Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[13:28]
Order of business like bow your head
please. Most gracious heavenly father we
[13:32]
come here again today celebrating the
blessings that you so generously give us
[13:37]
each and every day. We just pray Lord
for those that are less fortunate, those
[13:41]
who may not have the means that they
need to see about their daily lives and
[13:45]
just ask that we be able to do things to
help enhance their lives, the quality of
[13:50]
their lives. We pray Lord and thanks for
th this this country for what it stands
[13:56]
for. We pray Lord that we might have
your guidance to help us in things that
[14:02]
we need improvement on and celebrate the
things that have been fruitful for us
[14:07]
all. We ask these things in your name.
Amen.
[14:09]
» Amen.
[14:16]
» I pledge algiance to the flag of the
United States of America and to the
[14:21]
republic for which it stands, one nation
under God, indivisible, with liberty and
[14:28]
justice for all.
[14:37]
The next item is the adoption of the
business agenda. Everybody's had an
[14:42]
opportunity to review it. If there's no
need to make any changes in it when
[14:47]
someone feels so led, we need a motion
to approve it as it is.
[14:52]
» May I'll make a motion to adopt the
business agenda as presented.
[14:57]
» Second.
>> Have a motion by Mr. Stain, second by
[15:00]
Mr. Bale. Is there any more discussion
on the matter? There being none, all in
[15:05]
favor signify by saying I. I.
>> All oppose, no. The agenda will be
[15:09]
approved as it is presented. Um, item
four is special recognitions. I call on
[15:15]
uh Chief Cook.
[15:23]
Good evening, Chief.
[15:26]
Good evening, mayor, council, citizens,
and guests.
[15:30]
For those of you who may not know me, my
name is Richard Cook. I'm the fire chief
[15:34]
of Rapids Fire Department.
It is my pleasure tonight to present our
[15:39]
promotions and newly hired firefighters
thus far in 2026.
[15:44]
At this time, I'd like to ask Brian
Hollowell, Will Harris, Chris Boyin,
[15:48]
Jared Lynch, Seth Mathy, and Matthew
Pierce please come forward.
[16:06]
Each of the me each of these men with
the support of their families and fellow
[16:10]
firefighters has worked tirelessly
toward achieving their goals.
[16:15]
Their dedication, commitment, and
willingness to serve our community
[16:19]
are qualities that we are proud to
recognize. Tonight is my privilege to
[16:24]
recognize each of them and congratulate
them on their accomplishments.
[16:31]
Brian Hollowell began his employment
with City of Rapids on September 2nd,
[16:35]
2008, working with public works
department. On March 17th, 2009, he
[16:41]
transferred to the fire department where
he had the opportunity to work alongside
[16:44]
his brother Kenneth.
Brian was promoted to engineer on
[16:49]
January 15th, 2013 and lieutenant on
July 12th, 2016.
[16:57]
He holds credentials as a North Carolina
EMT,
[17:02]
firefighter 1 and two, driver operator
pumps and aerials, fire officer one and
[17:07]
two, fire instructor, and fire
investigation technician. the only one
[17:13]
in our department. I'll say
[17:17]
throughout his career, Brian has earned
the respect of his peers
[17:22]
through his extensive knowledge of our
apparatus and his dedication to the
[17:26]
department and his strong work ethic.
Tonight, it is my pleasure to recognize
[17:32]
Brian for his years of service and
dedication to the city of Ronald Rapids
[17:36]
and to announce his promotion to
assistant chief of operations. Brian,
[17:41]
congratulations on your well-deserved
promotion.
[17:47]
[applause]
[17:52]
At this time, I'd like to ask Brian's
wife, Jordan, and his daughters,
[17:57]
Ellie,
is Aubrey Aub Aubrey
[18:02]
to please come forward and prize on
Brown's new badge on. And don't forget
[18:06]
Charlie, the littlest one.
[18:15]
decided not to. Oh, there she comes.
>> Here she comes.
[18:41]
Good job.
>> Good job.
[18:55]
Will [snorts] Harris began his career
with the Ronald Rapids Fire Department
[18:57]
on November 27th, 2017. Proudly
following in the footsteps of his father
[19:02]
BJ Harris, battalion chief of B shield,
Will was promoted to engineer on January
[19:08]
19th, 2020.
He holds credentials as a North Carolina
[19:13]
emergency medical technician,
firefighter one and two, driver operator
[19:18]
pumps and aerials, fire officer one and
two, and as a qualified fire instructor.
[19:23]
Will also serves as a chairman of our
training committee. Will has earned
[19:28]
respect of his peers through his
knowledge, enthusiasm, and consistently
[19:32]
positive attitude. It is my pleasure to
announce the promotion of Will Harris to
[19:37]
the rank of lieutenant. Congratulations,
WILL. [applause]
[19:46]
At this time, I invite Will's brother,
Maul Carris, also a firefighter with
[19:50]
Gaston Fire and Rescue, to come forward
and pin on Will's badge.
[19:55]
Here
[20:06]
we go.
[20:26]
Chris Boyin graduated the Nash Fire
Academy in December 2023. He began his
[20:31]
career with the Runt Rapids Fire
Department on April 22nd, 2024.
[20:36]
He is North Carolina certified
firefighter 1 and two and he is
[20:40]
currently working towards his drive
operator pumps and aerial certification.
[20:44]
Chris is assigned to CE shift and has
quickly proven himself through his
[20:47]
professionalism, commitment and strong
work ethic. It is my pleasure to
[20:51]
announce the promotion of Chris Boyin to
the rank of engineer. Congratulations,
[20:56]
CHRIS.
[applause]
[21:04]
At this time, I' I'd invite Chris's
fiance, Cheyenne Price, to come forward
[21:08]
and pin his new badge.
[21:29]
» [clears throat]
[21:37]
» Jerry Lynch began his career with the
Ron Rapids Fire Department on May 19th,
[21:41]
2014, working his way up to engineer and
eventually step-up lieutenant prior to
[21:45]
his departure on October in October of
2023.
