Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[3:13]
Thank you all for viewing tonight's
planning commission meeting. I'd like to
[3:16]
call this meeting to order at the city
of Clear Lake chambers on Tuesday, June
[3:21]
9th, 2026 at 6 PM. As a reminder, we are
currently live streaming this meeting on
[3:28]
the city's YouTube channel. Please be
aware the public will not be able to
[3:33]
provide verbal comment during this
meeting if attending via Zoom. However,
[3:38]
the public can submit comments and
writing for commission consideration by
[3:43]
commenting via the Q&A function in the
Zoom platform. To begin with, can I get
[3:49]
a roll call, please?
[3:55]
Commissioner Williams
>> here.
[3:57]
» Commissioner Silva, Vice Chair English
>> here,
[4:01]
» and Chair Smallley
>> here.
[4:03]
» And Commissioner Counts is absent.
[4:09]
» For those present, will you please stand
for the pledge of allegiance?
[4:17]
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the
United States of America and to the
[4:23]
republic for which it stands, one nation
under God, indivisible, with liberty and
[4:30]
justice for all.
[4:36]
» Okay, we'll move on to the adoption of
the agenda. Uh, city manager or city
[4:42]
planner, are there any modifications?
No modifications, Mr. Chair.
[4:47]
» Thank you, sir.
>> Um, may I have a motion to adopt it the
[4:52]
agenda?
>> I move to adopt the agenda as presented.
[4:57]
» Second.
[5:04]
May I have a roll call on the vote,
please?
[5:07]
» Commissioner Williams,
>> I.
[5:10]
» Commissioner Silva,
>> I. Vice Chair English
[5:14]
» I
>> and Chair Smallley
[5:18]
» I.
[5:22]
» So this is the time for any member of
the public to address the planning
[5:25]
commission on any matter not on the
agenda that is within the subject matter
[5:30]
jurisdiction of the city. The Brown Act
with limited exceptions does not allow
[5:36]
commission staff to discuss issues
brought forth under public comment. The
[5:41]
commission cannot act on non non-aggenda
items. Concerns may be referred to staff
[5:47]
or placed on the next available agenda.
Please note that comments from the
[5:52]
public will also be taken on each agenda
item. Comments shall be limited to three
[5:57]
minutes per person.
[6:01]
Are there any members of the public in
the council chambers who would like to
[6:05]
speak at the podium?
[6:10]
Will you come up and introduce yourself
please?
[6:24]
» My name is Seth Dandridge.
>> Um, basically I just wanted to I just
[6:30]
had a couple questions about the
operation.
[6:33]
» Uh, one
>> I'm sorry. Are you are you addressing um
[6:37]
uh the permit issue?
>> Yes. So
[6:41]
» that comes that comes in a while.
>> Okay.
[6:43]
» Yeah. Yeah. We'll get we'll get to the
public comments on that one.
[6:46]
» Public comments.
>> Yeah. Okay. Okay. No.
[6:50]
Have we received any written comments
via the Q&A Zoom function?
[6:56]
» There are no comments on the Zoom, Mr.
Chair.
[7:00]
» Uh so we'll move on to the consent
items. Uh June 9th, 2026 planning
[7:04]
commission minutes. Uh recommended
action is receive and file. Uh are there
[7:10]
any members of the public in chambers
who wish to comment on the consent items
[7:15]
which there is none, right?
[7:20]
There's no consent items.
Okay.
[7:23]
» There's just there's adoption of
>> Yeah, I was going to make that. So, may
[7:28]
I have a motion to adopt
the consent items?
[7:33]
I so move.
>> Second.
[7:43]
» May I have a roll call on the vote,
please?
[7:46]
» Commissioner Williams,
>> I.
[7:49]
» Commissioner Silva,
>> I.
[7:51]
» M. Vice Chair English,
>> I.
[7:54]
» And Chair Smallley,
>> I.
[7:58]
Um, so there's no business items
tonight. So, we'll skip to public
[8:02]
hearings.
Item one, discussion and consideration
[8:06]
of conditional use permits CUP 20265
to allow the rental of small boats and
[8:14]
personal watercraft located at 13 or
13885 Lakeshore Drive in Clear Lake,
[8:21]
California. Uh, recommended actions
would be to adopt the resolution
[8:25]
PC202607.
Uh staff, will you please proceed with
[8:30]
the report?
[8:35]
» Yes. Thank you, chair and commissioner.
