Agenda
Transcript
AI TRANSCRIPT
This transcript was generated automatically from audio using AI and hasn't been reviewed by a person — it can contain mistakes, including plausible-sounding sentences that were never actually said. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record.
[0:00]
Good evening, everyone. Welcome to our town council workshop. Today is February 15, 2023.
[0:18]
If you could please take roll. Council Member Ramirez.
[0:22]
Here. Council Member Lord.
[0:24]
Here. Council Member Duncan.
[0:26]
Here. Vice Mayor Callaghan.
[0:28]
Here. Mayor Mirabat.
[0:29]
Present.
[0:30]
We have a quorum.
[0:31]
If you could please rise with me and join me for pleasant allegiance.
[0:38]
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for
[0:43]
which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.
[0:53]
Good evening, everyone. Welcome to our workshop. We'll get to talk a little bit about our
[0:57]
little pool a little bit. First, I'd just like to welcome our new communications manager.
[1:01]
Welcome. Just so you know, you don't have to wear a tie to our meetings. We're very casual,
[1:05]
okay? So you can relax. All right. With that, I'm going to go ahead and turn it over to
[1:11]
Ralph, sir.
[1:12]
Thank you, Mr. Council. And the purpose of this workshop is just to provide some guidance
[1:18]
to town staff. And I just want to do a little brief history. As you recall, one
[1:23]
of the items that early on that we did with the American Rescue Plan funds, we commissioned
[1:29]
STANTEC to do a full assessment of our qualifiers that we call the pool. Since that time, they've
[1:37]
actually gone to our Parks and Recreation Committee, provided a detailed platform presentation.
[1:42]
And several months ago at a council meeting, provided a report to the council. So that's
[1:48]
where we're at today. And then I also like to go ahead and introduce we have
[1:52]
Etienne Bergeron, our Parks and Recreation Director. We have Michelle Horne, our aquatic
[1:57]
facility manager. And then we also have Sean Campell from STANTEC and Terry Glunt, as
[2:03]
I call the pool guy. That has spent several days and weeks over in our pool. It was
[2:09]
the author of the report that we have here tonight, Mayor and members of the council.
[2:13]
Tonight, what we're really seeking is just some a little bit of guidance where
[2:16]
the size of the pool, we know that there's a Parks and Recreation Commission advisory.
[2:21]
And also the location of the pool. So with that, Mayor, I'll just open it up for any questions.
[2:26]
Do you have any further questions from the council?
[2:32]
If needed, we could do a presentation. We've done it before with the council. I mean, it's
[2:37]
I really don't think we need to. Yeah, you're right. I mean, all right, bottom line,
[2:41]
pool's old, not worth fixing. It needs to be replaced. Okay. Many disagree with that.
[2:48]
So with that, I'll open it up. I'd like to, I guess, recognize the Vice Mayor. He's been
[2:54]
working with the town advisory committee. So if you don't mind starting with you, you
[3:02]
have the most knowledge I think of this and your thoughts and ideas.
[3:06]
Sure. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Been working on this project for a long time. This even
[3:12]
goes back before the assessment of the pool when we commissioned a architectural firm to
[3:18]
evaluate the possibility of building a new aquatic center, right? Because we knew even
[3:24]
back then that the pool was on its last leg. And through that whole process of public
[3:30]
meetings and park committee involvement, that process, I think the price tag on that was
[3:36]
about $15 million and it was just not feasible for us to move forward.
[3:44]
At that time, we didn't have the 16 acres, right? So there was always a question of where
[3:48]
were we going to put a new aquatic center, right? But lo and behold with the acquisition
[3:55]
of the 16 acres, this opened up a whole brand new possibility. So we approached,
[4:02]
we revisited the idea, right? Now that we have more flexibility in a location, we're
[4:08]
able to get Stantec to evaluate the pool for us, right? To give us a strong analysis
[4:14]
of where we stood. We always knew that the pool was in dire need. But obviously we
[4:22]
want to thank Stantec for their very detailed report on the pool that they've
[4:27]
shared with all of us. And basically, there were a couple of options that were
[4:35]
presented to the Parks and Recreational Advisory Committee based on the report.
