[0:05] We'll have a few of you here. We're actually, a few of you are probably strutting, so we'll

[0:09] have a good day's rolling here, and we'll have a meeting, a whole meeting, for Tuesday,

[0:12] so if you'd like to support us, we'll call it all.

[0:17] Stop checking.

[0:23] Check.

[0:23] Here.

[0:24] All in the back.

[0:25] Here.

[0:33] All right, we'll send it to you tomorrow.

[0:36] Oh, I'm here.

[0:39] I've heard about it for a little bit of minutes, and I'll be July 23rd and August 12th.

[0:46] Second, I'll share with you some of the comments or questions.

[0:51] You can see none of those in favor of the committee.

[0:53] And as you can see, aye.

[0:55] Aye.

[0:56] Aye.

[0:58] Aye.

[0:59] Aye.

[1:03] Aye.

[1:04] Aye.

[1:07] Aye.

[1:08] So, you know, we'll review from our consultant, and I'll just execute with it, and we'll execute

[1:13] the survey, and then we'll kind of resolve some of the analysis on the background.

[1:18] So, that will run it over to staff and carries it in the lead to the survey.

[1:24] Well, good evening.

[1:25] So, it was just over a year and a half ago that we began talking about the community survey,

[1:31] since the last one took place in 2018.

[1:34] And so then we, I hope that, while we're at our committee, interviewed several consultants and it would suggest last September we had the council or the contract to MTC Institute.

[1:50] So with me here is Robert E. Bob, the consultant from MTC, and he's going to share the consultant with you.

[1:59] Thank you all for the opportunity to be here.

[2:02] I'm just going to start by talking a little bit about this slide.

[2:07] Those not familiar with the spirit of IT and the film paradise we see in film business

[2:11] since then.

[2:12] We need to really focus a lot of the community survey, business survey, and all types of

[2:18] transportation services and all types of services since the late 1990s really.

[2:23] And it's the last 14 years of surveying more than 3.6 million people over 1,000 different

[2:30] cities and counties across the different parts of the country.

[2:36] Tonight we're going to talk briefly about the purpose of ethnology and why we do this

[2:40] for the whole of the stress of the state and how it's the leader of the top.

[2:45] The one that's going to be satisfied with the percentage of city services is the support

[2:49] of the development of the city.

[2:55] We have some other findings based on unique questions that can be asked related to the

[3:00] community and the private album, sunrise, and big, lots of new questions.

[3:08] There are a few of them that I don't know why I don't know what those goals are.

[3:13] For us, we never should have done it.

[3:15] We should have done it on the basis of a jacket that says,

[3:17] and has a passion to stay civil citizen.

[3:19] We hear from a lot of people as individuals,

[3:23] around the community, sometimes with the wrong question.

[3:27] So we make them in the city for wanting to engage with the community

[3:30] and know how to hold the right people in,

[3:33] whether they're values, what's involved with them.

[3:35] And now in terms of work for development around the city,

[3:38] then we want to share those moments

[3:41] to the communities to help you.

[3:42] Otherwise, the system is just pure by itself.

[3:46] We don't have that to compare things very good on the end of the line.

[3:52] So as Eric said, we've used the survey by mail and online, and they introduced it actually this year.

[3:58] The goal was 400 communities here, which would have given us a plus or minus 5% margin of error.

[4:04] Your community is very engaged, very willing to share their opinions and the response to

[4:10] When we set out, we had a world-wide number of 705, I think it surmised the fact that it's really phenomenal in our business.

[4:20] And you can see it reduces the margin of the barriers across the last 3.7%.

[4:25] It also has additional 1100 or so.

[4:28] We're not part of the random survey, but share their needs to keep people aware of the small amount of opportunities shared.

[4:34] It's a very engaging community and it's possible to lead on a council to understand being open

[4:42] to new problems like this slide.

[4:47] Let's give you an idea of the next exercise we're going to get here by the end of the

[4:51] afternoon.

[4:52] Just to be a little bit more specific,

[4:56] this is a map that shows the rentals.

[4:58] We don't share any of the services under the same confidential, but we do go down

[5:04] a lot of them, which shows that they're wanting to deal with their own responses.

[5:10] They don't share any of the visual of this policy as much as I thought.

