[0:20] It's 7:05, March 3, 2026. This

[0:24] is the council meeting. The secretary is going

[0:25] to call roll.

[0:34] Here here

[0:42] Israel Rivera here Jenny Rivera here

[0:47] Sullivan here

[0:49] Bacen here

[0:54] please stand for the oath to the

[0:56] flag Surely

[0:58] to the flag of the United States,

[1:01] uh, of the Republic in which I stand

[1:05] , one nation under God,

[1:08] indivisible, with liberty and

[1:12] justice for all.

[1:16] Okay, I have a few announcements before we

[1:20] begin.

[1:23] This meeting has been recorded live

[1:26] on public television and has been

[1:29] interpreted in Spanish. We are here at

[1:38] the Council Chamber of Commerce

[1:41] and we have some people joining via

[1:43] Zoom, which is totally understandable because it's

[1:45] quite slippery out there.

[1:48] So whatever we start, I'm going to

[1:49] introduce a motion to call on Lisa

[1:52] that for the purpose of this meeting,

[1:54] all motions to

[1:56] receive and refer points to the committee, to

[1:59] take points from the table, to put points on

[2:00] the table, to put points as a package, to

[2:04] comply with points, to adopt

[2:07] points if required, to suspend

[2:09] rules, unless there is a unification, we

[2:11] all follow in favor. Someone objects.

[2:14] Okay, counselor.

[2:17] His name came up first tonight,

[2:21] so that's for your information.

[2:25] And since many of you

[2:28] aren't here tonight to sign

[2:31] the committee report, he's

[2:36] someone who objects to signing

[2:39] the committee report,

[2:41] and that's why I'll be

[2:46] doing the

[2:49] rules. Just one, or when we get

[2:52] there? I

[2:55] meant signing the orders, not

[2:57] the vote. Oh, okay. Thank you.

[3:05] And I think that's for the

[3:08] announcements part,

[3:10] so please be patient with us

[3:12] , raise your hands. Let's make sure we

[3:15] call everyone and do what I

[3:17] actually do.

[3:20] And as for the reporter, Mr. President,

[3:24] I have a couple of updates

[3:28] and reminders for everyone. Thanks,

[3:30] Jeffre. I'm

[3:32] taking water

[3:33] for always being there to help

[3:39] as a reminder that

[3:42] you are serving breakfast to the

[3:45] organizers

[3:49] on the morning of the St.

[3:52] Patrick's Day parade. We have, uh, we're

[3:55] seeing reservations for March 12.

[3:58] Uh, we also sent out an email

[4:00] early today for registration,

[4:03] uh, but a reminder there will be a

[4:05] shuttle going from Wof to

[4:09] Keer Plaza. Hey, if he's marching,

[4:13] please let Jeffre know if he's

[4:14] planning to be at the march. And there

[4:17] will also be a breakfast meeting for employees

[4:19] on Friday, March 20.

[4:24] Uh, you also received an email

[4:25] about this. Uh, it's from 8 in the morning

[4:29] until 9:30, you're invited to

[4:32] understand. There is a calendar, so

[4:34] please answer that so they can

[4:36] count the food correctly. At our

[4:38] next meeting

[4:40] we will be inviting

[4:42] the winners and dignitaries of the

[4:46] parade, the parade commissioner,

[4:49] the Order of Herians and Caledonian Pip

[4:54] will be there. Thanks Jeffre for

[4:56] coordinating that. Hey, it looks like I'm going to get

[4:58] an award. It will be a little

[5:01] strange for me to give that to myself.

[5:04] and an update from Jeffrey. If you

[5:08] are attending the meeting via

[5:10] Zoom or are on the committee and plan to

[5:13] attend the meeting via Zoom,

[5:15] please do what Dad reminds

[5:18] Jeffre to do by noon on the day of the

[5:20] meeting

[5:22] because you don't need to print the

[5:24] packets. If you are on the committee

[5:27] and will only be

[5:29] on Zoom, you don't have to let them know.

[5:32] He printed the variscope for us; it

[5:35] would be a great help so that we don't

[5:36] print them and then say more paper,

[5:40] and I think it's a piece of general

[5:42] information,

[5:45] something I wanted to share. Obviously there have

[5:48] been many topics that are

[5:52] passionate

[5:56] and there are many things and I love it because that's

[5:58] democracy. Having said that,

[6:02] just because it's a priority for you,

[6:04] doesn't mean it's a priority for

[6:07] everyone in the body, and that doesn't apply

[6:10] to advice here. It's

[6:13] also because of the audience. The

[6:15] legislative branch is here to legislate, and

[6:17] sometimes it takes a while. There's no big

[6:19] conspiracy, there's no

[6:21] grand plan,

[6:24] sometimes it just takes time for

[6:26] things to happen.

[6:29] So the way we work

[6:31] with each one is that we'll be able to get

[6:33] there.

[6:36] Now I feel I have to remember

[6:37] the people we have a lot on

[6:42] our jackets, the employees

[6:44] have many who are working.

[6:45] We need to be aware of this

[6:49] and have our expectations and try to

[6:51] be very fair with the

[6:56] late and requested files, but at the same time I

[6:58] think that sometimes I feel

[7:05] that we have to do a

[7:07] search for what is urgent.

[7:11] I will try to do as fair as

[7:12] possible.

[7:16] But I have a lot of

[7:19] trouble with the late files,

[7:23] but we'll treat everyone with

[7:24] kindness. But having done that, there are

[7:27] other updates that

[7:30] people want to let the public know about

[7:33] related to the

[7:35] president's report

[7:37] with Cilia. I would

[7:40] like to ask for a moment of silence

[7:43] for John Heisen, who has passed away. Oh,

[7:45] thank you.

[7:56] so much. It

[8:01] was an amazing business, so

[8:04] our thoughts and prayers are

[8:06] with his family. Thanks, Mike.

[8:11] Okay, public comment.

[8:15] Next one. And here I have three people.

[8:18] If you are on Zoom, please raise your

[8:21] hand so Jeffre knows if you are here

[8:23] for public comment

[8:25] and how to save to keep uh for the time

[8:30] and so you for how it works 2

[8:32] minutes and I will be monitoring the

[8:35] time. I have these time letters that

[8:37] I will hold and for the time

[8:41] I am allowing people to

[8:44] have their name, address or district.

[8:50] You tell me when I

[8:52] first have David Owen from 12 Mason R.

[8:58] Thank you

[9:00] David 12.

[9:07] Recently the MFMA was signed,

[9:10] Mayor Garcia collected and declared a

[9:14] first step. I would like to suggest that

[9:17] step two should occur in four weeks from

[9:19] today, which will be on the 31st,

[9:22] when applications of the position

[9:25] of the CAFO are

[9:29] raised. Yes, I was in the

[9:31] construction business for many years and I

[9:32] would like to suggest to the board

[9:37] that the person who will be

[9:40] carrying out the tasks

[9:43] alongside the mayor

[9:46] and the individual mission dynamic should not

[9:50] be surprised

[9:52] to see a request for a salary close to the

[9:57] limit of what was dimensioned.

[9:59] Recently, step three should be

[10:01] in 4 months or on June 3rd and in

[10:05] fiscal year 26 a minute ago and the

[10:09] auditors pointed out the expansions that

[10:12] were seen and that the auditors' work

[10:13] for 24-25 will be completed

[10:15] by the date and that is also good

[10:17] news for a variety

[10:20] of economic and different

[10:24] quality of life reasons.

[10:25] Much has been said about my faith,

[10:28] I don't really understand it,

[10:30] but there have been

[10:33] significant changes in how the government

[10:36] operates, the financial systems,

[10:39] departmental changes, the

[10:43] investment community, the educational focus,

[10:46] public safety, and support for businesses. What I

[10:49] mean is the methods now and the

[10:51] way

[10:54] the new CAFO is being said,

[10:57] but I can emphasize that what

[10:59] I think requires a

[11:01] diligent effort on the part of all the

[11:04] people involved. Thank you.

[11:07] so much.

[11:09] Okay. Following. I have

[11:12] José Extra 139 Hillside.

[11:19] Oh, Adestra, my apologies, it's okay. I know a

[11:24] lot of things are going on here

[11:29] and I don't want to be a broken record,

[11:35] but we have a chance.

[11:38] I read

[11:40] the overdose figure as being below

[11:45] 20% and I would like our policies

[11:47] to be transparent and

[11:49] consistently updated.

[11:51] Reassure us because they are not alone in

[11:53] jail right now.

[11:56] I think we'd all like to know that

[11:58] figure and be positive about it,

[12:01] but I don't think it's about being more

[12:03] transparent. And beyond that,

[12:08] I am ashamed because our country just

[12:11] bombed Iran and they killed and

[12:15] bombed a girls' school, they

[12:17] bombed a maternity district,

[12:21] they violated international law in a

[12:25] similar place where we have been

[12:27] funding Israel to commit genocide

[12:29] in Palestine.

[12:31] I would like the people here to

[12:34] represent the diversity of

[12:36] Israeli businesses that are here in the town.

[12:39] I believe we should not be doing business with

[12:42] people who are killing children in

[12:44] schools and hospitals.

[12:46] I think we should also

[12:48] pay our federal taxes until

[12:49] our executive branch stops

[12:52] breaking the laws

[12:56] and expanding and using

[12:59] methon.

[13:01] And also an extension of looking for

[13:03] free housing that

[13:07] is paid for through the

[13:11] rent control, if they support

[13:15] rent control, because we do

[13:17] n't need it as

[13:20] well as the project was frozen, we

[13:26] developed the same ones at the same time, we are already on

[13:29] time.

[13:30] We were already on time.

[13:32] Excuse me, I'm trying to be fair

[13:35] to everyone. He's a little

[13:38] respectful.

[13:43] Okay. We have Jennifer Kids 63.

[13:47] Arthur Street, good night. Thank you.

[13:50] I would like to speak briefly about the

[13:54] meetings of the committees of the

[13:58] board. This is important to help make

[14:00] decisions that affect

[14:02] neighboring residents throughout our city.

[14:05] Quotes refer to people who respect

[14:07] rules, understand processes, and are

[14:09] prepared to shoulder our

[14:11] responsibilities with a role of

[14:12] professionalism and integrity.

