[0:11] - Bonsoir. Bienvenue à la séance

[0:16] ordinaire du conseil du 27 mars,

[0:20] 2023. Welcome to the regular

[0:25] meeting of the municipal council

[0:28] of March 27th, 2023. I will now

[0:31] ask the clerk to go ahead with

[0:36] the adoption and the agenda.

[0:39] - Adoption de l'ordre du jour de

[0:40] la séance ordinaire du du

[0:41] Conseil de la Ville de

[0:42] Beaconsfield du 27 mars 2023

[0:44] avec la modification suivante.

[0:47] Ajout du point 90,1 Affaires

[0:49] nouvelles. Octroi du contrat TPS

[0:52] mais le 23 tiret 0 cinq,

[0:56] concernant un camion

[0:57] (---)

[0:58] qu'on Lunney au plus bas

[0:59] soumissionnaire conforme, soit

[1:00] les équipements

[1:01] (---)

[1:02] pour, la somme de 828378 dollars

[1:04] et 75 cennes, taxes incluses.

[1:08] - Je propose.

[1:10] - En faveur.

[1:16] - Comme le commandant n'est pas

[1:21] avec nous ce soir, et qu'on n'a

[1:23] pas de commentaires à vous

[1:25] donner, nous allons passer à la

[1:28] période de questions. Alors,...

[1:32] command and from -- its met with

[1:33] us this evening. And we don't

[1:37] have any comments from him to

[1:41] communicate to you. So we will

[1:45] go directly into the question

[1:47] period. I will start with the

[1:50] written questions that we got.

[1:55] First Mr. Derek pounce, -- is --

[2:04] his subject is the agenda of

[2:07] item 60.3 on the agenda this

[2:08] evening. Please explain the

[2:12] project regarding the

[2:13] acquisition of documents for the

[2:15] Beaconsfield library.

[2:19] - Le ministère de la Culture et

[2:21] des Communications...

[2:54] Richard foncière uniformiser.

[3:50] Where the years 23 and 24. And

[3:53] here are the estimated amounts.

[3:58] 2023 $116,313. And 2020,

[4:03] $416,401. The next question

[4:09] comes from Mr. Tom Laval. From

[4:13] Tilson. And it is regarding the

[4:16] learning bowling club. Why are

[4:20] we giving the long balloon Club

[4:21] money when they have over

[4:24] $35,000 in their bank account?

[4:26] They have no capital expenditure

[4:30] projects membership has

[4:32] retracted dramatically -- and

[4:35] their sponsorship program is

[4:38] very successful. Well I have to

[4:43] tell you that the city

[4:45] subsidized is a small portion of

[4:48] the lawn bowling clubs

[4:50] maintenance costs as the club

[4:52] was responsible for cutting the

[4:55] grass and the maintenance of the

[4:58] greens. Other city owned

[5:00] facilities are maintained by

[5:02] city employees, and like the

[5:06] laundry mulling the club. We

[5:07] have had this agreement with the

[5:09] lawn bowling club for many

[5:12] years. La prochaine question de

[5:17] madame Morency lente... le

[5:21] sujet, c'est le nombre croissant

[5:23] de piscine privée. Alors que

[5:26] l'eau est un enjeu majeur à

[5:29] travers le monde, et que nous

[5:31] sommes invités, à chaque été, à

[5:34] l'économiser dans nos maisons et

[5:35] nos jardins, la Ville continue

[5:38] de livrer des permis pour des

[5:40] piscines qui entraînent

[5:42] l'abattage d'arbres et d'autres

[5:43] végétation. Cela me semble

[5:47] incohérent et contraire à des

[5:49] pratiques saines pour notre

[5:51] environnement. Je ne comprends

[5:53] pas et j'aimerais savoir comment

[5:54] la Ville justifie ses pratiques,

[5:57] qui ne sont plus de mise dans

[5:59] l'urgence climatique que nous

[6:00] vivons. Madame, premièrement, je

[6:05] veux vous remercier de notre

[6:08] part pour vos préoccupations.

[6:12] Nous respectons vos motivations,

[6:14] mais par contre, l'interdiction

[6:16] de piscine privée n'est pas dans

[6:18] les plans de la Ville. La

[6:24] prochaine question vient de...

[6:29] c'est une série de questions. Ça

[6:32] vient de Nicole Colorado. Nicole

[6:35] qui est... Cole is a Toronto

[6:39] resident. And Nicole has several

[6:43] questions regarding certain

[6:44] items on the agenda. There are

[6:48] so many questions that we will

[6:50] refer your questions to the

[6:52] urban planning department as

[6:54] well as the culture and leisure

[6:56] department for follow-up. We

[6:58] kindly ask you that if you have

[7:00] other questions, please contact

[7:04] directly in full at

[7:08] Beaconsfield.ca. Your questions

[7:10] will be transferred into the

[7:13] appropriate department. Thank

[7:15] you. And we now go to the

[7:22] questions from the floor.

[7:57] What the developer actually

[7:58] wants to do. And I notice

[8:01] through reading through it that

[8:04] he is running over our maximum

[8:12] and minimum setbacks. On just

[8:15] about everything. He wants to be

[8:17] able to put the number of

[8:20] dwellings on the plaza to the

[8:23] maximum he can possibly get. And

[8:25] I am just asking of Council if

[8:28] they are going to actually allow

[8:30] that. Because some of the

[8:32] setbacks that he he is

[8:33] suggesting in this document are

[8:38] very very small setbacks.

[8:41] >> Well I don't want to

[8:45] anticipate a vote from the

[8:46] Councillors this evening. But I

[8:47] can assure you that the items on

[8:49] the agenda will not be accepted.

[8:52] >> Thank you.

[8:53] >> And we are strongly

[8:57] encouraging the developer to

[9:01] communicate with the residents

[9:03] of. And try to explain his

[9:08] project, explain his ideas to

[9:12] the residents in the area. It is

[9:14] up to him. But we certainly

[9:17] strongly encourage him to do

[9:18] that.

[9:19] >> Thank you for that because we

[9:21] are well aware that he has not

[9:25] communicated with, as far as we

[9:27] know, with any of the residents

[9:28] at all.

[9:29] >> Thank you.

[9:30] >> Okay.

[9:45] - Bonjour à tout le conseil.

[9:48] Avant de poser des questions...

[9:50] (inaudible)

[9:51] pourriez-vous vous identifier.

[9:52] - Oui, Michel.

[9:54] - C'est...

[9:55] (inaudible)

[9:56] Michel, rue beau repère.

[9:59] - Alors, avant de poser la

[10:00] question, j'aimerais adresser au

[10:02] Conseil ce que je crois est

[10:04] nécessaire de vous donnez...

[10:06] vous donner des félicitations.

[10:09] Pour la rapidité que... pour

[10:12] réagir à un règlement ou une loi

[10:14] qui a été votée au princière le

[10:15] pour ce qui est des Airbnb. Ce

[10:19] que je comprends. J'étais pas

[10:21] là, mardi ou mercredi, là, mais

[10:23] ce que je comprends, c'est que

[10:24] vous avez rapidement réagi. À un

[10:27] règlement ou une loi qui vient

[10:28] d'être votée et qui permettait

[10:31] la généralisation des Airbnb et

[10:34] quand je regardais l'ordre du

[10:35] jour, c'était comme secteur par

[10:38] secteur. Je sais pas... c'était

[10:41] pas bloqué mais, en tout cas,

[10:43] c'est... il fallait passer avant

[10:45] une certaine date, donc

[10:46] félicitations, là, ça a été

[10:48] rapide et je crois, efficace. Je

[10:50] vous donne des fleurs, quand ils

[10:51] viennent. Ça fait que...

[10:53] - Merci.

