[2:23] meeting. Thank you, everyone.

[2:24] Good morning and welcome to

[2:24] the Legislation Committee

[2:29] meeting on this Thursday, JULY

[2:31] 9th. The time is now to 31 in

[2:33] this meeting shall come to

[2:35] order the 4 I call roll. I

[2:38] would like to give

[2:39] instructions on how to submit

[2:41] a speaker card for items on

[2:42] this agenda. If you're here in

[2:44] person would like to submit a

[2:45] speaker card, please fill out

[2:46] a speaker card and turn it

[2:48] into a clerk. Representative

[2:49] either before the item is

[2:50] called or 10 minutes after

[2:53] this meeting began. Again,

[2:54] this meeting started at 10.

[2:55] 31. So that time will 10. 41

[3:00] will stop receiving in-person

[3:01] speaker cards on lines. Hearts

[3:02] were do 24 hours before this

[3:03] meeting began. So those will

[3:04] no longer be accepted at this

[3:06] time. With that, we will now

[3:10] call roll. On role for this

[3:13] meeting. Moment Council member

[3:13] Brown PRESIDENT Councilmember

[3:17] Fife. Councilmember

[3:18] Ramachandran PRESIDENT And

[3:20] Chair Jenkins PRESIDENT. Good

[3:23] morning morning. We have 4

[3:24] members present. But before I

[3:24] go to the first item, do you

[3:27] have any announcements

[3:28] council, PRESIDENT Jenkins?

[3:28] Yes, we are calling a special

[3:32] meeting that 3rd. 13th at 10,

[3:33] 30 special meeting of the City

[3:35] Council. Thank you so much for

[3:37] that. So noted it. We will now

[3:41] move The time in 30 am. Thank

[3:45] you. Also, we will be

[3:52] canceling JULY 23rd rules.

[3:52] 23rd 20rd incoming on camera

[3:58] looking crazy. Thank you for

[3:59] that council PRESIDENT Uses

[4:01] just so Reno to Henry stating

[4:01] that you have called a special

[4:04] meeting on JULY Monday, JULY

[4:07] 13th at 10:30am, as well as

[4:10] canceling JULY 23rd rules.

[4:11] Correct. Thank you so much

[4:14] with that. We will now move to

[4:15] the first item item. Number

[4:15] one is approved the draft

[4:18] minutes for the committee

[4:22] meeting on MAY 28th JUNE 18th

[4:23] and JUNE 25th 2026. Have one

[4:24] speaker for the side. Move

[4:27] move approval. Let's go to the

[4:32] public speaker. Thank you so

[4:34] much. I have Blair became and

[4:37] if you would like to speak to

[4:39] this item. Blair, please raise

[4:40] your hand in the queue so we

[4:41] new chowan give you the

[4:42] opportunity make your

[4:49] comments. You've ut MAY begin.

[4:52] Play a peak I signed item. I

[4:52] think I'm going to pass this

[4:54] time and that could let Thank

[4:56] you. Thank you so much for

[4:57] your comments. There was a

[4:59] motion by council member Brown

[5:00] seconded by Councilmember 5 to

[5:02] approve item. One. The

[5:04] committee meeting minutes for

[5:06] a mate 28th JUNE 18th in JUNE.

[5:08] 25th on that on row

[5:12] councilmember around. I life.

[5:13] Councilmember Ramachandran. I

[5:16] ensure Jenkins. I item number

[5:19] one is approval for ice. Thank

[5:21] you for that. Moving to item

[5:22] number 2. Number is the

[5:23] termination of scheduling

[5:23] about standing committee

[5:24] items, which is your pending

[5:27] list for rules. And I have 2

[5:33] speakers. Anything from the

[5:35] administration, no changes at

[5:36] this time. Thank you. Let's go

[5:38] to our public speakers. Thank

[5:41] you so much for that. I have

[5:42] this La Bala in Blair Beekman

[5:43] for item. Number 2, your?

[5:47] Lists. And it looks like data

[5:51] is passing on that. We're big

[5:52] i see you in the queue. You

[5:53] mute yourself to begin your

[5:57] time. Big also thank you.

[5:59] Thank you so much. You know,

[6:01] motion for item number 2.

[6:09] Pentagon lists. Was a motion

[6:10] by council member Brown

[6:13] seconded by Councilmember

[6:15] Ramachandran to approve item

[6:15] to ask is on a roll

[6:20] councilmember Brown. I

[6:23] ramachandran I and

[6:24] Councilmember Jenkins item

[6:25] number 2 is approved as is

[6:29] with 4 eyes that now takes us

[6:33] to item 3 new scheduling.

[6:35] Starting with item 3.1, which

[6:36] I believe there will be a

[6:36] title change ready to make it

[6:41] happen. Thank you. Good

[6:41] morning. Candidate, director

[6:44] of economic and Workforce

[6:45] Development Development are

[6:47] real. 24 justification is that

[6:48] we need to bypass committee

[6:49] because we just came to terms

[6:51] that Laci yesterday and we

[6:53] need to accommodate to city

[6:54] council meetings before recess

[6:55] to enable a potential sale as

[7:00] early as SEPTEMBER. The type

[7:03] the revised title is as

[7:05] follows ordinance. Number one,

[7:06] authorizing the city

[7:08] administrator to amend the

[7:09] purchase and sale agreement

[7:10] with the city of Oakland's

[7:13] undivided, 50% interest in the

[7:15] Coliseum complex located at

[7:17] 7,000 Coliseum way. Oakland,

[7:18] California, to allow the

[7:20] simultaneous sale of the arena

[7:21] parcel for the lump sum

[7:24] payment of 50 million dollars

[7:26] in the stadium. Pursell for

[7:27] 60 million dollars with seller

[7:29] financing from the city

[7:30] crediting the 5 million dollar

[7:31] deposit held by the city prior

[7:35] to the sale. Number 2,

[7:35] authorizing the city

[7:38] administrator to negotiate and

[7:39] execute an agreement pursuant

[7:41] to which the buyers agree to

[7:42] pay to the city. 6 1% of the

[7:44] annual gross ticket sales for

[7:46] any event at the arena.

[7:47] Personal in the stadium,

[7:48] personal less applicable

[7:52] taxes. Number 3. Amending

[7:55] ordinance. Number 1, 3, 8, 0,

[7:57] one c Ms conditioning the sale

[7:59] to require development of

[8:01] onsite, affordable housing and

[8:02] other benefits to solely the

[8:03] sale of the city's interest in

[8:06] the seat and personal number 4

[8:07] authorizing the city

[8:09] administrator to facilitate

[8:11] closing prior to DECEMBER

[8:12] 31st. 2020 26 by redirecting

[8:15] to the buyer of the stadium

[8:17] parcel a portion of the pro

[8:19] rata share of the city's

[8:21] annual subsidy. Stadium

[8:23] personal based on a per day.

[8:29] I'm out of $16,000.

[8:30] $416,438.36 limited to the

[8:33] period between the stadium.

[8:36] Pursell closing DECEMBER 31st.

[8:38] 2026 and number 5 adopting

[8:38] California Environmental

[8:39] Quality Act findings. Thank

[8:43] you. Thank you so much for

[8:44] that title change being read

[8:46] into record in just noting

[8:48] that this item as it shows in

[8:50] the scheduling JULY 14th, this

[8:50] actually will be going to the

[8:53] JULY 13th Special City Council

[8:54] meeting at 10 30. That was

[8:54] just caught by council

[8:57] PRESIDENT. And we will now

[9:04] move to item number 3. Is a

[9:05] title change I will read in

[9:09] the new title. Under title is

[9:10] a resolution authorizing the

[9:11] city administrator to amend

[9:14] the professional services

[9:15] contract with outs of

[9:18] planning. Plus design for 7th

[9:19] Street Connection project by

[9:25] increasing the contract amount

[9:28] 747 7, $747,288 for the total

[9:33] contract not to exceed

[9:33] 3 million, 955,000 $404

[9:37] extending the contract

[9:38] expiration date to DECEMBER

[9:42] 31st. 2030, To the extent

[9:44] required further advertising

[9:45] competitive bidding.

[9:46] Competitive selection

[9:48] requirements under the Open

[9:53] Sea. Sec Shoes and adopt teen

[9:53] sequel. Binding to this item

[9:54] is being requested to be

[9:59] schedule for the JULY 14th.

[9:59] Public Works and

[10:01] Transportation Committee and

[10:03] this will this has an urgency

[10:04] finding. So I will read that

[10:08] into record, which is staff

[10:08] staff needs council's

[10:10] resolution before the summer

[10:10] recess. So the staff MAY move

[10:13] forward with that project

[10:16] design and meet the federal

[10:16] funding milestones at the end

[10:21] of the year. We will now move

[10:24] to item 3.3, 3.3 is also a

[10:25] title change. But only the

[10:29] second piece of legislation is

[10:30] the has a change in title. I

[10:31] will read the first part in it

[10:33] consists of 2 pieces of

[10:35] legislation, one, a resolution

[10:36] authorizing the city

[10:37] administrator to remove

[10:41] delinquent city of Oakland,

[10:41] code enforcement liens. And

[10:42] only these costs assessment

[10:44] says civil penalties on

[10:46] certain tax defaulted

[10:49] properties for a period of 4

[10:50] years to facilitate the

[10:53] development of these

[10:53] properties into affordable

[10:56] housing. The Alameda County

[10:56] chapter, a tax sale program in

[11:00] limiting aggregate amount of

[11:00] the liens remove pursuant to

[11:05] this authorization Nunley

[11:06] valued the not to exceed

[11:09] 2 million dollars

[11:11] acknowledging trans mutation

[11:14] of these code enforcement

[11:17] liens into proper Kate. It

[11:18] chapter 8 sale proceeds that

[11:21] will be paid to the city of

[11:23] Oakland and 2. I will read in

[11:26] the new title, a resolution

[11:27] authorizing the city

[11:29] administrator to remove dilute

[11:29] with city of Oakland, vacant

[11:30] property tax liens on certain

[11:33] tax default to properties for

[11:34] period of 4 years for this

[11:36] elite. 8 to facilitate the

[11:37] development of these

[11:38] properties and affordable

[11:40] housing. The Alameda County

[11:42] Tech sales program

[11:43] acknowledging that trans

[11:44] mutation of these vacant

[11:47] property tax liens into.