[21:53]
[laughter]
[21:55]
Our department proudly welcomed Jared's
return on February 9th, 2026. He holds
[22:01]
credentials as a North Carolina
emergency medical responder firefighter
[22:05]
1 and two driver operator pumps and
aerials.
[22:09]
Jarrett is currently assigned to a shift
and has quickly reaffirmed his value
[22:13]
through his professionalism, team work,
and strong work ethic. It is my pleasure
[22:17]
to announce the promotion of Jerry Lynch
to the rank of engineer.
[22:21]
Congratulations, Jared.
[22:25]
[applause]
[22:29]
At this time, I invite Jared's mom,
Trina Lynch, to come forward and pin
[22:33]
Jerry's new bag.
[22:49]
I'm not
[23:06]
Seth Mafy graduated the Nash Fire
Academy in June of 2022 and began his
[23:11]
career with the Runner Rapids Fire
Department on March 9th, 2026. He is a
[23:15]
credentialed as a North Carolina
emergency medical technician and
[23:18]
firefighter 1 and two. Seth is currently
assigned to a shift under Battalion
[23:24]
Chief Gray. It is my pleasure to
introduce firefighter Seth Mafy.
[23:30]
[applause]
[23:34]
At this time, I invite Battalion Chief
Tim Gray to come forward and pin self's
[23:38]
badge.
[24:05]
Matthew Pierce began his career with the
Ronald Rapids Fire Department on August
[24:09]
23rd, 2026. He is a credentialed as a
North Carolina emergency medical
[24:14]
technician and has his firefighter 1 and
two. Currently is assigned a C shift
[24:18]
under Battalion Chief Chris Hov. It is
my pleasure to introduce Matthew Pierce.
[24:23]
[applause]
[24:28]
At this time, I invite Matthew's wife,
Morgan Paris, to come forward and pin
[24:32]
his new badge.
[24:54]
If you will give these gentlemen another
round of applause.
[24:59]
[applause]
[25:08]
» Thank you guys. Yes, sir.
>> Thank you, chief.
[25:13]
» All right.
So, that concludes special recognition.
[25:18]
I've actually got one more item of
business I need to talk about.
[25:26]
Where's my paper?
[25:36]
So, as you know, we've been having
more issues with vacant buildings in
[25:44]
inside the city of Rapids.
These buildings pose a threat to our
[25:49]
firefighters
um and in some cases a threat to the
[25:53]
public.
Um, we've had cases where we've had
[25:57]
squatters in some of the buildings. As a
matter of fact,
[26:01]
yesterday I was in two of the buildings
along with the PD obtaining evidence out
[26:06]
of those out of said buildings that it
was really I can tell you from being in
[26:10]
there, it was not safe for us to be in
there.
[26:14]
Um,
[26:17]
I know nobody here has actually crawled
around in a smoke filled room and tried
[26:22]
to navigate their way through something
like that in 70 lbs worth of gear. Um,
[26:28]
but they pose a great threat to our
firefighters. And with it with there
[26:33]
being more and more of them, they're
getting harder and harder to identify.
[26:38]
The
2018 version of the International Fire
[26:43]
Code, which is the version that North
Carolina is currently using, does state
[26:47]
that the fire department has the
authority to inspect the building. The
[26:52]
fire marshall, if he deems the building
unsafe, then the building can be marked.
[26:59]
This right here is how the building
should be marked.
[27:03]
At every entrance, it is reflected.
We intend probably starting next week to
[27:10]
start inspections
and we're going to start posting these
[27:14]
signs. Now, the reason for this is is
when our officers back there pull up and
[27:20]
they see this sign, then they know it's
a no-go bill. Unless they act, unless
[27:26]
they absolutely have to, they see
somebody, you know, they see somebody at
[27:31]
the window, obviously they're going to
save them. That's what they're trained
[27:33]
to do. uh but they're not going to enter
the building if they don't have to
[27:39]
because it is unsafe for them.
Um in years past, the way we've gone
[27:45]
about this
um in years past, the way we've gone
[27:50]
about this is there's always been an
understanding that we had buildings that
[27:54]
were no-go buildings. You just you just
do not enter them. The problem with that
[27:58]
is there's getting to me more and more
of them and it's hard to keep track of
[28:01]
what's what. And specifically, I'll
mention the 200 block of Avenue. There's
[28:07]
several buildings in the 200 block of
the Avenue that that it's not safe for
[28:10]
us to go in. Um, we've recently had an
incident where power was being stolen
[28:16]
from one building to the other and I
don't know why it didn't cause a fire.
[28:19]
It it was caught.
Um, we've gone so far as to help out and
[28:24]
try to secure those buildings. Um, as a
matter of fact, we put a chain last week
[28:28]
on people's theater. Um, I was called
yesterday morning and we went and the
[28:34]
chain had been cut. We're doing
everything we can to keep people out
[28:38]
because we don't want to have to risk
the lives of these men back here.
[28:42]
But we're starting to get backed up
against the wall. So, this is our remedy
[28:49]
to that is we at least we can post it.
You know, we're going to continue to do
[28:53]
everything we can to keep people out of
those buildings um because it's not safe
[28:58]
for them.
But, you know, this allows our people
[29:03]
when they get there at 3:00 in the
morning, because eventually one of these
[29:06]
buildings is going to burn. When they
get there at 3:00 in the morning and
[29:09]
they see that big red X at the entrance,
which is what the code states that it
[29:13]
actually is posted at the entrance, then
they know it's a no-go building. So, we
[29:19]
intend to start that probably next week.
Um, if everything works out.
[29:25]
» Is that just for commercial buildings?
>> Just the commercial buildings. So the
[29:27]
fire code does not address residential
buildings. So it's just commercial
[29:33]
buildings. But I will tell you as
history has shown, you know, when
[29:39]
firefighters
die, get injured. It's in buildings like
[29:44]
that. I mean, that's that's what
happens. You know, the people that are
[29:48]
in those buildings, they don't come
running out and tell you, "Hey, I was in
[29:52]
there and I'm okay." like we teach
people to do because they're not
[29:55]
supposed to be in the building to begin
with. And usually they're a direct
[29:59]
result of a fire in those buildings.
