Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
[0:22]
Good morning. We will go ahead and
[0:24]
call the
[0:27]
audit and finance committee meeting
[0:29]
for friday, march 14, 2025 to order
[0:30]
at 9:45 --
[0:33]
9:45 a.m.
[0:35]
may we please have a safety briefing.
[0:36]
this will be done by
[0:45]
system safety.
[0:46]
>>
[0:47]
good morning. We are at one gateway
[0:48]
plaza at the l.a. Metro board room
[0:49]
on
[0:50]
the third floor. If we do need to
[0:51]
evacuate the room here, we will effectively
[0:53]
out to my left. We will go down the
[0:54]
escalators and meet out
[0:56]
at the metro customer service area.
[0:57]
for accident --exiting the
[1:00]
room, make sure you are aware
[1:20]
of the tripping hazards, chairs, backpacks,
[1:21]
things of that nature. In the event
[1:22]
of
[1:23]
an earthquake, we will huddle under
[1:24]
the tables until the shaking stopped
[1:25]
to do an
[1:26]
assessment to see if we need to evacuate.
[1:27]
in the event of a first-day situation,
[1:29]
there is an aed across from the security
[1:30]
desk. We have first responders in
[1:32]
the room from internet county --san
[1:33]
benito county. In the event of an
[1:34]
active
[1:35]
attacker, run, hide and fight. 20th
[1:36]
online, make sure you're familiar
[1:37]
with your surroundings. Make
[1:38]
sure you're familiar with your place of
[1:39]
safety and exit route. That concludes
[1:41]
my briefing.
[1:42]
>> thank you very much.
[1:43]
with that, we are going to
[1:44]
move to the pledge of allegiance.
[1:45]
>>
[1:49]
[ inaudible ]
[1:52]
>>
[2:05]
thank you very much. And now,
[2:08]
madame secretary, roll call.
[2:09]
>> [
[2:11]
roll call ]
[2:35]
we do have a quorum present.
[2:36]
>> very
[2:37]
good. Do we have any public
[2:38]
comments today?
[2:39]
>> I have not received
[2:40]
any request to
[2:41]
speak or any written comment.
[2:43]
>> okay.
[2:44]
we get to move
[2:46]
to item ,
[2:47]
approval of the minutes from february
[2:49]
14, 2025.
[2:51]
any of my colleagues have any request
[2:52]
to modify
[2:55]
or make any comments about it?
[2:58]
if not, do we have a motion
[3:01]
to approve ?
[3:02]
>> I move for
[3:04]
approval.
[3:05]
>>
[3:07]
approval by chaffee. Must be
[3:10]
a separate county. Yeah.
[3:11]
>> dutrey
[3:13]
seconds .
[3:14]
>> that
[3:15]
sounds great. Thank you. Roll call please.
[3:19]
>> [ roll call ]
[3:31]
motion carried unanimously.
[3:32]
>>
[3:34]
excellent. Next will be
[3:36]
fiscal year 2025 midyear operating
[3:37]
budget review amendment
[3:40]
presented by christine wilson,
[3:43]
assistant director of finance.
[3:46]
a very lovely hat and outfit for
[3:48]
st. Pattie's day.
[3:49]
>> thank you. Good morning,
[3:54]
chairman and members of the committee. I'm
[3:55]
assistant director of
[3:57]
finance presenting item number 6b,
[3:58]
the
[4:00]
fy 25 midyear operating budget review amendment.
[4:07]
it is a
[4:09]
practice of metrolink to perform a review
[4:13]
of the annual budget at midyear to
[4:15]
identify any revisions that may be needed
[4:16]
to the
[4:18]
operating budget as a result of changed circumstances.
[4:22]
our review indicates
[4:24]
that an amendment is required this year.
[4:36]
the amendment we are presenting is
[4:37]
driven by the following. Changes to
[4:38]
ridership, changes to the service
[4:40]
schedule, a change to the cost of
[4:41]
mobilization, and
[4:42]
a member agency request. This slide
[4:43]
shows the details of the amendment
[4:45]
staff is recommending for adoption
[4:46]
by the member agencies.
