Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:02]
This conference will now be recorded.
[0:09]
Will stand
[0:15]
alsible
[0:25]
with liberty and justice for all.
[0:34]
Welcome everyone to Tuesday September
1st board of supervisors meeting.
[0:40]
Uh it's also available on goto for later
viewing.
[0:46]
We all should have received an agenda.
[0:51]
There's no movement of any item.
Um, I would entertain a motion.
[0:58]
» Move to the agenda.
>> I have a motion. Do I have a second?
[1:04]
» Second.
>> Motion and a second.
[1:08]
Any discussion?
All those in favor say I.
[1:13]
» I.
>> I.
[1:14]
» Oppos. Same sign.
Passes.
[1:19]
Approve the minutes of the August 25th
meeting.
[1:24]
have a chance to look at the minutes.
[1:32]
If no additions or corrections, I
[clears throat] corrections, I would
[1:35]
enter a motion.
>> I move to approve the minutes.
[1:41]
» Motion do I have a second?
>> Second.
[1:44]
» Motion and second on the floor. Any
discussion?
[1:47]
» Roll call. Jim.
>> Hi.
[1:48]
» Sydney.
>> Hi.
[1:49]
» Dad.
>> Hi.
[1:50]
» Mark.
>> Hi.
[1:51]
» Bam.
>> Hi. Motion passes.
[1:57]
County Attorney General discussion. He's
not here.
[2:05]
» Sheriff's update.
>> Yes. Good morning, every morning.
[2:09]
» Just a quick update. We did do a a test
this morning at 6:30 on the generator.
[2:14]
It was successful. did switch over what
we were hopeful for, but we're going to
[2:19]
continue to conduct some testing on that
just to make sure we're consistent
[2:22]
before we further the the bids on this.
Outside of that, our dispatch center
[2:30]
number two is back up and running. So,
everything is good in that area. Other
[2:35]
than that, I don't have anything if you
have any questions for me.
[2:39]
Any
>> questions sh
[2:44]
Thank you.
[2:47]
uh department head discussion
[2:53]
» two things um want to confirm next
week's meeting slashno meeting unless
[2:59]
anyone has anything
>> anything big come in has anything okay
[3:06]
» anything come across
I would consensus
[3:11]
take a week off
>> yeah you Sure.
[3:14]
» Mhm.
>> No meeting next week.
[3:19]
» And then second one, um, just after a
visit yesterday, I just wanted to
[3:24]
discuss taxes a little bit, how they
work. Um, so if you look at your taxes,
[3:31]
when we reprint them, it gets printed on
the bottom. I believe they're they're on
[3:34]
the top of this your second page there.
The different taxing authorities. Um, so
[3:40]
for this person, it says like the
distribution of your current taxes. It
[3:46]
gives a percentage there. So this
individual, the first one is Osage
[3:52]
school is 47%.
So when you come to the county and you
[3:56]
say, why are you raising our taxes? Just
look at those just to see like where
[4:00]
your money is actually going to. It's
not just Rachel's raising her taxes. I
[4:05]
have nothing to do with it. I'm just
putting it all together, compiling it.
[4:10]
Um,
they're all listed there. There's Oage
[4:14]
School, Rural Basic, General Basic,
General Supplemental, NYAK, Hospital, a
[4:20]
township if you're in a township or city
if you're in a city. Um, the assessor
[4:24]
and egg extension.
That's all. They have questions. And
[4:30]
there was a big change last year with
the roll back how that went down the
[4:34]
taxable value actually kind of stayed
the same. Um but there's just those
[4:41]
different changes that are happening.
>> I'd like to add to that too that um you
[4:47]
know everybody wants a raise also and uh
we our taxpayers money are going for
[4:56]
services that we provide.
So if we don't increase with the times,
[5:04]
the services will decline
as far as I'm concerned. So
[5:09]
we just have to consider that
we need our roads plowed. We need rock
[5:15]
on our road and improvements. So
[5:23]
anybody else have anything?
Any more department heads?
[5:30]
County Engineer update.
>> Good morning. I guess I'll stand. Go
[5:35]
ahead.
>> Oh, it's fine. No,
[5:38]
» I was going to ask.
>> I knew there was something I wanted to
[5:41]
ask.
>> I don't have a lot. What happened to the
[5:44]
company chair? Anybody know? I I'm
guessing it's over in in the planning
[5:49]
and zoning office because John Robinson
has been back and forth doing they've
[5:54]
been doing some work there
>> and that was okay the closest chair with
[5:58]
a roller.
>> I don't want to get comfortable here
[6:00]
anyway brought that up because I was
going to say something at the department
[6:03]
head
>> last week I pushed that.
[6:04]
» No, it's fine. It's fine.
>> Or I might have even gone and gotten it
[6:08]
because I realized it wasn't
>> okay.
