[0:07] - Bonsoir et bienvenue à la

[0:11] séance ordinaire du conseil

[0:15] municipal du lundi 24 février.

[0:18] Welcome to the regular meeting

[0:20] of the municipal council on

[0:23] February 24th. Now, I will pass

[0:27] it on to our city clerk to open

[0:30] the agenda.

[0:32] - Merci. >> Adoption de l'ordre

[0:35] du jour de la séance ordinaire

[0:36] du Conseil de la Ville de

[0:37] Beaconsfield du 24 février 2025.

[0:40] - Proposé.

[0:42] - En faveur.

[0:44] - À l'unanimité.

[0:47] - Alors, nous allons passer aux

[0:52] questions que nous avons reçues

[0:54] par écrit. La première question

[0:58] est de monsieur Pound The Sweet

[1:03] Bryer. What is the cities

[1:07] responsibility in the

[1:08] construction of a harbour

[1:09] master's office at the -- yacht

[1:12] club on the centennial marina

[1:15] property. And please justify the

[1:17] need. Mr. pounds, in the 2019

[1:24] management agreement between the

[1:25] city and the lord ready yacht

[1:28] club, the city agreed to fund

[1:30] the construction of a harbour

[1:32] master office to support

[1:35] activities appropriate for its

[1:37] size. As the existing club

[1:40] building is planned for

[1:43] demolition. Additionally, a

[1:46] small storage facility will be

[1:47] provided for equipment and

[1:49] winter storage. The plan also

[1:52] includes a public restroom

[1:55] accessible to all citizens. The

[2:00] second question from Mr. pounds

[2:02] is

[2:03] | | |

[2:04] Why has become field

[2:05] administrations and councils

[2:06] over the last 39 years failed to

[2:09] resolve the highway 20

[2:11] environmental issues affecting

[2:13] many citizens? There are photo

[2:15] radars limiting highway 20

[2:17] traffic speed on Île-Perrot and

[2:21] a sound wall from Cartier and

[2:23] Pointe-Claire. Mr. pounds, you

[2:27] have asked these questions and

[2:33] topic and they were answered

[2:35] numerous times already at

[2:38] various municipal council's.

[2:40] Over the past years. Successive

[2:43] Beaconsfield administrations and

[2:45] councils have made various

[2:47] efforts to address the highway

[2:49] 20 environmental issues

[2:52] affecting residents as well as

[2:53] the speeding on highway 20. The

[2:57] city of Beaconsfield is of the

[2:59] opinion that if the noise and

[3:02] air pollution from Highway 20

[3:03] poses a significant health risk

[3:06] to Beaconsfield residents, it is

[3:08] the government's responsibility

[3:10] to take appropriate action

[3:13] whether through speed

[3:15] reductions, noise barriers or

[3:17] other solutions to effectively

[3:19] address residents concerns.

[3:23] Also, we have contacted

[3:27] Baie-D'Urfé, Pointe-Claire and

[3:29] Dorval before by letter. Their

[3:34] answer was that they do not

[3:35] agree with the speed reduction

[3:38] on highway 20. The next question

[3:43] is from Allison smiley from

[3:45] Grosvenor. Good day, I'm

[3:49] wondering if you might be able

[3:50] to update us as to which roads

[3:53] will be undertaken in the

[3:55] capital expenditures

[3:59] improvements. As I saw a map

[4:00] communicated at 1.4 2025.

[4:03] However, I did not see Grosvenor

[4:04] on the list. I thought they

[4:09] would be here speaking with

[4:12] someone from public works and I

[4:15] thought the governor would be on

[4:17] the said list for 2025. This

[4:20] relates to a recent council

[4:22] update where by the stated

[4:25] purpose of bylaw be 163 is to

[4:29] authorize capital expenditures

[4:30] in a loan of 2,200,000 for the

[4:34] structural rehabilitation work

[4:36] of water mains and for the

[4:39] structural rehabilitation of

[4:41] sanitary sewer pipes. Mrs.

[4:46] Smiley, the lone bylaw pertains

[4:50] to the aqueduct network rehab

[4:52] work. As well as the sanitary

[4:56] wastewater network rehab. As of

[4:59] today, there are no

[5:00] interventions planned on the

[5:05] aqueduct networks on growth for

[5:06] in 2025. However, under bylaw

[5:13] b-165 which consists variance

[5:15] the improvement of storms were

[5:16] networks, an extension of the

[5:17] storm drain network on Westcroft

[5:21] as been designed. This work is

[5:23] planned for 2025. This

[5:26] intervention will relieve the

[5:28] drainage network in the

[5:30] surrounding sector by increasing

[5:32] the drainage capacity and

[5:35] encouraging surface runoff water

[5:38] to infiltrate the network and

[5:41] flow toward lake St. Louis.

[5:44] There are more interventions

[5:45] planned across the city to

[5:47] relieve the network. Residents

[5:49] can consult and download the

[5:51] city's preliminary action plan

[5:53] on the Beaconsfield website,

[5:56] which addresses the cities

[5:57] approach to finding and

[5:59] implementing innovative and

[6:01] reliable solutions to strengthen

[6:03] the resilience of the drainage

[6:06] network. The next question is

[6:11] from me gonna do on Saint

[6:13] Andrew. I will summarize your

[6:16] question. -- Next comments and

[6:19] suggestions about treating a

[6:20] preservation committee for

[6:23] creating a preservation

[6:24] committee for historic

[6:26] buildings. Item 45.2, providing

[6:30] feedback as an artistic person

[6:31] on the disability emergency

[6:33] plan, item 60.4, are we naming

[6:37] mental health day to neuro

[6:39] affirming day. Item 60.5, and

[6:42] her opposition to the rental by

[6:46] -- of the -- parking lots as

[6:49] they sell meat items. 60.6. I

[6:54] have to tell you, Madam, that

[6:57] your comments have been noted

[6:59] and have been passed on to our

[7:01] administration. Now, we are

[7:07] ready for the questions from the

[7:09] floor. Est-ce qu'il y a des

[7:12] questions du plancher?

[7:21] >> My name is Diana

[7:22] (inaudible)

[7:23] .

[7:25] >> It's not made for short

[7:26] people.

[7:28] [Laughter]

[7:29] >> Now it's working?

[7:30] >> There you go.

[7:31] >> Okay, good evening, Mister

[7:33] Mayor and councillors. My name

[7:35] is --, 205 Lakeview. On behalf

[7:39] of my husband, Steven Lloyd, and

[7:42] myself, and I'm clearly the

[7:43] better half for being here

[7:44] tonight

[7:46] (applause)

[7:47] >> I bet that he's watching the

[7:49] debate right now.

[7:50] >> No. Actually, he's already on

[7:52] the road doing something else.

[7:55] But we sincerely want to thank

[7:56] you. This is a milestone tonight

[7:58] for the concordance bylaw that

[8:00] you are adopting. I was

[8:03] remembering that it has been 27

[8:04] years for me since my daughter

[8:06] is 26 years old, since we

[8:07] started to get involved in the

[8:08] prediction of Angel woods. So my

[8:11] question is, since the public

[8:13] consultation meeting that we

[8:15] had, has there been any changes

[8:16] to what you are adopting

[8:17] tonight?

[8:18] >> I don't believe so. I don't

[8:21] believe there was

[8:22] (applause)

[8:23] There's been no change.

[8:24] >> Do I get a second question?

[8:30] >> My other question is in

[8:32] regards to the work that is

[8:34] going to be done on wood limb,

[8:36] -- and elm for $287,000. Could

[8:42] you describe what kind of work

[8:44] that entails? Mister Mayor.

[8:50] >> Yes. The idea here is to

[8:53] improve the safety of the

[8:57] overpass from elm to --. We are

[9:04] hiring a consultant to see our

[9:05] options to improve the safety

[9:07] and mobility of the traffic and

[9:09] the possibility of adding a

[9:11] sidewalk on east side which is

[9:14] probably the big item on the

[9:16] east side between the tracks.

[9:19] So, this is very important and

[9:21] there are safety issues and

[9:23] safety regulations with the

[9:25] track companies, the CN and the

[9:29] CP and Casey are. So, there's a

[9:31] lot of things to consider. It is

[9:33] not an

[9:35] (applause)

[9:36] Easy intersection. One of the

[9:37] most complicated in Canada I

[9:38] believe, so we need to look how

[9:39] we can improve that. From time

[9:42] to time, people think there are

[9:43] changes in the sequences but

[9:46] it's not the case. Often when a

[9:48] train passes, it creates a

[9:51] situation and obviously some

[9:52] people have to wait a long time

[9:55] so this will all be looked at

[9:57] considering the volume of

[9:58] traffic we have now, considering

[10:00] what are the issues we have, how

[10:01] we can improve the safety. So

[10:03] that is a mandate that we are

[10:05] giving. We have to do a study

[10:08] and prepare plans --

[10:10] >> Well that involve the sunrise

[10:12] lot?

[10:14] >> I don't think so. I do not

[10:16] see why it would at this point

[10:17] in time. We do have studies a

[10:21] few years ago if there was going

[10:22] to be a development on the north

[10:24] side of summarize, what the

[10:26] impact would be. My recollection

[10:27] was very little impact on

[10:29] traffic. It's the closing of the

[10:30] tracks that's the problem. It's

[10:31] not the traffic per se. But we

[10:33] want to improve the environment

[10:37] of that location where there is

[10:40] a fairly good number of users

[10:42] Gary. On elm --

[10:44] >> I know. I have to take it

[10:45] every day. It's my only access.

[10:47] >> People have difficulty

[10:50] respecting their own safety with

[10:55] jaywalking all over the place.

