Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:01]
Good morning everybody. I'd like to
[0:03]
welcome you out to our regular board
[0:04]
meeting July 16, 2026
[0:07]
uh at our water location 8085 West 3500
[0:11]
South. I'd like I'd like to call this
[0:14]
meet I'd like to call this to order. So,
[0:16]
helping us out today with this meeting
[0:19]
is Tai Quinn, um Dallas Headline, Steve
[0:23]
Clark, Andrew Sumption,
[0:25]
um Jeff White, myself, Mick Sudbury,
[0:28]
Danny Stewart, Leo Fitzgerald, legal
[0:30]
counsel, Nathan Bracken, and our general
[0:33]
manager, Clint Dilly. Um so, we'll
[0:37]
again, I want to welcome everybody out.
[0:39]
Will you
[0:41]
will everybody join me in the pledge of
[0:43]
allegiance?
[0:47]
I aliance to the flag of the United
[0:50]
States of America and to the republic
[0:53]
for which it stands. One nation under
[0:56]
God, indivisible, with liberty and
[0:59]
justice for all.
[1:04]
» Thank you. Does anybody here today have
[1:07]
a public comment they'd like to address
[1:08]
the board?
[1:12]
Okay, see none. Does anybody here have a
[1:15]
conflict
[1:17]
that's on our agenda today?
[1:20]
Okay,
[1:22]
let's moving on. So, approval of common
[1:24]
consent items.
[1:25]
>> Minutes of the regular board meeting
[1:27]
held June 11th, 2026. Minutes of the
[1:31]
special board meeting held June 18,
[1:33]
2026.
[1:35]
Expenses from June 4th to July 7th,
[1:38]
2026. General expenses 1,8717,7976
[1:49]
signs bank bond payment $51,980.
[1:55]
» I'll second it.
[1:56]
>> It's been motion second. All in favor?
[1:58]
>> I Okay, we're going to move on to
[2:01]
department reports. Clint,
[2:03]
>> thank you, Mr. Chairman. Um, as you got
[2:06]
the GM report in there, as usual, I'll
[2:08]
highlight a few items. If there's any
[2:10]
questions, let me know. Um, staffing,
[2:13]
all of our positions are currently
[2:14]
staffed and have been for a while. So,
[2:17]
that's in a we're in a good position
[2:18]
there. Um, knock on wood.
[2:22]
Water operations, I did want to
[2:24]
highlight, they've been uh we did have
[2:28]
issues again along 35th primarily on the
[2:32]
secondary system.
[2:34]
Um we've found that we need more
[2:38]
aggressive flushing even after the
[2:41]
startup. Um we've got some we think
[2:45]
we've got some pockets where maybe more
[2:48]
like a dead end some dead zones is what
[2:51]
we're find.
[2:52]
>> Yeah. So, one of the things that we did
[2:54]
this year, which I'm really excited
[2:56]
about, um we had purchased
[3:01]
a hydrant flushing
[3:04]
um box.
[3:07]
Uh Steve was using that and he's like, I
[3:09]
can't get enough flow through this. I
[3:12]
wonder if I could come up with something
[3:14]
better. He's really handy with uh
[3:16]
fabricating and I want to show you what
[3:18]
he ended up fabricating and it's working
[3:21]
out great. Uh Steve, maybe you can tell
[3:23]
them a little bit about it.
[3:25]
>> Yeah. So with the other one, like you
[3:27]
said, we couldn't get the flows to um
[3:29]
really scour the pipe good enough. So
[3:33]
the other one, you'd try to turn it up
[3:34]
too much and it kind of just walk around
[3:36]
the road.
[3:36]
>> Yeah. No, like a snake.
[3:38]
>> Yeah. So,
[3:39]
>> and it was standalone. It was just
[3:41]
sitting on
[3:42]
>> Yeah. It's pretty teetery. And so I
[3:44]
thought if we built one that we can just
[3:47]
put it right in the hitch of the truck.
[3:48]
>> I like that. And the nice thing is is it
[3:51]
also helps kind of keep it confined to
[3:53]
the gutter so we're not making a mess of
[3:54]
>> it does go all over the road.
[3:56]
>> Yeah. So it it actually worked out
[3:58]
pretty good.
[3:59]
>> And you
[4:01]
>> What's that?
[4:03]
[laughter]
[4:03]
[clears throat]
[4:03]
>> I told him he needs to. But
[4:05]
>> yeah, you better put your name on that
[4:06]
fast.
[4:07]
>> Mhm.
[4:09]
>> Pretty cool. Um and so you might see
[4:13]
them out there uh more frequently
[4:16]
throughout the year. We think
[4:17]
>> people think that's gas coming out the
[4:19]
back. [laughter]
[4:20]
>> I I seen it up on my street. It looked
[4:22]
really really good. [clears throat]
[4:25]
>> So, wanted to make the board aware of
[4:27]
that.
[4:27]
>> Awesome.
[4:28]
>> Thank Thanks, Steve for He's handy. He's
[4:30]
done
[4:31]
>> he built the uh trailer, all of that
[4:34]
emergency trailer, all of the um
[4:38]
connections and the pump and the pipe
[4:40]
work and
[4:41]
>> water tank
[4:42]
>> on the water tank. Steve is handy with
[4:45]
uh in all kinds of ways. Concrete work,
[4:48]
welding.
[4:49]
We're lucky to have them. Um,
[4:51]
>> yes, we are.
[4:52]
>> We are. It's real handy.
[4:54]
>> The sanitary survey,
[4:57]
their drink, division of drinking water
[4:59]
does that every couple years.
[5:01]
>> Every three years we have to do it. They
[5:02]
come through and check everything, make
[5:04]
sure um everything's up to par. So, we
[5:07]
had our first meeting yesterday. Um,
[5:11]
she's going to come out Monday and
[5:12]
Wednesday to go through all the
[5:13]
facilities. So,
[5:16]
>> okay.
[5:16]
>> Pretty extensive.
[5:18]
>> Is it a different person now?
[5:20]
>> Um, yes. This lady hasn't done it
[5:22]
before. So,
[5:23]
>> so might be something a little
[5:25]
>> Yeah, we'll see how it goes, but she
[5:27]
seems pretty good talking to her over
[5:29]
the phone. So,
[5:31]
>> on site's a lot different.
[5:33]
>> Yeah, we'll see.
[5:35]
>> Um, the Hannes well number two that
[5:38]
we've had issues with. Um, we've got
[5:42]
some additional sampling, some specific
[5:44]
sampling that gives us more information
[5:46]
completed. Steve's getting some quotes,
[5:50]
uh, bids for pulling the pump and the
[5:53]
video camera. And this we think there's
[5:56]
a problem potentially with the surface
[5:58]
seal.
[5:59]
>> So, are we going to do a new wheel on
[6:01]
number eight? Like,
[6:03]
>> yeah, number eight's underway with a
[6:06]
>> So, that'll be like 20 feet away or
[6:08]
something. It's within is itund I think
[6:11]
it has to be within 150 feet. What would
[6:13]
you estimate it to be?
[6:15]
>> They're probably
[6:17]
25 ft from the building right now. The
[6:20]
>> You're talking the old number eight,
[6:21]
right?
[6:22]
>> Yeah. The old well and the new well.
[6:23]
>> Yeah. So, they're like 25 ft from the
[6:26]
old number eight that we're replacing.
[6:29]
>> Um the number two that he's talking
[6:32]
about, that's the one that we had bad s.
[6:34]
[cough]
[6:36]
So, we're trying to investigate.
[6:38]
>> So, what you have to dig around it and
[6:39]
put a new concrete seal around it or
[6:42]
>> um we won't really know until we
[6:44]
actually get it camera to find out if
[6:46]
that's actually the problem.
[6:48]
>> So, the casing will rot or something it
[6:50]
could create.
[6:51]
>> Yeah. I mean, there's a few different
[6:52]
things that could be. So, once we get
[6:54]
the camera, we'll have to
[6:55]
[clears throat]
[6:57]
>> Don't we have a camera we can shoot
[6:59]
down?
[7:00]
>> No, but Gavin's pretty skinny. we could
[7:02]
sh [laughter]
[7:06]
um we have done more extensive PAS
[7:10]
sampling that the state wanted us to do
[7:13]
on all of the the sources. We have found
[7:16]
that it's really isolated to one of our
[7:20]
wells
[7:22]
>> pretty much. Um it's still below
[7:26]
any potential future MCL.
[7:29]
Um but they did want to meet and talk
[7:33]
about options if we did want to pursue
[7:36]
treatment um in the future.
[7:40]
So we'll be meeting with them to talk
[7:42]
through that and uh see what they have
[7:44]
to say.
[7:45]
>> So do we ever um I know it's pretty big,
[7:48]
but do we ever put a casing down and put
[7:50]
gravel around it? Do we ever do that
[7:53]
>> as far as doing it ourselves?
[7:55]
>> No. No. Do we ever put a PVC casing down
[8:00]
and then put gravel around it so that it if if the casing's kind of rotted and
[8:06]
stuff? Do we ever do that?
[8:08]
>> Yeah, that's kind of how they're all set
[8:10]
up. Um
[8:12]
>> all of them are drawn through a
[8:13]
perforated PVC liner.
[8:16]
>> Um it's still on the the actual
[8:18]
>> Oh, it's steel.
[8:19]
>> Yeah.
[8:21]
>> So on a steel casing, I had an old one
[8:23]
was done in 53. Now we put a line a PVC liner down, but gravel between the
[8:29]
steel and the PVC.
[8:31]
>> Okay.
[8:32]
>> Yeah. And I didn't have any more
[8:34]
problems with contamination or rust or
[8:38]
other than what was in the water.
[8:40]
>> Yeah.
[8:44]
» But I'm only 200 390 ft deep and you're
[8:47]
like what 360?
[8:49]
>> Um it varies. We got them anywhere from
[8:51]
like 120 and I think this is going to
[8:54]
400.
[8:55]
>> Okay.
[8:56]
and yours about that.
[9:00]
» Um, on the wastewater side, Dallas and
[9:05]
Steve's been working together, but kind
[9:07]
of spearheaded by Dallas on the reuse
[9:10]
water. Uh, part of that is making sure
[9:14]
we're providing the best water quality.
[9:17]
and he's been looking at chlorination
[9:20]
options and cycling of the reservoir
[9:23]
levels to ensure that we keep the water
[9:26]
age and as much chlorine as we can to
[9:29]
keep any issues down uh in that
[9:33]
secondary water. So, they've been
[9:34]
working through that and I think that's
[9:36]
going to be helpful
[9:38]
>> going forward. Uh he'll talk about the
[9:41]
rat
[9:43]
and the acoustical inspection. One thing
[9:45]
I wanted to let the board know, we met
[9:47]
as a team with ET Technologies. They
[9:50]
came out to our office and we finally
[9:53]
are getting some answers on what's
[9:54]
happening.
[9:56]
>> Um, the new site.
[9:57]
>> Yeah. So, they've confirmed they are
[10:00]
moving. They've uh Dallas probably can
[10:04]
speak to this a little better than me.
[10:05]
Do you want to give them a heads up on
[10:06]
that?
[10:07]
>> When we met with them, they did confirm
[10:09]
the date that they're closing and the
[10:11]
proposed date that they're opening.
[10:13]
There should be a loss in service. It's
[10:15]
closed December 31st, open the new one
[10:18]
January 1st.
[10:19]
>> They have finalized the location. It's
[10:22]
out there by Mad. Um they're just
[10:24]
working through the process now. So once
[10:28]
you get off the freeway though to the
[10:30]
facility, it's all paid, which is a
[10:31]
bonus for us. We weren't sure if we were
[10:34]
going to be going or what, but
[10:37]
>> sounds like the site's going to be much
[10:39]
safer, much smoother.
[10:41]
>> It looks we saw some of the tended and
[10:44]
it looks really good. Now that we've got
[10:47]
that confirmation, our team is looking
[10:49]
at hauling equipment needs. We're
[10:52]
working with the on personel needs cost.
[10:55]
>> So, was we going I thought we were going
[10:56]
to kind of go out and see what it's
[10:58]
going to cost us to contract it out
[11:00]
versus what we what we can do it for.
[11:02]
>> Yep. That's exactly right, Mr. Chairman.
[11:04]
So, what we want to do is we want to
[11:06]
bring back a little bit of report to the
[11:08]
board, say this is what it would cost if
[11:10]
we did it. These are some options if we
[11:12]
hire it out. What makes for us.
[11:14]
>> Okay.
[11:15]
>> I think we'll save a lot of money if we
[11:16]
use side dumpers instead of pushers.
[11:18]
>> That was one of our main concerns was
[11:21]
will the new facility
[11:23]
um allow any type of truck,
[11:25]
>> right?
[11:26]
>> There won't be operations won't dictate
[11:29]
which vehicles you can break,
[11:30]
>> right? Yeah, it's good news.
[11:33]
>> So, do we know how we should take a ride
[11:35]
out there?
[11:36]
>> Yeah, we should as soon as
[11:37]
>> Is it built yet?
[11:38]
>> No,
[11:38]
>> it's not yet per right now. You drive
[11:42]
out
[11:43]
Right. But we'd have an idea how far
[11:45]
out. Right.
[11:46]
>> We have an idea now.
[11:48]
>> Yeah. You can put in rolly. It'll tell
[11:49]
you exactly how far.
[11:50]
>> It's about 60 miles.
[11:53]
>> So
[11:54]
>> quite a
[11:55]
>> Yeah, we've got we've got a calculation
[11:57]
that it's about 60% of an operator's
[12:00]
fulltime job.
[12:05]
» Okay. On the office side, um we're just
[12:08]
finalizing. We've got the policy on the
[12:12]
agenda for discussion for the backup
[12:14]
sewer backup program. And then on the
[12:17]
AMI data collection, we're actually
[12:20]
installing the final pole today. Y
[12:24]
>> um so we'll have all of the towers set
[12:30]
and so
[12:32]
um that won't be a limitation on our
[12:35]
data collection. So we're excited to be
[12:38]
to that point.
[12:40]
And then it's not on here, but we did
[12:43]
get just this week approval grant money
[12:47]
through division of water resources
[12:50]
through their transparent billing grant.
[12:53]
26
[12:55]
>> $26,000
[12:57]
um that we can put towards this program.
[13:00]
So that's exciting
[13:01]
>> exciting news. Um, we'll bring that back
[13:05]
in a future meeting on coordination
[13:08]
communication.
[13:11]
We have been working with the Great Salt
[13:13]
Lake Commission. They're modeling the
[13:16]
Great Salt Lake Basin and so we've been
[13:18]
providing them information on all our
[13:20]
water use patterns. So, I just want to
[13:23]
make the board aware of that. They're
[13:25]
trying to get a better handle on all the
[13:27]
inputs and outputs, you know, of the
[13:30]
Great Salt Lake. Um, I'm sure they're
[13:33]
working with the legislature and the
[13:36]
federal government to solve this problem
[13:39]
and I think that's one of the steps.
[13:41]
>> Since we jump into the surplus canal,
[13:44]
then
[13:46]
most of their discussion will be at
[13:47]
Kent.
