Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:12]
You have to go back.
[0:20]
» We're doing
>> Yeah, we're
[0:47]
This one's eating all the time.
[1:03]
9:00 in the morning.
[1:31]
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen,
and welcome to our September County
[1:36]
Commissioners meeting. It's uh a little
different time than what we normally do.
[1:41]
It is at the first of the month, but
since uh the first Monday is the on the
[1:47]
7th, the last day possible for it to be
the first Monday, um we set up to meet
[1:53]
on the first Tuesday of September. Glad
you're here tonight for conducting the
[1:59]
business for the county. I see several
of our law enforcement officers here and
[2:04]
others that are with us tonight. various
agenda items and we'll get to those as
[2:09]
as we work through our agenda. So with
that, we welcome you all here again
[2:14]
tonight. U Chaplain Bill Hatfield is
here for our invocation and we'll have
[2:20]
our pledge of allegiance.
[2:32]
Lord God, I want to thank you so much
for who you are and again as always for
[2:35]
the freedoms that you've given us be
able to gather here to seek your face to
[2:40]
cry out to you, the King of Kings, the
Lord of Lords. Oh God, we need your
[2:44]
wisdom. As we look around, do we need to
make the right decisions for the people
[2:51]
for the citizens of Randolph County?
Lord, I just want to thank you again and
[2:55]
for the honor and the privilege of being
here tonight to be able to lead in
[2:59]
prayer, to seek your face. I pray for
each person here that you would just
[3:06]
touch them and just continue to to move
on their lives. I pray the decisions
[3:10]
here tonight would be in order for what
you would want. Lord, you know, as
[3:16]
voting may be going on, recognitions may
be going on, uh, everything that's going
[3:22]
to happen in this meeting, I ask that
you would guide it. Thank you, Lord.
[3:26]
Again, give these fine people the wisdom
they need, the boldness they need, the
[3:32]
compassion they need, the listening ear
they may need as they listen to the
[3:36]
citizens. Uh, you know the needs of our
county. You know the financial needs. Uh
[3:42]
Lord, I just lift each of these up to
you God and I give you the praise and
[3:45]
Lord, I give you the glory. In Jesus
name I pray. Amen.
[3:50]
» Amen.
>> I
[3:54]
to the flag of the United States of
America and to the republic for it
[4:00]
stands one nation
indivisibley
[4:07]
for all.
>> Thank you.
[4:15]
Okay, we have um one special recognition
item on our agenda tonight and I'm going
[4:21]
to call on uh our director of social
services, Tracy Murphy, who will do the
[4:28]
honors.
[4:33]
Good evening, everyone.
Miss Davis, would you please join me up
[4:38]
here in front of all of these fine
people? While she's coming, I'm going to
[4:42]
read uh some of the accomplishments of
Miss Davis over the years.
[4:50]
Don't be shy now.
[4:54]
» Miss Davis retires from Department of
Social Services on July 31st, 2026.
[5:00]
She started her career with us in
September of 1995.
[5:05]
and she ended up as a universal intake
supervisor. There are many of her
[5:10]
colleagues here tonight whom she has
encouraged and lifted up along the way
[5:15]
to celebrate her in her retirement. She
became a great asset for our agency. She
[5:21]
has always held herself and those around
her to very high expectations, pushing
[5:26]
them to rise to the fullest potential.
She is a dedicated worker. Her impact
[5:32]
will be felt for years to come. Her
family consists of her husband Brian,
[5:37]
daughter Nicole, son-in-law John,
granddaughter Calie, and her hobbies
[5:42]
include spending time with family,
especially that grandbaby whom we hear
[5:46]
so much about, playing with her dogs,
and doing projects around the house.
[5:52]
Her greatest joy has been seeing those
she has supervised grow and move up
[5:56]
within the agency. She hopes her
leadership has impacted them and
[6:01]
encouraged their growth and they are
here this evening with us to celebrate
[6:06]
her. We appreciate um Miss Davis and
congratulations on a very welldeserved
[6:13]
retirement.
[6:16]
[applause]
[6:25]
[applause]
[6:30]
here.
[6:38]
Maybe we want to recognize you on your
retirement, but to say a special word of
[6:43]
thanks and gratitude to you. And I for
all of you folks here and all of you
[6:47]
that work in the various departments in
the county,
[6:52]
this this is hard to replace.
and those she's been here 31 years has
[6:58]
made a tremendous difference in the
delivery of services in this county
[7:04]
helping these other folks that have
followed you to be prepared to do their
[7:08]
jobs and we just so grateful to you and
wish you all the very best take care of
[7:14]
that little grandbaby and maybe come
back and visit every once in a while.
[7:19]
God bless you. This is in grateful rec
appreciation to Libby Davis in
[7:25]
recognition of 31 years of service
September the 1st, 2026
[7:31]
by the Randolph County Board of
Commissioners. God bless you.
[7:35]
[applause]
[7:40]
[applause]
[7:51]
All right. Before we go to our public
comment period, we want to approve our
[7:56]
agendas for tonight. And uh I'll remind
the board we're adding one item to the
[8:02]
consent agenda. That will be item R.
This is a budget amendment which
[8:07]
recognizes previous decisions following
a public hearing by our board. This is
[8:13]
the book the uh budget amendment for the
incentives for the environmental air
[8:19]
system
project that has moved into our county.
[8:24]
So we will add that to the consent
agenda. Any other changes to the consent
[8:29]
agenda?
Do I have a motion to approve the
[8:32]
agendas as presented?
>> So move.
[8:35]
» Have a second.
>> Second.
[8:38]
» Those in favor let it be known by saying
I.
[8:41]
» I oppose. No, the agendas are approved.
So, at this time, we have our public
[8:48]
comment period. And I would just add um
on our new business item tonight, we
[8:55]
have a public hearing for another
economic development project for
[8:59]
Asavant.
So, it will have its own public hearing.
[9:03]
If anybody anybody's here tonight to
speak to that issue, we'll have it will
[9:08]
have its own public hearing when we get
to that item on the agenda. So, with
[9:12]
that having been said,
madame clerk,
[9:17]
who do we have? Mr. Chairman, I'll read
the rules of procedure for the public
[9:21]
comment period. The rules of procedure
are as follows. The public comment
[9:24]
period will be limited to 15 minutes at
the beginning of the meeting. If more
[9:29]
time is required, it will be at the
discretion of the board. Each speaker
[9:33]
must give his or her name both orally
and in writing before speaking. Speakers
[9:39]
will be limited to three minutes.
Comments are to be directed to the board
[9:42]
as a whole and not to one individual
commissioner. Response, discussion, or
[9:48]
action concerning issues raised during
the public input session will be at the
[9:53]
discretion of the board. Speakers will
be courteous in their language and
[9:58]
presentation. Speaker should not discuss
matters which concern the candidacy of
[10:03]
any person seeking public office or
matters in current or anticipated
[10:08]
litigation.
[10:11]
Michael Moss.
[10:25]
Good evening, commissioners. Uh first
off, my name is Michael Moss. Uh I own
[10:29]
Windy Hill Farms in Ramsur and I've got
some exciting news to share with you
[10:34]
just a little bit later. But first, I
want to thank you for the service that
[10:39]
you provide to Randolph County and uh
the decisions that you make and the
[10:44]
leadership and guidance that you provide
this county um and into the future and
[10:49]
the things that we need to be doing. I
know your jobs aren't easy all the time
[10:52]
and I've been sitting out here sometimes
when I've seen it that way. But so thank
[10:56]
you for that. Uh back in February,
announcement came out that a longheld
[11:04]
tradition around Randolph County, the
Liberty Antiques Festival was going to
[11:08]
be sold.
There were a number of biders for that
[11:12]
particular um festival. It's been a
longstanding one within Randolph County
[11:18]
for 35 years. Many of you know Veto and
his family have curated a great show
[11:24]
there.
There were out ofstate uh biders for it.
[11:28]
It looked like the show was going to
leave. Ladies and gentlemen, I'm here to
[11:32]
let you know that me and my family have
purchased the Liberty Antiques Festival.
[11:37]
My son's here with me in the back. Uh
and we're going to curate it for another
[11:42]
35 years. All right. and we're looking
forward to the support that we will get
[11:48]
from this esteemed body from my own
commissioner David. I'm sure he'll be
[11:53]
right there with me by my by my side.
But um it's a great honor for us to be
[11:58]
able to hold it here. It's got a
significant economic impact I believe on
[12:02]
this county. We'll be working with Amber
and others within the group to try to
[12:06]
understand what that true impact is. But
this a festival for all of Randolph
[12:10]
County and it's here to stay. So, I
welcome each of you to come out. Uh,
[12:15]
September 25th and 26th will be our
first show at our farm, Windy Hill
[12:20]
Farms. We've got a lot of work to do to
get it there and get it to where it
[12:24]
wants to go. Uh, but we've had such good
support from many of the departments in
[12:29]
the local government here in Randolph
County, whether it be environmental
[12:32]
health, whether it be in permitting
offices, whether it be with our
[12:36]
sheriff's department, the our EMS,
everybody's worked really well with us
[12:40]
and I just want to thank you for the
leadership that you've given those
[12:43]
different departments because they're
outstanding. So, thank you. Welcome all
[12:47]
of you to 10.
