[0:06] >> Good evening. Bonsoir.

[0:09] Bienvenue à la séance ordinaire

[0:10] du conseil municipal du 22

[0:12] avril. Welcome to the Regular

[0:16] meeting of the municipal council

[0:19] on April 22nd. Now the clerk

[0:23] will go with the opening of the

[0:26] meeting. Adoption de l'ordre du

[0:28] jour de l'ascenseur d'une aire

[0:29] du Conseil de la ville de

[0:31] Beaconsfield du 22 avril 2024.

[0:33] - Je propose.

[0:38] - Est-ce qu'il y a quelqu'un qui

[0:40] seconde?

[0:41] - Je seconde.

[0:42] (rires)

[0:43] - En faveur.

[0:44] - à l'unanimité.

[0:46] - à l'unanimité. Alors, on passe

[0:47] à la période des questions. I

[0:52] will start with the questions

[0:56] that were received by mail, the

[1:00] first question was from Mr.

[1:04] Derek pounds. A sweet buyer.

[1:07] Council meeting notes prepared

[1:11] by Derrick pounds, April 2022,

[1:13] for sending the report by the

[1:15] international joint commission

[1:17] who requested comments, clear

[1:20] bluish waters from the Great

[1:21] Lakes flow into Lac-Saint-Louis

[1:24] over the hydro dam in the heart

[1:26] of, while the murky Ottawa river

[1:29] water flows into the lake of two

[1:31] mountains over the hydro dam,

[1:34] just upstream of E Oka, Québec.

[1:39] Water is flowing from the Great

[1:40] Lakes and Ottawa River are

[1:43] linked at

[1:45] Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, and

[1:46] under the Taschereau bridge on

[1:48] Île-Perrot. The murky Ottawa

[1:50] River waters in Lac-Saint-Louis

[1:53] normally extend about a quarter

[1:55] mile south from the Beaconsfield

[1:58] shoreline, usually marked with

[2:00] clear, narrow line of --

[2:03] becoming clear blue fish Great

[2:05] Lakes water right across

[2:07] Lac-Saint-Louis to Châteauguay.

[2:09] During the springs of 2017,

[2:12] 2019, when high water levels and

[2:14] flooding occurred, Clearwater,

[2:17] bluish Great Lakes waters,

[2:18] extended to the Beaconsfield

[2:20] shoreline, and at least one of

[2:22] those years, I believe, flowed

[2:24] into the lake of the mountains

[2:26] as far as north as the

[2:28] Île-aux-Tourtes bridge.

[2:30] Questions? Agenda item 60.3 for

[2:35] 22nd April, 24. Council meeting,

[2:38] in good faith, and spirit of

[2:41] transparency, please explain

[2:43] councils sudden interest in

[2:45] transforming the Great Lakes and

[2:47] St. Lawrence river basin into

[2:48] our thriving, blue green

[2:50] economic corridor while

[2:52] safeguarding our fresh water

[2:55] resources. This interest have

[2:57] any connection with -- thank

[2:59] you. I will start with a little

[3:03] bit of a joke as I answer. It is

[3:05] earth day today. I guess that is

[3:07] why we have it on the

[3:10] resolution. That is not a real

[3:14] answer. We are a member of the

[3:18] Great Lakes and Saint-Lawrence

[3:19] River basin initiative, and the

[3:21] Québec alliance of the Great

[3:22] Lakes and St. Lawrence cities

[3:26] initiative has asked us, as

[3:27] members, to adopt this

[3:30] resolution, which will perform

[3:31] the basis of their working

[3:33] program for the annual

[3:35] convention, which will take

[3:37] place in May, in Montréal. It is

[3:41] not whatsoever elated to

[3:44] imagine. J'avais oubli? que nous

[3:47] avions le commandant avec nous,

[3:49] alors je vais répondre à la

[3:51] seconde question après que

[3:53] j'aurais eu l'opportunité

[3:56] d'écouter le commandant sur le

[3:58] rapport sur les activités ?

[4:01] Beaconsfield. Allez-y,

[4:03] commandant.

[4:07] - Merci, Monsieur le Maire.

[4:08] J'aurais pu entendre... non,

[4:10] c'est correct. Donc, merci,

[4:15] Monsieur le Maire, conseillère,

[4:16] conseiller, citoyennes et

[4:18] citoyens de la ville de

[4:19] Beaconsfield. Avant de vos

[4:20] présenter le bilan des

[4:21] activités, je tiens à partager

[4:23] quelques points importants avec

[4:24] vous. Avec l'approche de la

[4:26] saison estivale, je souhaite

[4:27] vous informer que les policiers

[4:28] du poste de quartier seront

[4:30] encore une fois très présent

[4:31] dans votre municipalité pour

[4:33] assurer votre sécurité cet été.

[4:35] Cette année, ces quatre

[4:37] policiers à vélo et quatre

[4:38] cadets policier à vélo qui

[4:40] patrouilleront la municipalité de

[4:42] Beaconsfield en couvrant les

[4:43] secteurs résidentiels, les

[4:44] parcs, ainsi que les nombreux

[4:46] événements festif cet été. Je

[4:48] vous encourage d'ailleurs à les

[4:50] approcher et prendre le temps de

[4:52] parler avec eux puisque un de

[4:53] leur mandats aient le

[4:54] rapprochement communautaire.

[4:57] Aussi, je vous encourage cet été

[4:59] à communiquer avec le poste via

[5:02] courriel,

[5:03] (---)

[5:06] pour toutes

[5:08] (inaudible)

[5:09] ou toutes plaintes de

[5:10] circulation nécessitant une

[5:11] attention spéciale, afin que

[5:13] nous puissions planifier nos

[5:15] patrouiller stratégiquement dans

[5:16] le secteur. De plus, une demande

[5:19] officielle a été faite à la

[5:20] patrouille nautique du SPVM a

[5:21] pour patrouillé les berges et

[5:23] les cours d'eau cet été, afin de

[5:25] garantir le respect des

[5:26] réglements et des lois en

[5:29] vigueur. Cette année encore,

[5:30] nous mènerons plusieurs

[5:32] opérations visant sensibles... ?

[5:33] sensibiliser les cyclistes et

[5:35] piétons au respect aux régles de

[5:36] la route. Le projet trottent ont

[5:39] Hickey sera également reconduit

[5:40] cet été pour les cyclistes ayant

[5:43] reçu une contravention. Pour

[5:44] plus d'informations sur ce

[5:47] projet, n'hésitait pas à

[5:48] contacter le poste de quartier

[5:49] un. Concernant la problématique

[5:52] des vols de véhicules, présenté

[5:54] dans les médias, sachez que le

[5:56] SPVM est actuellement engagée

[5:58] dans plusieurs opérations pour

[6:00] lutter contre ce fléau. à

[6:03] Beaconsfield, tout comme les

[6:04] quatre autres municipalités du

[6:06] secteur, je tiens à vous dire

[6:08] qu'aucune augmentation anormale

[6:10] des vols de véhicule n'a été

[6:13] constaté ces derniers mois.

[6:16] Finalement, la semaine de la

[6:17] police approche à grands pas.

[6:20] Cette année, la semaine se

[6:21] tiendra du 12 au 18 mai, le

[6:24] th?me: engagé pour servir

[6:26] ensemble. Soyez à l'affût dans

[6:28] les différents médias locaux de

[6:30] la ville puisque plusieurs

[6:32] activités de rapprochement

[6:34] intéressantes seront planifiées,

[6:36] dont celle de café avec un

[6:38] policier à la gare Beaconsfield

[6:40] le 16 mai. Sans plus tarder,

[6:43] voici le rapport des activités

[6:44] du PQ un, du 25 mars au 22 avril

[6:50] pour la

[6:51] (---)

[6:52] This is PDQ1's activity report

[6:53] from the 25th of March to the

[6:54] 22nd of April for the town of

[6:58] Beaconsfield. Tout d'abord, la

[7:00] sécurité routière. Le 2 avril,

[7:02] Saint-Charles et Avery Green,

[7:03] est une opération de vitesse sur

[7:04] le boulevard Saint-Charles en

[7:06] direction sud de, plusieurs

[7:07] constats émis. Le trois, neuf,

[7:11] 13 et 14 avril, un quatre

[7:13] opérations vitesse sur

[7:14] elle-même, dans la zone de 40

[7:15] kilométres heure, 28 constats

[7:18] d'infraction ?milien lors de

[7:19] cette. Passons Elm, pardon. Le

[7:22] huit, 15, 16, 22 avril, c'est

[7:25] Elm est morose, dans la zone de

[7:28] parc, quatre op?rations de

[7:29] vitesse, encore une fois,

[7:30] effectuer dans la zone de 30

[7:31] kilom?tres heure. Le module

[7:34] nautique s'est joint d'ailleurs

[7:35] ? l'op?ration le 16 avril, un

[7:37] total de 90 ce constat

[7:40] d'infraction fut ?mis lors de

[7:41] ses op?rations durant la

[7:43] p?riode. Finalement, le neuf et

[7:45] 10 avril, Saint-Charles et

[7:47] (---)

[7:48] , des op?rations de vitesse ? la

[7:50] hauteur de

[7:51] (---)