[13:48]
>> Yeah. Yeah.
[13:51]
We participated in the Fourth of July
[13:53]
parade. I thought that went well. Andrew
[13:55]
will talk a little bit about that. Um,
[13:57]
we have worked with the city on some of
[14:00]
the flyers that the city has. I think
[14:03]
that's
[14:05]
uh nice to partner together. The only
[14:09]
thing that we would want to make sure
[14:10]
the board is supportive of is, you know,
[14:13]
[snorts] you could have a resident that
[14:15]
we're not paying for any of the costs of
[14:17]
the flyers that's been provided by the
[14:19]
city. Um, you might have a resident in
[14:22]
West Valley say, "Why am I getting a
[14:25]
Magna Flyer?" Uh,
[14:27]
>> I've had people say to me, "Why have we
[14:29]
not got a Magnaflier?"
[14:31]
>> Yeah, [laughter] exactly. You might have
[14:32]
>> It works both ways.
[14:34]
>> Exactly. I think it's a positive, but I
[14:37]
just wanted to make sure, you know, the
[14:39]
board was aware of that. We haven't had
[14:41]
any
[14:43]
>> complaints. I think generally people
[14:46]
appreciate more, like you said, more
[14:48]
information.
[14:49]
Um the earlier summer work hour changes
[14:53]
I think so far so good. Again this we
[14:57]
haven't seen any increase in tardies.
[15:00]
Actually a decrease it sounds like um
[15:03]
through the summer. Um so that's
[15:05]
positive. I don't know if the board has
[15:07]
any feedback on that. Um but from staff
[15:11]
side I think that's working well. It has
[15:14]
been exceptionally hot. We had 199
[15:16]
degree day. So, um, that does help. The
[15:22]
CCR, the consumer confidence report has
[15:25]
been completed and posted,
[15:27]
uh, and we're, we've satisfied that
[15:30]
requirement. It will go to every six
[15:32]
months in the future. So, rather than
[15:35]
once announced
[15:41]
to make sure you're aware of that.
[15:44]
>> That's my report, Mr. Chair.
[15:45]
>> Thank you, Kate. Hey K, let's turn it
[15:47]
over to you for engineering report.
[15:59]
» So currently we're looking at
[16:03]
projects 800
[16:05]
projects
[16:10]
the same.
[16:13]
We have a big thing going on down there
[16:17]
station building start up nearly
[16:20]
actually start
[16:26]
testing with the screw pumps that went
[16:28]
well I understand
[16:31]
um we're going to continue setting
[16:33]
mantors
[16:42]
all
[16:42]
As you saw foot
[16:47]
as of July 9th
[16:51]
has been completed and EPA is current.
[17:04]
They're going to start by relocation at
[17:06]
the end of July.
[17:08]
After that, I guess it'll take about two
[17:10]
weeks to
[17:13]
Um after that we're going to start
[17:16]
along
[17:18]
at the end of July beginning August or
[17:21]
more so beginning to middle August
[17:28]
three project working towards%
[17:32]
middle
[17:35]
copper
[17:36]
working towards that I You got
[17:41]
designed
[17:46]
operations and change finally
[17:58]
working on
[18:01]
fill up that
[18:03]
and so it might not be total weight
[18:09]
early August, late July, early August.
[18:19]
» Yeah, we're we're wanting that done
[18:21]
fast.
[18:22]
>> Oh, yeah.
[18:23]
>> I said we're want the city's wanting
[18:24]
that done fast.
[18:25]
>> City's choing at the bit. Yeah, they're
[18:28]
almost
[18:37]
11 replacement about 70%
[18:43]
primarily working on 850 West and 8900
[18:47]
West
[18:50]
and also on that Tempest is no longer
[18:53]
Tempest now
[18:56]
get
[19:00]
Um
[19:02]
design
[19:08]
you guys know how that's going
[19:12]
on analysis.
[19:15]
I think they are scheduled to do that
[19:19]
December December
[19:25]
office
[19:28]
design.
[19:40]
» Any question from the board?
[19:43]
>> Okay. Thank you.
[19:45]
>> Okay, let's move on to water, Steve.
[19:49]
>> All right. Thank you, board chair. Um,
[19:51]
culinary water production for the month
[19:53]
of June, 217.45
[19:56]
million gallons or 667.39.
[20:01]
That's a 11.3 11.36%
[20:05]
decrease from 2025. Our year-to- date
[20:09]
production for June is 84.58
[20:12]
million or 2500.04
[20:16]
acre feet. That's a 2.4% decrease from
[20:20]
2025.
[20:22]
So far year to date, um we purchased
[20:25]
404.40
[20:27]
acre feet from Jordan Valley Water.
[20:30]
The secondary water production for the
[20:32]
month of June was 82.57
[20:35]
million gallons or 253.41
[20:39]
acre feet. That's a 9.24%
[20:43]
decrease from 2025.
[20:45]
Year today
[20:47]
was 154.25
[20:49]
million gallons or 473.4
[20:53]
ac. That's a 9.59%
[20:57]
decrease from.
[21:00]
So going off these numbers, I think you
[21:02]
can see that the community is really
[21:03]
helping us out with our conservation
[21:05]
campaign, which is nice.
[21:07]
>> Even as hot as it is, it's coming out
[21:09]
big time.
[21:10]
>> But we've noticed a lot of people are
[21:12]
letting their lawns just dry out.
[21:14]
They're just not even They're just
[21:16]
cutting the dead weeds.
[21:18]
>> So I don't know if they're
[21:20]
>> Yeah, that's not great either.
[21:22]
>> Yeah.
[21:22]
>> Well, a lot of people
[21:24]
heard the thing from Jordan Valley. So
[21:27]
they assumed that we were under the same
[21:29]
thing. So they thought, well, we won't
[21:32]
water. Then their lawns started to die
[21:34]
and they thought, well, just mow the
[21:36]
weeds once uh maybe twice a year.
[21:40]
>> Yeah.
[21:42]
>> I don't know how we get them back on. I
[21:44]
don't know.
[21:47]
Um, as far as the call outs go, we had a
[21:51]
total of 34. 23 of them were water, 11
[21:54]
wire for a total of 102 hours, 69 water.
[22:02]
We had one mainline week, two service
[22:05]
line weeks, and then 31 miscellaneous
[22:08]
calls.
[22:10]
One of the the mainline leak I kind of
[22:13]
wanted to
[22:15]
um give the guys a little bit of credit
[22:17]
was this big one right here on 8800 and
[22:20]
35th that we had that was quite a quite
[22:23]
a leak. We had a lot of water and they
[22:26]
actually did a good job shut off quick.
[22:28]
>> What caused it?
[22:29]
>> Um just pipes
[22:32]
>> pipes were rotted or
[22:33]
>> joint
[22:35]
it had a twoft crack in it but also had
[22:39]
a hole blown out of the middle of the
[22:41]
crack. So, we were losing a lot of
[22:43]
water.
[22:43]
>> That's cast iron pipe or plastic.
[22:46]
>> That one's cast.
[22:49]
>> Wow.
[22:51]
>> Yeah. No, I just wanted to
[22:53]
>> Good thing Good thing the storm drains
[22:54]
worked.
[22:55]
>> Yeah, that's what I was telling Clint.
[22:58]
>> Well, [clears throat] kids, I guess on
[23:00]
8800 there's so much water going down
[23:02]
the road that they were kayaking in the
[23:04]
gutter.
[23:05]
>> Oh my goodness. But guys got it shut
[23:08]
down pretty quick. So
[23:10]
>> they done a good job. Todd and and Ardan
[23:13]
said what a good job they done down
[23:14]
there and how nice the guys were and
[23:16]
everything. They were real impressed.
[23:18]
They said
[23:19]
>> thank you.
[23:20]
>> And to please Ardan is a hard job.
[23:23]
[laughter]
[23:23]
You know that.
[23:25]
>> But that's my report unless you have any
[23:27]
other questions.
[23:28]
>> That's great.
[23:28]
>> Any questions?
[23:29]
>> Nope.
[23:30]
>> Thank you. Okay. Dallas.
[23:31]
>> Yes sir. Mr. Chairman, I just want to
[23:34]
operations report. There's just a couple
[23:36]
treats to highlight. Um during June the
[23:39]
treatment plant 58 million gallon breeze
[23:42]
water pumped up to the system. Um the
[23:45]
coordination with the water to try to
[23:48]
maintain water quality at the
[23:49]
reservoirs. A little more information on
[23:52]
that. The balance we're trying to find
[23:53]
is keeping a good chlorine residual at
[23:56]
the reservoir without adding too high of
[23:59]
a chlorine residual at the first
[24:00]
customers. So, we're playing with
[24:03]
different dosing rates and different
[24:04]
kinds of dosing for that. Um, but it's
[24:07]
been a collaborative effort and I think
[24:08]
we're narrow in the meeting. So, we're
[24:10]
in a pretty good place.
[24:12]
Um,
[24:14]
the plant's in really good shape.
[24:16]
Everything with everything remained
[24:18]
within the permit throughout June.
[24:20]
Routine sampling continued to reflect a
[24:22]
pretty stable process with no compliance
[24:25]
issues observed. Um, if we can go to the
[24:29]
next thing, Mr. Chair, I want to just
[24:31]
give a summary of the wastewater
[24:33]
collection system maintenance and the
[24:36]
SLA assessment that was just done. The
[24:39]
first slide here is just a quick
[24:40]
reminder. So for this assessment
[24:43]
summary, we're just highlighting that we
[24:45]
use the CCTV equipment that's there on
[24:48]
the left. Obviously the Raptor picture
[24:50]
top right. And then maybe a little less
[24:52]
familiar is the SL rack. It's a sewer
[24:54]
line rapid assessment tool. It's two
[24:57]
pieces of equipment, a transmitter and a
[24:59]
receiver that sends an acoustic signal
[25:01]
through the mainline. And any
[25:03]
obstruction that obstructs that acoustic
[25:06]
signal will come back and you go from
[25:09]
manifold to manhole. And at the end of
[25:12]
the assessment, it provides a grade for
[25:14]
each each portion of the pipe that's
[25:17]
assessed.
[25:19]
>> Now, if the pipe is settled,
[25:22]
does it tell you exactly where that is?
[25:24]
Will this tell you exactly? It just
[25:26]
tells you there is an obstruction.
[25:28]
>> Yeah.
[25:29]
>> But it could be a settled pipe, right?
[25:31]
>> Exactly. So for a belly in a pipe where
[25:33]
the pipe's holding water, that will
[25:35]
register as an obstruction, but it won't
[25:38]
give us a distance within the run.
[25:39]
>> But then you can send the camera down.
[25:42]
>> So just an overview. So we've been doing
[25:45]
this for over 10 years now. Um
[25:48]
historically 70 to 90% of our system
[25:51]
comes back with a good healthy grade.
[25:54]
There's 10 to 30% that require some
[25:57]
additional cleaning then 10% will
[26:00]
require some additional investigation
[26:02]
with the CCTV equipment and then less
[26:04]
than 1% of our system right now require
[26:07]
some engineering study and that could be
[26:10]
um a line with a significant belly could
[26:13]
be a line that's got some cracks
[26:15]
things like that. So
[26:18]
next, so just a 30,000 foot view.
[26:23]
This is just the area of operations.
[26:26]
This is everything that we've assessed
[26:29]
throughout the entirety of our
[26:32]
partnership with SLA. Everything in
[26:34]
orange is stuff that we've done.
[26:37]
Everything that's green, yellow, or red
[26:39]
in that main fur
[26:42]
is stuff that we've assessed again this
[26:44]
year. So after a years of assessing the
[26:47]
west side of town. We know that there's
[26:50]
a lot of roots there. We know that
[26:52]
there's a lot of drop manholes there.
[26:54]
Anything north of 35th and west of
[26:58]
8,400, that's more of a area that we
[27:01]
know historically requires routine
[27:03]
maintenance. So, we don't assess that
[27:05]
acoustically anymore. That just gets hit
[27:08]
every year with a vac flush truck and
[27:10]
gets inspected every year with CCTV. On
[27:13]
the right, north quadrant of town,
[27:15]
that's
[27:16]
more industrial areas or the trunk
[27:18]
lines. Those trunk lines have so much
[27:20]
flow that it interferes with the
[27:22]
acoustics. So we use the acoustic
[27:25]
assessment initially to map all the
[27:27]
lines and that way we can get input into
[27:29]
our database but we don't assess every pipe every year. Um we focus most
[27:36]
of our time between 8,000 and 72 and
[27:39]
then from 41 down to 2100. So, next,
[27:44]
>> uh, Dallas, you were talking about
[27:46]
possibly
[27:47]
something that measures the flow in the
[27:49]
pipe. Did we ever look into that? I
[27:52]
thought it was like $8,000 to where the
[27:55]
machine measures water going into this
[27:58]
manhole, water passing this manhole, and
[28:00]
you could tell by the flow. Essentially,
[28:03]
that's you're you're right. That's
[28:05]
essentially what we were looking at. The
[28:08]
equipment, to your point, was really
[28:10]
expensive. Um, and then it didn't give
[28:12]
you a a true gallons per minute or
[28:15]
gallons per day flow rate. What it did
[28:17]
was it measured the flow in the pipe.
[28:20]
So, if a 12in pipe is running 8 in deep,
[28:24]
it can extrapolate a flow rate based on
[28:26]
that depth. Um, and we were trying to
[28:29]
decide at that point, you know, how much
[28:31]
of our flow was coming from the west
[28:33]
side of town, how much of the flow is
[28:35]
coming from the east side of town. that
[28:36]
was the attack equipment to try to
[28:38]
better understand where flows are coming
[28:40]
from. Um, since then we did do a we did
[28:44]
do a three month demo with that
[28:46]
equipment to try to better understand
[28:48]
some of the stuff. Um, with the new infl
[28:50]
pump station that's going on plant, now
[28:53]
we've got individualized flow meters for
[28:56]
the trunk line that's coming from the
[28:57]
west side of town and the trunk plant
[28:59]
that's coming from the east side of
[29:00]
town. So now we know exactly what flows
[29:03]
are coming from which parts of town. So
[29:05]
maybe it's a little premature because
[29:06]
once we put the 8,000 west under 2011,
[29:11]
that should really help a lot, right?
[29:13]
For the load.
[29:14]
>> Yeah, it should. And that was kind of
[29:16]
the intent behind some of these capital
[29:18]
building projects. So
[29:20]
what
[29:21]
>> we just didn't know we'd hit a fiber
[29:23]
lot.
[29:24]
>> Right. Right. What we're showing here,
[29:26]
Mr. Chairman and board, is exactly what
[29:28]
was assessed this year. Um the
[29:30]
assessment just completed. So neat thing
[29:33]
for me is they create this dashboard.
[29:35]
And you can see it's pretty intuitive.
[29:37]
If the line comes back green, that means
[29:40]
it's good. If the line comes back
[29:42]
yellow, that means it's about medium.
