[0:01] waiting for council and the mayor. So I would

[0:03] like to call this meeting to order General Committee for

[0:06] March. 8th 2023 will start with our indigenous land

[0:11] statement. We acknowledge the lands which constitute the present

[0:15] day city of Mississauga as being part of the treaty

[0:18] and traditional territory of the Mississauga of the credit First

[0:21] nation. .

[0:22] Holding the Shoni.

[0:23] Confederacy that here on when dot and Wyandotte nations.

[0:27] We recognize these peoples and their own ancestors as peoples

[0:30] who inhabited these lands Since the time immemorial, the

[0:34] city of Mississauga is home to many global indigenous peoples

[0:38] as a municipality, the city of Mississauga is actively

[0:41] working towards reconciliation by confronting our past. .

[0:44] And our present providing space for the indigenous peoples within

[0:48] their territory to recognize and uphold their treaty rights and

[0:51] to support indigenous peoples. We formally recognize the animals

[0:55] to be origins of our name and continue to make

[0:58] Mississauga a safe place for all indigenous peoples. .

[1:03] Can I have an approval of the agenda this morning,

[1:05] counselor? Temerloh. Thank you all in favor

[1:08] that is carried. Do we have any declarations of

[1:10] conflict of interest? ?

[1:12] Seeing none. Can I have a mover of the

[1:15] minutes of the previous meeting? Councilor Fonseca, Thank

[1:18] you all in favor that is carried

[1:21] Presentations. We do not have any of this morning

[1:24] deputation Zweiri have one on item. 10.1 Mr.

[1:28] Dan Anderson resident

[1:31] Mr Anderson. The floor is yours.

[1:42] Absolutely.

[1:49] Dan Anderson. Good morning to the chair and other

[1:53] council members hope there'll be some flexibility on time,

[1:57] but maybe not necessary primarily as a war to resident

[2:02] I'm here to address Agenda item. 10 1 10.1,

[2:05] in which commissioner writers requesting your approval for the

[2:07] funding of roadway modifications, particularly speed bumps for various

[2:12] words. .

[2:13] The agenda report, however, does not disclose the

[2:16] proposed number of speed bumps for each roadway. .

[2:19] But it should, in the same way that proposed

[2:22] numbers are disclosed for new stop signs and raised crosswalks.

[2:25] The reason is the specifics are important, for

[2:28] example, the specifics and that are in agenda.

[2:30] 10.1 indicate that the funding request is not consistent with

[2:35] the number of speed bumps. . Um

[2:38] That are implied by the voting of word to residents

[2:41] for two roads, Bronze, Grover and or Road.

[2:44] It's unfortunate Counselor schedules. Not here, Um,

[2:48] , slide number seven. .

[2:50] But I sent him a copy of my comments.

[2:53] So

[2:54] I had a time.

[2:55] The, um for Brahms Grove Road.

[3:00] The voting implied.

[3:02] As in this display here is road safety is compromised

[3:06] Option of four speed bumps. .

[3:08] And one additional stop sign.

[3:11] As a related consideration. The illustrated location for these

[3:15] four speed bumps is somewhat problematical and may have distorted

[3:19] the voting. Three speed bumps were placed adjacent to

[3:23] a vacant hydro right of way on the right and

[3:27] the arrows shown suggests relocating one of those to the

[3:30] middle section flanked by homes. .

[3:33] And that should be done in the context of a

[3:34] compromise solution. .

[3:37] The only forced choice option otherwise for residents

[3:41] Who wanted at least one speed bump in that section,

[3:44] where a lot of the homes are was that

[3:47] they were essentially told If you want one, you

[3:50] have to vote for 10 instead of four, so

[3:52] some would have that would have distorted the voting slide

[3:56] number eight for or road. The voting implied the

[4:00] bottom section. .

[4:03] Of the slide, which shows a compromise option of

[4:05] three speed bumps. .

[4:06] And two additional stop signs.

[4:09] As can be seen here. There is a fully

[4:11] fenced industrial section, and the picture at the top

[4:16] makes that more clear, fully fenced industrial section all

[4:19] along the southern side of the road, so no

[4:22] pedestrians cross that road. .

[4:24] And related to this. In a separate 2022 survey

[4:28] provided to interim councilor Pat Mullen. .

[4:31] 80% of all the residents on or a road identified

[4:35] that they wanted only

[4:37] To speed bumps and two additional stop signs.

[4:40] But the only compromise option provided was three speed Watch,

[4:45] , which which isn't materially different. .

[4:48] The top section isn't directly relevant today but shows that

[4:51] prior request last year to obtain funding for 12 speed

[4:55] bumps and asserting that there was 63% support. .

[4:59] But that was because the residents weren't informed about what

[5:03] was being proposed predominantly enough to give that kind of

[5:07] a result, and there was a similar nondisclosure for

[5:10] Bronze Grove Road. .

[5:13] That was partially offset because prior to the end of

[5:15] the voting period, , they discovered did not

[5:18] Non disclosure at least hundreds of people did enough to

[5:22] change what happened. .

[5:24] Now there's two summary video links on slide number two,

[5:27] and they provide further background on what then led

[5:30] to a re vote because of these problems. .

[5:32] For the residents for Brahms girlfriend in Park Royal in

[5:36] general, but these ones were the most materially affected.

[5:40] .

[5:41] Now slide number five.

[5:43] This one helps to clarify the understanding about why the

[5:49] compromise options. .

[5:50] I know that the level of support for the compromise

[5:53] options of four speed bombs since three speed bumps now

[5:57] whether it's for a maximum number of speed bumps.

[5:59] That's what you want, or if you don't want

[6:01] any or anything in between, when none of the

[6:04] options that are available gets more than 50%. .

[6:08] Then the individuals at the extreme.

[6:11] Would reasonably be assumed to take a default to the

[6:14] next closest option. .

[6:16] If you do that, In the case of Bronze

[6:18] Grove, you had end up with 100% of the

[6:21] people who voted supporting the compromise option, not 5100%.

[6:26] .

[6:27] Um with regards to or road there's to compromise options.

[6:31] 62% would take the one with three speed bumps.

[6:34] The question is how that compares with what's in

[6:38] the agenda. 10.1 information provided to you instead of

[6:42] four speed bumps for Brahms Grove. It's saying 10

[6:45] speedboats. .

[6:47] And it's saying there's 56% support.

[6:49] Which makes no sense, and I'll explain how that

[6:52] happened. .

[6:53] Because the support is actually

[6:56] 26% and even that is overstated for our road.

[7:01] The agenda. 10.1 says that

[7:05] Support for six speed bumps. Not three is 61%.

[7:09] . But the facts are

[7:11] That the support is no higher than 30%.

[7:15] Now slide number six.

[7:18] This is a little bit heavy. I hope some

[7:20] people had a chance to review it. First going

[7:22] left to right. The columns are the number of

[7:24] speed bumps. .

[7:26] The number of residents voting percentage voting for the different

[7:30] options. .

[7:32] And you can see 26% that voted for 10 speed

[7:37] bumps. .

[7:38] Not 50 some percent and 30% for six speed bumps.

[7:42] .

[7:43] And then the second last column is the compromise option.

[7:48] And as you can see, the 100% is

[7:49] if as these people at the extremes moved to a

[7:52] compromise position

[7:54] And then the sixth one. We probably don't need

[7:56] to get into it. So what happens if you

[7:58] simply ignore people that don't want speed bumps? ?

[8:02] Now, as noted the percentage support used to justify

[8:05] 10.1. .

[8:06] Relies upon this issue of as you can see the

[8:10] start of the 56% in the 61% of the total

[8:14] in the second quarter and the second box column. .

[8:17] All that represents is the number of people that said

[8:20] yes to traffic coming. However, they define traffic

[8:24] calming. .

[8:26] But

[8:27] But they certainly didn't support what commissioner right is proposing.

[8:31] And that raises a fundamental question. That is.

[8:33] There is a mandate that's been expressed by his

[8:35] operations demonstrated by his operations and demonstrated by the funding

[8:40] request, , And it's this

[8:42] If residents support traffic, calming.

[8:45] Then it is not their business. How many speed

[8:47] bumps we install? I believe they're actually operating without

[8:51] understanding. The question is whether or not collectively Council

[8:54] has given them that as a mandate because it completely

[8:57] contradicts the notion that residents are voting for things. .

[9:01] Assuming that's not the mandate and the agenda. 10.1

[9:04] funding request should be modified. .

[9:06] For those roads and instead reflect the compromise options implied

[9:09] by the voting of residents. Now, all kinds

[9:13] All councilors want to have a good working relationship with

[9:16] commissioner right. .

[9:18] And at the same time they want to demonstrate respect

[9:21] for the views of residents. So for purposes of

[9:24] agenda 10.1 to avoid unnecessarily created an awkward situation for

[9:29] our new war to councilor of intellectual and for other

[9:33] councilors as they prepare to ask questions and decide how

[9:36] to vote on agenda 10.1. .

[9:38] It would be helpful procedurally. If the chair Councilor

[9:42] Mahoney might give commissioner right the opportunity to first identify

[9:47] the council members whether he was receptive to modifying his

[9:50] proposal for those two proposal for those two roadways. .

[9:54] In order in order to be consistent with the voting

[9:56] results. Commissioner right could identify the council members the

[10:01] approximate financial effect of such modifications. I expect it's

[10:03] not very material, , and it's less of anything. .

[10:06] Then all the council members would have the opportunity of

[10:09] being able to simultaneously support commissioner rights request for funding

[10:14] and also respect the vote by war to residents now

[10:18] have modified my intended addendum comments to instead address a

[10:23] specific example with regards to slide nine. .

[10:28] Slide nine is referencing other wards. I'm going to

[10:30] give you an example. And I'm not positive on

[10:32] the details of this at all. But in Ward

[10:35] three, for example, and that came to mind

[10:37] partly because Queen Frederica Street when I looked at what

[10:40] was in the 10.1 agenda, had a very I

[10:43] think was 51% or 53%, , something like that. .

[10:46] So I took that as an example and try to

[10:49] find information, though it's been deleted from the website.

[10:52] .

[10:53] And, um, you may find that there's hundreds

[10:56] of residents are angry about what ends up happening because

[10:59] they don't know what's going to happen similar to what

[11:01] happened in the war to prior to interim councilor Pat

[11:05] Mullen, , arranging for a revote. .

[11:08] The information may not have been disclosed to Ward three

[11:10] residents about what was going on. In the case

[11:13] of Golden Archerd, for example, there's no options.

[11:16] .

[11:17] Provided that suggests that the letter they received did not

[11:21] disclose the number of proposed speed bonds and the Web

[11:24] page link that was provided to them also does not

[11:27] disclose it. . The commentary. . The links

[11:30] The only place that appears in a tab. No

[11:32] reference is made to the tab. So that's what

[11:35] happened in war. Two presidents didn't have a clue

[11:38] what was happening. If you go down the Web

[11:39] page route, it's suggesting there's a survey and it's

[11:43] suggesting that there is going to be a

[11:46] Community meeting, and that's not what happened.

[11:49] So it seems unreasonable for an uninformed group of people

[11:52] to be making a decision may continue for a bit.

[11:55] I would encourage you to wrap up. It

[11:57] has been a full force. Um, presentation in

[11:59] a full 10 minutes. Sounds good, and I

[12:03] don't know of similar concerns apply elsewhere to other awards,

[12:06] But you know, the other things I was

[12:11] going to mention, are things that should be done.

[12:13] .

[12:13] I think there should be explicit provisions for disclosure in

[12:17] the surveys in the funding requests in what's on the

[12:22] website, all kinds of things, and once voting

[12:26] has taken place. Residents should be able to access

[12:28] online versions right now. It's deleted for not for

[12:31] the award to stuff

[12:33] Because cancer Ted, I don't think has come to

[12:36] a settled agreement with the commissioner. .

[12:38] But I think for others have been deleted. And

[12:42] I think that's because of a policy that an agreement

[12:44] between the counselors. Anderson, can you please wrap

[12:47] up, sir? And this is my final point.

[12:49] Other than returning to what I originally asked about

[12:52] war, , too. .

[12:53] I think counselors Karen Ross and others had an agreement.

[12:58] .

[12:58] For council purposes that councilors could not would not oppose

[13:03] whatever they wanted to do with gas tax funds. .

[13:06] At a council meeting regardless of what residents say and

[13:10] I think that's fundamentally wrong for council. Thank you.

[13:13] .

[13:13] Thank you, sir. I will go to the

[13:14] board Councilor Maria

[13:18] I just was curious about one question. Can we

[13:20] just go back to Brahms Grove Road? Your slide

[13:24] on Brahms. . Grover Brahms Grove. . Sure. .

[13:29] Ah, probably true. You just passed it.

[13:31] Yes, , I'm sorry. .

[13:35] Sorry. What was the question? No, not

[13:38] this one, the next one, the next one

[13:40] or wrote

[13:41] Where you had the numbers of people. Oh,

[13:43] sure, sure. There. These are all I

[13:46] wanna do. Clarify was when you come to 56%.

[13:50] There's no double counting right? So we don't

[13:52] have

[13:53] In the 26% people who are

[13:57] Because people who want 10 presumably also good with four,

[14:01] so all I wanted to make sure was there

[14:03] is no double count. I just agree with that.

[14:05] I'm just asking staff, though. Is there

[14:07] any double counting or there is no double counting. .

[14:11] Three chairman Tony the counselor, Djamila So as an

[14:15] example, counselor in terms of Bronze Cove. The

[14:17] way the survey was set up is that it initially

[14:20] opens up with a broad question. Do you support

[14:24] traffic coming in your neighborhood? And it's almost like

[14:27] a yes no kind of response. And as an

[14:30] example in that 1 56% of the respondents said,

[14:33] Yes, , we support traffic, , calming. .

[14:35] So then that that group of people then goes on

[14:37] to the next phase of the survey, which then

[14:39] presents a few options for them to vote on. .

[14:42] And then what staff do is compiled the results of

[14:44] that vote, and in the in the example of

[14:47] bonds Grove, it was option one that received the

[14:49] most support from the people that supported traffic coming. .

[14:53] And then we take that information. And then we

[14:55] work with the ward councilor to lay that out and

[14:57] then to come up with a plan for traffic coming

[15:00] for that neighborhood, So that's really in general how

[15:03] that process worked. So just so I understand because

[15:06] I did a similar one on Paisley. But I

[15:08] think we did a little bit differently. As I

[15:10] just want to understand our 56% of the people who

[15:14] live on that street wants some kind of speed bumps,

[15:17] not traffic coming, but speed bumps. Would

[15:20] that be correct? ?

[15:21] So out of the amount of responding So an example

[15:26] on bonds. Grove 205 households completed the survey.

[15:30] So that's not saying everyone completed the survey. And

[15:32] of those respondents, 56% said, yes to traffic

[15:36] calming. .

[15:37] But what percentage of the streets said Yes to traffic

[15:40] coming. We typically don't measure the overall we only

[15:44] go with the response rate. So the people that

[15:47] so people that don't respond at all Don't get counted

[15:50] into the response. So it's either so that we

[15:52] get the responses back. So we surveyed the whole

[15:54] street. Right this case. We got 205 households

[15:58] and out of that response. We then take that

[16:00] percentage. Fair enough. 56% of the 206 wanted

[16:04] speed bumps, not traffic coming. That's what I'm

[16:06] trying to understand. .

[16:07] So that it was because what we're proposing is not

[16:10] just speed bumps. There is a mix of stop

[16:12] signs raised raised. .

[16:14] Pedestrian crossings and speed traffic calming. So the question

[16:17] was broad. Is it do you support traffic coming

[16:19] on your street? And then if the answer was

[16:21] Yes, then the detail goes in and sort of

[16:24] the next part of the survey, which was option

[16:26] one or option two. And then we looked at

[16:28] the response from that part of the survey to come

[16:30] back to the council and present that information and work

[16:33] towards a plan. . So it is possible that

[16:38] Of the 206. Not a majority want speed bumps,

[16:42] but they're okay with other parts of speed traffic

[16:45] coming right, But we haven't drilled down to because

[16:48] speed bumps tend to be very divisive. And it's

[16:50] of course, up to individual ward councilors. What

[16:53] I know Councilor Mahoney had one where 100% of the

[16:56] street wanted the speed bumps until they didn't want them.

[17:00] So and I have had the same issue on

[17:03] Paisley where you do surveys and then people wake up

[17:05] later. So it is something I mean, it's

[17:07] an interesting point. .

[17:08] And at what point do you say?

[17:10] It's warranted technically. So it's a safety issue versus

[17:14] do people wanted on their streets. . So I

[17:17] I'm still not clear, though. Looks like we

[17:20] don't have a number for speed bumps. We have

[17:23] a number for traffic, calming and a buffet or

[17:27] menu of items that people are saying yes, but

[17:29] the most contentious ones tend to be speed bumps.

[17:32] So maybe going forward. We need to look at

[17:35] that. Thank you. Thank you, Councilor Councilor

[17:38] Fonseca. .

[17:39] Thank you, Hugh chair, no questions to the

[17:42] delegate or two staff, but since War three was

[17:45] named, I just want to make it very clear.

[17:49] . Um, , that

[17:52] In all the instances in Ward three where there has

[17:55] been a request from residents in the community for traffic,

[17:59] , calming, , Um, , I have

[18:04] Went through a process with the residents in the community.

[18:09] .

[18:10] And with staff.

[18:12] To have a very, very fulsome understanding. Uh

[18:18] and, , um

[18:20] Study of the the roadway where the residents in that

[18:26] neighborhood

[18:28] Have inquired about traffic coming calming, including speed bumps,

[18:35] and that has included not only the initial,

[18:41] um communication out to the community, which goes through

[18:46] through, , um, , staff

[18:49] Ah, along with multiple multiple community meetings, Um,

[18:56] virtual in person down to the point where I

[19:01] have, , actually, , uh

[19:04] Divided the sections of the road into three or four

[19:09] parts. . Uh and had, , um

[19:14] In some cases along about beaches as an example,

[19:17] that roadway is almost three kilometers long. I put

[19:21] out I think over 9000 letters I had, , uh

[19:28] Perhaps 10 community meetings. Uh and then I also

[19:33] engaged the Rockwood Homeowners Association. . Ah, ,

[19:38] In particular to that neighborhood and in further further study

[19:44] of the roadway, So just to be clear because

[19:49] you said in your remarks that the community was not

[19:52] engaged in more three, sure making, making it

[19:55] clear that in all because you reference Ward three. .

[20:00] I just wanted to make it clear that in all

[20:03] the cases ah in, uh in Ward three,

[20:07] where the request has come from the community for some

[20:13] form of traffic coming to be put on the roadway,

[20:16] , I have ensured and exhausted. .

