Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:00]
Uh, good morning everybody. It's
Wednesday, August 19th at 9:00 a.m.
[0:04]
Justin, would you lead us in the pledge
of allegiance?
[0:09]
I
>> allegiance to the flag of the United
[0:11]
States of America and to the republic
for which it stands, one nation under
[0:16]
God, indivisible, with liberty and
justice for all.
[0:24]
» All right. Uh, any public comment before
we get started?
[0:42]
There we go. Commissioners, for the
record, Justin Alderman, managing editor
[0:46]
at the Primeville Review. Um, just
because this has been a matter I know
[0:51]
you guys have spoke um publicly during
meetings on, I felt it was uh um
[0:56]
appropriate to at least raise this
question. um during a meeting. Uh and
[1:00]
since you guys have a late schedule, I
figured you could spare a couple
[1:03]
minutes. Um but I did just want to ask
if the commissioners uh would want to
[1:07]
address ongoing concerns regarding your
efforts um to seek information on some
[1:14]
controversy involving uh the vector
control district. Um obviously it's a
[1:18]
supple special district but as I think
we know and has been the continuing uh
[1:23]
reality since uh you started your
efforts in December uh you do have
[1:26]
oversight authority and uh bear I I
imagine some responsibility in uh the
[1:32]
affairs of the vector control district.
Um, we our publication became aware that
[1:36]
your county manager once again sent a
letter on August 7th to the vector
[1:42]
control district after it again for
apparently the third time has ignored
[1:46]
requests um from the board of
commissioners. Um, so I just didn't know
[1:50]
and wanted to see if you uh wanted to
provide us and and the public maybe just
[1:55]
your general thoughts and comments on
where we're at the process and and the
[1:59]
fact that you it seems shocking. Not
only are we having difficulties getting
[2:02]
information and records and repeatedly
having to petition the district attorney
[2:05]
for records, uh, but it's shocking that
a board of county commissioners over 8
[2:09]
months has basically gotten nothing
under this public body that you have
[2:13]
oversight and and again bear some of
that responsibility. So, we felt it is
[2:17]
appropriate to make sure you had an
opportunity to provide some comment and
[2:20]
maybe share your current position and
feelings uh with the public. Thank you.
[2:25]
» Sure. Uh, Will and I talked uh
yesterday. Um, can we speak about next
[2:29]
week?
>> Yeah.
[2:32]
» So, I think uh I I asked Will to put
something on the agenda for next week to
[2:37]
uh talk to the rest of the board about
uh I think it's time to request a third
[2:43]
party go in to uh just do a deep dive in
all their stuff. Uh I think I've been
[2:49]
pretty clear throughout the process. I
think for the meat of their job of
[2:54]
getting rid of
um mosquitoes, they do a really well
[2:59]
really good job, but they have a lot of
work to do on the nuts and bolts of the
[3:04]
organization and public records and and
you know interacting with different
[3:09]
government and the press and public and
different people. And so I think we've
[3:16]
given them ample chances to
independently work on that. And I'd like
[3:20]
to see uh a third party go in there and
uh just do a deep dive and and help them
[3:26]
to understand the processes that they're
missing.
[3:33]
» Commissioner Herick, did you have any
>> I just agree. I agree with Seth, I
[3:37]
guess. So I'm not going to be redundant,
but yes.
[3:40]
» Thank you.
[3:44]
» Did you have a question?
>> Well, I
[3:46]
» you got to come to the mic and tell your
name and rank and serial number. right
[3:50]
now. It's
>> how old I am.
[3:53]
» No, I mean,
>> we don't need your age.
[3:55]
» We don't need to know. We don't need to
know you're 25 years old.
[3:57]
» Thank you very much. 45, actually. Um,
hi, I'm uh Lori and Maximum and I live
[4:04]
up at Iron Horse. Um, I just had a
question about um I was driving to work
[4:10]
yesterday morning and they still have
that elk crossing sign there. And a
[4:15]
couple weeks ago I was driving into work
and um where that new brick building is
[4:23]
that the new solar farm has, they've
just built that new kind of brick
[4:26]
building there on the left. It was
shortly past that, maybe, you know,
[4:30]
eighth of a mile or so, there was a
group of elk, um, kind of back on the
[4:35]
left hand side of the road. I don't
know, maybe five, six, seven of them.
