[0:05] Bonsoir et bienvenue à la séance ordinaire du conseil municipal, lundi le 24 mars. Welcome to the

[0:13] regular meeting of the Municipal Council of Monday March Twenty-four. And to open the

[0:19] meeting. I will ask the city clerk to go with the agenda. Adoption de l'ordre du jour de

[0:31] la séance ordinaire du Conseil de la ville de Beaconsfield du 24 mars 2025, avec les

[0:35] modifications suivantes Le point 40.1. Le montant du règlement aurait dû être précisé comme

[0:43] 39 805 000 $. Et le point. Il y a le point 45 neuf qui doit être ajouté à l'ordre du jour. Et

[0:54] c'est le point. Demande de certificat d'autorisation pour l'installation d'une enseigne

[0:59] pour le commerce situé au 482 Beaconsfield. Je propose. Je seconde. En faveur. À l'unanimité.

[1:11] Nous avons deux conseillers qui nous manquent ce soir. Le conseiller Saint-Jean

[1:16] Et conseiller Newell. Conseiller Newell is on vacation and conseiller Saint-Jean is sick. So

[1:25] Unfortunately, we only have four counselors. So that's the minimum for. To have four

[1:33] Fortunately you have four not unfortunately four.

[1:37] Ok. Alors nous avons avec nous le commandant du PDQ 1. Alors

[1:44] je vais lui demander de venir faire un rapport sur les activités durant le mois.

[1:49] Ça a été un mois très actif je crois à Beaconsfield

[1:55] So thank you for having me tonight. So this is

[1:57] the report of the crime for March at Beaconsfield. Premièrement, je voudrais. Je ne

[2:02] pourrai pas passer sous silence ce qui s'est passé le 13 mars dernier à Beaconsfield, où un

[2:07] piéton a été frappé par un automobiliste. Je pense que vous l'avez vu dans les médias. Si

[2:11] vous ne l'avez pas vu, je vous l'annonce. Sur place lorsque c'est arrivé, j'ai dépêché des

[2:16] enquêteurs spécialistes en sécurité routière, des agents de sécurité routière qui ont

[2:20] rencontré des témoins, qui ont visionné des caméras. Bien que l'enquête ne soit pas terminée,

[2:25] je ne peux pas me prononcer sur l'enquête. Présentement, tout laisse croire qu'il n'y a

[2:28] absolument rien de criminel. Non seulement rien de criminel, mais rien au niveau du code de la route

[2:33] aucune infraction a été commise. Bien sûr, on attend les rapports finaux des enquêtes, mais aussi le rapport prelimiraire.

[2:40] Je tiens à mentionner aussi qu'à Beaconsfield, durant

[2:43] cette période là, le mois de mars, mes agents acquiescèrent. Mes agents de quartier en

[2:46] sécurité routière ont effectué 25 opérations au niveau de la route pour donner des constats

[2:51] d'infraction aux automobilistes récalcitrants. Et sur les 25, 20 opérations ont été faites pour

[2:56] la vitesse. C'est seulement Beaconsfield. Pour les autres événements. Et bien, depuis deux

[3:03] nuits, on a des événements où des gens se font lancer des oeufs sur leur véhicule, où les

[3:08] résidences. Donc, si jamais vous voyez des personnes circuler, lancer des oeufs, se promener

[3:14] avec un casseau d'oeuf, s'il vous plaît communiquez avec le neuf un. On aimerait ça leur parler

[3:20] Il y a également trois interventions sur le territoire de Beaconsfield qui ont été

[3:22] faites durant le dernier mois pour des personnes en crise. Ils ont tous été transportés à

[3:27] l'hôpital et les soins leur ont été donnés. Au niveau communautaire. Nos agents ont

[3:34] effectué des rencontres dans les écoles afin de sensibiliser les étudiants sur la

[3:38] cyberintimidation. Je peux vous mentionner également certaines statistiques. Le dernier bilan

[3:44] trimestriel du SPVM est sorti et j'ai le bonheur de vous annoncer que pour le poste de quartier

[3:50] un, les crimes contre la propriété ont diminué de 12 %. Les crimes contre la personne de

[3:55] 4 % et les constats d'infraction pour les usagers de la route, je parle encore une fois de

[4:01] sécurité routière ont augmenté de 51 % émis par les agents. J'invite tout citoyen qui voit

[4:09] des infractions au niveau du code de la route ou une infraction criminelle ou un

[4:12] comportement inadéquat de communiquer avec le 911. Mes agents sont sur le terrain 24 h

[4:16] sur 24, sept jours sur sept et sont là pour répondre aux appels. Merci pour votre

[4:22] confiance. C'est ce qui termine mon bilan. Je tiens à mentionner que vous pouvez rejoindre le

[4:28] poste de quartier en tout temps au 514-280-0101 ou vous pouvez

[4:33] rejoindre également moi même avec le site internet pdq1@spvm.qc.ca

[4:41] Soyez assurés de notre disponibilité, nous sommes toujours présents et nous répondrons à vos appels 911

[4:46] Thank you for your confidence, you may call 514-280-0101 at any time

[4:51] or reach the station on mail by pdq1@spvm.qc.ca be sure that we are available for any

[4:58] concerned rise by the citizens of Beaconsfield. Merci. Merci beaucoup, Commandant. Est ce

[5:05] qu'il y a des questions? Any questions to the commandant.

[5:15] Please identify yourself as a I am Nicole Curadeau I do some civilian work with the Toronto

[5:22] police service on the missing implementation team and as person of the autism Spectrum. I

[5:29] would love to work with the SPVM and with commandos to educate about autism and persons in

[5:36] crisis. I love that he used the term person in crisis because that term correctly identifies

[5:44] these as neurological incidence neurological crisis and its. I'm glad that they used that terms

[5:54] and I'd love to work with the SPVM and I'd love to set up a time where I could educate them

[6:00] about autism and I know they already work with with giant steps but that focus on

[6:06] children. I'd love to give the perspectives as the autistic adult who lives independently

[6:12] but still sometimes gets this regulated may required support. Thank you. Commandant?

[6:25] Madam Corretto, If you are willing, do you know Stephanie? She's gonna get in touch with you by mail like you

[6:31] used to OK and what the cut that with her is that alright. Thank you. Il y a d'autres questions.

[6:42] Any other questions to the commandant? Just a comment George I just want that to say twenty out of twenty five

[6:50] were for speeding. Thank you for every maybe one residents that they got a speeding ticket.

[6:58] There's a thousand that Thank you for your intervention. So continue the good work. Thank

[7:03] you very much. Merci. N'hésitez pas à communiquer avec la ferme. Merci. Merci. Thank you. Now.

[7:10] We're going to proceed with the question that we got in writing. Les questions qui nous ont été

[7:22] envoyées par écrit. La première question, c'est de M. Derek Pounds. Sweet Briar. The subject

[7:32] it’s agenda item 20.8 authorization of an expenses concerning accessories work of

[7:39] 520 703,84 all taxes included relating to

[7:44] contract 599-23-GC for the rehabilitation of the centennial jetty.

[7:53] His first question is the amount of 520 703,85 84 for accessory work at the centennial

[8:01] yet included is it included in the three million, three night, two old Seven Seven

[8:10] loan approved at the Twenty-fifth of March Twenty-four Council meeting and

[8:16] His second question is what accessory work is involved relating to contract five night in five

[8:24] ninety nine twenty trois GC for the rehabilitation of the centennial Jetty. Please explain

[8:29] in transparent terms. So I will ask our directeur General Mr Boileau to please answer the

[8:36] question. Avec plaisir, Monsieur. Je ressens que j'ai laissé sur mon bureau. Thank you

[8:43] for your question. Mister pounds and facts. Yes! The total amount of five twenty thousand dollars

[8:48] is appropriate from the boring by law and which representing the difference of sixty-five

[8:54] thousand dollars eight hundred doors, which is an extra cost. If I can see another words and

[9:00] it will total the cost of the project to 3 millions for hundred fifty seven thousand

[9:07] hundred sixty dollars. Then the other questions There is there are four order of change to the

[9:14] contract and the first one was for the stopped to work and running the running continuous

[9:21] for the pumping because they had to stop the work so that's the first change of order and then

[9:24] there was the supply transport and installation of gravel and installation of an underwater

[9:30] structural slab, which it was a change of order to the contract. Another one was the cost for the

[9:36] disposal of surplus. Soil excavation that we call ab bc so contaminated or not

[9:40] contaminated. And then the change order for stone retaining wall, including granular

[9:47] Foundation géotextiles and filter stone. So those are the change that took place during

[9:52] the contract. So the we're gonna exceeded bylaw by sixty six thousand dollars since I ask

[10:00] you to answer the second question from Catherine Pinel Bolton. Please, go ahead. Ok.