[20:19] Pretty much all avenues with regards to communicating, uh,

[20:24] to the community about the traffic coming and at

[20:27] the end of the day

[20:29] We have to make a decision at some point as

[20:31] to whether or not um

[20:33] The technical experts and the proposal that is being put

[20:36] in place is going to be right for that roadway.

[20:39] . But I did want to clarify. . Ah

[20:43] Factually that I have had many meetings. And if

[20:46] you would like the details of that you can contact

[20:48] my office. Thank you very much, Mr.

[20:51] Anderson. This isn't a debate. I think you've

[20:54] been given your 10 minutes. I'd like to just

[20:55] go through the council so they can do that.

[20:57] And I think you understand, clarify One part give

[21:01] you 10 minutes to to to do it, And

[21:04] this is an opportunity for council. We're not going

[21:06] back and forth debate. We're trying to address the

[21:09] The issues in like councilor speak as you were given

[21:11] the opportunity Counselor Parish. .

[21:15] Yes. I haven't had any bad experiences like you

[21:18] were. Everybody wanted them, Then nobody wanted them.

[21:20] I'm just curious. Um, we used to

[21:23] have temporary ones that you could throw across the road

[21:26] and see if people want to change their minds.

[21:29] Do we still have those? ?

[21:31] Three Mr Charity Counselor Parish we had We don't use

[21:34] them as much anymore. But they were when we

[21:36] first started getting into the business of traffic coming now

[21:38] that there are quite a few within the city,

[21:41] it's easier for us to demonstrate Go to the street,

[21:43] and you can see the insulation that's in place.

[21:45] So we try and get out of the amount

[21:47] of labor that's involved in installation and then removing it

[21:50] later on. We tend not to use the temporary

[21:53] ones as much, but it is. It is

[21:54] an available option. I just wanted to know that.

[21:56] . Thank you. .

[21:57] Thank you, Councilor just for clarification. I did

[22:00] have one that had 100% in them when they were

[22:02] put in something like them. It's the unintended consequences

[22:04] As we deal with and quite a regular basis.

[22:06] Councilor Hong Thank you through the chair, and I

[22:11] want to thank the resident for coming in today and

[22:13] sharing his concerns. We've spoken a number of times

[22:17] about this did want to apologize for being late.

[22:20] We were at the International Women's Day event, and

[22:23] I was

[22:23] Speaking with the number of residents, students from Clark's

[22:26] in high school and Lauren Park High School who are

[22:28] very engaged and amazing young women who want to be

[22:33] involved in our city, and actually, we're talking

[22:35] about some of the challenges of of speeding and safety

[22:39] issues along Brahms Grove and Lauren Park Road, which

[22:43] we have a number of measures there. .

[22:45] Um, I do acknowledge that I think it is

[22:49] something that has come up quite a bit in the

[22:51] in the in the ward. I know. Previous

[22:54] counselors have emphasized this and I think it's appropriate.

[22:59] It's our Vision zero mission to prevent these incidents from

[23:05] happening in our communities. .

[23:07] And we know for the most part. It is

[23:09] our own residents and neighbors who are who are facing

[23:12] these problems, and there are the ones who are

[23:14] likely also facing the consequences for speeding. .

[23:20] We will be debating this later. And so I'm

[23:22] happy to engage further on traffic coming in general,

[23:25] when we're when we get to the to the item

[23:28] on the agenda. I do want to acknowledge that

[23:31] it is just where the chair said it is not

[23:34] just not really a back and forth debate here,

[23:36] but, um, that you do have a legitimate

[23:40] point. . In acknowledging that there are residents who are

[23:43] Um, not in favor that we should consider as

[23:47] part of the mathematics around, Um, numbers and

[23:51] the types of traffic coming that we do employ,

[23:54] but I think we've learned a lot and I think

[23:57] the department has done a good job of receiving that

[24:01] feedback and calculating what would be appropriate. .

[24:06] Measures moving forward. Not every calming measure is a

[24:09] speed bump. Not every solution is a bollard and

[24:13] you know there are road diets. There's so many

[24:15] tools that we have in our toolbox that I know

[24:17] the city staff are eerily exploring, and I look

[24:22] forward to, uh to them continuing to do that,

[24:25] , in this instance in our area. .

[24:27] Um, chair I'm happy to move my residence deputation.

[24:31] .

[24:32] Thank you, Councilor Ted Joe and very well said,

[24:35] and I think we all do agree. It's

[24:37] not a perfect science or an easy solution. We

[24:39] do try to communicate as best as we possibly can.

[24:41] With residents to gauge supporter or non support.

[24:45] I will just speak as I do have one on

[24:48] this 10.1 as well in Ward eight that I have

[24:51] engaged with the residents and another one that I got

[24:53] 100% support from from the residents and have had some

[24:56] public meetings and consultations so

[24:59] I certainly appreciate you coming forward, Mr Anderson and

[25:02] welcome to stick around when 10.1 comes forward and listen

[25:05] to the debate, So the deputy and his moved

[25:07] by councilor to go all in favor. .

[25:09] That is carried. Thank you.

[25:13] Moving on to public question. Period. Madam clerk.

[25:16] . Do we have a

[25:19] On the same subject matter. We have Athena Tag

[25:22] ado from more three Athena's online. Okay, thank

[25:25] you. I will read the blurb here for public

[25:28] question. Period pursuant to section 58 of the Council

[25:31] procedure by law. 0044-20 to two as amended General

[25:37] Committee may grant permission to remember of the public to

[25:39] ask a question of General Committee with the following provisions

[25:42] one. .

[25:43] Questions may be submitted to the clerk at least 24

[25:46] hours prior to the meeting. .

[25:48] To a person is limited to two questions and much

[25:51] must pertain specific items on the current agenda, and

[25:54] the speaker will state which item the question is related

[25:57] to

[25:58] Three. The total speaking time shall be five minutes

[26:01] maximum per speaker unless extended by the mayor or the

[26:04] chair and for any response, not provided at the

[26:08] meeting will be provided in the format of a written

[26:12] I ran out of room here.

[26:19] 12. I think you get the gist. My

[26:23] page cut off. So response. Thank you.

[26:27] I don't have response in my by the Chanda. .

[26:30] Um, is the resident online?

[26:34] Okay? Yes, I am. Good morning.

[26:36] Good morning. .

[26:38] Yes, Before I begin, I would like to

[26:40] clarify counter Fonseca's comments with respect to Ward three.

[26:44] She did respectfully count to everyone. It counts with

[26:49] reference to the Rockwood area and two about beaches.

[26:52] And today I

[26:54] I will be addressing the Applewood Heights area of war,

[26:58] three of which the three streets are noted in

[27:01] today's traffic Common report, So the sees that the

[27:05] questions please survey results of respondents for Constitution at 53%

[27:11] and Queen Federica at 51% are very close difference between

[27:15] respondents who are in favor. .

[27:17] Of and who oppose this traffic comic proposal and with

[27:21] the undecided respondents, the actual percentage differences even less.

[27:25] .

[27:26] For Constitution Boulevard from the 100 responded to this combined

[27:31] survey with Queen Federica. The difference between yesterday.

[27:34] No around the side is only six people for Queen

[27:38] Federica from the 100 respondents again to the combined service

[27:41] with constitution. The difference is only two respondents.

[27:45] The question of why the online survey for these two

[27:47] roadways was combined on one survey has been asked city

[27:51] staff and waiting for their response. .

[27:53] It is requested that because of the small differences in

[27:56] respondents and which are not most of the community as

[28:00] well as the fact that the city survey was combined

[28:02] for both Constitution and Queen Federica during the summer months

[28:06] of July and August, only better review be taken

[28:09] to reconsider the traffic kami speed humps for these two

[28:12] streets before any staff recommendation is made. The question

[28:16] is, can the roadways of Queer Constitution Boulevard and

[28:19] Queen Federica not included in today's recommendation for approval? ?

[28:23] All due to the very close results and the results

[28:26] for additional consideration by city staff for community feedback be

[28:30] made. .

[28:32] Question number two for the Golden Orchard traffic calming proposal

[28:36] from floor Street to Dixie. The total responders were

[28:39] 27 from this 18 in favor and nine opposing the

[28:44] speed up placement for this area. There were issues

[28:48] of delays in postal delivery this past year, and

[28:51] there are residents who have both on and off quote

[28:53] an orchard who would be impacted and who did not

[28:56] know about this plan nor able to successfully complete the

[28:59] online survey. . These may be the reason

[29:02] As as to the low responsible. Only 27 completed

[29:05] surveys from that community for this proposal. .

[29:09] And the question is considering the above local issues.

[29:12] Can the Golden Orchard proposal from floor to Dixie not

[29:16] be included in today's recommendation? And because we considered

[29:19] what request for feedback from this community, both in

[29:23] paper and all my surveys be made available to residents

[29:26] who live on and off court an orchard before any

[29:29] decisions are recommended on how to proceed. And please

[29:33] just add after hearing the deputation by resident Don Anderson

[29:37] on traffic, , calming for all road

[29:39] It appears that similar concerns are shared by residents and

[29:42] other wards were results, as provided in today's traffic

[29:45] Common report show 60 about 61%, or less higher

[29:51] standard of approval is needed for proposed roadways to be

[29:54] recommended, as are for other roadways presented in today's

[29:57] report of 80% or higher the same measure, or

[30:01] at least approval from a minimum of 75% of respondents

[30:05] is requested to be used for all

[30:07] Traffic calming world with recommendations that are being considered as

[30:11] well. More direct information to the community is needed,

[30:15] as well as attention to timing and availability of

[30:17] surveys and how survey questions are addressed. And simply

[30:21] to add that there were no community meetings whatsoever held

[30:25] for these particular three world ways in that war,

[30:28] three in the applewood area. Thank you very much,

[30:31] , and I look forward to the responses. .

[30:35] Thank you.

[30:37] Very much for your, um deputation counselor. Fonseca

[30:42] to thank you through you chair. Perhaps we should

[30:46] just move 10.1 forward. .

[30:49] Seeing what I was. We're having discussions or no,

[30:51] I'm happy to if it's the will a council

[30:53] as everybody Okay with moving 10.1 forward in favor,

[30:57] okay, it has moved forward and we can discuss

[30:59] 10.1 now. .

[31:00] Okay? And I guess with regards to the questions

[31:05] that Athena raised, they were to staff. So

[31:09] if staff can clarify the those questions, and then

[31:12] I have a couple of follow up questions. .

[31:17] Three, Mr Chaired a council for Sega and ask

[31:18] Colin Patterson to come forward to give more detail about

[31:21] the surveys. But in general counselor the surveys as

[31:23] you're aware, we're follow our traditional process. And

[31:26] I think the deputy and raised questions in terms of

[31:29] the percentage of overall support, and that's something that

[31:33] outlined in the report today is we are recommending traffic,

[31:37] , calming. .

[31:37] To a counselor to Joe's point, really around the

[31:39] notion of vision zero and road safety, So that's

[31:41] our primary function is that the councilor Ward Councilor is

[31:44] aware and staff everywhere of concerns that have come forward

[31:47] with speeding in these neighborhoods and in absence of redesigning

[31:51] the whole street traffic calming is is an easy approach

[31:53] for us to retrofit a street to slow vehicles down

[31:57] and to provide a safer environment. So that's our

[31:59] overall objective. Responding to our direction around Vision zero

[32:03] and so, with our survey responses, we are

[32:05] looking for support for traffic coming from the

[32:07] Unity.

[32:08] It was raised earlier that these are sometimes every you

[32:13] know, after the traffic coming device goes in.

[32:15] There is feedback that some people don't like it there.

[32:18] Dr is disrupted, But that is the intention

[32:21] is that people don't have the same access to the

[32:23] street. They did in terms of being able to

[32:25] speed or go at the speed that they desire.

[32:27] So we are looking for support from the community and

[32:30] we're open. .

[32:31] And wish to be transparent in our process, and

[32:33] hence, the report today outlines all of the streets

[32:36] that were recommending traffic calming be installed on so with

[32:40] that, Mr Chair. I think I'll turn it

[32:41] over to college talk more specifics about the survey in

[32:44] that area. .

[32:46] Good morning through the chair to cancel Fonseca with respect

[32:50] to why we combine multiple roadways into one survey.

[32:55] The simple answer is often we want to receive feedback

[32:58] from the same group of residents on the on both

[33:00] projects. So in the case of Constitution and Queen

[33:03] Fredricka, , the same neighborhood residents are asked. .

[33:07] Both questions whether they support traffic coming on Constitution and

[33:11] Queen Frederica, and that is in the case of

[33:13] that survey. It was, I believe the entire

[33:17] neighborhood, not just the residents that were on that

[33:19] street, so there's often a much different opinion,

[33:23] depending on where that response comes from the residents who

[33:25] live on these roadways who are dealing with the consistent

[33:29] speeding concerns and aggressive driving. .

[33:31] Are often a little bit more supportive than some residents

[33:34] that may live elsewhere in the neighborhood and don't have

[33:36] to deal with the the, uh, driving behavior

[33:41] on those roadways. With respect to the timing of

[33:44] those surveys they were issued. I believe late spring

[33:48] and carried on into the summer. I believe both

[33:52] surveys were extended for that reason to make sure that

[33:55] we accommodated any and all feedback that we could receive

[33:59] from the public. . So

[34:01] Even after those surveys, the date closes. We

[34:05] will not discount any feedback that's received, if if,

[34:08] at any point in time, residents of those

[34:11] neighborhoods want to provide feedback. We will collect that

[34:14] in summarize, and it would be reflected in the

[34:17] numbers in the report. .

[34:18] I should also clarify that all of the information related

[34:23] to the quantity of devices proposed types the locations it's

[34:28] always posted on the city's website for anyone who has

[34:31] questions about what exactly is being proposed, and where

[34:34] that might be. .

[34:38] Councilor for the secret Anything further, So that was

[34:42] one of my questions with regards to the posting of

[34:44] the actual Ah

[34:47] Proposed design.

[34:49] Of of traffic calming. Ah, you answered that

[34:54] and just to clarify with regards to Queen Fredricka Constitution

[34:59] and this leg of Golden Orchard. .

[35:04] The first step in the process is

[35:06] For when, when a when a request or a

[35:09] concern comes from residents is to is for staff to

[35:14] go out and US speed study on the roadway and

[35:19] the first recommendations are always around. Pass it passive

[35:25] traffic calming, , are they not? ?

[35:28] Yes or no? Are they passive? Yes.

[35:31] Our digital boards also recommended yes. Is there also

[35:37] often engagement or requests for police to be out to,

[35:44] Um um, study or collaborate with the residents?

[35:48] ?

[35:48] Ah ah, ah, and city staff on the

[35:51] particular roadway to try to address or

[35:56] Get down to what the real issues are with motors

[35:59] behavior. .

[35:59] Yes. And were these done? I know the

[36:03] answer to this. But for the public where these

[36:06] done on Queen Frederica Constitution and this leg of Golden

[36:10] Orchard, Yes. Okay. Thank you very much.

[36:13] Thank you, Mr Chair. Thank you.

[36:14] Councilor Fonseca counseled Asco. .

[36:18] Thank you through the chair, and I just wanted

[36:20] to speak actually to the report itself, and I

[36:23] know just in terms of the way that it came

[36:26] forward. . It's one that I know that are

[36:31] Our team at the city. It's talk about challenging

[36:36] role that they're in. It's trying to find that

[36:38] right mix of finding road safety at the same time

[36:43] as allowing traffic to pass etcetera literally trying to make

[36:48] everybody happy and in an imperfect world, and it's

[36:51] it's a real challenge definitely know that we see a

[36:53] lot of it Safety committee. .

[36:56] And also each of our offices.

[36:59] Bar. Nana get an awful lot of calls.

[37:02] I know that you know, from from the mayor's

[37:04] office all the way through all of us and coming

[37:07] up with these different things, so I just would

[37:10] like to speak on behalf of

[37:13] The work that's gone into this. It's it's never

[37:16] taken lightly. I always know that when it comes

[37:19] to our team

[37:21] They're always saying that Let's try every other measure before

[37:24] you go and get into that because it's such a

[37:26] blunt instrument that that gets prescribed, , but

[37:31] You know, it's also one that was as counselors.

[37:34] We tend to know our communities pretty well because

[37:37] we're engaging with them all the time. And these

[37:39] are things that we do here and so

[37:42] You know the work that's gone into this report.

[37:45] I know for the streets and Ward one. I

[37:47] wanted to say a profound thank you for that. .

[37:51] Um, in terms of the work that has gone

[37:52] in the survey results, I think also speak for

[37:57] themselves in terms of what goes in, but you

[38:00] know it's again imperfect, but at the same time,

[38:03] if quite frankly, if everybody was doing the

[38:06] speed limit

[38:07] We wouldn't be going through all this and to begin

[38:09] with, but unfortunately, that's just not the case

[38:13] and a few people that I think we all probably

[38:15] have saying, Why would you want to do this?

[38:18] And they tend to be the worst offenders because

[38:20] they just don't want to have these types of measures

[38:21] in place. So at the appropriate time, myself

[38:25] or whoever would move it, I'm I'm happy that

[38:29] this is coming forward and that we're looking to get

[38:31] this done in the spring season ahead. .

[38:34] I just wanted to say thanks to staff for all

[38:36] your work on this. Thank you. Councilor,

[38:39] disco counselor. .

[38:41] Thank you through the chair.

[38:44] This is we have some of us knew folks here.

[38:48] We've only been here 16 weeks now. 15

[38:51] weeks. . I think we're in

[38:52] And we haven't had a lot of opportunity to talk

[38:55] about some of these issues. I want to take

[38:57] a minute to really

[38:59] Reaffirm our position, at least as a council and

[39:03] for a number of new folks that we do believe

[39:07] in the in the Vision, zero mandate and policy

[39:09] of the city. .

[39:10] Um, because at the end of the day,

[39:12] we're talking about the lives and well being of our

[39:15] residents, and it's completely preventable based on the actions

[39:21] of our city and of its residents. .

[39:24] And

[39:25] The question that we're asking is how much are we

[39:27] willing to be inconvenienced? ?

[39:29] To protect those people. Certainly there are accidents that

[39:32] are at the fault of cyclists or pedestrians, and

[39:36] we need better education all around. .

[39:39] But a quick look at the stats from the region

[39:41] of peal shows that there were 327 deaths from collisions

[39:46] in the last decade. . 17 cyclists 113 pedestrians. .

[39:51] And then you look at the studies around traffic,

[39:54] calming and approximate pedestrian survival rate. .

[39:58] And I'll tell you, my partner. She's

[40:02] Mhm better than me and so many ways and works

[40:06] at sick kids emergency

[40:08] And she will tell you their kid that shows up

[40:10] at 30 kilometers an hour is going to make it

[40:12] kid that gets hit at 40. Kilometers an hour

[40:14] has a 60% chance. The kid that gets hit

[40:17] at 50, kilometers an hour has a 20% chance

[40:20] of survival. .

[40:22] And they know that they know that coming in.