[5:16] Only if you're the resident that honestly, 14% have been with the city or living in the city

[5:23] for more than 21 years or so.

[5:25] I think that's a good way to break down there.

[5:29] of people from five years would last by 10 and some by next month.

[5:36] All age groups were also lower than 10, I've seen here.

[5:40] I'll have a slide.

[5:45] I'm going to look at SAS and actually perception and see

[5:47] so it's not going to be the one next month.

[5:51] So this is the only job right now here.

[5:53] I'm wanting to kind of let you know

[5:57] on how this is going to happen.

[5:59] Responses may vary from slide to slide,

[6:02] and in this particular case, the dark blue bees

[6:05] responds to the question, responds to say it,

[6:11] and bring it as essence.

[6:13] Like you, this is buddha, a pretty sad routine, this case,

[6:17] and low in energy and low on the floor.

[6:23] I'm in the PNH Red Cross.

[6:26] You can see near at, really,

[6:30] if you have almost 100% of the response

[6:34] statement that has the place of the medical

[6:36] assessment to the good, you can average state

[6:39] if that's the place to raise children, that's the place that you provide

[6:43] phone. You can see the moment of the low average of four,

[6:47] We're picking it up out there as a city of new recognition,

[6:50] thinking about a conversion development.

[6:52] Next slide.

[6:55] There's a lot of sections that have a background.

[6:58] We have the quality of life at the top.

[6:59] We have a procession called safety

[7:01] and representation of the city on the top.

[7:04] We're going with almost unanimous

[7:07] of being very satisfied, almost almost satisfied.

[7:10] In this case, being the gray is the neutral.

[7:13] So keep that in mind,

[7:14] to be one of the cases that, in addition to law and officials, we will get a problem

[7:20] in cities, land, or land. That is subject to some dissatisfaction. You can see, but there's

[7:26] also that third of all percent bias that's going to be backed up by some of them. You

[7:32] do these trying to move the email system that's been filed in the web. It really

[7:37] don't make the unhappiness of happening. It would suggest to you that it's easier

[7:41] to educate the community that they can be more aware of instead of being on issues and

[7:47] know them from the neutral to satisfy their own needs.

[7:51] Which helps to understand just this one.

[7:54] When you're on a tree, there's not a thing about how long you're planning to grow and what not.

[8:00] You have 31% of your spot is basically growing.

[8:05] It's better to think that I don't have to be, I think it is neutral.

[8:09] That means it's not being fatted as an opening for the city through various means of opening.

[8:14] Additional dialogue or information, that is something you have to follow in this issue.

[8:20] It's not going to be about the next slide.

[8:23] It's not going to be about the major categories of the city services.

[8:27] It's not going to be about the opening of the city.

[8:29] It's not going to be about the opening of the city.

[8:35] It's not going to be about the opening of the city.

[8:40] related to the kind of issues like, yeah, our attention to human organs is a lot of

[8:45] things, and you know how much that means.

[8:48] The overall satisfaction of the data is a very high level.

[8:51] Pro-baking is not in all of those things.

[8:53] I fall into the character of the city government.

[8:56] It doesn't matter where you are, where you're at,

[8:58] because there's government rules in addition to that.

[9:01] They've got to come to you on the next slide.

[9:06] Satisfaction with experiencing or acting with the county or the big addition in the

[9:09] case of city government departments.

[9:16] Really, it's our year of results from the decision-making system.

[9:23] Satisfaction with a satisfied and satisfied and long

[9:28] -term significant overall satisfaction

[9:32] with the

[9:38] development and the city.

[9:39] That was a major topic on the slide.

[9:42] So we included some apps, but so recently we kind of understand what there is in

[9:46] the city if you're a spot in the government.

[9:49] As you're measuring the level of support for different types of development, this is a

[9:54] residential development that we have now set up today, so I just want to point out between

[9:58] those rows where you know where we are, do you see quite a bit of assistance in our

[10:05] positions in the area of our town, which is sitting in the opposite corner of the

[10:18] Next slide.

[10:21] I think I saw a lot of this in Fairfield.

[10:23] It's a type of commercial development in front of Washington.

[10:28] You can see casual dining.

[10:29] They tell a specialty that is an auditory entertainment department.

[10:33] I think she can add these.

[10:34] They are the highest quality and apartments in the town.

[10:37] A lot of this is surprising.