[10:56] Hopefully, we are trying to

[10:57] improve that with another

[11:00] sidewalk and better signage. New

[11:02] devices from the truck companies

[11:04] on the sidewalks to stop people

[11:06] from walking.

[11:07] >> Or dropping their kids off

[11:09] not at the departure there.

[11:11] >> I know.

[11:12] >> That would be very helpful.

[11:14] Not at the light.

[11:15] >> The solution should have been

[11:17] thought about 30 years ago with

[11:19] that underpass.

[11:20] >> No, no, no, no, Mister Mayor.

[11:22] I disagree. But thank you very

[11:24] much.

[11:25] >> By the way, we spend $307,901

[11:31] for the -- what is it called?

[11:37] They did the repairs between

[11:39] their tracks and the CP level

[11:40] and that cost $300,000. We pay

[11:44] for that. $307,000. Yes?

[11:50] >> Good evening, Council. My

[11:51] name is Kate quarter at 132

[11:53] Evergreen Drive at Beaconsfield.

[11:55] I've come to ask a question,

[11:56] first of all to congratulate you

[11:58] all in advance when you do adopt

[11:59] the bylaw that is coming up this

[12:01] evening to protect Angell Woods.

[12:05] We've been going at this for 27

[12:07] years as she said. So it's a big

[12:08] night for us. What I'm wondering

[12:11] going forward is what is the

[12:13] role of the city of Beaconsfield

[12:14] and potentially -- in the

[12:16] stewardship of the woods? As far

[12:18] as the organization of this

[12:21] park. And how much impact can we

[12:23] as citizens of Beaconsfield and

[12:25] members of -- have on the plans

[12:27] for the woods going forward?

[12:30] >> Well, most of the woods has

[12:36] now been bought is under the

[12:39] administration of the City of

[12:43] Montréal. The plan is to make a

[12:49] great western park that

[12:52] Montrealers talking about

[12:54] eventually. I think there's

[12:56] still a lot of work to be done

[12:58] by Montréal to do this. So, we

[13:03] are going to be relying on

[13:08] Montréal for whatever they need

[13:09] to do. And we want to join it

[13:13] with the great park at one

[13:15] point. To determine what kind of

[13:19] activities there would be in the

[13:21] woods itself. That is where we

[13:24] stand right now.

[13:25] >> Okay. We've been working on

[13:30] trying to save the switch for 27

[13:31] years. I'm just asking if the

[13:33] city could have a major role in

[13:35] that because it is in our

[13:37] territory and I think that we

[13:39] have a lot of experience in

[13:41] those woods. It would be nice if

[13:43] somehow the city of Beaconsfield

[13:44] could take a leadership role and

[13:47] consider the participation of

[13:48] the members of APAW going

[13:51] forward. I think it's a unique

[13:53] situation as being part of the

[13:55] Grand parc de l'Ouest. I

[13:56] understand that.

[13:57] >> We are taking note of your

[13:58] comments, but it will be hundred

[13:59] the City of Montréal.

[14:01] >> I understand. But we are city

[14:04] of Beaconsfield so I think we

[14:05] should take part in that

[14:08] process.

[14:09] >> We couldn't afford to buy all

[14:10] of the woods.

[14:11] >> I know.

[14:12] >> So it has been purchased by

[14:13] the City of Montréal. Hopefully,

[14:14] they will make it part of the

[14:17] western park from Angell Woods

[14:23] all the way up to Pierrefonds.

[14:26] >> Yeah. Okay, thank you.

[14:29] >> Thank you.

[14:31] >> Okay. I'm just talking more

[14:33] -- sorry. I'm just going to talk

[14:36] more about Angell Woods and

[14:41] 20.2. First of all, thank you

[14:45] for saving Angell Woods. I hope

[14:48] you do vote yes on the proposed

[14:50] by law to protect it. I

[14:52] understand why the City of

[14:54] Montréal would have it because

[14:55] it's not actually the City of

[14:58] Montréal running at, it's the

[14:59] agglomeration of Montréal. So

[15:00] it's the same way as how police

[15:04] services and paramedics services

[15:07] are run. It's similar to

[15:10] regional municipalities in other

[15:14] provinces.

[15:16] >> You are right. It is the

[15:19] agglomeration of Montréal.

[15:21] >> So 20.2, what I was going to

[15:24] say about the building, I think

[15:26] building an underpass or

[15:27] something?

[15:29] >> No, no, no. We are not going

[15:33] to build an underpass at

[15:37] Woodland. It would cost anywhere

[15:39] between 15 to $75 million.

[15:41] >> That's a lot.

[15:45] >> It could have been done 30 or

[15:47] 35 years ago. At that point, I

[15:51] think that basically the Council

[15:54] at the time was looking at elm

[15:57] as not being a very important in

[15:59] terms of access. They turned it

[16:03] down and it would cost probably

[16:06] the city of Beaconsfield around

[16:09] two to $300 million for

[16:12] expropriation. Right now though,

[16:14] it's out of the question. 15 to

[16:17] 75 million.

[16:18] >> I'm wondering if you could

[16:19] even have a small underpass or

[16:21] overpass for animals.

[16:23] >> There will be no underpass

[16:26] period.

[16:27] >> What about an overpass?

[16:28] >> There will not be an overpass

[16:30] at woodland either.

[16:31] >> Okay. Again, back to Angell

[16:35] Woods. I was going to say I

[16:37] absolutely love Angell Woods.

[16:38] Being a person on the autism

[16:40] spectrum, I find it very calming

[16:42] to walk in Angell Woods.

[16:43] >> Thank you very much.

[16:44] >> It's very therapeutic and

[16:45] it's one of the things I like

[16:47] about Beaconsfield.

[16:48] >> Thank you very much.

[16:49] >> Thank you for saving it.

[16:50] >> Thank you.

[16:51] >> One comment, Mister Mayor.

[16:53] Talking about overpasses. You

[16:56] know, we have an overpass

[16:58] between elm and the HST. That

[17:01] overpass is certainly, very

[17:04] important for the flow of

[17:06] traffic and students going to

[17:08] high school, North and South.

[17:09] But that overpass, to replace

[17:12] it, I think it could cost maybe

[17:14] $20 million. We have a project

[17:17] to do some work on the overpass

[17:19] because it needs it. But that is

[17:22] -- everything today is so darn

[17:25] expensive overpasses certainly,

[17:28] as much as we might not want,

[17:31] others are almost prohibitive.

[17:33] >> 20 years from now, $20

[17:36] million might look like a real

[17:37] bargain. But that is what we

[17:38] have to put up with.

[17:41] - Bonjour.

[17:43] (---)

[17:44] J'avais deux questions...

[17:46] j'avais d'autres questions, mais

[17:47] elles ont été répondues. 60,2,

[17:50] vous avez un mandat à propos de

[17:51] la propriété au 254 Ouest Coast.

[17:55] C'est quoi, les intérêts de la

[17:56] ville?

[17:57] - C'est qu'elle...?

[17:58] - 60.2.

[18:06] - Oui. C'est pour remblayée.

[18:11] C'est ça? C'est le remblai du

[18:15] terrain.

[18:16] - Les gens ont remblayé et il

[18:17] faut...

[18:18] - Oui, exactement.

[18:19] - Puis 60.9, on parle de... je

[18:23] ne sais pas si j'ai bien

[18:25] compris, on parle de diviser le

[18:26] territoire de la ville. Est-ce

[18:27] que vous allez changer les

[18:28] divisions de la ville? Division

[18:32] en secteur de territoire de la

[18:33] ville.

[18:35] - C'est la politique

[18:37] d'établissement ordinaire...

[18:38] - 60.9.

[18:39] - C'est quoi?

[18:40] (inaudible)

[18:43] Explique-lui.

[18:44] - C'est une bonne question.

[18:46] C'est très technique. C'est le

[18:49] projet de loi 39 qui a été

[18:51] adoptée le 8 décembre 2023. Il a

[18:54] donné aux municipalités une

[18:56] nouvelle approche en termes de

[18:59] fiscalité municipale. Donc, on

[19:00] est habitué avec certaines

[19:03] catégories de taxation. Par

[19:05] exemple, le tarif résiduel, qui

[19:07] pourrait présider

[19:09] (---)

[19:10] . Et on a un tarif six logements

[19:11] et plus. Cette catégorie-là

[19:13] n'existe plus. Il n'y a plus de

[19:14] catégories qui existent. Donc,

[19:15] il reste la catégorie des

[19:17] tarifications résiduelle. Donc,

[19:19] les villes, pour le prochain

[19:22] rôle, qui va être en

[19:23] mi-septembre 2025 pour 2026 -

[19:27] 2027 - 2028, on doit adopter

[19:29] quelle catégorie on aimerait

[19:32] avoir pour des fins de taxation

[19:34] pour l'année budgétaire 2026 en

[19:37] fonction du rôle qui va être

[19:38] déposé. Et on doit aviser la

[19:42] direction de l'évaluation de

[19:43] Montréal pour qu'ils puissent

[19:44] préparer leur rôle en

[19:46] conséquence ou en fonction des

[19:47] sous-catégories qu'on aimerait

[19:48] créer. On pourrait créer 72

[19:52] catégories et en utiliser quand

[19:54] même un seul taux résiduel, par

[19:56] exemple. Mais si on ne les a

[19:57] pas, on ne pourrait pas, pour la

[19:58] trois prochaines années, avoir

[20:00] des taux de taxation différente

[20:02] par catégorie. C'est l'objectif.

[20:04] Donc, c'est très technique. Ça

[20:05] découle de la loi 39, où on doit

[20:09] réinventer les catégories, par

[20:11] exemple.

[20:12] - Donc, la loi 39 n'a pas créé

[20:13] des catégories.