[6:10]
» Thank you. So, speaking of rock on
roads, since you brought it up, we're
[6:13]
going to address a situation that I
found out about this morning about
[6:16]
somebody scraping a window and using it
for their own purposes. So, we'll
[6:20]
address that. Um,
[6:25]
we're still out doing no passing zones.
Um, we are running out of sign posts
[6:30]
because we've got to move so many signs
for this
[6:33]
nice mandated thing. So, [clears throat]
we're still out there doing it. We've
[6:36]
got a lot of them marked. We just got to
get them located and where we can adjust
[6:39]
the speed of it. There will be some
roads, like I said in the past, that
[6:42]
will stay 55 and that's basically
because of tight curves and short
[6:45]
stretches where we don't necessarily
feel the need to go 60 miles an hour in
[6:49]
a mile, you know. So, um, we're still
working on that. I will inform you that
[6:54]
tomorrow, I'm hoping tomorrow, right? Uh
we got a phone phone call with the
[7:01]
railroad yesterday and we're working
really well with the maintenance facil
[7:04]
the maintenance crews on on the the
railroad um for the rail through
[7:09]
Carpenter.
They and I have agreed that we'll do
[7:12]
some minor maintenance on the crossing
to get us through winter to uh get us at
[7:18]
least through April when we hope the
project for replacing that rail crossing
[7:22]
will come to fruition. We're hoping so.
We'll be out and about working side by
[7:29]
side with the railroad. We're looking at
temporary cold patching, maybe some dura
[7:34]
patching in the rail itself, in the
rails crossing itself with um haven't
[7:40]
really got a good um
plan of attack yet from the railroad
[7:44]
about there was talk about removing some
wooden ties and just filling it in with
[7:48]
asphalt or cold patch just to get
through. Um, so kind of they're they're
[7:54]
sparking the information the the service
to get it done. So kudos to them for
[7:58]
trying to trying to improve it. We can't
get in there without their permission.
[8:01]
So we're working hand in hand with them.
So we'll hopefully
[8:07]
improve it a little bit or at least make
it better than it is. It won't be
[8:13]
perfect. So but we'll get us through
through
[8:17]
» I think they're talking.
>> Yes. That's why we're working on Kevin.
[8:21]
They've got their crews to try to and it
may be removal of ties. It may be just
[8:26]
trying to put uh cold patch in. But I
said any cold patch we put in on wood's
[8:30]
probably not going to hold because
everything flexes and it doesn't bond to
[8:34]
wood very well. But we even thought
about once we get the cold patch in, we
[8:38]
may take the dur patcher and seal the
top of that so we don't have water
[8:41]
migrating into the cold patch and things
like that.
[8:44]
kind of a let's try to get and we're
only going to focus on the the the uh
[8:49]
westbound lane for now. The eastbound is
not perfect, but it's a lot smoother
[8:54]
than the westbound lane and and so um
that was their decision uh to look at
[8:59]
that. So,
>> so um in light of that, you know, there
[9:03]
was another flat tire incident.
>> That's what he told me and
[9:07]
» and that was reported. Yeah. So, I just
want to publicly state that those people
[9:12]
that are concerned about the condition
of that railroad track, and I've
[9:17]
mentioned it to many people in and
around the car Carpenter area, there's a
[9:22]
phone number right there on the railroad
sign. Call that phone number and submit
[9:30]
a report and they they put a number on
it and they log all those reports. I've
[9:35]
done it a few times as I've gone through
and encouraged others. And I know the
[9:41]
incident with the tire, she did call and
and submit a report and and a claim,
[9:48]
» you know. Um,
>> and he does they do get those phone
[9:51]
calls because it sounds to me like the
contact that I have does get those calls
[9:55]
and there are a lot of them and they're
aware of it.
[9:58]
» You said the more that they get the
higher up it bumps. So, I've encouraged
[10:02]
people to do that. That's the only thing
right now that I can tell taxpayers to y
[10:08]
to do. And I understand their
frustration because man, I hate driving
[10:12]
over that thing.
>> I do, too. So, um, but
[10:17]
I will stress it's not going to be
perfect, but we hope to improve it.
[10:21]
» Okay.
>> So, I think you guys will do a good job.
[10:24]
» Well, it's all about what the river
wants to do. Hopefully, he said, "I I
[10:28]
don't know if it'll take we're going to
provide cold patch and Dura Patch and
[10:31]
stuff because it is and and the and the
agreements between railroads and and and
[10:36]
the highway authorities is really weird.
Their stance is, well, if your road
[10:40]
wasn't here, we wouldn't have a
crossing." Our stance is if your
[10:43]
railroad wasn't in the way, we wouldn't
need a crossing. But, they have private
[10:46]
property and our roads crossing private
property. It's just it always goes back
[10:50]
and forth, but a lot of times we're
stuck with their rules on their private
[10:54]
property. So we are limited in what we
want to do unless we want to spend a
[10:58]
fortune in flagers and railroad
insurance to go build potholes and
[11:02]
usually it's just right up against the
rail because their rails do settle and
[11:06]
our road stays the same and the bumps
come when the rails settle and they've
[11:09]
got a transition like that. So anyway,
we're looking to improve the ride, not
[11:15]
make it perfect, but once the project is
is done, hopefully next year
[11:20]
» and hopefully they will start that
project next year.