[10:40] There are a lot

[10:49] of this in Fairfield.

[10:50] I think it's interesting.

[10:51] I think I saw a lot of this in Fairfield.

[10:53] There are a lot of this in Fairfield.

[10:58] The number of voices is the same based on what happened in

[11:09] the other communities.

[11:10] I think in my practice this way, say, city things in your city,

[11:14] this area before, how long you've seen this type of response,

[11:19] this type of response is a very, very positive impact.

[11:22] In most cases we've seen several areas that they should live in.

[11:26] To visit there, you normally see that people,

[11:38] So, we looked at, asked about areas of the community, how do you think there were all

[11:42] ways of satisfaction we should have in comparison to this to live, to see 98.9% of the community

[11:49] in the community.

[11:49] So, that one leads out of just the yellows across averages.

[11:56] We do these for 18.4 months to take care of gay developments, make sure that we're not

[12:03] measured against them,

[12:07] particularly for our children.

[12:13] Planting to the region consists of inspecting the

[12:18] Wisconsin, the Illinois, and so the Missouri,

[12:23] Iowa.

[12:31] They're not, these are not necessarily in size, these are, this is based on the

[12:37] area.

[12:38] Yeah, so just like to see a national survey that might have been done by the state,

[12:43] it's not taking down necessarily comparison to a life-size stage.

[12:55] See every category, every new level.

[12:58] And I may not know if it's a specific one,

[13:01] maybe a meeting that marks the mirror.

[13:05] See if you are seen in the back in some places in the back of the field.

[13:10] So we're going to just value see the city tax model in the piece.

[13:15] That's really an important piece.

[13:17] We're really going to see that very often.

[13:20] We're going to set the satisfaction by you see it.

[13:25] That tells me that you're telling the story.

[13:27] It doesn't necessarily mean life in taxes,

[13:30] but it tells me that you're telling the story about where the city is

[13:33] and where the investment is going.

[13:36] You're telling the community what you're doing with the tax dollars.

[13:38] And they respond very, very well.

[13:42] Leadership of elected Christians, you can see there.

[13:45] Well, in this day and age, you don't know what you're seeing.

[13:53] Obviously, there's a culture here that you have the development of the

[13:56] council and the staff where you're getting information,

[14:00] you're communicating, you're validating your senses.

[14:03] And they all respond very well to these responses.

[14:09] The satisfaction of being a panel is to say services needed, needs to be sponsored by

[14:14] the overall quality and priority of non-services to the road maintenance department.

[14:19] Even though road maintenance is at a low 60% of all satisfaction,

[14:24] the satisfaction is higher than it must have been.

[14:30] And I'd say the fact that considering quite a few of those are more of a blindness

[14:37] but there is to see whether the relief impact road maintenance

[14:51] So it's a lot of refining, it's a lot

[14:58] of information about how.

[15:00] Power evidence. Early units. How

[15:05] they get their information. City, you can see the top.

[15:09] Creator of the city's website. Both the newspaper and the city event.

[15:15] Weekly calls and e-mails are all there.

[15:22] That's specifically about all amenities that respond to legacy.

[15:27] in the middle of the city,

[15:32] and getting an option so you can go first and see by far.

[15:38] I mean, sick partners who are at the hospital, and in the way you can always know about that

[15:45] thing they call it. It's still responsible, and I know some of them are sick and others.

[15:54] It's a lot of work.

[15:57] The authority of residents today is sitting down

[15:59] while the needs of additional and low-income side

[16:01] are as the side must.

[16:03] We're going to bring in community.

[16:05] I need to see a small 60% of the population

[16:08] and the community needs to be more

[16:11] of a growing side as the side must.

[16:14] I want to follow up with a sense of income

[16:15] so that we can be more responsible.

[16:18] If that's not a lot of work,

[16:20] we're going to do it with the state

[16:20] and I want our community to spend more money

[16:23] they do it safely. I suppose it's a small degree of authority that we didn't like this year 68% of the

[16:33] response in a green and strong environment out in the city. It's been a long year that I would

[16:42] say that I would suggest that not only being safe but also a lot of times you're doing things

[16:51] and you could be in movements and maybe mitigate the side of the issue,

[16:55] but part of it is part of the balance of maybe shifting the topic with successes

[16:59] and to project out of the piece of the even one, what you're doing,

[17:04] I need to figure out on that issue.