[4:41]
One, we had the opportunity to repair the current pool. It would have taken
[4:49]
extensive repairs and cost almost as much money as a new pool would. And one of
[4:56]
the questions that were asked of the firm was what is the guarantee that those repairs
[5:04]
and modifications would last for a period of time? And of course, there is no guarantee
[5:11]
just because of the basic foundation of the existing pool. So based on that
[5:18]
information, the Parks and Recreational Advisory Committee made the determination
[5:24]
that it would probably be in the best interest of the community and financially
[5:29]
that we move forward with constructing a new pool. So the question then is where,
[5:36]
right? We could construct a new pool in the existing Coloritch Park, right?
[5:46]
But what are the benefits there? What are the drawbacks? One, you have to shut
[5:52]
the pool down for a period of two years or whatever during the construction phase,
[5:57]
right? So the community would be without a pool. The second part is that the
[6:04]
price, the pricing, which was a ballpark preliminary pricing for a pool that we
[6:10]
chose that the Parks and Recreational Advisory Committee chose that they
[6:14]
thought would be the best for the community was about $1.8 million
[6:21]
a slightly more. But that didn't include the construction of ancillary buildings,
[6:27]
right? So if we demoed the existing pool, put a new pool there, we would still
[6:32]
have to spend additional funding $800 to a million for locker rooms, bathrooms,
[6:39]
offices, equipment rooms, right? So the initial price of the pool looks
[6:48]
okay until then you take into consideration that there's about another
[6:53]
million dollars worth of cost that would be associated with rebuilding the pool
[6:58]
in its current location. After analyzing that, we looked at the 16-acre property.
[7:05]
What are the benefits of having the pool at the 16-acre property? One,
[7:10]
we're building our municipal building there. There's going to possibly be a
[7:16]
community center there. We're building from the ground up, so we're not rebuilding
[7:22]
in the same area. Two or three, the funding for the, it generated through
[7:32]
ARPA funds, which means that we don't have to touch the bond money to build
[7:37]
the pool. So the pool in itself that cost that $1.8 to $2 million through
[7:44]
ARPA money, but now we can share the ancillary building from the community
[7:51]
center or the municipal center, right? So you have, we're already going to be
[7:56]
building bathrooms. If we have a community center that has a recreational element
[8:01]
to it, you're already going to be building bathrooms. You're already going to
[8:05]
be building locker rooms. You're already going to be building a concession.
[8:08]
You're already going to be adding all of these ancillary support facilities,
[8:12]
right, that we can piggyback off the pool. The other benefit is that we can keep
[8:19]
the current pool open during this construction process. So the community
[8:25]
basically doesn't lose anything while we go through this process if the
[8:29]
decision was made to add the pool to the 16-acres. When the Parks and
[8:36]
Recreational Advisory Committee looked at all of this information,
[8:41]
looked at the pros and the cons from all three options, rebuilding the existing
[8:48]
pool, building a new pool in the current location, or building a new pool in
[8:54]
the 16-acres, the decision that the Parks and Recreational Advisory
[8:59]
Committee came out with is that it would be probably in the best interest
[9:03]
financially and in the interest of the community to build it in the 16-acres.
[9:08]
We also looked at the type of pool, and what we determined that the best pool
[9:14]
for us would be a 25 by 25, which is a 25-yard or a short course pool, right,
[9:22]
but the depth of the pool would be deep enough to be able to accommodate
[9:27]
other programming, not only swimming, but water polo, SCUBA certification,
[9:35]
lifeguard certification, and obviously swim lessons and all those types of
[9:39]
things. But by building this pool to regulation standards, which our
[9:45]
current pool is not regulation. So we can't hold sanctioned meets there.
[9:51]
We can't hold any sanctioned high school meets. We can't hold any
[9:55]
sanctioned club meets because it doesn't meet that criteria.
[9:59]
By building a regulation pool, 25 by 25 eight lanes, we have the ability
[10:07]
to be able to use that facility to host swim meets, host high school meets,
[10:14]
host district regional meets, right? The other thing, too, is the parking,
[10:21]
right? If we're going to be able to have those types of events at this pool,
[10:27]
we're going to have the parking available in the 16 acres, right?