[10:07] Thank you, Mr Mayor that was about safety and fairway and the question of the lady is that

[10:13] with all the question was I'm gonna read as you do is with growing on fairway, including

[10:19] incidence where car are driving on safely and nearly hitting children on bikes as well as pedestrians

[10:25] past traffic study recommended installing the sidewalk wheel the city take action to build

[10:29] the sidewalk this year or wait for a serious accident. So well the sidewalk was in the context

[10:34] of the development of two seventy-five elms that was asked to the developer to included

[10:41] the sidewalk and his project and since the project was refused well there's no sidewalk in the

[10:46] plans for the municipality at the present time. Mrs Harris had a second question Mr Mayor

[10:51] Can the city provide an update on the elm plaza. What is the current status is the land

[10:56] zone residential or commercial and has new plants been reviewed. Well. We are not

[11:00] currently reviewing any proposal that require the zoning change and the sector is we are waiting

[11:07] for the agglomeration approval to the concordance bylaws that was completed last month and

[11:12] until the process is complete the agglomerations can not authorized any project involving

[11:17] zoning change or a specific construction alterations or occupancy proposal for any

[11:23] immovable sorry and then that presented the area is known for commercial use. However, the

[11:29] adopted concordance by the seven twenty one twenty one approved by the agglomerations will

[11:35] change the zoning designation to residential. Thank you, Mr Boileau. The next question is

[11:42] from François Corriveau Ferland and I will try. I will read this question You are the one. Yeah

[11:53] Alright, go, go ahead. Okay. I have a. My name is François Corriveau and I'm on fire loud

[12:06] and I have a concern about the building of the new house in the neighbourhood. So they are very

[12:12] good example for example on pylon or jasper that outfit the neighbourhood. But they are

[12:18] others that clearly don't and as an example. I have the one on the. 58 fairlawn. It's a

[12:25] new new building. It has been finished building in two years ago and it's still empty and it

[12:33] doesn't match the houses around it. So my concern is if you have what you call architectural

[12:42] design guidelines. Why is and are those guidelines not followed for such houses and

[12:49] they are the question. Why was asked at the city hall at some time and the answer was new

[12:56] young families want to start house, but actually there was two point million plus taxes and

[13:06] I don't think it's good to have empty house for two years. Do. Just empty and on more and it's the

[13:19] same question on Jasper and number hundred and thirty. There is a house that is being

[13:25] demolished right now and will it be replaced by the house that will fit the neighbourhood as

[13:33] the guidelines say. Or Will? Will you build another castle there you know those big house

[13:40] like on on fairlawn. On. So all the neighbouring also our bungalows so I'm curious to see

[13:49] how we can guarantee that the new house will match. Well, we will certainly look into the

[13:57] houses that are empty. Because they should not. They should be occupied after a certain time. So

[14:05] we will ask our urban planning people to take out take a look at the ones that are empty.

[14:12] Now as I look here I see why this building must go last one October twenty-first will

[14:20] another castle be built again not matching its surroundings. Well, we approve new projects

[14:27] that our new project are analysed by the planning Advisory committee and according

[14:35] to the criteria. Set out in bylaws BEAC-098 on sight planning and. Architectural

[14:43] integration program the pack makes recommendations to council and the council makes the

[14:49] decision to approve the architecture of the permit to be issued. So that's the process

[14:58] and approving the what you call the castle the architecture for the permits that is to be issued

[15:06] for one hundred and thirty Jasper was approved by the council and based on the

[15:12] objectives and criteria of BEAC-098 that so it's already 130 Jasper is already been approved

[15:19] by the council. And what is it? What type of house is it on Jasper Quel genre de maison? Yes!

[15:34] Willowbrook, yes, Cottage. But it's in accordance with our rules and regulations. So it

[15:47] meets the. The bylaws that means the regulation of housing and in Beaconsfield so that means the

[15:57] guideline. Don't need to be followed as long as you you follow the bylaws. Yeah, yeah,

[16:05] Go ahead. So Thank you for your question number one. Alright. Merci beaucoup. Can I ask you a

[16:15] question. Would you like me? Is the concern because the neighborhood is maybe

[16:19] predominantly somewhere with bungalows. And we see cottages is coming up or what's the

[16:24] concern? Exactly. Well. I thought any new building. If there is there is a need for a

[16:32] new building should match the surroundings. That's what the guideline say. And sometimes

[16:38] you come into the street and you see bungalow. And suddenly you see a big thing right in the

[16:43] middle which doesn't seem to match. Yeah, so I was maybe, I was concerned. But I'm so I'm

[16:53] also curious to see what is the justification behind that. So I think it's a question that comes

[17:01] up often enough and it's something that we have as a council discuss often enough right. I

[17:08] A neighborhood that is a neighborhood of single single floor homes bungalows. That's

[17:13] just say is. Should the owner be allowed to add a second floor or demolish and build new. These

[17:23] are questions that come up quite often, I would say regular enough. Okay. We can

[17:30] debate that on both sides right. We could debate and in both sides. However, bylaws in

[17:36] this city, do permit for two story homes to be built. Anywhere? Yeah. Okay. Anywhere. So in a

[17:47] certain sense. On what ground would be refuse a two story home in our bylaws allowed for the two story homes.

[17:56] It was easier to find the guidelines and the bylaws to know that I agree too

[18:02] But but. So it is it's a bit of its a question that definitely is worth the debate and worth

[18:09] questioning but for the time being. And I know the home definitely on Jasper and willowbrook

[18:15] and you are right it is willowbrook. It will be different than what was there

[18:20] previously. No doubt. And obviously when people invest in Beaconsfield well there there.

[18:24] Building home and investing in Beaconsfield. The expectations is they're not gonna demolish

[18:31] an existing home and build the exact same existing home. They're gonna want to build something

[18:35] that is more up to date, more in style and that justifies their investment. As long as it

[18:44] As long as it respects the bylaws. As long the respect the imprint of the of the lots so

[18:54] For me, it's not to understand that somebody will build a house, but not to occupy it for two years.

[19:02] That's a different questions, it's a different issue and we will look into that

[19:08] Like if somebody has build it in order to sell it. That's something that will look into

[19:16] Merci, Monsieur Corriveau. Merci beaucoup. May I add a comment I heard you say that you felt that

[19:22] these homes don't integrate in the neighborhood. But some don't. Just do it because the

[19:30] city we do have a committee called the CCQ committee. And that one thing that they are

[19:35] very very careful of this is looking at integration with in the community and maybe there's

[19:41] broadband that way. But it's an interesting thing that the most of the time. We're here back

[19:47] from new residence looking to be our home or a build a home or or even added after the demolition.

[19:54] Actually say that you know that's the most difficult part is getting the home owner to

[20:00] integrate what they want with the neighborhood. So it's difficult thing, but it's

[20:06] something that you know you can wash for or bring up and if you think I think that the committee

[20:13] should ask the neighbors what they think also. Thank you. The next question is actually. They

[20:28] are not questions but they are comments from Madame Corrado and she makes comments and suggestions

[20:39] about three planting long care and pesticides. The West Island association for the intellectual

[20:45] handicapped New Construction on Saint Louis, Evergreen Lake View and Demolition and the

[20:53] Preservation of Héritage. So thank you very much. Madame Corrado for your comment and

[21:00] suggestions and we will pass on your comments and they are noted and transferred to the

[21:09] administration where relevant. Thank you. And now, we will go to the floor. Est ce qu'il y a

[21:16] des questions? Des questions sur Please identify yourself at the microphone? Bonsoir Ella Lavigne 324

[21:24] Arlington Crescent. Bonsoir Monsieur le Maire. J'ai une question pour vous concernant le

[21:32] règlement municipal pour installer les panneaux solaires à Beaconsfield? Est ce que ce

[21:37] que you speak? To? Est ce que le règlement municipal. Est ce que vous m'entendez? Parce qu'on va

[21:42] capter, oui. Et les gens vont être par la lecture. Ok. Alors, moi, je pose la question

[21:52] concernant les panneaux solaires. Est ce que existe encore un règlement municipal

[21:56] interdisant les panneaux solaires à Beaconsfield? Les panneaux solaires? Oui. Est ce

[22:02] qu'il y a un règlement? Je ne sais pas par cœur. Il faudra revenir à madame Labelle parce

[22:08] que par cœur, je sais pas. Il sait pas encore, Monsieur Boileau. Vous avez pas d'idée?