[17:09] That's not as fast as the overall value that it could possibly receive from your parts.

[17:15] It's being very satisfied, it's 0.5 percent satisfied at 0.5 percent.

[17:20] quite tied into them among these additional tasks that we just didn't have.

[17:27] Quite the same as still at 76% in the satisfied and dissatisfied,

[17:33] categorical, and that's the base of the enemy and other

[17:38] subordinate.

[17:41] So I'm sorry, I imagine we need all of these,

[17:43] but I think we're supposed to have presidents very satisfied

[17:48] for the wrong perceptions that the city and the services that they're providing

[17:53] And you can see here, all of these parameters

[17:55] that are tiny is 90% higher.

[17:59] Really, it will be very significant as well.

[18:04] And you have to vary from place to region

[18:07] and to any nostalgia in the environment.

[18:10] And personally, all major parameters

[18:12] are city services,

[18:18] not any questions.

[18:23] Thanks for the overview.

[18:24] It's nice to get some positive feedback over on.

[18:29] and I think they did really well.

[18:31] It's a little better though, but it's nice to get back to.

[18:36] I know there's a whole multitude of great comments

[18:39] in the back, and just about it's all in my second.

[18:42] I'll add to the chat GTP paper for the adjustable.

[18:46] We're not going to go through all of it.

[18:47] Here on the floor, we're going to read our

[18:50] pre-made events version that we can't stop

[18:52] but 15 or 20 pages in a bit.

[18:56] A lot of white written comments,

[18:57] but it was certainly interesting

[18:58] I think they did some of this stuff.

[19:00] So it was only after Washington

[19:01] that they saw all the lives of the person.

[19:03] Yeah, I mean, first things I want to thank everybody

[19:06] on the panel.

[19:08] Hope it's a pleasure to work with you.

[19:09] Hope it's a pleasure to work with you.

[19:13] Robert, I've worked with that, and especially with Kerry.

[19:17] I just do the little thing, and Justin,

[19:19] don't talk to Kerry.

[19:21] Thanks to everybody that did that

[19:23] and all the different committee members

[19:26] and giving the substantive feedback and different inputs

[19:31] that we got from everybody, that was just fantastic,

[19:34] just got to work.

[19:35] Like what's been seen, though, is that,

[19:37] instead of getting asked before,

[19:40] quote, quote, we're about to assume,

[19:42] since we've had the time,

[19:45] if people put online and there was a raise,

[19:48] that's the nerves,

[19:49] and you're going to give us kind of all the other data

[19:51] to the most people, probably,

[19:53] to be asked twice a year and set it out with them.

[19:56] Like a person who can make a tube,

[19:58] get prevention and caretans,

[20:00] and thicknesses, or whatever.

[20:05] To me, honestly, when you've done that before,

[20:08] we've done it all with responses.

[20:11] Statistically, nobody might have been in the order

[20:13] and they've all combined with those of others.

[20:18] But those are, it's tough to say,

[20:20] it's those that are supposed to be addressed here.

[20:24] It's not possible for them to manage things.

[20:25] So we might have said 3,000, but it's not going to be the response of the new people.

[20:32] We added online, we wanted them first, we will respond, we get social media ads, and we do have that

[20:38] accessible to people so we don't have to worry about where it's going to go.

[20:44] But the website wasn't even going to apply to the new people.

[20:48] We may not believe it's the buy-in-the-sick-year-old kind of thing, but it's not going to be the buy-in-the-sick-year-old kind of thing.

[21:00] It's the type of summary of what we call the dollar and a hand in the sponsored vehicle

[21:07] that they're going to see.

[21:08] I didn't carry this in my sport.

[21:13] And it isn't the group

[21:16] that can be so many things to do with it.

[21:19] But I think it would be any of this.

[21:24] And it's sort of that.

[21:25] Sometimes I could be like that, but I think the times of last year are usually

[21:35] again in four versions.

[21:40] When I was in the company I asked, can you get a copy of my presentation

[21:43] and the company?

[21:44] Yeah, I'd give you that, I think you should.

[21:46] It's nice to meet you.

[21:47] Okay, perfect.

[21:48] Good to have you.

[21:50] Good to have you.

[21:51] It's me.

[21:52] It's a little early to get up.

