Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:16]
[clears throat]
Timson.
[0:19]
[cough]
[0:27]
Perfect.
[0:32]
Okay.
[0:36]
Okay.
[0:50]
» [clears throat]
[1:02]
» I'd like to welcome everybody to the
regular town board meeting. I please
[1:07]
silence your cell phones.
>> [clears throat]
[1:15]
» To the flag of the United States of
America to the stands, one nation under
[1:22]
God, indivisible, liberty and justice
for all.
[1:35]
» [clears throat and cough]
[1:38]
» At this time, I ask for a moment of
silction, please.
[1:52]
» Thank you very much. So, at the
beginning of this meeting, we have a
[1:56]
public hearing on a local law. This will
be on a local law. Did anybody sign this
[2:01]
sheet in regards to the public hearing?
Okay. So, um,
[2:12]
please take notice that a public hearing
will be held by the town of Lon, Niagara
[2:16]
County, New York on the 24th day of
August, 2026. Commened at 6:00 p.m. at
[2:21]
the town hall 1375 Bridge, Leon, New
York, on the adoption of local law
[2:27]
number 4, 2026. A local law imposing a
moratorum on [clears throat] placement,
[2:32]
installation, use, storage, occupancy of
shipping containers within the town of
[2:36]
Lewis, Hager County, New York. Said law
is intended to provide time for the town
[2:40]
board of the town of Lewis to research
and adopt appropriate modifications to
[2:44]
the town of Lewis comprehensive zoning
regulation. A complete text of this law
[2:49]
is on file at the office of the town
clerk and is available for review by any
[2:52]
interested person during business hours.
As such public hearing all persons
[2:56]
interested who wish to be heard will be
heard
[3:00]
is July 27th.
>> Thank you. Okay. I don't have anybody
[3:05]
signed up to speak on the public
hearing. Does anybody wish to speak on
[3:09]
the public hearing in regards to the
moratorum on storage sh
[3:24]
All in favor? I opposed. Motion carries.
Um
[3:30]
before we get into the agenda, our
highway superintendent as has asked me
[3:36]
um if he would like to give a quick
statement to everybody. So
[3:42]
Michael Weiss is our highway
superintendent.
[3:45]
[clears throat]
Over the years, the highway department's
[3:49]
approach to drainage maintenance has
largely been uh reactive rather than
[3:54]
proactive due to limited staffing
efforts and primary focus on cleaning
[3:58]
areas. Only after complaints
have we have been received. While this
[4:05]
has addressed immediate concerns, it has
not provided our residents with a
[4:08]
long-term solution to the growing
drainage and flooding challenges facing
[4:12]
our community. Our current method of
operation is no longer sustainable.
[4:17]
Aging infrastructure, changing weather
patterns, and years of deferred
[4:21]
maintenance have placed an overwhelming
demand on our existing workforce. The
[4:25]
dedication of my current employees has
allowed us to accomplish tremendous
[4:29]
amount, but they cannot continue to meet
uh these increasing demands without
[4:35]
additional support. Since taking the
role of highway superintendent, Mr.
[4:39]
Broadick and I have spent countless
hours meeting with residents and
[4:42]
visiting dage problem areas, inspecting
dig ditches and culverts and evaluating
[4:48]
recurring flooding concerns throughout
our community. Doing so has provided
[4:52]
valuable insight in both immediate needs
and long-term improvements required to
[4:56]
better serve our residents. I completely
sympathize with our community's
[5:01]
concerns. Taking action to resolve these
issues is top priority. I remain fully
[5:06]
committed to finding a lasting solution
to our flooding issues. My goal is not
[5:11]
only to simply respond to complaints,
but to develop a comprehensive drainage
[5:15]
program that identifies problems before
they become emergencies, prioritize
[5:20]
critical projects, and create a
primitive maintenance schedule that
[5:23]
benefits every neighborhood. With that
being said, it needs to be understood
[5:29]
that this is not a realistic overnight
uh solution to our problems, but a
[5:35]
long-term ongoing project that will take
time to complete. While not every issue
[5:39]
can be resolved immediately, every
concern should be received uh receive
[5:45]
careful evaluation, honest
communication, and a plan moving
[5:48]
forward. I plan to complete these
projects while remaining fisc fiscally
[5:53]
responsible.
To effectively address our community's
[5:57]
drainage needs, I recommend establishing
a drainage division as a part of our
[6:02]
current highway department responsible
for routine inspection and maintenance
[6:06]
of roadside ditches and off-road
ditches, culverts and drainage channels,
[6:11]
preventative cleaning program rather
than a than a complaint driven response.
[6:16]
flood mitigation planning and project
development, mapping and documenting
[6:20]
drainage infrastructure, coordinating
drainage improvements with road
[6:24]
projects,
uh responding effectively to emergency
[6:28]
flooding events, maintaining regular
communication with residents regarding
[6:33]
drainage concerns.
We're going to need equipment um
[6:37]
especially for off-road ditching. Uh we
would be looking at an excavator, a tub
[6:42]
grinder, and possibly an off-road dump
truck. Uh tub grinder would help us
[6:47]
tremendously, but we wouldn't have to
try and haul everything out. It would
[6:50]
save us time.
Uh if you're looking for a dedicated
[6:54]
budget line
um for perforated pipe, drainage,
[6:59]
gravel, crush stone, landscape fabric,
fabric, uh solid drain pipe, pipe
[7:05]
contractor, uh connectors, coupling
elbows and end caps as needed, catch
[7:10]
basins or drain inlets, uh top soil or
mulch to restore the areas. I'd also be
[7:16]
looking to hire two or three man crew
for this. um we just don't have enough
[7:22]
guys right now. [clears throat] The
staffing structure would allow for both
[7:26]
routine maintenance and uh in response
by planning future infrastructure
[7:32]
improvements along with help of our
current staff.
[7:36]
We also need help from the community.
Residents also play an important role in
[7:40]
maintaining our drainage system. I
respectfully ask everyone to help avoid
[7:44]
it the placements of [clears throat]
brush leaves, grass clippings or other
[7:49]
debris in roadways, roadside ditches and
drainage channels. These materials
[7:54]
restrict water flow, clog culberts and
basins and contribute to localized
[7:59]
flooding during heavy rainfall. By
working together, we can improve
[8:03]
drainage performance throughout the
community. This is a long-term
[8:07]
commitment. Approximately between 2014
12 and 2014, the highway superintendent
[8:13]
at that time cut the drawing division. I
firmly believe we need to reinstate this
[8:18]
division.
The proposal represents more than a
[8:22]
creation of new drainage division. It
represents a long-term commitment to the
[8:26]
residents of our community. My
objectives is to build a drainage
[8:29]
program to protect homes, roadways, and
public infrastructure for years to come.
[8:34]
By investing in a drainage division, uh
we
[8:39]
dedicate personnel, equipment, and
proactive maintenance, we can move away
[8:44]
from complaint driven system and move
toward one that prevents these events
[8:47]
from happening before it occurs. While
these improvements will take time,
[8:51]
planning and investment, I also commit
to working alongside with
[8:56]
uh alongside this community employees
and current registration to develop long
[9:02]
lasting solution that improve the
quality for everyone. I've only been in
[9:06]
this position for a year. Unfortunately,
some of the drainage issues were not
[9:10]
properly addressed by my predecessors.
Please bear with us while working. We
[9:14]
work diligently to understand these
issues, develop solutions, and make
[9:18]
necessary improvements. We appreciate
your patience and understanding as we
[9:23]
work toward getting these issues
resolved.
[9:29]
Steve and the town board have been
completely supportive of funding sol of
[9:33]
finding solutions to finding these
issues and our full support of our
[9:37]
highway department. I appreciate their
continued support and they're committed
[9:41]
to working together to address these
issues. [clears throat] Thanks.
[9:50]
» Okay. Agenda approval. Does anybody have
any
[10:00]
approval as to
the
[10:04]
motion? Second. All in favor? I opposed.
Motion carries. [clears throat]
[10:10]
Res
[10:14]
Nancy
49 392.
[10:22]
[cough and clears throat]
[10:30]
Can you hear me?
>> Yes.
[10:33]
I'm here to talk about the
chronic severe flooding on.
[10:42]
I have asked for help since I bought my
house in 1989.
[10:49]
This has been going on for 37 years.
[11:03]
On the east side of the street,
I am the lowest line home,
[11:09]
so I get the brunt of the flooding.
My yard becomes a lake truly.
[11:18]
It has rotted out the floor of my shop
or shed
[11:24]
and the lower boards of the shed itself.
And of course,
[11:31]
it's washed out by raised vegetable
garden
[11:36]
and leaves behind a mess of mud, debris,
and stone strewn out into the street.
[11:45]
This happens every time.
Every time we get a heavy rain or
[11:51]
downpour, a deluge of [clears throat]
water flows down the escarment
[11:58]
across a portion of Creek Road extension
just east of Hill
[12:06]
and continues to pour down mostly my
side of Hill.
[12:13]
The flood water is pouring down through
from the escarment
[12:19]
to an open dirt ditch
plugged up with brush leaves grass
[12:27]
clippings.
Shouldn't an effort be made and I hope
[12:33]
can find
a solution
[12:36]
to find the source of this poor dage on
top of the hill and
[12:44]
I don't have too much.
I do thank supervisor Rodri for kindly
[12:51]
stopping to talk with me several weeks
ago,
[12:56]
but respectfully I cannot accept his
excuses for inaction.
[13:02]
He says the Hojack Railroad has
jurisdiction
[13:08]
and I have learned [clears throat] it
since our talk that the Hojack was sold
[13:13]
years ago to Mr. Steve Muda. I don't
know.
[13:20]
[clears throat]
>> I don't believe it's the whole it's not
[13:23]
the whole
[13:27]
south of Creek Road extension is owned
by Nager.
[13:32]
So he did not buy that section.
>> Another excuse given by previous town
[13:39]
officials for inaction was that Creek
Road extension is a state highway.
[13:46]
and the town cannot interfere.
[13:51]
Isn't it about time after flooding
properties for at least 37 years
[13:58]
that the town step up to help residents
on road extension
[14:05]
and build new court?
Of course, I'm not an engineer, but
[14:10]
wouldn't you start
with this open ditch,
[14:15]
find the source on top of the hill,
and corrected the drainage issue up
[14:22]
there, try to contain the stitch.
What Mr. White said was
[14:30]
very uplifting.
And of course he he talked about
[14:34]
cleaning the necessity of cleaning rings
and catch basins. So [clears throat] I
[14:40]
look forward to whatever can be done
to help us all. Thank you very much.
[14:47]
» Thank you.
>> Can I just ask a quick question?
[14:51]
[clears throat]
[14:54]
» Did you have any sewer backup?
>> Did you have sewer?
[15:00]
Just water in the basement. Okay. Thank
you. Um if uh I probably will ask that
[15:06]
question of everybody when you get up.
Um I've got a map that I'm marking
[15:13]
points on just so that I'm aware of
where we've actually had sewer backup
[15:19]
and where it's just been water cooling.