Well, that you know, well, I say maybe
[30:03]
not direct, direct, indirect, but you
know, could be accidental, could be
[30:08]
deliberate. I don't know. Um, but we
wanted to make you aware that we do plan
[30:13]
to start that that process next week in
case you get question on it.
[30:19]
» Thank you for your work on that.
>> NO PROBLEM.
[30:24]
» [applause]
[30:29]
» ITEM FOUR IS SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS. We
have one individual, Mr. Brodsky had
[30:33]
signed up. Uh
[30:50]
» Good evening, members of council. My
name is Arfan Brodsky and I live at 936
[30:53]
Eastn Street in Rono Rapids. I want to
begin tonight by reading a poem. It was
[30:58]
written by Martin Neuer, a German pastor
who lived through the Third Reich and
[31:02]
who to his lasting regret waited too
long to speak.
[31:06]
First, they came for the communists and
I did not speak out because I was not a
[31:09]
communist. Then they came for the
socialists and I did not speak out
[31:13]
because I was not a socialist. Then they
came for the trade unionists and I did
[31:17]
not speak out because I was not a trade
unionist. Then they came for the Jews
[31:21]
and I did not speak out because I was
not a Jew. Then they came for me and
[31:26]
there was no one left to speak out for
me. I'm Jewish and that poem's not
[31:30]
history for me. It's my family story. My
mother's name is Shiffra. She was named
[31:35]
after her paternal grandmother, also
Shiffra, who was hanged in the woods
[31:38]
near her home in Poland by Nazi
sympathizers during World War II. Her
[31:42]
crime was being Jewish. She didn't die
in a camp. She died close to home in a
[31:47]
place she knew among people in her
community who decided that she no longer
[31:51]
deserved to live. My son's name is
Joseph. He's named after Schiffer's
[31:56]
husband, her Joseph, who survived the
Holocaust. He survived not because the
[32:00]
world was just was just, but because the
villagers around him were afraid to come
[32:03]
for him. He had been a decorated war
hero in World War I. He fought for his
[32:08]
country and he killed many men. And so
they hesitated. That hesitation was a
[32:12]
difference between his life and his
death. I carry those names with me every
[32:16]
single day. And because I carry them, I
can't be silent when hate speech is
[32:20]
allowed to stand without consequence in
this or any community. I want to be
[32:24]
historically clear about something
because clarity matters here. Adolf
[32:27]
Hitler did not begin with the Jews. The
Nazi regime's machinery of persecution
[32:32]
and murder was built in stages. It began
with people the regime labeled
[32:36]
defectives, people with physical and
mental disabilities who were subjected
[32:40]
to forced sterilization and ultimately
to systematic killing. It expanded to
[32:45]
include gay men who were imprisoned and
sent to concentration camps. It then
[32:49]
swept up the Roma people, the gypsies,
who were persecuted, deported, and
[32:53]
murdered in numbers that Europe is still
reckoning with. The genocide of European
[32:57]
Jews, what we now call the Holocaust,
was not the spark. It was the direct
[33:01]
result of a society that had already
learned step by step to dehumanize
[33:05]
people in categories. That's what
unchecked rhetoric does. It doesn't stay
[33:09]
where it starts. It teaches cruelty and
then it spreads. That's why I'm standing
[33:13]
here tonight. You see, the mayor's wife
made racist and xenophobic comments. She
[33:18]
has not apologized, not once, not in any
form. And Mayor Emory Dowy, the elected
[33:23]
leader of the city, waited a full week
before offering a response that by any
[33:27]
honest measure was too little, too late,
and too carefully worded to mean very
[33:32]
much at all. That's not leadership. It's
damage control. And our community
[33:36]
deserves to know the difference. Mayor
Dowy, your time is up. I also want to
[33:41]
speak directly to the council. Your
silence is not neutrality. Silence in
[33:45]
the face of racist rhetoric is a choice,
and our community sees it. Your combined
[33:49]
statement doesn't mention the mayor's
wife by name or even her comments. It's
[33:52]
simply a generic statement that didn't
really let anyone know where you stand
[33:56]
on this specific issue. When talk of
dissolving the police department came
[34:00]
about, each one of you made it a point
to take an individual stand and make
[34:04]
individual public statements in open
session supporting our municipal police
[34:08]
force. It's really telling that none of
you were brave enough to attach your
[34:12]
name to a comment directly condemning
the mayor's wife or the lack of
[34:15]
leadership our mayor showed by staying
silent for a full week while the
[34:19]
national media picked up this story and
ran with it, further disgracing our
[34:23]
city.
I want you all to take a step back and
[34:26]
think, would you handle this the same
way if your spouse said what Ivon Dowy
[34:30]
said? Would you handle this the same way
if your spouse had years worth of
[34:35]
anti-Muslim xenophobic rhetoric
plastered all over her public Facebook
[34:38]
profile? There's no path forward for Ron
Oak Rapids with Emory Dowy as our mayor.
[34:43]
A leader who cannot promptly, clearly,
and sincerely condemn hate speech,
[34:48]
including hate speech from within his
own household, has forfeited the trust
[34:51]
this office requires. I'll be back. I'll
be back the next meeting and the one
[34:56]
after that and every meeting that
follows until Mayor Dowy resigns or is
[34:59]
otherwise removed because Ne Mueller's
great regret was that he waited and I
[35:04]
prefer to live my life without regrets.
I brought my children here to watch me
[35:08]
speak to listen to the message because
it's important. It's important as Jews
[35:12]
to stand with everybody. And my
children, they're anti-racists as well.
[35:16]
And when racist rhetoric is spread in
their schools, when they hear it, they
[35:19]
have the responsibility to speak out and
to take action. and is large people. My
[35:24]
son is 11 years old, 5 foot seven, 175
pounds. And he has an active instruction
[35:30]
to actively go after anybody who says
anything racist in front of him.
[35:36]
You need to go, Mayor Dowy. You need to
go. Thank you.