[22:15] Non, non. Vous demandez s'il est interdit? Je sais pas si on le permet ou si on l'interdit. Je

[22:19] le sais pas. C'est à dire si demain on va vous revenir, si demain on va revenir là dessus,

[22:25] on va vérifier avec les autres. Mais moi, j'ai une proposition pour vous, Monsieur le Maire, si

[22:29] demain je reviens et je veux appliquer pour des panneaux solaires sur ma toiture, est ce

[22:34] que vous allez refuser? Est ce que vous allez me dire Non, ne, c'est pas ma question si ce

[22:40] règlement existe. Est ce que vous êtes prêt à le mettre sur l'agenda le mois prochain et

[22:46] voter pour? Car Hydro-Québec est en train de demander à 125 000 personnes au Québec

[22:52] s'ils veulent installer des panneaux solaires. L'année passée, tout notre quartier nous

[22:57] le quartier cinq et six, on est resté une semaine sans électricité. Premièrement,

[23:02] madame Lavigne, on va vérifier si on a un règlement présentement et si on a un

[23:07] règlement, on va vous l'envoyer. Et si vous voulez faire une modification au règlement, vous

[23:15] vous viendrez au conseil ou parler à votre conseiller ou votre conseillère pour faire le

[23:23] changement au règlement et ce qui sera considéré par. Notre. Département de planification

[23:33] urbaine. Alors, alors, premièrement, on sait pas, on n'a aucune idée s'il y a un

[23:39] règlement ou non, on va vérifier. Puis après ça, on prendra les étapes qu'il faut

[23:45] pour. Je ne sais pas si on va vous refuser ou non. On va vérifier le règlement premièrement.

[23:54] C'est pas question de refuser ou non, Monsieur le Maire, mais c'est devenu

[23:57] Maintenant on est tous vers l'électrification, on est tous, on veut voir quelque chose qui

[24:03] se produit de la sorte. Il y a 390 000 voitures au Québec électrique aujourd'hui

[24:09] on va vérifier l'électricité, on va vérifier si on a un règlement. Premièrement, on sait

[24:14] qu'il y a un règlement qui interdit puisqu'il y a quelques années, il y a même pas dix ans,

[24:18] ils ont demandé une de mes voisines de retirer les panneaux solaires. Si ça existe, je vais

[24:24] demander à Monsieur Patrice Boileau et vous Monsieur le Maire, car c'est votre vous,

[24:27] vous avez la capacité de le faire et moi je vais vous demander si c'est le cas et

[24:33] qu'on n'a pas de panneaux solaires, de le mettre sur l'agenda la prochaine, le mois

[24:38] prochain, on verra, on verra. J'aimerais bien que tous les conseillers votent pour. On

[24:42] verra selon on a un caucus puis on en discutera au caucus. Monsieur le Maire, je peux

[24:48] rajouter, s'il vous plaît, il y a, il y a de la réglementation qui fait en sorte que ça définit

[24:54] l'orientation et tout. Ça fait que c'est pas juste n'importe où et n'importe comment. Mais j'ai

[25:01] pas comme le numéro à ma disposition. On le permet, mais il y a des conditions. Ok, alors

[25:06] demain je vais vous écrire à vous tous et s'il vous plaît, il faut qu'on fait quelque chose

[25:12] pour nous tous. La demande d'électricité est tellement forte et si vous voulez faire

[25:16] quelque chose pour votre ville, Monsieur le Maire, peut être c'est bien le moment. Je vous

[25:20] remercie de votre suggestion. Merci beaucoup.

[25:33] Nora Graham. Item 20.9 it says supply the installation of the new box e intersection of

[25:41] St-Charles and 20. 20.9?. Yes. Does it mean it hasn’t been done yet? Oh this is a new

[25:53] controller that is being installed at St. Charles. Will they be doing that at night?

[26:02] This morning it was down to one line during rush hour at St-Charles, created a big traffic jam

[26:11] We will try to do our best to alleviate problem to the traffic and this morning a traffic lights were

[26:18] working so I passed by. No but it was down to one lane and it had a construction sign and an arrow

[26:24] everything was one lane and you had to kind of go like this We’re gonna do it so

[26:29] it's efficient and that should be replaced it's gonna take about three months delivery to

[26:34] receive this controller. So when we receive it will try working. It's not it's not a problem,

[26:39] that's when we have it down to one line, not that this controller is outdated and we

[26:43] have challenge with this equipment. It has to be replaced so was it very difficult to keep

[26:49] two lines open? Well I'm not sure of the situation. What you're talking about this morning at 7:15 or so

[26:57] when I came through it was down to one line. OK. If you were the safety so what if they were

[27:03] doing some one of the thing that is important first is the safety of the workers that are there

[27:10] That’s what I’m. That's what this could be inconvenients for some motorist. I can agree I do use

[27:17] that intersection. Can they warn us ahead of time? Had I know ahead of time I would’ve gonne by

[27:21] Saint John's. Well I don’t think this morning was planned because it's when

[27:25] there's a problem, we can not work and when we do the replacement of this one we can

[27:29] certainly give a heads up to our residence through our BVA. Ok. Thank you. We are replacing the

[27:36] controller. That we will bring in some disturbances with the traffic so that's there's

[27:46] nothing very much that we can do about it. Yes, yes. I am my name is. Christopher Portier, I live

[28:02] at three two lake Shore, I would like to request that it is time this Canada day that we bring

[28:10] back the joy of the community spirit and the tradition of real Fireworks for Canada day

[28:18] Now fireworks have been around for thousands of years. They bring immense joy and satisfaction.

[28:26] They actually have actual property that they say that they aliviate, excuse me. They aliviate depression

[28:35] they all I know I've loved here for thirty five years and for most of those years we go

[28:40] together with our kids and hundred and hundreds of others and we walked over the

[28:45] centennial, but the excitement and thrill of knowing that we were having fireworks and not

[28:50] some lame laser show afterwards. The thing is this year is Canada day. I think it's more important

[28:57] than ever now. I'm not going to say for a second that fireworks don't create a little bit of

[29:02] pollution. They do in fact I did a bit of research our twenty many of fireworks that we used

[29:07] to have create about the same as driving your car to toronto and back. So this whole thing have

[29:14] not having fireworks because of you know all. I know is that I actually made the recording last

[29:20] Canada day. They got out of my back balcony and I looked out and instead of my neighbors and

[29:27] everybody being out enjoying Canada day. It was empty I looked down at centennial dead

[29:34] silence I looked down the lake. I see Dorval all the other community is having fireworks.