[20:14] - Non. Je vais vous donner un

[20:16] exemple qu'on a mis en place

[20:17] pour 2024. Pour les terrains

[20:21] en... terrains vagues desservis,

[20:23] auparavant, ont accès deux fois

[20:24] le taux résiduel. La loi a

[20:26] changé pour qu'on puisse taxer

[20:27] quatre fois le taux résiduel.

[20:28] Celle-là était facile à utiliser

[20:30] et on l'a appliqué dès 2024.

[20:33] Mais les autres catégories

[20:35] n'existeront plus. Elles sont

[20:37] toujours prévues au rôle

[20:38] d'évaluation. Elles sont encore

[20:39] là. Mais si on n'informe pas le

[20:41] service d'évaluation de

[20:43] Montréal, elle n'existeront plus

[20:44] pour Beaconsfield. Chacune des

[20:46] villes doit déterminer, décider

[20:48] quelles sont les catégories ou

[20:49] les secteurs de taxation qui

[20:52] vont prévaloir dans le prochain

[20:53] rôle d'évaluation. C'est un

[20:55] exercice qui pourrait être fait

[20:57] à tous les 3 ans. Et si la

[20:58] catégorie n'est pas créée au

[21:01] printemps, elle ne pourra pas

[21:02] être appliqué pour les trois

[21:03] prochaines années du rôle

[21:04] d'évaluation. Donc, les budgets

[21:06] 2026 - 2027 - 2028.

[21:08] - Donc, ça n'a pas rapport au

[21:10] secteur strict, des districts.

[21:12] - Non, ça n'a pas rapport

[21:14] districts. Ça aurait pu,

[21:15] effectivement, mais ça n'a pas

[21:16] rapport. Ce n'est pas des

[21:17] sous-catégories de territoire,

[21:18] mais c'est des sous-catégories

[21:19] de taxation.

[21:20] - Ma dernière question, c'est à

[21:21] propos de la neige que vous

[21:22] faites fondre ici. Ça s'en va

[21:24] dans les égouts directement au

[21:27] lac?

[21:28] - Non. C'est la tête de

[21:31] l'intercepteur de

[21:33] l'agglomération. Donc, ça s'en

[21:34] va à l'usine de

[21:37] Rivière-des-Prairies. C'est ici

[21:38] que ça commence, l'intercepteur.

[21:40] C'est la tête de l'intercepteur.

[21:42] C'est l'endroit où on peut

[21:44] l'envoyer en collaboration avec

[21:46] l'agglomération.

[21:47] - Merci.

[21:48] - Merci beaucoup. Merci

[21:51] beaucoup. Alors, nous allons

[21:53] maintenant procéder avec

[21:56] l'agenda du jour. Approval of

[22:01] the minutes of the City of

[22:02] Beaconsfield's Public

[22:03] Consultation of January 20,

[22:04] 2025, at 6:30 p.m..

[22:07] >> I propose.

[22:08] >> I second.

[22:09] >> In favour.

[22:11] >> Unanimous. - À l'unanimité.

[22:15] Approbation du procès-verbal de

[22:16] la séance ordinaire du Conseil

[22:17] de la Ville de Beaconsfield du

[22:18] 20 janvier 2025.

[22:19] - Proposé.

[22:20] - Et j'appuie.

[22:22] - En faveur.

[22:24] >> In favour.

[22:25] - À l'unanimité. >> A warning of

[22:30] contracts 666-25-GC for street

[22:31] line and sign-painting work to

[22:32] the lowest conforming bidder,

[22:33] Lignes-fit Inc. in the amount of

[22:39] $149,271.24, all taxes included.

[22:44] >> Proposed.

[22:45] >> I second.

[22:46] >> In favour.

[22:49] - À l'unanimité. Octroi du

[22:51] mandat. 25-SP-213 concernant des

[22:55] services professionnels pour la

[22:59] reconfigurationsécurisation de

[23:00] l'intersection

[23:01] Woodland-Beaurepaire-Elm à

[23:02] Beaconsfield au soumissionnaire

[23:03] ayant obtenu le meilleur

[23:04] pointage final, soit Shellex

[23:05] Groupe Conseil inc.

[23:06] , Pour la somme de 287437,50 $,

[23:10] toutes taxes incluses.

[23:16] >> Proposed.

[23:17] >> Seconded.

[23:20] - En faveur.

[23:21] - À l'unanimité. >> Awarding of

[23:25] mandate 25-SP-214 for

[23:27] professional services for the

[23:28] preparation of plans and

[23:29] specifications to replace the

[23:31] mechanical units and the

[23:33] building control system of the

[23:36] Public Works'building - City of

[23:38] Beaconsfield to the tender

[23:39] having obtained the best final

[23:40] score, Les Services EXP Inc., in

[23:42] the amount of $219,889.69, all

[23:44] taxes included.

[23:51] - Proposé. >> Second.

[23:54] - En faveur.

[23:56] - À l'unanimité. Octroi du

[24:01] contrat TP 2025-01 concernant

[24:03] l'entretien paysager du Village

[24:04] Beaurepaire pour l'année 2025

[24:06] avec quatre

[24:07] (4)

[24:08] options de renouvellement au

[24:09] plus bas soumissionnaire

[24:10] conforme, soit 7574479 Canada

[24:12] inc.

[24:13] (DLC)

[24:14] , Pour la somme de 34686,54 $,

[24:18] toutes taxes incluses.

[24:20] - Proposé.

[24:22] - Secondé.

[24:24] >> In favour. - En faveur.

[24:26] - À l'unanimité. Renewal of

[24:29] contract TP 2023-07 for bulk

[24:33] leaf pickup for the year 2025

[24:35] with GFL Environmental Inc., At

[24:37] an approximate cost of $57,000,

[24:40] all taxes included.

[24:42] >> I propose.

[24:44] >> I second.

[24:46] - En faveur.

[24:48] - À l'unanimité. Renouvellement

[24:51] du contrat FT 2021-01 pour les

[24:54] services professionnels de

[24:55] vérification de l'optimisation

[24:56] des ressources de la Ville de

[24:58] Beaconsfield pour l'année 2025

[25:00] avec Raymond Chabot Grant

[25:01] Thornton, pour la somme de 29

[25:02] 847,51 $, toutes taxes incluses.

[25:07] >> Proposed.

[25:09] >> I second.

[25:11] - En faveur.

[25:12] - À l'unanimité. Awarding of a

[25:16] contract by mutual agreement

[25:19] (RGC 2025-05)

[25:20] for professional architecture

[25:21] services with Lemay CO. For the

[25:26] preparation of detailed plans

[25:27] and specifications and the

[25:28] supervision during construction

[25:30] of a harbour master's office on

[25:32] the Centennial Marina property,

[25:34] for the amount of $87,381.00,

[25:38] all taxes included.

[25:42] >> Proposed.

[25:43] >> Seconded.

[25:44] >> In favour.

[25:46] - À l'unanimité. Approbation de

[25:48] la liste des comptes à payer au

[25:50] 24 février 2025, et de la liste

[25:52] des paiements préautorisés pour

[25:53] la période du 9 janvier 2025 au

[25:56] 19 janvier 2025 et du 21 janvier

[26:00] 2025 au 12 février 2025, pour un

[26:01] déboursé total de 4931311,91 $.

[26:09] - Voici les montants les plus

[26:12] importants. 369593 et 64 à

[26:17] consultations Arcade pour des

[26:19] comptes progressifs numéro 7

[26:22] pour la rénovation de la

[26:24] patinoire. 307900 dollars à la

[26:26] compagnie de chemins de fer

[26:28] Canadien Pacifique pour les

[26:29] travaux de passages à niveau.

[26:35] 231046 et 78, BFL Canada,

[26:37] risques et assurances pour le

[26:39] renouvellement des assurances et

[26:41] dommages 2025 - 2026. Et

[26:48] 177624,30, les entreprises

[26:49] vantait King, pour des comptes

[26:51] progressifs numéro 1 pour le

[26:54] patio et auvent à l'annexe herbe

[26:56] Lander. Et finalement, à 555065

[27:01] et 63

[27:02] (---)

[27:03] .

[27:04] - Proposé.

[27:06] - Secondé.

[27:07] - En faveur.

[27:13] >> Approval of a $2,000

[27:14] contribution to the Toope

[27:15] Memorial Scholarship for the

[27:16] year 2025.

[27:19] >> Proposed.

[27:20] >> Seconded.

[27:21] >> In favour.

[27:25] - À l'unanimité. Participation

[27:27] du maire au congrès annuel de

[27:28] l'Union des municipalités du

[27:29] Québec

[27:30] (UMQ)

[27:31] du 14 au 16 mai 2025 à Québec,

[27:32] au coût approximatif de 845 $,

[27:35] plus remboursement des frais de

[27:36] transport, de logement et

[27:37] d'autres dépenses afférentes.

[27:39] - Proposé.

[27:41] - Secondé.

[27:43] - En faveur.

[27:45] - À l'unanimité. Participation

[27:47] of the Mayor at the annual

[27:49] conference of the Fédération of

[27:50] Canadian municipalities from May

[27:54] 29 to June 1, 2025, in Ottawa

[27:56] (Ontario)

[27:57] , at an approximate cost of

[27:58] $1,195, plus reimbursement of

[28:01] travelling and lodging expenses

[28:02] and other related costs.

[28:08] - En faveur. >> Proposed.

[28:10] >> I second.

[28:13] - À l'unanimité. Participation

[28:17] du directeur général au congrès

[28:18] annuel de l'Union des

[28:19] municipalités du Québec

[28:20] (UMQ)

[28:21] du 14 au 16 mai 2025 àQuébec, au

[28:22] coût approximatif de 845 $, plus

[28:25] remboursement des frais de

[28:26] transport, de logement et

[28:27] d'autres dépenses afférentes.