[11:47] Prorated chapter 8 sales

[11:50] proceeds. That will be paid to

[11:51] the city of Oakland and

[11:54] limiting the aggregate amount

[11:54] of the Remove pursuant to the

[11:58] author this authorization. To

[11:59] Normal Value, not to exceed

[12:02] 2 million dollars in. This is

[12:04] requested for the JULY 14th

[12:05] Community, Economic

[12:09] Development Committee agenda.

[12:10] This we'll need and urgency

[12:11] finding staff will be present

[12:17] to read that into record. Good

[12:17] morning. Kim Smith for the

[12:19] city of a fun hasn't committee

[12:20] development department, the

[12:20] urgency funding for this item

[12:24] is as follows. This item is

[12:24] urgent as the Alameda County

[12:26] Board of Supervisors is

[12:27] expected to approve a chapter,

[12:28] a tax sale at the JULY 14th

[12:32] meeting. The City Council will

[12:33] therefore need to authorize

[12:34] the release of an collectible

[12:35] leans on Chapter 8 properties

[12:36] by the end of JULY to avoid

[12:38] possible disruptions to the

[12:38] app. Chapter 8 of 82 15

[12:39] MacArthur pull apart. Thank

[12:44] you. Thank you so much for

[12:47] that. Just the finding, we

[12:49] will now move on to item 3.4,

[12:51] which has a title change.

[12:53] Again, this is 2 pieces of

[12:54] legislation in that. The title

[12:56] change is only at the second I

[12:57] will be the first part in the

[12:59] new titles. The second piece

[13:01] following that the first

[13:02] resolution is authorizing the

[13:03] forgiveness of a city long to

[13:11] act it Mt. Of up to 2 million

[13:11] dollars in outstanding

[13:14] principal. Plus, all accrued

[13:17] and unpaid interest and fees

[13:19] and a city revolving line of

[13:23] credit too. So lash, sure.

[13:24] With a final outstanding

[13:28] balance of 1 Million.

[13:29] $500,000. Plus, accrued and

[13:30] unpaid interest and fees for

[13:34] the foothills seminary point.

[13:35] Retail project. Each

[13:36] contingent upon the sale of

[13:38] the transfer of the project to

[13:41] a qualified purchaser and

[13:43] making appropriate sequel.

[13:47] Findings and 2, I will read in

[13:49] the piece of legislation and

[13:52] ordinance, the new title of

[13:53] the second piece of

[13:54] legislation ordinance

[13:55] authorizing the forgiveness of

[13:58] outstanding and future rent

[14:01] balance in the amount up to

[14:03] $40,000 for Point llc pursuant

[14:04] to ground lease with the city

[14:05] contingent on the sale or

[14:07] transfer of the leasehold

[14:11] interest in the property to a

[14:13] qualified purchaser and making

[14:14] sequel findings. This item is

[14:16] being scheduled for the July

[14:18] 14th Community and Economic

[14:20] Development Committee agenda.

[14:20] And this too needs an urgency

[14:26] by did. Hi, good morning. My

[14:29] name is Teresa with public

[14:30] Division and economic

[14:31] Workforce development and the

[14:36] agency finding is that. We

[14:37] want to correct the ordinance

[14:38] titles to that. It could be

[14:41] heard on the JULY 40's cd

[14:43] committee in JULY, 21st cd

[14:45] Committee. And the Reason We

[14:46] want this to be heard before

[14:47] the break is that the property

[14:52] is in forbearance. Lender

[14:56] extended to APRIL 21st. If we

[14:57] wait till SEPTEMBER, it will

[14:58] extend the time period that

[15:01] developers be able to sell the

[15:03] property. He cannot sell it

[15:04] without authorization to

[15:06] forgive the loan, the debt

[15:10] alone in the rent on the

[15:11] property because he's

[15:12] overleveraged. And that's why

[15:14] we're pursuing this Resolution

[15:21] ordinance thank you for that

[15:22] emergency financing it on the

[15:22] record. We're now moving to

[15:26] item 3.5, 3.5 is a resolution

[15:29] in support of Assembly Bill.

[15:31] 15 88 vehicles, sideshow

[15:32] enhancements. And this is

[15:32] being request to be scheduled

[15:36] for JULY. 21st 2026 City

[15:40] Council agenda on consent.

[15:40] Because there were 24. And

[15:41] just make a statement to the

[15:43] council members counts rolls

[15:49] has. Governance over these

[15:49] legislations. And so we're

[15:52] going to be substantively and

[15:53] rules from here on out. But

[15:54] we'll let these 2, though. So

[16:00] coming up with the world, 24.

[16:01] Good morning. Bridgett reserve

[16:02] as staff for Councilmember.

[16:05] Charlene Wang up until today,

[16:10] these. Resolutions have

[16:11] typically gone from Wall

[16:20] Street to council. Some noted.

[16:21] We will now move to item 3

[16:28] point. 6. I'm 3.6 adopt the

[16:29] following pieces of

[16:31] legislation in one resolution.

[16:33] Conditionally approving a

[16:34] final map for the track.

[16:39] Number 8, 6, 9, 7 located at

[16:41] 87 50 Mountain Boulevard for a

[16:43] 35. A lot subdivision within

[16:45] parcel 9 of the track. 83 part

[16:48] of the property owned by Oak

[16:49] Knoll the insurer

[16:50] Acquisitions, llc in adopting

[16:52] sequel. Findings into a

[16:54] resolution conditionally

[16:55] approving a final map for

[16:57] track number 8, 6, 9, 8

[17:01] located at 87 15 Mountain

[17:02] Boulevard for a 24 lot

[17:04] subdivision within parcel teen

[17:07] of the track 83 20, that part

[17:10] of the property owned by the

[17:11] Ensure Acquisition, llc and

[17:13] adopting sequel. Findings. And

[17:16] this item is being requested

[17:16] the schedule for the JULY 20

[17:18] for City Council agenda on

[17:18] consent. And I see staff with

[17:23] 24th. Good morning Reginal

[17:24] Basile right-of-way division

[17:28] dot. This item. Concerns are

[17:29] the approval final maps for 2

[17:32] parcels at Oak Knoll. The

[17:33] largest real estate

[17:34] development project in the

[17:36] city. And importantly, these 2

[17:39] parcels 9.10 We'll bring

[17:40] online some 54 units of

[17:44] single-family housing. The map

[17:46] approval for these 2 parcels

[17:47] has been delayed on the city

[17:50] side for several months. We

[17:53] need urgent action to

[17:53] demonstrate to residents of

[17:54] the city of Oakland and our

[17:57] real estate partners that

[17:58] we're committed to being good

[17:59] regulators and good partners

[18:00] and bringing new housing units

[18:05] online. Final urgency item is

[18:07] that the chief engineer has

[18:07] determined that the final maps

[18:11] are consistent with the

[18:13] tentative maps previously

[18:15] approved. We've collected some

[18:16] 13 million dollars in

[18:18] guarantees for the public

[18:19] infrastructure work that will

[18:22] be needed for these parcels.

[18:23] The council approval in this

[18:24] issue, as is always the case

[18:27] for final maps, his

[18:28] ministerial. So we won't be

[18:29] question debate on these

[18:34] matters. Thank you. Thank you

[18:35] for saying that 24 on the

[18:39] record. Now moving item 3.7

[18:39] adopt a resolution authorizing

[18:40] the city administrator to

[18:43] enter into a governance in.

[18:46] With the Bexar Urban Area

[18:48] Security Initiative approval

[18:51] authority, which will provide

[18:51] overall governance of s I

[18:54] grant program as well as other

[18:55] grant programs under

[18:56] jurisdiction of the approval

[18:57] authority across the Bay Area.

[19:01] Regional. Effective 12/1/2025.

[19:04] Through NOVEMBER, 30th 2030.

[19:05] And this item is being

[19:06] requested to be scheduled for

[19:07] the JULY 21st City Council

[19:08] agenda on consent. There's a

[19:10] real 24. I'll read that into

[19:13] record. The Bay area uas. I

[19:15] operate on federal homeland

[19:17] security grants funding cycle

[19:22] with establishing established

[19:23] deadlines for participate,

[19:24] participate in jurisdiction

[19:27] agreements. Delaine the

[19:28] intraday introduced by the

[19:32] full committee. Really process

[19:34] risks. Jeopardizing Oakland's

[19:35] eligibility to receive or

[19:38] expand us. I allocated funds

[19:39] within the current program

[19:42] year potentially resulting in

[19:43] for future federal dollars

[19:43] already designated for

[19:50] Oakland. Moving to item 3.8 It

[19:51] is a resolution confirming the

[19:55] appointment of Terri boxed

[19:57] Buxton as a member of the

[19:58] cannabis Regulatory

[19:59] Commission. This item is being

[20:01] requested to be scheduled for

[20:03] JULY. 21st City Council agenda

[20:05] on consent. The real 24 is due

[20:08] to the recent challenges

[20:09] experienced by the cannabis

[20:14] Regulatory Commission. Item.