[10:31]
If we rebuild in the existing space, we are still going to be challenged
[10:36]
by the parking that we have in that park. And if we have a swim meet
[10:42]
on a Saturday that you have the same on the same Saturday as the
[10:46]
soccer clubs and, you know, it just it becomes chaos and everybody's
[10:51]
parking in everybody's yard. So based on all of that, that's the
[10:55]
recommendation that came out of the Parks Committee after we analyzed
[10:59]
all of the options and, you know, what they thought was in the best
[11:04]
interest, both financially and in the best interest of the community.
[11:09]
So just...
[11:13]
Yes, DJ, you recognized?
[11:15]
Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Thank you, Mr. Vice Mayor.
[11:17]
That's a wonderful position.
[11:22]
Two questions that I would have, and I'm not opposed at all to the
[11:27]
consideration of having a pool, a regulation size pool included in, you
[11:32]
know, what the final 16 acres plan would be. Two questions, mainly
[11:36]
one question and then a comment. Have we looked into or do we know
[11:40]
what the cost would be to remove or to fill in the current pool
[11:45]
at the time in which we would move to the new location?
[11:49]
That cost has not been considered at this time.
[11:52]
Okay. And then my only other comment would be, I think, you know, if we are
[11:55]
looking at whether it is utilizing the 16 acres for this purpose and
[12:00]
kind of starting from the ground up and or repurposing in the future,
[12:04]
you know, where the current pool is that would no longer be there.
[12:07]
I think the town, it would behoove us to consider and think about
[12:10]
future uses potentially such as like a splash and play area for town
[12:15]
and children residents, something that we don't have or, you know, items of
[12:19]
that nature that are water items, water activities that aren't
[12:23]
necessarily swimming that we don't have currently within our town that
[12:27]
I think would benefit our town residents. So that's my two
[12:31]
cents on that.
[12:33]
Yeah, I appreciate that. The Parks and Recreational Advisory
[12:38]
Committee has already started looking into options for that space.
[12:42]
Nothing has been finalized or is still in the very infancy of the idea
[12:48]
process, but some ideas that have been tossed around.
[12:51]
And I do like the idea of a splash and play.
[12:54]
I do like that idea, but some ideas that have been tossed around
[12:57]
now, of course, or pickleball courts. This seems to be the huge craze
[13:00]
today.
[13:02]
But yes, we would repurpose that area, you know, to enhance the town,
[13:08]
you know, whether it be pickleball courts, splash and play, additional
[13:11]
parking in the park, you know, those types of options.
[13:14]
Awesome. I ultimately, so like I said, if we end up ultimately choosing as a
[13:18]
council to go forward with with a regulation size pool at the
[13:21]
68ers, and we're tapping into ARPA funding for said pool as opposed to
[13:25]
bond money, then I think we might want to also consider having
[13:28]
additional amenities that are water based for children that are not
[13:32]
swimming in addition to the pool.
[13:35]
That's it. Thank you.
[13:38]
Thank you.
[13:41]
All right. You know, I agree with the recommendation of moving the pool
[13:46]
over there.
[13:48]
And I just want to talk about a couple of things.
[13:51]
The councilman Duncan's point of perhaps maybe including a splash and play
[13:55]
area in that pool.
[13:58]
The ARPA money that we have, we have to kind of really look at that as a
[14:02]
whole, where we're going to spend it at.
[14:06]
And not to mention that, you know, where is a splash and play more conducive
[14:10]
to encourage activity, you know, is it in the center of our new
[14:15]
green space or the tucked away by a pool someplace.
[14:19]
You know, those are things that we can always incorporate a splash
[14:23]
and play in our 16 acre park that's going to be going in as well.
[14:28]
The main question I had is, you know, I love the idea that we can
[14:31]
use ARPA money instead of bond money.
[14:34]
I mean, that's just like using your uncle's credit card.
[14:37]
The only question is, and do we take advantage of it?
[14:40]
If your uncle gives you a credit card, you obviously want to take advantage of
[14:43]
the fullest of your ability, especially because there are rumblings
[14:46]
now that some of the senators are going to bring in forward.
[14:49]
Hey, if you haven't spent this ARPA money yet, too late,
[14:52]
you're not going to be able to use it.
[14:54]
So we have to make sure we spend it in a timely manner as well.
[14:57]
At least that's just my understanding.
[14:59]
The recommend...
[15:00]
The recommendation on the size of the pool was at 25 yards or meters by 25. Could you give
[15:06]
me a little bit more on why you believe that's better than having a full competition pool?