[14:15] Any question needs to be

[14:17] clarified in the presence

[14:20] of public trust,

[14:22] even in small meetings. My

[14:25] second comment would continue to

[14:28] review the public and

[14:31] cause-related comments.

[14:33] That was a bit of direct access

[14:36] to this body. Some changes to

[14:38] these rules should be carefully considered so

[14:41] that participation can be

[14:44] greater and not limited. eh requests to

[14:48] feel receptive or intimidating. Uh,

[14:51] you can unmute people so they can

[14:54] fully participate. When a

[14:56] resident feels heard and respected,

[14:58] the government works better.

[15:01] Selective officers

[15:05] with the professional point and the

[15:09] leadership point, including

[15:11] essential public communication, the

[15:13] advisors bearing a

[15:16] higher responsibility and standard. Thank you for

[15:18] your core.

[15:20] Thank you so much.

[15:22] We have

[15:25] Spencer Fox Peterson online.

[15:29] Good evening, Spencer Fox 51 on the

[15:33] Street. I just want to put a couple of

[15:35] things on the table. He appreciated that

[15:37] people mentioned him in

[15:39] public comments.

[15:40] Our executive branch is out of

[15:43] control, that's what you

[15:45] mean, but also the

[15:47] public comment. Some of the rules didn't

[15:52] specifically address my

[15:58] avatar, and I'm very proud to be part of

[16:01] the LGBT community.

[16:03] K. I don't know if I'm on a positive vibe or whatever

[16:08] , whatever. That, that's... that

[16:15] 's freedom of speech. So no,

[16:18] some people can't even respect

[16:19] the first one here where they are under this

[16:22] earth, I leave this constitution. The

[16:25] end of the story. This

[16:27] discussion about public commentary. He

[16:31] appreciated that

[16:33] access and more participation is the

[16:35] best thing for us.

[16:38] These rules should not be used

[16:40] instead. Anyone should

[16:41] speak up. This is ridiculous. Ridiculous, those 2

[16:44] minutes. But I'm going to make a

[16:47] comment before they comment on

[16:50] their civilization. It is not the role of the

[16:53] government. If

[16:57] you mention God on these

[16:59] walls, that's the end of the story.

[17:02] You need a

[17:06] fresh perspective on the Constitution and the

[17:08] document, and you should be

[17:09] ashamed and listen to the

[17:13] constituents. We are good people and

[17:14] we are good for the city. Thank you for

[17:16] your time.

[17:25] Wait a second.

[17:36] With your hand raised.

[17:41] Yes, thanks. I'm in District 6.

[17:44] Can you

[17:46] hear me? I

[17:50] just want

[17:53] the advisor with the initiative of

[17:55] Order 51

[17:59] that offers to create

[18:01] a body with people with

[18:03] lived experiences in our most

[18:06] vulnerable communities. It is my belief that this must have been

[18:09] done in the

[18:12] opium process, from the opium funds. I

[18:14] really want to take notes on the

[18:16] initiative that's there.

[18:20] And to show my appreciation for this

[18:24] and for everyone who is doing

[18:25] the work of having the

[18:28] difficult conversations of public commentary, it is my

[18:30] belief also that we cannot

[18:35] obstruct the public process, and I thank

[18:38] the people who are taking the

[18:39] time to look at that and the

[18:41] barriers that it creates

[18:44] for vulnerable populations who do

[18:47] not have

[18:50] a direction to come here. Minute.

[18:52] Thank you.

[18:54] No comments. I just want to

[18:56] say I appreciate the log.

[18:59] Thank you.

[19:07] We have another person. No, that's

[19:12] cone puerperation.

[19:17] to take point 59 out of order.

[19:22] As has been done and circumvented to

[19:25] take point

[19:28] 59.

[19:34] Motion first the motion to suspend

[19:36] the rules. Everyone in favor. Does

[19:39] anyone object?

[19:44] Okay. Item 59 was the council

[19:46] ordered that in accordance with MEGL4

[19:52] they accept the fiscal year

[19:53] 26 provisions of the executive office of

[19:57] public safety and security of $50,000

[20:01] and establishment of the funds

[20:04] and receipts of expenses. Thank

[20:08] you, Mr. President.

[20:10] Item 59 is a mark from Governor

[20:14] Maurili in the amount of 50,000 for the

[20:17] Hollywood Police Department.

[20:20] That one was founded by Senator John

[20:24] Villis. This location includes 30,000

[20:26] for or a new gym equipment and I

[20:30] can tell you that having to ask

[20:31] the high agents this

[20:35] gym equipment has been there since the

[20:38] police department was built,

[20:41] which was in 1980, 1999, something like that,

[20:44] so that's what it's for. And there is

[20:49] no award for traffic equipment safety

[20:52] .

[20:55] The security team wears

[21:00] yellow vests that people will

[21:01] use to identify the police, and

[21:03] obviously for weekends, parades,

[21:06] or any

[21:11] traffic issues that need to be

[21:13] addressed. They're already quite worn, but

[21:16] Sergeant Sergio is here if anyone

[21:17] has any questions. Thank you, thank you

[21:20] for being here, Sergeant.

[21:23] Conselo, Smith. Thank you. And to the

[21:27] president through the body, uh, if

[21:30] we can suspend

[21:33] the rules so that the talent can

[21:34] speak, because it is my understanding, it is to

[21:36] pass it tonight rather than move it

[21:39] to finance.

[21:41] So, to make sure there's enough

[21:43] before

[21:45] the parade, we've suspended

[21:47] the rules so everyone can come here and

[21:49] talk to the council in favor.

[21:52] Someone objects.

[21:56] Hello.

[22:02] Sorry, sergeant.

[22:05] Not yet.

[22:07] Good night. Thank you. Yes.

[22:11] The boss is asking for a vote

[22:13] tonight. If we can vote

[22:16] tonight, we would normally go through the

[22:18] normal process, but the

[22:23] 20,000 is for

[22:26] safety vests. We're trying to get them

[22:29] here before the parade, and it's the

[22:32] urgency that came with it, and we're grateful for the

[22:35] process and all the time it took

[22:37] . This is not

[22:38] self-cleansing.

[22:40] That's Senator Lisa's brand and she

[22:44] helped us get it into the budget, and

[22:46] the other 30 will be for

[22:49] Gy's team, what the gym is for, what's going to be

[22:51] bought on YouTube. Is

[22:54] there anyone else? Does

[23:00] anyone else have any questions about

[23:02] the sergeant? I don't

[23:08] see any. Motion to approve.

[23:15] Motion to receive, accept and pass the

[23:18] first reading. Thank you.

[23:21] Motion to receive, accept and pass the

[23:24] first reading.

[23:27] So, in favor, I,

[23:29] someone, put forward a motion to pass the

[23:32] first reading.

[23:34] Second,

[23:40] the secretary is going to call roll. You are voting

[23:42] if you are voting to opt for item 50

[23:47] tonight. Say yes.

[23:55] yes, yes.

[24:03] Esra Rivera, yes. Jenny Rivera, yes.

[24:08] Sulo, yes. Toimo, yes. Bacen, yes. Andersen

[24:15] Burgos, yes. Unanimous vote.

[24:22] With that, 59 will be spent testing the

[24:25] alternative.

[24:26] Thank you.

[24:30] Give the agenda.

[24:34] Item three is the minutes of February

[24:39] 17. Are

[24:41] there any

[24:42] corrections, comments, additions, or

[24:46] a motion to receive or adopt?

[24:49] There's a second, everyone's in favor. Someone

[24:54] objects,

[24:56] so let's continue.

[24:59] Four of what I know is still on

[25:01] the table

[25:05] and five. Yes.

[25:09] Six.

[25:13] Mayor Garcia presented a letter of

[25:14] appointment to Kevin Ray, 52nd Ave., to

[25:17] serve on the district commission. You will

[25:19] appoint Mr. King to replace

[25:22] Mr. Stefan Fe and complete the remainder

[25:24] of his term, which expires on

[25:26] Jubilee 1, 2028. Send to public service for

[25:29] seconds. Everyone in favor. I. Anyone up for it

[25:31] ?

[25:36] And it will be on April 9. Okay. I just

[25:41] wanted to let the public know. It will be

[25:43] on April 9th,

[25:46] and we will also take

[25:51] everyone's approval.

[25:54] Alon

[25:58] Seven is also an appointment

[26:01] by Mr. R 52 to serve the historical commission.

[26:07] He will replace Ms. Rodriguez and

[26:11] complete the recourse.

[26:15] We discussed that for a minute. No

[26:17] problem.

[26:20] Let's make a motion to receive, and that's

[26:24] under discussion.

[26:26] How much do we have? Second under discussion.

[26:29] Third, go up.

[26:32] As I understand it right now, the

[26:36] historical commission has not been able to make any

[26:39] decision. They had been having several problems for a while

[26:45] ,

[26:50] so they had been singing for so long and

[26:52] couldn't find anyone. I know that

[26:55] our usual protocol is to forward the

[26:57] package to

[26:59] a public service,

[27:02] but in this case I would like the information

[27:05] at least,

[27:07] maybe not for local, but maybe

[27:10] for the other appointment tonight.

[27:14] Lift with your hand. I honestly

[27:18] disagree.

[27:19] I prefer to send him to the public service.

[27:22] Okay, fine. Let the

[27:25] body decide

[27:29] if they want to do that. That's why

[27:31] accepting the

[27:35] late one is similar. There's

[27:42] some other discussion going on.

[27:46] Thank you. Through the president

[27:49] of the public services department, there is some

[27:53] possibility of an

[27:54] earlier meeting. The only reason they're

[27:55] asking is because we're waiting on all

[27:58] the CPA projects; we can't

[28:01] move forward until the

[28:03] historical commission can meet and do the work they

[28:05] need to do.

[28:07] that we are, uh, in a

[28:11] waiting period.

[28:12] I can suggest that the six who bought it

[28:15] could try it out

[28:18] with a copy for public service so

[28:21] that people can come. I

[28:26] just made it up, but I don't know.

[28:30] Councilor Renici,

[28:34] we can put up

[28:36] temporary signage until we code it under

[28:38] public utilities to follow. I do

[28:42] n't think we can make

[28:44] temporary signage, but

[28:47] I think cones would be a good suggestion

[28:49] .

[28:52] Mr. President,

[28:54] I support your idea that we approve the

[28:56] pending signage indicating

[28:59] that

[29:04] the appointee will come to

[29:06] the interview and continue the

[29:08] process. Thank you.

