[0:01] And I, Andrew, from our district engineer, connection group, and then the pinnacle team on the line here as well. So we can call the meeting to order at 11.02 in the morning. Jake has the agenda up on the screen here.

[0:26] For your review, that was updated in recent yesterday.

[0:30] We look for approval of the agenda unless there are modifications to be made by the board.

[0:39] Motion to approve.

[0:42] Ms. Suckett.

[0:44] Second.

[0:46] All second.

[0:47] All in favor.

[0:48] All right.

[0:50] All right.

[0:51] Thank you.

[0:52] Agenda approved.

[0:54] Public comment on non agenda items.

[0:56] don't see any public on the line. If anyone would like to speak as a member of the public,

[1:02] please do so at this time.

[1:07] Hearing none, we'll move to the action items. First thing is

[1:09] approval of the minutes from the last meeting on July 16th. Those were in the board packet that was

[1:15] sent out. If there are no questions on the minutes, we'd entertain a motion to approve, please.

[1:24] I'll move to approve. Second? Second. All in favor?

[1:33] All right. Thank you. Moving on to our

[1:40] contracts here, Megan, did you want to walk through those?

[1:46] Yeah, of course. Good morning, board. So we're

[1:50] to item 2B, which is the approval of, oh, sorry, the contract with Rocky Mountain Power.

[1:58] So this is basically their form contract, and they weren't interested in any changes,

[2:04] and that's okay. It meets compliance with Utah law.

[2:08] So one thing we are doing in addition to this contract is approving a procurement finding by TPP

[2:14] P for a sole source award since Rocky Mountain Power is the only power distributor you have

[2:19] the choice to work with. You're going to work with them. Happy to answer any questions

[2:23] or have anyone else fill in additional information if you'd like.

[2:31] Okay. Looking for a motion to approve subject to final legal review and a finding by the

[2:37] Procurement official.

[2:38] So moved.

[2:42] Second.

[2:43] All in favor?

[2:45] Aye.

[2:47] Thank you.

[2:49] The next item we're on to is the Jordan Basin Improvement District.

[2:55] This has to do with the roads in the promenade, which are a little bit less wide than would normally be required.

[3:03] I think the difference is about two feet in width.

[3:06] So, Jordan Basin Improvement District wants the PID to enter into this contract saying

[3:11] if something happens way, way in the future and for whatever reason, they need to rip

[3:16] up those roads to get to their easement area, the PID will be responsible for that.

[3:20] This has already been approved by Jordan Basin Improvement District here for your approval

[3:25] today and it sounds like someone else wants to jump in, so please do.

[3:29] Oh, I was just going to clarify, it's not if they have to rip up the roads, it's if in the

[3:34] area that they would in the space they would normally have, the encroachment areas and the exhibit

[3:39] actually details very specifically those encroachment areas that if they have to move utilities

[3:45] in those encroachment areas that we would essentially bear the burden of the additional cost

[3:50] that that has borne so it's not any repairs it's it's kind of the incremental cost.

[3:56] Thank you for that clarification Robert appreciate it.

[3:59] Yeah.

[4:01] So looking for a motion to approve.

[4:06] I move to approve.

[4:10] Second.

[4:12] All in favor?

[4:14] Aye.

[4:17] Okay.

[4:17] The next item is your standard six additional services.

[4:22] Addendum with Kimlee Horn.

[4:23] This is for the promenade area.

[4:26] Do you want mine Jake going to the exhibit for this item?

[4:29] It's exhibit a.

[4:33] And this had been sent around via email by Zach and everyone agreed that this needed

[4:39] to be added.

[4:40] If you go a little bit lower, you can see the cost of the services shake.

[4:46] Right, there's perfect 152,000.

[4:52] And maybe I can just explain this for context a little bit, unless Zach, you're going to do

[4:57] that.

[5:02] So when we're trying to establish a clear process for draper understanding how they're

[5:08] going to validate that these horizontal improvements will, you know, they'll accept at the end of the day.

[5:15] The question arose on who's doing construction administration. Kim Lee Horn did the engineering

[5:20] for the infrastructure, but there was nobody that was doing the construction administration. So here,

[5:27] we've requested them to give us a puzzle, and that's what we're looking at here.

[5:35] Yeah, and we've backed channel just cost on this. This is, I think, a reasonable cost for the work.