Um I do have some areas already marked
[15:24]
on the map, but that would be very
helpful. Thank you,
[15:29]
» Linda Skelezo.
>> [clears throat]
[15:41]
» Hello. Um, my name is Linda Scal. I
reside at 477 Creek Road.
[15:48]
I came here tonight intending to demand
answers and express my anger over the
[15:52]
fourth backup in my home in as many
years. The reality is I know I'm
[15:57]
unlikely to receive a clear answer.
Instead, I would like to address a few
[16:01]
other issues.
The first is a statement published on
[16:05]
social media by the sewer department on
August 11. Quite frankly, the statement
[16:09]
was rude, dismissive, and insensitive to
residents who had just cleaned raw
[16:13]
sewage out of the basement, not once,
but twice in a 5day period.
[16:19]
The statement begins by suggesting that
some residents do not understand the
[16:22]
difference between storm water and
sanitary sewer. I can assure you we do
[16:26]
after all these years.
The statement then went on to provide a
[16:30]
list of things homeowners can do to
protect themselves. Eliminating basement
[16:34]
bathrooms, installing backwater valves,
installing knife for gap gate style
[16:40]
valves, updating plumbing systems, and
spending thousands of dollars to modify
[16:44]
their homes.
Every one of these recommendations
[16:48]
carries a significant cost. Some require
expensive construction and disruption to
[16:52]
the property, and not one of them comes
with a guarantee.
[16:57]
Most importantly, the statement failed
to explain what the town is doing.
[17:01]
The sewer issues have been occurring for
more than 20 years here. Residents
[17:05]
continue to experience backups,
flooding, property damage,
[17:10]
financial hardships, emotional stress.
Yet, after decades of complaints,
[17:15]
studies, projects, and promises, none of
us are are still dealing with
[17:19]
[clears throat] the same problems.
The next thing in the statement, do this
[17:23]
and you'll never have to call the town
again. As a taxpayer, I found that some
[17:29]
I found that statement shocking. Is that
really the message this administration
[17:33]
wants to send to its residents? Should
residents feel discouraged from calling
[17:38]
the town for help?
The financial damage I have suffered now
[17:43]
exceeds what I have originally paid for
my home. Let that sink in. But the
[17:47]
financial impact is only part of the
story. The physical and emotional toll
[17:51]
has been devastating. Cleaning raw
sewage is exhausting. It's hazardous. It
[17:57]
exposes families to contamination and
health risk. I am an insulin dependent
[18:02]
diabetic and I have legitimate concerns
about the health implications of living
[18:06]
in and administering medication in a
home that was contaminated by sewage.
[18:12]
Even after extensive cleaning, I still
have to question if my home is truly
[18:15]
safe. Every weather forecast now causes
anxiety. Every heavy rain brings fear
[18:21]
just like the other day. Weeks later, I
remained physically exhausted and
[18:25]
mentally drained from this aftermath. No
resident should have to live like this.
[18:30]
Residents deserve transparency and
accountability.
[18:33]
After more than 20 years of reoccurring
sewer problems, residents deserve more
[18:37]
than excess expensive suggestions and
social media posts telling them how they
[18:42]
should protect themselves.
We deserve to know what is being done,
[18:46]
what improvements are planned, what is
the timeline, what [clears throat]
[18:50]
measurable results have been achieved,
and most importantly, what is being done
[18:54]
to permanently address these issues.
Secondly, the backflow prevent program.
[19:00]
The program should correctly identify
the equipment being installed. A
[19:04]
backwater valve is not a backflow pre.
These are two very different devices
[19:08]
that serve two different purposes, and
the grant document should use the proper
[19:12]
terminology. the residents can clearly
understand what they're being funded and
[19:16]
what they're installing in their home.
The eligibility requirements state the
[19:20]
program is available to owner occupied
single family homes that are chronically
[19:24]
burdened with sewer backups issues
relating to inflow and infiltration
[19:29]
during sign significant rainfall events.
This raises several questions. How are
[19:35]
these affected areas identified? Who
determines which property qualifies? Is
[19:40]
there a map of this? and if so, is it
publicly available?
[19:44]
Residents deserve transparency regarding
how the eligibility is determined.
[19:49]
In addition, if the town's position is
that the sewer backups are caused by the
[19:53]
inflow and implication and that water
keeps its own level as in that
[19:58]
statement, what happens as more
homeowners install the pound recommended
[20:02]
val? If sewage can no longer enter my
home, does the pressure and flow simply
[20:06]
move elsewhere in the system?
Potentially affecting properties that
[20:10]
have not historically experienced
backups. If affected areas have already
[20:14]
been identified and these issues have
existed for more than 20 years,
[20:18]
residents also deserve to know what
improvements have been made in the in
[20:22]
the past, the root cause of the problems
rather than simply shifting the burden
[20:26]
of protection on the individual.
Secondly, the liability and insurance
[20:31]
requirements concern. The town is not
hiring the contractor, selecting the
[20:35]
contractor, supervising the work, or
paying them. The homeowner is
[20:39]
responsible for hiring and paying.
Therefore, it is reasonable for the town
[20:43]
to disclaim responsibility for the
workmanship. But it is difficult to
[20:47]
understand why homeowners are being
asked to indemnify the town and wave
[20:51]
their rights through such broad
language.
[20:54]
The agreement states, "The homeowner
hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the
[20:58]
town of Lewon harmless against any and
all claims and further covenants not to
[21:02]
sue the town of Lewon for any and all
claims." What exactly does that mean?
[21:07]
Any and all claims? Does it apply to the
contractor's workmanship and
[21:11]
installation of the valve or does it
extend to claims involving the the town
[21:16]
sewer infrastructure?
If a homeowner installs a backwater
[21:20]
valve through this program and later
experiences another sewer backup, does
[21:24]
the town believe that the homeowner has
waved their right to pursue a claim
[21:27]
against them? If not, then that
agreement should should be revised to
[21:31]
clearly state that the release applies
only to the contractor.
[21:37]
No matter how that language is
interpreted though, the practical
[21:40]
concern remains the same. If I
experience another sewer backup caused
[21:44]
by a known problem within the town sewer
and the backwater valve fails, the focus
[21:49]
will admit it immediately shift to that
valve. The question will be who fail?
[21:53]
What failed? Was it the town sewer or
was it your valve? The town can now
[21:57]
point to the valve and the signed waiver
while the homeowner is left bearing that
[22:01]
loss. Residents are being asked to
install equipment on their own property,
[22:06]
hire and paint their own contractor, and
maintain this device for the life of
[22:10]
their home
to indemnify the town in a green office
[22:15]
sue in return and receive $2,500
reimbursement. It raises an important
[22:20]
question. Is this program intended to
help the homeowner protect their home or
[22:23]
does it effectively transfer the
responsibility for a known municipal
[22:27]
infrastructure problem onto the property
owner?
[22:31]
Finally, the process itself is
unnecessarily complicated. Homeowners
[22:35]
dealing with recurring sewage backups
are already under significant stress.
[22:39]
Requiring pre-insspections, approvals,
and additional administrative work steps
[22:44]
before work can even begin only delays
the solution. The process should be
[22:49]
really simple. Homeowner submits an
application, hires a qualified
[22:54]
contractor,
backwater valve is installed, and the
[22:58]
town performs final inspection, and then
you reverse. This is a reimbursement
[23:02]
program, not a town construction
project. The focus should be on helping
[23:07]
the residents quickly reduce the risk of
future sewer backups, particularly when
[23:11]
those backups are tied to your known
limitations within the town sewer. I
[23:16]
respectfully ask the board to revise
this program by correcting the
[23:19]
terminology, clarifying the eligibility
criteria, and making affected area
[23:24]
information publicly available,
[clears throat] narrowing the liability
[23:27]
language to contractor related issues
only, removing unnecessary
[23:31]
administrative burdens, and creating a
more straightforward process that truly
[23:35]
serves the residences intended to help.
My [clears throat] issues began in 2017,
[23:42]
just six weeks after purchasing my home.
After the first tour backup, I was told
[23:47]
my lateral was a problem. Following that
advice and approximately $18,000 to
[23:53]
excavate and replace the line,
lo and behold, the backups happened
[23:58]
again. Suddenly, now we're told that it
wasn't the lateral. It was the problem
[24:02]
is the town sewer infrastructure, and
we're working on it. Repairs are
[24:06]
supposedly underway. Fast forward to
today, and I have now experienced three
[24:11]
additional sewer left on August. After
calling the town in frustration, two
[24:16]
town employees came to my home. One
pointed to the floor drain actively
[24:21]
discharging raw sewage and stated that I
needed to hire a plumber and kept that
[24:25]
drain. There's my problem is what he
said. I asked him whether I should kept
[24:30]
the toilet too where it was flowing out
of or the shower, but I kept everything
[24:34]
in my house because Steuart's family.
My husband has been a plumber for over
[24:40]
40 years. We understand plumbing. We
understand drainage and we understand
[24:43]
the difference between a homeowner
problem and a municipal infrastructure
[24:47]
failure.
What I witnessed that day was not
[24:50]
problem solving. It was lane shifting. I
was also told that drains are not
[24:54]
allowed in new construction and would
not pass an inspection. Which raises
[24:59]
another question. If our sewer
infrastructure is already struggling
[25:02]
under existing demand, are we properly
evaluating the impact of continued
[25:07]
development on an AC sewer system? The
answer seems pretty obvious, but yet
[25:11]
here we are to issuing a new build
permit, not just for homes, but condos
[25:16]
and development.
Today, I have installed a backwater
[25:20]
check valve and hopefully protects my
home in the future. But I am no longer
[25:23]
standing here for myself. I am standing
here for residents who can't afford the
[25:27]
thousands of dollars in plumbing
modifications. I am standing here for
[25:31]
the elderly residents on fixing them.
And I'm standing here for young families
[25:35]
that cannot absorb 10, 20, and $30,000
expenses to fix the system.
[25:41]
I don't know if it is the intention of
this administration to make the town of
[25:44]
Lewon an embarrassment, but
unfortunately that is the direction we
[25:47]
are heading. There was a time when I
would tell people I lived in Lewon and
[25:51]
the response was always, "What a
beautiful town." Today that response is
[25:55]
shifted to is that the town with the
flooding problems? How's your sewers? We
[26:00]
can compare it to Falls and L now
the two go hand in hand now. Think about
[26:05]
that for many outside our community.
This is becoming what we are known for.
[26:10]
Lewon deserves better. Our residents
deserve better. At some point we have to
[26:14]
stop managing the symptoms and start
solving the problem. We have to ask
[26:18]
ourselves whether the current approach
is working because after decades of
[26:22]
issues, residents are still standing
here asking the same questions and
[26:26]
telling the same story. When does it
end? When do we accepting temporary
[26:31]
fixes and start demanding lasting
solutions
[26:34]
because the reputation of this town, the
trust of its residents and the quality
[26:38]
of let the families who live here depend
on it.
[26:42]
The ability to flush a toilet, take a
shower, trust that sewage will safely be
[26:47]
removed from your home is not a luxury.