[35:54]
» [clears throat]
[35:59]
» While these uh individuals are making
their way out, we have one uh individual
[36:04]
that has signed up for unscheduled
public comment. And we had some people a
[36:09]
while back that um didn't know you had
to sign up. So that's why I'm letting
[36:13]
everybody know that would like to speak,
you know, just by coming in and and
[36:17]
signing up. And we welcome you to do
that. you have three minutes, not like
[36:21]
five when you're on the agenda. So, soon
as everyone gets settled back down,
[36:26]
we'll move on with that part of the
meeting. Okay. Okay. Okay.
[36:32]
» So, if anybody else wants to comment in
public uh comment, just see the clerk
[36:37]
now and and get signed up.
>> So, if anybody wants to speak, see the
[36:42]
clerk signed up and you'll be welcome to
speak. Uh Miss Briggs, I believe, is
[36:48]
first.
[36:51]
Good evening.
>> Good evening. Thank you. My name is
[36:54]
Amanda Briggs. I'm the president CEO of
the Lake Gaston Regional Chamber of
[36:58]
Commerce. I hit heavy on that regional
because I'm not just Lake Gaston. I do
[37:02]
cover five counties. That one of those
being Halifax. I did want to come here
[37:07]
tonight and make a special announcement.
About two hours ago, I got off the phone
[37:10]
with Congressman Don Davis. Um he is
coming to the Lake Gaston area on
[37:16]
Friday, September 4th at 9:30 a.m. at
the chamber office to do a meet and
[37:21]
greet with small business owners. So it
is not a campaign stop. He is literally
[37:26]
coming to hear from the small business
owners. So I wanted to make that
[37:31]
announcement and let anybody know that
if you would like to come and attend,
[37:34]
share your successes, share your
struggles, um anything that you would
[37:38]
like to talk to him about, please do so.
So again, that's um Friday, September
[37:43]
4th at 9:30 at the Chamber of Commerce
in Lake Aston. That's it.
[37:49]
Okay. Thank you very much.
And Mr. Garrett
[38:08]
» [sighs]
[38:13]
» Mayor, members of city council, I'm Jim
Garrett.
[38:17]
Mayor, I'd like to say congratulations.
That was um quite a heroic
[38:24]
demonstration. You standing up for your
wife. I know she's a private citizen and
[38:30]
she has no bearing on your job and I
think it's commendable.
[38:36]
I'm asking for the city manager to
resign because I see it's a clear double
[38:41]
standard in our leadership. The mayor's
wife is a private citizen. She made
[38:47]
comments on Facebook. The city manager
issued an official statement about these
[38:53]
these comments and all of you signed
them.
[38:58]
Now a city ploy employee, the city
librarian has entered the same fight.
[39:03]
She identified herself as the librarian.
She criticized the mayor. She said the
[39:09]
mayor should give away all of his pay.
And she um supported calls for his
[39:15]
resignation.
The city should have a clear policy
[39:20]
separating personal politics from city
employment. I've not seen any statement
[39:26]
distance dist distancing yourselves from
the comments that Mr. Bronzk's wife, I
[39:33]
believe, who is the city librarian, made
on Facebook, the city manager can um can
[39:40]
publicly address the speech of a private
citizen like the mayor's wife. Why is
[39:45]
there no clear standard when city
employees bring their position to the
[39:51]
same controversy?
The manager decided to start policing
[39:57]
Facebook and her job to hold everyone
accountable. The manager has a record of
[40:04]
inconsistent leadership. I have lost
confidence in the city manager and I'm
[40:10]
asking for her resignation or for you
all to replace her. Thank you for your
[40:15]
time.
>> All right. Thank you, sir.
[40:21]
That's all the names we have. Is there
anyone else at this time that would like
[40:24]
to speak?
Okay.
[40:30]
We will move on to the approval of the 8
August 18th, 2026
[40:37]
minutes.
Need a motion to approve them.
[40:41]
Mayor, I'd like to make a motion to
approve the city council meeting minutes
[40:47]
of August 18, 2026.
Motion is made by Mayor Pro Tim Bryant.
[40:54]
Do you hear a second to
Mr. Second by Mr. Jackson?
[41:00]
There any discussion? There being none,
all in favor signify by saying I.
[41:05]
» I. All oppose, no. Minutes would be
approved as they are presented.
[41:10]
Item eight. Under new business, I'd call
on the deputy finance, Miss Ror.
[41:20]
Good evening, mayor and council. Just
one budget amendment for you this
[41:24]
evening. So, I would direct you to
ordinance number 2026.42.
[41:29]
The city has received a donation or
sponsorship from Bright Speed in the
[41:34]
amount of $15,000 in support of our
city's Main Street program. So, we ask
[41:40]
that you approve 2026.42
to accept that $15,000 donation.
[41:46]
» All right. You hear the finance
director. We need a motion to approve
[41:50]
this.
>> Make a motion for me
[41:54]
to $15,000
for sponsorship to support the main
[41:59]
street.
>> Okay. The motion is made by Mr. Bale.
[42:02]
Second to the motion.
>> Second.
[42:04]
» Second by Mr. Strickland. Any more
discussion? There being none, all in
[42:08]
favor signify by saying I.
>> I.
[42:10]
» All oppose, no. Motion will be approved.
Thank you, ma'am.
[42:15]
And next, we move on to the city
manager's report,
[42:19]
Mr. Train.
>> Good evening, mayor and council. And I
[42:21]
will ask um for our main street director
to um share some more information about
[42:26]
the main about the sponsorship from
Bright Speed as well. But um the just a
[42:33]
few items to note here. The Twilight
Festival is scheduled for Friday,
[42:37]
September the 18th at Centennial Park.
It's a community event. Uh the Halifax
[42:42]
County Board of Commissioners will hold
its on the road tour and um have its
[42:47]
meeting on September the 21st here in
Reno Rapids in this building at 5:30
[42:52]
p.m. Also, another community event
that's coming up is the NC DOT by annual
[42:58]
fall litter sweep um scheduled September
12th through the 26th. There are
[43:02]
resources available through NCDOT for
state roadways and we want to encourage
[43:08]
and uh ask community groups to come
together and [snorts] whether it's
[43:11]
picking a day or a couple hours each day
or do something to help um clean up
[43:17]
litter throughout the city. Um during
that time frame,
[43:21]
uh the police department held a
community meeting last night at Shiner
[43:25]
Wreck. We were able to get record
attendance so far as requested. So I
[43:28]
want to thank everyone for coming out.