[7:52] King, quelques constats

[7:53] d'infraction ?mis. Pour les

[7:55] patrouilleurs ? v?lo, c'?tait

[7:56] tout l'hiver qu'il y avait une

[7:58] pr?sence de la patrouille ? v?lo

[8:00] Park Angel Woods et j'en profite

[8:02] pour vous partager que nette

[8:05] diminution marqu?e des

[8:06] infractions a ?t? constat?e en

[8:08] lien avec les chiens en laisse

[8:10] versus 2023. Le 3 avril, au parc

[8:13] que Santoro, c'?tait la pr?sence

[8:15] et la participation de la

[8:16] patrouille ? v?lo ? la journ?e

[8:19] d'incitation aux fatalistes la

[8:20] ville de Beaconsfield. Le 19

[8:22] avril, ? l'?cole j'ai expliqu?,

[8:23] pr?sente un patrouilleurs ? v?lo

[8:25] et politiciens du PDQ1, ainsi

[8:27] que flic, notre mascotte, au

[8:30] SPVM, lors de la marche de

[8:32] l'autisme aux alentours de

[8:33] l'?cole JFK. Belle

[8:36] collaboration, d'ailleurs, avec

[8:38] S?curit? publique Beaconsfield,

[8:39] encore une fois. Pour les

[8:42] agences socio-communautaires

[8:43] lors des derniers mois, les

[8:45] agents de socio-communautaire du

[8:47] poste 1 ont ?t? tr?s pr?sente

[8:48] dans les ?coles du secteur pour

[8:50] offrir aux jeunes des

[8:51] pr?sentations de pr?vention en

[8:53] lien avec la cyber-intimidation,

[8:55] la s?curit? sur les r?seaux

[8:57] sociaux et l'intimidation. Les

[9:00] ?coles Beckham et Yale,

[9:01] Christmas Parks, Saint-Edmond,

[9:03] Saint-R?my, Sherbrooke Acad?mie

[9:05] junior, ?cole Beaconsfield ont

[9:07] toutes ?t? visit? par les

[9:08] agentes socio-communautaires.

[9:11] Pour la criminalit?, on parle de

[9:14] trois introductions par

[9:15] effraction dans des r?sidences

[9:17] priv?es, deux vols de v?hicules

[9:20] automobiles et deux agressions

[9:22] arm?es, une

[9:24] (intervention en anglais)

[9:25] et un ?v?nement de prof?rer des

[9:27] menaces. ?a fait le tour pour la

[9:28] Ville de Beaconsfield. Merci de

[9:30] votre confiance. Vous pouvez en

[9:31] tout temps composer le

[9:33] (---)

[9:35] pour joindre le poste de

[9:37] quartier 1 ou envoyer un

[9:39] courriel au

[9:40] (---)

[9:42] . Thank you for your confidence.

[9:43] You may call five on four, 280,

[9:46] 010 and at any time to reach

[9:48] station one, or send an email at

[9:51] PDQ1 at SPVM point Q C.ca. Thank

[9:55] you. Merci.

[9:56] - Merci, commandant. Juste un

[9:59] commentaire avant de passer ?

[10:00] des questions, c'est ?vident que

[10:03] nous avons un probl?me de

[10:05] vitesse ? Beaconsfield. Souvent,

[10:11] ce sont les gens qui se

[10:15] plaignent de la vitesse, c'est

[10:17] eux qui en font, de la vitesse.

[10:18] Alors, il faut se

[10:21] responsabiliser, comme citoyen,

[10:23] puis respecter la vitesse dans

[10:26] les rues, que ce soit 40

[10:29] kilom?tres-heure ou 30

[10:30] kilom?tres heure. Il faut

[10:32] respecter cette vitesse-l?.

[10:34] Alors, j'encourage fortement nos

[10:38] r?sidents, si vous ne voulez

[10:39] pas... ce n'est pas parce qu'on

[10:43] veut aller chercher de l'argent.

[10:46] Si il faut respecter la vitesse,

[10:48] vous ne paierez pas de constat.

[10:50] Alors, c'est aussi simple que

[10:51] ?a. Respecter la vitesse et vous

[10:56] n'aurez pas de constat, comme il

[10:57] y en a eu plusieurs dans une

[11:00] p?riode...

[11:01] (inaudible)

[11:02] vous avez raison, Monsieur le

[11:03] Maire. Vous avez vraiment

[11:04] raison. Ce n'est pas une

[11:05] question d'argent. C'est

[11:06] vraiment la s?curit? routi?re.

[11:07] On essaie de passer un message

[11:08] dans les zones accidentog?ne et

[11:09] on a vraiment une nouvelle

[11:10] philosophie au SPVM, ?a

[11:12] s'appelle: pile. J'en profite

[11:14] pour vous en parler. C'est

[11:15] vraiment le bon billet, ? la

[11:16] bonne personne, au bon endroit,

[11:18] pour justement passer le

[11:20] message. Les trappes ? ticket,

[11:22] c'est fini. Je vous le dis, ce

[11:24] n'est pas une question d'argent

[11:25] ou un quota. C'est vraiment une

[11:27] question de responsabilit?, de

[11:28] s?curit? routi?re. En plus, j'en

[11:32] profite aussi pour, je vous l'ai

[11:34] dit, contacter le poste de

[11:36] quartier font de l'attention

[11:37] sp?ciale. Toute plein de

[11:38] circulation, c'est important. On

[11:39] a besoin de vos informations. On

[11:42] a les zones accidentog?ne avec

[11:44] les statistiques, mais on a

[11:45] besoin aussi de vos plaintes

[11:47] pour alimenter notre base de

[11:49] donn?es. Pour savoir o?,

[11:51] justement, tenir ses op?rations

[11:54] ? des vitesses.

[11:55] - Merci beaucoup. Est-ce qu'il y

[11:56] a des questions? You can come up

[12:04] to a mic.

[12:21] Nor Graham, 140 crust well. When

[12:26] the cadets and police officers

[12:28] on bikes, can I tell people

[12:31] walking, where there is no

[12:32] sidewalks, that they should be

[12:34] walking facing traffic, not with

[12:36] their backs to traffic? I tell

[12:39] people all the time, especially

[12:40] when it's dark. They're wearing

[12:43] dark clothing, you can't see

[12:44] them. If they are facing you,

[12:46] you can see that light shine on

[12:48] their face. Not when they have

[12:51] got your back to you. In the

[12:53] wintertime, there are hoods, you

[12:55] don't see them. It's another

[12:57] security measure. Thank you.

[13:01] >> I will answer. Yes, the

[13:05] cadets, and it is actually what

[13:07] they are therefore, prevention

[13:09] to approach people and to talk

[13:13] about security and preventions.

[13:15] That is part of what they're

[13:17] going to be doing this summer.

[13:20] >> Any other questions? Est-ce

[13:21] qu'il y a d'autres questions

[13:23] pour le commandant? Oui?

[13:27] - Bonsoir. Dans mon district, il

[13:32] y a l'?cole primaire

[13:33] Beaconsfield.

[13:34] - Oui.

[13:35] - R?cemment, j'ai re?u quelques

[13:38] plaintes. ?videmment, c'est

[13:40] plate ? dire, mais ce sont les

[13:42] parents qui sont un peu trop

[13:43] press?s pour amener les enfants

[13:45] ? l'?cole. Il y a peut-?tre un

[13:48] ou 2 ans de cela, nous avons

[13:50] chang? la circulation autour de

[13:52] l'?cole, sur la rue Beaurepaire,

[13:54] on n'a pas le droit de tourner ?

[13:56] gauche pour descendre de

[13:57] l'?cole, il faut faire la

[13:58] tourn?e.

[13:59] - D'accord.

[14:00] - Quand m?me, j'ai des r?sidents

[14:01] dans le coin qui sont tr?s

[14:03] allum?s, ils regardent le matin,

[14:04] puis il y a encore des parents

[14:06] qui, tu sais, coupe.

[14:08] - Oui.

[14:09] - Il tourne ? gauche. Il d?passe

[14:11] les voitures qui sont en ligne

[14:13] pour entrer dans l'?cole. ?a

[14:15] cr?e une zone dangereuse, je

[14:18] peux dire ?a.

[14:19] - Oui.

[14:20] - Si vous pouvez porter un peu

[14:21] plus attention dans les

[14:23] prochaines semaines, ce serait

[14:24] appr?ci?.

[14:25] - Bien, merci pour votre...

[14:27] c'est justement ?a qu'on a

[14:28] besoin. Ce sont des attentions

[14:30] sp?ciales comme cela. On a une

[14:31] banque au poste, une banque, un

[14:35] nombre d'attention sp?cial dans

[14:36] les cinq municipalit?s. Donc, ce

[14:39] sont des plaintes comme cela

[14:40] qu'on a de besoin pour,

[14:42] justement, savoir o? envoyer les

[14:44] policiers. On parle de passer un

[14:45] message, mais c'est justement

[14:46] ?a. Puis comme monsieur le maire

[14:48] a dit, c'est plate, mais des

[14:50] fois, ce qui arrive, ce sont les

[14:51] parents qui portent... qui font

[14:53] les plaintes, mais le matin

[14:55] arrive, puis ils sont en retard

[14:57] et il faut juste savoir ralentir

[15:00] et avoir la s?curit? de nos

[15:02] enfants en t?te. M?me si on est

[15:05] en retard, m?me si... alors,

[15:07] oui, la s?curit? aux abords des

[15:08] ?coles, c'est traiter avec

[15:12] priorit?, puis on va l'attention

[15:14] sp?ciale ? l'?cole bikini Field.

[15:15] - Merci beaucoup.