[40:24] They know that coming into the emergency room that this

[40:26] kid got hit by a car at 50 kilometers an

[40:28] hour, which is easily where most people drive in

[40:30] this city in residential neighborhoods. .

[40:32] Is not going to make it.

[40:35] So is that so inconvenient for us to slow down

[40:39] that we think that this is something that we need

[40:41] to we need to look past. . So

[40:44] That's where I'm coming from. I've got young kids.

[40:46] They're 8, 10 and 12 and certainly they

[40:48] need to be more responsible in terms of how they

[40:50] cross the street. .

[40:51] And how they interact in their neighborhoods. And we

[40:54] are trying to make safer neighborhoods. But at the

[40:56] end of the day, sometimes a government um an

[41:00] agency, whatever it is needs to come in and

[41:02] say We need to wear seatbelts. We need to

[41:04] impose traffic coming. We need to have a red

[41:07] light cameras. We need to do these things for

[41:09] the safety of our community, and they're not always

[41:12] popular. .

[41:12] But sometimes that's what we need to do.

[41:15] And we're trying to find the best ways possible to

[41:18] move forward so that we get buying from residents and

[41:21] buying from the community to understand that we're doing this

[41:23] as part of our priorities. If this is no

[41:26] longer a priority, and we don't want to do

[41:27] that, then we should debate that we should talk

[41:29] about how we're willing to sacrifice. You know those

[41:32] lives and those accidents because it's their own fault and

[41:35] that they should be more careful when they're crossing the

[41:37] street. .

[41:38] But the inconvenience of having to slow down is just

[41:40] too much for us to bear for that, If

[41:42] that's the debate that people want to have that I'm

[41:44] happy to have that, But I don't think that

[41:47] what the city is trying to do is in any

[41:50] way inappropriate and that they have learned quite a bit

[41:53] in terms of what is and is not a useful

[41:55] tool, and not every tool has to be a

[41:57] speed bump. There are bollards. There are road

[41:59] diets, , there are protected bike lanes. .

[42:02] There are so many things that I like in my

[42:04] neighborhood to where we have raised crosswalks in front of

[42:06] schools, and this is an ongoing discussion. This

[42:10] isn't the end of the beyond. And all of

[42:12] traffic coming. This is how are we going to

[42:14] continue to progress to find solutions to try and make

[42:18] our roads as safe as possible? ?

[42:20] I think this is entirely appropriate action for us to

[42:24] take and for this council to endorse for our staff

[42:27] who are consulting who are learning who are working with

[42:30] experts to see what we can do in order to

[42:32] reduce that because we look at the stats

[42:36] And you think about all these people? There's there's

[42:38] There's families behind these behind these stories and

[42:42] You know, I wish we had an opportunity to

[42:44] mark every single time Somebody passed away because of an

[42:47] accident on the road. But not just that.

[42:49] We have to think about all the accidents that don't

[42:52] need to road dust as well. That don't lead

[42:53] to fatalities. How many times are people getting maimed

[42:56] and hit and they're injured? And then they have

[42:59] years of recovery or permanently disabled. Because of that,

[43:02] it's not just about the death is about how

[43:04] are we making a safer, more sustainable, walkable

[43:07] neighborhood everywhere and the fact that we have to retrofit

[43:09] our city because our city wasn't built for that? ?

[43:12] Is something that we're looking at right now. And

[43:14] I think that's the courage that our council is taking

[43:17] in order to do that that we've taken in the

[43:18] past that we should continue to pursue moving forward.

[43:21] Thank you. . Chair. .

[43:23] Thank you, Councilor Federal and that was very,

[43:26] very well said, and I really don't have anything

[43:28] to add. So I appreciate you bringing that to

[43:31] everybody's attention. And that's really some of the tough

[43:33] decisions and the reason that we move forward with a

[43:35] lot of these initiatives. So I certainly appreciate your

[43:39] comments. I do not have anybody else on the

[43:41] board to speak. So at this time, I

[43:44] will. .

[43:45] Councilor. Disco has volunteered to move 10.1 so I

[43:51] will put 10 4.1 on the table and it's a

[43:54] recorded vote. .

[43:55] And Councilor Mahoney, can we also take the associated

[43:58] correspondence? 17 12 17 4 in this vote,

[44:02] please. . We can

[44:19] Okay, that passes unanimously. Thank you very much.

[44:23] And thank you to the deputies. Today.

[44:26] We're moving on to our consent agenda. .

[44:29] A 10.1 was just past 10.2 funding for PRC 003837

[44:37] roadway, sweeping cleaning, hauling and disposal services for

[44:40] a three year period. .

[44:43] That is on consent. 10.3 my way. 2024

[44:47] bus procurement that is held by Councilor Tejo. .

[44:54] 10.4 municipal access agreements between the city of Mississauga and

[44:58] various telecommunications companies. .

[45:03] That's on consent. 10.5 single Source Contract awards for

[45:07] provision of electronic resources for the city of Mississauga library

[45:10] systems. .

[45:14] Signed consent 10.6 single Source Contract awards for provision of

[45:19] specialty physical resources for the Mississauga Library system. .

[45:25] Resign, Consent 10.7 office. Sorry, I think

[45:30] Stafford

[45:33] Sorry. I thought I saw her library director speaking

[45:35] wanted to speak to him. .

[45:36] Nor its council can hold it or no

[45:41] The director of the library is free to go.

[45:44] 10.7 Office of Emergency Management 2022 report. .

[45:50] Is on consent.

[45:51] 10.8 during use of funding agreement with the different people

[45:55] Catholic District School Board for a new track and field

[45:58] facility at City on Lands Inca Park. 094766 anchor

[46:04] Annika Sorry Dr Ward, five that will be held

[46:08] by Councilor Parish. .

[46:12] 10.9 expanded, delegated authority ministers, zoning orders that's

[46:19] held by councilor perish. .

[46:22] 10.10

[46:24] 2022 obsolete policies and procedures.

[46:30] On consent.

[46:32] 10.11 annual report on commodity price hedging agreements for 2022

[46:38] electricity and natural gas. .

[46:42] It is on consent.

[46:45] 10.12 removal of the municipal capital facility designation under bylaw

[46:50] 0434-2004 for units. . 809 100 of

[46:57] 201 City Center, Dr Tax Roll.

[47:00] Number a lot of numbers to 10504015400449.

[47:07] So on consent.

[47:10] 10 13 removal of the municipal capital facility designation under

[47:15] bylaws zero for 34-2 2004 for unit. .

[47:20] 8001003 of 667 medieval town center Circle tax roll.

[47:27] Pic number big number that is on consent as well,

[47:30] Folks. 10 14 amendment to bylaws 0 to

[47:34] 33-2013. .

[47:38] Okay, Mr on consent.

[47:42] Advisory Committee reports. 11.1 Heritage Advisory Committee report 2-2

[47:49] 2023 February, 2023.

[47:54] On consent. 11 to Mississauga School Traffic Safety Action

[47:59] Committee report 1 2023 to February 22nd 2023 revised

[48:06] That is on consent. So that's our consent agenda

[48:10] Folks will have recorded also have item 18.1 sorry.

[48:14] That was at the bottom. I wasn't sure where

[48:15] that food ends. 18.1 is the resignation letter dated

[48:18] March 6th 2023 for Robert J. Sweezy, Integrity

[48:22] Commissioner. .

[48:25] That is on consent.

[48:28] 30 will go to a recorded vote.

[48:32] We need a new for

[48:35] Councilor Hornet moved it.

[48:41] Okay. Thank you, folks. That's unanimous down

[48:43] to 10.3 my way. . 2024 bus procurement counselor. .

[48:49] Thank you through the chair to commissioner, right?

[48:52] No issue with what we're talking about here. I

[48:54] think this is obviously what we need to update the

[48:58] service and to improve our fleet as we're moving forward.

[49:03] I do want to ask a couple questions in

[49:05] terms of our these, um, done with the

[49:08] intent of future proofing our fleet with the right equipment

[49:16] Are we looking at? Is it all the things

[49:18] that we've looked at? ? A few weeks? ?

[49:19] Ago when we were there.

[49:21] And is there an opportunity to really imagine the future

[49:26] needs that the service will need in terms of,

[49:30] um, you know, expanded capacity. The cameras.

[49:34] We were talking about the display boards, things

[49:36] like that, and then I also want to ask

[49:38] a little bit about maybe the opportunity to revisit the

[49:43] hydrogen. .

[49:43] Um, pilot that we were exploring before understanding that

[49:48] we did not have a provincial partner come to the

[49:51] table, but the federals partner did come to the

[49:53] table and that, you know, not withstanding this

[49:57] particular motion. If that's something we could potentially reopened

[50:01] to explore, what would it cost for us to

[50:03] meet him? ?

[50:05] That pilot need without necessarily getting that provincial funding and

[50:09] could go back to the to the feds to ask

[50:11] for more as well because I think that that's worth

[50:13] doing and worth exploring, especially as we're going to

[50:16] continue to expand the fleet over at my way,

[50:19] and assuming this again is just for existing service,

[50:22] and not for necessarily expanded service. .

[50:25] Three Mr Chair to Councilor Ted Hose. So yes,

[50:28] Counselor. You're right. This is our fleet

[50:30] replacement plan that outlined and through the program. There

[50:34] was an opportunity for us to fast track our fleet

[50:36] replacement program And at the time we submitted for Ah

[50:42] hybrid electric Busses, and that's what's being procured for

[50:46] 2024 bus order. So there's 82 hybrid electric Busses

[50:50] very similar to the bus that you are on the

[50:52] other day. In fact, that's one of that

[50:53] was one of their newest Busses that arrive from the

[50:56] Last procurement.

[50:57] So it will be very similar in nature. And

[50:59] obviously, this would go through public tender process.

[51:02] The actual bus manufacturer at this point is not determined,

[51:04] but the general features that you saw on the

[51:06] bus in terms of you know, the state of

[51:08] the art municipal Transit bus. That's what we would

[51:10] be procuring with this. .

[51:12] I would just kind of note that as we we

[51:14] are moving forward with our transition to to net zero

[51:19] Bus fleet, And so this is part of our

[51:21] journey. This is aligned with our climate change goals

[51:24] and hits our targets as an organization with the 2025

[51:28] bus order. We should be in a position to

[51:30] start to procure battery electric Busses. And so I

[51:33] would suspect next year when we come back with the

[51:35] 2025 bus procurement. .

[51:37] Um, will be in better shape because we will

[51:39] have charging capacity and some some charging capacity available at

[51:44] our seven IQ location that we toured a few weeks

[51:47] ago, so that would be a sort of our

[51:49] first step into the the Battery Electric bus determined phase.

[51:53] .

[51:54] Your comment around the hydrogen pilot? Yeah, that

[51:58] is something that we were quite optimistic for. You

[52:01] know, hydrogen as a net zero bus is seen

[52:05] as a valid uh, product for my way in

[52:08] terms of its range battery electric Busses while they are

[52:11] improving, have range issues, especially on the type

[52:16] of charging that's done. So if there's a depot

[52:18] charging that's done overnight, the bus can go out

[52:21] for a certain amount of time. But that's dictated

[52:23] by the life of the bad. .

[52:24] Marie and the duty cycle of the bus has to

[52:26] come back to get charged. .

[52:28] It does add a layer of complexity to our route

[52:30] and schedule planning for my way. .

[52:33] Whereas the hydrogen bus has a much longer range and

[52:36] can almost align with our traditional way of scheduling those

[52:39] Busses. So you know, we did provide counsel

[52:43] sort of just a quick email memo update saying Here's

[52:45] the status of that program would be happy to sort

[52:47] of maybe bring back a report and have a more

[52:49] fulsome conversation here about the hydrogen project, the benefits

[52:54] that it does provide for my way. .

[52:57] And where some of those gaps are potentially how those

[52:59] gaps could get filled. So we'd be happy to

[53:00] bring back a report on on that. Thank you.

[53:03] Commissioner yesterday was fortunate to be at the TRC

[53:06] a project green over at the airport, and they're

[53:10] working on their fleet as well in terms of hydrogen,

[53:14] and I think there's an opportunity there. This

[53:18] just another quick question. Commissioner around the old Busses

[53:21] were replacing. These are all just diesel only Busses.

[53:24] . I'm assuming

[53:25] And if we did need to still use them to

[53:27] expand existing services is that possible. .

[53:30] Three. Mr Charity counselor Ted Hose. So,

[53:32] yes, So the replacement Our staff from Fleet is

[53:36] here. Daryn riding their senior manager and his team

[53:38] that we can comment more about the status of our

[53:40] fleet. But these are replacement Busses, and the

[53:43] Busses that are being replaced are at the end of

[53:45] their useful life. And so they need to be

[53:47] retired. And they would go through a plan to

[53:51] get rid of those Busses and and bring on these

[53:53] new Busses. So we're spending quite a bit on

[53:56] maintenance of those older Busses and it would be it's

[53:59] time that they reach the end of the relation. .

[54:01] All right. Thank you. Thank you. Councilor

[54:03] Councilor Hornick. Thank you very much. Mr Chair.

[54:06] Yeah, and Commissioner, right. I mean,

[54:07] I know we've talked lately about the need for

[54:09] a new bus depot that we're going to have coming

[54:11] up in the near future. I just wanted to

[54:13] have that opportunity to express maybe again about that project

[54:16] and the need from our higher levels of government to

[54:18] support that if you have a moment to speak to

[54:19] that, , sure. .

[54:21] Through Mr Chair to Councilor Hornick, as outlined in

[54:24] the housing plan recently. We did kind of flag,

[54:27] the the improvements that my way needs to make

[54:31] in order to move more people around the city that

[54:34] could result of as a result of that housing plan.

[54:37] And so we did flag within that a new

[54:39] electric transit gradient northwest Mississauga. .

[54:42] And as our we're kind of at the point now,

[54:45] where in order to substantially grow our freedom to

[54:47] continue to invest in my we do need to make

[54:50] that investment in new maintenance facilities and and to support

[54:53] our transition to a net zero fleet. We need

[54:57] to construct a electric transit garage that would primarily be

[55:01] for electric Busses, , and that would allow us to

[55:04] Grow and expand into a net zero transit fleet and

[55:08] then come back and make retrofits to our existing transit

[55:11] facilities to allow them to operate in this sort of

[55:14] hybrid environment where you still need diesel fuel, But

[55:18] you also need to have electric charges on site as

[55:20] well. So it is part of our overall strategy

[55:23] and overall growth program. It is an expensive asset

[55:27] to build. You know, we did put a

[55:29] very rough number of about $500 million on that facility.

[55:32] .

[55:32] Which in my experience, seeing some recent tenders across

[55:36] the country coming in for similar types of facilities were

[55:39] not too far off the range on that. So

[55:41] it is a significant ask within our capital program and

[55:44] one that we are going to need federal and provincial

[55:46] support in achieving this transition to a net zero Transit

[55:50] fleet, and I would just note that it's not

[55:53] just Mississauga that's in this position. All fleets across

[55:55] the country are in the same position where

[55:58] You know they have traditional diesel Busses now moving into

[56:03] hybrid diesel electric. Ultimately, battery, electric or

[56:06] hydrogen, and all these transit organizations are going to

[56:09] need to make those similar investments in their transit fleet.

[56:12] So it is an ask that I know as

[56:14] an organization, the Canadian Urban Transit Association in the

[56:17] Ontario Public Transit Association is raising awareness on and the

[56:21] continued need to invest in facilities to support

[56:24] Public transit transition to a net zero fleet.

[56:28] Thank you so much. Commissioner. I think it's

[56:29] just important that you know when we have these big

[56:31] asks, we take that opportunity to remind the public

[56:33] who watch that we do have these big things out

[56:36] there and it's great that you know, a new

[56:37] facility will be able to position ourselves for those better

[56:40] power sources that are more net zero Beit Hydrogen Electric,

[56:43] etcetera. So thank you very much, and

[56:45] I'll make sure we keep this on the agenda.

[56:46] Right. . Thank you. .

[56:48] Great points, counselor, Hornick and thanks for highlighting

[56:50] that I don't see any other speakers on the board.

[56:53] Councilor Pedro Can I ask you to move this

[56:55] forward, , so moved by Councilor Tahoe recorded vote? ?

[57:03] Thank you folks that has passed unanimously down to 10.8

[57:07] joint use funding agreement. . Counselor Parish. .

[57:13] Jody is smiling.

[57:15] This has been worse than birthing five elephants.

[57:19] I've never seen anything. Take this long.

[57:23] The patients that Jodi exhibited is saint like

[57:28] Occasionally got red in the face dealing with the staff

[57:32] at the school. That was the problem. We

[57:34] had the money in the bank. We had a

[57:36] designs done. We did what would fit And if

[57:39] you look at the diagrams, you'll see it's a

[57:41] very tight location. Um, it's an elementary school

[57:46] property on a

[57:48] Deep down Crescent with

[57:50] Just no access at all. The some

[57:56] They're back in the dark.

[57:57] Days allowed of secondary school to be built on an

[58:00] elementary school site. Um, who shall remain unnamed,

[58:04] , but did go to jail at one point

[58:07] Um, so this has been a battle Royal and

[58:12] it's not that we didn't want to do it.

[58:13] It's not that we didn't do 25 drawings. It

[58:16] was the principal kept saying. .

[58:18] That she wanted six tracks. She wanted a dome.

[58:21] I mean, look at the site. So

[58:23] anyway, it is finally going through. Jody got

[58:26] red in the face. Occasionally, I actually lost

[58:28] my patients once or twice and blasted them. .

[58:31] The guy who showed the most patients with Steph ship

[58:34] Pinsky. He never lost it. He just would

[58:36] get that smile on his face That said. .

[58:39] I'm dealing with difficult people. I'm going to just

[58:41] take deep breaths. Really Want to thank Flavia Ian

[58:45] Sagna Lean. She is the president of the Student

[58:48] council Parents there. . The student

[58:51] Body parents.

[58:52] She was at first under the spell of the staff

[58:57] there. And once she figured out, um,

[59:00] that she had a grade nine students that went through

[59:03] four years with no track that could have had a

[59:05] track. She came on our side hard and fast.

[59:08] So this has been a really tough battle.

[59:11] The separate board was a little difficult as well on

[59:14] their half of the money. .

[59:16] All they had to do was ask the province to

[59:19] dip into the money that they accumulate from selling sites.

[59:21] They didn't want to do that. I don't

[59:23] know why. .

[59:24] So I'm making a big deal out of this because

[59:27] it was for five, , maybe years of fighting. .

[59:30] And the sad part is they have fabulous kids.

[59:33] There they come. They go to Ropa Rhapsody,

[59:37] and they win everything all the time. They do

[59:40] really well. Track and field. This is a

[59:42] strength there. .

[59:43] And they were practicing running on terrazzo floors in the

[59:46] halls. .

[59:48] They were practicing high jump in the parking lots on

[59:51] pavement. .