>> Yes.
[12:49]
» And all of you,
>> you're here.
[12:51]
» Thank you.
>> Thanks, sir. Uh we might put you on an
[12:54]
inviting speaker list sometime today.
>> Okay, that'd be great. [laughter] Glad
[12:58]
to do that. Whatever.
>> We're not It's great and sincerely and
[13:03]
seriously appreciate your comments and
it's good to keep it here in the county
[13:08]
and to keep it going.
>> Absolutely.
[13:10]
» My wife will be there.
>> My wife frequents it.
[13:12]
» Awesome. See you.
[13:18]
Susie Scott.
[13:29]
Sorry, got to get this where it can
reach me. My name is Susie Scott and I'm
[13:33]
here to speak about the library. I
attended the first meeting in
[13:37]
introduction of the new library trustees
and I was pleased to see the slide from
[13:41]
the state library of North Carolina
which explained that a publicly
[13:46]
supported library provides free,
equitable and confidential access to
[13:52]
information for all people of its
community. I hope that the new board
[13:57]
will follow that wise policy and support
the freedom to read. I also have a
[14:02]
comment on the new library ordinance.
Since the library board of trustees is
[14:08]
the final authority on challenged
material, I'm requesting that the
[14:12]
ordinance be altered to include at least
one out of nine voting members who is a
[14:19]
trained librarian. Thank you. Thank you.
>> All right,
[14:26]
» Judy Saunders.
[14:53]
I would like to make a few comments
about social security. According to the
[14:58]
social security trust fund, it will be
depleted in 2034
[15:04]
unless Congress decides to act.
The retirement age now is 67.
[15:14]
As some may or may not know, there is a
cap on social security.
[15:21]
The wealthy, once they have paid just a
little over $100,000 per year, do not
[15:28]
pay into social security anymore.
Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, they don't care
[15:36]
about what things cost. They are not
interested in anything but themselves
[15:42]
and their wealth. I want us to remember
that we have got to do something. And if
[15:50]
the cap is lifted, then there will be
funds there for our children and our
[15:56]
grandchildren. If it is not lifted,
social security will be depleted. The
[16:03]
wealthy are not interested in the cost
of food, gas, or health insurance. We
[16:10]
are the ones who pay and pay and pay.
Thank you.
[16:15]
» Thank you, Miss Andre.
[16:19]
» All right. Thank all of you tonight for
your public comments. And we will move
[16:26]
first to approve our consent agenda. Is
there a motion to approve consent agenda
[16:30]
as adjusted as amended?
>> So move.
[16:34]
» Have a second.
>> Second.
[16:37]
» Pick one.
>> Go ahead.
[16:39]
» Those in favor, let it be known by
saying I.
[16:41]
» I.
>> I oppose. No.
[16:43]
» Consent agenda is approved.
on our new business.
[16:49]
The first item tonight is to consider an
economic development incentive request
[16:55]
for a savant. Crystal Gettys with the
economic development corporation is here
[17:01]
to present the case.
[17:06]
» Good evening, Chairman Fry,
commissioners, county manager. Thank you
[17:10]
for having me. Um, I'm here to talk
about the what we label at the EDC is
[17:15]
the Highway 311 South Site. This is 67.6
acre roughly rail serve site that we've
[17:22]
been marketing for, well, it's been
available for over 20 years, way before
[17:28]
my time. Um, it is owned by Asavant Real
Property Co uh Company LLC. I've been
[17:34]
before you um previously in in the
recent months for uh grants that we have
[17:41]
helped with and um and applied for on
their behalf to help with utilities that
[17:47]
Asavant will be paying for outside the
grants. But tonight, the the EDC is
[17:53]
requesting a total of $160,000
to be split between the county and the
[17:59]
city of Randleman um in the amount of
80,000 each to support access
[18:06]
improvements to this site. Currently, um
there is no access off of Highway 311
[18:13]
and the access point is on the back side
of the property through an easement that
[18:18]
is not conducive for industrial use or
traffic um should we land an industry
[18:24]
there.
The project supports the the development
[18:28]
of this 67.6 acre site for future
industrial use by extending water sewer
[18:34]
utilities and improving site access from
Highway 311. As I mentioned, to include
[18:40]
relocation of the current private
crossing over Norfick Southern's rail
[18:45]
line, we've obtained two North Carolina
Railroad grants totaling $1 million, and
[18:52]
they've been secured to offset the
water, sewer, and access improvement
[18:56]
costs with the remaining costs being
covered by the property owner. To
[19:01]
complete the access improvements,
approximately 4.31 acres must be
[19:08]
acquired from the adjacent property
owner. This is where the current private
[19:13]
crossing is located on the adjacent
property to this. RCEDC plans to
[19:20]
contribute $9,200
from a unused and reallocated Duke
[19:26]
Energy grant that was initially for the
industrial park across the road from
[19:32]
this where Ross uh currently sits. Those
funds were uh the remaining funds were
[19:38]
to be used for signage for the
industrial park. And when Ross came
[19:42]
along, we no longer needed that. Duke
Energy authorized us to be able to use
[19:47]
it across the road. So, we're going to
be contributing toward that as well. Um,
[19:52]
[clears throat]
so once we we use that, um, again, we
[19:57]
are requesting $160,000.
This is to help with the acquisition and
[20:03]
the design and permitting of a relocated
private crossing that will be located at
[20:10]
a signalized intersection directly
across from Wall Brothers Road where
[20:15]
Ross entrance is. Um, this will help
with our permitting costs. Any excess
[20:20]
cost to this will be absorbed by the
property owner. Our CEDC, as you know,
[20:27]
is charged with supporting existing
industries of Randolph County, as well
[20:31]
as recruitment of new industry, which
grows the tax base of the county and the
[20:35]
municipalities where they are located.
Having sites that are marketable and
[20:40]
include utilities, access, and due
diligence is crucial to our efforts in
[20:46]
attracting new industry.
We at the R RCEDC appreciate your
[20:51]
consideration to contribute the
requested funds that will in turn help
[20:56]
provide a marketable rail serve site for
new industry. I am scheduled to uh be on
[21:02]
the agenda for the city of Randleman on
Tuesday night for their approval of the
[21:07]
other $80,000.
I am happy to answer any questions.
[21:12]
We're excited about this site and we're
finally um gaining access to the site
[21:18]
will expedite our efforts in starting
the construction of the utilities to
[21:23]
serve the site.
>> And that'll be next Tuesday night for
[21:27]
them.
>> Yes. Yes, sir.
[21:30]
» Anyone have any questions of Crystal?
[21:36]
» Thank you. I know in EDC we've we've
been hearing about this project for a
[21:40]
long time and it's it's good to see it
starting to come come to shape for us.
[21:44]
It's great.
>> Okay,
[21:46]
» it's a good start.
>> We will now open the public hearing for
[21:51]
anyone who wishes to speak to this
request. And again, it is um for the
[21:55]
county request of $80,000 to be used for
the readiness of that site uh on old
[22:03]
311.
We will now open the public hearing. Is
[22:06]
there anyone here tonight who wishes to
speak to this issue for or against
[22:12]
either way
please come forward Mr. Small and state
[22:18]
your name and address please.
[22:23]
Lynn Small uh 4807 Walker Mill Road
Sophia Chairman Fry Commissioners
[22:31]
I have three questions I would like to
ask about this 67.6
[22:36]
6 acre site.
First of all, has Kevin Franklin, the
[22:41]
economic development corporation, the
county or asavant marketed this site to
[22:48]
any data data center development up to
this point.
[22:55]
» Crystal, do you want
>> No, don't tell us.
[22:59]
» Thank you.
>> Yeah. Secondly,
[23:02]
will the county ever market this site
for a data center going forward?
[23:13]
» Your third question.
>> What's your third question?
[23:16]
What's your third question?
>> And the third and I'll assume that you
[23:20]
will since you won't answer didn't give
me an answer. I'll assume that you
[23:24]
would.
>> We don't we don't
[23:25]
» want all of your questions.
>> Yeah.
[23:27]
» Oh, okay. Okay. Thank you. It's not that
we're not answering.
[23:29]
» Third, uh if this 1 acre and 3.31 acres
are so important to develop this site,
[23:40]
why that's the total of the two parcels
that you would be getting. Why did our
[23:47]
economic development people wait until
the parcels were sold on June 10th of
[23:56]
this year at exorbitant prices to decide
that we need that
[24:05]
asant has owned this for years and as
[clears throat] was pointed out uh the
[24:11]
county has been trying to develop it for
years
[24:14]
» without the without the without the
change in in the rail access. It wasn't
[24:19]
marketable.