[29:11] Okay, but Conheimer, those are

[29:15] leaning because the head of the committee just

[29:19] told us, he would like it to

[29:21] go to public services. I think it's

[29:23] important to listen to the president and

[29:27] follow the procedure. Thank you,

[29:30] Concelo Sulión.

[29:33] So that everyone understands my

[29:34] suggestion.

[29:38] We have two signs for two

[29:40] different commissions and it's the same

[29:42] person, so he's going to come to the

[29:44] public services office for the

[29:47] district commission. We're not going to

[29:51] try to approve that tonight. It's just

[29:53] the one from the historical commission where it's

[29:56] next to all the things that are being

[29:58] held up, SPA and the

[30:00] demolition permits and the things that are

[30:02] being stopped.

[30:04] Penich Council.

[30:08] I'd like to make a legal point here.

[30:13] Once we confirm someone,

[30:18] we can do the interview later,

[30:20] but we have confirmed

[30:22] and done it without the information before

[30:26] doing the public service hearing

[30:27] . I'm neutral on that, but

[30:30] considering the discussion I just wanted to

[30:33] point it out.

[30:38] Okay. Its

[30:42] final point.

[30:45] Uh, I've been, I've been for 13 months

[30:50] someone who left,

[30:53] counselor Gramsm. Yes, thank you, Madam

[30:55] President.

[30:57] Finally, I don't understand why the

[30:58] entire council is involved in the process

[31:02] that's happening, but we

[31:04] 're also using an ordinance to

[31:06] combine the

[31:10] historical commission and the local historical commission

[31:15] in the coming months.

[31:19] So I hear the arguments

[31:22] about wanting to follow the processes,

[31:25] but I also understand that

[31:27] somehow there is room to

[31:30] move things forward while

[31:33] we are in a week

[31:36] starting that process to reform

[31:39] this group. So thank you.

[31:44] I don't know, but I think they

[31:46] called me; I think it was this afternoon that

[31:49] the mayor reappointed someone else as

[31:52] historical commissioner. Yes, that's

[31:54] correct.

[31:55] Uh, I wouldn't have accepted it if I hadn't been

[31:59] under the impression that it had to

[32:00] happen quickly and I would

[32:03] have just waited for the

[32:05] next meeting, but that was the only

[32:08] reason why I accepted that

[32:14] article, but if you want to send it to

[32:16] public safety and wait I

[32:19] need it in front of me.

[32:22] Yes,

[32:25] as long as she comes before me,

[32:28] before us. Yes, I understand.

[32:34] Okay. So I'm going to entertain

[32:38] a commandment to that emotion in order

[32:42] to receive

[32:44] approval

[32:48] and send it to

[32:53] the public service for the

[32:57] property interview.

[32:58] Second.

[33:03] OK thanks.

[33:07] And ma'am

[33:09] and secretary, we need a

[33:11] call button for that.

[33:14] No, they don't need to.

[33:17] be clear, we are

[33:19] only voting for

[33:22] Article 7 and we are sending it to

[33:26] committee. Okay,

[33:28] so everyone, do me a favor. If someone

[33:31] says no, it

[33:38] goes to the committee.

[33:43] Okay, on the next page,

[33:47] that

[33:49] lawyer from Massachusetts

[33:51] responded about an open

[33:56] motion meeting to receive.

[33:59] Everyone in favor. Does anyone object?

[34:03] Okay, that won't get us anywhere. So

[34:06] the one from the fire commissioner's board is new

[34:08] .

[34:10] Motion of the meeting of 21, motion to

[34:13] receive. Everyone in favor. Already. Anyone up for it?

[34:17] Article 10

[34:19] is from Alicia Seller's

[34:23] committee development. A request to reschedule

[34:26] the CDGB fund from 2025 and the recommendation

[34:30] for 2026.

[34:34] That's where we're also going to

[34:36] see on the agenda to vote on

[34:39] Article

[34:41] 30 and something,

[34:44] which is the recommendation.

[34:55] I believe that's for receiving a 10.

[35:01] And if one of the articles is

[35:05] the DGR recommendation, then

[35:08] that has to go to DGR.

[35:11] So that needs to be done; that article 10

[35:14] has to go to DGR. Yes, because that's

[35:18] a program 10 request, it has to go

[35:21] to DGR. Concept for receiving and sending to

[35:24] DGR. Conaker, everyone's in favor. Anyone up for it

[35:28] ?

[35:31] Okay.

[35:34] Aici seller eh como de desarrollo de

[35:37] clarificación de opier y el el

[35:43] resultado que nosotros tuvo eh de

[35:46] orden, moción para recibir y enviar a

[35:49] finanzas, el acuerdo de ops.

[35:59] Okay. The OBT funds agreement

[36:01] . Do you want it sent to DGR for the

[36:04] next meeting or do you want it funded?

[36:08] The IPO agreement will be discussed at

[36:11] the next DGR meeting.

[36:15] DGR. Send it to DGR.

[36:18] Second. Thank you.

[36:21] Everyone in favor. I, someone, get on board.

[36:25] Okay. Article 12

[36:27] is the

[36:32] July that does not and the industrial corporation

[36:35] of minutes of the meetings of

[36:37] November 20, 2025. Promotion has been made

[36:40] to receive someone all, someone

[36:42] puts. Three is the minute

[36:48] of the Development authority meeting

[36:52] all in favor. Someone gets involved, so

[36:55] we move and have our

[36:57] requests. The first is 14 requests

[37:01] from River Cannibal LRS for

[37:04] marijuana establishment in a

[37:05] first aircraft to send

[37:08] second orders. Everyone in favor. Does anyone

[37:10] object?

[37:13] 15 goes to finance, so request from

[37:17] Jonathan Nieves Vidov for

[37:21] Liberty transportation services at 131 Walter

[37:23] Street. I have to see that before I

[37:27] had to see our rules

[37:29] for receiving and sending finances. Everyone

[37:32] in favor. Someone gets on board. And then 16 is

[37:37] the request

[37:40] of

[37:42] the white blow eh in 106 20 high stream

[37:46] to rebuild non-conforming structure

[37:49] in order to rebuild two

[37:51] exterior exit staircases

[37:54] send the DGR.

[37:56] Okay. Motion for DGR. Everyone in favor.

[38:00] Anyone up for it?

[38:03] Okay, let's move.

[38:05] The report from committee 17, the committee that

[38:10] issued an order and the

[38:13] order department that

[38:18] revived the definition of monalized

[38:23] in chapter 86 and recommended that the

[38:25] order be sued. Councilor, thank you.

[38:26] very much, Mr. President. In the

[38:30] public education committee there was quite a bit of

[38:33] discussion and we were looking

[38:35] to see if there were any changes and

[38:37] indeed what we decided

[38:39] was to move forward. Just

[38:41] by making it clear that it was

[38:43] aligned as the state language, so you

[38:45] can also see 17 in your package.

[38:49] All it does is amend the

[38:51] last sentence, removing

[38:54] the period after the sentence and

[38:57] after it says, including those below

[39:00] chapter 90, session one, as it simply

[39:06] means that we don't need to increase

[39:08] our definition; it always has to be

[39:09] used and

[39:12] aligned with the language of

[39:13] serious information to accept the report and to

[39:17] adapt

[39:19] the report of the committee. So

[39:22] thank you, Councillor Grasme.

[39:25] So the motion was to

[39:29] receive and adapt the committee's report

[39:31] and you said to pass the first one.

[39:35] Yes. And pass the first one. Yes.

[39:40] Second.

[39:42] Thank you. I heard there must be another

[39:44] discussion about this.

[39:47] Okay. So the motion was to pass the

[39:50] first reading. Everyone in favor. Come is

[39:53] supposed to be

[39:55] for the second reading.

[39:57] To get through the second reading. So,

[39:59] please me. It puts an option to pass the

[40:04] orderly pass.

[40:08] The secretariat will call her if they

[40:10] vote to adapt article 17.

[40:14] Yes, Pet yes,

[40:30] Israel Rivera, yes. Jenny Rivera, yes.

[40:34] Selv, yes. To Herman, yes. Yes, that's right.

[40:40] Anderson Berger, yes.

[40:42] unanimous vote.

[40:44] Okay. And with that past and 17

[40:48] now article 18 the committee in ordinance

[40:52] which was referred an ordinance for

[40:54] the committee to review an ordinance on

[40:56] vehicle repairs of streets in

[40:58] the city of residential driveways,

[41:00] particularly the changes made

[41:02] some years ago that allow certain

[41:04] repairs on public roads. This is

[41:07] recommended so that that order is still fulfilled

[41:09] with me. So,

[41:11] the Olino committee

[41:16] discussed only the

[41:19] repairs to the city streets,

[41:23] but in fact,

[41:26] the thing we were talking about is

[41:28] that there are some quick repairs that

[41:32] are specified, they are not allowed, like

[41:36] changing a window when

[41:39] someone comes to the committee, when someone

[41:42] sees that so they could have seen it

[41:46] again, but it's very misleading because there are

[41:49] quite a few people who

[41:51] rent and I don't have a place where I

[41:53] can get a window

[41:59] repaired.

[42:02] So if you have someone who needs

[42:04] someone to explain my ordination to you, they can't do it for you

[42:07] . But if that's

[42:09] where the street is, then where's it

[42:10] going to be fixed? If you don't have a place

[42:12] like a parking lot to make it

[42:16] private and something, so to

[42:18] see, but as we discussed in

[42:20] committee there was no answer either, so

[42:23] allowing

[42:27] vehicle service to potentially

[42:30] block traffic,

[42:32] including the safety of that

[42:35] person and the fact that companies

[42:38] have to specify that there are things they

[42:41] have to do and that this company

[42:44] simply isn't going to do it and be on the

[42:46] street, well, we talked about how that

[42:49] is a problem, but

[42:50] we also didn't have any

[42:53] easy answer for that, so we decided that it

[42:55] might make more sense for another one

[42:57] or that it be done specifically because

[43:01] we were focused on

[43:04] city property if we want to see that and I tried

[43:06] to find a middle ground there, but it

[43:08] seems that the OL as I was written was already

[43:11] complete, so the motion is

[43:13] to accept the committee report.

[43:16] Any other discussion

[43:19] and nothing.

