issue that is being
[54:57]
evaluated by my cardiologist at
[54:59]
Cleveland Clinic. A continuous heart
[55:01]
monitor is being brought back from
[55:03]
Cleveland Clinic this afternoon and I
[55:05]
need to be home to begin wearing it.
[55:07]
Nancy needs to remain with me. There is
[55:09]
some irony in the fact that a heart
[55:11]
issue is keeping me from speaking
[55:12]
personally tonight about AEDs.
[55:15]
Nancy and I offered these AEDs to
[55:17]
Jupiter in Lakeland Colony for one very
[55:19]
simple reason. To give one of our
[55:21]
neighbors, friends, family members, or
[55:23]
perhaps one of us a better chance of
[55:26]
surviving a sudden cardiac arrest. We
[55:29]
paid for the project ourselves. We
[55:31]
expect nothing in return. There is no
[55:33]
benefit to Nancy or me that is any
[55:35]
different from the benefit that every
[55:37]
other person of this in this town. I
[55:39]
understand that some residents don't
[55:41]
like the appearance of the AED
[55:42]
installations. I respect their right to
[55:45]
feel that way, but I ask everyone to
[55:47]
weigh the concern against what these
[55:48]
devices are there to accomplish. When
[55:51]
someone suffers a sudden cardiac arrest,
[55:53]
minutes matter. The purpose of locating
[55:56]
AEDs throughout the community is to put
[55:58]
one within very quick reach rather than
[56:00]
depending upon an AED arriving with
[56:02]
someone else. I have had AEDs at Earl
[56:05]
Stewart Toyota for many years. Our
[56:07]
employees receive regular CPR and AED
[56:10]
training. They have been used in real
[56:12]
emergencies. My experience with them is
[56:14]
one of the reasons I feel so strongly
[56:16]
about making them readily accessible
[56:18]
here. None of us knows whose life one of
[56:21]
these AEDs might someday help save. It
[56:24]
could be someone walking on the beach.
[56:26]
It could be a visitor. Or it could be a
[56:27]
child or grandchild visiting one of us.
[56:30]
It could be the person who supports
[56:31]
these AEDs most strongly. And it could
[56:34]
even be someone who opposes them
[56:35]
tonight. If that day ever comes, I don't
[56:38]
believe anybody will care what the AED
[56:40]
cabinets look like. The only thing that
[56:42]
will matter is how quickly somebody
[56:43]
could get to it.
[56:46]
Nancy and I love Jupiter Inlet Colony.
[56:48]
This is our home. We made this gift
[56:50]
because we care about the people who
[56:52]
live here. We respectfully ask the town
[56:54]
commission and the neighbors to allow
[56:56]
these AEDs to be activated and available
[56:58]
for the purpose for which they were
[56:59]
given to be there when somebody
[57:02]
unexpectedly needs one and when every
[57:04]
minute matters. Thank you Earl Nancy
[57:06]
Stewart.
[57:09]
» Thank you chief
[57:12]
right now if anybody else has any uh
[57:15]
comments public uh in reference to
[57:18]
specifically the ads then we'll switch
[57:20]
back over to the rest of the agenda. If
[57:22]
you want to approach, if I don't have a
[57:25]
card for you,
[57:27]
up to the podium, please give us your
[57:29]
name and your res. [clears throat]
[57:31]
>> Oh, hi. My name is Dale Haynes. I live
[57:33]
at 188 Shelter Lane. Question I have is,
[57:36]
do each of the patrol cars have a unit
[57:40]
in in their vehicles?
[57:44]
>> Yes.
[57:46]
>> Great. Uh the the other comment I might
[57:48]
make is uh dialing 911 on on a cell
[57:52]
phone may not be as easy as you think. I had a recent uh relatively recent
[57:59]
incident where I got my touchcreen up
[58:03]
and dialed 911 and nothing happened. you
[58:07]
have to go back out to your home screen
[58:10]
and and on the iPhone I have and
[58:15]
uh push the uh emergency call and so
[58:21]
don't think you can just get on your
[58:23]
phone and dial 911.
[58:25]
I stood by the side of I95 and watched
[58:28]
my car burn up. So I think it's a good
[58:31]
idea. Uh I I like the idea of the patrol
[58:35]
cars having the the devices uh because
[58:39]
if we're in our homes, we're we're not
[58:42]
going to think about running down and
[58:43]
leaving our loved one to get get a
[58:46]
device. But on the beach, in the park,
[58:49]
these devices save lives.
[58:52]
>> Great. Thank you. And just as a a
[58:56]
further point that um Oh, I lost my
[59:00]
train of thought. Never mind. Um, next.
[59:04]
[clears throat]
[59:06]
>> Yeah.
[59:06]
>> Hey guys. So, uh, I just got into town.
[59:09]
Uh, Matt Car 173 Beacon. I just got into
[59:13]
town yesterday. So, and I'm I was
[59:15]
unaware of any of this actually, any of
[59:17]
the comments. I had no idea. Uh, I've
[59:20]
been I've been away so traveled a lot.
[59:22]
But, um, I did drive through the
[59:24]
community with a friend today for the
[59:25]
first time and he was like, "What is
[59:26]
that?" uh when we got to one. Uh I think
[59:30]
it's a great idea. I think it's great
[59:32]
that we have uh residents that are
[59:34]
willing to do this type of thing for us.
[59:36]
Um my only comment would be maybe we can
[59:40]
just make them a little less obvious to
[59:42]
people driving through the community so
[59:43]
they're not like staring you in the face
[59:45]
when you drive down the street. I don't
[59:46]
think it's going to matter if they're 10
[59:48]
foot in on the pathway versus on the
[59:50]
corner. If somebody needs them in an
[59:52]
emergency, they can access them five
[59:54]
feet away or 10 feet away where they're
[59:56]
less visible to traffic and people
[59:58]
coming through the community, but the
[1:00:00]
people who live in the community will
[1:00:01]
know where they are and be able to
[1:00:03]
access them on a regular basis. So,
[1:00:05]
that's really common.
[1:00:07]
>> Thank you. And I remember what I was
[1:00:09]
going to say is that also remember these
[1:00:11]
things being put in with solar panels.
[1:00:13]
Some of you have been here long enough,
[1:00:15]
you can remember when we had no power
[1:00:16]
and here after a hurricane, these will
[1:00:19]
still function. So that's one of the
[1:00:21]
reasons that they're powered as they
[1:00:23]
are. And they give us the look that they
[1:00:24]
do. Similar to the pole that's out at
[1:00:26]
the [clears throat] east end of KO
[1:00:29]
Bridge. You might see the warning light
[1:00:31]
here for the curb. They've got the exact
[1:00:33]
same kind of setup. Um I had John and
[1:00:37]
Kathy
[1:00:39]
who wanted to discuss AEDs wanted part
[1:00:41]
of your questionnaire question coming.
[1:00:48]
First of all, it's very sweet of people
[1:00:52]
to Kathy Methel. Sorry,
[1:00:54]
>> address [clears throat]
[1:00:55]
>> 133 Lighthouse Scrap.