[4:52]
the box at the top of the
[4:53]
screen shows the budget as it currently
[4:55]
exists. Revenue of
[4:58]
68 million, expensive 332 million,
[5:01]
and support of 264
[5:04]
million. In the next box
[5:07]
we see the
[5:08]
amendments. The revenue adjustments
[5:10]
consist of a reduction of the revenue
[5:11]
based on
[5:13]
a re-forecast of the revenue
[5:22]
by capital kpmg. Because the lc top
[5:23]
funding
[5:24]
was not confirmed at the time we did
[5:25]
the budget, the original budget forecasted
[5:26]
student
[5:28]
ridership in the numbers
[5:31]
as a
[5:32]
25% discount. This re-forecast to
[5:33]
takes into account that students ride
[5:34]
free.
[5:37]
in addition to
[5:38]
the most current changes in ridership,
[5:40]
this reduced revenue by
[5:46]
7.9 million. The second change
[5:47]
that the revenue is to include the
[5:49]
student adventure pass pilot budget
[5:52]
. Once again, because we were unsure
[5:54]
of funding, it was not included in
[5:55]
the budget. Including the student
[5:56]
adventure
[5:58]
pass funding , it adds
[6:02]
6.3,000,002 revenue that produces
[6:04]
a net revenue change of
[6:07]
1.6 million. The next amendments relate
[6:09]
to expense. First we have the removal
[6:10]
of four
[6:14]
42 laguna trades originally included
[6:16]
in the optimized
[6:19]
service budget. Next, another in just
[6:20]
a
[6:22]
moment --adjustment is the removal
[6:25]
of 20 laus
[6:27]
to convene a trains replaced by the
[6:28]
addition of 10
[6:31]
laus to montclair trains.
[6:33]
you also see here at the request of
[6:40]
sp cta, the
[6:41]
addition of cause for san bernardino
[6:43]
sharers added to san bernardino
[6:49]
county. This is funded in
[6:51]
its entirety by sp cta. Finally, the
[6:52]
negotiation of the mini bundle
[6:55]
has
[6:57]
reduced the original estimate budgeted
[6:59]
for mobilization by 2.5 million
[7:06]
. All these amounts create, in that,
[7:07]
a reduction to member agency required
[7:11]
support by $896,000.
[7:14]
the boxes
[7:15]
at the bottom of the slide show the
[7:17]
amounts of the fy 25 budget if
[7:18]
this recommended amendment is excepted.
[7:31]
all the following slides show the
[7:32]
proposed amended budget by category
[7:33]
and member agency, including changes
[7:35]
to the individual
[7:38]
lines in the operating budget.
[7:44]
you see here
[7:46]
the individual items that have been changed.
[7:52]
at the bottom, as I said, it creates
[7:53]
a
[7:54]
reduction to the amount we are asking
[7:56]
for member agencies by
[8:00]
$896,000. That concludes my report.
[8:02]
can I answer any questions?
[8:03]
>>
[8:04]
thank you very much for the report.
[8:05]
attorney to my colleagues here.
[8:08]
and online. A quiet bunch
[8:11]
again. Linda
[8:13]
.
[8:14]
>> thank you for your great explanation
[8:17]
of the numbers.
[8:18]
>> thank you. >>
[8:21]
everybody knows what the numbers are,
[8:22]
but you explained them so clearly.
[8:23]
thank you
[8:24]
for that.
[8:25]
>> thank you. >> all right.
[8:26]
with that,
[8:29]
this is actually an action item.
[8:30]
we need to first asked for public
[8:32]
comments.
[8:33]
>> mr. Chairman,
[8:36]
john dutrey. I have a couple of questions.
[8:38]
on the sharers contract
[8:41]
, obviously, sbcta is
[8:46]
covering that cost. Is that also in
[8:47]
the budget?
[8:48]
>> yes, that
[8:50]
it started
[8:53]
--added to
[8:54]
the budget by this amendment.
[8:55]
>> all
[8:56]
right, them. I move for approval.
[8:57]
>>
[8:59]
okay. We do have a motion.
[9:04]
before we do that, do we have any
[9:05]
public comments?
[9:06]
>> I have
[9:07]
not received any written public comment
[9:08]
or request to speak on this item.
[9:09]
>> okay.
[9:10]
emotion on the floor to approve. Do
[9:11]
we have a second? We have a second.
[9:14]
different county. [ laughter ]
[9:16]
roll call, please.
[9:17]
>> [ roll call
[9:18]
]
[9:34]
motion carried unanimously.
[9:35]
>> very good.
[9:38]
item one to
[9:41]
six see -- 6c.
[9:44]
performance audit
[9:47]
, deactivation of badges for employees,
[9:48]
board
[9:50]
members, and idts.
[10:00]
presented by the director of the audit
[10:01]
department.