[15:16] - Si vous en avez, les citoyens

[15:18] et citoyennes, n'h?sitez pas. Le

[15:21] courriel, c'est la meilleure

[15:22] fa?on. Un policier vous

[15:23] rappellera de vive voix. Je me

[15:25] suis engag?e au service ? la

[15:27] client?le, justement, pour ?a.

[15:29] Donc, voil?!

[15:30] - C'est un message tr?s

[15:32] important que vous venez de

[15:33] donner, commandant. Tout citoyen

[15:35] peut vous appeler et s'ils

[15:38] observent de la vitesse dans son

[15:41] secteur, ou des gens qui ne font

[15:42] pas leurs stops, enregistrent

[15:47] une plainte chez vous, et je

[15:50] sais que des policiers vont s'en

[15:51] occuper tr?s rapidement.

[15:53] - Et on garde la plainte ouverte

[15:54] tant et aussi longtemps que le

[15:55] message n'est pas pass?.

[15:56] - Oui.

[15:57] - Donc, si on ne va pas aucun

[15:59] ralentissement, la plainte reste

[16:00] ouverte. Elle peut rester des

[16:01] mois ouverte, la plainte. On a

[16:02] un travail ? faire. On le fait.

[16:05] Comme je l'ai dit, le citoyen va

[16:07] toujours avoir un rappel de vive

[16:09] voix.

[16:11] - Est-ce qu'il y a d'autres

[16:12] questions? Oui. Frank.

[16:27] >> Put my courage somewhere. I

[16:29] will keep up here. Frank.

[16:32] >> Question --

[16:33] >> Sorry, I was -- I thought it

[16:35] was a question period.

[16:36] >> We are not there yet.

[16:38] >> Okay.

[16:42] - D'autres questions? Any other

[16:44] questions for the commandant? To

[16:47] the commandant? Pour le

[16:48] commandant? Go ahead.

[16:51] >> Yeah, I am an engineer. I

[16:54] like numbers. I want to know how

[16:56] many regions there are, how many

[16:59] guys go snooping around houses,

[17:01] look in the windows, and all

[17:03] that stuff. There is that going

[17:05] on all the time. You know, it's

[17:08] a state of art, I guess, people

[17:10] have to do that. Is there any

[17:16] safer thing? Stealing cars, you

[17:19] know, all of that kind of stuff,

[17:23] we are lucky. As discussed

[17:25] earlier, anyway, they are not

[17:30] having any success, or we don't

[17:33] know --

[17:34] >> What is your question?

[17:35] >> What danger are we in as a

[17:38] Beaconsfield resident? Is there

[17:41] anything we should watch and

[17:43] see? It's all on the news. Give

[17:45] us a little idea?

[17:47] >> Yeah.

[17:48] >> Thank you for your question.

[17:50] If you like numbers, I will

[17:52] refer you to the website, the

[17:55] SPVM website. We have

[17:57] statistics. You have to put

[17:58] station one, and you will have

[18:00] statistics for every crime there

[18:03] is. To answer your question, you

[18:06] are very safe in Beaconsfield,

[18:09] like the four other

[18:10] municipalities that station one.

[18:13] You can also see it on the

[18:15] website with the statistics,

[18:18] which is a good thing. We are

[18:19] one of the last one's one

[18:22] talking about crime rates. Yeah.

[18:25] I mean, anything to be aware of

[18:27] in Beaconsfield, I mean, there

[18:30] are a lot of fraud going on. We

[18:33] have an eye on that. A lot of

[18:35] prevention has been done,

[18:37] especially towards older people,

[18:41] senior citizens. So, that we are

[18:46] working hard on. Other than

[18:47] that, I would say it is the road

[18:51] safety that -- you know, doesn't

[18:54] mean we are not keeping an eye

[18:55] on other sorts of crimes. In

[18:58] Beaconsfield, 100%, you are very

[19:01] safe in Beaconsfield, if we

[19:04] compare to the rest of Montr?al.

[19:07] >> Thank you. Merci beaucoup,

[19:09] commandant.

[19:10] - Merci.

[19:11] >> Thank you. Now I will go back

[19:19] to the second question in

[19:21] writing that we got, and it was

[19:26] from Nicole. She made several

[19:34] comments and requests regarding

[19:35] the following subjects, creating

[19:37] a safe space program in

[19:40] Beaconsfield, use of organic and

[19:42] natural methods for the ash tree

[19:45] treatment, protecting

[19:47] Lac-Saint-Louis for the animals,

[19:50] suburban family and pet day

[19:52] event, request to use

[19:54] plant-based food and focus on

[19:56] adopting animals, suggestions

[19:59] regarding the activities that

[20:02] day. Rodenticide uses, creating

[20:05] a mural at the dog shelter and

[20:08] extending the shelter. So, your

[20:12] comments and suggestions are

[20:15] certainly noted, and we will

[20:18] take them into consideration.

[20:20] Thank you for your questions.

[20:25] Maintenant And now, we will go

[20:26] to the questions from the floor.

[20:30] Who will be the first volunteer?

[20:38] >> Okay, I've got my nuclear

[20:40] engineering hat on. I want

[20:43] nuclear power in Qu?bec. You

[20:47] were -- on the air, you wanted

[20:48] to embed all the wires, and I

[20:51] totally agree. That should have

[20:53] been done X million years ago,

[20:55] it will never be done --

[20:57] >> This, we will agree,

[20:59] together, we agree on that.

[21:00] >> Yes, okay. Well, we have two

[21:04] nuclear power plants, and they

[21:06] are sitting there, and as you

[21:07] know, the water levels are going

[21:10] down in the rivers.

[21:16] The Newfoundland government is

[21:18] going to expire, and we're not

[21:19] going to have electricity. We're

[21:21] going to be blacked out. We have

[21:23] to, obviously, prepare. It takes

[21:26] a while to get the reactor

[21:30] going. It's sitting there,

[21:31] minding its own business, and I

[21:34] think we are going to suffer

[21:36] here, especially in the West

[21:37] Island, where we have these

[21:39] outages. That is one point --

[21:42] >> What's your question?

[21:43] >> My question is, what is the

[21:47] government -- one is the

[21:48] government going to tell us that

[21:50] they will get something that

[21:52] makes sense before we have

[21:56] another down of power.

[21:58] >> You will have to ask the

[22:00] government that question. You

[22:02] can do leg me, put in a

[22:06] generator. That solves the

[22:08] problem for me, at my house.

[22:11] >> I just had a heat pump that

[22:13] failed, that's going to cost me

[22:15] a lot. Now you want to be to buy

[22:17] a generator?

[22:18] >> I didn't say that, but I did

[22:21] solve the issue with power

[22:23] outages at my house by putting

[22:25] in a generator.

[22:26] >> That's not going to solve the

[22:29] problem. We need nuclear power,

[22:30] and we need it right now. That

[22:32] is another provincial thing. I

[22:34] --

[22:35] >> It's a question you need to

[22:37] ask the provincial government --

[22:39] >> I worked in the nuclear

[22:41] business in Ontario 60 years

[22:42] ago, and before I came here.

[22:44] They got 70% nuclear, 70%.

[22:48] >> It's not an issue we, as the

[22:51] municipal government, can

[22:52] resolve for you.

[22:53] >> I understand.

[22:54] >> You go to the right people,

[22:56] ask the right questions.

[22:57] >> I see. One of the things,

[23:00] falling for a petition,

[23:02] suggesting to allow Beaconsfield

[23:03] residents to reserve a court for

[23:08] pickleball. What does that all

[23:09] about? Pickleball, you know, I

[23:13] brought up Pickleball a century

[23:15] ago, it seems, and we haven't

[23:18] been successful at it. Just -- I

[23:24] am interested in the sporting

[23:26] thing. I know the recreation

[23:27] center is going to be closed

[23:30] down. We are preparing for

[23:32] nothing there. I don't see

[23:34] artificial ice rink built in

[23:36] your property, on the big piece

[23:41] of land we have on the south, on

[23:43] the lake. What is the timeline

[23:46] on all of this?

[23:47] >> We will pass your comments to

[23:50] the cultural leader department,

[23:53] and the reason for the petition

[23:55] here is some people are

[23:57] complaining there are not enough

[23:59] Pickleball courts, there are at

[24:03] least one pickable Court in

[24:06] every tennis area, or two --

[24:08] >> They allocated --

[24:09] >> People want three. That's the

[24:12] petition.

[24:13] >> It's important to make a

[24:14] pickable court the exact size of

[24:15] the pickleball game. You guys

[24:18] put a couple of nights, put in

[24:21] little squares --

[24:22] >> Frank, we know --

[24:24] >> It's not exact.

[24:25] >> We know you are an advocate

[24:26] for pickleball, we know that.

[24:29] Let me tell you, we are doing

[24:31] everything we can to try to

[24:33] resolve the issues.

[24:35] >> What is the schedule on that

[24:37] closing down? I came from

[24:39] Connecticut playing hockey with

[24:40] the Beaconsfield old-timers.

[24:42] >> Did you win?

[24:43] >> We won the gold medal.

[24:45] >> Good, good.

[24:46] >> We lost, for the last five

[24:49] years.

[24:50] [Applause]

[24:51] For the last five years, we

[24:52] didn't win when we go down

[24:53] there. We did this time. It was

[24:55] a great event. Yes, so, you

[24:59] know, we have our events at the

[25:02] end of the year, Dave knows

[25:04] about it. He is going to fix

[25:06] everything up, right, Dave? He

[25:09] plays in the league. There you

[25:11] go. You know, is there going to

[25:15] be another ring for everybody

[25:22] available? When you close that

[25:23] rank down, we are going to skate

[25:25] and play hockey?