[59:53] And a lot of them got hurt and dropped out.

[59:55] And there were kids that went through that system

[59:58] that could have had a track five years ago.

[1:00:01] So that's why I'm making a big deal out of

[1:00:03] this. Jodi, I thank you, 100%.

[1:00:05] You've been fantastic. I think Steph who's not here,

[1:00:09] but we should carry him on our shoulders.

[1:00:10] These listening probably, um and I think everybody who

[1:00:14] had anything to do with this. This is just

[1:00:16] a major accomplishment for Malton. .

[1:00:19] And for the separate school and for the kids,

[1:00:22] especially so I happily move this with great joy because

[1:00:28] we never have to talk about it again. Thank

[1:00:31] you. .

[1:00:33] Thank you. Councilor Parish Councilor Birla just want to

[1:00:36] congratulate Counselor Parish. I want to do something not

[1:00:40] the same but similar at TL Kennedy. But I

[1:00:43] don't know it's going to be like birthing 10 elephants

[1:00:46] if you had five, because that's I don't know.

[1:00:48] I don't know those size of this project.

[1:00:50] It's pretty big, but what we're hoping to do.

[1:00:52] There is much bigger and they never come to

[1:00:54] pass. . But

[1:00:55] Really well done, that you were able to do

[1:00:57] it and we'll see how it goes and cooksville.

[1:01:00] We'll look at all options to get revenue to thank

[1:01:06] you. Councilor went from birthing elephants to really good

[1:01:08] news story. So well done, counselor Paris and

[1:01:10] I know you're happy to move this, so it's

[1:01:11] moved by councilor Paris and it's a recorded vote. .

[1:01:20] Thank you folks. That's unanimous as well. 10.9

[1:01:24] expanded, , delegated authority and those council parish. .

[1:01:30] No, I'm really pleased to see this report.

[1:01:33] I just wanted a little clarification when it suggests that

[1:01:37] rezoning doesn't have to come through council anymore that it

[1:01:40] can be done through staff. Um, I assume

[1:01:42] it applies to things like seniors, buildings, things

[1:01:45] that are

[1:01:46] That we as a group agree deserve him. Zito's

[1:01:50] It wouldn't be other, obviously more political situation,

[1:01:53] so I just want to double check that if there's

[1:01:57] a seniors building or long term care building coming through

[1:02:01] Obviously we'd be notified, but we wouldn't have to

[1:02:03] go through all that rigmarole. .

[1:02:07] Through the chair to the counselor. Yes, yes,

[1:02:10] that's correct. So then, is it really

[1:02:12] is changing the land use

[1:02:14] Creating a new zone for that particular land and what

[1:02:20] this really is doing outside of that through site plan

[1:02:24] approval process. We have various agreements right now it's

[1:02:29] silent to that for MZ does this would essentially just

[1:02:33] give me the authority to do that for these M

[1:02:35] said. . Oh, ,

[1:02:36] Situations and and is it safe to presume that right

[1:02:40] now it's it's long term care buildings. None of

[1:02:42] us would have any objection to that. If there's

[1:02:45] anything else that falls into that category would come back

[1:02:48] to us with that. .

[1:02:50] Through the chair to the counselor. So for the

[1:02:52] M zero process typically what when somebody comes to us

[1:02:56] and contemplates that we direct them to counsel and counsel

[1:03:00] has a policy that you consider and usually involves things

[1:03:06] like long term care, affordable housing and economic development

[1:03:10] that you would

[1:03:11] Generally consider and them Zito or support one. Beyond

[1:03:16] that, If it's just housing project as an example,

[1:03:19] it's not something counselors indicated. Support for okay.

[1:03:23] Thank you very much, and I'm really delighted

[1:03:25] to move this. Thank you. Great. Thank

[1:03:27] you very much. Counselor. Paris. I don't

[1:03:28] see anybody else on the board, so it is

[1:03:30] moved by councilor perish and it's a recorded vote. .

[1:03:36] Okay?

[1:03:40] There we go. It is unanimous and we are

[1:03:43] moving right along to matters pertaining to the region of

[1:03:47] peel. .

[1:03:51] Not seeing anybody. Okay? I don't know what

[1:03:55] Crombie.

[1:03:56] Just to let everyone know that we did do the

[1:03:59] interviews for the overall yesterday and there will be a

[1:04:03] recommendation coming to the to counsel out of Indian camera.

[1:04:08] We spent a better part of the day giving

[1:04:11] careful consideration to all the candidates, so I hope

[1:04:14] you'll hope you'll appreciate a lot of work went into

[1:04:17] the decision. The recommendation that's been made. Thank

[1:04:19] you. .

[1:04:21] Thank you, Madam Mayor Councilor

[1:04:24] Thank you through the chair. Just wanted to comment

[1:04:27] on our I believe our next meeting isn't for a

[1:04:30] couple of weeks. . Um

[1:04:32] Sorry. There's one tomorrow but in a couple of

[1:04:34] weeks because we're skipping through March break, I know

[1:04:37] that counselor Hornick and I are both going to have

[1:04:41] motions to support some of our community members here at

[1:04:46] council last week we voted in favor supporting the Coptic

[1:04:50] Church and and some of their development charge issues.

[1:04:53] The larger portion of that is going to be the

[1:04:55] regional portion. And so I know that we're council

[1:04:59] mornings can be looking for support for that. .

[1:05:01] I have the Muslim Association of Canada School, which

[1:05:05] is the largest Muslim school in Ontario, or possibly

[1:05:08] in Canada, and they are looking for some support

[1:05:11] as well. And we are going to the region

[1:05:12] first, because it is the significantly larger piece of

[1:05:16] the pie, um, and would appreciate council's consideration.

[1:05:20] Mississauga counselors consideration when we go to the region

[1:05:23] for that. .

[1:05:24] Thank you.

[1:05:25] Thank you for finding those. I don't see any

[1:05:29] other counselors on the boards around a counselor, Enquiries,

[1:05:32] counselor, But thank you very much, Mr

[1:05:36] Chair. .

[1:05:37] I've been contacted by a couple of residents who have,

[1:05:41] , uh

[1:05:42] Wildlife that have decided to inhabit. Uh

[1:05:46] Their property. In one particular case. It's a

[1:05:49] family of Fox's. What they've done is they have

[1:05:53] contacted. Obviously, our animal services, folks who

[1:05:57] I believe have said that we do not

[1:06:00] Remove or play any role when the when the wildlife

[1:06:04] is on private property, And that may very well

[1:06:07] be the city policy. I guess my question through

[1:06:10] you to commissioner right would be. Is this or

[1:06:14] can we really look at that? I think there

[1:06:18] might be some situations from time to time where the

[1:06:23] onus only on the homeowner

[1:06:25] When it might be broader in the neighborhood, depending

[1:06:28] on the type of wildlife there is there that our

[1:06:33] staff could actually be involved in, Um, taking

[1:06:37] action, possibly relocation or removal, Obviously, in

[1:06:42] a humane way, because I think we all agree

[1:06:44] with you want it to be done. .

[1:06:46] Humanely and not to, um, not to belittle

[1:06:52] the private companies that do that, But I have

[1:06:55] a little bit more faith in our staff that I

[1:06:57] think I would in a private company doing taking the

[1:07:01] action or doing the removal. So that's my first

[1:07:04] inquiry. And then Mr Chair. I do have

[1:07:05] one more quick one, but that's the first one.

[1:07:08] . Thank you. .

[1:07:09] Through you, Mr Chair to counselor but council,

[1:07:11] But, yeah, you did summarize sort of the

[1:07:13] general practice that animal service takes in terms of working

[1:07:15] with residents around. It's more of an education and

[1:07:19] awareness perspective in terms of they do have animals.

[1:07:22] Let's say it's a fox den or something that's on

[1:07:24] their private property ways to discourage that from happening and

[1:07:28] ways to potentially get those foxes to or whatever animal

[1:07:31] it is to move on on their own. .

[1:07:33] Generally we don't go in and relocate animals from private

[1:07:36] property. From that perspective, there are certain cases

[1:07:39] where we do go in. If there's you know,

[1:07:41] inside the building or there, they made their

[1:07:44] way into the roof. Those types of things we

[1:07:46] do take a different approach with that, And we

[1:07:49] do to your comment often, Uh, you know,

[1:07:53] help the residents utilized private relocation services in that

[1:07:58] regard. .

[1:07:59] But we would be happy to bring back a report.

[1:08:01] That kind of speaks to our practice speaks to

[1:08:04] a little bit about, you know, just firm

[1:08:05] and awareness perspective, the provincial legislation around relocation.

[1:08:09] There are some guidelines in place around distances that if

[1:08:13] there is a relocation, one kilometer that the maximum

[1:08:16] that can be relocated, , so in that situation often

[1:08:20] Animals do find their way back. So it's good

[1:08:22] that the resident you know, enables practices that discouraged

[1:08:26] that type of, , you know, , um

[1:08:28] Re homing or re accessing the property so we can

[1:08:32] take that as direction counselor to work with their Animal

[1:08:34] service team and come back with a better report that

[1:08:36] outlines our current practice provincial regulations. And then if

[1:08:41] we were to, maybe, perhaps change our practice

[1:08:43] what That would mean from a from a resource perspective

[1:08:45] so we can certainly take that direction. .

[1:08:49] Okay. Thank you very much for that, and

[1:08:50] I look forward to seeing that report back in due

[1:08:53] course. .

[1:08:54] The second item is everyone's favorite this time of year

[1:08:58] because we've all got the calls and the emails.

[1:09:01] And that, of course, is is windows and

[1:09:03] snowplowing and other

[1:09:06] Related issues. And I know previous councils have debated

[1:09:09] the level of service what we can and can't do,

[1:09:12] and I don't know whether the timing is right

[1:09:15] for this new council to be re looking at it

[1:09:18] again, but that last storm was particularly bad because

[1:09:22] of the amount of ice and really solid end of

[1:09:26] driveway. .

[1:09:27] And sometimes sidewalks know that there is no way residents

[1:09:31] can possibly be in a position to remove that even

[1:09:35] talked to one person that my neighbor came over with

[1:09:37] the snow. But the snow blower can't even deal

[1:09:40] with that, because they're not. They're not built

[1:09:42] to, you know, they're not Zambonis or other

[1:09:44] ice ice oriented type machinery there, snowblowers and a

[1:09:49] lot of people were simply not able to get out

[1:09:53] of their driveways or walkways for many days and still

[1:09:57] We're not going to get any thawing this week.

[1:10:00] Either, and there are still people who have not

[1:10:02] had been able to get their car out of the

[1:10:04] driveway for for five days. Now, we're six

[1:10:07] days since the storm last Friday, so I guess

[1:10:11] through you Mr Chair to commissioner right again. I

[1:10:15] don't know if you want to comment on that again,

[1:10:18] , whether this is the right time to get another

[1:10:21] Report or my colleagues here think it's appropriate for us

[1:10:26] to re look at that issue again. I know

[1:10:29] there's pros and cons and all this and obviously there's

[1:10:31] cost. I actually got one email from a resident

[1:10:34] said, , Raise my taxes. .

[1:10:36] Just get just get this stuff off the end of

[1:10:39] my driveway. I don't think I've ever read an

[1:10:40] email or someone said, Raise my taxes. But

[1:10:43] this could be an issue now that we need to

[1:10:45] revisit in some way, shape or form because we

[1:10:47] are getting way more comments back from our residents,

[1:10:53] both by email and by phone, So I'll leave

[1:10:55] that Mr. . Chair. . Thank you. .

[1:10:59] Question. Do you want to make comment? Thank

[1:11:01] you, Mr Charity Counselor. But so, counselor,

[1:11:04] Um, yeah. You know what you said,

[1:11:06] is correct. We did have a debate at

[1:11:08] the previous council in 2020. When the current winter

[1:11:12] maintenance contract was being decided, And at that time

[1:11:15] we did procure a number of options to the tender.

[1:11:18] One of those being wind rose and the price

[1:11:21] that was presented to council was about $10.4 million annually.

[1:11:24] .

[1:11:24] For the cost of wind rose and so council decided

[1:11:28] to omit that service level from the winter maintenance contract.

[1:11:32] Um and but there was a request for us

[1:11:34] to go back and re tender that again and come

[1:11:37] back to this council with an update. So we

[1:11:39] are in the process of doing that We are in

[1:11:42] market right now for that additional service level. .

[1:11:46] Um, and will likely be in a position to

[1:11:49] take that back through a budget committee in the not

[1:11:52] too distant future about the cost for that for that

[1:11:55] price, So I would expect that $10.4 million because

[1:11:59] it's not part of a winter maintenance contract to be

[1:12:02] a lot higher than than what it was bid at

[1:12:05] previously. I think the current estimate from staff was

[1:12:08] around $15 million, but I wouldn't be surprised if

[1:12:11] that cost came back a little bit higher, So

[1:12:12] I just wanted to provide that context, but we

[1:12:15] will be bringing back

[1:12:16] A report as requested, outlining the cost of that

[1:12:20] service level, and we can and council can have

[1:12:22] that discussion again. .

[1:12:23] In the not too distant future.

[1:12:26] Thank you, Jeff.

[1:12:29] Councilor Kovac. Thank you. And through you,

[1:12:33] Mr Chair. I have a question about street sweeping.

[1:12:36] It's quite general. Which is why I didn't

[1:12:38] ask to have item 10.2 earlier held and for commissioner

[1:12:44] right? ?

[1:12:45] When we are sweeping

[1:12:48] And we have a bicycle lanes and they're separated either

[1:12:51] by Bullard's or whatever they might be separated by what

[1:12:54] are we using to ensure that those

[1:12:57] Lanes, get the sweeping as well.

[1:13:00] And when there are not

[1:13:03] Presumably or not, even presumably, there is debris

[1:13:06] that will build up. How frequently are we checking

[1:13:09] catch basins on arterial roads? ?

[1:13:12] Would be kind of the second part to the question.

[1:13:15] .

[1:13:17] Three. Mr Charity counselor Kovac. So it's Scott

[1:13:20] home is in the audience, so I'm going to

[1:13:21] ask him to come down to give more. .

[1:13:24] More detailed response and I could provide on your specific

[1:13:28] questions. .

[1:13:28] Thank you.

[1:13:30] Thank you, Jeff. Through you, Mr Chair

[1:13:32] to Councilor Kovac. We do have some other specialized

[1:13:35] equipment that can win. Whether we put it on

[1:13:38] a track this machine the machines that clear some of

[1:13:40] our sidewalks. We can put a broom on there

[1:13:42] to be able to clear them. We've been working

[1:13:44] with our active transportation team to make sure that when

[1:13:47] they are putting these sorts of

[1:13:49] Um

[1:13:50] Separated bike lanes that we've got the proper equipment available

[1:13:54] to be able to maintain them through the summer as

[1:13:56] well as the winter to be able to do that,

[1:13:58] , so

[1:13:59] We should be fine to be able to go through

[1:14:01] the areas that have been designated as a separated bike

[1:14:04] lanes to make sure that they're clear when the program

[1:14:06] kicks off. .

[1:14:07] Okay? And as usual, if there's ever a

[1:14:10] situation where there are blockages and residents are concerned,

[1:14:14] and the expressed that I'm sure you won't mind as

[1:14:17] you've, you've always told us reach out to you

[1:14:20] Let you know And you'll make sure that that gets

[1:14:23] remedied so absolutely yes. .

[1:14:27] Thank you, Councilor. Thank you, Scott.

[1:14:29] And thank you to the team for all your hard

[1:14:31] work over the last little while appreciated America, Crombie.

[1:14:34] .

[1:14:34] So two things. First off Thank you, Councilor.

[1:14:38] But on the windrow issue, I have never

[1:14:41] had more complaints. They come to me direct me

[1:14:43] to directly. They are sending me videos of what

[1:14:46] this wall of ice at the end of their driveway

[1:14:48] looks like as as counselor but described as nothing that

[1:14:51] anyone is going to shovel or a snow blower is

[1:14:53] going to remove so other municipalities I understand are getting

[1:14:57] this not having the same effect with their snowplowing. .

[1:15:01] So I think it's time that we sit down and

[1:15:03] look at them equipment again and what it would cost

[1:15:05] and maybe it's evolved and won't cost so much And

[1:15:08] maybe we can accommodate it. Even although I think

[1:15:10] one of the reasons we couldn't accommodate as we can

[1:15:12] store, it costs too much, and it wasn't

[1:15:14] going to do the smaller roads and cold air sacs

[1:15:17] and just the bigger boulevard. So if we could

[1:15:19] look at it again, Jeff, I don't know

[1:15:21] Maybe it this

[1:15:24] This snowstorm, and the one was at last month.

[1:15:28] No last month that one was bad, but

[1:15:30] this one was horrible. It's just seems to be

[1:15:32] the amount of snow and ice fell in such a

[1:15:35] contracted period of time, and it was very heavy.

[1:15:38] And then the rain started and it became ice

[1:15:41] and then it froze. And it's just a nightmare.

[1:15:44] It's worse than I've ever heard it in my

[1:15:45] 11 years here, and it's always been a problem.

[1:15:48] .

[1:15:48] But I can't. I don't even like to open

[1:15:51] my inbox Right now. I honest to God.

[1:15:53] I have forwarded a few of them to you.

[1:15:55] But maybe it's something you can bring back and we

[1:15:58] can have that discussion again about what the cost would

[1:16:01] be and whether the equipment is evolved and we could

[1:16:03] have accommodated etcetera if you want to make any comments.

[1:16:06] .

[1:16:06] Three Mr Chair to Tamir Crombie. Yes, Mayor

[1:16:09] Crombie. So we are at market right now,

[1:16:11] with a going to tender for a cost for wind

[1:16:15] rose and we'll bring back a report. I believe

[1:16:18] we're going to target Budget Committee because it would have

[1:16:21] a budget impact and will outline the results of that

[1:16:23] procurement in terms of what it means to provide Windrow

[1:16:27] removal service. .

[1:16:28] And answer all the questions that you've just flagged in

[1:16:30] terms of equipment where it can be done. What

[1:16:33] type of driveways can be done? What the cost

[1:16:35] is and when it could be added to the contract,

[1:16:38] which would likely be is so if council were

[1:16:41] to decide Yes, , let's say later this year. .

[1:16:44] You need time for the contractors to acquire the equipment.

[1:16:46] So would likely be the fall of 2024 that

[1:16:50] started that winter season where that service level could be

[1:16:52] provided. But we will get into all that information

[1:16:56] to go through all these complaints again next year season

[1:16:58] because of the need for the contractors to it's been

[1:17:03] a relatively warm

[1:17:06] Winter, other than a couple of big, really

[1:17:08] big dumps that we've had. So we were fortunate

[1:17:11] up to a few weeks ago with the amount of

[1:17:13] snow that we received this year. It was looking

[1:17:15] like it was going to be a pretty mild winter.