[15:12]
Well, so there are two types of sanctioned swimming pools, right? You have a long course
[15:20]
and a short course. Back in the day, they used to be seasons, right? When I used to
[15:25]
swim competitive, there used to be seasons. There would be a long course and a short course.
[15:30]
The 25-yard, so it's a 25-yard pool, which is the short course pool, versus a 50-meter
[15:36]
pool, which is a long course pool, which is they call an Olympic-sized pool, right? And
[15:43]
of course, that's, you know, that's the type of events that are held in the Olympics
[15:46]
is on a long course pool. You know, what are the benefits? I mean, there's really
[15:53]
not a whole lot of benefits to spending, and I get the arc of money, right? But there's
[15:59]
not a whole lot of benefits that are different between a long course and a short course pool,
[16:05]
right? Because in a short, with all of, and we had this discussion in very, very
[16:13]
heavily in the Parks and Recreational Advisory Committee meeting, you know, we can accommodate
[16:20]
all of the programming that we need to in a short course pool, right? Competitive swimming,
[16:27]
water polo, like I mentioned, you know, the SCUBA certification, the Lifeguard certification,
[16:31]
which was very important to our aquatics coordinator, right? Swim lessons, you know, with the
[16:37]
zero entrance, the adult, all of the adult programming, right? All of that can be
[16:41]
accommodated within a short course pool. If we go to a long course pool, I don't
[16:47]
believe that we gain any additional benefits through, one, the extra cost in understanding
[16:57]
the ARPA. But the main, my main issue there is that now I'm taking up twice as much space
[17:04]
in our community center, right? That we're not going to gain that much more programming,
[17:13]
right? So it's not like, in a short course pool, you can do 15 things, and if you have
[17:21]
a long course pool, you can do 30 things. No. We can do everything that we need to in
[17:27]
a short course pool, and a long course pool is not going to gain us any additional programming,
[17:31]
right? The only thing that it would gain is in swimming. That's really the end of
[17:38]
it. But I've always taken the position, and I took this position in the parks meeting,
[17:45]
is that a short course pool is a certain size, right? If you double that size, I just don't
[17:51]
want our 16 acres in our community center to be about a pool, because a long course
[17:57]
pool takes up a lot of space, a lot of space, you know, whereas a short course pool takes
[18:04]
up half the space and still accommodates. Short course is 25 meters, long is 50.
[18:10]
Short course is 25 yards. Okay, yards. Long course is 50 meters.
[18:16]
Okay. So it's about double. It's about double, correct.
[18:21]
Rafa, I mean, I don't know what the involvement of our, I mean, we have Michelle here. She was our,
[18:26]
I guess, our pool manager and kind of knows swimming very well as well.
[18:30]
Was, did she give her input for the advisory committee?
[18:33]
She did, yes. She spent two meetings that I know of, and I really appreciate your involvement,
[18:40]
because she was very much involved in the process. It's not like she just came
[18:47]
and made a presentation. She did come and make a presentation, but she spent at least two
[18:52]
full meetings with us. And as the committee was going through this process, she was offering
[18:59]
her ideas and making sure that as we were considering what the best option
[19:05]
were, that we were accommodating all of the things that she needed in terms of her total
[19:10]
programming. One thing I'm not clear on. So you can have like 16 different events there.
[19:16]
You can have water polo, regular swimming, companies like that. What about simultaneously?
[19:22]
Does having a larger pool give you the ability to have the utilization without
[19:27]
overlap? Is that an issue right now? Michelle, do you want to come up for a minute?
[19:31]
I was going to say Mayor and Members of the Council, we have Michelle and also Terry,
[19:35]
if you come up too. Terry, our consultant as well, because obviously we have wonderful
[19:41]
aquatic managers, Michelle, who's there, boots on the ground every day. And then we also have
[19:45]
the advantage of Terry, that this is what he does strictly for Stantic throughout the
[19:50]
entire state. So whatever answers you get. I don't want to put you on the spot, but
[19:55]
again, we have our Uncle's credit card. Okay, I keep saying it that way. But so let's get the
[20:00]
best thing possible. So if you just give me a share of your opinion with the council, please.