[11:24]
» That's well, we're still working through
some paperwork on on that. We had to re
[11:27]
reestablish
uh the agreement and and I don't know
[11:32]
that I've got another agreement for you
guys to sign yet. Um, I'll have to check
[11:37]
because they were still working on
getting estimates from the railroad
[11:40]
because things changed from the first
agreement to where the co-op was going
[11:45]
to remove their rail, now they're going
to keep it. That changed things. I think
[11:48]
I maybe mentioned that to you guys a
couple weeks ago. So,
[11:52]
they're re they're redoing the agreement
or at least getting some sign off on it
[11:56]
so that we can have a a firm path of
which way we're going to go now because
[12:00]
it changed the way the roadway authority
our authority is for trying to patch
[12:04]
between two rails and things like that.
So, anyway, I don't want to get
[12:09]
everybody wound up, but it looks like
we'll try to do something to help make
[12:13]
the transition in the tracks a little
bit better for
[12:17]
get us through. So the sale come
>> well. And I think the thing is to to
[12:22]
relate to that railroad team. This isn't
just about us wanting to make sure our
[12:27]
cars stay nice and neat and our tires
stay neat, but that if you have a loaded
[12:32]
semi Oh, yeah. chucking through there
and something blows, you've endangered
[12:38]
things on both sides of that road.
>> I wouldn't say they're not aware of
[12:40]
that.
>> Very hazardous for them.
[12:43]
» I wouldn't say it's they're not aware of
that. They have a lot going on and I'm
[12:47]
not going to necessarily defend them.
They've got a lot of crossings. We got
[12:50]
We're in Iowa. Every mile of road has a
crossing where the rail goes. So, um
[12:55]
[clears throat] there's a lot to
maintain on both sides when you think
[12:58]
about it. So,
>> and crossings on the gravel roads coming
[13:01]
off of that are just as bad, if not
worse.
[13:03]
» And they're talking about doing a repair
south of their rail on a gravel road. I
[13:10]
don't think it's in North County. So,
but there's a lot of bad crossings and
[13:14]
and so
>> we'll do what we can to maybe make it a
[13:17]
little bit better
>> for a short amount of time until the
[13:20]
project can take place. So,
>> thank you. Thanks for working on that
[13:24]
one.
>> But I think if we can get a good working
[13:26]
relationship with the railroad, we can
probably do a lot better maintenance on
[13:30]
our crossings if we can work hand in
hand and try to avoid some of these
[13:34]
flagger costs and things like that. I'm
not saying they won't always be that way
[13:38]
depending on the work, but
>> I appreciate that.
[13:41]
» So
that's all I got for you.
[13:46]
» Thank you.
>> Any questions?
[13:50]
» Thank you. Thank you.
>> Moving on. Discussion possible action
[13:55]
for services with M [clears throat]
broker Associates Incorporated.
[14:03]
And I think she's on the line.
>> Good morning. Can you all hear me?
[14:08]
» Yep. Yes.
>> Okay. Well, thank you um very much for
[14:13]
your time. Um I just wanted to um I
guess it's more of an update. Um I've
[14:21]
talked to uh uh Rachel a couple times.
Um one of the things about that we learn
[14:27]
in life, isn't it? Is that we learn we
keep learning about ourselves. and I
[14:31]
discovered that uh I'm really really
good at delivering HR services but maybe
[14:36]
not so good at retirement. So, um this
all started um uh
[14:44]
just about two two three months ago when
um I was had some occasion to talk to a
[14:50]
couple counties and was hearing that
there's just not they're just not
[14:55]
finding anybody out there that's
delivering the types of services that I
[14:59]
did. Um you know, a really coste
effective way of doing it. Um, and I
[15:08]
really love the, you know, providing
care services because I feel I'm helping
[15:15]
people, I guess, is one way of doing it.
Um, and I'm
[15:21]
am looking to u work with a limited
number of counties. So, I just wanted to
[15:27]
kind of give you an update. Nothing's
really new from what I provided before.
[15:34]
Um, this would be a I think the
[clears throat] thing that's unique
[15:38]
about it is that it's
one fee and it's an unlimited number of
[15:47]
communications with any management
personnel in the county. So what I'm
[15:53]
hearing from counties is
that
[15:58]
[clears throat]
department has really are looking for
[16:02]
somebody to call when they have an issue
no matter how minor they think it is
[16:08]
because my approach is preventative one
is have a conversation [clears throat]
[16:13]
assess the situation see what's going on
those can be involved
[16:19]
almost always at a easy
level. Um, and you keep the problem from
[16:27]
developing into a large one. Um, I've
also been told many times that the my my
[16:36]
responsiveness is really good. So, if
you're a department head and has a
[16:40]
potential issue going on, you don't want
to wait a couple weeks to talk to
[16:44]
somebody and see what the best course of
action is. Uh so that's the other thing
[16:49]
that I've been been hearing. Um also
from a standing point um the majority of
[17:00]
issues that arise in counties are not
legal issues. So sometimes what happens
[17:06]
is that department heads will hesitate
to make a phone call because of the
[17:11]
cost. Um and again that kind of works
against
[17:17]
um looking at a problem really in its
really early stages um before it gets um
[17:24]
you know out of hand.
