9/9/26 BAA Meeting

Columbia, CT · · More Columbia, CT meetings · More Connecticut meetings

Transcript

Download: Text · SRT
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT

This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.

These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:16] Am I running this cuz I'm the senior? >> I Yeah, I would say so.
[0:21] » So called to order of the BAA at the 7:00 p.m. on
[0:28] September 9th, 2026.
[0:32] Roll call. We have Thomas Carrier a member.
[0:37] And we have Phil Stone, of course.
[0:41] And Keith Peck. We uh
[0:45] which is a quorum. >> Yes.
[0:48] » And uh to my knowledge, no additions or
[0:51] changes to the agenda other than moving up
[0:55] the uh election of officers. >> Okay.
[0:58] » So >> Motion to do that if you like.
[1:00] » Is there a motion to move up the election of officers?
[1:03] Agenda item. >> I make a motion to move up the election
[1:06] of officers. >> We have a second.
[1:08] » Second. >> We have a motion and second. We're going
[1:11] to move up the uh election of officers.
[1:16] Board chair. Help me with language.
[1:20] » You simply just have Someone has to make a motion to nominate someone.
[1:27] » I'll make a motion to nominate Phil Stone.
[1:31] » I second that.
[1:34] » Do we have one to pick another now? >> We will accept the nomination.
[1:38] » Yes.
[1:41] » We're all done. >> We love to like kiss.
[1:44] » All in favor of electing Phil Stone. >> I.
[1:47] » I.
[1:55] Thank you. Thank you, for this. Motion
[1:58] carried. >> All right. So, this might be your
[2:02] applicant I'm assuming online. >> Hello, do we have an applicant online?
[2:06] » I see a hand. >> We don't hear you. Maybe unmute if
[2:11] that's an option. >> I see a unmute button there.
[2:17] » Okay. Good afternoon. Good evening. Can you hear me?
[2:21] » Yes, we can hear you. >> Hi, my name is that March says I'm
[2:25] sorry. I tried to join the Zoom meeting online, but it says the meeting does not
[2:31] exist. So, I'm using my phone instead. >> Okay, well, you've been successful.
[2:39] » Well, that's a good thing. So, um
[2:44] Do you have a question for me? Um where I live, why did I appeal? I
[2:49] don't know. What you'd like to know? >> Uh before we
[2:54] get you to get to you on the agenda, the next agenda is approval of minutes.
[3:00] » Oh, okay. I understand how that works. So, I'll be quiet until then.
[3:03] » Yeah, we'll we'll get back to you. >> We have none to approve cuz we do not
[3:07] have enough members present here that was at that meeting. So,
[3:11] » So, we will pass over the approval of minutes and get to the appeal hearing.
[3:16] We have a motor vehicle appeal from you that's
[3:19] Martis. Hopefully, I'm not damaging
[3:23] name too much. And
[3:26] » it's all right. >> Okay.
[3:30] And we've got your appeal
[3:35] disregards a 2014 Ford Edge Select. Is that what that SEL is?
[3:43] » Yes, SEL stands for Select. Yes. >> Um
[3:48] and if you could state your name and address for us, just to
[3:54] » Of course. My name is Yvette Martens. I reside at 16 Wildwood Drive,
[4:01] Columbia, Connecticut, 06237.
[4:07] » Okay. Thank you. Uh and
[4:11] perhaps give us just your We have your application, obviously, but of your
[4:16] appeal, but if you just give us your uh uh
[4:20] brief on it. >> Certainly. Um
[4:24] so we initially looked at the value of our
[4:29] egg uh as a trade-in. Um and that is how I
[4:34] got to the point of understanding the Kelley Blue Book. Um
[4:39] and when I went on to evaluate the value,
[4:44] they do ask for any damages that are cosmetic. Um we have a door that the
[4:51] passenger the passenger No. The um
[4:56] driver's side door, which is banged. Um we have a side view mirror that
[5:01] someone tried to knock off. And
[5:05] um there are some electrical issues that
[5:10] the as a driver of the car, you know, you
[5:13] learn the idiosyncrasies of your vehicle, so you bang or you move or you
[5:18] do something to get things to move. So, I felt that the
[5:23] value that was placed by the county uh or by the town on my car
[5:30] was not was not uh cognizant of
[5:36] these other issues of the car, and therefore,
[5:39] um the value
[5:42] that I put into my form reflects those cosmetic and electrical issues,
[5:48] and therefore lowered the value of the car.
[5:51] And I was using the Kelley Blue Book as my resource.
[5:57] » Okay, thank you for that. >> Thank you.
[6:00] Mhm. >> Uh
[6:01] so I'm I'm going to read something you know, you probably are knowledgeable
[6:05] about this, but we have we're very limited in terms of what we can do in
[6:09] terms of evaluation. Uh cuz we're this is
[6:14] governed by statute. So I'm going to kind of read what that
[6:19] involves. So all municipalities must use the same method which is prescribed in
[6:23] statutes to determine the value of a personal motor vehicle for property tax