[10:02]
>> good morning, chairman
[10:03]
and committee
[10:04]
members. Internal audit completed
[10:05]
the deactivation the badges for employees,
[10:06]
board members and
[10:07]
integrated digital and technology
[10:08]
services, also
[10:09]
known as idts, contractors. The audit
[10:11]
is included in the fiscal 25 board
[10:12]
approved
[10:13]
audit plan. The objective was to evaluate
[10:15]
the effectiveness of the agency's
[10:17]
badge deactivation process
[10:20]
for secure access control for employees,
[10:23]
board members and idts contractors.
[10:24]
the audit
[10:26]
period was january 2023 through
[10:35]
july 2024. There are three findings
[10:36]
and
[10:37]
three audit recommendations. Management
[10:38]
agreed with the findings and developed actions.
[10:41]
audit will
[10:42]
track the status of the corrective
[10:43]
actions. This concludes my item. Happy
[10:44]
to answer any
[10:47]
questions.
[10:48]
>> for such a long stretch
[10:49]
of
[10:50]
time to deal with this, that was a
[10:51]
quick report. I will open it
[10:53]
up to questions. I don't have
[10:56]
any questions.
[11:02]
any public
[11:04]
comments?
[11:05]
>> I have not received any
[11:06]
written public comments or requests
[11:07]
to speak on
[11:08]
this item.
[11:09]
>> okay. So then, I will
[11:10]
make a few comments. I asked
[11:11]
for this item to come to the audit
[11:12]
committee some time ago for the mere
[11:14]
fact that
[11:20]
my badge was supposedly expired
[11:22]
in the year 2020, and it was 2022
[11:23]
or 2023 and still working just fine.
[11:25]
I thought, at the time, there was
[11:26]
a lot of disgruntled ex-employees
[11:32]
using things like old keys or badges
[11:33]
to
[11:35]
get into
[11:41]
other
[11:42]
facilities. Not metrolink, but just, in
[11:44]
general, on the news. I thought, well,
[11:45]
we don't want
[11:46]
people with expired badges to be able
[11:47]
to come in and, you know, get
[11:49]
access to our facilities to cause harm.
[11:50]
and so, this started
[11:53]
this process.
[11:56]
I have learned that we
[11:58]
have one more little tweaks we are
[11:59]
going to have to add to this.
[12:01]
I am still getting comments from board members
[12:05]
, easy that even
[12:07]
as of today, that the old badges are
[12:08]
still working. What I have now
[12:09]
learned over the last many months
[12:11]
on this is that
[12:17]
our
[12:18]
badges are programmed twice, at least
[12:20]
board members, and anybody who has
[12:21]
access to this
[12:22]
building here at union station. The
[12:23]
expired badges, I believe, will not work,
[12:29]
will not work
[12:31]
at the wilshire building or any of
[12:32]
our facilities because they have been
[12:33]
turned off.
[12:34]
but what if it turned off are the
[12:38]
access to this building here by ellie
[12:39]
metro. Somehow we
[12:40]
have got to communicate to ellie metro that
[12:47]
--l.a. Metro, that when board members
[12:48]
change out
[12:49]
or expired badges, et cetera, anybody
[12:51]
who has access to this building,
[12:54]
they should be
[12:55]
notified to deactivate those badges
[12:56]
as well. I think that is the one thing
[12:57]
we
[12:58]
have to add to this to make sure that
[13:00]
gets accomplished, and we should
[13:01]
be good. I will leave it at that.
[13:08]
this is a receive and file. Appreciate
[13:09]
the audit
[13:10]
department's long-term deal to get
[13:11]
this resolved and figured out. It
[13:12]
will
[13:15]
lead to the much safer
[13:18]
work environment for
[13:25]
all of the metrolink family. With
[13:27]
that, we moved to item 6d,
[13:28]
financial results for the first seven
[13:30]
months of
[13:36]
fiscal year
[13:37]
2025 through january 2025 ridership,
[13:38]
revenue and operating results. Presented
[13:39]
by christine wilson, assistant director
[13:40]
of finance.
[13:41]
>> good morning, again.
[13:42]
this slide
[13:45]
shows the actual
[13:50]
versus forecast ridership by month.
[13:51]
the redline is the budget,
[13:54]
the columns are actual
[13:55]
with the blue portion regular ridership
[13:56]
in the orange portion the student
[13:57]
adventure
[13:58]
pass ridership. As you can see, where
[14:00]
below the forecast ridership.