It is one of the most basic services
[26:51]
local government infrastructure is
intended to provide. New York state law
[26:55]
recognizes the necessity of sewage
systems for the protection of public
[26:59]
health and federal law recognizes the
importance of wastewater systems in
[27:03]
preventing pollution and protecting the
community.
[27:06]
Residents should not have to repeatedly
bear the financial, physical and
[27:10]
emotional consequences of a known
recurring sewer failure. I am asking
[27:14]
this board to remember that behind every
flooded basement is a family whose home
[27:19]
health and peace of mind are being
[clears throat] affected. Thank you.
[27:23]
Thank you,
[27:29]
» Michael Hall.
>> That was my wife. You gave her enough
[27:33]
time to speak. I'm good.
>> Okay. We're [clears throat] I mean, when
[27:37]
a lot of people speak, we try to limit
it to 45 minutes. We're not going to do
[27:40]
that tonight. Um Clayton Miller,
[27:47]
» I was just gonna say thank you for
letting
[27:52]
um
Just a few things. I I've read every
[27:56]
single port that has spoken this since
great.
[28:05]
So I would like to say that I have no
absolutely no doubt that every single
[28:09]
one of you there
deeply
[28:15]
and I 100% there to fix this issue.
I also think that public
[28:26]
garbage
driving.
[28:34]
I also think that in the same we are
probably past the point of the people in
[28:41]
this room
fixing the issue.
[28:46]
Let me give you a quick since you're
only five minutes. Don't worry,
[28:51]
[clears throat] but a quick historical
anecdote. So when the Apollo 13 mission
[28:54]
went to hell and hand for two straight
days, all the people at all the people
[29:00]
on the show worked without sleeping to
fix the issue to get Apollo 13.
[29:07]
They tried everything. They were
committed to it, but eventually after
[29:11]
the second day, they say, "We need
help." So what did they do? They got on
[29:16]
the phone. They called the best jet
propulsion specialist in the country.
[29:20]
They called the best engineers and
tracked down the company that made
[29:24]
thrusters for our team. that them making
the call and saying we need help is the
[29:31]
reason Tom Hanks lives at the end public
um I I firmly believe that despite all
[29:39]
of your best efforts everyone's best
efforts we need help from a firm or
[29:45]
[clears throat] a person that at this
very moment is somewhere in another
[29:49]
municipality
making corrections the same issues that
[29:54]
we have it's not from a lack of
these people exist. So even if we don't
[29:59]
hire or contract, I think the board
should put together an RFP for
[30:05]
information from an outside company that
can potentially contract with and fix
[30:12]
these issues. And I think part of asking
for help quite frankly is letting go
[30:19]
ego. I think it's letting go hubris. No
offense, but every mostly people up
[30:26]
there every year about election time
fixing Louis's infrastructure.
[30:31]
Nothing's getting fixed. And a lot of
these issues go way past your
[30:36]
administration, your term of service.
They go all the way back to 2018.
[30:42]
I believe every time
any word associated with flooding
[30:47]
drainage sewers happen in this town in
2008, it's on a spreadsheet. I put it
[30:52]
online. 2,147
pounds since 2008.
[30:57]
We are nowhere closer despite our best
efforts of being where we need to.
[31:06]
It's okay to say that we need help. You
guys are all servants. Hart time job.
[31:12]
I'm sure there's thous.
[31:17]
The best thing servants can do is say
because my
[31:24]
but a lot of people here's then you can
only push people so far.
[31:32]
So
if you have a company come in and they
[31:37]
have a viable long-term solution
they should be wide latitude wide
[31:43]
authority to enact the
what you need. And as a community, we're
[31:50]
all going to have to buckle up and get
our checkbooks out. And that's not your
[31:54]
fault. These are things that should have
been done incrementally for a long time.
[31:58]
But the second part of this conversation
that is coming is what it's going to
[32:03]
cost all. But quite frankly, if we are a
community, we're going to have to we're
[32:09]
gonna have to suck it up and help these
people up. So I'm probably over my
[32:14]
» No, I'm not cutting anybody off.
[32:21]
Tim Henderson.
[32:30]
My name is Tim Henderson. I live in the
village of Houston
[32:35]
and I was a licensed wastewater
treatment plant operator for almost 30
[32:41]
years at our plants.
I was at a meeting here about a year ago
[32:49]
and the crowd looks the same. Um, at
that time I questioned the allocation of
[32:57]
$15,000
toward the engineering department to do
[33:02]
a study of the flooding process.
Now, with the basement still flooding, I
[33:09]
think the only people that benefited
were the engineers.
[33:13]
Um during my time at the treatment
plant, my partner and I were assigned
[33:19]
one summer and there was plenty of rain,
so we got pretty good idea of what was
[33:24]
going on. Uh extensive
walkound survey of troubled areas.
[33:33]
We found looked at just about every
manhole in the town and just about
[33:38]
everyone was leaking.
Uh we die tested the parking lots at NU
[33:45]
and we found that some of the roofs on
the dormitories were discharging right
[33:50]
into the sewer system and you took it
seriously
[33:55]
put uh $250,000
into a [clears throat]
[33:59]
cleanup campaign and
they made things right.
[34:06]
We also found
off of Bronson
[34:10]
a manhole where some fish had taken the
manhole cover off. So, we were actually
[34:16]
draining Fish Creek during a high flow.
Um, fellow operator and I made some
[34:23]
suggestions,
but they were largely ignored. So, I'm
[34:28]
just going to offer them again tonight.
Now, the water pollution control center
[34:35]
serves approximately 27,000
residents.
[34:42]
It's been estimated that each individual
contributes about 100 gallons a day.
[34:49]
So, as you can see, um
I went to courts on the little math
[34:55]
challenge.
But if you multiply
[34:59]
27,000 by 100,
[35:04]
you're almost at capacity even on a
sunny day. I have been there during high
[35:10]
flow events where the flows have uh
reached over 12 million.
[35:18]
So I have a few suggestions.
One was the installation of a an
[35:25]
automatic
um overflow line like an intercept on
[35:32]
the line that comes in to the treatment
plant.
[35:36]
[clears throat] And at a certain level
when it flow got so high it would
[35:40]
automatically
uh take over the flow and and go into
[35:45]
the alcohol line
before it even gets to the treatment
[35:51]
plant.
Uh there's a large area behind the
[35:56]
treatment plant which would probably
accommodate a third overflow retention
[36:02]
facility.
Um, you can apply to the DDC for a
[36:06]
waiver uh to bypass the village closed
the requirements. Right now, you can't
[36:15]
bypass
until it gets to a certain level
[36:24]
that you know this system is is
critical.
[36:28]
uh increase in the scheduling for
clearing lines including
[36:33]
village lines off center streets that uh
consistently flood with grease from the
[36:39]
restaurants.
Uh possibly sleeves in some of the the
[36:45]
older areas that would help with the
INI.
[36:50]
And uh
if these fail, I guess the last resort
[36:56]
would be an adjustment to affected homes
uh in their taxes that would reflect,
[37:04]
you know, what their cleanup costs have
been.
[37:07]
Um many homes now pay more in cleanups
than they do in taxes. And homeowners
[37:15]
uh shouldn't live in fear of a rain
event.
[37:20]
many that I know
actually have some form of PTSD.
[37:25]
So, I wish you all well and I hope you
take it as seriously as everybody else
[37:32]
that is affected.
[37:36]
» Did you experience uh any storage back
up in the basement?
[37:40]
» No, but I uh submitted a letter to my
friend Eva.
[37:44]
» Yep. I know she did, but um I just
wanted to um I was one of the lucky
[37:49]
ones.
>> Okay. Okay. You're also on a boat too,
[37:52]
right?
>> No.
[37:53]
» You're on. Okay. Thank you so much.
Appreciate it.
[37:57]
» Rick Flores,
[38:02]
» I'm going to make mine quick. I I
appreciate Mr. Wise coming up with
[38:07]
saying that u there was a lack of uh
transparency and in the highway and he's
[38:14]
only been there a year. So, what can you
expect from me here? But my story starts
[38:19]
back in 2002.
I built my house in 2002 and from 2002
[38:24]
to 2008.
I had a lot of water problems. I was
[38:29]
going through some pumps like it's king.
Okay. In 2008 finally uh the town came
[38:35]
up. Uh Bob Nobles used to work for the
water department and he implied that I
[38:40]
built my house on
artisian well. There was no electric.
[38:48]
There was a town being leaked somewhere,
but they never found it. What they did
[38:54]
was put two dams [clears throat] in
front of my house to offset the storm
[38:59]
water coming into my house.
From 2008 to 2024, I was fortunate.
[39:05]
Nothing happened, but there was a lot of
new builds in our area. Legacy, uh,
[39:12]
North Bridge, there's a lot of town
homes. So there's a lot of additional
[39:16]
water coming, you know, in our area.
Just this recent one on the 20 um
[39:24]
what was it? The 26 I believe um
we had the water coming down from Upper
[39:32]
Mountain. Actually, somebody said, not
upper mount, correction, Mountain View,
[39:36]
that there was somebody pumping water
right down the highway. All right.
[39:42]
Sanitary water. Some people say, "Well,
no, that's sewer water." But the U
[39:46]
manholes say sanitary.
I can tell you this. I'm tired of having
[39:53]
sanitary water come up from my toilet in
my basement.
[39:58]
I have a new home, fairly new home. The
infrastructure in that area, this should
[40:04]
never happen. [clears throat] The s the
sewer and the sanitary are two separate
[40:09]
entities. Why Why are we having that in
uh issue with uh
[40:17]
excuse me infiltration between the storm
and the sanitary. That's a big problem.
[40:24]
And what we do have is we have a problem
with one uh part of the town saying,
[40:30]
"Well, that's sewer's problem." Or they
the sewer guys will say, "No, that's
[40:35]
that's a that's a storm sewer, not the
sanitary sew." And then we hear about
[40:40]
how the town will not allow us to clean.
I mean, the state won't allow us to
[40:44]
clean the ditches because of muscles.
We're just tired of hearing that. We
[40:50]
want you guys to work together and find
a solution because homeowners like
[40:54]
myself, [clears throat] there's seven
home owners in in our area and they're
[40:59]
very new homes and seven of them got
flooded basement with sanitary sewer.
[41:06]
That should not happen. How would you
like your grandkids to be playing in
[41:10]
your cellar when you had that happen? I
have grandson. I don't want that to
[41:15]
happen. And mine is send not once,
twice, within one week.
[41:21]
» Where?
>> Uh 4692
[41:25]
Stacy Drive.
>> Thank you very much. Appreciate it.
