[0:05] city administration

[0:06] for conducting

[0:07] regular

[0:08] council meeting

[0:09] directors D select. Uh,

[0:11] one quick one

[0:12] addition to

[0:13] agenda in

[0:14] section "

[0:14] Correspondence for

[0:15] actions", we need

[0:17] vote for

[0:18] someone who

[0:18] will vote, er, yes

[0:19] board of directors

[0:20] passive and

[0:21] verbal

[0:22] VCT insurance.

[0:24] So, we'll do this.

[0:26] there. Uh, okay. So, in

[0:31] We have one protocol.

[0:32] for approval

[0:33] regular

[0:33] September 16 meeting

[0:34] and introduction

[0:35] suggestions about

[0:36] approval

[0:37] minutes of the meeting

[0:38] September 16.

[0:38] We support this.

[0:40] Uh, is there a discussion?

[0:43] Good. Everyone who is for

[0:45] approval

[0:45] minutes of 16

[0:47] September, they say Ya. Eh.

[0:48] Everyone who is against and everyone

[0:50] are being held. We have

[0:54] three warrants. Order 77P

[0:56] and fund accounting number

[0:58] two.

[0:59] I will make a suggestion.

[1:00] on approval

[1:01] 77P fund orders

[1:02] vacation number two.

[1:04] I support this. Uh,

[1:06] discussion. Good. THERE ARE-

[1:10] eh, protocol board #2-

[1:12] for the amount of $3565 for

[1:14] protocol. Uh, 7P, what

[1:16] this is a salary,

[1:18] is $12.81, and seven

[1:20] total costs-$

[1:23] 81,549. Uh, more

[1:26] half of these 51,000

[1:28] dollars–this is payment for

[1:29] , uh, a new bond

[1:31] for a gravel pit, and

[1:32] $8,500–Belov,

[1:34] who did a little digging. I will call you.

[1:37] Sticky Brook.

[1:38] Yes. Rent

[1:39] equipment. So this is

[1:40] was a large part

[1:41] of the total amount.

[1:43] Sorry. In fact, on

[1:45] the first record board

[1:46] two amounts are indicated.

[1:47] One amount in writing

[1:49] form, and then one

[1:50] total amount

[1:51] . But there are two accounts,

[1:53] seems.

[1:55] Yes. But they say "

[1:56] "summing up", and

[1:57] then the number they say "summarizing"

[1:59] ", differs from

[2:00] final

[2:01] value.

[2:01] 1339.

[2:06] Where is the friend?

[2:07] On the back...

[2:08] No, just on

[2:09] front side...on

[2:10] first page.

[2:12] Yes.

[2:13] Look at that one.

[2:14] small excerpt

[2:15] text there, under which is

[2:16] "to".

[2:16] Oh, I see 30. Yes, I do.

[2:18] I understand what you mean.

[2:19] you speak. Yes, it is.

[2:22] interesting.

[2:22] I think it's 3565.

[2:25] Yes, a large number.

[2:26] Yes. I wonder if this is

[2:28] they moved it from...

[2:29] I bet,

[2:29] the last one was 3124.

[2:30] They just didn't add it.

[2:31] its.

[2:32] They didn't update.

[2:33] Yes.

[2:33] So I'll just cross it out.

[2:34] it.

[2:35] Oh, okay. Now that you

[2:36] Do you mean?

[2:37] Yes.

[2:37] Good. Uh, so everyone,

[2:40] who supports

[2:41] order approval

[2:42] 77P and record two,

[2:43] I say.

[2:45] I. Everyone who is against.

[2:47] Good. Procedures

[2:49] approval

[2:49] value between

[2:50] meetings.

[2:54] So, I saw this between

[2:55] our last one

[2:56] meeting about what

[2:57] there was 214, and I didn't

[2:58] I knew, I thought I

[3:00] asked Marie

[3:01] put it there because

[3:02] I really am

[3:03] printed out for

[3:04] law, how do we do it

[3:05] we do. So I give this.

[3:09] everyone, and I was going to

[3:10] put it on Chris

[3:11] , because the only

[3:16] the way to do it—

[3:17] one of two ways

[3:19] : to convene special

[3:20] meeting, okay, or we

[3:21] waiting for

[3:23] next meetings.

[3:25] So, I think we

[3:26] you just need to have

[3:27] a clear idea about it

[3:28] because we simply don't

[3:29] we can ratify

[3:30] Willy-nilly. Not

[3:31] what we don't

[3:32] ratify the warrant,

[3:33] until actually

[3:34] let's meet

[3:35] as a group, but we don't

[3:36] we can approve

[3:37] no money. So I thought that was it.

[3:40] written explanation,

[3:41] how to do it

[3:43] How about this idea? Uh,

[3:46] if it's not urgent

[3:47] case before separate

[3:48] meeting, it will be on

[3:49] the next separate

[3:50] meeting, if not

[3:51] will need

[3:52] pay. For example,

[3:53] if there is anything that

[3:54] need to pay, we will hold a special

[3:56] meeting,

[3:56] if not, just

[3:57] let's move this to

[3:58] next.

[3:59] Yes,

[3:59] and then, I know, we

[4:00] usually in July

[4:02] we appoint someone,

[4:03] for him to come to

[4:04] these end of year matters,

[4:05] which need to be done

[4:06] on the 31st, but this

[4:07] only at the end

[4:08] July, at the end

[4:09] June, sorry,

[4:10] That's how it should be, there

[4:11] It is clearly written that

[4:13] need

[4:13] use

[4:14] economical, and I think

[4:15] that we did this on

[4:16] holidays in June, but

[4:18] very little. And I think,

[4:19] that's right, anything is possible

[4:20] wait 2 weeks if

[4:22] this is not extraordinary

[4:23] situation.

[4:24] Yes. If this

[4:24] urgent matter, its

[4:25] must be submitted to

[4:26] next meeting,

[4:26] then convene

[4:27] meeting. There are three of us.

[4:28] will appear, and...

[4:29] That's right.

[4:30] Okay, that's good.

[4:31] Thank you.

[4:32] That's a good explanation.

[4:34] You must copy

[4:35] the rest of this book for

[4:36] me when you have

[4:37] ...

[4:37] Well, now is the time...

[4:39] I think you

[4:40] search on eBay,

[4:41] maybe you can do it

[4:42] find.

[4:42] Yes.

[4:43] Good. Uh,

[4:44] reimburse us

[4:45] water test costs.

[4:46] Was it...Or...

[4:47] did Grange reimburse us?

[4:49] I don't know who I have.

[4:50] check with Chris.

[4:52] Good. Sent

[4:53] a memo.

[4:54] Yes, there was a letter.

[4:55] He really is

[4:56] connected the account, in

[4:57] to whom it was written,

[4:58] what is the score

[4:58] connected. Yes.

[4:59] But I think it's Grange

[5:00] paid their dues

[5:01] part.

[5:02] I think so, but I

[5:03] ...I don't think there is

[5:04] there was something from the church

[5:05] or

[5:06] churches. Someone in

[5:07] told the church that

[5:08] they did it. I think it was

[5:10] church, not gra. Someone

[5:12] did.

[5:12] No, I'm almost sure.

[5:14] I thought it was

[5:14] Larry Lynch, who was

[5:15] wonderful.

[5:16] Good. I will ask.

[5:16] Chris contact

[5:17] you.

[5:18] Yes, it could be in...

[5:18] Yes, I think we have

[5:20] one of three.

[5:20] Yes.