[1:00:58]
>> Um, no pun intended, but their heart is
[1:01:00]
in the right place and I appreciate how
[1:01:04]
um in love they are with the community
[1:01:06]
and how generous they are. I also think
[1:01:11]
they're a good idea, but not so many. I
[1:01:14]
just don't get the number of them. I
[1:01:17]
think it's a good idea to have them by
[1:01:19]
down by the beach and maybe one by the
[1:01:22]
park where we gather, but I just think
[1:01:27]
there are too many and the police have
[1:01:30]
them in their car. And honestly, if I'm
[1:01:33]
in my house and my husband goes down,
[1:01:36]
I'm calling 911 and staying with him.
[1:01:39]
I'm not going to run and get one of
[1:01:41]
them. But I do appreciate it. I came in
[1:01:45]
late to the game also. That's my bad.
[1:01:47]
Um, and I appreciate all that you do. I
[1:01:50]
just think maybe we could eliminate
[1:01:52]
another one. And also, I wouldn't mind I
[1:01:56]
don't know if there's a rule, but maybe
[1:01:58]
we could even build they have um kind of
[1:02:02]
like they're book little book libraries
[1:02:05]
where you put wood around them
[1:02:08]
>> so that they don't look so obvious.
[1:02:11]
You know, maybe we could hide that part
[1:02:13]
of them but still have the front of them
[1:02:16]
showing. And one more question. Are
[1:02:19]
there lights on them at night time or
[1:02:22]
>> Yes,
[1:02:23]
>> there are. And is it a red light, green
[1:02:26]
light, or does
[1:02:27]
>> I can answer that just at the same time
[1:02:30]
as steps? Um, so it's built to have
[1:02:33]
[laughter]
[1:02:35]
where
[1:02:36]
>> it's built to have lights, but um they
[1:02:39]
can all be turned off, which they should
[1:02:41]
have been turned off within the last
[1:02:42]
week. The one at Comr was supposed to be
[1:02:45]
more amber. It was burning red, but we
[1:02:47]
asked them to take um turn the lights
[1:02:49]
off and that's how it and they can stay
[1:02:51]
that way.
[1:02:52]
>> I think that would help also. At
[1:02:54]
[clears throat] night time, it's kind of
[1:02:56]
glaring. But like I said, I I'm all for
[1:03:00]
saving lives and
[1:03:03]
I think it's a great thing for the
[1:03:04]
community. I just don't think we need so
[1:03:08]
many of them.
[1:03:09]
>> Well, we only have four. So, you
[1:03:11]
mentioned three. The board ones over the
[1:03:12]
observation pan. Um, thank you.
[1:03:16]
>> Thank you.
[1:03:18]
>> Um, I I'll I'll just add first of all,
[1:03:20]
I'm gratified to hear that in a room in
[1:03:21]
front of a room full of witnesses, she's
[1:03:23]
pledged to call 911 for you. [laughter]
[1:03:25]
happy about Heidi or Chief
[1:03:29]
>> Heidi or Chief maybe have the answer to
[1:03:31]
this question, but what is our average
[1:03:33]
response time from 9 from a 911 receipt
[1:03:36]
of a call to to the uh uh to the
[1:03:40]
response to the um incident, let's call
[1:03:42]
it.
[1:03:43]
>> So I can give you both numbers uh just
[1:03:46]
for people on Zoom. So for your police
[1:03:49]
department, you're looking about a
[1:03:51]
minute and 56 seconds. So and fire
[1:03:53]
department is generally between five and
[1:03:55]
seven depending on railroad bridges and
[1:03:59]
the other piece of this is we have to go
[1:04:00]
off island sometimes to get gas and do
[1:04:02]
other things. So we would be susceptible
[1:04:04]
to those same things which would
[1:04:05]
increase our response time.
[1:04:07]
>> Okay. All right. But average is is 156.
[1:04:09]
>> Yes sir.
[1:04:10]
>> Okay. So
[1:04:10]
>> that but that's in town.
[1:04:14]
>> Do you ask a question from calling 911?
[1:04:16]
>> Yeah.
[1:04:18]
>> If [clears throat] you if you
[1:04:19]
>> Go ahead. Sorry.
[1:04:21]
>> Calling 911. you're going to have to add
[1:04:22]
more time on to that five to seven
[1:04:24]
minutes because they then have to turn
[1:04:25]
around and exercise the system to go out
[1:04:28]
to
[1:04:29]
>> I understand that. But that that's in
[1:04:31]
whether whether we have the
[1:04:32]
defibrillator or we just have what we
[1:04:34]
have now. That's that's the same. My my
[1:04:36]
point is like the stewards made a a uh a
[1:04:40]
point of indicating that there's a
[1:04:41]
balance between the sightliness of of
[1:04:44]
these units and the the the uh desire to
[1:04:48]
save lives. There's also a balance
[1:04:51]
between, you know, the benefit that we
[1:04:53]
get from installing these and the number
[1:04:55]
of them. Um, and how does that directly
[1:04:58]
affect the response time and and you
[1:05:00]
know, we talk about minutes matter here.
[1:05:02]
So, average time we're there within two
[1:05:04]
minutes. We've got somebody, an officer
[1:05:06]
with a vehicle with an AED in it. So,
[1:05:09]
we're trying to cut that down. Um, to
[1:05:12]
what? And to what end? and you know is
[1:05:16]
it I is it is it that is the efficacy of
[1:05:19]
that uh that important that we have this
[1:05:23]
number of units that's that's the only
[1:05:25]
thing I I throw out as so thank you
[1:05:27]
>> thank you
[1:05:34]
» do you want the micr
[1:05:45]
Okay. I'm Tracy Cian79 Lighthouse. I've
[1:05:48]
been here for a number of years. Um, and
[1:05:52]
I drove into town probably the first day
[1:05:56]
the box was up on. I had just been off
[1:06:00]
the island and had come down through all
[1:06:03]
the greenery and it was lovely. I got to
[1:06:06]
town and there were these beautiful
[1:06:09]
green plants all in the front of the
[1:06:13]
town. It looked like a a homecoming. It
[1:06:17]
was just wonderful. I was so thrilled
[1:06:20]
with peace and joy. I drive in and wham,
[1:06:24]
my eyeballs were absolutely assaulted.
[1:06:29]
Yellow, red, white, huge box. What?
[1:06:33]
Well, I got very excited and I wrote the
[1:06:36]
commission a letter and I said pretty
[1:06:40]
much what I just said now. Okay,
[1:06:44]
I've changed my mind a bit.
[1:06:47]
How could you possibly say I don't want
[1:06:49]
to save somebody's life? You can't. You
[1:06:52]
just don't know when you might be able
[1:06:55]
to use something like that. But even
[1:06:57]
though I felt, oh, I'll never figure out
[1:06:59]
how to do it and etc. Now it looks maybe
[1:07:02]
even I could do it in an emergency but
[1:07:04]
besides that I might be a victim. So
[1:07:07]
that would be nice. Okay. However, I
[1:07:11]
would like to just round this out to say
[1:07:14]
saving our town feeling which I was so
[1:07:18]
happy to hear you speak to.