[41:30]
[applause]
[41:34]
So, I received a letter from Eva
Nicholas. I want to read it into the
[41:38]
record. Um, statement regarding the
recent sewer backup. I'm Eva Nicholas
[41:42]
and I live at 903 Onidita Street in the
village of Lewon. I'll be out of town
[41:46]
for this important meeting, but I write
this statement because I too experienced
[41:50]
raw sewage flooding into my basement
during the last two storm events. My
[41:54]
damages are substantial, several
thousand dollars so far, and other than
[41:58]
pure rainy days. As long as I've lived
here, I never experienced any water
[42:02]
problems in my basement until after the
clearing of acres of green space pines
[42:06]
and that land was replaced with new
buildings, parking lots, driveways,
[42:10]
brick, concrete, asphalt, and water has
no place to go. I wonder if the impact
[42:14]
on sewer systems were carefully
evaluated before all that development
[42:18]
was approved. Relentless expansion
shouldn't come at the expense of
[42:21]
longtime residents and you shouldn't
have to deal with the consequences or
[42:25]
the expense of poor planning and
overdevelopment in historic sign even
[42:32]
the record. Um, Sharon Bland.
[42:41]
» Hi, I'm Sharon Bland. I'm a fourth
generation res. [clears throat]
[42:48]
Yes, on river road. [clears throat] Um,
I'm for action group. We've got over 300
[42:54]
active homeowners that have experienced
damages in our community. But obviously,
[42:58]
this is a Niagara County problem. Um, I
want to issue a brief rebuttal to some
[43:03]
statements made by Mr. Weiss and Mr.
Ritter, which were incredibly
[43:06]
insensessive, suggesting that we don't
know the difference between sewer water
[43:10]
in our basement and storm water, which
of course we do. We don't put stuff in
[43:14]
the ditches. Mother Nature puts stuff in
the ditches. And state law requires the
[43:18]
town and the county and the state to
maintain their rights of play. Now, I've
[43:22]
lived here long enough that I can say,
as other residents have said, nobody's
[43:26]
maintaining our ditches. I've been
contacting you for 40 years. My
[43:30]
grandmother broke her leg in the ditch.
My mother broke her arm in the ditch and
[43:34]
I'm still trying to maintain the ditch.
Now I contacted Mr. Weiss in February
[43:38]
and respectfully requested help when we
had flooding then and I got kiss. I
[43:43]
filed notice of clay. Now I have 7 to
15,000 of damage, a huge crack in my
[43:48]
basement, sewer water, flies, all kinds
of fun. The storm system was not
[43:53]
working. I notified them in February.
There's a problem. I got nothing now.
[44:00]
We're not supposed to be reactive. We're
supposed to be proactive. We've been
[44:03]
paying tax dollars for decades and
decades to clean our ditches. So before
[44:09]
you decide to allocate hundreds of
thousands of dollars to new department,
[44:13]
new employees, where did our
infrastructure dollars go? Why are our
[44:17]
ditches not being maintained? Why is the
state not enforcing it? And when are the
[44:21]
county and the state going to step in
and help residents? Because this is a
[44:25]
fiasco. There are hundreds of people
with hundreds of thousands of dollars in
[44:29]
damages.
After I received no response from Mr.
[44:34]
Weiss, I filed three more notices of
claim.
[44:37]
As of today, I've filed a foil request
for all of the infrastructure records in
[44:42]
order to audit the town of Lewon and to
find out where our money has gone. I've
[44:46]
also issued a letter to all Niagara
County mayors, supervisors, and
[44:51]
townships to ask them to take part in
programs that exist to help us create
[44:56]
our infrastructure. There's government
money out there, and all we have to do
[45:00]
is apply for it. Um, we've had a 350%
increase in our assessments. Now, we
[45:06]
paid money for infrastructure and our
property values are predicated on things
[45:10]
like storm water and sewer and now
radioactive waste runoff that we need to
[45:15]
be very concerned about. Um, before one
penny gets spent in additional
[45:20]
departments and personnel and equipment,
we want town meetings. We want
[45:24]
accountability. We want to have these
conversations because there are many,
[45:28]
many, many people affected. We want no
more band-aids. Now, there's two
[45:32]
programs out there that already exist.
the clean water revolving state fund
[45:36]
which provides grant monies low interest
loan 7%. There's also another one that
[45:40]
turns out everybody's availing except us
called the New York State Resilient
[45:44]
Watershed Grant Program and it's funded
by the Environmental Bond Act and
[45:49]
basically we need to get a resilient New
York flood study or have a DEC approved
[45:53]
comparable study. Then we can apply for
all kinds of improvements. They've
[45:57]
already got it up on Bill Creek in
County um up at at Tom and Niagara and
[46:02]
all kinds of surrounding areas. I've got
a map here that shows that a whole bunch
[46:06]
of municipalities in our area are
already included except us. Um there's
[46:11]
all kinds of money and help to do what
we need to do. Um we need volunteers to
[46:18]
be included so that we can clean up
areas if we don't have enough personnel.
[46:22]
We got to fix this before spring. We're
going to have a huge problem in the
[46:25]
spring. It's going to be a heck of a lot
worse than it is right now. So, I'm
[46:29]
asking the town to please look into
programs that would help us. I'm asking
[46:34]
all the supervisors and mayors in the
various cities and towns in Iber County
[46:38]
to register their damages. There's a
website to do this that the states put
[46:43]
forth. I've got a petition on
change.org. I'm trying to get Governor
[46:47]
Hokll to answer. I'm getting a little
bit of blowback there because of course
[46:50]
they don't want to take responsibility
for their part of our problems. I know
[46:54]
this isn't all you. I've lived here a
long time. These problems have existed
[46:58]
forever. But it doesn't matter what came
before. It matters what we do tomorrow.
[47:03]
We have to fix these issues. Our
property values are going to depreciate
[47:06]
if we don't fix these issues. We are in
the equivalent of a basin. We are
[47:11]
becoming a sort of an effective flood
zone. When you call for flood insurance,
[47:16]
it's double the cost of your homeowners
and it only covers 250,000 which won't
[47:20]
cover most of us. So that's a bad one.
You can't even fix the problem if you
[47:25]
want to throw money at it. Um, we're
also, I think, being victimized by local
[47:29]
providers that are fixing cracks in our
basement. I went to multiple homes whose
[47:34]
basement walls cave in. It is
disgusting. It is a health issue.
[47:40]
It's just appalling. I've never seen
anything like it and I've seen of it.
[47:43]
But I'll tell you what, we've got to fix
the problem before it gets worse. And we
[47:48]
have to also pay attention to the fixes
that people are putting in because I put
[47:53]
a fix in too and that fix failed and
other people's fixes failed and now
[47:57]
there's people with the races caving in
that can't live in their house and
[48:00]
that's because those fixes are not
fixing the outside they're just putting
[48:04]
a band-aid on the inside. So my theme
for the day is no more bandaids. Please
[48:08]
help us find permanent solutions. We
deserve that. Thank you. It's Cheryl,
[48:14]
right?
[48:18]
Um, do you have that website? Because I
think isn't it through FEMA? It's like
[48:24]
» I bet I can give you a piece of paper
that's got it all laid out. That would
[48:27]
be wonderful because I think it would be
very helpful if we put that on our town
[48:31]
website so that at least we can get that
cataloged. So if we are able to apply
[48:36]
for any federal money, FEMA money,
>> then um that kind of gets aggregated
[48:41]
together. Right. And and I'm also trying
to get people to put a sign out in front
[48:45]
of their house that they're a flood
victim because people were
[48:48]
misunderstanding when I was trying to
gather names together because there's
[48:52]
thresholds and I'm not understanding
completely if it's a property threshold
[48:55]
or a money threshold or both.
>> But people are like, "Oh, no, no. Um,
[48:59]
you know, my sump pump didn't work." I'm
like, "It doesn't really matter. What
[49:03]
matters is that if you've had water
damage, we can't meet the threshold
[49:07]
unless we know about you."
>> Yeah. I believe that it is a monetary
[49:10]
threshold, but I'm not positive. I think
it's like 38 million somewhere around
[49:15]
that point.
>> Yeah, I talked to somebody um but
[49:17]
Governor Huffle referred me to of all
places, Homeland Security's emergency
[49:22]
response team. Yeah.
>> And apparently the city, I think the
[49:26]
county has to have 1.3 million and the
state has to have something like 39.
[49:32]
» Yeah, it's like 38 or 39 million.
>> But then he also told me that FEMA
[49:36]
doesn't cover private people. Now, this
is the first time I've heard this. And I
[49:39]
mean, we all know FEMA from Baton Rouge
and and Louisiana and all that. I'm not
[49:44]
sure what he's talking about there, but
I do know that there's funds out there
[49:47]
that we can apply for. And they've done
it locally in smaller communities than
[49:51]
our Somerset. Um, if they can do it, we
can do it. And [clears throat] maybe
[49:56]
that would get us to our destination
quicker.
[49:57]
» Okay. Because that would be so very
helpful.
[49:59]
» I absolutely.
>> So, thank you very much.
[50:03]
Sharon Shar, could could you email me
that map, please?
[50:07]
» Yes. Okay. I could probably just give
you the sheet of paper.
[50:11]
» Oh,
>> it's very interesting. It shows up the
[50:13]
townships that have already. So,
basically, we've had over 50 um events
[50:19]
in this area already that are considered
right now.
[50:22]
» I think it's like um I believe it's it
and that's I don't know if I'm going to
[50:26]
say it right. It's a life grant. Um
there's a couple of other grants that
[50:30]
were uh could possibly go for but I do
know that we have to get our ducks in a
[50:38]
row as far as to like with Mike. It's a
fabulous start. We now have to develop
[50:43]
some type of plan that we can now
present in that grant application.
[50:48]
» Right.
>> So
[50:49]
» I would be more than willing to
volunteer to finance. I'd be happy to
[50:53]
help you with that. I'm sure there's
lots of other people that could too
[50:55]
because they wrote massive amounts of
paperwork.
[50:59]
Okay. Thank you so much.
[51:05]
» Thank you everybody for speaking. Really
appreciate it. Um
[51:12]
moving on right now to our approval of
meet minutes from the regular town board
[51:18]
meeting on July 27.
[clears throat]
[51:22]
I reviewed them meeting minutes and I
make a motion to make acceptance
[51:26]
presented. We have a motion, a second.
All in favor?
[51:32]
» Motion carries abstract claims.
>> I move to approve the regular abstract
[51:38]
claims 2602317
through 2602462.
[51:45]
[clears throat] Recommend payment. This
is an amended amount in which you have
[51:50]
recommend payment in the amount of
$525,358
[51:55]
plus a post audit in the amount of
$16,590.
[52:02]
A second a motion and a second. All in
favor?
[52:07]
» I oppos
[52:26]
clerk's office.
>> The postage machine is up. We need to
[52:31]
approve to extend the lease and have the
town clerk sign the lease with any votes
[52:35]
for another 60 months that $1735
a month
[52:44]
is moving forward.
[52:50]
» Second motion second all in favor
motion car.
[52:58]
So recently we put out bits for cleaning
key fobs for the doors. It's 25 inside
[53:03]
doors and two outside doors. Um at town
hall we did receive three bids for that
[53:10]
from maximum security in the amount of
$57,500.
[53:14]
One from security 101 $51,750
and from technical solutions 23,856.
[53:24]
I'm requesting approval to accept the
low bid from technical solutions in the
[53:28]
amount of $23,856.
[53:32]
I'll make that motion.
>> Second motion in a second. All in favor?