Um, it was well attended, good
[43:32]
conversations were had. Um, and it
really shows that people care. And um I
[43:38]
commend our police chief and his and his
command staff and and all of our police
[43:43]
officers and um administrative
assistants uh for their work in and and
[43:50]
relaying the needs of the community and
really understanding that many of the
[43:55]
problems that are faced are community
problems, not necessarily police
[43:58]
department problems or city of Venic
Rapids problems, but um having those
[44:03]
open conversations leads to better
results.
[44:07]
Uh the next meeting uh will be scheduled
for Monday, October the 19th at the
[44:12]
First Pentecostal Church on Becker
Drive. Um and more information will come
[44:17]
about that soon. Uh the police club will
hold its cornhole tournament on
[44:23]
September the 19th at TJ Davis. Um this
is a fundraiser for their Christmas for
[44:27]
kids um program that benefits our
community. Um, for more information,
[44:33]
please contact the police department
about it. In the planning development
[44:36]
department, they've been uh busy and
also expanding um reviewing plans and
[44:42]
progress out at the Cross Creek
subdivision on 125. Uh there's
[44:47]
infrastructure that's near completion
and ready for new single family
[44:51]
residential homes to be built. Um during
or probably at one of our next meetings,
[44:55]
uh we'll ask council to consider
approving and accepting the streets. um
[45:00]
that are proposed for the by the
developer for city um inventory.
[45:06]
Um parks and recreation is planning for
the annual 5K and fun run and walk u to
[45:12]
be held Saturday, September the 19th.
The race will start and end at the
[45:16]
Dominion Day use park at the end of Oua
Avenue and the registration is available
[45:20]
at www.rronoccanal.com.
[45:25]
The senior center in addition to their
regularly scheduled activities has some
[45:29]
other special events taking place
including grief support with Nancy Hugs
[45:33]
at 2:00 September the 3rd and the 19th.
Hearing life screens will be held on
[45:38]
Octo September the 9th. Medicare
appointments September 21st.
[45:44]
ECU health screens September 29th. And
coming up on October the 1st will be the
[45:50]
annual aging expo held at Kirkwood
Adams. [snorts] the fire department um
[45:56]
is well chief changed but uh they're
sporting it's now September 1st which is
[46:01]
also lymphoma awareness month and the
department will maintain its tradition
[46:04]
of wearing the slime green colors to
increase the awareness of firefighter
[46:08]
cancer risks that um plague the
profession
[46:12]
and also September is uh suicide uh
awareness month and so uh we've received
[46:19]
uh some armbands to remind folks and
also to promote the 988 emergency line
[46:25]
or the health line um for anyone in
crisis. Um Public Works is preparing for
[46:30]
loose leaf collection season that will
begin on November the 1st. They are
[46:34]
assisting in securing vacant residential
structures recently completed 217 Monroe
[46:39]
and 126 Wilin Streets. [snorts] Uh and
I'm in finance and HR. Um we've been
[46:45]
facilitating the issuance of the um law
enforcement bonuses that have been
[46:50]
directed by the general assembly through
the state bureau of investigation. This
[46:54]
is part of the state's adopted budget.
Um so there is a level of effort
[46:58]
involved um with the city administration
in that in addition to preparing for our
[47:03]
fiscical year 26 audit services and uh
closing out that fiscal year. Uh the
[47:10]
city will observe the Labor Day holiday
on Monday um September the 7th. So most
[47:14]
of our facil most of our buildings or
city offices will be closed. Believe is
[47:19]
parks and recreation open TJ will be
open that day. And then our next
[47:24]
regularly scheduled um council meeting
will be Tuesday the September the 15th
[47:29]
at 5:30 p.m. And um Miss Thomas, are you
prepared to to share some information? I
[47:36]
I didn't want to leave you out, but um
want you to share about First Fridays
[47:41]
and the Bright Speed sponsorship
[50:48]
subject to your questions. That
concludes my report.
[50:54]
Um, if I could make a comment on the uh
meeting that we had over at Chhatt uh
[51:00]
recreation department last night. I know
you came in and police chief is he's not
[51:05]
going to make make any comment. Is it
okay if I do something on it right
[51:09]
quick? It it was a good group of people
there. It was it was pretty much full
[51:15]
and um people asked a lot of good
questions and it was very um easy to
[51:21]
discern that the individuals that were
there were very much interested you know
[51:26]
we we've had some some comment about uh
defunding or doing away with our police
[51:31]
department to me and and Mr. Strickland
and Mr. veil where they also it seemed
[51:36]
like they were very much interested in
uh enhancing our police department if
[51:41]
anything much less doing away with it.
So um they asked some really good
[51:46]
questions. Uh they were very sincere
about um the difficulties that they had
[51:53]
experienced and it it wasn't in just one
area of town. It was several areas that
[51:58]
did people, you know, some live
downtown, some live across 158. And um I
[52:04]
thought it was I've been to a couple of
those meetings. I thought it was by far
[52:07]
the best one. And uh the chief and the
captains that were there u provided good
[52:13]
information for the people. And I mean,
I felt like I got something out of and I
[52:18]
think the people that came did also. So
I I think if he can continue those
[52:22]
meetings that they would um have have
continued better uh attendance in people
[52:28]
coming and um how how do you get the um
material you need for the fall litter
[52:35]
sweep? How do you get that from public
works or where
[52:40]
» uh there is a um request through you can
make a request through the county um DOT
[52:47]
office
>> the county
[52:48]
» through their maintenance office
[52:53]
» I don't have the information in front of
me
[52:54]
» would it be possible for public works to
kind of give us some spots that really
[52:59]
needed I know I know one that pops into
my mind is out where Henson Street comes
[53:04]
out on 10th street in that curve Yeah,
it's always it's always a bad place
[53:08]
there. You think that's possible?
