Agenda
Agenda: https://s3.amazonaws.com/granicus_production_attachments/chccs/fffa06ad4fbd24b118fc041f46fe71030.pdf
Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
[11:07]
[Captioner present]
[15:21]
Chair Jenkins: Good evening.
[15:23]
I call the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools board
[15:26]
of education meeting to order.
[15:28]
The first item on the agenda.
[15:29]
May I get a motion to approve the agenda.
[15:31]
>> So move.
[15:34]
Chair Jenkins: I have a motion from Vicky
[15:36]
and a second from Meredith.
[15:38]
All those in favor say aye.
[15:40]
[Members voting]
[15:41]
Chair Jenkins: May I get a motion
[15:42]
to go into closed session for the purpose
[15:44]
as stated on the agenda.
[15:46]
>> So move.
[15:48]
Chair Jenkins: I have a motion from Barb
[15:51]
and a second from Vicky.
[15:52]
All those in favor say aye.
[15:55]
[Members voting]
[15:56]
Chair Jenkins: Well return to 7:00 as close as possible.
[15:59]
Thank you.
[16:05]
--We'll return to 7:00 as close As possible.
[16:23]
Thank you.
[1:16:32]
Chair Jenkins: To amend the agenda.
[1:16:33]
I'll entertain that motion.
[1:16:35]
Go ahead Barb.
[1:16:37]
>> I move that we move to amend the agenda to include items six
[1:16:42]
C, gestion of our district joining some multidistrict
[1:16:46]
litigation against social media companies.
[1:16:49]
Chair Jenkins: I have a motion from Barb.
[1:16:51]
Can I get a second?
[1:16:53]
A second from George.
[1:16:54]
All those in favor of amending our agenda to include item six
[1:16:59]
C as Barb stated say I. voting]
[1:17:03]
Chair Jenkins: The agenda has been amended.
[1:17:06]
All right.
[1:17:12]
So our next item on the agenda is public comment.
[1:17:17]
I'm looking to Miss Holloway to see.
[1:17:21]
Okay, thank you.
[1:17:24]
Do you need to adjust that?
[1:17:28]
Yeah we can.
[1:17:29]
It's a very quiet meeting.
[1:17:31]
Do you know how to do it?
[1:17:42]
Um the board of the board appreciates and encourages
[1:17:44]
public comment.
[1:17:45]
Board members will listen to the comments
[1:17:48]
and may ask or make clarifying questions or comments
[1:17:50]
but there will be no general discussion
[1:17:52]
related to the public comments.
[1:17:54]
Comments should relate to the education and safety of students
[1:17:56]
or the operation of the school system.
[1:17:58]
The public time comment times for discussion
[1:18:01]
of educational issues or the operation of the Chapel
[1:18:05]
Hill-Carrboro City Schools.
[1:18:06]
Public comment is not intended for disruptive behavior.
[1:18:09]
Speakers may offer criticism of the school
[1:18:11]
operation and programs as well as criticism of board members
[1:18:14]
and administrators and their official capacity
[1:18:16]
however the board will not allow personal attacks,
[1:18:18]
seem abusive or definitively language will not be tolerated.
[1:18:22]
Since we have just a few speakers tonight,
[1:18:25]
speakers will have up to three minutes for their comment.
[1:18:27]
When you're recognized, please come forward, state your name
[1:18:30]
and if you're speaking for an organization,
[1:18:32]
please identify the name of the organization.
[1:18:34]
It doesn't look like we have any of our recognized
[1:18:37]
teachers organizations, city or student groups,
[1:18:39]
so we'll go ahead and start with anyone
[1:18:41]
who signed up with advance and thank you Mr. Mullen,
[1:18:44]
it looks like you are ready to go.
[1:18:46]
>> Hi.
[1:18:47]
I'm Rob Mullen.
[1:18:48]
I spoke once before in the spring of the year.
[1:18:52]
My wife and I have two children in the Mandarin dual language
[1:18:57]
pathway.
[1:18:57]
I cannot say all I want to say now but I can say this:
[1:19:03]
I listened live online to the previous board meeting and heard
[1:19:07]
you vote to divide the two Mandarin pathways.
[1:19:11]
You had hinted at your leanings since late February early March,
[1:19:16]
so that was no surprise.
[1:19:19]
I noted also the way you relied on the school camp
[1:19:23]
report prepared by folks from NC state.
[1:19:26]
That too was no surprise.
[1:19:28]
You paid for the report and said its parameters.
[1:19:32]
You got what you paid for.
[1:19:35]
You own it.
[1:19:36]
What did surprise me was when I had the chance to read your lead
[1:19:42]
fleshed teacher Shawna Catlett's letter to you
[1:19:45]
and saw that you had cherry picked her words
[1:19:47]
that the Mandarin World language pathway
[1:19:49]
would have difficulty standing on its own while
[1:19:53]
ignoring her larger point.
[1:19:55]
Clearly stated that the dual language and world language
[1:19:59]
pathways should remain together.
[1:20:02]
What appalled me was that you, having made many commitments
[1:20:10]
to maintain the two pathways, seemed
[1:20:14]
so ready to throw the Mandarin world language pathway
[1:20:17]
under the bus.
[1:20:19]
Thankfully some of you remembered your commitments,
[1:20:24]
so the world language pathway will go on for the time being
[1:20:27]
in a form yet to be determined.
[1:20:32]
In view of the ongoing chaos that the board has created
[1:20:37]
over the past year, and the harm is inflicted, supposedly
[1:20:43]
in the name of fairness, but perhaps
[1:20:45]
more accurately in an attempt to create plausible deniability
[1:20:49]
and tick all the legal boxes, I strongly
[1:20:53]
suggest that you reconsider your vote
[1:20:56]
to separate the two pathways and the subsequent votes
[1:21:00]
to house them in separate schools.
[1:21:02]
You have reversed yourselves before and you can do so again.
[1:21:08]
If that creates a strain on the district administration,
[1:21:12]
then so be it.
[1:21:14]
That's what we pay all of you for.
[1:21:16]
Thank you.
[1:21:28]
>> Thank you members of the board.
[1:21:30]
My name is Calvin.
[1:21:32]
I have a kindergartner at Glenwood in the dual language
[1:21:35]
program.
[1:21:36]
I don't have prepared remarks tonight.
[1:21:39]
I just wanted to express to you how important it
[1:21:44]
is to the many parents at Glenwood who
[1:21:48]
have been part of this process since January February
[1:21:52]
that promises are kept to the parents of the world language
[1:21:58]
students.
[1:22:01]
I think that could be lots of different things.
[1:22:05]
I believe that the message from the Glenwood community
[1:22:08]
has always been consistently that we want to work together
[1:22:11]
to figure out a solution that works
[1:22:14]
for our community and the district as a whole.
[1:22:19]
Our community are the experts in the dual language
[1:22:23]
and the Mandarin world language pathways.
[1:22:25]
We know how they can work.
[1:22:27]
We know how they can survive and thrive.
[1:22:31]
Certainly at Glenwood but also at the new Environments.
[1:22:35]
We want to make sure that those pathways --
[1:22:42]
the board has voted to split them,
[1:22:43]
we want to make sure that those pathways will continue
[1:22:46]
to provide opportunities for students in the school district.
[1:22:52]
And whether that is in the current form as part of steam
[1:23:01]
squared or and some new form that
[1:23:04]
honors the experiences and the cohorts of the children
[1:23:10]
that are currently in the World language pathway.
[1:23:13]
That's very important to us.
[1:23:16]
I look forward to having Glenwood
[1:23:19]
double Dutch current Glenwood community to continue
[1:23:22]
to be at board meetings, continue
[1:23:27]
to meet with the board to make sure there's
[1:23:30]
a way forward for all of us.
[1:23:31]
Thank you.
[1:23:32]
Chair Jenkins: Thank you.
[1:23:35]
Kevin are you going to speak tonight?
[1:23:37]
Okay.
[1:23:41]
>> (Inaudible)
[1:23:44]
Chair Jenkins: It's fine.
[1:23:45]
We don't have a work session so all public comments are now.
[1:23:48]
If it was a work session, then you
[1:23:50]
would speak before the work session.
[1:23:52]
>> I understand.
[1:23:53]
Thank you.
[1:23:54]
My name is Kevin Argabright.
[1:23:56]
My comment was more of a question on agenda item
[1:24:00]
around the rights for students and parents.
[1:24:03]
You have a reading where you're amending it, adding
[1:24:07]
a statement that is in order to request that students be not
[1:24:13]
included in the list of information
[1:24:15]
given to military recruiters and higher education institutions
[1:24:18]
that they have to submit that in writing to the guidance
[1:24:24]
counselor or superintendent.
[1:24:26]
I was wondering if you could provide clarification
[1:24:29]
as to why that right is being separated out
[1:24:34]
in isolated with that because none
[1:24:36]
of the other things, such as asking to amend your student
[1:24:41]
records require you to submit that in writing
[1:24:43]
and I personally believe there should
[1:24:46]
be a consistency but the lowest barrier to entry
[1:24:52]
for removing yourself from military recruiter scope.
[1:24:57]
Thank you.
[1:25:01]
Chair Jenkins: Thank you.
[1:25:03]
Meredith did you want to ask a clarifying question?
[1:25:06]
>> I wanted to see.
[1:25:08]
Even wanted to mention why that was.
[1:25:10]
I just wanted to wonder if you could reiterate that?
[1:25:13]
Chair Jenkins: Microphone.
[1:25:16]
>> There are a couple of statutes that require the school
[1:25:19]
system to provide information to military recruiters.
[1:25:24]
One is the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act,
[1:25:30]
which states that any school system receiving federal funds
[1:25:33]
must upon the request of a military recruiter,
[1:25:35]
provide name address and telephone
[1:25:37]
number of each student.
[1:25:39]
And then there's another statute that requires schools
[1:25:42]
provide also email addresses for students.
[1:25:46]
The military recruiters are supposed to be requesting
[1:25:50]
or directing their efforts at students who are 17 or older
[1:25:54]
or 11th grade or higher.
[1:25:56]
But they are allowed to request the information of students
[1:25:59]
who are younger.
[1:26:01]
And the statute specifically states
[1:26:03]
that we are required to notify parents that they can opt out.
[1:26:11]
So the law is that you have to provide it
[1:26:13]
unless parents opt out.
[1:26:14]
And opt in is not permitted and then
[1:26:17]
there's a state statute as well that
[1:26:19]
says that any school system that provides access
[1:26:23]
for educational or like college fairs,
[1:26:27]
anything like that, that you have
[1:26:29]
to provide the same access to military recruiters
[1:26:31]
as you do to colleges or other employers, job fairs, etc.
[1:26:35]
Chair Jenkins: Thank you Eva.
[1:26:40]
I mean, you still have time for your public comment.
[1:26:43]
If you want to continue.
[1:26:45]
>> Hearing all that, it didn't address the concern that I had
[1:26:50]
because the state statute said that you have to make those opt
[1:26:54]
out requests in writing, understood.
[1:26:56]
But the right as it's written right now
[1:27:00]
is already an opt out system, so once again, it's
[1:27:03]
just adding the opt out via writing to specific people.
[1:27:08]
So understanding why that is.
[1:27:11]
>> I think if the board wants to pull it from --
[1:27:16]
Chair Jenkins: We can do that.
[1:27:18]
If there's still questions.
[1:27:19]
Thank you Eva.
[1:27:22]
Any other community members wishing to make public comment?
[1:27:26]
Go ahead and step forward, make sure you state your name, first
[1:27:31]
and last name.
[1:27:32]
We do need it for the minutes.
[1:27:34]
>> My name is Joe Irick and I'm the mother of a student
[1:27:39]
at Victor Hill Elementary and Victor Hill Middle.
[1:27:41]
I think we all know that we've had a bus disaster.
[1:27:43]
My sixth grader was one of hundreds of kids who had no bus
[1:27:48]
and for my family, this was an inconvenience
[1:27:51]
because my work is flexible and I could drive a middle Schooler
[1:27:55]
to school for two weeks.
[1:27:56]
But for some families in our community
[1:28:00]
who are hourly wage workers or who do not have access to a car,
[1:28:05]
this is a disaster.
[1:28:07]
This is not an inconvenience.
[1:28:08]
And so, I know that Mr. Stewart and others have been working
[1:28:13]
very hard on trying to get this straightened out
[1:28:15]
but this is an equity issue.
[1:28:18]
This cannot happen.
[1:28:19]
We can do better than this.
[1:28:22]
Our students have to be able to get to school, all of them,
[1:28:26]
regardless of their family's ability
[1:28:28]
to drive them in the morning.
[1:28:31]
And certainly at McDougall, there are a lot of students --
[1:28:41]
[NO AUDIO]
[1:30:23]
Chair Jenkins: Anyone else?
[1:30:24]
All right.
[1:30:25]
Thank you everyone.
[1:30:27]
Board members, are we open to a motion to amend our agenda again
[1:30:33]
and move consent item --
[1:30:36]
I just wrote it down -- five C, recommendation for approval
[1:30:41]
of first reading of minor changing to policy code 4700
[1:30:45]
student records down to discussion and action.
[1:30:47]
It will be item six D. Is everyone good with that?
[1:30:53]
Okay, we've got a motion.
[1:30:55]
Sounds like Barb is seconding.
[1:30:57]
All those in favor say aye
[1:31:00]
[Members voting]
[1:31:01]
Chair Jenkins: So it'll be item six
[1:31:02]
D. All right, our next item on the agenda
[1:31:05]
is consent, board members may I have a motion to approve
[1:31:09]
our consent agenda as amended?
[1:31:11]
>> So move.
[1:31:14]
Chair Jenkins: I've got a motion from Meredith
[1:31:16]
and a second please.
[1:31:17]
Second from Vicky.
[1:31:18]
All those in favor say aye.
[1:31:21]
[Members voting]
[1:31:22]
Chair Jenkins: Any opposed?
[1:31:23]
Okay.
[1:31:24]
Next is discussion and action and our first item
[1:31:29]
is recommendation for approval first reading for policy code
[1:31:34]
3460 graduation requirements.
[1:31:48]
>> (Inaudible)
[1:31:49]
Chair Jenkins: You turned it off.
[1:31:50]
There you go.