[53:37]
» I
[53:40]
think
[53:47]
this was going to come out,
I believe.
[53:52]
» H97. So, So I will make a motion that
supervisor sign the contract with
[53:58]
technical solutions for the money to
come out of H97.
[54:03]
» Second motion second. All in favor I
[54:09]
» just need
a motion
[54:13]
supervisor that conception
[54:21]
just mentioned that
>> I didn't know that that's my guess for
[54:26]
the town clerk to sign
the town clerk to sign.
[54:31]
» [clears throat]
>> And I will second that. We have a motion
[54:33]
to second. All in favor? I opposed.
Motion carried.
[54:38]
» And lastly, the uniform and M contract
through vestice is up in December of
[54:42]
this year. We'd like to get head start
on for a smooth transition. We'd like to
[54:47]
go ahead and start obtaining some bids
for that. Now
[54:51]
board approval to go out to bed for
uniforms and
[54:55]
need a motion for that.
>> To go out to bed. Yes,
[54:58]
» I'll make that motion to go out.
[55:03]
motion a second. All in favor
[55:11]
on the agenda.
Anything
[55:15]
you want to add?
[55:20]
[clears throat]
>> Michael,
[55:22]
we have been out
some of the areas
[55:28]
[clears throat] pretty going on right
now.
[55:33]
So it's taking some time
[55:39]
out. Um this is where talking
[55:45]
other than that we've been working
alongside with the waste water treatment
[55:49]
plant with the camera and the sewer jet
storm drains and camera and stuff to see
[55:54]
if we can find any problem.
[56:00]
Now, Mike, I just had a question with
how your proposed with the um two
[56:04]
additional individuals.
I understand that they're they're summer
[56:09]
work, but now in the winter, would they
be put to work to develop projects or
[56:16]
would they be um brought in as far as
with snow removal and other winter
[56:21]
maintenance or how would they be
strategically? As long as we don't have
[56:27]
six feet of snow on the ground, we can
continue.
[56:30]
We can clear ditches, we can cut down
trees, we can clear those areas out. I
[56:36]
mean, it's something that we continue
year round.
[56:39]
» Okay. Okay. So, they would just
>> Yeah. Just because it's snowing or it's
[56:43]
cold out doesn't mean we have to stop,
>> but also just to answer your question,
[56:48]
they would be available if you couldn't
be town.
[56:52]
» Okay. Well, that's just what um you
know, just to be able to wrap my head
[56:56]
around um what they actually would be
doing. I know
[57:01]
» a lot of work ahead of us, but um I just
want to know if they would be utilized
[57:05]
in
the capacity to um you maybe run a drone
[57:11]
like you had done in some areas to look
at or you know as far as to help.
[57:17]
» Oh yeah, absolutely.
>> So as far as your proposal
[57:23]
You want from my understand you want to
add two highway department workers MEOS.
[57:29]
» Yes.
>> You want to discuss that real quick?
[57:33]
» Sure.
>> Go ahead.
[57:35]
» Yeah. If you look at they add two MEOs
to our department um solely for the
[57:40]
reason [clears throat] but as we said
you know they will be utilized in the
[57:44]
highway department for whatever reason
[57:50]
it would
it's a start
[57:54]
it's definitely a start
>> so after talking like
[57:58]
two crew members
>> and adding a third from within the um
[58:05]
that's where we would start. So, um I
think what Mike's looking for is a
[58:09]
motion to approve two new hires, any
hires for the town highway department.
[58:14]
They would be part of the ditching crew
within the town highway department. So,
[58:18]
they would be a town highway worker who
would be just doing ditches. I mean, the
[58:22]
goal is to do ditching, but they would
be available to do other things.
[58:29]
Yeah, the primary focus is going to be
cleaning the kitchen with a preventative
[58:33]
maintenance program.
>> Absolutely propritoring the dishes
[58:36]
» to get us back to a situation where
we're not struggling to spend months to
[58:41]
clean out a dish. It would be very quick
to go through and be able to just scoop
[58:47]
that ditch out at some point.
>> Okay. So, basically, it's it's it is
[58:51]
developing a ditch commission. We're
just going to call it a ditch commission
[58:54]
piece. A ditch voice or ditch division.
Um and then they would be responsible
[59:01]
for like a rotating basis once
everything does get to where we would
[59:07]
like it. Then there would be a
rotational schedule [clears throat] that
[59:11]
they would uh develop and maintain each
year.
[59:14]
» Basically basically when we finish this
project we're just going to
[59:19]
» Okay. And then that um I'm going to
assume that the ditch division would
[59:23]
then need to be its own budget line as
you had mentioned. So if you're looking
[59:27]
for a budget line for equipment and
supplies for the pitching, I don't think
[59:35]
we we would be able to do a separate
budget line for the actual employees.
[59:40]
» Yeah, I'm just thinking of like, you
know, like being able to subsection it
[59:44]
out as like a division as to where it
doesn't go into the general highway
[59:50]
budget, but then it actually gets the
money gets put in that division
[59:55]
» for Yes. for the for the equipment or
supplies.
[59:59]
» Yes.
[1:00:03]
» No, that's fine. I'm just talking for
the um you know equipment and whatever
[1:00:09]
materials are needed, but I guess that
would be question also.
[1:00:13]
» Yes.
>> So, okay.
[1:00:15]
» Okay. So, um you want to make that
motion? [clears throat]
[1:00:19]
» I if nobody else wants to make it. Yes,
I will. I will make that motion to um
[1:00:24]
hire two additional people at the
highway department for the um sole
[1:00:30]
purpose of
becoming members of the ditch division.
[1:00:36]
» Again, I would stay away from sole
purpose. Okay. Yeah. So, I guess not
[1:00:41]
sole purpose, but their their main char
[1:00:46]
but we can
>> as as MEOs within the highway department
[1:00:50]
for the purpose of being additionally
approved.
[1:00:53]
» Yes.
>> You mentioned some additional equipment.
[1:00:57]
Do you have enough quick? Can we do this
one first? Let's do this one first. We
[1:01:01]
have a motion. We have a second.
>> Okay. Motion a second. All in favor?
[1:01:06]
» I motion. Okay. Go ahead.
>> So my question was you mentioned some
[1:01:11]
additional equipment with with these two
not there. Do you have enough equipment
[1:01:17]
currently for them to be productive?
>> We we do. Yes, but there is ideally
[1:01:23]
equipment that you would prefer to see
which would make this go a lot faster
[1:01:30]
as a discussed proposal like a tough
grinder. That way we could actually just
[1:01:36]
take care of all the trees and
everything right on property and it
[1:01:39]
would go back to the earth compared to
it takes us 10 times longer to pull all
[1:01:44]
the trees out
because you can't just cut down a tree.
[1:01:51]
» Now would that be included then in this
year's budget line? Are you going to
[1:01:56]
amend um you know for next year's budget
to include that?
[1:02:02]
» Yeah. I don't have that.
>> Okay. So, I was going to say that might
[1:02:05]
be um you know some things we look at
for next year.
[1:02:12]
Mike and I discussed some work on that.
So, state we can try and find time. So,
[1:02:17]
we we definitely talked about it. Um so,
we felt like getting two people hired
[1:02:22]
tonight was the first equipment.
>> It's going to take us some time to find
[1:02:26]
the right people.
>> Yeah. It's not it's not like we have
[1:02:30]
people lined up to start working
tomorrow. It's gonna take time to get
[1:02:34]
the word out.
[1:02:39]
» Water,
anything you'd like to say?
[1:02:42]
» Well, um we had about uh almost 10
inches of rain in five days. If it was
[1:02:49]
snow, it would be 8 ft.
It's a lot to deal with. I feel for all
[1:02:55]
the people that talked today and it's uh
you know it's hard to hear uh talked to
[1:03:01]
all of the people that spoke here today
and hundreds of other people um
[1:03:07]
when we have flooding issues and the
ditches are flooded um there's no way to
[1:03:12]
keep the water out of the sanitary
sewer. Um and it's going to back into
[1:03:17]
low
uh residences. Um, I didn't mean to
[1:03:22]
offend anybody by putting uh what I put
out on uh Facebook. It's just there are
[1:03:28]
some people that do absolutely nothing
to try to protect themselves but just
[1:03:35]
call and complain. So, um trying to help
out everybody that we can and we'll
[1:03:41]
continue to try to do our best.
>> Thank you. Um Bob Lander from GHB
[1:03:46]
couldn't be here, but he sent his storm
water expert. Tammy, is there anything
[1:03:51]
you'd like to add?
>> Um I think we just felt it was important
[1:03:54]
to have someone from GH here uh to
listen and and hear everything that has
[1:03:59]
happened especially for those specific
events. And we will continue to work
[1:04:03]
with the town. We've already had some
meetings with the supervisor, council
[1:04:07]
member, and highway department. Um we've
already talked about some options and
[1:04:11]
we'll continue to work.
>> Um can is there get a hard copy of
[1:04:15]
report or a hard copy of uh the drainage
study that was [clears throat]
[1:04:20]
farms. Um I do have it online but I
would prefer to be able to have
[1:04:24]
something I can go through and capture
notes off of. Thank you.
[1:04:30]
» So with that since we're on engineering
um you know we know the town that we
[1:04:36]
have areas that have problems they're
historical problems um some go back 60
[1:04:41]
70 years.
The big question mark is Lewis Town
[1:04:45]
Park.
That neighborhood is only like Mr.
[1:04:50]
Flores said, I believe he built his
house in 2002.
[1:04:55]
And he was in phase 8. He was the last
house in phase 8. So that neighborhood's
[1:04:59]
been going in since the 80s. I know
that's a long time ago, but it's
[1:05:04]
relatively new compared to
Dage. So
[1:05:10]
that neighborhood highway sewer has been
out there for the last two days coming
[1:05:16]
Friday trying [clears throat] to do some
camera work.
[1:05:20]
Uh sewer jet using the sewer jet to
clean out um pipes and everything like
[1:05:25]
that. It's a mystery right now what's
going on in Moosetown Park. So um what
[1:05:31]
we did at Morgan Farms is we did a
topographical we did um basically as
[1:05:38]
built drawings current asbuilt drawings.
So what we're going to do and I'm going
[1:05:41]
to make a motion tonight is that the
town is requesting a proposal from GHD
[1:05:46]
to investigate the drainage issues
Lewistown Park phase 8 and nine Harry
[1:05:52]
Court Stacy Drive Raymond Sarah and
Lauren Court. This effort will include
[1:05:58]
necessary topographic and boundary
survey storm water modeling concept and
[1:06:02]
final design of the storm water infra
infrastructure improvements. So, I'm
[1:06:07]
gonna I'm gonna make that motion to ask
them for an RFP for that.
[1:06:12]
So, we have a motion in a second.
>> Can I ask a question?
[1:06:15]
» Sure.
>> Um I my question is,
[1:06:21]
you know, we we recognize that we have
the infiltration issues. We've been
[1:06:27]
dealing with it for years. So, I I mean,
I'm curious as to the corporate
[1:06:33]
structure of GHD.
