Construction Board of Appeals - September 10, 2026

Port St. Lucie, FL · 2026-09-10 · More Port St. Lucie, FL meetings · More Florida meetings

View original source →

Agenda

Agenda: https://psl.granicus.com/AgendaViewer.php?clip_id=6506&embedded=1

Transcript

Download: Text · SRT

SOURCE TRANSCRIPT

This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.

[0:55] {~{~{~.

[0:58] >> like to call the

[0:59] SEPTEMBER 10th, 2026,

[1:00] construction board of appeals

[1:02] for the city of port st. Lucie

[1:03] to order.

[1:05] Can I have the roll call,

[1:06] please?

[1:07] >> MR. Williams.

[1:08] >> here.

[1:09] >> MR. Larsen.

[1:10] >> here.

[1:10] >> MS. Silvestri.

[1:12] >> here.

[1:13] >> MR. Mahood.

[1:13] >> here.

[1:14] >> MR. Martinez.

[1:14] >> here.

[1:15] >> MR. Illg.

[1:15] >> here.

[1:17] >> please let the record reflect

[1:19] that MS. Kaegi is not present.

[1:20] >> can we have the swearing in

[1:28] of staff?

[1:33] >> [Swearing in]

[1:37] Thank you.

[1:40] >> we do have quorum so now if

[1:44] we could stand for the pledge of

[2:06] allegiance.

[2:08] >> moving onto the approval of

[2:08] minutes.

[2:10] Do we have any questions,

[2:12] concerns, changes, relative to

[2:15] the minutes from the JULY 9th

[2:20] meeting?

[2:22] >> make a motion to approve the

[2:23] minutes of JULY 9th.

[2:23] >> second.

[2:25] >> I second that.

[2:29] >> all in favor?

[2:31] The minutes are approved.

[2:33] Additions or deletions to the

[2:33] agenda.

[2:35] You said I do believe --

[2:36] >> yes, we do have one addition

[2:37] to the agenda.

[2:37] We're going to introduce this

[2:40] under new business to review and

[2:46] approve the 2027cba dates.

[2:48] >> okay.

[2:50] there is no consent agenda so we

[2:52] will move right to that item

[2:52] under new business.

[2:56] So the board has been presented

[3:03] with with the proposed meetings.

[3:05] I think all we need is a motion

[3:14] to approve these, correct?

[3:15] Are there any questions,

[3:16] concerns, comments?

[3:19] >> make a motion to approve the

[3:20] 2027 meeting dates.

[3:21] >> I second that motion.

[3:23] >> all in favor.

[3:26] Any opposed?

[3:27] Nope.

[3:30] Said dates have been adopted.

[3:32] No other new business, no

[3:34] quasi-judicial hearings on item

[3:35] 10.

[3:37] Item 11, citation hearings.

[3:40] We have a number of these.

[3:42] Do we need to read these in

[3:46] individually or?

[3:46] What's --

[3:49] >> I would, being that they're

[3:52] each listed in the, do each of

[3:55] these need to establish

[3:58] violations?

[4:00] >> [Off mic]

[4:03] >> if a, if an officer needs to

[4:04] present their case to establish

[4:06] the violations, they have to be

[4:07] done individually --

[4:13] >> [Off mic]

[4:14] >> in which case if there is --

[4:15] we need to make sure that there

[4:18] is no one present who wishes to

[4:20] speak on any of these items

[4:21] before they're considered.

[4:22] >> okay, so we do need to read

[4:26] them one at a time then.

[4:28] >> [Off mic]

[4:29] >> okay, we need to be sure that

[4:31] there is no one who wishes to

[4:35] speak on any of these items

[4:38] before, before moving on any of

[4:38] them.

[4:40] But if no one moves on any of

[4:43] them, they could be moved on all -- the orderses could be

[4:45] entered all at once.

[4:46] >> oh, they can be entered at

[4:48] all once.

[4:49] >> if there is no one who wishes

[4:52] to speak.

[4:53] But you know, it MAY still be

[4:54] best to go through them.

[4:55] >> all right, I think we can

[4:57] just read them one at time and

[4:59] approve each one.

[5:01] Do we need a member of the board

[5:02] to read each of these oresa are

[5:03] you able to read?

[5:04] >> I'll go ahead.

[5:05] I'll read them through.

[5:06] So we'll --

[5:09] >> before you get started, could

[5:11] I -- I have a question on 11 e

[5:15] and f.

[5:17] It is daniel graham.

[5:19] I guess it was presented over to

[5:21] the detective and is there any

[5:23] update on that so far as --

[5:25] >> well, if I'm understanding

[5:26] correctly I'm going read each

[5:27] one and then you guys have a

[5:29] motion so once I get down to 11

[5:30] e then we can present the

[5:31] questions.

[5:31] >> the attorney said if you want

[5:34] to talk first and then.

[5:36] >> I meant that they couldn't be

[5:38] considered as a bulk -- they

[5:39] couldn't be considered all at

[5:42] once if anyone wanted to talk on

[5:43] any item.

[5:45] >> so once we get to those two.

[5:45] >> sure.

[5:46] >> okay, so starting with our

[5:50] citation hearings item 11 a

[5:50] citation order where the

[5:51] violator did not request a

[5:53] hearing and did not pay the

[6:00] citation.