[4:38]
And it it got me thinking now, is this
going to be their where they think
[4:43]
they're crossing now? I just have never
really gotten an answer on where are the
[4:47]
elks crossing now? They obviously
haven't disappeared, but I mean they
[4:51]
kind of have, but was a new route
created for them or or what's going on
[4:57]
with them?
So, back oh gosh, I don't know how many
[5:01]
years before you, Will, they tried to do
a wildlife plan in Crook County and it
[5:07]
got all the way up to the finality of it
and unfortunately OD uh FNW vetoed it.
[5:14]
So, we have a very antiquated
wildlife map for our county and that is
[5:21]
one of the things that they're trying to
do with this goal five and they're
[5:24]
having the planning meetings and trying
to update. That is one of the things
[5:28]
they're trying to do is to get that
wildlife done. So yes, there were elk
[5:32]
that went through where the elk sign is
that we did take into consideration with
[5:37]
the solar farms migration that we knew
of. But again, without anything firmly
[5:42]
written down, it's pretty hard to just
say, hey, elk go through there. So that
[5:48]
is one of the reasons that goal five is
very dearly needed and why we're going
[5:54]
to be working on it and that will be a
really important aspect of it. Um,
[5:59]
» but they don't know. They don't read
signs. They go where they want. And you
[6:02]
also have
>> Well, I know that, but I'm saying people
[6:05]
that are driving. I've seen that sign
for 20 years. And now it's like, well,
[6:08]
why is it even there, you know?
>> But you also have to understand we've
[6:11]
had fires. So now you're going to see a
totally different migration pattern just
[6:16]
because that Yeah. That this is way
before the fires began that this has
[6:21]
been going on. Um, so what needs to
happen to bring to attention that with
[6:27]
this next solar farm that's getting
ready to go up? I mean, now, you know,
[6:32]
there's a group of elk there now. Are
they thinking, well, maybe this is where
[6:35]
we'll go? Well, no, now we're going to
wipe that one out for him, too. I mean,
[6:38]
who's taking into consideration?
>> That should have been taken into
[6:40]
consideration in the staff report and
ODF andW should have weighed in on it.
[6:45]
So, if that has been passed and it's
done, that should be if you go back to
[6:49]
that staff report, that should all have
been taken into consideration. I can't
[6:52]
tell you off the cuff what what was
done, but yeah.
[6:55]
» Right. Right. So, I guess bottom line,
they're just on their own kind of. I
[7:03]
mean, there's not a whole lot we can't
obviously about the solar farms. So, and
[7:06]
bring their lives back. Well, not really
because that was part So when you do a
[7:11]
staff report and you do an application,
you have all the various agencies weigh
[7:16]
in and ODFNW would have been an
important aspect of that because they
[7:21]
would have taken into that
consideration. There is a problem in the
[7:25]
fact that we didn't solidify that
wildlife map. I'm not going to say there
[7:29]
isn't, but that should have been. And so
if we looked up that solar farm, we
[7:34]
looked up that staff report, that would
have all been taken care of and there
[7:38]
would have been a mitigation. Some of
the mitigation that was done on some of
[7:42]
the solar farms was money that went to
Aspen Valley Ranch that preserved
[7:48]
property and developed water for mu
deer. I know that was part of it. Some
[7:53]
of the mitigation was with the
prongghorn. We did ramps so if they were
[7:57]
in the solar farm, they would be able to
escape. I can't tell you all the
[8:00]
different mitigations, but each solar
farm was taken separately and was done
[8:05]
and it was done under the advice of
ODFNW.
[8:09]
» Okay.
So, it's done. There's nothing any
[8:14]
» I'd have to look up the staff report to
tell you. But if that solar farm is
[8:18]
approved, it was taken into
consideration. And yes, there was a
[8:21]
mitigation.
>> I guess I'm I'm just curious when this
[8:23]
was all going on. Where's all the animal
lovers out there? I mean, were there to
[8:28]
me this is like a big red, wow, this is
huge. Were there not people out there
[8:33]
that were questioning?