[10:54] - Dans ce cas-ci, je crois que

[10:55] ça s'est bien passé. Je sais pas

[10:56] si vous avez des commentaires

[10:57] là-dessus.

[10:58] - Non. C'est vrai qu'on a fait

[11:01] réellement

[11:02] (---)

[11:03] . Et on a identifié quelques

[11:05] secteurs où ça pourrait, Airbnb,

[11:11] ce serait acceptable. Mais ils

[11:13] sont très peu de secteurs. Et

[11:18] nous allons vu 100, comment

[11:20] vérifier. Il y a toute une

[11:22] procédure, de toute façon, qui

[11:23] doit être suivie. Pour avoir des

[11:26] permis. Pour avoir la permission

[11:30] d'avoir un Airbnb. Alors on, va

[11:32] s'assurer que les gens qui, dans

[11:36] les territoires où c'est permis,

[11:40] de suivre la procédure comme il

[11:42] faut. S'ils ne le font, pas et

[11:43] ne seront pas illégales, alors

[11:45] on va certainement surveiller

[11:47] ça.

[11:48] - Est-ce que le cas particulier

[11:50] des résidence principale est

[11:52] permis pareil? J'ai cru

[11:53] comprendre que les résidences

[11:54] principales, on pouvait le

[11:57] passer à Airbnb. C'était des

[11:59] résidences...

[12:00] - Si vous êtes dans la zone

[12:02] qu'on a identifié comme étant

[12:04] une zone où c'est permis,

[12:06] c'est...

[12:07] - C'est beau. Fin de l'item.

[12:09] Mais merci. Le deuxième, c'est

[12:12] encore une question, c'est un

[12:13] suivi. Il y a un mois ou deux,

[12:15] je suis venu ici, à cette

[12:17] assemblée, et je vous ai demandé

[12:19] une information, et je pense que

[12:20] vous avez fait la passe au

[12:23] directeur général qui devait me

[12:24] revenir, mais j'ai jamais eu de

[12:25] réponse. J'ai posé une question

[12:26] qui était: quelle est la

[12:28] proportion des cols blancs qui

[12:31] utilisent la politique aire H-8,

[12:34] de travail, c'est-à-dire, je

[12:35] sais pas, est-ce que c'est le

[12:37] cas des employés, la moitié des

[12:39] employés, les trois quarts des

[12:40] employés? Qui s'absentent deux,

[12:41] trois jours par semaine pour

[12:43] travailler de la maison? C'était

[12:44] ça, ma question. Je pense pas

[12:46] que vous ayez la réponse tout de

[12:47] suite, la, à moins que vous ne

[12:49] légués collecter et nous n'légué

[12:51] pas communiquer.

[12:52] - J'imagine que c'est de la

[12:53] séance où j'étais absent où

[12:55] j'étais remplacé par mon

[12:56] collègue...

[12:57] - Ça, je peux pas...

[12:58] - J'en ai pas entendu parler. Je

[13:00] suis désolé si on a raté ça,

[13:02] mais j'ai vérifié avec nous, si

[13:05] on est en mesure de vous

[13:06] revenir, mais on a déposé un

[13:08] rapport au Conseil, à l'automne.

[13:10] En fait, en décembre, qui

[13:13] mentionne le télétravail, c'est

[13:15] un peu théorique, parce que

[13:17] chacun ne remplit pas que chaque

[13:19] jour le travail, mais chaque

[13:21] employé à exprimer les moments

[13:23] où il voulait faire du

[13:25] télétravail, et ça les met dans

[13:27] un registre ou un calcul

[13:29] théorique. Sur les économies des

[13:30] gaz à effet de serre qui

[13:33] équivalent au gaz carbone, qui

[13:35] ne serait pas émis. Mais

[13:37] peut-être que, ça, ce serait

[13:38] d'intérêt pour vous. Je peux

[13:40] peut-être demander à Nathalie de

[13:42] l'envoyer, ça a été déposé au

[13:44] conseil. Saisi d'autres

[13:45] questions, bien, vous pouvez

[13:46] m'écrire, ça va me faire plaisir

[13:47] d'essayer de compléter ce qu'il

[13:49] ne serait pas... il faut

[13:53] comprendre la période de

[13:54] janvier, février, mars, c'est

[13:55] une période plus propice pour le

[13:59] télétravail pour les employés

[14:00] cols blancs, cadre. Dès qu'on a

[14:02] rive en avril, jusqu'en

[14:04] décembre, c'est Palmer moins

[14:06] évident que du télétravail. Je

[14:08] dis pas qu'il n'y en a pas, mais

[14:09] c'est beaucoup plus limité. Les

[14:11] inspecteurs sont sur place. Il y

[14:12] a toujours des constructions qui

[14:14] sont débutés. Donc, les

[14:16] inspecteurs sont sur place

[14:17] aussi. Et donc, quand les

[14:18] inspecteurs sont se place, les

[14:20] superviseurs ne sont aussi,

[14:21] etc.. Donc, tout découle de ça.

[14:23] Hiver, c'est un peu vrai.

[14:24] Janvier, février, mars, plus

[14:27] disponible. Le reste de l'année,

[14:28] il n'y en a un peu. Mais c'est

[14:30] beaucoup moins répandu.

[14:33] - Même le registraire à mon

[14:35] rassurer, je suis sûr. Donc,

[14:38] pour m'envoyer ça... au hockey.

[14:44] Questions... In a recent article

[14:53] from left praise. The journalist

[14:56] said appropriate Tory meetings

[14:57] should be made public, to reveal

[15:00] the debates and opinions of the

[15:01] councillors. He set some limits,

[15:05] but this is the core of his

[15:07] argument. I sent this article to

[15:10] all be elected councillors, and

[15:17] the Mayor, and asked this

[15:19] question. As a citizen and

[15:22] taxpayer of Beaconsfield, I'm

[15:24] asking each one of you, what is

[15:27] your position about either

[15:29] abolishing the proprietary

[15:31] meeting, or making public the

[15:33] issues discussed in caucus,

[15:35] through the production of

[15:36] minutes. So far, I received one

[15:40] answer from the Councillor, who

[15:44] already said his opinion about

[15:45] this. My question here today, is

[15:49] what is your position, ideally,

[15:52] of each councillor about this

[15:58] idea

[15:59] - C'est proposed by this

[16:00] journalist?

[16:01] >> It wasn't

[16:02] Un article dans La Presse?

[16:03] - Oui.

[16:04] - En français?

[16:05] - Oui. Mais je voulais envoyer

[16:06] avec traduction en anglais.

[16:07] - Je vais vous répondre en

[16:08] français.

[16:09] - Ça me dérange. Pas mais je

[16:10] vous les envoyer en anglais,

[16:11] aussi. La traduction.

[16:12] - Je comprends. Mais je pense

[16:13] que vous avez émis l'opinion

[16:14] d'un conseiller.

[16:15] - D'un journaliste. C'est un

[16:16] journaliste.

[16:17] - O.K..

[16:18] - Un conseiller sur ce sujet-là.

[16:21] Le reste du conseil n'est pas

[16:23] d'accord. Alors, nous allons

[16:25] continuer.

[16:26] - Vous parlez au nom de tout le

[16:27] monde.

[16:28] - Oui, je peux parler au nom de

[16:29] tout le monde. Je suis certain

[16:31] que les autres, ils sont très

[16:32] heureux que je parle en leur

[16:34] nom. Alors, c'est non.

[16:38] - Avez-vous vu, un peu,

[16:40] d'historique avec...

[16:41] - Ces noms, ces noms, ces noms.

[16:45] Merci pour la transparence.