[28:30] - Proposé.

[28:31] - Secondé.

[28:32] - En faveur.

[28:33] >> Participation of the Director

[28:34] General at the annual conference

[28:35] of the Canadian Association of

[28:36] Municipal Administrators from

[28:37] May 26 to 28, 2025, in Mont

[28:38] Tremblant

[28:39] (Québec)

[28:40] , at an approximate cost of

[28:41] $895, plus reimbursement of

[28:42] travelling and lodging expenses

[28:43] and other related costs.

[28:44] - À l'unanimité.

[28:53] >> Proposed.

[28:55] >> Seconded.

[28:56] >> In favour.

[28:58] - À l'unanimité. Participation

[29:01] du directeur général au congrès

[29:02] annuel de l'Association des

[29:03] directeurs généraux des

[29:04] municipalités du Québec

[29:07] (ADGMQ)

[29:08] du 4 au 6 juin 2025 à La Malbaie

[29:09] (Québec)

[29:10] , au coût approximatif de 880 $,

[29:11] plus remboursement des frais de

[29:12] transport, de logement et

[29:13] d'autres dépenses afférentes.

[29:15] - Proposé.

[29:17] - Secondé. >> In favour.

[29:20] - À l'unanimité. >> Filing and

[29:24] notice of motion of Draft By-law

[29:25] BEAC161-1 entitled « By-law

[29:26] modifying By-law BEAC-161 on

[29:28] tariffs ».

[29:30] >> I give notice of motion.

[29:32] - Merci. Pour les prochains six

[29:38] règlements, de 40.2 A 40.7, je

[29:41] vais introduire les

[29:43] modifications et après ça les

[29:44] propositions seront faits pour

[29:45] les adoptions. Donc, l'objectif

[29:47] des modifications au Règlement

[29:48] de concordance et du plan

[29:50] d'urbanisme ainsi que... est que

[29:52] la Ville de Beaconsfield procède

[29:54] à la révision de son plan

[29:55] d'urbanisme et de ces règlements

[29:56] pour en assurer la concordance

[29:57] au schéma d'aménagement et de

[30:00] développement. Le stade de la

[30:01] dernière action de Montréal, qui

[30:02] a été adoptée en 2015. Les

[30:04] modifications entre la vie de

[30:05] mesurer l'adoption des

[30:06] règlements sur notamment de

[30:07] nature cléricales. Cependant,

[30:09] plus PCP siffler comment pour

[30:10] les règlements de lotissement,

[30:12] le point 40.2, qui est des

[30:16] modifications qui ont été

[30:17] apportées à l'amendement

[30:20] BEAC-43-01 pour enlever des

[30:22] articles qui étaient déjà

[30:23] concordantes. En ce qui a trait

[30:24] au plan d'urbanisme, le

[30:27] BEAC-165, qui est au 40.5, il y

[30:29] a eu des modifications

[30:31] additionnelles qui ont été pour

[30:32] corriger une coquille au niveau

[30:36] des adresses, le 97 chemins

[30:40] Lakeshore devient le 597 chemins

[30:43] Lakeshore. C'est modifié

[30:44] aujourd'hui à même le règlement.

[30:46] Et ces règlements ne sont pas

[30:48] soumis au processus

[30:49] d'approbation référendaire,

[30:50] puisqu'ils sont modifiés

[30:52] exclusivement à des fins de

[30:54] concordance. Donc, pour le point

[30:57] 40.2, Adoption, avec

[31:01] modifications, du Règlement

[31:02] BEAC043-01 intitulé « Règlement

[31:03] modifiant le règlement de

[31:04] lotissement BEAC-043 afin de le

[31:05] rendre conforme au Schéma

[31:06] d'aménagement et de

[31:08] développement de l'agglomération

[31:09] de Montréal

[31:11] (RCG 14-029)

[31:13] et au plan d'urbanisme de la

[31:14] Ville de Beaconsfield ».

[31:15] - Je propose.

[31:18] - Appuyé.

[31:19] >> In favour.

[31:21] - À l'unanimité. >> Adoption,

[31:23] with modifications, of By-law

[31:27] BEAC-045-19 entitled « By-law

[31:28] amending By-law BEAC-045 on

[31:30] permits and certificates in

[31:31] order to render it compliantwith

[31:32] the Land-Use Planning and

[31:34] Development Plan for the

[31:35] Agglomeration of Montreal

[31:37] (RCG 14-029)

[31:39] and with the Planning Program of

[31:40] the City of Beaconsfield ».

[31:45] >> Proposed.

[31:47] >> Seconded.

[31:48] >> In favour.

[31:49] - À l'unanimité. Adoption, avec

[31:53] modifications, du Règlement

[31:56] BEAC098-04 intitulé « Règlement

[31:57] modifiant le Règlement BEAC-098

[31:59] sur les plans d'implantation et

[32:00] d'intégration architecturale

[32:01] afin de le rendre conforme au

[32:03] Schéma d'aménagement et de

[32:04] développement de l'agglomération

[32:05] de Montréal

[32:07] (RCG 14-029)

[32:08] et au plan d'urbanisme de la

[32:09] Ville de Beaconsfield ».

[32:11] - Je propose. >> Second.

[32:14] >> In favour.

[32:17] - À l'unanimité.

[32:24] Adoption, with modifications, of

[32:25] By-law BEAC-165 entitled

[32:26] « By-law regarding the Planning

[32:27] Program ».

[32:31] >> Proposed.

[32:33] >> Seconded.

[32:34] >> In favour.

[32:36] - À l'unanimité. Adoption, avec

[32:39] modifications, du Règlement

[32:41] 728-01 intitulé « Règlement

[32:43] modifiant le Règlement sur

[32:44] projets particuliers de

[32:47] construction, de modification ou

[32:48] d'occupation d'un immeuble

[32:49] (PPCMOI)

[32:50] afin de le rendre conforme au

[32:51] Schéma d'aménagement et de

[32:52] développement de l'agglomération

[32:53] de Montréal

[32:54] (RCG 14-029)

[32:55] et au plan d'urbanisme de la

[32:56] Ville de Beaconsfield ».

[32:59] - Proposé.

[33:00] - J'appuie.

[33:01] - En faveur.

[33:05] - À l'unanimité. Adoption, with

[33:08] modifications, of By-law 720-129

[33:11] entitled « By-law amending

[33:12] Zoning By-law 720 in order to

[33:13] render it compliant with the

[33:16] Land-Use Planning and

[33:17] Development Plan for the

[33:19] Agglomeration of Montreal

[33:22] (RCG 14-029)

[33:23] and the Planning Program of the

[33:24] City of Beaconsfield ».

[33:26] >> I propose.

[33:27] >> Seconded.

[33:28] >> In favour.

[33:30] - À l'unanimité. Résolution en

[33:35] vertu de l'article 59.1 de la

[33:36] Loi sur l'aménagement et

[33:37] l'urbanisme concernant les

[33:38] règlements qui n'ont pas à être

[33:39] modifiés dans le cadre du

[33:40] processus de concordance

[33:41] règlementaire. >> Proposed.

[33:46] >> Seconded.

[33:47] >> In favour.

[33:49] - À l'unanimité. Request for

[33:54] minor exemptions for the

[33:55] property located at 133

[33:56] Chartwell. The recommendation is

[33:58] to approve.

[33:59] >> Proposed.

[34:01] >> Seconded.

[34:02] - En faveur.

[34:03] - À l'unanimité. Demande

[34:06] d'approbation du Plan

[34:07] d'implantation et d'intégration

[34:08] architecturale

[34:09] (PIIA)

[34:10] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[34:11] de construction pour un nouveau

[34:12] bâtiment principal situé au 7,

[34:13] Kirkwood. La recommandation est

[34:15] de refuser.

[34:16] - Proposé.

[34:17] - Secondé.

[34:19] - En faveur de la

[34:21] recommandation.

[34:24] - À l'unanimité. Request for the

[34:28] approval of the Site Planning

[34:29] and Architectural Integration

[34:32] Programme relating to a building

[34:33] permit application for a new

[34:34] main building located at 72

[34:35] St-Louis. The recommendation is

[34:38] to refuse.

[34:39] >> Proposed.

[34:42] >> I can't -- okay. I second.

[34:46] >> In favour of the

[34:47] recommendation.

[34:49] - À l'unanimité. Demande

[34:51] d'approbation du Plan

[34:52] d'implantation et d'intégration

[34:54] architecturale

[34:55] (PIIA)

[34:56] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[34:57] de construction pour la

[34:58] modification de la façade du

[34:59] bâtiment principal situé au 168,

[35:00] Ruskin. La recommandation est

[35:03] d'approuver.

[35:04] - C'est proposé.

[35:05] - Secondé.

[35:06] - En faveur de la

[35:07] recommandation.

[35:09] - À l'unanimité. Request for the

[35:12] approval of the Site Planning

[35:13] and Architectural Integration

[35:15] Programme relating to a building

[35:16] permit application for a new

[35:17] main building located at 185

[35:19] Lakeview. The recommendation is

[35:21] to refuse.

[35:22] >> And proposed.

[35:24] >> Second.

[35:26] >> In favour of the

[35:27] recommendation.

[35:29] - À l'unanimité. Nomination en

[35:33] vue de permanence à titre

[35:35] d'Opérateur/Préposé à la

[35:37] menuiserie au poste 6400 au

[35:38] Service des travaux publics. >>

[35:43] I propose.

[35:45] >> Second.

[35:46] >> In favour.