Um this is conditional use permit CUP
[8:42]
2020605
for watercraft rentals located at 13885
[8:48]
Lakeshore Drive.
The name of the business is Clear
[8:53]
Cottages and Marina.
Just
[8:57]
just a quick update on the staff report.
Couple of changes here and in addition
[9:02]
to the conditions of approval as you can
see there on the screen. So project
[9:06]
summary and the parking um packet page
nine paragraph two uh change
[9:12]
approximately seven additional uh
vehicles will be changed to as eight
[9:16]
additional vehicles. staff actually went
out there and did a count and took some
[9:21]
pictures and confirmed that it was eight
eight vehicles
[9:25]
um additional vehicles and what is an
area that's um what we could call
[9:30]
overflow parking but it's actually
striped parking. So
[9:35]
then for the conditions of approval um
section A general conditions packet page
[9:41]
14 would like to add item eight. Um and
I had a discussion with the applicant on
[9:47]
this and he signed with it. Um the
public watercraft rental operation shall
[9:51]
be limited to a maximum of seven
simultaneous rental parties during peak
[9:56]
period operating operating periods. A
rental party shall mean an individual
[10:01]
renter or group of renters using
utilizing a single rental watercraft
[10:05]
under one rental agreement. Reason why
we're doing this, this is tied to
[10:09]
parking. Okay. This limitation is
established based on the maximum proof
[10:13]
of rental fleet and that the existing
on-site parking supply is adequate to
[10:17]
accommodate the approval of an amendment
to this conditional use or other
[10:22]
entitlement as determined by the
director.
[10:28]
So let's move on to the location here.
Um so everybody I think knows where this
[10:36]
is located. It is zone mixed use. Um
site size is approximately 2 2.06
[10:44]
acres. It's of an existing use with
lodging, you know, small marina, and
[10:50]
they currently um
rent watercrafts
[10:55]
to registered guest only. So, this kind
of plays into how the rental to the
[11:01]
public and how that um determines peak
period use.
[11:09]
So the applicant is requesting approval
of CUP 202605
[11:15]
C 20265.
It's categorical exempt. We're in a
[11:19]
categorically exempt project from this
because it is a existing use with no
[11:25]
expansion.
U the purpose is to allow the rental of
[11:29]
small boats and personal watercraft to
members of the general public. Now keep
[11:33]
in mind this is in conjunction with the
existing
[11:38]
uh rentals to guest and how that relates
to parking. Okay. No new no new
[11:44]
construction onsite or or expansion is
approved.
[11:48]
So they have an existing
um lodge with lodge which includes
[11:55]
cottage. It's about 18 cottages. Well
actually there are 18 cottages. Um
[12:00]
they've currently the current owner own
has owned it since 2016 and they've been
[12:05]
renting only to guest the watercraft
since 2017.
[12:10]
Uh they're proposing operating hours of
8 a.m. to 6 p.m. for watercraft rentals
[12:14]
and they have approximately five
employees as stated in their
[12:18]
application.
No changes proposed to the buildings,
[12:22]
docks, slips, parking areas and rental
fleet size.
[12:27]
So the rental fleet is uh this is what
they currently have. Um they have two
[12:34]
jet skis, a bassboat and two pontoons
and then some kayaks. One is a single
[12:39]
person kayak and one is a double person
kayak. And actually um in their
[12:46]
actual uh well their second proposal to
us, we asked them to do an actual um
[12:52]
write up on it. They only included in
that the um jet skis,
[13:00]
um the bass boat and the pontoons, but
we went ahead and included the kayaks in
[13:05]
there also
in terms of um parking as it relates to
[13:11]
parking.
So this particular slides um as in their
[13:17]
application talk about safety
requirements
[13:21]
doing SE pre-safety rental inspections
and they've been doing this for several
[13:25]
years now. So renting to their guest so
I'm guessing they pretty much have some
[13:30]
sense of what they need to do to be
compliant. Um California voter card
[13:35]
verification. These are all things
they're going to be doing. Minimum
[13:38]
operated age 21 years. uh liability and
waivers in the rental agreements. Um
[13:45]
life jackets
and they will be doing orientations and
[13:50]
competency reviews for those who are
renting the the watercraft.
[13:56]
Uh they will have GPS tracking devices
on the on the um watercraft.
[14:03]
Propellar guards obviously that would
only be for the pal uh pontoon boats.