[20:07]
Just touch it button there. There we go. So as of right now, we do have a lot of teams that
[20:13]
want to use the pool. And they currently either cannot, because we don't have the time for
[20:17]
them, the space for them. So yes, a 50 meter pool would allow us to host multiple teams or
[20:23]
even, for example, our Cutler Bay water polo team. They right now cannot have the boys
[20:29]
and the girls playing at the same time, because there's just not space for them.
[20:32]
So they have to rotate maybe the boys Monday, Wednesday, Friday, the girls Tuesday, Thursday,
[20:37]
things like that. So we could use the space. We could host a lot more teams. We just
[20:42]
currently only have two recreational and one currently one high school because
[20:50]
coral reef does not currently want to swim at our pool. They want to swim at like a pool that
[20:54]
is sanctioned for water polo. Since ours is not, they don't feel it makes sense to even practice at
[21:00]
ours. Okay, Kerry, you want to give your input as well? Of course. And yeah, Michelle and I did
[21:06]
a lot of work together when we were doing the original assessment. So she was heavily involved.
[21:12]
I'm going to just point out that the 25 meter by 25 yard pool
[21:17]
does allow you in the yard direction, sanctioned for Florida High School Athletic Association
[21:25]
events in the metric is sanctioned by US swimming as well as FINA and Olympics. So
[21:32]
they do tend to use different nomenclature, so to speak. But the one advantage of a 50 meter
[21:40]
pool by a 25 yard will allow you to swim 10 lanes on one side of the 50 meters and now
[21:48]
10 lanes on the other side of the 50 meters. So you now have 20 lane capability in the 25 yard
[21:55]
direction, which would allow you to streamline your events. You could have 10 lanes for boys
[22:01]
events, 10 lanes for girls events going on simultaneously. It really streamlines it or
[22:08]
you can have tournaments with multiple schools coming in and being able to take advantage of all
[22:13]
of those. So that's the one advantage. Obviously the flip side of that is bigger pool, more equipment,
[22:20]
larger restrooms, things like that. But the 25 meter does allow you to do certain activities on
[22:28]
half the pool and then do different activities on the other, as well as larger events and more
[22:34]
streamlined efficient meets. Are there, how many other Olympic sized pools are there in the South
[22:40]
State area? Oh, there's lots. And seriously, there are a lot. Most of the colleges and universities
[22:50]
are all at 50 meter. Almost all of them, some have multiple pools at 50 meters.
[22:58]
I'm going to just start with Broward because I know them like the back of my
[23:02]
update County South State. Actually, I'm looking at only South State. Yeah. Southridge
[23:10]
have a 50 meter. They only 25 by 25. No, Southridge, Southridge Park. They didn't know.
[23:15]
Oh, no, they don't even. They don't have a pool yet. No, they didn't build it.
[23:20]
Well, no reason not have a pool. Southdade has a pool, but it is Miami.
[23:24]
Miami Dade College has a long course pool. The University of Miami has a long course pool.
[23:30]
I believe Gulliver Academy has a long. They used to have a short course pool,
[23:34]
but I believe they upgraded to a long course pool. And I believe
[23:40]
Branson Everglades has a long course pool. I'm not sure about Palmer.
[23:47]
Yeah, I don't either. I know that the Hall of Fame does in Fort Lauderdale,
[23:52]
Coral Springs Aquatic does, Deerfield and Pompano both do.
[23:57]
Back in the day when I used to swim competitive, we had a lot more long course pools,
[24:02]
but those have all gone away now. Tammy Ammi is short course.
[24:09]
Okay. Yes. And again, my concern is we have, we only have one chance to build a pool.
[24:15]
The last one we have 60 some years old. So I want to make sure we're going to do something
[24:19]
that's going to benefit the community. And quite honestly, Ralph, as I'm sitting here
[24:23]
thinking about this, is there a way that we could perhaps leverage something,
[24:27]
working with our partners in the county to see if they would be able to do,
[24:33]
perhaps kick in on this. I don't know. It is kind of far reaching.
[24:37]
We have this ARPA money, roughly about, you know, $10 million that we're not
[24:40]
spending on stormwater projects. And from your perspective, what would you say was the best use?
[24:47]
Would it be, I mean, I guess the 25 yard pools, about 5 million and 50 would be about
[24:54]
7 to 8 million, is that correct? Yeah.