[29:39] It's time, we had fireworks the comeback I've spoken that I don't know how many people and

[29:44] they all say they want fireworks back they all think you did it cause you want to save money,

[29:49] but please could we have fireworks this year more than ever. We need some joy this year

[29:55] on Canada day and the way to end Canada day is not an empty park and kids standing around some

[30:03] guy waves the laser we want to end it with the community enjoying fireworks. Please thank

[30:09] you very much and I love fireworks too so well will look into it and please do there is

[30:15] no reason, not to have fireworks well will look into it, but I'm corado you already asked

[30:24] questions in writing So. Thank you very much. About something so the gentlemen to go up before

[30:38] about you know building a house that has to fit into the community I found it ironic that

[30:43] I'm looking at that old Quebec farmhouse up there now if that farmers had been around when

[30:49] your house got built. He would have said no way your house is getting built the only thing

[30:54] that can get built is that exactly what you see is that's what existed in Beaconsfield at

[30:59] that time Beaconsfield is a city in fluxx the people moving to Beaconsfield are necessarily

[31:06] post war people that have no money the people coming to Beaconsfield now they are

[31:11] realizing the Beaconsfield is the fabulous place to leave like Westmount or thema Outremont and

[31:18] they want to build a nice house. They want the second story they want space and just cause many

[31:25] of Beaconsfield living a. You know post-war pieces of crap it doesn't mean you have to build

[31:31] another one beside it. Thank you, Thank you very much for your comments. Thank you very

[31:35] much for your comments. Oui. Pauline Faguy Gérard, Vous avez un item sur le. Sur l'agenda à

[31:48] propos du Centre récréatif. Est ce que c'est quel item? C'est pour l'emprunt, là? Moi? 40 40.1

[32:02] Oui, en fait c'est plus ou -1 question. Là je voudrais faire une petite note historique

[32:08] aujourd'hui qui a rapport à ça. Saviez vous que le Centre récréatif a 50 ans? Il y a deux

[32:15] jours? Oui, oui, il y a 50 ans, Oui, oui. Alors j'aimerais peut être faire une petite révision

[32:21] de l'histoire. C'est le temps de le rajeunir. Alors, le 21 juillet 1961 69, c'est à dire le

[32:28] règlement municipal 351, supportait un plan de patinoire pour le patin à glace, le

[32:34] curling et le hockey est proposé. Un groupe de citoyens s'étaient réunis en formant

[32:39] l'association de l'aréna communautaire de Beaconsfield et ils avaient ramassé 243 000 $ en

[32:45] souscription en plus d'un don de 18 000 18 000 $ et 85 000 $ provenant de financement public.

[32:52] Une réunion publique d'information a été faite le 4 août 1969 et un projet. Mais ce

[32:59] projet a été défait par un référendum du 6 septembre 1969 parce qu'un groupe de citoyens

[33:07] étaient inquiets de l'augmentation des taxes, que cela aurait pu amener. Alors, il

[33:13] y a eu un vote de 740 pour 1002 contre 42 % des électeurs avaient voté. Mais quatre ans

[33:20] plus tard, en 1973, on s'aperçoit que ça en prend un centre récréatif. Alors un

[33:25] nouveau projet est lancé sous les auspices de la ville. C'était un plan plus ambitieux à

[33:30] ce moment là, qui incluait un aménagement pour la natation, un gymnase et un aréna pour le

[33:35] hockey. Le coût total dépassait 1 500 000 $ et fut financé par la Ville et par une subvention

[33:42] de 100 000 $ par le gouvernement provincial. Ça a été soumis à un référendum, encore une fois le

[33:48] 26 mai 1973 et cette fois ci, ça a été accepté. 1629 électeurs ont voté pour, 5858 ont voté

[33:56] contre, qui représentait 50 % des électeurs ont voté à ce moment là. L'ouverture

[34:03] officielle du centre récréatif a eu lieu. Donc il y a il y a 50 ans, presque jour pour jour, le

[34:08] 22 mars 1975, ça a été couvert dans le News and Chronicle du 27 mars. Comme la météo n'était pas

[34:17] clémente, la coupure du ruban a eu lieu à l'intérieur, près de la patinoire. Et sur la photo du

[34:24] News and Chronicle, on y voit une jeune fille, Debbie Bastien, membre du club de patinage

[34:30] artistique de filles. Alors si jamais cette Debbie Bastien existant existe encore, elle

[34:37] pourrait peut être se s'adresser à la ville pour pour dire qu'elle est encore là. Alors il

[34:43] y en a peut être qui se sont déjà demandé pourquoi l'adresse de la du centre récréatif est le

[34:52] 1974 City Line. Alors c'est parce que c'était l'année de la construction durant l'année 74.

[34:59] Mais l'inauguration a peut être peut être que le projet a pris un peu de retard. Alors

[35:03] l'inauguration s'est fait le 22 22 mars 1975. Alors ça fait 50 ans maintenant. Merci beaucoup.

[35:10] Je sais pas si la ville avait l'intention de souligner cet événement. On va premièrement

[35:17] souligner l'ouverture de la patinoire à l'aréna, au premier juin. Cette année où je pense

[35:25] que c'est le premier juin. Oui, on prévoit une réouverture le premier jour, quelque chose pour

[35:29] l'ouverture de la patinoire. Pour le reste, c'est encore un peu loin. Là, pour le reste du

[35:39] travail qui va être fait là, parce que c'est beaucoup de travail, Il faut changer la

[35:44] piscine, il faut tout changer, l'extérieur aussi. Alors, et je peux vous dire que le 39 800 000

[35:55] qu'on a, on autorise comme prêts, là, si ça veut pas dire que ça va être entièrement.

[36:04] Utilisé, on veut tout simplement prévenir pour être capable de faire le travail. Mais on a

[36:12] regardé si on voulait remplacer remplacer le. Le centre récréatif, c'est à peu près 50

[36:22] millions aujourd'hui. Alors quand je regarde le million et demi, là, dont vous parlez, là,

[36:28] c'est loin, c'est loin de 50 ans, là, 50, 50 ans, les prix changent. Oui, oui, merci

[36:35] beaucoup, Merci beaucoup. Est-Ce qu'il y a d'autres questions? Une question? Non. Ok. We'll go

[36:45] with the agenda. Regular Agenda. Madame la greffière. Approval of the minutes of the City of

[36:54] Beaconsfield Special Council Meeting of February 19th 2025 at 5:15 pm

[37:04] In favor? À l'unanimité. Approbation du Procès-Verbal de la séance ordinaire du Conseil

[37:12] de la ville de Beaconsfield du 24 février 2025, proposé ce en faveur à l'unanimité. Warden of

[37:23] Contract 665-25-GC for sidewalk repairs to the lowest confirming bidder

[37:30] Les entreprises Pearson Pelletier, Inc. in the amount of $192,019.80

[37:37] all taxes included. Propose. Second. In favor? À l'unanimité. Octroi du contrat

[37:46] 667-25-GC concernant la réfection des chaussées souples au plus bas soumissionnaire

[37:51] conforme, soit Eurovia Québec Construction Inc. Pour la somme de 1 041 779 $ et 90 800, toutes

[37:59] taxes incluses. Proposé. En faveur. À l'unanimité. Ordering of Contract 672-25-GC

[38:10] for the extension of the Westmount of the WestCroft StormWater Network to the lowest

[38:16] conforming bidder, Uniroc Construction Inc In the amount of $313,451.74

[38:25] all taxes included. Je propose, j'appuie

[38:30] en faveur à l'unanimité. Octroi du contrat TP 2025-05 concernant l'entretien et

[38:38] réparations des items CVC des bâtiments municipaux pour l'année 2025, avec deux options

[38:43] de renouvellement plus bas soumissionnaire conforme, soit Never Réfrigération Inc. Pour la

[38:48] somme de 11 466,02 $ toutes taxes incluses. Propose. À l'unanimité. Warden of Contract

[39:01] TP 2025-06 for the repair of street, park and traffic light units and

[39:07] electric signs at an hourly rate for the year 2025 with two options renewal

[39:14] with two renewal options to the lowest conforming bidder, A.J. Théoret entrepreneur électricien Inc

[39:20] in the amount of $17,246.25, all taxes included

[39:26] Propose. À l'unanimité renouvellement du contrat TP 2023-06 pour la fourniture

[39:38] et plantation d'arbres sur les emprises et parcs municipaux pour l’automne 2025. Option deux

[39:43] de deux pour l'année 2025 avec Arbo-Design inc au coût approximatif de 77 999,62 $

[39:51] toutes taxes incluses, je propose en faveur à l'unanimité. Modification to resolution

[40:01] 2025-01-013 entitled "Authorization to sign two leases on water property

[40:08] with the Québec Government for deep-water shore lots at St-James Park Park and confirmation of their

[40:13] purpose. Je propose, Je seconde. À l'unanimité Autorisation Autorisation d'une dépense

[40:23] portant sur les travaux accessoires de 520 703,84 $ toutes taxes

[40:29] incluses. Concernant le contrat 599-23-GC pour la réhabilitation de la jetée Centennial, je

[40:37] propose. Je l'accorde, mais je me faire des commentaires Monsieur le Maire. Après qu'on a

[40:44] approuvé en faveur. Euh en faveur. We would like to make a comment Rogers and I were both

[40:55] against the jetée to begin with. We will vote for it. What are you going to go for

[41:01] it, but I'd like to say that you are looking at the project. I want you to make your comment

[41:06] after you waiting for it or against it now, we will go for it. Okay, now, you go ahead and

[41:15] make your comments. We're going for this because as the director General had said the

[41:22] 500 thousand dollars needed extra for the jetée work that when it was. I guess voted on by the

[41:32] council, Maybe last year and mounted two about trois point 3.6 millions de dollars. The

[41:40] alternative that was also presented to us was to actually just teardown the entire jetty

[41:46] and that was going to us has been somewhere in the area of about 2.8 2.9 million

[41:52] dollar. We didn't like the idea of building the jetty okay would rather see you turn down for

[41:59] better view of the lake that kind of thing, but I think at this point in time when we have

[42:04] decided as the council of the city to move forward on building the jetty we've no choice but to go ahead and approved

[42:11] of the extra five hundred thousand dollars so. Any comment. Roger and I spoke about it would

[42:18] we both agree that we want to see the project finished so we will be voting for the extra money.

