Agenda
Transcript
AI TRANSCRIPT
This transcript was generated automatically from audio using AI and hasn't been reviewed by a person — it can contain mistakes, including plausible-sounding sentences that were never actually said. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record.
[0:02]
Good afternoon. We're going to convene this meeting. It is 1.02 p.m. on Tuesday, November 12th. We're
[0:11]
going to start with a discussion. Does anybody have any issues or any action items from the
[0:17]
second regular meeting that they would like a separate discussion, or have anything
[0:25]
Yeah, on the considering.
[0:29]
Oh, okay.
[0:50]
I'd like to pull 6J.
[0:52]
6J.
[1:00]
6J, we're actually pulling that from the agenda, and it won't be discussed until the next meeting.
[1:05]
Oh, you're pulling that?
[1:05]
Potentially the next meeting.
[1:06]
Okay.
[1:21]
Got something.
[1:22]
Paul?
[1:23]
Yeah.
[1:24]
I got one question for you on the police vehicles.
[1:29]
Do we wait?
[1:30]
On the police vehicles, the new one?
[1:31]
That is five C police
[1:41]
vehicles for 485,000. Yeah that right there now on the
[1:45]
older ones what are they doing they're going on mileage or did we get any
[1:48]
racked so generally on the emergency vehicles police cars and fire trucks
[1:53]
ambulance we don't go by maintenance as much as we go by mileage simply because
[2:00]
we can't really afford for one of those to break down so we generally rely
[2:04]
on the fleet department to make that determination when they've hit the mileage
[2:08]
when it's time to, I think we sell them or trade them in. What's our threshold on
[2:14]
that, Keen, do you know? Like 150,000? Yeah, it's a hundred or less. A hundred or less.
[2:18]
Yeah. All right, did you need a presentation on that? No, I'm good. I just
[2:22]
had that question. Thank you, Keen.
[2:26]
Well, if there are no other issues,
[2:28]
we're going to go straight to the presentations. We've got the presentation
[2:31]
by Dr. Jason Barfnick.
[2:41]
Good afternoon Mayor Pro Tem Council. Before we get started I
[2:45]
want to say a little bit about the water. This presentation is to give you an
[2:51]
update and is based on a requirement for provisions passed by the federal
[2:56]
government to the EPA, to TCEQ and then delegated down to the cities for
[3:02]
all public water supply systems to do is survey, initial survey of their service lines, both
[3:10]
public and private side, provide that information available to the public and then to work toward
[3:18]
identifying any unknown services whether they contain lead, made out of lead or not.
[3:27]
Before I get started, there's no indication that there are any lead issues with the water
[3:32]
supply in Bryan.
[3:33]
So we don't want anybody to take away from this that there is a problem with lead in
[3:38]
the water within Bryan, Texas.
[3:41]
It's not a Flint, Michigan situation.
[3:45]
I want to go through this.
[3:46]
Your seat gave you a copy of the presentation.
[3:50]
There's also a copy of the letters that we will be sending out and so if you have any
[3:56]
questions about that you can ask, but I will go through the presentation and then summarize
[4:00]
at the end that there is not a problem with the water in Brian, but I want to get that
[4:04]
point across.
[4:05]
If we have questions would you like us to shout them out or you won't wait until
[4:08]
the end of the presentation?
[4:09]
No, go ahead and stop me and ask as we go along.
[4:11]
So go over some background information, there's some specific definitions, go over
[4:16]
For the lead testing that we've done and Brian in the water over time, our current efforts
[4:22]
that we have to comply with this recommendations and then questions at the end.
[4:28]
So when we talk about service line, what we're talking about is the piping that comes from
[4:32]
the city main, which is either located in the street right away or within an easement
[4:38]
that goes up to the meter.
[4:39]
That's where we have a dividing line between public and private.
[4:43]
it.
[4:44]
And then the private side is from the meter to the house or the structure or wherever
[4:48]
the water is used.
[4:49]
So you have the public side, utility online, and then the customer online.
[4:54]
In this program, we're required to identify both sides.
[5:01]
Lead pipes were used in back in the 1800s all the way up into the 1980s.
[5:06]
And around 1986, Congress passed the Safe Drinking Water Act, which banned the use
[5:11]
of lead.
[5:12]
In July of 1988, lead piping was banned in Texas.
[5:16]
In June of 1991, EPA adopted its first lead and copper rule that provided some provisions
[5:22]
for utilities to do testing within the system on the water, typically through the house
[5:29]
or a structure to see what kind of lead concentration may be in the water as it's being used.