[16:58] Good evening, I'm Boris

[17:00] skylines, Kate 11 Ferry Drive. I

[17:02] had to question, but one appears

[17:03] to be answered. The question was

[17:10] regarding the refurbishing --

[17:16] and the City website, here is

[17:22] the proposal from January. It is

[17:26] also the proposal that is right

[17:28] now for the vote, and they kind

[17:30] of comparative what is exactly

[17:31] the difference between two

[17:32] proposals, and there is hardly

[17:35] any worth mentioning, the kind

[17:37] of moving something by metre or

[17:39] a metre and a half here and

[17:40] there, the only difference that

[17:43] can be noticed, is that they

[17:46] reduced slightly the height from

[17:48] 16 and a half metres, to 13 and

[17:50] a half, but that still 35% over

[17:54] the limit for this. So anyway, I

[17:57] believe you already answered it.

[17:59] And the other question is, is a

[18:02] kind of anticipatory nature. It

[18:05] came to my attention that

[18:07] there's a big construction going

[18:09] north of 40 and west of St.

[18:12] Charles and there's some

[18:14] warehouses being built. And the

[18:15] people whose properties are

[18:20] facing, they're complaining that

[18:23] finding damage to the

[18:24] foundation, because the machine

[18:25] are being used, they're also

[18:27] driving some piles of the

[18:28] ground, and so on. So,

[18:33] apparently some one or two of

[18:35] the citizens of the West Island,

[18:37] I'm not sure whether it's DDO,

[18:40] or maybe Pointe-Claire, in

[18:43] anticipation of potential

[18:45] situations like that, they would

[18:47] send the inspectors to survey

[18:50] the foundation condition of the

[18:52] buildings around the

[18:53] construction site, so in the

[18:54] case that there is some damage

[18:56] to the construction, it would be

[18:58] possible to whatever, asked the

[19:01] contractor for damages and so

[19:02] on. So, my question is, where

[19:06] the Council consider something

[19:07] like that? Or, at least advising

[19:13] residents to survey, somehow,

[19:16] the subterranean structure of

[19:17] the house, in case of damage to

[19:20] the construction of, let's say

[19:24] anything else in the future,

[19:25] that there might be some legal

[19:26] recourse.

[19:28] >> Yeah, it sounds like all of

[19:30] this is related to the ramp. I

[19:33] think the construction of the

[19:34] ramp --

[19:36] >> No, it's not the construction

[19:37] of the ramp, it's north of the

[19:39] ramp align. There's a huge lot

[19:41] north of 40, and west of St.

[19:43] Charles.

[19:44] >> What is being constructed?

[19:45] >> I think it's called

[19:47] Roosevelt, the company that is

[19:48] doing that. Some warehouse,

[19:51] something like that.

[19:52] >> Industrial park --

[19:54] >> Industrial park, yeah.

[19:55] [Inaudible]

[20:00] >> No, it's not about them,

[20:02] they're doing whatever they want

[20:03] to do. The question is about,

[20:07] how to protect people who are

[20:11] facing that, from suffering some

[20:14] damage for their properties.

[20:15] >> I would ask Mr. bio to

[20:16] answer. Can't tell specifically

[20:22] to one project that you

[20:23] referring to. Depending on the

[20:27] type of projects, or the kind of

[20:29] digging, dynamiting, for the

[20:34] vibrations that are gonna create

[20:35] with the tools. Some projects,

[20:39] we do include the fact that

[20:42] inspectors have to monitor the

[20:45] property before the work starts,

[20:48] this is video of each property,

[20:50] and some we go inside, so the

[20:54] type of projects, I know we did

[20:56] somewhat infrastructures, I'm

[20:57] not sure if that would apply for

[20:59] them, but we'd have to verify

[21:01] for the technical department

[21:04] that something that does exist

[21:06] already. It's a good practice,

[21:08] depending on the project, I'm

[21:09] not sure implies. I took some

[21:12] notes, and we can consider that

[21:14] for the future. And in formula

[21:17] if that's gonna happen, or is

[21:18] not gonna happen. If people

[21:20] could also make their own

[21:24] videos. Normally it's a third

[21:25] party that does this then

[21:27] afterward, we can determine if

[21:29] there is a new crack, where was

[21:31] that crack there? When are we

[21:33] damaged, or are we not. You

[21:36] don't talk about.

[21:37] >> Okay, very good. Thank you.

[21:39] >> Thank you.

[21:48] >> Good evening, and my name is

[21:50] David whirl, I'm also a resident

[21:52] on Fairway Drive. I think one of

[21:56] the things, the message I want

[21:57] to get across tonight, is the

[22:00] sense of concern, that we all

[22:02] have, for what is about to

[22:05] transpire, maybe on the plaza.

[22:09] Again, you brought a very good

[22:11] point, with foundation damage, I

[22:15] work in the construction

[22:17] business and a lot of times,

[22:19] there are inspections done prior

[22:21] to work being done in the area,

[22:24] in order to establish whether

[22:26] not someone's gonna make a claim

[22:28] against the building, or use it

[22:30] as a tool, to improve their own

[22:33] house. So I think, like you

[22:37] mentioned, there is very few

[22:40] changes in the recent proposal,

[22:45] and we're always wondering, as

[22:48] to what's gonna tip the scale of

[22:49] yes go ahead, or whatnot. So

[22:54] that's again, as a resident

[22:56] close by two L plaza we all have

[23:02] concerns as to what the

[23:04] developers actually planning,

[23:05] and I don't want to use the

[23:06] words, what we're able to get

[23:08] away with. But at what point the

[23:11] cities can put their foot down

[23:12] and say, no, you can't do this.

[23:16] And also, as somebody else

[23:17] mentioned, we haven't heard

[23:18] anything from the developer, as

[23:20] to the intent of what he wants

[23:23] to do. And I think that is

[23:25] really paramount, in our

[23:28] neighbourhood, of what should be

[23:31] done.

[23:33] >> Well, yeah, I said it before

[23:41] two misses -- a repeat, again we

[23:43] strongly encourage the

[23:45] developer, to get together with

[23:49] the residents of the

[23:51] neighbourhood, and to listen to

[23:54] their feedback, so what their

[23:56] concerns are. And hopefully he

[23:59] can address those concerns

[24:02] within the project that he wants

[24:03] to put together. As far as we're

[24:05] concerned, we're not going back

[24:07] to him to tell him what to do.

[24:09] He has to come to us, and based

[24:11] on what he submits, and we

[24:13] either say no or yes. So, it's

[24:19] not up to Council or the City,

[24:22] to actually do is project, and

[24:26] suggests what project you should

[24:27] be doing. He has to come to us

[24:29] with his project. But in the

[24:31] meantime, I certainly strongly,

[24:33] and I hope the developers

[24:36] listening to us, because he

[24:38] should be spending a lot of time

[24:40] with the residents in the

[24:42] neighbourhood, explaining what

[24:44] he wants to do, answering

[24:46] questions, listening to

[24:50] concerns, and I've seen it done

[24:51] before with other developers in

[24:54] the city. And the projects and

[24:57] ended up being very successful

[24:59] projects, because the developer

[25:02] did listen to the residents, and

[25:06] the neighbourhood, and just of

[25:08] the project accordingly. So

[25:10] again, I strongly encourage that

[25:13] developer to do the same thing.

[25:16] [Applause]

[25:20] Any other questions?