[5:21] Good. Uh,

[5:24] visitors, Colin

[5:25] Bratton here, W.K. Gale

[5:27] here. Dana sneaked in.

[5:28] through the back door. IN

[5:29] someone has something that is not

[5:30] is in order

[5:31] daytime, that they

[5:31] want to discuss?

[5:32] Now

[5:33] I'm just sharing.

[5:34] some information.

[5:35] Um, historical

[5:36] company

[5:37] will open the following

[5:39] two weeks, and then in

[5:40] It will be our 50th.

[5:42] anniversary, and you probably

[5:43] saw this in

[5:44] email

[5:46] Laura, maybe

[5:47] a week ago, but

[5:48] our 50th anniversary

[5:49] will take place on January 18,

[5:51] October, from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Em

[5:52] , I would really like to

[5:54] some of you came.

[5:56] Um, it won't be anyone,

[5:57] who will speak for a long time,

[5:58] no long speeches.

[6:00] Um, different people

[6:01] for many

[6:02] years that have made

[6:04] your contribution,

[6:04] offering programs,

[6:06] exhibits, etc. Therefore,

[6:07] we are going

[6:08] share some of

[6:09] the brightest

[6:10] moments. Um, what we

[6:11] prepared, it's just

[6:12] selection of exhibits

[6:14] over the years of work

[6:15] historical

[6:15] society. Um, and we would

[6:17] wish you could

[6:18] to learn a lot about

[6:20] Dumerston, about people in

[6:21] community, which you are,

[6:22] maybe not before

[6:23] met or not

[6:24] knew about all the skills

[6:26] and talents in the city.

[6:27] So, welcome.

[6:30] Very informal and

[6:32] anniversary cake. IN

[6:34] Are there any rock and roll fans among you?

[6:35] Roller skates? No, I'm kidding.

[6:37] Well, if you have

[6:38] attention from the quarry,

[6:39] these are just stones,

[6:40] wall builders.

[6:41] Yes, of course. Good.

[6:43] Perfectly. That's exactly 18

[6:45] October from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.

[6:47] You will hear, you will hear a reminder

[6:49] in two weeks.

[6:50] Good.

[6:51] So, Mr. Brad, in

[6:52] We are meeting downstairs.

[6:53] city council, to

[6:54] discuss this.

[6:55] Let's just

[6:56] Let's do it now.

[6:57] Let's raise

[6:58] here. Come here.

[6:59] You come here,

[7:00] Sit down here.

[7:01] Stay there. What would

[7:03] you didn't say

[7:07] it will be easier for the camera,

[7:08] if I...That's good.

[7:09] Of course.

[7:12] Hmm, so I think that

[7:17] the main reason why

[7:18] I was here, is in

[7:19] because the city

[7:20] is considering the possibility

[7:22] setting tables

[7:23] speed. Hmm, this is

[7:25] some position on this

[7:27] . So, I have

[7:29] only specific

[7:30] remarks on

[7:31] speed tables,

[7:31] but I guess I am too

[7:32] I will be glad.

[7:33] discuss the issue

[7:34] excess

[7:35] speed in more

[7:36] in a broad sense. Um, I would like to say about

[7:41] speed tables

[7:42] specifically, what exists

[7:44] many rules about

[7:45] how to follow them

[7:46] to set up so that

[7:47] answer

[7:48] minimal

[7:48] engineering

[7:49] standards. I think

[7:55] that how strict

[7:57] Vtrans eventually

[7:57] is going to them

[7:58] to provide, it is already

[8:00] another question. So, I think that both New Fain and

[8:06] Marboro introduced them

[8:07] for the last few

[8:08] years, not necessarily

[8:10] following all

[8:11] the rules that are in the book,

[8:12] which should this contain

[8:14] T-shirt. But I think

[8:17] that for familiarization with

[8:19] the best

[8:19] practices, um, me

[8:20] must them

[8:21] to look at and a little

[8:22] to talk about what

[8:24] this is it. Um, and

[8:26] the most important thing, in my opinion, for Dumbstone

[8:29] in particular, it is that their

[8:30] should not

[8:30] to install on any roads where

[8:33] speed limit

[8:34] exceeds 30 minutes per

[8:36] hour. Um, I know that.

[8:41] some problem areas

[8:42] here, if I'm correct

[8:44] I remember the restrictions.

[8:45] speed is

[8:47] 35 mph or more,

[8:48] um, and that will limit,

[8:50] where exactly can they be found

[8:51] to install if

[8:52] you don't want either

[8:53] to take a step if

[8:55] speed limit

[8:56] is 35 miles/hour,

[8:58] we can, that is

[9:00] 30 or 35, then technically

[9:05] establish

[9:06] speed should be

[9:07] illegally.

[9:09] So I was just passing by.

[9:10] this afternoon over

[9:11] Williams Town. I

[9:12] thought: "I'll check

[9:14] it".

[9:14] is obvious that their

[9:15] speed limit

[9:16] in the city center

[9:17] fully complies

[9:18] 25 miles/hour. So

[9:18] question about 30 miles/

[9:20] It's a little strange,

[9:21] because ours

[9:21] speed limit

[9:23] at some point

[9:24] changes from 35 to 25.

[9:25] So,

[9:25] in fact, they can

[9:26] to be at the 25 mark or in

[9:27] within the mark 25. Yes,

[9:29] they can be, I think, on a par or with

[9:31] them, if they

[9:32] are within 25

[9:33] mph, but I don't

[9:34] I think there are some

[9:35] rules on how

[9:36] They are far away in the zone.

[9:37] can be. Um, so

[9:39] if they were in the zone

[9:40] 25 mph, that would be

[9:42] allowed. Um, and then

[9:46] another, and this again

[9:47] yes, they should

[9:48] to be at a distance of 300

[9:50] feet from this

[9:51] turning, how do you

[9:52] must have something on

[9:53] like 300 feet

[9:54] line of sight to

[9:55] what you get,

[9:57] I think it's in Dston.

[9:58] not

[10:02] very easy to find. I mean, this

[10:07] part, I think, is,

[10:08] You know, I wouldn't.

[10:09] expected that Vrance

[10:10] will be here with the team

[10:12] surveyors who

[10:13] accurately measured, but

[10:14] is that they, you

[10:15] they said you have

[10:17] to be a significant area

[10:18] quite a straight road,

[10:21] you said it was 300

[10:22] feet, Yes.

[10:27] And then, obviously, on

[10:29] signs is a sign for

[10:31] this. They have a sign on

[10:32] potholes. There are two

[10:33] signs, it seems.

[10:35] Um, so

[10:36] I only read one,

[10:37] you know, one at a time

[10:39] character set for

[10:40] everyone.

[10:40] Yes, I don't know. William

[10:42] signs two. There is one

[10:43] abbreviation of "says"

[10:44] "recumbent obstacle" or

[10:45] "speed table,

[10:46] approaching" or "

[10:47] speed table", and

[10:48] then there is another one nearby

[10:49] speed tables,

[10:50] but I think, um, I think technically it has.

[10:53] be another set

[10:54] characters before this. Ahem,

[10:56] I don't think so.