[1:07:21]
If you go into off the island's
[1:07:25]
cold Frenchman's creek any one of the
[1:07:28]
others take a look. You don't see white
[1:07:32]
posts holding up street signs. You don't
[1:07:36]
see white posts with other things on it
[1:07:39]
in red and yellow.
[1:07:42]
We can do that, too. In the old days,
[1:07:45]
all of our posts were green.
[1:07:48]
When you showed the picture that you had
[1:07:51]
of the way it looks right now, my mind
[1:07:54]
painted the pole green. It painted the
[1:07:57]
flange around the circle green. That all
[1:08:02]
fades back into the greenery behind it.
[1:08:06]
And that's what we're trying to keep
[1:08:07]
because that is really a peaceful
[1:08:10]
feeling of returning home to our unique
[1:08:16]
little town that doesn't have signs,
[1:08:19]
doesn't have stores, doesn't have that
[1:08:22]
kind of traffic.
[1:08:24]
We're so lucky. Let's try to keep it up.
[1:08:28]
So, let's look at our signage and see if
[1:08:31]
there's some way we can tone it down.
[1:08:36]
>> That's my suggestion.
[1:08:38]
>> Thank you.
[1:08:44]
Commissioner. Any other questions?
[1:08:46]
Comments?
[1:08:53]
Are you coming up in reference
[1:08:56]
a like what you said Paxton 47 Ocean
[1:09:00]
Drive
[1:09:01]
um in regards to the AED there was a
[1:09:04]
gentleman I believe a doctor here that
[1:09:06]
came up with some information in regards
[1:09:08]
to those units and he was kind of like
[1:09:10]
bypassed he's spoken two times and I
[1:09:13]
think now that we're all a little bit
[1:09:15]
more aware
[1:09:17]
of what this thing is and what it can do
[1:09:21]
and the mistakes that can be made.
[1:09:23]
Forget about liability. You're talking
[1:09:25]
about someone like it. And I think we
[1:09:28]
should relisten to what Mike Jacobs
[1:09:31]
brought up before about those things and
[1:09:34]
its usage. Okay. That's my opinion.
[1:09:38]
>> Yeah. Thank you.
[1:09:42]
» All right.
[1:09:49]
» Moving on. We'll switch back over to the
[1:09:51]
regular agenda order
[1:09:53]
>> going public comments. Go ahead.
[1:09:57]
>> Yeah, mayor. I think I think we need to
[1:09:58]
close this out and give direction to
[1:10:00]
staff
[1:10:00]
>> and on support of what staff is
[1:10:02]
recommending um kind of move forward
[1:10:05]
with you know placing location that you
[1:10:07]
have provided in the staff report and
[1:10:10]
I'm I'm willing to support that.
[1:10:13]
>> I like the compromise. like what what
[1:10:15]
the staff supported, but I would uh
[1:10:17]
challenge that we'd remove Lighthouse
[1:10:19]
Drive because it was consistent with the
[1:10:21]
definition of in public places at the
[1:10:24]
beach, one at Conewell. I love the
[1:10:26]
painting idea, make it blend in better.
[1:10:28]
Um
[1:10:34]
I was
[1:10:35]
>> sorry, I'm sorry.
[1:10:37]
All right. Repeat that.
[1:10:39]
>> All right. So,
[1:10:42]
we go back to I agree with the that we
[1:10:44]
should do the compromise when you
[1:10:46]
presented. I would advocate that we
[1:10:49]
apply the matrix that you said like
[1:10:51]
public access points and then actually
[1:10:53]
remove one lighthouse drive so we get
[1:10:55]
the three to the beach one park by
[1:10:59]
direction. Again, I liked Tracy's idea
[1:11:02]
of make it joined in his and then frame
[1:11:05]
it as a maybe a pilot. We revisit this
[1:11:08]
every year and consume because I I think
[1:11:11]
we are I don't think it should be is it
[1:11:12]
an isore that's not the argument is
[1:11:16]
needed
[1:11:17]
at least a month.
[1:11:20]
>> So I think if we have a motion we should
[1:11:21]
have a second or we have more
[1:11:23]
discussion.
[1:11:25]
>> What was the motion?
[1:11:27]
It was to approve. It was to approve the
[1:11:30]
staff staff recommendations
[1:11:33]
are for each one at least.
[1:11:40]
» Well, I think I think I think there
[1:11:42]
needs a second to that motion so there
[1:11:44]
can be discussion among the council
[1:11:47]
commission and once the commission kind
[1:11:49]
of decides if the maker of the motion,
[1:11:51]
which is me, decides to change the
[1:11:52]
motion, I'll do that. If not, we'll vote
[1:11:55]
on motion either yay or nay. And it will
[1:11:58]
either approve or not.
[1:12:00]
>> Yeah. So, I made the motion. Is there a
[1:12:02]
second to my motion?
[1:12:06]
» Second. Anybody?
[1:12:09]
>> What happens if there is no second?
[1:12:10]
>> It dies.
[1:12:11]
>> Motion dies.
[1:12:12]
>> I'll make another motion. But I can make
[1:12:15]
notion that we would uh slightly amend
[1:12:17]
the uh you know the proposals of the
[1:12:19]
staff and that we do the truth of each
[1:12:22]
one.
[1:12:27]
» Do we need to include um the uh
[1:12:31]
recommendation of wrapping the polls? We
[1:12:33]
had talked about that wrapping the polls
[1:12:35]
green. Um if that's something you want
[1:12:38]
to include the I would like. I would I
[1:12:41]
would also include
[1:12:43]
>> the flanging around it.
[1:12:46]
>> Are you painting it or are you going to
[1:12:47]
wrap it green?
[1:12:49]
>> Look into the deal.
[1:12:50]
>> Maybe we could make the motion to paint.
[1:12:52]
>> We will look into methods of
[1:12:55]
camouflaging the white pole and its
[1:12:57]
surrounding box.
[1:13:00]
>> But continuing with the installation,
[1:13:05]
» that's not my motion.
[1:13:06]
>> No, I made another motion. Um they
[1:13:09]
wanted wanted north and south of beach
[1:13:12]
fell apart with the understanding that
[1:13:15]
we would attempt to chemical and then
[1:13:18]
less jarring and jarring they
[1:13:22]
>> less
[1:13:27]
blending to our community
[1:13:30]
>> that
[1:13:33]
favor.
[1:13:35]
So, the only comment I think I would
[1:13:38]
want to offer up is this this property
[1:13:41]
would seem very ripe for an installation
[1:13:43]
of something like that. This building
[1:13:46]
and this property gets more public use
[1:13:48]
than all three of those combined
[1:13:50]
probably on a monthly basis. So, I would
[1:13:52]
like if the maker of the motion would
[1:13:54]
agree to direct staff as part of that
[1:13:57]
motion to contact the Beach Club and see
[1:13:59]
if we could install one um with their
[1:14:02]
approval at the location they chose on
[1:14:05]
this property.
[1:14:07]
>> If I may, before we continue, motion's
[1:14:10]
on the table. Um, I believe that's
[1:14:12]
already something that's being
[1:14:13]
considered as part of the optional
[1:14:15]
change to do both here with one of them
[1:14:20]
and a sixth one potentially by the
[1:14:21]
marina that they
[1:14:23]
>> That's not official. So,
[1:14:24]
>> that's not official. What I'm trying to
[1:14:25]
put that on the table so that we're
[1:14:26]
looking at the whole picture.