[25:26] >> It's not in the plans.

[25:28] >> What are we going to go play

[25:31] hawking? I'm just asking. We've

[25:39] had the lead for 80 years.

[25:41] >> There is going to be no

[25:43] available ice rink in

[25:45] Beaconsfield refrigerated or

[25:47] endorsed for the next fall and

[25:49] next year, most probably. People

[25:52] have to go and find ice time in

[25:55] other arena, speakerphone or we

[25:57] go, for what Troy, or other

[26:00] arenas.

[26:01] >> Their full up already with

[26:03] their programs. Whatever it is,

[26:06] no. That is pretty sad. We could

[26:09] have had an artificial ice rink

[26:11] --

[26:12] >> It wasn't possible to install

[26:14] one in the short term at that

[26:16] location you're suggesting.

[26:17] >> I'm suggesting --

[26:18] >> It's --

[26:19] >> From Dorval --

[26:20] >> Frank. It is not in the plan.

[26:23] Thank you very much.

[26:24] >> Thank you, but you better get

[26:25] it done so we can -- hockey

[26:29] hockey doesn't stop. Canadians

[26:31] have won the Stanley Cup for a

[26:32] long time, and we are not

[26:33] encouraging hawking. Thank, you

[26:37] I'm sorry. Thank you very much.

[26:38] >> You're welcome.

[26:43] >> -- West. Travel you'd be

[26:45] allowing questions when the

[26:48] documents regarding the plaza

[26:51] are explained? We've only just

[26:53] received them here tonight. Will

[26:55] you allow questions?

[26:57] >> You can -- go ahead.

[26:59] >> For explanation.

[27:00] >> Ask questions.

[27:01] >> I don't want to ask them now,

[27:02] I want to know during the

[27:06] explanation of the documents,

[27:09] will you be answering questions?

[27:11] Is there going to be --

[27:12] >> Now. Now, it's the agenda

[27:15] here, and Council will build on

[27:17] the agenda.

[27:19] >> Okay. Very complicated.

[27:33] - Louise Marien, je vais parler

[27:34] du 275, Elm. Est-ce qu'on peut

[27:37] avoir le nom du propri?taire?

[27:40] - Je n'ai aucune id?e.

[27:42] - On devrait savoir le nom du

[27:44] contracteur.

[27:45] - Je n'ai aucune id?e.

[27:46] - Est-ce qu'il va y avoir un

[27:47] comit?? J'aimerais ?tre dessus.

[27:49] - C'est ce qu'on a dit, il y

[27:52] aurait un comit? de citoyens.

[27:53] - Est-ce qu'on va pouvoir mettre

[27:55] notre nom aujourd'hui o? il faut

[27:56] attendre?

[27:57] - Non, ce n'est pas pour le

[27:59] moment. Je pense qu'en temps et

[28:01] lieu, vous allez avoir

[28:03] l'information et pour le comit?

[28:06] et ce comit?-l? sera form? ? ce

[28:08] moment-l?.

[28:09] - D'accord.

[28:10] - Monsieur le Maire, juste pour

[28:11] pr?ciser, c'est un comit? de bon

[28:13] voisinage sur lequel il y aura

[28:14] des citoyens.

[28:15] - C'est celui-l? dont je parle.

[28:16] Ensuite, vous allez faire des

[28:18] ?gouts en arri?re de chez moi,

[28:19] le terrain, ce sera en arri?re

[28:21] des b?tisses, hein? Est-ce que

[28:22] ces ?gouts-l?, qui vont passer,

[28:24] on va nous mettre un mur

[28:27] pourtant que notre terrain, qui

[28:28] n'est plus haut, la terre va

[28:31] partir? Je

[28:32] - N'ai aucune id?e.

[28:33] - ?a va bien, mon affaire!

[28:35] - ?a va bien.

[28:36] - Oui. Apr?s ?a, Hydro-Qu?bec a

[28:41] pass?, puis les monsieur

[28:43] d'Hydro-Qu?bec vont changer les

[28:46] poteaux. Avant la construction,

[28:47] il devrait... le propri?taire

[28:50] devrait le savoir parce que s'il

[28:52] b?tit et apr?s, Hydro vient

[28:54] changer tous les poteaux qui

[28:55] sont... il y en a trois en

[28:57] arri?re de chez moi, est-ce

[28:58] qu'il va y avoir de la place

[28:59] pour passer? Il veut faire les

[29:00] genres de patio.

[29:02] - Ce soir, nous allons adopter

[29:05] le PPCMOI, ce n'est pas tous les

[29:08] d?tails de l'architecture du

[29:11] projet. Dans le moment, moi,

[29:14] malheureusement, je n'ai aucune

[29:15] id?e de ce que ?a va ?tre.

[29:16] - Bon, d'accord. Si vous donnez

[29:18] les permis, est-ce que vous

[29:22] mettrez sur papier... pas juste

[29:24] que ce soit enregistr? comme

[29:26] quoi en ce moment, c'est deux

[29:28] ?tages et quatre ?tages? Que la

[29:31] personne dans trois ou 4 ans,

[29:32] elle nous rajoute des ?tages.

[29:34] ?a, j'aimerais que ce soit

[29:35] ?crit. Avec... quand vous donner

[29:37] le permis, vous leur faites

[29:39] ?crire comme quoi ils n'ont pas

[29:40] le droit de rajouter des ?tages.

[29:42] - Je pense que le PPCMOI, les

[29:45] dimensions sont d?j? pr?tes,

[29:48] pr?vu, puis si jamais il y avait

[29:49] des changements sur cette

[29:51] dimension-l?, il faudrait que le

[29:54] contracteur revienne ? la Ville

[29:57] pour demander des changements.

[29:58] Dans le moment, ce que le

[30:01] PPCMOI... c'est ?a qu'on veut

[30:03] adopter ce soir.

[30:04] - Oui, ?a, je l'ai vu et tout

[30:06] cela. Des fois, on le met et

[30:08] quand vous avez pour signer, on

[30:10] dit: tu n'as pas le droit, dans

[30:11] 50, de rajouter des ?tages.

[30:12] - Non. Pour le moment, non, on a

[30:15] pas de questions.

[30:16] - Et pour les fils ?lectriques,

[30:18] le fameux Joseph nous a dit

[30:20] qu'il les mettait parterre.

[30:22] Est-ce que c'est dans vos plans?

[30:27] En tout cas, j'aimerais savoir

[30:29] si on va... si les ?gouts, que

[30:31] nous autres, tout le monde...

[30:33] - Quand on aura... quand on aura

[30:36] les r?ponses, on va vous les

[30:38] donner.

[30:39] - Je vous remercie.

[30:41] (inaudible)

[30:42] Plus avanc?.

[30:47] >> Daniel, oak Dale Crescent. My

[30:52] question relates to part one of

[30:54] the final authorization. It is

[30:58] relating to the fact that this

[31:00] part is not subject to a

[31:04] referendum. It says the second

[31:08] draft contains provisions that

[31:10] are not subject to referendum

[31:13] approval. Could someone explain

[31:16] what those provisions are that

[31:18] are not subject to it? Dennis,

[31:25] can you answer that one?

[31:40] >> Can you hear me well? I will

[31:43] talk louder, right?

[31:45] >> I am fine.

[31:46] >> I don't have the list here

[31:47] with me, but the way the

[31:50] provincial law works is there

[31:52] are very specific items that

[31:54] need to go through the

[31:57] registration process, and some

[31:59] that don't have to. I will give

[32:00] you an example, such as signage.

[32:04] Signage doesn't have to go

[32:05] through a referendum process. If

[32:08] we are modifying elements of

[32:13] subject pertaining to sheds, for

[32:15] instance, it doesn't have to go

[32:17] through the registration

[32:18] process. We could give you that

[32:20] very precise list, if you give

[32:23] me your address, email address,

[32:26] I will gladly send them to you

[32:28] tomorrow.

[32:29] >> Great, it's just that I

[32:30] looked at that proposal from the

[32:32] March meeting, and the only

[32:35] things they talk about, related

[32:37] to this, are things like, I

[32:40] think, drainage, and a few other

[32:43] items.

[32:44] >> Those are most specifically

[32:47] general items that could be

[32:50] applicable to all aspects of the

[32:52] municipality. That's why they're

[32:53] non subject to referendum.

[32:56] >> Okay --

[32:57] >> Let's say, for instance, the

[32:59] type of usage, this is

[33:01] definitely going into the

[33:03] registration process. The height

[33:04] of the building, the density

[33:05] levels, all these elements that

[33:08] pertain to the construction of

[33:09] the building's subject. One of

[33:11] them that I have in mind is, for

[33:14] instance, the slope that goes to

[33:16] the underground garage. The

[33:19] disposition pertaining to the

[33:20] width of the parking spaces in

[33:22] the underground garage, that

[33:23] doesn't have to go through the

[33:25] registration process.

[33:26] >> What about cladding

[33:28] materials, things like that? I

[33:30] know there are now accepting

[33:31] three types of different ones in

[33:34] ten of two. Would that apply

[33:36] just to that project --

[33:38] >> It goes into that, yes.

[33:39] >> It goes into --

[33:40] >> The registration process. No,

[33:43] sorry, that's general.

[33:45] >> Again, we are doing the

[33:49] PPCMOI now, not the

[33:50] architecture.

[33:51] >> I could give me the precise

[33:52] list.