[20:15] 3.8 is a resolution confirming

[20:21] the mayor's appointment of 3.9

[20:24] Item, 3.9, a resolution

[20:27] confirming the mayor's appoint

[20:28] appointment Page Tomlin as a

[20:31] member of the Head Start

[20:32] Advisory board. This item is

[20:32] being requested the schedule

[20:37] for JULY. 21st Council agenda

[20:39] on consent. The real 24 is to

[20:40] build the recent vacancy on

[20:44] his start advisory board. Item

[20:46] 3 point team is a resolution

[20:47] confirming the reappointment

[20:50] of Edgar Rodriguez, Ramirez

[20:54] pry shot gun. Not that and

[20:55] Ricky Jackson and members of

[20:57] the Children's Initiative,

[21:00] Citizens Oversight Commission.

[21:01] This item is being request to

[21:03] be scheduled for JULY. 21st

[21:05] 2026 City Council agenda on

[21:07] consent. The will 24 is to

[21:10] ensure continuation court

[21:12] quorum for Children's

[21:13] Initiative, Citizens Oversight

[21:19] Commission. Item 3.11 is a

[21:20] resolution confirming the

[21:23] mayor's appointment of Jacobs

[21:23] to the Cultural Affairs

[21:26] Commission. This item is being

[21:26] requested the schedule for

[21:27] JULY. 21st 2026 City Council

[21:30] agenda on consent. The rule 20

[21:32] for us to fill the current

[21:33] vacancy on the Cultural

[21:34] Affairs Commission to ensure

[21:40] continuation. Item. 3.12 is a

[21:42] resolution confirming the

[21:45] mayor's appointment of Braxton

[21:45] Gunter and Ronald Busby to the

[21:49] Privacy Advisory Commission

[21:50] the ad this is being requested

[21:52] the schedule for the JULY 21st

[21:53] City Council agenda on

[21:59] consent. Item. 3.13 is a

[22:03] resolution in support of sb

[22:04] 954, a bill changing the Knott

[22:05] House in California.

[22:09] Environmental Quality Act

[22:10] exemption. This item is being

[22:12] requested the schedule for the

[22:14] JULY 21st City Council agenda

[22:16] on consent and we will need

[22:17] staff read rule. 24 for this

[22:22] item. Is customer wants

[22:23] present to state road. 24 for

[22:28] the record. Yes. Good morning.

[22:30] Bridgett. We serve as Oak

[22:33] staff member Councilmember

[22:35] long. These items once again

[22:37] typically go from rules, too

[22:47] straight to cancel. And on

[22:48] this item, I would like the

[22:50] opportunity to be added as a

[22:52] co-sponsor and then also I

[22:55] know sending the street the

[22:57] council would be beneficial to

[23:01] ensure that the city support

[23:03] is made known prior to the

[23:03] final vote on this item in the

[23:08] Senate. Great. Thank you.

[23:11] Thank you for that real. 24

[23:12] noting COUNCILMAN Brown was

[23:15] added as a co-sponsor moving

[23:18] to item 3.14 It is an

[23:19] ordinance amending the

[23:21] reenacting ordinance. Number

[23:22] 1, 3, 5, 6, 1, for the

[23:24] Cultural Affairs Commission to

[23:26] enable Quorum with the

[23:27] majority of appointed members

[23:28] establishing authority to

[23:31] create standing Committee.

[23:34] Allowing the commission to

[23:34] appoint the chair person and

[23:38] make other clarify edits. This

[23:39] item is being requested the

[23:40] schedule for the JULY 20 for

[23:41] City Council agenda on

[23:42] consent. I will read in the

[23:46] real 24. Staff request that

[23:48] item proceed directly to the

[23:49] full City council in lieu of

[23:51] consideration by the life

[23:53] enrichment committee due to

[23:53] the time, sensitive nature of

[24:03] the proposed ordinance. Item.

[24:04] 3.15, it is to piece of

[24:04] legislation. I will read in

[24:05] the first piece of legislation

[24:06] which is a resolution

[24:07] accepting the police

[24:08] commission selection panel,

[24:12] slate, Ricardo Garcia Costa in

[24:16] Johnny Harrison to serve on

[24:17] the Oakland Police Commission

[24:19] or a resolution rejecting the

[24:20] police commission's selection

[24:23] panel. Slate of Ricardo Garcia

[24:25] Acosta Jenny Harrison, too,

[24:27] serve on the Oakland Police

[24:29] Commission. This item is being

[24:31] requested to be scheduled for

[24:32] JULY. 21st City Council agenda

[24:40] on 9 consent. Moving to item

[24:43] 3.16 which is received the 25

[24:44] 26 informational

[24:44] consolidation. Annual

[24:46] performance in evaluation

[24:46] report for Community

[24:50] Development Block Grant Home

[24:52] Investment Partnership,

[24:53] Emergency Solutions, Grant and

[24:54] Housing opportunities for

[24:58] Persons with aids. This has

[24:59] been requested the schedule

[25:00] for the SEPTEMBER 15th City

[25:02] Council agenda as a public

[25:06] hearing. The rule 24 for this

[25:07] item, is that the caper is due

[25:09] to hood by SEPTEMBER 28th

[25:16] 2026. Now moving to item 3.17,

[25:17] a resolution authorizing the

[25:18] city administrator or designee

[25:19] to enter into a co-operative

[25:23] contract agreement with

[25:26] government jobs dot eac dba

[25:30] neoga for human resource

[25:31] information Systems,

[25:32] subscription services for a

[25:33] two-year period starting JULY

[25:36] first 2026 through JUNE, 30th

[25:38] 2028 in the amount not to

[25:44] exceed 1 Million. 77,547

[25:45] dollars and $0.98 and waving

[25:48] the competitive multi step

[25:50] solicitation process and the

[25:51] local small business

[25:52] enterprise requirements. This

[25:53] item is being requested to be

[25:56] scheduled for SEPTEMBER 22nd

[25:57] Finance and Management

[25:58] Committee. And that concludes

[25:59] all of your new scheduling at

[26:01] this time. I do have several

[26:04] speakers this item. Council

[26:11] member. So I also have a new

[26:13] scheduling item. I emailed the

[26:16] clicks. And so just read the

[26:18] title a resolution authorizing

[26:19] reimbursement for council

[26:22] PRESIDENT Kevin Jenkins and

[26:23] council members Rowena Brown

[26:26] and Ken Houston travel costs

[26:27] to Washington, D.C., for

[26:28] attendance at the

[26:30] Congressional Black Caucus

[26:32] Foundation's annual

[26:35] legislative conference from

[26:36] SEPTEMBER 16th through the

[26:37] 20th. And that is to go to the

[26:53] Tuesday JULY. 21st meeting.

[26:54] Let's go to the public

[26:58] speakers. As I call your name,

[27:00] please approach the podium in

[27:01] any order and state your name

[27:02] for the record. If you are

[27:05] participating via zoom, please

[27:06] raise your hand so I can

[27:08] easily identify you will take

[27:09] those who in person first

[27:10] followed by those who signed

[27:16] for Zoom. And add the speakers

[27:20] aren't misses out on the Blair

[27:21] beat both signed up for 3

[27:24] items as well that all right,

[27:28] Jon Jones, the 3rd and Zach,

[27:31] who also signed up for 3. In

[27:36] any order. If use signed up to

[27:37] speak on to item 3 and you're

[27:37] hearing chambers in person,

[27:38] please approach the podium.

[27:40] We'll take those. I just want

[27:41] to remind our public speakers.

[27:42] We have all art and turns in

[27:45] here want to set a wonderful

[27:46] example for all of our

[27:55] interns. Johns on 3rd for the

[27:56] record. Good morning through

[28:03] the I want urge you all to.

[28:04] Move the item related to the 3

[28:05] point line Coliseum for to

[28:09] full Council. And aside about

[28:12] this because the sheer and

[28:14] utter complexity that was

[28:14] involved in this deal that I

[28:16] know a lot of people are not

[28:18] aware of. Lot of people are

[28:18] not aware that real estate

[28:20] transactions occur in closed

[28:22] session. And when that

[28:23] happens, it opens the door for

[28:26] people to speculate. There has

[28:26] been rapid and just grow

[28:28] speculation Michael even get

[28:30] into, but also his real

[28:33] quickly is important people to

[28:35] understand that was are really

[28:35] tough because it was unique

[28:36] because it was under the

[28:37] authority of to the state

[28:37] municipality's that happens.

[28:40] Nowhere else in this country.

[28:42] But this deal actually has 16

[28:44] cities red. You got cj. You

[28:45] have the a's. You have

[28:46] communities will better

[28:48] environment. So to do this

[28:49] balancing act to meet the

[28:50] needs of everyone involved was

[28:53] like really a miracle. So just

[28:55] want to thank everyone. I want

[28:56] thank council member Rebecca

[28:56] Kapnick is on her leadership

[28:59] at the Coliseum. Specific.