[25:24] >> Hi, Matt bug, resident of

[25:28] Crestwood, and begin Hill, a

[25:30] newly appointed treasurer of the

[25:31] beacon pool. Two things I wanted

[25:36] to mention, as a resident of the

[25:39] beacon, how I know that the

[25:41] construction is starting very

[25:43] shortly, so excited to see the

[25:46] community he's gonna come

[25:47] together the new community

[25:48] centre that. Second thing is. On

[25:52] behalf of the board, we're

[25:55] looking for a to move working

[25:56] with the city, with the

[25:58] construction project that's

[25:59] gonna be happening right next to

[26:01] us summer. Hopefully we can work

[26:04] together to minimize any

[26:06] disruptions, to the pool, and I

[26:08] think first and foremost,

[26:10] maintain a safe safety of the

[26:11] uses of the pool and in the

[26:13] community. So I just wanted to

[26:14] come and open a dialogue,

[26:16] introduce myself, and say that

[26:18] the board is looking forward to

[26:19] working with the council in the

[26:21] city, to make this project goes

[26:23] smoothly as possible, obviously

[26:25] there's gonna be some hiccups

[26:26] along the way, nothing ever goes

[26:28] as planned with these projects,

[26:30] but we want to work with the

[26:31] City for this project, and in

[26:33] the future as well so open the

[26:36] dialogue.

[26:38] >> Thank you very much, we

[26:39] appreciate your work. But I'll

[26:42] ask Mr. below, to perhaps

[26:43] reassure you a little bit, about

[26:45] how things are gonna get done,

[26:48] so we will try to certainly

[26:51] rests respect the presidents in

[26:52] the area.

[26:53] >> Thank you, and thank you for

[26:55] showing your concern, and we do

[26:56] share the same concerns.

[26:58] Obviously, safety is a priority

[27:00] when we do projects, and yes,

[27:02] there could be some hiccups. We

[27:04] did discuss her team level, you

[27:10] know the pool being closed, and

[27:11] there should be investigation

[27:12] measures to make sure the safety

[27:14] is there. I encourage you to

[27:16] talk with recreation, and Amelia

[27:19] Côté, and she's gonna be the one

[27:21] handling with you guys, and she

[27:24] could go to the public works,

[27:26] the technical services

[27:27] department, and see if there's

[27:29] anything that should be looked

[27:30] at, to fix anything that's not

[27:32] quite properly, hopefully

[27:34] doesn't happen but we end case

[27:36] would be that she's the best

[27:38] person to talk with, and also as

[27:43] what's coming up, we have the

[27:45] the demolition of the chalet. At

[27:55] this point, will be promoting or

[27:56] reforming the residents, it's a

[28:01] good time to start a project,

[28:09] -- hopefully everything's gonna

[28:13] go well.

[28:14] >> Great, we look for to

[28:15] collaborating with you guys over

[28:16] the summer on that.

[28:18] >> Thank you.

[28:20] >> Congratulations on your

[28:21] nomination's treasurer.

[28:22] >> Thank you.

[28:24] >> Any other questions? If not,

[28:30] I would like to cover an item

[28:33] which normally and cover 70.1,

[28:37] Rapport du which is about the

[28:38] maire sur

[28:39] [Speaking non-English]

[28:40] Les décisions prises. But as I

[28:42] know, the many people do leave

[28:44] right after the question period,

[28:46] I will try to cover it now. And

[28:49] La it's --

[28:50] [Speaking non-English]

[28:51] Consultation prébudgétaires

[28:52] 2024. That is being done now, or

[28:56] will be done by Montréal.

[29:03] Consultations prébudgétaires...

[29:07] it's a

[29:08] [Speaking French]

[29:09] , That will cover mostly the

[29:12] City of Montréal budget, but

[29:14] also we have questions, it's an

[29:18] opportunity for the

[29:19] conglomeration, emerging

[29:21] municipalities to input into,

[29:25] the pre-budget consultation,

[29:29] that is gonna be carried. So if

[29:30] you want to participate, and

[29:36] Consultation. The first they,

[29:40] Une séance publique. Is gonna be

[29:43] a public sounds. And on

[29:44] Wednesday, 29th of March, from

[29:51] 18 to 21 hour,. And it's that

[29:54] the Saudi can say to dead of him

[29:58] again. And that is also gonna be

[30:01] web costing about session. That

[30:03] session is going to be simply to

[30:08] set the scene, put in place the

[30:15] stash necessary, to be able to.

[30:16] Continue the consultation et il

[30:20] y aura, and un sondage qui there

[30:23] will be -- sera

[30:25] Disponible à partir du 22 mars

[30:29] au 6 avril, qui est de répondre

[30:32] aux sondage en ligne. Alors,

[30:36] soit que vous fassiez des

[30:39] réponses en ligne à ce sondage

[30:40] là ou que vous déposiez un

[30:45] mémoire ou une opinion par

[30:48] courriel, boîte postale ou en

[30:51] personne au service du greffe de

[30:53] la Ville de Montréal. And there

[30:57] will be more sessions, on

[31:00] Tuesday,

[31:07] April 25th from -- now will be

[31:09] again in public. We will show up

[31:14] in person, and that's how they

[31:17] can say. And again, from 18

[31:21] hour, 21 hour the same day, --

[31:29] it'll be by video conference,

[31:32] and so to be on the 4th of May.

[31:36] If you want to, deposit among

[31:46] law Lors des. -- séances... lors

[31:49] de ces séances... you have to,

[31:55] do it online, or by telephone at

[31:58] 5148 72, La date limite

[32:05] d'inscription... 3000, -- the

[32:12] 18th of April 2023 5:00. So I

[32:18] strongly recommend and suggest

[32:20] residents, certainly in

[32:22] Beaconsfield, or other major

[32:24] municipalities, to participate.

[32:27] If we don't participate, then

[32:30] don't complain but the high

[32:32] taxes, because this is an

[32:35] opportunity to have a say if you

[32:37] don't have to say than you gonna

[32:39] have to put up with high taxes.

[32:45] >> I have a question.

[32:55] Je regarde ça, les documents des

[32:57] consultations, à la question de

[32:58] la ville, c'est pas tout à fait

[33:00] nous ont. Nous, c'est

[33:02] l'agglomération. Au sujet de

[33:03] l'agglomération, les gens

[33:05] informations fournies dans ce

[33:06] document, ça réfère à s'il y

[33:08] aurait des pouvoirs que l'on

[33:10] pourrait transférer de

[33:12] l'agglomération vers les villes.

[33:16] J'étais surpris que ce soit ça,

[33:17] la seule portée de la

[33:19] documentation parce que, d'après

[33:20] moi, si c'est un document

[33:23] budgétaire, il devrait aussi

[33:25] parler des taxes. Donc, ma

[33:28] question, à vous, à ce sujet-là,

[33:30] là, c'est: quelle est la portée

[33:32] de ce que l'on peut questionner

[33:35] dans un mémoire parce que, la,

[33:36] est-ce qu'on peut aller vers les

[33:38] taxes? Parce que ce n'est pas la

[33:40] question de prendre plus de

[33:42] pouvoirs, là. Avec les mêmes

[33:43] pouvoirs, on a 37% de plus de

[33:45] taxes qu'il y a 4 ans.

[33:47] - Bon, premièrement, vous

[33:49] soulevez prend plus de pouvoirs,

[33:50] mais ils espèrent que les taxes

[33:52] vont baisser, là en, même temps.

[33:54] Mais, écoutez, ce n'est pas la

[33:56] question qui est importante.

[33:58] C'est la réponse. Alors, vous

[34:01] pouvez aller avec la réponse que

[34:03] vous croyez qui serait la bonne

[34:05] réponse pour la Clément ration.

[34:08] Autrement dit, si vous croyez

[34:12] que vous parlez des taxes, de la

[34:15] façon que les taxes sont, tout

[34:16] ça, moi, je vous dirais:

[34:18] allez-y.

[34:20] - Je suis sûr que vous êtes

[34:21] d'accord.

[34:22] - Allez-y d', à votre mémoire.