[33:53] >> Three types of cladding is

[33:57] subject to the referendum --

[33:58] >> Not necessarily cladding, it

[34:00] is materials, and it's not

[34:03] subject.

[34:04] >> Not subject --

[34:05] >> To the registration.

[34:06] >> Does that bylaw change -- is

[34:08] it a bylaw change, first of all?

[34:10] Does that apply over the entire

[34:13] municipality, or over the zone?

[34:14] Is it restricted to that one

[34:16] project?

[34:17] >> Restricted to that project.

[34:19] >> Thank you.

[34:20] >> You are welcome.

[34:28] >> Hello. Jason, molten -- I was

[34:34] reading through this as I came

[34:35] in, and perhaps I don't know if

[34:37] that's the right time to be

[34:38] asking the question. Duly know

[34:41] how many applications for a

[34:43] referendum or registry were

[34:45] opened?

[34:46] >> No.

[34:47] >> We don't know?

[34:48] >> No.

[34:49] >> I know. How come I know? Can

[34:52] somebody please let me know?

[34:55] >> No one really knows. You

[34:57] might have a number in mind. To

[35:00] have the exact number, and we

[35:01] need to have the eligible lists

[35:03] in our hands. When this is

[35:06] adopted by Council, we will

[35:07] submit the resolution of Council

[35:09] to the director general of

[35:11] election, and he's going to give

[35:12] us the latest electoral lists,

[35:16] and when we get that list, we

[35:17] are able to make the

[35:19] calculations, which will be made

[35:22] public on May 1st.

[35:23] >> May 1st. No public notice

[35:26] goes out. You guys are voting on

[35:28] that night?

[35:30] >> On the resolutions to have a

[35:32] registry, and when we have those

[35:33] resolutions, and we tell the

[35:35] government, listen, we will have

[35:36] registries, can we have the

[35:37] electoralist, please? They are

[35:38] the most updated list we have

[35:40] for the sectors, and they will

[35:42] be able to do the accounts.

[35:43] >> What is the timeframe from

[35:46] presuming tonight you vote on

[35:47] it, then they have to give it to

[35:49] you, and what is the timeframe

[35:50] for the residents?

[35:51] >> Around a week. You are going

[35:52] to know officially on May 1st

[35:55] when we are going to issue

[35:56] public notice to inform the

[35:58] general population that there is

[36:00] a registry on May 7th.

[36:02] >> Okay. The registry is on May

[36:05] 7th?

[36:06] >> That's what we have on the

[36:07] agenda tonight.

[36:08] >> Okay.

[36:09] >> May 1st is a public notice,

[36:11] and May 7th would be the

[36:13] registry.

[36:14] >> May 1st, we know the numbers

[36:15] we need --

[36:16] >> We have to figure it out

[36:18] first.

[36:19] >> Okay, what is the timeframe

[36:21] from there to go? You need to --

[36:25] >> May 1st will be the public

[36:27] notice to provide all this

[36:30] information.

[36:31] >> And then we have how many

[36:32] days before?

[36:33] >> May 7th is the registry that

[36:37] will be announced with the

[36:38] hours, dates, here at City Hall.

[36:41] >> Okay.

[36:42] >> Pardon me? There is only

[36:46] seven days?

[36:47] >> Yes.

[36:49] >> Yes.

[37:02] Nobody else? Just me, I guess.

[37:05] Do we know how many zones we're

[37:09] going to be canvassing?

[37:12] >> I think, Denis, could you

[37:16] provide the zones?

[37:20] >> Yes. The zones are defined in

[37:23] the bylaw. Basically, it's too

[37:25] concerned sectors. It is no

[37:28] longer zone pertaining to the

[37:29] zoning. There is two zones that

[37:33] have been combined because they

[37:35] were losing to the same

[37:36] elements, and there is another

[37:37] one, a smaller one, that is

[37:40] opposing to seven of the

[37:41] elements, if I'm not mistaken.

[37:43] Those are the two concerned

[37:45] sectors --

[37:46] >> Three in total?

[37:47] >> No. You've got to. The two

[37:49] have been combined, two zones --

[37:51] >> Westcroft and my zone?

[37:53] >> Those become one. There's

[37:55] only two.

[37:56] >> There's two. What happens

[37:59] with the two? Those two are not

[38:01] combined, there's two separate

[38:03] ones --

[38:04] >> At the end, they will.

[38:05] >> Pardon me?

[38:06] >> Numbers, at the end, they

[38:07] will, for the numbers.

[38:08] >> On May 7th, it's a combined

[38:10] vote?

[38:11] >> Two --

[38:12] >> To separate registries, but

[38:14] at the end, the numbers will

[38:16] have to -- there will be a total

[38:19] of all the numbers for the

[38:21] areas.

[38:22] >> Can you explain how come they

[38:23] are separated but combined at

[38:24] the end?

[38:25] >> They're not opposing to the

[38:26] same elements.

[38:27] >> Okay. What does that mean

[38:29] then? If you have to separate --

[38:32] >> Well, the way it's going to

[38:33] work is at the elements that are

[38:37] similar, the numbers will be

[38:39] added to those elements.

[38:40] >> Let's say, for example, there

[38:41] is one that is independent, not

[38:44] similar.

[38:45] >> You guys will -- the small

[38:47] zone won't be able to sign on it

[38:50] because you are opposing to

[38:52] seven out of ten.

[38:54] >> They can only opposed to the

[38:56] ones they signed on for?

[38:57] >> Correct.

[38:58] >> The other can oppose --

[39:00] >> All ten of them.

[39:01] >> Okay.

[39:03] >> Thank you.

[39:10] I want to be patient, but if we

[39:12] are going to re-run the same

[39:14] questions all over again -- go

[39:16] ahead.

[39:17] >> Totally different. Dave,

[39:20] fairway drive. We spoke earlier

[39:23] when the confidant was here

[39:24] about public safety. Our aging

[39:29] population, I have noticed a lot

[39:31] of, I will say, solicitation to

[39:36] do summer work here in

[39:38] Beaconsfield. I understand there

[39:39] is no solicitation whatsoever

[39:41] from what I understand, other

[39:44] than Girl Guides, Boy Scouts,

[39:46] that kind of thing. Already, we

[39:48] are starting to see a lot of

[39:50] window washers, grass cutters, a

[39:52] variety of things of this

[39:53] nature. With our aging

[39:55] population, what kind of steps

[39:58] are we putting in there to make

[40:00] sure that these people are not

[40:04] just making idle calculations on

[40:06] how much it's going to cost to

[40:07] clean someone's windows, cut

[40:09] their grass, these kinds of

[40:11] things? It is kind of a tie in

[40:15] with station one, but also, what

[40:17] are the municipalities doing in

[40:20] order to ensure people aren't

[40:21] just walking around the streets,

[40:24] looking for a business summer?

[40:26] >> We do have a bylaw for that.

[40:30] It says no one can go to your

[40:33] house and solicit business. In

[40:36] fact, if anyone does that, you

[40:40] call immediately Municipal

[40:43] patrol. They will take it up

[40:46] immediately. No one is

[40:48] authorized to go around in the

[40:51] city. That bylaw says it very

[40:54] clearly. No one is authorized to

[40:56] go around and solicit business.

[40:58] >> And now the nice weather is

[41:01] here, I have seen six people in

[41:04] the last weekend a half --

[41:05] >> You should have reported it

[41:06] to municipal patrol. They need

[41:09] that kind of information so they

[41:12] can act on it.

[41:14] >> Mayor, it is true there is a

[41:19] bylaw. However, there's a permit

[41:22] that is available. One of the

[41:25] things people can do when people

[41:27] show up to their door's request

[41:29] to see the permit the City has

[41:34] issued. If they don't have one,

[41:36] as the Mayor mentioned, the

[41:37] right thing to do is say, you

[41:40] know, leave and call Public

[41:44] Security. They can't go door to

[41:46] door without a permit.

[41:47] >> Fair enough. Thank you.

[41:51] >> Denis, could you --

[41:55] (inaudible)

[41:56] >> Allowed to solicitation. A

[41:58] permit they could get is for

[42:00] pamphlet distribution, we are

[42:02] not allowed to not gone your

[42:03] door. Today, patrollers

[42:06] intercepted somebody that was

[42:09] cleaning the dreams of the

[42:11] garages, and was asking I

[42:13] horrendous amount of money to do

[42:14] that. He was an elderly person.

[42:16] By all means, if you have

[42:18] neighbours that are being

[42:20] approached like, that give us a

[42:21] shout. I mean, we will gladly be

[42:24] on the go. The trick is to try

[42:27] to be there fast enough to be

[42:29] able to get them. Usually, they

[42:31] act pretty quick. They grab that

[42:33] money and leave. Sometimes they

[42:34] don't even do the job. We have

[42:36] to be very vigilant. As soon as

[42:38] you see something that is out of

[42:39] the ordinary, give us a shout.

[42:42] Don't hesitate.

[42:44] >> Yeah, I think that is the

[42:46] important thing, make sure that

[42:48] you call immediately, the

[42:51] municipal patrol, to say that

[42:53] somebody is soliciting without a

[42:55] permit.

[43:00] Any other questions?

[43:07] We will move on to the agenda.

[43:12] >> Adoption of the minutes city

[43:14] of Beaconsfield, March 25th,

[43:19] 2024.

[43:20] >> I second.

[43:21] >> In favour.

[43:23] >> All in favour?

[43:25] - ? l'unanimit?. D?p?t d'une

[43:29] p?tition sugg?rant de permettre

[43:30] uniquement aux r?sidents de

[43:31] Beaconsfield la possibilit? de

[43:32] r?server un terrain pour jouer

[43:33] au pickleball. Un d?p?t?