So
[17:28]
give you maybe just one quick example.
Um a lot of times department has really
[17:36]
need to walk through or talk through
something
[17:40]
kind of to like increase confidence. Um
had a situation last week in which the
[17:45]
department head was extremely nervous
about having a conversation with one of
[17:50]
her employees.
Um we spent a lot of time just talking
[17:55]
about that best way to approach it. Um
how to have that conversation. she knew
[18:00]
something needed to be done, just needed
a bit of confidence to move forward. So,
[18:06]
that's a really, I think, unique service
that I've always provided to counties.
[18:13]
Um,
again, you don't, the county doesn't
[18:17]
need to really be concerned about the
cost.
[18:21]
Some years, in some counties, things
move along just, you know, no problem.
[18:27]
And then there's another year in which
it seems like things come in in bunkers.
[18:32]
So it's all the same flat view.
Um,
[18:38]
one
analogy that I'm not sure how good of
[18:42]
the analogy it is is that you want to
find the right person or resource for
[18:48]
the situation.
So for example, if you need your teeth
[18:53]
clean, don't go to an orthodontist. um
go to that resource that has the most
[18:58]
experience in dealing with that issue.
Um
[19:02]
you have instances in which something
gets really complicated or um there is a
[19:08]
need to bring in other resources. Well
then we triage that I triage that with
[19:13]
county and we together kind of decide
well here's who we need to bring into
[19:18]
this situation.
Um so it's a pretty straightforward
[19:22]
service. Um again unlimited uh phone and
email. Um I will also review
[19:33]
um like I did last week with the
department head on
[19:37]
you know how to how to talk with how how
to have a difficult conversation I guess
[19:41]
is one of the ways of doing it or if
the department needs a has written up a
[19:48]
letter to the employee or discipline. um
how we do those we go through those
[19:53]
together. Um
I know uh in the past um I've worked
[20:00]
with county on
primarily the negotiations and if I'm
[20:06]
correct, correct me if I'm wrong, I
don't think you have
[20:10]
will not have a bargaining obligation
this year. Is that correct?
[20:15]
» We have a three-year contract that was
signed.
[20:19]
» Okay. Okay. Um so in the year in which
uh the agreement isn't open sometimes
[20:25]
there are contract interpretation issues
that may arise or you know there may be
[20:32]
a grievance or something that comes
about um for that contract. Um and then
[20:38]
those I could work with the county too
on looking at that contract and see um
[20:46]
just discuss about whether there is an
interpretation issue. Um I know there's
[20:53]
not been
many grievances or anything filed in the
[20:59]
county. So hopefully that will continue.
just in case that it would um you know
[21:04]
you'd have somebody to
talk to or um whether the rich or the
[21:11]
supervisors would have somebody to
consult with on interpreting that
[21:15]
contract and then also responding to
that with the union or the the employee.
[21:22]
So [clears throat] I want to be
respectful of your time. So maybe I'll
[21:27]
just pause here and see if there's any
questions.
[21:35]
» You said flat. Excuse me. You said flat.
I mean, you don't have to name that now,
[21:40]
but I guess I'd be interested as far as
what you're looking at. You can send
[21:46]
that to Rachel. And flat fee. is that
and you said unlimited email and phone
[21:54]
conversations. So we have we have two
things. We have HR in regards to all the
[21:59]
departments but then we also have the
the contract. So are you saying the flat
[22:02]
fee covers both of those avenues?
>> Yes. Um for sure. Um when the contract
[22:11]
isn't open any questions regarding the
contract would be included. And I think
[22:16]
I maybe was remiss. Um that's my bad. um
that I that up um that I
[22:26]
intended I think to send an email to
Rachel but and I don't mind the the flat
[22:30]
fee is the annual fee is $10,500.
Um
[22:36]
and uh again I apologize I meant to send
send uh that to Rachel and she and I
[22:41]
maybe talked about that but um I maybe
failed to follow up with an email on
[22:47]
that. Um
so I think um again it's a number that
[22:53]
doesn't change
in years in which the bargaining is
[22:57]
open. I think maybe the best thing to do
is just to look at that when the time
[23:03]
comes. Um
some how I'm doing that is in some
[23:08]
counties
it isn't everybody feels in the county
[23:12]
that they maybe don't need someone at
the bargaining table but they do want
[23:18]
somebody a resource to ask some
questions you know during that course
[23:23]
either the preparation a lot of the work
is before you know bargaining takes
[23:28]
place so that's something that we can
certainly talk about and see what the
[23:32]
county you like you know planning your
development.