[14:03]
much of this has
[14:04]
to do with the devastating fires in
[14:06]
the month of january. Reductions
[14:11]
went from 2.5% on the ventura line to
[14:12]
9%
[14:15]
on the antelope valley line.
[14:18]
this graph shows the
[14:19]
current ridership forecast for the
[14:21]
entire year. Looking at the most
[14:24]
recent month,
[14:28]
january is historically a recovery from
[14:29]
december holidays. This year was different.
[14:30]
the fires
[14:33]
had a real effect
[14:40]
. Through january, ridership was forecasted
[14:42]
at 4.2 million or 60% while actuals
[14:43]
work 4.3 or 62%. The student adventure
[14:45]
pass pilot provided 1.3 million writers
[14:48]
--riders year to date.
[14:51]
we see here a graph of farebox revenue
[14:52]
by month and the current forecast
[14:54]
for the rest of the year.
[14:56]
through the month of january, revenue
[14:57]
was budgeted at
[15:03]
24.4 million or 54% recovery,
[15:05]
while the actual is 23. 4 million
[15:06]
or a 52% recovery.
[15:09]
1.1
[15:15]
1.1 million
[15:16]
under budget. What are we so far under
[15:18]
forecast? The 25% monthly pass discount
[15:21]
offered systemwide for the poor on-time
[15:24]
performance account
[15:27]
--accounts for 170,000 of the shortfall.
[15:29]
the reduction of the student adventure
[15:30]
pass reimbursement
[15:33]
to
[15:34]
25% accounts for another 600,000.
[15:36]
free rides for
[15:39]
fire victims added
[15:42]
to the reduction in revenue. There
[15:43]
were fewer
[15:44]
passengers as a result of the fire.
[15:51]
for total financial results in january,
[15:52]
before san clemente, total expenses
[15:54]
were under budget by 17.6 million
[16:03]
, and member agency support is in
[16:04]
surplus
[16:05]
by 21 point 4. Total operating revenue
[16:06]
is 37.6, less than
[16:08]
0.1 million under budget. Total expenses
[16:23]
at 169.8 million are 17.6 million
[16:24]
under budget. Categories under
[16:25]
budget hour as shown on the slides.
[16:27]
these expenses, I remind you, are
[16:28]
based on
[16:30]
accruals, not actuals. This slide
[16:31]
shows
[16:33]
that we had
[16:39]
passed two receivables of
[16:40]
almost 40 million. In truth, by now,
[16:42]
we actually have received 30 of it.
[16:43]
this
[16:45]
is way out of date, --
[16:48]
, just because we have received the
[16:49]
money. This
[16:50]
is the operating cash that we are presenting
[16:57]
our cash position at metro. As you
[16:58]
know, there
[16:59]
is a $50 million threshold we are
[17:00]
to maintain
[17:02]
. You see here that the threshold
[17:06]
, the amount we're at
[17:09]
right now, is 86.1.
[17:15]
moving to
[17:18]
arrow. This is the ridership
[17:21]
by month.
[17:27]
through january, the
[17:28]
ridership was forecasted at 81,000
[17:29]
and actual ridership is at 85,000.
[17:30]
over forecast by 4000.
[17:31]
year to date, the student adventure
[17:33]
pass attributes over half of the ridership.
[17:48]
this is the arrow farebox revenue
[17:49]
by month compared to budget. Through
[17:50]
january, farebox revenue was budgeted
[17:51]
at 113,000 and the
[17:52]
actual is 217,000, over budget by
[17:54]
102,000. With the student adventure
[17:55]
pass contributing half
[17:57]
of the revenue. Financial
[18:00]
results for
[18:06]
arrow through january show operating
[18:07]
revenue at 365,000, or 264,000 over
[18:09]
budget.
[18:12]
expenses are 8.9 million, or 1.1 billion
[18:21]
--million over budget. Support is
[18:22]
required at 8.6
[18:24]
million, or in surplus by 1.3 million.
[18:25]
this is the student
[18:27]
adventure pass update. As you
[18:30]
can see, this slide shows the
[18:33]
amount of the student
[18:36]
adventure pass ridership that we
[18:39]
have obtained both through tvd
[18:42]
and the mobile app.
[18:45]
as you can see, it has added
[18:48]
1.4 million riders to the system,
[18:49]
including
[18:51]
arrow.