[5:36]
In December of 21, EPA finalized the lead and copper rule revision.
[5:41]
It was the first touch of the lead and copper rule in 30 years.
[5:46]
In 22, they issued the guidance on our initial service line inventory.
[5:50]
A few, about a month or so ago, you may have heard that the lead and copper rule
[5:55]
improvement revision was adopted and passed by the Biden administration.
[5:59]
It provided a 10-year window to remove any lead service lines found.
[6:05]
October the 16th, we were required to provide our initial service line inventory to the
[6:11]
state, which we did comply with.
[6:14]
In 30 days after that, by November the 16th, we were required to have postmark notifications
[6:20]
to customers that either had a status of unknown galvanized requires replacement
[6:26]
or a lead service line.
[6:28]
According
[6:31]
to this 40 CFR 141, water systems must provide notification within
[6:38]
30 days of completion of the lead service line inventory. That's the October
[6:41]
16th date. Water systems, we shall also provide notices to new customers at the
[6:46]
time of service initiation. We work with BTU, if somebody comes in and there is
[6:51]
an unknown status at an address and the tenant changes, new customer.
[6:58]
The new
[7:00]
service line their status is unknown until we work through all of these that
[7:04]
we have.
[7:07]
So how does lead get into the water? Lead is more soluble and acidic
[7:11]
water, a pH of 6.5 and lower. So you may have a pipe that is there that's made out
[7:17]
of lead. The water sets in it overnight when it's not being used. Maybe some of
[7:23]
the lead in the pipe leaches into the water. Next morning you turn on the
[7:26]
tap and here comes that first surge of water through the pipe and into
[7:30]
the house and maybe into your glass water. Lead is from lead piping, plumbing fixture,
[7:38]
solder, and fittings that leach into the water. City Brian's water, pH is 8.3 to 8.5,
[7:45]
so give a little pH scale. We're to the right, more alkaline side of things. If you're
[7:51]
on the left side, you would either be treating that water to bring it up or making sure
[7:55]
that you don't have that lead leaching into your water.
[8:01]
On October the 8th, the EPA, as I mentioned, released the final lead and copper rule improvements.
[8:07]
Lead service line replacement requires the public water system to identify and replace
[8:11]
all lead pipes within 10 years.
[8:13]
It changes the process for sampling lead in the drinking water, lowers the allowable
[8:17]
lead limits in drinking water, requires more consistent and communicable citizens
[8:22]
about lead pipe replacement schedules and locations.
[8:25]
That's more specific if your water is above the threshold that they have set.
[8:33]
And then it lowered the lead trigger level, which is now currently a 15 parts per billion
[8:37]
down to 10.
[8:40]
Get into the definitions.
[8:41]
What is a lead service line?
[8:43]
Lead service line is just what it is.
[8:45]
It's a line that's made out of lead.
[8:48]
Galvanized requires replacement.
[8:49]
It is a galvanized service line that is or was at any time downstream of a lead
[8:55]
service line, or is currently downstream of a lead status unknown service line.
[9:01]
If the water system is unable to determine that the galvanized service line was never
[9:04]
downstream of a lead service line, we must presume that it was upstream, was the lead
[9:11]
service line.
[9:12]
So the default is, if I can't prove that it was not lead, I have to assume that
[9:16]
it was lead.
[9:18]
Out of all of them that are listed here, I think that one's going to be the one
[9:21]
that we're going to have the most trouble proving because there are a lot of places in town
[9:26]
where we have gone in and replaced our water mains since they were first built and we replaced
[9:32]
them and now there's a copper service but that line may have been put in in 2005.
[9:38]
The house that's there may have been 1940 model or 1950.
[9:42]
I don't have the chances of me having a record that the original service line was
[9:48]
is not a lead line is going to be pretty low.
[9:52]
A non-lead line, a service line is determined through an evidence-based record method or
[9:56]
technique not to be lead or galvanized requiring replacement.
[10:00]
And an unknown service line is the service line material is not known to be lead, galvanized
[10:04]
or non-lead service line such as where there is no documented evidence supporting
[10:09]
material classification.
[10:10]
So we're actually going to have to go out and actually physically locate, find, dig
[10:16]
up and verify what the material type is. Question? Yeah. Is the those clay pipes
[10:23]
coming in? The clay pipes is on the sewer side. On the sewer side? Yeah, this is just
[10:28]
on the water distribution side of the system. It won't come into play? That is
[10:31]
correct.