[1:31:51]
>> All right, I am Alicia Curtis executive director for secondary
[1:31:57]
instruction and academic program.
[1:31:59]
Hi Rebecca Atkins our director of programing.
[1:32:01]
A brief overview of policy 3460 and our recommendations
[1:32:05]
for revision.
[1:32:07]
We last revised policy 3460 prior
[1:32:10]
to block schedule implementation at the High school.
[1:32:14]
So looking at this, we need to update
[1:32:17]
it to reflect a couple of changes in the number of courses
[1:32:21]
students take and additionally, with graduation which was not
[1:32:25]
necessarily on the table before transitioning to a block
[1:32:28]
schedule.
[1:32:28]
So you have in front of you the recommended changes,
[1:32:32]
one of which removes graduation requirements which were listed
[1:32:36]
in tables which were not in addition to the state
[1:32:40]
requirement for graduation or state requirements
[1:32:42]
for graduation, which are listed in graduation policy 004
[1:32:46]
by the state.
[1:32:48]
And that recommendation was made at the May Policy Committee
[1:32:51]
meeting.
[1:32:52]
Additionally, we added language in section C adjusting
[1:32:55]
the course load requirements to meet block schedule
[1:32:58]
and then added language in section D
[1:33:00]
for special circumstances regarding graduation
[1:33:03]
and defining an saying that major graduation requirements.
[1:33:07]
We are h happy to answer any questions
[1:33:11]
or provide any clarity on items that you may need.
[1:33:14]
Chair Jenkins: Thank you.
[1:33:16]
Board members, do you have any questions about this policy
[1:33:18]
change?
[1:33:19]
Go ahead Barb.
[1:33:22]
>> Thank you Miss Curtis.
[1:33:25]
I find see one, what were saying students are generally required
[1:33:30]
to be enrolled in eight courses or six courses in a study period
[1:33:34]
each semester A confusing sentence because it's not
[1:33:40]
each semester.
[1:33:41]
It's four?
[1:33:45]
>> We could add some punctuation and or tighten up the language
[1:33:50]
so it's less confusing for six courses per year and two study
[1:33:58]
halls if they choose that route.
[1:34:04]
Vice-Chair Fedders: Yeah.
[1:34:06]
>> And I think you said this and I missed it but what was
[1:34:08]
the rationale behind deleting all the graduation requirements?
[1:34:12]
>> The policy committee discussion in May felt that it
[1:34:16]
was overkill having the -- all the tables listed since they do
[1:34:20]
not differentiate in our district from the state
[1:34:22]
graduation requirements that are linked in graduation policy 004.
[1:34:26]
>> I can speak to that as well because I think that was partly
[1:34:30]
my recommendation.
[1:34:31]
Originally, there were state graduation minimums
[1:34:34]
and then Chapel Hill had its own in addition,
[1:34:37]
but a couple of years ago the legislature
[1:34:40]
passed the requirement that you could
[1:34:41]
no longer have any additions.
[1:34:42]
The state sets it and so it's no longer your policy
[1:34:45]
and it was every time the state made a change,
[1:34:48]
you would have to come back and make your change your policy
[1:34:50]
even though it's nothing that you decided.
[1:34:52]
So I think there's still set forth in your handbook
[1:34:55]
and so forth but it didn't make sense
[1:34:58]
to reproduce the whole state policy and your policy
[1:35:00]
now that you have no control over it.
[1:35:03]
>> So if a parent wants to know what their kid has to do
[1:35:07]
to graduate, where do they get that information?
[1:35:09]
I guess then?
[1:35:11]
>> It's in the high school course book.
[1:35:16]
And on the state website.
[1:35:18]
We can add it to the counseling website for high school easily
[1:35:21]
but it's in the high school course book.
[1:35:29]
Chair Jenkins: Any other questions?
[1:35:33]
Go ahead Vicki permit
[1:35:36]
>> I want to follow up with Barr for a second.
[1:35:38]
Basically what the state did is take away and say you
[1:35:41]
guys don't get to have your own requirements.
[1:35:42]
It's ours and ours alone.
[1:35:44]
Vice-Chair Fedders: I guess if I'm just random parent
[1:35:48]
of a sixth grader and I want to know,
[1:35:50]
you're not going to look --
[1:35:52]
I just want it to be somewhere easy to find for everybody.
[1:35:56]
What else did you say Miss Atkins?
[1:35:58]
You said it could be the high school course book?
[1:36:01]
>> I don't mind adding it to the school counseling website.
[1:36:05]
I certainly would it will certainly fit quite well.
[1:36:08]
I always wonder what people would Google
[1:36:10]
and if they see CC s graduation requirements,
[1:36:13]
and we want to make sense what they found.
[1:36:15]
>> That makes sense.
[1:36:18]
Chair Jenkins: Any other questions or comments?
[1:36:23]
So so are we good with the minor adjustments --
[1:36:28]
the clarification, I think we just need to say six per,
[1:36:32]
and the study session per semester?
[1:36:35]
>> I will edit that this evening.
[1:36:38]
Chair Jenkins: That's a minor enough edit
[1:36:41]
that we don't need to get a motion
[1:36:42]
to approve this as amended.
[1:36:46]
>> So move.
[1:36:48]
Chair Jenkins: I've got a motion from Barb.
[1:36:51]
I've got a second from Meredith.
[1:36:54]
Thank you.
[1:36:54]
All those in favor say I.
[1:36:58]
[Members voting] Any opposed?
[1:36:59]
Chair Jenkins: Thank you.
[1:37:04]
Our next item on the agenda -- sorry my computer is item six b.
[1:37:17]
Oh that's me.
[1:37:20]
Approval of our draft timeline and application
[1:37:23]
process to fill our board vacancy.
[1:37:27]
Board members, I put together this abstract.
[1:37:34]
I used the information and how we've
[1:37:39]
done it in this district for the past couple of times.
[1:37:43]
I did include the relevant statutes and policies
[1:37:46]
in the abstract.
[1:37:48]
That kind of governs who could be elected to the board
[1:37:54]
in any requirements listed in our policy 2110 and 2115.
[1:38:01]
And so, why don't we start by just looking at the timeline
[1:38:08]
first.
[1:38:09]
Board members, so if we approve the application
[1:38:14]
and the timeline tonight, the timeline
[1:38:19]
starts with advertising the process
[1:38:21]
to fill the board vacancy.
[1:38:24]
And so, the application will go out
[1:38:26]
and we'll work with our districts communication team
[1:38:29]
on getting this information out to the community
[1:38:32]
and obviously it'll get posted on our social media
[1:38:35]
and everyone in the community will
[1:38:37]
be encouraged to post it out.
[1:38:39]
That application will be open from September 4th through
[1:38:42]
the 14th, with the applications due by September 14th at 12 noon
[1:38:47]
because there is an option for people to drop off hard copies
[1:38:50]
of the application.
[1:38:52]
Although, electronic is obviously preferred
[1:38:55]
but we want to make sure people had both options.
[1:38:59]
So that's our timeline.
[1:39:01]
And then I did put on here --
[1:39:06]
I wanted to hold some time for so a potential special meeting
[1:39:09]
for the board to review applications and possibly
[1:39:11]
conduct interviews of candidates if needed.
[1:39:13]
Obviously, we all know more on September 14th in terms
[1:39:17]
of the volume of candidates that we have.
[1:39:21]
But those are two dates that I put out there as placeholders
[1:39:24]
and obviously, we'll work with staff
[1:39:27]
to get it advertised and posted, in terms of time and place.
[1:39:34]
Here for a special meeting to do that and the timeline has
[1:39:38]
an expectation that we will select at our September 17th
[1:39:43]
meeting a replacement board member.
[1:39:46]
The swearing in, we will determine at a future date.
[1:39:52]
Any comments on the timeline from board members?
[1:39:58]
Go ahead George.
[1:40:00]
>> I don't think I really have a comment on the timeline.
[1:40:03]
I just do have some questions about the process after
[1:40:06]
the 14th.
[1:40:07]
However you're handling that.
[1:40:11]
Chair Jenkins: We can go to the application
[1:40:15]
and we can talk a little bit more about process two.
[1:40:18]
On the second page of the attachment for the abstract,
[1:40:23]
is the actual application.
[1:40:25]
It does look slightly different maybe from past applications.
[1:40:31]
But it gathers demographic -- just basic data,
[1:40:37]
demographic information.
[1:40:38]
Their name, their information and things like that.
[1:40:41]
And then the two questions.
[1:40:44]
The first one is the potential --
[1:40:48]
the applicant has reviewed the requirements and they made
[1:40:50]
the requirements to serve on the Board of Education.
[1:40:53]
Because we're doing this process and it's not like the election
[1:40:56]
process where you go to the Board of Elections
[1:40:59]
and they vet you to make sure you meet the requirements.
[1:41:01]
We just need people to make sure that they
[1:41:03]
do that step of confirming that they have
[1:41:08]
gone through the process of making sure they
[1:41:10]
make the requirements.
[1:41:11]
And then the second question is on the application
[1:41:15]
why do you want to serve on the school board.
[1:41:18]
And that's it with the application.
[1:41:19]
It provides the information where any applicant can
[1:41:23]
return it with the deadline.
[1:41:25]
And so that is the whole application.
[1:41:28]
Any questions or comments on the application itself?
[1:41:36]
Okay.
[1:41:38]
So George --
[1:41:43]
>> I appreciated the simplicity of the questions.
[1:41:46]
Do you qualify and why do you want to be on the board.
[1:41:48]
I think that's a great way to start.
[1:41:50]
Rather than 25 questions or something.
[1:41:53]
Chair Jenkins: Yeah, I think, the first draft for you guys.
[1:41:59]
I thought back to my time of other applications I've seen
[1:42:02]
and I think that's really all the requirements we have
[1:42:05]
to have as board member as we meet the requirements
[1:42:08]
and why do we want to serve.
[1:42:10]
That was the question that we got
[1:42:12]
asked so we want to make sure we kept it simple
[1:42:14]
and it wasn't a barrier for anyone
[1:42:16]
who might be interested in applying as well.
[1:42:18]
>> So my question is then on the 14th or on the 15th
[1:42:23]
in the morning, if we have say double digit applicants,
[1:42:27]
what's the process then?
[1:42:29]
What are you thinking?
[1:42:31]
Because we can't obviously call a meeting and then
[1:42:33]
interview people if we haven't decided ahead
[1:42:36]
of time who to interview and invite them.
[1:42:38]
I'm just curious what happens after applications arrive
[1:42:42]
on the 14th?
[1:42:43]
What are you thinking?
[1:42:45]
Chair Jenkins: First thing, we will
[1:42:48]
have our staff go through an organize who they are.
[1:42:52]
We'll have our special call meeting that's
[1:42:54]
going to be up to us how we weed through,
[1:42:58]
however we end up with 1 or 1000.
[1:43:01]
And so, we will need to decide then
[1:43:04]
what that's going to look like.
[1:43:06]
I think prescribing a process now
[1:43:09]
probably might be a little heavy handed.
[1:43:12]
>> You mean during the meeting?
[1:43:14]
The special call?
[1:43:16]
Because there's a meeting on the 17th, a board member.
[1:43:19]
Chair Jenkins: We do.
[1:43:21]
>> I know there's a big agenda for that night.
[1:43:24]
Chair Jenkins: Yeah and for something like this
[1:43:26]
we want to have it as our own thing
[1:43:28]
because we might have to workshop our way through how
[1:43:30]
we're going to narrow down.
[1:43:32]
>> Okay I'm fine.
[1:43:34]
I'm just trying to see how this works.
[1:43:38]
If we do have a lot of applicants,
[1:43:40]
then we would just go through them
[1:43:42]
with a special called meeting?
[1:43:44]
Chair Jenkins: That's right.
[1:43:47]
We'll review all the applications that are there
[1:43:49]
and we will determine how we want to whittle it down.
[1:43:54]
Obviously it's all going to be in an open double Dutch special
[1:43:57]
call but an open meeting. -- special call but an open
[1:44:02]
meeting.
[1:44:03]
Any narrowing down or voting we might want to do we'll
[1:44:05]
do an open session.
[1:44:06]
Go ahead Vicki.
[1:44:08]
>> Are we possibly open to moving the selection date if we
[1:44:13]
need to based on what we have, considering what we know
[1:44:17]
we're going to have on our agenda for the 17th?
[1:44:19]
So that we don't have to feel pushed
[1:44:21]
to have a placement because we know we're fine with six
[1:44:26]
if need be.
[1:44:28]
Chair Jenkins: Yes.
[1:44:29]
We can always amend whatever we need to.
[1:44:31]
Go ahead Barb.
[1:44:32]
Vice-Chair Fedders: So is your vision then on the 15th or 16th
[1:44:36]
where we're sitting and looking at applications?
[1:44:39]
>> Potentially.
[1:44:42]
Vice-Chair Fedders: We can't do the interview on that same day
[1:44:44]
right?
[1:44:45]
Because we'll be looking at them all together for the first time.
[1:44:48]
Chair Jenkins: That's correct.
[1:44:50]
That's why I held two days there for us.
[1:44:52]
Vice-Chair Fedders: And when are we
[1:44:53]
going to decide what questions we are going to Chair Jenkins:
[1:44:58]
In an interview?
[1:44:59]
When we narrow it down.
[1:45:00]
Vice-Chair Fedders: Okay.
[1:45:01]
All right.
[1:45:02]
On the same day?
[1:45:04]
Chair Jenkins: On the same day.
[1:45:10]
I mean, if we wanted to go ahead and amend the timeline and move
[1:45:14]
the selection to the October -- what is it fourth?
[1:45:20]
It was at the fourth?
[1:45:21]
Is it the first?
[1:45:23]
I've been typing these days a lot, so it is the first.
[1:45:27]
If we want to move it to October 1st, we can,
[1:45:31]
to give ourselves some relief.
[1:45:33]
And then we could swap out the language
[1:45:36]
for the interview process?
[1:45:44]
I'm fine with that.
[1:45:48]
I wanted to put dates out there so people are applying --
[1:45:54]
you know?
[1:45:54]
They have enough and they can go ahead and start thinking about
[1:45:57]
if I work or I have obligations with my family
[1:45:59]
or something like that.