[29:00] Thank you for your comments

[29:12] next. Speaker. In compliance

[29:17] of 5 usc. 29 1, 6, 3, cfr. I

[29:19] am analyst purchase the

[29:22] Coliseum. Choose regard

[29:25] question and are leaving

[29:26] international and the right us

[29:28] tsa capital and Royce

[29:29] Investments. I propose are

[29:31] requesting instead of the

[29:33] review that there be a

[29:35] complete player application to

[29:38] amendment ordinance, ems, 13

[29:39] 81 instead of the housing

[29:42] based on pickle view on Main

[29:42] Street, that would be

[29:46] wondering, does sewer change

[29:47] based on the touchy arc in the

[29:50] View Ngv Australia compliance

[29:51] is a Trump in the water

[29:52] resource board full of voices

[29:55] of the wetland be the Water

[29:56] Resource Board, Michigan, be

[29:57] the epa, Tennessee Valley

[29:58] Authority. The U.S. Colorado

[30:02] River Basin be the U.S.

[30:04] Hensley View and the special

[30:08] recommendation, 9, 3, 4 for of

[30:10] of the the United States tva

[30:11] Authority, the U.S. In New

[30:13] York Pistol Rifle v the United

[30:16] States. I move claws as Novi

[30:17] Rubenstein and Do the bar as

[30:24] do. I wish challenge 0 United

[30:25] States and the tax sale

[30:27] authorization as the principal

[30:29] agent and capital of

[30:31] Investments. Operation a

[30:35] director cap capital as well

[30:39] as the application as a field.

[30:40] Analysts and Warburg Pincus

[30:43] and on. Janice Capital. I

[30:45] wished asked why want a

[30:47] building has been purchased

[30:50] for 2 years and has not been

[30:50] redevelop and Beal low-income

[30:51] housing to the surrounding

[30:53] community. Based on

[30:57] application. And the short and

[30:59] moderna in cryptocurrency as

[31:00] an investment. There is 16

[31:04] over and management by that of

[31:05] the of the art of state under

[31:09] Lehman International. A field

[31:11] agent and responsible

[31:11] controllers, Ronald Jeffery

[31:13] refill interest or Eisenhower

[31:16] Camp Kennedy. I wish challenge

[31:17] to write a review of the state

[31:20] to Ministry application and vw

[31:21] International for you. James

[31:22] Herbert, Mercy Housing, be the

[31:26] United States. By that point

[31:29] of sale debt forgiveness. I

[31:30] wish to challenge an

[31:32] application and of revealed

[31:34] interstate moving it against

[31:35] the capital application via

[31:35] the 2 in the 10 year Treasury

[31:39] note. Based on the application

[31:41] of the review of the state. I

[31:42] do not believe that the

[31:43] outstanding balance and the

[31:46] debt forgiveness is enough. I

[31:48] wished asked that voucher

[31:53] program across the state. View

[31:54] of understanding the

[31:56] resolution to ask the the Bay

[31:56] Area even skin to ascribe

[31:59] initiative. Grant poster

[32:02] jurisdiction across Bay Area.

[32:03] I asked that be wondered to

[32:06] the on. Where you what you

[32:10] call I can't think of it. I do

[32:14] all. Thank you for your

[32:14] comments. Your time has

[32:15] indeed. Thank you so much.

[32:21] Thank you, sir. So I want to

[32:22] know why going to Washington,

[32:25] D.C.? Are you going to

[32:27] Washington, D.C., to talk

[32:28] about reparations? That's that

[32:32] happening for black people.

[32:33] You want to be talking about

[32:34] the fact that we got 10%

[32:35] unemployment, 70% of all

[32:36] homeless. You want to be

[32:39] talking about the fact that I

[32:42] can't get you have a

[32:43] discussion on gentrification

[32:43] in this chamber and no way in

[32:47] city. We'll have a discussion

[32:48] on the fact that we haven't

[32:51] had sanctuary city

[32:52] intervention impact negative

[32:54] impact. What the h#

[32:54] #

[32:54] . Yeah,

[32:58] going talk about. Because not

[32:58] come to every meet and talk

[32:59] about black people that you

[33:02] just sit there and look at me.

[33:04] So I object to y'all going to

[33:05] Washington, D.C., Now. Let's

[33:06] talk about this beautiful

[33:13] black on 3.5, 1, 5, nice. A

[33:14] probability. You can go

[33:15] through the process. Usually

[33:15] go through way. Y'all

[33:16] interview to people in this

[33:21] room. But you want to pass it

[33:23] Ricardo wasn't that the person

[33:24] you attacked and you approve

[33:26] recall do now. The Spanish

[33:28] got. But the black man, isil,

[33:31] 45 people apply for this job.

[33:35] Being on the commission? Only

[33:36] members of the commission. By

[33:40] the way, the selection panel,

[33:40] you change. That was a

[33:41] majority black selection

[33:43] panel. Nice majority White. So

[33:44] I guess you comfortable with

[33:45] white people selecting these

[33:48] people. So all of the

[33:51] candidates, they had to select

[33:55] 10. Nobody a foot. A top 10.

[33:56] Overall from a has a history

[34:00] of involvement. That cannot be

[34:04] disputed. History working with

[34:07] veterans. He still does that

[34:08] working with the Bot

[34:09] Commission selection a

[34:11] security issue. Working on

[34:13] measures e hey, it Chan of

[34:20] Measure z. Working on many,

[34:21] many out all ad hoc

[34:21] committee's full and caught

[34:23] committees on the police

[34:25] commission all but he don't

[34:25] deserve to be back on it at

[34:28] Black man. Don't deserve it.

[34:29] But you got another black man

[34:31] welcome on what has he done?

[34:34] He's on the business

[34:34] improvement. Association. Put

[34:40] him cell. What is it that you

[34:41] allow one woman to come in and

[34:46] destroy the cat integrity all

[34:47] You proceed to uplifted this

[34:49] black me. Then you go through

[34:51] a process of the police

[34:53] commission. Well, we don't

[34:54] know who was on selected to

[34:56] Comey's police commission

[34:59] today. The last time we had

[35:01] the police commission

[35:01] selection process, the public

[35:02] got to see all of the

[35:03] candidates not have done it in

[35:04] secret. I don't know who else

[35:07] was involved. But we had a

[35:10] chance to hear all of those

[35:11] candidates. Probably a black

[35:13] man was left out. You

[35:17] satisfied with do you got? Do

[35:20] not go to Washington, D.C.?

[35:21] All you do is and acting like

[35:22] you're doing something for

[35:27] black people. Thank you so

[35:28] much for your comments. Side

[35:30] your time has indeed. We will

[35:33] now go to those who signed up

[35:34] on MISTER Big Ben, please

[35:35] unmute yourself. You MAY

[35:39] begin. All right. Thank you

[35:42] win. Thanks for the public

[35:44] comment. Took rip items set up

[35:48] 3.7 3 point. Well, keep 0.15,

[35:48] are you? Thanks for the words

[35:52] of first public comment or

[35:55] that open all over being done

[35:57] to work on the future of the

[36:00] Coliseum. And thank you for

[36:01] the previous work up. Rebecca

[36:04] Kaplan be mentioned from the

[36:05] previous work of council

[36:06] person's good luck to our

[36:08] current council person's and

[36:11] how they can navigate working

[36:13] the county. It was a lot of

[36:15] work previously and hopefully

[36:18] maybe just this time around a

[36:20] good mediation process can be

[36:21] taken place. Good luck in your

[36:23] after town. You can be working

[36:25] council with the County. Well,

[36:26] what the county at this time

[36:29] in your new rules. I wanted to

[36:35] mention the Bay Wi Fi. Okay.

[36:40] This For Okay. I want to

[36:41] mention with Bay, you watch

[36:44] the issues that I'm I'm trying

[36:47] to learn. I came here, you

[36:48] know, back last year, number

[36:51] through MARCH, just in a panic

[36:52] he watched. It is going to

[36:55] some serious, serious changes.

[36:58] They are. You it maybe not so

[36:59] bad. As first thought, there

[37:00] MAY be parts of democratic

[37:03] process that will continue all

[37:04] they are, although they

[37:05] consolidating their process,

[37:08] it seems like how they do that

[37:09] openly. And clearly I hope you

[37:11] can still work with them on an

[37:12] asset of them and demand that

[37:15] of them. Good luck in the

[37:16] efforts and working with a one

[37:18] and that man, it is a place

[37:19] that is a public meeting place

[37:20] and the community should

[37:22] really go to their meetings

[37:23] and see what their

[37:26] contribution is to our local

[37:29] national security and and and

[37:30] law enforcement priorities. I

[37:32] mean, if you want to have a

[37:33] question that it's important

[37:33] to attend those meetings and

[37:37] see what they do. And on to

[37:41] item 3.15, sounds like you are

[37:44] possibly going to bring back

[37:45] one of the previous police

[37:46] commissioners. Thank you. If

[37:49] you can doing that is pretty

[37:50] amazing. But to me, if you can

[37:55] be as a he really deserves it.

[37:57] And thank you that we're

[37:59] trying You're trying to

[38:00] mediate a new feature in

[38:01] Oakland that invites all parts

[38:02] and you're listening to that

[38:04] and thank you. I can't thank

[38:08] you enough doing So good luck

[38:10] to the meeting previous

[38:11] commissioner can be returned

[38:12] to case play to that record

[38:15] correctly. Earlier. And then

[38:19] there was one more item on pa

[38:21] on a person be 8 to be

[38:22] appointed. Good luck that we

[38:26] can talk about buck more. We

[38:28] can talk about it at the not

[38:29] war, actually. And that's an

[38:31] interesting concept. Teacher.

[38:32] Good luck. How we can work

[38:37] towards that. Thank you for

[38:37] your comments. That concludes

[38:38] our speakers for this item.

[38:41] Thank you so much. Everybody

[38:42] that came out and spoke noting

[38:44] 3.1 title change. 3.2 urgency,

[38:49] finding 3.3 urgency finding

[38:52] 3.4 finding in a title change.