[1:17:16] From that perspective, and in the winter maintenance

[1:17:19] teams. Well, very busy, certainly didn't have

[1:17:22] to deal with the amount of snow that we typically

[1:17:24] get. But that changed and as you flagged the

[1:17:26] type of snowstorm that we got last week, the

[1:17:30] temperature that there's no arrived in

[1:17:31] Allowed for a very high accumulation quickly. But then,

[1:17:35] as you've referenced with the temperature change to reign,

[1:17:37] it became very heavy and quickly turned to ice.

[1:17:40] So yeah, I can. I can I

[1:17:42] can relate to the amount of windows that we received,

[1:17:45] but also the impact that had on residents and

[1:17:49] on their access to and from their driveways. Thank

[1:17:52] you. So you know other municipalities are getting this

[1:17:55] done and we're aware of it. .

[1:17:56] People have moved in from other municipalities and said that

[1:17:59] it was cleared previously. Why can't we do it?

[1:18:01] And I wrote back to one of the residents

[1:18:03] and said what it would be 1 to 1.5% on

[1:18:06] your tax bill, and they wrote back that they

[1:18:08] thought it might be worth it. So it's something

[1:18:10] to look at. Because it was $10 million for

[1:18:13] the newer counselors when we looked at it before,

[1:18:17] you know, so something to look at is a

[1:18:19] big cost. .

[1:18:20] The other one is something that's been kind of brewing

[1:18:23] in my in my head since the passing of our

[1:18:25] former beloved mayor Hazel in just another way that we

[1:18:29] can recognize her. Obviously, we have named the

[1:18:31] library Central Library for her. But you know,

[1:18:34] I've often wondered about how citizen of the years operated

[1:18:38] out of the real estate board and her story Mississauga

[1:18:42] News and volunteer of the year. .

[1:18:45] Volunteer volunteer of the year. Out of the,

[1:18:47] uh they're out of the Mississauga news, vice versa

[1:18:49] and the real estate boards. We don't have any

[1:18:52] word honoring residents here. So I thought, if

[1:18:55] you could look at a hazel McCallion Spirit award,

[1:18:58] if possible, and just think about what that would

[1:19:01] look like, and you know, it doesn't have

[1:19:03] to be maybe some sort of glass sculpture award. .

[1:19:06] We have the glass studio across the street. But

[1:19:09] what would that look like? I just asking staff

[1:19:11] to think. Give that some thought. Maybe it's

[1:19:13] something we could launch on Canada Day pick someone who

[1:19:17] embodies Hazel Spirit and the hazel McCallion spirit or what

[1:19:20] I like that idea lot and something that we can

[1:19:23] present big on a larger stage without, you know,

[1:19:26] ,

[1:19:27] Anyway, so I just

[1:19:28] I was thinking about more recognition and tributes as the

[1:19:31] weeks have gone by, and I thought I'd throw

[1:19:33] that to staff to direct you to take a look

[1:19:36] at it and bring it back Some suggestions to us

[1:19:40] Looking at Rob for worth up there. Is he

[1:19:42] nodding so we'll take that back and and come back

[1:19:46] with a proposal. Thank you. Thank you.

[1:19:48] Thank you, , Councilor Hornick. .

[1:19:52] Well, I feel like we almost all need to

[1:19:54] drop a loony in a swear jar for saying the

[1:19:56] s word. Snow Snow, Right? Um,

[1:20:01] counselor part you, Madam Mayor, You're all put

[1:20:03] in a loony in the Yeah. I mean,

[1:20:06] I think just kind of elaborate more on the debate.

[1:20:08] I mean, I think we face the challenge

[1:20:10] in the city where we have an aging population in

[1:20:13] single detached homes, , right? ?

[1:20:15] And it's creating a generational issue because you know,

[1:20:19] people who were previously more able who could break down

[1:20:22] those ice blocks are not able to as much anymore,

[1:20:25] Right? So I think it is a challenge.

[1:20:27] I guess my question for the commissioner nowhere out

[1:20:29] to tender on this. .

[1:20:31] There's sometimes when you look at it, and you're

[1:20:33] like man, that's just the price living in Canada.

[1:20:35] There's other times when you're like somebody who lives

[1:20:38] on a four lane road, and they're getting two

[1:20:42] lanes of windrow. .

[1:20:45] Is an even steeper hill to climb. And I

[1:20:47] wonder, Is there any differentiation that we can make

[1:20:50] in the contract? ? Because

[1:20:52] Look when drones stink, no matter where you are,

[1:20:54] but there's also some where you look at and

[1:20:55] you're like you're not just clearing a one lane of

[1:20:57] traffic going out two lanes of traffic. That's an

[1:21:00] even higher bar to have to do. Is there

[1:21:03] any differentiation we can make about that? ? Scott? ?

[1:21:06] While Scott's waiting to come down. I will say

[1:21:08] I did take the time where I got a small

[1:21:10] number of compliments on our snow clearing

[1:21:13] It was small. I know it's rare, but

[1:21:15] some very kind. People did compliment us and I

[1:21:18] do make sure I pass those on to Scott and

[1:21:19] his team. Because I know the differentiation of people

[1:21:22] who send a compliment versus a complaint is is not

[1:21:25] always the best. Scott, do you have a

[1:21:27] thought? ?

[1:21:27] Yes, through you, Mr Chair that counselor Hornak.

[1:21:29] . Thank you for that. .

[1:21:31] We didn't separate in the in the tender the procurement

[1:21:34] that's out now the differentiating between

[1:21:37] You know, two or three lane road that might

[1:21:39] have some residential streets and just the regular residential.

[1:21:42] It was more

[1:21:43] Just how many dwellings do we actually have?

[1:21:45] Um, And it's very difficult to do townhouse dwellings

[1:21:49] because you've got nowhere to put the snow even if

[1:21:51] we went out with the machines, , so

[1:21:53] We will detail all that information for you something that

[1:21:57] we can look at. But I haven't really had

[1:21:58] a lot of complaints from like the people on Katara,

[1:22:01] for instance, that we actually clear it's been

[1:22:05] the people just on the residential streets that have been

[1:22:09] the boisterous ones for this for this episode, so

[1:22:12] we'll put it that way. But something we can

[1:22:14] look at

[1:22:15] Okay, I guess I had two other quick points.

[1:22:17] One is also the other place where I had

[1:22:19] sympathy as people in the bends of a road right?

[1:22:21] And I know that it's a challenge, sometimes

[1:22:24] to kind of

[1:22:25] Get deeper into the curve of a street, depending

[1:22:27] on how it's constructed. But again, you know,

[1:22:29] when you're leaving several feet of snow, it

[1:22:33] is that much harder on people and again. Sometimes

[1:22:35] you have to say we are in Canada. But

[1:22:38] there's sometimes you look at something on a video and

[1:22:40] you're like, , Oh, , boy, , I

[1:22:42] Yeah. Is there anything we can do a little

[1:22:44] bit in our current on that Just getting into those

[1:22:47] bends a little bit better through the chair to Councilor

[1:22:49] Hornak. We do instruct the plows to try to

[1:22:52] get as close to the curb as they can on

[1:22:53] those. We call them the deep elbows where you've

[1:22:55] got those wide turns that you have to do.

[1:22:58] We also set up loader routes that we have loaders

[1:23:01] go in afterwards and then clear those areas. .

[1:23:03] So if you have any of your residents that maybe

[1:23:06] we missed it that it's not on the map.

[1:23:08] Let us know and we can make sure that we

[1:23:10] get that added, , because we do have

[1:23:13] About a dozen to 15 loaders in each one of

[1:23:16] the yards that we have that are specifically to do

[1:23:18] the deep elbows as well as clean up the courts.

[1:23:21] Because, you know, we use the loaders

[1:23:22] to clean up the courts and pal everything into the

[1:23:23] middle. So if you do get those requests,

[1:23:26] send them over to me, and I'll make sure

[1:23:28] that we get them onto the roots. Perfect.

[1:23:30] Thank you. . I guess last question I have was

[1:23:34] Maybe this is more to Jeff and parking enforcement.

[1:23:37] So in a couple of cases, one particular case,

[1:23:39] , a resident saw that snow was coming. .

[1:23:42] The streets were littered with cars. And so when

[1:23:45] subsequently the plow comes around. It just can't get

[1:23:48] down the road. Um, is there anything we

[1:23:51] can be doing on the parking enforcement too? Because

[1:23:53] you know, when we have a snow date,

[1:23:54] we shouldn't be out there parking our cars, and

[1:23:56] I know we make the announcements. But is there

[1:23:58] anything especially with our possibly amped up by law that

[1:24:02] will be able to do on that side of things?

[1:24:04] ?

[1:24:06] Sure, sure. I'll tell field that one that

[1:24:07] when the commissioner passes you the torch you take it.

[1:24:10] So we work with our parking enforcement team to

[1:24:15] try to help prevent that. We do have the

[1:24:18] no parking 2 to 6 A.m.. When we are

[1:24:20] in the winter event, we suspend the temporary parking

[1:24:23] permits to try to help. We do have a

[1:24:25] bit of a pilot going on in war 10 with

[1:24:28] The one street parking only that has been working and

[1:24:33] maybe not always working. . It's very difficult. .

[1:24:36] If you don't have kind of a broad, no

[1:24:38] parking through the winter for our vehicles to do any

[1:24:42] kind of activity, , and it's not just

[1:24:44] In any particular area. It's a citywide thing,

[1:24:47] so we do try to work with our parking enforcement

[1:24:49] teams. There's communications that our team has, as

[1:24:52] we know we're getting into the residential areas are crews

[1:24:55] and inspectors will actually go and and look into the

[1:24:58] streets that we're getting ready to go into. .

[1:25:00] And if we see some issues, try to let

[1:25:02] them know, but they're not resource to be able

[1:25:05] to do this as big as what we need to

[1:25:07] across the city as well. But we do partner

[1:25:10] with him as best we can to try to minimize

[1:25:13] it because it adds extra expense and time for us.

[1:25:16] .

[1:25:16] If we have to go back because of parked cars

[1:25:19] afterwards, people think if they park their car,

[1:25:21] they're all we're not going to get the windrow.

[1:25:23] But when we come back, guess what? You

[1:25:25] know, we put the snow back in the in

[1:25:27] the driveway. So or the neighbor next to them

[1:25:30] ends up getting it And then we get the call,

[1:25:31] because they they don't. They don't like having

[1:25:34] that in their driveway because their neighbor park the car

[1:25:37] in the street, , so

[1:25:38] It's a challenge for us when we try to work

[1:25:40] with our parking enforcement, friends as best we can,

[1:25:43] and I know in from what I heard just

[1:25:45] in Toronto. You know, In some cases,

[1:25:47] they'll tell the car, especially, I think if

[1:25:50] the plows completely blocked from getting onto a street,

[1:25:52] maybe that is a right. We have to go

[1:25:53] and what they do is they stick a big orange

[1:25:55] flag on it. .

[1:25:56] Like along with the parking ticket, and it's like

[1:25:58] you better come get your car right now, um,

[1:26:01] Otherwise it's getting hold. Is that anything we

[1:26:03] could do if I mean look, I know you've

[1:26:06] got a big city, but there's got to be

[1:26:08] some times where, like you can't get the plow

[1:26:10] down the road, and that's inconsistent, inconveniencing a

[1:26:13] higher number of people, , right? ?

[1:26:15] Three. Mr Charity counselor Hornick. So, yes,

[1:26:18] certain as an example. Toronto does that a

[1:26:20] lot more because of things like street cars as well.

[1:26:22] So, Yeah, I was driving on Dundas

[1:26:24] Street in Toronto on Saturday. And there was a

[1:26:27] car parked blocking a street car, which is quite

[1:26:30] and there was a tow truck on its way so

[1:26:32] you can see the operation in process And so we

[1:26:35] have done that in the past where we do tow

[1:26:36] vehicles where it's not a level of service that we

[1:26:39] provide across the city. It is, you know,

[1:26:41] we have that available that sort of you know,

[1:26:43] , and and an emergency type basis last

[1:26:45] But it's not sort of a level of service that's

[1:26:47] offered during winter events just from a resource perspective in

[1:26:49] terms of management, managing that, that type of

[1:26:51] demand. . Thank you so much. .

[1:26:53] Thank you very much. Scott. I know it's

[1:26:54] a hard winter. If I my colleagues, colleagues

[1:26:57] indulge me one more minute. I have one last

[1:26:59] question. This one is actually more to Jodi.

[1:27:01] So this is about parks. And we have some

[1:27:04] parks that are seasonal parks. . Um

[1:27:08] Stay support, usually sports fields they get barred in

[1:27:11] the winter. I have got a couple of examples

[1:27:14] where people are saying during the summer months, there

[1:27:17] are a few cars coming in, and the parking

[1:27:19] lots are unlit. That's our current standard is to

[1:27:21] not have them live. But cars are coming in

[1:27:24] late at night, and things are being exchanged through

[1:27:26] windows. I don't know, maybe trading hockey cards.

[1:27:29] .

[1:27:29] But I don't suspect that's the case. Um,

[1:27:33] I guess is that something? We've had a report

[1:27:35] on lately that we could look at the service level

[1:27:37] of that Because I think in particular when we have

[1:27:40] people, calling us out for activities that are repeat,

[1:27:43] and I understand Yes, we can call peel

[1:27:45] police. But peel police will deem that a very

[1:27:48] low priority of response because it's not an actionable. .

[1:27:51] Um, high risk situation is that something we could

[1:27:53] look at or have we looked at recently? ?

[1:27:56] Thank you through you. Chair. Maloney to Councilor

[1:28:00] Hornick haven't specifically looked at parking lots. We do

[1:28:03] have parking lots that are either maintained or not maintained

[1:28:06] in the winter. The ones that aren't maintained in

[1:28:08] the winter are generally gated where we have the P

[1:28:12] gates and we close them off. But there are

[1:28:14] some still that aren't maintained that don't have P.

[1:28:18] Gates. .

[1:28:19] And it really depends on whether we have access.

[1:28:23] Um In some cases, we have parking agreements with

[1:28:26] schools where we maintain certain parking lots, even though

[1:28:29] it may not seem like the park is used,

[1:28:31] But we have an access agreement with the school to

[1:28:34] keep a parking lot open. So it's It's not

[1:28:37] an easy yes or no answer, and I can't

[1:28:40] say that since Covid. We went back and we

[1:28:43] really looked at what facilities were open in the winter

[1:28:47] time and so we opened. .

[1:28:48] Tennis courts, and we opened some of our artificial

[1:28:51] fields, and it sort of became a new level

[1:28:54] of service. Once once covid restrictions were in place,

[1:28:58] we didn't go back and close those all up

[1:29:00] because the members of the community really liked access to

[1:29:04] the parks more in for winter use, so I'd

[1:29:07] have to look at the specific

[1:29:09] Locations. But if it isn't a parking lot that

[1:29:12] we can close down because we have another agreement,

[1:29:15] we do work with peel regional police as well.

[1:29:19] Or if it's a parking lot where we really just

[1:29:21] need to look at getting some P gates in there

[1:29:23] and closing it during off season. We can do

[1:29:26] that as well. In particular lighting, I guess

[1:29:28] is the challenge that the neighbors really would like to

[1:29:31] see some lighting in the park because I know that's

[1:29:32] not our standard on that kind of park, right?

[1:29:34] I will. I will say lighting in the

[1:29:36] park is a little bit like our speed hump issue

[1:29:39] that

[1:29:39] Everybody wants lighting in the park until the park is

[1:29:43] Lit up and then they don't want lighting in the

[1:29:45] park. So we have a standard on where we

[1:29:48] light pathways and where we light parking lots and where

[1:29:51] we don't and it and it is very site specific

[1:29:55] because you know part of the sub tested. .

[1:29:58] Kind of philosophy is if you light it, you're

[1:30:01] encouraging people to use that area. Um and is

[1:30:06] and is it really meant for

[1:30:08] Use.

[1:30:09] All night long, So we have to

[1:30:11] Take a look at that. I'm sorry. I

[1:30:12] can't give you a really simple, easy answer to

[1:30:15] thank you so much to work with your office and

[1:30:17] thank you to my colleagues for giving me a little

[1:30:19] extra time. . They appreciate it. .

[1:30:20] Unintended consequences. Counselor Birla

[1:30:25] Thank you. I just had a interesting well,

[1:30:28] several similar conversations. I just wanted to ask if

[1:30:32] we have a policy citywide. So my residents are

[1:30:35] telling me that given what's going on along here,

[1:30:38] Ontario, the traffic through side streets and neighborhoods,

[1:30:42] streets has increased significantly, , which I can understand. .

[1:30:46] But then they also said that Toronto has in place

[1:30:50] and I was surprised to hear this where they stop.

[1:30:53] People who don't live in the neighborhood from going

[1:30:57] in. And I don't know how you do that,

[1:30:58] , like you sit there with

[1:31:00] Ensure your idea. Do you live here? I

[1:31:02] mean, I don't know how you would do that.

[1:31:03] But I was also wondering. I mean,

[1:31:05] these are all taxpayer paid roads. So how do

[1:31:08] you stop someone from going in to use it as

[1:31:11] a through cut

[1:31:12] Some sensitive to you know the increased volume going through

[1:31:15] certain neighborhoods, but also it's kind of curious.

[1:31:17] Is this true that Toronto's doing this because they are

[1:31:20] asking me now to look at ways to stop through

[1:31:23] traffic going through? ?

[1:31:26] Their neighborhoods.

[1:31:28] Mr Charity counselor, Maryland. So you're like.

[1:31:31] These are public roads, so technically, you can't

[1:31:33] shut them down and provide access to only to residents.

[1:31:37] Only you can put up signage and say local

[1:31:39] traffic only as an example. But that's really not

[1:31:42] really that enforceable because these are public roads and people

[1:31:45] need to get around. And I would suggest that

[1:31:47] you know. Yes. Yes, The Ontario construction

[1:31:51] is

[1:31:52] Impactful, and it is creating a lot of challenges

[1:31:55] for residents that are along the corridor. And this

[1:31:57] morning I was sitting at a table with someone who

[1:31:59] is living off of your Ontario. We're having this

[1:32:01] exact conversation. And so the fortunate part of it

[1:32:04] is that it's temporary. But you know, as

[1:32:06] we lived through that it's it's a concern. So

[1:32:08] I don't want to dismiss Mishka diminish the concerns that

[1:32:11] are being addressed. So if there are certain streets,

[1:32:13] we can certainly have a look at a more

[1:32:15] detailed review of

[1:32:16] It. Does this road provide access to a different

[1:32:19] corridor, and sometimes you know, you kind of

[1:32:21] want traffic to disperse a little bit. Otherwise,

[1:32:23] it's going to be significant congestion in certain areas so

[1:32:27] but if it's if it's a court or local street,

[1:32:29] maybe there is something we can do. So

[1:32:31] I'd be happy to work with your office counselor on

[1:32:33] any specific locations you have, and between metro links

[1:32:36] and the city's LRT office. We can have a

[1:32:38] look at our their mitigation measures that we can put

[1:32:40] in place. .