[6:07] Odanis. Campbell.

[6:08] Citation 32500, first offense.

[6:09] >> motion to approve.

[6:09] >> I second it.

[6:11] >> all in favor.

[6:12] >> all right.

[6:14] Item 11 b.

[6:14] >> citation order where the

[6:15] violator did not request a

[6:17] hearing and did not pay the

[6:22] citation, od ains. Campbell,

[6:24] O.C. Renovation llc.

[6:26] Citation 32499, first offense.

[6:27] >> motion to approve.

[6:28] >> second that.

[6:28] >> all in favor.

[6:30] >> just to clarify for the

[6:32] record, you intend by motion to

[6:34] approve to approve the staff

[6:37] recommendation on each of these.

[6:37] >> correct.

[6:38] >> thank you.

[6:41] >> all in favor of 11 b.

[6:42] >>> aye.

[6:42] >> okay.

[6:43] 11 c.

[6:44] >> citation order where the

[6:45] violator did not request a

[6:47] hearing and did not pay the

[6:49] citation.

[6:51] Odains. Campbell, O.C.

[6:56] Renovation llc, citation 32498,

[6:56] first offense.

[6:58] >> motion to approve.

[6:59] >> I second that.

[7:00] >> all in favor?

[7:01] 11 d.

[7:01] >> citation order where the

[7:02] violator did not request a

[7:04] hearing and did not pay the

[7:09] citation, odains. Campbell, O.C.

[7:13] Renovation llc, citation 32497,

[7:14] first offense.

[7:15] >> motion to approve.

[7:15] >> second.

[7:17] >> all in favor.

[7:17] >> aye.

[7:19] >> 11 e.

[7:22] Before -- we'll read the it off and

[7:22] then --

[7:23] >> citation order where the

[7:24] violator did not request a

[7:26] hearing and did not pay the

[7:27] citation, daniel graham,

[7:31] handyman that can, citation

[7:33] number 32389 first offense.

[7:36] >> yes, I had a question in

[7:39] reading his case, that it was

[7:41] handed off to a detective.

[7:45] Do we know if the last thing I

[7:47] read is nobody could find this

[7:48] guy.

[7:52] Did, I mean did somebody find

[7:52] him?

[7:55] Has he been served?

[7:56] No?

[8:14] >> the last -- [Off mic]

[8:16] >> jennifer van netter, this is

[8:16] my case.

[8:17] The last contact that I had with

[8:19] the detective, they did not have

[8:21] a good contact for this

[8:23] gentleman either.

[8:24] I have not had any contact with

[8:26] him since then, so I'm not sure

[8:28] what's going on with it as far

[8:29] as the police department's

[8:30] concerned.

[8:32] >> I notice on the filing of the

[8:35] llc to the state there is

[8:36] another name in this company as

[8:37] a manager or something.

[8:40] A woman I believe.

[8:40] >> yeah,.

[8:42] >> have you pursued that avenue

[8:43] too?

[8:44] >> yeah, I believe we sent --

[8:46] tried to send it to a couple of

[8:48] different addresses.

[8:50] Both the one that she's listed

[8:52] at and an additional address for

[8:54] him and we're unsuccessful with

[8:56] both of those.

[8:58] ?Ee soi guess be on the look out

[9:00] for this guy.

[9:01] [Laughter]

[9:01] Thank you.

[9:04] >> yes, sir.

[9:06] >> do I have a motion to approve

[9:08] the recommendation for 11 e?

[9:10] >> I make a motion to approve.

[9:12] >> I second that.

[9:14] >> all in favor?

[9:14] All right.

[9:16] 11 f.

[9:17] >> citation order where the

[9:17] violator did not request a

[9:19] hearing and did not pay the

[9:20] citation, daniel graham,

[9:24] handyman that can, citation

[9:25] number 32392, first offense.

[9:28] >> motion to approve.

[9:28] >> second.

[9:30] >>> all in favor.

[9:30] >> aye.

[9:32] >>> all right.

[9:36] That concludes item 11.

[9:37] Item 12, citation of fine

[9:39] hearings, we just have one of

[9:39] these.

[9:41] I believe we just need to

[9:42] order -- read this in and

[9:45] similarly order to lien on this.

[9:47] >>> 12 a, certifiction of fine,

[9:49] order to lien.

[9:55] Tony bedolla, bedolla

[9:58] construction cleaning llc,

[9:59] citation 32442, remaining

[10:00] balance owed $1,000.

[10:01] >> main a motion to lien.

[10:02] >> second that.

[10:03] >> all in favor?

[10:04] >> aye.

[10:04] >> all right.

[10:06] That carries as well.

[10:08] No more certification of fines.

[10:10] We have nothing on disciplinary

[10:10] hearings.

[10:16] Is there any public to be heard?

[10:17] And in world record time I am

[10:18] gauche

[10:19] going to ask if there is a

[10:20] motion to adjourn.

[10:22] >> I don't think it's oo record.

[10:23] >> it's pretty close.

[10:24] >> it's close.

[10:25] >> do I have a motion?

[10:26] >> yes, motion to close.

[10:27] >> motion to approve.

[10:29] >> all in favor.

[10:30] [Laughter]

[10:32] >> all in favor,.

[10:32] >> aye.

[10:32] All right.

[10:36] We are adjourned.