[43:22] A motion for the order to have been

[43:24] carried out. Everything is in our favor. Does anyone

[43:25] object?

[43:27] So I don't see myself anymore. 19. such as the one that

[43:30] allows ordering in which an order is sent,

[43:33] eh in which an order is sent

[43:36] requested from several

[43:38] business owners to update the sale, it is to be

[43:41] gratified, eh in order to transfer

[43:44] responsibility, eh from the enforcement of

[43:46] the police department instead

[43:48] of the owners, or order the

[43:51] properties, buildings, eh warnings

[43:54] with a specific grace period,

[43:57] eh for before,

[44:01] and

[44:05] the person is already eh being

[44:09] allowed 14 days instead of 7 days.

[44:12] That was a good conversation about the

[44:15] policies and what some

[44:19] business owners are facing, wasn't it?

[44:20] What we focus on is that there

[44:22] are two sessions in that line of credit and that there

[44:25] are two PAS that can also follow a

[44:29] $300 fund

[44:32] and can also

[44:35] follow a fine and a communication

[44:39] from the board and we are

[44:41] going to look for the least aggressive step and we are

[44:45] only going to use that more

[44:47] aggressive step when we haven't had any, it

[44:50] 's consistently or something that has been

[44:54] a problem frequently or they are not

[44:56] responding and the other thing is that

[44:58] we only use the mail and that

[45:00] speaks to a scenario in which

[45:03] the mail is no longer local and it

[45:05] will possibly take longer to

[45:09] reach the final destination because it goes to Harf

[45:12] and then comes to Streamf then Hol. So

[45:16] we're talking about a

[45:18] suggestion from the health director that they

[45:21] can now make it a formal policy instead

[45:24] of giving the person 7 days, to give them

[45:26] 14 days. Seeing that currently during

[45:29] the process someone is possibly going to

[45:32] get and possibly can be

[45:34] marked 5 days ago. Now they have two

[45:37] days to respond and possibly they can't

[45:39] respond in two days, so I

[45:41] think it's uh 14 days

[45:46] in a better way and it looks like they

[45:50] want to do the best way, so the

[45:53] excitement is that the fact is fulfilled.

[45:56] Thank you for being with me.

[46:02] So even though I understand

[46:04] that everyone believes the order

[46:06] will be fulfilled, I believe it will be

[46:09] because the city of Joli is indeed

[46:12] going to the business owner. Exact.

[46:17] The city property that they have, uh,

[46:22] full walls,

[46:25] the bridges, and someone who's going to bring

[46:29] us, we're going to the taxpayers

[46:31] .

[46:33] So the property is covered in

[46:35] graffiti,

[46:37] but nothing has happened,

[46:41] we're just passing by and we're

[46:45] going to give the

[46:47] owner, the owner of the place, a benevolent gift. Did anyone

[46:51] warn me about

[46:56] the graffiti? I

[46:59] hope no one will come after me. I didn't

[47:01] mention Mir, but he's talking about

[47:04] graffiti.

[47:08] I don't see any remains. Anyone else? Has

[47:11] anyone seen him do that? It's like

[47:14] the age of teeth coming in at

[47:17] night, well, that's it

[47:19] . I see another discussion.

[47:24] Okay. It has been fulfilled

[47:28] and the communication is sent to

[47:31] the one who

[47:35] favors someone who opposes it so move it.

[47:37] Article 20 is the ordinance committee to

[47:40] which an order has been referred that

[47:46] is added to the

[47:48] sanctioning ordinance regarding

[47:50] after-work violations or points where

[47:56] they recommend that the order.

[47:59] One so we already know

[48:03] we all have it

[48:06] and I only have the time. We

[48:08] cannot act on that because we

[48:09] have already passed the point

[48:12] that if the perpetrators want to

[48:14] subdue us, they can, but at this point

[48:16] we have to remove it. So

[48:18] thank you.

[48:20] That was the

[48:22] motion to remove it, and now there's

[48:26] another discussion.

[48:29] Seeing nothing,

[48:32] so I don't pee 21

[48:35] and it begins

[48:39] that the order is removed

[48:43] and that the projects of any

[48:46] information and recovery and it is

[48:49] recommended that the order be to uh

[48:51] take classes, Mr. President, the same

[48:53] situation and the order uh uh so

[48:58] that uh pass that.

[49:02] Second. Anyone else?

[49:05] Emotion to bring everyone out in favor. I'm wondering

[49:09] if we can

[49:11] take 22 up to 25 as a package. It is

[49:16] to suspend the rules to take

[49:18] article 22, 23 and 25 as a

[49:21] motion package to suspend the rules. Everyone

[49:23] in favor. Does anyone object?

[49:26] So I'm going to read it quickly.

[49:30] Many of them are recommended to be

[49:32] removed. 22

[49:36] commits ordinance, which was referred to

[49:38] the order that the pieces in home be

[49:42] spoken.

[49:43] It's uh the

[49:45] one in the middle of the block homeset2

[49:50] of 23

[49:52] was an order that the

[49:54] city engineer look at the visibility

[49:57] over

[50:00] uh the sidewalk approaching HCC

[50:05] and 24 is that the city councilor

[50:09] refers one that the council have a

[50:13] new crossing and 25 and the ordinance that

[50:18] the city engineer review the uh

[50:21] the parking situation on

[50:22] West

[50:25] Glen Street and all those that it was

[50:29] recommended that the order be taken out, so

[50:32] thank you.

[50:34] So this was added to remove him

[50:38] as councilor. They were all able to communicate

[50:42] to the committee that they are directed towards

[50:47] public education and as it turns out,

[50:50] we are going to remove him.

[50:53] Second.

[50:55] Okay. Emoción has become second to

[50:57] bring out any other species.

[51:02] Okay, not seeing any excitement. Everyone

[51:04] in favor.

[51:06] Anyone up for it? So we don't see each other.

[51:11] 25. Thank you. Ordinances.

[51:15] Finance 26. The finance committee which

[51:19] referred to an order that the city

[51:23] councillor of the city received eh 000

[51:27] in return for culture, district and

[51:31] investments and it was recommended that the

[51:33] order be adapted councillor

[51:38] to pass the first reading or that

[51:40] after second

[51:43] has

[51:44] to pass the first reading. My motion has been

[51:47] made and seconded,

[51:50] and if there was discussion with Iván,

[51:53] this Fen Colón was there the other night

[51:56] when we had this meeting, and

[51:59] what the incentive is, which is not, was not

[52:02] an incentive that will be used for

[52:04] culture, the district of Puerto Rico, and

[52:08] Celina's trip, and I fund it to

[52:11] support small businesses and the

[52:14] best with other incentives. to

[52:16] help with the residents,

[52:19] with the

[52:22] recent brochures and that's the reason why

[52:24] this incentive is there

[52:29] and yes the motion has been made however

[52:30] to pass the first reading to

[52:32] any further discussion

[52:35] in favor. Me, does anyone object? Motion

[52:38] to proceed to the second reading. Mo to

[52:41] move on to the second reading. The

[52:43] secretary is going to call the rules and vote that they were

[52:45] voting to vote on article 26. Divine

[52:52] sim

[52:56] or she has just left the room.

[52:58] BCN

[53:06] Isabel Rivera, yes. Jenis Rivera, yes.

[53:13] Bak by Andersenberger. Yes.

[53:18] So, yes, a vote was cast, and with that, the

[53:21] 26th

[53:23] and 27th passed. It was the finance committee which gave

[53:26] an indication that there is a

[53:29] transfer of 50,000 as follows for the

[53:33] stabilization of

[53:36] legal fees for prosecutors. It is recommended that

[53:38] the order be adapted to Councillor Ivan

[53:41] without a motion to pass the first

[53:42] reading. The motion is to pass the first

[53:45] reading under the table.

[53:50] We're having a

[53:51] finance meeting and possibly two to three

[53:53] minutes after the start of finance

[53:57] we had information

[54:00] from TJ about some of the things that are

[54:04] coming and one of the things he

[54:06] said is a transfer of

[54:10] cannabis stabilization

[54:12] funds and services that are going to be

[54:15] paid for KPL law services

[54:19] and they are experts on this issue and as a

[54:22] councilman it may be work to pass on

[54:26] the city's community charges

[54:29] for capillary services

[54:33] and that it was on the issue of

[54:39] municipal laws

[54:43] now

[54:46] and right now has more funds for

[54:49] this department to

[54:52] make the transfer.

[54:59] Okay, thanks councilman. Does

[55:02] anyone else have anything to add?

[55:04] Advice.

[55:07] Mr. President. I am absolutely going to

[55:09] do it quickly because I don't want to

[55:11] create a new committee, but I

[55:13] just want to keep saying in

[55:16] public resources

[55:18] that there are quite a few people I don't

[55:19] understand. The city is no longer charging fees imposed

[55:21] because

[55:24] after the fines were

[55:27] collected. Businesses started

[55:29] talking about how we weren't

[55:31] legally allowed to address those impacts, and they

[55:34] started suing the city and

[55:37] winning. It's quite

[55:39] complicated at this point; they've given a

[55:42] lot of the money they've connected.

[55:45] Some of Hollyw has been in a good

[55:47] position currently,

[55:50] and the department is doing a lot of work.

[55:52] There's a reason why

[55:56] we're working with KPL,

[55:59] knowing legally what we

[56:03] have to do. But it's

[56:04] important to understand

[56:06] that we're no longer collecting public park fees

[56:08] from their businesses. So

[56:11] yes,

[56:13] those are good businesses on the seventh floor

[56:15] that are paying taxes, and

[56:18] we get a portion of the

[56:21] taxes that come with that project.

[56:24] That kind of thing. Besides

[56:28] the forms,

[56:32] that's what happened for the city.

[56:34] We were able to try to bring in the

[56:37] funds, but it's not like the impacts

[56:39] we're bringing, which

[56:42] unfortunately... that already happened a

[56:44] few years ago; it's in the process, it's

[56:46] not happening anymore. So I just

[56:48] want to keep saying that until members

[56:50] of the public understand that, because

[56:52] we keep

[56:54] asking, where is that money? We do

[56:59] n't understand why we're using the

[57:01] background to direct the g that's happening, that's why

[57:05] .

[57:08] Thank you. and carries one hand. Councilman

[57:09] Rivera.