[34:23] C'est pour ça que je dis que

[34:24] c'est la réponse qui est

[34:25] importante. Alors, la réponse,

[34:27] c'est à vous de décider ce que

[34:29] vous allez mettre comme réponse

[34:30] à leurs questions. Mais

[34:35] j'agirais certainement.

[34:36] - Non j', ai bien compris, là,

[34:37] mais c'est parce que le document

[34:38] est surprenant. Est-ce que vous

[34:41] voulez d'autres pouvoir

[34:42] transférer?

[34:43] - C'est parce que les gens qui

[34:44] ont fait ce document-là...

[34:46] - Ils ont leur point de vue.

[34:47] - Il compte... ils comprennent

[34:49] absolument rien de la

[34:51] glorification.

[34:52] - En effet, en effet.

[34:58] - Alors, voilà. On continue avec

[35:03] madame la greffière. Approval of

[35:08] the minutes of the public

[35:11] consultation on February 20

[35:14] 23rd.

[35:20] >> Seconded.

[35:21] >> All in favour?

[35:23] - À l' unanimité.

[35:26] Approbation du procès-verbal de

[35:29] la consultation publique de la

[35:30] Ville de Beaconsfield du 20

[35:31] février 2023.

[35:35] - En faveur.

[35:39] - À l'unanimité. Awarding of

[35:44] contracts 612-23-GC for the

[35:46] extension of the water network

[35:49] from City Lane to Celtic to the

[35:51] lowest conforming bidder,

[35:53] Transport J-R Cyr & Fils Inc.,

[35:54] In the amount of

[36:00] $269,995.79, all taxes included

[36:01] 20.2 Awarding of contract

[36:10] - À l'unanimité.

[36:13] Octroi du contrat 612-23-GC

[36:14] concernant le bouclage du réseau

[36:15] d'aqueduc, City Lane à Celtic au

[36:18] plus bas soumissionnaire

[36:20] conforme, soit Transport J-R Cyr

[36:21] & Fils inc., Pour la somme de

[36:23] 269 995,79 $, toutes taxes

[36:25] incluses.

[36:31] - Je propose.

[36:32] - Proposé.

[36:33] - Appuyé.

[36:34] - En faveur.

[36:37] - À l'unanimité. 20.3 Awarding

[36:43] of contract TP 2023-02 for the

[36:44] cleaning and mowing of green

[36:46] spaces for the year 2023 with

[36:47] four

[36:48] (4)

[36:49] renewal options to the lowest

[36:50] conforming bidder, Lee Ling

[36:51] Paysagement, in the amount of

[36:56] $187,697.75, all taxes included

[37:08] 20.4 Renewal of contract

[37:12] Renouvellement du contrat

[37:13] 538-19-GC pour le marquage axial

[37:14] des chaussées souples pour

[37:15] l'année 2023 avec Entreprise

[37:16] T.R.A.

[37:17] (2011)

[37:18] inc. Au coût approximatif de 23

[37:20] 571,98 $, toutes taxes incluses.

[37:29] - Proposé.

[37:31] - Je puis.

[37:32] - En faveur.

[37:35] - À l'unanimité. 20.4 Renewal of

[37:41] contract 538-19-GC for the

[37:42] renewal of contract 538-19-GC

[37:43] for the street line painting

[37:44] work for the year 2023 with with

[37:50] Ligne-Fit Inc., At an

[37:51] approximate cost of $129,005.42,

[37:54] all taxes included 30. FINANCE

[38:01] AND TREASURY

[38:10] Approbation de la liste des

[38:11] comptes à payer au 27 mars 2023,

[38:12] et de la liste des paiements

[38:13] préautorisés pour la période du

[38:14] 9 février 2023 au 19 février

[38:15] 2023 et du 21 février 2023 au 15

[38:16] mars 2023, pour un déboursé

[38:17] total de 18 077 299,76 $.

[38:31] - Alors, c'est un gros montant,

[38:33] ça, mais le premier montant est

[38:35] de 14 millions 573 46, à la

[38:39] Ville de Montréal pour le

[38:42] premier versement sous protêt.

[38:45] Les quote-part d'agglomération

[38:47] 2023. 253803 et 63, à la Ville

[38:51] de Montréal, pour le premier

[38:53] versement sous profiter de la

[38:55] contribution du centre-ville

[38:57] 2023. 250499 dollars, Communauté

[39:03] métropolitaine de Montréal, pour

[39:04] versement de la quote-part

[39:07] provisoire 2023. 200 souvent...

[39:10] 200 33483 et 53, mazout j'ai

[39:13] Bélanger, pour

[39:14] l'approvisionnement en diesel.

[39:19] 183693, haricot ce service, pour

[39:21] la collection des matières

[39:23] résiduelles au mois de janvier

[39:24] et février. Et 181643 et 60, à

[39:29] (---)

[39:30] , pour le prix du carburant et

[39:33] la collecte des matières

[39:35] résiduelles et le recyclage

[39:37] 2022. Et, finalement, les

[39:39] salaires de 515915 et 19.

[39:44] -

[39:45] Proposé.

[39:46] - Appuyé.

[39:47] - En faveur.

[39:48] - À l'unanimité. In compliance

[39:57] with some 5:13 respecting

[39:58] elections and referendums in

[39:59] municipalities

[40:03] Ordonnance pour vendre les

[40:04] immeubles comportant des soldes

[40:05] de taxes impayées pour 2021 et

[40:06] 2022 aux enchères publiques et

[40:07] dépôt par le trésorier de la

[40:08] liste de ces immeubles.

[40:11] - Je propose.

[40:16] - À l'unanimité. 30.4 Approval

[40:20] of a financial contribution of

[40:21] $5,500 for the annual greens

[40:22] maintenance

[40:28] between the Beaconsfield Lawn

[40:29] Bowling Club and the City of

[40:30] Beaconsfield for the year 2023

[40:34] - À l'unanimité. 30.5 Approval

[40:35] of a $3,000 Approbation d'un

[40:36] appui contribution to West

[40:37] Island financier de 3 000 $ à

[40:38] Association for l'Association de

[40:39] l'Ouest de Intellectually

[40:40] Handicapped l'Île pour les

[40:41] handicapés intellectuels for the

[40:42] (WIAIH)

[40:43] pour l'année 2023.

[40:45] - Je propose. All in favour?

[40:52] Year 2023 30.6 Approval of a

[40:53] $1,000 contribution to the West

[40:55] Island Community Resource Centre

[40:56] for the year 2023

[41:08] >> All in favour?

[41:09] - À l'unanimité. Approbation

[41:10] d'un appui financier de 2 000 $

[41:11] à NOVA l'ouest-de-l'île pour

[41:12] l'année 2023.

[41:15] - Je propose.

[41:17] - Je seconde.

[41:21] - À l'unanimité. 30.8 Approval

[41:23] of a $500 contribution to West

[41:24] Island Youth Action

[41:27] (AJOI)

[41:31] for the year 2023 30.9 Approval

[41:34] of a $500

[41:35] - En faveur.

[41:36] - À l'unanimité. Approbation

[41:37] d'un appui financier de 500 $ à

[41:38] Les services à la famille AMCAL

[41:39] pour l'année 2023.

[41:43] - Je propose.

[41:44] - Appuyé.

[41:45] - En faveur.

