Agenda
Full agenda packet (agenda plus every staff report and attachment): https://download.avcaptureall.cloud/customer-4c7243f0-0dba-4a92-a8e9-8bb133bfefca/meetings/09ef1cbe-e71a-4ed4-8b53-7b3328e3380c/packet.pdf
Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
[0:18]
100 And you said
[0:30]
40893 Casson Road, Win Press. is 80.39 acres in size.
[0:38]
To maintain the travascular, the property has 3 existing cinder-friendly works. Me
[0:45]
2010 1988 and one built around 2000, the
[0:52]
residential structures appear to be residence and the remaining utilized for long-term
[0:59]
rental or employee housing. It also contains numerous accessory structures to.
[1:06]
19. As structures are located within proposed latch.
[1:13]
would remain residential and cultural use and lot one would be residential agricultural
[1:19]
use as well.
[1:22]
Appears to be developed with two wastewater treatment systems and a well, and while
[1:28]
Graham proposes an individual wastewater treatment system and fiber.
[1:34]
It's
[1:45]
accidentally 1 mile south of Preston and is accessed off of Preston Road via Stassen
[1:51]
Road. Many maintained roads. Surrounding properties consist of residential and agricultural
[1:58]
uses and range in size from 8 acres to 240 acres. Number 2, the property is relatively
[2:06]
flat and contains areas of wetland. The padre A feeder.
[2:12]
FIIP irrigation. West to east through the property and your friend proposed that
[2:19]
too. The vegetation is consistent with grazing land, red. And large trees and vegetation
[2:26]
surrounding the residential structures. The property is located within the Pago Bird
[2:32]
District. The property does appear to have perimeter fencing, and the property is
[2:37]
not located within a zoning district. The a suggested 20 acres. For
[2:45]
the 2018 Lake County Borough Policy. is 80.39 acres in size as
[2:52]
shown on the preliminary facts. It has 3 existing single-friendly residential structures
[2:59]
according to Montana Cabasco. The proposed development does comply with the Lake
[3:05]
County suggested density as shown within Appendix C of the 2018 Lake County Growth
[3:11]
variety. Page 3 Proposed to access at the northeast corner, which
[3:19]
ends in the center line of Stassel Road, a county-maintained roadway with a paved.
[3:26]
Block One is proposed to continue its historic use after passing road, the county
[3:31]
maintained road.
[3:34]
Um, Osmos, Pass and Rose Road, Stassa Road, and India to the right of grades are
[3:40]
shown on the preliminary. New amusements are proposed. H
[3:48]
The northeast corner of the property is adjacent to Montana Highway 350. More commonly
[3:55]
known as Bat Road, a state-maintained highway, approximately 307 ft on the
[4:01]
northeast-northwest corner of proposed Route 1 is adjacent to Montana Highway 35.
[4:11]
The agent has requested a variance to the landscaping and maintenance requirements
[4:16]
along the property line adjacent to the arterial.
[4:23]
is recommending variance approval to allow for relief from Section XL of the county
[4:29]
Brook County subdivision regulations requiring landscaping and maintenance plan along
[4:34]
arterial roadways.
[4:41]
state issued letter right with the of October 2017, associated with the
[4:49]
landowners Glenwood Farms north of.
[4:54]
The associated ladder rights are located within the property boundaries of proposed
[4:59]
lap 2 and are proposed to be retained.
[5:04]
Page 8, Mission Valley. has commented that they will serve.
[5:13]
Uh, irritation.
[5:23]
Utilized blood irrigation. Pabloway Canal runs through the property from west to
[5:28]
east. Proposed boundary of lots 1 and 2.
[5:35]
It is above the canal and is not subject to the flat oak. Irrigation project. Or
[5:41]
not to religion, water rights, historic use, then assume all operation and maintenance
[5:46]
costs of the Flathead Indian Irrigation Project.
[5:57]
In weighing the expected impacts as discussed in the report and the proposed finding
[6:02]
of facts. Recommends that the proposed first liner subdivision be considered for
[6:08]
preliminary approval and subject to conditions which include conditions of preliminary.
[6:15]
In addition to perpetual conditions that trigger.
[6:20]
That concludes my
[6:28]
The rest is
[6:31]
I'll point out what I did not highlight is the The nurse and the therapists, um,
[6:39]
Have provided preliminary covenants, conditions, and restrictions to be placed in
[6:46]
the property. You have crackers of them and they're attached.
[7:26]
That I've always has to go through with her and.
[7:31]
Sorry, bro, we straightened out.
[7:51]
But
[8:01]
that
[8:39]
A big pile of evidence just to To relieve from putting on that.
[9:04]
Also that my findings are just bad, but with the amount of deer on that road.
[9:31]
But the rat side of you doesn't make a lot of sense in that area. That's, that's
[9:36]
it. And, uh,
[10:26]
Has,
[10:32]
I checked.
[10:35]
He
[10:39]
Yeah
[10:52]
That I'm attached to. OK. So,
[10:56]
Mr.
[11:05]
Exactly.
[11:11]
That's what that was.
[11:20]
Stepmom's stepdad's back.
[11:31]
10 minutes.
[11:42]
You can have,
[11:49]
The duplicates from the, Yes.
[11:55]
Similarly, we want collaboration to
[12:04]
I second that motion. Questions?
[12:21]
Yeah.
[12:59]
Permanent, 32 reception Emotions Conditions?
[13:34]
Questions.
[13:37]
Easy.
[13:46]
Did you do,