But but but the question was why are you
[24:24]
just now deciding that those two two
pieces of property
[24:29]
uh one acre and 3.31 acres needed to be
bought just now after all this time
[24:37]
» and they've just been sold to another
person company
[24:42]
» for an exorbitant fund of
>> it's been available it's been available
[24:46]
then we just if somebody wanted to take
it and hope these things get done. But
[24:53]
it's been available.
>> The acorage you're speaking of has been
[24:57]
discussed for years.
>> For years. Well, I know. But my question
[25:00]
is, so why did
>> Let me finish your answer. I'm trying to
[25:03]
answer your question. The property
owner, the previous property owner has
[25:06]
been talked with for years and years
about this and has not wanted to sell.
[25:10]
And now that they're gone, the new
owners were willing to sell.
[25:14]
» You're speaking of the Cranford
property, right?
[25:16]
» I'm sorry, I didn't hear. You're
speaking of the Cranford property.
[25:20]
» Yes, that's right.
>> He He's been talked to and courted for
[25:24]
years,
>> but suddenly
[25:26]
» Well, we can't we can't make him sell
in.
[25:29]
» I understand that, but I was just trying
to I'm just inquiring why. You know, we
[25:33]
let him know.
>> It seemed odd that it would get sold. He
[25:36]
knows we want it.
>> That's what I mean.
[25:39]
» He's the one decided to do that. He's a
private property owner.
[25:42]
» All right. Thank you, Commissioner Fry.
U the other thing I would say is ASAT as
[25:49]
has been pointed out has been given a
million dollars by the railroad for the
[25:54]
crossing
and it just sold 2.4 acres to Ulus Gas
[26:01]
a mile up the highway near me for
215,000.
[26:06]
If a savant in my opinion cannot manage
160,000
[26:11]
towards making this crossing better,
it's not ready to develop this site. To
[26:17]
me, asking for additional taxpayer money
is just simple corporate greed from a
[26:24]
savant.
The county should be asking a Savant to
[26:29]
reimburse some of the money the county
has already spent promoting this site
[26:35]
rather than funding another handout.
Although this is a minuscule amount of
[26:41]
money and I agree with that.
It demonstrates what happens when you go
[26:47]
down the incentive uh pathway. Everybody
then expects a handout from taxpayers.
[26:55]
Can we not come up with something that
will attract business other than just
[27:01]
giving up my taxpayer dollars, my that I
hand over to the county every year.
[27:09]
I just got through paying 2,900 in
property taxes on my 22 acres.
[27:15]
That's the same amount that Asavat paid
on this 67 will have to pay. I don't
[27:20]
think they paid it yet on this 67 and
uh.6 acres. So there that property was
[27:27]
valued at 6 $6,750
an acre and they valued mine at 9,000
[27:32]
right up the road. That's why I get dis
that's why I get disquled about property
[27:38]
taxes. It's it's not a fair system. I'm
paying through the nose and ASA's
[27:44]
getting a great deal and then they will
get an even better great deal down the
[27:49]
road. So, I appreciate your listening.
Uh, but I do I did have concerns and do
[27:56]
have concerns. I don't want a data
center in our area. It's it's bad enough
[28:01]
that we have Ross. And by the way, our
road, Walker Mill Road that they've been
[28:07]
bringing the gravel trucks in for three
months is coming apart. DOT was down
[28:12]
there p fixing another hole today. I
didn't even think they were supposed to
[28:16]
be on it. Been hauling gravel on it for
three months. Still continuing to fix
[28:21]
that parking lot, I guess, for for Ross.
If you could get that fixed, I'd
[28:27]
appreciate it.
>> Thank you, ma'am.
[28:29]
» Thank you.
>> Thank you.
[28:33]
Is there anyone else wishes to speak to
this request?
[28:38]
Hearing none, we will come back to
session and um ask for action board
[28:46]
action
questions.
[28:52]
» Are you ready for a motion?
>> Yes. Crystal, did you have any you have
[28:56]
any other response? The only thing I'll
say
[29:00]
» come up here.
[29:08]
» The only thing that I will add alluding
to the data centers is that this is a
[29:12]
rail serve site and it's being marketed
as a rail serve site. um a data center
[29:17]
would not fit that bill and part of the
North Carolina railroad grants are to
[29:24]
recruit a rail served manufacturing or
distribution center.
[29:29]
Do you know is this is this already is
this already is this already zone heavy
[29:32]
industrial we know.
>> Yes, this site is zoned into industrial
[29:36]
and it has been incorporated into um
Brandman's ETJ. It was in their ETJ.
[29:42]
It's been incorporated.
>> Other questions? Crystal.
[29:48]
» Thank you.
>> Thank you.
[29:50]
» All right. What's the pleasure of the
board?
[29:54]
» That's in my district chairman. So, I'll
be glad to make the motion
[30:00]
to adopt the resol resolution
authorizing the county of Randolph to
[30:05]
grant funds to Asavant Real Property
Company LLC
[30:10]
for industrial site preparation and the
associated budget amendment contingent
[30:17]
on Randleman approval next week.
>> Second motion and a second. Further
[30:22]
discussion of the motion
hearing none. Those in favor of the
[30:26]
motion to approve, let it be known by
saying I.
[30:30]
» I oppose. No. And [clears throat] it's
approved. Thank you. Thank you, Liam.
[30:37]
All right. Item B, um, consider the
project amendment for Randolph Community
[30:43]
College, a U capital project ordinance,
the amount of $3 million. Th this is
[30:49]
part of a process again that's been
going on for several months in
[30:54]
discussion with the community college
and their needs. We've had public
[30:58]
meeting comments here as our board when
our two boards met. Um this this will
[31:05]
help with a couple projects and Dr.
Shaw, I would recognize Chris Yao who's
[31:10]
current chairman of Randolph Community
College Board and Reynolds Lisk who's
[31:15]
immediate past chair is in the audience
tonight and thank both of you for your
[31:20]
involvement in this. Dr. Shaw, do you
want to make a comment?
[31:24]
» Yes, sir.
[31:28]
» Please add me too to the invited guest
list. [laughter]
[31:34]
» Good afternoon. Thank you so much for
for this honor. It is indeed a pleasure
[31:40]
to say hello and to say thank you for
considering this item. Uh we made a
[31:46]
presentation this this at lunch to all
those who have given scholarships to the
[31:52]
college and the topic was this is your
college. We appreciate everybody coming
[31:58]
forward and helping but also the impact
that the college has had. So, we
[32:03]
appreciate your investment in your
community college and we're going to
[32:08]
make sure it's going to be put to great
use. Seven out of 10 individuals in in
[32:14]
Randolph County do not have an associate
degree or above.
[32:19]
So, that's my job to really change those
numbers to at least bring it up to the
[32:24]
average of the state and the neighboring
counties. So uh again any help we
[32:30]
appreciate the the promises that we will
put it to great use as for the plan that
[32:35]
we presented in detail on uh last March
and uh I'll be more than happy to
[32:42]
entertain any questions.
>> I think this helps you finish the
[32:46]
completion of remodeling of a building
and 1 million is for deferred
[32:52]
maintenance.
>> Yes sir.
[32:54]
» on the campus and various various other
structures.
[32:58]
Yes sir. Again we cannot really start as
you know for us to start any project we
[33:04]
have to show the full funding for it to
the to to our board and also to the
[33:10]
state. So as soon as you approve now on
uh on September 17th our board is going
[33:17]
to approve it. It's going to go to the
system their their meeting is in
[33:21]
October. So they will approve it and
that's going to really what is going to
[33:25]
kickstart this project and it's going to
be going back and forth. The architects,
[33:29]
the RFP and all that stuff has to go to
the state to be approved. But uh if we
[33:35]
cannot show the entire money for it, we
cannot we're not authorized to start the
[33:40]
project.
>> Any any questions of Dr. Shaw?
[33:45]
No, I'd just like to say to um any of
our citizens that might be listening at
[33:50]
home that um I think we all recognize
how critical RCC is to this to this
[33:58]
county. It drives um economic mobility
and it also drives workforce
[34:04]
development. So, thank you for the work
that's done there and thank you for
[34:09]
those that serve on that board of
trustees. Yes, it is a blessing to be
[34:13]
serving in this capacity. The economic
impact for the county last year was 142
[34:20]
million
and we appreciate that. Again, many
[34:23]
thanks to the the board and to our
trustee emmerites, Mr. Reynolds list, to
[34:28]
to always be here for the college. This
is the third time he stood up and his
[34:33]
present for the college. So, retirement
apparently he doesn't know how to do
[34:38]
that.
I I would add if some of you might not
[34:42]
be aware of such things, but in three
out of the last four years, including
[34:48]
this current year that we're in right
now, Randolph Community College has been
[34:52]
selected the number one community
college out of 56 55
[34:58]
» 58 58 community colleges in North
Carolina. It's ranked number one three
[35:04]
out of the last four years.