[1:32:41] Perhaps we could put up some additional signage. That's

[1:32:43] a you know local traffic only, but to the

[1:32:45] point earlier. You can't really, you know,

[1:32:47] prevent people from utilizing that street. Thank you.

[1:32:51] Thank you. . Councilor Parish. .

[1:32:54] Yes, Um, on the wind, Rose.

[1:32:56] We all want to go to heaven and no one

[1:32:58] wants to die. As soon as you get into

[1:33:01] the budget discussions, everybody pulls back from this and

[1:33:05] I'm going to remind everybody about today's conversation. Because

[1:33:09] we've got an aging population in Mississauga. We've got

[1:33:12] a lot of seniors who were made housebound by wind

[1:33:15] rose. .

[1:33:16] Can't get out. Their kids live in Vancouver,

[1:33:19] and they just they're stuck there until it melts.

[1:33:22] And I was watching the snow blowers on my street.

[1:33:25] And what was coming out of the end of

[1:33:26] it wasn't snow. . It was water. .

[1:33:28] Because it was so wet underneath, So I'm just

[1:33:31] going to remind everybody because when we do budget,

[1:33:34] the weather is usually better, and we don't have

[1:33:36] complaints from people who are getting stuck. And then

[1:33:40] we hear the amount it's going to cost and we

[1:33:42] all go. Oh, my God, we'd love

[1:33:44] to do this, but we can't afford it.

[1:33:45] So front row remember today. .

[1:33:49] Marked down the date we've been talking about. This

[1:33:52] is 2006 when I was in council the first time

[1:33:55] and it's never been affordable and you go through the

[1:33:59] reports that we get are very extensive and very detailed

[1:34:02] and take a lot of staff time and we all

[1:34:04] go. We'd love to do it, but we

[1:34:06] just can't afford it. So that's my little spiel

[1:34:08] on that. And Brad, I agree with you

[1:34:11] on wildlife. . Um

[1:34:13] My office called. I have two foxes in my

[1:34:16] backyard. .

[1:34:17] They live under my wooden deck, and one of

[1:34:20] them has mange so badly there is nothing left on

[1:34:23] the tail No for and it shakes when it comes

[1:34:26] out, Of course, my stupid Bulldogs chase it,

[1:34:28] So they whip under that gazebo, and we

[1:34:31] called because the one Fox is very sick, and

[1:34:34] it's kind of sad for the kids in the neighborhood.

[1:34:36] .

[1:34:36] And didn't get much of a response. So I

[1:34:39] think we have to start looking at the fact particularly

[1:34:43] when you live close to ravines. You live close

[1:34:45] to parks with some wild area in it. I

[1:34:49] have coyotes. They don't come in my backyard.

[1:34:51] They're afraid of my Bulldogs. I think, but

[1:34:54] the foxes I have two of them. I have

[1:34:56] a raccoon who's lived here in my backyard for three

[1:34:58] years. .

[1:34:59] And I now have a possum who looks adorable until

[1:35:01] he opens his mouth. .

[1:35:03] And you look at those teeth and it's like old

[1:35:05] my God. Anyway, I think I'd like to

[1:35:08] see that report that counselor but has asked for and

[1:35:11] I might say in a city built along ravines in

[1:35:15] the credit River, , we might have to look at

[1:35:17] Doing something with wildlife just to be humane. Was

[1:35:21] it Gandhi that said, the way you treat your

[1:35:24] animals is the way you treat your people, and

[1:35:26] I think we have to pay attention to this.

[1:35:28] So I'm just supporting you, Brad. I think

[1:35:30] it's a something we should be looking at. Thank

[1:35:32] you. .

[1:35:35] I think Brad appreciates that counselor.

[1:35:39] Thank you through the chair. Um, first question,

[1:35:43] um either city manager or corporate services in and

[1:35:46] around support for our residents. Associations have had this

[1:35:50] request from a number of our repair associations of which

[1:35:53] everybody knows. I have many 14 very engaged associations

[1:35:58] across war, too, And I believe counselor.

[1:36:01] Tesco also has about a dozen

[1:36:03] So, you know, certainly the South is very

[1:36:06] engaged, and we love that they are asking for

[1:36:11] some support, either to the community benefits program.

[1:36:13] If you're registered group or something that could be offered

[1:36:17] to residents associations specifically around insurance for boards. It

[1:36:22] is one of their, um large expenses that they

[1:36:25] do to be ensured. .

[1:36:27] As and this could be community services. Apologies that

[1:36:31] they would like the city to look into. And

[1:36:34] I'd be interested in seeing if we could support our

[1:36:36] residents Associations with board insurance. .

[1:36:40] Thank you. Through you, Mr Chair. We

[1:36:42] do have an insurance program as part of being a

[1:36:46] registered group. I think what you're seeing is boards

[1:36:50] who are wanting to get additional insurance. Um,

[1:36:54] just because of some, you know, bad behavior

[1:36:57] is going on in other areas, not in their

[1:37:00] own board. . But

[1:37:01] You know, a number of boards have been a

[1:37:03] little bit more cognizant and wanting to increase insurance.

[1:37:06] So we have you know our insurance provider and they

[1:37:08] pay the premium through the city. So if there's

[1:37:12] an additional amount that we can take a look at

[1:37:16] that would be a premium that you know, and

[1:37:18] they just pay. They just pay that. But

[1:37:19] then they get all the benefits of you know certain

[1:37:22] things for it, but it was a lot more

[1:37:23] reasonable than individually having to go out. .

[1:37:26] And secure that insurance for themselves like to see if

[1:37:29] it would be affordable or not for the city to

[1:37:32] potentially pay for that insurance as well for if they

[1:37:35] had a certain amount of requirements that we want to.

[1:37:38] I just want to look into it a bit

[1:37:39] more would be appreciated. My second question is in

[1:37:43] around this report that, um, unfortunately, came

[1:37:47] out yesterday from the B C. Human Rights Commission.

[1:37:50] .

[1:37:50] On hate and discrimination in Canada and BC specifically But

[1:37:56] this has been a theme since Covid started, um

[1:38:01] 483% 82% increase in anti Asian racism was reported yesterday.

[1:38:08] .

[1:38:09] 400. That's five times.

[1:38:11] That's unbelievable.

[1:38:13] There was 115 increase in, uh, in black

[1:38:17] racism as well. .

[1:38:19] And that's very, very disturbing, and I was

[1:38:21] going to say that in sort of announcements and that

[1:38:24] we need to reaffirm our support for these communities.

[1:38:27] But also I think we have an opportunity with the

[1:38:30] amazing celebrations that our communications team has put on,

[1:38:34] Um for black History month. The event this morning

[1:38:38] for international women's Day was fantastic. .

[1:38:41] And I think the city has a role to play

[1:38:44] in promoting our diverse Ah, populations in the city

[1:38:48] and over. I think 56% from the last census

[1:38:51] showed that Mississauga residents are Asian or South Asian descent.

[1:38:56] So I'd like to quickly ask Rob. I

[1:38:58] know it wasn't part of the original celebrations schedule for

[1:39:03] the city of Mississauga for this year, but is

[1:39:06] there you know? Could we get a number or

[1:39:09] an idea if

[1:39:10] If we wanted to do something similar

[1:39:12] Because it's been they've been such phenomenal events and sort

[1:39:15] of your victim of your own success here Rob for

[1:39:18] for doing such a good job for the city for

[1:39:20] promoting these different landmark events that we have throughout the

[1:39:25] year looking into what we could potentially do this year,

[1:39:28] even if it's small to start off for for

[1:39:31] Asian Heritage Month and South Asian Heritage Month, which

[1:39:34] happens to be in May. .

[1:39:37] Ah, through you, Mr. Chair to Councilor

[1:39:39] Ted Hose. . Um

[1:39:40] It's a bit of a tough one to answer in

[1:39:42] terms of what we could do because we could do

[1:39:44] a lot. We brought a report last year in

[1:39:47] May two council recommending that we add to the traditional

[1:39:51] events list International Women's Day National Day for truth and

[1:39:55] Reconciliation, Black History month as well as pride and

[1:39:59] that would join Remembrance Day it would join New Year's

[1:40:02] Eve Levy, the mayor's levy Canada Day and a

[1:40:06] couple of other events that we would do as events

[1:40:08] that the city would do every year. .

[1:40:10] At the same time, the city has a number

[1:40:12] of other ways to recognize events of significance. Months

[1:40:16] of significance. And so you'll see programming across the

[1:40:19] community in terms of libraries does quite a bit of

[1:40:22] that culture does quite a bit of that as well.

[1:40:25] And so the report last year really spoke to

[1:40:28] how do we better coordinate that across the city so

[1:40:30] that we aren't

[1:40:32] Missing anything that's of importance, but that we also

[1:40:34] have some criteria around. You know what we're celebrating.

[1:40:37] And so that report was approved, and we've

[1:40:39] been implementing that and that the Black History month event

[1:40:42] that took place this year was the first one that

[1:40:44] the city itself has coordinated. The mayor's office in

[1:40:47] the past has done them, and I think the

[1:40:49] last couple of years they were virtual. So this

[1:40:50] was the first in person, , one. .

[1:40:52] Um, this morning's event. I'd like to take

[1:40:55] credit for it. But I can't that was done

[1:40:56] entirely by the mayor's office, so I don't want

[1:40:59] credit where it's not due. But that was an

[1:41:01] event that the city was hosting. We've also had

[1:41:04] a number of internal events. Sherry, among others,

[1:41:06] were on a panel yesterday, talking about International

[1:41:09] Women's Day. .

[1:41:10] So this was really our first foray without significant resources

[1:41:15] being put behind it to do this, I would

[1:41:17] suggest if we wanted to move forward with recognizing other

[1:41:20] months other days that we take this back and maybe

[1:41:25] take it to the newly established or soon to be

[1:41:27] established anti racism, , discrimination and hatred committee

[1:41:31] Have those conversations there and see what those recommendations would

[1:41:34] be. I know other cities have grappled with this

[1:41:37] and other cities have different ways of doing this,

[1:41:41] and there is resource implications. So my concern is,

[1:41:45] if we start down this path without a coordinated

[1:41:47] approach that we could wind up, not really having

[1:41:50] a criteria and sort of

[1:41:52] Doing ad hoc events. So I'd like to go

[1:41:56] back and have that conversation with the newly established committee

[1:41:59] and then possibly bring back report with that said.

[1:42:03] We do have the community recognition program, which is

[1:42:06] open to all residents and all groups. And so

[1:42:08] if anybody wants to raise a flag if they want

[1:42:11] to have the clock tower lit, you know if

[1:42:13] they want to talk to the libraries if they want

[1:42:15] to talk to museums about some of this

[1:42:17] I know that programming can be done. So I'm

[1:42:19] thinking we can probably accommodate that in the short term

[1:42:22] because may is coming up quickly. But in the

[1:42:24] longer term, I think we'd want to have a

[1:42:26] bigger conversation about which dates and events. Do we

[1:42:29] recognize this corporation and what the resource implications of that

[1:42:32] would be

[1:42:34] Thank you, Rob and happy to do that and

[1:42:36] move that when? When? Appropriate. Thank you.

[1:42:39] .

[1:42:39] Thank you, Councilor Fonseca.

[1:42:42] Thank you, Hugh Chair. Um, I think

[1:42:45] this question might be to Jody. I'm not certain,

[1:42:50] um, in 2021 to help prevent diabetes in

[1:42:57] the city of Mississauga City, joined the city's changing

[1:43:02] diabetes. .

[1:43:03] Program and also unveiled a stra and Mississauga Mississauga made

[1:43:09] diabetes strategy. Um and I'm just wondering, uh,

[1:43:15] I've had questions from a number of residents just

[1:43:18] wondering if we are still on the timelines that were

[1:43:22] presented the milestones that were presented back when we launched

[1:43:27] the project. .

[1:43:28] Um, with regards to am

[1:43:31] Winter and spring public engagement happening this year in 2023.

[1:43:37] .

[1:43:38] And when will a, uh a report or,

[1:43:42] um

[1:43:43] Hmm. An update be brought back to council.

[1:43:50] Thank you to you, Mr Chair. I'm happy

[1:43:53] to provide some more information Councilor. I know a

[1:43:56] number of things are ongoing and so specifically public engagement

[1:44:01] in spring of two. If that was specific,

[1:44:03] specific action item, we did a lot of work

[1:44:06] in conjunction with the mayor's office and U T m

[1:44:09] right. . So I think

[1:44:11] There has been if that's the program you referring to?

[1:44:13] There's been a lot of movement on some of

[1:44:16] those areas. But if it's a specific action item

[1:44:19] in the plan, , I think

[1:44:22] That's the piece that will have to go back and

[1:44:24] get more info and I'm happy to take it offline.

[1:44:26] It's just a number of a number of residents

[1:44:29] in light of different announcements that have been made you

[1:44:32] TM was one partner as well as um, Trillium

[1:44:37] Health partners, So I think that's where the questions

[1:44:40] from community members have come from. So so I

[1:44:43] don't need an answer necessarily today, but it's just

[1:44:46] something that residents have flagged for me and also different

[1:44:50] organizations. .

[1:44:51] Ah as well. So thank you very much.

[1:44:55] Um, And then just to follow up on the

[1:44:57] don't want to belabor the winter maintenance, But I'm

[1:45:00] I too am in support of taking another look at

[1:45:05] it with regards to, , um not only the equipment

[1:45:09] Um, that we we need to provide, Uh,

[1:45:14] equitably. Uh, no matter what community in

[1:45:19] the city, um, but also to look at

[1:45:21] the service levels. So, um, Jeff,

[1:45:25] you had mentioned that even if we do have a

[1:45:28] report that comes back in

[1:45:31] In the next couple of weeks or months that we

[1:45:34] can look at that you're looking. You are saying

[1:45:37] that we won't necessarily be able to deploy the equipment

[1:45:43] if we were to make the decision to remove the

[1:45:46] wind, rose, But could you also include in

[1:45:49] that report? What can suggestions of what can be

[1:45:53] done? ? Of course. .

[1:45:54] It.

[1:45:55] It will be at potentially at a cost. Um,

[1:45:59] but what could be done in 2023 for this

[1:46:02] for this winter coming forward? Um and that would

[1:46:06] be. I had asked last week for report to

[1:46:09] come back with regards to service levels in parks and

[1:46:13] trails and connections to schools, but also is there

[1:46:17] something that could be done to better align the service

[1:46:20] levels for sidewalk clearing

[1:46:23] Mm. Sidewalk clearing and also, um with regards

[1:46:29] to, um how we collaborate with the region,

[1:46:33] so I am not sure if we now clear all

[1:46:39] regional roads. I'm under the understanding that the region

[1:46:42] continues to clear Dixie. . I could be mistaken. .

[1:46:46] But perhaps there are there's service level through coordination with

[1:46:51] the region and co throwers referenced also by Scott.

[1:46:55] Um, perhaps there's ways that we can through through

[1:46:59] coordination. Look at the service levels with the equipment

[1:47:03] that we do have right now. . I'm not sure

[1:47:06] Um and, uh, also one other thing that

[1:47:14] I did get quite a few emails, not only

[1:47:19] this year, but last year and concerns from residents

[1:47:23] that live along Blur Street and if we are moving

[1:47:28] And I've had them in the past with from residents

[1:47:32] that live up front on two or corner onto Rathburn

[1:47:37] and pony trail, and this has been a as

[1:47:40] a result of a vast moving forward towards planning for

[1:47:45] integrated road projects. As you know, so if

[1:47:49] that could be all part of the report that is

[1:47:52] brought back obviously what the costs are. .

[1:47:55] But what

[1:47:56] Can potentially be done in 2023.

[1:48:02] If we're not able to get and if we do

[1:48:04] decide, and we're not able to get the the

[1:48:06] windrow clearing equipment put in place for winter of 2023.

[1:48:11] How else may we be able to support equitably?

[1:48:15] All all road users, including pedestrians, those

[1:48:20] with accessibility. Those are they're taking transit those that

[1:48:24] are walking to school. .

[1:48:27] Ah, um and so on and so forth.

[1:48:33] Three. Mr Charity counselor Fonseca. So we've obviously

[1:48:36] captured all your comments counselor and will will respond appropriately

[1:48:41] in the winter maintenance report. Um, our focus

[1:48:43] of the report was just on windows. But you've

[1:48:45] asked us now they consider a number of other things

[1:48:47] that we can take a look at in terms of

[1:48:49] the regional service levels and give you the reconfirm that

[1:48:53] breakdown between what the region of peel does. .

[1:48:55] Versus what the city of Mississauga does from winter maintenance

[1:48:58] perspective, and the city does perform services for the

[1:49:01] region, and perhaps I'll seek clarification from the team

[1:49:04] behind me on if you want that information now,

[1:49:06] or would you want it in that report, but

[1:49:09] maybe quickly, Helena Scott, just in terms of

[1:49:11] the service at the region, appeal provides and and

[1:49:14] we'll take all that information Councilor in factor that into

[1:49:17] the report. .

[1:49:18] I'm not sure there would be a lot of support

[1:49:20] we could offer from a windrow perspective. You know,

[1:49:24] in that short time frame between when council could

[1:49:27] decide, Say it. Budget Committee you know,

[1:49:29] in in

[1:49:30] Let's say it's May or June. Whatever the date

[1:49:32] works out to be, Um, and then that

[1:49:35] winter season, you know, we do have our

[1:49:36] windrow program Would that is a separate level of service,

[1:49:40] And that's something that perhaps we could look at

[1:49:42] that and see if there's an opportunity to expand that.

[1:49:45] But that is a resource issue than maybe all

[1:49:48] that. Scott Helen just comment on that piece,

[1:49:50] And I'll just say that the Windrow program that we

[1:49:54] have

[1:49:55] Um and other counselors have referenced it for for seniors

[1:50:00] or those with ability, ability, challenges that have

[1:50:05] applied for that program there, Uh, the service

[1:50:09] levels that we have currently and that we have supported

[1:50:13] being 36 hours after the event is declared complete,

[1:50:19] is just

[1:50:21] I think it's just too much for for those that

[1:50:23] have that have applied for that program. So there's

[1:50:28] that. Potentially there's opportunity there for at least the

[1:50:31] 2023 winter season. Um and also with sidewalk clearing,

[1:50:37] potentially if there's opportunity there and then increasing service

[1:50:41] levels again. .

[1:50:43] Within our trail and park system to to address requests

[1:50:48] that have come from students, So I'm not sure

[1:50:51] if Scott wants to comment really, really briefly or

[1:50:54] Helen. So through chair Mahoney to Councilor Fonseca Scott

[1:50:59] and I'll tag team. I'll do some of the

[1:51:00] answers, and I'll pass the operational based ones more

[1:51:03] to Scott. But Jeff mentioned earlier that we have

[1:51:06] a procurement out right now. .