[57:11] Yes, Councilor Rivera understands all that and

[57:15] doesn't speak against it. I

[57:18] tell him where that money is and I'll

[57:20] end with that. Thanks

[57:26] beacon.

[57:29] So I'm going to be quick and

[57:30] just say that

[57:33] the cow is no longer

[57:38] doing the cow thing, and that was

[57:41] a big topic, and that's why we're going to keep

[57:46] hearing from the public about this.

[57:48] Thank you.

[57:52] And there being no other provision. The

[57:54] motion was to pass the first

[57:56] reading. Everyone in favor. Motion to

[57:58] proceed to the second reading.

[58:01] Anyone up for it? Okay.

[58:04] The motion was to proceed to

[58:07] the second reading. If you

[58:10] vote yes, vote to vote 27

[58:14] and yes.

[58:31] Isel Rivera.

[58:33] Jen Rivera,

[58:39] yes

[58:43] unanimously.

[58:47] Unanimous vote there. And that's what happened,

[58:53] Madam President, we

[58:55] can take 28 and 29 as a

[58:59] package.

[59:01] The other one, I don't know when we had another

[59:04] motion, was the rule to take articles

[59:08] 28 and 29 as a package, all in favor.

[59:12] Anyone up for it?

[59:16] During our user, we

[59:19] were allowed to have two of these items and

[59:22] that's what happened,

[59:24] both are going for unemployment compensation,

[59:29] there's another discussion,

[59:32] so I'm going to have a motion to pass

[59:35] the second reading. Can't

[59:38] .

[59:41] We're going to be the first ones to do this.

[59:49] I think we can discuss this

[59:51] instead of just taking a button or object

[59:55] there in this article.

[1:00:00] So I'm going to have a motion. We're going to

[1:00:03] do 28 first because we need to

[1:00:05] have votes to read it to the record because we have

[1:00:08] n't had the time to

[1:00:10] read your article. 28

[1:00:13] is the finance committee, which has

[1:00:14] one that refers to us

[1:00:17] transferring $18,000 250

[1:00:21] from patrol pay to

[1:00:25] compensation.

[1:00:27] After the first reading. The

[1:00:32] motion to pass the second reading is opposed.

[1:00:34] Okay. The motion has been made to proceed to the

[1:00:37] second reading. The secretary will

[1:00:39] call roll if you vote. Yes, you

[1:00:40] vote on item 28.

[1:00:44] Grannym

[1:00:54] síel

[1:01:07] Rivera. Yes, yes,

[1:01:15] Anders

[1:01:23] unanimous vote.

[1:01:27] 29 for the 29th

[1:01:32] take point 29 second.

[1:01:36] What happens on the first reading?

[1:01:40] I'll do it one of those days.

[1:01:45] Any other arguments

[1:01:48] in favor? Anyone up for it?

[1:01:52] Pass the second reading. Motion to

[1:01:55] proceed to the second reading by the

[1:01:56] secretary: whether to vote yes for

[1:01:58] item 29.

[1:02:02] Yes.

[1:02:16] Israel.

[1:02:29] Thanks, it happened on the 29th. I

[1:02:32] have a note here and I think they're talking about

[1:02:35] point 30.

[1:02:38] Motion to send it back to the

[1:02:40] auditor.

[1:02:43] First, the finance committee

[1:02:45] refers to the order that there be a

[1:02:48] transfer of 56

[1:02:51] 5500

[1:02:52] as follows

[1:02:54] to pay for the existence of CPO to

[1:02:57] pay the profit from the collection of

[1:03:00] the payroll specialist,

[1:03:03] treasurer, auditor who recommends that the

[1:03:05] auditor advisor be returned.

[1:03:10] That was the suggestion.

[1:03:14] The finance committee because we had

[1:03:16] some questions about the trip outside,

[1:03:20] so we wanted to take care of the

[1:03:22] first floor,

[1:03:24] but not the

[1:03:26] trip outside zero and there's another

[1:03:28] order, I think there's

[1:03:32] more discussion coming, I

[1:03:37] think that's 661.

[1:03:43] The rule and take 60 61.

[1:03:48] We're going to make 6 safe,

[1:03:51] but we're going to have to use then

[1:03:53] so

[1:03:56] we can see with 31 because the

[1:03:59] excitement to return is gone. Is

[1:04:02] there any discussion about that? He does

[1:04:05] n't see any. Everyone in favor.

[1:04:09] Someone is already objecting.

[1:04:12] And the motion was made to suspend the

[1:04:14] rules

[1:04:16] and take 70 61

[1:04:21] as a package.

[1:04:24] Uh, 60. I'm considering a

[1:04:27] transfer request of $21,000 to pay the

[1:04:30] 60 FPO for

[1:04:34] out-of-state travel, and the

[1:04:37] Venezuelan conservator requested a transfer of $34,800

[1:04:41] to pay the assistant CPO to pay

[1:04:45] the earnings collection, the

[1:04:49] specialized payroll treasurer

[1:04:50] auditor, to take points. 60. I

[1:04:55] 'm not sure.

[1:04:57] Leon suddenly realized he

[1:05:03] could handle that.

[1:05:08] is the decision I voted against

[1:05:11] in the first one we took up with the auditor. That's what

[1:05:16] we would like to see him return to the

[1:05:18] committee.

[1:05:20] I had a few arguments just about that

[1:05:23] .

[1:05:25] The out-of-state trip is a

[1:05:28] conference at a Las Vegas hotel,

[1:05:31] but it sounds like

[1:05:34] a place to have a good

[1:05:36] conference is not unusual in this field,

[1:05:39] but it has to do with Munis and the

[1:05:42] company

[1:05:44] that they do it abnormally and

[1:05:48] we had a group of people who

[1:05:51] went and the results

[1:05:55] and benefits of this.

[1:05:58] We would like to hear from you, so we

[1:06:01] inform people in

[1:06:03] any way possible, and for me the

[1:06:06] most serious question is if we are not going to

[1:06:09] spend $21,000 to send a

[1:06:12] team of people to

[1:06:14] the Tyler

[1:06:21] ERP company. They have offices

[1:06:24] in Albany, New York,

[1:06:31] New Hampshire, Providence,

[1:06:34] Harford, Connecticut, so it

[1:06:36] might cost a little more. I don't know

[1:06:38] how much more they

[1:06:41] could have here so that more

[1:06:42] people can train.

[1:06:45] I think it's worth doing a

[1:06:48] deeper forest. It makes sense to take a

[1:06:50] second to send the song to the 60 committee,

[1:06:57] please, if

[1:06:59] anyone objects, so let's continue.

[1:07:02] So, 61st

[1:07:05] motion to pass the first reading.

[1:07:08] Mo sech to pass the first reading

[1:07:12] was on Zoom and I can no longer break if I

[1:07:15] was here.

[1:07:17] He talked about that and also

[1:07:21] gave us information 5 minutes before

[1:07:23] our meeting.

[1:07:29] He also decided to transfer funds

[1:07:32] from the off-SA budget so that

[1:07:36] employees could attend the

[1:07:39] Tyler Conference 2026, and I believe it

[1:07:42] was April 7th and April 10th. This is a

[1:07:44] 4-day conference that includes

[1:07:48] several days of working sessions

[1:07:50] related to Tyler RP Municis and

[1:07:55] problem learning, and it leads

[1:07:57] Municis experts to the opportunity of

[1:08:00] books.

[1:08:02] This would be a question about point 60. Yes.

[1:08:07] Or he was talking about that. Sorry, I didn't

[1:08:09] mean to interrupt.

[1:08:12] That's what he told us. Five minutes

[1:08:15] before

[1:08:17] that, he went to have sex with me, just

[1:08:22] to talk a little bit more than 61.

[1:08:24] Indeed, why did we take the

[1:08:26] money, the funds from the assistant

[1:08:31] prosecutor's office? It's because

[1:08:34] the role of our current budget

[1:08:40] is

[1:08:45] that, uh, then it's 34,800

[1:08:48] to the other girls

[1:08:51] and they didn't see me where they were edited.

[1:08:55] if we hire someone

[1:09:01] to supplement them at that new

[1:09:04] salary.

[1:09:08] So we're hiring in Elogrado.

[1:09:12] Suddenly we're going to have a [unclear - possibly "one

[1:09:15] depending on the experience"]

[1:09:18] to hire those children.

[1:09:22] So 17,100 will be moved

[1:09:25] to the specialist

[1:09:28] for the payment of R

[1:09:32] and 7200 to the treasurer's line and

[1:09:35] 6400 to the auditor's line.

[1:09:38] Thank you. Considered. Alma

[1:09:41] motion to proceed to first reading.

[1:09:43] Everyone in favor. Does anyone object?

[1:09:47] Motion to pass the second letter.

[1:09:48] Motion to proceed to the second reading.

[1:09:50] which secretary if it is voted like this or was voted

[1:09:54] for point 61

[1:09:59] grm

[1:10:03] Yes, yes, Israel Rivera, yes, Rivera, yes,

[1:10:17] Sullian, yes, yes

[1:10:20] ,

[1:10:21] No, it

[1:10:30] passed. I'm going

[1:10:34] back to

[1:10:37] the 31st.

[1:10:44] is the finance committee where a

[1:10:47] referred order for an

[1:10:50] outside auditor request to provide a

[1:10:51] status update for 2023-2024

[1:10:54] in person or in writing as soon as possible. It is

[1:10:57] recommended that this order be compared

[1:11:01] motion to pass the first reading, it is not

[1:11:03] purchased with zero VAT, apparently

[1:11:07] speaking with heroic, that is why they

[1:11:10] already know

[1:11:12] that it has been fulfilled to

[1:11:20] know this.

[1:11:24] Thank you, Mr. President.

[1:11:27] Arch a subsequent order that I

[1:11:30] think is in the jacket. Thank you.

[1:11:33] The order

[1:11:35] recommends that it be complied with. Everyone in

[1:11:38] favor. Does

[1:11:40] anyone object?

[1:11:43] 32. It is the finance committee that refers to

[1:11:46] an order.

[1:11:48] Should I take that one at 33 or not?

[1:11:54] I am referring to an order to the

[1:11:57] police department to explain how

[1:12:03] the bills are paid at the request of the council, so that

[1:12:06] some information can be shared with

[1:12:07] the office.

[1:12:10] D a cash transfer.