[5:40] work. So I don't have any issues or comments. So is this a not to exceed amount or is this

[5:49] just an estimate as we go forward? It says estimated fee. Yeah, I think it's the latter

[5:59] Okay, so who's burdened on the actual costs of that?

[6:05] I think it's from our side.

[6:08] And the Aaron and those management construction.

[6:14] Okay, I think maybe I could speak that to Jay.

[6:19] I think it really does come down to the performance of the contractor and the management of that.

[6:24] Right.

[6:24] If they fail tests and they have to be on site more and hold additional meetings, then that cost will go up.

[6:34] Yeah, understood.

[6:35] Which then you would push back on to the contract.

[6:38] Contractor.

[6:39] Yeah. Got it. Thanks, Mike.

[6:43] And the other thoughts or comments on this contract?

[6:49] I'm good with it.

[6:51] A motion to approve the contract.

[6:53] I'll second.

[7:01] All in favor?

[7:01] All right.

[7:11] All right. Our next item here item E is adoption of the resolution for eligible costs. That's cost certification number seven.

[7:21] Jake, if you could move to that part of the packet, please. And Andrew, would you like to walk us through this cost certification?

[7:32] Yeah, sure thing. So we received some costs from Arcadus and in the events, can we horn,

[7:39] Maynard Nexon, Selbert Perkins, and Snell and Wilmer, totaling 274,695 dollars and 24 cents.

[7:49] I know that amount, we found 137,072 dollars and 87 cents digital capital service costs.

[7:57] And these costs all relate to master planning, design, phase one, contract negotiations,

[8:07] and the event area, promenade, and H3A as well.

[8:14] A couple of portions of H3A.

[8:17] Yes, yes, that's correct.

[8:29] Any questions?

[8:30] Any questions?

[8:30] Any concerns?

[8:36] Is there a motion to approve, cost certification number seven?

[8:42] All motion to approve.

[8:43] second.

[8:48] Second. Second. All in favor? All right.

[8:57] Thank you. Then we have the award of contract

[9:01] for construction of the event venue. Aaron, is there anything you'd like to say about

[9:08] this item? Yeah. Yeah. Thank you everyone. Before you jump in, I sent you a text to

[9:17] to let me go, but I'd like to have Megan just kind of take us back through what we went through

[9:24] late last year to deliver approval. So this in many ways, this is a ratification

[9:30] and then an update on where we are. But Megan, would you sorry to interrupt your error, but

[9:35] we kind of take us through where we've been leading up to today before we go through that.

[9:41] Yes, of course, happy to.

[9:43] So, at your meeting on December 3rd of 2025, you approved the RFP submitted by latent

[9:50] construction to construct the event venue.

[9:55] And then Aaron and his team went to work and there have been many, many contract negotiations

[9:59] over that time.

[10:01] And here today you're going to be approving the form of final AIA contracts so they can start

[10:07] putting shovels in the ground.

[10:09] But as Jay said, in many ways, this is a ratification because the RFP was approved in December,

[10:15] it's been so long we all forgot to bring it back to you here today.

[10:20] So I'll turn over to Aaron and thank him and his team for all the work they've done to get us here.

[10:25] Thanks, Maggie.

[10:27] I mean, long and short, you know, we awarded Light and we've been grinding on this thing trying to get designed,

[10:34] and get through design, get to our cost,

[10:36] get to our contract, and get shovels in the ground

[10:39] so we could hit booking windows.

[10:41] And I think we're there.

[10:42] So we've got the cost on the full 95% CDs

[10:45] we're still working through some value engineering stuff,

[10:48] pretty decent amount of that,

[10:50] plus some supply stuff from OBG.

[10:52] In the meantime, we've all spent negotiating this contract.

[10:54] At this point, the contract language is done and final.

[10:58] We've got a couple exhibits that we still need

[11:00] to vet out and finish, like going through the quals, the schedule.

[11:07] That's about it, so like a couple of other exhibits we need to finish, but as soon

[11:10] as we have those, we would like to proceed with executing this contract.

[11:15] I

[11:20] don't know if anybody else needs any more history on it.

[11:23] I have some questions.

[11:25] Yep.

[11:26] So this was a CMGC contract, is that correct?

[11:31] Yes. Design build. Design assist. Contract. Okay. So they've gone out to various subcontractors with a 95% CDs and received multiple bids. Oh yeah. And we have that included in the information that we can review.