[29:44]
And then if the line comes back red,
[29:46]
then we can we can alert and we send the
[29:49]
crews out right away to investigate. So
[29:52]
if you think about the color system on a
[29:54]
scale of 1 to 10, you know, 7 to 10 will
[29:57]
come back green. Anything from about 5
[30:00]
to seven would be yellow. and anything
[30:02]
less than five would come back red. Four
[30:04]
or five would come back red.
[30:06]
[clears throat] That's kind of how we
[30:07]
target our targeted cleaning. Next,
[30:12]
then at the end of the assessment, I get
[30:15]
onto the dashboard and I can filter the
[30:18]
results of every assessment and I
[30:21]
immediately go to anything that came
[30:22]
back at four or less. And those red
[30:25]
lines you see on the map now are
[30:27]
sections of the pipes that came back
[30:29]
four or less. And so we send the guys
[30:32]
out and we hit all these things, we
[30:34]
would just consider those the required
[30:36]
maintenance or the hot spots from the
[30:37]
assessment. Um so that's a neat tool,
[30:40]
right? Typically when we're when we're
[30:43]
starting the flushing of the system,
[30:44]
we'll start here at the office 9200 or
[30:47]
35th and we just work our way north and
[30:50]
east. Um with this equipment and this
[30:52]
technology, we're able to really target
[30:54]
our flushing to the areas that um
[30:58]
require the immediate service, right? It
[31:00]
takes us about 12 to 15 months to get
[31:02]
all the way through the system. With
[31:04]
this technology that we've implemented,
[31:06]
if we're on the other side of 72 or on
[31:09]
the west side of 8,400, we might not get
[31:12]
to these red sections for 6 to 8 months.
[31:15]
So, this gives us an opportunity to
[31:18]
address any issues right away. The
[31:20]
assessment takes about two weeks and
[31:22]
then we get a overview of the entire
[31:24]
system. So,
[31:25]
>> what would be the major part of the
[31:26]
reds? Would they be defective pipe?
[31:31]
It could it could be the bellies. It
[31:32]
could be the roots. It could be a little
[31:34]
bit of TP and rag build up in some of
[31:36]
the manholes. It could be a drop
[31:38]
manhole. We tried to isolate anything
[31:40]
that would cause an audible interference
[31:42]
with the acoustics and not assess those.
[31:45]
Um sometimes based on the mapping,
[31:47]
nothing's perfect. You might put um the
[31:51]
transmitter into a dead end manhole. So
[31:53]
it's shooting it's it's shooting to a
[31:55]
run that's not there. So it could come
[31:57]
back with a red. Um, and that's part of
[32:00]
the process. We try to eliminate any of
[32:01]
those options. Um, and really try to
[32:04]
battle in this map. So,
[32:05]
>> do we need to send out any letters about
[32:08]
what they can and can't put down the
[32:10]
sewer?
[32:11]
>> Because
[32:12]
>> we we have we certainly can. Again,
[32:15]
>> you said wipes are flushable, but
[32:17]
>> they cause pipe buildup.
[32:19]
>> Yeah.
[32:20]
>> As the police department found out on
[32:22]
Main Street.
[32:23]
>> Yeah.
[32:25]
Clint's point, we send out quite a bit
[32:27]
of messaging. There's no flushable
[32:30]
wipes. [snorts]
[32:31]
They're just all hazard. They're just
[32:33]
all liability. So, um, last slide here
[32:37]
is just the summary. So,
[32:40]
um, you can see there the barraph
[32:43]
represents what parts of the system came
[32:45]
back
[32:46]
green, yellow, and red. So we assessed
[32:49]
in 2026 250,166
[32:53]
linear feet of sewer pipe of the
[32:57]
assessed footage only 38,750
[33:01]
came back as required immediate
[33:03]
attention. And then if you break that
[33:05]
down into a dollar per dollar per line
[33:09]
of foot if we were to assess or if we
[33:12]
were to maintain the entirety of that
[33:14]
250,000 ft based on man power and water
[33:18]
usage be about $125,000.
[33:21]
The targeted maintenance of the 38,000
[33:23]
ft that's an estimate to only cost
[33:26]
25,000.
[33:28]
So quite a bit of savings there, but it
[33:30]
also gives us the peace of mind that
[33:32]
we're we're getting the snapshot of the
[33:34]
entirety of the system rather than
[33:36]
having to work through it over a
[33:38]
calendar year.
[33:40]
And then on the last page, we've got a
[33:42]
couple new faces. Oh, excuse me. Um I
[33:46]
just wanted to put this together. This
[33:48]
is just a historical summary table. It
[33:50]
shows [clears throat] each year since
[33:53]
2021 when I took over how much feet
[33:58]
we've assessed and then how much has
[33:59]
been identified for cleaning. You can
[34:01]
see it fluctuates. Um we used to assess
[34:04]
a lot more. Part of that is the new
[34:06]
developments. We get them off mapping
[34:08]
through these assessments. Um some some
[34:12]
part of that was the learning curve.
[34:14]
Hey, we don't need to assess 8400 on the
[34:16]
west side of all groups. We just know
[34:18]
that requires significant maintenance.
[34:22]
And then that center it just says each
[34:24]
annual assessment how much was
[34:26]
identified for cleaning and then the
[34:28]
percentage of the system that required
[34:30]
cleaning on that far right. If you're
[34:32]
looking at the data table 2025 was a bit
[34:36]
of an outlier. Um there was some
[34:38]
equipment issues and
[34:41]
the contractor had some issues. We ended
[34:43]
up meeting in the middle on a discounted
[34:46]
price. That's a little bit of an
[34:48]
outlier.
[34:49]
2026 you can see
[34:51]
back to a good trajectory. So
[34:55]
the observations just since we've been
[34:58]
doing this almost 2 million feet linear
[35:01]
feet of sew has been assessed. Um
[35:06]
2026 assessment identify less needs in
[35:09]
the 2025 indicating good improvement
[35:11]
year over year and then the long-term
[35:14]
assessment data continues to validate
[35:16]
our targeted data driven maintenance
[35:18]
strategy allowing maintenance resources
[35:20]
to be focused where they provide the
[35:22]
greatest benefit while improving overall
[35:24]
efficiency of the collection system.
[35:28]
And the last thing I would add Mr.
[35:30]
We've got a couple new faces on the
[35:32]
collections crew. So, I just wanted to
[35:34]
recognize those guys. This is the 2026
[35:37]
National Water District wastewater
[35:39]
collection system.
[35:40]
>> They all got door classes. I need to see
[35:42]
[laughter]
[35:45]
» you should have the updated list.
[35:47]
>> Yeah,
[35:48]
>> you got the updated list.
[35:49]
>> I think I did.
[35:50]
>> I think so.
[35:51]
>> Yeah. And I can call him out. Just
[35:53]
starting on the right is our is our
[35:54]
newest guy, Cameron Peterson. And we've
[35:57]
got Mark Maziner. He's about two or guy
[36:00]
along with Clint in the middle he's a
[36:02]
two or three year guy and then Clint
[36:05]
supervisor you guys all
[36:08]
he's a fiveyear guy last
[36:13]
» and that's all I got for
[36:16]
>> thank you
[36:23]
» okay let's moving on lay your report
[36:26]
>> thank you Mr. chair and board. Um so
[36:29]
just a check up on our compliance
[36:32]
requirements. Um after the board meeting
[36:34]
last month after the uh audit report was
[36:37]
approved, we filed with the state
[36:39]
auditor's [cough] office. So that was
[36:41]
submitted and the certification was
[36:43]
submitted. We haven't heard back. So I'm
[36:44]
assuming there's no problems. Um coming
[36:48]
up, oh first of all, I guess blue is
[36:50]
completed and yellow is coming up. uh
[36:54]
quarterly budget to actual reports will
[36:56]
be provided to the board of trustees for
[36:59]
second quarter next month.
[37:01]
Um
[37:03]
the
[37:05]
transparency website, the second quarter
[37:07]
is due July 31st. So we're working on
[37:09]
that [clears throat] now. There's a
[37:11]
semianual report to the state money
[37:13]
management council that's due at by the
[37:15]
end of this month that was filed this
[37:17]
morning.
[37:19]
Um and then the quarter payroll reports
[37:21]
are due at the end of this month also.
[37:23]
We're working on those. Now, the as
[37:27]
Clint indicated in the manager's report,
[37:29]
the CCR report has [laughter] been
[37:31]
submitted and sent out to the residents
[37:35]
or customers.
[37:37]
Uh, Hansen Loose is working on our risk
[37:40]
management plan. Is that right? I think
[37:42]
that's right. Okay. Sorry. [laughter]
[37:44]
And then the water conservation plan.
[37:46]
Um, Tai's been working on that. He
[37:49]
submitted a draft to the state on the
[37:52]
15th and then I believe that the final
[37:55]
draft has to be to them by December
[37:57]
31st.
[37:59]
>> Great.
[38:00]
Um and that's as Tai indicated also that
[38:05]
um Bowen Collins is working on our rate
[38:08]
structures. So and that is all I have to
[38:11]
report unless you have any questions.
[38:13]
>> Any question?
[38:14]
>> No.
[38:16]
>> Okay. Thank you Leah.
[38:17]
>> Thank you. Let's move on to our HR
[38:19]
report.
[38:19]
>> Thank you, board chair. Uh, as Clint
[38:22]
indicated, we are currently still fully
[38:25]
staffed.
[38:27]
Uh, some of the trainings that we were
[38:29]
able to accomplish this last month is we
[38:32]
had a Cassell work order training. Le
[38:34]
presented to all the employees. Um,
[38:37]
a new process in doing work orders for
[38:42]
maintenance facilities.
[38:45]
Um, we did a chlorine training tour at
[38:48]
Thatcher Chemical with all of the people
[38:51]
that come in contact with chlorine. I
[38:53]
thought it was uh well put together by
[38:55]
Thatcher and it went well. Um, we did a
[38:59]
excavation safety and trenching training
[39:02]
on the 24th that uh Chris Tai Jean
[39:07]
Dawson, Mark and Quinn attended. We did
[39:09]
an on-site confined space training. had
[39:11]
a company come in uh show us some of
[39:14]
their stuff. Went over our gas monitors
[39:17]
and also did some confined space
[39:19]
training. Um upcoming we've got our
[39:21]
cyber security training this month.
[39:23]
That's a required training. Um we've got
[39:26]
some of our new employees getting their
[39:28]
flagger certification at the end of the
[39:29]
month and we are getting geared up for
[39:31]
some of our more senior employees to do
[39:33]
their traffic control supervisor. This
[39:35]
month we're focusing on hand and power
[39:38]
tools as our safety focus. Uh and then
[39:42]
conferences that are coming up just so
[39:43]
the board are aware of them. Um one
[39:46]
we've got AW conference coming up in
[39:48]
September in Logan. Um as of right now
[39:52]
we don't have anybody to put forward to
[39:55]
say that they're wanting to go but we'll
[39:56]
come with that probably next month if
[39:58]
there are some. Um the UASD annual
[40:01]
convention that the board attends is
[40:03]
coming up sooner than we think. November
[40:07]
4th through the 6th. I believe you guys
[40:09]
would be attending on the 5th. Um that's
[40:12]
in Leighton. And then that same week is
[40:14]
the WEAU
[40:17]
uh midyear conference here locally at
[40:19]
West Valley.
[40:20]
>> Where will that be in West Valley?
[40:22]
>> It's at the cultural center.
[40:23]
>> Oh, okay.
[40:25]
>> Um usually Dallas and Bo attend that. Uh
[40:29]
and then the Fourth of July parade, I
[40:32]
that that was that went really well.
[40:33]
From all reports, it's the best parade
[40:35]
that everybody's ever been a part of
[40:38]
there. um was bigger than ever, went
[40:41]
smooth. Um we're really happy with the
[40:45]
uh relationship that we've got with the
[40:48]
city on that. And we've got some
[40:49]
pictures here from from the parade. Uh
[40:52]
we had Ty and uh Cameron walking and we
[40:57]
also had Gavin Henshaw there helping out
[40:59]
with driving the truck. Um, we, this was
[41:02]
the banner that we put together, uh,
[41:06]
trying to remind everybody to conserve.
[41:09]
So, it says, "Securing tomorrow's water
[41:12]
today, conserve, diversify, and reuse."
[41:15]
Um,
[41:17]
I think it was a overall good
[41:19]
experience. So, that's it for me,
[41:21]
chairman.
[41:21]
>> And we as a city and me as the mayor, I
[41:23]
want to thank you guys for participating
[41:25]
[clears throat]
[41:25]
and being involved. Next time, bring
[41:27]
more candy. [laughter]
[41:29]
I think
[41:30]
>> we went we went through we we on the
[41:33]
float went through 13 boxes.
[41:36]
>> So, we've upped the candy each year. I
[41:38]
think the first year that I did it, we
[41:39]
bought eight bags. We went to 10. This
[41:42]
year we did 12 and
[41:46]
I think with how you're growing that
[41:48]
parade,
[41:49]
>> maybe that's what it is. We just can't
[41:50]
get ahead.
[41:51]
>> We can't get ahead of it. We had
[41:53]
>> Stop telling people to come. [laughter]
[41:55]
>> We had probably 10 to 11,000 people
[41:57]
there.
[41:58]
>> Wow. And um we had 85 entries. We had um
[42:03]
seven seven floats. I sit on a I sit on
[42:07]
a group with all the mayors.
[42:09]
>> Mhm.
[42:09]
>> And so we kind of share things about our city. And I I
[42:15]
started this deal about, hey, you bring
[42:16]
your float to ours. Prayed we'll take
[42:19]
our float to yours. And so it all worked
[42:21]
out good. Um next year we'll have West
[42:23]
Jordan and uh Riverton coming to ours.
[42:27]
And uh
[42:28]
>> we've got a big one on next Friday.
[42:31]
Nathan, are you riding on the float
[42:33]
>> for the 24th?
[42:35]
>> No. Where's that? [laughter]
[42:37]
>> Downtown the days of 47.
[42:39]
>> I'm going to be in that.
[42:40]
>> I'm I'm debating just to send the float
[42:42]
down.
[42:44]
>> I'm going to be at 10.
[42:45]
>> I know.
[42:46]
>> But yeah, it was awesome.
[42:48]
>> Thank you guys. And it went really well.
[42:51]
And like I said, they said that's the
[42:52]
best float in 40 years.
[42:54]
>> Nice. I I've heard nothing but shining
[42:58]
responses about it.
[42:59]
>> So, it's nice to hear positive and
[43:02]
>> isn't it? [laughter]
[43:03]
>> So, but yeah, thank you you guys.
[43:08]
» That's all you have.
[43:09]
>> That's all I have. Thank you.
[43:10]
>> Okay, let's move on to water sewer
[43:12]
availability. Ty, I'm going let you take
[43:15]
the lead.
[43:16]
>> Thank you, chairman of the board.
[43:19]
So, today we have two developments we
[43:21]
discussed. Um they're wanting approval
[43:24]
for
[43:28]
First we'll start off with PC.
[43:31]
Now this one
[43:41]
is located at 244
[43:44]
and Caroline Drive city.