[6:27] purposes. Previously the law required the Office
[6:31] of Policy and Management >> [clears throat]
[6:33] » to select the method. Beginning with uh the 2024 assessment
[6:38] year, vehicles are instead generally valued using their manufacturer's
[6:42] suggested real retail price reduced according to the age of the vehicle.
[6:48] By law, motor vehicles are assessed at example taxed on 70% of this value.
[6:56] Municipalities and special taxing districts set their own tax rates, but
[7:00] cannot set them higher than a statutory cap currently at 32.46 mills.
[7:06] The law specifies that taxpayers may appeal the MSRP used to value their
[7:11] vehicles. So so really we are governed by these
[7:16] statutes, so we can't take into account you know, damage or you know,
[7:22] uh mechanical problems. We basically uh can only go by the statutes which is
[7:28] based on MSRP. So the really your only uh
[7:32] way for us to consider changing this is if the MSRP is
[7:37] it was incorrect. And we uh if you could read what we have there.
[7:43] » Now, the MSRP that we're showing from the motor
[7:47] vehicle is 33,250.
[7:52] Uh the um assessment value on that is 6980.
[7:59] So, we cannot move any of those figures at
[8:04] all with that because those are set by the state of
[8:09] Connecticut. So, we cannot adjust
[8:12] » So, I'm I wasn't aware of that. So, what is
[8:17] the purpose of the appeals process? If because it sounds like I have no
[8:21] recourse. >> You do have a recourse.
[8:23] » Well, if the MSRP was incorrect, if we were valuing off the wrong MSRP.
[8:29] So, that really is the only uh you know, argument, if you will,
[8:34] whether this MSRP was correct.
[8:40] » So, I got to have a jalopy and if the MSRP says it's a particular value,
[8:45] that's all that the state recognizes and so as a resident of the state, I have no
[8:52] other recourse. That's pretty much what I'm understanding. Am I correct?
[8:57] » Yes, unless the MSRP was incorrect and we're valued valuing it off the wrong
[9:02] MSRP. But that doesn't seem to be the case
[9:05] here as as as far as we can tell.
[9:10] » No, I'm not arguing that. I'm arguing the value of the car.
[9:14] » [laughter] >> Yeah, again,
[9:15] » And that's what I thought. >> you know, we're very limited with what,
[9:19] you know, how we can alter that. You know, we just you know, as you say, what
[9:24] is the value of the appeal process? You know, if for some reason the MSRP were
[9:29] incorrect, if we were valued off the wrong MSRP, you could bring that to our
[9:33] attention and we could fix that. But beyond that, we
[9:37] we are not uh don't have the wherewithal to be able
[9:41] to >> No, I get it.
[9:43] » Yeah. >> No, no, I understand. I do understand
[9:46] that. And I guess that concludes our discussion
[9:51] cuz there's not much more to be done. >> Yes, thank you. Appreciate you coming
[9:57] on and at least giving us your your viewpoint.
[10:02] » Well, I just there must be some value in that, right?
[10:06] » [laughter] >> All right. Well, thank you so much. You
[10:09] have a nice evening. Thank you very much.
[10:11] » Thank you, Nina. >> Thank you. You as well, Eva.
[10:14] Goodnight. Bye-bye. >> Goodnight.
[10:16] » Thank you. >> Uh concluding the appeal hearing.
[10:21] Uh set possible special September meeting date for appeal decisions if
[10:26] needed. Do we have a suggested date? >> Uh the the calendar Oh, actually you
[10:31] don't need a special meeting. Nothing to carry on with.
[10:39] » Uh discuss and act upon 2027 BAA meeting schedule.
[10:43] » Yes, this is it. >> So, we have those
[10:45] » dates are finalized.
[10:49] » As put into record, we have 2027 meeting dates.
[10:54] Do I need to list these words? >> No, I want to say the dates were
[10:58] approved by all three of you all. You just have to motion to approve.
[11:01] » I'll make a motion to approve. >> Two, one in March and one in September.
[11:06] » If somebody has an appeal. >> That's it.
[11:09] » Yeah. >> That's it.
[11:10] » It's it's light lifting. >> Okay.
[11:13] » Um Uh is there a motion to
[11:18] accept these meeting dates? >> I'll make a motion.
[11:22] » Yes. Uh
[11:23] » I'll make a motion to accept the dates. >> Motion made, motion seconded. All in
[11:28] favor, I. >> I.
[11:30] » I. Opposed?
[11:32] None.
[11:35] » And I would just say for the record on the appeals you might just want to state
[11:38] for the record that it has been denied officially.
[11:40] » Okay. Uh the
[11:42] appeal that came from Yvette Marches
[11:47] has been denied based on no changes to the MSRP.
[11:58] » And there's just the adjournment and then you know
[11:59] » Uh So we did uh motion to adjourn.
[12:04] » Done.
[12:06] » Motion made, motion seconded. All in favor?
[12:08] » I. >> I.
[12:10] » So we don't need a dental mark. >> Correct.
[12:13] » That's not correct.