[42:24] Alright. Thank you. Awarding of a mandate by mutual agreement RGC 2025-08

[42:35] for the supply and of a new box and controllers at the intersection of saint Charles

[42:40] and Highway 20 to TechX Électrique Inc. In the amount of $56,326.83 all

[42:48] taxes included. À l'unanimité. Approbation de la liste des comptes à payer au 24 mars 2025

[43:00] et de la liste des paiements préautorisés pour la période du 13 février 2025 au 23 février

[43:05] 2025 et du 25 février 2025 au 12 mars 2025 pour un déboursé total de 19 316 307,60 $

[43:17] Voici les montants les plus importants 15 686 823 $ à la Ville de Montréal pour le

[43:29] premier versement sous pretexte des quotes-parts de l'agglomération 2025. Alors je

[43:36] souligne encore une fois que c'est un paiement sous protêt 29 369 92 pour annexe CA pour

[43:46] décompte progressive numéro six concernant les travaux de réhabilitation de la jetée

[43:51] Centennial 352 441 et 47. Construction arcade pour le décompte progressif numéro huit

[44:01] pour la rénovation de la patinoire et 257 631 Communauté métropolitaine de Montréal. Ce

[44:11] sont les quotes-parts provisoires 2025 à la Communauté. La Communauté

[44:17] métropolitaine de Montréal et finalement les salaires à 512 965 et 18. Qui propose et

[44:27] propose. With protest with protest or in favor, well well, We're in favour, but with

[44:38] protesting the following the Montreal. À l'unanimité of the list of the reimbursement of

[44:46] counsellors’ research and support expenses authorized by the City of Beaconsfield in the

[44:50] 2024 fiscal year and compliant with section 31.5.5 of an Act respecting

[44:57] remuneration of elected municipal officers. Yes. Ordonnance pour vendre les

[45:04] immeubles comportant des soldes de taxes impayées pour 2023 et 2024 aux enchères publiques et

[45:09] dépôt par le trésorier de la liste de ces immeubles. Propose. Seconder en faveur à

[45:16] l'unanimité. Resolution of the year of Beaconsfield and tension regarding the use of immovable

[45:28] sub categories for the 2026-2027-2028 property assessment roll

[45:35] proposed. À l'unanimité Approbation du contrat de gestion entre le Club de

[45:44] Boulingrin de Beaconsfield et la ville de Beaconsfield pour l'annexe Herb Linder et les terrains

[45:48] de Boulingrin pour l'année 2025, je propose. En faveur à l'unanimité. Approval of the Financial

[46:00] Contribution of $6,500 for the annual Green maintenance between

[46:06] the Beaconsfield and Bowling Club and the City of Beaconsfield for year 2025

[46:14] À l'unanimité, approbation d'un appui financier de 3 000 $ à l'Association de

[46:18] L'ouest-de-l'île pour les handicapés intellectuels pour l'année 2025. Proposed. À

[46:26] l'unanimité. Approval of a $3,000 contribution to NOVA West Island for the year 2025

[46:35] Proposed. En faveur. À l'unanimité, approbation d'un appui financier de 3 000 $ à la

[46:45] table de quartier sud de L'ouest-de-l'île pour l'année 2025. Je propose l'appui. À

[46:54] l'unanimité Approval of $2,000 Contribution to West Island Community Resource

[46:59] Center for year 2025. À l'unanimité. Approbation d'un appui financier de 1 500 $ à

[47:10] accompagnement bénévole de l'Ouest pour l'année 2025. Je propose seconder en faveur à

[47:20] l'unanimité, Approval of a $1,000 contribution to West Island Women's Women's

[47:25] Center for year 2025 proposed. À l'unanimité. Approbation d'un appui financier

[47:36] de 1 000 $ à l'Association d'entraide d'arthrite de L'ouest-de-l'île pour l'année

[47:40] 2025, propose. À l'unanimité Approval of the a $500 contribution to AMCAL

[47:51] family services for year 2025. Je propose. À l'unanimité approbation d'un

[48:01] appui financier de 500 $ à Club 55+ Beaconsfield pour l'année 2025. Je propose. In

[48:11] favor. À l'unanimité. Merci. Approval of a $500 contribution to Bread Basket for year 2025

[48:21] Propose. En faveur à l'unanimité approbation d'un appui financier de 150 $ à

[48:30] l'harmonie du Lake Shore pour l'achat d'une annonce dans le programme Concert Gala pour

[48:34] l'année 2025, je propose je seconde en faveur à l'unanimité. Resolution to promote local

[48:46] purchasing in the context of American tariffs I propose. À l'unanimité autorisation de

[48:58] signer une entente de participation financière avec l'organisme à but non lucratif

[49:02] GRAME, le groupe de recommandations et d'actions pour un meilleur environnement

[49:05] pour le programme de plantation d'arbres « Ensemble on verdit » pour l'année 2025. Je propose, en

[49:13] faveur à l'unanimité. Filing and notice of motion of Draft By-law BEAC-167 entitled "By-law

[49:22] to authorize a loan of $39,805,000 for the expansion and

[49:28] redevelopment of the Recreation Centre and municipal pool" Un avis de

[49:33] motion. Je. Je donne l'avis de motion. Merci, Merci. Dépôt un Avis de motion du projet de

[49:40] règlement BEAC-142-1 intitulé « Règlement modifiant le Règlement BEAC-142 portant sur le Régime

[49:45] supplémentaire de retraite pour les cadres de la ville de Beaconsfield » Merci. Adoption of

[49:53] By-law BEAC-161-1 entitled "By-law modifying By-law BEAC-161 on tariffs" the objective of this by-law

[50:01] is to by-law BEAC-161 by lowering fees for Beaconsfield Residence

[50:09] When renting Beacon Hills chalets and lowering starting additional fees for all users

[50:14] when Renting City City facility modifications our concerning the table number six and seven of

[50:22] annexe A propose. À l'unanimité. Adoption du règlement BEAC-166 intitulé Règlement autorisant un

[50:36] emprunt de 844 270 $ pour les travaux de réfection de la passerelle piétonne au-dessus de

[50:42] l'autoroute 20. Donc l'objet du règlement est clairement indiqué par le titre à l'ordre du jour

[50:48] et le remboursement de l'emprunt est entièrement supporté par les propriétaires d'immeubles de

[50:52] l'ensemble du territoire de la municipalité. Proposent. À l'unanimité. May I add something to

[51:03] that. Some of the wording is a little misleading in the sense that we have the sense that were you

[51:09] we’re renovating the entire passerelle but it's really the one column just so that people

[51:17] understand where we were doing that one column not the entire passerelle. Yeah. Yeah. Thank

[51:23] you. Thank you very much for making that clear and the replacement cost, I think you told us in the past could be a

[51:30] 20 million dollar or or so well. That's it, that's the whole thing that changing the whole

[51:37] passerelles. Yeah, yeah, yeah Probably 20 million dollar. Yes. It's important. Fixing it its a lot less

[51:46] expensive. Yeah. O.K. Request for minor exemption for the property located at 260

[51:58] Brighton de recommendation is to refuse proposed. In favor of the recommendation?