[41:46] - À l'unanimité. 30.10 Approval

[41:50] of a $150 contribution to the

[41:51] Lakeshore

[41:57] Concert band for the purchase of

[41:58] an advertisement in their 2023

[41:59] Gala Concert of the Lakeshore

[42:00] Concert Band programme for the

[42:01] year 2023

[42:10] - À l'unanimité. Dépôt, avis de

[42:17] motion et adoption d'un projet

[42:19] de Règlement BEAC-045-16

[42:20] intitulé « Règlement modifiant

[42:21] le Règlement BEAC-045 sur les

[42:22] permis et certificats afin

[42:23] d'abroger les dispositions

[42:24] relatives aux amendes pour la

[42:25] démolition, de référer au

[42:26] Règlement de démolition BEAC-152

[42:27] préalablement à l'obtention d'un

[42:28] permis de construction

[42:29] nécessitant la démolition d'un

[42:30] bâtiment, d'assujettir la

[42:31] démolition totale d'un bâtiment

[42:33] à l'obtention d'un certificat

[42:34] d'autorisation et d'abroger les

[42:36] dispositions relatives aux

[42:37] démolitions du présent

[42:38] règlement » et soumission du

[42:39] projet de règlement à une

[42:41] consultation publique le 24

[42:42] avril 2023 à 19 h 30.

[42:53] -

[42:54] Est-ce qu'il pourrait y avoir

[42:55] une proposition pour le projet?

[42:57] - Oui.

[42:58] - Je seconde.

[43:00] - En faveur.

[43:01] - À l'unanimité. 40.1 Filing,

[43:05] notice of motion and adoption of

[43:06] Draft By-law

[43:12] BEAC-045-16 entitled « By-law

[43:13] modifying By-law BEAC-045

[43:14] concerning permits and

[43:15] certificates to repeal the

[43:16] provisions relating to fines for

[43:21] demolition,

[43:24] - Et vous proposez d'adoption du

[43:26] premier projet?

[43:32] - À l'unanimité. Dépôt, avis de

[43:34] motion et adoption d'un projet

[43:35] de Beaconsfield. Règlement

[43:36] 720-128 intitulé «

[43:37] Règlement modifiant le règlement

[43:38] de zonage 720 afin d'ajouter la

[43:39] définition de bâtiment

[43:40] accessoire, d'abroger le terme

[43:41] démolition et sa définition et

[43:42] de modifier les définitions de

[43:43] mur extérieur et de superficie

[43:46] d'emprise au sol » et soumission

[43:47] du projet de règlement à une

[43:48] consultation publique le 24

[43:49] avril 2023 à 19 h 30.

[44:01] - Je donne l'avis de motion et

[44:02] je propose l'adoption.

[44:05] - En faveur.

[44:06] - All in favour?

[44:07] À l'unanimité.

[44:18] On the use of drinking water in

[44:20] order to propose measures in

[44:22] connection with the potable

[44:26] water strategy. The objective is

[44:28] to respect the measures other

[44:33] Québec strategy, for the

[44:34] conservation of drinking water

[44:36] on the responsibility of the

[44:39] municipal affairs announcing and

[44:44] therefore modified certain

[44:45] provisions regarding water usage

[44:48] and all applied to the whole

[44:49] territory of

[44:50] - Beaconsfield.

[44:51] >> In favour?

[44:52] >> À l'unanimité. Adoption du

[44:56] Règlement 720-122-2 intitulé

[44:57] »Règlement modifiant le

[44:59] Règlement de zonage the

[45:02] opposition

[45:03] 720 afin de modifier la

[45:04] définition du terme arbre« .

[45:11] Donc, l'objet du règlement et de

[45:13] modifier les dispositions pour

[45:16] l'abattage et la plantation et

[45:18] s'appliquera à l'ensemble du

[45:20] territoire de la ville de

[45:21] Beaconsfield.

[45:22] - Proposé.

[45:24] - Oui.

[45:29] - En faveur.

[45:33] - Donc, à l'unanimité. 40.6

[45:40] Adoption of By-law 720-122-2

[45:41] entitled »By-law

[45:48] modifying Zoning By-law 720 in

[45:49] order to modify the definition

[45:50] of a tree«

[45:51] - Donc, tel que...

[46:02] 40.7 Request for approval for a

[46:06] specific construction

[46:22] - Demande d'approbation d'un

[46:24] projet particulier de

[46:26] construction, de modifications

[46:28] ou d'occupation d'un immeuble

[46:29] (PPCMOI)

[46:30] situé au 275, Elm, Beaconsfield

[46:32] (lots projetés 6 555 296 et 6

[46:34] 555 297 du cadastre du Québec)

[46:35] dans la zone C330 du Règlement

[46:37] de zonage 720. la recommandation

[46:43] est de refuser.

[46:47] - En faveur de la

[46:48] recommandation.

[46:50] -...

[46:59] In favour of the recommendation?

[47:04] - Donc, c'est un refus à

[47:05] l'unanimité. Favour the

[47:12] recommendation was refused.

[47:17] >> Requests for review of the

[47:20] demolition community the vision

[47:22] of January 31st 2023, compared

[47:23] to the building at 1:31

[47:24] woodland. --

[47:34] >> All in favour? So you're

[47:40] proposing to to review

[47:47] --

[47:48] >> Is what's in the agenda,

[47:49] correct?

[47:51] [Inaudible]

[48:03] >> So that's clear, the

[48:08] proposals to extend the

[48:09] demolition. All in favour?

[48:13] Against?

[48:16] >> Motion carried.

[48:24] -

[48:25] Demande de dérogations mineures

[48:26] pour la propriété située au 85,

[48:28] Heritage. La recommandation est

[48:32] approuvée.

[48:33] - Proposé.

[48:34] - Secondé.

[48:35] - En faveur. J'ai oublié, là,

[48:37] mais est-ce que les deux

[48:38] personnes qui ont voté contre la

[48:40] démolition aimerait s'exprimer?

[48:46] O.K., parfait. O.K., parfait.

[48:51] - Donc... approuvé, pour 85,

[48:55] héritage. Request for minor

[49:00] exemption for the property

[49:02] looking at when 13 -- the

[49:03] recommendation is approved.

[49:05] >> Opposed.

[49:06] >> All in favour of the

[49:08] recommendation?

[49:09] - À l'unanimité.

[49:14] Demande d'approbation du Plan

[49:15] d'implantation et d'intégration

[49:17] architecturale

[49:18] (PIIA)

[49:19] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[49:20] de construction pour un nouveau

[49:21] bâtiment principal situé au 5,

[49:22] Claude. La recommandation est de

[49:23] refuser.

[49:24] - Proposé.

[49:25] - Appuyé.

[49:26] -... Him

[49:27] - À l'unanimité. Make the

[49:28] recommendation.

[49:29] >> Request for the approval of

[49:30] the site planning an

[49:32] architectural integration

[49:33] program, with a two-way building

[49:35] permit, for a new building, the

[49:39] recommendation is to be refused?

[49:41] >> Proposed.

[49:42] >> Seconded.

[49:43] >> All in favour of the

[49:44] recommendation?

[49:48] Demande d'approbation du plan

[49:53] d'intégration architecturale

[49:54] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[49:55] de construction pour un nouveau

[49:56] bâtiment principal situé au 109,

[49:57] Jasper. La recommandation est

[49:58] refusée.

[49:59] - Proposé.

[50:02] - En faveur de la

[50:03] recommandation.

[50:04] - À l'unanimité. -- relating to

[50:12] a building permit application

[50:14] for a new main building located

[50:17] at 1:37 field fair, the

[50:19] recommendation is to refuse.

[50:21] >> Proposed.

[50:22] >> Seconded.

[50:23] >> In favour the recommendation?

[50:30] -

[50:31] >>

[50:32] Demande d'approbation du Plan

[50:33] d'implantation et d'intégration

[50:34] architecturale

[50:35] (PIIA)

[50:36] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[50:37] de construction pour un nouveau

[50:38] bâtiment principal

[50:43] situé au 160, Stone. J'

[50:47] - Propose. Et

[50:48] - Appuyé.

[50:49] - En faveur.