[35:48] - À l'unanimité. Minutes of the

[35:51] Planning Advisory Committee

[35:52] meeting of February 5, 2025.

[36:01] >> Proposed.

[36:04] >> Seconded.

[36:05] >> Any comments?

[36:07] >> No specific comments, but all

[36:09] the projects we review tonight,

[36:11] you can call and approve or

[36:14] disapprove. Those people can

[36:15] call the urban planning

[36:17] department tomorrow for next

[36:18] steps, to know what to do next.

[36:19] I'm just letting you know. I

[36:20] think most people do know that,

[36:22] but just as a reminder. Tonight

[36:24] on the agenda, if you are one of

[36:25] those properties, you can call

[36:27] urban planning for the next

[36:28] steps. Thank you.

[36:32] - Proposé. I am proposing.

[36:37] >> I am seconding.

[36:38] >> In favour.

[36:41] - À l'unanimité. Procès-verbal

[36:44] de la réunion du Comité

[36:45] consultatif de l'environnement

[36:46] du 3 décembre 2024.

[36:53] - Je propose.

[36:54] - Proposé.

[36:56] (inaudible)

[36:57] Faire des commentaires. >> Are

[36:58] you proposing?

[36:59] >> Yes.

[37:00] >> Who is seconding? You are

[37:05] seconding?

[37:06] >> I will second the proposal.

[37:07] >> Okay. Any comments on your

[37:10] minutes?

[37:11] >> Yes.

[37:12] >> Mister Chairman.

[37:13] >> I will make them short. Pour

[37:15] commencer, la communauté

[37:17] d'Environnement reconnaît les

[37:18] problèmes qu'on peut avoir avec

[37:21] la respiration de la fumée de

[37:23] bois sur nos résidents sur leur

[37:27] santé, la qualité de vie et

[37:29] l'environnement. Certainly a lot

[37:31] of science and medical research

[37:33] on the health effects of wood

[37:36] burning and wood smoke on our

[37:38] residents. I want to thank the

[37:40] city for their continued efforts

[37:42] to continue to educate our

[37:47] residents and wood burners on

[37:49] the problems that smoke causes.

[37:54] Everybody breathed including

[37:55] homeowners to. At our December

[37:57] meeting, we reaffirmed the

[37:58] November recommendation for the

[38:00] City Council to modify the

[38:01] current regulations on wood

[38:03] burning appliances. The last

[38:06] thing I would mention is that,

[38:09] at our December meeting, we were

[38:11] looking and we will continue to

[38:12] discuss the priorities and

[38:13] objectives for the environment

[38:18] committee. Sorry about that. For

[38:20] the Environment committee and

[38:24] certainly what we discussed so

[38:25] far, we will continue more in

[38:27] our April meeting. The

[38:29] importance of trees here in

[38:31] Beaconsfield. You have seen with

[38:33] global warming and climate

[38:35] crisis that we are in, trees

[38:38] provide important shade but also

[38:40] in terms of air quality. They

[38:43] absorb carbon and produce

[38:45] oxygen. At the same time,

[38:47] something that my

[38:49] (applause)

[38:50] One of my neighbours had

[38:51] mentioned is a mature tree can

[38:52] actually absorb 40,000 to 50,000

[38:55] gallons of water. We are hearing

[38:59] another subject and topic at our

[39:02] environment committee, certainly

[39:03] water drainage and the flooding

[39:04] situations we've had in the last

[39:05] two years. It is interesting to

[39:07] note that a tree can absorb that

[39:10] 40 to 50,000 gallons of water.

[39:13] That is immense. It is a way to

[39:16] perhaps dry up part of the land

[39:18] on a person's property.

[39:20] Sometimes we hear that the

[39:22] ground itself is actually

[39:24] saturated. So, trees might be

[39:27] another solution for people who

[39:28] can afford to finalize some

[39:32] space to have another tree.

[39:36] Thank you, Mister Mayor.

[39:37] >> Thank you. Are you proposing?

[39:43] Yeah.

[39:44] >> I propose.

[39:47] >> All in favour?

[39:48] >> Yes.

[39:53] >> Minutes of the Finance

[39:54] Advisory Committee meeting of

[39:55] February 3, 2025.

[39:59] >> I will propose.

[40:02] >> And who is going to second?

[40:05] >> I will second.

[40:06] >> Now, any comments from the

[40:09] finance committee?

[40:10] >> Yes. Typically, I would, but

[40:13] I was sick and I did not attend

[40:14] the finance committee. So, Roger

[40:19] is co-president and the floor is

[40:21] yours, Roger.

[40:23] >> Thank you, Mister Chair.

[40:24] >> Thank you, Councillor Moss.

[40:27] [Laughter]

[40:28] >> At this committee, it was

[40:29] only six weeks into the fiscal

[40:31] year. So there was obviously

[40:33] kind of nothing to report on

[40:35] with the city's operating

[40:36] budget. But there was some good

[40:38] news that came out of that

[40:40] meeting from our city's finance

[40:44] department telling us that it

[40:45] looked like the preliminary

[40:47] figures that they were looking

[40:50] for, looking at pretty welcome

[40:52] tax, was going to end up at

[40:55] around five point $6 million.

[40:59] Ça, c'est des nouvelles

[41:01] excellentes, parce qu'en

[41:02] réalité, ça nous aide beaucoup,

[41:04] les finances de la ville. Of

[41:05] course, the five point $6

[41:08] million, as with all the

[41:10] surpluses from the welcome tax,

[41:11] part of it is used as an

[41:13] operating surplus for the city's

[41:15] finances. At the same time, we

[41:17] take a good part of that chunk

[41:19] of money and we actually

[41:21] transfer it into various

[41:23] reserves funds. Those reserve

[41:25] funds are used it anytime for

[41:27] specific projects, but they are

[41:29] very flexible. So they can

[41:31] switched from reserve fund to

[41:33] reserve fund. The other thing

[41:35] that I would mention is that the

[41:38] City municipalities are not

[41:40] allowed to go into a deficit

[41:44] situation during a fiscal year.

[41:46] And so it's very important that

[41:48] a city have reserves so that we

[41:50] can draw on it. Otherwise, it

[41:53] would mean a cash call to

[41:55] taxpayers. I think it's always

[41:57] important for people to

[41:58] understand. When we do report a

[41:59] big reserve, what do we do with

[42:01] those funds. At the same time,

[42:03] part of those funds for $5.6

[42:07] million will go into what we

[42:09] call a reserve fund called the

[42:10] balanced budget. Le équilibre

[42:14] budgétaire That is funding we

[42:15] will use for next year's tax

[42:17] increases that residents don't

[42:19] have to pay. So, what I always

[42:22] tell residence is $5.6 million

[42:26] divided by roughly 7000

[42:28] taxpayers or home owners works

[42:30] out to $800 on average per

[42:33] household. That is used to pay

[42:36] for taxes that otherwise we as

[42:39] residents might have to pay. So

[42:40] it's really important we keep

[42:42] our eye on it, but we are also

[42:44] very conservative. That was one

[42:46] thing. The second thing, and our

[42:49] DG did a good job of answering

[42:51] your question on the projet de

[42:55] loi 39. Projet de loi 39. It's a

[43:00] way of trading categories for

[43:02] each municipality so they can

[43:03] actually look at a ways to maybe

[43:07] tax businesses or residents fare

[43:10] or make sure that in certain

[43:12] cases it is used for very

[43:15] efficient purpose. In this case,

[43:18] the finance committee did

[43:20] recommend that we create a

[43:23] special category four homes in

[43:25] Beaconsfield that are

[43:26] intentionally left vacant for

[43:28] periods of like 12 months or

[43:29] longer. Generally, it could be

[43:31] offshore investments. People who

[43:33] are just letting the house stay

[43:36] empty for whatever reason. It is

[43:39] a problem. It's an eyesore in

[43:41] certain instances. We have seen

[43:43] that kind of investment up here

[43:48] across Toronto and Vancouver a

[43:51] few years ago. It rolled a bit

[43:53] into Québec. But I think the

[43:55] important thing is to have

[43:57] another category that we can

[43:59] influence any home that is left

[44:01] for vacant intentionally. If

[44:04] residents do see that. If you

[44:08] see homes that are empty in your

[44:09] own neighbourhood for a very

[44:10] long time, called municipal

[44:12] patrol. Contact the city because

[44:14] we now have a new tax category

[44:18] coming in with the 2026 real

[44:20] estate rules to be able to

[44:23] actually surcharge that empty

[44:25] property as it is a vacant home.

[44:29] Again, thank you all the time

[44:30] for taking an interest in this

[44:32] city and contacting the city or

[44:35] municipal patrol whenever there

[44:37] is something that you notice

[44:38] that is important. So that is

[44:42] it.

[44:43] >> In favour of the minutes.

[44:51] The next items are two

[44:55] nominations of the member of the

[44:56] traffic advisory committee. 53.4

[45:02] and 53.5. So could we have a

[45:04] proposal and seconded for both

[45:06] items?

[45:07] >> We did not vote on the

[45:09] minutes of the finance Advisory

[45:12] Committee.

[45:13] >> I thought we had. In favour

[45:14] of the minutes of the finance

[45:16] committee.

[45:22] >> Okay.

[45:23] >> So the next two items are the

[45:28] nomination at the traffic

[45:29] committee. 53.4 and 53.5. So

[45:33] will somebody proposes both

[45:35] items?

[45:36] >> I will propose both items.

[45:38] >> And?

[45:39] >> I will second them.

[45:41] >> And will you now talk to the

[45:44] Nominations?