Are they prepared to give us the
[1:06:37]
resources that that we need and do you
have the people on staff that can that
[1:06:42]
that can get us answers in a relatively
short period of time?
[1:06:46]
» Absolutely. GHD has a hall's office, a
Buffalo office. We have a very large
[1:06:52]
office out of the Sier area. Uh we share
resources all the time. We work together
[1:06:57]
as a larger team. Uh we have thousands
of employees. Um even some of the early
[1:07:02]
work we have done right now has not just
been from our local staff. It has been
[1:07:06]
shared across our offices to find the
best technical staff to work on what is
[1:07:12]
needed. So we have a system of many
systems in place to ensure that we
[1:07:17]
constantly have the right staff and the
available staff to work on our project.
[1:07:22]
So this will be no different. We will
commit to what is needed to get this
[1:07:26]
done and to get it done in good in a
reasonable amount of time because this
[1:07:31]
cannot linger as we heard tonight. It
cannot be a slowm moving item. It has to
[1:07:38]
» do we have even a rough time estimate
before we
[1:07:42]
» I don't right now but we will get that
together quickly following this
[1:07:47]
resolution.
>> Is this something that we can get
[1:07:49]
updates monthly?
>> Absolutely.
[1:07:52]
» And addressing
Typically, Mr. Landon would be here and
[1:07:56]
provide updates. Um, that's moving
forward with Mr.
[1:08:00]
» So, what we're asking for is proposal on
what they're going to do with cost and
[1:08:05]
everything like that. Then moving
forward once we decide if we're going to
[1:08:09]
do that and moving forward, we will work
with GHD.
[1:08:13]
» Um, I do have another question. Um, just
as far I know it's just only a request
[1:08:18]
for proposal. Um, I know that GHD has
been involved in other engineers
[1:08:23]
projects and is currently involved in a
project in Tananda with that sewer for
[1:08:28]
installing I think sewer liners. But now
I'm wondering as far as after we do all
[1:08:34]
of these studies and we've got all of
this information now is G uh GHD uh
[1:08:41]
capable of developing an action plan for
us that we then can take and use in
[1:08:49]
these applications for assistance.
You're looking for something more of a
[1:08:55]
master planning or more of a what to do
when something occurs?
[1:08:59]
» Well, no. I just feel like we've got
these studies like we've got study of
[1:09:03]
Morgan Farms. We're going to do a study
of um I can't remember the name. We got
[1:09:08]
the Pure Court Raymond Drive area. Then
we're going to do a study here. And
[1:09:12]
we're going to
What do we do with that study? Like we
[1:09:16]
need to have a consolidated
like, okay, so this is what's going on
[1:09:21]
here. these are the problems we have
identified. This is what we can write
[1:09:25]
our grant applications off of or this is
what we can utilize to implement. So I
[1:09:31]
just I just feel like we're we're in a
disconnect with the information that
[1:09:36]
we're getting and the applicability of
that information.
[1:09:40]
So the the best format would be to start
putting again more of an overall picture
[1:09:47]
of the town. Um focus then bringing that
focus areas and areas of interest and
[1:09:53]
then like you said study can focus on an
area but then that needs an action plan
[1:09:59]
to then what we will do to improve the
infrastructure and or repair or modify
[1:10:04]
or whatever the plan is after that. So
this first proposal starts that process
[1:10:09]
with one area but we need to put
comprehensive list together of all the
[1:10:14]
areas of interest and start prioritizing
and planning ahead and we can start
[1:10:19]
working on that I think now that we've
had some of these conversations um and
[1:10:23]
try to work out the best picture so all
the board members can understand and our
[1:10:26]
department heads can understand what to
do moving forward.
[1:10:29]
» Now are there any other historical
studies that GHD has already done? I
[1:10:34]
mean, and if they've already done them
in the village, if they've already done
[1:10:38]
them, you know, out uh Creek Road, if
they [clears throat]
[1:10:43]
under other comprehensive historical
studies,
[1:10:47]
there are other drainage studies that
we've done for local municipalities area
[1:10:52]
county
specific
[1:10:55]
» specifically. Not that comes to mind,
but I have to double check with Mr.
[1:10:59]
because obviously being a resident he's
involved in what goes on here and often
[1:11:04]
handles it more directly himself. So I
don't want to speak outside of what his
[1:11:09]
level of knowledge out outweighs.
>> Okay. Not that's just a question for
[1:11:13]
[clears throat]
[cough]
[1:11:15]
about three years. Just that we do have
that historical.
[1:11:23]
We have a motion and a second. Any more
questions?
[1:11:28]
All in favor?
>> I oppos. Motion carries. Thank you. Um I
[1:11:34]
would also like to acknowledge before
they stand up and leave, we invited uh
[1:11:39]
our legislature. So um Irene Myers is
our our legislature to the north and
[1:11:45]
Mike Cassell is our legislator from to
the south basically divided by 104
[1:11:50]
closely 104. There's some area. So I
appreciate you being here. they they
[1:11:55]
understood that um the county has some
issues in this and that it's it's a
[1:12:00]
bigger picture of how we can solve
resolve some of these issues. It may
[1:12:04]
need the county may need the state.
Obviously, we have state groups, we have
[1:12:08]
county groups. So, I appreciate you guys
coming.
[1:12:10]
» No, it was our pleasure meeting. Um
county is going to be getting together.
[1:12:16]
Uh Ari and I only had conversations with
the chairman of our infrastructure and
[1:12:21]
facilities committee. Uh so, Rest
assured, we will be talking and coming
[1:12:26]
up with a plan on how to lend some
support to the effort.
[1:12:30]
» And just so everybody knows, Mike
Cassell was a victim of major flooding
[1:12:34]
as well.
>> I definitely feel the pain of people
[1:12:37]
here. Uh flooded in both events, July
26, 27th, and August
[1:12:43]
» with
[snorts]
[1:12:46]
the address.
[1:12:50]
» Okay. Thank you very much. Appreciate
it. And we did spend some money to do
[1:12:55]
some of those competitive things.
>> Okay. [clears throat] So, which are you
[1:12:58]
closer down towards library?
>> Right down the road from the library.
[1:13:02]
» Okay. Thank you very much.
>> And I'd also like to acknowledge the
[1:13:05]
mayor of Lewon, Dan Cota, for coming out
to the meeting as well. I would like to
[1:13:09]
thank the mayor of Lewon for getting his
guys out and doing the ditch cleaning on
[1:13:14]
my street and the crap on
and also the ditch between the parkway
[1:13:24]
and the quad trail. I know that you're
looking to work with the DEC to get the
[1:13:28]
permits you need to get that cooled out.
We should have that permit in the next
[1:13:32]
14 days. And if there is a need and
we're talking on the county level, uh we
[1:13:38]
need all the towns to work together. We
don't want something that the town of
[1:13:41]
Louiswis does that negatively impacts
the town of Niagara or vice versa. So,
[1:13:46]
you know, we need to work with soil and
water within our our county, you know,
[1:13:50]
people. So, you know, we Niagara if we
did anything to get the water out here,
[1:13:55]
it would affect the town of Porter,
which is also
[1:13:57]
» we don't want
>> everything goes north. So some goes west
[1:14:02]
into the river, but everything kind of
between the creeks goes north.
[1:14:05]
» And I know sometimes the DEC is not the
easiest agency to work with. So I mean
[1:14:11]
their application process pretty
burdensome. If there's a need for some
[1:14:16]
assistance with doing these
applications,
[1:14:18]
we can help with the county.
>> So our our ditches next to the parkway,
[1:14:22]
which is on both the east and the west
side, is a big source of where our water
[1:14:27]
goes.
>> Permanent was signed. It's owned by New
[1:14:30]
York parks. We have a lease with New
York parks for our trail, our bike path
[1:14:35]
to, you know, operate that area drainage
on our bike path. But the ditches are
[1:14:39]
part of New York State Parks. They
signed a permit application which Mr.
[1:14:44]
Cota started with them and they signed
it Friday. So I got I got an email on
[1:14:50]
that. So the ball's rolling. We'll see.
and and numerous phone calls I believe
[1:14:56]
from council
governor's office directly um along with
[1:15:03]
mayorota
uh to seek their assistance on the other
[1:15:07]
uh areas that we have issue as far creek
fish creek and um Gil Creek that's it
[1:15:14]
right so um hopefully that we can
establish that communication there and
[1:15:20]
get their assistance with the DEC for
those creeks and then also to be able to
[1:15:25]
possibly get pointed towards some type
of, you know, grant program or something
[1:15:30]
that we can apply for to get as far as
monetary.
[1:15:35]
» Thank you very much.
>> Thank you. Yes, thank you for having us
[1:15:38]
and um like legislator Christelle said
that uh we're going to be
[1:15:45]
um putting in much effort into trying to
look at the big picture of everything.
[1:15:50]
Um as we all our weather pattern is
changing. So
[1:15:54]
» yeah, I think we have 42 we've had 42
inches of rain to date,
[1:16:00]
» which is well well above average in this
area. So thank you.
[1:16:05]
» Well, again, thanks to Michael, thanks
Mayor.
[1:16:12]
I totally 100% agree.
>> I can tell you from supervisors meeting
[1:16:17]
across the county, every every town is
dealing with this. Every town is dealing
[1:16:21]
with DC. Every town is dealing with
flooding. Every town is dealing with
[1:16:26]
drink issues. So, thanks. And so, we'll
take a cover up. You've been to the
[1:16:30]
meetings with the uh with the DOT and
the towns and the county and the state
[1:16:35]
and DPC. [clears throat]
So, I appreciate it.
[1:16:38]
» Thank you.
>> And I was going to say if you have any
[1:16:40]
more
app,
[1:16:48]
» Tim, last but not least, Tim Smith. Oh.
Uh, thank you, sir. Uh, we just finished
[1:16:53]
up our camp season, uh, preparing for
our next season, which I don't want to
[1:16:58]
bring up any of those events. I still
like to enjoy the last two weeks of
[1:17:01]
summer, but follow us on Facebook and,
uh, the town website. We got plenty of
[1:17:05]
events coming up for the fall and the
winter time. So, yeah, a lot of adult
[1:17:08]
events, too, not just kids. So,
[clears throat] that's a big aspect of
[1:17:12]
our recreation department as well.
Jackie, no, I'm sorry. You're you'll be
[1:17:16]
last. Jackie's online. Jackie, it's
minor surgery and attention. You there,
[1:17:23]
Jackie?
[1:17:27]
» You're on mute if you're there. There
you are.
[1:17:30]
» Y
>> I'm here.
[1:17:34]
So, so go ahead.
[1:17:39]
» Previously, I submitted eight budget
revisions
[1:17:43]
for the board to review. And tonight I
ask for those budget revisions to be
[1:17:48]
approved.
>> I went over them with Jackie this
[1:17:51]
morning. I'll make a motion to accept.
I'll second that motion. Motion a
[1:17:57]
second. All in favor?
>> I opposed. Motion carried. Jackie,
[1:18:02]
anything else you'd like to add?