[50:50] - À l'unanimité. The approval of

[50:51] the site planning, and the

[50:53] format relating to a building

[50:57] permit application for new main

[50:58] building located at one 90

[51:01] Lakeview it is the

[51:03] recommendation is to refuse?

[51:04] >> Proposed.

[51:05] >> Seconded.

[51:07] >> Favour the recommendation?

[51:10] >>

[51:12] -

[51:13] Demande d'approbation du Plan

[51:14] d'implantation et d'intégration

[51:15] architecturale relatif à la

[51:16] demande d'un permis de

[51:17] construction pour

[51:18] l'agrandissement du bâtiment

[51:19] principal situé au 18,

[51:20] Lakeshore.. La recommandation

[51:22] est de refuser.

[51:23] - Proposé.

[51:24] - Secondé.

[51:25] - En faveur de la

[51:26] recommandation.

[51:27] - À l'unanimité. Request for the

[51:31] approval of the site planning

[51:32] and Architectural Integration

[51:34] Programme relating to a building

[51:36] permit explanation for the main

[51:37] building were located at 1:13 --

[51:40] direct nation is to prove.

[51:42] Proposed seconded.

[51:48] - Demande d'approbation du Plan

[51:49] d'implantation et d'intégration

[51:51] architecturale relatif à la

[51:52] demande d'un permis de

[51:53] construction pour

[51:54] l'agrandissement du bâtiment

[51:55] principal situé au 393, Bishop.

[51:59] La recommandation est de

[52:00] prouver.

[52:01] - Proposé.

[52:02] - En faveur.

[52:04] - À l'unanimité. Request for the

[52:09] approval of the site planning

[52:10] and Architectural Integration

[52:12] Programme relating to a building

[52:13] program -- beside of the main

[52:16] building located at 1:55 west

[52:18] grove the recommendation is to

[52:20] refuse.

[52:21] >> Opposed.

[52:22] >> Seconded.

[52:23] >> -- Okay, I will allow. It

[52:30] normally should come during the

[52:32] question period to ask the

[52:33] question. But go ahead. Go

[52:34] ahead. Not a problem. Just go to

[52:38] the microphone and ask your

[52:39] question.

[52:46] >> First I didn't know if you

[52:48] would accept or refused this

[52:52] proposition that I am doing. It

[52:53] is only that I have now owe the

[52:57] acceptation of all my

[53:01] neighbours. So we all the six

[53:03] people that want to change the

[53:05] wood on the facade to put

[53:11] something like metallic surface.

[53:13] And that is why I am here

[53:15] tonight. Well, I went to the CCU

[53:19] unaided all the work requested,

[53:24] - Est-ce que je peux parler en

[53:25] français? Bon, merci, merci.

[53:27] Alors, c'est ça, mes voisins

[53:30] sont d'accord pour faire le

[53:31] changement: on a vraiment

[53:32] débattu... des problèmes avec

[53:33] les surfaces en bois. C'est très

[53:35] haut, on a des pitbull qui

[53:36] viennent faire des trous. On a

[53:38] beau boucher les trous, les

[53:40] pitbull reviennent! C'est

[53:42] vraiment tannant, là, ça

[53:43] commence à faire. Tout le monde

[53:44] est bien tanné de ça. Et on

[53:46] aimerait faire faire les travaux

[53:48] ce printemps, le plus tôt

[53:50] possible pour que... pour qu'on

[53:52] ait pas ce problème-là encore

[53:53] une autre année et qu'on soit

[53:55] obligés de boucher des trous.

[53:56] Alors, on veut une surface qui

[53:58] soit en métal. Comme ça, il n'y

[54:00] aura plus de bois. Mais on m'a

[54:02] demandé, puisque ce n'est pas du

[54:04] bois qu'on remplace pour Dubois,

[54:07] on remplace pas quelque chose de

[54:09] permanent, on m'a demandé de

[54:10] passer par l'approbation, ici.

[54:12] - Alors il, faut que vous

[54:13] passiez par l'OCDE.

[54:15] - Oui, ce que j'ai. Fait

[54:17] - Refaire votre demande. Et à ce

[54:19] moment, là on va la passer, ici,

[54:21] au conseil. Si on en

[54:24] recommandation favorable du CCU.

[54:25] - Donc, c'est O.K.. C'est beau.

[54:27] - Juste un commentaire: si tout

[54:31] vos voisins... excuser... si

[54:34] tous vos voisins doivent

[54:36] démontrer cette volonté, pas

[54:37] juste pour vous. Par famille. Je

[54:41] pense que, professionnellement,

[54:42] ils doivent déposer leur projet

[54:44] par adresse. Donc, parfait.

[54:45] (inaudible)

[54:52] vous pouvez très bien faire

[54:55] votre demande.

[54:56] (inaudible)

[54:59] - Parfait, O.K., parfait.

[55:01] - Je voudrais dire parce que

[55:04] vous êtes six voisins, ensemble.

[55:06] Alors, l'idée de changer,

[55:09] d'après moi, c'était pour, comme

[55:12] vous dites, pour vos voisins.

[55:14] Alors, ça, je dirais que c'est

[55:17] d'être certain de...

[55:31] Roger, use the mic we can't hear

[55:32] you on the webcast.

[55:35] - Je dis simplement d'être

[55:38] certain que vous parlez avec la

[55:41] Ville. À ce moment-là, pour

[55:44] indiquer ce que vos plans sont

[55:45] pour tous les voisins. O.K.,

[55:48] d'accord.

[55:51] - C'est exact, c'est ça, c'est

[55:52] ça. Oui.

[55:53] (inaudible)

[55:55] - Merci. Merci beaucoup. On y

[55:57] va.

[56:00] - Donc, la recommandation est de

[56:01] refuser.

[56:09] - Proposé.

[56:10] - Appuyé.

[56:11] - En faveur.

[56:17] - À l'unanimité. Donc, c'est un

[56:18] refus. Demande d'approbation du

[56:20] Plan d'implantation et

[56:21] d'intégration architecturale

[56:22] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[56:23] de construction pour la

[56:24] modification de la façade du

[56:25] bâtiment principal situé au 155,

[56:26] Westcroft. La recommandation de

[56:30] refuser.

[56:32] - Proposé.

[56:34] - J'appuie.

[56:35] - En faveur.

[56:38] - À l'unanimité. Request for the

[56:42] planning an architectural

[56:44] integration program relating to

[56:45] a building permit application

[56:46] for the modification of the

[56:48] facade of a main building

[56:49] located at 506 Montréal. The

[56:52] recommendation is to approve.

[56:55] Proposed. Second. In favour.

[56:59] - À l'unanimité. Demande

[57:00] d'approbation du Plan

[57:01] d'implantation et d'intégration

[57:02] architecturale relatif à la

[57:03] demande d'un permis de

[57:04] construction pour la

[57:05] modification du plan déjà

[57:06] approuvé au 50, York. La

[57:09] recommandation est de refuser.

[57:12] - Proposé.

[57:14] - Secondé.

[57:15] - En faveur.

[57:17] - À l'unanimité. Request for the

[57:20] approval of the site planning

[57:22] and integrated program relating

[57:23] to a building permit application

[57:26] to modify the already approved

[57:28] plan at 89 Frederick. The

[57:31] accommodation is to refuse.

[57:33] >> Proposed.

[57:34] >> Seconded.

[57:35] >> In favour.

[57:36] - À l'unanimité. Demande

[57:37] d'approbation du Plan

[57:38] d'implantation et d'intégration

[57:40] architecturale relatif à la

[57:41] demande d'un permis de

[57:42] construction pour la

[57:43] modification du plan déjà

[57:44] approuvé au 122, St-Louis.. La

[57:47] recommandation est de refuser.

[57:48] - Proposé.

[57:51] - Secondé.