[1:46:02]
Or if I might have flexibility with my schedule, then
[1:46:04]
maybe I will hold these two dates open.
[1:46:07]
That was my only thinking about calling commas dates
[1:46:11]
for a special meeting.
[1:46:14]
Vice-Chair Fedders: We just say September 17th or October 1st.
[1:46:18]
Just to leave ourselves --
[1:46:22]
Chair Jenkins: We can.
[1:46:23]
Do we want to put two more dates after the 15th and 16th?
[1:46:26]
Or are we okay with the 15th and 16th?
[1:46:29]
Are we still fine?
[1:46:32]
Are people still fine with the 15th and 16th?
[1:46:34]
Okay.
[1:46:35]
All right.
[1:46:36]
So we're going to adjust the timeline to say September 17th
[1:46:43]
or October 1st.
[1:46:45]
Okay?
[1:46:45]
>> Is it possible that we can leave a little wiggle room with
[1:46:50]
the 15th and the 16th?
[1:46:51]
Because we also know that we're going
[1:46:53]
to have to have another hearing that week.
[1:46:57]
Chair Jenkins: We do.
[1:47:00]
We could do it the week of the 22nd and 23rd?
[1:47:04]
We've got a teacher work day on the 21st.
[1:47:13]
>> (Inaudible)
[1:47:23]
>> I definitely like that you have the ten days to get
[1:47:25]
the applications in.
[1:47:26]
We just want to know what we're going
[1:47:29]
to look at until after that.
[1:47:31]
So you've got a good head start.
[1:47:33]
But we just can't foresee.
[1:47:36]
Chair Jenkins: I'm just trying to see
[1:47:39]
and make sure there's no committee meetings on that day
[1:47:41]
to.
[1:47:41]
We have student success on the 22nd.
[1:47:45]
We do not have a board meeting on the 24th.
[1:47:49]
>> We wouldn't hold anything on the 21st though right?
[1:47:54]
It's Yom Kippur.
[1:47:56]
I don't think that'd be a good --
[1:48:00]
Chair Jenkins: Yeah, no.
[1:48:03]
We could do the 23rd and 24th?
[1:48:07]
Everyone -- I just want to make sure?
[1:48:13]
Obviously Miss Manning's not here but.
[1:48:18]
>> (Inaudible)
[1:48:20]
Chair Jenkins: It'll be the next week.
[1:48:22]
The 29th.
[1:48:23]
Oh, no it's not.
[1:48:25]
No, it's a second.
[1:48:27]
The second Tuesday.
[1:48:29]
Finance is on the eighth, sorry.
[1:48:32]
So it's success.
[1:48:36]
>> (Inaudible)
[1:48:37]
Chair Jenkins: All right so, 23rd and 24th for holding
[1:48:42]
for the special call meeting.
[1:48:46]
And moving the -- let me get my titles.
[1:48:56]
The selection to October 1st.
[1:49:08]
>> (Inaudible) correct those other things strike those other
[1:49:11]
things
[1:49:13]
>> Strike those other things.
[1:49:14]
Chair Jenkins: The dates on the process will be the fourth
[1:49:17]
through the 14th for the advertising and application
[1:49:20]
going out.
[1:49:20]
September 14th at 12 noon for the deadline.
[1:49:23]
September 23rd and 24th, we're going to hold those
[1:49:27]
for a special call meeting of the board to review
[1:49:31]
the applications and also possible interviews
[1:49:36]
of candidates if needed.
[1:49:38]
And October 1st, will be the Board of Education's selection
[1:49:43]
of a replacement and the swearing in still TBD.
[1:49:51]
Go ahead.
[1:49:53]
>> Well the applications be available for the board members
[1:49:57]
to review prior to the meeting where we're discussing?
[1:50:00]
Chair Jenkins: Because they're doing the 14th.
[1:50:03]
>> Because I think that would be better.
[1:50:07]
Nobody wants to watch us reviewing each one.
[1:50:09]
Chair Jenkins: That's fair.
[1:50:12]
I'll work with our clerk to make sure that you guys get
[1:50:14]
the whole package of that.
[1:50:16]
Go ahead Eva.
[1:50:17]
>> Madam chair com I thought it might be helpful for those out
[1:50:21]
loud for those that might be applying that those applications
[1:50:25]
are not confidential those are public record.
[1:50:27]
So that they're Chair Jenkins: Thank you for stating that Eva.
[1:50:35]
Board members, do you have everything?
[1:50:38]
All the updates?
[1:50:39]
Miss Holloway, do you have everything you need?
[1:50:42]
Okay.
[1:50:43]
I'll work with the team to make sure the communication goes out.
[1:50:48]
Okay.
[1:50:49]
This is on discussion and action.
[1:50:54]
So board members, I'll need a motion to approve the timeline
[1:50:59]
as amended in the application --
[1:51:07]
>> Go ahead Meredith.
[1:51:08]
>> Sorry one more question.
[1:51:10]
Can we request that the communication staff comment
[1:51:13]
when they put it out, that they put it out
[1:51:14]
in multiple languages.
[1:51:16]
Chair Jenkins: Everything gets translated
[1:51:18]
into all the languages so yeah.
[1:51:21]
Good on that?
[1:51:25]
Okay.
[1:51:26]
So again, this is on discussion and action
[1:51:31]
so we'll need a motion to approve the timeline as amended
[1:51:34]
and the application
[1:51:35]
>> So moved.
[1:51:38]
Chair Jenkins: We've got a motion from Barb.
[1:51:40]
Can I get a second?
[1:51:41]
A second from George.
[1:51:45]
All those in favor say aye.
[1:51:46]
[Members voting] Any opposed?
[1:51:47]
Chair Jenkins: Okay, thank you.
[1:51:53]
Our next agenda item is approval of a retainer agreement
[1:52:01]
for Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools
[1:52:03]
to join the multi District Social Media litigation
[1:52:05]
and we're going to have our board attorney,
[1:52:07]
miss Eva assist us with this one.
[1:52:14]
>> The proposal before you tonight is whether to join
[1:52:21]
as a plaintiff a nationwide lawsuit against social media
[1:52:25]
companies.
[1:52:26]
The lawsuit is a multidistrict litigation
[1:52:30]
against in which all the plaintiffs are school systems.
[1:52:37]
The defendants are meta, snap Inc.
[1:52:40]
Which owns Snapchat, TikTok and Google, which owns YouTube.
[1:52:46]
And the theory of the plaintiffs is
[1:52:49]
that these companies deliberately designed
[1:52:52]
developed and marketed social media platforms to attract
[1:52:55]
and addict minors permit and that that
[1:52:59]
has had a measurable impact on schools because of the need
[1:53:05]
to deal with the disciplinary and mental health
[1:53:08]
outcomes of that.
[1:53:10]
This case that was filed in 2022 and has
[1:53:16]
been consolidated into this one courtroom in California.
[1:53:20]
It is still possible for additional school systems
[1:53:23]
to join as plaintiffs.
[1:53:25]
And so in order to do that, you would have an open session
[1:53:30]
joining the lawsuit and retaining
[1:53:33]
the law firm of Brock Stock Madalas
[1:53:39]
Frederico, who is lead counsel.
[1:53:43]
And then Lieff Cabraser and Darrington Smith
[1:53:49]
as local counsel.
[1:53:50]
Those agreements are contingencies
[1:53:52]
so the board would not be paying attorneys fees unless it
[1:53:55]
receives some sort of settlement or judgment.
[1:53:58]
But part of the lawsuit is seeking
[1:54:01]
damages for school systems to have resources
[1:54:04]
to combat these negative outcomes and part of it
[1:54:08]
is seeking injunctive relief to require the social media
[1:54:11]
companies to change their practices.
[1:54:13]
Chair Jenkins: All right, thank you.
[1:54:16]
Board members, do you have any questions or comments?
[1:54:24]
Okay.
[1:54:24]
Do I have a motion to approve the joining of the litigation
[1:54:33]
and authorization to execute the retainer agreement?
[1:54:38]
>> So move.
[1:54:40]
Chair Jenkins: A motion from Meredith.
[1:54:43]
Do I have a second?
[1:54:44]
Second from George.
[1:54:46]
All those in favor say aye.
[1:54:48]
[Members voting]
[1:54:49]
Chair Jenkins: Any opposed?
[1:54:50]
Thank you so much.
[1:54:51]
Our next item on discussion and action
[1:54:54]
is former Consent item five C, it
[1:54:58]
is now six D, recommendation for approval
[1:55:01]
of first reading to minor changes to policy code 4700,
[1:55:06]
student records.
[1:55:10]
Let me navigate over to that.
[1:55:13]
I know we had some questions at the beginning.
[1:55:18]
And so, just give me one second.
[1:55:21]
Give the board members a second to reorganize our notes.
[1:55:28]
Okay.
[1:55:34]
So for this one, I think there was some concern about why there
[1:55:38]
had to be a written opt out from the double Dutch and I'm trying
[1:55:46]
to get to the section --
[1:55:48]
sounds like a federal act and requirement.
[1:55:52]
>> The requirements be that there's an opt out and that was
[1:55:56]
already entered policy.
[1:55:57]
The additional writing of it being
[1:55:59]
in language writing to a different person
[1:56:01]
came from the policy committee saying
[1:56:03]
there's a concern that an opt out was not enough guidance
[1:56:06]
for parents and that they needed more information about how.
[1:56:09]
So that's where that came from.
[1:56:11]
Chair Jenkins: That's helpful, thank you.
[1:56:14]
And I know we've got a couple members on policy here.
[1:56:17]
So I don't know if you have anything to add to that?
[1:56:20]
Or thoughts?
[1:56:21]
Go ahead.
[1:56:22]
>> Yes, we're wanting to put it to be done that way so that
[1:56:27]
parents wouldn't just be who am I supposed to say it
[1:56:29]
to, considering we have different schools and different
[1:56:32]
situations.
[1:56:32]
So that if it's in the policy saying
[1:56:34]
that it needs to have a specific opt out to a certain person,
[1:56:40]
we'll be able to get that specific person
[1:56:42]
and know exactly who is going to and who will be responsible
[1:56:45]
for you to follow up with.
[1:56:47]
Chair Jenkins: Okay.
[1:56:49]
Any other comments or questions go ahead Barb.
[1:56:52]
Vice-Chair Fedders: So is this something
[1:56:55]
that the student can do or just the parent?
[1:56:59]
Chair Jenkins: It's the parent.
[1:57:01]
>> The student can do it if they're 18 or over.
[1:57:07]
I believe the student can do it at any age.
[1:57:10]
That is my recollection.
[1:57:12]
I do believe we looked at that.
[1:57:14]
It's been a little while.
[1:57:15]
But certainly if they are over 18, they can.
[1:57:22]
I think I may have -- here it is.
[1:57:25]
Yes, a student or parent may opt out.
[1:57:27]
So
[1:57:31]
Vice-Chair Fedders: So I want to address the public comment
[1:57:33]
and wonder if the request can be a verbal or written?
[1:57:37]
I realize
[1:57:40]
[Interposing voices]
[1:57:40]
Chair Jenkins: I'm curious.
[1:57:42]
So if it's verbal and I'm just asking
[1:57:45]
as we think about this, if it's verbal and somebody still
[1:57:51]
gets contact from the military recruiter
[1:57:54]
after they've verbally said it to someone in the school,
[1:57:59]
how does anyone say well, I told someone?
[1:58:03]
Vice-Chair Fedders: The council would write it down
[1:58:06]
that this person wants to opt out.
[1:58:09]
>> It is possible.
[1:58:10]
I think the idea from the policy committee
[1:58:13]
was that this was intended to make it easier for parents,
[1:58:18]
not harder, by adding that.
[1:58:23]
And I do worry about how we would
[1:58:24]
keep track of verbal requests.
[1:58:26]
But it's not illegal to have it be verbal.
[1:58:30]
Chair Jenkins: Go ahead.
[1:58:32]
>> My concern would be if it's verbal and let's just say it was
[1:58:37]
a message and technology is technology and that'd be
[1:58:41]
a message that you don't know where it went.
[1:58:45]
Sometimes lines do go down and you're
[1:58:48]
thinking your message was received by a counselor who
[1:58:50]
may have ignored your situation and that's not the case
[1:58:54]
and it may simply be that it didn't
[1:58:56]
get where it was supposed to.
[1:58:58]
As opposed to if you have an email,
[1:59:01]
I'm just saying or a handwritten letter, something
[1:59:03]
that you can put your hand on to stand
[1:59:06]
to say I know I sent this to counselor Mr. Or Miss Smith
[1:59:10]
and we can follow this up.
[1:59:13]
And you can ask that this is placed in my student's counselor
[1:59:16]
record.
[1:59:16]
We have a method to follow to make sure
[1:59:19]
that you have recourse.
[1:59:22]
Chair Jenkins: Unfortunately no.
[1:59:26]
No
[1:59:27]
>> You can send me an email you can send an email though.
[1:59:30]
Chair Jenkins: Barb, I see you still contemplating on this.
[1:59:36]
Vice-Chair Fedders:
[1:59:37]
That makes sense.
[1:59:40]
Any email will do we're not going to create a template
[1:59:43]
or anything like that?
[1:59:44]
>> I don't have an answer to that.
[1:59:47]
I think somebody who's been a principal
[1:59:48]
would be able to speak to how this work a little bit better.
[1:59:51]
My guess is that the recruiters come in annually
[1:59:53]
and ask for a list.
[1:59:59]
>> And the on the parent side, I could say that often at the end
[2:00:03]
of the year you'll get different forms that you'll want to say
[2:00:06]
if you want to opt out of this, you sign and you just opt out
[2:00:11]
and you send it back.
[2:00:12]
To the school and it tells you to who it's going to.
[2:00:15]
And then ups you out of what said things
[2:00:18]
you want to be opted out of.
[2:00:20]
Chair Jenkins: But we're not saying creating a form.
[2:00:24]
Vice-Chair Fedders: I'm just saying if the parent just
[2:00:26]
said I, Vicki wanted to opt my child out
[2:00:28]
from being a, b, c, d to the counselor for the recruiter.
[2:00:32]
Chair Jenkins: Right.
[2:00:34]
It can be written on a napkin as long as it's written.
[2:00:37]
It doesn't have to be in any form.
[2:00:39]
There you go.