[23:38]
» Does that answer your question?
>> Yes.
[23:42]
» So to tag on to that question or your
reference to HR, is that HR specifically
[23:50]
for that department that you are working
on the um contract negotiations or is
[23:58]
that for all county employees? That's
for all departments.
[24:04]
So I don't um and it's management
personnel. So it's not that you know
[24:12]
employees directly could call me. It's
the department head. It would be the man
[24:18]
I'm the resource to management
personnel. So yes, it would be um you
[24:25]
know auditor, treasur, recorder, um
conservation,
[24:31]
um it would be any any management
personnel in those departments.
[24:41]
» Thank you.
>> Yes, you're very welcome.
[24:46]
if if something would um like I say this
is you know email phone um it's really
[24:54]
aligned to me for management to
you know address issues and I say a lot
[25:01]
of them a lot of them most of them get
resolved you know pretty easily and
[25:08]
quickly
if something would come up um
[25:14]
like it would include like a rewrite of
your employee handbook. I mean, that's a
[25:19]
major undertaking. But let's say there
was a policy in the county that
[25:26]
everybody was sort of interpreting it
wrong or was really causing some issues
[25:33]
in the county and you know there's kind
of a pattern that certainly that that
[25:37]
individual policy um I could take a look
at and you make some suggestions on how
[25:43]
to make the wording a bit clearer so
it's it doesn't cause any confusion or
[25:50]
as much confusion. Um, but if there
would be something that the county uh,
[25:57]
you know, feels that they would like to
do that, you know, goes beyond the email
[26:01]
or phone, I'm open to, you know, talking
about those um, and discussing that, you
[26:07]
know, with the county
to see what the best way to
[26:12]
to accomplish that.
[26:15]
Any
[26:19]
other questions for Renee?
[26:25]
» It's something that we'll have to I
mean, we have the union contract for
[26:28]
three years and I know what you said at
HR for other things. It's something that
[26:32]
we'll have to look at the price and see
where it's at compared to what we have
[26:38]
the direction we started after,
I guess, after you retired. So, we'll
[26:43]
have to do some comparisons. Mhm. Sure.
Understand that completely. Yeah.
[26:52]
And it it is uh has been happening and
it's perfectly uh
[26:59]
reasonable that
at least in a secondary road department
[27:04]
um the negotiations
uh
[27:11]
with a change I guess I will say with a
change in chapter 20 regarding
[27:15]
negotiations for secondary road
departments I think the process has
[27:19]
become much more strange. streamlined
um where it's
[27:24]
I'm trying to think of the word it's
just sort of a less formal process.
[27:28]
So you know there there are situations
in which if everybody is happy with the
[27:34]
language in the baring agreement um then
it's really just a simple matter of
[27:39]
coming to a conclusion on you know wage
increase. Um
[27:46]
because when the law changed in chapter
20, the other major issue of course for
[27:51]
the county and for employees is health
insurance and that's no longer a
[27:56]
bargainable subject. So I do think the
negotiations have um you know
[28:03]
streamlined and I'm thinking uh with the
cost of the negotiations
[28:09]
[snorts] prior to when I retired um I
know this is I know my thing now is a
[28:16]
bit more but I think the services are
more broad as well.
[28:27]
Okay.
Well, we'll have to discuss this amongst
[28:31]
ourselves, Renee, and uh talk with
Rachel and we'll uh we'll get back with
[28:38]
you.
>> Okay. Sounds good. I sure appreciate
[28:41]
your time.
Thank you.
[28:43]
» Thank you.
>> Thank you.
[28:45]
» Bye.
>> Bye.
[28:46]
» Bye.
[28:50]
» Okay. Item eight, discussion and
possible action on contract for services
[28:55]
with crisis intervention.
[29:04]
» I would entertain a motion.
Move to move to approve resolution
[29:10]
1382-26
in the amount of $1,000 to crisis
[29:14]
intervention services.
>> Second.
[29:18]
» Have a motion and a second on the floor.
Any discussion?
[29:23]
» Roll call. Todd
>> I.
[29:24]
» Mark.
>> Hi.
[29:25]
» Pam.
>> I.
[29:26]
» Jim.
>> Hi.
[29:27]
» Sydney.
>> Hi.
[29:30]
» Taxes.
[29:33]
discussion and possible action on
contract for services with St. Anser
[29:38]
Senior Saints.
That would be resolution 1383-26.
[29:47]
I move to approve the contract for
services with the St. Ansar Senior
[29:52]
Saints which we had budgeted for $4,000
resolution 138326.
[30:00]
A motion. Do I have a second? Second.
Motion and a second. Any discussion?
[30:07]
Roll
>> call. Mark.
[30:08]
» Hi.
>> Pam.
[30:09]
» Hi.
>> Jim.
[30:10]
» Hi.