>> I'm sure we can come up with some uh
[53:13]
areas that state roads um that would
benefit from that.
[53:16]
» Okay.
I mean, that's that's something anybody
[53:19]
that can walk and bend over can do. Uh
that's that's a good project and and you
[53:24]
get you get immediate benefit from it. I
mean, you don't have to wait and see see
[53:28]
how it's going to look. As soon as you
get finished, it looks nice. Does
[53:32]
anybody else have any questions?
>> Yes. Okay,
[53:36]
» Kelly, where are we at for second
[53:42]
» demolition?
Uh the we have a order um for the
[53:49]
demolition and removal. The owner of the
property has not complied with that
[53:53]
order. uh the city council if should
desire we can
[53:58]
uh we have the authority to complete the
uh remediation which is demolition in
[54:04]
this case. Um the planning department
did solicit bids um back in April and
[54:11]
did receive uh a bid in the matter of
$500,000 for the demolition.
[54:17]
Um at this time um that project is not
funded. Um, and
[54:25]
that's where that stands at this point.
[54:30]
» Well, what do we got to do?
>> Appropriations by city council in the
[54:36]
form of a budget amendment would be
appropriate.
[54:40]
» Can I
Well, Mr. Davis came back several months
[54:44]
ago. Um, Representative Davis,
he told us he could not help us if it
[54:50]
was a private building.
What would happen if we were able to to
[54:55]
reach out to the owners and purchase it
from them? Then it would be our building
[55:02]
far as would it at least open up an
opportunity for us to get some funding?
[55:08]
We don't know we get it, but is that is
that possible?
[55:12]
and and maybe you can't answer that
question right now.
[55:14]
» That's a that's a dangerous choice for
the city council to make until unless we
[55:20]
are certain 100% that we're going to get
that funding. Um that's a that's a
[55:28]
dangerous choice. I think it I think it
would be trivial for us to to take it
[55:32]
into our possession, but then suddenly
now we do have that liability. um you
[55:37]
know, as it is now, you know, if if
I hate to say it, but and I feel like
[55:42]
I'm I'm maybe giving in to some kind of,
you know, social media kind of whatever
[55:49]
you call it, catastrophic kind of
theories, but if the building were to
[55:53]
fall down today and hit somebody, that's
not the city's problem. It's not our
[55:56]
It's not our property. Just because
something happens in the city of Renick
[56:00]
Rapids, it is not the city or our
liability carrier or our problem.
[56:06]
um if the city owns that building, it is
absolutely our problem.
[56:12]
And so I I'm I'm you know, if we had
some kind of of absolute guarantee and I
[56:17]
don't know how I don't know the the the
function of facilitating that to where
[56:22]
we have that level of guarantee, I I
don't see otherwise we would we would be
[56:27]
there and it would be taken care of. But
um
[56:31]
without that I would strongly discourage
that from becoming city property because
[56:38]
we are accepting a huge liability. Um,
and
[56:44]
you know, to to the to the I I guess
going to the the original question, you
[56:48]
know,
we could clean up and and I think we
[56:51]
we've kind of talked about this before,
but just to put a fine point on it, the
[56:54]
the city has would have the authority
through various statutes to condemn and
[57:00]
clean up a lot of properties that are
derelict, you know, um
[57:07]
that have become a public nuisance that
um are in need of demolition. or repair,
[57:12]
we have that ability to do that. We
could very quickly bankrupt the city
[57:16]
doing that. Um because those costs fall
on us. And kind of like we've talked
[57:20]
about before, the only way that you get
those costs, you know, we could could we
[57:25]
do a budget amendment and take $500,000
out of fund balance and demolish that
[57:30]
building? Yes. Um I certainly would not
suggest that. um if you ever were to do
[57:37]
that or if you were to use any other
kind of funding funding mechanism and
[57:41]
and like I say, you know, unless you're
going to our our budget is is our
[57:46]
budget. There's really not really any
give there. Um so you're so there's only
[57:50]
two places else that well there's only
one place else that the city could get
[57:54]
funding um this fiscal year and that
would be the fund balance. Um, you know,
[57:58]
in a longer term program, could the
city, and I I even hesitate to say it,
[58:02]
but could the city raise taxes to fund
demolition efforts? Yes. Um,
[58:10]
you know, so unless there's some kind of
outside grant or somebody that's going
[58:15]
to give that money to the city, however
the city is paying it, the assumption I
[58:20]
think should be is that that is money
that is going to that would be spent by
[58:24]
the city that is not going to come back.
Um, you know, the idea that, you know,
[58:30]
you're going to go out and demolish a
building and essentially create a vacant
[58:35]
lot. Um, what does the value of a vacant
lot at the corner of Second and uh, Reno
[58:42]
Avenue have? Probably not very much. Um,
certainly not $500,000
[58:48]
um, worth. Um, and so, you know, it's
we're we're kind of back at that that
[58:53]
same kind of question when you have
when you have aging buildings like this.