[11:51] You know, I haven't asked for the full complete bid sets.

[11:54] You know, a lot of the GC, sorry, the subs, we awarded along the way.

[11:59] So we awarded, you know, well, it's late in concrete, but electrical plumbing, steel, the main, you know, elevators.

[12:09] We awarded under design assist through Precom. They were competitively bid. We interviewed and they were awarded.

[12:16] finishes all of the, they've kind of had them in tow, but yeah, they receive multiple

[12:21] bids and I reckon request the cheats we need them.

[12:26] I'm just, when you're establishing a GMP, I'm used to, you know, kind of a bid package,

[12:33] right?

[12:33] With leveling, it's in showing who was the low bid and then you can put together that

[12:39] calculates to the bottom line.

[12:43] Is this for a GMP?

[12:45] is a JMP contract, yeah.

[12:49] And we have the breakdown on cost.

[12:56] Is that part of the packet?

[12:58] It will be, it's, their SOB is going to be as an exhibit.

[13:07] Okay. Mike, could you talk about

[13:09] as a part of this packet? Yeah. I was. That's a usual, usually a giant file, right?

[13:20] I mean,

[13:21] seen that or reviewed it. I don't know if anybody else has.

[13:26] I've been in it. I've been in every one of the meetings when we've gone through the depth of coverage on all the big categories.

[13:34] Yeah, and FF and EY we selected it.

[13:39] Typically what we get Mike as we get a full breakdown division by division of all the costs and we track that through the if through every 50% progression of the drawings and estimate, right?

[13:50] And we get our full variance log. We go through it and we tack problems and get our VE list together and we end up at a schedule of values, which I would share if I could apparently I can't know I understand I understand that Aaron. I'm just looking for the backup that proves that we've gone out to multiple subcontractors to validate that we follow the procurement process. That's all.

[14:13] Yeah,

[14:16] I can get that. I thought, you know, I thought that we went through that basically public for here in process when we awarded late and in a competitive bit process.

[14:30] We did, we did do that and J and Aaron are telling us I think on this call that we've gone back to multiple parties, multiple times on all of the major categories of subs.

[14:44] Mike's to your point Mike, it's not in this packet and if we need to, it's not hard to

[14:54] suggest it.

[14:55] Not hard.

[14:56] Yeah, it'll take light in a bit.

[14:59] I would

[15:03] We move rather than kind of delay, just from a timing perspective, subject to, you know, just

[15:10] compound calculation. I can share now, if you'd like me to walk through what I have.

[15:17] Let's

[15:17] do. I just want to give a couple of trades just to see what we have.

[15:27] Yeah, Mike, I don't

[15:28] have a breakdown by trade of, okay, I mean, this list out who was awarded, but it doesn't

[15:35] list out all the other numbers that we got.

[15:43] This is how we've been we've been tracking it

[15:46] with Layton. Got some accepted the all their breakdown of numbers. We've got some push and pull.

[15:53] I'm trying to get rid of the builder's risk number. We got another 1.7 million in pending VE. I think

[16:00] one and a half is really viable.

[16:06] So I think we're going somewhere around 88. But we got to work on

[16:12] that so it's it's 90 million just over 90 million dollar number.

[16:19] Okay I mean yeah I would

[16:20] like to see additional information after the you know to validate that they have going

[16:28] out to a public process and receive multiple bids per scope.

[16:44] I'll I'll get that together

[16:45] and send it are you looking to see every every bid the actual bids from all the subs. Well usually

[16:54] they just usually they'll have a leveling sheet that lists all the subs that bid per trade.

[17:00] And then behind each trade, they'll have the awarded low bid from that actual subcontractor.

[17:08] Yeah, I know what you're looking for. We haven't asked them for this, so it's going to take

[17:11] them some time to prepare it and make sure it's clean. Yeah, they should be very familiar with this

[17:15] process because they do a ton of public work. What

[17:24] else do we need to see? You know,

[17:28] Megan, you've been through the full contract. Does anybody else, does it need to be sent out?

[17:35] No, I'm good.

[17:39] Yeah, I'll just add that both myself and Adam Richie on behalf of the PID have reviewed the contract many times.

[17:47] And we feel really good about the language and both have legal secretaries doing final clean ups as late as yesterday afternoon.

[17:54] So feel really good about the contract, ready to move forward.

[18:00] Yeah, my goal was to have this thing signed early next week.