[24:56]
Okay. So it's not quite double, but it is a couple million more.
[24:59]
Right. Okay. I think, Mayor, just, you know, just a little 30 second recap of the ARPA,
[25:04]
you know, we did receive $21 million. We already committed 11 million
[25:09]
improvement projects. We have 10 million for what we call general government use.
[25:13]
Just last council meeting, we authorized $800,000 for sidewalks. So now,
[25:19]
and then we also commissioned this, this study. And we have later on tonight,
[25:23]
we have a couple of ITBs for retrofitting some park, I mean, some park lights,
[25:28]
both Bellaire and Lakes by the Bay Park. And then we also have some other items to do some
[25:32]
resurfacing on our playgrounds that don't have the porn play or the,
[25:38]
yeah, they have the porn play, but we're going to AstroTurf because, you know,
[25:40]
the porn place is kind of falling apart. So we do have still some funds available
[25:47]
in the $10 million, you know, call it general services, you know, allotment in our ARPA.
[25:54]
I think, you know, yes, we will maximize, we're not going to be one of the ones that
[25:58]
return money. That's not going to be our goal, you know. So if anything, yes,
[26:03]
I think it's a good, healthy conversation to have or, you know, you have the
[26:05]
Parks and Rights Committee, we have our staff to look at it, you know, 25 by 25 by the two meters,
[26:13]
a new wrinkle as well or suggestion, you know, a splash pad. I mean, you know,
[26:17]
some ideas of what to do with the other side. We don't know what to do yet if we got to decide,
[26:23]
you know, if it's going to be in the 16 acres, then we could kind of repurpose
[26:26]
that area and that Cutleridge Park, you know, for different things. And we know that we've
[26:30]
had, you know, emails back and forth about having an official pickleball court. Those aren't
[26:34]
cheap. All right. So we have that. So there's some uses that we could use in terms of the $10
[26:41]
million. But I think another important part, Mary's going to be too, is we do a great job
[26:47]
leveraging the ARPA funds, searching for other grant funds. For example, FURDAF, you know,
[26:54]
FURDAF, this is right up FURDAF's alley. It's a recreational community to get people out of
[27:00]
their homes and do something. And that's right up their alley. If you recall, even when we
[27:06]
reconstructed Franjo Park, we received a $250,000 grant for FURDAF. We also received over $500,000
[27:13]
for FURDAF for the Canoe Kayak launch to Lakes by the Bay. So we could certainly, talking to our
[27:18]
grant school, this is certainly eligible for that type of money. So there might be even some more
[27:23]
cost savings that maybe we don't have to draw down as much from the ARPA if we could leverage
[27:28]
that with state money for the pool. So there's different opportunities there as well.
[27:35]
Can I offer this suggestion? The first decision would be if we're going to build the new pool
[27:44]
on the 16 acres. If I could offer this suggestion, once we choose the architectural firm,
[27:51]
let's have them come back with a schematic drawing showing a short course and a long course
[27:57]
pool. What would that design look like? My concern is that the long course would stick out like a sore
[28:02]
thumb, but I could be totally wrong. They could come back and design a long course pool that
[28:07]
looks fantastic, and then that takes all my concern away. Or we could look and say, oh,
[28:15]
that short course is way too small. So I don't know. If we could do that, and then that
[28:20]
gives us the ability to make a final decision after we've looked at both options.
[28:23]
What do you think about the timing of that, Ralph? Because we don't have forever to
[28:29]
commit this money, so let's slow it down too much waiting for architectural drawings.
[28:34]
I think we could always ask the design firms that we're going to go through that process.
[28:39]
You're going to hear that report shortly at six o'clock. We did put in the RFQ and the RFP
[28:46]
that there may be an aquatic facility, so they understand that. We are in the process
[28:51]
of issuing a request for information RFI. We want to hold off on the RFI just to get some clear
[28:58]
direction if it's going to be there or not, because we don't know until we had the sunshine
[29:02]
meeting that is it going to be in the 16 acres or going to be in the current site.
[29:06]
I'm getting the consensus that it's going to be the 16 acres, so we understand that direction.
[29:10]
And I think that we could always have the design firms draw up, hey, this option A or option B,
[29:20]
what will it look like? How much is it going to encompass? But also, it does come with a cost.