[43:47]
Uh it takes up two lots along there and
[43:50]
I can show you on GIS.
[43:53]
Right
[43:56]
here.
[44:00]
» What west is that? Dy,
[44:02]
>> what is that?
[44:04]
>> West
[44:06]
got to be 5700.
[44:08]
>> Just right off 2011.
[44:10]
>> Right.
[44:10]
behind the building.
[44:14]
>> Oh, okay.
[44:18]
» All these different names
[44:21]
right here. I thought it was a swamp.
[44:24]
>> With that,
[44:27]
we determined that there's something
[44:29]
here that can supply that water. We have
[44:31]
a 16in water line along Caroline, which
[44:35]
is just east of the development.
[44:38]
We also have a 12in main located
[44:43]
just,
[44:47]
it doesn't show on the JS, but we do
[44:49]
have a 12 in secondary one that's
[44:55]
So they won't need to install that time.
[44:58]
So with our recommendation, we recommend
[45:00]
that they connect to the existing 16in
[45:03]
line there
[45:09]
and they provide and service to the
[45:13]
current.
[45:17]
» What will that what will that area be
[45:18]
used for? Um, so I don't know. There's
[45:22]
going to be two buildings built. Um, PC
[45:25]
Holdings and WB7
[45:30]
those are two companies.
[45:31]
>> How much water usage will they have?
[45:34]
>> It won't have an extraordinary amount.
[45:37]
>> Maybe just bathrooms and warehouse.
[45:40]
>> Yeah.
[45:43]
» Okay.
[45:47]
And after analyzing that with firefl
[45:58]
what we see happen a lot with these over
[46:00]
there is they have just the the building
[46:04]
box. They don't tell us a lot of times
[46:06]
what the final use will be on this step
[46:10]
unless it's obviously a high water user.
[46:13]
We
[46:13]
>> Yeah, like a bottling company or
[46:15]
something like that.
[46:15]
>> But but what we do see is we get another
[46:18]
step of approval when they come and the
[46:21]
tenant improvement comes in. They have
[46:24]
to contact us again to get another
[46:26]
approval.
[46:26]
>> So they're not applying here. They just
[46:29]
want water sewer availability. But when
[46:31]
do they determine how big of a meter
[46:33]
they need and stuff?
[46:34]
>> Um, they do do that.
[46:36]
>> Yeah, they we'll work through that with
[46:38]
them. So that's how one of the reasons
[46:41]
we get an indication is size of services
[46:44]
that they need.
[46:52]
» Okay. Well, Mr. Chairman, I'd like to
[46:55]
make a motion to approve uh water and
[46:57]
solid sewer availability to PC Holdings
[47:01]
WV-7
[47:06]
on Anakarine Drive, West LA City.
[47:09]
>> I'll second that.
[47:10]
>> Motion second. All in favor? I
[47:12]
>> I
[47:13]
>> Okay, Ty.
[47:25]
So this one is located on
[47:29]
279 south.
[47:34]
» Yeah.
[47:38]
» It's right behind all a dollar. Right.
[47:41]
>> Sorry.
[47:42]
>> All right behind all a dollar.
[47:44]
>> On 84.
[47:45]
>> Mhm. Okay.
[47:46]
>> So it's just this lot right here. 2790.
[47:50]
Finally, they're going to get rid of the
[47:52]
weeds.
[47:53]
>> Yeah, no kidding.
[47:54]
>> Next to Duck
[47:55]
>> Quickquack.
[47:58]
>> Well, so from what we determined, we
[48:01]
found that there are existing services
[48:05]
in that property.
[48:07]
>> There will be two buildings though. For
[48:09]
the water, we have a 1 in service that's
[48:12]
located in the southwest corner. If you
[48:14]
look right here, that's where we have
[48:17]
that.
[48:19]
that's uninstalled and everything, but
[48:21]
it's not tied in. So, they would have to
[48:23]
go in and tie that line through one of
[48:25]
the buildings.
[48:27]
Um, and then with the other building, we
[48:30]
recommend that they have to attach along
[48:33]
the 8 in line.
[48:37]
Um with sewer there is a gated chain
[48:41]
that's currently going through the
[48:42]
building on it west side there. Um with
[48:47]
that there is also a 4 in cap off um
[48:52]
sewer there that was placed there
[48:57]
that would have to be located. I believe
[48:59]
it is by the southwest as well on the
[49:03]
property.
[49:07]
use that for the building, but we would
[49:09]
also recommend them also attaching
[49:11]
service lateral into the building as
[49:15]
well.
[49:18]
For the second water, there is an
[49:21]
secondary water line that goes along
[49:26]
and so they just have to tie in there
[49:29]
also is an existing service there.
[49:35]
Now, Ty, that on the west side, they're
[49:37]
showing a green line there. Is that in
[49:39]
an easement right away?
[49:41]
>> Yes.
[49:41]
>> In the property.
[49:44]
>> Okay.
[49:47]
» And that show you guys
[49:55]
and yeah, it would just be one lot, two
[49:57]
buildings
[50:01]
of it. and they're seeking approval for
[50:04]
those items.
[50:05]
>> Okay. Mr. Chairman, I'd like to make a
[50:07]
motion to uh approve water and sewer
[50:10]
availability to the back plaza 2 located
[50:13]
at 2790 South 8400 West.
[50:16]
>> I'll second that.
[50:17]
>> It's been a motion and second. All in
[50:18]
favor?
[50:19]
>> I
[50:21]
Okay, let's move on to the project
[50:24]
awards and agreements. Um Clint,
[50:28]
>> thanks, Mr. Chairman. I'm going to take
[50:30]
these first two for Trevor. Um, we've
[50:33]
been working with Bone Collins on that
[50:36]
master planning, impact fee, and rate
[50:38]
study. If you'll remember, we've
[50:40]
completed the master planning and the
[50:41]
impact fee portion. They've made
[50:43]
substantial progress on the rate study,
[50:46]
but we've got a task hit order here for
[50:49]
an amendment because we did have some
[50:53]
legislation come through that with
[50:56]
regards to rate structures including
[50:59]
analyzing a conservationbased tier
[51:02]
um that's reflected in this amendment.
[51:05]
And then we also have asked them to do
[51:08]
some more rate modeling
[51:10]
>> and give us some more impact on how
[51:15]
different rate options would impact the
[51:18]
community because
[51:21]
each way we approach rates has a varied
[51:25]
impact. Some people benefit
[51:28]
and some people lose when you change
[51:31]
rate tiers. Right.
[51:33]
>> I've had some complaint about that.
[51:34]
Yeah,
[51:35]
>> but I told them if you're trying to
[51:37]
conserve,
[51:38]
>> you know, you need to check your water
[51:40]
usage. It's not the water company's
[51:42]
fault,
[51:43]
>> right?
[51:43]
>> You're you've gone to another tier. You
[51:45]
need to look at that and see if there's
[51:46]
any way you can drop back down,
[51:48]
>> right? And so the the challenge is is we
[51:51]
want to be able to serve the people that
[51:55]
use a like a low amount of water.
[51:59]
Right now, they've got to pay that
[52:01]
minimum, right? 6,000.
[52:04]
We would like to see if we can remove
[52:06]
that minimum so that they can pay less
[52:08]
water.
[52:10]
>> But if we do that, that benefits them.
[52:13]
But then it has to put the burden of all
[52:15]
that on others,
[52:17]
>> higher usage.
[52:18]
>> And so what we are trying to do is
[52:20]
understand how that would all work out
[52:22]
with different scenarios so that we can
[52:23]
then come to the board at that point and
[52:26]
say, "Okay, we've looked at these
[52:28]
scenarios. What would the board like to
[52:30]
see? here's our recommendation and that
[52:33]
type. So, we'd like to be able to do a
[52:36]
little bit more of that modeling than we
[52:39]
have normally historically done because
[52:42]
this is the direction it's heading at a
[52:44]
lot of districts. It's getting more
[52:48]
geared towards the tiers are tightening.
[52:52]
There's getting more tiers.
[52:55]
We're they're trying to get the cost of
[52:57]
water dialed down as best they can for
[52:59]
everybody, but ultimately I think the
[53:03]
more you use, the more you're going to
[53:05]
pay, you know.
[53:06]
>> Well, I think if we could get the city
[53:08]
to code enforcement to jump on these
[53:11]
people that not watering at all.
[53:12]
>> And if we do the thing to minimize that,
[53:15]
Yeah.
[53:15]
>> I I think that will help.
[53:18]
>> So, Nathan, I got a question with you on
[53:19]
that. Um,
[53:22]
can we as a city make them water?
[53:25]
So, there have been Yeah, I mean, you
[53:28]
have to maintain your your yard,
[53:30]
>> right? Right.
[53:30]
>> And I think we already have provisions
[53:32]
that that require that. It sounds like
[53:34]
there was some confusion with
[53:36]
>> because for instance, I've just go off
[53:38]
of the slow flow watering guide, which I
[53:41]
think now is like two or three waterings
[53:43]
per week depending on your on the type
[53:46]
of landscaping you have. So, I think we
[53:49]
can I I if we don't already have it in
[53:51]
there, we can. Um, so yeah, that's, you
[53:55]
know, maintaining your lawn, making sure
[53:56]
you don't have weeds that grow, that
[53:58]
sort of thing. But I know that there has
[53:59]
been some legislation recently where the
[54:01]
what the legislature has said is there
[54:03]
used to be cities that would prohibit
[54:04]
like zeroscaping and water-wise
[54:07]
landscaping. And so the legislature
[54:09]
said, "No, you have to allow people to
[54:11]
put in water-wise landscaping." And so,
[54:14]
but the the challenge is some people
[54:16]
will say, "Well, this is water wise."
[54:17]
>> Yeah. [laughter]
[54:19]
>> It's not that don't fly.
[54:20]
>> Um,
[54:21]
>> so I think we already have provisions in
[54:23]
there already.
[54:24]
>> Right. Right. But
[54:25]
>> I think so, too. I don't think you're
[54:26]
allowed to have weeds. It has,
[54:28]
>> but I think what people are confused on
[54:29]
is like,
[54:32]
>> you know, how many days a week? I mean,
[54:34]
they've asked me and I've told them two
[54:36]
to three days,
[54:37]
>> I think. So,
[54:38]
>> Danny's said seven days a week, but
[54:42]
yeah. Well, that's but two or three two
[54:45]
even two is better than zero or
[54:47]
something.
[54:49]
I think
[54:50]
>> I will say that when you're in over 100
[54:52]
degrees to to two days a week is pushing
[54:54]
the limits, you know, right?
[54:56]
>> Yeah. If that goes on very long,
[54:58]
>> it's
[54:59]
>> you can handle it for a week. But if
[55:01]
that prolongs at those high
[55:03]
temperatures, you're you can't get by
[55:05]
with two days.
[55:05]
>> Nope, you can't.
[55:06]
>> Well, if if if we can reduce that rate
[55:08]
on the low end, I think people will try
[55:11]
to do that. One of the things too, it
[55:13]
becomes a fire issue because they let
[55:15]
the weeds, they let the grass all dry
[55:16]
out and goes brown. Yeah.
[55:17]
>> Starts fires.
[55:19]
>> Well, the the problem is if we hold them
[55:21]
to task, some people don't even bother
[55:23]
to see that they're wasting water,
[55:26]
>> you know? And if they they water at
[55:28]
night when it's cooler, they don't waste
[55:30]
water,
[55:30]
>> right?
[55:31]
>> Or early in the morning. And I think and they check and make sure the
[55:37]
system's working and not just spraying
[55:39]
>> go a little deeper. You know,
[55:41]
>> I've talked to a lot of people just
[55:42]
checking their wa their toilet tank, see
[55:44]
if it's running over and nine times out
[55:47]
of ten that's the problem.
[55:49]
>> Yeah.
[55:49]
I mean, there's a a lot of this is
[55:51]
really dealt with through education,
[55:53]
right? And and so and part of it is this
[55:57]
is I think there might be some confusion
[55:59]
about what they're hearing from other
[56:00]
water providers. I mean, most people
[56:02]
don't even necessarily know where they
[56:03]
are.
[56:04]
>> It's a challenging time.
[56:05]
>> Yeah. Yeah. And so I think my
[56:08]
recommendation would be you might might
[56:10]
want to either work with the city or do
[56:12]
some ed outreach on your own to educate
[56:15]
people about
[56:15]
>> thinking about that. Maybe we need to do
[56:17]
an education.
[56:18]
>> Yeah. Because it's
[56:19]
>> with the city and the water district.
[56:20]
>> I I will say this. I mean code
[56:23]
enforcement and mayor you and I it's a
[56:25]
lose-lose. Wherever you set the needle
[56:27]
on code enforcement, somebody's going to
[56:28]
be happy. If if you go on the full bore
[56:31]
enforcement, people are going to be mad.
[56:32]
If you don't enforce enough, people are
[56:34]
going to be mad. So, what's usually more
[56:36]
effective and quicker is educating
[56:39]
people because most people that are in a
[56:41]
code enforcement situation, there's a
[56:43]
reason why and it's not usually
[56:44]
something you can easily fix. Um, but
[56:47]
most people it's just, oh, I just need
[56:48]
to have information. You know, I don't
[56:50]
think most people know when to water. I
[56:52]
don't think that they're paying
[56:53]
attention. Most people, they just want
[56:54]
to set it and forget it. And and the
[56:56]
problem with a situation like we have
[56:58]
now, it's really dry year, hot
[57:00]
temperatures. You know, I check that,
[57:02]
you know, slow the flow guide every week
[57:05]
to see where I need to set it. Um, so I
[57:09]
think you'll get more bang for your buck
[57:10]
education wise in terms of getting
[57:12]
people to do what you want than you will
[57:14]
by code enforcement. Not to say that you
[57:17]
shouldn't do code enforcement, but code
[57:19]
enforcement is a legal process. There's
[57:20]
due process, you know, there's there's
[57:22]
[clears throat] people have to have a
[57:25]
certain amount of notice. Incidentally,
[57:26]
it's not 30 days in the code. I don't
[57:28]
know who told you that.
[57:29]
>> It's 15. It's always been that way. Um,
[57:32]
we can talk about that offline, but I
[57:34]
think that's just a policy practice
[57:36]
call.
[57:36]
>> Um, but you know, by the time you could
[57:40]
just inform somebody and have them fix
[57:42]
it that day, whereas if you have to
[57:43]
force them to do it, it's a whole big
[57:46]
long process that could take the whole
[57:47]
summer.
[57:48]
>> Oh, wow. because you know we have to
[57:49]
give them a notice with a certain amount
[57:50]
of time to comply. They have a legal
[57:52]
right to appeal that notice a lot do and
[57:54]
then it takes time to get it before the
[57:56]
ALJ. I mean it it just
[57:58]
>> the process
[57:59]
>> it's a process
[58:01]
>> and it's a legal process and a lot of
[58:03]
it's mandated by state law. We don't
[58:04]
have any ability to control
[58:05]
>> and it costs more money than education.
[58:08]
>> Yeah. And most people are
[58:09]
well-intentioned. Most people care. They
[58:11]
want to do what's right.