[18:03] But if we, if we're going to pending approval based on the bid spreads, you know, we'll probably push them late next week.

[18:12] So let me get to work on it.

[18:13] But let's talk about that. I don't know the, like once you feel strongly about it, I mean,

[18:18] I mean, if we got to assemble all of that stuff,

[18:22] I don't think it's going to change the decision.

[18:26] If we're doing it to, you know, paper it up,

[18:30] that's one thing.

[18:32] But I would prefer to get it approved

[18:35] so we don't lose additional time.

[18:41] Yeah, Jay, it's a fair question.

[18:45] I just, I'm trying to validate

[18:46] that they follow the public procurement process

[18:49] Yes, and I it's hard for me to vote. Yes, if I can't if I don't see the evidence of that. That's all I'm saying.

[18:57] Mike is a public procurement process relate to late and all their subs and all their subs and all their subs.

[19:04] Like at what point is this? Yes.

[19:10] Yeah, that's the contract they've entered into. Yes.

[19:15] Something doesn't feel right to me there.

[19:18] I guess I thought that we were following the public

[19:21] premium process by competitively bidding and awarding late.

[19:26] That's my understanding as well.

[19:28] My game, can you speak to that at all?

[19:32] Yeah, but I want to make sure Mike's still with us because it looks like his.

[19:36] Camera went out or are you there, Mike?

[19:39] I'm here.

[19:40] Oh, OK, sorry.

[19:42] Yeah, the districts adopted procurement policy required the public bidding process for the event venue.

[19:48] which we went through last fall, Aaron and his team and pinnacle helped with that process.

[19:54] Layton was awarded the contract and then as Aaron is represented and I'm sure the documentation

[19:59] will bear forth, they've been going through a public procurement, multiple bidding process for

[20:04] each of the subs, but I'm not aware of anything in the procurement code that requires those findings

[20:10] or that information to be included in the contract itself which you're awarding today.

[20:15] understand the need for Aaron to get that paperwork and review it. And Mike or any other trustee

[20:20] liking to review it, I think is completely fine. But I believe and agree with some of the

[20:26] trustees on the line that public procurement has been followed and the district's procurement

[20:31] process has been followed to award this contract today. Okay, I would just like to validate it

[20:37] and you know later with backup. You're right, it doesn't need to be necessarily part of the contract,

[20:43] But for auditing purposes, we would want to validate that they did follow a public process.

[20:49] And if you've done that, Megan, great.

[20:51] I just haven't been part of that.

[20:53] Oh, I haven't, Mike, and I think it's a fair question.

[20:56] And I think Aaron's going to get you the information you need.

[20:59] I know there's some urgency to get this signed and get the dirt moving.

[21:03] So I think we can check both boxes today by, and I recommend awarding the contract, approving that,

[21:10] and then getting the backup documentation to all the trustees.

[21:13] So you can have a clear look at that.

[21:15] And if there are questions that come out of that,

[21:17] I think we can address those as they come forward.

[21:20] But I don't think it impacts the AIA contracts

[21:23] that Aaron's trying to get signed early next week,

[21:26] late next week, depending on the timing.

[21:29] Okay. Guys, I'm so sorry.

[21:32] I have a hard stop in about a minute.

[21:38] Mike, you can talk about the next item for JBID, I think.

[21:41] But as it relates to this item on the contract,

[21:44] but I think, unfortunately, we approve that today.

[21:53] Object, well, I would say that we approve it

[21:55] and then you're gonna provide the backup.

[21:58] Yep, yeah, if we have approval,

[22:00] then I'll get the contract ratified,

[22:03] executed and we'll follow up with the backup.

[22:07] Is there a second for approval

[22:09] that award a contract pending review of the backup data?

[22:15] Oh, second.

[22:16] Okay.

[22:18] All in favor?

[22:19] All right.

[22:21] All right.

[22:22] I just want to be clear, can I get this contract signed before the backup data is provided

[22:29] and reviewed?

[22:32] Or am I my assumption?

[22:33] That's what I was voting for.

[22:35] Yes, Erin, you can do that.

[22:37] And then if there's problem with the backup data on a specific sub or specific category of

[22:42] subs, we can address that separately.

[22:46] Okay.

[22:47] Does that work for your processes?

[22:50] Yeah. We're fine for me. Okay. All right. All right. Thank you. Appreciate everyone. Thank you. Thanks, Robert.