[1:14:28]
>> So, that would be the direction that
[1:14:29]
you'd be looking to go.
[1:14:31]
>> I wouldn't I wouldn't be opposed to the uh the marina the marinas and the
[1:14:36]
village. You would have to go back to
[1:14:38]
the stewards and ask them to
[1:14:41]
>> to see if that's okay because they made
[1:14:42]
it to the town.
[1:14:44]
>> Right.
[1:14:46]
>> So, can we
[1:14:49]
be direct?
[1:14:49]
>> I mean, direct it would just be they
[1:14:51]
would be the direct and town staff
[1:14:55]
contact the beach club to see if they
[1:14:57]
would take one. And I guess it would be
[1:14:59]
also direct staff to talk to the marina.
[1:15:02]
But prior to moving forward with the
[1:15:04]
marina, you would have to get the
[1:15:06]
steward's approval in order.
[1:15:09]
>> Good. A second.
[1:15:11]
>> No. Does the maker agree to make that
[1:15:15]
modification?
[1:15:17]
>> I'm open to including the request. Give
[1:15:19]
them the opportunity to say yes or no.
[1:15:21]
And they have a different facility to
[1:15:23]
figure it out. That's right.
[1:15:25]
>> So yeah, 17.
[1:15:28]
You agree? Okay. So now all
[1:15:30]
>> all in favor? All in favor?
[1:15:32]
>> I I
[1:15:34]
>> All right.
[1:15:35]
>> Okay.
[1:15:37]
>> I got it.
[1:15:37]
>> Okay.
[1:15:38]
>> Thank you.
[1:15:38]
>> Very good.
[1:15:39]
>> Good deal.
[1:15:40]
>> So, moving on then. Public comments on
[1:15:44]
other topics.
[1:15:46]
And if I've got your cards
[1:15:49]
>> I don't have I had your card in
[1:15:52]
reference to the papers of the
[1:15:55]
>> This is a comment.
[1:15:59]
Although
[1:16:00]
>> oh I can't say
[1:16:00]
>> Oh no you can come up forward
[1:16:05]
>> maybe Sheridan 131 L's house I just have
[1:16:08]
a question on your strips like the vice
[1:16:11]
mayor was saying um I agree we need
[1:16:14]
something
[1:16:15]
but you make a comment people are riding
[1:16:19]
on them that are not supposed to I don't
[1:16:22]
think putting a yellow strip or any
[1:16:24]
color strip in there is going to stop
[1:16:26]
them and go oh look I've got to stop now
[1:16:28]
They don't obey the rules anyway. You go
[1:16:31]
through Scotland, they go through
[1:16:33]
everything. So I I don't know. I mean,
[1:16:37]
that's just my thinking. I don't know
[1:16:39]
what's Maybe you have to pull these up
[1:16:42]
and find them. Maybe whether the kids
[1:16:45]
who live in this develop people, the
[1:16:47]
neighbors, they've got to be stopped.
[1:16:51]
So that's all.
[1:16:52]
>> Thank you. Thank you.
[1:16:58]
M vessel again, 133 Lighthouse Drive. I
[1:17:01]
just noticed on my car going through the
[1:17:03]
neighborhood that on my car it says that
[1:17:06]
the speed limit within town is 30 miles
[1:17:08]
an hour which which seems excessive.
[1:17:12]
That's what's coming up on people if
[1:17:14]
they are attached to Google. Their car
[1:17:16]
is using Google
[1:17:19]
that so the town can call Google I guess
[1:17:23]
and have that changed. I can't do it
[1:17:26]
personally. Um, and the other thing is
[1:17:30]
the speed limit's 25. I speaking of
[1:17:34]
>> it's 20. It is 20. Okay. Um, somebody
[1:17:39]
told me it was 25, but that's perfect.
[1:17:41]
That's all I wanted to say is it
[1:17:43]
shouldn't be it's coming up on people's
[1:17:45]
cars 30 mile 30 miles an hour. So,
[1:17:48]
>> all right. Thank you. We'll reach out to
[1:17:50]
Google and Apple
[1:17:52]
>> and Tesla.
[1:17:54]
>> No,
[1:17:54]
>> same thing. It's happening on Tesla's
[1:17:57]
too.
[1:17:57]
>> Okay.
[1:18:00]
>> Yes, ma'am.
[1:18:01]
>> I just wanted to make a comment.
[1:18:03]
>> Name please. And
[1:18:04]
>> Sarah Luke Meyer, 68 Colony Road.
[1:18:07]
>> Thank you. I was not in attendance at
[1:18:10]
the June 3 meeting and the vote the
[1:18:13]
commission
[1:18:15]
in favor of surveillance cameras
[1:18:17]
throughout the neighborhood and wondered
[1:18:21]
if you could possibly address the large
[1:18:24]
crowd here with the installation of
[1:18:27]
another pole and another solar panel and
[1:18:33]
cameras in the neighbor. But as far as a
[1:18:36]
privacy issue,
[1:18:40]
» and moral, you also had a question in
[1:18:42]
reference to cameras.
[1:18:45]
>> Only if you're going to be talking about
[1:18:46]
it tonight.
[1:18:47]
>> Uh, not stand alone. It's not on the
[1:18:49]
agenda.
[1:18:52]
» Briefly talk. Um, hi everybody. Pam Rous
[1:18:55]
69 Colony Road. First of all, thank you
[1:18:57]
for all the discussion tonight. I just
[1:18:59]
have been so happy to hear just the
[1:19:01]
willingness of staff and all of you to
[1:19:03]
take everyone's comments and really try
[1:19:05]
to find compromise because these are all
[1:19:07]
really great things. So, thank you for
[1:19:09]
being willing to listen to everyone. My
[1:19:11]
only questions that I've heard that
[1:19:12]
there's going to be some security
[1:19:13]
cameras installed in town is I had some
[1:19:16]
concerns and I just didn't know where to
[1:19:18]
go to get the answers on data privacy
[1:19:20]
concerns. Um hacking, how the data is
[1:19:23]
going to be stored, you know, how long
[1:19:25]
the data would be stored, who would have
[1:19:26]
access to that data. Um in the business
[1:19:29]
that I'm in, these are things that we're
[1:19:30]
dealing with every day, and I know how
[1:19:32]
serious they are. So, as you as you are
[1:19:35]
discussing these things and deciding
[1:19:36]
what to do with that, I just wanted to
[1:19:38]
put that out there and maybe there's a
[1:19:40]
way we could have um a workshop or
[1:19:42]
something on it because I'd like to
[1:19:43]
learn more. Thank you.
[1:19:44]
>> Thank you.
[1:19:48]
» I didn't sign up. May I say something?
[1:19:52]
>> Absolutely.
[1:19:53]
>> Come on, Dan.
[1:19:54]
>> Okay.
[1:19:56]
>> Only good.