[1:12:13] I recommended that the order be carried out.

[1:12:17] Something to add, like that

[1:12:20] was for the advice,

[1:12:24] something I want to add

[1:12:28] because I want to add that this is

[1:12:30] filed,

[1:12:32] that starting the state

[1:12:37] makes the problem be solved.

[1:12:43] Everything has been done in our favor. Does anyone

[1:12:44] object?

[1:12:46] After 33, the finance committee

[1:12:49] referred to an order and other officials

[1:12:52] in the DLS letters of 922 and 25 and

[1:12:59] October 10, 2025 prohibited a

[1:13:02] report from the city council of the

[1:13:05] state.

[1:13:07] It is recommended that the order be carried out. I

[1:13:10] agree that something is the same with and to know

[1:13:19] Mr. President,

[1:13:21] this order to resolve for the

[1:13:27] letter under 50 of the state and the activity

[1:13:29] that is happening right now

[1:13:33] is in control, the contract wants

[1:13:36] to recognize our stories. Thank you.

[1:13:39] So that people know

[1:13:42] having those meetings

[1:13:45] and we didn't have one last week,

[1:13:48] so I have a space we have

[1:13:51] that has been fulfilled. Everyone's in

[1:13:53] favor,

[1:13:56] so let's continue. Thanks to finance.

[1:14:02] of relationships. Point 34

[1:14:05] the committee in relations

[1:14:08] referred to a special permit

[1:14:10] for a mental station in front of his

[1:14:14] house a permit for parked on the 17

[1:14:19] Martin Avenir recommendation that was

[1:14:21] granted with people. Thank you. That's

[1:14:25] my first date, I'm taking a

[1:14:30] present, thanks to those who

[1:14:32] helped me, and now I'm back here because of

[1:14:34] the NIV.

[1:14:36] The applicant arrived for the meeting and

[1:14:40] also went up

[1:14:45] and

[1:14:48] with the letter and

[1:14:53] the appropriate documentation,

[1:14:56] so we are encouraged to approve the

[1:14:58] special permit.

[1:15:02] Any other suggestions?

[1:15:05] I see another hand. Penich. Yes, Mr.

[1:15:08] President.

[1:15:10] This is precisely, uh, totally, uh,

[1:15:15] a procedural question.

[1:15:18] This is the first special permit we have

[1:15:21] made and under 9.3 of the

[1:15:25] SONEN ordinance that the

[1:15:28] special permit government provides that

[1:15:30] special permits must be granted by the

[1:15:33] authority unless

[1:15:36] otherwise specified in writing

[1:15:39] indeterminate to benefit the

[1:15:40] city or neighborhood

[1:15:43] taking into account the characteristics of the size and

[1:15:47] the proposal

[1:15:49] in addition to other

[1:15:52] specific matters.

[1:15:54] For consideration, the following can be

[1:16:00] resolved in proposal

[1:16:02] two: security

[1:16:05] 13

[1:16:07] eh adequacy of utilities and other

[1:16:10] public services of the neighborhood and

[1:16:13] social and

[1:16:15] structural characteristics. Five, impacts on the

[1:16:19] natural environment, six, potential

[1:16:22] fiscal impact, including impact on

[1:16:24] services, taxes and employees.

[1:16:28] We need to do that

[1:16:30] written ending. It's a good

[1:16:32] proportion, she

[1:16:34] 's happy to vote

[1:16:37] and I don't know how

[1:16:40] fast the practices have been that

[1:16:44] we gave a special permit.

[1:16:46] Where does Jeffre work this out with the

[1:16:49] committee chair, or whether we

[1:16:52] should have voted on any of these

[1:16:54] things when we granted a

[1:16:56] special permit, or if they are voted on now? I don't know, and I

[1:17:00] should bring it tonight. Thanks

[1:17:04] for my experience. When yesterday I was the

[1:17:06] president of R

[1:17:09] when we voted on a special permit

[1:17:12] it was with the understanding that the

[1:17:13] permit we are following in that

[1:17:15] section

[1:17:19] that we agree with those

[1:17:22] particular

[1:17:26] things in mind. However, I do

[1:17:34] n't know if the lawyer... I'm not sure, I

[1:17:38] 'm not sure. I don't

[1:17:40] know which one, I'm not clear on what

[1:17:44] you want to do,

[1:17:48] so I'm not sure.

[1:17:51] The legal department wants to

[1:17:54] mention it, but I think it was Manuel

[1:17:56] . Well, I was already there, not

[1:17:58] only to answer the question again,

[1:18:01] but just to bring up a fact that in

[1:18:05] the public hearing we

[1:18:06] asked for comments

[1:18:09] from the committee, I wanted to add that.

[1:18:13] Okay, no problem.

[1:18:17] I would be very happy if

[1:18:20] the lawyer could give us power, so that we could

[1:18:22] go through

[1:18:24] the process that

[1:18:28] other authorities have looked at,

[1:18:31] just to have a

[1:18:36] basis for what happens with this. Okay, it didn't happen

[1:18:39] to me the other time.

[1:18:42] This was the moment that was going to bring him

[1:18:43] now.

[1:18:48] Attorney Beninet, would

[1:18:51] you like to be here? Welcome.

[1:18:54] Thank you, sir. Good evening

[1:18:55] everyone.

[1:18:57] Yes,

[1:19:01] polite. I consider Punish because of his

[1:19:05] experience in planning;

[1:19:09] he has a good understanding of the

[1:19:11] requirements.

[1:19:13] Generally,

[1:19:15] we have to hold specific meetings

[1:19:19] regarding opponents

[1:19:22] who pass special matters. What

[1:19:25] we receive the most is when we

[1:19:28] make special permits

[1:19:32] for

[1:19:34] cannabis companies,

[1:19:37] as long as

[1:19:40] this form and list we had for

[1:19:43] a special permit.

[1:19:46] There's one that's actually available

[1:19:49] for this particular one because I think there's

[1:19:51] the girl who went back to the DPW

[1:19:57] to see if the city council

[1:19:59] could look at a space

[1:20:03] on their lot out front,

[1:20:06] but we're already in

[1:20:08] compliance with that, so I'm not

[1:20:11] sure

[1:20:14] about looking at it. The

[1:20:17] special permit requirements here,

[1:20:22] at least, had to

[1:20:25] be with his front yard,

[1:20:29] but you're in a

[1:20:33] position to grant it to do those

[1:20:36] encounters, and usually it's up

[1:20:41] to the committee when they have to

[1:20:44] go with the cannabis permits,

[1:20:48] so that's taken before

[1:20:51] finding out

[1:20:58] in the determination to help that

[1:21:00] girl, our situation on his part.

[1:21:05] Thank you. So it sounds like you

[1:21:09] 're good to continue,

[1:21:12] but in the future

[1:21:14] that might be taken into account when

[1:21:17] we're voting for the committee, but it's not like we ca

[1:21:20] n't start.

[1:21:22] I'm hearing correctly tonight.

[1:21:25] Okay,

[1:21:27] I'll consider punishing man.

[1:21:30] If this is just to say that I can

[1:21:32] provide a

[1:21:36] guide for the committee. Okay,

[1:21:39] great.

[1:21:44] In the

[1:21:48] special motion that can be granted, so let's continue

[1:21:50] . Second,

[1:21:54] this is a call to action

[1:22:00] to adopt 34.

[1:22:03] Yes, Smith

[1:22:08] Biser

[1:22:12] Pinch. Yes. Cel Israel Rivera

[1:22:18] Jenny Rivera. Yes, Solido,

[1:22:22] Tamimer,

[1:22:24] Vi

[1:22:26] Anderson Brigos. Yes, unanimous vote.

[1:22:30] With vote,

[1:22:33] granted. Item 34 35 is the

[1:22:37] development and government and relations committee who

[1:22:39] referred the city council to

[1:22:42] invite the health board and the DGR to

[1:22:44] the meeting to discuss the

[1:22:46] building vacancy and recommended that the order has been

[1:22:49] complied with 0%.

[1:22:51] Yes, these members of the

[1:22:54] health will came and told us about the

[1:22:57] increased

[1:22:59] charges for the vacancies, which are from $3,000

[1:23:03] to

[1:23:05] $1000.

[1:23:07] The money that will be received that year

[1:23:10] for

[1:23:13] these forms is for the...

[1:23:19] And once the increases are seen,

[1:23:25] the owners of these buildings will go

[1:23:27] on a maintenance plan and that will be

[1:23:30] increased

[1:23:32] beforehand.

[1:23:34] The understanding

[1:23:36] is that this will increase

[1:23:39] for our buildings.

[1:23:42] They took the heart and started sending

[1:23:44] those maintenance plans,

[1:23:47] and they are trying to have their

[1:23:50] plans

[1:23:52] and the charge will be a 50% deduction,

[1:23:56] and they will look at the rehabilitation plans

[1:24:00] so that these buildings

[1:24:03] can be rehabilitated

[1:24:06] for more housing in our city. The number of

[1:24:09] vacant buildings

[1:24:12] is now 120. I

[1:24:18] 'm trying

[1:24:22] and it has calmed down

[1:24:26] to 120,000, it's

[1:24:29] also providing

[1:24:32] information integration. Who is

[1:24:35] signaling?

[1:24:38] to integrate all our

[1:24:42] projects

[1:24:44] and have everything in one place

[1:24:47] that is looking at properties. That's

[1:24:49] the main position coming up at the

[1:24:51] meeting, and Councilor Sullivan

[1:24:54] was a big part of this meeting, and I think he

[1:24:57] has some additional information,

[1:25:02] a notion

[1:25:04] that now you see

[1:25:06] here the building was worth

[1:25:09] 1.5 million and now it's worth 11.4 million,

[1:25:19] if you don't mind.

[1:25:22] Thank you, with all due respect, for your advice, Professor.

[1:25:30] Yes, we had a good update

[1:25:33] and we recommend that the order be

[1:25:35] fulfilled.

[1:25:38] We'll have to come back in a couple of

[1:25:39] months to discuss

[1:25:41] open times that move if

[1:25:43] a couple were inherited

[1:25:47] and how different

[1:25:50] departments handle that. So that

[1:25:52] already worked out, specifically.

[1:25:56] Uh, 111 Moiser uh came because there wasn't a

[1:26:01] position. It was

[1:26:04] removed, and the question was why it was

[1:26:07] removed and for what reason.