[10:58] serious, you know,

[10:59] obstacle. That's right. AND

[11:02] still, um, there must be

[11:03] road markings

[11:04] coating. THERE ARE

[11:07] special set

[11:08] road markings

[11:10] the coverage I have

[11:11] as standard

[11:12] drawings, um, which

[11:13] essences are drawn on the road. This is something on

[11:18] like a series of arrows,

[11:20] um, with an interval

[11:21] about 10 or 15

[11:22] feet, probably 50

[11:24] feet ahead, with

[11:25] both sides of the table

[11:27] speed. Um, then I think that if I remember correctly,

[11:34] then engineering

[11:35] the standard is

[11:36] because at the beginning

[11:37] third set

[11:38] lines or something like that

[11:40] and next to the table itself

[11:41] speed. Hmm, and again

[11:47] anyway, I want

[11:47] to emphasize that I am not

[11:49] I think I'm transgender.

[11:50] will be here as long as they are

[11:51] submitted in good faith

[11:53] efforts to

[11:53] follow the rules

[11:55] . I wouldn't expect that.

[11:57] it will be something like this,

[11:59] what will become big

[12:00] problem. AND

[12:01] how about

[12:01] responsibility?

[12:04] You know what I mean?

[12:05] I say? I think that this

[12:08] potentially can

[12:09] depend on whether

[12:11] it will happen eventually

[12:12] problem. I can't

[12:15] to say, and honestly

[12:17] saying, someone should

[12:18] to have a big enough

[12:19] technical expertise to

[12:24] understand that these things

[12:25] do not respond

[12:26] engineering

[12:27] standards. And, as I

[12:29] already said, and Newfein,

[12:31] and Marorrow is not

[12:32] respond

[12:33] standards by 100%. I think they are both.

[12:37] made efforts to be as good as possible

[12:39] closer to them. But

[12:42] this question is more about

[12:44] city council, than that,

[12:45] What can I do?

[12:46] answer.

[12:48] Do you know any?

[12:49] court cases

[12:50] lawsuits?

[12:52] I don't know. This is not that.

[12:55] what I, um, never

[12:57] did, that is, I...I didn't

[12:58] researched this

[12:59] in advance. I,

[13:01] of course, it could

[13:02] to consider. Hmm, I don't...

[13:04] know exactly which ones.

[13:06] regulations. Hmm, I have to

[13:09] meaning that damage

[13:11] vehicle

[13:12] would not be the main thing

[13:13] problem. And I would again

[13:16] Well, I'm not a lawyer. I can't give you

[13:18] legal advice, but

[13:19] so that someone

[13:21] really exceeded

[13:22] speed limit

[13:23] 25 or 30 mph on "

[13:24] speed bumps

[13:25] ", it would be necessary

[13:25] to go much faster,

[13:26] than the established

[13:27] speed limit

[13:28] at 25 or 30 mph.

[13:28] But on the other hand, you cannot exceed

[13:30] the one who has

[13:30] Williamstown, from

[13:31] at a speed of more than 15

[13:32] mph You

[13:32] need to go with

[13:33] at a speed of 12-10 miles/

[13:34] hours This is quite strict.

[13:36] punishment, or

[13:36] wrong?

[13:37] Therefore, one of the questions that

[13:38] call

[13:39] anxiety and

[13:39] research that I

[13:40] read, is that, you are not trying

[13:42] slow down everyone

[13:43] at a speed of 10 miles/hour.

[13:44] This is a little higher.

[13:45] punishment than I want

[13:46] set for

[13:47] someone on the road with

[13:48] at a speed of 25 miles/hour.

[13:49] Personally, if I

[13:50] has to

[13:51] exceed

[13:51] speed 16 km/h, and

[13:52] then 15, then I

[13:52] trying to achieve

[13:53] minimal

[13:54] speed, because I'm going with

[13:54] at a speed of 15 miles per hour,

[13:55] which is completely

[13:56] corresponds

[13:56] speed limit

[13:57] . I have certain

[13:58] concerns about

[13:59] this.

[13:59] Um, that's one thing. And the other thing,

[14:04] very quickly, do you have

[14:06] us something from New Fain or

[14:07] somewhere else? Marlboro.

[14:09] What effect do they have?

[14:10] Did you see? Or

[14:11] observed

[14:12] decrease in quantity

[14:13] people who talk about

[14:14] excess

[14:14] speed in the city, or

[14:15] ...

[14:17] I know that Marboro

[14:18] installed two of them

[14:19] years ago. They already

[14:22] two seasons work.

[14:25] I don't have any.

[14:25] specific data from

[14:27] Maro, but I know they

[14:28] very happy with them.

[14:30] Um, they, in particular,

[14:31] they think it's good

[14:33] worked hard. They

[14:35] very, you know,

[14:35] they think that they

[14:37] very effectively

[14:38] slow down the movement

[14:39] people in the village. I, New-

[14:43] Fain, I have this.

[14:44] the feeling that now it is

[14:45] a little more difficult

[14:46] a political issue, and

[14:48] that not everyone is in town

[14:49] completely agree about

[14:50] what they took out

[14:51] winter, right?

[14:55] Yes. They, they...that is,

[14:57] , they are not...no

[14:58] nothing that is legal

[14:59] obliges you

[15:00] take them out for the winter,

[15:02] but in the city, I think, in

[15:03] Vermont them

[15:06] allow

[15:08] 600 volts to

[15:09] keep it up

[15:10] to each of them.

[15:11] Yes. They must

[15:12] drill 600

[15:13] bolted into the road.

[15:14] So even 600 volts...I

[15:16] I think my question is:

[15:17] if we want

[15:18] to invest in something,

[15:19] which will reduce

[15:20] speed, I don't know,

[15:21] What will it be? What do we have?

[15:24] When will the wind blow?

[15:25] within six

[15:26] months, four

[15:27] months? We will not have

[15:28] everything. So I know that

[15:29] I can just blow it out.

[15:30] through Dalston in winter,

[15:31] because there are no beds there

[15:32] police officers.

[15:32] Yes. Then there is snow or

[15:34] ice,

[15:34] Yes? Well, but there is no snow, no ice. I have

[15:37] in mind,

[15:38] Yes.

[15:38] Although, unlike

[15:39] other options,

[15:40] maybe it's possible

[15:40] to do all year round,

[15:41] you know, and not like that

[15:42] punitive, but again

[15:42] Yes, that's what we're talking about.

[15:43] We can talk.

[15:44] So I just had

[15:45] I'm curious to know.

[15:46] thought that they

[15:47] need to be cleaned.

[15:49] Yes, I think we would.

[15:50] appreciated.

[15:54] And they, I would say, are

[15:55] their removal. It's about

[15:57] actually about harm,

[15:59] what kind of plow blade

[16:00] will cause tables

[16:01] speed, more,

[16:02] than about the harm you,

[16:03] in fact, you will tear

[16:05] them and replace them every

[16:06] , you know, every few

[16:08] years.

[16:08] And then, I suppose,

[16:09] you probably

[16:10] will have enough

[16:11] often

[16:12] to repaint

[16:13] lines,

[16:13] because you have snow and

[16:15] ice, and you need

[16:16] it will be that they will be

[16:17] visible. And then,

[16:20] after you will asphalt,

[16:22] you'll have to, er, er

[16:24] ...

[16:25] Yes.

[16:27] Um, yes, I should have heard.

[16:28] where we really are

[16:29] thinking about it, and um...

[16:32] Well, I would say that

[16:34] I know that in Lebanon they

[16:35] are in the asphalt, and they

[16:36] leave them, um, and

[16:38] They are ruining them. I would

[16:39] more inclined to

[16:41] this, but I don't

[16:42] I support the restrictions.

[16:43] speed. I don't think so.