[52:09] Against the recommendation. Are you against or? I will vote in favor of the recommendation since I have the

[52:20] time in both. Can we regroup the vote? It was done in fragments. There was three one in favor of the recommendation. You

[52:32] you voted. Okay. So you don't need my vote. Motion carried. Demande de dérogation mineure

[52:43] pour la propriété située au 443 Beaconsfield. La recommandation est de refuser. Are you from

[52:55] 260 Brighton? Well, you go ahead If you want to make comments. It's not going to

[53:02] change the decision. But you go ahead and make some comments. If you go ahead and make some comments

[53:14] I'm sorry, I'm a bit confused. I

[53:22] reach out to all of you. Many of you came and visited the property and so at first and for

[53:29] what it is. And I have explained the situation about what I'm facing. And I was willing to

[53:40] work with the council to find a compromise solution. Something that would be good for you in

[53:49] terms of not setting the right precedent that might cause you difficulties in the future and I

[54:01] think I received some support of our sympathique feedback from from many of you about the

[54:10] situation. I'm a new citizen of Beaconsfield. I moved here eight months ago because we like the

[54:21] city. My in-laws have lived here for many years and I’m happy to move here and we wanted to

[54:29] improve our property. We're not experienced in the ins and outs of your bylaws. The rules the

[54:38] regulations and things like that and we drew up plans. And we got them approved and I know the

[54:44] planning committee recommended to refuse my request. I spend 800 dollars asking for this

[54:53] to be considered. It’s a lot of money out of my own pocket. Just to have a hearing. There has been

[55:01] very little guidance in terms of how to do these things properly. I submitted plants.

[55:12] They got approved my builder came in and started working on it and suggested modifications

[55:17] to the plan. I trusted the builder. The builder have done a lot of work in this city. In

[55:25] fact some of the recommendations for the plan came from worked that had been done elsewhere in

[55:30] the city. And so when they said it's fine trust us, we know what we're doing. I took them at

[55:39] their word shame on me for doing that really. My neighbor is very happy with the result. He

[55:51] paid for half the fence. I understand after talking with Roger about this. That you know

[56:04] you're concerned about the precedent with the fence being too high and I understand

[56:10] that completely. And I'm willing to take the fence down to a lower height and be compliant.

[56:15] That's not the issue. The issue is the setback. The setback is I think it's point too far too

[56:28] close to the property line and I'm not sure what what the problem is in terms of real

[56:35] impact to the community. My neighbor me when it doesn't pose any kind of. Problems. And if

[56:49] the idea here is to punish me for not following the. Process or trying to trick the city and

[57:02] to doing something that wouldn't be approved. I can't get you that wasn't me at all. It's not

[57:08] my. I had no knowledge of the details of the in and out of how the bylaws worked what they were

[57:15] what they weren't. And I trusted and experts like many of us would would do in any situation.

[57:25] Oui, oui, Discover this is the night and the decision that you heard, basically came after

[57:34] discussion and I think some counselor had visited your property. Yeah! You know in

[57:44] retrospect. You should not have listened to your contractors. Who gives you instructions that

[57:52] should have been approved approved by the urban planning. Departments before going ahead

[57:59] which we had approved a certain. Plan. WE had giving you something permit and then it

[58:10] wasn't followed. And that's where that's where the problem was Anderson would say just that

[58:18] you get get back to urban planning work with them. See if there is the solution that you

[58:25] can come up with. And then it can be submitted to the cc you again and something to do

[58:34] council again, but this is and fact This is a warning that I think I hope that a lot of

[58:47] residence will listen to this when you are given a permis by the urban planning departments

[58:55] follow that permits to the tea don't that et contractors. Give you some advice that doesn't

[59:07] hold and as a result. Now what you are in the bed of a pickle because of that because you know

[59:16] nobody has any. Authority to make a change to the terms of the plan that has been approved

[59:27] approved already without going through the process of asking for that changes before it's

[59:36] done after I understand what you're saying I really do I think this I think I think you

[59:44] need to do it would be helpful. I think if you took a step back and you consider the average

[59:52] citizen and their understanding of these things. I know you you say you would expect us to

[1:00:01] follow those things to the rule to the letter, but the average person doesn't really pay

[1:00:07] attention to that detail. I am not experienced in bylaws and management of permits and things

[1:00:16] like that I've never had to deal with that this was the first time. I did it. I trusted

[1:00:20] somebody who who I shouldn't have trusted in the end and I and I. I don't feel good about

[1:00:26] that I think but I. If I could just if I could just say a little more things about this

[1:00:32] because. You know like I said. I'm willing to do stuff that would help you understand that

[1:00:41] I'm not trying to set a president or or do something untoward. What I'm asking is a

[1:00:48] little bit of compromise to say if I don't have to modify that deck then I'm happy to do the

[1:00:55] fence because the fence. I think is the most obvious visible thing. I think Peggy. You

[1:01:00] mentioned from the street. It's obvious to sit and I get that and I'm happy to take that fence

[1:01:05] down the two feet or two and a half of encroachment into the setback nobody sees nobody knows

[1:01:14] the neighbors is happy. I'm happy the two the two citizens of your community are happy with

[1:01:21] that and I understand. I understand the neighbors the neighbors where they are now,

[1:01:26] but there may be other neighbours in that. But if you look at the property as some of

[1:01:32] them Have you can see that there there's no problems with where it is physically as an

[1:01:39] exemption. I was asking that if that could be done then you can spare what will likely be for me

[1:01:48] a legal fight with the builder with the builder. The builder has agreed to do something that

[1:01:54] they're gonna do the minimum possible to make it compliant and it's gonna suck and it's

[1:02:00] gonna look around us and we don't want that for the city either right. Just I think that

[1:02:11] you need to go back to urban planning and review the whole thing and let them come up with

[1:02:19] recommendations as do what should be done and then they can come back to the council with

[1:02:27] whatever changes or modifications. They will accept through ccq because there is a

[1:02:36] process here that has to be followed. I understand that they also know that you can vote

[1:02:42] against the CCQ. And there are my number of my we have to go through with recommendations and

[1:02:51] there's no doubt that yes. I think you have a legal. Your contractors have some legal

[1:03:01] responsibility here because he did not follow the plan as it was here and he didn't want to

[1:03:09] understand you should go go through the process of getting. I'm not sure. What you are

[1:03:14] trying to do if you're trying to send a message to the community to not do this. Non we are not

[1:03:20] because we will deal with this many times I know Rodgers is told me many times so we're not

[1:03:28] in particular with you with your situation, We're not trying to send it feels person with that

[1:03:35] many many times for you and I love for you. Shawn Johnson. But if you know Shawn like a man of

[1:03:45] course it feels personal to you. It's your home right. But for us, Please like when you see if

[1:03:50] you know punishing you. WE don't know and you're not wrong When you say you know that we don't

[1:03:56] have to follow the recommendation and there are time when we do. But that's

[1:04:02] where the group has to use our judgement to decide when not and sometimes you like the answer

[1:04:09] and sometimes you don't. But it's not personal. It's not a punishment, Please like I know

[1:04:14] you feel that way, but I know. But don't. Upset me you. Okay. When contractor gives fausse

[1:04:28] information that it's me. My name is well, but in the pool last year in the contractor said

[1:04:35] go ahead because it is not allowed she was lucky that I happen to be here neighbours and

[1:04:39] I'm a counselor and I intervient. But it gets me angry so why we can't. Unfortunately,

[1:04:45] you're the one bearing the burden of it right. But it's it can't be global that the

[1:04:51] contractors can come in and whether it's cost cutting whether it's easier for him to

[1:04:55] do the job, whatever it might be expensive, you know and you said the reputable contractors in the

[1:05:03] area so he should know even more. He didn't come from Laval, he comes from the East and he's

[1:05:09] from Beaconsfield and un excellent point and the point is. I think you guys have a

[1:05:16] problem that you haven't recognized. The problem is that you are not regulating the

[1:05:23] contractor doing the work in your city and that's a very difficult thing to do and. But.

[1:05:30] But it is the source of some of this problem because I have another contractor in my house.