[2:00:42]
We good?
[2:00:48]
This one was on consent and is now on discussion in action,
[2:00:53]
so if we want to approve this policy,
[2:00:57]
I'll require a motion to approve first reading of minor changes
[2:01:04]
to policy code 4700, student records.
[2:01:07]
>> So move.
[2:01:10]
Chair Jenkins: I have a motion for Vicki.
[2:01:12]
Do I have a second.
[2:01:13]
A second from Meredith.
[2:01:16]
All those in favor say aye.
[2:01:17]
[Members voting]
[2:01:18]
Chair Jenkins: Any opposed?
[2:01:19]
Thank you.
[2:01:32]
Our next item on the agenda is an update on the Board
[2:01:38]
of Education's fiscal year 26-27 budget adoption and I see Mr.
[2:01:43]
Scott coming forward.
[2:01:44]
Thank you.
[2:01:47]
>> Thank you Madam Chair.
[2:01:50]
Good evening board members, doctor,
[2:01:53]
members of the cabinet and members of the public.
[2:01:55]
I've got some good news for you all for a change.
[2:01:58]
This time around.
[2:01:59]
I wanted to come and update the board of where we are with
[2:02:02]
the budget adoption for 26-27.
[2:02:04]
As you know, the state took budgetary action early in July
[2:02:09]
which has led us to the point now where we're ready
[2:02:11]
to recommend a budget for adoption at your September 17th
[2:02:14]
meeting.
[2:02:19]
It's not working.
[2:02:27]
>> The side.`
[2:02:29]
>> Technology, right?
[2:02:31]
So as I just said, we're kind of at the end now.
[2:02:35]
Through our budget process for the year.
[2:02:38]
We wanted to give a broad overview of what we intend
[2:02:40]
to bring on September 17th for adoption.
[2:02:43]
We gave this presentation a few weeks ago
[2:02:46]
at Finance and Facilities so some of you
[2:02:48]
may be familiar with it.
[2:02:49]
Wanted to talk a little bit about enrollment.
[2:02:53]
Student data, and just wanted to make sure
[2:02:57]
that we're all clear on this.
[2:02:59]
We've spoken about many times, North Carolina
[2:03:03]
places our budget in arrears in Orange County
[2:03:06]
also bases our funding on that.
[2:03:08]
So when we're looking at our budget enrollment for this year,
[2:03:11]
it's a budgeted enrollment for revenues and not
[2:03:15]
necessarily expenditures.
[2:03:17]
So this year on the revenue side,
[2:03:19]
we're looking at projected decrease of 277 students with
[2:03:23]
a budgeted revenue enrollment of 10,741.
[2:03:26]
When we get to where we're beginning to apply our cost
[2:03:33]
allocations across schools, we use a different estimate,
[2:03:37]
which is a projection for this year which is significantly
[2:03:40]
lower than the 10,741.
[2:03:41]
I just want to call that out because I
[2:03:43]
think there's been some questions in years
[2:03:45]
past about why enrollments dropped so much from projected
[2:03:48]
budget enrollment.
[2:03:49]
That's the reason because we go back a year
[2:03:51]
and we look at revenue and again we're
[2:03:53]
projecting expenses based on our enrollment
[2:03:56]
projections for the year.
[2:03:57]
And as we approach the 40th day, we'll have more information
[2:04:01]
to get back to the board about actual enrollment for the year.
[2:04:04]
Let's talk a little bit about the impact of the state budget.
[2:04:09]
It was very calm a very different this year
[2:04:11]
to normal years.
[2:04:13]
The state took actions for teachers
[2:04:17]
and instructional certified positions very different
[2:04:20]
than they typically do.
[2:04:21]
We have seen changes in the certified salary scale from 5%
[2:04:26]
to 18% depending on years of service permit that can change
[2:04:31]
your raise from basically under $3,000 to almost $7,500.
[2:04:36]
People at the beginning of the scale are certified A0 teachers
[2:04:41]
went from a $41,000 a year annual salary to a $49,000
[2:04:46]
a year or $48,000 a year salary.
[2:04:50]
That's where you see the 18% year increases.
[2:04:52]
It was very varied this year.
[2:04:54]
A lot harder to project especially
[2:04:56]
because the majority of our lower ten year teachers
[2:04:59]
are on our local side.
[2:05:01]
It's created a significant increase
[2:05:04]
to the requirement of local funds
[2:05:07]
to match the certified increases.
[2:05:09]
Our assistant principals, we have our own local assistant
[2:05:13]
principal scale.
[2:05:14]
It is tied to the average teacher increase
[2:05:18]
because the assistant principals have also served that position.
[2:05:22]
We're seeing across the board 8% for assistant principals.
[2:05:25]
Again, we talked a little bit in the last meeting
[2:05:28]
about classified staff, principals, and administrators.
[2:05:31]
That was legislated to 3% across the scale except
[2:05:35]
of course for employees that we had
[2:05:36]
that were under the Orange County living wage which
[2:05:40]
this year increased by 10% so we do have a pretty significant
[2:05:43]
of our lower paid staff that are receiving raises
[2:05:45]
in excess of 3%.
[2:05:47]
Beyond that, there are several one time mandated state bonuses
[2:05:51]
in the budget.
[2:05:53]
Again, for teachers and certified staff
[2:05:56]
it will either be a 500 or $1000 bonus depending of your license
[2:06:02]
Surestep.
[2:06:02]
Anything from 0 to 15 is a $500 bonus anything above that is
[2:06:12]
a $1,000 bonus.
[2:06:14]
On the administrator and classified staff
[2:06:16]
side is a 1000 to $1750.
[2:06:19]
That believe that cut off was employees
[2:06:21]
who make less than 65000.
[2:06:24]
Their bonus would be 1750.
[2:06:27]
Anyone above that, it was $1,000 bonus.
[2:06:29]
The state will pick up the state side
[2:06:31]
but remember we have a pretty significant of local personnel
[2:06:34]
so we have to budget that money on the local side
[2:06:36]
for our local people.
[2:06:38]
These bonuses won't be subject to retirement,
[2:06:40]
just social security .
[2:06:46]
And then employer matching rate went up from 24.67 to 26.1.
[2:06:52]
That was a pretty sizable increase,
[2:06:56]
much larger than we anticipated in our earlier budget
[2:06:59]
presentations.
[2:06:59]
Health insurance is going from 8500 to 8925,
[2:07:02]
which is pretty much in line with what we predicted.
[2:07:05]
Obviously there were increases in Social Security
[2:07:08]
to match the salary increases.
[2:07:10]
And then we applied the 4% inflationary factor
[2:07:14]
across all Non-personnel costs.
[2:07:16]
That brings us to our total continuation budget.
[2:07:20]
This is the largest one I've seen.
[2:07:22]
Since I began doing this.
[2:07:25]
We have a total continuation budget
[2:07:27]
on the local side of just over 5.6 million.
[2:07:30]
We typically see continuation budgets in the $3 million area.
[2:07:35]
Remember though, about a million of that is one time bonuses,
[2:07:39]
so our actual continuation is closer to 4.6 million.
[2:07:43]
Again, one of the largest I've seen
[2:07:46]
by far the largest I've seen.
[2:07:49]
Talk a little bit about our revenue
[2:07:52]
changes because that offsets some of that need.
[2:07:55]
Our budgeted revenues total 98.1 million,
[2:07:58]
about 3,000,001 or 3.1% more than last year.
[2:08:02]
Driven primarily by a $2.8 million
[2:08:05]
increase in the county appropriation.
[2:08:07]
Also our special district has increased just under $600,000.
[2:08:13]
We also were projecting an increase of about $25,000
[2:08:17]
in sales and use tax revenue.
[2:08:19]
That's going up because of inflation and our application
[2:08:23]
of inflationary factors to non-personnel costs,
[2:08:26]
just by nature of that sales tax.
[2:08:29]
Just because goods are costing more than they did.
[2:08:32]
Also wanted to address a couple of revenue decreases.
[2:08:36]
We're proposing to move $375,000 in transportation revenue
[2:08:40]
and $50,000 in driver's Ed fee revenue from the local fund
[2:08:44]
to Fund eight.
[2:08:45]
The reason for that is the transportation revenue we're
[2:08:48]
moving will be primarily for activity busses,
[2:08:51]
for field trips and sporting events.
[2:08:53]
That revenue, if it were to remain in fund two,
[2:08:57]
would be shared and subject to sharing with driver schools
[2:09:01]
along with the driver's Ed fees.
[2:09:03]
So this is a good opportunity for us
[2:09:05]
to move those into fund eight where
[2:09:06]
we don't know how long I have to share those
[2:09:09]
by court decision with the charter schools.
[2:09:12]
Also, we're proposing a breakdown of fines
[2:09:16]
and forfeitures by about $25,000.
[2:09:19]
We just have not been collecting funds fines and forfeitures
[2:09:22]
at the level we were previously.
[2:09:24]
When you add all that up, you kind of see
[2:09:27]
this revenue changes.
[2:09:28]
It just kind of paints the pictures
[2:09:30]
of the local revenue changes.
[2:09:32]
But now we need to look at the impact of that.
[2:09:35]
As you compare it to the continuation need,
[2:09:38]
so as we talked about earlier, we had a 5.6 million
[2:09:41]
continuation need.
[2:09:42]
We've addressed just over 2.6 million
[2:09:45]
of that with additional revenue.
[2:09:48]
That's still left us --
[2:09:51]
I'm sorry.
[2:09:52]
We addressed about 3 million of that with additional revenue.
[2:09:55]
Leaving us with just over $2.6 million deficit.
[2:10:00]
As you -- as I'm sure you're aware,
[2:10:04]
we've had several significant changes over the course
[2:10:07]
of the last couple of months.
[2:10:09]
One is that we had a central office
[2:10:11]
reorganization and reduction.
[2:10:14]
From that, once everything cleared,
[2:10:16]
moving to this fiscal year we anticipated about $1.3 million
[2:10:20]
in that savings.
[2:10:21]
Beyond that, we had a change in the high school
[2:10:24]
allotment formula this year and we anticipate
[2:10:26]
about a $1.1 million savings.
[2:10:28]
When you net those two against the $2.6 million need,
[2:10:33]
we've gotten that down to about a $250,000 difference.
[2:10:37]
We feel fairly comfortable we can cover that
[2:10:40]
with existing surpluses that were available from last year.
[2:10:44]
So that's the nuts and bolts or big picture
[2:10:47]
to what we intend to bring.
[2:10:49]
I want to talk about fund balance.
[2:10:52]
We are now through June 30th of 2026.
[2:10:55]
At the last board meeting, we provided the board
[2:10:59]
with urine financial statements.
[2:11:00]
I don't want to go into that too deep tonight.
[2:11:04]
But just wanted to project out where
[2:11:06]
we anticipate our fund balance to be once the audit report is
[2:11:10]
released.
[2:11:10]
As you remember last year, we had very little fund balance,
[2:11:14]
I think $360,000 in total.
[2:11:16]
At the end of this year now we are
[2:11:18]
projecting about a $6 million fund balance.
[2:11:22]
Of that, we think about 4 million,
[2:11:25]
somewhere about 4.2 million will be unallocated and reserved.
[2:11:29]
We do reserve a portion of the fund balance
[2:11:31]
for prepaid expenses and we try to pay things like insurance
[2:11:35]
and large ticket items prior to year end
[2:11:37]
as a reservation of fund balance.
[2:11:39]
But I just wanted to share this chart with the board
[2:11:42]
to let you know that our fund balance is coming back
[2:11:44]
a little bit.
[2:11:45]
That will be about 4% of local expenditures.
[2:11:50]
Which is a good thing.
[2:11:51]
And we anticipate that some of those recurring surpluses
[2:11:55]
will be available next year to be able to rebuild
[2:11:57]
that a little bit more.
[2:11:59]
Probably not to the level that we've experienced in 2026
[2:12:02]
but we do anticipate that we will be able to add
[2:12:05]
a little bit in fiscal 2027.
[2:12:08]
And that's pretty much all I had.
[2:12:10]
Again, I just wanted to give the board a high level overview
[2:12:13]
of what we intend to bring.
[2:12:14]
We're in process right now of compiling the official budget
[2:12:19]
document and we'll bring that to the board for discussion
[2:12:21]
and action on September 17th.
[2:12:23]
And at this point, I'd be happy to turn it over
[2:12:26]
to you for questions.
[2:12:29]
All
[2:12:33]
Chair Jenkins: All right thank you.
[2:12:35]
Board members do you have any questions?
[2:12:37]
Go ahead.
[2:12:38]
>> Doctor Scott thank you for that.
[2:12:41]
Back to the fund balance, four years ago when we had a surplus,
[2:12:44]
we elected to spend a good amount of that on teacher
[2:12:48]
supplement increases.
[2:12:50]
That's Steph classified staff salary increases to spend down.
[2:12:57]
And then thanks to Doctor Hamlet and now Doctor Trice,
[2:13:01]
we've had two significant reductions in force
[2:13:05]
in the past three years.
[2:13:06]
You alluded to them.
[2:13:09]
I think that just bears commending people
[2:13:13]
for taking action over the years to get us to this point from it
[2:13:17]
you yourself, you have been right on the money
[2:13:23]
predicting where we would fall for the past three
[2:13:26]
years, four years.
[2:13:28]
And I'm sure before that.
[2:13:30]
I'm not suggesting you weren't before that,
[2:13:32]
but I commend you on that because there's
[2:13:34]
a lot of reassurance that in very difficult money times,
[2:13:39]
you've got a good picture of what we're doing.
[2:13:41]
And the last thing I would ask you to comment on
[2:13:45]
is our county commissioners at the very tail end
[2:13:49]
of their budget work really came through with more money
[2:13:52]
than they had originally planned to allocate to public schools.
[2:13:56]
And if anybody's been following their agenda,
[2:14:00]
it took a big reach for them to find that extra money.
[2:14:03]
Could you elaborate a little bit on that
[2:14:05]
so that people are aware that the commissioners really did
[2:14:09]
come through for the schools?
[2:14:10]
I think as much as they could?
[2:14:12]
>> Certainly.
[2:14:14]
I kind of painted right through that
[2:14:16]
so I appreciate you calling my attention back to that.