[38:57] 3.5 full. 24 3.6 3020.13 20 4

[38:58] and it requests Councilmember

[39:00] Prounced to go to the JULY

[39:03] 20st on consent. With that. An

[39:08] emotion as minute. So moved.

[39:13] Second. Thank you. And that

[39:15] was a motion by council member

[39:16] Brown seconded by

[39:17] Councilmember Ramachandran to

[39:20] approve item 3 as amended on

[39:21] role Councilmember Brown. I

[39:24] councilmember Fife. I

[39:26] ramachandran I Chair Jenkins.

[39:27] I item number 3 is approved as

[39:30] amended with 4 eyes. That now

[39:37] takes us to item 4. Item

[39:38] before his review of the draft

[39:39] agenda is pending list. City

[39:40] Council in committee meetings

[39:45] we have here your JULY 14th

[39:47] committees, JULY 16, Rule's

[39:51] your pin De Lis and your July

[39:51] 21st Council in JULY 23rd

[39:54] Legislation Committee agenda.

[39:57] Thank you to ministrations.

[39:58] Any changes. Administration

[40:01] has changes at this time. And

[40:01] we will move to public

[40:05] comment. Thank you. As I call

[40:07] your name, please approach the

[40:08] podium. Order. And again, if

[40:09] you are participating via

[40:10] zoom, please raise your hand.

[40:13] I a societal of Allah, Zach

[40:14] and Blair Beekman in any

[40:15] order. Good morning. Missus,

[40:22] Attar. First, new report on

[40:22] the overpayment of city

[40:23] employee employees. When get

[40:27] that money back. You committed

[40:30] $700,000 for the we modeling

[40:33] of the routes. Soco you

[40:33] weren't supposed to pay the

[40:37] full 700,000. Alameda in

[40:38] Berkeley, the city of Berkeley

[40:39] was supposed to make a

[40:40] contribution. But what the

[40:43] reports that reflect what do

[40:45] we gain in terms of finances

[40:46] as a result of committing to

[40:49] the World Cup? You have

[40:52] $81,000 that was spent by

[40:56] children's initiative to

[40:56] remove Portables from Skyline

[40:57] High School. That was on the

[40:59] agenda last week at the school

[41:00] board meeting. That money is

[41:02] supposed to be use for early

[41:03] childhood development. You

[41:04] need to find out how that

[41:07] happened. You need to have a

[41:09] report on sanctuary cities and

[41:11] how it impacts the lives of

[41:12] jobs and housing needs of

[41:14] African-Americans. You need to

[41:15] have a report on

[41:16] gentrification, how it impacts

[41:17] the lives of

[41:19] African-Americans. You need to

[41:21] have a report on the city

[41:24] administrative spending up to

[41:25] $250,000. The last report was

[41:26] done in 2023. That's supposed

[41:28] to be annual report and has

[41:29] not happened and it is

[41:32] scheduled to happen in 2027.

[41:33] He did have a report on ca

[41:36] school environment is status.

[41:37] That's serious. You need to

[41:39] have a report on new so-called

[41:40] reparations that everybody's

[41:41] talking about. But you have

[41:43] never taken a position created

[41:43] an ordinance resolutions

[41:46] related to reparations. You

[41:47] have to you need to have a

[41:50] report on the parking

[41:50] violation. Sorry. The parking

[41:52] validation that's allowed

[41:53] anyone that uses the city ice

[41:58] Center. You can report on the

[42:00] schools of thoughts use of

[42:01] that land when we got get that

[42:02] land back so we can use it for

[42:06] housing. You need to have a

[42:09] report on the waiting list of

[42:11] 5,000 people while waiting to

[42:12] get housing. According to the

[42:15] Open Housing Authority. You

[42:19] need to have a report on all.

[42:20] How it Durant library funding

[42:24] when that funding is going.

[42:25] Thank you for your comments.

[42:39] Mississauga next speaker.

[42:39] So

[42:41] on my understanding of this is

[42:43] that I believe with the

[42:44] approval. I do understand I

[42:46] have a little bit issue with

[42:48] the public works and

[42:50] Transportation Committee. Art

[42:51] is real list will not been

[42:52] sent in to any of the

[42:53] circuits. Based on how you

[42:56] guys writing based on the bond

[42:58] etf, while the bart bonds are

[43:00] seeing I have to hack your

[43:03] systems in 9 different

[43:07] languages to validate the

[43:08] wonderment cryptocurrency

[43:11] knowing that nonprofits offer

[43:12] 3 one-day passes as a way it

[43:13] any of the nonprofits and

[43:14] that's executive order to no

[43:15] questions asked. And you inner

[43:19] pole. How that is wondered pre

[43:21] and post the door assignment

[43:22] to atf standards. Yes, there

[43:26] is an issue when you guys ask

[43:27] that that is wondered in these

[43:28] types of forms of being able

[43:31] to pound them Biden walk and

[43:31] show you as a grant of the

[43:33] city and the county is a he

[43:36] not among this issue based on

[43:37] the view of federal

[43:37] legislation to the two-year

[43:40] Treasury note. When this is

[43:41] wondered a little bit public

[43:45] safety is a request Mont. I do

[43:47] believe should be. 28 to 34

[43:52] ask it is compromised at 16 27

[43:52] and say you don't understand

[43:56] community fundraising. Sba or

[43:57] there is a police credit union

[43:58] in this community and why the

[43:59] f you don't use it compared

[44:02] paying the highest federal

[44:04] consulting fees in the country

[44:04] is f#

[44:04] #

[44:05] #

[44:05] b#

[44:05] #

[44:06] #

[44:06] , excuse my

[44:09] language. When this is wonder

[44:10] to the Port Liaison Committee

[44:12] draft. I do have a little bit

[44:14] issue with knowing that

[44:14] they're going through it from

[44:17] the environmental on q e c d I

[44:19] do have an issue with the

[44:22] housing. I believe it's

[44:23] absolutely bull ship. And I'm

[44:24] gonna say it's student. Please

[44:25] mind your language.

[44:30] Understood. Look at the

[44:30] community and county

[44:31] legislation office only says

[44:34] that there are 8200 within the

[44:34] county that are homeless. We

[44:39] have 5,000 just city. That's

[44:42] Thank you for your comments

[44:42] make Speaker Blair Beekman

[44:43] please unmute yourself and you

[44:46] MAY begin. All right. Up

[44:52] impeachment. On your upcoming

[44:54] committees this JULY. I what

[44:56] you're starting to hint at in

[45:00] JUNE, you're going to be

[45:01] budget deficit issues a bit

[45:05] more. I think I would how we

[45:05] can have those conversations.

[45:06] I don't exactly know how you

[45:09] guys want to work. That idea.

[45:10] You know, I've just been

[45:13] describing what what San

[45:14] Diego's been going to have,

[45:15] the second highest budget

[45:16] deficit for a city only to

[45:21] Oakland. And I described in

[45:23] Oakland, you guys that made

[45:24] feel important effort that you

[45:25] concentrate on social services

[45:27] first and then talk about the

[45:28] budget. Diego really been

[45:31] learning those lessons and I'm

[45:33] just interested now how

[45:35] exactly the programs you know,

[45:35] you have to be considering for

[45:39] budget deficit issue that I

[45:40] think has been included in

[45:43] ideas such you know, how

[45:46] workers can take pay cut in

[45:47] health care. And in their

[45:50] retirement plans. I've been

[45:51] trying to say I don't think

[45:53] that's quite the right

[45:55] approach and they can take a

[45:56] cut all together, you know,

[45:57] like 50 bucks a month, 600

[46:01] bucks a gear that brings the

[46:02] budget savings of almost

[46:02] 2 million dollars. If you have

[46:07] a staff of a 2500,000 workers.

[46:11] So, you know, I'm I'm I'm. You

[46:13] know, how do we navigate those

[46:13] things and have that

[46:15] conversation and make the

[46:16] connection that there is

[46:19] important deficit? You guys

[46:20] have to acknowledge and work

[46:22] on you guys have been doing

[46:25] incredibly Thank you. So good

[46:25] luck out how you can be

[46:26] working on that and that we

[46:30] can do it. Well. To quickly

[46:34] conclude. Yeah, as I said Icac

[46:38] Underwrote writer. I outlines

[46:41] working towards peace for our

[46:42] community. Peter I it's an

[46:43] important concept that we're

[46:43] trying to understand could

[46:44] look how we can be learning

[46:45] that we can create a policy

[46:48] that. Thank you for your

[46:49] comments that concludes our

[46:52] public speakers for this item.

[46:53] Thank you. If there are no

[46:57] counts in there, comments we

[46:57] have posh U.S. District 7

[47:06] office. Please go ahead. 2026.

[47:07] There was an item that was

[47:09] presented in conjunction with

[47:11] the other That item was 5.5

[47:12] titled and Counting to in

[47:14] management. Team operations

[47:15] and had a presentation that

[47:16] was not presented during City

[47:18] Council meeting on JULY 7th

[47:20] 2026. That would have answered

[47:22] questions from other council

[47:23] members. Councilmember Houston

[47:24] would like to request this

[47:24] item to come back to next

[47:26] council meeting on JULY. 21st

[47:28] 2026, we're asking for real 24

[47:29] to bypass committee and go

[47:32] straight to council due to the

[47:35] ap going into effect on JULY

[47:35] 14th 2026. It is important for

[47:36] the council members to have

[47:37] clarity on the incumbent

[47:37] management abatement team

[47:45] operations. Thank you. So just

[47:54] for clarification so MADAM

[47:56] City Clerk, Reed City, her can

[47:57] click of the council. So

[47:57] during that meeting, those 2

[48:00] items were taken together. And

[48:01] I believe one of your

[48:01] colleagues say they were going

[48:03] to work with council member

[48:04] Houston to bring a different

[48:06] item bat possibly for action.