[14:10]
and the bass boat, the jet skiis
typically have an impeller, so um that
[14:16]
probably doesn't need a propeller guard.
Um
[14:23]
uh building things full spill prevention
procedures, that was all spelled out in
[14:26]
the um the staff report how they would
take care of that with sponges.
[14:32]
uh invasive species inspections. They
pretty much um have that noted all over
[14:38]
the property for boats.
Um post-rontal inspections and ma
[14:44]
maintenance.
So this kind um the next slide kind of
[14:49]
leads up to kind of the gut of this you
know whether this can work or not for
[14:54]
them. So existing so there's two parking
analysis going on here. Uh lodging. So
[15:00]
there's one for lodging. Um so the code
requirement they have 18 guests rooms
[15:06]
and one manager's unit. So per our code
there's one parking space required for
[15:12]
each guest cottage plus two additional
for every 10. So that's four parking
[15:18]
spaces. Then the manager's unit we you
know that would be two consider that
[15:24]
kind of a dwelling or housing. So two
spaces for that. So they would be
[15:28]
required to have a total of 24
um existing they have potentially 35. If
[15:35]
you're looking at the map there on the
screen,
[15:39]
the yellow is existing parking spaces
that are actually striped. Now the area
[15:45]
where you see the red dot, that's kind
of hard packed dirt or gravel. And then
[15:51]
the red dot there, um I didn't measure
the distance across. It's about 62 ft
[15:56]
which could accommodate double row
parking. Um and in the end rows down by
[16:02]
the park they would you know we would
it would make sure that that there were
[16:07]
some room for back out for the cars on
the end down towards the the lake. So
[16:12]
with the red dot, there's a potential
for six additional vehicles,
[16:17]
which aren't striped, but that's just a
demonstration to show how potentially
[16:22]
you can get up to 41 parking spaces in
this particular site. Um,
[16:28]
you would have to consider trailers
obviously, but I spoke with the um
[16:35]
actually the applicant this afternoon uh
in terms of how busy they are during the
[16:41]
week. They said 50%
you know the rooms would be occupied dur
[16:45]
over the weekend would be 90%. You would
have to consider also that they would
[16:50]
get first dibs to the rentals to the
guest and then anything that's left over
[16:54]
would be for public general public
rental.
[17:00]
Yeah. Um so
um parking seats minimum code. So
[17:05]
essentially
they exceed parking code based on just
[17:10]
the striped parking spaces.
[17:16]
Um so here's just the next slide is just
a quick watercraft
[17:21]
um analysis by staff based on additional
parking and what how many parties
[17:31]
rental agreement um one bass boat. So
you'd have one party, so one vehicle. So
[17:36]
that's saying one space for one party,
one parking space for one party. Okay.
[17:43]
Um,
two pontoon boats, two parties. So two
[17:47]
vehicle parking spaces, two jet skiis,
two vehicle parking spaces. Now, the
[17:51]
kayaks, that wasn't actually in their
final proposal, but we went ahead and
[17:56]
added it anyway. So we would assume two
additional parking spaces, so a total of
[18:01]
seven parking spaces.
um for the watercraft.
[18:08]
Next slide is just um there's some
pictures. So the first picture is of the
[18:16]
we'll call it overflow parking. That's
where you would have seven additional
[18:21]
plus the potential of six. And then he
they also do park trailers there. So,
[18:27]
um, that would literally, you know, um,
get you up to 41 parking spaces. The
[18:34]
next slide is where it doesn't really
tell a p tell the story here, but
[18:39]
that's where, uh, they launch their
boats. So, there's some pull in and
[18:43]
backup room in there to launch boats
down the ramp. Um, next picture is they
[18:48]
have do have two,
uh, handicap parking spaces.
[18:54]
Um next slide is uh zoning consistency.
So this area is again zone mixed use
[19:00]
visitor serving
um which you know includes housing um
[19:05]
commercial I mean this isn't existing
it's been there for a long time uh
[19:09]
recreational activities. So the main um
from analysis standpoint
[19:17]
um so expansion only allows public
assets to existing rental services.
[19:24]
That that's it. I mean we're not doing
anything structurally. No more slips no
[19:29]
docks not being expanded.
Um no physical expansion proposed.
[19:36]
So the staff finding is the project is
consistent with the intent of the mixed
[19:40]
use district.