[21:54] We're going to end the video at this time.

[21:57] There's a bit of a problem with that.

[21:58] Please call me.

[21:59] We'll get away with that.

[22:00] I'm sure we can work.

[22:00] I think you'll have time to call.

[22:03] Call me if you can.

[22:04] Okay.

[22:06] Thank you, Mike.

[22:07] You're welcome.

[22:07] We'll ask you to find out.

[22:23] Good job.

[22:24] We appreciate it.

[22:27] Carrie, I respond to that.

[22:28] I appreciate it.

[22:30] I appreciate it.

[22:31] I appreciate it.

[22:32] I think the results are bigger by your efforts.

[22:35] So, on your columns, it's like, you know, how much you're going to get.

[22:43] So, we're going to come to all our environment that we needed,

[22:47] aside, aside with the public first statistical version.

[22:51] So, on that,

[22:55] we wanted to express some disappointment

[22:58] and there's disappointment in the news graphic again.

[23:01] And actually, I'm reminded, because I saw all our women,

[23:03] and a lot of them will hold it up.

[23:06] And yet again, his graphic is published in an article

[23:09] with all of us having actually had a meeting here.

[23:16] So once again, I believe the public is not in properly.

[23:20] As far as there are reactions to the actual survey,

[23:24] but against the policies of, or another kind,

[23:26] or were you mind to hear some of our reactions tonight?

[23:30] No, I mean, speaking, discussing the survey,

[23:36] What is the most policy there is?

[23:38] Great.

[23:39] Well, in the future, I'll have a commentary on the central industrial residential, self-bus,

[23:46] or becoming more intensive industrial, I think.

[23:49] I think this survey will be very well-designed.

[23:54] I think this is going to give us a lot of the data we need for decision-making from before.

[23:59] So, thanks again for coming here and for all your work and to Terry and the rest of the staff.

[24:08] Thank you.

[24:11] I

[24:14] think this is a real helpful framework.

[24:16] Grab the card and pull it down.

[24:18] I think this is a draw on the strategy of what's important to some of our initiatives,

[24:25] especially when we first met it out here on, you know, the new toy that was tax-based

[24:29] over the coming years, but what is developing it all the way down.

[24:35] I'm going to question the bottom part, you know, with what development could be.

[24:56] My question is, that's a new graph, but how can we get to find this

[25:02] and it could be made a presentation or maybe be able to find out if there is something,

[25:08] something like this, and invite residents in and hear what the results were that might

[25:15] be worthwhile for people to say, hey, this is an opportunity.

[25:21] We'll learn a little bit about what happened in the survey.

[25:24] Come on in and we'll make the presentation for you.

[25:27] It seems like something that they did best to do, so how do you get the word out of it?

[25:36] I think we'll certainly go and bring it to them.

[25:39] I think we'll turn this into something that people know we can.

[25:43] There is a survey of the results.

[25:46] It's no secret that we have a survey of people who are interested in seeing the results.

[25:51] The majority of them have not done this.

[25:53] I don't think they'll use their app or even if they jumped the round about it.

[25:57] It's been worried by a couple days.

[25:59] also think we didn't really change the substance of this type of speaking.

[26:04] On my meeting the last one, where we didn't change the substance was in the back of the

[26:09] book that actually.

[26:11] There's so much information in here.

[26:14] There's so much information in there.

[26:17] Guys, instead of saying, we'll serve our government with one option.

[26:24] That's something like this, some of the business reports that the citizens are going to get

[26:29] some kind of quick summary that inspires them to go through the scene and that's an

[26:37] option that's going to help them.

[26:42] Certainly the results of the new vision is probably working.

[26:47] As we mentioned,

[26:50] you have a one

[26:56] -year-old time for a 10-hour shift,

[27:10] which is a different

[27:11] thing to how we use it.

[27:12] So

[27:35] we'll definitely take that comment back to the staff and figure out the best way to

[27:39] accomplish that.

[27:40] It's hard to meet people that come here, come here and meet, it's hard to meet people

[27:47] that are really interested in their children with this kind of thing.

[27:50] It also may not have seen me a job enough, I guess, so we can certainly draw more attention

[27:56] to what they're able to comment on and substance and what they're able to serve

[28:01] people.

