Cavendish Development Review Board 9/17

Cavendish, VT · 2026-09-21 · More Cavendish, VT meetings · More Vermont meetings

Transcript

Download: Text · SRT

AI TRANSCRIPT

This transcript was generated automatically from audio using AI and hasn't been reviewed by a person — it can contain mistakes, including plausible-sounding sentences that were never actually said. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record.

[0:02] All right, we'll call the Development Review Board meeting to order here at 6.20. I don't do what Jeff to agenda. I don't think there are any item three here citizens, everyone's here for the subdivision.

[0:18] So, I am forward to discuss additional recommendations for the proposed service subdivision as per section 2.5e.

[0:28] You mail out a basically just a draft of recommendations from the development review board that we can go over tonight, and there's also a letter from the neighboring property with some concerns.

[0:44] Maybe we could address those.

[0:50] So, yeah, I guess everybody read that letter.

[0:54] So I guess that part of the drive might be in the flight as an area, what way is it?

[1:06] Part of the drive is not in the front half of the area.

[1:12] The town road is in the front half of the area and we pass the flood area as an area.

[1:19] and go about a hundred feet and begin our drive so we're not touching the drive.

[1:26] Right. Same way on.

[1:32] Did you address just the neighbors issue?

[1:35] I mean, is there any way any drainage could it impact his property or...

[1:40] I'm not sure where his property is.

[1:43] I'd look at it deed and I can't determine where it is.

[1:52] But I presume he comes towards Jeff's property, maybe he goes all the way to Jeff's property and where he abuts his, his on existing road that's been there for

[2:04] 50, 100 years or whatever

[2:08] Jeff has maintained that.

[2:45] Did he live this on Zoom?

[2:47] Anybody with this?

[2:48] Who's who?

[2:49] Who's who?

[2:49] Okay, we can't even ask the question.

[2:53] Well, one thing that we will have to do is get what's called a construction, construction, general permit from the state, and that's basically an operational permit, and that deals with erosion, deals with soap, vence, and that's

[3:28] in this couple.

[4:10] No, it is a just a meeting, you know, probably should have a site,

[4:16] what's the difference between a meeting and a hearing?

[4:31] This is just a meeting and light up.

[4:34] Extra meeting.

[4:36] Invite the letter from the neighbor and just to go over

[4:40] These subdivision regulations are new.

[4:42] We just wanted to go over with you guys.

[4:46] You don't want to expect it.

[4:51] Kind of just suit things out.

[4:55] So that way they hear it.

[4:55] In my understanding, so this is our determination

[4:59] information letter that you drafted by our reckoning days recommendations. Yes. And that was what needs to be submitted

[5:08] 45 days after the sketch plan review, which is not correct. Yes. And that's why we're having the meeting.

[5:17] You should, you should be specific on that.

[5:29] Is it anyone to the sketch plan review? We asked. We've got to get some

[5:34] some information, you know, we're gonna get,

[5:47] we take a vote though. I know we've

[5:49] voted on, I think,

[5:55] the waiver for slope. Yes, but there's something that we

[6:01] have done that I don't,

[6:05] the letter I think was the next step. Yes.

[6:11] Apologies, this

[6:12] is all new to us, and I don't like that it's taken so long, this is shouldn't be

[6:16] like this and down it's expensive for you to come out here and you know so there's an additional

[6:25] need in order to address this. It's not part of it. We have to have a war here and that's right.

[6:31] Next because it is a major. I believe it has been more.

[6:42] It has been more.

[6:46] It should like last week.

[6:47] Yeah, I said do the warning.

[6:49] Okay, I'm okay.

[6:50] You don't have the application yet.

[6:59] Sorry,

[7:17] I'm pretty sure that it was more or less because that was the most effective paper.

[7:24] Okay, should get it.

[7:27] Yeah, if it was one, it would go.

[7:30] The applicant, it would go to the eplotters.

[7:36] That happens. It happened. That wasn't, I wouldn't.

[7:40] You didn't, yeah. Okay. We need to verify that.

[7:45] Well, let's, let's continue the global door.

[7:49] Right.

[7:52] So I guess what we're looking at here.

[7:56] We've already addressed some of the properties, the count plan to find steep is 25 percent.

[8:05] The file laws, some of the vision by laws are 20 percent.

[8:12] Is there any plans how you're going to deal with steeper slopes with the house sites?

[8:20] The house sites are not on steep slopes.

[8:23] But there's lots of steep slopes around it.

[8:26] A nice and minute steep slope, though.

[8:30] Yeah, and which was asked for it.

[8:33] And you have that.

[8:34] Great.

[8:35] OK.

[8:38] We already dealt with roads and driveways.

[8:41] You know, we agreed to the waiver on the first part of the road.

[8:46] That was like a 14% goal.

[8:51] And then I think one in terms of emergency access, we just want to make sure

[8:56] that there's access for emergency vehicles to get within 100 feet of the dwellings and be on the

[9:05] turn around. So what I will do is, I believe in a lot of 3 and 4 I don't have it, so I will

[9:18] put the drive well.

[9:30] We did discuss the floodplain.

[9:34] Please, liquid or liquid or.

[9:38] And let's see, determine whether the sketch plan conflicts with a down plan.

[9:46] And we recommended,

[9:49] you know, obviously it's in the village.

[9:52] It's been a village fringe, so that's really a lot of development.

[9:59] All right, something up. Yeah.

[10:01] And then determine whether the sketch plan conflicts with other,

[10:06] I mean, municipal regulations,

[10:12] you know, flood hazard breaks, I think that would be it.

[10:17] How do you, how do you all make it just that?

[10:19] It would be such a way.

[10:24] I guess I'll dare from this floodway engineer.

[10:27] Jessica.

[10:28] But why do we need that?

[10:31] Because we're showing that we're nowhere near that.

[10:37] Well, I guess part of the regulations state that you have to access dry land from the development.

[10:48] That's what we're doing.

[10:52] We're coming up the town and existing town road onto our law.

[11:14] Make a statement.

[11:22] And then are you going to request any other waivers?

[11:29] I don't believe so.

[11:30] And we're not

[11:47] going to...

[11:48] I think they have to rule me to split her.

[11:51] Yeah, we have to.

[11:52] Yeah, we have to.

[11:52] I think that

[12:01] was it.

[12:02] So Martha, you never received a warning for this.

[12:13] No, for the hearing.

[12:14] I didn't even know that I did either, but I didn't even know.

[12:20] All right, does anybody else have anything else?

[12:25] Yeah.

[12:25] Mark doesn't you have anything to add?

[12:32] What do you think?

[12:34] In this list, I don't know whether or not.

[12:41] Perhaps not totally.

[13:39] You already addressed that.

[13:41] In self-penses.

[13:43] Yeah.

[13:44] That's managed with the practices.

[13:56] Right.

[13:56] We could put a condition that followed a lot of the stormwater.

[14:12] The state and your general construct,

[14:44] anything to say what a piece of India is going to give for Andreas, but he didn't.

[15:00] Okay,

[15:07] anything else? Okay, motion two adjourned,

[15:17] plain favour.