[22:59] Before we move on to the next item, Jason Waller wasn't able to be on the call today, but he had a discussion with Ryan Homer this morning on the procurement for the parking garage.

[23:09] they were planning to meet and maybe Aaron you know a little bit about this as

[23:15] well. Meet late next week Ryan Aaron to discuss starting the procurement process

[23:24] for the parking garage after they get aligned. Jason was going to start working

[23:29] with DFCM on the procurement process. Is that amenable to the board to move forward

[23:36] in that direction.

[23:40] But what's the timing of that?

[23:45] I think we want to get a kicked off as soon as possible Mike. We've been kind of

[23:50] vacillating back and forth as to whether we want the actual garage to break ground or

[23:54] the the private side to break ground for logistic purposes. And so we had had paused

[23:59] kicking this off. I have a little bit of concern nagging in the back of my head about deck

[24:05] to deck heights and things like that. I would like to get this design done sooner than later.

[24:09] So I think right now we're talking about go ahead and kicking off the RFP and Design

[24:14] Go process for the parking garage so that we can get better aligned.

[24:20] So it's just going back to those conversations we had about how we're going to do this.

[24:23] It's rebooting the conversation about following DFCM processes as opposed to the process.

[24:28] We were following how that's going to be administered, the design surets and all that.

[24:33] So it's just restarting the conversation now.

[24:38] Okay.

[24:43] All right.

[24:43] Well, we'll proceed with rebooting that conversation like Aaron said to get that

[24:51] procurement process moving, meeting next week, and then moving forward from there.

[25:00] For our next item, we have the variance agreement with Jordan Basin District.

[25:07] Mike, did you want to talk to that?

[25:11] Yes, I did, but I thought that this was already mentioned.

[25:15] We talked about Jordan Basin and the need for a variance agreement because if we were multiple years in the future they needed to come in and replace the sewer and in those locations that we don't have the five foot of separation.

[25:33] Yeah, right. Yeah, so this was covered under Item 2C and there were several emails that made it

[25:41] very confusing for a lot of different reasons about what this item is. So I think 2C is the same as

[25:48] 2G and has already been approved. And then at your next meeting they have additional agreements that we

[25:55] just got yesterday, I believe, that we're going to review and bring back to your next meeting from

[26:00] Jordan Basin are

[26:04] those agreements the connection agree yes is that we're referring to okay. Yep

[26:11] There's another one that's not on this list that I was expecting to see and that is and I know that

[26:17] I believe our procurement policy with this

[26:21] Board is that we can direct a word up to $50,000 is that right?

[26:26] Yes, sir

[26:28] And we did go out with a third party

[26:30] a consultant for inspections and material testing

[26:35] for the horizontal work around the promenade area.

[26:42] Was that the kidney?

[26:44] I might not be saying the name right.

[26:47] Something more?

[26:48] Yes.

[26:50] So my record show we awarded that contract

[26:53] at the last meeting.

[26:55] Yeah, okay, I wasn't in the last meeting.

[26:57] I appreciate that.

[26:58] Now can I ask a follow-up question to that though?

[27:01] Drayper City has requested a copy of their proposal and the contract and I believe because

[27:11] this is a public entity that they probably have to go through a grandma request. Am I right

[27:16] on that?

[27:19] We could make them go through a grandma request if you wanted but I can also just send

[27:24] that to them if you direct me to the right person or send it to you to send it to them.

[27:32] I don't find it necessary to go through a grandma. I just wanted to make sure we were covered.

[27:37] So if you wouldn't mind sending me both the contract, I have the proposal and I'll forward that on to them.

[27:45] Yes, sir. We'll do.

[27:47] And thank my third reason for wanting that is just to make sure that it complies with their policies or their acceptance policies.

[27:55] No, yeah, and Robert brought this up because I mentioned this to him earlier.

[28:03] I, truthfully, Jay, I don't have 100% correct answer because it was just in an email requesting it.

[28:10] But this is my optimistic theory.

[28:14] It's because Scott really is really trying, at the end of the day, you know, they're going to own and operate the utilities, right?

[28:21] So in our interlocal agreement, we have to validate that those utilities met the standards

[28:28] that we agreed to and that they comply with the plans and specifications.