[1:19:58]
Dan Gardner 60 Colony Road and I would
[1:20:03]
like to discuss the safe the safety
[1:20:07]
mats. Um I stood on the um deck on the
[1:20:14]
north deck and counted
[1:20:18]
I looked down to towards the inlet and
[1:20:23]
um there would be 13
[1:20:28]
yellow striped
[1:20:32]
and I think that's excessive. I think I
[1:20:36]
might be the oldest living
[1:20:39]
person who actually walks this colony.
[1:20:43]
Maybe Bob [laughter]
[1:20:47]
is the oldest. Um, and I don't have
[1:20:51]
trouble with it. And if you absolutely
[1:20:56]
need to put these safety mats in, um,
[1:21:00]
they come in a a cement color color.
[1:21:05]
I've seen them at, um, only commercial,
[1:21:09]
um,
[1:21:11]
areas have safety mats, not individual
[1:21:16]
colonies. Um, but they do come in a
[1:21:21]
cement color which would be
[1:21:25]
not so inciting unsightly.
[1:21:29]
So that's my suggestion.
[1:21:34]
» Sure.
[1:21:34]
>> Hey Jen,
[1:21:35]
>> there
[1:21:37]
Jen come back up to the podium.
[1:21:41]
>> I was talking to you.
[1:21:45]
>> You You have a great ideas. We did. We
[1:21:47]
did. Did we change the Yeah, the
[1:21:49]
>> We agreed with you on the color. We're
[1:21:51]
going to go to more like a dark
[1:21:52]
>> Oh, so we'll
[1:21:53]
>> cement.
[1:21:54]
>> Oh, good. Red paper.
[1:21:57]
>> Like a darker red.
[1:21:59]
So, the blend [laughter]
[1:22:02]
>> I vote for cement.
[1:22:09]
» Uh, let's see. Jim Paxton, you had a
[1:22:12]
question on reference to cameras as
[1:22:14]
well.
[1:22:25]
Just a couple of things.
[1:22:27]
>> Name address, please.
[1:22:29]
>> Max done for motion drive.
[1:22:34]
>> Thank you.
[1:22:36]
who created the problems on this $11,000
[1:22:39]
situation that has been circled through
[1:22:42]
everything that we all have to
[1:22:45]
participate in. Okay. Who created this
[1:22:47]
problem with the banks?
[1:22:50]
We had something secure at a certain
[1:22:52]
interest rate. Now we've got something
[1:22:54]
that's extremely higher.
[1:22:56]
>> If I may interrupt you for a second.
[1:22:58]
>> Sure.
[1:22:58]
>> The banks instituted this. They're
[1:23:00]
calling the loans.
[1:23:01]
>> And why did they call the loans? because
[1:23:03]
that's what TD wanted to do. It's their
[1:23:05]
decision. It's their loan. There wasn't
[1:23:07]
anything to do with the town.
[1:23:13]
» Listen, this isn't a go back and forth.
[1:23:15]
If you'd like to set up a meeting with
[1:23:17]
Heidi, Heidi, we walk them through
[1:23:19]
everything. We have an agenda tonight
[1:23:21]
and I I suggest that we stick to the
[1:23:23]
agenda. You can ask all the questions
[1:23:24]
you want. We're under no obligation to
[1:23:26]
respond to you. The
[1:23:27]
>> information Why is that? Why is that?
[1:23:30]
That's fair, Mark. It certainly isn't
[1:23:33]
fair. I would like to know why, you
[1:23:35]
know, Chip allowed $600,000 to get blown
[1:23:38]
away on the permits.
[1:23:40]
Okay. That also has All right. And then
[1:23:43]
what are the responsibilities for Dan
[1:23:46]
and Marie that you guys said no to?
[1:23:49]
What's the responsibilities? Who's going
[1:23:51]
to have to pay for the differential?
[1:23:54]
Because they won their cases from what I
[1:23:56]
understand. Okay. But we are
[1:23:58]
responsible. So, who's going to pay for
[1:24:00]
it? and what is the amount that we're
[1:24:02]
going to have to pay for it or is that
[1:24:03]
part of the $11,000? Those are the
[1:24:06]
things I'd really like to know.
[1:24:08]
>> Okay. Tell you what, make it easy for
[1:24:09]
yourself.
[1:24:10]
>> Yes.
[1:24:11]
>> Go ahead, Rick. Pass it in to Heidi and
[1:24:14]
she can provide you an individual answer
[1:24:16]
to each of your questions specifically.
[1:24:19]
>> And with the actual numbers for you
[1:24:21]
>> and you agreed to all, correct?
[1:24:24]
>> Agreed to what?
[1:24:26]
>> You agreed to what we did to Dan and
[1:24:27]
Marie. that's been proven that they are
[1:24:30]
innocent.
[1:24:31]
>> I'm not agreeing with anything. I'm
[1:24:32]
saying if you want to submit that
[1:24:34]
question for a specific answer,
[1:24:36]
>> write it down. We'll bring it into Heidi
[1:24:38]
and the town will
[1:24:40]
>> and then she'll also answer them. This
[1:24:43]
is this is the course of conduct. We've
[1:24:45]
adopted it. This is out of order. He
[1:24:47]
should sit.
[1:24:47]
>> Why is it out of order? Why is it out of
[1:24:49]
order? I think you're out of order,
[1:24:51]
Mark. Because I'm talking Why can't I
[1:24:54]
talk?
[1:24:56]
>> You always do this, Mark. You know,
[1:25:00]
you're a chicken when we you're walking
[1:25:01]
down the street and you don't say
[1:25:02]
anything, Mark.
[1:25:03]
>> Oh, that's enough. You would like to
[1:25:06]
leave. You may.
[1:25:12]
» There's no reason for this to do to that
[1:25:14]
level.
[1:25:14]
>> There's no reason for him to do that.
[1:25:16]
>> Any other questions in reference to the
[1:25:19]
business at hand?
[1:25:21]
>> Huh?
[1:25:21]
>> No.
[1:25:22]
>> Okay.
[1:25:24]
>> Moving on to the consent agenda. Bob, I
[1:25:26]
can bring the mic to you if it's easier.
[1:25:29]
>> Comment.
[1:25:31]
>> Oh, I'm sorry. Yes, Laura, you do.
[1:25:34]
>> Sorry.
[1:25:37]
» Actually, I have an additional situation
[1:25:39]
that I thought of. I I realized we're
[1:25:41]
talking about these bumpy things.
[1:25:43]
>> Oh, I'm sorry. Lorie Jacob, 16 ocean.
[1:25:46]
Um, Anna has come to us numerous times,
[1:25:49]
even prior to being commissioner, which
[1:25:51]
I think is a brilliant idea. And since
[1:25:53]
we've already established solar power
[1:25:55]
will work the AED, why can we not at the
[1:25:58]
roadways put a solar light? Because the
[1:26:02]
bumps, while they are fabulous for some
[1:26:04]
installations, we are on salt air and
[1:26:07]
they will start to peel and become
[1:26:10]
disgusting and it just won't be a good
[1:26:12]
situation. Why can we not reook at
[1:26:14]
putting solar lights at each
[1:26:17]
intersection,
[1:26:18]
which would probably be about the same
[1:26:20]
amount? I don't know if we've sent this
[1:26:22]
out to bid if we have two or three bids
[1:26:24]
on her. We only once again are going for
[1:26:25]
one contractor, but maybe that's an
[1:26:27]
option. It doesn't seem anyone is really
[1:26:30]
too thrilled with the bumps. And
[1:26:31]
honestly, I don't know that the bumps
[1:26:33]
are really going to be great for a lot
[1:26:36]
of people who wear sneakers. They
[1:26:37]
already have bumps on them. You may not
[1:26:39]
feel it. It's true. All right. Next step
[1:26:43]
is um as far as the payments, I
[1:26:45]
apologize. We were out of town. I did
[1:26:46]
come to the July meeting. Maybe this was
[1:26:48]
discussed. I received an email while we
[1:26:51]
were at town about an $11,000 payment.