[18:58]
this is an update on the fy 26
[18:59]
budget development schedule. We have
[19:01]
,
[19:04]
thus far,
[19:09]
the budget presented to member agency
[19:10]
cfos three
[19:11]
times, and to the membership agency
[19:12]
ceos on february 21. We continue to
[19:16]
be in daily discussions with the member agencies
[19:19]
on fy 26 budget
[19:21]
, and we feel that we are on track
[19:22]
to bring
[19:25]
a budget as required to this
[19:28]
committee next month.
[19:33]
that concludes my report. May I answer
[19:34]
any
[19:35]
questions?
[19:36]
>> did any of the agencies
[19:37]
that you have been --of
[19:38]
the member agencies have any issues
[19:40]
with what the 26
[19:41]
budget is looking like?
[19:42]
>> at the
[19:43]
beginning, but
[19:46]
by now, almost everyone is --
[19:47]
there are certain things we still
[19:49]
have to work out.
[19:50]
>> no
[19:52]
huge hurdles
[19:55]
that will cause any --
[19:56]
>>
[19:57]
we will work them out.
[19:58]
>> any questions
[19:59]
or comments by anybody? Okay. This
[20:00]
one is receive and file. Do we have
[20:01]
any
[20:04]
public comments on that
[20:07]
?
[20:08]
>> I have not received any
[20:09]
written public comments or request
[20:10]
to speak on that item.
[20:11]
>> okay. Our
[20:12]
most
[20:13]
favorite part of the day
[20:16]
, ceos report.
[20:17]
>>
[20:18]
I will make sure it is brief so it
[20:19]
stays your favorite. Very quickly,
[20:20]
we
[20:21]
mentioned this in the executive committee meeting
[20:24]
. I think it is important to share
[20:25]
here
[20:28]
today as well as it
[20:29]
relates to some financial issues.
[20:31]
we are all
[20:35]
looking towards 2028 in our ability
[20:37]
to be ready to move
[20:40]
so many people for the olympic games.
[20:49]
the most
[20:50]
--most recently, we had an earmark
[20:51]
in a senate appropriations bill that
[20:52]
was going
[20:53]
to set aside $200 million to the region
[20:55]
4 --region for
[20:57]
olympics preparedness. And 25 million
[20:58]
was identified
[20:59]
for metrolink. With what is expected
[21:01]
to happen today in the senate,
[21:06]
that they will act on the house's
[21:07]
version of the
[21:10]
continuing resolution
[21:13]
, that will effectively
[21:14]
eliminate the earmarks that were identified
[21:15]
in that senate appropriations package
[21:16]
in the
[21:19]
appropriations bill.
[21:21]
besides losing the money, the other
[21:22]
element it did
[21:24]
is that that action, that earmark,
[21:25]
was creating a
[21:28]
special account for
[21:31]
the olympic games so there
[21:33]
was this place you could put money
[21:34]
over the
[21:36]
next appropriations cycles. The action where
[21:45]
the cr will eliminate the ability
[21:46]
of having that
[21:47]
account also available for us for
[21:49]
future efforts. Where now --the royal
[21:50]
we,
[21:51]
collectively, will have to identify
[21:52]
another way of securing funding
[21:54]
from the federal government. Is a
[21:58]
big deal.
[21:59]
is a huge disappointment. We had other
[22:01]
earmarks in both house and senate
[22:02]
packages,
[22:03]
as probably some of your own home
[22:04]
agencies had. On top of
[22:06]
that, we've also lost other earmarks
[22:07]
as well
[22:12]
through what is happening in washington d.c.
[22:19]
thought I would share that with the
[22:20]
group is
[22:21]
the only other item is that I want
[22:22]
to call back your attention to the
[22:23]
announcement I made earlier this week
[22:25]
that on friday of last week our chief
[22:26]
financial
[22:27]
officer let me know that he was going
[22:28]
to be moving on to
[22:31]
new activities
[22:34]
, new things. He
[22:36]
is going to be leaving us here at
[22:37]
metrolink in early april.
[22:40]
this is why
[22:41]
christine wilson felt so confident
[22:42]
in saying we will have the budget
[22:43]
all worked out.
[22:44]
it is because arnold has committed
[22:46]
to making sure it is done before he
[22:47]
rides
[22:49]
off into the sunset.
[22:57]
that is why christine said, sure,
[22:58]
we have got no problem. In any
[22:59]
event, I said it earlier, my thanks
[23:01]
to arnold for his service here at
[23:02]
metrolink. He
[23:03]
has been --it has been six or seven
[23:04]
years he served in
[23:07]
various capacities.