>> Uh, no. I will sit down with Mike to
[1:18:09]
figure out the uh the new ditch division
funding requirements.
[1:18:15]
get that all put together.
>> Okay. Thank you very much.
[1:18:20]
We'll talk to you soon.
[1:18:24]
» Okay. Nothing under old pending
business. Nothing under new business
[1:18:28]
under my leazison report. Um
[1:18:33]
Leah, are you here?
[1:18:39]
» She's in hospital.
>> Oh, okay. So, can you step up to the
[1:18:43]
microphone?
I'm sorry. What's your first name again?
[1:18:48]
» Gina Maria Marino.
>> Gina.
[1:18:50]
» So, Gina came to me with her with her
sister and talked about a break in their
[1:18:56]
um water line. Um there's water and
sewer. Um it was a water line break. Her
[1:19:03]
average bill is I
>> Yeah, I got it right here. I was going
[1:19:09]
to run through this real quick. Real
quick. Bear with me. Uh, her most
[1:19:13]
expensive bill on here was in 23 at $112
and it was 60 61 61 61 61 62 62 706 62
[1:19:24]
and $5,729.
[1:19:27]
So that's a long shower.
So explain explain to us what happened.
[1:19:33]
» Um, my sister has health issues.
She was in hospital and
[1:19:41]
had a water break in the bathroom
upstairs.
[1:19:46]
It ran for two
days and then it was two subs and then
[1:19:54]
um I had another neighbor check in on
Florida and it's been flown in every
[1:20:01]
month for the last six months to try to
get this sorted out. I'm on a plan
[1:20:07]
and I like she had a new meter put on
and everything. There's no way this was
[1:20:13]
just a normal.
>> I think if you remember our
[1:20:15]
conversation, you had the work done.
>> I did.
[1:20:18]
» And I I asked for like a work order
on my phone that I'm not allowed to
[1:20:26]
because my phone had to be shut off.
>> Oh,
[1:20:29]
» that's why I I brought everything
digital. I came up with Well,
[1:20:33]
» give me
We'll do
[1:20:36]
a meeting
>> either a meeting or if you can email
[1:20:39]
them to
>> I can do all the
[1:20:40]
» okay and we'll figure out
water we'll figure sewer water I'll have
[1:20:46]
your phone number um
>> please
[1:20:48]
» do me a favor write down your
[1:21:07]
And then what we'll do in our next
meeting, you wouldn't need to be here. I
[1:21:10]
can present
[1:21:18]
» I will call you tomorrow.
Okay,
[1:21:22]
» I hope your sister feels better.
[1:21:31]
» So, um, we just settled.
Um,
[1:21:36]
I believe it's been completely
finalized. Um, we know what the numbers
[1:21:41]
are going to be. And what we've done in
the past is we have matched our court
[1:21:46]
officers with our part-time police
officers per their contract.
[1:21:52]
And what I would like to do is um
basically approve the court officers
[1:21:59]
making as much as equal to the part-time
officer's pay within within the town
[1:22:05]
highway per town police contract.
So I have I don't have those numbers in
[1:22:11]
front of me. I have the contract you
want to look at them. But um it's a
[1:22:15]
situation. It's a product basically of
minimum wage going up and everybody's
[1:22:19]
salaries going up. So we approved the
police contract I believe at the last
[1:22:22]
meeting and I would ask that we approve
the court officer's pay moving forward
[1:22:29]
um from Hold on a second.
What was the date again? Was it was
[1:22:35]
today right?
>> Yeah.
[1:22:41]
It'll be today to coincide with the new
with the payroll period. So I would ask
[1:22:45]
that the court officers pay would
increase equal to the part-time police
[1:22:49]
officers paying their contract. Yeah,
I'll make that motion. I'll second.
[1:22:54]
» All in favor?
>> I opposed
[1:22:58]
motion.
Um legal
[1:23:03]
you have a resolution in front of you
relative to an undertaking with the
[1:23:07]
state. Obviously uh town does work
within the rights of way of state of New
[1:23:14]
York etc. And basically what this is is
a understanding uh that of what the town
[1:23:21]
will do andifying the state for that
type of work. So this is just
[1:23:26]
[clears throat]
basically a reaffirmation of what the
[1:23:30]
town did I believe 10 years ago. It's a
longer term relationship. I think the
[1:23:35]
last one was 2005.
Okay. without reading the whole thing.
[1:23:39]
Um, it's town list town board resolution
authorizing the execution of new
[1:23:43]
undertaking of New York City Department
of Transportation. Now, therefore, be it
[1:23:46]
resolved town board and town hereby
approves and authorizes town to enter
[1:23:51]
into the New York State DOT undertaking
presented to town board attached here to
[1:23:55]
exhibit A. Town supervisor is hereby
authorized and directed on behalf of the
[1:23:59]
town to execute the undertaking attached
as exhibit A and to deliver the executed
[1:24:04]
undertaking
to New York State Department of
[1:24:07]
Transportation together with a copy of
the instant resolution and any other
[1:24:11]
documents reasonably required by New
York State DOT to process and accept the
[1:24:15]
undertaking. The undertaking attached is
exhibit A is incorporated into and made
[1:24:19]
a part of this resolution. This
resolution will take effect immediately
[1:24:23]
upon it adoption. So you need a vote on
to resolve to enter into it and then a
[1:24:29]
vote to authorize supervisor to sign the
actual undertaking attachment.
[1:24:35]
Okay. Can I get a motion? I'll make that
motion.
[1:24:40]
» Second motion to second. All in favor? I
motion carried and a motion for
[1:24:51]
second. Motion second. All in favor? I
motion.
[1:24:57]
» Some months ago, um town board
authorized me to negotiate
[1:25:03]
um with the owner of
parcel of property on Slement
[1:25:08]
[clears throat] Road and Garlo. There's
some issues with respect to the traffic
[1:25:12]
patterns there. Uh also some complaints
of the neighbors as to uh whether it met
[1:25:18]
code numbers of American violations
coming from the manager's office. we've
[1:25:22]
reached uh an agreement with that um
with that individual and I have supplied
[1:25:28]
and that is attached to your agenda a
contract purchase contract for the
[1:25:34]
amount of $60,000 for that particular
lot. Um we are holding uh several deeds
[1:25:42]
and documents in escro pending vote
today.
[1:25:46]
So
we're all aware of this. So what it is,
[1:25:50]
just so everybody else knows, there's
the old red and white building, the
[1:25:53]
corner of Carlo 31, which has been in
court for since I started here in 2007
[1:25:59]
» and it's changed ownership and it's been
kicked out of the court because of that
[1:26:03]
and brought back into the court. We've
had promises, oh, we're going to clean
[1:26:05]
the building up, which it was cleaned
up, but the building needs to be
[1:26:08]
condemned and it is condemned.
>> It is condemned. So um so it's a
[1:26:13]
two-fold process. when we were had the
opportunity to purchase it. Also, if
[1:26:18]
anybody that's driven south on Garlo and
hit 31, it's an awkward intersection.
[1:26:24]
The intention is to line up Garlo on the
on the north side with Garlo on the
[1:26:29]
south side so you're not facing
kind of a a south east angle. We're
[1:26:37]
going to to line it up. So, that's the
real intention of getting the property.
[1:26:42]
Um, the other is to demolish that
building and clean that property up. So,
[1:26:47]
I would ask for a motion. And also, we
received a $50,000 grant from
[1:26:53]
Assemblyman Morinell that could be used
to obtain this property. It's one of the
[1:26:57]
parameters of using the grant and one of
them is to obtain property. So, with
[1:27:02]
that, I would ask for a motion to uh
approve the purchase of that property
[1:27:07]
for $60,000
>> plus closing costs. Closing cost.
[1:27:12]
Exactly.
>> Wouldn't you figure another
[1:27:15]
» $1,500 to $2,000 at most?
>> Where the remainder come from?
[1:27:21]
» Um H97 our infrastructure.
>> Jackie Jackie now are you there?
[1:27:30]
» Was that how I understood it? It was
going to be through the um our H97
[1:27:36]
infrastructure fund.
>> Yes.
[1:27:38]
» Okay. Thank you. So
It would be a total of basically $62,000
[1:27:45]
up to $62,000.
>> Motion
[1:27:50]
second.
>> All in favor?
[1:27:56]
» Motion and also authorized
[1:28:05]
contract.
All
[1:28:07]
» in favor? I oppos.
I know we had some
[1:28:19]
engineering. We've already taken care of
that. We've already taken the budget
[1:28:22]
provisions. Councilman Bird report
police fires. I have a letter here from
[1:28:28]
Officer Buzzio.
Please accept this letter as formal
[1:28:32]
notification that I am resigning from my
position as a police officer with the
[1:28:35]
Louis police department effective August
31st 20126.
[1:28:40]
Leaving the Louis in police team was a
very deep and well thoughtout decision.
[1:28:43]
I have had an extraordinarily rewarding
time in serving this community alongside
[1:28:48]
some of the finest individuals I ever
known. My co-workers here have truly
[1:28:52]
become like family to me and the
camaraderie, memories, and invaluable
[1:28:56]
professional lessons I've gained are
things I will carry with me throughout
[1:28:58]
the rest of my career. I am deeply
grateful for the opportunity,
[1:29:02]
mentorship, and support provided to me
during my tenure police. Prior to my
[1:29:06]
departure, I will ensure all my open
reports are finalized and assist in
[1:29:10]
making the transition as smooth as
possible. I wish you and the entire
[1:29:13]
Louis Police Department continued safety
and success. I make a motion to with
[1:29:20]
regrets accept Mr. Buzzio or officer
Buzzio's resation.
[1:29:26]
Motion a second. All in favor?
>> I
[1:29:31]
[clears throat] wish the best.
>> I'm requesting a motion to hire two
[1:29:37]
full-time positions to fill up coming
vacancies. One is Paul Neville with a
[1:29:42]
start date of September 7th, 2026 to
replace vacancy created by the
[1:29:48]
resignation of M officer Michael Buzzio
who is leaving on August 31st 2026
[1:29:56]
and also for the hiring of Dylan
Loganich
[1:30:01]
okay sorry thank you with the start date
there's a bunch of change in the start
[1:30:07]
date September 8th 2026 [clears throat]
to replace the vacancy created by
[1:30:11]
Anthony Nicolleti when he retires on
September 25th
[1:30:16]
Both hireers are from the civil service
list. They need to attend the Niagara
[1:30:18]
County law enforcement academy which
starts on September 8th.
[1:30:25]
We have a motion to second. Any
questions? All in favor?
[1:30:29]
» I opposed.
[1:30:34]
» The only other thing that I have is the
historical association Lewon. are
[1:30:38]
holding their annual
Lew in Jeopardy Wednesday September 16th
[1:30:44]
at Fellow Winery
looking for good entertainment time and
[1:30:50]
learn something about your community.
It's always a well dependent.
[1:30:55]
Okay, thank you very much. Councilman
Memorial. The first thing on my agenda,
[1:31:01]
we had an agreement for transferring
street lights from Buffalo Street in San
[1:31:07]
back back in September 23rd, 2024.