[19:45]
Um so with looking at our code there
really is no category of land use that
[19:53]
you could fit watercraft in. So staff
made the closest and best guess on that
[20:00]
which would be other outdoor commercial
amusement
[20:04]
which that could potentially fit in. And
if you actually look at the
[20:11]
definition of that it says allincclusive
but you're talking about baseball
[20:16]
parks. These are really high demand
traffic type uses. Baseball
[20:21]
um mini golf those sorts of things. So
um
[20:28]
so with that with that type of use a use
permit is required
[20:34]
to use appropriately is
um a conditional use permit
[20:43]
because there's no expansion um
staff determined that it would be
[20:48]
categorically exempt from SQA
[20:54]
And next slide is uh agency review. So
these are the
[21:01]
agencies we uh sent the application to.
We did not get any responses back and we
[21:07]
public publicly noticed it you know to
the uh neighbors around within 300 ft.
[21:14]
So quick summary existing lodging marina
use no expansions
[21:19]
um staff feels adequate parking and
consistence with the mixeduse zoning
[21:24]
seek to exempt no agency objections that
we have received. Um so um with motions
[21:31]
I mean we move to adopt number one move
to adopt two move to deny the resolution
[21:37]
or send staff with directions to
re-evaluate project
[21:44]
that concludes presentation
[21:50]
small microphone please.
>> Thank you sir. I'll now ask
[21:55]
commissioners if there are any questions
of staff on this item.
[22:02]
» I may have a couple and they'll probably
also go for when the the uh applicant
[22:08]
comes up. Um part of our job is to
imagine worst case scenarios like the
[22:15]
overcrowding and stuff like that. And
the one obvious thing was the parking.
[22:18]
That's why you spent a lot of time with
that. How you got to determine that it
[22:21]
was adequate. Um but uh if indeed um
that street in that area is the overflow
[22:28]
parking, are there clearly marked
places? Number one, just let me get them
[22:33]
all out and then you can answer. Um I
have a concern full of a like a car full
[22:37]
of people visiting Clear Lake with eight
kids in the car deep dear debarking not
[22:43]
debarking getting out getting out of
their cars um and and and walking out on
[22:48]
that. So, it'd be nice if there was some
procedure in place that would tell them
[22:52]
about that. It sounds like it might, if
on a really busy day, require more
[22:57]
monitoring. Um, and maybe something
specific. Um,
[23:04]
yeah. How many street parking spaces?
Did you say five additional?
[23:10]
» No street parking. This is all on site.
>> Okay. So, the overflow is all on site.
[23:14]
» There's no street parking. Yeah.
seems pretty tight.
[23:18]
» I mean, when you say street parking, are
you talking
[23:21]
» Well, it said it said in in here that
overflow was there was overflow and also
[23:27]
adequate street parking.
>> Okay. Well,
[23:30]
» um let me typo
>> section F item two.
[23:35]
Uh existing partner.
>> Well, if that's the case, that that's a
[23:41]
a mistake on our part and we didn't
really mean street. So that would be it
[23:45]
says it's all on site.
>> It says the code doesn't establish
[23:47]
specific off- streetet parking
requirement. Okay. So
[23:53]
» so it seemed to just kind of blow that
off by saying it's it it's um
[23:59]
it's it's that way. I mean that was what
popped into my head. So if that's a
[24:04]
mistake and this is adequate with onsite
then I guess that's a different story. I
[24:09]
suppose just be aware of it that that
something like that could happen. Um,
[24:15]
this is great. I'm all for rental. I
mean, the more people that move up here
[24:19]
full-time, the more people that are
selling their boats and starting to
[24:22]
rent, and I love the fact that the
economy is showing the ability to just
[24:26]
stay in the rental, and I'm all for
this,
[24:28]
» but and we we did kind of look at it a
peak a peak period. And
[24:33]
» you know, I talked to the applicant
today. They said they're really 50% full
[24:37]
during the week and then on the weekends
90% maybe. And then you'd have guests
[24:41]
who were actually renting who would you
know.
[24:44]
» So yeah, that was what I got. The
vigilance should definitely um
[24:49]
» definitely apply to the week to the
weekends and holidays and peak periods.