[10:34]
Historical lead testing. The city of Bryan has tested for lead and
[10:37]
water going back to the early mid-1990s. It falls in line with the
[10:41]
original lead and copper rule in 1991. We qualify for reduced sampling and
[10:46]
monitoring due to our historical low test results as far as the concentrations of
[10:51]
lead in the water. We test for lead every three years as required and 30
[10:56]
samples were taken throughout the city. If we didn't qualify for reduced sampling
[11:00]
that number of samples would be 60.
[11:05]
This is a graph showing going back to 2006
[11:08]
every three years what the lead concentrations have been out of the
[11:12]
30 sites. You can see it's hovered around two parts per billion down
[11:16]
to say one and a half. The top, the 15 parts per billion was the threshold and the new lead
[11:24]
limit is the one at 10 parts per billion.
[11:29]
Dr. Barfkine, I'm looking at 2018, we had a
[11:32]
reduction and then it jumped back up in 2024 slightly obviously. But do you have an explanation
[11:39]
for that? I don't know what that is. I don't know if it's a potential.
[11:47]
I know in
[11:47]
Anything below one part per billion, they call that a non-detect, so I don't know if it may be something
[11:53]
from one of our wells that were running at the time that maybe it had a little more in it or
[11:59]
It just turned out the way that it was sampling that maybe one of the sites had a little more than it did in the years past
[12:05]
Regardless, we are way below both the old and the new by the limit correct
[12:11]
So current efforts on our lead service line inventory we submitted that on October the 16th
[12:16]
there are 36,446 address points that we identified throughout the city. We're
[12:21]
going by address points and what does that mean? Well suppose you have an
[12:25]
apartment complex and each unit is addressed separately then if there's a
[12:29]
hundred units in there then we may have one meter but it's actually a hundred
[12:33]
units it's a hundred customers that we would have to notify depending on the
[12:37]
service line. Currently we have seven just over 17,700 of unknown 15,910
[12:45]
we've identified as non-LED out of that 36,000, about 2,800 of them are vacant lots. We have
[12:52]
found two galvanized requires replacement lines and our intent is to meet with those customers
[12:58]
individually just not rely on a mail out to them but I've asked staff to get with those two
[13:04]
customers and discuss with them what the letter means and what the requirements are
[13:09]
and then zero lead service lines yes sir that's you talking about the city
[13:15]
service line up to the meter right yes sir okay and what if the house will
[13:18]
build before 1988 yes so how is that being addressed it's still getting lead
[13:24]
right well so the pipes are still is there any losing by the government about
[13:29]
the houses I mean on the other side of the meter so really what this rule is
[13:33]
doing is from the main to the house mm-hmm it doesn't cover any plumbing
[13:37]
inside the structure. What we are required to do is identify both the public
[13:43]
and the private side of the service line. So for the 17,759 unknowns, we will
[13:49]
continue to look for records to see if we can identify any information on those.
[13:54]
And even if I find that, say in these older neighborhoods where we replaced a
[13:59]
water line, I know that my water line and service line may be copper, but I
[14:04]
can't call it designated non-lead or galvanized requires replacement or
[14:09]
whatever other than unknown until I identify what the private line is. So we
[14:16]
will have to physically identify by some method what the private service line is
[14:22]
made out of. Right now we're planning to do that just outside the meter box but
[14:28]
who's to say that right outside the meter box that piece wasn't replaced
[14:31]
and then, you know, 10 feet later, you know, that's another material type. So there is going to be,
[14:37]
you know, an effort on our part. We're not digging up the entire service line to identify the material.
[14:42]
We are picking spots right outside the boxes to evict that identification.
[14:48]
I've got a stupid question. Obviously, this is a federal mandate that we do this. Yep.
[14:53]
Through the, what did we say the, what the? Ledney Copper Rule? Yes. His federal government
[14:59]
for body.
[15:00]
Is there any funds that could assist in?
[15:03]
There are some funds, even the ARPA funds that they provided could be used for this. And I
[15:07]
think that's one of the things that, you know, we need to be discussed as we go forward on
[15:12]
the private side, you know, how would we want to handle the replacement of that if
[15:18]
it's warranted? Is it something that we want to provide, say, like on the service,
[15:23]
on the sewer side? And when we go out and smoke test and we've identified it defects,
[15:26]
We've come up with a program where we would help pay, and then the customer could then
[15:31]
pay us back through a loan program over time.
[15:34]
That's one option.
[15:35]
Another option would be, you know, possibly the city participates in replacing that.
[15:42]
Whenever we do a relocation where we've had meters in the back, we relocated the meters
[15:46]
to the front because that's where we want them.
[15:49]
We're putting that new line in to reconnect the house we're paying for that.