[16:45] that we have a certain area

[16:46] or a certain place where

[16:48] they are needed. As in

[16:49] West Village, we

[16:50] let's just say where

[16:51] Did you put them?

[16:59] You know, you put them

[17:00] before Grange, and

[17:01] then people who

[17:02] are going

[17:03] exceed

[17:04] speed, actually

[17:05] they will trample them again

[17:06] after

[17:07] will cross the limits

[17:08] speed. Um, this is

[17:20] helps people who

[17:22] exceed

[17:22] speed, issuers

[17:24] to keep an eye on yours

[17:25] speed, issuers

[17:26] ...

[17:28] Well, even right here,

[17:29] How many cars do you have?

[17:30] you see them moving

[17:32] at a speed of 24 miles

[17:33] per hour or 25 miles per

[17:34] hour?

[17:35] Right. Right.

[17:36] Um,

[17:36] and never like this

[17:37] saw.

[17:38] Um, never do that.

[17:39] saw.

[17:39] Right. AND

[17:41] so I think that, um,

[17:45] if we...I know what it is

[17:46] whole conversation, you still have

[17:48] no, but, hmm,

[17:49] flashing signs, we

[17:50] were also going to do this

[17:52] to pick up, and Jay said,

[17:53] that, um, data from them, but

[17:55] it's a $400 fee

[17:56] per year

[17:59] for someone who has them

[18:00] follows or, you know,

[18:01] receives this data. Um, and

[18:05] I think, um, counter

[18:06] traffic, if

[18:08] you are trying

[18:09] to see when we

[18:10] need to patrol

[18:11] dear, if that's what it is,

[18:13] What do we want, hmm,

[18:14] for example, here, when

[18:15] people exceed

[18:16] speed is the highest,

[18:18] hmm, what do we tell them

[18:19] or ask them, hmm,

[18:20] set the counter

[18:22] traffic

[18:23] right here in the office

[18:24] the city clerk or,

[18:25] hmm, you know, 100 yards away

[18:27] from here by road. Um, and

[18:31] then we definitely

[18:32] we will know when people

[18:33] exceed

[18:34] speed when we

[18:35] Patrols are needed. Ahem,

[18:40] so I think that's it

[18:42] a way to, um, solve

[18:43] this problem. Tables

[18:47] speed, we don't

[18:48] we need ours

[18:49] equipment. If you

[18:50] install here

[18:51] speed table, you don't want ours to

[18:53] dump trucks her

[18:54] moved. Ahem,

[18:55] you know when we carry sand, we transport, you know, 50

[18:58] loads per day.

[19:00] Um, they don't suit you.

[19:01] they are needed

[19:02] only needed for

[19:03] suspensions and everything

[19:04] another. You just, you

[19:06] just causing

[19:07] unnecessary

[19:08] braking,

[19:08] unnecessary wear and tear

[19:09] vehicles

[19:10] . If you destroy

[19:13] a city in this area,

[19:14] if you wanted

[19:15] set tables

[19:17] speed right here,

[19:18] you probably

[19:19] get, um, 90% of people

[19:20] who have to commute to work, not

[19:23] will want to have them.

[19:27] Retired people, hmm,

[19:28] can, you know, not

[19:29] to turn such a thing on them

[19:31] attention, hmm, because

[19:32] they, you know, don't, um,

[19:33] so I think I should

[19:35] definitely worth hearing,

[19:36] where, you know, West-

[19:37] The Village is the only place

[19:38] where is it really not so

[19:40] many trucks. Hmm

[19:44] , but we don't want to, we don't want our

[19:47] trucks drove by

[19:48] them. New Fames

[19:50] is in a place,

[19:51] where heavy loads

[19:52] rise through,

[19:53] hmm, Parish Hill. They

[19:55] don't drive through this

[19:56] bridge over bridge.

[19:57] Yes. I mean that

[19:58] I think I am

[20:00] talked to several

[20:01] people about this, that

[20:04] The main thing, in my opinion,

[20:05] there are eight places that

[20:06] lead here

[20:07] four-sided

[20:08] by the way, for any

[20:09] methods that

[20:10] are used

[20:13] twice, or both

[20:14] ends in the West Village

[20:16] or not. I said that in

[20:17] ends, but possible

[20:18] a third of the way from

[20:19] on the one hand, a third

[20:20] way from another, and

[20:21] school zone.

[20:22] It seems to be targeted

[20:24] zones, right, for

[20:25] safe movement. It

[20:26] all 25.

[20:27] There are children, there are people who

[20:29] walking down the street, and there

[20:30] intersection with four

[20:31] traffic lanes.

[20:32] So it seems to me that

[20:34] we are dealing with

[20:35] eight with something,

[20:36] if we are going to do something

[20:37] to do, right? For

[20:38] otherwise we, you know,

[20:39] we are installing something

[20:40] near the school in West-

[20:41] Village, but in the center

[20:42] there is nothing in the city,

[20:43] what do people always say

[20:44] They complain, don't they?

[20:46] And we will have nothing

[20:47] on

[20:47] East Road. Another thing,

[20:48] which constantly violates

[20:49] rules, this is a ride

[20:50] under the "Stop" sign.

[20:51] Nobody stops.

[20:52] They are just leaving.

[20:53] straight through it.

[20:54] Yes. Yes. And this is even

[20:56] city trucks.

[20:57] Yes. Yes.

[20:58] They don't stop.

[21:00] Right. Lines.

[21:02] We discussed this.

[21:03] What do you think, whether

[21:04] really line

[21:05] will stop the truck

[21:06] or a car?

[21:09] Um, the line is no more legitimate than himself

[21:12] "Stop" sign. Um, and them

[21:15] need

[21:16] to repaint

[21:17] annually. Um, we definitely

[21:20] we can do it,

[21:21] if the council wants it to

[21:23] there were "Stop" lines. Ahem,

[21:26] You know, I just

[21:28] I am looking at

[21:28] white service

[21:30] stripes. Hmm, hmm, that's not true,

[21:34] this will not happen...

[21:36] people passing by

[21:37] through them, usually

[21:38] they know there's a sign there

[21:40] stops. They just

[21:41] passing through

[21:42] them.

[21:42] They are standing at the end.

[21:44] covered bridge to

[21:45] Route 30, and they are

[21:46] It doesn't matter. They are blowing.

[21:47] right through them. It

[21:49] just typical. So this is

[21:50] does nothing. THERE ARE

[21:51] stop sign and

[21:52] a huge white line,

[21:54] and the states...I don't think so

[21:55] that we do this. I think the states

[21:57] they put paint on it.

[21:58] This does nothing.

[22:00] Right.

[22:00] This does nothing.

[22:02] It's good if someone,

[22:03] if it's something on

[22:03] kind of a blind spot,

[22:04] where you go around and not

[22:05] you see a stop sign,

[22:06] you know, you can

[22:07] first notice

[22:08] white line.

[22:09] Now there is a sign

[22:10] apple pie

[22:10] right there on the left. You can't see

[22:12] no one who leaves from

[22:13] half a day. As if you don't

[22:14] can you see the sign

[22:15] apple pie. Ahem,

[22:16] so very quickly that

[22:17] close, so don't

[22:18] close, but we

[22:19] talked about tables

[22:20] speed, so we know the rules.

[22:22] Yes. What is the cost,

[22:24] related to...?