[28:01] I'll

[28:05] just like, I didn't say one thing, one comment that allowed me additional comments

[28:09] by him.

[28:11] It's an early range that you can use to consolidate some of the numbers.

[28:15] One comment for anyone listening, one of the major things that came out of a survey,

[28:20] great comments, was that we committed to the city, county, and state jurisdictional

[28:25] confusion.

[28:27] Certainly, that's due to a lot of construction fatigue and three straight years of construction

[28:33] back to the 543 interchange, and back to our own, and we're now embarking on the world with all the closer road and all of our own projects.

[28:45] Also, the issues noted in the survey account is related to the status of actually the roads that are owned by other jurisdictions, but the survey results seem to indicate that

[28:57] People will sign the most simply responsibility for those roads in the city, has to literally

[29:02] continue to go through the issue of contact with the caravan's policy bill.

[29:07] I don't know how we can even get the word out better, but also the roads are going to

[29:11] be complaining about our cars.

[29:14] I've seen that in other jurisdictions, but I would suggest an answer to that.

[29:19] I have not, with a lot of people, know that that's the issue of working with

[29:23] of sensitivity. We can frame some questions that will have a career computer upgrade,

[29:31] such as actually destroying this, which a lot of people are doing, which are working a lot

[29:37] of ways through the boss room, especially some of them, and in the state, where people

[29:43] want to save my alias a month or even a day, so there's a lot of spending that concerns

[29:49] America, not about the cities, but it's a bit about the talent and the specificities

[29:55] So, in other ways, I already featured on that issue.

[30:01] I mentioned a couple of people, too. It's interesting to see how many comments there were of schools.

[30:10] And the confusion that the council somehow has with additional schools and the task increases.

[30:18] Well, where the schools, I thought, are pretty stable, but they relate somehow to the council.

[30:26] The council has a jurisdiction on what's really to be done on the law.

[30:33] So, you know, there's some, you know, there's some written in that there,

[30:37] but there's some indication that there's clear something about it.

[30:55] You know, as you do the learner talks,

[31:00] there's those relative questions

[31:02] that really needed to be asked, ultimately, that we didn't do.

[31:08] So there's still some questions that we haven't

[31:16] been very, very well.

[31:17] It doesn't say anything, but

[31:24] it's sort of looking at it down there and it's kind of close to how it looks down at the end of this point.

[31:42] Maybe we're going to see, we're still going to have a study of hygiene information.

[31:48] Submission here on the box.

[31:53] It's also a little bit of the S&P box demo.

[31:57] It was a savings.

[31:59] Any other comments?

[32:01] All the history?

[32:12] I'm going to stop that, I need some of you to stop this, raise it down a bit, but we're

[32:21] a little 57% said it will increase this, so it's getting interesting that, you know,

[32:29] placing them but not necessarily increasing, which kind of leads me to think of any

[32:34] We need to have a lot of businesses or activities that are going to be long.

[32:42] Because I'm sitting on my own.

[32:45] You already knew what was going to be the best of this.

[32:48] Some things that have been delivered, how it's going to sound,

[32:52] have not been used, but if you're looking for more venues to have an agreement,

[32:59] have excitement in these things.

[33:01] It's going to go away as soon as we get to our next step.

[33:06] It's going to take about the same scenario as experience.

[33:11] Thank you, Robert, for taking the time to speak.

[33:14] Thank you.

[33:17] Thank you for that information.

[33:19] Any last questions or feedback?

[33:26] Thank you.

[33:33] Thank you.

[33:34] So she was probably not hearing.

[33:35] That isn't an excellent segue into what I would offer

[33:39] on this second hand that I would suggest you

[33:42] to the members of the council.

[33:44] As it was noted when we got this process earlier

[33:50] this year and even into late last year,

[33:53] the results from these surveys,

[33:56] both random and non random, are excellent.

[34:01] And they're also been served

[34:04] as sort of the whole market basis for the next strategic land process and then we can take

[34:11] off into our businesses. That was communicated by probably any family within the organization.

[34:18] So to the extent that any of you were unable to make it through the five voluminous reports

[34:26] that were distributed to the police in the whole grand area, that made it through

[34:30] two, that was the last thing we did in Canada, three normal groups to come through the cell.