[24:53]
» Yeah,
>> I I don't know. It's maybe over
[24:55]
alarming, but it can. We're here to kind
of evaluate the worst case scenario. We
[25:00]
don't have to deal with the reality that
you do. We can imagine anything. So um
[25:06]
no, that's pretty much about it. Um,
on that, I know that that the one street
[25:12]
limit is 72 hours, and I don't think
that would apply or be of any kind of
[25:16]
concern. That's the only city rule I
could find that would affect that.
[25:20]
» Yeah. The uh parking code is is geared
around off streetet. So, you know, any
[25:26]
use, it would be off streetet parking.
>> Yeah.
[25:29]
» And I don't see anybody staying for
three days off street unless their car
[25:32]
broke down. So,
that was it.
[25:37]
And and When these gentlemen have a
chance, I would like to hear just a
[25:42]
tight comment on that.
>> Mr. Silvin,
[25:47]
» thank you. Um,
I took the opportunity Sunday to drive
[25:52]
down in there and I happened to
run into a a gentleman pulling his boat
[25:57]
out and he was
squaring it away before
[26:02]
um it was a little tight getting by him
heading down to the launching area. But
[26:08]
that area uh adjacent to the dock is a
big area. I was surprised how big it is.
[26:15]
And and uh I think the amount of parking
that they have in there right now uh
[26:20]
depending on how they orient u if they
need to to park trailers or anything
[26:26]
like that, they got a lot of room there.
So um it's a real clean site. I was
[26:32]
impressed.
Thank you,
[26:42]
» Commissioner Williams.
>> I have nothing at this time.
[26:46]
» At this time, I will open the item up
for public comment.
[26:57]
» Okay.
[27:00]
» Yeah. Come on up.
and state your name again.
[27:09]
» Uh my name is Seth Dandridge. Um just on
behalf of myself, I was just wondering
[27:14]
about the parking itself. Uh I was
wondering is the 41 parking places with
[27:21]
or without boat trailer parking? So is
that just by themselves? No trailer
[27:26]
parking included. So single places. So
if you actually have boats in there,
[27:31]
trailers in there, it's not going to be
41, right?
[27:35]
» That's correct. Yeah, but they do have
>> they do have marked spaces on. So
[27:41]
that 41 if I were if we were to actually
include the six on the right side where
[27:46]
they if you look in the picture, you can
see a few trailers parking there.
[27:50]
um
that still would leave you with enough
[27:54]
parking for
you know the the folks that are driving
[28:00]
in to rent.
>> I know that people that actually rent
[28:03]
the cottages also launch both there.
>> Yeah.
[28:06]
» So they also have trailers
>> and then I just I know from running a
[28:10]
rental that um you can have even if you
have a requirement for only one vehicle
[28:16]
you can have three people show up for a
single jet ski. So, where do the other
[28:20]
two cars park? I was just wondering.
>> So, that's part of the condition where
[28:24]
we're saying that um and we've spoke to
the applicant about that. Um so, per
[28:31]
like for instance, if someone wanted to
come in and rent the
[28:37]
um
mass boat, one parking space for the
[28:41]
party, the rental party.
>> No, for sure. I was just wondering where
[28:47]
the other cars parked for the family.
>> Do they just park in town somewhere
[28:50]
random or
>> that's because usually, you know, I get
[28:55]
it, but you can't have a if a full
family is coming up here, say there's
[28:59]
nine people getting on the vessel
>> onto a pontoon boat.
[29:03]
» Okay. Just just a quick point order. Um
we need to address the questions or any
[29:07]
comments directly to the commission and
then they can direct staff to respond.
[29:11]
» Sorry. Uh yeah, no, that was just
basically my concern was mostly with the
[29:15]
parking because I know it can get pretty
crazy with the parking. Um so yeah, just
[29:22]
just making sure that that was not
knowing where people were going to
[29:25]
actually park the other vehicles or
anything. U like I said, there's going
[29:29]
to probably most likely 100% be more
than one vehicle showing up for Pontoon
[29:34]
B on occasions. Even if you have the
requirement, they'll still be coming
[29:38]
into town with more than one vehicle.
So, where they parked the other vehicle,
[29:41]
I have no idea. That was all all I was
saying.
[29:48]
» All right. Thanks.