[22:26] So, I, m, quantity,

[22:27] which I just bought,

[22:29] was approximately from

[22:30] four to six. I mean, this

[22:33] will depend on whether

[22:34] how many sets

[22:36] you buy, 000. Yes. AND

[22:37] then, by the way, I have

[22:39] meaning that it would be

[22:40] in a way it is important,

[22:41] but how much

[22:42] it will cost, you know,

[22:44] insulation, and then

[22:45] removal every year...In

[22:46] I don't have a number for

[22:47] this, because this city...Um

[22:49] , again, paint,

[22:50] you are not...

[22:51] signs...

[22:51] Yes, signs...I have them.

[22:52] there is no number for

[22:53] signs. I would expect

[22:55] you know, probably...

[22:56] How much does it cost?

[22:57] a sign on a pole?

[22:58] You know,

[22:59] approximately, it will be,

[23:01] probably 300 dollars

[23:02] together with the pillar. Ahem,

[23:03] maybe it's included

[23:04] in the cost of work,

[23:06] if you said 200,

[23:07] yes per piece,

[23:08] and the new Fain cost 45,

[23:10] and their 100,

[23:11] 4500.

[23:13] I was looking for information in

[23:14] Internet of the past

[23:16] week, it was something on

[23:17] like 3400. Yeah, yeah, um

[23:19] ,

[23:19] two days,

[23:20] including signs,

[23:21] two days for the initial

[23:22] installation,

[23:24] Ahem,

[23:26] and this if expensive, um,

[23:27] closed, otherwise you

[23:28] Signals are needed

[23:30] signs,

[23:30] I feel that

[23:32] we...Oh, I'm part of...

[23:39] So, we were also waiting

[23:40] on the data.

[23:42] Yes. What we have. We

[23:44] spent a whole bunch

[23:45] discussions in the council. I think that's all.

[23:48] processed. I...I don't...

[23:49] I don't do that. I have to check, but I

[23:52] ...I can look and

[23:53] to get this...um...

[23:55] Yes. No, no, no. It

[23:57] easy enough for me

[23:58] to figure it out. Um, and I would,

[24:00] probably just

[24:00] returned briefly

[24:02] to the question of tables

[24:03] speed. That would be...

[24:04] It sounds like you

[24:06] looking for. If you

[24:07] are you going to do them

[24:09] in one place, you

[24:10] it seems to you

[24:11] need to be placed

[24:12] them and in other places,

[24:13] just so that

[24:14] people felt that before

[24:16] they are considered more-

[24:17] less fair.

[24:20] Because, in my opinion,

[24:22] if they were going to go somewhere, then West-

[24:24] The village would be for

[24:25] the simplest of them,

[24:27] the most logical place

[24:28] , you know, this, you know,

[24:29] densely populated village.

[24:32] It's slow, you know,

[24:34] speed limit

[24:35] 25. It somehow

[24:36] remote. Hmm, you know,

[24:38] trucks can

[24:39] to go around it. There is no

[24:40] will be like this

[24:41] heavy traffic, like

[24:42] in other places. I think that if there were

[24:45] easy place to, um,

[24:46] to place them, you know

[24:47] , relatively easy

[24:49] saying, obviously,

[24:50] because, you know, you have

[24:51] there are problems with

[24:52] installation and

[24:53] service, then

[24:54] West Village, I think.

[24:56] would be the place

[24:57] where is it worth

[24:58] to address, hmm, as in

[24:59] East Road or here. I think that would be

[25:03] a little more difficult,

[25:05] I think you have

[25:06] quite clear view and

[25:07] near the school. Yes, I am.

[25:10] I think that at school, I mean, another

[25:12] thing about school

[25:13] consisted in the fact that

[25:15] there you can

[25:16] avoid this if

[25:17] you need time for

[25:18] this, you can

[25:19] to bypass, uh, that's right, I

[25:21] Yes,

[25:23] there are some roots

[25:24] around the school, uh,

[25:26] you know,

[25:26] I wonder what

[25:27] in the west, on the western side there is also

[25:30] fire department with

[25:31] trucks, I have

[25:32] meaning that this is still

[25:33] one thing worth

[25:34] take into account and

[25:34] talk to them,

[25:35] if you at all

[25:36] thinking about the west, I think this is great.

[25:42] discussion, and I think

[25:44] that's right,

[25:45] uh, yeah, I think that's it

[25:49] more than I think,

[25:50] what should it be, uh,

[25:52] yes, bigger, uh,

[25:54] group, uh, mine

[25:55] personal feeling,

[25:57] yes, probably

[25:59] to go to the city,

[26:00] especially when we have

[26:01] was not correct

[26:02] city code,

[26:03] but let's see how

[26:04] they feel,

[26:05] Yes,

[26:06] because from what I heard from

[26:07] people, they are tired

[26:08] from this.

[26:09] Yes.

[26:10] They want us to do something.

[26:11] did, something.

[26:12] Uh, I think

[26:14] just talked

[26:15] about this.

[26:15] Yes. I think that in

[26:16] the sheriff's department he

[26:17] I've been here often, and now

[26:18] , to be honest, I

[26:19] suddenly he is not here

[26:20] saw.

[26:21] He was on my side.

[26:22] Well, do you know why?

[26:26] Good. So, does anyone have

[26:27] one more question for

[26:28] Knees on details?

[26:30] That's all good. Thank you.

[26:31] Yes, Dan.

[26:32] Don't ask questions.

[26:34] Aha.

[26:34] OK. Interesting. I heard

[26:37] some comments, like

[26:39] all these people

[26:39] complain. Not

[26:42] need to be precise,

[26:43] but I think, Todd, no

[26:44] I want you.

[26:45] criticize.

[26:46] Actually, I'll call

[26:47] three people. But who...

[26:48] how many people are there

[26:49] Dmerson Center

[26:50] complained? Um,

[26:51] at the Dmerson Center.

[26:52] Yes. I thought you said,

[26:54] that they constantly

[26:55] complain in Dmerson-

[26:56] center.

[26:56] This is mostly because

[26:57] stop signs, not

[26:58] because of speed.

[26:59] Good. But these are different

[27:00] vehicles

[27:02] Are these residents?

[27:03] These are the residents.

[27:04] And me too

[27:05] interesting, because they only

[27:06] about six.

[27:07] Many people walk

[27:09] to Grange on Wednesday

[27:10] for lunch.

[27:10] Good. Trying

[27:12] cross the street, and

[27:13] they are not

[27:14] are slowing down.

[27:15] Users Res.

[27:16] I'm just trying, and

[27:18] many people also

[27:19] dirt roads.

[27:21] So, this is, you know, what is it?

[27:23] West Emerson. Their,

[27:25] probably 20.

[27:26] Believe it or not, but

[27:27] excess

[27:28] speed, which

[27:29] occurs in West-

[27:30] Emerson, actually

[27:31] happens because

[27:32] local residents.

[27:33] I must say that 85% of those

[27:34] who exceeds

[27:35] speed, that is

[27:36] city residents who

[27:37] live in this area

[27:39] , or they live on the road and immediately

[27:41] next to, holding on to

[27:42] horns, brother. It

[27:43] mostly, I have to say that I am watching

[27:46] on them, I know who

[27:47] they.

[27:47] Of course.

[27:48] So in any case,

[27:50] just curious, because I'm from

[27:51] those people who

[27:52] like to receive

[27:53] information from data.

[27:57] Um, and often

[27:58] organizations respond

[27:59] per voice group, and

[28:05] it's not always

[28:06] most or even

[28:07] close majority

[28:08] people who are

[28:09] interested

[28:09] parties, if

[28:10] you want.