[58:13]
We are we are finding I think there's
[58:15]
some sentiment too if we push that
[58:18]
message too hard. People are feeling
[58:20]
like well it's all of the burdens
[58:24]
getting put on to us and what about all
[58:26]
these data centers and what about all of
[58:29]
the
[58:30]
>> down
[58:31]
>> what about the bigger? So we try to find
[58:34]
a balance where we're not pounding them
[58:37]
all the time with you know here you have
[58:41]
to do this or you should do this. So
[58:43]
it's I think there is a balance. We try
[58:46]
to find that needle but certainly more
[58:48]
education the better I think in general.
[58:50]
>> Well we'll educate we'll let the city
[58:52]
>> Yeah. code enforce
[58:54]
>> they be the bad guy. [laughter]
[58:58]
>> Yep. But uh
[58:59]
>> well the district doesn't really have
[59:00]
code enforcement authority anyway.
[59:04]
>> So um as far as the rate study that's
[59:09]
coming in here
[59:10]
>> would like to be able to finish that up
[59:12]
by like Tai said by the end of the year
[59:15]
>> and so we'd recommend this task order
[59:18]
for approval unless the board has any
[59:21]
objections.
[59:23]
>> I'm good.
[59:29]
Make a motion on number one.
[59:32]
>> Mr. [clears throat] Chairman, I make a
[59:33]
motion for Bowen and Collins associate
[59:36]
amendment task order 24-2
[59:39]
for master plan impact fee and study
[59:41]
amount of $15,814.
[59:44]
>> Second motion second. All in favor?
[59:47]
>> Okay, Clint.
[59:48]
>> Okay. The next uh task order is um for
[59:52]
the bidding period and construction
[59:54]
management services for the garden
[59:57]
project with our Bon and Collins as our
[1:00:00]
consultant. Um there is some additional
[1:00:03]
signage that we've asked them to design.
[1:00:06]
Um it would be more like central
[1:00:10]
stations, some bigger signs, not just
[1:00:12]
the individual,
[1:00:14]
>> not the little teeny ones,
[1:00:15]
>> teeny ones. This would be some bigger
[1:00:17]
signage. um that would give some more
[1:00:21]
information and have six spots where
[1:00:23]
people could stop. So, you'd have the
[1:00:25]
main big sign at the back of this
[1:00:29]
concrete signage that would give them
[1:00:32]
the overview and then we would have
[1:00:34]
these stops along the way. And that's
[1:00:36]
what this portion would be um to really
[1:00:39]
flesh those out.
[1:00:40]
>> So, we plan to do the design in a CAD so
[1:00:44]
they so people bidding it just have to
[1:00:46]
download it. Okay.
[1:00:48]
>> Yep.
[1:00:48]
>> That saves a lot of money.
[1:00:51]
>> Okay. So, Mr. Chairman, like to make a
[1:00:54]
motion [clears throat]
[1:00:55]
for Bona Collins, associate scope and
[1:00:57]
fee for additional signage design,
[1:00:59]
bidding assistance, uh, construction
[1:01:02]
management services for the conversation
[1:01:06]
conservation garden project in amount
[1:01:09]
not to exceed $28,696.
[1:01:13]
>> I'll second that.
[1:01:14]
>> Motion second. All in favor? Hi Kate
[1:01:17]
Dallas.
[1:01:19]
So this is our annual dudes root control
[1:01:22]
program. Just a reminder, this is the
[1:01:25]
chemical that gets sprayed down the
[1:01:27]
collection system. It's a foam. It just
[1:01:30]
eats the roots that are attacking the
[1:01:32]
collection system. Uh we've been doing
[1:01:34]
this for over 10 years. They've been a
[1:01:37]
great partner.
[1:01:39]
2026 we're scheduled to do 9,646
[1:01:43]
linear feet and we just go from manhole
[1:01:46]
to manhole. One of the best things I
[1:01:48]
like about Duke is they offer a
[1:01:51]
threeyear warranty. So when they come
[1:01:53]
out to do this roughly 10,000 ft any
[1:01:57]
work that they've done in the previous
[1:01:58]
three years if it needs another shot
[1:02:00]
then they'll do all that included.
[1:02:02]
>> Oh.
[1:02:03]
>> So it's just been a great partnership.
[1:02:06]
If you will notice on the quote, it came
[1:02:08]
in just around 20,000. Um, what we're
[1:02:11]
asking for upon approval is not to
[1:02:14]
exceed 25,000. Inevitably, as we get in
[1:02:17]
there doing the maintenance, we always
[1:02:19]
find something that we hadn't seen at
[1:02:22]
the time the generator. So, we give
[1:02:24]
ourselves a little bit of a buffer to
[1:02:26]
get anything any
[1:02:31]
like this.
[1:02:33]
>> Are you okay with that?
[1:02:34]
>> Yes.
[1:02:35]
Okay, Mr. Chairman, like to make a
[1:02:37]
motion uh 2026 for Duke's annual
[1:02:40]
chemical root control the amount not to
[1:02:43]
exceed 25,000.
[1:02:44]
>> I'll second that.
[1:02:45]
>> Good motion. Second. All in favor?
[1:02:47]
>> I I
[1:02:49]
>> Andrew.
[1:02:51]
>> Yes. Thank you, board chair. Uh
[1:02:55]
we recently ran a fleet pricing estimate with Jerry
[1:03:04]
Siner LHM who had the state contract as
[1:03:08]
well as Ken Gar Ford who had a state
[1:03:10]
contract. Um some of the things to note
[1:03:14]
as we did this is we've had this current
[1:03:16]
fleet coming up on three years. So,
[1:03:18]
we're just about out of warranty. And
[1:03:20]
so, that kind of makes you start looking
[1:03:22]
at uh operational cost costs and
[1:03:25]
maintenance costs of what's going to
[1:03:27]
come as well as tire replacement and
[1:03:29]
things like that. Um, as you can see on
[1:03:32]
here, Jerry Siner came in significantly
[1:03:34]
cheaper than the state bid. Um, which is
[1:03:38]
pretty impressive. Um, when we spoke
[1:03:40]
with Ford, they did not have all the
[1:03:43]
options we needed. You know, that is so
[1:03:45]
funny with Ford because they used to be
[1:03:47]
where you couldn't they had the best
[1:03:49]
leasing and everything back in the day.
[1:03:51]
>> Yeah. They told me they went right away
[1:03:53]
from anything small with the fleet.
[1:03:57]
>> I said, "Okay, well, send me what you've
[1:03:59]
got."
[1:03:59]
>> Good.
[1:04:00]
>> Um, the other thing that we're looking
[1:04:03]
at possibly doing is converting some of
[1:04:05]
our half ton pickups to four Colorados.
[1:04:10]
um that as you can see that gives you
[1:04:11]
some cost savings of about $8,000 on the
[1:04:14]
purchase price, but you're also looking
[1:04:16]
at probably around uh 10 miles to the
[1:04:19]
gallon
[1:04:21]
increase with the Colorado for some of
[1:04:24]
our more heavy users that drive.
[1:04:27]
>> Where would the four Colorado go to?
[1:04:29]
>> Um the three meter guys that probably
[1:04:32]
are some of our bigger users on vehicle
[1:04:35]
usage. Okay. Okay. And and and a
[1:04:37]
Colorado uses more fuel than I have
[1:04:39]
>> and less fuel.
[1:04:40]
>> Oh yeah. Okay.
[1:04:41]
>> So I I think the Colorado you'd
[1:04:43]
experience about 25 miles to the gallon.
[1:04:46]
>> Oh yeah, that'd be good.
[1:04:48]
>> Um so that would be a big increase
[1:04:50]
there. Um
[1:04:52]
and then the other Colorado would go to
[1:04:54]
the wastewater treatment plant for the
[1:04:57]
lead. Uh they'd still have the half ton
[1:04:59]
to haul the pumps, but the lead would
[1:05:02]
move to a to a Colorado.
[1:05:04]
>> Okay. Um I I but while on this
[1:05:09]
discussion um if you'll look down to the next portion of that on the on
[1:05:15]
the fleet buyback just to give you a
[1:05:17]
full picture of what it would be um they
[1:05:21]
came out it didn't get put in I guess so
[1:05:24]
if you look at the um
[1:05:26]
>> agenda
[1:05:28]
>> you can pull up the agenda tie
[1:05:31]
[clears throat]
[1:05:32]
>> should have a button there that'll take
[1:05:33]
you straight back to agenda.
[1:05:34]
Oh, I see it. Number five.
[1:05:36]
>> Number five there. So, Jerry Siner came
[1:05:39]
and gave us a quote on purchasing our
[1:05:42]
fleet of $570,300.
[1:05:47]
That's a difference of $141,555
[1:05:52]
um from what the purchase price of the
[1:05:54]
new fleet would be. If you look at that,
[1:05:57]
that's basically a cost of this fleet
[1:06:00]
over the last 36 months of 3,932,
[1:06:05]
which breaks down to $231 per vehicle.
[1:06:08]
>> Wow, that's great.
[1:06:09]
>> Which you can't really beat. And so
[1:06:11]
>> what's our limitation for mine?
[1:06:14]
>> So
[1:06:15]
there isn't one. These it states a
[1:06:18]
lease, but it's more it's more of a
[1:06:19]
lease through Zans. It's a little
[1:06:22]
>> Oh.
[1:06:22]
>> set up. It's more of a purchase. Well,
[1:06:25]
it says based on mileage.
[1:06:26]
>> Oh, so the buy based on mileage is
[1:06:29]
>> if we if we
[1:06:32]
hold off for two months, right, we're
[1:06:34]
going to accumulate mileage and so the
[1:06:36]
buyback price is going to reflect any
[1:06:38]
mileage that we use between now and a
[1:06:41]
decision if that's where we go.
[1:06:43]
>> So, do we have any do we have any of our
[1:06:44]
vehicles over 36,000? Because I think
[1:06:47]
they come with 12,000 miles a year.
[1:06:49]
Yeah, there's I think two. One of the half tons is just over 36 and
[1:06:56]
one of the SUVs is around 40.
[1:07:00]
>> 40.
[1:07:02]
>> So now we're going to have to pay.
[1:07:03]
>> No. So it doesn't it's we're not we we
[1:07:06]
have no mileage limitation.
[1:07:07]
>> Oh, so they're not going to Okay, that's good then.
[1:07:10]
>> No, we have no mileage limitation.
[1:07:11]
>> Yeah. I I will just highlight we looked
[1:07:14]
at this was it a year and a half ago. We
[1:07:17]
l looked at the when the tariffs were
[1:07:19]
first getting going and
[1:07:20]
>> it just didn't make sense falling. It
[1:07:22]
didn't make sense.
[1:07:23]
>> But the only reason we hang on to stuff,
[1:07:25]
it's not available for the new stuff.
[1:07:27]
Right.
[1:07:27]
>> Well, I like I said, I think it didn't
[1:07:31]
make sense. Uh we actually didn't get
[1:07:34]
the values that we were wanting to get.
[1:07:39]
>> And this
[1:07:40]
I think like Andrew said, it's the
[1:07:43]
values are back. They're given more.
[1:07:45]
Yeah.
[1:07:46]
>> Again.
[1:07:47]
>> Yeah.
[1:07:47]
>> For what we
[1:07:48]
>> So, for instance, the purchase of the
[1:07:51]
new one tons is $52,000 and they're
[1:07:53]
offering $46,000 for the one tons.
[1:07:55]
>> Wow.
[1:07:56]
>> And that's the middle grade one too,
[1:07:58]
right? That's the middle grade of the
[1:08:00]
1500 series.
[1:08:01]
>> That's the LC's.
[1:08:02]
>> The LT. Yeah. Okay,
[1:08:03]
>> that's good.
[1:08:04]
>> So, first off, before we go any further,
[1:08:06]
I got to look over to the money person.
[1:08:09]
Can we do it?
[1:08:11]
I think if we set it up like we have in
[1:08:13]
the in the past, they've set up the
[1:08:17]
purchase agreement where if we were to
[1:08:20]
trade them in after 3 years, then it's a
[1:08:22]
lower payment,
[1:08:23]
>> right?
[1:08:24]
>> And then if we do decide to keep them,
[1:08:26]
then it goes higher. But
[1:08:28]
>> yeah, we should be okay if
[1:08:30]
>> Okay. Because I want to make
[1:08:31]
>> work it that way.
[1:08:32]
>> So make sure because you know me. So
[1:08:34]
currently,
[1:08:35]
>> yeah,
[1:08:35]
>> the the the buyback
[1:08:39]
>> puts us in the black on what we owe as
[1:08:41]
well.
[1:08:42]
>> Good.
[1:08:43]
>> Okay. So So
[1:08:45]
>> significantly.
[1:08:46]
>> So question for you. Um
[1:08:48]
>> so we're going to go back to four
[1:08:50]
equinox.
[1:08:51]
>> Yes.
[1:08:53]
>> Okay.
[1:08:54]
>> Chevy.
[1:08:55]
>> So So the question I have here, and I
[1:08:56]
I'm just going to be really upfront
[1:08:58]
about this. Have we went through and
[1:09:00]
analyzed? I mean, because I don't want
[1:09:01]
to see extra trucks. I don't want to see
[1:09:03]
people having an extra truck just
[1:09:05]
running around. I I you know what? I I'm
[1:09:08]
the mayor. Plus, I sit on this board.
[1:09:10]
You know, we pay a lot of money in in in
[1:09:12]
taxes here to the water district. I do
[1:09:15]
not want to see these. You know what? I can we consolidate any of these
[1:09:19]
vehicles and and I'm being really
[1:09:22]
upfront honest because I have had
[1:09:24]
complaints that I see the guys running
[1:09:27]
here and there. Of course, they don't
[1:09:28]
know why they're running here and there.
[1:09:30]
Right.
[1:09:30]
>> Uh but I'm just saying I see a lot of
[1:09:32]
the time guys with one truck and then I
[1:09:34]
see a lot of guys when they're all
[1:09:36]
ganged up in the service truck.
[1:09:39]
>> So I mean
[1:09:40]
>> Yes. And part of the reason why you're
[1:09:41]
seeing more people in the service truck
[1:09:42]
is we have consolidated the fleet and
[1:09:45]
our maintenance uh buildings maintenance
[1:09:48]
operator has taken one of the
[1:09:51]
construction vehicles and been operating
[1:09:53]
with been operating.
[1:09:54]
>> Hey, where's our GMC little truck at? I
[1:09:56]
don't see it out and about being
[1:09:58]
>> it gets used.
[1:09:59]
>> Is it okay because I don't see it out
[1:10:01]
anymore.
[1:10:01]
>> Ty Ty T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T drives it quite frequently. Um
[1:10:04]
the EDR plant will use it at times.
[1:10:07]
>> They've kind of switched to using the
[1:10:09]
other Chevy, the one.