[45:45] - Avec plaisir, Monsieur le

[45:46] Maire. Merci. Alors, le comité

[45:49] consultatif sur la circulation à

[45:52] quatre membres citoyens. Nous

[45:54] avions deux postes à combler et

[46:00] donc nous allons procéder, si

[46:01] tout le monde est d'accord, à la

[46:03] nomination, dans un premier

[46:05] temps, de madame Lena Zajdel, Et

[46:13] monsieur Cyril Duclos

[46:56] Alors, dans le cas présent,

[46:58] c'était d'abord la candidature

[47:00] du district du district six qui

[47:02] devraient être comblés de façon

[47:03] à ce qu'on ait, soit par

[47:05] l'entremise des membres du

[47:06] conseil des résidents, une

[47:10] personne qui habite à

[47:11] Beaconsfield dans le plus grand

[47:13] nombre des districts et de coin

[47:14] possible afin d'assurer une

[47:15] bonne représentativité. Alors,

[47:17] je remercie tout le monde de

[47:19] leur participation, de leur

[47:21] désir de participer à notre

[47:24] communauté. I welcome Madam --

[47:27] and Mr. -- to our committee.

[47:31] - En faveur des nominations.

[47:45] - Nomination d'un membre au

[47:46] Comité consultatif de

[47:47] l'environnement.

[47:48] >> Who is proposing?

[47:49] - Je propose.

[47:50] - J'appuie.

[47:53] >> Okay.

[47:54] - O.K., La nomination...

[47:55] - Je suis heureux de nommer

[47:58] mademoiselle Tiffany Lafleur.

[48:00] C'est une résidente de

[48:02] Beaconsfield depuis 6 ans elle a

[48:05] de l'expérience en travaillant

[48:10] avec une industrie qui est très

[48:12] occupé avec l'environnement.

[48:14] Alors, je pense que c'est une

[48:16] personne qu'on serait très

[48:22] heureux d'avoir avec de

[48:23] nouvelles idées sur notre

[48:24] comité.

[48:25] - En faveur.

[48:30] >> Mandate to the administration

[48:31] of the City of Beaconsfield to

[48:32] pay, under protest, the first

[48:33] payment of the quotes-parts,

[48:34] invoices and contributions for

[48:35] the year 2025 to the

[48:36] Agglomeration of Montréal.

[48:38] >> Proposed.

[48:40] >> Second.

[48:43] - En faveur.

[48:45] - À l'unanimité.

[48:46] - Alors, je souligne encore que

[48:49] le versement des quote-part est

[48:54] fait sous protêt, encore une

[48:57] fois. Et maintenant, Monsieur le

[48:59] Directeur général, on est rendu

[49:00] à combien pour la poursuite

[49:02] contre Montréal?

[49:03] - On est rendu à près de 20

[49:05] millions de dollars. Évidemment,

[49:06] ça ne calcule pas les pénalités

[49:10] et intérêts qui vont s'ajouter

[49:12] quand on va gagner notre cause.

[49:17] - Alors, 20 millions de dollars.

[49:19] C'est quand même beaucoup

[49:20] d'argent.

[49:21] - C'est beaucoup de sous.

[49:22] - Et le compteur augmente à

[49:24] chaque année. Alors, plus ça va

[49:27] prendre de temps pour régler

[49:31] cette poursuite-là, plus le

[49:32] montant va être élevé. Est-ce

[49:37] qu'on a approuvé... ces faits,

[49:41] O.K..

[49:45] - Mandat donné au cabinet

[49:46] d'avocats Bélanger Sauvé afin de

[49:47] représenter les intérêts de la

[49:48] Ville de Beaconsfield

[49:49] relativement à la propriété

[49:50] privée située au 254, Westcroft.

[49:51] - Proposé.

[49:53] - Et j'appuie.

[49:54] - En faveur.

[49:57] - À l'unanimité. Mandate given

[50:01] to Bélanger Sauvé law firm to

[50:04] represent the City of

[50:05] Beaconsfield's interests

[50:06] regarding contract 588-22-ME

[50:07] concerning the replacement of

[50:08] the rooftops and controls at

[50:09] City Hall and Library.

[50:12] >> Proposed.

[50:13] >> Second.

[50:14] >> In favour.

[50:16] - À l'unanimité. Résolution

[50:18] concernant le besoin de tenir

[50:19] compte des personnes handicapées

[50:20] dans la planification des

[50:22] mesures d'urgence de la Ville de

[50:23] Beaconsfield.

[50:25] - Proposé.

[50:26] - J'appuie.

[50:27] - En faveur.

[50:30] - À l'unanimité. Resolution in

[50:32] support of National Day for the

[50:35] Promotion of Positive Mental

[50:36] Health, March 13, 2025.

[50:40] >> Propose.

[50:41] >> Seconded.

[50:43] >> In favour.

[50:46] - À l'unanimité. Autorisation à

[50:48] la Ferme Rêveuse d'utiliser deux

[50:50] espaces de stationnement du parc

[50:52] Christmas pour la distribution

[50:53] de produits de la ferme, les

[50:54] vendredis du 28 février au 30

[50:56] mai 2025 de 15 h 30 à 19 h.

[51:01] - Proposé.

[51:02] - J'appuie.

[51:03] - En faveur.

[51:05] - À l'unanimité. Authorization

[51:09] for street closure for the event

[51:14] Beau Market, on Fridays between

[51:15] May 30 and September 12, 2025,

[51:18] from 2 p.m. to 6:30 p.m..

[51:23] >> Proposed.

[51:24] >> Seconded.

[51:26] - En faveur.

[51:28] - À l'unanimité. Autorisation

[51:30] pour Les Amis du Village

[51:32] Beaurepaire d'organiser une

[51:33] vente de garage communautaire

[51:34] (Big Beau)

[51:35] dans le secteur du Village

[51:36] Beaurepaire le samedi 10 mai

[51:37] 2025 de 10 h 30 à 19 h 30 et

[51:39] autorisation de fermeture totale

[51:40] de la rue. >> Proposed.

[51:45] >> Seconded.

[51:46] >> In favour.

[51:48] - À l'unanimité. Adoption of the

[51:53] Policy on the establishment of

[51:55] immovable subcategories and

[51:56] division of the City's territory

[51:57] into sectors.

[51:59] >> Proposed.

[52:00] >> Seconded.

[52:02] >> In favour.

[52:03] - À l'unanimité. Rapport du

[52:06] maire sur les décisions prises

[52:07] par le Conseil d'agglomération

[52:08] lors des séances du 23 janvier

[52:09] et 20 février 2025.

[52:12] - Comme le conseiller David

[52:16] Newell m'a remplacé pour cette

[52:18] réunion du conseil

[52:20] d'agglomération, je lui ai

[52:21] demandé de faire les

[52:25] commentaires qu'il a vécues avec

[52:26] ce conseil d'agglomération.

[52:27] - Merci, Monsieur le Maire.

[52:30] Indeed, I was at the last, to

[52:33] January and -- January

[52:34] agglomeration meetings. They

[52:35] were eventful ones, not without

[52:37] some controversy. So they were

[52:40] interesting to say the least.

[52:43] These were long meetings, a lot

[52:45] of points being raised, but

[52:46] there are four point I want to

[52:47] address tonight that I thought

[52:48] would be an interest to

[52:49] Beaconsfield residents in

[52:50] particular. So I would just like

[52:52] to cover what those points were.

[52:55] The first one being fluoride in

[52:57] our drinking water. I'm sure

[52:59] that you've all heard about this

[53:01] over the past few months and so

[53:03] on. The decision of the -- the

[53:06] agglomeration was announced in

[53:07] November. There has been a lot

[53:08] of discussion in and around it.

[53:10] I can say that for the past

[53:12] couple of months this has also

[53:15] been challenged and questioned

[53:17] quite a bit at the acclamation

[53:19] meeting. The questions were

[53:20] pointed at -- who is basically

[53:23] the mayor of Lachine, but who is

[53:24] also responsible for our water

[53:28] within the Agglo. So the

[53:30] questions have come up, there is

[53:33] really I would say three points

[53:34] that the mayors around

[53:37] (applause)

[53:38] From the West Island who have

[53:39] really been focusing. In

[53:41] addition to the strong

[53:42] endorsement from Health Canada,

[53:43] which is well documented out

[53:45] there I would say, the three

[53:46] points that came up were, and

[53:48] that we are trying to get

[53:49] answers to as to what

[53:51] significance or why more

[53:53] significance were placed on

[53:54] these documents, was a clear

[53:56] document that was even

[53:57] commissioned by the City of

[53:58] Montréal themselves to look at

[54:00] the value of fluoride in the

[54:02] water. And this was coming from

[54:04] the department -- essentially

[54:07] from Midland to White, the

[54:09] regional director of public

[54:10] health. Directrice régionale de

[54:11] la santé publique pour la Ville

[54:12] de Montréal. Essentially, in her

[54:16] accompanying letter, she also

[54:17] strongly supported the use of

[54:19] fluoride. So that was there. It

[54:22] was seemingly glazed over by the

[54:23] City of Montréal. To up the ante

[54:25] one more level, there was a

[54:27] letter that was provided by Dr.

[54:30] Boileau. He's basically the

[54:31] provincial government provincial

[54:33] director of Public Health right

[54:37] from our provincial Ministry of

[54:38] Health. Clearly, in his letter

[54:41] he was very straightforward and

[54:42] clear. He also supports the use

[54:44] of fluoride. He's so convinced

[54:49] that which really see in these

[54:50] types of letters, but also

[54:53] reminding them that there is

[54:55] financial support for

[54:56] infrastructure, maintenance,

[54:57] even the cost of fluoride which

[54:58] is not a lot overall. So that

[55:00] gives you a glowing endorsement

[55:01] for all of these factors. We

[55:03] have yet to receive any feedback

[55:05] of any constructive importance,

[55:09] I would say, which is very

[55:13] frustrating. Last week, when I

[55:14] decided to do at the meeting was

[55:16] actually give more of a case

[55:19] study, a situation in Calgary.