[48:07] But that item is was it

[48:14] dispensed with? Through the

[48:16] chair to the body just for

[48:18] clarity. If you're trying to

[48:19] schedule line of that would be

[48:19] done under items. 3 of this

[48:21] agenda, which has already

[48:22] occurred, so need to be

[48:23] brought back as a new

[48:28] scheduling item at this point.

[48:28] Thank you. I will entertain a

[48:36] motion. So moved second. And

[48:37] that was a cold ocean by

[48:40] Councilmember 5 seconded by

[48:41] council member Brown to

[48:44] approve item for as is on row

[48:45] Councilmember Brown. I

[48:49] councilmember 5. I council

[48:51] member Ahmed Chandran. I in

[48:52] Chair Jane King is excused.

[48:53] Item 4 is approved with 3 eyes

[48:57] won excused. That now takes us

[48:59] to item number 5. Number 5 is

[49:01] receiving information report

[49:03] from the city Attorney office

[49:05] regarding the cases the city

[49:06] attorney's office has brought

[49:08] pursuant to the open. This

[49:10] Bull Code chapter 1.1, 0. I

[49:13] have 4 speakers for this item.

[49:19] Thank you to the city tend

[49:20] Deputy city attorney pennies

[49:21] here to present the report.

[49:25] Think Good Morning Council.

[49:26] Here to present the

[49:27] information report on the

[49:29] civil protection of the people

[49:30] of Oakland ordinance. So we

[49:34] call say for short for those

[49:37] of you are on council in JULY

[49:38] 2023, you might remember this

[49:38] ordinance and for those of you

[49:40] who are not on council at that

[49:42] time, this ordinance was

[49:43] passed unanimously by City

[49:47] Council. And what it did was

[49:48] it gave the city attorney

[49:49] explicit authority to enforce

[49:52] all of the Oakland Municipal

[49:53] Code prior to this. The city

[49:54] attorney couldn't for some but

[49:58] not all of Oakland's laws. And

[49:58] by and for us. I mean, when

[50:01] one of our violated the city

[50:02] attorney can file a lawsuit, a

[50:06] civil lawsuit under the law.

[50:06] The ordinance also gave the

[50:08] city Attorney authority to

[50:09] seek a range of meaningful

[50:10] remedies for the city. And for

[50:12] Oakland, residents, tenants

[50:14] and workers and others who are

[50:15] harmed by our laws being

[50:19] violated. Importantly, the

[50:20] ordinance was designed to

[50:22] promote equitable enforcement

[50:22] of our laws, equity with built

[50:26] into the ordinance. We had

[50:26] worked with the Department of

[50:28] Race inequity to conduct a

[50:29] racial equity impact analysis.

[50:32] But prior to passage and that

[50:32] was in the staff report and

[50:35] that's attached here

[50:39] attachment b. And the reason

[50:40] that we're here today is

[50:42] because the ordinance required

[50:43] the city attorney to collect

[50:45] data on lawsuits filed under

[50:46] the ordinance and to present a

[50:47] report to council within 3

[50:50] years of passage. And the

[50:50] reportedly publicly available

[50:52] on our website. So we have

[50:55] this report that we we put

[50:58] forward to the committee and

[50:59] as the report says, the city

[51:00] attorney filed 5 lawsuits

[51:01] under the ordinance over the

[51:04] last 3 years, including

[51:06] lawsuits to protect the rights

[51:07] of Oakland, tenants, workers

[51:09] and residents to the lawsuits

[51:11] are still pending. One was

[51:12] dismissed. One was settled and

[51:14] one is mostly resolved. And

[51:15] the details of those lawsuits

[51:18] is in the report. The city

[51:21] attorney also included this

[51:22] ordinance in demand letters.

[51:23] We are often able to resolve

[51:23] issues short of filing a

[51:28] lawsuit. And and overall c one

[51:31] point has been. Useful for

[51:34] office, we continue. We plan

[51:37] to continue using this tool

[51:41] and we have some next steps

[51:42] that are included in the

[51:44] report, too. Make our use of

[51:48] this tool more meaningful in

[51:48] robust, for example, we will

[51:51] be creating a plan to collect

[51:51] enforcement data more

[51:53] thoroughly inconsistently

[51:54] across the teams that are

[51:57] using ordinance in the office.

[51:58] We will follow the current

[51:59] cases through collect

[52:00] demographic data on the

[52:02] outcomes and impacts of

[52:04] litigation. We will develop

[52:05] additional training for

[52:07] attorneys in our office about

[52:08] conducting an equity analysis

[52:12] when c 1.1 Now and we will be

[52:13] consulting with Dre, the

[52:15] Department of Race inequity in

[52:15] this process. We have

[52:16] consulted with them and they

[52:18] continue to be a partner for

[52:19] us. I'm happy to answer any

[52:23] questions about the report.

[52:28] Thank Colleagues. Okay, I'm

[52:30] not. I will ask a couple of

[52:32] quick questions. I very much

[52:33] remember this being brought

[52:36] forward back in 2023 glad to

[52:39] hear that office had success

[52:41] in utilizing it in a few

[52:45] cases. My first question is

[52:47] mentioned that it's also been

[52:48] invoked in demand letters.

[52:50] What type of cases are those?

[52:53] This is primarily used by the

[52:54] affirmative litigation

[52:55] division and our office and

[52:56] the types of cases that we

[53:00] bring. There are a lot of

[53:01] housing cases. So cases where,

[53:03] you know, tenants complained

[53:03] to the city about their rights

[53:08] being violated by landlords.

[53:10] We also have used it worker

[53:13] protection cases cases where,

[53:14] you know, I've wage and paid

[53:16] sick leave. Another worker

[53:16] protection laws are being

[53:18] violated and their complaints

[53:20] the city or to our office

[53:21] about that. We also have a

[53:25] fair number of public nuisance

[53:30] matters where. There there's

[53:32] you know, a business that is

[53:32] engaging in conduct that's

[53:34] creating a public nuisance.

[53:36] And Oakland and residents are

[53:40] being harmed. And so we make

[53:42] include this in. This is

[53:42] actually a great tool to

[53:44] address public nuisances

[53:47] locally. So we have used this

[53:49] tool and some of our public

[53:50] nuisance matters. Those are

[53:51] some examples of the types of

[53:52] cases that our our team has

[53:55] worked on. We work on a range

[54:00] of issues, but those are some

[54:03] of That's great. And I

[54:04] understand having written a

[54:04] lot of demand letters in my

[54:05] previous legal career that

[54:07] these can be very impactful.

[54:09] And on that note. How can

[54:13] members of the public have a

[54:14] complaint? Obviously, your

[54:16] office cannot take all of

[54:18] them. How does, for example,

[54:19] if there is a serious is that

[54:20] of tenants that have a major

[54:24] issue in want to seek the city

[54:25] attorneys use this see how to

[54:27] engage with their office

[54:29] based, you know, it's a great

[54:29] question. So we do get lots of

[54:34] complaints from the public and

[54:35] we have 3 units within the

[54:36] affirmative litigation

[54:38] division. That, you know, we

[54:39] work together, but we also

[54:43] have have different focus

[54:45] areas. We have a housing

[54:46] justice initiative. That's one

[54:49] of the units that focuses on

[54:52] tenant protection cases and so

[54:56] the members of the public can.

[54:57] So that there's also the

[55:00] neighborhood La La Core, which

[55:04] as a team 4 to 5 attorneys

[55:05] that we'll address complaints

[55:08] that come in. I think that the

[55:08] contact information that we

[55:09] probably have on the website

[55:10] is for the neighborhood lock

[55:11] or because they're a little

[55:13] bit closer to the ground they

[55:14] can also so they can contact

[55:17] the neighborhood lock or if

[55:20] you look at the Oakland City

[55:22] attorney's website and you

[55:22] find the neighborhood block

[55:23] where the firm Litigation

[55:26] Division you should find there

[55:28] at least email if not also a

[55:30] phone number. So that's one

[55:30] way to contact our team. And

[55:35] that's where a lot of direct

[55:36] complaints and inquiries come

[55:36] through is the neighborhood

[55:41] lock or and sometimes look at

[55:42] rooted then to the Housing

[55:44] Justice Initiative. For

[55:45] example, if it's a tenant,

[55:47] like a large tenant protection

[55:50] case, I also we you know, we

[55:51] hear from council members

[55:51] about complaints that have

[55:55] come to the city. We hear from

[55:55] nonprofits, legal aid

[56:02] organizations. And also filing

[56:02] complaints with diversity

[56:06] departments. So for example,

[56:07] the Department of Workplace

[56:08] unemployment standards is sort

[56:13] of the first stop. For worker.

[56:14] Rights violations. If you

[56:16] think you're not being paid

[56:17] minimum wage or that your your

[56:18] rights are being violated in

[56:21] the workplace, you can file a

[56:22] complaint with the Department

[56:22] of Workplace unemployment

[56:23] standards and that information

[56:25] is on their website and we

[56:26] have worker protection

[56:27] attorneys on our team who work

[56:29] with that department and you

[56:32] know, help them with resolving

[56:35] cases, filing lawsuits cetera.

[56:37] And you can file complaints.