[1:10:11]
>> One of the things I think it'd be really
[1:10:13]
smart to do is that big service truck,
[1:10:16]
you know, it went home all week on call
[1:10:18]
out to
[1:10:20]
I I think we need to be a little bit
[1:10:21]
more wiser. I mean, that takes a lot of
[1:10:23]
gas. We need to
[1:10:25]
>> we need to maybe switch. We need to be a
[1:10:27]
little
[1:10:27]
>> Have them take the Colorado on that
[1:10:29]
call.
[1:10:30]
>> Yeah.
[1:10:30]
>> Or an SUV.
[1:10:31]
>> Yeah.
[1:10:32]
>> But that does affect response time. I
[1:10:36]
mean, if they have all the It's
[1:10:37]
depending.
[1:10:38]
>> Yeah.
[1:10:39]
>> We could even have him take like Chris's
[1:10:41]
truck. Chris's truck would get a lot
[1:10:42]
better gas mileage. And it has
[1:10:45]
>> the majority of the tools that he could
[1:10:47]
respond to an emergency with.
[1:10:49]
>> Yeah. Especially if you got a service
[1:10:51]
truck out there that you don't have
[1:10:52]
nowhere to really have safety and you
[1:10:54]
know if the stuff gets stole off the bat
[1:10:55]
then what happens?
[1:10:57]
>> Yeah.
[1:10:57]
>> That comes with a hefty cost on us.
[1:10:59]
>> Yeah.
[1:11:00]
>> I think we need to be a little bit more
[1:11:02]
wiser on what we what we take home. And
[1:11:05]
when you say well they can respond
[1:11:07]
faster. I don't know if I buy into that.
[1:11:09]
But
[1:11:10]
>> hey Steve, you're going to design a
[1:11:11]
telescoping Yes.
[1:11:13]
>> main shut off valve out that'll fit in
[1:11:14]
less than an 8.
[1:11:16]
>> Yeah.
[1:11:17]
>> You already did. That's that's what he's
[1:11:20]
using in his. So,
[1:11:21]
>> but I just think we need to be a little
[1:11:22]
bit more smarter on what we send our
[1:11:26]
people home that's on call because at
[1:11:28]
the end of the day, it's bunch of gas.
[1:11:30]
>> It comes It all comes back on us.
[1:11:32]
>> Gas a lot cheaper than diesel for sure.
[1:11:34]
>> And uh
[1:11:35]
>> better.
[1:11:36]
>> But no, I mean, if we're if we're
[1:11:38]
watching what we're doing with these
[1:11:40]
vehicles, I have no problem as the
[1:11:42]
chair.
[1:11:42]
>> They were quite impressed with with the
[1:11:44]
care that was taken in them
[1:11:46]
>> and good. Well, and I'm very particular
[1:11:48]
on them trucks being maintained because
[1:11:50]
it cost us a lot of money and we as
[1:11:52]
taxpayer pay for these vehicles
[1:11:54]
>> 100%.
[1:11:55]
>> I will just also say we met with the
[1:11:58]
insurance company, the Glap Filter. Uh
[1:12:01]
they're the bigger national carrier. Uh
[1:12:04]
Olympus is our local rep. Um they did
[1:12:07]
comment to us that they have not seen as
[1:12:11]
clean of a vehicle record. Um,
[1:12:14]
>> oh, we like that.
[1:12:15]
>> In their recent travels, they go out and
[1:12:19]
meet with a bunch of different
[1:12:20]
facilities and they just highlighted
[1:12:22]
that. And so I think that's a that's
[1:12:26]
kudos to the managers and
[1:12:29]
>> Oh, I agree. I I really do appreciate
[1:12:30]
them guys making
[1:12:31]
>> important to hear
[1:12:32]
>> holding them because you know what
[1:12:34]
>> because that goes into this value as
[1:12:36]
well. If they've been in
[1:12:37]
>> if they've been beat then they don't
[1:12:39]
want to buy our vehicles back.
[1:12:41]
>> Yeah. Used vehicles are in high demand
[1:12:43]
right now comparing to what new vehicles
[1:12:45]
cost.
[1:12:47]
>> Well, and at the end of the day, it all
[1:12:48]
comes back to us three people.
[1:12:51]
>> You guys don't get to hear it. We do.
[1:12:53]
>> Yeah,
[1:12:53]
>> we hear.
[1:12:54]
>> And uh I just want to make sure again I
[1:12:57]
appreciate then there's no reason why,
[1:12:59]
and I'm being honest. We can argue all
[1:13:01]
this. There's no reason why these
[1:13:03]
vehicles can't be cleaned once a week.
[1:13:05]
We're not that busy that we can't clean
[1:13:07]
our vehicles once a week.
[1:13:08]
>> We're in agreement with that.
[1:13:10]
Oh yeah.
[1:13:11]
>> So if the C if the board's good, I'm
[1:13:14]
good to move on it.
[1:13:16]
>> Okay.
[1:13:17]
>> Mr. Chairman, I'd like to make a motion
[1:13:18]
to proceed with the lease purchase Jerry
[1:13:22]
Siner Chevrolet $711,855.
[1:13:26]
Uh and that will be subject to change
[1:13:29]
upon release.
[1:13:31]
>> Yeah. So the 27 models are coming out
[1:13:32]
soon. And so if the 27 models come out
[1:13:35]
before we had made this decision and the
[1:13:38]
26 were no longer available, then you'd
[1:13:41]
see about 2 to 4% increase. But I think
[1:13:44]
we're probably within that limits.
[1:13:45]
>> So we're going to do 26s or 27s?
[1:13:48]
>> 26s. I think there's one I think the
[1:13:50]
equinoxes have to be a 27, but I think
[1:13:52]
the rest were still 26.
[1:13:54]
>> Okay.
[1:13:55]
>> And does the Equinox work out for you
[1:13:57]
guys?
[1:13:58]
>> I think so. I think it gets good gas
[1:14:00]
mileage. 28 to 30 miles the gallon and
[1:14:03]
with the all-wheel drive it's capable
[1:14:05]
>> and they're really popular as long as
[1:14:07]
you do the oil changes.
[1:14:08]
>> Yes.
[1:14:09]
>> Oil any of these?
[1:14:12]
>> No.
[1:14:16]
» I don't mess with that stuff. That's
[1:14:18]
high maintenance.
[1:14:22]
» Okay then.
[1:14:23]
>> Okay. Let's move on to
[1:14:25]
>> Okay. Sorry. I'm moving ahead.
[1:14:28]
>> I'll second it then. Okay.
[1:14:30]
>> All in favor?
[1:14:31]
>> I I
[1:14:33]
>> Okay, let's move on to administration.
[1:14:35]
>> It's number five.
[1:14:37]
>> Number five. Oh, sorry.
[1:14:39]
>> I jumped ahead and talked about five,
[1:14:41]
but we didn't do that one yet.
[1:14:42]
>> Go for it.
[1:14:43]
>> I'd like to make a motion to also
[1:14:45]
approve the fleet buyback quote uh for
[1:14:48]
$570,300
[1:14:50]
subject to change based on damage and
[1:14:52]
mileage to cured or sell.
[1:14:54]
>> I'll second that.
[1:14:55]
>> Motion second. All in favor?
[1:14:56]
>> I.
[1:14:57]
>> Okay. Now, we're moving on. Clint, sorry
[1:14:59]
I'm pushing this agenda fast.
[1:15:01]
>> That's good.
[1:15:01]
>> So, uh, let's move on to you number one.
[1:15:04]
>> Okay. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. We've
[1:15:06]
got, uh, some comments that we made
[1:15:10]
along with, uh, Nathan's
[1:15:14]
he he's made the majority of the changes
[1:15:17]
to this,
[1:15:19]
um, no fault program. I think we're
[1:15:21]
getting close to a really good product.
[1:15:25]
He's also added an application
[1:15:29]
>> that they could
[1:15:31]
>> people affected could put in and we can
[1:15:34]
consider. Um, I think one of the things
[1:15:38]
as we're working through one of these
[1:15:40]
potential claims with a customer,
[1:15:44]
um,
[1:15:44]
>> he's not very smart. One of the things
[1:15:46]
that became apparent is they may submit,
[1:15:50]
you know, documentation
[1:15:52]
for consideration in this program, but
[1:15:55]
it's really important that and LI's been
[1:15:58]
noticing this. They might submit the
[1:16:01]
estimate right from the insurance
[1:16:05]
company or from the cleanup company.
[1:16:09]
And that estimate is usually maybe based
[1:16:13]
on if the insurance pays for it. Well,
[1:16:16]
we've seen where they'll discount at
[1:16:18]
50%.
[1:16:20]
>> If the customer pays them directly, you
[1:16:22]
know, if the insurance won't co cover
[1:16:24]
it. So, we want to make sure that we are
[1:16:28]
only paying this is to help out the
[1:16:30]
customer, right? In a situation where
[1:16:34]
it's not our fault and it potentially is
[1:16:37]
not their fault.
[1:16:38]
We don't want to be paying anything
[1:16:40]
that's inflated.
[1:16:42]
>> And so it really needs to be based on
[1:16:44]
actual invoices
[1:16:46]
>> that that the customer gets instead of
[1:16:49]
any estimated
[1:16:50]
>> because then it'll be lower
[1:16:52]
>> cost. So and then if they're if the
[1:16:56]
customer contributes any labor,
[1:16:58]
we really shouldn't be paying out for
[1:17:03]
because how do we quantify that? So, I
[1:17:06]
think we need to make sure that any
[1:17:07]
labor costs have to also be invoices or
[1:17:12]
>> we can't pay for customer labor costs
[1:17:15]
because again, we're just trying to help
[1:17:18]
them out, not have them pocket any
[1:17:21]
money, right? And and wanted to make
[1:17:24]
sure the board was supportive of that.
[1:17:26]
Um adding if we have to add anything.
[1:17:30]
That was just this morning's discussion.
[1:17:32]
Um great. So
[1:17:34]
>> a spot in here for
[1:17:36]
>> receipts.
[1:17:38]
>> Okay. Uh Mr. Chairman, I'd like to make
[1:17:40]
a motion, too.
[1:17:41]
>> Wait, there is there is one and then one
[1:17:42]
more thing that and then if Nathan wants
[1:17:44]
to add anything else, the value the
[1:17:46]
total [clears throat] limit. If we want
[1:17:49]
to set a limit, there was $10,000
[1:17:53]
discussed. I think we probably should I
[1:17:56]
would recommend raising that just to
[1:17:58]
give the board the flexibility
[1:18:01]
um to be able to cover
[1:18:04]
uh the the costs the closer to the truer
[1:18:07]
costs. And you know, often no fault
[1:18:12]
programs are already defaulted at 5,000.
[1:18:16]
So going to 10,000 doesn't give a whole
[1:18:18]
lot more than maybe a standard default.
[1:18:21]
So
[1:18:21]
>> do we know what a do we know what a
[1:18:23]
standard anybody I mean of course they
[1:18:26]
all range at different you know
[1:18:27]
different flooding
[1:18:28]
>> the range that we
[1:18:30]
>> what what has been the range what has
[1:18:32]
been the range that
[1:18:33]
>> I would recommend you land somewhere
[1:18:35]
around $30,000 for this.
[1:18:37]
>> Okay. Um, I think it's probably going to
[1:18:41]
be on the lower end of an insurance
[1:18:43]
estimate,
[1:18:44]
>> but it gives you some,
[1:18:46]
>> but and it's probably maybe on the
[1:18:48]
higher end of what actual costs might be
[1:18:52]
if if we're not paying if they do some,
[1:18:56]
>> I go 35.
[1:18:57]
>> Yeah. And that could that there's argument for that, too. So
[1:19:00]
>> yeah, it just gives us a little
[1:19:02]
>> but it gives you a little latitude. So
[1:19:04]
whatever the board feels comfortable
[1:19:05]
there, um
[1:19:09]
it's one of those things the more that
[1:19:11]
you set the limit to, the more potential
[1:19:15]
you'll pay out. But if we're really
[1:19:17]
narrowing it down to just actual cost,
[1:19:20]
>> it should stay.
[1:19:22]
>> You don't want to put it too low because
[1:19:25]
then you can't cover that if that's the
[1:19:28]
intent,
[1:19:29]
>> right? If you go super high, people
[1:19:32]
might get dollar signs in their eyes,
[1:19:34]
you know. So,
[1:19:35]
>> of course,
[1:19:36]
>> I think I think that would be a good
[1:19:38]
recommen.
[1:19:38]
>> So, it's set in right here at 10.
[1:19:40]
>> No, it's blank. Blank. I put together a
[1:19:43]
draft and I just literally threw $10,000
[1:19:46]
in. And so, I asked the aisle to take
[1:19:48]
the number out so the board could make a
[1:19:50]
decision today or whenever it approved
[1:19:52]
this as to what amount you want because
[1:19:54]
I don't know what that amount should be.
[1:19:57]
Yeah, it was a good good starting point
[1:19:58]
for discussion.
[1:19:59]
>> I my recommendation would be 35, but I'm
[1:20:02]
just throwing that out there.
[1:20:05]
>> So, if you were to approve it today,
[1:20:07]
you'd have to approve it and in the
[1:20:08]
motion, you would say, I approve this
[1:20:10]
resolution subject to including X as the
[1:20:12]
amount of money for the threshold. And
[1:20:14]
just as a a reminder, the way this is
[1:20:16]
structured, that's a lifetime payout
[1:20:18]
amount,
[1:20:18]
>> right?
[1:20:18]
>> Because we don't want somebody coming in
[1:20:20]
saying getting 35,000 one year and then
[1:20:23]
coming back the next year. We are not.
[1:20:25]
One of the things I was concerned about
[1:20:27]
in drafting this is
[1:20:29]
you are not an insurance company,
[1:20:30]
>> right? And and part of what Leo and I
[1:20:33]
talked about and and I've added this in
[1:20:36]
that language for for fault is
[1:20:39]
what I don't want is people to just go
[1:20:42]
and get the cheapest possible insurance
[1:20:44]
which will cover these things and then
[1:20:45]
use you as the backup
[1:20:47]
>> because that's not fair for the
[1:20:48]
residents that have listened to your
[1:20:50]
recommendations and have gotten adequate
[1:20:52]
insurance because then they're
[1:20:53]
effectively subsidizing the people that
[1:20:55]
have gone really cheap and haven't
[1:20:57]
gotten the adequate policy. So you had
[1:20:59]
asked me to reflesh out what fault means
[1:21:01]
and one of the things I put is
[1:21:03]
disregarded district recommendations.
[1:21:05]
>> So if you've done education stuff in
[1:21:07]
your billing and you've said do X Y and
[1:21:09]
Z and they've completely ignored that
[1:21:12]
that's not fair to the people that have
[1:21:14]
gone spent the cost and the time to
[1:21:16]
prevent the problem from happening.
[1:21:17]
[snorts]
[1:21:18]
So again this gets back to being no
[1:21:20]
fault.
[1:21:23]
» Does 35 years?
[1:21:25]
>> I think that sounds like a good plan. Uh
[1:21:28]
did you have any other comments?
[1:21:29]
>> No, that was it. I just um so in in it
[1:21:33]
you'll see I I did put together an
[1:21:35]
application form.
[1:21:36]
>> Okay.