[43:39] >> Contracts, 20.1 Awarding of

[43:45] contract 627-23-GC for the

[43:46] construction work for the rain

[43:47] basin Tower and Elm to the

[43:48] lowest conforming bidder,

[43:49] Travaux Routier M?tropole

[43:51] (9129-2201 Qu?bec Inc.)

[43:52] , in the amount -- sorry.

[43:55] Excusez-moi.

[44:04] [Laughter]

[44:08] , In the amount of $857,679.00,

[44:10] all taxes included.

[44:13] >> Blush, Natalie. Proposed.

[44:18] >> All in favour?

[44:29] - D?sol?.

[44:33] (rires)

[44:34] Octroi du contrat 651-24-GC

[44:37] concernant la r?habilitation

[44:40] structurale de conduites

[44:41] d'aqueduc au plus bas

[44:42] soumissionnaire conforme, soit

[44:43] Foraction inc., Pour la somme de

[44:45] 711000,00 $, toutes taxes

[44:47] incluses.

[44:52] - Second?.

[44:53] - En faveur.

[44:55] - ? l'unanimit?.

[44:57] >> A a contract, 653-24-GC for

[45:04] the renovation of the Recreation

[45:06] Centre ice rink to the lowest

[45:07] conforming bidder, Construction

[45:10] Arcade, in the amount of

[45:11] $5,498,000.00, all taxes

[45:12] included.

[45:15] >> Proposed.

[45:16] >> All in favour?

[45:19] - ? l'unanimit?. Octroi du

[45:23] contrat TP 2024-02 concernant la

[45:27] collecte et transport des

[45:28] mati?res recyclables pour les

[45:29] villes de Beaconsfield, Dorval,

[45:30] Kirkland, Mont-Royal et

[45:31] Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, du 1er

[45:32] juin 2024 au 28 mai 2027, avec

[45:37] deux options de renouvellement

[45:38] d'une ann?e, au plus bas

[45:39] soumissionnaire conforme, soit

[45:43] 386-0120 Qu?bec Inc., Pour la

[45:45] somme de 297964,43 $ toutes

[45:48] taxes incluses pour la premi?re

[45:49] ann?e du contrat pour la Ville

[45:50] de Beaconsfield

[46:00] (le montant total taxes

[46:03] incluses pour les cinq villes

[46:04] participant au groupement est

[46:05] de 1568623,01 $ pour la

[46:06] premi?re ann?e du contrat)

[46:07] .

[46:08] - Je propose.

[46:09] - J'appuie.

[46:10] - En faveur.

[46:15] >> Awarding of contract this

[46:16] isn't, TP 2024-03 for the

[46:20] maintenance and repair of

[46:21] electrical systems in municipal

[46:23] buildings and installations at

[46:24] an hourly rate for the years

[46:26] 2024 and 2025 with two

[46:29] (2)

[46:30] renewal options to the lowest

[46:31] conforming bidder, Les

[46:32] Sp?cialistes AVA, in the amount

[46:37] of $110,054.07, all taxes

[46:39] included.

[46:43] >> Proposed.

[46:44] >> I second.

[46:45] >> In favour?

[46:48] - ? l'unanimit?. Octroi du

[46:52] contrat TP 2024-04 concernant le

[46:54] traitement pr?ventif des fr?nes

[46:55] contre l'agrile du fr?ne au plus

[46:58] bas soumissionnaire conforme,

[46:59] soit EspacesVerts, pour la somme

[47:01] de 139694,63 $, toutes taxes

[47:04] incluses.

[47:07] - Propos?.

[47:09] - En faveur.

[47:11] - ? l'unanimit?. Rejection of

[47:13] the bid for contract TP 2024-05

[47:16] for the supply of a 4-door

[47:17] electric SUV.

[47:19] >> I propose.

[47:21] >> Second.

[47:22] >> In favour?

[47:25] - ? l'unanimit?. Octroi de gr? ?

[47:29] gr? pour l'achat d'une structure

[47:30] demi-lune en b?ton pour le

[47:31] skatepark de la Ville de

[47:32] Beaconsfield ? Papillon Skate

[47:33] Parc inc. Pour la somme de

[47:36] 73469,30 $, toutes taxes

[47:38] incluses.

[47:39] - Propose.

[47:41] >> Second.

[47:42] >> In favour.

[47:43] - ? l'unanimit?.

[47:48] >> Rejection of the bid for

[47:50] contract 658-24-EL for

[47:51] electrical work, Publics Works

[47:52] building, 300 Beaurepaire,

[47:54] Beaconsfield.

[47:55] >> I propose.

[47:56] >> Seconded.

[47:58] >> In favour?

[47:59] - ? l'unanimit?. Approbation de

[48:02] la liste des comptes ? payer au

[48:04] 22 avril 2024, et de la liste

[48:05] des paiements pr?autoris?s pour

[48:07] la p?riode du 14 mars 2024 au 24

[48:09] mars 2024 et du 26 mars 2024 au

[48:12] 10 avril 2024, pour un d?bours?

[48:15] total de 2304887,64 $.

[48:24] - Les montants importants sont

[48:28] (---)

[48:29] pour justement du prix du

[48:30] carburant 2023, sur les services

[48:33] de collecte des ordures, du

[48:35] recyclage et des mati?res

[48:36] organiques et les encombrant.

[48:39] 131585 et 90 as

[48:42] (---)

[48:43] pour la collecte des mati?res

[48:44] r?siduelles des mois de janvier

[48:45] et f?vrier. Ville de Montr?al

[48:47] pour les travaux de r?fection de

[48:49] conduites d'aqueduc et les

[48:52] installations de bornes

[48:53] fontaines r?alis?s durant l'?t?

[48:56] 2023 selon ententes internes

[48:58] municipal, appuyer les

[49:00] entreprises vantait qu'pour le

[49:03] d?compte

[49:04] (---)

[49:05] num?ro 1 concernant le contrat

[49:06] 622 - 23

[49:07] (---)

[49:08] pour la d?molition de la grange

[49:11] au nord

[49:12] (---)

[49:13] . Ce sont des montants

[49:15] importants.

[49:16] - Je propose.

[49:17] >> Proposed. - Second?.

[49:20] >> In favour.

[49:21] - ? l'unanimit?. Approval of a

[49:27] $400 contribution to Ella Robins

[49:30] for participating in the Short

[49:32] Track Canada Cup Junior Final in

[49:34] Richmond

[49:35] (British Columbia)

[49:36] from March 22 to 24, 2024.

[49:38] >> Proposed.

[49:39] >> Seconded.

[49:40] >> In favour?

[49:43] - ? l'unanimit?. Approbation

[49:45] d'une contribution de la Ville

[49:46] pour couvrir les co?ts des

[49:48] services sanitaires lors de

[49:49] l'?v?nement ? Au-del? de

[49:50] l'insigne ? du 2 mai du foyer

[49:52] d'accueil Oasis des Centres de

[49:53] la jeunesse et de la famille

[49:55] Batshaw.

[49:56] - Je propose.

[49:57] - Je seconde.

[49:58] - En faveur.

[49:59] - ? l'unanimit?. Adoption of

[50:04] By-law BEAC-153 entitled

[50:06] ? By-law authorizing a loan of

[50:10] $3,392,077 for the

[50:13] rehabilitation of Centennial

[50:15] jetty, 288 Beaconsfield,

[50:18] Beaconsfield ?, and register to

[50:19] be held on April 30, and May 1,

[50:21] 2024. This bylaw, the objective

[50:25] of this bylaw is clearly stated

[50:28] in the title, and the cost of

[50:31] the alone bylaw will be entirely

[50:34] borne by the owners of -- entire

[50:39] territory of the municipality.

[50:41] >> I propose.

[50:42] >> I second.

[50:44] >> In favour?

[50:46] - ? l'unanimit?. Against? Are

[50:50] you against? Against?

[50:53] >> Yes.

[50:54] >> Two votes against.

[50:57] >> Motion carried.

[51:07] - Adoption du R?glement BEAC-159

[51:08] intitul? ? R?glement autorisant

[51:09] un emprunt de 1149113,18 $ pour

[51:13] des travaux de construction pour

[51:14] le bassin pluvial Tower et Elm

[51:17] ?. Donc, le budget dit

[51:20] r?glement est clairement indiqu?

[51:21] dans le titre et ?galement, le

[51:25] co?t de l'emprunt est

[51:26] enti?rement support?e par les

[51:29] propri?taires d'immeubles de

[51:30] l'ensemble du territoire de la

[51:32] municipalit?.

[51:33] >> Proposed.

[51:34] >> Seconded.

[51:35] >> In favour?

[51:38] - ? l'unanimit?.

[51:54] Donc, ? l'unanimit?.

[51:56] - Oui.

[52:02] >> Final authorization of the

[52:04] specific construction,

[52:06] alteration or occupancy proposal

[52:07] for an immovable

[52:17] (located at 275 Elm,

[52:18] Beaconsfield, ( projected

[52:19] lots 6 555 296 and 6 555

[52:20] 297 of the Cadastre of Qu?bec)

[52:21] in zone C330 of Zoning Bylaw

[52:22] 720, relating to the provisions

[52:23] which are not subject to

[52:24] approval by referendum, PP-12-1,

[52:29] Part I ).

[52:31] >> Proposed.

[52:32] >> Seconded.