[58:59]
And it's one of the reason, and I know I
always say this, it's one of the reasons
[59:01]
that our building codes are so that that
modern building codes are so important
[59:06]
is because one of the reasons why
we
[59:12]
require developers to build buildings in
a certain way is so that they have a
[59:18]
they have a a normal lifespan and that
we don't have to worry about them during
[59:24]
that lifespan becoming derelict or um
because of, you know, shoddy
[59:29]
construction or something like that
becoming a a burden that's then borne by
[59:34]
the public at large. Um, and so, you
know, these obviously, you know, we all
[59:39]
know that that that
those buildings on Reno Avenue um are
[59:45]
very old. They're certainly older than
than I am. Um, and you know, they were
[59:51]
when they were built, I I don't know,
you know, what somebody had in mind as
[59:56]
far as their their normal lifestyle,
their their their
[1:00:01]
um lifespan. Um, thank you. Um, I don't
know. I don't know what folks had as far
[1:00:06]
as their their lifespan, but obviously,
you know, it it has come to the end of
[1:00:10]
that. Um, and you know, does it need to
be demolished? I think we all agree that
[1:00:15]
that yes. um you know with with the with
the level of asbestos contamination in
[1:00:20]
there, there is no there's no other
solution. You can't you can't remediate
[1:00:24]
that. You got to go down to the you got
to go down to the floor and if you're
[1:00:28]
going to build something back up, build
something back up. But um
[1:00:33]
there's [clears throat] there's just it
it's the city's real option unless
[1:00:39]
there's unless you know the state
creates some kind of program tomorrow,
[1:00:44]
you know, some
I don't know, you know, some um wealthy
[1:00:50]
benevolent millionaire wants to uh give
us give us some money to take care of
[1:00:54]
it. Um, you know, other than, you know,
something coming from outside,
[1:00:59]
um, the only way that the city funds
demolition out there is by either
[1:01:04]
essentially taking from savings or
creating new revenue to that level. And
[1:01:11]
I, like I say, that's that's the dilemma
that that that we're all in. And
[1:01:17]
you know, it's one of those things
where, you know, I think
[1:01:20]
and and and maybe this is kind of
getting outside of my role as city
[1:01:23]
attorney, but you know, I know that
folks want solutions for that. And I
[1:01:30]
think sometimes they think that because
there is no that they haven't seen any
[1:01:34]
solution out there, because we haven't
found the magic bullet or that maybe
[1:01:38]
there is a magic bullet out there that
we're just choosing not to use. Um,
[1:01:42]
that's that's not the case. if we if we
had some
[1:01:47]
way of of solving this problem, I I I am
pretty certain that the city would go
[1:01:52]
down that road and do it. Um, so I don't
know that that may be more than than we
[1:01:56]
were looking for, more than I I have to
say. I don't know if the city manager or
[1:01:59]
the uh planning director has anything
that that I may have missed or that you
[1:02:03]
may think needs to be added. I'll just
echo that we continue to look for and
[1:02:08]
pursue remedies for that building and it
has changed ownership since uh council
[1:02:16]
uh adopted the ordinance on it. Um I
think that the owner of record has maybe
[1:02:23]
corresponded with the planning
department one time but now at this
[1:02:27]
point we don't hear back from any from
we don't the current owner has been
[1:02:33]
unresponsive.
um on the level of effort for that
[1:02:36]
building.
>> I have a question. How many bids were
[1:02:39]
submitted uh with the demolition?
>> I I don't know. I think there could have
[1:02:44]
been two, but
>> two
[1:02:45]
» uh is there is there any hope of getting
a third or fourth?
[1:02:50]
» Reasonable hope on that.
>> We can rebid the project and see what we
[1:02:54]
come up with see what the return is. Um
we have advertised and that forbid a few
[1:03:01]
times but because of the anticipated
cost we do have to follow state
[1:03:06]
procurement processes and receive a
certain number of bids and then perhaps
[1:03:10]
and if you still don't receive a certain
number then you have to readvertise and
[1:03:14]
upset. Um and so it could be a lengthy
process uh that we're willing to pursue
[1:03:19]
on that. that the struct standalone
buildings like residential homes or
[1:03:24]
standalone buildings are much easier,
but when they are uh when there's party
[1:03:28]
walls and shared walls, there's also
structural conditions that you have to
[1:03:32]
be aware of and concerned about is um in
those scenarios. But
[1:03:38]
um we'd be glad to pursue um additional
bids for that property.
[1:03:45]
» Can we get a consensus on that? Maybe
just going to get
[1:03:49]
try the bid process one more time.
>> So, you're saying you put it out for bid
[1:03:53]
or do you contact each you pick out
people in contact or you just advertise
[1:03:58]
we want to bid on demo demo in this
building?
[1:04:00]
» There has to be a formal um bid
procedure uh advertisement and scope of
[1:04:04]
work. So, um we would have to follow the
general statute guidance and our in our
[1:04:10]
procurement policy on that. Um and a
council action is not necessarily
[1:04:15]
required since you've already adopted
the the order for the demo and
[1:04:20]
clearance. And so um we can again pursue
that um with the cost of advertising
[1:04:27]
um as part of the process.
>> For some reason I was thinking it was
[1:04:31]
250,000. I don't know where I got that
number.
[1:04:33]
» That that figure was
>> when you told me five I went wild.
[1:04:36]
» That figure was shared several years
ago.
[1:04:38]
» Okay. um
>> inflation
[1:04:41]
» and and the majority of the costs have
to do with the wood, the disposal of the
[1:04:46]
material there. It's a lot of brick,
metal, wood um and those materials
[1:04:52]
assuming assuming contamination uh have
to go to uh asbestous receiving landfill
[1:04:59]
um under certain treatment conditions.
And when she when the city manager says
[1:05:05]
assuming contamination, it's not we
assume that it's contaminated. It's that
[1:05:09]
the law requires us to to assume that
they are contaminated. That is it's it's
[1:05:14]
not it's not a well, we're just guessing
they are. No, we know that they are. And
[1:05:19]
so because some part of that structure
is, the law forces us to treat all of
[1:05:25]
the materials that come from that site
as being contaminated. So it's not like
[1:05:29]
somebody can sit there and kind of shift
through and say, well, you know, this is
[1:05:33]
this is asbestos contaminated, but this
this part over here isn't. We are
[1:05:37]
required by law to assume that all of it
>> and a lot and and that is because the
[1:05:43]
unsafe conditions of the building don't
allow a full asbestous survey to be
[1:05:48]
conducted uh where all the materials can
be tested.
[1:05:54]
And generally before in in under the
normal process or the routine process,
[1:05:58]
you have to remove the asbestous before
you're issued a demolition permit. But
[1:06:03]
the unsafe conditions warrant that
you're it's you're not able to go in and
[1:06:08]
effectively remove the asbestous
containing materials um prior to
[1:06:13]
starting demolition activities. So
everything has to be treated as
[1:06:17]
asbestous through approved methods uh
through environmental services.
[1:06:25]
The walls, I understand, are like eight
bricks wide, thick. So, you know, it's
[1:06:31]
probably it's probably not going to fall
when the roof continues to go down. So,
[1:06:37]
I mean, we we might be looking at 30 or
40 more years unless we get a violent
[1:06:41]
storm or something.