[1:26:53]
My question is this. What is our option?
[1:26:57]
Is there going to be a loan put in place
[1:26:58]
to take up where we were not where
[1:27:02]
people are not giving money? And what is
[1:27:03]
the percentage? Is it better for some of
[1:27:06]
us to use what they call other people's
[1:27:08]
money if we're getting the same interest
[1:27:10]
that we lost when TD and Heidi had their
[1:27:13]
discussions and things didn't go well?
[1:27:16]
Or is it better to pay it? We have no
[1:27:19]
options. We have nothing on the table to
[1:27:21]
tell us what the loan, if we need to
[1:27:23]
take a new loan for the town, is going
[1:27:25]
to be. What's a percentage? What will it
[1:27:27]
cost me more than the $11,000? If it's
[1:27:30]
minimal, it may pay for everyone to just
[1:27:32]
go ahead and use the loan or is the town
[1:27:35]
going to subsidize it with the same
[1:27:38]
percentage that we had at the original
[1:27:40]
loan? since seems to be a controversy on
[1:27:44]
what transpired. I've heard a story from
[1:27:47]
people who were there that is a
[1:27:49]
completely different story than the
[1:27:50]
commission is telling us. I don't know
[1:27:52]
which is true or not. I can investigate
[1:27:54]
and find out. But in the meantime, what
[1:27:57]
are the options? I don't have another
[1:27:59]
option. All I have is an email saying,
[1:28:01]
"Please send us a check for 11,000 plus
[1:28:04]
so you don't have to pay any extra." My
[1:28:06]
question is if I don't want to and other
[1:28:08]
people in the community don't want to,
[1:28:10]
what is our payment going to be over the
[1:28:12]
long term? What will the loan cost us?
[1:28:15]
What are we possibly going with the same
[1:28:18]
percentage we had in the town? We'll
[1:28:20]
just invest in it.
[1:28:21]
>> All right. Good. Thank you. We'll put
[1:28:24]
something out to the town.
[1:28:26]
>> Thank you.
[1:28:30]
» Any further comments from the public?
[1:28:36]
later.
[1:28:37]
>> You want oneonone with somebody?
[1:28:39]
>> Oh, that's fine. Very good. Thank you.
[1:28:41]
All right, moving on into uh consent
[1:28:44]
agenda item agenda number five.
[1:28:48]
Motion.
[1:28:51]
>> Yeah, I make a motion that
[1:28:55]
July 136.
[1:28:59]
All
[1:28:59]
>> in favor? Hi.
[1:29:00]
>> Hi.
[1:29:01]
>> You
[1:29:06]
next item is for uh
[1:29:11]
our new member
[1:29:13]
>> for building zone committee.
[1:29:17]
>> Actually, we have new
[1:29:21]
2602 which is the amendment to the
[1:29:24]
comprehensive plan. the building and
[1:29:27]
zoning committee. Your appointment was
[1:29:28]
part of the consent agenda.
[1:29:35]
» Congratulations, Jim. Thank you.
[1:29:39]
>> I think
[1:29:42]
we'll send the paperwork and we're done.
[1:29:45]
[laughter]
[1:29:46]
>> And thank you.
[1:29:48]
>> Okay.
[1:29:50]
A vote on an ordinance 2026-2.
[1:29:55]
This is in reference to the office that
[1:29:57]
we got earlier. An ordinance of the town
[1:30:00]
of Jupy Florida amending policies in the
[1:30:02]
sanitary sewer solid waste storm water
[1:30:04]
management water groundwater act require
[1:30:07]
recharge element of town comprehensive
[1:30:09]
plan related water supply and adopting
[1:30:11]
the 2026 water supply plan.
[1:30:16]
You just want to give an quick overview.
[1:30:18]
So, as you saw at the present
[1:30:20]
presentation at the local planning
[1:30:22]
agency meeting, this is required by
[1:30:24]
state statute, it basically presents as
[1:30:28]
an amendment to our comprehensive plan.
[1:30:30]
Lance gave an overview unless you have
[1:30:32]
any further questions on the water
[1:30:34]
supply plan. What we're looking for is
[1:30:36]
approval on first reading of the
[1:30:37]
ordinance. This will allow us to
[1:30:39]
transmit it to both the state as well as
[1:30:42]
the related agencies as required by
[1:30:44]
Florida statute. Once they've given us
[1:30:46]
our their comments, we will return to
[1:30:48]
you on second reading for adoption.
[1:30:52]
>> Okay. Thank you.
[1:30:53]
>> I'll go ahead and make a motion to
[1:30:55]
approve ordinance 20 26-2 for transmitt
[1:30:59]
to the rec required agencies including
[1:31:01]
this state for review on first read.
[1:31:05]
>> Anybody?
[1:31:07]
Second.
[1:31:08]
>> Thank you. All in favor?
[1:31:10]
>> I
[1:31:11]
>> thank you.
[1:31:16]
» Okay.
[1:31:18]
>> A vote on the ordinance 2026 03
[1:31:23]
ordinance of the township of Florida
[1:31:25]
amending article one chapter 4 of the
[1:31:27]
code of ordinances relating to buildings
[1:31:29]
building regulations.
[1:31:32]
>> Thank you. Jackie is going to bring up a
[1:31:34]
quick presentation I have on the item.
[1:31:36]
Thank you, Nico.
[1:31:42]
Go back up a couple slides.
[1:31:49]
» I can go back. That's They're listening
[1:31:51]
the Zoom.
[1:31:57]
So, this is a staff initiated ordinance.
[1:32:00]
Um, there are a few things that drove
[1:32:02]
it. This is a amendment to chapter 4 of
[1:32:05]
the code of ordinances. What it is not
[1:32:07]
is an amendment to the zoning code. And
[1:32:10]
those are two very different things. The
[1:32:11]
zoning code specifically talks about how
[1:32:14]
you can improve a property. This is more
[1:32:16]
kind of the mechanics of getting a
[1:32:18]
building permit and things related to
[1:32:21]
building permits. So like I said, this
[1:32:23]
was stash staff initiated. There were a
[1:32:26]
few things that initiated this. Um there
[1:32:30]
were proposed there's changes that were
[1:32:32]
made to the Florida statutes this past
[1:32:35]
um legislative session that just ended
[1:32:38]
specifically um bill 803 which tells us
[1:32:42]
how we can present or issue building
[1:32:45]
permits and for how long they can be.