>> Yes, sir. Um,
[35:08]
it's something to be proud of. And
>> yes, our our nursing was uh ranked
[35:12]
number three against all colleges, all
universities, public and private.
[35:19]
» Yes.
>> So, we're talking about UNCC Chapel
[35:22]
Hill. We're talking about Duke. We're
talking about High Point University.
[35:27]
So, none of them ranked higher than us
as far as nursing. [snorts]
[35:33]
And I will I will add the structure of
this. It it's not a part of the county
[35:38]
budget. We have a capital reserve fund
in the county. That is funds that this
[35:44]
board sets aside.
When we don't fund a project that we
[35:49]
thought we were, if we underspend a
budget, we keep them. We have a fund
[35:54]
balance requirement set by this board.
Anything over that goes into our capital
[36:01]
reserve fund. So these funds are coming
from that capital reserve and not from
[36:08]
our regular county budget.
>> So that's the reason we're doing it in
[36:13]
this process as opposed to when we
adopted our budget for 2627.
[36:19]
I wanted to make that clarification
also.
[36:22]
» Yes sir. Back then I almost had a heart
attack.
[36:27]
But I appreciate I knew this board has
been always supportive of the college.
[36:32]
The reason this Friday we're going to
celebrate our 64th birthday
[36:38]
and on campus and you're all invited to
come and uh it's because of you. Again,
[36:44]
without you this college would not exist
is is clear. 64 years.
[36:51]
» All right. Any other comments from
commissioners?
[36:55]
Mr. Chairman, I just want to say we
appreciate the board's uh patience there
[37:02]
between trying to get the budget passed
and understanding if there were going to
[37:05]
be recurring funds available or not and
then determining
[37:09]
maybe there were going to be some
partnership opportunities with a state
[37:12]
budget and then the state budget passed
and there were not. And so we appreciate
[37:16]
your patience while we put this
opportunity together with
[37:19]
» Thank you. reserve
>> fun. We we trust our commissioners more
[37:22]
than anybody.
>> Yes.
[37:24]
Yes.
>> All right. Thank you, Dr. Shaw. Thank
[37:28]
you, sir.
>> Thank you, Chris Reynolds, Richard.
[37:31]
Thank you.
>> All right. What's the pleasure of the
[37:34]
board?
[37:38]
» I'll make I'd be glad to make a motion
to approve the RCC capital project
[37:42]
ordinance amendment number 19 for $3
million.
[37:46]
» Second.
>> Motion second by Commissioner Allen.
[37:50]
» Yes. Further discussion on the motion?
Those in favor, let it be known by
[37:55]
saying I.
>> I oppose. No. And it is so ordered.
[38:00]
Thank you all of you.
>> Next item. And I I want all of you to to
[38:07]
pay attention to this. Um
this is a about a lot of history for
[38:13]
Randolph County. And u I'm going to ask
U.
[38:19]
County Assistant County Manager
William Joey Johnson.
[38:25]
» Yes, sir. Mr. Chairman, thank you. In uh
January 2026, the Randolph County
[38:29]
Historic Landmark Commission designated
the original County Home Cemetery as a
[38:33]
local cultural historical site located
at present-day intersection of Carowway
[38:38]
Mountain Road and Old County Farm Road.
The site became the final resting place
[38:42]
for 405 Randolph County citizens. Local
historian Ricky Alred has researched the
[38:47]
site in depth and in 2025 published the
book the least of these caring for the
[38:53]
poor in Randolph County 1794 to 1922.
Mr. Ared has asked to place a monument
[38:59]
on the site at his expense to com
commemorate the lives of those resting
[39:03]
there. Mr. Ared has worked with WY
monuments and memorials as well as
[39:08]
county engineer Paxton authors to find
the best location for the monument. Uh
[39:12]
there's a picture of the proposed
monument on the screen there. Um if it
[39:15]
pleases the board, staff is requesting
you approve the proposed memorial and
[39:19]
the at the original county home site.
>> The site is is accessible out there and
[39:26]
it's on our historic site, is it not?
>> It is. Yes, sir.
[39:31]
» But
it's
[39:35]
it's called the potter's field in in
some areas. But um to have those folks I
[39:44]
think only one grave is actually marked.
>> That's correct. Yes sir.
[39:47]
» Identifiable right now.
>> Yes sir.
[39:50]
» So 405
of
[39:56]
unclaimed
bodies
[39:59]
are buried in that
>> in that cemetery. And
[40:04]
this seems a small amount to recognize
them. And
[40:11]
if there was any family left, which is
not likely, but um and on to Mr. Aard
[40:18]
for his willingness to to take this on
as a project is a special recogniz
[40:24]
recognition of him also. So, uh, what we
need is approval to, um, place the the
[40:32]
more memorial marker on the site.
>> Mr. Chairman, before we do that, could
[40:38]
we have Mr. Alred to stand? Sure.
Because he's here. I stand up, Ricky.
[40:43]
This is Ricky Alred. If any of you have
ever done any of the um cemetery walks
[40:48]
at the historic cemetery in Ashboro,
then Ricky's the guy who knows all about
[40:54]
all the people buried there, the spooks,
you know, whatever. He knows all that.
[40:59]
And um he's a fellow Wake Forest
graduate. So, uh that makes him a good
[41:05]
guy. But I would like to commend him for
seeing the value
[41:10]
um of this of this property, the value
of the way it was used and the value of
[41:16]
preserving it and for doing this at his
own expense. So, thank you very much,
[41:21]
Ricky, for that. And it is um an honor
for me to make the motion to approve the
[41:28]
proposed memorial at the original county
home site.
[41:33]
Do
>> I have a second?
[41:35]
Second.
>> Any other comments? And Mr. We do most
[41:40]
grateful to you for your research
[clears throat] and bringing this to our
[41:45]
attention and recognizing those long
pass.
[41:49]
Any other comments or discussion? Those
in favor, let it be known by saying I.
[41:54]
[clears throat]
>> I.
[41:55]
» I. Oppos? No.
>> And it is approved. Thank you.
[42:00]
Okay,
here's another exciting item. Our
[42:04]
property revaluation.
Deborah Hill.
[42:15]
I want y'all to see what she's carrying.
>> I promise not to read it off.
[42:24]
» Good evening.
By North Carolina, General
[42:28]
» Never. There you go.
>> By North Carolina General Statute
[42:33]
105286,
all counties must conduct a reappraisal
[42:37]
of all real property at least every
eight years. However, counties can
[42:42]
decide to advance a reappraisal of the
real property if the board of county
[42:46]
commissioners adopts a resolution
providing an advancement of the
[42:51]
reappraisal. The Randolph County, the
Randolph County Board of County
[42:57]
Commissioners has adopted a four-year
reappraisal cycle. The last reappraisal
[43:02]
was in 2023. The next reappraisal will
be effective January the 1st, 2027.
[43:09]
The reappraisal is conducted by the
Randolph County Tax Department staff. Uh
[43:15]
just some statistics. Uh the there are
28 counties left in the state that are
[43:21]
still on a 8-year cycle. Most of those
are the small mountain counties or the
[43:27]
counties down on the coast. Uh there are
72 counties that are on a shorter cycle.
[43:33]
Anywhere from a seven-year cycle to a
three-year cycle. The three-year cycle
[43:37]
is Wake County. Uh for 2027, there will
be over 30 counties in the state that
[43:45]
will be having a re uh 2027 reappraisal.
Uh that's counting all the 2026
[43:52]
uh counties that was postponed till
2027. So they're going to have to go
[43:58]
back through it plus the counties that
was already scheduled for 2027. So it's
[44:03]
going to be a busy time across the
state.
[44:06]
The uniform schedule of value standards
rules used in appraising real property
[44:11]
is to reflect the true value in money.
That's in other words, market value as
[44:16]
defined by the North Carolina General
Statute 105283.
[44:20]
The tax department appraisal staff has
spent much time analyzing sales data,
[44:26]
market trends, conducting cost studies,
and gathering income information. All of
[44:31]
this data was used to develop the
proposed 2027 schedule of values.
[44:38]
I am presenting uh the schedule of value
standards and rules for the 2027
[44:44]
countywide reappraisal of all real
property for the board's review and
[44:49]
approval. And I have attached uh a copy
of 105317 which outlines the
[44:55]
requirements for adopting the schedule
standards and rules.
[45:00]
That standard of 317
uh prescribes the uh procedure that the
[45:06]
county commissioners must adhere to for
the reappraisal process. I have attached
[45:11]
a recommended date specific timetable
for the counties for the board. The next
[45:18]
step is to have a public hearing to give
the public an opportunity to comment on
[45:22]
the true value and present use
schedules, standards, and rules to be
[45:27]
used in the 2027 reappraisal. A public
hearing must be published stating that
[45:32]
these schedule, standards, rules, and
have been submitted to the board and
[45:37]
that a copy is available for the public
inspection in the tax office. I
[45:42]
respectfully request that the board set
October 5th for the public hearing for
[45:47]
the proposed SK schedule, standards, and
rules for the 2027 reappraisal.