[34:34] That would encourage you to continue to make notes mentally or through AI or any other fashion

[34:42] of that matter. You need to continue to organize your thinking and your prioritization

[34:48] relative to what you're seeing and what you're hearing from the survey results.

[34:53] Because as we get into second quarter, third quarter next year we're going to be looking to

[35:00] We double our effort to set the strategic plan for all, so that we have a five-year roadmap to guide future efforts and future investments

[35:08] and to keep it built on these great results that we're hearing about tonight.

[35:13] Our current strategic plan is scheduled to run through 2025, so we've got a little time.

[35:20] We've made a lot of progress in approaching the plan, which was covering the years 2022 through 2025.

[35:27] But it will serve us well to give that second strategic plan to form a role for the world.

[35:36] Organized and ultimately developed, and I think the results that they're seeing here

[35:42] and some of the great feedback that we've had over the course of these policy discussions,

[35:49] and some of these vision issues

[35:53] that have now emerged.

[35:56] So just now we have that discussion.

[35:59] session,

[36:05] it's not sharing on the Sunday there, no more questions, comments, you can

[36:13] move on.

[36:14] That's the meeting.

[36:19] On our next agenda item for this evening is setting up a little old pilot workshop.

[36:30] It's been a while since the review decided me if we should spend a couple of minutes

[36:33] It's like,

[36:37] give me your two prints for time, or I can stop you short.

[36:42] So we're looking at where we're at now.

[36:43] That's where we get the community survey results.

[36:46] Next month, we're scheduled to be discussing the syndicates master plan.

[36:51] We'll be a open house and baby in this space.

[36:54] Later this month.

[36:56] Don't look at those whether you're pregnant or going to the hospital.

[36:59] Next month, we're looking at attention to giving the public more time to absorb

[37:03] with those planning for the throat problem council in October.

[37:08] They'll have to be on the 17th.

[37:11] This one, November 8th with a plan on something,

[37:15] that'll be a, I'm sure, a really good presentation

[37:19] for our state intermediates.

[37:22] And then, 7th or 4th Street,

[37:24] and then the 8th, you got the 8th,

[37:26] and the 2nd district graduate programization discussion.

[37:31] So that's the plan for now to get to the end of the year for me.

[37:35] The digital items we need to be on came out.

[37:37] Mr. Jones, thank you very much for pointing out to me from staff.

[37:42] of this loop yesterday, but it's adding policy discussion on the plans for makeshore ride

[37:51] on that long road.

[37:53] Aden project just wrapped up on Zevlar, as well as Captain Pernick Park, which is setting

[38:01] the bird legs of that three-thousand project in one loop, makeshore ride in that long

[38:06] road, heading west to the valley to intercede.

[38:10] As the council will recall, we have awarded a contract last month to Barry Smith of Foot

[38:17] Design and Services along Big Show Drive in Mughorn Road, and we're going to be working

[38:23] to have the consultant come back in the future committee in the whole meeting, last week

[38:28] we needed a number, or at least a number, at time frame towards the end of the year

[38:32] to help drive a policy conversation and hopefully a decision on the third design

[38:37] I'm not sure, so we have those dots in the wrong, so to speak, in advance of publicly

[38:43] accrediting those projects, and really, it functions.

[38:46] So that'll be added to the calendar, you'll be seeing, and that's about to happen.

[38:51] That'd be nice to have, that

[38:56] as well, why don't we have a

[39:06] tag in the middle, we'll

[39:07] see what we can all do, and that'd be nice too, for one, especially, I'll tell

[39:14] those two get under the same big feedback while we're actually using the process.

[39:20] I want to give you the other feedback for future items. I know this scale is

[39:24] broken against the end of the year, but we're meeting beyond this.

[39:29] I don't know if they've been correct or it's always been since I'm

[39:35] an entrepreneur.

[39:39] I also said that if we're over time, we'll be able to create

[39:42] a policy that we're going to revisit a couple of times. So when she's

[39:46] to discuss such a reverberating expert.

[39:54] Thank you guys.

[39:56] Seeing none, we'll observe motion to adjourn.

[39:59] Total.

[40:02] Motion to second.

[40:03] All those in favor can say aye.

[40:04] Aye.

[40:05] Any votes?

[40:06] And we're adjourned and we'll be adjourned in two minutes.

[40:09] All those in favor.

Committee of the Whole Regular Meeting

Agenda

Transcript