[1:05:37] He's doing a little bit of a cabinet thing in my family room and he said it It's not like you

[1:05:44] don't have to follow a permis. You just don't you draw the permit and then you do what you

[1:05:49] want to do and nobody comes back and checks and I'm saying this guy. I'm telling you this for

[1:05:56] the benefit of you and the city is that there are like there are permis where you ask for the

[1:06:04] haircut number of the enterprise. I know because I did this. I put the gate fireplace

[1:06:09] in my property and so I know and that you asked for the contractor and you want it to be

[1:06:15] repeatable. Obviously if you're doing the line installation for something like fence pools dex

[1:06:22] patriots You don't have the same requirement when you do a permit. I'm learning all of this

[1:06:26] now because of this situation and I think if you want to fix this once and for all so you

[1:06:35] don't have this kind of deviation. You gotta hold the contractor accountable the

[1:06:41] citizens are taking the price. I'm the price for this now. You're like you say I get what

[1:06:47] you feel like it's punishing me but I'm taking the price for taking the voice of the

[1:06:52] contractor who you're right should know better. I'm off about it to. And I guess what

[1:06:58] I'm saying is please spare me the year. It's gonna take me to go a small score and fight this

[1:07:05] out with the contractor to get him to come in and pay to do whatever modifications are going

[1:07:10] to have to do in the end because the fence will probably do for free. He won't charge me for you

[1:07:17] but if I does what I think I want to have to do for the deck which is lower it by six cm to

[1:07:25] make it below. If I met you are gonna be certainly to cut down the fence the six feet because

[1:07:31] that's the below across the city and with something where we have talked about I think the other

[1:07:38] thing that is the best scenario for you at this point is that the deck can remain at the same

[1:07:44] height. But it will have to be shortened by that and that's not see you understand and like

[1:07:51] Roger. Roger. I think you should go back to the urban planning. We're not. We're not expert here

[1:08:00] so we should not give him any recommendations. I think you should go back to urban

[1:08:05] planning. And submit a plan that will be acceptable to urban planning and then they can you

[1:08:14] can come and then who's gonna for it. You're gonna make me pay for it. Well. I guess what I'm

[1:08:19] saying guy here is. I expect you going to help the citizen as well. And I would have been

[1:08:28] transparent with you guy from the start about the plate that I'm in and you're putting me

[1:08:34] against my contractor and I'm gonna lose or I'm gonna fight it for a year and for the sake of

[1:08:42] another material change that in terms of the impact of the community. I mean I challenge

[1:08:49] any of you have seen it to tell me what the material, Please, please products Urban Planning

[1:08:55] Summit, whatever you decide to submit to them and let them consider it. WE are not going to

[1:09:03] make a decision tonight. WE are not expert, we got on recommendation that either get

[1:09:12] approved or not the urban planning people are there the expert the CCQ then goes through

[1:09:19] the process of looking at what's submitted? So please? There is no point in going on and on and

[1:09:27] on. That's the process that I suggest that you that you followed another hundred dollars

[1:09:35] fee to do and exemptions requests again you gotta be kidding me. When you make a

[1:09:43] minor dérogation request hundred dollars. That's the. Thing that is the five guys are crazy. By

[1:09:51] the way it. Is there is a person wants before look. Not bad guys. I think like. I strongly suggest

[1:10:09] that you guys look at how you deal with contractor in this city. If you really want to fix

[1:10:14] this if you really want to stop these things from happening in the future. You gotta clean up

[1:10:19] how you handle the contractor in the city and they don't have your contractor. It doesn't

[1:10:25] matter. You can we can you as you can oblige me to tell you how the. Contractor is in the

[1:10:32] bridge them to sign something saying that they will abide by the bylaws. You can reach out to

[1:10:41] us. You can send us. I'm not interested in what you're saying like what are the lessons

[1:10:45] learned. Yeah! WE could do better job. I think we talked about trying to put out with

[1:10:51] some kind of brochures and information for urban planning to make things easier for people

[1:10:56] and to take it from your experience. WE can take a look at that to have the other the

[1:11:03] other. Contractor. WE would run to another problems. I mean, that's the competition and

[1:11:10] that's not going to work. It's not going to work contractor have our free to go and get a

[1:11:18] job. It's up to them to follow the plan if they don't follow the plan. You know even though

[1:11:27] it seems to me that the logic here is there is a plan and it's been approved by by the city. If

[1:11:37] we're going to make any change to that we have to go back to the city and it seems to me.

[1:11:43] That's very logical and very logical thing to do as as hiring and contractors. Tout doux, tout

[1:11:53] doux, tout doux, tout doux. Work so I think you have a problem. The reality is that it's not

[1:11:58] what people do around the city in general. Well. I mean. I can tell you that many many examples

[1:12:08] where people have done that and that has been because it wasn't checked every time we run into a

[1:12:14] problem. It's because somebody has not followed the permit properly among the contractor

[1:12:21] community that that's not necessary. I'm just telling you how it is. I'm just telling you

[1:12:27] how it is the last thing. I was the last thing, I am going to see before I leave and I know

[1:12:30] you are frustrated with me, but I'm frustrated to. So look. No but look guy, It's not because

[1:12:39] it's too much for me because the other thing about this process is it's very opaque. I've made a

[1:12:48] request. I get down with the urban planner that I've been working with you by the way is a

[1:12:53] very nice guy and when it when in I was not allowed to communicate with the planning

[1:12:59] committee. The one that would be reviewing my request that was not allowed to discuss with

[1:13:03] them. I don't know from the out of the meeting. I'm telling you and you're. Thank you very much.

[1:13:13] Thank you very much. Thank you. Ok. Demande de dérogation mineure pour la propriété située

[1:13:29] au 443 Beaconsfield. La recommandation est de refuser. Proposer, seconder en faveur de

[1:13:39] la recommandation. Trois. Beaconsfield. En faveur de la recommandation qui est en faveur

[1:13:54] de la recommandation. Fort, fort, Fort, Fort fort. Beaconsfield Are you saying no?

[1:14:07] No? Ok, Roger. You are saying no. I'll I'll wait for the recommandation. Yes! Motion

[1:14:16] carried. Beaconsfield. Request for the arrival of the side planning and architectural

[1:14:24] integration program relating to the building permis application for new man building located at

[1:14:29] seven two St-Louis recommandation is to refuse proposed. A l'unanimité? Oui.

[1:14:47] Demande d'approbation du plan d'implantation et d'intégration architecturale relatif à la

[1:14:51] demande d'un permis de construction pour un nouveau bâtiment principal au 127

[1:14:55] Evergreen. La recommandation est de refuser, proposer, voter en faveur. À l'unanimité. Request

[1:15:06] for the approval of the side planning and architectural intervention program relating to

[1:15:10] the building permis application for new man building located at one of five lake view the

[1:15:15] recommendation is to refuse. À l'unanimité. Demande d'approbation du plan

[1:15:25] d'implantation et d'intégration architecturale relatif à la demande d'un permis de

[1:15:28] construction pour l'agrandissement du bâtiment principal au 24 Saint-Louis. La

[1:15:33] recommandation est approuvée selon des plans déposés le 10 mars. Proposé. À l'unanimité.

[1:15:44] Request for the people of the side planning and architectural integration program relating to

[1:15:48] a building permis application for d'extension of the main building located located at the

[1:15:54] seven. Parlant de recommandation is to refused proposed. À l'unanimité, Demande

[1:16:04] d'approbation du plan d'implantation et d'intégration architecturale relatif à la

[1:16:07] réalisation de travaux de remblais sur la propriété située au 200 Beacon Hill. La

[1:16:12] recommandation est de refuser. Nous allons commencer avec ce vote sur la recommandation cinq.

[1:16:18] Recommandation. Donc un seul vote en faveur de recommandation, les autres

[1:16:31] contre la recommandation. Donc, nous allons ajouter. On passera au vote avec une condition. Oui.

[1:16:40] Donc. La condition serait de scinder la résolution 20 24 douze 462 qui est par rapport

[1:16:49] aux remblais, et donc le remblais est autorisé, mais les dalles situées au nord ouest

[1:16:54] doivent être enlevées. Ce sont les dalles le long du boulevard St-Charles, donc proposées,

[1:16:59] secondé en faveur. Ok, d'accord. Donc donc c'est approuvé, ça a été proposé. C'est pour ça que

[1:17:13] c'est incomplet. Non, il n'y a plus de question. Maintenant, si, à la période de questions

[1:17:18] infinies. Non, non, non, non, non, non, non. Madame Lavigne Il n'y a plus de questions. Il y a.