[45:53]
If anybody has any questions, I'll be
glad to answer.
[45:56]
» Anyone have questions?
This is based on
[46:02]
property
trans transitions.
[46:05]
» That's right. The market that's uh it's
all based off the the market trends.
[46:10]
What the
current market is reflecting. We don't
[46:13]
make the market, we follow the market.
[46:18]
» Anyone have a question?
[46:23]
» All right.
So, we are approving
[46:30]
setting a public hearing is is what what
we're Yes. That will be
[46:33]
» the next step will be the public hearing
and then
[46:35]
» October 5th. Yes. A regular October
commissioners board meeting.
[46:39]
» Yes. Yes.
Questions of Deborah?
[46:47]
» Hearing none.
>> Mr. Chairman, uh, if you're ready for a
[46:50]
motion, I'd like to make a motion to set
a public hearing for the the proposed
[46:54]
true value schedules, standards, and
rules and the present use value,
[46:58]
standards, and rules for October 5th,
2026 at the meeting starting at 6 PM.
[47:05]
Do
>> I have a second?
[47:06]
» Second.
Those
[47:11]
um present use values are sometimes
referred to as farm deferred.
[47:16]
» That is correct. That is correct. And we
do adopt them separate so that if
[47:20]
there's a challenge to either schedule,
it doesn't postpone the other one. One
[47:24]
can move forward if the other one is we
don't want to hold up one if the other
[47:29]
one is challenged. And we also Mr. Allen
is very familiar with it because he
[47:34]
serves on that uh advisory board. But we
do use the adopted schedules provided by
[47:41]
the state as our schedules for the open
land, forest land, horicultural land. We
[47:47]
use the state recommended
uh per acre value for that.
[47:53]
» I I will say serving on that board, the
forestry numbers are very good.
[47:58]
Sometimes the cash rents are based on
the agricultural lands a little bit
[48:04]
tougher and there is some discussion
about how to value the farm deferred in
[48:11]
a little bit more um fair manner uh
throughout the state. So, um, with the
[48:18]
emphasis on property taxes that the
legislaturator's given, uh, this past
[48:24]
year and and they'll be looking at it
next year, maybe we can get some funding
[48:28]
to do some studies on how to update
that.
[48:31]
» Okay. Because the cap rates are uh set
by the by the state.
[48:37]
» Yeah. Yeah. This issue has been at the
forefront of our state association and
[48:43]
local governments for the last year.
Some counties had to that had to reval
[48:50]
in 26 had to do them over. Had to redo
their budgets.
[48:53]
» Yes. And all those will have to be that
was notified in 26 will all have to be
[48:59]
renotified of their new values in 27.
It's been a big job for those counties.
[49:04]
It's been a big undertaking rolling
those values back and then they'll have
[49:09]
to proceed for 27 just like they never
had 2026.
[49:14]
» But most of that legislation or part of
it is to require local governments to
[49:19]
adopt what is called revenue neutral.
>> Yes.
[49:22]
» Our last two have been revenue neutral
in Randolph County and our tax rate
[49:28]
hadn't changed I think in 15 years. So,
we'll be watching that as we go through
[49:35]
this process next year. Further
questions and discussion.
[49:40]
Those in favor of the motion to approve,
let it be known by saying I.
[49:44]
» I.
>> I. No.
[49:47]
» Thank you.
>> Thank you.
[49:48]
» Go.
>> I shall return.
[49:52]
» Okay. Next item is a request from our
district attorney
[49:59]
Andy Gregson and our sheriff Greg
Seabolt
[50:03]
concerning an issue I think that
concerns us all.
[50:10]
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Um Andy and I
both are very concerned about what we're
[50:16]
seeing in our schools, what we're seeing
at uh coming out of these vape shops. Um
[50:23]
the level of THC that's in these
materials that kids are buying, that
[50:28]
kids are are smoking. And uh I'd like to
introduce you to a youth protection
[50:35]
initiative on the use of THC
and schedule one substances.
[50:42]
Um, have you got it loaded?
Okay.
[50:47]
We um we have SRO's that have documented
over 79 drug violations in the previous
[50:55]
school year and EMS handled 63 calls for
service so far in 2026 involving
[51:02]
patients 18 years of age or younger.
And what we're concerned about is the
[51:11]
ingredients that are in these products.
They're not regulated. Uh you don't know
[51:17]
if you're getting 03%
or 10%.
[51:24]
Um,
not only young people, but I had a
[51:28]
church couple uh that's 80 years old
that was that went by and bought a uh
[51:36]
some gummies at a vape shop and they
took one, didn't feel any any side
[51:43]
effects, took another one, and it put
her in the hospital. And um you know,
[51:49]
they're good people. They had two
daughters that were very concerned about
[51:53]
what happened. Couldn't find out what
they had taken. Finally found out they
[51:58]
stopped by the uh hemp store out here on
64 and bought some stuff for arthritis.
[52:05]
So, it it's a concern not only for our
youth, but also for uh our general
[52:11]
public. They don't know what they're
what they're taking and how much they're
[52:15]
taking. Um,
our detectives have investigated 17
[52:21]
reported juvenile overdoses in the
previous school year. And most of those
[52:27]
overdoses, the common denominator was
THC.
[52:33]
and
gummies, whether it's a vape or gummies
[52:38]
or edible
um materials,
[52:43]
they're putting unknown amounts of THC
in these uh products and it's causing a
[52:51]
problem.
And you, if you notice the products,
[52:56]
they look like um packages
that would be appealing to the youth. uh
[53:03]
very colorful
and it looks like candy. As a matter of
[53:08]
fact,
[53:11]
in reference to the overdoses,
we had um it spread throughout Randolph
[53:19]
County. Um as far as the schools are
concerned,
[53:24]
we had several up in the Trinity area,
Archdale, Randomman. I talked to a
[53:29]
teacher that made a statement if she was
not in the bathroom at Randomman
[53:36]
there'd be 75% of the females going in
vaping and they have to monitor it
[53:43]
monitor it very closely. Um
we are looking at possibly going into
[53:51]
these vape shops. We've got 33 or more
throughout Randolph County. And our
[53:59]
problem is once we go in, we have to
purchase a product. In order to find out
[54:06]
what is in that product, we're going to
have to send it off and be tested to
[54:12]
find out how much THC is in that
product. And and I know it's going to
[54:18]
vary from product to product and also
from item in that package
[54:24]
to another item in that package. You may
have five or six items in one package
[54:30]
with different amounts of THC in those.
So, we're going to have to spend some
[54:37]
money in order to do our job uh
effectively and find out how much THC is
[54:44]
in the product. And
order to do that, we we've got to know
[54:51]
that in order to config these people in
court. And I'm going to turn it over to
[54:55]
Andy and let him talk a little bit about
um what he needs as far as testing. But
[55:04]
there's a lot of convenience stores, gas
stations that are selling these products
[55:09]
uh that well even I think it's called
cratom which is uh illegal. It's uh
[55:17]
drugstore or gas station heroin. Um
you've got uh psilocybin psilocybin
[55:27]
which is a mushroom they're selling and
um we need to do something about it and
[55:34]
hopefully we can be one of the first
counties in the state. I know there's
[55:38]
couple counties down east uh new
handover and Brunswick that are hitting
[55:44]
a home run with the way they're
enforcing this. So, I'll turn it over to
[55:49]
our DA and let him explain some more.
>> Thank you, Sheriff M, Mr. Chairman,
[55:55]
county commissioners. I I don't stand in
front of you unless there is a crisis
[56:00]
and we got a crisis. Now, this crisis is
not the making of anybody in this room.
[56:06]
the the genesis of this program. I'm I'm
currently president of the Conference of
[56:11]
District Attorneys for the State, and I
was asked to go participate in a press
[56:14]
conference trying to put pressure on the
House of Representatives in North
[56:18]
Carolina to pass House Bill 328, which
simply outlawed THC products to anyone
[56:25]
under 21 and outlawed synthetic hair uh
cradle. That's it.
[56:31]
It's already been passed in the Senate.
All of our legislators supported it and
[56:36]
it could not even get out of caucus in
the house. So on the way back I was
[56:41]
pretty mad and I started calling the
sheriff and I started calling some of
[56:45]
you and say we need some help. Now the
problem is that state law allows whether
[56:50]
we like it or not
3% of THC in products. That's because
[56:56]
that's the threshold of when it becomes
intoxicating.
[57:00]
Below that it is not. It's we it's been
sold to us as therapeutic. fine up to.3
[57:05]
it's legal. The problem is, and this is
the elephant in the room, the last two
[57:10]
attorney generals, for whatever reason,
have not asked for money for the state
[57:15]
lab to test these products.
So, they have had free reign to sell all
[57:21]
kinds of stuff. When we have gone into
these places, when law enforcement has
[57:25]
gone in, they found products that
contain 10 to 20% of THC
[57:30]
on the packaging. We've also found that
they are selling products with
[57:35]
psilocybin in it, which like the sheriff
pointed out is not even arguable to be
[57:41]
legal. It's a schedule one controlled
substance under state and federal law.