[56:38] Tenants filed complaints with

[56:39] our building Code Department

[56:43] all the time. And we also work

[56:45] with code to address some of

[56:46] those issues, especially when

[56:48] seeing pattern and practice.

[56:51] Okay. Thank you. And remember

[56:54] 2 and a half. 3 years ago

[56:55] asking this question. But he

[56:59] and a fresh and ready. How is

[57:01] 1.1 0 different from the

[57:02] powers that the affirmative

[57:06] litigation team already So the

[57:07] city attorney already had the

[57:09] authority to enforce a number

[57:10] of Oakland laws, but not every

[57:12] single Oakland law. And so

[57:16] when this ordinance passed, it

[57:17] became gave the city attorney

[57:18] clear authority to enforce all

[57:20] of the Oakland Municipal Code.

[57:24] And it also. Gave the city

[57:27] attorney and meaningful

[57:29] remedies that were not

[57:29] available under every single

[57:30] Oakland. Last of some laws

[57:33] say. When the city attorney

[57:34] brings a lawsuit under this

[57:36] the city attorney can seek,

[57:38] you know, penalties that we'll

[57:41] go to the city. Some of the

[57:42] ordinances had said the city

[57:47] attorney can seek money for

[57:48] residents or workers are

[57:49] tenants who are harmed. Some

[57:51] ordinances didn't say that. So

[57:56] this c 1.1 0 provides clear

[57:59] authority to seek a range of

[58:01] remedies that make our work

[58:05] meaningful. That can be a

[58:06] deterrent. 2 actors that are

[58:10] repeatedly violating the law.

[58:17] And that allow the city to to

[58:19] recoup money for the city as

[58:21] well. As for people who are

[58:22] armed and who might be owed

[58:23] back rent or who might be

[58:26] owed. You know, back wages and

[58:30] things like that. We can move

[58:34] to public speakers. Thank you.

[58:36] As I I apologize, discounts on

[58:36] MAY use and have a question or

[58:38] comment on this nat of this.

[58:41] But something Then a little

[58:41] bit for this item to be

[58:46] distant. Thank you. Thank As I

[58:46] call your name, please

[58:49] approach the podium. You

[58:51] signed up via please raise

[58:52] your hand so I can easily

[58:55] identify you. I have societal

[58:57] of Barry Bonds, Blair Beekman

[58:58] and Zach for item number 5 in

[59:07] any order, please. That I'm a

[59:11] full-time angry black woman.

[59:13] And like James Baldwin said.

[59:15] To be black and conscious in

[59:18] America. You have to be in a

[59:20] constant state of reach. And I

[59:24] agree with that. Now what take

[59:27] from this is the thing that

[59:28] made in first angry with the

[59:28] city attorneys offices, wind

[59:31] as Brooke, to sue the city

[59:34] attorney's Office for not

[59:35] appropriately with that Elaine

[59:38] Brown issue. I remember

[59:39] Jonelle Harris when she said

[59:41] on the police commission. And

[59:44] it was far gently represent

[59:45] that she was doing something.

[59:46] Wasn't happening related to

[59:49] the former police chief.

[59:50] Fitzpatrick City attorneys

[59:55] office did nothing. And this

[59:57] Harris a foot a break

[59:58] misunderstanding of account

[1:00:02] integrity. It has cost dearly.

[1:00:05] I remember the Bay case that

[1:00:08] the city attorney on many

[1:00:09] occasions has done nothing to

[1:00:10] bring resolve to the big case

[1:00:12] where police officers killed

[1:00:18] the Bay Brothers. I remember

[1:00:19] the police commission having

[1:00:20] to defend itself on several

[1:00:21] occasions because the city

[1:00:25] attorney's office did nothing.

[1:00:26] I have no respect for the city

[1:00:26] attorney's office of the way

[1:00:29] they handled to has it on his

[1:00:31] number of the cases had the

[1:00:31] avoid and do not do things

[1:00:36] appropriately. So that issues

[1:00:36] with the city attorneys

[1:00:38] office. Particularly when it

[1:00:42] relates to. This case. Coming

[1:00:45] up with the $900,000 that you

[1:00:46] all being sued, put the

[1:00:50] streets. That's fine. I want

[1:00:51] to add a city attorney's

[1:00:51] office will handle that when

[1:00:52] you're probably going to have

[1:00:59] to end up. Doing a settlement.

[1:00:59] Which is absolutely

[1:01:00] ridiculous. You should

[1:01:01] intervene in any in the first

[1:01:04] place before this happened.

[1:01:04] But the city's attorneys

[1:01:08] office no respect for. Thank

[1:01:09] you for comments. Next.

[1:01:17] Speaker. In regards to this

[1:01:18] case, I wish challenge and

[1:01:21] then or appellate application

[1:01:26] 14, 5, 5, 6, 9, 0, 18, 6, 3,

[1:01:27] 4, 8, John Hanke up Santa

[1:01:32] Clara University. Patrick Bach

[1:01:34] here. The California victim

[1:01:34] compensation Government claim

[1:01:41] board 14, 17 o for 3 Neill

[1:01:41] silver, the Higher Education

[1:01:44] Assistance Agency, 16. 15, 6,

[1:01:48] 6, 4. Anthony Cassie, U.S.

[1:01:53] State Bar of California. 21

[1:01:58] Dash 15 for excuse me. 21 Dash

[1:02:00] 5, 5, 9, 0, 0, and the view of

[1:02:02] Davis me a verse macdonough

[1:02:04] you will stir view the United

[1:02:04] States Graf. Israeli

[1:02:08] rodriques. Graphics,

[1:02:12] Rodriguez, beholder and park

[1:02:13] or so U.S. Pork Association be

[1:02:17] the United States. I wish to

[1:02:19] fully the application of the

[1:02:20] barn holding and the view of

[1:02:23] the Oakland Promise and the

[1:02:24] contempt and ask that it be an

[1:02:27] inner appellate review for

[1:02:29] great. Gross, blatant malice,

[1:02:30] unintentional negligence.

[1:02:33] Malice claim against the state

[1:02:34] of California. Malice claim

[1:02:36] against the state or the city

[1:02:39] of Oakland and the county of

[1:02:39] Alameda for purposes of gross

[1:02:46] negligence. Asking that the

[1:02:47] case Anthony Cassesse the

[1:02:49] state bar. California shows it

[1:02:51] to regulatory bond holdings

[1:02:56] tied investment schemes based

[1:02:57] on performance based or

[1:02:59] consulting as you see to

[1:03:02] shooting Neill server shows

[1:03:03] that bond liquidity and

[1:03:06] applications to it based on

[1:03:07] debt financing across multiple

[1:03:11] regions. Patrick van shows it

[1:03:15] to compensation based on

[1:03:15] intrinsic property. The

[1:03:16] intrinsic property would be

[1:03:19] the short of Thank you for

[1:03:22] your comments. I will now move

[1:03:24] to speakers. If you've signed

[1:03:25] up to speak on item 5, please

[1:03:27] raise your hand so I can

[1:03:27] easily identify you. I have

[1:03:32] Blair beat in Derrick Barnes.

[1:03:32] Lady have been a muted. You

[1:03:37] measure something began. All

[1:03:39] Good luck the continuing

[1:03:41] impact that equity with this

[1:03:41] item, how we can do that

[1:03:42] better is a city and a

[1:03:47] community. It takes a lot to

[1:03:47] understand just extend kids to

[1:03:50] clean, working towards equity

[1:03:52] like what you can be doing,

[1:03:53] what it can all be coming

[1:03:54] together with item can help

[1:03:55] contribute Charcot future.

[1:03:58] Thank you. Thank you for your

[1:04:04] comments in Derek. Barnes. If

[1:04:05] you wish to speak as you

[1:04:07] signed up for item 5, muted.

[1:04:11] You MAY begin MADAM No

[1:04:13] comments from me. I sent note

[1:04:14] earlier this morning to remove

[1:04:15] me from the speaker to thank

[1:04:18] Thank you. Includes just

[1:04:22] because for the side. Okay.

[1:04:29] Thank Eleanor. 10 motion. Make

[1:04:29] the removing the item to the

[1:04:34] full That So under your

[1:04:35] council rules, you of course,

[1:04:36] have the authority to receive

[1:04:37] a here are move it to the full

[1:04:37] council. I think the

[1:04:40] recommendation from our office

[1:04:42] that this body can receive it

[1:04:44] in committee. Okay. Make that

[1:04:45] motion to receive in filing

[1:04:50] committee second. And that was

[1:04:50] a motion by council member

[1:04:53] Brown seconded by

[1:04:53] Councilmember Fife to receive

[1:04:57] and file item number 5 in

[1:04:57] committee on role

[1:05:02] Councilmember Brown.

[1:05:02] COUNCILMAN Ramachandran I and

[1:05:05] share Jenkins is excuse. This

[1:05:07] item was received about in

[1:05:09] committee with 3 ayes and one

[1:05:11] excuse. We'll now move to open

[1:05:12] forum. I have Mississauga Ohl

[1:05:16] of Allah. Derek, Blair man

[1:05:21] ends Zach. To show you

[1:05:22] ridiculous the selection panel

[1:05:25] issue is. Of the 45 candidates

[1:05:29] that applied. One of the 10

[1:05:30] that went through was Doug

[1:05:32] Law. The person that y'all

[1:05:37] rejected 2 times out of the 45

[1:05:37] candidate. Doug Long made it

[1:05:41] to the top 10. That shows you

[1:05:46] credible this process. Let me

[1:05:46] go back to the sanctuary city

[1:05:50] thing. Sanctuary city. The

[1:05:53] problem with it from me. It's

[1:05:54] not having people come here

[1:05:57] illegally on legally. It's

[1:05:59] once they get here. There is a

[1:06:02] impact that happens. The

[1:06:04] impact is jobs. The impact is

[1:06:07] housing. So they have been

[1:06:11] here. People who have come

[1:06:14] here in the immigrant status.