[2:14:18]
With the county manager's recommended budget,
[2:14:20]
the county manager recommended a 3% increase for public education
[2:14:26]
in Orange County.
[2:14:27]
The reason that increase was at 3%
[2:14:29]
was primarily because the existing debt from the school
[2:14:33]
bonds we're trying to balance the budget
[2:14:35]
and they're also experiencing some pretty significant
[2:14:37]
reductions on their side that they weren't anticipating
[2:14:40]
from Snap benefits to a whole list of things
[2:14:46]
that were creating a fairly large budget gap for them
[2:14:48]
as well.
[2:14:49]
The county manager presented his budget
[2:14:52]
at the same time the Board of Education of Orange County
[2:14:56]
and of Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools presented their budget
[2:14:59]
requests.
[2:15:00]
I think it's fair to say now looking back,
[2:15:02]
neither board of Education US or Orange County
[2:15:05]
had any idea the magnitude of the impact of the state budget.
[2:15:08]
And when we went in April.
[2:15:10]
So we both went to ask for a 4% increase.
[2:15:15]
So subsequent to that and subsequent to the release
[2:15:17]
of the county manager's budget, the state did take action
[2:15:20]
and they started signaling about what the actual state
[2:15:23]
budget would entail.
[2:15:25]
From that, it was very both school districts,
[2:15:28]
it was very clear that the amount of money including
[2:15:32]
in the county manager's budget was not going to be sufficient.
[2:15:35]
As I showed you earlier, we have one of the biggest continuations
[2:15:39]
that I've ever seen.
[2:15:40]
So both superintendents took an opportunity
[2:15:42]
to really plead their case with the county manager.
[2:15:45]
We all met in Hillsborough to talk it out.
[2:15:50]
The county manager was very receptive to what
[2:15:52]
the districts were saying and very understanding
[2:15:54]
of the situation we're going to be in.
[2:15:57]
In between that and his work with his board,
[2:16:00]
there was a budget amendment presented by County commissioner
[2:16:06]
that increased the manager's budget recommendation
[2:16:08]
for public education from 3% to 5.5%.
[2:16:13]
It wasn't able to give the schools a full continuation,
[2:16:17]
but for both the districts it really went a long way.
[2:16:19]
For us it was an additional million dollars,
[2:16:21]
so we'd be looking for another million dollars
[2:16:24]
had they not done that.
[2:16:25]
So we are very grateful for that and it really assisted us
[2:16:30]
with balancing this budget.
[2:16:31]
>> Thank you.
[2:16:36]
Chair Jenkins: Board members, any other comments or questions?
[2:16:41]
All right.
[2:16:42]
Thank you so much.
[2:16:45]
We look forward to seeing this back on our next agenda.
[2:16:53]
All right.
[2:16:54]
Our next agenda item is a transportation update
[2:17:01]
and I see our superintendent doctor Tice.
[2:17:06]
Is coming forward.
[2:17:11]
>> Thank you chair Jenkins, members of the board,
[2:17:15]
and certainly the community.
[2:17:16]
Before we get to the transportation presentation,
[2:17:20]
I wanted to just share a brief statement with the Chapel
[2:17:24]
Hill-Carrboro City Schools community concerning
[2:17:26]
transportation, if that's okay?
[2:17:28]
I want to take just a few moments
[2:17:32]
to speak directly to our students, our families, staff
[2:17:37]
and community.
[2:17:38]
The transportation problems we've
[2:17:41]
experienced since the beginning of school
[2:17:44]
have caused a significant disruption to many families.
[2:17:48]
Some students have been dropped from our systems.
[2:17:54]
Families have received conflicting or incomplete
[2:17:57]
information.
[2:17:58]
Parents have had to rearrange work schedules
[2:18:02]
to find alternative transportation,
[2:18:04]
as was shared earlier.
[2:18:07]
And to spend far too much time trying to get answers from us.
[2:18:14]
Our families expected reliable transportation and clean
[2:18:19]
communication and at the start of --
[2:18:22]
this was at the start of the school year,
[2:18:24]
too many did not experience that.
[2:18:27]
I'm sorry for the disruption, the frustration,
[2:18:31]
and the uncertainty that this has caused many
[2:18:35]
in our community, particularly our students and our families.
[2:18:40]
Are our immediate priority has been
[2:18:43]
and continues to be getting students to and from school
[2:18:47]
safely and reliably.
[2:18:50]
The work needs not finished.
[2:18:53]
Our transportation technology, data, school
[2:18:57]
based, and other staff continue working
[2:19:00]
through individual student issues and the broader systemic
[2:19:05]
or systems problems that we're experiencing so at this time um
[2:19:10]
we have an obligation when we understand what happened,
[2:19:16]
where the breakdowns occurred, and what contributed
[2:19:20]
to that as the board is aware Uh I'm initiated a that will be
[2:19:28]
on we will examine our entire process,
[2:19:35]
including transportation operations, our student
[2:19:40]
information system, data systems exceptional treatment systems,
[2:19:45]
and services communication, school processes, district
[2:19:49]
leadership, and the handoff that typically
[2:19:52]
occurs between those segments.
[2:19:55]
We need to understand what happened, why it happened,
[2:20:00]
where the processes and controls failed and prevented us
[2:20:04]
from detecting these problems.
[2:20:08]
Whether established procedures were followed and were
[2:20:10]
adequate and what changes are necessary so
[2:20:13]
that we do not repeat these experiences in the future.
[2:20:19]
Tonight's presentation is in an important part
[2:20:23]
of that work permit but it is not the final accounting of what
[2:20:29]
happened this year, there are questions we can answer tonight
[2:20:36]
but there are also questions we are still working through
[2:20:39]
as a staff.
[2:20:41]
And questions that will require deeper examination
[2:20:46]
once our staff can focus on the that.
[2:20:53]
That work may also require the assistance
[2:20:57]
from state and external partners.
[2:21:01]
From what we understand today.
[2:21:03]
I also understand and know that accountability
[2:21:06]
requires transparency.
[2:21:08]
So as we develop a a clearer understanding of what occurred,
[2:21:14]
we will share that information not only with the board,
[2:21:18]
but with our community as well, including
[2:21:22]
what we determine As I've heard but what we learn,
[2:21:27]
what changes are necessary.
[2:21:29]
But today, most importantly I want our families
[2:21:32]
to know that we understand the seriousness of what
[2:21:37]
they experiencing.
[2:21:40]
Transportation is not simply an operational function.
[2:21:45]
For many of our students, it's what makes access
[2:21:50]
to school possible paramedic when that system does not
[2:21:55]
work as intended, the impact on students and families is real.
[2:22:01]
We certainly have more work to do both to resolve the remaining
[2:22:07]
problems that you will hear about in just a moment,
[2:22:11]
but also to rebuild confidence in the system itself.
[2:22:16]
We are committed to doing both as an administration
[2:22:20]
and with that, I'll turn it over to our team who
[2:22:24]
can share tonight's presentation and we look forward
[2:22:28]
to addressing any of the board's questions thank you.
[2:22:31]
Chair Jenkins: Thank you.
[2:22:41]
>> Good evening board members.
[2:22:43]
Excuse me.
[2:22:45]
Doctor Trice, community members, colleagues,
[2:22:51]
we stand before you the operations division
[2:22:53]
and transportation tonight and the first thing
[2:22:56]
that we want to do is we want to offer our sincere apologies.
[2:23:00]
First to the community, to every affected family,
[2:23:04]
to every child , we are sorry that we failed you to begin this
[2:23:11]
school year.
[2:23:13]
Please understand that we take ownership.
[2:23:17]
That we are searching still for some answers.
[2:23:25]
We hold this as a high priority.
[2:23:28]
There's a level of urgency that we have right now.
[2:23:34]
But our top priority is to make sure
[2:23:37]
that every student that needs transportation
[2:23:40]
receives transportation.
[2:23:41]
I want to extend that apology to the board
[2:23:46]
for the number of correspondence that you've received
[2:23:51]
as well as Doctor Trice.
[2:23:53]
Doctor Trice, we apologize that you
[2:23:56]
had to stand here and offer an apology on our behalf.
[2:24:00]
Our staff feels horrible about this
[2:24:03]
and they are working seven days a week to try to correct this.
[2:24:08]
We have contacted the North Carolina Public Instruction.
[2:24:15]
We are working twice a week with each out of North Carolina
[2:24:21]
State.
[2:24:22]
They are the routing specialists for everyone
[2:24:25]
in the state of North Carolina.
[2:24:27]
And we will get to the bottom of this.
[2:24:32]
We were using a time frame that CHCCS has
[2:24:37]
used for probably two decades.
[2:24:39]
We were caught in a perfect storm.
[2:24:42]
The time frame failed us.
[2:24:44]
Our software failed us.
[2:24:46]
We had a retirement in the middle of the summer.
[2:24:50]
And the information that we received was insufficient for us
[2:24:55]
to know that there was a problem with this magnitude.
[2:25:00]
Tonight I want to try to go through what a normal year looks
[2:25:06]
like.
[2:25:06]
What happened to us this year.
[2:25:09]
And the steps that we will take to change things moving forward.
[2:25:17]
In a typical year with transportation,
[2:25:20]
what happens is our software --
[2:25:25]
we have three major software groups
[2:25:30]
and they speak to each other.
[2:25:32]
So we have infinite campus, Tims which is transportation
[2:25:36]
information management system.
[2:25:38]
Those are the two major components.
[2:25:40]
So in a typical year, what you will see
[2:25:43]
is data managers at the schools will enter yes's and no's
[2:25:47]
for students, for every child that wants transportation.
[2:25:50]
If you want transportation, it becomes a yes.
[2:25:53]
That information is then downloaded into the Tims system.
[2:25:59]
Tims will then begin to route students.
[2:26:01]
With the routing of students, we have a lot of codes
[2:26:06]
and I'll talk about those when we get to trends
[2:26:09]
and try to explain it a little better,
[2:26:11]
but after routes are created and students are placed on busses,
[2:26:16]
that information is then uploaded back
[2:26:19]
into Infinite campus?
[2:26:21]
Typically in a year, CHCCS receives
[2:26:26]
about 5000 transportation requests or just
[2:26:28]
over 5000 requests.
[2:26:29]
This year we received about 5000 requests.
[2:26:32]
So from the Tims side of things, everything looked normal.
[2:26:36]
We had the same number that we've had in years past.
[2:26:39]
It was not until we began to try to upload routes
[2:26:45]
that it gave us a small indication that something
[2:26:48]
may have been going on.
[2:26:51]
When we moved out and we moved forward,
[2:26:54]
what we saw was our ridership number --
[2:26:57]
and I'll need to explain this.
[2:26:59]
Well we have about 5000, 300 or so requests, on a yearly basis,
[2:27:05]
we route and our ridership numbers
[2:27:08]
are around 3800 students per year.
[2:27:11]
But we route every student who applies for transportation.
[2:27:14]
So about half the district applies.
[2:27:16]
We route everyone and as the year goes on, usually
[2:27:20]
in mid-October, we have to submit a Tims
[2:27:22]
report to the state.
[2:27:24]
That Tims report, the state wants us to be around 110%
[2:27:28]
of our student ridership.
[2:27:32]
We're usually up closer to 160% because we route everyone
[2:27:37]
and that's what we do and we have to take those students off
[2:27:40]
of routes when they don't show for ten days.
[2:27:43]
So this is the normal process of what happens every year.
[2:27:49]
We begin the process in the summer
[2:27:53]
and this is part of our timeline failing us this year.
[2:27:58]
We begin the process usually after summer school.
[2:28:01]
So we route for summer school in June
[2:28:05]
because we are dependent upon EOC and EOG
[2:28:10]
scores in order to know who the grant programs.
[2:28:13]
And then once that is complete, we begin to route for the year.
[2:28:18]
This year, what happened to us?
[2:28:23]
When we hold our download from infinite campus into TIMS,
[2:28:30]
we found that information was incorrectly coded.
[2:28:35]
It came over incorrect that's a question why that happened.
[2:28:40]
I know that's the million dollar question that everybody wants
[2:28:43]
to know why did this happen.
[2:28:44]
We're still searching with NC state,
[2:28:47]
with DPI to find out why this happened.
[2:28:50]
But because of the time frame that we
[2:28:53]
have used for over two decades, we
[2:28:55]
were then behind and being able to correct it.
[2:29:00]
So the information came over -- really what did we learn that
[2:29:05]
there was a major issue?
[2:29:06]
We believed to learn it was a major issue on the first day
[2:29:09]
of school because that's when we started to receive communication
[2:29:12]
saying my child doesn't have a bus.
[2:29:16]
And we went into our TIMS system to research it
[2:29:21]
and our system said no, no for that student.
[2:29:25]
We contacted the school staff and managers and the school data
[2:29:28]
manager said it's showing yes, yes.
[2:29:31]
So that was an immediate problem that we had.
[2:29:36]
About halfway through the first week,
[2:29:38]
we reverted to scheduling students on busses by the end.
[2:29:43]
This is the process that we're actually using right now.
[2:29:46]
It's the only foolproof way that we
[2:29:48]
know that we are capturing every child that needs a bus.
[2:29:51]
We're having to do them one student at a time tonight
[2:29:55]
to compound matters, what we found
[2:29:58]
is that the information that we had in
[2:30:01]
Tims when we went to upload it into Infinite campus,
[2:30:05]
it did not upload properly.
[2:30:07]
Which is why some parents have reached out to us
[2:30:11]
and they've said I see that here comes the bus app.
[2:30:14]
My child is on 133 in the morning and 155
[2:30:18]
in the afternoon, but there are no times.
[2:30:22]
There's no location.
[2:30:25]
It's because the information was incomplete.
[2:30:28]
CHCCS also has a lot of programs, program schools.
[2:30:34]
The way TIMS codes is but codes by attendance boundary. --
[2:30:43]
it codes biotin boundary.
[2:30:45]
So for example let's say a student a,
[2:30:48]
they went to Carrboro elementary.
[2:30:51]
They've now moved on to middle school.
[2:30:54]
They're going to Google to continue
[2:30:57]
in Spanish dual language.
[2:30:59]
But that student's address is actually in the Smith zone.
[2:31:04]
When that information comes down in TIMS,
[2:31:09]
they code that student has a 12 meaning they're out of boundary.