>> I think that's one of the biggest
[8:37]
problems with the process, right? Uh
people don't really get excited until
[8:42]
after they see it go up because I would
have loved to have the input that I've
[8:48]
gotten from the community since in
meetings when the decisions were being
[8:52]
made and and fortunately or
unfortunately
[8:56]
that's how the Oregon lands use process
works. Once you have an approval, you
[9:01]
have an approval, which I I see value to
a lot of things in that because you need
[9:06]
to have certainty in in all aspects of
land use, not just solar, but
[9:11]
whatever you're doing, if you're
building a house and then you pour a,
[9:15]
you know, a foundation and then they
come back, well, I don't want a house
[9:18]
here. And you go, well, you know, I've
already paid for a contractor to do all
[9:21]
this. So, you need to have certainty,
but it's very difficult. And I I think
[9:26]
we work very hard to get as many people
here as possible to input, but unless
[9:32]
people come and talk about their issues,
it's it's very difficult for us as
[9:36]
elected officials to just say,
>> you know, we need the public to be part
[9:42]
of that process. And and during that
time, people weren't passionate about
[9:46]
it.
>> Nobody showed up.
[9:47]
» Nobody showed up. Zero people in the
meetings.
[9:51]
» Were you advertising on the front page
of the newspaper? And we were we maybe
[9:55]
not the front page, but we were we were
making it very clear that these things
[9:59]
were going on.
>> Okay.
[10:00]
» On a on a consistent basis. And we have
agendas that we send out to hundreds.
[10:05]
What do you think?
>> How many What do you think? Is it even a
[10:09]
thousand? Maybe thousand.
>> So in the classified ad part, if you
[10:12]
look, it will say there's a planning
commission meeting coming up. I I get
[10:16]
it. I get what you're saying. and we do
notify the property owners and we do
[10:21]
take into consideration large parcels
and so we go above the state law to get
[10:26]
those people but in 2019 nobody cared
nobody showed up you did that and I
[10:33]
always say it wrong that ESSE is that it
is that
[10:36]
» analysis
>> okay so whatever the analysis was and on
[10:39]
social there was no one here so we did
we did we did the best that we could
[10:46]
» with what we had because there's boxes
to check and again on wildlife. Yes,
[10:52]
that was taken into consideration and
ODFNW was present and we did what we
[10:56]
could do
>> within the state laws that we're allowed
[10:59]
to that's the other thing is we aren't
allowed to really go outside of I guess
[11:04]
will could probably talk better to this
but I don't want to misspeak but you
[11:09]
know there's a process in land use
that's complicated but very well spelled
[11:14]
out that you have to follow
in order to approve or deny something.
[11:21]
And
>> so without public being here,
[11:23]
» yeah,
>> you can't you don't like it. That isn't
[11:27]
a reason. You have to have reason for
pro and reason for negative. And so
[11:32]
again, if just because I say I don't
like them is not that's not it's what's
[11:37]
presented to you and what's presented to
you if it checks the box and it matches
[11:42]
all that and it matches the and you do
the mitigation that you can you are you
[11:47]
have to go through otherwise what
happens is it's appealed and it goes to
[11:51]
luba and it would be deni or it would be
passed through you would be because you
[11:56]
just can't do that. This isn't a
personality contest. This is a pres
[12:00]
presentation of business facts
basically,
[12:02]
» right? Was there um so there wasn't a
group of animal activists out there that
[12:08]
got involved?
>> There was nobody here.
[12:10]
» Nobody.
>> Nobody.
[12:13]
» Okay. Well, to me that means that gets
to the point that things need to get on
[12:19]
the newspaper. I'm sorry. I know that
everyone's on the internet, but a lot of
[12:23]
people aren't. I grab the newspaper
every single week. And um and I'm not,
[12:29]
you know, there's a lot of people, a lot
of older people that live in this
[12:32]
community
>> and I just don't do the whole social
[12:35]
internet thing. I'm too old for it and
I'm not going to start it now. And um so
[12:40]
I just, you know, that's kind of
unfortunate that that happened because I
[12:44]
I just don't think that the
communication could have been done a
[12:49]
little bit differently to grab some
attention from others. So um that's my
[12:53]
comment. Are there any other pending um
permits out there for more solar farms
[13:00]
that you guys are looking at or that
you're aware of?