[1:06:14] African Americans are now 10%

[1:06:17] of the unemployment, 70% of

[1:06:21] the of the homeless. We are

[1:06:22] not getting jobs. And when

[1:06:23] that getting homeless and

[1:06:24] people who are coming

[1:06:30] illegally and what I mean.

[1:06:31] Apologies misses out of your

[1:06:34] time. Isn't it?

[1:06:51] Kuzma the Houston? Would you

[1:06:52] like to speak before we move

[1:06:55] to the next? Yes. Good

[1:06:57] morning. Colleagues have a

[1:06:58] question and I want to speak

[1:06:58] to the city attorney on this.

[1:07:02] If you don't mind to the chair

[1:07:03] at the meeting at 3.30, on

[1:07:06] Tuesday, 7, 7, 26 I had had 2

[1:07:09] items to come forward. And

[1:07:11] that was 5.4, 5.5 and our

[1:07:14] PRESIDENT Merge together. All

[1:07:17] right. But what happened was

[1:07:18] when MR. Que become came up. I

[1:07:19] don't know if it was k top of

[1:07:21] whatever councilmember Fife

[1:07:22] that he was saying that he had

[1:07:25] the power play right. But then

[1:07:28] he spoke to it and then the

[1:07:32] power point of 5.4, which was

[1:07:33] receiving information report

[1:07:35] on inventory of city-owned

[1:07:36] property. He kind of went over

[1:07:41] that. And councilmember Brown.

[1:07:43] So so Councilmember 5 had had

[1:07:43] a couple questions that were

[1:07:48] very critical, right? And if

[1:07:49] she would have got that

[1:07:49] information, she would have

[1:07:51] been able to understand some

[1:07:51] of the things that you do with

[1:07:53] needed to be addressed. But

[1:07:56] that. Power point. Was not

[1:08:01] present. And I said it when I

[1:08:03] sat in this chair. Wait, whoa,

[1:08:04] The power point isn't present.

[1:08:07] It. And now I'm here and that

[1:08:11] I got to wait till SEPTEMBER

[1:08:11] to for this power point to

[1:08:12] come up. I want to ask you the

[1:08:16] city attorneys office. This

[1:08:17] power plant was very critical

[1:08:18] for the Eap has been launched

[1:08:22] on 7.14, right. And my

[1:08:22] colleagues needed to

[1:08:24] understand what was in here.

[1:08:26] And it was overlooked. I put

[1:08:29] it on the agenda. It wasn't

[1:08:31] done on purpose. Cast member

[1:08:33] Brown things do happen. But I

[1:08:34] understand, but I should not

[1:08:35] have to a public shouldn't

[1:08:36] have to wait. And my

[1:08:38] colleagues. Even though they

[1:08:40] they understate they can get

[1:08:42] it. I wanted it explained by

[1:08:46] that. Amari that understands

[1:08:48] this on the ground. So I'm

[1:08:52] very disappointed. This was

[1:08:53] not present. And I have waited

[1:08:54] for this. Now we're going

[1:08:58] break. So to chair. To the

[1:09:00] city attorneys office. How do

[1:09:05] I get this scene presented?

[1:09:06] Because I had asked for it to

[1:09:08] presented before we went on to

[1:09:10] break. This is critical that

[1:09:11] they explain this to me and my

[1:09:14] colleagues. So why do I have

[1:09:16] to wait something I had

[1:09:17] planned that I had went

[1:09:20] through the process. I went

[1:09:21] through the process. So how do

[1:09:22] I do this? Because I'm not

[1:09:23] gonna wait that long because

[1:09:25] the public needs to hear this

[1:09:28] and my colleagues needed given

[1:09:29] presented to him that from

[1:09:32] their interpretation. Through

[1:09:32] the chair to the Rules

[1:09:33] Committee, Councilmember

[1:09:34] Houston first want to know

[1:09:35] open forum. And so this item

[1:09:37] is not agendas right now. But

[1:09:41] just to respond briefly, as

[1:09:42] MADAM City clerk said earlier,

[1:09:45] both of those items were

[1:09:46] dispensed like finally

[1:09:46] dispensed with council. So

[1:09:49] they were both received by the

[1:09:51] council and therefore, that

[1:09:52] item is dispense with as of

[1:09:55] now, of course, you can bring

[1:09:56] a scheduling request for a new

[1:09:58] item. Back to this body. And

[1:10:02] that would be submitted to the

[1:10:04] clerk and then taken up on

[1:10:05] items 3 at the next rules. And

[1:10:06] I'd be happy. Happy to talk to

[1:10:07] you after when is the next

[1:10:13] rules? Next Thursday. Next

[1:10:14] Thursday. So so let me ask

[1:10:16] this question, is brought to

[1:10:17] make sure those next Thursday

[1:10:18] will be the earliest meeting

[1:10:19] that this could be presented

[1:10:19] to my colleagues and the

[1:10:20] public. The public needs to

[1:10:25] see this. It could go to the

[1:10:27] JULY 21st Council meeting if

[1:10:28] the body and that this body

[1:10:29] and the council make an

[1:10:31] urgency finding to hear it

[1:10:34] with less than 2 days, not a

[1:10:36] case. I need urgently find him

[1:10:36] because I have put it on the

[1:10:37] calendar. Listen to me. Cali

[1:10:38] put it on the calendar was

[1:10:41] overlooked. I need council

[1:10:41] member Brown a need you to see

[1:10:46] it presented by them.

[1:10:47] Councilmember Fife. I need you

[1:10:48] to see my whole collies that

[1:10:51] to stand that this is what's

[1:10:53] been happening and then it's

[1:10:54] my answer. Some of the

[1:10:55] questions from the individuals

[1:10:56] that's actually implementing

[1:10:57] this process. So Trinity's,

[1:11:00] you hear that. Ok? I need that

[1:11:02] done so we can come back to

[1:11:02] the rules and get this done

[1:11:10] before our break. Thank you.

[1:11:11] Through the chair,

[1:11:12] understanding that we are open

[1:11:13] farm, just making it clear

[1:11:18] that. There are city Council

[1:11:21] and city Administrator

[1:11:21] Processees. That must line up

[1:11:23] for staff to end up on the

[1:11:25] agenda. So please make sure

[1:11:25] that you're in contact with

[1:11:28] the administration. For

[1:11:29] scheduling. Your item saw the

[1:11:32] components come together and

[1:11:33] just because I am over the tv

[1:11:35] station that was mention, it

[1:11:36] is also important that

[1:11:38] alignment saw the correct

[1:11:40] materials end up in the pac,

[1:11:42] Eat in with Kate after

[1:11:42] presentation and I'll leave it

[1:11:51] there. Thank you. Translated.

[1:11:53] I need to pull off some steam,

[1:11:54] Ken Slayton need to pull off

[1:12:00] some steam. I just want make

[1:12:03] sure that everybody

[1:12:04] understood. I know I'm

[1:12:05] gorgeous. Kim, I know I'm

[1:12:08] gorgeous. Project car wrecks

[1:12:13] is a go I am authorizing a

[1:12:16] review of active, a duality of

[1:12:18] theater for full application

[1:12:23] of the slap that. Project

[1:12:25] video game is now a complying.

[1:12:31] A review Markel crew. Cheryl

[1:12:33] will live out the true of

[1:12:34] Purdue roast. She has

[1:12:37] permission to score as Queen

[1:12:42] Mary Abigail Lynn already

[1:12:43] Everdeen Brunswick. The

[1:12:44] Eurofighter Typhoon is to be

[1:12:45] filed every time he goes into

[1:12:48] international waters.

[1:12:49] Authorize Ation Dmo c

[1:12:53] coordinator. Thank you for

[1:12:57] your comments next. Speaker is

[1:12:57] Blair Beat menu. Our immunity

[1:13:04] eat yourself and begin. All

[1:13:07] right. Thanks to the meeting

[1:13:10] to try further talk about the

[1:13:13] Oakland, strong mayor issues.

[1:13:16] You know, I I I meant to add

[1:13:17] on the previous meeting, you

[1:13:19] know that you guys, they're

[1:13:20] working on it. A process like

[1:13:22] the city of San Diego are

[1:13:24] already has. San Diego is not

[1:13:25] having success with it. They

[1:13:28] need organization or the

[1:13:29] actual programs. You know,

[1:13:32] city programs at themselves.

[1:13:33] And I want to trust that you

[1:13:35] guys can work that without

[1:13:38] work that out with the ipa.

[1:13:40] Good luck how you can do that.

[1:13:41] Sandia was working on office

[1:13:42] of, you know, of a

[1:13:46] coordinator. It can be like a

[1:13:47] small the 30 minute. It kind

[1:13:50] of job to help organize. And I

[1:13:51] that can be considered for

[1:13:57] yourselves as well. There are

[1:13:58] some important issues around.

[1:14:00] What is the future role of the

[1:14:01] city administrator of Oakland?

[1:14:02] Is their role going start to

[1:14:04] change a bit more? Thank you

[1:14:05] for your comments that

[1:14:06] concludes our open for

[1:14:07] speakers. Thank you. The

*Rules & Legislation Committee on 2026-07-09 10:30 AM

Agenda

Transcript