[23:10]
he has helped us to get
[23:11]
through this challenging time of coming
[23:13]
out of covid and metrolink reimagined
[23:14]
and a
[23:16]
few other elements. It took his steadfast leadership
[23:17]
in that regard to
[23:19]
help us navigate that
[23:31]
, and working with
[23:32]
her member agencies. My thanks, again,
[23:34]
to arnold for his service. You will
[23:35]
hear me
[23:36]
talk about this. We have a couple
[23:37]
more meetings where I get to embarrass
[23:38]
him
[23:39]
in public. You will hear more on that
[23:40]
too. They could, mr. Chair. That
[23:41]
concludes my remarks.
[23:42]
>> appreciate
[23:43]
your comments. Follow-up question
[23:44]
for you. With the cr, is
[23:45]
it passes today, that keeps the government
[23:46]
open for a couple more months. What
[23:47]
about,
[23:49]
at that point, are these earmarks
[23:50]
potentially able to
[23:52]
be put back into a final resolution
[23:58]
? How does that work?
[23:59]
>> so what
[24:00]
we're hearing, in fact, the timing
[24:01]
right now is that the members are,
[24:04]
many members
[24:13]
from southern california, are now putting
[24:14]
out the notice that
[24:15]
we are accepting new earmark requests.
[24:16]
we have a few already lined up that
[24:17]
we
[24:18]
will be looking at. This 200 million
[24:19]
one was a movement of funding from
[24:20]
one
[24:23]
program that was
[24:24]
stepped back and put this 200 million
[24:25]
into the special account. I think
[24:27]
we will go back after it. We will
[24:29]
be looking at fy 26. The appropriations
[24:30]
package that was being done today,
[24:31]
that will be done today, was actually
[24:35]
fy 25
[24:38]
, the year we are in right
[24:39]
now, and the can has been kicked down
[24:40]
the street a few different times.
[24:41]
now --
[24:42]
they want to appropriate, appropriators
[24:44]
want to appropriate --
[24:49]
the fact that the cr will move forward
[24:50]
means we keep things
[24:51]
business as usual. Then we will likely
[24:52]
see some level of continuing resolution
[24:53]
as we
[24:56]
get into federal fiscal year
[25:00]
, september 30. We will see what happens
[25:02]
as to whether
[25:04]
we see continuing resolutions for
[25:05]
fy 26
[25:08]
as well.
[25:11]
theoretically, congress should
[25:12]
act over the summer, and we should
[25:13]
have a full appropriations package
[25:14]
by the
[25:15]
end of september. That has not happened
[25:17]
emma doesn't
[25:20]
happen all the time. So
[25:21]
we will likely see some continuation
[25:25]
of the fy 26, but we will all be making
[25:26]
requests, and
[25:27]
certainly metrolink will be through
[25:34]
earmark requests in future appropriations
[25:35]
packages.
[25:36]
>>
[25:38]
okay. Thank you.
[25:39]
committee member comments. Anybody
[25:41]
have anything on their mind?
[25:49]
pam? But I just want to add about
[25:50]
arnold. In addition
[25:51]
to his technical abilities, he has
[25:52]
always been a very genial and kind
[25:53]
person. I
[25:54]
appreciate that.
[25:55]
>> anybody else?
[26:08]
you ought to see him when the
[26:09]
member agencies aren't cooperative.
[26:10]
that he is not so congenial.
[26:11]
>> that
[26:12]
is because he
[26:13]
knows when to pull his punches and
[26:14]
be the tough guy.
[26:15]
>> you've got it.
[26:16]
absolutely.
[26:17]
>> but to still maintain
[26:18]
good relationships.
[26:19]
>> no doubt. Are
[26:20]
right. Chair's comments.
[26:21]
arnold, I hope this is a retirement,
[26:22]
not l.a. Metro stealing somebody else
[26:23]
from
[26:24]
us . I will also point out that, before
[26:29]
darren, you filled
[26:30]
the shoes as the ceo, interim ceo
[26:32]
for a bit. You have had a variety
[26:35]
of roles
[26:37]
. You know, your reports are always
[26:38]
very
[26:41]
well presented . We appreciate all
[26:43]
that you have done here at metrolink.
[26:44]
hopefully, you are going fishing
[26:47]
and not fishing for something down
[26:48]
the
[26:50]
street. [ laughter ]
[26:55]
we will have to find that out. All right.
[26:56]
with that, we're going to go ahead and adjourn.