[57:52] - En faveur!

[57:54] - À l'unanimité. Request for the

[58:02] issue and a certificate of

[58:04] authorization for the

[58:05] installation of a sign for the

[58:06] business located at 4:52

[58:08] Beaconsfield. The recommendation

[58:09] is to approve.

[58:11] >> Proposed.

[58:12] >> Seconded.

[58:13] >> In favour.

[58:17] - Demande d'approbation du plan

[58:20] d'un tel ration pour lotissement

[58:22] de la propriété située au 275,

[58:24] elle. La recommandation est de

[58:26] refuser.

[58:27] - Proposé.

[58:28] - Secondé.

[58:29] - En faveur de la

[58:30] recommandation.

[58:33] - À l'unanimité. Minutes of the

[58:36] Planning -- reading of the

[58:38] Marine -- eight 2023.

[58:44] >> No additional comments.

[58:45] >> No comment.

[58:53] >> Proposed.

[58:54] >> Seconded.

[58:55] >> In favour.

[58:59] - Procès-verbal de la réunion du

[59:00] Comité consultatif culture et

[59:01] loisirs du 31 janvier 2023.

[59:03] - Ces commentaires? Madame?

[59:05] - Non, pas de commentaires

[59:06] additionnels. Merci.

[59:08] - Alors...

[59:09] - Proposé

[59:11] - Qui seconde?

[59:14] - En faveur.

[59:15] - À l'unanimité. Commissioner

[59:20] member to the traffic Advisory

[59:21] Committee.

[59:24] - Des commentaires, Monsieur le

[59:26] Président?

[59:27] - Merci, Monsieur le Maire.

[59:28] Donc, nous proposons la

[59:30] nomination de madame Daphne

[59:31] Lalonde... A resident from

[59:36] district three. South of the 20

[59:39] in Brier would neighbourhood.

[59:41] Miss Lalonde is in the committee

[59:45] from several years. And Elle est

[59:49] très, très intéressés à

[59:50] participer aux travaux du

[59:51] comité. On est heureux de

[59:53] l'accueillir. Et elle remplace

[59:56] monsieur Samson, qui était avec

[59:57] le Comité sur la circulation

[59:59] depuis nombre d'années. Encore

[1:00:00] une fois, on a remercié de ses

[1:00:02] années de services au sein du

[1:00:03] comité. C'est toujours apprécié.

[1:00:04] Merci.

[1:00:09] - Proposé par... O.K.. Et

[1:00:14] - Seconde. Est

[1:00:15] - En faveur!

[1:00:17] - À l'unanimité. Autorisation

[1:00:22] pour la fermeture de rue pour le

[1:00:23] Marché Beau, les vendredis du 26

[1:00:24] mai au 15 septembre 2023 de 14 h

[1:00:25] à 18 h 30.

[1:00:27] - Proposé.

[1:00:29] - En faveur!

[1:00:34] - L'unanimité. Authorizations

[1:00:40] for friends of the -- village to

[1:00:43] organize a community garage sale

[1:00:47] on May 30 2023.

[1:00:48] >> Proposed.

[1:00:49] >> Seconded.

[1:00:50] >> In favour.

[1:00:54] - Unanimité. Autorisation pour

[1:00:57] effectuer le dépôt d'une demande

[1:00:58] d'aide financière pour le projet

[1:00:59] d'acquisition de ressources

[1:01:00] documentaires de la bibliothèque

[1:01:01] de Beaconsfield auprès du

[1:01:02] ministère de la Culture et des

[1:01:03] Communications pour les années

[1:01:04] 2023 et 2024 60.4

[1:01:09] - Je propose. J'

[1:01:10] - Appuie.

[1:01:12] - En faveur.

[1:01:15] - À l'unanimité. Authorization

[1:01:19] to sign the political agreement

[1:01:20] between the minister of

[1:01:21] municipal affairs and the city

[1:01:22] of Beaconsfield regarding the

[1:01:24] special support as part of the

[1:01:31] as part of the PRIMADA for the

[1:01:32] Annex Herb Linder accessibility

[1:01:33] improvement.? Project. It's an

[1:01:34] update.

[1:01:35] >> Proposed.

[1:01:36] >> Seconded.

[1:01:37] >> In favour.

[1:01:38] - À l'unanimité. Dépôt d'une

[1:01:39] déclaration pécuniaire amendée

[1:01:40] d'un membre du Conseil. Il

[1:01:42] s'agit d'un dépôt. The mayor

[1:01:46] reporters on the decisions made

[1:01:48] by declaration Council and its

[1:01:49] meeting on February 23, 2023.

[1:01:52] - J'ai déjà fait le rapport.

[1:02:00] - Dépôt des rapport du

[1:02:01] directeur.

[1:02:03] - Je ne signaler en particulier,

[1:02:05] Monsieur le Maire.

[1:02:06] - Juste ajouter, pour le point

[1:02:08] 60,1, excusez, fermeture de rue

[1:02:11] pour le marché. Il y a peut-être

[1:02:13] des journées où ce sera déplacé

[1:02:16] ou suspendu à cause de travaux

[1:02:17] qu'il pourrait y avoir dans ce

[1:02:19] secteur-là. Donc, juste le

[1:02:20] préciser.

[1:02:26] - Un point en affaires

[1:02:27] nouvelles. Donc, le point 90,1.

[1:02:33] Contract Tippit 2023 of five.

[1:02:36] Supplier of a combined scoring

[1:02:38] track to the low is confirming

[1:02:40] better. CMA in the amount of it

[1:02:46] hundred $28,318.75. All taxes

[1:02:48] included. I would ask to please

[1:02:57] explain a little bit more about

[1:02:58] this.

[1:02:59] - Oui, Monsieur le Maire. C'est

[1:03:00] pas tous les jours qu'on achète

[1:03:02] un équipement de ce montant-là.

[1:03:05] 128000 dollars. Surtout qu'on

[1:03:06] l'a mis en affaires nouvelles.

[1:03:08] Donc... Normally we would be

[1:03:10] ahead of time but this is a

[1:03:13] quick purchase from 20 or 25

[1:03:14] years at least it's possible.

[1:03:16] And it just broke down on us

[1:03:19] sometime during this winter. So

[1:03:21] we went to -- closest date to

[1:03:25] open it was this a morning. And

[1:03:26] we thought it would be better to

[1:03:28] give the go for the project

[1:03:32] sooner than better. The sooner

[1:03:34] the better. Because we are going

[1:03:35] to get this equipment within the

[1:03:37] next month most probably. And it

[1:03:39] is costing us around $15,000 at

[1:03:42] the present time to rent a truck

[1:03:48] with a crew. On a really basis

[1:03:49] it would cost us about $150,000

[1:03:55] to contract that out, outsources

[1:03:56] activity. So on a ten-year

[1:03:58] period that is 1.5 million. One

[1:04:02] year that is it $30,000, is a

[1:04:04] good decision -- very favourable

[1:04:06] that we recommend to Council to

[1:04:11] purchase this equipment.

[1:04:12] >> Proposed?

[1:04:13] - Proposé par quelqu'un? Seconde

[1:04:15] et.

[1:04:16] - J'appuie.

[1:04:17] - En faveur.

[1:04:20] - À l'unanimité. Ce serait la

[1:04:24] levée de la séance.

[1:04:25] - Qui propose la levée de

[1:04:26] l'assemblée?

[1:04:28] - Je seconde.

[1:04:29] - I say good. Alors, je suis

[1:04:32] certain que tout le monde est en

[1:04:33] faveur. Oui. Alors, je vous

[1:04:36] remercie.

[1:05:08] Oh mon prochain. À la prochaine!

2023-03-27 - Conseil municipal de Beaconsfield

Transcript