I want to comment on on Mr. Dander's
[29:52]
thing. I I kind of agree with that and
that's why I thought there has to be
[29:56]
some kind of procedure in place whether
shuttle from Austin Park overflow strict
[30:01]
like off off streetet compliance. There
will be a time when they when they hit
[30:06]
peak and there's going to be three cars
showing up for a pontoon boat at the
[30:10]
same, you know, that's gonna happen. So,
it' be nice if they had procedures in
[30:14]
place. So, when people call for the
rental, you can give them a sheet that
[30:18]
says if there's overflow parking, please
park here. Don't bring five vehicles,
[30:22]
you get one. I mean, I get told that
even when I bring my car in to get work
[30:27]
done, you know, I can't park my wife
can't just park our other car there. Um,
[30:32]
bad analogy, but I mean there are limits
to parking spaces. So, I thought perhaps
[30:37]
some some simple procedure could avoid
that peak problem that Mr. Dandridge was
[30:42]
talking about. And I hope I got your
name right.
[31:00]
» Can you state your name, please? Of
>> course. I'm Jerome Mane and I'm the
[31:04]
manager at Clear Lake Cottages. Um, so
when people we haven't run into the
[31:10]
public yet, but what I was what I would
think is that they're either
[31:16]
in town or they're come, you know,
they're coming to stay here, so they're
[31:20]
we would instruct them like so they're
probably so they're staying somewhere
[31:24]
else. I'd instruct them to come in one
car. Um, so they wouldn't be I I don't
[31:30]
see that people I guess people could be
coming to town just for the day to rent
[31:33]
the place and then, you know, have to
figure out, you know, where to park, but
[31:36]
I think most people are going to be
here, you know, either on vacation or
[31:39]
living here.
I don't know for sure, but that's that's
[31:43]
my thought.
>> If that indeed is part of the procedure
[31:48]
to avoid any chance of overlock on some
of those big days, that would seem
[31:53]
» I don't know. Is that difficult to add,
sir? to the
[31:58]
» or is it even required? Is that kind of
thing you just I I I'm still new to
[32:02]
government.
>> I I think um let's let's get all the
[32:05]
comments out and then let's try to
address that. I think um I have some
[32:09]
things to add, but we really should
provide everyone the three minutes to
[32:13]
talk and then address the question.
>> Sounds good.
[32:16]
» I think that's all I have to say about
it.
[32:19]
» Okay. Thank you.
>> I do have one question.
[32:23]
» Oh, okay. If
um on average, would you say how many of
[32:28]
your guests bring their own watercrafts
with them who stay in in the cabins?
[32:35]
Uh I would say
[32:39]
like on a busy weekend. Um three or four
maybe. Um we only have
[32:47]
three or four slips to rent out. They
don't have to rent the slip. they can
[32:52]
store it on the in the overflow parking.
Um, but yeah, that's what it that's what
[32:58]
I feel about during the week less. You
know, we get a lot of people that are
[33:02]
doing like construction that are staying
there for work during the week
[33:05]
» that aren't there for fun.
>> Great. Thank you.
[33:07]
» Thanks.
>> One more question. Yeah, thank you. Um,
[33:11]
when these people bring their their
skidos or what boats or whatever, do
[33:16]
they park the trailers in that lower
area adjacent to the dock? Is that where
[33:19]
they park?
>> Yes, that's where they park. Yeah.
[33:21]
» Yeah.
>> So, a little bit of organization in
[33:24]
there would go a long way, right?
>> Yeah, of course. Uh I've been there
[33:27]
almost a year now and I've never There's
up to now we were busy last summer.
[33:33]
We've it's never been full
>> or close to full that area.
[33:38]
» Thanks.
>> You know, that's that's my experience.
[33:40]
» Thank you.
>> Thanks.
[33:41]
» Thank you.
[33:46]
» Is there anybody else in chambers if
we'd like to speak?
[33:57]
Have we received any written public
comments via Q&A function on Zoom?
[34:04]
» We do have a hand raised on the Zoom.
Mr. Chair,
[34:11]
which I believe is the applicant,
>> Jim Davis.
[34:16]
» So, Mr. Davis, can you hear us?
[34:25]
Can you hear me? Well, barely.
>> Okay, give me a second.
[34:37]
Turn this off.
Is that better?
[34:43]
» That is
[34:47]
okay. Sorry, I've not had to deal with
this particular I had a lot of trouble
[34:51]
getting in. I apologize.
Um, like Jerome had stated, we only have
[34:58]
three open slips. Um, the time that we
get individuals bringing their own boats
[35:05]
and typically it's usually fishermen um,
uh, coming for a tournament.
[35:13]
We may get three. Um, and so there's
there's quite a bit of parking there.