[57:46]
It is a powerful hallucinogenic that
your children can walk into these retail
[57:51]
spots and buy and nobody's going to ask
any questions. It's in gummies and it's
[57:57]
in chocolate. Uh Curry back there can
give you the stats. They just seized 168
[58:02]
pounds of product with psilocybin in it
in the city of Ashboro.
[58:09]
168 pounds.
People are charged. I can't say much
[58:14]
more about that, but there are more than
50 locations we've identified selling
[58:18]
this stuff in this county. I would
challenge anybody in this room to tell
[58:22]
me how many grocery stores we got and
compare that. We've got 51 at least
[58:27]
retail places we know of selling this
stuff.
[58:31]
And we know from the packaging, from the
lab reports they have, very little of it
[58:36]
is in compliance with the law. Now, the
problem is that we can't do everything.
[58:43]
But when our children start overdosing,
you just heard the numbers. It's worse
[58:47]
than that. The day reporting center for
juveniles tells me that almost every
[58:52]
single juvenile that comes through their
doors is addicted to or is abusing THC
[58:56]
products, primarily vapes.
My prosecutors in juvenile court tell me
[59:02]
that almost every single court involved
juvenile has a THC problem. You heard
[59:08]
about the overdoses. You heard about uh
the calls for service just this week at
[59:13]
Ashboro on the first day of school. We
arrested a student with THC vapes
[59:19]
selling it to his colleagues at school.
Where'd he get it? He walked into one of
[59:25]
these stores and bought it because there
is nothing to keep a 13-year-old from
[59:29]
buying this stuff.
And to make matters worse, some of this
[59:33]
stuff doesn't just have THC or
psilocybin or something else in it. It
[59:37]
has mercury, pesticides, because it's
coming from China.
[59:42]
Okay? So, the feds are uh working on
this with us, state agencies, but the
[59:48]
elephant in the room is the last two
attorney generals have not done their
[59:52]
job. We've had this crisis in this state
for many years, and there's not been one
[59:58]
single request to increase the state lab
funding. I can't do anything about that.
[1:00:03]
You can't do anything about it. But we
have a chance for us if you will
[1:00:07]
graciously allow us some money to test
these products. I have uh entered into
[1:00:12]
verbal agreements with two certified
labs that we can make $100,000 get us
[1:00:18]
about 400 tests and it's not it's it's
not going to fix the problem but maybe
[1:00:25]
it'll put some people on notice to stop
selling to kids. I will say that the
[1:00:29]
DA's are pressing the legislature to
give whether the AG asked for it or not
[1:00:35]
to give some money to the lab so they
can gear up and test these THC products.
[1:00:40]
They are challenging to test because
you're talking about small gummies,
[1:00:44]
small vapes. It's it's not an easy
thing. I get that. But it's been a
[1:00:49]
crisis throughout the state. Now, I will
say that we don't have a problem that's
[1:00:54]
any worse probably than any uh where
else. But consistent with the sheriff's
[1:00:58]
philosophy and my philosophy, we're just
not going to tolerate it. And I've stood
[1:01:02]
before you and said that before is you
get more of what you tolerate,
[1:01:06]
especially from criminals. And so the
decision is we going to just look the
[1:01:10]
other way and say, "Oh, well, state
doesn't test it. We're not going to do
[1:01:13]
anything or will you join us and and
give us $100,000 that we'll spend. We'll
[1:01:18]
invoice the county. You can see all the
invoices. It's going to be forensic labs
[1:01:23]
so that we can test these products and
quite frankly charge and prosecute some
[1:01:29]
people. So that's what we're here for.
It's a crisis. I'm able to I'm I'm glad
[1:01:34]
to answer. I'm sure the sheriff is. um
any questions you have, but we're
[1:01:38]
working very very closely together. I I
appreciate he's he's already dedicated a
[1:01:44]
lot of uh resources to it. Uh it's going
to stretch us a little bit in the DA's
[1:01:48]
office. Um but that's okay. This is
worth it because we're primarily
[1:01:52]
concerned about the children. So I I'm
I'm happy to answer any questions.
[1:01:59]
» This testing [clears throat] clear would
be used by the sheriff's department as
[1:02:02]
well as all our law enforcement agencies
in Randolph County. all the
[1:02:06]
municipalities working together
>> used by our entities that are helping us
[1:02:11]
with our undercover operations and um
yes it be used for that reason of
[1:02:19]
testing.
[1:02:24]
» So which is in the weeds a little bit.
So specifically you're saying
[1:02:29]
Ashboro PD has some stuff that needs to
be tested right now. No, [laughter] the
[1:02:33]
schedule one, anything that anything
that is not schedule six, the state lab
[1:02:37]
will test. So you don't have to worry
about the psilocyic psilocybin schedule
[1:02:40]
one.
>> Okay. So that's
[1:02:41]
» so that that the state lab that'll go to
the state lab. Um what we're talking
[1:02:45]
about is specifically THC in gummy,
vape, and candy form that the state lab
[1:02:53]
does not have the ability to test.
[1:02:58]
» If you go ahead,
>> do you remember how much it was
[1:03:01]
I mean, I was at the presentation, but
I've forgotten to There were two
[1:03:06]
different prices. It was much higher for
testing the gummies than it was for
[1:03:11]
testing vapes.
>> It It's actually based on what type of
[1:03:15]
quantification you want. If it we have
found a lab in Raleigh that will do a
[1:03:20]
test that tells us it is more than three
times the state limit. That is $75 per
[1:03:27]
item. There is a state accredited lab
and federal accredited lab in Winston
[1:03:32]
Salem that will quantify exactly how
much of the the item is THC for $263 an
[1:03:40]
item. They that also includes litigation
expenses. They will send a forensic
[1:03:45]
scientist here to testify if we need it.
>> And if uh a death if there's a death
[1:03:52]
involved in the case, we may want to go
that route,
[1:03:55]
» you know, through Winston Salem. Um, but
we would probably utilize the $75
[1:04:03]
price initially much as we can. We want
to make the money go far. I will say the
[1:04:09]
legislature has told the DAs that they
they understand this is a problem with a
[1:04:13]
state lab. So, this is not going to be a
recurring uh uh request. We hope the
[1:04:17]
state lab's going to get the funding
they need to test this like every other
[1:04:22]
drug they test.
And it not not only affects this, it
[1:04:27]
affects EMS. It affects these other
departments and the families that
[1:04:31]
they're working with every day.
>> Yes, sir.
[1:04:35]
» It's um
>> it doesn't know any boundaries. C
[1:04:37]
» can I just say that one thing the
sheriff said, which is a great point.
[1:04:41]
When we talk to the parents in juvenile
court,
[1:04:45]
they say to us, "Well, h how is this
harming my child when he can walk into a
[1:04:50]
brightly lit store,
>> right,
[1:04:53]
» in a strip mall beside Walmart and buy
this product? How can it be harmful? How
[1:04:58]
can it be illegal?
>> They can buy it in sheets."
[1:05:00]
» Yeah.
>> Yeah. It's because we've not been able
[1:05:04]
to test these products and we've allowed
the wild west to spring up and people
[1:05:09]
have gotten used to making money off of
it.
[1:05:12]
» So when we and you can't divulge, can't
say anything, just say I can't. But when
[1:05:17]
we test these products, is this going
after the manufacturers, going after the
[1:05:21]
sellers selling it here or both?
>> Well, I'm a little greedy. I want to go
[1:05:26]
after them all.
>> Okay, that's good. Do it. But but I mean
[1:05:30]
it will be dictated by what we get, how
good the buy is, what we seize, what
[1:05:37]
records we find. And it and I want to
stress, I've already heard from some of
[1:05:40]
these vendors that they're running legal
businesses. If you're running a legal
[1:05:44]
business, you got nothing to worry
about. But if you're selling products
[1:05:48]
that violate state law, then yeah, I
think you probably ought to be a little
[1:05:51]
worried
if we get the money to test.
[1:05:56]
» Can I ask you a quick question? We've
spoke a couple of times about the the
[1:05:59]
funding and and how it might be achieved
and I heard you talk a minute ago about
[1:06:04]
all the agencies maybe having the
availability to tap into this. Would we
[1:06:09]
have a way to centralize the the the the
invoices from that come through your
[1:06:12]
office and then to us to to pay?
>> No, sir. What what will happen when law
[1:06:16]
enforcement takes these items to the
lab, they will uh invoice whoever you
[1:06:22]
tell us to at the county and you will
get an official invoice which will show
[1:06:28]
the items and the officer requesting it.
And I want to point out to you that um
[1:06:33]
you know what my hope is is that we get
some seizures out of this and we're able
[1:06:37]
to replenish the fund. And um I I will
say we've gotten buy in not only of
[1:06:43]
course from the sheriff but from all of
the agencies that every single agency in
[1:06:47]
the county including the state agencies
who I'm not going to name know that we
[1:06:52]
have a problem. We just had a meeting
the other day of about 40 stakeholders
[1:06:57]
uh uh getting ready for this.