[1:21:37]
>> I thought that was good.
[1:21:38]
>> And that's based somewhat on the kind of
[1:21:41]
notice of claim that people would file
[1:21:43]
in a normal lawsuit. But the one
[1:21:46]
document that we would need to make if
[1:21:47]
you pass this and there's authorization
[1:21:49]
in the resolution let staff do this it'
[1:21:51]
be okay is is the waiver agreement we'd
[1:21:53]
have people sign because I don't want
[1:21:55]
someone to come in say wo is me get paid
[1:21:57]
and then turn around and sue us.
[1:21:59]
>> Yeah.
[1:21:59]
>> Oh wow. Yeah.
[1:22:01]
>> I I can see that happening. So
[1:22:04]
>> yeah that's a condition that's always
[1:22:06]
been here. That's the one document we
[1:22:08]
haven't prepared but I didn't want to
[1:22:09]
prepare that before you you know you're
[1:22:11]
proving it. Should we make a motion on
[1:22:13]
it today or wait?
[1:22:14]
>> Yeah. No, the motion's drafted right now
[1:22:17]
that you would approve it. We'll add in
[1:22:19]
the 35,000 if that's the number you
[1:22:21]
want.
[1:22:22]
>> You'll approve the application form, but
[1:22:23]
it's also authorizing Le and me and and
[1:22:26]
Clint to prepare the waiver agreement.
[1:22:28]
Okay.
[1:22:29]
>> If if you want to see that, we can bring
[1:22:31]
that back.
[1:22:31]
>> I'm fine. You know what? I believe
[1:22:32]
>> I didn't think you wanted to be involved
[1:22:34]
with that.
[1:22:34]
>> No. So, Mr. Mr. Chairman, I'd like to
[1:22:36]
make a motion to approve the uh 2026-05
[1:22:41]
Magna Water District no fault culinary
[1:22:43]
water and sewer failure reimbursement
[1:22:46]
program with a change of exhibit one to
[1:22:50]
uh 7.2.6
[1:22:52]
to 35,000 maximum limit
[1:22:56]
and uh approve the
[1:23:00]
call the waiver
[1:23:02]
>> the waiver.
[1:23:03]
>> No, that's already in there. the
[1:23:04]
resolution. It's already drafted in the
[1:23:05]
So, you just say, "I move to approve the
[1:23:07]
resolution as drafted subject to
[1:23:09]
increasing the threshold to $35,000."
[1:23:11]
>> Okay,
[1:23:12]
>> that's all you need to do.
[1:23:13]
>> Okay, we got that.
[1:23:14]
>> 35.
[1:23:15]
>> Okay. Yeah, you did. Sorry.
[1:23:17]
>> You know, second motion, a second. All
[1:23:19]
in favor?
[1:23:20]
>> I
[1:23:26]
leu.
[1:23:28]
So, I wanted to have a discussion or
[1:23:32]
just a little bit of guidance for the
[1:23:35]
election. Um,
[1:23:38]
there's one code section that says we
[1:23:41]
should have a voting day election
[1:23:44]
location in every precinct in the
[1:23:46]
jurisdiction. Well, we have like 12
[1:23:50]
little precincts. So, we're not going to
[1:23:52]
have 12 voting. In the past, we had
[1:23:55]
three voting day physical locations
[1:24:00]
and then another code section says one
[1:24:03]
or more polling places. So,
[1:24:07]
my thoughts are maybe we could have the
[1:24:09]
physical voting location on voting day
[1:24:13]
here at the office and then we would
[1:24:16]
only have to have three polling judges.
[1:24:19]
Um, if we have more than one location,
[1:24:22]
then we have to have three judges per
[1:24:24]
location.
[1:24:25]
>> Location.
[1:24:26]
>> If that's the case, then I needed a way
[1:24:29]
to find judges. Um, and Clint and I were
[1:24:32]
talking. I asked him if we could put it
[1:24:34]
on Facebook and see if anybody
[1:24:36]
volunteered.
[1:24:37]
In the past, you know,
[1:24:39]
>> in the past, years ago, uh, the county
[1:24:42]
would give us a list of people that had
[1:24:46]
volunteered to be polling judges,
[1:24:48]
[clears throat]
[1:24:49]
but they said they don't have that now.
[1:24:54]
They don't have a list. So, it was kind
[1:24:57]
of
[1:24:58]
>> Yeah. I think our our if you guys have
[1:25:02]
any concerns, we want to make sure
[1:25:04]
that's fair.
[1:25:06]
uh obviously and that they have
[1:25:08]
experience or
[1:25:10]
>> yeah there are some uh qualifications in
[1:25:12]
Utah code that polling judges have to
[1:25:16]
have of course I think it's just to be a
[1:25:18]
resident of the district US citizen
[1:25:22]
those types so it's not really too bad
[1:25:25]
of requirements to be a judge but
[1:25:27]
>> I'd say do it the way you've proposed
[1:25:29]
right now okay
[1:25:31]
>> just you know what I'm not going to
[1:25:32]
comment on it because
[1:25:34]
>> I'm running. So,
[1:25:35]
>> that's true.
[1:25:36]
>> I'm going to I'm going to stay out of
[1:25:38]
it. So, whatever you feel that you need
[1:25:40]
to do.
[1:25:41]
>> Oh, we still need
[1:25:42]
>> You've got Danny to
[1:25:44]
>> We still
[1:25:44]
>> ask Danny what he thinks.
[1:25:46]
>> Okay.
[1:25:47]
>> We're hope we're really hoping that we
[1:25:49]
>> What's your recommendation?
[1:25:50]
>> My recommendation is to maybe have two polling locations in person that
[1:25:57]
day.
[1:25:57]
>> Okay.
[1:25:59]
one here and maybe one
[1:26:01]
>> you do it
[1:26:02]
>> at a school where the county is going to
[1:26:04]
be.
[1:26:05]
>> Okay.
[1:26:05]
>> So that there's two, you know, if they
[1:26:08]
go to one place at least they can vote
[1:26:09]
on us if they want to. Um so that would
[1:26:13]
mean I'd need six judges. So if we could
[1:26:16]
>> Can those be all employees?
[1:26:19]
>> I don't believe they can be all
[1:26:21]
employees
[1:26:21]
>> because the employees would have to be
[1:26:23]
living here.
[1:26:24]
>> Can any of them be employees? like Mandy
[1:26:27]
lives within the district, right? So,
[1:26:29]
>> yeah. Um,
[1:26:30]
>> do we want that?
[1:26:32]
>> We never have had employees be the
[1:26:34]
judges.
[1:26:36]
>> I think it would be better to not have
[1:26:37]
employees be the judges. I just
[1:26:40]
regardless of what the law says. Just
[1:26:41]
the optics of that if like you don't
[1:26:44]
want to have somebody win and say,
[1:26:45]
"Well, it's because their employees
[1:26:46]
were."
[1:26:47]
>> Yeah.
[1:26:47]
>> You know, one of the things is you could
[1:26:49]
ask there's one that used to do it a
[1:26:50]
long time ago. Her name's Anna Beth Ma.
[1:26:52]
>> Is she still around?
[1:26:54]
>> That's what I was going to say.
[1:26:55]
>> Yeah. We had Annabth do our every time.
[1:26:58]
She was really good.
[1:26:59]
>> Maybe she could find you some people.
[1:27:01]
>> Yeah, that's just what I was going to
[1:27:02]
say. You get a hold of Ann Beth and she
[1:27:04]
would find
[1:27:05]
>> Okay,
[1:27:06]
>> that's just a recommendation. I'm not
[1:27:08]
saying just so you know that for the
[1:27:09]
record.
[1:27:10]
>> I'll I'll make that recommendation cuz
[1:27:11]
Annabth will do a good job.
[1:27:13]
>> Well, I she did do our elections every
[1:27:16]
time we did it and she's really good at
[1:27:18]
it. So, I just didn't know if she was
[1:27:20]
still around or not.
[1:27:21]
>> She is.
[1:27:21]
>> So, so there are different types of
[1:27:22]
judges. Are we talking about the
[1:27:24]
election judges that are at the polling
[1:27:25]
location?
[1:27:26]
>> Polling location.
[1:27:27]
>> Not the ones counting it though.
[1:27:29]
>> In the past they did it all.
[1:27:32]
>> Yeah. Cuz there's like three separate
[1:27:34]
classifications of it. But um
[1:27:38]
>> Yeah.
[1:27:39]
>> In the past the polls would close at
[1:27:41]
8:00 and those three judges and myself
[1:27:45]
would count the votes right after it
[1:27:48]
closed. involved with me.
[1:27:50]
>> I mean, I think the safest would be to
[1:27:52]
put an open call for it.
[1:27:55]
>> We need this many.
[1:27:57]
>> Respond to us if you're interested by
[1:27:59]
this date. If we can't get enough, then
[1:28:01]
we move on to asking individuals.
[1:28:04]
>> I mean, is that sound like a reasonable
[1:28:07]
fair?
[1:28:07]
>> Yeah, I think so. I I don't think
[1:28:09]
there's not a lot of qualifications in
[1:28:10]
the code. What? It's just whoever's
[1:28:12]
appointed. But I would say especially
[1:28:15]
given the [clears throat] the focus and
[1:28:17]
the concerns about the integrity of
[1:28:19]
elections over recent years, you just
[1:28:20]
want to
[1:28:21]
>> I think that's why we have
[1:28:22]
>> just the optics of having someone that's
[1:28:24]
connected.
[1:28:26]
>> I mean I think some people used to pay
[1:28:27]
for for judges too.
[1:28:29]
>> Yeah, we we might have to get to that
[1:28:31]
point.
[1:28:31]
>> What was that? I'm sorry.
[1:28:33]
>> Pay pay have
[1:28:34]
>> we did in the past. We paid them like it
[1:28:36]
was minimal but it was I think $30 to
[1:28:39]
$50 for the day
[1:28:40]
>> probably to get enough interest. I need
[1:28:42]
to do that.
[1:28:43]
>> Yeah. I I kind of feel like if if you
[1:28:45]
have to pay for judges that are
[1:28:47]
unaffiliated with the district, that's
[1:28:49]
probably money well spent just to avoid
[1:28:51]
the the appearance.
[1:28:53]
>> Yeah. We treated our judges very well
[1:28:54]
that day.
[1:28:55]
>> Your insult.
[1:28:56]
>> We ran our butts off, but we treated
[1:28:58]
them really well.
[1:28:59]
>> Made sure they have food.
[1:29:00]
>> Yeah.
[1:29:00]
>> Exactly.
[1:29:01]
>> Yeah.
[1:29:03]
>> So, this is just a picture of our ballot
[1:29:05]
box that's been ordered,
[1:29:07]
>> right? Oh, did we buy that box?
[1:29:10]
>> Wow. They're expensive. We bought two of
[1:29:12]
them.
[1:29:13]
>> They're required by law.
[1:29:14]
>> Yeah,
[1:29:16]
>> it's not optional.
[1:29:17]
>> No,
[1:29:18]
>> we had Steve make them.
[1:29:20]
>> Yeah,
[1:29:21]
>> I didn't think of that. Probably could
[1:29:23]
have, but no, they're they're secure.
[1:29:28]
Um, it's called American
[1:29:31]
>> American. I can't remember who it is.
[1:29:33]
Sorry. American Cabinet. Anyway, they do
[1:29:37]
belt. I couldn't find hardly anybody
[1:29:39]
that did belt.
[1:29:39]
>> Make them so they don't get pulled up
[1:29:41]
and locked.
[1:29:42]
>> They've got special bolts that go with
[1:29:44]
these apparently according to the aisle.
[1:29:45]
>> Yeah, you had to buy the bolts to secure
[1:29:47]
it separately. And one package of bolts
[1:29:50]
was $400.
[1:29:52]
>> Where do you mount it?
[1:29:55]
>> Screw it in.
[1:29:56]
>> Concrete mounted.
[1:29:57]
>> Yeah.
[1:29:58]
>> Where?
[1:29:58]
>> In a concrete. In concrete.
[1:30:00]
>> We're going to put ours right inside
[1:30:02]
here. Right.
[1:30:03]
>> Well, that's the next discussion. So,
[1:30:05]
>> yeah. because
[1:30:06]
>> we need to have one theoretically or
[1:30:10]
one.
[1:30:10]
>> We can we can use our Dropbox for one of
[1:30:12]
them
[1:30:14]
>> and then Clint and I were thinking maybe
[1:30:16]
the Webster Center
[1:30:19]
>> or the library, but the county is going
[1:30:21]
to have theirs.
[1:30:22]
>> Have it at the Webster Center because
[1:30:23]
it's it's we're remodeling. No,
[1:30:26]
>> just kidding. I'm just kidding. Keep in
[1:30:28]
mind, I haven't asked permission yet
[1:30:30]
either, but um the county is going to
[1:30:32]
have one of their ballots boxes at the
[1:30:35]
library,
[1:30:36]
>> so we could have ours kind of by
[1:30:39]
>> ask permission. We think just go by
[1:30:41]
where the existing ones are.
[1:30:43]
>> Yeah.
[1:30:43]
>> For the other election
[1:30:45]
>> and then they're going to have another
[1:30:48]
at West Valley City Hall.
[1:30:50]
Um I don't know if we can put one there.
[1:30:53]
I'd have to find out.
[1:30:55]
we can approach their leadership uh to
[1:30:58]
maybe
[1:30:59]
>> because it like we said, we're going to
[1:31:02]
have to anchor them in the concrete. So,
[1:31:04]
when we remove them, we'll have to patch
[1:31:06]
>> those anchors or
[1:31:08]
>> we can actually put Well, I don't know
[1:31:10]
what their anchors are, but usually you
[1:31:11]
just cut them off and
[1:31:12]
>> Yeah.
[1:31:13]
>> patch it. What about What about the
[1:31:15]
senior citizen center?
[1:31:17]
>> Yeah, that's
[1:31:18]
>> they're going to have a voting walks
[1:31:20]
there.
[1:31:21]
>> Uh we ordered two of them.
[1:31:23]
>> Okay. So we'd have two and then this one
[1:31:26]
that would be
[1:31:26]
>> in West Valley City. There could be some
[1:31:28]
commution at West Valley City.
[1:31:30]
>> Well, the bad thing is you got people
[1:31:31]
over in West Valley.
[1:31:32]
>> Yeah. They want to make sure you've
[1:31:34]
represented both.
[1:31:35]
>> And I think we there's some requirements
[1:31:36]
about if within Leis have had these
[1:31:39]
discussions about, you know, district
[1:31:41]
boundaries. It's a little ambiguous.
[1:31:43]
Remember that discussion we had about
[1:31:45]
where we had to locate the polling
[1:31:47]
places?
[1:31:48]
>> Yeah, I've I've read that code.
[1:31:49]
>> So, this will be all in person, not by
[1:31:51]
mail, right? Drop box.
[1:31:54]
>> These are So, you have to have It's the
[1:31:55]
drop boxes that have to be in different
[1:31:57]
locations. The um
[1:31:59]
>> mail would go to our PO box still,
[1:32:01]
right?