[55:20] You can read about it, I will

[55:21] summarize it very quickly.

[55:23] Basically, in 2011 Calgary, they

[55:26] basically stopped fluoride at

[55:27] that time. Within two years they

[55:31] saw quite increase in the dental

[55:33] issues whether it be

[55:35] hospitalizations for that matter

[55:36] or just a lot of potential

[55:39] problems that came up. They

[55:40] started monitoring this and

[55:41] doing studies over a ten-year

[55:43] period about. They had the

[55:44] benefit of looking before, in

[55:45] other words with fluoride and

[55:47] with no fluoride in their

[55:48] population. They were able to do

[55:49] some very, very good studies on

[55:51] this, recent studies as well. In

[55:56] fact, just recently, not that

[55:58] long ago, to make a long story

[56:00] short, they had actually

[56:01] reintroduced fluoride into their

[56:02] water based on the learnings

[56:03] they have learned from their own

[56:05] city for that matter among

[56:06] everything else. So I brought

[56:07] that up as a case study because

[56:09] at the last meeting, what had

[56:11] been mentioned by the

[56:14] acclamation responsible here,

[56:15] they were saying they looked in

[56:16] Québec and parts of Europe and I

[56:18] found it interesting why they

[56:20] would need to go that far

[56:22] examples that are in our own

[56:24] backyard. This was a glaring

[56:25] case. So I found ourselves

[56:27] sitting with basically what

[56:28] Calgary did in 2011. I was

[56:30] thinking we not learn from this

[56:31] experience and look at that a

[56:32] little closer and try to be more

[56:35] proactive in that? I did not get

[56:36] much of an answer. They just

[56:37] said we are not using fluoride

[56:38] in our water. So, unfortunately

[56:42] not much success to report with

[56:43] that. But I will say that the

[56:47] consensus around the table

[56:48] pretty much is that we continue

[56:49] to pose more questions,

[56:50] different questions, and other

[56:52] methods to try and get better

[56:53] answers to support the use of

[56:55] fluoride in the water. The

[56:57] evidence seems overwhelming as

[56:59] well as the more recent

[57:01] evidence. We are giving you an

[57:02] update on that. Le deuxième

[57:04] point, c'était plutôt... j'ai

[57:06] trouvé un point dans un rapport

[57:07] de la Ville de Montréal qui

[57:09] parle d'un plan d'action Vision

[57:13] 0. C'est un plan plutôt pour

[57:15] réduire l'objectif pour réduire

[57:18] les décès et les blessures

[57:20] graves due aux accidents qui

[57:21] arrivent sur les rues, de

[57:23] réduire de 50% d'ici 2030 et à 0

[57:26] d'ici 2020 40. Le contexte

[57:28] autour de ce plan, c'est

[57:30] vraiment pour améliorer... je

[57:34] ces Québec

[57:35] (---)

[57:36] artérielle, et particulièrement

[57:37] des zones scolaires. Nous

[57:38] autres, on a déjà fait des

[57:39] démarches depuis quelques années

[57:40] dans notre zone scolaire. Vous

[57:41] avez remarqué. Donc, pour notre

[57:44] part, on a déjà adressé une

[57:46] grande partie de ces choses-là,

[57:47] mais la Ville de Montréal a

[57:48] beaucoup de travail à faire. À

[57:50] l'intérieur de ce plan, j'ai

[57:51] noté qu'il y a aussi un plan

[57:57] pour incorporer l'usage des

[57:59] appareils de contrôle

[58:01] automatisé. Donc, autrement dit,

[58:03] les photos radar. Donc, la Ville

[58:06] de Montréal est en train de

[58:07] mettre sur point un plan pour

[58:08] regarder leur terrain, l'île de

[58:09] Montréal entière, identifier les

[58:10] endroits... qu'ils ont déjà

[58:11] fait, d'ailleurs, dans plusieurs

[58:12] parties de la ville. Photo

[58:13] radar.

[58:16] Il y a une carte qui va

[58:17] identifier les endroits. C'est

[58:19] un endroit qui nécessite l'usage

[58:21] de photos radar, incluant

[58:22] Beaconsfield aussi. Photo radar

[58:25] our minister of transport will

[58:26] decide on where and when these

[58:27] things get used. Donc, c'est un

[58:28] plan qui va continuer en 2025,

[58:29] mais j'ai signalé aussi à notre

[58:31] administration qu'il y a une

[58:32] opportunité d'identifier

[58:34] potentiellement... ce qu'on a

[58:35] déjà fait auparavant, par

[58:38] endroits, et peut-être d'autres

[58:39] pour l'utilisation de cet outil

[58:44] pour encore l'utiliser

[58:45] idéalement comme il faut. Le

[58:46] seul problème, c'est que ce

[58:47] n'est pas pour demain non plus.

[58:49] C'est le FTQ qui va décider, Ils

[58:56] vont décider de l'utilisation et

[58:58] des endroits spécifiques. En

[58:59] plus, il y 2500 appareils qui

[59:02] vont être disponibles pour

[59:04] l'entièreté de la province....

[59:07] 250, excuse. Excusez-moi, 2500.

[59:10] - Le 150.

[59:11] - 250.

[59:20] 250 pour toute la province..

[59:26] C'est une situation qui...

[59:28] finalement, aussi, les critères

[59:29] vont être de minimiser le nombre

[59:31] de décès ou d'accidents, la

[59:33] sévérité de ces accidents et le

[59:34] volume de trafic dans chaque

[59:36] endroit qui va être évalué pour

[59:38] déterminer qui mérite d'avoir ce

[59:41] genre d'appareils dans leur

[59:45] municipalité ou ailleurs.

[59:46] Néanmoins, nous sommes là. Nous

[59:49] nous sommes opposés. Donc, c'est

[59:53] une opportunité pareille. On va

[59:54] voir ce qui va arriver avec ça,

[59:56] mais on peut le temps, on verra.

[59:59] On envisage probablement...

[1:00:00] c'est un projet à moyen terme,

[1:00:01] donc 2027, probablement. Si ce

[1:00:04] n'est pas plus. On verra avec le

[1:00:07] temps. Donc, de toute façon, ça

[1:00:09] reste là. D'autres points... The

[1:00:12] other one you may also heard a

[1:00:14] little bit about in some of the

[1:00:15] media lately wasn't objection by

[1:00:21] our defused marched cities about

[1:00:23] a bylaw -- $20 million for the

[1:00:26] hype a drum number project. Just

[1:00:28] to provide a little context.

[1:00:30] Obviously, that area is not

[1:00:31] within Beaconsfield on the West

[1:00:33] Island, but why should it matter

[1:00:34] to us. In short, the project was

[1:00:37] a big project to develop the

[1:00:39] Hippodrome. It was always

[1:00:40] dedicated as a City of Montréal

[1:00:42] product, not an agglomeration

[1:00:45] project which we are part of.

[1:00:47] There was a nearby project

[1:00:49] called the Cavendish project.

[1:00:50] You've heard about this

[1:00:52] probably. It's not necessarily

[1:00:54] in our backyard again, but it

[1:00:55] becomes a competence of the

[1:00:57] glow. So we are committed to

[1:00:58] supporting that in that way.

[1:01:00] That was always a separate

[1:01:01] project which is a much smaller

[1:01:05] amount of money devoted to

[1:01:07] opening that area. With the

[1:01:08] traffic and bike paths and so

[1:01:09] on. It would seem that with the

[1:01:10] magic of the Agglo,

[1:01:12] extrapolating here with my

[1:01:13] words, but these projects have

[1:01:14] not been kind of fused together.

[1:01:17] So the Hippodrome, Charles Talon

[1:01:22] and Cavendish have been blended

[1:01:24] together and we packaged as a

[1:01:26] Agglo project for $20 million.

[1:01:28] That's only the tip of the

[1:01:30] iceberg that would be coming for

[1:01:33] the project. You maybe see where

[1:01:34] I'm going with this. Obviously,

[1:01:36] the decision of taking exception

[1:01:37] to this and we are looking for a

[1:01:38] lot more information which was

[1:01:41] not that forthcoming. The

[1:01:42] concern is what we were agreed

[1:01:44] to initially for a relatively

[1:01:46] small amount of money for

[1:01:47] Cavendish project. It has now

[1:01:49] been blended into a much larger

[1:01:51] project. That means a lot more

[1:01:53] when you consider the part we

[1:01:59] would be responsible for. This

[1:02:00] is something we take very

[1:02:02] seriously. I won't get into it

[1:02:03] too much further, but the final

[1:02:05] implications for Beaconsfield,

[1:02:06] there is the other echo cities.

[1:02:08] Because this is turning into a

[1:02:09] legal matter, I'm not going to

[1:02:10] be commenting further on that.

[1:02:11] There will be more information

[1:02:12] coming up from the ASM or what

[1:02:15] we referred to as a association

[1:02:17] of suburban municipalities. You

[1:02:19] will see more about this in the

[1:02:21] news with official statements

[1:02:23] coming from that group, above

[1:02:25] and beyond what has sort of been

[1:02:26] dropped out there.

[1:02:30] (inaudible)

[1:02:31] So we will keep our eyes on this

[1:02:32] one as well because it's

[1:02:34] important. The last point to

[1:02:35] move things along, Mr. the

[1:02:36] Mayor, is that we've heard in

[1:02:37] the news, this is not directly

[1:02:38] related to Beaconsfield, but I

[1:02:39] think it's an important issue

[1:02:41] because we hear about it a lot

[1:02:42] and we to discuss it even here

[1:02:44] in Beaconsfield to some degree.