[29:27]
As Terry mentioned, our consultant, that it's more equipment, more items as well. But certainly,
[29:33]
we could visit that with the firms, meaning that we have a window. There's a window as soon
[29:38]
as like tomorrow, believe it or not, meaning that we will issue the RFI to the shortlisted
[29:45]
firms. And we could tell them to design A or B. Okay. So, and again, counsel, just to
[29:54]
narrow the scope of this discussion, is there a consensus that we would like to see the pool
[29:58]
on the new 16 acres site?
[30:00]
Is there, okay, that was the main point. And we're still, I guess, waiting on making
[30:11]
a decision on the size determination. I think we haven't quite hit that yet, at least from
[30:16]
my perspective. I really haven't. Let me ask the rest of the council. I mean, if you have
[30:20]
an opinion on one way or the other at this point, Councilman Duncan.
[30:23]
Thank you, Mr. Mayor. My only fear of utilizing the larger pool is that it would eat up
[30:28]
too much real estate in the 16 acres.
[30:30]
Same as Vice Mayor Cowan, which is as duly noted. Councilman Lord, do you have an opinion on the
[30:34]
side?
[30:35]
Yes, I can explain.
[30:36]
Well, I think if we can get the biggest one, I think would be better. I mean, if we have
[30:42]
the funding, but it's sufficient with the smaller one. So I'm kind of good either way,
[30:49]
but I would be interested in seeing the renderings.
[30:52]
Councilman Ramirez.
[30:53]
I'd be curious to see what would totally be encompassed in the large pool and also in
[31:01]
the small one. Are we going to have diving platforms or is it just going to be swim
[31:05]
meet type facility? And what is the best benefit for us? Is this going to generate
[31:13]
more community involvement or are we looking at some funding or school activities, something
[31:18]
along that line? I would be interested in knowing the difference between the small and
[31:23]
the larger pool and what maintenance costs would be yearly, approximate maintenance costs.
[31:29]
It could take us over or outside of a budget. So we'd have to start looking at money for
[31:35]
that too. So that's the only thing I'd like to see.
[31:37]
All right. Thank you. And one other consensus. I think we've all agreed that we're
[31:40]
going to replace the pool. Yes. Okay. So that's too important.
[31:44]
I don't know if we've given you enough yet. You need more from us today.
[31:48]
I think we didn't. I think we have enough. I think another point to make, again, our
[31:53]
existing pool, the chiller and the heater are broken. One of the things that I recommend
[32:01]
now that we know that direction, the council wants to provide the town staff of going
[32:05]
to 16 acres. As Vice Mayor mentioned, the advantage of having that on the 16 acres
[32:10]
is that you still have a pool. But we still have a pool that's either too hot or too cold.
[32:15]
It depends on when it is. So in talking to Michelle and E.T. and our consultants, the
[32:24]
pumps that are, correct me if I mispronounce them, the pumps that are there, the refrigerant
[32:29]
pumps and the heater pumps are Sambionts, which is unique, meaning that they have like
[32:36]
a sole source, right? And you'll hear me say that later on. In order to replace those,
[32:43]
it's going to be approximately $57,000 to $60,000. My recommendation would be if we're
[32:48]
making that decision and go ahead to 16 acres, then I would recommend that the school had
[32:53]
to make that investment on the existing pool. The only reason, because you know,
[32:57]
Michelle and E.T. have done a great job, that they contacted the vendor that the
[33:02]
warranties and can be transferred over to the new site, and they would be doing the transfer.
[33:10]
So it's not like, you know, we're going to be spending it, and it's not going to come back.
[33:14]
But at least that would make Michelle's life so much easier, because again,
[33:20]
Michelle, that's why we want her involved in the process. She's on the front line. She hears it
[33:25]
every day. So my recommendation would be, and again, that'll be a future agenda item
[33:29]
that will come back with a sole source letter from the pumps vendor, and I'm glad to hear
[33:35]
that they would honor their warranty, and they could be used at the other location as well.
[33:39]
That makes a lot of sense. And without a doubt, as Councilman, I mean, the Vice
[33:42]
Mayor Callahan said, you can't go two years without a pool. Our community needs one.
[33:46]
So that certainly makes sense to me. And I look forward to seeing that in the future
[33:50]
agenda item for approval. Thank you.