[13:04]
» Nothing that I'm aware of that is on the
board's agenda. I'd need to double check
[13:08]
with our community development
department to see if you have anything.
[13:11]
» Yeah, I'd just be curious.
>> Now, are you on the planning commission
[13:14]
agenda, too? Because there's do we send
out the planning to both or you should
[13:20]
be getting those two. So, they should be
coming to your emails of upcoming things
[13:24]
on the planning.
>> Yeah.
[13:28]
» Um, is that the city of Prineville?
>> No, that would be the county planning.
[13:32]
» Oh. Oh. Oh, okay. I wasn't aware that
there were two different I go to the
[13:36]
city of Prineville
planning,
[13:39]
» but that's only things that are within
city limits. When you're talking outside
[13:43]
limit, you're talking Crook County
Planning Commission.
[13:45]
» Okay.
>> That's a different body.
[13:47]
» Okay. And they have meetings.
>> Like I say, that's what I say. It is in
[13:50]
the news. It is back in the classified.
It'll say what's going on. If you look
[13:55]
if you start looking, you're going to
start seeing it
[13:57]
» and and yes, it's a different entity,
but if you if if they're sent out, I I
[14:02]
mean, I was a planning commissioner, so
obviously I got them, but yeah, they
[14:08]
have
>> check and make sure. Can you double
[14:10]
check and make sure?
>> I get I get all your stuff.
[14:13]
» Yeah.
>> Yeah, we can make sure you're on the
[14:16]
planning side. It sounds like that's
kind of where I need to maybe
[14:20]
» that's more
being proactive.
[14:23]
» Yes, exactly.
>> Instead of reactive.
[14:25]
» That is your that would be your your
parcels because you're outside of that
[14:29]
city limit line.
>> That's great. Thank you. That is great
[14:32]
information. I appreciate it.
>> No problem at all. We appreciate you
[14:35]
coming every day.
>> Yeah.
[14:38]
» All right. Anybody online from the
public that would like to public
[14:43]
publicly input
[14:47]
By the way, Commissioner, I have to also
remind people how they get unmuted.
[14:53]
» We have to unmute them.
>> Well, I know, but when you say anybody
[14:56]
wants to comment, I don't think people
always know how and it's not super easy
[14:59]
if you're mobile.
>> Um, just as a FYI,
[15:02]
» I agree with you.
>> Is so should we have them do we have
[15:05]
them raise a hand? Raise your hand
sometimes
[15:08]
» or comment in the chat.
>> You have two options.
[15:15]
Okay, great. Um, we will move on to the
consent agenda.
[15:20]
» Okay, I make a motion to approve the
consent agenda as presented.
[15:26]
» I second.
>> Okay.
[15:28]
» Any discussion?
>> No. Everything is clear and that
[15:31]
everyone should understand the order
number 2026-37
[15:35]
of the distribution of the funds. So,
no, no discussion.
[15:41]
All those in favor
>> I
[15:43]
» prophet I
>> discussion
[15:48]
» what
I
[15:51]
» I don't think there is any discussion
that's good [laughter]
[15:54]
» I mean should I just say it
>> say discussion
[15:57]
» discussion none scheduled
>> none [laughter]
[16:02]
discuss okay
>> manager's report this one thank you
[16:09]
» and I really don't have anything at all.
I guess I mean the only thing I guess I
[16:14]
do have is no appointed me to be a
second vice president on the payments
[16:21]
for public lands. So evidently I must
have done a good job for SRS and PILT.
[16:25]
So there you go.
>> Perfect. Uh on September or sorry August
[16:33]
27th from 2 to 4 p.m. uh Congressman
Cliff Ben will be in town talking about
[16:39]
uh firefighting techniques, prevention
and postfire recovery
[16:45]
and resources for that recovery. Um, and
so hopefully we can get as many people
[16:50]
there that have been uh had losses and
want to talk about um possible
[16:56]
prevention like managing our forests and
different things so that he can take
[17:00]
that back to Washington DC and uh you
know try and try and improve some of
[17:05]
that stuff
>> and it will be at Barnes.