[2:31:13]
A bus does not automatically granted that to that student
[2:31:15]
and you have to go in and handwrite those.
[2:31:18]
We had about 475 what we call unmatched addresses,
[2:31:27]
where if Andre Stewart lives at 750 South Maryville Road,
[2:31:33]
his address needs to be entered in the road needs to be spelled
[2:31:39]
out R--a-d.
[2:31:42]
If that information is put into infinite campus
[2:31:45]
and it is r D or d period, it then kicks me out
[2:31:49]
it kicks my information out.
[2:31:50]
That's part of the holdup is we had
[2:31:52]
to get those addresses matched up
[2:31:55]
and work through that as well.
[2:31:59]
So what are we saying with some of our data
[2:32:02]
and some of the trends?
[2:32:04]
We have routed over ten 000 requests.
[2:32:09]
That accounts for about 5000 students
[2:32:11]
that we place on busses so far.
[2:32:14]
I had to submit this for upload to the board earlier.
[2:32:18]
We actually have over 4000 students running in the morning
[2:32:22]
and over 4600 students running in the afternoon currently
[2:32:26]
and that is the data from today comparison wise,
[2:32:30]
we have more riders than we did last year.
[2:32:34]
But in looking at it, we're looking
[2:32:38]
to go student by student to find out where the issues are.
[2:32:42]
So we're having to work with data managers.
[2:32:44]
I can tell you just today, I responded
[2:32:47]
to a parent who emailed me and her daughter, on our side,
[2:32:52]
says no and no.
[2:32:54]
But still in the infinite canvas side, says yes hype
[2:32:57]
and yes so we have to work through that
[2:32:59]
and then code that child properly and work through it.
[2:33:05]
--yes-yes
[2:33:07]
it has been an absolute nightmare for us.
[2:33:10]
It's been a nightmare.
[2:33:12]
And we apologize and we take full accountability for it.
[2:33:15]
But I wanted the board to know and the community
[2:33:18]
to know the process that we're working through in order to get
[2:33:22]
students on busses.
[2:33:25]
We also had issues with walk zones.
[2:33:29]
This is something that we've taken accountability
[2:33:32]
for because our initial communication on walk zones
[2:33:36]
that went out earlier, we placed it in infinite campus.
[2:33:41]
And because we later found out that that communication didn't
[2:33:45]
reach a lot of homes.
[2:33:47]
And it two years ago probably we worked with the towns two
[2:33:52]
and tours the state while policy, which is 1.5 miles.
[2:33:57]
That 1.5 miles from the top of our neighborhood,
[2:34:00]
not to the door of the house.
[2:34:04]
And enforcing that and talk about the towns,
[2:34:08]
there was a lot of construction projects,
[2:34:10]
as well as some safety issues that
[2:34:12]
were going on around the town.
[2:34:13]
So our routing team grandfathered
[2:34:16]
different neighborhoods in.
[2:34:19]
As construction things completed throughout the towns,
[2:34:23]
we went ahead and removed that grandfathering on those busses
[2:34:28]
and put those neighborhoods into the walk zones.
[2:34:32]
Our communication failed us here.
[2:34:37]
Mr. Austin and his team will actually go out
[2:34:43]
and when they receive requests from parents,
[2:34:46]
they will actually ride.
[2:34:48]
If a parent says I have a safety concern, they will ride,
[2:34:51]
they will walk it to see.
[2:34:53]
There are students and there are instances
[2:34:55]
where students are in within the 1.5 miles
[2:34:58]
but they may not have a sidewalk.
[2:35:03]
That they can use to get to school.
[2:35:05]
Their home may be in a blind curve.
[2:35:08]
We have to get those students transportation.
[2:35:11]
And working through those types of things,
[2:35:13]
that's always a fluid situation with transportation and walk
[2:35:17]
zones.
[2:35:18]
But we own the fact that the communication,
[2:35:21]
the initial communication, did not reach everyone
[2:35:24]
and the secondary communication was sent out late.
[2:35:29]
How do we fix this how do we change it
[2:35:33]
and how do we make it better?
[2:35:34]
Well the first thing that we are going to do
[2:35:37]
is we're going to overhaul the entire timeline.
[2:35:40]
So instead of waiting until August to begin routing we
[2:35:46]
are March and April will are routing
[2:35:52]
timeframe 20% of my colleagues and some other divisions,
[2:35:57]
but at this point, I don't ever want
[2:36:01]
to stand in front of the board for this again.
[2:36:04]
So we're going to hold fast to our time frame.
[2:36:09]
We'll route in April.
[2:36:11]
At the conclusion of routing in April, we will send bus routes.
[2:36:16]
Will work through communication at the end of the school year
[2:36:19]
to let parents know that their 27-28 bus routes are
[2:36:24]
in the portal.
[2:36:25]
If you don't see your information
[2:36:27]
in the portal in mid June, then reach out to transportation
[2:36:30]
and we can troubleshoot it.
[2:36:32]
That will give us enough time.
[2:36:35]
We don't have to run through scheduling summer programs
[2:36:38]
the same way that we have due to testing,
[2:36:42]
but this will give us a longer runway
[2:36:43]
to be able to troubleshoot and make sure that this does not
[2:36:47]
happen again.
[2:36:48]
The board did tonight approve also
[2:36:52]
the hiring of a second tennis coordinator for the district,
[2:36:56]
which will help us not only root better in March and April,
[2:37:01]
but will help us to come out of the current situation
[2:37:04]
that we're in right now.
[2:37:06]
And also we'll continue our work with NC state
[2:37:11]
and other outside agencies to troubleshoot
[2:37:14]
exactly what happened, to get professional development
[2:37:18]
for our staff and give them the tools that they need
[2:37:20]
to successful in America at this point of where we are,
[2:37:27]
we're going student by student.
[2:37:30]
We've asked and the communication team
[2:37:33]
has sent out a message that at noon tomorrow,
[2:37:37]
if infinite campus is not showing that your child needs
[2:37:41]
double Dutch has a bus route, that you simply
[2:37:45]
send an email to Mr. Austin and myself and we will
[2:37:49]
be working to respond to those.
[2:37:52]
Working through our alpha listing.
[2:37:55]
The Alpha listing is the master list of busses and students
[2:38:00]
throughout the district.
[2:38:02]
We uploaded an alpha listing this afternoon
[2:38:05]
and it had over 5400 entries in it.
[2:38:08]
So Mr. Austin and I will be working through that until we
[2:38:12]
get every student on a bus?
[2:38:15]
You can reach out to us.
[2:38:18]
And at this time, we'll take any questions from the board.
[2:38:23]
Chair Jenkins: All right, board members
[2:38:26]
questions or comments go ahead.
[2:38:29]
>> I have a lot of questions.
[2:38:32]
I'm also willing to let somebody else go.
[2:38:34]
Chair Jenkins, if you would prefer.
[2:38:37]
Chair Jenkins: I have a lot of questions
[2:38:39]
too so why don't you start and we'll just go down the line.
[2:38:43]
>> First of all, I sincerely do appreciate the apology permit I
[2:38:49]
believe that was from your heart and thank you for acknowledging
[2:38:54]
that.
[2:38:55]
And I don't really know where I'm going to start here
[2:39:00]
but one thing I wanted to back up
[2:39:02]
to was the hand-off from Infinite Campus to TIMS.
[2:39:08]
Who did that?
[2:39:10]
I don't need to know my name, but my position
[2:39:15]
because as I understand it, and if I'm wrong, please correct me
[2:39:21]
when we get into this.
[2:39:23]
You send over 4800 student requests and TIMS sends it back
[2:39:31]
and there's a batch number of problems that are identified
[2:39:33]
right then and there.
[2:39:34]
If you send over 4800 and you get back 3800,
[2:39:38]
you've got 1000 records that have problems.
[2:39:41]
Somebody then at that point should have stopped
[2:39:45]
and said this is a typical process,
[2:39:48]
we've got a problem here.
[2:39:50]
I don't care if it was on August the 1st or July 1st or whatever
[2:39:55]
and you mentioned it tonight but then you kept alluding
[2:39:59]
to software glitch or software.
[2:40:01]
We don't know.
[2:40:02]
You can't possibly even move forward
[2:40:05]
at that point without knowing what to do next.
[2:40:09]
Explain what happened there.
[2:40:12]
>> Yes sir.
[2:40:14]
Doctor Griffin, the process works when the information
[2:40:17]
is entered at the school level.
[2:40:19]
It is pulled into TIMS through the server.
[2:40:26]
You're exactly right when you say there
[2:40:28]
should have been some signs.
[2:40:36]
>> There's big signs there.
[2:40:37]
It's not a should then some signs
[2:40:39]
flashing lights there's parameters there
[2:40:41]
that don't like where to look.
[2:40:43]
Correct?
[2:40:44]
>> Correct doctor Griffin if- --
[2:40:50]
>> How come somebody didn't do that?
[2:40:53]
>> Because there is no sign of it.
[2:40:55]
There's no sign of that because there was yes on one side
[2:40:58]
and then they became nos.
[2:40:59]
They didn't flag it's problems.
[2:41:01]
They just flagged as students who did not need transportation.
[2:41:04]
Because when we pulled it, there were still over 5000 requests.
[2:41:08]
So what we saw as the flags were the 475 unmatched addresses.
[2:41:15]
That's something that is normal, every day.
[2:41:19]
What we did not see and what we did not get at that point
[2:41:23]
until we started to dig into it was the trend data where
[2:41:28]
it said students, infinite campus,
[2:41:31]
students that were moving from one grade level to the next,
[2:41:35]
when building to the next, excuse me
[2:41:38]
if Kindergartner's, sixth graders, ninth graders,
[2:41:42]
buildings.
[2:41:43]
Somehow, they were the ones that dropped.
[2:41:47]
They were a good percentage.
[2:41:50]
But there's no full rhyme or reason
[2:41:53]
because not every sixth grader, ninth grader and kindergartner
[2:41:55]
was dropped.
[2:41:57]
Then there were outlier schools.
[2:41:58]
So we worked through -- we found one school where none
[2:42:04]
of the students moved out of the school,
[2:42:07]
yet 70 students were flipped from yes to no.
[2:42:12]
So there is no rhyme or reason, but from the Tims side,
[2:42:18]
we could still see 5000 requests.
[2:42:22]
Routing 5000 students.
[2:42:24]
We're working through the unmatched addresses.
[2:42:26]
We're working through the students
[2:42:28]
that are out of boundary like we do every year.
[2:42:31]
So there was not an indication when the data pulled
[2:42:36]
that there was a problem.
[2:42:39]
>> Okay, so then when did you become first aware that
[2:42:44]
there's a serious problem?
[2:42:45]
>> We became aware that there's a serious problem on the first
[2:42:49]
day of school.
[2:42:50]
>> You thought everything was good until the first day
[2:42:53]
of school?
[2:42:54]
>> We did.
[2:42:55]
Because at that point we had 4000 students
[2:42:58]
routed in on busses.
[2:42:59]
>> Okay change in direction a little bit.
[2:43:02]
Tims you mentioned on the road.
[2:43:04]
I'm not clear if we're working with Tims
[2:43:07]
or we've been solo in it and now we're calling them for help?
[2:43:13]
TIMS what if advised all kinds of things back in July to say we
[2:43:17]
need to do this.
[2:43:18]
We need to do that.
[2:43:19]
We need to do that.
[2:43:21]
Are we working with them like that this summer
[2:43:23]
or are we on our own and now we're going to call them?
[2:43:27]
>> No doctor Griffin.
[2:43:29]
We work with them.
[2:43:30]
We meet with them.
[2:43:32]
And look.
[2:43:33]
What Tims will tell us is the major issue here.
[2:43:39]
Is that we had a problem, others had problems as well Tims,
[2:43:45]
problem, it was in August.
[2:43:49]
And now we're having to work through it manually, by hand.
[2:43:53]
Tims is going to say -- and that's part
[2:43:56]
of their recommendation, start your process earlier.
[2:43:58]
So that there is a problem, you can work through it.
[2:44:02]
They do not -- they can come in and look at the system.
[2:44:05]
We have a meeting with them tomorrow morning.
[2:44:08]
To look at it and to see where we
[2:44:10]
are, to see if our things are uploaded.
[2:44:11]
To see if our files are correct.
[2:44:14]
Those are the things that they look at for you.
[2:44:16]
They made the suggestion that our files were corrupt
[2:44:19]
when we went to upload and that was the issue that stuff was not
[2:44:23]
moving back into infinite campus.
[2:44:25]
So they're making recommendations to us
[2:44:28]
but they can't give us any hard line answers as to this
[2:44:34]
was the exact issue that you experienced.
[2:44:36]
I'm going to rephrase my question
[2:44:39]
and then I'll let somebody else
[2:44:42]
>> And then I'll let somebody else have a turn here because I
[2:44:44]
have a lot of questions.
[2:44:46]
Tims recommends regular quarterly meeting
[2:44:50]
with data managers can I pinch recommends monthly meetings
[2:44:54]
with data managers.
[2:44:55]
Tims recommends a process that we should have in place
[2:44:59]
if we're working with Tims all along.
[2:45:02]
And many other school districts are in fact in my career,
[2:45:06]
we've always worked with Tims.
[2:45:08]
Tims when map it out for you and say picture 110% goal
[2:45:13]
for efficiency and we're going to take money back from it --
[2:45:17]
are we working side by side with Tims or have we been working
[2:45:23]
on our own by ourselves on our own thing and I'm calling them
[2:45:27]
for help?
[2:45:28]
>> To answer your question as clearly as I can Doctor Griffin,
[2:45:33]
could we work with them better and more often?
[2:45:37]
Yes.
[2:45:37]
Are we working solo alone?
[2:45:40]
No we're not.
[2:45:42]
We probably could have worked with them
[2:45:45]
in the past, monthly can I where we're
[2:45:48]
working with them quarterly.
[2:45:51]
So yes.
[2:45:52]
We need to increase the relationship.
[2:45:55]
Increase the fluency of the relationship.
[2:45:58]
But no, we weren't out there by ourselves doing this all alone.
[2:46:02]
>> Okay well I look forward to hearing then what you learned
[2:46:06]
about this glitch.
[2:46:08]
In the process that seems to work in other districts.