I worked with National Grid. Our highway
[1:31:14]
supervisor at the time said there was a
lot of issues with them lights with
[1:31:18]
wiring. Parts aren't available anymore.
There's timers that have to be set for
[1:31:24]
daylight savings time. and he said if we
could turn them over national grid let
[1:31:28]
them maintain them replace what has to
be replaced the wiring infrastructure
[1:31:33]
also needed love and attention so this
was approved and everything but I got a
[1:31:39]
contact from national grid that they
can't find or something happened in
[1:31:43]
between with we need the supervisor to
sign the agreement for the transfer of
[1:31:48]
the street lights national grid that's
all this is it's uh something that was
[1:31:52]
approved on September 23rd 2044
just need supervisor signature.
[1:31:59]
» I'll make a motion that supervisor sign
>> with attorney approval.
[1:32:07]
So we have a motion and a second. All in
favor? I [clears throat]
[1:32:11]
oppos.
[1:32:15]
And then I have school forgiveness.
These are people that need to replace
[1:32:20]
the liner, put new pools in, and they're
asking to have the sewer part of their
[1:32:26]
build um
the first one is John Jerus 510
[1:32:33]
Riverdale Avenue. He has a $8231 sewer
portion. I make a motion credit that
[1:32:45]
a motion second. All in favor? I post
>> and all of these have been already
[1:32:52]
[clears throat]
reviewed by our
[1:32:56]
823.
>> Yes. Okay. That was already all these
[1:32:59]
were approved by Jeff. Okay. The second
one is Shell Fortuna 5268 Lewon Road
[1:33:11]
for $188.54.
[1:33:17]
Motion a second. All in favor?
>> I motion carried. The third one is for
[1:33:24]
Kate Mesa at 603 Park Lane.
S forgiveness $43.56.
[1:33:45]
Motion, a second. All in favor?
>> I opposed. And that's all
[1:33:49]
[clears throat] I got.
Um
[1:33:53]
Councilman.
[1:33:57]
» Um yes. First of all is that I do
believe that the library received the um
[1:34:03]
study from their building. I have not
reviewed that yet, but um I did see a
[1:34:10]
email from Fred Queso as far as I think
they have engineering study done of the
[1:34:16]
building. Also want to remind everybody
that the senior center is going to be
[1:34:20]
closed the week of Columbus indigenous
day so we can [clears throat] actually
[1:34:23]
knock out the remainder of the kitchen
[cough] and the women's bathroom. And
[1:34:29]
also I just want to say to everybody who
came here this evening, thank you very
[1:34:34]
much. I um can relate to what you have
gone through because I too at a point in
[1:34:39]
my life had to sewer back up and it is
it it's horrible and it's it's difficult
[1:34:45]
to go through and uh difficult to clean
up. But I will say that um I believe
[1:34:52]
that Jeff has been doing a very good job
with what he has been given and being
[1:34:58]
inundated with all that water. Um, as as
you think of a sewer system, it's kind
[1:35:04]
of like our blood vessels. It's supposed
to be a closed system and remain a
[1:35:08]
closed system and somehow we just keep
getting water that breaches that closed
[1:35:16]
system. So, I take it upon myself as a
charge and I believe the rest of this
[1:35:21]
board does that it is our responsibility
to find a solution to this. And I think
[1:35:30]
with all the steps that we have taken
tonight, I'm hoping that a solution is
[1:35:35]
going to be found. And then also too, we
were two days away, right Jeff? Two days
[1:35:40]
away from connecting the big sewer line
project and the end groomment. Two days
[1:35:45]
away. And I believe that that probably
would have helped mitigate. But again,
[1:35:52]
just know that we all are trying to wrap
our heads around this. And
[1:35:58]
um at least I know from my perspective,
I'm starting to collect information and
[1:36:04]
starting to funnel in that data into
something workable that we can use to
[1:36:09]
create a plan to move forward. So thank
you very much for being here.
[1:36:13]
» And I want to add to that. I went
through mine. I didn't touch base on it.
[1:36:19]
So the thing I would extend to everybody
and I tell this to everybody just the
[1:36:24]
town is a phone call away. Obviously, we
can't go in and do town work inside
[1:36:28]
people's homes, but what we can do is we
can visit your homes. Myself, highway
[1:36:34]
superintendent, um some of his highway
workers, uh Ryan Titler from the sewer
[1:36:39]
plant, we've gone in and we've actually
helped, not physically, but with some
[1:36:45]
suggestions that have actually helped
people out. Um we're always available to
[1:36:49]
do that. We've and again, I'm not trying
to blame the homeless. We know we have
[1:36:53]
issues, but we found some pumps that
were pumping into pipes that were
[1:36:57]
completely clogged. Um we found where um
some pumps weren't connected to our
[1:37:05]
infrastructure. Um and we found where
even our backflow preventor has helped
[1:37:12]
people um discover other issues when
they want to put them in. We're willing
[1:37:16]
to come out and try and do whatever.
Even um Ed Zimmerman and Tim Masters
[1:37:20]
from the building inspector's office um
they're a wealth of knowledge as well.
[1:37:24]
they'll come out and we'll visit any
house. Um, again, we're not allow we're
[1:37:29]
not allowed to do work. Um, you know,
the backlog for better program is to
[1:37:33]
help people out. Um, we can't do the
work. The intent of the document wasn't
[1:37:39]
to to hold the town not liable for any
and all. It's basically the backflow pre
[1:37:45]
because there is maintenance on a
backflow pre that once it gets
[1:37:47]
installed, there are requirements that
it needs to be cleaned. There's certain
[1:37:52]
aspects of it. So, it was to cover the
town in case it was put in faulty or if
[1:37:57]
there the maintenance wasn't done by the
homeowner, but it was not designed to
[1:38:02]
basically pay you people off for $2,500
to resolve the town of every issue we've
[1:38:06]
ever had in your house. And legally, I
talked with Alice today, it wouldn't
[1:38:12]
relieve the town from any and all um
flooding issues or anything if the town
[1:38:16]
was involved. Um the backflow pretor
program to me was a lowhanging fruit to
[1:38:23]
get some type of a resolution
immediately for people that were having
[1:38:26]
problems. Um and I promise you we are
going to continue to look at it. We're
[1:38:31]
we've always supported the highway
department. Um this board from 2016 on
[1:38:37]
the changes and everything has always
supported the highway department. I
[1:38:40]
don't believe we've ever told the
highway department no when it comes to
[1:38:44]
purchasing equipment, obviously
manpower. Um, so we'll we'll we'll
[1:38:49]
continue to plug away and um you can
call me. I mean, I'm available even if
[1:38:56]
you didn't like my excuses, but uh but
um I I will come to anybody's house.
[1:39:02]
I'll return any phone call. So, please
reach out to me. So with that, um, also
[1:39:06]
I want to give a quick update on our
lower river road park because I know it
[1:39:10]
was a frustrating process. Um, we
basically stopped the relationship with
[1:39:17]
the lowest bidder who bid on our lower
park. [clears throat] If anybody's
[1:39:20]
driven down there, it's beautiful and
it's going to get better. Um, he was
[1:39:24]
supposed to be done, the contract was
supposed to be done last December. It
[1:39:28]
was into February. We had weather that
was decent. He wasn't showing up. So, we
[1:39:32]
called in his performance bond. It did
not cost the town any money um any more
[1:39:39]
money by him being kicked off the job
site. He had a performance bond. We
[1:39:42]
called in that performance bond. The
company who uh wrote the performance
[1:39:47]
bond put the job back out to bid. I'm
happy to say that A1 Landscape was the
[1:39:52]
winner of that bid. They are the ones
that originally built our first pavilion
[1:39:56]
down there. So, what they're going to be
doing next is they're going to be
[1:39:59]
finishing the pavilion that's down
there, which also includes a 120 foot
[1:40:04]
fishing pier that runs parallel to the
ground with a kayak launch. Um, it's
[1:40:09]
it's going to also be ADA compliant with
a ramp. Um, it's going to be beautiful.
[1:40:13]
It's it's the whole totality of the
project is 950,000. That's what this
[1:40:18]
board approved. So, it's not a pavilion
that costs $950,000. It is a project
[1:40:24]
that includes a pavilion for $950,000.
And also Ed Zimmerman's not here. Um he
[1:40:30]
updated us on the bathroom that's going
in the outall building. One of the
[1:40:33]
biggest complaints or one of the
complaints was we didn't have a bathroom
[1:40:36]
that's closer to the pavilions. We're
putting in a full men's and women's
[1:40:40]
bathroom in the outall building. It's
all greenway money. It's all N River
[1:40:44]
Greenway money. It's been approved by
the N River Greenway. It's money that
[1:40:47]
can only be used for those type of
projects. It can't be used to fix
[1:40:51]
flooding. I wish it could because that's
where we would focus it to but it it
[1:40:56]
can't be. It has to be for parks,
recreation trails, um some uh
[1:41:03]
invasive species type things which we
haven't really done yet um right now on
[1:41:09]
it. But it also can help our waterfront
and um I talked to the uh fishermen, the
[1:41:15]
captains. They would like to see some
improvements down at the waterfront even
[1:41:18]
in the village. I I'll talk to Dan
eventually about that. So, those are the
[1:41:23]
projects that are going. I just want to
update everybody on the lower project
[1:41:26]
and um and I I appreciate everybody
coming tonight um and and promise to
[1:41:33]
support the highway department in their
endeavors with the drainage. So, with
[1:41:37]
that, um I would ask for um upcoming
board. Well, does anybody else want to
[1:41:42]
say anything before we close? Does
anybody want to say anything?
[1:41:46]
» Mr. Newman,
>> I just I missed the public hearing on
[1:41:49]
the the storage containers.
>> Okay.
[1:41:51]
» I just hope we can come to a resolution
where we don't have to outright ban them
[1:41:55]
from our title.
>> The intention isn't to ban them from I I
[1:41:59]
think I talked to
>> Yeah, I emailed you.
[1:42:01]
» Yeah. I mean certain areas, but it's
just we don't want a free-for-all
[1:42:05]
either, right?
>> That you know, that's the intent,
[1:42:07]
» right? I understand like residential are
>> we can slap some paint on them and make
[1:42:14]
» Yeah.
I appreciate it. Um, upcoming boards,
[1:42:19]
commission meetings, historic
preservation, I don't know if they're
[1:42:22]
still having a September 8th meeting.
It'll be posted on our [cough] do zoning
[1:42:26]
board September 10th at 6 p.m. Town
Board work session September 14th at 6
[1:42:31]
p.m. I will not be in attendance. I'll
ask Deputy Supervisor Conrad meeting. I
[1:42:37]
My in-laws are having their 60th wedding
anniversary, so I will be in the state
[1:42:40]
of North Carolina. I just want to put
that out there. Um, planning board is
[1:42:44]
September 17th at 6:30 p.m. and our
regular town board meeting is September
[1:42:49]
28th at 6 PM. With that, I would ask for
a motion to appear.
[1:42:54]
Motion second.
>> All in favor?
[1:42:57]
» I
appear. Thank you everybody.