[1:26:09] We are waiting for answers on that.

[1:26:13] The same goes for Heart Plaza

[1:26:16] in another list of other buildings.

[1:26:19] The update was good, but we're

[1:26:21] looking ahead to the next couple of months.

[1:26:26] It's just a note

[1:26:29] that the treasurer's price, which isn't $6,000, is

[1:26:33] based

[1:26:35] on square footage,

[1:26:39] but it can be a higher number in

[1:26:40] some cases,

[1:26:42] especially in cases like Kor Play.

[1:26:46] That

[1:26:48] 's an example of what led to this whole

[1:26:51] conversation.

[1:26:54] Thanks for the advice. Does anyone else have

[1:26:55] anything to add?

[1:26:59] That he fulfilled all in his favor.

[1:27:02] Someone objects, so let's continue.

[1:27:07] 35, sorry, 36 is the

[1:27:11] development and

[1:27:13] government relations committee, who was recommended

[1:27:16] fiscal year 26, the

[1:27:20] Block Applications development community and it was recommended that

[1:27:23] the CD C is due to

[1:27:26] recommended locations to the house funds and

[1:27:28] notes

[1:27:31] with a great idea. Do

[1:27:35] not copy, but recommend that the committee

[1:27:39] go with the advisory committee,

[1:27:44] groups and recommendations. We had

[1:27:47] debates about dividing the money

[1:27:50] for different organizations.

[1:27:53] Israel Rivera spoke so that many

[1:27:57] people can get more, or a

[1:28:01] piece of the council,

[1:28:03] to continue with the citizens

[1:28:07] and the committee's recommendation, and

[1:28:09] then we'll go,

[1:28:12] and if anyone else on the committee wants to

[1:28:13] say something, please.

[1:28:16] Absolutely. Are

[1:28:20] there any other comments?

[1:28:25] at this point.

[1:28:30] Okay. We need a call

[1:28:32] ready for this because it is the

[1:28:36] recommendation that we

[1:28:38] are adopting

[1:28:42] the CDBG, the DGR recommendations

[1:28:47] and the funds of the resolution

[1:28:49] adopted. So we're calling the

[1:28:51] list. The secretary is going to call roll.

[1:28:53] If you vote this way, you are voting

[1:28:55] to adopt the

[1:28:57] report.

[1:29:00] Yes,

[1:29:13] C

[1:29:16] S C R

[1:29:20] J

[1:29:22] S

[1:29:28] Anders,

[1:29:32] a

[1:29:37] con, passes 56.

[1:29:43] Thank you, thank you to Pulson for making your

[1:29:47] first price. In other words, it is

[1:29:57] from the

[1:29:59] rules committee that the order for

[1:30:01] the legal department to review the

[1:30:04] previously adopted rules, especially

[1:30:06] the act, to identify the

[1:30:09] additional calculations, and ordered that the recent

[1:30:11] adoption in the modernization of the

[1:30:14] chosen act be complied with.

[1:30:16] Thank you.

[1:30:18] Uh, I consider bread. Thank you, Mr.

[1:30:20] President. If the adaptation of the bread that

[1:30:22] finally has left us

[1:30:25] with various things

[1:30:28] where it is really consistent. So

[1:30:31] we asked the lawyer to take a

[1:30:35] look and give us some

[1:30:39] advice. We really have a big

[1:30:41] package of which

[1:30:44] I have a couple of things, three of which

[1:30:46] were discussed on our agenda

[1:30:48] tonight. There are some others who

[1:30:52] raised interesting points,

[1:30:54] they stayed in the committee last night, but it didn't

[1:30:56] resolve anything, so they'll come back

[1:30:58] at a later point, but

[1:31:03] the review will be completed and the

[1:31:05] committee session will be held.

[1:31:07] Thank you. Is that

[1:31:13] another argument

[1:31:16] in the motion that has actually come to

[1:31:18] pass? Everyone's in favor, someone's against it

[1:31:21] ,

[1:31:23] so let's move on.

[1:31:28] Rules committee that the request comes to

[1:31:33] change the rule.

[1:31:36] Section 46 of July

[1:31:40] reflects the residence clause for

[1:31:42] ordinance. I recommend that the order be

[1:31:43] adopted with the

[1:31:45] gentleman present; it could be a

[1:31:49] point of order if, according to

[1:31:54] the points that were taken last night

[1:31:57] and sent to the council tonight,

[1:32:00] they were changed

[1:32:03] in a legal manner. I

[1:32:05] 'm looking at the pension under

[1:32:07] Rule

[1:32:09] 9 BG because the legal form was only proven

[1:32:13] tonight as the truck and I don't think

[1:32:16] the case had a chance to

[1:32:18] review it,

[1:32:20] so I think this should be

[1:32:24] appropriately the mass for

[1:32:25] people to

[1:32:27] review the legal form. They were indeed

[1:32:31] changed

[1:32:34] and can be reviewed after the

[1:32:35] meeting. That I find

[1:32:39] for a change later on because it

[1:32:43] eliminates the ability to fill this

[1:32:47] vacancy that I believe will occur in the

[1:32:50] treasurer on March 31, so there are a number

[1:32:52] of

[1:32:56] certain points to review that

[1:32:57] need to take place. Thank you.

[1:33:00] So,

[1:33:03] for a second

[1:33:07] the order point is noticeable,

[1:33:12] these cores, but we just got the separate parts

[1:33:18] today. It

[1:33:22] has a sense of security, but the hand of the councilman.

[1:33:28] Yes, I wanted to add it; basically,

[1:33:30] I wanted to reinforce what the council

[1:33:33] just said. I believe

[1:33:36] we haven't had 48 hours to

[1:33:40] legally review this,

[1:33:43] right?

[1:33:45] or not really to file a complaint, that's why

[1:33:48] people take the time.

[1:33:54] Thank you for raising this point. I do

[1:33:58] n't know what to have an emotion to

[1:34:01] put points 30 and

[1:34:06] 38, 39

[1:34:10] and 41. Yes, please, on the table.

[1:34:15] There is a second one.

[1:34:18] Everyone in favor. Does anyone object?

[1:34:23] Okay, we'll come back at the next

[1:34:24] meeting.

[1:34:26] All other committee

[1:34:29] reports remain with the committee, so that

[1:34:33] brings us motions, orders, and

[1:34:36] retractions as a reminder.

[1:34:39] We've at least voted on

[1:34:42] the things we needed to vote on in the

[1:34:45] chamber tonight, so we're just going to

[1:34:47] refer these to the committee for

[1:34:50] further discussion.

[1:34:52] 47

[1:34:56] orders that representatives from the DP and

[1:35:00] Jolio's emergency response team be a public safety committee member

[1:35:02] for a detailed presentation

[1:35:04] on the

[1:35:06] city's snow response protocols and a

[1:35:08] lessons learned analysis based on

[1:35:09] Jolio's response to the two

[1:35:11] most recent snow events.

[1:35:13] This analysis aims to

[1:35:15] inform and improve the council's public understanding

[1:35:17] of how technical waste removal is managed

[1:35:19] in the city. Two, to correct any possible

[1:35:22] misunderstandings. If there is any

[1:35:25] opportunity for a public exchange

[1:35:27] of information

[1:35:29] between the relevant municipal departments, the

[1:35:32] public and councilors, and the

[1:35:34] professional council and the

[1:35:36] public, the information and tools to

[1:35:38] be improved, allies of first responders

[1:35:40] and DPO professionals, send to

[1:35:43] public safety. Okay. Second,

[1:35:47] all in favor,

[1:35:52] so let's continue for 48 by the council

[1:35:53] ordering that council rule 8

[1:35:57] be amended to conform to the

[1:36:01] council's practice regarding the

[1:36:03] approval of amendments to said rules and

[1:36:06] further ordering that the council take steps to

[1:36:08] affirm that

[1:36:10] amendments to the rules adopted in the

[1:36:12] past do not comply with

[1:36:14] rule

[1:36:15] 8 as this rule is currently

[1:36:17] considered validly opt to send

[1:36:21] to the rules. Okay, so favor 49

[1:36:26] is by the council, it is ordered that

[1:36:28] sections 13 and 24 of the letter of ju be

[1:36:30] flooded as needed to

[1:36:33] adjust to any changes in

[1:36:34] section 22 and to establish that unless

[1:36:37] the letter or state law provides

[1:36:39] otherwise.

[1:36:42] The ordinance will be considered adopted

[1:36:44] by final action by a simple majority

[1:36:46] of all members of the

[1:36:48] municipal council by roll-call vote,

[1:36:50] registering

[1:36:53] the charters and rules. So, please me. Does

[1:36:57] anyone object?

[1:37:00] 50 The Rivera Council orders that the

[1:37:03] honorable municipal council issue a

[1:37:05] proclamation to the Goay wrestling team

[1:37:07] for winning the

[1:37:10] Division 3 West Wrestling Championship of the MIA and also

[1:37:14] grant individual proclamations to

[1:37:17] Santiago Jesus Morales and Parker Run in

[1:37:22] recognition of their

[1:37:23] individual championships in their respective

[1:37:25] divisions.

[1:37:29] We recommend that we take

[1:37:33] care of the

[1:37:37] zero.

[1:37:40] I recommend

[1:37:42] that the advice is

[1:37:44] Okay, thank you.

[1:37:48] Rivera alone. There is a name, eh,

[1:37:52] Santiago, that is the exact number

[1:37:55] of the student. I think I might have had to

[1:37:57] focus on the first

[1:37:59] name, but all the others are

[1:38:01] correct. Thank you all for supporting that.

[1:38:04] They really fought

[1:38:07] for the

[1:38:09] championship. I'm not sure about the

[1:38:13] outcome, but I'm going to be able to get it.

[1:38:17] Thank you. Could you look into a tip? Yes, we will.

[1:38:22] Thank you. I recommend that you receive

[1:38:25] that order. So, in favor, I am

[1:38:27] opposed.

[1:38:32] So let's continue to urge the

[1:38:33] Rivera Ordina council to have the

[1:38:37] honorable city council, in

[1:38:39] collaboration with the mayor, create a

[1:38:40] lived experience committee to

[1:38:43] advise the city on

[1:38:45] community-related efforts such as

[1:38:46] homelessness, substance use disorder,

[1:38:48] education, and quality of life.