>> Sydney.
[30:11]
» Hi.
>> T.
[30:13]
» I.
Discussion and possible action on
[30:17]
contract for services with foster
grandparents program.
[30:28]
Move to approve resolution 1384-26
in the amount of $5,000 to
[30:36]
help me out here.
>> Foster grandparents program.
[30:38]
» Foster grandparents program.
>> Second.
[30:43]
» Have a motion and second on the floor.
Any discussion?
[30:47]
» Roll call. Pim.
>> I.
[30:49]
» Jim.
>> I.
[30:50]
» Sydney.
>> Hi.
[30:51]
» Hi.
>> Mark.
[30:52]
» Hi.
[30:56]
Discussion and possible action on
contract for services with Nyakog
[31:02]
Housing Trust Fund.
>> Make a motion to approve resolution
[31:07]
1385-26
contract for services agreement made
[31:11]
between Mitch County Board of
Supervisors and Niko Housing Trust Fund
[31:15]
is effective as of September 1st, 2026
where we they requested $2,000 from the
[31:22]
board.
>> Okay. Have a motion on board. Do I have
[31:26]
a second?
>> Second.
[31:30]
» Motion and second. Any discussion?
>> Call. Jim.
[31:34]
» Hi.
>> Sydney.
[31:35]
» Hi.
>> Todd.
[31:36]
» Hi.
>> Mark.
[31:37]
» Hi.
>> Hi. [clears throat]
[31:41]
» Discussion and possible action on
contract for services an Heritage Museum
[31:47]
and History Center.
>> Make a motion for 1386-26
[31:53]
for 4,000. The St. hands for Heritage
Museum and Historic History Center.
[31:58]
» I second that motion and a second. Any
discussion?
[32:03]
» Call Sydney.
>> Hi.
[32:05]
» Chad.
>> Hi.
[32:06]
» Mark.
>> Hi.
[32:07]
» Hi.
>> Jim.
[32:08]
» Hi.
>> Discussion and discussion and possible
[32:14]
action on contract for services with
RSVP of North Iowa.
[32:23]
I'll make a motion to approve resolution
number 1387-26.
[32:27]
This contract for services agreement
made between Mitchell County Board of
[32:31]
Supervisors and RSV P of North Iowa is
effective September 1st, 2026. Whereas
[32:37]
the North Iowa has requested $5,000 in
funding from the M County Board of
[32:42]
Supervisors that we approved at budget.
>> I second that.
[32:48]
» Motion second on the floor. Any
discussion?
[32:52]
» Roll call. Todd.
>> Hi.
[32:53]
» Mark.
>> Hi.
[32:55]
» Dam.
>> Hi.
[32:56]
» J.
>> Hi.
[32:57]
» Sydney.
>> Hi.
[33:04]
» Approve transfer from general basic fund
to secondary roads fund.
[33:12]
That would be resolution 138826.
[33:17]
» I just make a note.
>> Yeah. So, I have done the paperwork for
[33:21]
all these transfers. Typically, they
happen in November and May, but then we
[33:25]
just have this done. So, once November
hits, we can approve it. And for the
[33:31]
um we're going to get to them, but the
secondary roads, we transfer the full
[33:35]
amount of the 1451.
[33:40]
So, just to reiterate that for for the
taxpayers and the public, um it may seem
[33:46]
like we're going through these rather
quickly and not discussing a lot of
[33:50]
these things were discussed when we were
budgeting last uh January, February
[33:56]
area. And so maybe to reiterate that if
um those services are being thought of,
[34:05]
we need to have those contract for
services requests in so that we can go
[34:10]
ahead and budget, I think, moving
forward in our years ahead so we can
[34:15]
budget for them and and handle it
appropriately like like we are here.
[34:20]
» Thanks for mentioning that because we
were zipping through it probably get the
[34:24]
impression, well what's going on now,
right? we've discussed this
[34:27]
» that all these entities were discussed
um because that they were either coming
[34:34]
to us or we knew they would be um so we
talked about them during budget time.
[34:40]
» I'll make a motion to approve resolution
number 1388-26
[34:45]
uh general basic fund to secondary
roads.
[34:50]
» Second.
[34:53]
Okay, we have a motion or second on the
floor. Any discussion?
[34:58]
» Roll call. Mark,
>> I
[35:01]
» Jim.
>> Hi,
[35:02]
» Sydney.
>> Hi, D.
[35:03]
» I
passes.
[35:08]
Approve transfer from rural services
basic fund to secondary roads fund.
[35:15]
» And this one gets split up into two
payments. So the total for the year will
[35:19]
be1,718,56.
[35:25]
I [snorts] move to approve resolution
1389-26
[35:31]
for the transfer from rural services
basic fund to the secondary roads fund
[35:37]
not to exceed 1,718056
[35:43]
split into two payments.
We have a motion. Do we have a second?
[35:49]
» Second.
>> Go ahead, Sydney.