[2:46:11]
Where you upload the information and then they
[2:46:14]
send it back to you and right there
[2:46:17]
is where everybody should know we've got a problem.
[2:46:20]
And that didn't seem to happen here
[2:46:23]
but it seems to be working other places.
[2:46:25]
I don't know that tonight is appropriate
[2:46:27]
or I'll get it tonight, but I really
[2:46:30]
want to understand what happened.
[2:46:31]
Much less what we need to do down the road.
[2:46:35]
>> Yes sir.
[2:46:38]
>> I'll stop now and let other people have a turn.
[2:46:41]
I've got more questions.
[2:46:43]
Chair Jenkins: We'll ping pong this way.
[2:46:46]
Go ahead.
[2:46:47]
>> Thank you and I also appreciate the apology.
[2:46:51]
I know this is really difficult on all of our families
[2:46:53]
and I know you guys are working really hard to resolve things.
[2:46:56]
One thing that I have not yet heard tonight
[2:47:00]
is what the current status is.
[2:47:02]
Do we have a number of how many families are still affected?
[2:47:06]
And by when they can expect a resolution?
[2:47:09]
>> So we are, with the numbers, yes or no.
[2:47:14]
We have the number of what we still have to work through
[2:47:20]
that we currently know about.
[2:47:22]
We're hoping at this point that they're no additions
[2:47:25]
and there are always the transportation
[2:47:27]
everyday issues that you have to work through.
[2:47:29]
This town needs a US, this child wants a different route,
[2:47:34]
this child is going through a different place we have
[2:47:36]
to work through those as well.
[2:47:37]
Are priority right now is every child
[2:47:40]
that does not have a bus to get them a bus parent currently
[2:47:43]
request wise, this is not children but request wise,
[2:47:46]
we are still working about 800 requests.
[2:47:53]
>> (Inaudible)
[2:47:53]
>> Yes sir.
[2:47:54]
But a lot of our children have morning routes
[2:47:58]
and afternoon route.
[2:48:00]
Or they have an afternoon route and need a morning route.
[2:48:03]
That is a request that we're working through.
[2:48:06]
And then we have children that need both routes.
[2:48:09]
Well the issue, or crystal to 2000
[2:48:15]
that we were working through.
[2:48:18]
>> That's nearly half, right?
[2:48:21]
>> And what we're finding is we think that this is going to be
[2:48:25]
higher than normal usage year for transportation.
[2:48:28]
For people requesting routes.
[2:48:31]
Last Friday, or Monday, excuse me, we were at 1286 requests.
[2:48:41]
So today, working through being 800 and so,
[2:48:47]
we are working it down one by one.
[2:48:52]
>> Even while we've been sitting here at this meeting,
[2:48:54]
I got an email from somebody who not a native English speaker
[2:48:59]
and really needs assistance.
[2:49:00]
I know you guys are doing all you can
[2:49:03]
but we got to get through as many of these people as we can.
[2:49:08]
And then I wanted to talk specifically
[2:49:09]
about the segment of families that
[2:49:11]
were affected by the grandfathered neighborhoods.
[2:49:15]
I would love to understand, it doesn't
[2:49:18]
have to be tonight necessarily, but I
[2:49:20]
love to understand what the procedure is
[2:49:22]
for notifying those families and what approvals have to be made.
[2:49:28]
It just seems like when a family is
[2:49:30]
used to having bus service over a number of years
[2:49:32]
and they may not have been apprized of the fact
[2:49:34]
that it was a temporary grandfathered situation,
[2:49:36]
that there needs to be some kind of approval or process
[2:49:43]
by which we evaluate the need of the neighborhood.
[2:49:47]
Because the descriptions that we're
[2:49:48]
getting from a lot of families who are affected by that are
[2:49:51]
this is not safe.
[2:49:53]
My kindergartner can't cross myth level.
[2:49:56]
Just things like that.
[2:49:58]
It made me feel a little uneasy that those were
[2:50:04]
decided without board approval.
[2:50:05]
I know two years ago, there were some things
[2:50:09]
that changed as you mentioned.
[2:50:10]
I remember voting on a change that
[2:50:12]
was due to the state regulations or the state's recommendations.
[2:50:17]
And that seemed like that was a bigger board approval process.
[2:50:22]
And so, this time, like that was the first time I've heard of it.
[2:50:26]
So that concerned me.
[2:50:28]
I still don't have a sense of how many families
[2:50:30]
were affected by that.
[2:50:31]
Some people said they got no notification whatsoever.
[2:50:35]
And then, going forward, is it possible that we
[2:50:40]
can get a couple times a week of updates
[2:50:44]
to say you have 800 requests today, so in a couple of days,
[2:50:49]
can we get an update saying that hopefully that number is
[2:50:52]
smaller, so we know where we are?
[2:50:56]
Because I feel like we haven't gotten a lot of regular updates.
[2:51:00]
And so I would like to make sure that we know.
[2:51:08]
And then this is a separate note but on the timeline question,
[2:51:13]
in your opinion, what is the ideal date
[2:51:16]
that families would get a notification of what
[2:51:19]
their busses?
[2:51:20]
Just best practice?
[2:51:21]
To give us enough time to troubleshoot problems.
[2:51:24]
Because it really did seem like this year,
[2:51:27]
it was very less minute.
[2:51:29]
And I think from what I'm hearing from affected families,
[2:51:32]
by the time that they realized that they weren't going
[2:51:35]
to get an assignment like the first day of school
[2:51:37]
was already underway.
[2:51:38]
>> For the time, the Monday after graduation in June.
[2:51:44]
That's what we're aiming for.
[2:51:46]
>> Okay.
[2:51:47]
That's certainly better.
[2:51:49]
I was a little surprised that it was even you were recommending
[2:51:52]
that may time but great.
[2:51:54]
I think the earlier the better so families have time to really
[2:51:57]
troubleshoot what's going on.
[2:51:59]
And then you mentioned the last thing
[2:52:01]
I had is just the second coordinator that
[2:52:07]
was replacing the staff member that was retired?
[2:52:10]
>> Yes Ma'am.
[2:52:13]
Vice-Chair Fedders: Yes I echo everybody's appreciation
[2:52:17]
for the accountability and apology and extend my own.
[2:52:21]
We have oversight responsibility.
[2:52:24]
I'm the chair of Finance Facilities and Operations
[2:52:27]
and we should have met over the summer so I'll take that.
[2:52:32]
A lot of my questions have already been addressed.
[2:52:35]
But it seems like we have enough bus drivers right?
[2:52:38]
And the good news department?
[2:52:40]
>> Yes Ma'am we do.
[2:52:43]
Vice-Chair Fedders: And do you feel
[2:52:45]
with the new person we just hired, the department has
[2:52:48]
enough people?
[2:52:49]
Probably nobody has enough people?
[2:52:51]
>> We will be in a better place.
[2:52:54]
I think one of the things that Mr. Austin and I are working on
[2:52:57]
is ensuring that our operators have dedicated time to work.
[2:53:03]
That while having a CDL is a requirement for the position,
[2:53:07]
trying to keep them off a bus as much as possible as something
[2:53:13]
that is helpful so that they can sit in the office
[2:53:15]
and they can troubleshoot through this.
[2:53:24]
[NO AUDIO]
[2:55:13]
>> Just going to every classroom and say who's got a bus problem?
[2:55:16]
>> Doctor Griffin I apologize.
[2:55:21]
[Interposing voices]
[2:55:22]
>> We have 20 administrators sitting here tonight.
[2:55:24]
Why not tomorrow?
[2:55:25]
The system is not working.
[2:55:27]
We're not going to get 800 kids back in another week.
[2:55:30]
It's the third week of school next week.
[2:55:34]
The kitchen's on fire.
[2:55:36]
Somebody needs to go out there and find out
[2:55:39]
who's got a bus problem.
[2:55:41]
Not waiting for parents to contact you
[2:55:44]
for the third time saying nobody's
[2:55:47]
told me anything for nine days.
[2:55:50]
That's just not good enough.
[2:55:52]
It's not working.
[2:55:53]
So stop it and go fix it.
[2:55:58]
>> Excuse me for a second.
[2:56:00]
A while back I am being told and I apologize if I'm out of order
[2:56:04]
but this needs to be said.
[2:56:05]
A while back I was told that we need
[2:56:08]
to make sure we're going to have a certain level of decorum
[2:56:11]
and not make our staff feel that we're going to be attacked.
[2:56:14]
And if I'm going to be told we're
[2:56:15]
going to make our staff not feel that we're going to be attacked,
[2:56:18]
that's going to be across the board.
[2:56:20]
I want to take a deep breath.
[2:56:22]
I would invite all of us to take a deep breath.
[2:56:24]
And we're not going to want our staff to feel attacked.
[2:56:28]
He's standing here.
[2:56:29]
He is owning this problem.
[2:56:31]
He is not making an excuse.
[2:56:33]
He is not telling me something that's not factual.
[2:56:36]
A system that is not working is not
[2:56:39]
the same as a person that's telling me
[2:56:41]
history that's not correct.
[2:56:42]
So I will say yes, the master list may not be working.
[2:56:46]
Tims may not be doing what it's supposed to do.
[2:56:49]
Our families are hurting and the kitchen may be on fire,
[2:56:52]
but we're not going to act like we don't have water
[2:56:55]
from the university lake in Owosso.
[2:56:57]
We are going to deal with this and we're going to get it fixed.
[2:56:59]
I as a board member say I am sorry to our families.
[2:57:03]
As a former bus driver will be glad to volunteer my time
[2:57:07]
and get in a van to help you get our children to school.
[2:57:11]
But we have to work together at this point and realize that
[2:57:14]
we're at September the 3rd and we're in a bad situation and we
[2:57:18]
need to figure out what we need to do and we can get the answers
[2:57:22]
as we can get them, but what needs to happen right now is
[2:57:25]
to get as many children on the bus as possible and for us
[2:57:28]
to get the answers when we can come and how we can.
[2:57:32]
When I want to know is how and what
[2:57:33]
is the fastest way to get every little person on a bus,
[2:57:38]
in a van, in a car.
[2:57:40]
>> Yes Ma'am.
[2:57:42]
Thank you.
[2:57:43]
I want to take one step back because it
[2:57:46]
was an important omission that I made.
[2:57:50]
We have spreadsheets from every school that we share.
[2:57:56]
So the schools are filling out the spreadsheets
[2:57:59]
when they find out that there's a student who
[2:58:02]
does not have transportation.
[2:58:03]
We are addressing it through the spreadsheets.
[2:58:06]
And then adding those students to the alpha list.
[2:58:09]
That's my fault for that omission.
[2:58:11]
But we are -- we're not relying solely upon the alpha list.
[2:58:17]
We are actually communicating with schools
[2:58:20]
through spreadsheets, through the apps or the data managers.
[2:58:24]
Whoever they're designated as.
[2:58:26]
The fastest way for us to get students on a bus
[2:58:31]
is simply for us to put our heads down
[2:58:35]
to continue to route everything, every day.
[2:58:39]
For us to continue to partner with Itry to make sure
[2:58:45]
we're doing everything we possibly can the right way.
[2:58:50]
We want to resolve this as fast as we possibly can.
[2:58:54]
And we will continue to work to do so.
[2:58:59]
Chair Jenkins: I'm going to jump in.
[2:59:02]
Are there any other resources that we can offer?
[2:59:06]
Temp staff.
[2:59:08]
I know somebody off the street probably
[2:59:10]
can't come in and do this.
[2:59:12]
I doubt I can.
[2:59:13]
But I don't know if we need temp staff for like five days?
[2:59:18]
And Doctor Stewart, I appreciate every school year,
[2:59:20]
we talk about transportation since I've been on the board.
[2:59:23]
It's like a big concern.
[2:59:25]
Like barb, I was chair of FFO so even
[2:59:27]
on social media, putting out how people get in touch to address
[2:59:31]
transportation issues.
[2:59:33]
But if need temp staff for seven days
[2:59:36]
I feel like, it sounds like that the energy of the board
[2:59:41]
is like we can go out there and bring in temp staff.
[2:59:45]
Support somebody working additional hours
[2:59:48]
during the next week, two weeks to get this fixed.
[2:59:52]
>> Yes Ma'am.
[2:59:54]
We're bringing in a second TIMS operator next week on Tuesday.
[3:00:00]
We had a former operator that moved to another division.
[3:00:03]
That we've brought on board to help us as well.
[3:00:06]
Just getting them dedicated time that they can sit down
[3:00:10]
and they can route and we'll put out the other fires.
[3:00:12]
We'll get on the busses.
[3:00:13]
We'll do what we have to do but getting them
[3:00:16]
that dedicated time is the most important thing.
[3:00:20]
>> Just a word.
[3:00:23]
I also encourage our families.
[3:00:26]
There's direct communication and it's pretty long
[3:00:30]
but it does go a long way in terms
[3:00:34]
of letting family know what they can do to help us out
[3:00:39]
in the situation.
[3:00:40]
To Doctor Stewart's point, when I walked the schools,
[3:00:45]
principals and assistant principals
[3:00:47]
have a pretty good sense of whether it's
[3:00:51]
20 students, 30 students, 50 students who don't have a bus.
[3:00:54]
That's not as quick as okay, we have
[3:00:58]
to enter the students in the system.
[3:01:01]
The system then has to route the students
[3:01:02]
and then you have to notify parent like that's
[3:01:05]
not the fastest process.
[3:01:07]
But I don't know that I would frame it as, on a large scale,
[3:01:14]
any given school doesn't know who doesn't have is not still
[3:01:19]
working transportation.
[3:01:21]
Whether that's through a spreadsheet.
[3:01:24]
What I do understand the frustration
[3:01:26]
about how fast we can resolve the issue
[3:01:30]
and we're looking forward to the upload that occurred today
[3:01:34]
to give us a sense of how far we've
[3:01:38]
gone to correct that issue.
[3:01:41]
But parents, community members, families,
[3:01:44]
the district communication that went out
[3:01:47]
today would help us as well in terms of resolving this Chair
[3:01:55]
Jenkins: I would agree and I know,
[3:01:57]
thank you Doctor Stewart for taking some time
[3:01:58]
to talk with me this week.