[28:11] Um, so I just

[28:12] interesting, it would be

[28:13] nice to talk to

[28:14] a little more about that. I

[28:15] completely agree with Lee.

[28:17] I think this is important.

[28:19] discussion, uh, so

[28:20] what does it affect

[28:21] budget, uh,

[28:22] discussion, and, uh,

[28:24] if, for example, very

[28:25] small cohort

[28:26] supposedly receives

[28:27] benefit, and this is another one

[28:29] the topic I want

[28:30] to violate, because not

[28:31] always profitable

[28:32] to do such things.

[28:35] There are

[28:35] unforeseen

[28:36] consequences of the attempt

[28:37] solve the problem. THERE ARE-

[28:39] eh, but if there is a very

[28:41] a small cohort that

[28:42] benefits, and all

[28:43] the population pays for

[28:45] this, I think this

[28:46] also needed

[28:47] to take into account in such

[28:48] discussions. I am not

[28:50] against, you know, I wanted

[28:51] I wish everyone

[28:52] followed the rules

[28:53] . I would like to

[28:54] there never were any

[28:56] problems. So I'm not for it.

[28:57] or not, I just

[28:58] I think it is necessary.

[28:59] much more

[29:00] discussions and

[29:01] thought about it with

[29:02] different points of view. Uh-huh

[29:04] , and then,

[29:05] Sorry, continue.

[29:06] Yes,

[29:08] took place in March

[29:10] meeting with Mr.

[29:10] Bratton and someone from

[29:12] sheriff's department,

[29:13] and there was no

[29:14] a huge crowd,

[29:15] but a clear conclusion

[29:16] was that these

[29:17] people were really

[29:19] interested in

[29:20] to do something, and

[29:21] speed table

[29:22] seemed good

[29:23] decision. Almost everyone

[29:26] were disappointed that law enforcement

[29:29] does not happen.

[29:30] Fines are not issued.

[29:31] To get a fine for

[29:33] 35, need to go 50

[29:35] or more. So all this

[29:36] seemed absolutely

[29:38] useless. But, uh, I

[29:40] left with the feeling that

[29:41] these people are very

[29:42] interested in

[29:43] speed tables, and

[29:44] so I, uh, broke it

[29:46] question and contacted

[29:47] this time with Mr.

[29:48] Redom. And, uh, I'm with you.

[29:51] I agree. I would like to know what everyone thinks

[29:55] in the city, but the question

[29:57] excess

[29:57] speed—it

[29:58] approximately each

[29:59] the third thing I hear

[30:01] from people. This is probably

[30:04] the most common thing,

[30:05] until I broke it

[30:06] tax issues with

[30:07] sale. Uh, everything was fine.

[30:08] as if everyone

[30:09] only talked about

[30:10] excess

[30:10] speed and why we

[30:11] nothing to do with it

[30:12] are we doing?

[30:12] And I hear this often.

[30:14] Yes. So, if not

[30:15] take into consideration

[30:16] mind reading or,

[30:16] you know, a survey,

[30:17] or so, I wouldn't

[30:18] refused to put

[30:19] This is up for vote.

[30:20] You know, special

[30:21] meetings and voting;

[30:23] this is a great way,

[30:24] you know, invite

[30:25] people to a wider

[30:26] discussion. But yes,

[30:27] I would like us to

[30:28] could hear from everyone

[30:30] constantly. But if you constantly hear something

[30:33] like that, I don't want to reject it and say

[30:35] : “Oh, I don’t know what everyone

[30:37] think, so now I

[30:38] nothing for anyone

[30:39] "I will do it." Yes. And I...

[30:41] don't want to imply that I

[30:43] ...I mean, I have concerns.

[30:45] to be on dirt road

[30:46] on the road.

[30:47] There was a boy who

[30:48] intentionally drove through

[30:49] at a speed of 50-60

[30:50] meters per hour

[30:51] the other day. He...he's a neighbor.

[30:52] He is local.

[30:53] Yes.

[30:54] And he does it.

[30:55] intentionally at least

[30:56] once or twice a week.

[30:59] And I would really like to

[31:00] this didn't happen, but

[31:01] I'm just a dot. This is not

[31:03] means that

[31:05] I'm calling you.

[31:06] Everyone reacts differently.

[31:07] different, and this

[31:08] wrong. It

[31:09] unacceptable. Perhaps,

[31:11] someday I will find myself in

[31:12] Don't worry, I'll try.

[31:13] deal with it yourself.

[31:15] But, um, I...I

[31:16] I agree that there is

[31:17] bad actors.

[31:19] Undoubtedly. And I wanted

[31:21] I wish there was, uh,

[31:23] simple, uh

[31:24] cost-effective

[31:25] a solution that would not have

[31:26] negative consequences

[31:28] . You know, I would like to

[31:29] for it to exist, and I

[31:30] I'm not saying that it's not true.

[31:31] I'm just saying that, on

[31:32] in my opinion, this

[31:33] deserves

[31:33] much more

[31:34] discussion.

[31:34] That's right. And during

[31:35] for many years, I think Maria can

[31:37] to speak from

[31:37] their name. I have

[31:38] meaning that this

[31:39] question

[31:39] discussed at

[31:40] there are already many on the forum

[31:41] years, many years.

[31:42] So this is not a new topic,

[31:43] which we have,

[31:44] Do you understand what I mean?

[31:45] So if it arises

[31:46] , and it should be followed again

[31:47] to discuss. This has

[31:48] to see again

[31:49] daylight. But I don't

[31:51] I want people to think,

[31:52] that it's just new

[31:53] problem. It was

[31:55] permanent

[31:56] long-term

[31:57] problem during

[31:58] many years,

[31:59] and considering

[32:00] number of soil

[32:01] the roads that we have. «

[32:03] Speeding policemen»

[32:04] nothing will be done about

[32:05] dirt roads.

[32:06] They can no longer

[32:07] to be there.

[32:08] No. Even if they

[32:09] there will be 25, there will be five

[32:10] pit. Even because it's not

[32:11] could be reached

[32:12] to a bad level, because

[32:13] there is no rain. You understand.

[32:14] , what am I talking about? You have yours.

[32:16] , these signs of nature

[32:17] origin.

[32:18] Yes.

[32:19] I contacted the office.

[32:20] Mark, and he tied

[32:22] me with mine

[32:22] deputy, who

[32:24] deals with the sign

[32:28] speed. This is a sign

[32:30] speed P on

[32:31] batteries,

[32:32] which we can

[32:33] to install.

[32:35] So it's already in development,

[32:38] but I think, you know,

[32:39] it would be on our part,

[32:40] when we will work on

[32:42] budget, think

[32:43] about to buy

[32:44] a few more of the same

[32:45] , otherwise they

[32:46] will definitely appear.

[32:48] Yes. Good. We

[32:49] let's close this topic on

[32:50] anything else. Well,

[32:52] No. I would just say,

[32:55] what, um, these signs, signs

[32:56] feedback from

[32:57] radar, like them

[32:58] they call it, I think,

[32:59] will always be

[33:00] the simplest

[33:01] option for

[33:02] solution. They

[33:04] produce several

[33:05] different models. I am not

[33:07] saw a lot of them in

[33:08] Vermont. Hmm, but

[33:11] especially in New

[33:12] There are those in Hampshire who

[33:13] really blink on

[33:14] you. They are similar to

[33:17] blue, almost similar

[33:18] to the police station

[33:19] a siren, which, in my opinion, and this data

[33:23] show that they

[33:24] really enough

[33:25] effective. They

[33:26] economically beneficial.