[1:32:47]
It's a little more liberal than ours
[1:32:50]
have ever been. Um but that is now um
[1:32:54]
what the state tells us what we we can
[1:32:56]
do. It also amends the um installation
[1:33:00]
of synthetic perk. As you know, we had
[1:33:03]
some pretty strong language in our code
[1:33:05]
of ordinances and very specific
[1:33:07]
language. Uh Florida law changed in 2025
[1:33:11]
and the Florida Department of
[1:33:13]
Environmental Protection just issued uh
[1:33:16]
new rules. It essentially allows uh
[1:33:19]
synthetic turf to be installed very
[1:33:22]
broadly. Um we have a checklist in place
[1:33:24]
for this. the rules actually went in
[1:33:27]
place in the middle of June and it
[1:33:29]
allows it for in the front yard. So the
[1:33:32]
um ordinance changes that you have in
[1:33:34]
front of you do say for the 10 ft of
[1:33:37]
rightway
[1:33:39]
um that is the towns which is the first
[1:33:41]
10 ft of our front yards it has to be
[1:33:43]
saw and also the D rules say that it has
[1:33:47]
to be uh grass it cannot be synthetic
[1:33:49]
turf in any swale or right ofway
[1:33:52]
drainage area. So we do have to maintain
[1:33:54]
that part of the law. Um it also updates
[1:33:58]
to current town practices which include
[1:34:00]
when our holidays. Um and just now that
[1:34:04]
the roles of the building and zoning
[1:34:06]
committee versus the town commission,
[1:34:08]
one of my favorites that I always like
[1:34:10]
to point out is the code for many years
[1:34:12]
said that the town commission had to
[1:34:14]
sign off on blueprints. You all um do
[1:34:17]
not do that nor are you qualified to do
[1:34:19]
it as I am not. That is a building
[1:34:21]
official. So, it kind of cleans up that
[1:34:23]
language and also reflects um our
[1:34:25]
charter charter changes. And then what I
[1:34:27]
really want to point out are some of our
[1:34:29]
construction site best practices that
[1:34:32]
we've incorporated in here, which
[1:34:34]
includes really spelling out for
[1:34:36]
construction sites. Um that they have to
[1:34:39]
be maintained free of debris and scrap
[1:34:41]
materials. They are now required per
[1:34:44]
what we are proposing to have a fence or
[1:34:47]
if there's not a fence or wall around
[1:34:48]
the site, they need to have a fence
[1:34:50]
that's also screened around the site.
[1:34:53]
And as well as when they are doing demo
[1:34:56]
to make sure that um it's hosed down to
[1:34:59]
stop dust and debris from going off of
[1:35:01]
the site. and also requiring that any
[1:35:04]
damage made to adjacent yards, the
[1:35:07]
public right ofway utilities during
[1:35:09]
construction have to be restored to
[1:35:12]
their original condition. Um, so those
[1:35:14]
are the highlights of what's in front of
[1:35:16]
you. We did present this to the building
[1:35:19]
and zoning committee at their July 21st
[1:35:22]
meeting. We did have one recommendation.
[1:35:25]
I did not incorporate it in because I
[1:35:27]
wanted to discuss this with the town
[1:35:28]
commission and get further direction,
[1:35:30]
but it is a simple change should should
[1:35:32]
you agree with it that we can make
[1:35:34]
between first and second reading. It
[1:35:36]
does not materially change the
[1:35:37]
ordinance. So on the left picture is
[1:35:40]
what we currently have in town per um I
[1:35:43]
think it's 410D
[1:35:45]
in our code which says if you uh are
[1:35:49]
across or adjacent to a construction
[1:35:51]
site you may request of the construction
[1:35:53]
or the contractor to install green post
[1:35:57]
with yellow chain very specific on that.
[1:36:01]
What we've started to see um around town
[1:36:04]
in the last couple months are white post
[1:36:06]
with white chain. Now the so the
[1:36:09]
building and zoning board uh committee
[1:36:11]
recommended the idea of white post with
[1:36:13]
white chain. I think that's a great
[1:36:16]
idea. Um I think it's a cleaner look.
[1:36:18]
It's easier to update. I just want to
[1:36:21]
point out that what you see on the right
[1:36:23]
hand side is very manufacturer specific
[1:36:26]
and we would hate to tie our code to
[1:36:28]
like that exact look. But I think if
[1:36:30]
it's a white post with a white chain and
[1:36:32]
they want to go that far, that's
[1:36:34]
wonderful. if they just want to do
[1:36:36]
what's on the left but in all white that
[1:36:38]
would be um okay by code. So if in your
[1:36:41]
motion you agree to um update the code
[1:36:44]
from green post to white post, yellow
[1:36:47]
chain to white chain, uh we can make
[1:36:50]
that change between first and second
[1:36:51]
reading. It is our attempt to come back
[1:36:53]
to the next commission meeting if
[1:36:55]
there's no other substantial changes for
[1:36:57]
adoption.
[1:36:59]
I'm happy to answer any questions you
[1:37:01]
may have.
[1:37:02]
>> Thank you Jackie.
[1:37:03]
>> Questions? I have one question. So these
[1:37:05]
changes are they majority what was
[1:37:08]
required by statute or
[1:37:09]
>> they were and I can walk through those
[1:37:11]
with you
[1:37:13]
today. Yeah. Um broadly most of them
[1:37:15]
were either required by statute or D
[1:37:18]
rules. Um so the first few pages where
[1:37:21]
you see a lot of that strike through. We
[1:37:24]
used to say you could only renew your
[1:37:25]
building permit for 6 months. Florida
[1:37:27]
statute now tells us it can be renewed
[1:37:29]
for 12 months. So those are some of the
[1:37:32]
big changes you see. There were some
[1:37:34]
historical references um to the building
[1:37:36]
code that just don't exist anymore and
[1:37:38]
have it for many years. So, we just took
[1:37:41]
those out for best practices. Yes. And
[1:37:43]
then in the middle of the document, the
[1:37:45]
big strike through is related to the
[1:37:47]
artificial turf changes.
[1:37:50]
>> Thank you.
[1:37:54]
» Here the only question is the coloring
[1:37:56]
of the fence lines. Is there any
[1:38:00]
discussion on that reference? Whatever
[1:38:03]
you all want. I don't care.
[1:38:06]
>> Anybody from the garden club or miss?
[1:38:08]
What? What? Sure.
[1:38:11]
>> She wants green.
[1:38:14]
>> The the point is to be noticeable
[1:38:18]
because you don't want to get your lawn
[1:38:20]
backed into. So I suppose the what why
[1:38:23]
it is more noticeable.
[1:38:26]
It's impermanent,
[1:38:28]
>> is it not? What are the rules as to when
[1:38:31]
they have to go in and when they have to
[1:38:32]
get out?
[1:38:34]
>> It's basically conjunction
[1:38:36]
>> during building time.
[1:38:37]
>> But that also seems counterintuitive. We
[1:38:39]
were just discussing taking our white
[1:38:41]
bulls that have ours
[1:38:43]
on it. [clears throat]
[1:38:58]
» Concept of not not running over the
[1:39:00]
yard. That's the reason the green
[1:39:02]
disappeared, but the yellow stood out.