[1:02:46] But there has been, over the

[1:02:47] past two months, there has been

[1:02:50] some significant investments in

[1:02:51] social housing. It's more of an

[1:02:53] issue downtown than here. I

[1:02:58] wanted to share that with you

[1:02:59] because it does become part of

[1:03:02] our competence is of the Agglo

[1:03:04] as we call it. There has been

[1:03:05] 100 million dollars that will be

[1:03:06] invested over ten years to

[1:03:09] further acquire new property

[1:03:11] (inaudible)

[1:03:12] not new properties, but

[1:03:13] properties that become

[1:03:14] available. Also to help maintain

[1:03:16] the current properties and

[1:03:17] renovate these properties going

[1:03:18] forward at the same time. There

[1:03:19] was another 3.2 million that

[1:03:23] came up to buy essentially

[1:03:26] prefab modular units which are

[1:03:28] actually no longer needed by

[1:03:30] Hydro-Québec up north. So the

[1:03:31] city was able to get some of

[1:03:35] those, shall we say, at a very

[1:03:37] good price overall. And that

[1:03:38] should provide -- there's a

[1:03:40] couple of modular sections to

[1:03:41] it, but overall it should

[1:03:42] provide 60 housing units, pardon

[1:03:45] me, more on a temporary basis at

[1:03:47] two sites that they have set up

[1:03:49] for that. So I think we can all

[1:03:51] take a little solace that there

[1:03:52] has been some movement forward

[1:03:55] and some concrete action. There

[1:03:56] are a lot of other details in

[1:03:57] this, but I think it's

[1:03:58] encouraging to know that social

[1:04:00] housing is being addressed also.

[1:04:01] It gives you some numbers around

[1:04:03] it and some of the actions. I

[1:04:05] thought I would share. So that's

[1:04:06] it. That is quite a bit. More

[1:04:07] than we usually get out of these

[1:04:08] Bagot meetings, Mister Mayor.

[1:04:10] But I just thought these would

[1:04:11] be pertinent points.

[1:04:12] >> Well, you were certainly busy

[1:04:14] at that meeting. All I can say

[1:04:18] is that you can kick, yell,

[1:04:22] scream, do anything you want.

[1:04:26] The merged municipal

[1:04:27] (applause)

[1:04:28] The merged municipalities are

[1:04:29] eight minority and Montréal can

[1:04:31] do whatever it wants. I think

[1:04:36] the fluoridation is a good

[1:04:39] example of exactly that.

[1:04:41] >> Yes, the fluoridation. But I

[1:04:43] think our presence is valuable

[1:04:44] and useful there. As a

[1:04:46] collective, as I said, whether

[1:04:48] it be there posing questions and

[1:04:50] looking for answers or looking

[1:04:52] for perhaps other means, legal

[1:04:54] or otherwise, that is also a way

[1:04:56] of communicating that.

[1:04:57] >> It seems that illegal action

[1:04:59] is the only way to contest

[1:05:06] anything that Montréal wants to

[1:05:07] do. Thank you very much, David,

[1:05:13] for replacing me.

[1:05:14] >> It was a pleasure. Thank you.

[1:05:15] I wish I had better news.

[1:05:23] >> Deposit of the Directors

[1:05:24] reports.

[1:05:25] - On a les rapports habituels

[1:05:26] qui ont été déposés au conseil,

[1:05:27] mais j'aimerais tout d'abord

[1:05:28] vous remercier, membres du

[1:05:29] conseil, de me permettre de

[1:05:30] participer au congrès de la

[1:05:32] vieille qui est de la Camrose.

[1:05:33] Celui de la carte c'est un peu

[1:05:35] exceptionnel. C'est quand même

[1:05:37] pancanadien. Ils ne viennent pas

[1:05:38] au Québec très souvent. Donc, je

[1:05:41] sollicite le conseil quand ils

[1:05:42] viennent au Québec, sinon je

[1:05:43] trouve que ça coûte trop cher

[1:05:45] d'aller à Banff ou Vancouver.

[1:05:49] Ensuite, juste pour être certain

[1:05:51] que notre conseiller Moss... Did

[1:05:54] not create expectations. The

[1:05:56] welcome tax was higher than we

[1:05:58] expected. I just want to make

[1:06:00] sure of what we are seeing. It's

[1:06:01] not the surplus, the welcome

[1:06:03] Texas not a surplus. We think we

[1:06:04] are going to have a surplus

[1:06:06] around two or 2.5 million. 1.2

[1:06:10] goes into the -- and that will

[1:06:13] leave us as 1 million as

[1:06:15] Councillor Moss mentioned to put

[1:06:16] into reserves further on.

[1:06:19] Et le dossier des quote-part,

[1:06:21] Monsieur le Maire, toutes les

[1:06:22] villes réunies sur 6 ans, depuis

[1:06:24] 2020 à aujourd'hui, ça 120

[1:06:26] millions de dollars d'écart,

[1:06:28] selon les calculs qu'on a

[1:06:30] présenté à la Cour pour

[1:06:32] l'ensemble des villes. Nous,

[1:06:33] c'est 20, mais il y a 120

[1:06:35] millions pour les 15 villes.

[1:06:37] - Ça n'inclut pas l'intérêt.

[1:06:39] - Non, pas encore. On garde ça

[1:06:41] pour plus tard.

[1:06:42] - Non, non. 120 millions. Moi,

[1:06:44] ce qui m'étonne énormément,

[1:06:46] c'est que les autres villes

[1:06:48] liées n'ont pas réagi. Elles

[1:06:51] n'ont pas réagi. Il y a des

[1:06:54] villes qui laisse 6 millions,

[1:06:59] même, je pense que dans un cas,

[1:07:00] c'est 12 millions, qu'elle

[1:07:02] laisse sur la table. Et les

[1:07:05] maires n'ont pas réagi. La,

[1:07:08] leurs résidents n'ont rien dit.

[1:07:11] Ce

[1:07:12] - N'est pas un dossier qui est

[1:07:13] facile. C'est quand même

[1:07:14] complexe. Mais c'est quand même

[1:07:15] une somme importante sur

[1:07:16] laquelle on doit se pencher. Et

[1:07:18] on s'en est parlé aujourd'hui,

[1:07:19] Monsieur le Maire. Je sais que

[1:07:20] vous allez faire dans votre mot

[1:07:22] citoyen, mais j'ai envoyé une

[1:07:24] missive à mes collègues des

[1:07:25] travaux publics aujourd'hui pour

[1:07:27] les remercier, les féliciter du

[1:07:30] travail réalisé. Ils ont

[1:07:33] travaillé d'innombrables heures

[1:07:35] sur le territoire de la ville

[1:07:36] pour cette tempête... en tout

[1:07:38] cas, ce cumul de tempête

[1:07:40] exceptionnelle qui ont laissé

[1:07:42] 72,4 centimètres de neige en

[1:07:45] quatre jours. Ça a été un record

[1:07:47] de 125 années. Donc, je voulais

[1:07:50] vous laisser... je voulais vous

[1:07:51] tenir au courant de ça.

[1:07:52] - Merci beaucoup, au nom du

[1:07:56] conseil, à tous les employés qui

[1:07:58] ont contribué à cette tempête-là

[1:08:01] ou à ces deux tempêtes-là. Je

[1:08:04] pense que Beaconsfield a été un

[1:08:07] bon exemple très rapidement. Les

[1:08:11] rues ont été nettoyés et même

[1:08:14] les trottoirs ont été nettoyés

[1:08:17] après un certain temps. Ça a

[1:08:19] pris presque une semaine pour

[1:08:21] être capable de tout faire, mes

[1:08:26] félicitations à l'équipe des

[1:08:27] Travaux publics pour le travail

[1:08:29] qui a été fait.

[1:08:30] - Ça devrait être complétée, le

[1:08:32] nettoyage des bornes d'incendie,

[1:08:34] ces jours-ci. On a même de la

[1:08:35] difficulté à avoir des

[1:08:36] sous-traitants pour nous aider à

[1:08:38] les faire. Mais on travaille

[1:08:40] encore à faire ça. Évidemment,

[1:08:42] il y a un peu de ramassage de

[1:08:43] neige, mais 95% est complété.

[1:08:47] - Merci.

[1:08:50] - On serait à la levée de la

[1:08:52] séance.

[1:08:53] - La levée de l'Assemblée. Qui

[1:08:55] propose?

[1:08:57] - Je propose. >> And I second.

[1:09:02] - Qui

[1:09:03] (---)

[1:09:04] ? Alors, en faveur.

[1:09:07] - À l'unanimité.

[1:09:08] - Alors, c'est unanime. Merci

[1:09:14] beaucoup. Merci beaucoup à tous

[1:09:17] les gens qui sont ici dans la

[1:09:18] salle. Thank you very much for

[1:09:20] coming to our meeting. And to

[1:09:23] those of you who are watching us

[1:09:29] on the webcast, thank you very

[1:09:31] much for the interest that you

[1:09:32] are showing to your city. And I

[1:09:36] want to read a comment because I

[1:09:38] know that some people will be

[1:09:40] interested

[1:09:45] . It is from my son who is in

[1:09:48] Toronto. He is watching the

[1:09:52] debate in French. So I am doing

[1:09:54] my best to watch the debate in

[1:09:56] French. So I may have missed a

[1:09:58] few points. Sadly, my take is

[1:10:04] that they list sounds the most

[1:10:06] competent. And his odds of

[1:10:08] winning are not so good.

[1:10:11] [Laughter]

[1:10:12] So there you go.

2025-02-24 Conseil municipal de Beaconsfield

Transcript