[35:20]
Our watercraft sit in the slips in all
the other slips
[35:25]
at the location.
Um, and so you know, our guests, uh, and
[35:32]
also we're going to set this up on our
website.
[35:36]
And so we'll have a the same reservation
system as we do for our cottages.
[35:44]
So when someone wants to book one of our
watercraft, one of the locals,
[35:51]
um, they're going to be getting
information from us in advance. they're
[35:55]
going to be told to minimize and
carpool. Um, and so we're we're trust me
[36:02]
when I tell you it is way to our benefit
to ensure that our parking never maxes.
[36:08]
Um, we can always park our employees off
site. Um, and so we've we're pretty
[36:15]
adept at at making sure that cuz we do
have people come and rent half our
[36:23]
cottages or actually all of our
cottages. Um, and so managing through
[36:28]
the parking, it's something that Jerome
has to do on a on a daily basis. Um,
[36:35]
during the summer on the weekends when
it's max,
[36:40]
Sunday through Thursday, we're running
45 to 50% occupancy.
[36:48]
Um, even in the summer.
So, I just I wanted to make myself
[36:53]
available to answer questions. I I'm
profoundly sorry it I had such a
[36:58]
difficult time getting in.
[37:04]
Well, that's quite all right. Thanks for
uh thanks for coming on.
[37:09]
I will now ask the commissioners if
there are any further comments for
[37:13]
deliberation on this item.
[37:17]
» Commissioner Sylvia, you got your hand
up there.
[37:21]
» Mr. Chair, maybe before you get into
that, I guess make a couple of comments
[37:24]
about I mean, there's a lot of
discussion about the parking, which I
[37:27]
think
>> is appropriate. Um,
[37:31]
a couple of things. I mean, we have,
um, you know, our parking standards in
[37:37]
the zoning ordinance, which are in
designed and intended to sort of cover
[37:43]
the most likely scenarios for different
uses. Um, you know, as an example, just
[37:48]
a a u a restaurant, we normally don't
um, you know, figure out like what the
[37:56]
maximum occupancy is and like how many
cars that like if three people show up
[38:01]
for one of those tables or whatever, but
it's based on that type of use and how
[38:07]
many cars that generally generates,
right? So, this is a similar type of
[38:11]
thing. Um,
but the main goal in in my view of the
[38:17]
commission is to make sure that this
expanded use doesn't cause broader
[38:23]
negative impacts to the community around
this facility, right? Um, and you know,
[38:30]
it would be our hope at you know,
similar to the property owners that I'm
[38:33]
sure as many days as possible in a year
there would be 100% occupancy and
[38:38]
parking would be very difficult around
there, right? Um
[38:44]
however um with the parking standards
that we have I mean you know we've
[38:49]
permitted them based on that but we that
calculation doesn't specifically include
[38:55]
um okay we have 18 units what happens if
uh the occupants each show up with two
[39:02]
cars for each of those units right um
that would cause a tight issue but our
[39:08]
standards say that each unit has to have
one space And then for each 10 units,
[39:13]
you have to have an additional space,
right? So they have those in an
[39:16]
additional four spaces. Correct. Um just
for the units and that's not including
[39:24]
the overflow parking. So it seems like
there would be very few times when
[39:30]
parking would be at such a premium on
the site
[39:35]
um
that it would cause some significant
[39:39]
conflicts. Now, as the owner kind of
alluded to, it's kind of a business
[39:43]
problem for them if their operations
create that type of problem on site.
[39:49]
What I think we care about more is does
that then begin to overflow into the
[39:54]
community? Are people parking their cars
and boat trailers out on the street on a
[39:59]
corner where maybe it's not safe? And
that's something that we may then um
[40:03]
need to get involved in. Um,
so you know, uh, I guess one other thing
[40:09]
I wanted to point out is essentially the
way the conditions are laid out,
[40:14]
they are restricted to having the five
um
[40:21]
um,
like motorized watercraft, right? And so
[40:26]
they can't suddenly come in next month
and add five more because then that is
[40:31]
very clearly going to cause a parking
problem. However, having said all that,
[40:35]
if the commission is still concerned
about the parking situation, you could
[40:40]
um direct us to add an additional uh
question or direct them to provide some
[40:46]
uh you know, say a parking overflow
parking plan or something like that.