[1:39:04]
>> That was the original concept.
[1:39:05]
>> The white stands out more. And I just
[1:39:07]
went through one whole less than a year
[1:39:09]
of it.
[1:39:10]
>> Good.
[1:39:10]
>> Okay. The white stands out a lot more
[1:39:13]
than what the green or the yellow.
[1:39:15]
>> The building is only
[1:39:19]
I'll second it
[1:39:20]
>> with the white.
[1:39:22]
>> What coloration?
[1:39:24]
>> White.
[1:39:25]
>> Okay. With white.
[1:39:27]
>> Second.
[1:39:28]
>> Yeah, I'll favor.
[1:39:30]
>> I
[1:39:32]
>> Okay, we'll be back with second reading
[1:39:34]
next time.
[1:39:35]
>> Very good.
[1:39:40]
We have one last update.
[1:39:41]
>> One last item uh for manual review
[1:39:46]
approving the BTO approve approvals.
[1:39:58]
» Can I just give a quick overview of the
[1:40:01]
item? This is the town manager's re
[1:40:04]
annual review and as part of that um I'd
[1:40:08]
like for you to s
[1:40:10]
>> say a few words.
[1:40:11]
>> Thank you mayor and commission. This is
[1:40:13]
my second believe it or not annual
[1:40:15]
review. Um it's been two years since I
[1:40:18]
started. Part of my contract says that
[1:40:20]
annually at this meeting we would
[1:40:23]
discuss um my review. Um, my contract
[1:40:27]
calls for me to be evaluated based on
[1:40:30]
five um, components which each of you
[1:40:32]
have thankfully uh, evaluated me and
[1:40:36]
we've met one on- one and I appreciate
[1:40:38]
the time and the feedback. Part of my
[1:40:41]
evaluation is also um celebrating what
[1:40:44]
we've done and setting goals for the
[1:40:46]
coming year. And I think over the last
[1:40:48]
month, we've all um had some time to
[1:40:51]
reflect on uh town communications and
[1:40:54]
working together how we can improve them
[1:40:56]
going forward. And I take I take that
[1:40:58]
challenge um directly. As part of my
[1:41:01]
review request this year, I am um
[1:41:04]
requesting for 10 additional PTO days.
[1:41:07]
Right now, I earn um 10 per year and I'm
[1:41:10]
asking for consideration for 10 more. Uh
[1:41:14]
the reasoning is is as one of only two
[1:41:17]
exempt employees here in the town. I do
[1:41:20]
not earn overtime or comp pay. Not that
[1:41:22]
I am looking for um to do that as I'm an
[1:41:25]
exempt employee. However, most of our
[1:41:28]
employees use their comp time to go on
[1:41:31]
vacation. So they are actually in
[1:41:34]
practice using more vacation time that I
[1:41:37]
have. I would like to have that same
[1:41:39]
benefit. So um there is a payout rate of
[1:41:43]
it if we were to consider that, but I
[1:41:45]
don't intend on resigning um and taking
[1:41:48]
my PTO with me. So um I am asking for
[1:41:52]
your favorable consideration of it and
[1:41:55]
I'm open to any feedback that you might
[1:41:56]
have publicly.
[1:42:02]
any comments any further? I know Paul
[1:42:05]
and I had the opportunity to do a
[1:42:07]
one-on-one. So,
[1:42:08]
>> yeah, I mean, I've had an opportunity to
[1:42:10]
talk to the town manager about some
[1:42:13]
areas to improve, but I think generally
[1:42:15]
she does an excellent job for this for
[1:42:17]
this community and has instilled a sense
[1:42:20]
of professionalism that prior uh that
[1:42:24]
has definitely did not exist prior to
[1:42:26]
her arrival. In fact, we continue to clean up issues um from the
[1:42:33]
prior administration and um you know,
[1:42:36]
since she's been here, I think
[1:42:37]
>> I just been a breath of of fresh air and
[1:42:40]
I appreciate your professionals and not
[1:42:43]
only yours, but the entire town staff
[1:42:45]
that's here tonight are doing an
[1:42:47]
absolute excellent job.
[1:42:50]
>> I feel that as well. I know we talked
[1:42:52]
maybe for consideration we'll do that
[1:42:54]
now for those five buildings should be
[1:42:56]
considered maybe a 4%
[1:43:01]
» right it's the time to do it
[1:43:04]
this would be the time
[1:43:05]
>> all right well I would recommend
[1:43:07]
workers I really do appreciate work done
[1:43:10]
for professionalism I agree I think even
[1:43:12]
u the leadership and enjoy the police
[1:43:15]
chief you know help with that transition
[1:43:17]
as well appreciate it thank
[1:43:21]
Yeah, I would agree to
[1:43:23]
>> So the motion is a 4% salary increase
[1:43:26]
and that's bonus bonus
[1:43:28]
>> one time 4% bonus.
[1:43:31]
>> Oh
[1:43:33]
>> and 10 days of additional
[1:43:36]
second.
[1:43:39]
>> All in favor?
[1:43:40]
>> We didn't hear.
[1:43:41]
>> You didn't hear? I thought but
[1:43:45]
[laughter]
[1:43:48]
» I wasn't trying to do that before.
[1:43:52]
>> I concur what the commission says. I've
[1:43:53]
only been on a commission for five
[1:43:54]
months and in that time I have found
[1:43:56]
Eddie to be very knowledgeable and very
[1:43:58]
helpful. She has helped me get
[1:44:00]
comfortable in my position and is um is
[1:44:02]
always ready to answer any questions
[1:44:04]
that I may have. Um I think her
[1:44:06]
communication is great. I think that she
[1:44:09]
showed that through initially the
[1:44:11]
property tax changes that were coming
[1:44:13]
and then um with all of the weekly town
[1:44:16]
updates and things like that. I think
[1:44:18]
that that really is a great improvement
[1:44:20]
and so you talk about strengthening and
[1:44:22]
communication but I think you're on a
[1:44:24]
great path and I I think we need to
[1:44:25]
continue what we're doing. Um, and so
[1:44:27]
with that said, um, I too would concur.
[1:44:30]
And so I think we just, um, just need to
[1:44:33]
make sure that the,
[1:44:36]
u motion that we're passing is in
[1:44:38]
accordance with your employment
[1:44:39]
agreement that we sent two years ago.
[1:44:41]
>> So you're looking to do an update
[1:44:42]
potentially to the contract that we were
[1:44:45]
referencing. I think that in as the
[1:44:48]
gentleman said earlier, we need to have
[1:44:50]
um some sort of writing that just
[1:44:52]
memorializes the the pay or changes to
[1:44:55]
the payment that are done. And so that
[1:44:57]
would just need to be done in in
[1:44:59]
accordance with our agreement. And so I
[1:45:02]
would just recommend we do that.
[1:45:05]
>> Makes sense. Any further comment?
[1:45:09]
>> Okay. Should we start a motion?
[1:45:12]
>> No.
[1:45:13]
>> All in favor?
[1:45:15]
>> I
[1:45:16]
>> thank you. Appreciate your support.
[1:45:21]
» All in favor?
[1:45:22]
>> I