[33:28] Um, and then when your

[33:31] another one, you know, there is

[33:32] large booklet with

[33:33] research on

[33:34] means against

[33:35] excess

[33:36] speeds, and there are several

[33:37] those that you can

[33:39] get. There are those who

[33:40] just record your

[33:41] speed and give you

[33:42] feedback about

[33:44] what you exceed

[33:45] speed. There is one,

[33:46] who records, and there is more

[33:47] one who betrays

[33:48] beep if

[33:50] you are much

[33:50] exceed

[33:51] speed limit.

[33:53] This is for the neighbors

[33:54] will like it.

[33:55] I just thought, um

[34:02] can I just

[34:03] to say, um, uh, to

[34:04] return to these

[34:05] your meters, because

[34:07] I think this is the way.

[34:08] get the right one

[34:09] information. Ahem,

[34:12] wherever you want

[34:14] set the table

[34:15] speed,

[34:18] set the counter

[34:20] and that's because when

[34:22] they are finding out

[34:23] speed limit

[34:24] and all that, and where do we have

[34:25] it was like this, we had

[34:26] everywhere, from speed

[34:28] , you know, people in West-

[34:29] Village, they thought,

[34:30] that people exceed

[34:32] speed. Um, so we

[34:34] installed there

[34:35] counters. We

[34:37] did it in several

[34:38] places, the same for

[34:39] complaints. And there is a certain

[34:42] percentage, so that you

[34:43] never get 25

[34:45] , right?

[34:46] Yes.

[34:48] Um, you will get

[34:49] a certain percentage that,

[34:50] um, like, you know,

[34:52] at 20 m per hour

[34:53] more, but you want,

[34:54] so that it is very small.

[34:59] Um, so I think this is

[35:00] yes, and when we

[35:01] checked this data,

[35:02] everything was within limits

[35:03] standards. I have on

[35:05] meaning that everyone has

[35:06] problems with

[35:06] excess

[35:07] speed. Everyone has

[35:09] in the world.

[35:10] So, the situation is not

[35:11] worse. At that time on

[35:13] There was no West Street. Ahem

[35:15] , even if people

[35:16] think, you know, they

[35:18] see that one or two

[35:19] the cars still

[35:20] are passing by,

[35:21] and they say, "Oh, everyone,

[35:23] you know, there are several

[35:24] drivers who

[35:25] exceed

[35:25] speed. Hmm, and so on

[35:28] there may be, but all these averages are the same

[35:30] meaning, um, they

[35:31] invent a formula,

[35:33] so that in fact

[35:33] set limits

[35:35] speed on the road.

[35:37] Um, you just don't

[35:38] you can...well i guess

[35:39] maybe you can, I don't know, but that's it.

[35:41] they determine how

[35:42] quickly you can

[35:43] to drive on the road, they take a percentage, so

[35:45] what you don't want

[35:46] it was so

[35:47] low, so that everyone

[35:48] exceeded

[35:49] speed. I have on

[35:50] mind you, this,

[35:51] hmm, that's something

[35:52] wrong

[35:53] attitude. Hmm, but what?

[35:57] regarding safety in

[35:58] center, yes, I hope that people

[36:01] who go, you know, um,

[36:02] across, um, people

[36:04] they will say, you know,

[36:05] let them go

[36:06] ahead of you, right?

[36:08] If they are leaving with

[36:09] at a speed of 24 miles per

[36:11] hour, it's not

[36:11] problem. But when

[36:13] they rise to

[36:14] hill at speed

[36:16] 4550 and...Grange

[36:17] open, and you have

[36:18] these elderly people who

[36:19] are going to their car

[36:21] or walk on the sidelines

[36:22] roads, because there is an embankment there

[36:23] . They won't be.

[36:25] to climb this

[36:26] embankment,

[36:27] truth? You know, someone

[36:28] will suffer.

[36:29] Should we do it?

[36:30] speed table on

[36:31] that hill, are we

[36:32] let's just do it

[36:33] middle ground? Where

[36:34] we made a table

[36:35] speed?

[36:36] We made one on

[36:37] East-West Road. We

[36:39] made one for...us

[36:40] made one on

[36:41] middle road.

[36:44] So we made one

[36:45] on the way down the hill?

[36:46] No, about

[36:47] That's what you're saying. I think that would be

[36:49] yes, if you like it

[36:50] worries.

[36:51] One at Grange, which

[36:52] rises to that

[36:52] hill,

[36:53] Yes? We did...we

[36:54] they made one there, here

[36:55] What am I asking about?

[36:56] I don't think so. I think it was Middle-

[36:59] road, East West Road.

[37:00] Um, and there was another one...

[37:03] Yes, that's right.

[37:05] Good. Because this data is

[37:06] what Lee is talking about

[37:07] . That's why we

[37:08] this data is needed. But

[37:09] if you are so...if we

[37:11] it worries me whether it would be

[37:12] this...Where to put it

[37:13] him now? Do you want

[37:14] to see what he

[37:15] does?

[37:16] Right. I have on

[37:17] I mean, this... I mean...

[37:18] mind you, it's absolutely

[37:19] right. I don't mind,

[37:21] so that they are anywhere,

[37:22] where, in your opinion,

[37:23] You have a problem. Um,

[37:25] because this,

[37:26] um, and it really has

[37:28] to be quite accurate in

[37:32] the right place,

[37:33] because if you will move around the corner,

[37:35] you will get absolutely

[37:36] other data. Yes.

[37:39] But we are talking about

[37:40] people who are leaving

[37:41] on foot. So I have

[37:43] the problem with this,

[37:44] even if I agree, maybe

[37:47] with less and less

[37:48] number of people, but

[37:49] Kiplin Road will be at 35-

[37:50] and. Um, but when you see someone

[37:54] walks, like anywhere else,

[37:55] just slow down

[37:56] .

[37:58] Yes.

[37:58] Let's give it to everyone

[38:00] live,

[38:00] Do you understand? Um, that's all,

[38:02] what is needed. And exactly

[38:03] that's how I feel about

[38:04] cereals. And I, you know,

[38:06] when you come and

[38:07] you see 50 cars here,

[38:08] you know, lunch

[38:09] break, sooner rather than later

[38:11] everything is going on, and you

[38:12] slow it down. Em

[38:13] if someone

[38:14] rises to that

[38:15] hill at speed 40

[38:16] or more...50, dude,

[38:18] they just get started.

[38:19] And, um, if there are people there,

[38:20] they should be arrested,

[38:22] to throw in prison,

[38:23] to deprive of rights Hmm,

[38:24] That's all. And I again

[38:26] I still wish there were

[38:28] law enforcement agencies

[38:29] . If you are even a little

[38:31] Do you know the city of Chester?

[38:33] on the 103rd route,

[38:35] do not exceed

[38:36] speed in this

[38:37] city, because you

[38:38] will stop and discharge

[38:39] fine. And you can

[38:40] to say that they are

[38:41] this is supplemented

[38:42] your budget.

[38:43] More power to them. But

[38:45] they receive

[38:46] apartments.

[38:46] Yes.

[38:47] This is a rough situation, isn't it?

[38:48] wrong?

[38:49] Hmm, please be

[38:50] affection.

[38:51] Right.

[38:52] But this is a rough situation

[38:53] . You want to spend

[38:54] $200,000 per year,

[38:56] or

[38:56] wrong? I wouldn't say

[38:57] who wouldn't say that.