[1:32:01]
>> Yeah.
[1:32:02]
>> So, basically, you have three things.
[1:32:03]
You got the mail in ballots, you have
[1:32:05]
the people that are going to come in
[1:32:06]
person, that's where you need the
[1:32:06]
judges, and you've got the drop boxes.
[1:32:08]
>> Yeah.
[1:32:09]
>> And they're the judges are for voting
[1:32:11]
day.
[1:32:11]
>> Yeah. They're for the people that are
[1:32:13]
coming in to make sure that somebody's
[1:32:14]
not committing fraud.
[1:32:16]
>> Okay.
[1:32:16]
>> Yeah. So um and then uh
[1:32:21]
I think that's it.
[1:32:25]
>> Okay.
[1:32:26]
>> So if you're okay with generally th that
[1:32:28]
direction, we'll we'll proceed.
[1:32:30]
>> Okay.
[1:32:31]
>> So no action taken.
[1:32:32]
>> What
[1:32:33]
>> you okay with that?
[1:32:34]
>> Yes.
[1:32:34]
>> Okay.
[1:32:34]
>> I don't think we need any action on
[1:32:36]
that.
[1:32:36]
>> Yeah. They're just asking for direction.
[1:32:38]
>> Yeah. I just wanted I did I talked about
[1:32:40]
getting judges and didn't know if
[1:32:43]
Facebook would be good or not, but
[1:32:45]
>> Good to be
[1:32:46]
>> Thank you. Thank you, Kayle. The next
[1:32:49]
one's yours.
[1:32:51]
>> So, currently Magna Water has a third
[1:32:55]
party
[1:32:57]
company called Express Bill Pay that our
[1:33:00]
customers pay their bills online.
[1:33:04]
Um, there's been a purchase or a sale of
[1:33:08]
Express Bill Pay
[1:33:10]
by a competitor of Cassels. Um,
[1:33:15]
now instead of those two entities
[1:33:18]
working together, they're now
[1:33:20]
competitors.
[1:33:22]
And so
[1:33:24]
Cassell is no longer going to support
[1:33:27]
Express the way that they are supported.
[1:33:30]
Now,
[1:33:31]
Express has come up with a way where if
[1:33:35]
we don't want to leave Express Bill pay,
[1:33:38]
we don't have to.
[1:33:40]
But after seeing um this Cassell
[1:33:44]
community portal, it is uh more robust,
[1:33:52]
a little more userfriendly
[1:33:55]
and long story short, it's a really nice
[1:33:59]
application. Our accounting software is
[1:34:01]
already with Cassell.
[1:34:03]
Right now, if someone goes on to express
[1:34:05]
bill pay and makes a payment and then
[1:34:07]
looks at their bill, they can't see that
[1:34:09]
they made the payment. It takes at least
[1:34:10]
24 hours.
[1:34:12]
>> This Cassell community portal
[1:34:15]
is real time. They make the payment,
[1:34:18]
they toggle back over to their bill,
[1:34:20]
they can see the payment, their balance.
[1:34:22]
Anyway,
[1:34:22]
>> it's a lot easier.
[1:34:23]
>> It's not all that's
[1:34:27]
with this portal, but I just wanted to
[1:34:30]
introduce it to you. Um, Ty's going to
[1:34:32]
play a video, I'm hoping.
[1:34:35]
>> Yeah.
[1:34:35]
>> That kind of introduces it. Our my
[1:34:38]
suggestion is we roll this out slowly
[1:34:41]
because Magna Water's going to have
[1:34:44]
their AMI portal.
[1:34:46]
Then if we make this change, I think
[1:34:48]
it'll kind of be really boggle down our
[1:34:52]
customers and our AMI people are working
[1:34:55]
with Cassell so that they can streamline
[1:34:59]
it and our customer will only have to
[1:35:01]
have one sign on and they can toggle
[1:35:04]
back and forth from our AMI portal to
[1:35:06]
their payment portal.
[1:35:07]
>> That will be a lot easier. Mhm.
[1:35:09]
>> I think the concern we have is there's
[1:35:12]
other districts that have made this
[1:35:15]
transition from express bill pay and
[1:35:18]
it's created a lot of amp uh frustration
[1:35:21]
from the customers.
[1:35:23]
>> So we want to avoid that situation um
[1:35:26]
>> as much as possible
[1:35:27]
>> as much as [laughter] we could. I think
[1:35:29]
it was probably rushed,
[1:35:31]
>> but
[1:35:33]
I think we what I would say to that is
[1:35:36]
we might want to provide both platforms
[1:35:38]
for a transitional period
[1:35:41]
>> and that's doable.
[1:35:42]
>> Um I think it would be worth the expense
[1:35:45]
uh to make sure because nothing
[1:35:48]
frustrates a customer more than not
[1:35:50]
seeing their payment reflected or going
[1:35:53]
thinking it's going to be made
[1:35:55]
automatically and it's not. And we would
[1:35:58]
want to avoid all of that as as much as
[1:36:00]
we can. So
[1:36:02]
>> So this this Yeah. Play it if you would.
[1:36:15]
» Sometimes after you've been hooked up
[1:36:16]
for a minute, the sound
[1:36:21]
» while we're focus.
[1:36:25]
Hi, and welcome to this Community
[1:36:26]
Connect video. Today, we're checking out
[1:36:29]
the Community Connect portal, your
[1:36:30]
one-stop shop for interacting with your
[1:36:32]
community online. While we're focusing
[1:36:34]
on utility billing today, remember you
[1:36:36]
can also use this portal for building
[1:36:38]
permits, business licenses, animal
[1:36:40]
licenses, accounts receivables, [music]
[1:36:42]
and much more. Cassell's new payment
[1:36:44]
solution is designed, developed, and
[1:36:47]
supported by Cassell. Join us on this
[1:36:49]
tour to explore tailored theming and
[1:36:52]
customization. Unique theming and
[1:36:54]
customization specific to your
[1:36:56]
organization effortless payments. Enable
[1:36:59]
your customers to make payments on their
[1:37:01]
account with ease. Realtime account
[1:37:04]
insights. Access current [music] and
[1:37:06]
past bills, consumption graphs, and
[1:37:08]
more. Notifications. Keep your customers
[1:37:11]
informed with timely emails and text
[1:37:13]
alerts. Seamless integration. Enjoy
[1:37:16]
real-time posting of payments directly
[1:37:18]
into Cassell's utility billing. Accurate
[1:37:21]
reconciliation. Ensure deposits [music]
[1:37:23]
align exactly with your bank
[1:37:24]
reconciliation and much more.
[1:37:29]
When you first visit the site, you'll
[1:37:31]
notice it's personalized for your
[1:37:33]
community. Your community gets its own
[1:37:35]
unique web address. Your logo appears
[1:37:38]
right on the login screen. The
[1:37:40]
background can feature an image from
[1:37:42]
your community.
[1:37:50]
Even the colors can match your
[1:37:51]
community's branding.
[1:37:55]
If a customer needs to make a quick
[1:37:57]
payment without logging in, no problem.
[1:38:00]
Just hit the pay now button on the login
[1:38:02]
screen. A customer can pay their utility
[1:38:04]
bill or make other payments without
[1:38:06]
creating an account. Simply select what
[1:38:09]
you're paying for, enter your customer
[1:38:10]
number, and you're on your way. This
[1:38:13]
drives more adoption for those who want
[1:38:14]
to pay online but don't want to sign up.
[1:38:17]
More payments made online means less
[1:38:19]
work for you and your team.
[1:38:23]
We encourage customers to create
[1:38:24]
accounts to take advantage of numerous
[1:38:26]
benefits for both themselves and their
[1:38:28]
utility. The customer will see past
[1:38:30]
bills, can track usage, get email and
[1:38:32]
text alerts about new bills or bills
[1:38:34]
coming due, and much more. This means
[1:38:37]
fewer delinquencies and fewer calls to
[1:38:39]
your office. Setting up an account is
[1:38:42]
quite easy. A customer can use their
[1:38:44]
existing Google or Apple account or
[1:38:46]
create a new account with their personal
[1:38:48]
email.
[1:38:54]
Link their utility account once they're
[1:38:56]
set up. Set up autopay if they'd like.
[1:39:01]
Once logged in, customers will see a
[1:39:03]
clear summary [music] of what they owe
[1:39:05]
and what's coming due. Click on utility
[1:39:08]
bill to see service address, current
[1:39:11]
amount due and due date, recent payment
[1:39:14]
information. Quick link to view their
[1:39:16]
latest bill. On the right side of the
[1:39:18]
screen, there are other options. Allow
[1:39:20]
customers to enroll in paperless
[1:39:22]
billing, cutting down on your utility
[1:39:24]
form and postage costs. Customers can
[1:39:27]
set up autopay for fewer late payments
[1:39:29]
and delinquencies to deal with.
[1:39:31]
Additionally, customers can specify a
[1:39:33]
maximum amount for autopay, giving them
[1:39:36]
the peace of mind that a payment out of
[1:39:38]
their expected range won't happen.
[1:39:40]
Customers can save payment methods
[1:39:42]
securely in their wallet for easy and
[1:39:43]
quick payments. Link additional accounts
[1:39:46]
if a customer has more than one.
[1:39:51]
For example, landlords can link all of
[1:39:53]
their rental properties to their login
[1:39:55]
to make sure tenants are paying on time.
[1:39:58]
Customers can view their utility bills
[1:39:59]
and payments by clicking on any view
[1:40:01]
hyperlink. They can also click on any
[1:40:03]
amount to see the breakdown of the bill.
[1:40:06]
No more calling into the office to
[1:40:07]
request [music] copies of previous
[1:40:09]
utility bills.
[1:40:11]
We've made it easy for customers to view
[1:40:12]
their consumption patterns, [music]
[1:40:14]
which helps reduce the number of calls
[1:40:16]
from customers regarding high bills.
[1:40:18]
View sideby-side graphs of your usage
[1:40:20]
over the last 3 years. See a breakdown
[1:40:22]
of your bill by service. Track how your
[1:40:25]
usage changes seasonally. You can also
[1:40:28]
use communications for important
[1:40:29]
announcements like a water mane break or
[1:40:31]
to disseminate information that would
[1:40:33]
normally come as bill inserts such as
[1:40:35]
newsletters or rate changes. These
[1:40:38]
communications will also be emailed or
[1:40:40]
texted to your customers.
[1:40:44]
Ready to pay? Just click make payment
[1:40:47]
and the customer can pay the amount due
[1:40:48]
or choose how much to pay. Choose from
[1:40:51]
payment options including credit card,
[1:40:54]
checking account or savings account.
[1:40:57]
Submitting the payment will post in real
[1:40:58]
time to Cassell's cash receiping and
[1:41:01]
utility billing. Bank reconciliation is
[1:41:03]
made easy with our portal. You can use
[1:41:06]
the administrative tools in the portal
[1:41:07]
to see how deposits posted for the day
[1:41:09]
match up perfectly onetoone to your bank
[1:41:11]
reconciliation in Cassell. All payments
[1:41:14]
for the day will be deposited together
[1:41:15]
into your bank account. We hope this
[1:41:18]
tour helps you get the most out of
[1:41:19]
community connect. There's plenty more
[1:41:21]
to explore beyond what we've covered
[1:41:23]
today.
[1:41:26]
That's just a little blurp of what it
[1:41:28]
kind of looks like.
[1:41:30]
>> Who does the customer service on this
[1:41:32]
program at the angle
[1:41:34]
>> cell? So, it's it's the exact same
[1:41:37]
people that we [clears throat] have our
[1:41:38]
accounting software
[1:41:40]
>> software inputting is it for us to do
[1:41:43]
>> how much what
[1:41:44]
>> or inputting for up
[1:41:45]
>> less.
[1:41:48]
It's less, but um
[1:41:52]
we use forms on our website right now
[1:41:56]
where a customer, a new customer can go
[1:41:58]
to our website and sign an application
[1:42:01]
card and they submit the information
[1:42:03]
that we need so that we could set them
[1:42:05]
up in our billing. Um
[1:42:08]
we couldn't get rid of that service
[1:42:10]
because it's in this portal. So that'll
[1:42:13]
be a cost reduction because we pay for
[1:42:16]
that service. Um, it kind of looks like
[1:42:18]
it does some things that Yapify does as
[1:42:21]
far as notification, but it's not to the
[1:42:24]
degree Yapify is. Yify has a map, so if
[1:42:28]
there's an area that we're turning off
[1:42:29]
because of a leak or something. This one
[1:42:32]
doesn't have a map. It just has our
[1:42:34]
customer list. So, [clears throat] it's
[1:42:37]
not it's a little bit of duplication of
[1:42:39]
Yapify, but not entirely.
[1:42:41]
>> But, we're staying with Yapify. Yeah,
[1:42:43]
because Yapifi is going to be doing our
[1:42:45]
AMI,
[1:42:47]
our meter information. So,
[1:42:51]
but it won't be a rush do it tomorrow
[1:42:53]
kind of thing. We'll just roll it out
[1:42:55]
slowly,
[1:42:58]
>> informationational at this time. We
[1:42:59]
bring it back with costs.
[1:43:00]
>> Yeah.
[1:43:01]
>> Okay,
[1:43:03]
>> that's all I have. Thank you. Okay. So,
[1:43:07]
our next board meeting will be uh August
[1:43:10]
13th um at 10 o'clock here.
[1:43:15]
So,
[1:43:17]
we're in need of a closed door. Um
[1:43:22]
someone want to make a motion to close
[1:43:24]
the open.
[1:43:26]
>> Mr. I'll make a motion to take a brief
[1:43:28]
recess and immediately following meet
[1:43:31]
and close meeting to discuss the
[1:43:33]
purchase exchange lease or sale of real
[1:43:35]
property including any form of water
[1:43:37]
right water shares pending reasonable in
[1:43:41]
litigation and collective bargaining
[1:43:44]
issued pursuant to Utah code and 524 204
[1:43:48]
205 it is
[1:43:50]
>> 1143
[1:43:51]
>> 1142 two.
[1:43:56]
>> Second that.
[1:43:56]
>> Motion second. All in favor?
[1:43:58]
>> I
[1:44:00]
>> Okay, it's
[1:44:01]
>> It is 12:50.
[1:44:06]
We're needing a motion to close the
[1:44:08]
close and open the open.
[1:44:10]
>> Mr. Chair, I'd like to make a motion to
[1:44:13]
close the close and reopen the open
[1:44:16]
meeting.
[1:44:17]
>> Second.
[1:44:17]
>> A motion second. All in favor? by um do
[1:44:21]
we have anything else that needs to be
[1:44:23]
addressed
[1:44:24]
>> other than Danny's 80th birthday?
[1:44:28]
>> Yeah,
[1:44:28]
>> congratulations.
[1:44:30]
>> So, someone wants to make a motion to
[1:44:32]
adjourn.
[1:44:33]
>> I'll make Mr. Chairman, I'll make a
[1:44:35]
motion to adjourn.
[1:44:36]
>> I second it.
[1:44:37]
>> In motion, second. All in favor? I