[28:35] And so Scott Cooley's trying to understand how we get from the plans to a validated, you

[28:45] know, installed product that they can accept. And so they just, I think he just wants to know how

[28:53] these people are part of the process. Okay. That's what I'm thinking.

[29:02] I'll keep my narrative to myself.

[29:07] Okay.

[29:13] So the confusion on item G here is probably my fault. There's discussions yesterday morning

[29:19] in a 10 o'clock meeting that there was fear that this agreement was not there, so I asked

[29:25] well, Jake and Megan to add this, but it looked like it was already under C. So sorry

[29:32] for the gymnastics, for the chemical and legal team to add this,

[29:39] but thank you for appeasing

[29:41] my inupness.

[29:44] No worries.

[29:46] Happy to accommodate administrative non-action items.

[29:52] We don't have anything there.

[29:54] And we are ready to move into the closed meeting.

[29:59] I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry.

[30:01] To discuss the lease of real property related to the land lease, my district won. Betsy, did you want to go through the closed session process or Megan? Sorry, sorry to interrupt. Thank you, Shannon. Before we do that, this item went out. It's been discussed at the last two meetings. The draft went out via email to board. The only response I got was from Robert that it looks okay.

[30:29] Okay.

[30:30] We are happy to go into a closed session if the board would find that valuable, but I'm

[30:35] not sure just having not heard and discuss at the last meeting about this.

[30:39] If you want to do that or if you are ready to award this approval, again, this is a sole

[30:44] source approval.

[30:45] So it's supported by a finding from your procurement agent that TPP will sign saying that the only

[30:52] broker that's appropriate for this is the broker that's doing the rest of the project,

[30:56] along with those changes discussed at the last meeting.

[30:59] So happy to take direction from the Board.

[31:02] Yeah, I'm not sure we need to go into close session.

[31:06] I mean, we went through that last month.

[31:10] Oh, Mike, I know you weren't in that,

[31:12] but you're aware of what we're going to do.

[31:15] Very familiar, very familiar.

[31:18] I don't, you're talking about for item B or for A and B.

[31:22] So, A is the closed session to discuss item B.

[31:26] Jay, I just wanted to give you the opportunity if you needed that closed session.

[31:30] If you don't, we're ready to take a motion on B.

[31:34] Yeah, I don't see a need for it, but if any of the board members want to do that and get

[31:40] a refresher, we can do that.

[31:42] I agree with Jay.

[31:49] And I'm happy to make a motion unless Cal or Zach want to dig deeper.

[31:55] Yeah, I'm five in the same boat with you, Jake.

[32:01] I'm good.

[32:06] Okay, so I'll make a motion for the approval of the property leasing agreement with Centennial real estate management related to the pavilions.

[32:21] All right,

[32:26] that is all we have on the agenda for today.

[32:30] Are there any other items that board would like to discuss before we adjourn?

[32:38] Shannon, can we do a rewind real quick on the, I guess maybe it's an Aaron, Ryan, Jason

[32:47] a little bit of question. But what are the comment around the parking structure? What is the

[32:53] deliverable they're working on? What is the plan of action related to the PID board? Can somebody

[33:00] rewind that and give me a better understanding of what we're doing there?

[33:08] Yeah, and Aaron, feel free to jump in here. Since the conversation had just been

[33:13] and scale for a while of we wanted to confirm

[33:16] that the board was good with restarting the conversation

[33:21] and moving forward with that procurement process

[33:24] just so we didn't get a head of anything

[33:27] or start work on a project that the board wasn't ready

[33:31] to start on.

[33:33] It was just a reboot of the conversation

[33:36] that we had had earlier in the year

[33:38] and making sure that we weren't getting ahead of where the board wanted to go.

[33:45] Okay. Yeah, that's right. It's just preparing to get started together. Yeah. Got it. Okay.

[33:57] Thank you for that.

[33:59] Of course. I support that for sure. Getting a little later.

[34:06] Anything else? Act. Did you have a question?

[34:11] No, nothing for me.

[34:16] All right.

[34:16] Alright, pending any further discussion, we'd entertain a motion to adjourn.

[34:24] I'll move to adjourn.

[34:26] All second.

[34:27] All in favor?

[34:29] Aye.

[34:32] All right.

[34:36] Well, thank you all.

[34:37] Have a great rest of your week.

[34:39] Thanks for the meeting and we'll talk to y'all soon.

[34:43] Thank you.

Regular Meeting

Transcript