[17:08]
» Thank you. Barnes Elementary.
[17:12]
All right. Um
[17:16]
uh that wraps up the commissioner
updates. Uh
[17:20]
oh. Uh
have you joined county college yet?
[17:24]
» Yeah.
>> Okay. Well, uh we also have uh county
[17:28]
college uh is starting next two weeks
from now on uh Wednesday the 2nd.
[17:35]
And we're really excited. We have some
really good applicants for the thing,
[17:39]
but we could always use more if there's
uh anybody online or in the room that
[17:43]
would be interested and please share it
with friends and neighbors and we'd like
[17:47]
to really get as many people there as
possible.
[17:50]
» Feel like a second.
>> Yes.
[17:52]
» Yeah, we had to tweak it because we had
a a big uh meeting come up for the power
[17:57]
lines. I guess that'd be another good
one to bring up that we have a Pacific.
[18:03]
» It was the third. It got bounced back to
the second.
[18:11]
» Okay.
>> If you miss one, you just won't be able
[18:15]
to become the uh uh you know,
validictorian.
[18:22]
» But besides that, you're fine.
[laughter]
[18:27]
» Is it a Zoom? Can you zoom into
>> I don't think it's
[18:29]
» We don't have Zoom opportunity.
>> That's okay.
[18:35]
It's from It's It's me and Will talking.
So, you hear enough of us talking, so
[18:39]
you should be
>> And I just real That's my daughter's
[18:42]
birthday. [clears throat]
>> Well, it's just me talking.
[18:44]
» Might just be. [laughter]
>> So, see, even Will's going to be
[18:51]
» Yeah. Me and Brianna will take care of
it.
[18:55]
[laughter]
[19:00]
» Yeah. And so, you'll have all the
information. You can go back. Okay.
[19:10]
» The county board of commissioners.
[19:14]
» The county board of commissioners will
now meet in executive session under OS
[19:17]
1926602E
to conduct deliberations purchase
[19:21]
designated by the governing body to
negotiate real property transactions.
[19:25]
Representatives of the news media
designated staff shall be allowed to
[19:28]
attend the executive session. All the
members of the audience are asked to
[19:30]
leave the representatives of the news
media specifically directed none
[19:33]
reported on any deliberations during the
executive session except to state the
[19:36]
general sub the sessions previously
announced. No decision may be made in
[19:40]
executive session. At the end of the
executive session, return to open
[19:42]
session. Welcome the audience back into
the room. The K County Board of
[19:45]
Commissioners will now leave executive
session under RS1926602E
[19:50]
[clears throat] to conduct deliberations
with persons designated by the governing
[19:53]
body to negotiate real property
transactions. Representatives of the
[19:57]
news media and designated staff were
allowed to attend the executive session.
[20:01]
All other me all other members of the
audience are asked to leave the room.
[20:04]
Representatives of the news media
specifically directed not to report in
[20:08]
any deliberations during the executive
session except to state the general
[20:11]
subject of the session as previously
announced. No decision was made in
[20:15]
executive session. We will we have now
returned to open session and welcome the
[20:18]
audience back into the room.
[20:24]
» [clears throat]
[20:27]
» Commissioners, what I think I heard in
the inductive session is that no
[20:30]
decisions to be made today. Uh we'll
gather more information and bring this
[20:34]
back for future deliberations.
>> Okay,
[20:37]
» sounds good.
Um
[20:43]
» motion to adjurnn.
>> Motion to adjourn.
[20:45]
» I make a motion to adjurnn.
>> Second.
[20:49]
» Really screws up my cadence when there's
only two of us. No, it it does kind of
[20:54]
doesn't it kind of almost doesn't seem
right, but just be thankful there's not
[20:57]
five of us. So there you go.
>> Sure. Okay. Uh
[21:01]
» all those in fa or any discussion?
>> We don't need to discuss this.
[21:04]
» All those in favor I Okay.