[15:53]
So there may be some legal implications to us spending public funds on the
[15:57]
private side but that may be a topic for us to discuss as we go through this
[16:01]
process and and identifying the lines and how many we have looks to me almost
[16:07]
eighteen thousand unknown the the staff time required to ultimately identify to
[16:14]
their to their satisfaction just seems like it's going to be massive it's
[16:19]
going to be effort.
[16:23]
So our current efforts are a records review for
[16:25]
infrastructure and house bill dates. So we've looked at record drawings. We've
[16:30]
looked at through BCAD when structures were built, when subdivisions were
[16:34]
plated, field identification of materials. We have done some of that
[16:38]
already, both the city side and the customer side. We've developed a form
[16:42]
internally for our water crews to use when they go out and are working on
[16:46]
the lines for them to provide that information back to us on what they
[16:50]
found. We've created a website on our service line inventory, provides information, allows
[16:56]
the customer to share information to us if they know that they've replaced their line
[17:00]
or they just happened to work on it and they know what's there. They can provide that information
[17:04]
back to us through that web form. Service line inventory verification, it's an ongoing effort.
[17:11]
The inventory is to be a living inventory. It will be updated regularly and submitted to the
[17:16]
state and we're required to submit it annually to them and update it and keep
[17:21]
that thing going until we identified all the lines.
[17:27]
So what if lead or galvanized
[17:28]
requires replacement is found? If lead is found we're going to notify the state, we
[17:32]
will notify the customer and we're going to replace that service line
[17:35]
immediately that's on the public side. If we find a galvanized requires
[17:39]
replacement most of these are going to be on the private side because it's
[17:44]
to be downstream of a lead line or a line that is unknown. We would notify the customer
[17:51]
proposing that we take a sample and test it just like what we do now for our EPA lead and copper rule
[17:57]
just to see if there is any lead that has been trapped in that galvanized pipe that may be
[18:03]
leaching out and may be in the customer's piping. That test is going to be around $50 or so
[18:09]
for us to do, but that would give some peace of mind to the customer what may be in the
[18:14]
water and see how close it is to our historical testing numbers.
[18:19]
So Dr. Borsig, in the historical districts in Bryant, are there any evidence or trace
[18:24]
of some of those houses that were built before 1988?
[18:27]
Oh, it was a lot of houses that were built before 1988.
[18:29]
Oh, it was a lot of houses that were built before 1988.
[18:29]
Are they coming with a lead pipe?
[18:32]
I don't, right now, I don't have any evidence right now that, you know, that
[18:36]
there is currently a lot of lead piping in the city. Is there a chance that there
[18:44]
is lead piping on some of these services? Yes. May we find some? Yes, we might.
[18:51]
That's the process that the EPA is wanting to do with this, is to make the
[18:56]
water systems go through and identify and when you find them replace them to
[19:01]
make these safer place to try to improve the water system. I think even if we
[19:07]
find some because our water is more alkaline not as corrosive I don't know
[19:12]
that it would be an issue as far as the customer consuming lead by the use of the
[19:18]
water and certainly if the council wishes as we go through this process if
[19:23]
we find some lead service lines in your district we can certainly provide
[19:27]
that information to you if that is a desire of the council as we go through
[19:30]
this process.
[19:34]
I would say if we find any, it would be in these older neighborhoods, you
[19:40]
know, Brian Original Townside or the older neighborhoods where the houses are older is
[19:44]
where I would expect to find them.
[19:48]
Water services replace any public-led service lines found
[19:51]
immediately and notify the state. Private lines notify the customer. If it's a galvanized
[19:55]
requires replacement, we're offered to test the water for lead levels and provide
[20:00]
information as far as potential sources for lead and how the customer can go
[20:06]
about minimizing lead consumption and then utilize the loan program for
[20:11]
private replacement. Now if there's more of an effort if the council wishes that
[20:15]
we budget a certain amount per year to help the private citizen replace these
[20:21]
lines we can have those conversations as we get into budget and confirm
[20:24]
legally we can do all that we can certainly have those conversations.
[20:29]
Things to do to reduce lead exposure. Before drinking or cooking, flush your
[20:33]
home's pipes by running the tap, taking a shower, doing laundry, or running the
[20:38]
dishwasher. So if you don't feel comfortable, there are some things here
[20:41]
that you can do proactively to get that first set of water that may have been
[20:45]
sitting in the pipe flushed out before you put water in your glass or you
[20:50]
use it. The amount of time depends on how long your service line is. I think
[20:57]
I calculated that based on the one inch pipe going across the street maybe 80
[21:02]
feet long. I think there was about two two and a half gallons of water in there
[21:06]
so it does not a whole lot of water in there and wouldn't take long for it to
[21:09]
be circulated out. Use only cold water for drinking cooking and making baby
[21:15]
formula. Boiling water does not remove the lead. Use a water filter that is
[21:20]
certified to remove lead and don't run hot water through the filter and
[21:25]
and clean your faucet screen, also known as the aerator regularly.