[1:17:24] Il n'y a pas de. Il n'y a pas de commentaire. Expliquer quoi? C'est quoi la différence? Non,

[1:17:30] pas du tout. Merci. Donc 45.9 Demande de certificat d'autorisation pour

[1:17:40] l'installation d'une enseigne pour le commerce du 482 Beaconsfield. La recommandation

[1:17:44] est de refuser, proposer. À l'unanimité. Nomination in view of permanent a Technicien en

[1:17:56] génie civil et inspecteur tout position fifty one tree house. À l'unanimité. Confirmation de

[1:18:07] permanence au poste de contremaître, égout et aqueduc proposé. Voter en faveur à

[1:18:16] l'unanimité Meaning of the Edge friendly Municipality steering committee Meeting of February

[1:18:22] twenty seven twenty twenty five. Was not at the last meeting. Did meet the steering committee for

[1:18:39] the Mighty Committee in February and involves the action plan for our friendly community for

[1:18:46] senior. It's for your action plan and it would be similar to one that was printed out. I

[1:18:52] guess for years ago, which was I guess 200-018-2020 eighteen two twenty two so it's a report that

[1:19:01] really brings about discussion from all of our senior at various activity that they have

[1:19:10] utilise utilized here and Beaconsfield could be there recommendations that I've made

[1:19:16] online at the same time. It comes from common that they would have made to some of our

[1:19:21] employee at the City facility and also it has to do with the survey that was conducted as

[1:19:28] well recently. I'll come back to that and in the second at the same time on the steering

[1:19:33] committee we do have five residences of Beaconsfield at the volunteers they're time to

[1:19:38] be part of this steering committee. We've also have five West Island. Association as well

[1:19:45] who are very active and Beaconsfield also taking parts in looking at our services and

[1:19:51] what other services and in activities that we might offer our senior as as well as three

[1:19:58] of our senior personnel and culture and leisure, including our director of managers and

[1:20:05] specifically I want to mention. Judith Caron, Jobs of working with our senior with the mighty

[1:20:12] group and has been very very helpful through this entire process and in developing the

[1:20:17] plan for the future. I did mention the survey This was a survey that I believe was made

[1:20:24] public to all all residence you want to answer and to specifically the senior we did

[1:20:31] get for hundreds residence replying it covered nine different topics and it's very

[1:20:38] very interesting to hear their comments and I'll just least the major topics that we were asking

[1:20:45] our our. Senior residence to answer. Categories related to Espaces extérieurs et bâtiments,

[1:20:53] and comment we've got we're from centennial all in the library and the parks and our chalet

[1:20:58] transport et mobility active so talking about public transportation needs we all know

[1:21:03] that it needs to be better. The Rams as well as our bike paths. Santé et services sociaux and

[1:21:11] the interestingly its improved healthcare that we can provide. And also I've found it

[1:21:15] interesting woodburn and fireplace where were commented on the culture in the water

[1:21:21] which has to do with all of our program summer activities our parks and one thing that came

[1:21:27] that I could highlight was the growing popularity of pickleball was also and pickleball care was

[1:21:33] mentioned at the habitats and milieu vie, which has to do with affordable housing and housing

[1:21:41] for senior social participation commuication in information and of course security and safety

[1:21:47] with in the City. So overall we do get very favorable results and ratings from the resistance

[1:21:54] to participate in this in this survey and of course We're going to take their command and others

[1:21:59] to look at what improvement we could make make in other services so it's something that

[1:22:05] the government of Quebec require that we do and at the same time by doing so and this is doing

[1:22:13] this report. There is also grant that we can get from the government as well for some of

[1:22:17] these programs so the next meeting will really decide what our actual plan of action will

[1:22:23] be for the next for years and we have that's it. Thank you. Yes! Yes! Yes! À l'unanimité.

[1:22:40] Procès-Verbal, de la réunion du Comité consultatif d'urbanisme du 5 mars 2025. I guess I could

[1:22:51] we already went through quite a bit tonight. WE have no no no comments at this time. Thank

[1:22:57] you. Ok. I propose Yes! À l'unanimité. Deposit of the General report on the

[1:23:09] application of big one to one contract management for your twenty twenty for. It. C'est un

[1:23:20] dépôt. Autorisation d'effectuer une demande de subvention pour la gratuité de la formation des

[1:23:26] surveillants sauveteurs et des moniteurs aquatiques pour la période du premier avril 2025 au

[1:23:31] 31 mars 2026. Propose. À l'unanimité. Measures Reports on the decision made by the

[1:23:43] agglomération Council at this meeting of March twenty twenty twenty five. Oui, il y a

[1:23:49] Monsieur le conseiller Saint-Jean m'a remplacé pour la Réunion et il y a deux. Il y a

[1:23:54] deux décisions qui ont été prises à l'agglomération. La première, c'est la décision de

[1:24:00] réaménager le chemin Remembrance et la voie Camilien-houde sur le Mont-Royal. Les villes de la MB

[1:24:07] ont à l'unanimité voté contre l'octroi d'un contrat de services professionnels au

[1:24:13] montant de 12 000 795 141 36, au motif que la décision de réaménager le chemin rue Brandon

[1:24:22] ainsi que la voie Camillien-houde et leurs abords ceci ceci afin de couper la

[1:24:27] circulation routière de transit via le parc du Mont-Royal a été prise sans aucune sérieuse

[1:24:34] considération des problèmes de mobilité que cela va causer dans ce secteur. Moreover his

[1:24:41] reported in the march twenty twenty twenty five edition of the gazette Jerome questions

[1:24:47] regarding compliance with and respect of the fundamental principles of good natural

[1:24:54] management for the for the way in which the entire tindering and contract awards. That was

[1:25:01] proposed was conducted. It was proposed that the file by withdrawn from the agenda to be

[1:25:07] réexamen in depth and by the subject of consultation with the commission of the City of

[1:25:12] Montreal that may have an interest and this file as well as in depth examination of the

[1:25:18] contract management processes that has been carried out. Face au refus de l'agglomération de

[1:25:23] retirer ce dossier de l'ordre du jour, l'ensemble des maires, mairesses et maires des

[1:25:29] vaisselier de L'onb à SM a voté contre l'adoption de cette résolution. Il y a aussi un

[1:25:39] boring by law de 100 millions for Social Housing Projects. The agglo was proposing the adoption

[1:25:47] of boring by law of one hundred million dollars without a clear list of what projects the money

[1:25:53] will be used for and where on the island of Montreal the social housing projects will be

[1:25:57] planned given that since two thousand fifteen the agglo and the d'emerging municipality have

[1:26:04] already funded social housing projects to the town of for hundred and fifty millions de

[1:26:09] dollars. It was requested that a rendering of account by provided to our group of city to better

[1:26:16] understand where this considerable amount of money has gone. M. Benoît Doré s'est

[1:26:22] engagé à produire sous peu un rapport détaillé et complet de l'utilisation faite de cette

[1:26:27] somme totalisant, totalisant désormais plus d'un demi milliard de dollars. Les maires

[1:26:35] et mairesses de la MB ont clairement exprimé que nos villes n'étaient pas contre

[1:26:39] l'idée de créer des logements sociaux en cette période de crise. WE want to know where?

[1:26:45] And how many how the money allocated this far has been used given the promise to render

[1:26:52] account by Benoit Doré. The Emerald City voted in favour of the proposed boring by law.

[1:26:58] C'est le rapport. Je vais te donner. Ok. Alors voilà. Dépôt des rapports des directeurs.

[1:27:08] Rien en particulier. On a trois rapports habituels. Il n'y a pas d'affaires nouvelles? Non, à ce

[1:27:18] que je sache. On est au prochain point. Alors, qui propose la levée de la séance? Je propose

[1:27:25] la levée de la séance. Qui est en faveur. Alors c'est anonyme. On lève la séance de ce soir.

[1:27:35] Merci beaucoup et bienvenue aux gens qui nous regardent pour la webdiffusion. J'espère que ça

[1:27:45] vous a servi et je vous remercie pour votre intérêt. Dans le conseil de ville de

[1:27:53] Beaconsfield. Et à la prochaine! Le mois prochain, en avril. Merci beaucoup! Merci.

2025-03-24 - Conseil municipal de Beaconsfield

Transcript