[1:38:51] This committee is composed of

[1:38:53] full residents from certain

[1:38:55] districts, ensuring representation of

[1:38:59] the city.

[1:39:04] This, I'm going to say that

[1:39:07] public safety first, to

[1:39:09] complement if it's okay with the

[1:39:12] president and the committee, if not, it's going to be

[1:39:15] public safety because it's more about

[1:39:19] identifying, but first

[1:39:21] public safety.

[1:39:24] Okay. With a certain hammer, that would be fine

[1:39:28] . We don't do that for a minute

[1:39:31] , but yes. Let's do it.

[1:39:35] Okay. Envar public safety for everyone,

[1:39:37] please. Does

[1:39:39] anyone object?

[1:39:46] 52 is by Jenny Rivera orders that the

[1:39:48] Municipal Council of J authority

[1:39:50] approve a 6-month pilot program

[1:39:53] that allows the temporary use of two

[1:39:55] parking spaces on the

[1:39:57] public road in front of 267 as

[1:40:01] valet spaces for during business hours.

[1:40:04] It is further ordered that this

[1:40:06] pilot program aims to support the

[1:40:09] accessibility of a wellness center

[1:40:11] for older people that provides

[1:40:13] primary care services to

[1:40:15] people aged 55 and over. Uh,

[1:40:20] it is ordered that the operations of said

[1:40:22] spaces are subject to review and

[1:40:24] supervision and corresponding municipal departments

[1:40:26] including but not

[1:40:27] limited to the parking committee and

[1:40:30] that it complies with all

[1:40:31] traffic signage covered by

[1:40:34] permits or operations that the city

[1:40:36] considers necessary and it was ordered that the

[1:40:39] vehicles that use the price of be

[1:40:41] parked at the municipal hotel

[1:40:46] and that this order referred to the committee

[1:40:49] for reaction and commotion.

[1:40:53] Jarí will

[1:40:54] see that.

[1:40:59] Public safety.

[1:41:11] Yes, again before it takes a

[1:41:14] safe moment.

[1:41:18] I think it usually goes to the DGR.

[1:41:22] Thank you, Mr. President. Hey, Mr.

[1:41:24] Secretary, with a copy to the

[1:41:28] parking committee.

[1:41:31] The parking attendant, advice, I think another

[1:41:35] parking attendant.

[1:41:38] Send to TGR with a copy

[1:41:41] to the council committee. Ah, to the favor

[1:41:46] that opposes.

[1:41:48] 53 Councilor Jenny Rivera

[1:41:52] ordered that the council

[1:41:59] requested the Jolio Police Department

[1:42:02] share the

[1:42:03] relevant committee to explain the

[1:42:05] policies, procedures, and

[1:42:06] compliance practices related to fines

[1:42:09] against property owners who do not clear snow

[1:42:10] and ice from areas in accordance with

[1:42:12] municipal ordinances. It is

[1:42:13] further ordered that this matter be referred to the

[1:42:16] public safety committee for review and

[1:42:17] discussion, including how to handle

[1:42:19] repeated issues such as properties

[1:42:21] reported multiple times for non-

[1:42:23] compliance. The

[1:42:25] information is ordered to be provided to increase

[1:42:26] transparency, inform

[1:42:28] residents, and better prepare the city council for

[1:42:31] future events about which you want to send

[1:42:34] that public safety message. That's correct or

[1:42:35] right.

[1:42:37] Mr. President,

[1:42:42] I believe there is an ordinance

[1:42:46] that there is a charge of 50, a first,

[1:42:49] second confirmation,

[1:42:52] and I believe that is the order. Run me if you think

[1:42:55] , if I'm here it's actually to

[1:42:59] have a conversation about your

[1:43:00] ordinance

[1:43:02] and how you're forcing it. That's correct. Yes,

[1:43:05] that's correct.

[1:43:07] Thank you.

[1:43:11] Yes, we will certainly take that into account in terms of

[1:43:13] security for the judges

[1:43:17] in public. All in favor

[1:43:23] 54

[1:43:25] I invited to a forthcoming

[1:43:27] public safety committee meeting for a

[1:43:29] prominent discussion of the work they

[1:43:31] do in

[1:43:33] harm reduction. C send

[1:43:35] public safety.

[1:43:37] I vote in favor. Someone objects.

[1:43:41] So let's continue. 5. The council

[1:43:44] orders the charter and

[1:43:46] rules committee, the legal department, and the

[1:43:49] parks and recreation department to

[1:43:51] check if the language in the section

[1:43:53] corresponds

[1:43:57] to salary increases in

[1:44:00] municipal salvavis. Send and send the letter and

[1:44:03] rules with a copy.

[1:44:05] I see that the considered Viana is raised. I

[1:44:07] only have one question. I thought

[1:44:10] our ordinance was covered instead of

[1:44:13] our charter, but why did it stay here?

[1:44:18] It's in the letter that it considers, it may be that

[1:44:21] someone called me and they never had an

[1:44:24] increase,

[1:44:26] so I don't know where I should go, wherever I

[1:44:29] go, well, let me go.

[1:44:32] I think so, it's not in the cards.

[1:44:35] Sorry, I think

[1:44:37] the last thing that came came under

[1:44:41] ordinance, so I think we wanted to send

[1:44:43] the ordinance. Thank you. We only send

[1:44:46] ordinances that are

[1:44:49] all in favor. I, alien, become a

[1:44:53] 56-year-old counselor on the Divan.

[1:45:01] It is ordered that you have your hand raised

[1:45:04] for that reason or because of the issue we voted on. Alright

[1:45:07] .

[1:45:10] Sorry, I didn't see your hand raised.

[1:45:12] Okay, they

[1:45:14] already answered it. OK thanks.

[1:45:18] 56.

[1:45:20] Uh, it is ordered that municipal staff

[1:45:22] attending the Taylor Tech conference

[1:45:24] in April appear before the

[1:45:26] finance committee to report what they learned at

[1:45:29] said conference.

[1:45:33] Send where you want this or if you want it

[1:45:38] in finance. Yes, yes.

[1:45:43] Send all positive feedback to finance. Does

[1:45:45] anyone object?

[1:45:48] 57 Conservatives ordered that the

[1:45:52] retirement board conduct a feasibility study

[1:45:54] to fund Chapter

[1:45:57] 329

[1:45:59] C and D relating to half-salary payments

[1:46:01] for retirees, motion to send to the

[1:46:05] retirement board

[1:46:07] and obtain a response from them when they are

[1:46:09] able. Motion to send to the

[1:46:12] retirement board for a response.

[1:46:18] Hey, councilman,

[1:46:20] I only have one question, which is going to

[1:46:22] be a request,

[1:46:26] and we don't control

[1:46:29] the actions.

[1:46:30] Yes,

[1:46:32] just clarifying.

[1:46:37] I went to send it to the retirement board. And

[1:46:44] , sorry.

[1:46:47] Tell me, should we send the finances with

[1:46:50] the copy

[1:46:52] and if they want to discuss it with finance, they should

[1:46:54] probably be

[1:46:58] sent to finances.

[1:47:04] Everyone is doing a favor. Already.

[1:47:08] Okay.

[1:47:13] 58 is per councillor

[1:47:17] that city councillor accepts the

[1:47:18] profession of fiscal year 26 eh the

[1:47:22] recycling dividends for 7800 without

[1:47:27] counterpart.

[1:47:29] So,

[1:47:36] and we did, 61, so 62 by

[1:47:41] threat

[1:47:43] that session 54

[1:47:46] eh

[1:47:48] the removal

[1:47:52] that

[1:47:55] the business wheel lock have

[1:47:57] the responsibility

[1:47:58] to keep them in charge of their

[1:48:02] removal and which fulfilled some cart

[1:48:12] that 63 that the winter parking eh

[1:48:16] be reviewed as

[1:48:19] needed for the most

[1:48:20] functional clarity and flexibility based on the

[1:48:22] needs of DPW constituents.

[1:48:25] Everyone in favor.

[1:48:27] 64 is by myself. It is ordered that

[1:48:31] the St. Patrick's Day parade committee

[1:48:33] and the eh be invited to the

[1:48:37] meeting on March 17, 2026 to

[1:48:40] continue the annual translation, although I

[1:48:43] believe it has already been kicked around since January.

[1:48:46] And a list of winners to whom we will

[1:48:51] give schedules,

[1:48:53] so motion to receive and adapt.

[1:48:55] Second. I'm leaving the discussion open. Advice for the

[1:49:00] merely curious about who will be

[1:49:02] president.

[1:49:05] If

[1:49:07] I can, I like to speak in the third

[1:49:09] person.

[1:49:11] We can have another

[1:49:12] vice president. Thank you.

[1:49:16] Receive everything adapted in your favor. Someone

[1:49:19] puts

[1:49:21] 64 65 by

[1:49:26] ordering that session 38-73

[1:49:30] the ordinance code be in a pack

[1:49:34] to add the following. personnel

[1:49:36] allow or sound any signal

[1:49:39] coming from the Carrillos and

[1:49:41] Villa campaign or other similar device

[1:49:43] intended for participants for no more than 3

[1:49:45] minutes. Uh, any 7-day order

[1:49:49] will send orders, uh, all of them. When does it

[1:49:52] start? No. And then

[1:49:56] 66

[1:49:57] can put

[1:50:00] a subject

[1:50:02] of the cart Garcia naming the

[1:50:04] lady. a morg to serve on the

[1:50:08] local historic district commission.

[1:50:10] She will replace

[1:50:12] Mrs. David O and complete the remainder

[1:50:16] of her term, which expires on July 1,

[1:50:19] 2028. Under discussion, councilman.

[1:50:23] Mr. President,

[1:50:26] I've heard that Mr. Debón

[1:50:31] was never part of the team; he was

[1:50:36] appointed in December,

[1:50:43] so I

[1:50:45] want everyone to eat.

[1:50:53] Yes. Okay. You can send it to the committee or

[1:50:56] to public services. Someone puts

[1:51:03] one on, you get one,

[1:51:06] and that's it. So I'm going to entertain

[1:51:07] a motion to conclude.

[1:51:10] Everyone in favor. I. Anyone up for it?

[1:51:14] Thank you all.

[1:51:16] Well, good night. Thank you.

Holyoke City Council Meeting March 3, 2026

Agenda

Transcript