[35:51]
» Motion and a second. Any discussion?
>> Roll call. Sam.
[35:57]
» I.
>> Jim.
[35:58]
» Hi.
>> Sydney.
[35:59]
» Hi.
>> Todd.
[36:00]
» I.
>> Mark.
[36:01]
» Hi.
[36:05]
» Approve transfer from general basic fund
to sub project fund.
[36:17]
And this will be the same. It's a total
of 500,000. Um, we'll do it in two
[36:21]
payments of 250.
[36:25]
I'll make a motion to approve resolution
number 1390-26.
[36:31]
And this is the transfer from general
basic fund to sub project
[36:36]
$500,000.
Okay,
[36:39]
» I have a motion. Do I have a second?
Second.
[36:43]
Motion and second on the floor. Any
discussion?
[36:47]
» Roll call. Jim.
>> Hi.
[36:48]
» Sydney.
>> Hi. Don.
[36:50]
» Hi.
>> Mark.
[36:51]
» Hi.
>> Pam.
[36:52]
» Hi.
>> Passes.
[36:57]
» Approve transfer from general basic fund
to conservation land acquisition fund.
[37:05]
Make a motion for $30,000.
Resolution 1391-26.
[37:12]
» I second that motion and second.
Any discussion?
[37:20]
» Roll call. Sydney.
>> Hi.
[37:21]
» Todd.
>> Hi.
[37:22]
» Mark.
>> Hi.
[37:23]
» Pam.
>> Hi.
[37:24]
» Jim.
>> Hi.
[37:27]
» Motion passes.
>> Discussion and possible action on
[37:32]
pointing a dispersement.
[37:38]
Uh sorry.
Uh so we have kind of changed the
[37:44]
process of this but uh public health
would turn in claims as they got them
[37:48]
when they used the credit card. Um which
meant sometimes there'd be multiple
[37:52]
checks getting they hold them until the
statement came. So sometimes there would
[37:55]
be multiple checks. Um
they were pretty sure that they shredded
[38:01]
the one check after they pulled the one
check out. Um, so we're just asking to
[38:05]
void this check because it was in the
previous fiscal year. Um, there's a
[38:10]
different way that we can do it if it's
in the same fiscal year. So, we just
[38:14]
need to avoid it so we can send down
that remaining balance
[38:19]
[clears throat]
>> and that has to be done by the board
[38:22]
supervisors.
>> Yes. When it's from the previous fiscal
[38:25]
year.
So the motion just we just voiding a
[38:31]
dispersement.
Is that adequate for the motion or do we
[38:37]
title?
>> What is the claim number?
[38:41]
» We probably should target somehow.
>> Yep. Claim number is 66418.
[38:47]
» I move to approve avoiding a
dispersement for claim number. What you
[38:52]
just said?
>> I'll second.
[38:58]
A motion. We [clears throat] have a
motion and a second for any discussion.
[39:04]
That is that 66
>> 664
[39:08]
» 418. Yep. Thank you.
>> Roll call.
[39:12]
» Roll call. Todd.
>> Hi.
[39:14]
» Mark.
>> Hi.
[39:15]
» Pam.
>> Hi.
[39:16]
» Jim.
>> Hi.
[39:17]
» Sydney.
>> Motion [clears throat] passes.
[39:23]
Yeah. Very good. meetings attended.
>> Uh I didn't have any during the week,
[39:28]
but we had ISAC visited yesterday and
number of department heads were here for
[39:35]
that. That was the director of Isac and
uh their legislative representative and
[39:42]
their legal advisor. the three of them
were here and they came they spoke with
[39:47]
us regards to things that ISAC is doing
to try to
[39:52]
maintain existing things that they're
doing and also a new direction that
[39:56]
they're trying to implement in different
things whether it be approaching the
[40:02]
legislature or uh software that they're
developing to help counties and uh
[40:07]
there's a lot of back and forth
[laughter] discussion between the three
[40:10]
of them and the department heads that
were here and uh it was a pretty
[40:14]
informative session last about an hour
maybe a little bit more
[40:23]
» uh FMC ECI we're just continuing on
policies and procedures
[40:32]
» um I had an emergency management um
fullscale exercise on Saturday morning
[40:40]
um set up by our um emergency management
individual Chris Olsen and it was about
[40:48]
50 individuals that were there. It was
held at the Absolute Energy Plant up
[40:55]
there close to to Lyall. Um it entailed
the Canadian Nation Railroad. Um it was
[41:03]
a Canadian Nation Railroad tanker
exercise. It was kind of rainy that
[41:08]
morning at first. So, so, um, it was
held right there on the grounds for
[41:14]
absolute. Um, it included the Mau County
Sheriff, the Lyall, uh, rescue people
[41:21]
and the and their fire department, the
railroad teams and representatives from
[41:28]
Mason City, also Mitchell County
Regional Health, um, public health, St.