>> What we'll have to do is just try to
[1:07:03]
monitor that if you all are awarded
funding as it's drawn down. I don't want
[1:07:07]
one agency to go submit a whole bunch of
tests and and other folks don't have
[1:07:11]
that opportunity.
>> The agencies are working together.
[1:07:15]
» Mr. Holden, that's a great point. And
the agencies have agreed to a general
[1:07:19]
outline of a plan and everybody is on
board about how we proceed and how many
[1:07:25]
items we seize.
[1:07:31]
Well, um
you will note on the the motion the
[1:07:38]
recommended motion, it refers to the
strategic planning funds. Uh, I would
[1:07:43]
just point out on our consent agenda
tonight, our recent check from um
[1:07:50]
um wealth management, I mean from uh
waste management is for $357,682.
[1:08:00]
That's the second contract we have with
them. And that money goes into the um uh
[1:08:07]
strategic planning fund. And I think we
had about
[1:08:11]
close to 300,000 left in there from last
year's. But this is the first time we've
[1:08:18]
had opportunity to use strategic
planning funds in this kind of setting
[1:08:22]
or this kind of a issue.
>> Yes, sir.
[1:08:26]
» Mainly it's been for nonprofits,
>> but all the nonprofits are dealing with
[1:08:31]
the issue.
>> Yes, sir. If I could just say, I think
[1:08:36]
um I think that doing this would send a
strong message about the value of public
[1:08:43]
health in Randolph County, about um the
value of our of our youth. I think it
[1:08:52]
would send a message to our legislators
to hey, get together and let's let's
[1:08:58]
raise that age to 21.
um and let's monitor these shops.
[1:09:04]
Um so, u I think it would send I think
it would send a message because I
[1:09:10]
certainly know the decisions they make
send me messages and so I think we can
[1:09:15]
send a message with this. So,
if you're ready for a motion, I'll make
[1:09:21]
one. But if you want more discussion,
I'll be quiet.
[1:09:24]
» Well, I I will say um I serve on the
Trillium Government Board and and down
[1:09:29]
in more uh more in Dair County. uh they
have commission there has adopted an
[1:09:37]
ordinance regarding cratom uh and the
the regulating the the sale of I guess
[1:09:43]
they have kind of stepped in and done
what the state was looking to do as far
[1:09:48]
as goes. Um I don't know that something
we would look at that but I don't know
[1:09:53]
how I don't know how that's going to
be enforceable down there but they have
[1:09:59]
they've evidently seen the issue in uh
in Dair County and I don't think in Dair
[1:10:03]
County necessarily being uh a hotbed for
that kind of thing really you think that
[1:10:08]
being more vacation destination so
>> uh there are other counties are dealing
[1:10:12]
with this other than you know
>> just us
[1:10:16]
» and then taking more more extreme
measures
[1:10:20]
um to regulate,
>> right?
[1:10:26]
» Yes. Since I'm on since this is
discussed fairly often at state child
[1:10:31]
fatality task force, I would like to
make the motion. I'd like to make a
[1:10:36]
motion uh that we approve the $100,000
request
[1:10:43]
for strategic planning funds from the
our district attorney and sheriff
[1:10:50]
And did you include you did say plan?
>> Is there a second to the motion? Second.
[1:10:56]
Second.
>> We have two seconds.
[1:11:00]
» Further discussion
funding. Everybody understands what
[1:11:05]
we're doing.
Those in favor of the motion to approve,
[1:11:09]
let it be known by saying I. I. Post.
No.
[1:11:14]
» Make it work, guys.
>> Thank you.
[1:11:16]
» Thank you very much. I mean that. Thank
you,
[1:11:18]
» sir.
>> Have at it, guys.
[1:11:23]
» Okay. Next is update on our building
inspection fees. David, welcome.
[1:11:30]
» Good evening, uh, commissioners,
chairman. Um,
[1:11:34]
on Senate Bill 247, the North Carolina
General Assembly has uh implemented a uh
[1:11:41]
significant administrative restructuring
within the state budget
[1:11:45]
which will take effect on uh January
1st, 27.
[1:11:50]
This change involves the transfer of all
building code administration,
[1:11:54]
interpretation functions, appeals, and
personnel from the office of state fire
[1:11:58]
marshal um and the department of
insurance to the newly established
[1:12:03]
building codes and interpretations
bureau within the department of labor.
[1:12:07]
To support this new bureau, legislature
has introduced a regulatory fee
[1:12:12]
framework for the state building code
designated lo local municipal and county
[1:12:18]
inspection departments as the primary
agents for fee collection.
[1:12:22]
This memorandum serves to clarify the
procedures for collecting, tracking, and
[1:12:27]
remmening specific regulatory fees
associated with local building permits.
[1:12:32]
These fees are collected on behalf of
the state of North Carolina building
[1:12:36]
codes and interpretation bureau which is
part of the reorganization that transfer
[1:12:41]
building code enforcement oversight to
the North Carolina Department of Labor.
[1:12:46]
This process will not affect the
operating budget of local governments um
[1:12:51]
as
as the uh local inspection departments
[1:12:55]
are function solely to collect agents or
collect fees for the state. However, it
[1:13:01]
will increase the budget.
And a sample on the permit fees here is
[1:13:07]
like a standard home.
Our standard 1,200 foot home is $630.
[1:13:15]
The statemandated fee is going to be 25.
The electrical building and plumbing
[1:13:20]
permits, each one's going to have a $10
fee. So the statemandated fee on
[1:13:28]
that total would be $55. A commercial
permit is is about the same. $100 for
[1:13:35]
the state permit and then $10 for
electrical plumbing and mechanical. Now
[1:13:41]
the bad thing is like some commercial
buildings, you know, we only do like $60
[1:13:46]
permit fee. So the state's going to be a
$100 fee in addition to that. And same
[1:13:52]
with uh um demo permits and stuff like
that. Anything related to the building
[1:13:59]
code gets these fees.
Um so a commercial permit fees 100.
[1:14:05]
Residential permit fees are 25 and this
is all for general construction permits.
[1:14:10]
Mechanical electrical and plumbing is
10. And residential demos and commercial
[1:14:16]
demos are 25 and $100 respectively.
Um just in July
[1:14:25]
we figured up the fees it's going to be
11 $111,000 for the month of July you
[1:14:30]
have to submit to the state. So overall
it's going to be roughly between 100
[1:14:35]
$130,000
in annual uh fees to the state.
[1:14:41]
» So is that the state's portion David or
is that
[1:14:44]
» that's just the state's portion? Hey, we
we we do the general uh homeowners
[1:14:49]
recovery fund, which is a $1 portion to
us and $9 to the state. That's not
[1:14:55]
included in this, but this uh fee here
goes all of it goes to the state.
[1:15:02]
» Do you have the I guess if you're doing
that, I guess you got you got the
[1:15:07]
capability of through your system just
to add these fees so it's not a as bad
[1:15:13]
as it could have been. Yeah, we've been
working with it. Got it in test now. So,
[1:15:17]
we're going to test it out and make sure
everything's right and then start it up
[1:15:22]
uh January 1st 27.
[1:15:27]
» This doesn't require action on our
board, but what this is make putting us
[1:15:31]
in compliance with the state mandated
changes.
[1:15:36]
» Yeah. And I know um Joey had said maybe
posted on the website the uh fee
[1:15:43]
schedule. We just put it out there. You
know, they can call the Department of
[1:15:47]
Labor, senators, or whoever approved it
is are
[1:15:51]
» where they need to call.
>> If they're not happy.
[1:15:53]
» No,
>> don't call us. We didn't do it.
[1:15:56]
» Are these in effect right now?
>> No. January 2.
[1:15:59]
» January 1st. [clears throat]
>> Yeah.
[1:16:04]
» All right.
>> Yeah, Mr. Chairman, you hit it on the
[1:16:06]
head. There's no action needed on your
behalf. We just felt we needed to
[1:16:09]
publicly acknowledge that the fees are
going up and that we had nothing to do
[1:16:13]
with it.
>> Right.
[1:16:16]
» Any other questions of David?
>> Thank you. Appreciate it.
[1:16:22]
» Okay. Last agenda item is a proposal for
the McGill Engineering for the waterline
[1:16:27]
design at 0421 Liberty.
>> Good evening. Uh two months ago, I came
[1:16:35]
before him and presented a resolution uh
which authorized the county manager to
[1:16:39]
enter into an interlocal agreement with
Liberty uh to enable us to build a water
[1:16:44]
line and sell water to Liberty by
willing it through Greensboro system.