[33:52]
Any other questions or comments on this issue?
[33:55]
Just one more real quick, just to kind of emphasize to Councilmember Romero's comment.
[34:03]
Michelle, how many lifeguards do you have currently at our Color Ridge pool?
[34:10]
We currently have 10.
[34:12]
10.
[34:13]
Well, we're short-staffed, but we've eight.
[34:15]
You're short-staffed.
[34:16]
Yes.
[34:16]
So if we went to a larger pool, that means 20 lifeguards, right?
[34:23]
And we're having trouble staffing today.
[34:25]
It's not that we're having trouble. We just haven't posted that we have positions open.
[34:30]
We have people who just left for school.
[34:32]
You would need twice as many lifeguards or surfacing for just the double service area.
[34:36]
They can't see another 25.
[34:38]
I mean, it would, I would have to, I haven't done the math for that, but
[34:43]
they each can, I think, Terry, you do know the,
[34:47]
I'm trying to think off the top of my head. I don't know if we need double per se,
[34:51]
maybe an additional five or six.
[34:54]
Yeah, I think it's proportional, but I think it's actually double, I think.
[34:58]
Yeah, it depends how much space at the time we're utilizing.
[35:01]
If we have the small section being used and the two big sections,
[35:06]
we would need probably four to five lifeguards on a shift at a time.
[35:11]
But if we only have, it would honestly depend on what activities we're holding at the time.
[35:16]
So a weekend, we wouldn't need maybe as many.
[35:18]
It would have to be something I'd have to sit down and look at and go over the area.
[35:22]
And I certainly understand the vice mayor's point about
[35:24]
maintenance costs, which includes labor costs.
[35:27]
Well, right, right.
[35:28]
And my point also is that, yes, the lifeguard is proportional to, you know, the pool itself.
[35:37]
But, you know, the other point that I just want to make is that it's going to be
[35:42]
increasing staff. It's going to be an increase in lifeguards.
[35:45]
And if on a Saturday, our intention is to open up the entire pool,
[35:48]
then we have three lifeguards calling sick.
[35:51]
All of a sudden, you have to close part of the pool, right?
[35:54]
So there are repercussions.
[35:55]
If we can't staff properly, you know, if you don't have, you know,
[35:59]
the right amount of lifeguards to cover the entire pool.
[36:02]
So the reason I bring that up is I didn't want everybody to be under the misconception
[36:06]
that, hey, we have twice the pool.
[36:08]
We can still do it with 10 lifeguards right now.
[36:11]
We have to increase staff, you know, proportionally.
[36:15]
All right, any other points?
[36:17]
No. Guys, thank you very much for providing that information.
[36:19]
Thank you.
[36:20]
Thank you for coming to us for the last minute.
[36:21]
E.T., thanks for your work with this.
[36:23]
I think folks come and do this for us.
[36:25]
Ralph, anything else?
[36:26]
No, I think, I think Mayor Murr's Council, like you mentioned,
[36:28]
I want to thank the other consultants and also, you know,
[36:30]
E.T. and Michelle, because they're in the front lines.
[36:33]
And this is a great discussion.
[36:35]
You know, we needed to have this.
[36:36]
That's why we want to make this in the workshop atmosphere.
[36:39]
So thank you for all the comments.
[36:40]
And the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee members as well.
[36:42]
But they spent a lot of time on this, you know,
[36:44]
at least two or three meetings with Terry,
[36:46]
providing the detailed reports.
[36:47]
So, and again, the detailed reports,
[36:49]
the PowerPoint presentation, and the full engineering
[36:52]
report assessment are online,
[36:55]
as well as the folks who view it at home as well.
[36:56]
So thank you, Mayor.
[36:57]
And the one last point that some people have made for,
[37:00]
I just want to bring this up so people know we're listening
[37:02]
about the ability to have larger tournaments,
[37:05]
put Cutler Bay's name on the map.
[37:08]
That's something that's a lot of the,
[37:10]
I guess, the swimming community have put out there.
[37:12]
I just want to let them know that, yeah, we heard you on that.
[37:15]
And it will be part of our considerations.
[37:17]
We muddle our way through this.
[37:19]
So again, guys, thank you very much with that.
[37:21]
This workshop is adjourned.