[52:33] >> In favour? Against? I am in

[52:41] favour.

[52:44] >> Motion carried. Autorisation

[52:48] finale du projet particulier de

[52:49] construction, de modification ou

[52:50] d'occupation d'un immeuble sur

[52:51] la propri?t? situ? au 275, Elm,

[52:56] Beaconsfield,

[52:58] (lots projet?s 6 555 296 et 6

[52:59] 555 297 du cadastre du Qu?bec)

[53:00] dans la zone C330 du R?glement

[53:01] de zonage 720, il s'agit du

[53:06] projet PP-12-1, Partie II, les

[53:09] zones concern?es, C330 et zones

[53:12] contigu?s H333, H334 et H340 et

[53:17] tenu d'un registre le 7 mai 2024

[53:18] encore.

[53:19] - Propos?.

[53:20] - Second?.

[53:21] - En faveur.

[53:24] - Contre. Je d?cide de le vote,

[53:29] en faveur.

[53:30] >> Motion carried. Final

[53:34] authorization of the specific

[53:35] construction, alteration or

[53:37] occupancy proposal for an

[53:39] immovable located at 275 Elm,

[53:40] Beaconsfield,

[53:47] (projected lots 6 555 296 and

[53:48] 6 555 297 of the Cadastre of

[53:49] Qu?bec)

[53:50] in zone C330 of Zoning Bylaw

[53:54] 720,

[53:58] (Project PP-12-1, Part III)

[53:59] , and the concerned zone C330

[54:04] and contiguous zones H333 and

[54:09] H340 ) and register to be held

[54:10] on May 7, 2024.

[54:14] >> Proposed.

[54:15] >> Seconded.

[54:17] >> In favour? Against? In

[54:22] favour?

[54:25] - Motion adopt?e. Demande de

[54:32] d?rogation mineure pour la

[54:33] propri?t? situ?e au 69, Circle,

[54:35] la recommandation est approuv?e.

[54:40] - Propos?.

[54:42] - J'appuie.

[54:43] - En faveur.

[54:46] - ? l'unanimit?.

[54:49] >> Request for minor exemptions

[54:50] for the property located at 56

[54:52] Park. The recommendation is to

[54:54] approve.

[54:55] >> Proposed.

[54:56] >> Seconded.

[54:57] >> In favour?

[54:59] - ? l'unanimit?. Demande de

[55:01] d?rogation mineure pour la

[55:02] propri?t? situ?e au 246,

[55:03] Beaconsfield, la recommandation

[55:05] est approuv?e.

[55:06] - Propos?.

[55:07] - J'appuie.

[55:08] - En faveur.

[55:10] - ? l'unanimit?. Request for a

[55:14] minor exemption for the property

[55:15] located at 300 St-Charles. The

[55:17] recommendation is to refuse.

[55:19] >> Proposed.

[55:20] >> Seconded.

[55:21] >> In favour? You are against?

[55:27] Okay. Against. One vote against.

[55:30] >> Motion carried. Demande

[55:34] d'approbation du Plan

[55:35] d'implantation et d'int?gration

[55:37] architecturale relatif ? la

[55:38] demande d'un permis de

[55:39] construction pour un nouveau

[55:40] b?timent principal situ? au 74,

[55:41] Devon. La recommandation est

[55:45] approuv?e selon l'option un.

[55:46] - Propos?.

[55:49] - Second?.

[55:50] - En faveur.

[55:52] - ? l'unanimit?. Request for the

[55:55] approval of the Site Planning

[55:56] and Architectural Integration

[55:58] Programme relating to a building

[55:59] permit application for a new

[56:01] main building located at 246

[56:04] Beaconsfield. The recommendation

[56:05] is to approve.

[56:06] >> Proposed.

[56:07] >> Second.

[56:08] >> In favour?

[56:10] - ? l'unanimit?. Demande

[56:13] d'approbation du Plan

[56:14] d'implantation et d'int?gration

[56:16] architecturale relatif ? la

[56:17] demande d'un permis de

[56:18] construction pour la

[56:19] modification du plan d?j?

[56:20] approuv? au 30, Madsen. La

[56:21] recommandation est d'approuver.

[56:22] - Propos?.

[56:24] - Second?.

[56:25] - En faveur.

[56:27] - ? l'unanimit?. Request for the

[56:29] approval of the Site Planning

[56:30] and Architectural Integration

[56:33] Programme relating to a building

[56:34] permit application for the

[56:35] modification of the facade of

[56:36] the main building located at 74

[56:38] Jasper. The recommendation is to

[56:41] refuse.

[56:42] >> Provost.

[56:43] >> Seconded.

[56:44] >> In favour?

[56:47] - ? l'unanimit?. Demande

[56:49] d'approbation du Plan

[56:50] d'implantation et d'int?gration

[56:51] architecturale relatif ? la

[56:52] demande d'un permis de

[56:53] construction pour la

[56:54] modification du plan d?j?

[56:55] approuv? au 80, Jasper. La

[56:58] recommandation est d'approuver.

[57:00] - Propos?.

[57:01] - Second?.

[57:02] - En faveur.

[57:04] - ? l'unanimit?. Request for the

[57:07] approval of the Site Planning

[57:09] and Architectural Integration

[57:11] Programme relating to a building

[57:12] permit application for the

[57:13] modification of the facade of a

[57:15] main building located at 128

[57:16] Beacon Hill. The recommendation

[57:18] is to approve.

[57:20] >> Proposed.

[57:21] >> Second.

[57:22] >> In favour?

[57:24] - ? l'unanimit?. Demande

[57:26] d'approbation du Plan

[57:27] d'implantation et d'int?gration

[57:29] architecturale relatif ? la

[57:30] demande d'un permis de

[57:31] construction pour

[57:32] l'agrandissement du b?timent

[57:33] principal situ? au 69, Circle.

[57:34] La recommandation est de

[57:36] refuser.

[57:37] - Propos?.

[57:43] - J'appuie.

[57:44] - En faveur.

[57:46] - ? l'unanimit?.

[57:53] 45.12 Request for the approval

[57:55] of the Site Planning and

[57:56] Architectural Integration

[57:59] Programme

[58:00] (SPAIP)

[58:01] for the subdivision of the

[58:02] property located at 194

[58:03] Westcroft. Through

[58:04] recommendations to approve.

[58:05] >> Proposed.

[58:06] >> Seconded.

[58:07] >> In favour.

[58:09] - ? l'unanimit?. Acceptation

[58:12] d'une somme de 51040,00 $ ? des

[58:15] fins de frais de parcs que le

[58:16] propri?taire du lot 1 416 487

[58:20] (74, Devon)

[58:21] doit payer ? la Ville,

[58:22] conform?ment au R?glement

[58:23] BEAC-128 concernant les

[58:25] contributions pour fins

[58:26] d'?tablissement, de maintien et

[58:27] d'am?lioration de parcs,

[58:28] terrains de jeux et espaces

[58:29] naturels sur le territoire de la

[58:30] Ville de Beaconsfield.

[58:32] - Je propose.

[58:33] - Je seconde.

[58:34] - En faveur.

[58:37] - ? l'unanimit?. Acceptance of

[58:41] an amount of $330,950.00 for

[58:45] park fees to be paid by the

[58:46] owner of lot 1 971 029

[58:51] (246 Beaconsfield)

[58:52] to the City, according to By-law

[58:55] BEAC-128 concerning

[58:56] contributions for the

[58:57] establishment, maintenance and

[58:58] improvement of parks,

[58:59] playgrounds and natural areas on

[59:00] the City of Beaconsfield's

[59:03] territory.

[59:04] >> Propose.

[59:05] >> I second.

[59:07] >> In favour.

[59:08] - ? l'unanimit?. Nomination en

[59:10] vue de permanence ? titre de

[59:12] Chef de division, finances et

[59:13] assistant-tr?sorier au poste

[59:15] 2100.

[59:16] - Je propose.

[59:18] - J'appuie.

[59:19] - En faveur.

[59:21] - ? l'unanimit?. Nomination en

[59:25] vue de permanence ? titre de

[59:26] Chef de section, comptabilit? et

[59:27] paie au poste 2001.

[59:31] - Je propose.

[59:33] - Second?.

[59:34] - En faveur.

[59:39] >> Nomination in view of

[59:40] permanency as Contrema?tre,

[59:41] m?canique et signalisation to

[59:42] position 5206.

[59:44] >> Propose.

[59:45] >> I second.

[59:46] >> In favour.

[59:51] >> Nomination in view of

[59:52] permanency as Contrema?tre,

[59:53] b?timents to position 5205.

[59:54] >> Proposed.

[59:55] >> I second.

[59:56] >> In favour.

[59:57] - ? l'unanimit?. D?signation du

[59:59] maire suppl?ant pour les mois de

[1:00:00] mai, juin, juillet et ao?t 2024.

[1:00:05] - Alors, c'est Martin qui va

[1:00:10] ?tre le

[1:00:11] (---)

[1:00:12] pendant cette p?riode-l?. Bonne

[1:00:13] chance. Je tire mes vacances

[1:00:15] pendant une partie de la

[1:00:16] p?riode.

[1:00:17] - Je propose.

[1:00:18] (rires)

[1:00:19] - En faveur. Tout le monde est

[1:00:23] en faveur.

[1:00:24] - ? l'unanimit?.

[1:00:25] (inaudible)

[1:00:26] - ?a ne donnera pas grand-chose!