[1:51:08] And there's actually three elements to that procurement. The

[1:51:11] wind Roses one, but we're also looking for quotes

[1:51:15] on sidewalk snow clearing across the city. Currently,

[1:51:18] we only have priority routes. So we're looking for

[1:51:21] the cost for sidewalk snow clearing citywide, So I

[1:51:24] think that will address some of the questions that you

[1:51:27] have raised this morning. Um and then the third

[1:51:29] element is bicycle lane, , snow removal as well. .

[1:51:33] And so that will be broken down in the report.

[1:51:35] And, as Jeff has mentioned, all the

[1:51:37] other questions that you've raised today will try to incorporate

[1:51:40] in the report as well. But from an operations

[1:51:42] perspective and coordination with the regional past that over to

[1:51:45] Scott, Thank you, Helen through the charity counselor,

[1:51:47] , Fonseca. .

[1:51:48] At this time we do all the maintenance on Queensway

[1:51:51] Catherine Winston Churchill That's part of the regional road. .

[1:51:54] We are in conversation with them to pick up Dixie

[1:51:58] below Queensway just because their resources their only yard is

[1:52:02] copper road, which is it steals in the 4

[1:52:04] 10. .

[1:52:05] So it becomes kind of challenging for them to get

[1:52:07] all the way down here. This is why they

[1:52:08] have access to do that. So we're working on

[1:52:10] an updated agreement to include portions of Dixie. .

[1:52:13] We work very closely. In fact, I had

[1:52:15] a meeting with the region appealed Brampton and Kalinin counterparts.

[1:52:19] We meet every month. People at my level

[1:52:22] we have that discussion to talk about. .

[1:52:23] How we're working together to make sure that we've got

[1:52:26] those timelines in order. So we're keeping an eye

[1:52:29] on that very closely to make sure that we're in

[1:52:31] conversations they provide us updates similar to I do,

[1:52:34] updates for your team and the rest of a lot

[1:52:37] of people here at the city. They do the

[1:52:39] same thing for us and our supervisor team, So

[1:52:41] we know where everybody is and where we are to

[1:52:44] make sure that we're coordinating. .

[1:52:46] When it comes to getting equipment for the 2023 2024

[1:52:50] season. If we get approval in June, it

[1:52:52] will be a supply chain issue for any of those

[1:52:55] equipments. If you've tried to even get a car

[1:52:57] yourself, you know how long did it take?

[1:52:59] So you can imagine this sort of specialist equipment?

[1:53:02] That's why we're giving them that year and a half

[1:53:04] to be able to make sure that they've got the

[1:53:06] equipment in place before we start. .

[1:53:08] The other piece of that If the Windrow program goes

[1:53:12] through, we expect it's about 220 pieces of equipment

[1:53:16] that we would need to do this program. I

[1:53:19] don't have anywhere to put 220 pieces of equipment right

[1:53:22] now. So we are in the works of making

[1:53:25] sure that we've got the room. .

[1:53:27] Same with the sidewalk to do the remainder of the

[1:53:30] sidewalks. Um, that's about another 50 pieces of

[1:53:33] equipment. I believe to be able to handle that.

[1:53:36] So it becomes a capacity thing that we have

[1:53:38] to make sure that we're ready both logistically operationally and

[1:53:42] have staff supported to be able to, , um

[1:53:45] I had those programs if council wishes us to add

[1:53:48] them. .

[1:53:49] Okay. Thank you. I appreciate that. If

[1:53:52] there

[1:53:53] If there's anything that could be done for the 2023

[1:53:55] season, that would be wonderful, and I understand

[1:53:58] the

[1:53:59] The capacity or the the

[1:54:03] The capacity issues and not having somewhere to store all

[1:54:06] of the equipment in place. But thank you very

[1:54:08] much. Thanks for everyone for clarifying. Thank thank

[1:54:11] you, Councilor Franciscan. I assume Jeff when you

[1:54:13] were in there, just trying to follow that.

[1:54:14] Adding to the report a user pay type system for

[1:54:17] wind. Rose. Is that what you were saying?

[1:54:18] That could kind of add some information on how

[1:54:20] that could work or

[1:54:22] Sorry, Harry.

[1:54:23] Remember, you know, like I think Councilor we

[1:54:27] could look at when we present to the options will

[1:54:30] present the cost to do the work. And then

[1:54:33] it becomes a financial discussion in terms of is that

[1:54:35] a tax a tax recovery? User recovery may be

[1:54:39] even more difficult to achieve, But we can look

[1:54:41] at different options and have that conversation that Budget Committee

[1:54:45] appreciate that America Crumby

[1:54:47] Thank you and I for neglected to add two things

[1:54:51] to my inquiries, and I'll kick off announcements if

[1:54:53] I may since I've seen to be the last person

[1:54:55] on the board. .

[1:54:56] Um, I should have said a big thank you

[1:54:59] as well to the road clearing efforts that were done.

[1:55:02] We don't have the equipment to do the windrow

[1:55:04] so we don't so that's it to staff looking at

[1:55:07] the committees. I met with the New Trucking Association

[1:55:10] yesterday, and they are asking when with that might

[1:55:13] get up and moving. If we have terms of

[1:55:15] reference, yet we will be reporting back on that

[1:55:18] in the next couple of weeks. .

[1:55:20] Weeks. Okay, Very good. And then on

[1:55:23] Friday, this is this crosses over between announcements and

[1:55:26] inquiries. So, as you know, the peel

[1:55:29] regional police is hosting along with the police board is

[1:55:32] hosting a summit on car jackings and auto thefts.

[1:55:36] And whereas I try to get everyone invited, they

[1:55:39] kind of said they have limited space and I already

[1:55:41] sent out the invites, but I will report back.

[1:55:43] .

[1:55:44] And the bigger issue is that they need the people

[1:55:47] at the table. Who can make a difference like

[1:55:49] the car manufacturers, insurers, the federal provincial government

[1:55:53] border services, etcetera, so that's what will happen

[1:55:56] on Friday. .

[1:55:58] But as well, I'm wondering, looking at Rob

[1:56:00] North up there. Look at our comms team.

[1:56:02] If you'd be able to work with peel police to

[1:56:05] maybe do a small education and communications campaign project on

[1:56:09] car thefts and prevention tips on top vehicles being stolen

[1:56:14] And what to do with your car is stolen.

[1:56:16] Who you call obviously, , insurance and

[1:56:19] And just to keep our residents informed and engaged.

[1:56:22] Is that something we can look into? I did

[1:56:24] talk about some prevention measures that

[1:56:28] Peel regional police discussed when Councilor Mahoney and I were

[1:56:31] at a community meeting on auto thefts and break ins,

[1:56:35] etcetera, and they said something like a tin

[1:56:38] box at the dollar store could go a long way

[1:56:40] to put your keys in and little foil wrappers for

[1:56:43] spare keys, etcetera. So I wonder if you

[1:56:45] might think about little education campaign on what comes the

[1:56:50] outcomes of the summit on the

[1:56:52] Friday.

[1:56:55] Through the chair to Mayor Crombie. We can take

[1:56:57] a look at that. I think we should see

[1:56:58] what the outcomes of our the of the summit are,

[1:57:01] , Um

[1:57:02] Certainly hot and really lean on, you know,

[1:57:04] Peel police in terms of their information, and then

[1:57:07] we can certainly push it out through all of our

[1:57:09] channels. Thank you. Subject to council direction to

[1:57:12] do something broader. You didn't see how are you

[1:57:14] Didn't see Rob to Ortho approaching the podium. I

[1:57:17] did, but he doesn't need to come down every

[1:57:18] time we talk about communications, so we'll talk about

[1:57:21] announcements now. Just a big thank you to everyone

[1:57:24] involved this morning. . Such

[1:57:26] To the front bench team here are champions are commissioners

[1:57:30] who all joined us and to the councilors who were

[1:57:33] able to make it to communications department. Corporate comms

[1:57:36] who assisted my office. A big big Thank you

[1:57:39] to Natasha. Mystery in my office who was a

[1:57:42] real superstar this morning and I executed this thing flawlessly.

[1:57:46] I know a lot of people help. But

[1:57:48] Natasha was her brainchild. She found the guest speakers

[1:57:52] who were so inspirational. I have to say this

[1:57:54] is my favorite one. . We've had some great

[1:57:56] Speakers in the past, but this was awesome.

[1:57:58] So it just to acknowledge that the two were Lesley

[1:58:01] Hampton and Inish Nabi, breakthrough fashion designer who joined

[1:58:05] us and provided the keynote address. This is a

[1:58:08] young woman that went to U T M, Our

[1:58:11] girl who dresses, big names and every award show

[1:58:14] in the US and the Golden Globes, etcetera.

[1:58:17] A lot of local celebrities like the

[1:58:20] E U E Entertainment tonight. Folks where her talk?

[1:58:25] Yeah, I think that's the one where her

[1:58:27] designs and so she's just so great. And Brianna

[1:58:31] Olson Tawana Kwaht, who was a jingle Dress dancer

[1:58:35] also performed two beautiful dances. She was and also

[1:58:39] talked about her story. .

[1:58:42] The theme this year was embraced Equity, which encourages

[1:58:45] all to take action towards a more gender equitable world,

[1:58:48] where all the differences are valued, celebrated embraced

[1:58:51] again. We invited all high school students and we

[1:58:55] had, you know mentors from business in the community.

[1:58:59] The school trustees are counselors who were able to

[1:59:01] attend. . We had

[1:59:03] Corum there, so it was a great, well

[1:59:05] attended event. And, um so is my hope

[1:59:09] that this becomes an even bigger and better events.

[1:59:12] Tonight we're going to light the clock tower Purple for

[1:59:15] IW Do so Happy International Women's Day and be sure

[1:59:18] to embrace equity. .

[1:59:20] On behalf of counselor merlot, and I was happy

[1:59:23] Holi to everyone who is celebrating the Hindu in the

[1:59:26] Hindu community for a memorable holy. I had the

[1:59:29] opportunity to visit the Hindu Heritage Center on Monday night,

[1:59:33] when you guys were hard at work at planning.

[1:59:35] I was supposed to go to run Monday here,

[1:59:36] but I have to say, because of the

[1:59:38] Swedish event had to attend. I ran out of

[1:59:40] time a little bit so it couldn't make it. .

[1:59:42] But as you know, Holy is the Hindu festival

[1:59:44] of colors celebrated by Hindus all over the world with

[1:59:48] great enthusiasm, spreading chalk or colored powders, spreading

[1:59:53] messages of love, respect and faith. So extend

[1:59:55] our message of to all those celebrating Holi. .

[2:00:00] Saturday, March 11th is the three year anniversary of

[2:00:04] the National Day of observance of Covid 19 hard to

[2:00:08] believe it's been three years since the WH O declared

[2:00:11] covid 19 a global pandemic three years. So those

[2:00:15] birthdays and those three years, counselor read. They

[2:00:17] don't count, right. This was a blip gone.

[2:00:19] .

[2:00:20] So Dave observance for those who lost their lives,

[2:00:23] as well as individuals who continue to deal with the

[2:00:26] long term effects of the virus. I know some

[2:00:29] folks and also let's extend a big thank you to

[2:00:32] all the frontline healthcare workers and those healthcare heroes appeal

[2:00:37] Public Health and Trillium health partners for the incredible support

[2:00:41] they gave Mississauga and their sacrifice throughout the pandemic. .

[2:00:45] Friendly reminder to everyone that you get to turn your

[2:00:47] clocks forward on Saturday night because on Sunday, we

[2:00:51] will be springing forward for daylight savings time. And

[2:00:55] you gain an extra hour of sunlight. Maybe.

[2:00:58] And one less extra hour of sleep, , though. .

[2:01:02] Also like to take a moment to acknowledge a new

[2:01:05] phenomenon. Mississauga Grade four student Mama Thieving off who

[2:01:11] broke several world records in her hula hooping skills,

[2:01:15] just nine years old Mammoth except three. Guinness World

[2:01:19] Records for Hula Hooping. Let's get her in here

[2:01:21] so we can pay tribute to her, , please. .

[2:01:24] Give a certificate ready for her most hoops while spinning

[2:01:28] most hops. Most people hop off, spinning a

[2:01:31] hula hoop on one ankle in one minute 110 times

[2:01:35] that was one of the records. She broke most

[2:01:37] hula hoop rotations around knees while in a dancer pose

[2:01:42] in 30 seconds, 62 times and most hula hoop

[2:01:46] rotations around knees on in line skates, folks and

[2:01:51] 30 seconds. . 76 times. .

[2:01:53] Let's congratulate this little phenomenon on her achievement and look

[2:01:58] forward to meeting her. Let's try to get her

[2:02:00] in if we can looking up there. .

[2:02:02] Upstairs power so few past events. We should acknowledge

[2:02:06] I did speak. I was speaker along with Mayor

[2:02:08] Brown and counselor Shelley Carroll on Gateway to Growth summit

[2:02:12] at the Toronto region. Board of Trade hosted the

[2:02:14] other day on how cities can help unlock the true

[2:02:17] potential of the Pearson economic Zone. Thank you also

[2:02:21] to my staff and to Christina Kaka flickers for joining

[2:02:24] Also was it yesterday Or is it the day before?

[2:02:27] Which is this Wednesday? Yes, Yesterday paid

[2:02:29] tribute to Hazel McCallion at Sheridan College. . They

[2:02:34] Of course, he's always there, Chancellor and we

[2:02:37] had a little tribute to her there. Yesterday morning

[2:02:40] Counselor Button I attended the streets will be I a

[2:02:43] networking breakfast. Also another I wd breakfast. Thank

[2:02:46] you to cook Collins Pub Karen Collins for hosting and

[2:02:50] also mentions on Sunday and Monday night. So many

[2:02:53] things joined Ambassador Urban Allen and several Swedish businesses all

[2:02:58] All many of them home here in Mississauga for joining

[2:03:03] this little gathering of Swedish businesses. And to Sarah

[2:03:06] Mordechai, who was secretary of state minister for energy,

[2:03:10] business and industry. So welcome them to access

[2:03:13] communications here in Mississauga. Thank you. Those are

[2:03:16] my announcements. Mr. Chair. Thank you,

[2:03:18] Madam era hula hoop opposite Twister. .

[2:03:21] Cancel Hornick.

[2:03:24] Thank you so much, Mr Chair. That would

[2:03:26] be something to see in council chambers. I gotta

[2:03:28] think I think Councilor read being the most fit among

[2:03:31] us Could maybe try it out and see if he's

[2:03:33] any competition for that, Because I know I'd fall

[2:03:35] on my face anyways, onto announcements. Um,

[2:03:39] you know, I want to thank the residents of

[2:03:42] Jury Road and Caroline Road and and the adjoining roads

[2:03:45] off that we had Monday night. What is the

[2:03:49] start of a

[2:03:50] Residents Association as a great turnout, you know about

[2:03:54] 50 people showed showing a lot of interest in starting

[2:03:58] that, and this comes from a place you know,

[2:04:00] as many residents associations have as a place of

[2:04:03] challenge, , right? ?

[2:04:04] The residents have been facing a number of break ins

[2:04:07] and vehicle thefts in the area. And so they

[2:04:10] feel very challenged in their community right now, and

[2:04:12] they're doing the positive steps that it takes now,

[2:04:15] to kind of address that so they've been forming a

[2:04:16] neighborhood watch, and now we're onto the next step

[2:04:19] of the residents Association. So it was great to

[2:04:21] see a number of people willing to step up and

[2:04:23] wanting to serve on that association, and I'm really

[2:04:26] excited to work with them and bring that forward and

[2:04:28] make sure we're putting our best foot forward for that

[2:04:31] neighborhood. .

[2:04:32] Both addressing the crime issues and you know the other

[2:04:34] issues that occur in the neighborhood. .

[2:04:37] And wanted to turn that negative into a positive,

[2:04:39] So I just wanted to take the time to applaud

[2:04:41] them and thank them for coming out. And,

[2:04:43] uh And that's why I was missing from PDC because

[2:04:46] I had my residence and I need to help him

[2:04:48] out. .

[2:04:49] So thanks very much. Thank you. Councilor Councilor

[2:04:52] Federal

[2:04:54] Thank you through the chair, Um and council horning

[2:04:57] happy that we were able to support your rate peers

[2:05:00] with some of our repair expertise over and war to

[2:05:04] to to support them getting off the ground and that

[2:05:08] that offer would appoint anyone who wants to do that.

[2:05:11] I just wanted to wish everyone a happy march

[2:05:14] break. Um, I think it's important that we

[2:05:17] get the time. I know we all work incredibly

[2:05:19] hard. .

[2:05:20] Um and I've got kids that are just going to

[2:05:23] continue getting older and I very much appreciate the time

[2:05:26] to spend with them during the next March break,

[2:05:30] and the city has a number of phenomenal events number

[2:05:32] of them happening in war, too. If you

[2:05:34] want to stop by our museums with maple magic.

[2:05:38] I know we're going to try to do that while

[2:05:39] we're here and the city and as well as the

[2:05:43] CVC have also put on a number of events and

[2:05:46] camps. .

[2:05:47] Throughout the area for families to enjoy and encourage everybody

[2:05:52] to explore the city. But more during during this

[2:05:55] march break. . Thank you. .

[2:05:57] Thank you. Don't forget about Riverwood counselor Fonseca.

[2:06:02] Thank you to Mr Chair, uh, with this

[2:06:06] being international women's state, and I did want to

[2:06:10] say big. Thank you to Mr Crombie and the

[2:06:12] team for the was an exceptional, very inspirational breakfast

[2:06:17] this morning, but I also wanted to and there's

[2:06:20] many, many incredible women in the city of Mississauga,

[2:06:24] um, that we could be recognizing, but

[2:06:27] I wanted to take the opportunity to congratulate. .

[2:06:31] Um

[2:06:32] A resident. Uh

[2:06:35] In the city of Mississauga, who when she was

[2:06:40] I think started at the age of four cutter teeth

[2:06:44] in soccer with Dixie soccer club that is now a

[2:06:51] The head coach who made history as being named the

[2:06:54] head coach of league A MX feminine yell club.

[2:06:59] T Gresh U H. N L. Kar Molina

[2:07:03] Moscato to and she was just inducted into the Canadian

[2:07:09] Soccer Hall of Fame yesterday. So having grown up

[2:07:14] in Mississauga

[2:07:16] And being supported by many many coaches, female and

[2:07:21] male coaches, Uh, both in the club system

[2:07:24] in the city of Mississauga and in the region and

[2:07:28] then also throughout high school, um and university and

[2:07:32] then on the national team and being an olympic medalist,

[2:07:35] she she has referenced ongoing the support that she

[2:07:39] has received in the city of Mississauga. So I

[2:07:41] wanted to say a big congratulations. .