[21:30]
The lead levels are historically low, but low-actionable level in Brian.
[21:35]
There's not a lead problem within the water system.
[21:38]
Service line inventory will continue and customers notified
[21:41]
when required. Any public lead service line found will be replaced immediately.
[21:46]
As I mentioned, we will notify the state, we will communicate that with the customer,
[21:50]
provide
[21:50]
literature to them on on what we found and and how they may reduce exposure to
[21:56]
lead and any galvanized requires replacement lines found for the private
[21:59]
line will be communicated with the customer or the property owner. In some
[22:04]
cases we have the tenant which needs to be notified because they're the one
[22:06]
that's using the water and we may have a property owner that may be out of
[22:10]
state out of the city that we would need to discuss on anything we decide
[22:15]
to do about what needs to be done as far as replacing the line.
[22:21]
Do you
[22:22]
Any questions?
[22:23]
Dr. Barbara, I have one question.
[22:25]
Obviously, this is not a problem right now.
[22:28]
We are 2% or lower, which is way below the limits required.
[22:35]
Do we know how we compare with other cities in Texas?
[22:38]
Are we lower typically, or do we have that data?
[22:41]
I do not know that question or the answer to that question.
[22:44]
I'd have to do some research to see what other cities are doing, and a lot of cities
[22:50]
get their water from surface water, ours coming from the ground. I don't know how that chemistry
[22:55]
differs. I know in some parts of the country they have to add some chemicals to their water
[23:02]
so it's not so corrosive. I think we're blessed in that sense where we're not required to do that
[23:07]
because of the naturally occurring water and the pH that it's at whenever we pull it out
[23:13]
of the ground. But I can do some research there and see and provide some information
[23:19]
to counsel on that. I would just be curious, just roughly.
[23:26]
On page six, so
[23:28]
you're saying the lead is more soluble in acid water, 6.5 and lower. So the city
[23:33]
of Bryant's 8.3 to 8.5? Yes. Okay are we measuring that on a consistent basis just
[23:39]
in case? We're measuring that. All the tests that we have done, it's been
[23:44]
in that range right there 8.3 to 8.5. It's been a little higher and it's
[23:50]
It's not dropped below eight that I've seen.
[23:53]
So are you adding to the pH like soda ash or anything like that?
[23:57]
We're not adding anything.
[23:58]
When it goes down or high or anything like that?
[24:00]
We're not adding anything because it's been so consistent of where it's been.
[24:03]
We're not having to add any chemicals to it.
[24:06]
We pull the water out of the ground, we cool the water, we add chlorine to disinfect
[24:11]
it, to get our residual, and we send it through the system.
[24:15]
To
[24:19]
recap, we have not yet found any cases of lead service lines in Bryant.
[24:24]
I have not found any, throughout this inventory process, I have not found any lead service
[24:28]
lines.
[24:29]
We have found two, and I expect we will find more galvanized lines, or we have replaced
[24:35]
our service line in the past.
[24:39]
So our line was copper, the downstream side was galvanized.
[24:43]
and I expect we will find more of those as we get more back into the older parts
[24:49]
of town and where we have replaced our water line and service line. I expect that
[24:54]
number will go up.
[24:58]
All right anybody have any more questions? So just to recap the
[25:05]
17,000 whatever number of customers will be getting letters very soon. So there's
[25:13]
information there. If you hear of anything, information provides who they are to call.
[25:18]
They have any questions and we have a website that provides information.
[25:22]
Have the letters been drafted yet?
[25:25]
The letters are drafted. You have that. It's basically a template. It's slightly modified
[25:31]
from what the state provided us as a template. We have English on one side and Spanish
[25:35]
on the other. The letter will go out as current resident, mailing, name, and then
[25:42]
the address.
[25:45]
The two that will not be mailed are going to be the galvanized
[25:47]
requires replacement. I've asked staff to meet with those individually so they
[25:51]
just not get a letter and not understand what we were doing.
[25:58]
Very good.
[26:00]
All right. Well thank you Dr. Parker. Thank you.
[26:04]
All right that is all we have on the
[26:05]
agenda so we're going to go ahead and adjourn and go upstairs.