[41:33]
Ansar Rescue and Fire, and, um, the
sheriff was there. um operational
[41:40]
command and control planning,
um public information, how we get
[41:47]
information out when there's a situation
like that. So they blocked off the road
[41:52]
and and they literally worked through
the exercise of um at at this point it
[42:00]
was an ethanol spill. And so they talked
about how they would contain it and how
[42:06]
they would make sure there were a couple
of little dummies off to the side that
[42:10]
they they had to make sure were in a
safe position, a safe place. They talked
[42:16]
about how they would seal a a rail car
or a tanker and um it was very
[42:24]
informative
and they went through the communication
[42:28]
between the Minnesota people and um you
know our Iowa team. Um it it was uh very
[42:38]
informative and lasted a few hours and
and I think they were able to kind of
[42:44]
find some some hiccups, some ways that
we can can improve and um and
[42:51]
streamline, but uh for the most part the
operational command and control I think
[42:57]
went very well. Maybe Justin has some
more to add on that. But it was um it
[43:04]
was really encouraging to see the kind
of response because they timed from when
[43:13]
they made that first initial call to
every step when every truck arrived,
[43:18]
when every team arrived and you know
where what what was the situation? You
[43:25]
know, how are we controlling traffic?
How are we controlling the the actual
[43:30]
spill? How are we taking care of the any
people that might be involved? Of
[43:34]
course, absolutes um had staff and their
safety uh team was in involved as well.
[43:41]
So, um I don't know if Jason has or
Justin has anything else to add to that
[43:46]
or not.
>> You know, I would just say that we don't
[43:49]
get a lot of training time with anything
across the state line. So, having
[43:54]
Minnesota fire bio fire route was uh
really good to see. They have a three
[43:59]
mile by six mile section in Mitchell
County that they cover that they respond
[44:04]
to. Uh Absolute of course being one of
them. Um they did a tremendous job. We
[44:09]
didn't know what their capabilities
were. Their training regimen is very
[44:12]
different than what um St. Ansker
Riceville State and Oage is. Uh but they
[44:19]
actually showed up. They took control of
the scene. They did a a tremendous job I
[44:23]
thought and did things appropriately as
you would expect. um communication was
[44:28]
was very well between us. We established
that we can have radio communications.
[44:33]
Uh not to dig too far into that, but
they had removed the the VHF
[44:38]
capabilities out of their vehicles,
which does not allow us to use mutual
[44:42]
aid with them. However, there is another
system, digital VHF that we're able to
[44:47]
utilize to communicate on scene, which
is extremely important. So, they did a
[44:52]
great job. Absolute. Um they have a a
really good setup there with all the
[44:57]
safety measures necessary uh for spills
like this. They actually have their own
[45:02]
drainage system already set up to
mitigate this problem. Um so that was
[45:07]
refreshing to see that you know based on
28,000 gallons that was suspected
[45:12]
leaking at that time.
Obviously they were able to handle that
[45:16]
with no issues.
And what was neat to see was the
[45:21]
planning for, you know, some maybe
individual oneoff training or, you know,
[45:27]
they talked about anhydrris issues and
and that kind of training and that's a
[45:32]
more specialized training, but you know,
both both the Iowa team and the
[45:38]
Minnesota team, I'd have to say, visited
about the importance of anhydrris, you
[45:44]
know, leakage training because that's so
prevalent in in our county and theirs.
[45:49]
as well. So, a lot of great
communication and great great example of
[45:54]
skill.
>> Thanks. And I also attended the Isac 99
[46:01]
uh county tour and appreciated the
opportunity to kind of ask them some
[46:07]
questions on how long it will be before
we're able to to get some
[46:15]
tools to help us plan here for the next
year with all the tax changes and legal
[46:21]
changes.
[46:25]
That's all I got. public comment.
[46:32]
Oh, I I want to mention this. So, a
couple weeks ago, um Deb Sharper was in
[46:38]
and uh I don't know how I struggle with
pronouncing that. Not know, but and um
[46:45]
we took some pictures. Uh I don't know
if any of you guys have received any
[46:50]
emails, texts, or calls, but it was a
terrible picture. So, um, I called the
[46:56]
Oracle and I guess there was a gal here
that was for the Oracle, took the
[47:02]
picture. Um, I'm working with them to
get a better they they cut one of the
[47:07]
supervisors off. Uh, couple people were
looking down at the ground and so um,
[47:14]
we're working on I've got a couple other
pictures that Rachel had taken that we
[47:19]
need to get in there. It was
>> I saw that. It was really bad.
[47:24]
» Yeah, it was bad. So, um I just want you
guys and the public to know that we're
[47:30]
working on getting a better picture for
it in the paper. So,
[47:36]
we're evidently not very photogenic
[47:40]
off.
>> Oh, the one that they posted that Deb
[47:43]
posted was really good. Then the Oracle
that I was like, "Oh, no. That's not the
[47:47]
same."
>> Yeah, it wasn't.
[47:51]
If no other public comment, we'll
adjourn at 9:17.