[2:07:44] To her for her induction into the Canadian soccer Hall

[2:07:48] of Fame and also a thank you for the invitation

[2:07:53] and I'm looking forward to attending on Sunday, March,

[2:07:57] , 12th. .

[2:07:58] The Little Native Hockey League tournament that is happening at

[2:08:03] Paramount Fine Foods. I was made aware and invited

[2:08:06] by volunteers that participate in help support, um through

[2:08:13] applewood hockey, and I'm looking forward to it.

[2:08:16] And, , um, , just a thank you to

[2:08:20] The many, many volunteers that make our export tourism

[2:08:26] in our city such a great place and looking forward

[2:08:30] to that tournament and good luck to all the participants.

[2:08:34] Thank you, Mr Chair. Thank you,

[2:08:36] Councilor Fonseca, and that exhausts the list for announcements

[2:08:40] So we will now, um, move into closed

[2:08:43] session. .

[2:08:45] Mm.

[2:08:47] Surreal read this, whereas the Minister Act 2001 is

[2:08:50] amended, requires council passed a motion prior to closing

[2:08:53] part of a meeting to the public. And whereas

[2:08:56] the act requires that the motion states the act of

[2:08:58] the holding of the closed meeting in general nature of

[2:09:01] the matter to be considered at the closed meeting now,

[2:09:04] therefore be it resolved that a portion of the

[2:09:06] General Committee meeting to be held on March 8th 2023

[2:09:09] shall be closed to the public to deal with the

[2:09:10] following matters. .

[2:09:12] Pursuant to section 2 39 2 of the Municipal act,

[2:09:16] 2001 16.1 proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of

[2:09:21] land by the municipality or local board. .

[2:09:25] Agreements approved and executed by the city manager during City

[2:09:28] Council. . Summer election recess. . Wards one end seven

[2:09:32] 16 point to a trade secret or scientific, technical,

[2:09:35] commercial, financial or labor relations information supplied in

[2:09:39] confidence to the municipality or local board, which,

[2:09:42] if disclosed, could reasonably be expected to prejudice significantly

[2:09:46] their competitive position or interfere significantly with the contractual or

[2:09:50] other negotiations of a person group of persons or organizations.

[2:09:55] .

[2:09:55] Authorization and a goat.

[2:09:57] Entering to municipal agreement 16.3 of trade secret or scientific,

[2:10:01] technical, commercial, financial or labor relations.

[2:10:04] Information supplied in confidence to the municipality or local board,

[2:10:08] which, if disclosed, could reasonably be expected

[2:10:11] to prejudice significantly the competitive position or interfere significantly with

[2:10:17] account contractual negotiations of a person. .

[2:10:20] Group of persons or organization.

[2:10:23] You have heard the motion. Can I have a

[2:10:24] mover counselor? Hornick, all in favor that is

[2:10:27] carried. We will now move into closed session.

[2:10:29] I'm not sure 45 minutes. .

[2:10:32] An hour. I got an hour.

[2:10:35] Thank you.

[2:10:37] Never have a seat so much.

[2:10:45] Hi. Your post to love you can't trust

[2:10:57] To be or not to be quite the question.

[2:10:59] Truly not stop this all tonight. Work in China

[2:11:05] hurt and don't in my shadow crap. Broken glass

[2:11:08] crashing

[2:11:11] I bet you're really feeling out feeling attractive Ashes and

[2:11:17] don't magnets. It's your turn to get lost in

[2:11:20] the madness without the magic. No more attachments.

[2:11:25] Accidents happen, but in my heart is a lasting

[2:11:31] no, , that letter says. .

[2:11:35] I can't stand

[2:11:38] Windows.

[2:11:42] Is in the home where the high road zero overload

[2:11:45] overfill overgrown over self flowers from the meadow on the

[2:11:50] tone. .

[2:11:52] No, no.

[2:11:55] No, no, no.

[2:12:00] Never have a so much

[2:12:07] I love when you can't

[2:12:43] Been a waiver mind in a moment back in time

[2:12:47] you wanted to explore party. .

[2:12:53] So we parted ways with the hope and may still

[2:12:59] cross again. .

[2:13:01] Only like glands grow out the seasons change.

[2:13:06] James. Same, but I know

[2:13:15] Because I'm just thinking back to what I'm missing.

[2:13:19] 15

[2:13:22] Million.

[2:13:33] Hold it up for another.

[2:13:37] Looking back at the best through rose colored glasses.

[2:13:45] Do they meddle in your

[2:13:49] Push out the proof. What's over?

[2:13:54] Beautiful life.

[2:13:55] But only like a dress throughout the season.

[2:14:03] For millions.

[2:14:05] Can't touch an empty space.

[2:14:12] Think about to bring it after

[2:14:18] Giant.

[2:14:43] Because I'm just thinking back to what? I'm missing,

[2:14:46] , bringing it back to you. .

[2:14:49] Like a million times.

[2:15:05] Just thinking that

[2:15:46] Another.

[2:16:10] Goodbye.

[2:16:12] Try.

[2:16:29] We should be.

[2:16:56] As I should slide these

[2:17:00] Help me.

[2:17:05] By

[2:17:19] We should be better.

[2:17:22] Be more

[2:17:30] Together.

[2:18:15] We should be better.

[2:18:29] Could be all right.

[2:18:34] Together.

[2:18:39] Could be better.

[2:19:37] Yeah.

[2:20:15] Mm.

[2:21:53] Okay?

[2:23:57] Yeah.

[2:24:06] My baby.

[2:24:09] Yeah.

[2:24:17] In my minus.

[2:24:31] Dream.

[2:24:36] Together.

[2:24:41] Your love is what I need.

[2:24:45] Good snapping power taking champagne with me.

[2:24:53] The stuffing legal make it happen coming by with me.

[2:24:58] .

[2:24:59] She wondering if it's just a place.

[2:25:02] She wondered one night thing.

[2:25:05] Queen King.

[2:25:08] Baby girl. You're my everything.

[2:25:12] My son is away.

[2:25:17] In my mind this recess never get

[2:25:25] The way

[2:25:30] Minus

[2:25:36] Yeah, always and my mind.

[2:25:42] Reason why I sing these lines coming from far never

[2:25:48] turned back. The principal written life truly learned that

[2:25:52] the bridges behind but never burn. That would keep

[2:25:56] on going on. We never gonna stop finger snapping

[2:26:00] our tickets shopping. .

[2:26:02] Ride with me. Ain't the stamping happen coming by

[2:26:09] with me? ?

[2:26:11] She wondering Siplin? She wondered someone night thing.

[2:26:17] Queen King, Baby girl, everything in my town

[2:26:25] away. .

[2:26:29] In my mind.

[2:26:36] Towns away.

[2:26:42] Minus

[2:27:03] Yeah.

[2:29:21] Yeah.

[2:29:43] Yeah.

[2:29:48] Yeah.

[2:30:43] Yeah.

[2:30:47] Words are use aren't forgiving.

[2:30:51] Many times, please forgive me.

[2:30:55] Tired hearts can't always sing.

[2:31:03] If you heard my insisting many times, please don't

[2:31:09] give me tired. Hearts can't do so many things.

[2:31:15] .

[2:31:18] All this sweat that beats my brow. All these

[2:31:23] things. . I don't know how

[2:31:27] To bring me to what I really need.

[2:31:34] There's a place

[2:31:38] Been missing.

[2:31:41] Well, we can forget

[2:31:45] Um, misgivings. Maybe maybe on the assures and

[2:31:53] you will see. .

[2:31:56] Little River.

[2:31:59] To be

[2:32:09] All I do and persisting

[2:32:13] Water life. Please don't give me

[2:32:16] We're in mind seek greater things.

[2:32:24] Leave Bill High and don't your worry is

[2:32:28] What makes life worth living.

[2:32:32] Loving hearts have greater needs.

[2:32:40] All this beats by Brower.

[2:32:43] All these things. I don't know how

[2:32:48] To bring me to what I really need.

[2:33:03] Forget

[2:33:15] See

[2:33:20] I hope

[2:33:25] Anytime.

[2:33:32] So

[2:33:34] Frustrating.

[2:33:38] You can

[2:34:19] Yes, please.

[2:34:24] Forward.

[2:34:27] This morning.

[2:34:34] I swear I

[2:35:00] What to share. This moment seen far.

[2:35:16] Needs much more than a parachute.

[2:35:20] Alone and now I'm ready to share this life road.

[2:35:27] .

[2:35:29] Welcome for

[2:35:33] Right and

[2:35:39] We can't

[2:35:51] That's right.

[2:36:08] True.

[2:36:29] What? You lay beside me your feet for a

[2:36:36] while. .

[2:36:40] Shelter shoulder strong between

[2:36:46] The tree in the rain, darkness, thunder rolling

[2:36:59] Day writing.

[2:37:04] At speed.

[2:37:07] We can saying

[2:37:22] That's

[2:37:40] 100.

[2:37:55] For us.

[2:38:05] Roads when for us

[2:38:19] Satisfy free

[2:38:22] We ain't

[2:38:24] Long fantasy.

[2:38:27] It was control.

[2:39:12] Mm.

[2:39:39] Thomas self to her.

[2:39:41] Third stayed in life felt fine.

[2:39:46] No.

[2:39:46] Friends, which to complied only

[2:39:50] Time and time and time.

[2:39:52] So

[2:39:53] Opened up my heart.

[2:39:55] Tried to

[2:39:56] Read a Pokemon puncture and such, um, still

[2:40:05] Show me

[2:40:11] Tom trying so

[2:40:13] Got to see

[2:40:17] Show me the way

[2:40:21] Love.

[2:40:30] Surgeon for the sidelines, buried with him. My

[2:40:34] mind just can't satisfy. .

[2:40:39] Mm hmm.

[2:40:42] Maybe if I weigh, Spend some time I meditate.

[2:40:47] .

[2:40:54] Show me

[2:41:00] I'm trying to say.

[2:41:06] Show me the way

[2:41:10] Love.

[2:41:14] Lamy.

[2:41:18] Show me the way

[2:41:24] I'm trying so

[2:41:27] Out to sea.

[2:41:30] Show me

[2:41:38] Baby.

[2:41:39] Father Blame me.

[2:41:43] Mm hmm.

[2:41:47] I'm listening to the sound of rain drops window.

[2:41:52] Don't no one wants to feel the rain. I

[2:41:55] think it's beautiful little things. I noticed that never

[2:42:00] seen before. Until you came along in touch me

[2:42:05] through the door. .

[2:42:07] I don't know what you've done to me, but

[2:42:10] I really like a spy. .

[2:42:15] Parking with

[2:42:18] Greater moment saved to be just me my balance and

[2:42:26] dance down the street. .

[2:42:32] You.

[2:42:49] So many things predictable, which is good intention and

[2:42:56] your kisses are forgettable throughout the day with you Every

[2:43:02] second feels like mine. Never take this for granted.

[2:43:06] . Not a moment of this. .

[2:43:14] You.

[2:43:31] Doesn't take much to make this feel smile seems so

[2:43:36] simple. .

[2:43:41] In fact, told you things do

[2:43:47] I don't know. I'm listening to the sound of

[2:43:53] rain drops stands and don't know wants to feel the

[2:43:58] rain. . I think it's booted awful. .

[2:44:01] Little things I noticed I never seen before, until

[2:44:07] you touched me and let you through the door. .

[2:44:15] You.

[2:44:48] Just do me back.

[2:45:13] Yeah.

[2:45:24] Yeah.

[2:45:31] Hmm. Hmm. Hmm. Hmm. Hmm.

[2:45:39] Yeah, , yeah. .

[2:46:06] Mm hmm. Hmm. Hmm. Yeah, yeah.

[2:46:27] .

[2:47:06] Mm hmm. Yeah. Hmm. Yeah. Mm

[2:47:28] hmm. .

[2:47:33] Yeah, yeah. Yeah. Mm hmm.

[2:48:04] Yeah.

[2:48:08] Yeah.

[2:48:17] No.

[2:48:41] Don't brag. Don't pose from combat Compose. Yeah,

[2:48:48] I let you get close, emotionally exposed when

[2:48:52] I needed you the most. You will never down

[2:48:55] 10 full of natural highs and lows overdose. .

[2:49:02] I cell tight rope slipping sliding and I can cope

[2:49:06] without my necessary evil sub zero below shivering cold,

[2:49:12] your color, , the scope ego. .

[2:49:16] Colors have shown that flowers from the meadow on the

[2:49:19] town. . No, , no, , no. .

[2:49:28] Tom.

[2:49:30] Ever have a seat so much.

[2:49:38] Are you opposed to love when you can't

[2:49:50] To be or not to be quite the question.

[2:49:52] Truly not stop this all tonight. Work in China

[2:49:58] hurt and don't in my shadow crap. Broken glass

[2:50:01] crashing

[2:50:04] I bet you're really feeling out feeling unattractive ashes and

[2:50:09] don't magnets. It's your turn to get lost in

[2:50:13] the madness without the magic. No more attachments.

[2:50:17] Accidents happen, but in my heart, I know

[2:50:24] that

[2:50:29] Brain.

[2:50:31] Windows.

[2:50:35] Is in the home where the high road zero overload

[2:50:38] overflow, overgrown over self flowers from the meadow on

[2:50:43] the tone. .

[2:50:45] No, no, no.

[2:50:47] No, no, no, no.

[2:50:53] Never have a so much

[2:51:00] I love when you can't

[2:51:36] Been a waiver mind in a moment back in time

[2:51:40] you wanted to explore party so parted ways with the

[2:51:48] home and they still

[2:51:53] But only like oh, out the seasons change.

[2:51:59] James. Same, but I know

[2:52:04] Just

[2:52:08] I'm just saying, Get back to work.

[2:52:12] 15

[2:52:15] Million.

[2:52:26] Hold it.

[2:52:30] Looking back at the best through rose colored glasses.

[2:52:37] Do they meddle in yours, too?

[2:52:42] Push out the proof. What's over?

[2:52:47] Beautiful life.

[2:52:48] But only like a season.

[2:52:56] Familiar

[2:52:58] But I can't touch it and

[2:53:11] Science.

[2:53:35] Because I'm just thinking back to what

[2:53:38] Missing and bringing it back to you.

[2:53:42] Like a million times.

[2:54:01] Bring it in.

[2:54:38] Another life.

[2:54:56] These days are running high.

[2:55:02] Goodbye.

[2:55:05] Try.

[2:55:22] We should be.

[2:55:49] Sure.

[2:55:52] Kept me safe.

[2:55:53] Escaping.

[2:55:57] Never

[2:56:03] You mentioned.

[2:56:12] Should be better.

[2:56:15] To be more

[2:56:23] Together.

[2:57:21] Could be

[2:57:27] Together.

[2:57:32] Could be better.

[2:58:29] Yeah.

[2:59:47] Yeah.

[3:00:45] Okay?

[3:01:01] Oh,

[3:03:00] But how do you eat it? Yeah.

[3:03:05] Towns away.

[3:03:10] In my mind.

[3:03:24] Dream.

[3:03:29] Together.

[3:03:35] Love is what I need.

[3:03:40] Snapping power taking champagne with me.

[3:03:46] Painting the stuffing vegan make it happen coming by with

[3:03:50] me. .

[3:03:51] She wondering if it's just a place.

[3:03:54] She wondered. Is there someone night thing?

[3:03:58] Queen King.

[3:04:00] Baby girl. My

[3:04:05] Months away.

[3:04:10] In my mind this precinct.

[3:04:22] In my mind.

[3:04:26] I never carried on

[3:04:28] Yeah, always and my mind.

[3:04:33] The reason why I sing these lines coming from far

[3:04:41] never turned back. The prince of Britain. Life

[3:04:44] truly learned that the bridges behind but never burn that.

[3:04:48] Keep on going on. We're never gonna stop

[3:04:51] on finger snapping our tickets shopping. .

[3:04:55] Take a ride with me.

[3:04:58] Ain't no stopping bigger. Make it happen coming by

[3:05:01] with me. .

[3:05:04] Wondering if it's just playing.

[3:05:06] She wondering. Is there someone night thing? Queen

[3:05:11] King Baby girl? ? Everything in my town. .

[3:05:22] Minus never get carried away.

[3:05:33] Understand my minus

[3:08:14] Yes.

[3:08:41] Yeah.

[3:08:57] Session, Folks, we do have a couple of

[3:08:59] motions that

[3:09:01] Will be read by the clerk as a result of

[3:09:04] our camera session. Madam clerk 16.1. Thank you.

[3:09:08] For 16.1. The recommendation is that the report

[3:09:11] dated February 1st 2023 from the commissioner of corporate Services,

[3:09:15] , entitled Agreements executed by the city manager during

[3:09:19] City Council. Summer slash elects Shin recess be received

[3:09:22] for information I need a mover counselor. Murillo was

[3:09:26] going to do it. But counselor Hornick is going

[3:09:29] to do it now. .

[3:09:31] Recorded vote.

[3:09:36] That passes 16.2.

[3:09:41] The recommendation for 16.2 is that one the commissioner of

[3:09:46] transportation and works or their designate be authorized to negotiate

[3:09:49] a municipal access agreement with a new telecommunication company,

[3:09:53] including all necessary documents and celery there, too,

[3:09:57] and any and all amendments and renew ALS and two

[3:10:00] that the commissioner of Transportation and works in the city

[3:10:02] clerk be authorized to execute a municipal access agreement with

[3:10:06] the new telecommunications company, including all necessary documents and

[3:10:10] salary there, , too. .

[3:10:11] In any and all amendments and renew ALS, all

[3:10:14] in a form satisfactory to legal services. .

[3:10:17] Thank you, and that's moved by Councilor Tamerlan all

[3:10:20] in favor. .

[3:10:22] According vote

[3:10:23] Oh,

[3:10:28] And finally 16.3.

[3:10:34] And 16.3 recommendation is that the commissioner of Transportation and

[3:10:38] works or their designated knit be authorized to negotiate a

[3:10:41] service level agreement between the Corporation of the city of

[3:10:43] Mississauga and Bell Canada for Bell Canada to implement their

[3:10:47] fiber to home project to the commissioner of Transportation Works

[3:10:51] in city clerk be authorized to execute a service level

[3:10:54] agreement between the corporation of the city of Mississauga and

[3:10:57] Bell Canada. .

[3:10:58] For Bell Canada to implement their fiber to home project

[3:11:01] all in a form satisfactory to legal services and three

[3:11:05] the Bell Canada's fiber to the home presentation be received

[3:11:08] for information. Great, Thank you. Can I

[3:11:11] have a mover counselor? McFadden all in favor recorded

[3:11:14] vote. .

[3:11:19] That is past and who wants the pleasure of adjournment.

[3:11:22] Counselor Kovac all in favor That is carried.

General Committee

Agenda

Transcript