[1:16:48]
You approved that resolution. So, I'm
here to take the follow-up steps. Uh
[1:16:52]
previously we did a preliminary
engineering report with McGill
[1:16:56]
Engineering where they pro they looked
at the best route for this water line
[1:17:00]
and they proposed coming off of uh
Greenspurs water tank there at Toyota
[1:17:04]
setting a meter vault at an adjacent
parcel that the county still owns and
[1:17:08]
then going south down Highway 421 to tie
into Liberty system. We then did a
[1:17:15]
follow-up hydraulic uh study to model
that line to make sure that it was
[1:17:20]
capable of, you know, filling Liberty's
tanks. And it found that it was that it
[1:17:24]
was capable of a 12-in line could
provide 1 million gallons per day of
[1:17:29]
water to Liberty. And it gave a
estimated cost of $4.9 million. So we
[1:17:35]
now have asked Miguel to give us a
actual full design which include the
[1:17:40]
planning, the surveying, the permitting
and helping us bid and doing
[1:17:44]
construction administration. Uh the
total cost of this service is $394,000
[1:17:50]
and well $500. Uh we also have a budget
adjustment tonight of that amount plus
[1:17:56]
an additional 5% which brings it to
$414,225.
[1:18:02]
And with that, I will ask that you
approve a contract with McGill
[1:18:05]
Engineering for design, bidding, and
construction administration of a water
[1:18:09]
line along Old 421 at a cost of $494,500
that you authorize the county manager to
[1:18:16]
approve the contract and that you uh
approve the associated budget
[1:18:21]
adjustment. I'll be glad to answer any
questions.
[1:18:24]
I I'll just make a note to who whoever
wants to make the motion that the actual
[1:18:29]
amount for the budget amendment is
414,225
[1:18:35]
not not the 394 that that's listed that
includes the contingency, right?
[1:18:40]
» Yes, that's yes, we have a a change
order policy which enables authorizes
[1:18:46]
the county manager to approve up to 5%.
However, if we don't go ahead and and
[1:18:50]
fund that, it would sort of defeat the
purpose. So
[1:18:53]
» we're asking
>> is this integrated anyway in what what
[1:18:57]
Greensboro's plans are or for the the
bigger the bigger
[1:19:02]
» project?
>> We are working with Liberty and
[1:19:05]
Greensboro now Greensboro and Liberty
are doing a interlocal agreement you
[1:19:10]
know to to wheel that water through
their system and and uh and then we're
[1:19:14]
doing an interlocal agreement with
Liberty to actually sell them our our
[1:19:18]
water from the Pedmont Triad Water
Authority. Right.
[1:19:23]
» You know what Liberty's water usage is
now per day? If this is going to give
[1:19:27]
them a million dollar a million gallons,
what you know how much you're using now?
[1:19:32]
» They're using around 250,000 gallons a
day.
[1:19:35]
» So this plenty of
>> Yeah, that gives plenty for future
[1:19:39]
» growth. Okay.
Commissioner Allen that the also the
[1:19:44]
goal the the in intention is to give
them a redundant water supply in the
[1:19:48]
future and and bring water up 49 um and
supply them from the south side with
[1:19:54]
primarily water coming through 64
through the southern way and having
[1:19:58]
essentially the Greensboro connection
simply be an emergency redundant
[1:20:02]
connection. What we're doing here is
>> an an immediate effort to try to get
[1:20:06]
them off of their wells. We saw an issue
over the past couple of weekends where
[1:20:10]
they've had some failures and and that's
really strained their wells and taken to
[1:20:14]
the point where they're having to put
restrictions on their existing customers
[1:20:18]
which certainly doesn't allow future
capacity and growth. So, um all of these
[1:20:22]
funds are coming from the the state
funding that was allocated for
[1:20:26]
infrastructure development to try to get
our uh municipalities better
[1:20:30]
interconnected and and sustainable for
long-term growth.
[1:20:36]
» Question. Any other questions?
What's the pleasure of the board?
[1:20:40]
» Mr. Chairman, that's my neck of the
woods. Uh, so I'll make a motion to
[1:20:44]
approve the contract proposal from
McGill Engineering for the design build
[1:20:48]
bid and construction administration of
waterline along 0421 at a cost of
[1:20:55]
$414,225.
[1:20:58]
Authorize the county manager to sign a
contract and approve the associated
[1:21:01]
budget amendment.
>> Do I have a second?
[1:21:05]
» Second. And I I'll just offer a
clarifying thing and I think Paxton
[1:21:09]
mentioned it a minute ago, but the
contract itself is
[1:21:12]
» 395. Okay. Okay. So, we need 3945.
>> All right. I'll just my
[1:21:19]
» motion.
Yep.
[1:21:23]
» Further comments, questions.
Those in favor, let it be known by
[1:21:27]
saying I.
>> I oppose. No. And it's approved.
[1:21:32]
» Thank you.
>> Thank you, Paxton. All right. This
[1:21:35]
concludes our posted agenda for tonight.
Uh, County Manager, do you have any
[1:21:41]
comments or
>> Uh, a couple of things I just wanted to
[1:21:44]
bring attention to. U, one, thank you
for everybody being here on a Tuesday.
[1:21:48]
This worked out really well. I know
staff prefers coming in on a Tuesday
[1:21:51]
night after a Monday, not a Tuesday
night after a Labor Day. Um,
[1:21:57]
well done. I don't know that the
calendar is going to set up perfectly
[1:22:00]
for us to do this all the time, but it
worked out really well this year and we
[1:22:03]
appreciate it. Um,
I wanted to mention I've had a couple of
[1:22:08]
folks ask me about when the upcoming
chamber retreat would be. The Ashran
[1:22:13]
Chamber doesn't do their traditional
retreat to Myrtle Beach like they did in
[1:22:16]
the past. They now do a a chamber chair
celebration and so that is coming up in
[1:22:21]
October. Um, this is the hundth year of
the Ashan Chamber and so they're doing
[1:22:26]
two events. One on October 15th which is
a Thursday evening that'll be at AVS. I
[1:22:32]
I'll get details to the commissioner so
Hopewood doesn't have to write them all
[1:22:36]
down right now. Um and then the
following day, the 15th at the A Center,
[1:22:40]
we'll have an the the actual kind of
retreat day, which will be the the um
[1:22:47]
the chamber chair celebration is what
they call it now. It's a little harder
[1:22:51]
than retreat. Sorry. Um but I'll get
details to you all. I just wanted to
[1:22:55]
give you a heads up that that's coming
because I have had a couple of questions
[1:22:58]
about upcoming opportunities to interact
with the chamber. That's it.
[1:23:03]
Commissioners updates.
[clears throat] I would um we had our
[1:23:09]
annual state conference in Durham County
a couple weeks ago and Commissioner
[1:23:13]
Allen was um duty elected by the body to
second vice president of state
[1:23:20]
association which will put him in line
to be the president in about four years.
[1:23:25]
So
>> if I can get two two more two more
[1:23:28]
elections. Yeah. So just make that any
other one. [applause]
[1:23:37]
» Any other commissioners have anything?
>> I just also like to point out again that
[1:23:41]
our wellness team uh presented what how
we got to the place that we have the
[1:23:47]
program that we have now. So they they
presented Sam Barner and Ashley Dugens
[1:23:53]
and uh Christy Wallace. So they did a a
great job. represented Randolph County
[1:23:58]
really well. And then our um Randolph
County opioid settlement technical
[1:24:05]
assistance team won a civic award. A few
of those were given out across our state
[1:24:13]
and so they were recognized for the
outstanding work they've done. Uh
[1:24:17]
Michael over here has been part of that
team. So, um, so we have those two and
[1:24:23]
then we had, um, our chairman in one of
the sessions helping, you know, on a
[1:24:29]
panel. And so, I just felt proud of
Randolph County. And hope was on our
[1:24:35]
initiative, which was the our our I call
it our urgent care facility for county
[1:24:40]
employees. That's really playing
[clears throat] great dividends. And we
[1:24:45]
got a lot of feedback on that. I wish I
told our director if we'd had a little
[1:24:50]
more publicity, I think more of the
counties would have been interested in
[1:24:53]
what what was discussed at that uh at
that session. But overall, it was a good
[1:24:58]
session and um well attended. I think
originally had 89 of 100 counties that
[1:25:04]
were registered for that event.
>> Some of the feedback I got from people
[1:25:10]
that were not in the session was they
knew their county couldn't afford it.
[1:25:16]
So, so why come into that session and
it's like how can you
[1:25:21]
» how can you not afford it? If you look
at the level at which we've been able to
[1:25:26]
ensure our employees and how much we've
saved by doing that, it has more
[1:25:32]
uh far more than paid for the program.
So, um so maybe there'll be counties
[1:25:39]
that will look into it, implement some
parts of it. Uh we didn't get where we
[1:25:44]
are overnight. Um, it's taken some
developments. So, so we'll see.
[1:25:50]
» All right. Any other comments? Do I have
a motion to adjurnn?
[1:25:54]
» Move.
>> We are ajourned. Thank all of you. Be
[1:25:58]
safe. Thank you again for your
participation.
[1:26:13]
» They've already had guys.