[1:00:31] >> Minutes of the Planning

[1:00:33] Advisory Committee meeting of

[1:00:34] April 3, 2024

[1:00:37] - Les commentaires? >> So no

[1:00:39] comments, we've been through the

[1:00:41] projects. So there's no new

[1:00:42] comments. So proposed.

[1:00:43] >> Seconded.

[1:00:45] >> In favour.

[1:00:46] - ? l'unanimit?. Nomination d'un

[1:00:49] membre au Comit? consultatif de

[1:00:50] l'environnement.

[1:00:53] - Je crois que Roger... Has

[1:00:57] something to say about the

[1:00:58] nomination.

[1:00:59] >> Thank you, Mister Mayor. Yes,

[1:01:02] I'm happy to nominate Elizabeth

[1:01:04] panel as a member to the

[1:01:06] environmental committee. She's

[1:01:08] been a resident of Beaconsfield

[1:01:09] for close to ten years. She's a

[1:01:13] graduate of John Abbott College

[1:01:15] and also a graduate of Concordia

[1:01:18] university, where she graduated

[1:01:21] with her bachelor's of science

[1:01:23] degree and her major it was an

[1:01:25] environmental sciences, or

[1:01:27] environmental geography, which

[1:01:29] maybe it has been changed to. At

[1:01:32] the same, time she's either

[1:01:34] taken a diploma with the

[1:01:36] University of Guelph in

[1:01:38] horticulture for the past two

[1:01:42] years. Kathryn has been a active

[1:01:44] member with a Beaconsfield

[1:01:45] garden club and also very active

[1:01:46] in the Beaconsfield library,

[1:01:48] with many of the programs and

[1:01:50] events that we have four

[1:01:51] children, that she attends with

[1:01:53] with her daughter. And at that

[1:01:56] point, I think she fits very

[1:01:59] well but with the demographic

[1:02:01] profile that we are looking to

[1:02:03] get with some of our younger

[1:02:05] residents in Beaconsfield. So

[1:02:07] Mister Mayor, I'm very happy to

[1:02:10] propose Kathryn as a member but.

[1:02:18] >> Seconding --

[1:02:20] [Inaudible]

[1:02:21] >> In favour.

[1:02:23] - ? l'unanimit?.

[1:02:31] >> Approval of the lease

[1:02:33] agreement with Beaurepaire

[1:02:34] Nursery Group for the use of the

[1:02:35] Beacon Hill chalet for the

[1:02:36] school year 2024-2025.

[1:02:37] >> Proposed.

[1:02:39] >> Seconded.

[1:02:40] >> In favour.

[1:02:42] - ? l'unanimit?. Avis de la

[1:02:45] Ville de Beaconsfield sur le

[1:02:46] projet aux fins de consultation

[1:02:47] du Plan triennal de r?partition

[1:02:49] et de destination des immeubles

[1:02:51] (2025-2028)

[1:02:53] du Centre de services scolaire

[1:02:54] Marguerite-Bourgeoys.

[1:02:55] - Je propose.

[1:02:57] - Second?.

[1:02:58] - En faveur.

[1:02:59] - ? l'unanimit?. Transforming

[1:03:03] the Great Lakes and St-Lawrence

[1:03:05] River basin into a thriving

[1:03:06] blue-green economic corridor

[1:03:07] while safeguarding our

[1:03:09] freshwater resources.

[1:03:13] >> Proposed.

[1:03:16] >> Seconded.

[1:03:18] >> In favour.

[1:03:20] >> I think you missed a -- one.

[1:03:25] It was 60.3, which was --

[1:03:28] [Inaudible]

[1:03:31] >> Good, good. So everybody is

[1:03:33] in favour initially. Everybody

[1:03:35] is in favour.

[1:03:37] >> Unanimous. Autorisation de

[1:03:42] tenir l'?v?nement Amateur Radio

[1:03:43] Field Day au parc Centennial du

[1:03:46] samedi 22 juin au dimanche 23

[1:03:47] juin 2024.

[1:03:49] - Je propose.

[1:03:50] - Je seconde. I am a seconding.

[1:03:53] >> All in favour?

[1:03:57] [Inaudible]

[1:03:58] >> Okay, that's good.

[1:03:59] - ? l'unanimit?. All in favour.

[1:04:05] >> Request for official

[1:04:06] recognition of the Low Vision

[1:04:07] Self-Help Association by the

[1:04:08] City of Beaconsfield.

[1:04:09] >> I propose.

[1:04:10] >> I second.

[1:04:11] >> In favour.

[1:04:15] - ? l'unanimit?. R?solution

[1:04:17] d?signant le 16 mai comme la

[1:04:19] Journ?e internationale de

[1:04:20] sensibilisation ? la maladie

[1:04:21] coeliaque.

[1:04:25] >> In favour. C'est l'Irak...

[1:04:31] (rires)

[1:04:32] ? l'unanimit?. Request to

[1:04:36] authorize night operations for a

[1:04:37] film shooting at 313 Pinetree on

[1:04:41] May 22 or 23, 2024.

[1:04:45] >> Proposed.

[1:04:46] >> I second.

[1:04:47] >> In favour.

[1:04:49] - ? l'unanimit?. Autorisation de

[1:04:52] tenir l'?v?nement Journ?e de la

[1:04:53] famille et des animaux de

[1:04:55] compagnies organis? par le

[1:04:57] journal The Suburban au parc

[1:04:58] Centennial le samedi 15 juin

[1:04:59] 2024.

[1:05:01] - Avant le vote, je vais vous

[1:05:04] demander, ? notre directeur

[1:05:05] g?n?ral, de donner des

[1:05:07] explications.

[1:05:08] - Oui, Monsieur le Maire. Il y

[1:05:09] avait une information qui m'a

[1:05:10] ?t? demand? lors du caucus. Je

[1:05:13] ne l'avais pas port?e de main.

[1:05:14] Je remercie Nathalie qui le

[1:05:15] maire... qu'il a sem?. Je vais

[1:05:16] l'envoyer ? tout le monde. Par

[1:05:18] rapport ? l'approbation, une

[1:05:20] activit? dans un parc de la

[1:05:21] Ville a ?t? autoris? par le

[1:05:23] Conseil, selon le r?glement 109,

[1:05:27] Day 109 ? l'article 11, pour les

[1:05:31] ?v?nements ext?rieurs qui sont

[1:05:32] exempt?s du r?glement, mais ils

[1:05:34] peuvent ?tre exceptionnellement

[1:05:35] autoris?es par r?solution du

[1:05:36] Conseil. Donc, c'est ce que vous

[1:05:37] faites ce soir, Monsieur le

[1:05:39] Maire, et membre du conseil.

[1:05:41] BEAC-109, pardon.

[1:05:42] - Merci, Monsieur le Directeur

[1:05:43] g?n?ral. Je propose.

[1:05:45] - Je seconde.

[1:05:46] - En faveur.

[1:05:48] - ? l'unanimit?.

[1:05:49] - Oui.

[1:05:53] >> Mayor's report on the

[1:05:54] decisions made by the

[1:05:56] Agglomeration Council at its

[1:05:57] meeting of April 18, 2024.

[1:06:02] >> All I can say is that we

[1:06:04] continue the, the suburban

[1:06:09] mayors, continue to oppose

[1:06:13] certain agenda items where the

[1:06:15] sharing of expenses is

[1:06:19] inequitable for the merch

[1:06:22] municipalities. So this will

[1:06:24] continue on for as long as it's

[1:06:27] not resolved. We spent many,

[1:06:33] many, many millions of dollars

[1:06:35] on your behalf at that last

[1:06:37] meeting. And we will continue to

[1:06:38] spent many, many, many millions

[1:06:41] of dollars on your behalf of the

[1:06:42] future meetings.

[1:06:52] - D?p?t des rapports des

[1:06:53] directeurs.

[1:06:54] - Monsieur le Maire... I just

[1:06:57] want to say thank you for the

[1:06:58] nominations for -- its really

[1:07:01] just my colleagues at the

[1:07:03] finance department and public

[1:07:04] works department will be very

[1:07:05] happy to have some new

[1:07:07] reinforcement to help them do

[1:07:08] their work and their eager to

[1:07:12] have these people working with

[1:07:15] them, who keep continuing the

[1:07:16] best service possible to the

[1:07:18] residents. You know, sometimes

[1:07:19] there's delays, and in all

[1:07:21] industries, it's difficult

[1:07:23] sometimes to find new employees.

[1:07:25] But our HR department is

[1:07:27] delighted that we found those

[1:07:30] employees, those potential

[1:07:31] employees, for sure. Thank you

[1:07:33] so much.

[1:07:38] >> The closing of the meeting.

[1:07:40] - La lev?e de la s?ance, oui.

[1:07:42] - Je propose.

[1:07:45] >> All in favour? I want to

[1:07:49] thank everybody who is here

[1:07:50] tonight. Merci beaucoup d'?tre

[1:07:52] rest?s pour la r?union de la

[1:07:54] s?ance du conseil ce soir.

[1:07:57] J'appr?cie beaucoup et je suis

[1:07:59] certain que tout le conseil

[1:08:01] appr?cie beaucoup votre pr?sence

[1:08:03] et vos... votre int?r?t dans les

[1:08:07] activit?s de la ville. And to

[1:08:12] those of you who are watching us

[1:08:13] on the website, thank you very

[1:08:15] much for your interest in the

[1:08:16] activities of the city. And we

[1:08:18] will see you next month. Take

[1:08:21] care and until then. Bye.

2024-04-22 - Conseil municipal de Beaconsfield

Transcript