[3:02:00]
I also echo the need for the board, the community, definitely
[3:02:04]
the board to get frequent updates.
[3:02:07]
You know?
[3:02:08]
If it's weekly or whatever.
[3:02:11]
One thing I don't want to stop you
[3:02:13]
guys who are running a report to give to us when
[3:02:15]
you can be doing the work.
[3:02:17]
So obviously, give us an update.
[3:02:20]
Keep us updated until we get to zero requests per minute we just
[3:02:25]
need to know that this is getting worked on
[3:02:29]
and we are moving quickly to get these requests done.
[3:02:33]
I will say --
[3:02:35]
I want to go back to George's point about validation.
[3:02:37]
We talked a lot you and I about this
[3:02:39]
and I said I'm not going to go and do your job.
[3:02:42]
I don't want to be the type of board where we reach in
[3:02:45]
and start telling staff, who are supposed to do this,
[3:02:49]
but I think there are some additional layers of validation
[3:02:52]
and I think as we're thinking about how this process works
[3:02:56]
and all the process failures that one along the way,
[3:03:00]
there are a lot of opportunities.
[3:03:02]
And so obviously, think about, like George said, ahead of.
[3:03:09]
Those data managers see the numbers,
[3:03:13]
they get a report that says we've got 300 kids in our school
[3:03:16]
and 200 of them require transportation
[3:03:19]
and we have all those numbers across the district
[3:03:22]
and we end up with 6000 and you see what TIMS report says.
[3:03:29]
We already have a mismatch.
[3:03:30]
There's something going on in the system so I just want you
[3:03:33]
guys to think about even -- we all fill out that form.
[3:03:36]
I am also --
[3:03:37]
I want to make sure we're moving up timelines,
[3:03:39]
it's going to impact a lot of things.
[3:03:42]
We're saying it lightheartedly now in a meeting
[3:03:45]
but to families, that means deadlines for things
[3:03:48]
are critical.
[3:03:48]
That's why when families are like why
[3:03:50]
is this deadline moving up?
[3:03:51]
This is why.
[3:03:52]
So if there's an application deadline for something
[3:03:55]
that students need to enroll in.
[3:03:57]
If the district moves up their email
[3:03:59]
that they send at the end of the year saying
[3:04:01]
what is your intention?
[3:04:02]
You need to fill it out.
[3:04:04]
I know I get in in June or whatever I get it.
[3:04:07]
If they move that up to April, we have to make sure as families
[3:04:12]
we're filling it out.
[3:04:13]
We're not like oh I forgot to fill it out
[3:04:15]
and things like that.
[3:04:16]
This is only going to work if we also
[3:04:20]
help move this because obviously, they
[3:04:22]
want to fix this sooner.
[3:04:25]
They want to be able to no issue sooner
[3:04:27]
but this is going to be a shift across the board.
[3:04:30]
I think if we can communicate that very loud, very clear,
[3:04:36]
and keep doing that because I hear you.
[3:04:40]
I'm just envisioning all the things
[3:04:42]
that are going to be impacted across the district.
[3:04:46]
Timelines and deadlines for things that families are used to
[3:04:49]
are going to completely shift and people
[3:04:52]
are going to be asking why and the response should
[3:04:55]
be because we need to make sure we get transportation assigned
[3:04:58]
sooner to families, however, we can just remind people
[3:05:04]
sooner, earlier, the better.
[3:05:06]
Because I want to make sure that we
[3:05:08]
have enough time that if we have typically 400 issues every year,
[3:05:13]
we can clear those even sooner and if there's continued systems
[3:05:17]
issues, we identify that as early as possible.
[3:05:20]
And then we can roll that out.
[3:05:25]
We've answered a lot of my questions and things.
[3:05:30]
But I think board members and community members
[3:05:32]
have conveyed it's urgent.
[3:05:35]
I appreciate the people emailing the board
[3:05:39]
and doing things that we didn't we just forwarded it to Primo.
[3:05:43]
Please follow the emails.
[3:05:45]
Emailing the board is a slowdown in the process.
[3:05:48]
Obviously we have people monitoring
[3:05:49]
stuff that comes to us but if I can go directly
[3:05:51]
to Doctor Stewart and Mr. Allston, please do that.
[3:05:56]
We are aware this is an issue.
[3:05:58]
So just get it directly to them for people
[3:06:01]
who need the email to email anyone
[3:06:03]
because it's another step in the process
[3:06:06]
that it has to come out of our inbox and go over to them
[3:06:09]
and we don't want any more delays with this to.
[3:06:12]
Go ahead Barb.
[3:06:13]
Vice-Chair Fedders: I just feel like at the pace that we've
[3:06:16]
been going, it's going to take two and a half more weeks
[3:06:19]
and I just still haven't heard anything
[3:06:21]
that suggests that we're going to solve this problem quickly.
[3:06:25]
That's just a comment.
[3:06:27]
I don't understand why we didn't hire somebody
[3:06:30]
faster after the person quit in the middle of the summer.
[3:06:33]
I don't understand why we didn't get temps right away.
[3:06:37]
Like on August 25th.
[3:06:40]
Again, those don't need answers but I
[3:06:42]
think as we're doing our review, I just I'm not seeing enough
[3:06:47]
I'm upset also like George, very,
[3:06:51]
and it's not getting matched.
[3:06:54]
I'm not feeling enough urgency in any of this.
[3:06:59]
So I don't know.
[3:07:01]
I'm not an operations expert but something
[3:07:03]
has to happen that's different.
[3:07:06]
We had an audit in 2022, maybe there's something in there.
[3:07:14]
I have a couple specific suggestions if that's okay?
[3:07:19]
I think we need weekly updates but I think the public does too
[3:07:24]
and we have a dashboard for Carrboro elementary
[3:07:29]
and we have a digital dashboard for the education plan
[3:07:32]
but we need a digital dashboard.
[3:07:34]
I think Doctor Tracy's point about trust is really important.
[3:07:37]
We're about to redistrict.
[3:07:41]
--Trice so people have to trust us.
[3:07:44]
That's number one.
[3:07:45]
Number two, restore all the kids at school
[3:07:47]
are going to be held harmless?
[3:07:48]
They're not going to turn in those assignments
[3:07:51]
and not be docked on their grades
[3:07:52]
I'm going to make sure that happens.
[3:07:54]
I think we should seriously consider
[3:07:56]
having either simultaneously or after the internal review
[3:08:00]
that we're doing, an external firm to audit us.
[3:08:05]
Because I'm mystified as to why this is just happening to us
[3:08:09]
and why this year not last year when it just rolled out
[3:08:12]
I'm like I was expecting it to be a bad last year.
[3:08:15]
This is just mystifying.
[3:08:17]
And so I think we need some help figuring out what went wrong.
[3:08:20]
I hate to spend that money but I think
[3:08:22]
it would go a long way to restoring trust.
[3:08:24]
So those are my four suggestions.
[3:08:27]
I don't know if we should vote on them
[3:08:29]
or if we can just discuss them or what.
[3:08:33]
Chair Jenkins: Thank you Barb.
[3:08:37]
I think in terms of updates, I agree with you,
[3:08:40]
I think we don't necessarily need to vote on those.
[3:08:43]
We can just direct administration
[3:08:44]
to provide not only the board but the public weekly updates.
[3:08:47]
In terms of where we stand.
[3:08:51]
Typically transportation comes in where front of FFO
[3:08:55]
we and the stand. full I think maybe,
[3:08:59]
typically transportation comes in front of FFO
[3:09:01]
and the full board at the beginning of the year anyway
[3:09:03]
so we were set to get a transportation update anyway.
[3:09:06]
FFO this month and then the full board
[3:09:09]
as part of a greater operations update in October
[3:09:12]
if I remember the cadence of these updates.
[3:09:14]
So I think in that meeting, maybe we
[3:09:17]
can talk about next steps after we hear
[3:09:20]
and hopefully the staff will have more time
[3:09:22]
and then we can direct another transportation audit.
[3:09:26]
I think we also probably need to layer
[3:09:28]
in like impact of redistricting as well in.
[3:09:33]
So that we factor that into.
[3:09:35]
So you know, so I think that part will just
[3:09:38]
put it in our notation and administration
[3:09:41]
know that that's probably going to come.
[3:09:43]
As a request.
[3:09:44]
And what was that last one?
[3:09:46]
Oh there was some other, the audit that's what I was saying.
[3:09:48]
Yeah.
[3:09:49]
Oh the holding kids harmless.
[3:09:51]
I think that's the important part
[3:09:52]
I've been seeing and hearing some things about that, I know
[3:09:56]
generally like for transportation if kids are late
[3:09:58]
and things like that, it gets noted as like excused
[3:10:01]
and it's not penalized, they're not penalized for it.
[3:10:04]
But I think also Doctor Trice it would go a long way that if kids
[3:10:09]
like miss assignments because they've like
[3:10:11]
missed the entire first period or whatever,
[3:10:14]
that we ask the teachers provide some flexibility.
[3:10:19]
>> We'll make sure that happens.
[3:10:22]
Chair Jenkins: Okay thank you.
[3:10:24]
Any other questions?
[3:10:26]
Comments?
[3:10:27]
Go ahead.
[3:10:29]
>> I had a question about the Tims in terms of where
[3:10:33]
they're clocking the one and a half miles or the 1.6 miles I
[3:10:36]
think it is where you say it's at the top of the neighborhoods.
[3:10:39]
Is our communities becoming more and more dense,
[3:10:43]
from the top of our neighborhood to sometimes the back
[3:10:46]
of our neighborhoods, we're looking
[3:10:48]
at sometimes three quarters of a mile.
[3:10:51]
So if the top is saying, is one and a half so to speak,
[3:10:57]
or that child's door is which is where they're not gauging
[3:11:00]
is well outside of what a walk zone could be because so
[3:11:04]
many of our communities are now being interconnected where there
[3:11:07]
are different entrances so how are we,
[3:11:10]
are those having to be like one offs?
[3:11:12]
Because those are whole additional neighborhoods,
[3:11:15]
I'll give you even an example like the way Lake Hogan is now
[3:11:19]
connecting for the back on 086, where there's homestead and then
[3:11:24]
there's 086 and it's going deeper and deeper and it's a new
[3:11:28]
subdivision.
[3:11:29]
So how would that look to make sure
[3:11:31]
that those children that are in the center towards the back
[3:11:34]
wouldn't be considered in a walk zone
[3:11:37]
because they are much further away
[3:11:39]
from the school than the children that
[3:11:41]
are facing like Homestead Road.
[3:11:44]
I mean I know you guys probably know where I'm talking about,
[3:11:46]
if that makes sense to you that's kind of my question.
[3:11:49]
How are we looking at that?
[3:11:50]
So that our young people aren't looking
[3:11:53]
at spaces without sidewalks or safety to get from so far back
[3:12:00]
to get to a main road to maybe be able to get a bus.
[3:12:02]
Is that something that will be looked at?
[3:12:05]
>> Yes Ma'am.
[3:12:06]
We will get you an answer.
[3:12:08]
>> Thank you.
[3:12:11]
Chair Jenkins: Anything else from our members?
[3:12:14]
>> I just have one last little thing that actually jogged
[3:12:18]
my memory what you said Risa about redistricting.
[3:12:20]
I do think that it would be helpful
[3:12:22]
as we approach redistricting, the board
[3:12:25]
is made aware of plans on how we're
[3:12:28]
going to, I mean there's definitely
[3:12:30]
going to be an additional lift in burden
[3:12:32]
with regard to transportation as we
[3:12:34]
change the existing routes quite a bit.
[3:12:36]
So I just want to make sure that like we're
[3:12:39]
kept abreast of those plans as we approach that.
[3:12:43]
Major event.
[3:12:55]
Chair Jenkins: Thank you.
[3:13:03]
All right.
[3:13:05]
Thank you.
[3:13:06]
Thank you doctor Stewart.
[3:13:08]
Thank you Mr. Ralston.
[3:13:15]
Our last item on our agenda is committee reports and sharing.
[3:13:22]
Let's see.
[3:13:23]
Who we have here.
[3:13:25]
I think we've got all the committee's represented right?
[3:13:28]
Finance facility and operations.
[3:13:31]
Okay.
[3:13:31]
You have an upcoming meeting?
[3:13:33]
Okay.
[3:13:36]
I think it's the eighth, September 8th, 530.
[3:13:43]
Okay.
[3:13:44]
And hopefully you all will get more updates on this.
[3:13:47]
Previous topic.
[3:13:49]
Student success?
[3:13:51]
>> Yes we are meeting on September the 22nd as our next
[3:14:00]
meeting.
[3:14:01]
And we will be going over the results of all
[3:14:08]
of the testing and things that have just recently come out,
[3:14:11]
so it's going to be an important meeting.
[3:14:13]
So I'd encourage folks to watch that if they're
[3:14:15]
interested to see some of our growth numbers
[3:14:18]
and other things that are coming out with those reports.
[3:14:21]
Chair Jenkins: Thank you.
[3:14:23]
And then policy.
[3:14:25]
Our next meeting?
[3:14:27]
That's you.
[3:14:28]
>> We have our next meeting on September the 15th at 530
[3:14:32]
and our last meeting information was on (Indistinct)
[3:14:37]
Chair Jenkins: Okay thank you Vicki.
[3:14:38]
Any sharing from board members?
[3:14:42]
Well I just want to say I know we've had hiccups
[3:14:46]
with the opening of school but I will say,
[3:14:48]
thank you to the staff doctor Trice and staff and our schools
[3:14:52]
and other board members who joined, Doctor twice
[3:14:55]
as he visited all the schools in the district.
[3:14:57]
I think I made it to all but one and even wrote
[3:15:00]
some of the school busses with the kids early in the morning.
[3:15:03]
So thank you so much to our staff, the kids were happy
[3:15:09]
and in class and excited, it was just
[3:15:11]
really really great to see our kids back in school
[3:15:15]
and just really excited and energized
[3:15:17]
and enjoying lunch and playing outside.
[3:15:20]
It was really great.
[3:15:22]
To see all of our kiddos back in school.
[3:15:25]
So thank you.
[3:15:26]
Thank you again, our community our families and especially
[3:15:29]
our staff and our schools.
[3:15:31]
And with that, I'm looking around,
[3:15:35]
our meeting is adjourned.