Everybody on this council and probably
[1:06:46]
the people that work for the city and
and then anybody else that has people
[1:06:50]
that come from out of town
They want to know what's going on
[1:06:54]
downtown.
So, I think we need to continue to to
[1:06:59]
try every angle to see if there's any
money that can come from somewhere.
[1:07:05]
» Now, you said you going to follow up on
the Brownfield cleanup and assessment
[1:07:11]
grant.
>> Yes. Um,
[1:07:15]
as part of the Brownfield Coalition,
there's a meeting next week that will
[1:07:19]
discuss the 27 application period.
>> Any reason why they decline 2425
[1:07:29]
26?
>> Those reasons? Well, it's a very
[1:07:33]
competitive program through the United
States Environmental Protection Agency
[1:07:37]
and um they're regional applications and
so people all over the United States
[1:07:42]
review different locations. our
applications have been competitive um
[1:07:48]
but there's not enough money to serve
all and so um those grant applications
[1:07:54]
um are typically for a 3 to 5 year um
period of performance and
[1:08:02]
um
we work with the upper coastal plane
[1:08:06]
council of governments um because the
regional applications are determined to
[1:08:12]
be the most success successful option
And so um there is feedback that has
[1:08:19]
been shared with the applicant, you
know, with applicants as far as we'll
[1:08:23]
learn more about what we need to do to
improve our application. Um but again,
[1:08:28]
it's it's a very competitive program. Um
buildings all across the United States
[1:08:32]
are experiencing similar conditions. um
they were built 100 plus years ago and
[1:08:37]
and um but really the the owners failing
to maintain and then neglecting their
[1:08:45]
properties is how we end up where we
are. and and you know and I kind of said
[1:08:50]
it but she kind of said it too and I I
think it is something to kind of keep in
[1:08:53]
mind is the kind of course of of
building over the the 20th century and
[1:09:00]
the 21st century and that this is a
problem that is not is not unique to
[1:09:06]
Reno Rapids. It's a problem that that a
lot of towns our size and smaller have
[1:09:11]
in that you have um a a significant
amount of especially commercial
[1:09:19]
um
structures that were built in the middle
[1:09:23]
part of the 20th century and they
they've just reached the end of their
[1:09:27]
lifespan.
And um you know because like cities in
[1:09:33]
our case have have built out and kind of
moved away from their main streets um
[1:09:37]
because of the cost of remediating a
building versus just building something
[1:09:41]
new.
um
[1:09:44]
you kind of end up in in these
situations where you have an an aging
[1:09:50]
um main street in our case and in a lot
of cases that um
[1:09:56]
the the costs just make it proative
probitative for even the for for the
[1:10:01]
owners to remediate. And at that point,
you know, that there comes a point where
[1:10:07]
the exposure to them is,
you know, that there's there's nothing
[1:10:11]
that you can do. I think we've talked
before about when something is held by a
[1:10:15]
LLC when it's and and that's the only
asset. Yes, I would we would love to be
[1:10:21]
able to go after um the individuals
involved in the LLC, but the fact of the
[1:10:26]
matter is is you generally cannot do
that. Not not for a liability such as
[1:10:31]
this. Um, if courts allowed you to
pierce the corporate veil in scenarios
[1:10:37]
like this,
you wouldn't have LLC's. There would be
[1:10:41]
no there would be no point in that that
corporate protection. Um, is that fair?
[1:10:45]
Is that right? In this case, it really
does, you know, hurt a city like ours in
[1:10:51]
that um, you know, a a
the an LLC can own or a a corporation or
[1:10:59]
corporate entity can own a piece of
property like this with no other assets
[1:11:03]
and basically say, well, you know, it's
a there's we don't have any other
[1:11:06]
assets. We just have liabilities. Um,
and so that that really, you know,
[1:11:12]
constrains our our ability to be able to
um
[1:11:17]
recover anything. You you can't get
blood from a turnup. Um and and you
[1:11:22]
know, unfortunately, regardless of what
what some people may want or or may, you
[1:11:27]
know, depending on how you look at it,
be just, you know, we're not going to be
[1:11:31]
able to go out and and drag the members
of that LLC and and throw them in jail
[1:11:37]
or or threaten them in any way to get
them to to do that. That's just not
[1:11:40]
something that legally
we have the tools for in in this state
[1:11:44]
or in in the country. Um, and so anyway,
that like again that that may be kind of
[1:11:49]
getting outside of of the kind of
specific instance we're talking about,
[1:11:54]
but that's the [clears throat]
that's the context that we're in. So,
[1:12:00]
» okay. Thank you, Mr. Davis. Anything
else needs to come before us tonight?
[1:12:06]
Mayor, I'd like to um suggest I think
I've talked with a couple of council
[1:12:12]
members about this upcoming um fall
litter sweep and I think this would be a
[1:12:20]
great opportunity for us to assist our
citizens in getting our areas cleaned
[1:12:28]
up. Um Mr. Manning, I think it was said
that you could provide bags or something
[1:12:34]
from the county. Is that correct?
>> Oh,
[1:12:39]
» from DOT house for state first roads.
>> Okay, great.
[1:12:43]
» It's Mr. Love.
>> Um,
[1:12:46]
I just like to put the word out if we
have organizations that are willing to
[1:12:52]
do some community cleanup during the
during that time. They've designated
[1:12:57]
September 12th through the 26
to please
[1:13:02]
do so. let me know personally if we have
other council members. I think Mr. Bale
[1:13:09]
and Stain had possibly agreed. We'd be
happy to come out and help do some work
[1:13:15]
and, you know, help beautify our city.
I don't know what we can do, how much
[1:13:22]
difference it'll make, but if it's only
two or three yards that we get done,
[1:13:28]
it's going to make it look better than,
you know, we not doing anything. and we
[1:13:33]
invite other community groups to join in
and let us know if you need the bags or
[1:13:39]
whatever and we can set a schedule as to
where we want to work during those some
[1:13:46]
of those days. Thanks.
>> I like that idea.
[1:14:01]
motion. Second second