[40:51]
Sounds like they've already thought
about a number of solutions,
[40:54]
but you could um request that that
applicant do that and and have it um
[40:59]
reviewed and approved by staff. for I
mean you could ask that it come back to
[41:03]
the commission if you want as well but
just wanted to kind of give a little bit
[41:07]
of background and throw out a couple of
options if you feel like there needs to
[41:11]
be more um
you know conditions put into place to
[41:16]
make sure that it doesn't this problem
doesn't overflow into the larger
[41:20]
neighborhood.
My feeling on that is if indeed you can
[41:26]
talk to each person that's going to rent
and tell them bring one car or drop
[41:31]
somebody off or however you limited
that. If that's already part of your
[41:35]
practice then I think that question is
at least for me is answered.
[41:39]
I drive by there all the time. If it
isn't answered we'll see. So
[41:48]
» Mr. Sil
I'd like to make a comment on that. I
[41:53]
like I said, I drove down in there and
uh um I can't see there being a problem,
[42:00]
but if there were, I would I would
assume that it would be in the best
[42:05]
interest of the people who are on duty
there to uh figure out a way to make
[42:10]
things as easy as possible for everyone
involved. Otherwise, you get a traffic
[42:16]
jam, boats coming in, uh trailers coming
out, it would be a nightmare. So, I
[42:22]
think that they'll probably if they have
a problem, they'll address it post
[42:28]
haste.
That's it. Thank
[42:31]
» I agree. Thank you, sir. Um,
I have a motion on item one.
[42:40]
I move to approve conditional use permit
COP 2026-05
[42:46]
as well as the categorical exemption CE
2026-05
[42:51]
to include the additional conditions
that were mentioned in the staff report.
[42:58]
» I'll second.
[43:03]
» Commissioner Williams
>> I.
[43:07]
Commissioner Silva
>> I.
[43:10]
» Vice Chair English
>> I.
[43:13]
» And Chair Smallley.
>> I
[43:20]
passes 40 Z. So,
city manager floor or senior planner
[43:27]
Roberts, do you have a report?
>> Uh, I don't have too much report. I did
[43:31]
want to make sure and point out that
last week we released the public draft
[43:34]
of the environmental impact report for
the airport redevelopment project. Um I
[43:40]
think you all should have gotten that
via email. If you didn't recall seeing
[43:44]
it, we'll make sure that you get the the
link to that. So, this opens the um
[43:49]
initial 45day
um comment period on that draft and um
[43:56]
we'll be receiving comments hopefully um
incorporating those and then at some
[44:02]
point hopefully sooner rather than later
bringing that to the commission for
[44:06]
review.
Um we have also considered actually just
[44:11]
having a um no recommended action just
kind of a public hearing type of thing
[44:17]
and doing it here in front of the
commission to kind of give an initial
[44:22]
presentation to the commission about the
project. allow the community to come and
[44:27]
get questions answered while there's um
uh you know kind of a a first bite at it
[44:34]
because you know obviously it's a very
lengthy document with a lot of studies
[44:38]
and then bring it back for actual
hopefully recommended approval at a
[44:43]
later time. So um I think that's the the
most significant update I had since the
[44:48]
last meeting.
>> Thank you. question and I know my my
[44:55]
colleague Commissioner Counts asked this
last week but my boss my wife asked me
[44:59]
to ask about writing.
Okay. Um I don't remember what I told
[45:04]
you last time but we have been
coordinating with the owner and working
[45:07]
with them and our um retail specialists
to try and um help identify some tenants
[45:16]
for them. Um, so, you know, I haven't
heard any um, you know, deals are in
[45:23]
place yet, but we're trying to to push
folks towards them and and the owner's
[45:27]
been been pretty engaged uh, with us on
that. So, he's seems very open to um,
[45:35]
you know, doing his best to accommodate
something that the community really
[45:39]
wants there.
>> Thank you, Owen.
[45:44]
Any
[45:47]
of the commissioners
do any of the commissioners have any
[45:51]
item to report?
[45:56]
» No, not see any uh do any any
commissioner have a request for future
[46:03]
agenda items?
[46:08]
All right. Well, thank you to everyone
who took the time to attend tonight's
[46:11]
meeting and to those who are watching
our meeting on Zoom and YouTube
[46:15]
platforms. Uh meeting there being no
further business of the commission, we
[46:21]
are now adjourned at
6:43 p.m. on Tuesday, June 23rd, 2026.
[46:28]
Thank you.