[38:58] I would say, but this

[38:59] sheriff's department

[39:01] No, the department

[39:02] sheriff, um, you know, um,

[39:04] I think they are

[39:05] must patrol,

[39:06] it is not so if we worry about

[39:09] speed. Not Route 30,

[39:10] not route 5. Although I also don't want that

[39:13] people traveled with

[39:14] speed 70 on it, or

[39:16] wrong? Right.

[39:17] Hmm, but in this

[39:18] area, if they

[39:19] sat here,

[39:21] yes, they could

[39:22] stop people, hmm,

[39:23] almost as fast

[39:25] , like, um, they can

[39:26] get back in the car,

[39:28] Yes?

[39:29] Hmm, and I think people

[39:30] would have learned.

[39:32] I know that the locals

[39:33] the residents would learn.

[39:34] Hmm.

[39:36] this one doesn't have it either

[39:37] doubts if you

[39:38] spent that time,

[39:40] which we spend,

[39:41] paying them now, and

[39:42] told them to sit down

[39:43] in the middle half

[39:44] this time, otherwise we don't pay them. Hmm, you

[39:49] would write out a few

[39:50] fines, and people would

[39:52] slowed down. The thing is

[39:56] because, um, from some

[39:57] reasons to, um, stop

[39:58] there are no more people

[40:00] a big problem or

[40:01] something like that. I think I think that's why

[40:06] we didn't do it,

[40:08] then if this

[40:09] correct answer,

[40:10] so that's what

[40:12] I mean, we

[40:13] forced him

[40:14] park your car there

[40:15] car, he was there,

[40:16] but you know, that's enough

[40:17] it's hard when you, when

[40:19] they stop

[40:20] near the church,

[40:22] and they are quite noticeable

[40:23] , yes, that's too much,

[40:25] it's too visible there,

[40:26] you know, okay, there

[40:27] policeman, I am going

[40:28] slow down, I am going

[40:30] make sure I

[40:31] I'd stop if they had

[40:32] was unmarked

[40:33] car. This would be

[40:34] another story. IN

[40:36] There is one of them.

[40:37] They him

[40:38] are used.

[40:39] Yes,

[40:39] it should be just like

[40:41] signs, you understand?

[40:42] They put

[40:43] blinkers, something on

[40:44] pedestrian type

[40:45] transition, you know,

[40:46] they warn on the mountain

[40:47] or downhill or

[40:48] something like that. Idea

[40:50] to manage it with someone

[40:51] I think so

[40:52] hopeless. And now

[40:54] we play as a spy

[40:55] against the spy. Well,

[40:56] let's put

[40:57] unmarked

[40:57] car and we will do

[40:58] all this and that. Let's install a few

[41:00] signs. The sign can

[41:02] good job, and

[41:03] he, well, doesn't have one

[41:04] family that needs

[41:06] to feed, you know, yes,

[41:07] in

[41:10] we were in Taland, this

[41:12] was a city that

[41:12] more than that, but we,

[41:14] well, we considered

[41:15] possibility

[41:15] shame, by

[41:16] essence, photography,

[41:18] when private

[41:19] citizens publish

[41:20] photos of people who

[41:21] violate the law,

[41:25] with their license plates

[41:26] signs, and publish

[41:27] this is in

[41:29] Internet, this

[41:30] illegally. AT,

[41:32] we can do it,

[41:33] if they want, but

[41:34] concerning

[41:35] dental

[41:36] politicians, it seems,

[41:37] what if to

[41:38] pedestrian flow

[41:38] are getting very close

[41:39] fast cars, we

[41:40] must

[41:41] to set...signs

[41:42] . I would just like to apologize,

[41:47] that at the crossroads here,

[41:49] and also in West-

[41:50] Village. I have on

[41:53] meaning that theoretically

[41:54] there are many options,

[41:56] which you could

[41:56] to consider that

[41:57] help achieve

[41:59] some of these goals and

[42:00] to make it

[42:01] safe for

[42:02] pedestrians, but they

[42:03] will not be cheap. I think it's true,

[42:05] you know, you say

[42:07] about construction

[42:08] infrastructure, and I,

[42:09] you know, more than

[42:10] happy to talk about

[42:11] this and discuss

[42:12] options. But this, this, will be significant,

[42:16] you know, the project

[42:17] worth ten

[42:18] thousand dollars.

[42:20] I think it's over.

[42:21] many years since then,

[42:22] how did we not do

[42:23] the hill here, in

[42:24] Grange, and it's over

[42:25] a few years ago,

[42:26] How was the West made?

[42:28] -street. I think that's all.

[42:29] It will go as Lee said.

[42:30] , there will be an anomaly, as in

[42:31] there were several of us

[42:32] weeks ago, and will be

[42:33] several cases

[42:34] excess

[42:35] the speeds we are talking about

[42:36] we know, but I think

[42:37] what will come out of this

[42:38] medium level. But

[42:39] we haven't passed yet

[42:40] West Village. Perhaps

[42:42] , it would be good

[42:42] get data about it.

[42:44] I mean, first of all

[42:45] than we will just say

[42:46] , which seems to be

[42:47] last time we

[42:48] passed Middle Road,

[42:49] that was quite a lot

[42:51] years ago,

[42:52] because everyone complained about

[42:54] excess

[42:54] speed, average

[42:56] the speed was 38 miles

[42:57] /hour Yes.

[42:58] And this is what happened,

[43:00] when I was on the council

[43:01] earlier. We had

[43:02] problem on route 5.

[43:04] Yes.

[43:05] And we used

[43:06] a certain technique that

[43:07] was at the station

[43:08] the sheriff, about whom no one knows

[43:09] didn't know. And everyone there

[43:11] complained. Oh. It

[43:12] really bad. It was on the 40th. I think

[43:15] that's right. This is the 40th. AND

[43:16] it turned out that there was

[43:18] one car that

[43:19] was driving at a speed of 85

[43:21] m/h. Sheriff's Department

[43:22] stopped her, discharged her

[43:24] fine, and average

[43:25] the speed was

[43:26] 38 m/h. And this revealed

[43:29] this whole situation on

[43:30] that time. So this is

[43:33] perception. So I think that if we

[43:35] we're going to go with this

[43:36] way before we

[43:37] let's even talk

[43:38] about things...In the budget

[43:39] we better get

[43:40] our rate. To us

[43:41] better to install

[43:42] counters in those

[43:43] areas where, in our opinion, they are needed,

[43:45] because there is no point in saying

[43:46] what we need

[43:46] order six of them,

[43:48] if we don't do this

[43:48] we will do it.

[43:49] You know what I mean?

[43:50] I say? We are better off

[43:51] first get

[43:52] our data.

[43:53] I would just like to

[43:54] see the data we

[43:55] already collected.

[43:56] Of course. Yes.

[43:57] But I have to

[43:58] mind, but you have to

[43:59] add, you must

[44:00] to think about everything

[44:01] city and add to

[44:02] this something, so that

[44:04] we had in common

[44:05] idea before we

[44:06] let's even think about

[44:07] this is for assembly

[44:08] budget. IN

[44:09] you are public

[44:10] meeting.

[44:11] That's right. Public

[44:12] meeting. Honestly,

[44:14] West Village, if you

[44:15] talk to

[44:15] residents, maybe not

[44:16] to want "lying"

[44:17] "policemen" or,

[44:18] Do you understand what I mean?

[44:19] You don't know. I have on

[44:21] mind you too

[44:21] must take into account

[44:23] features of different

[44:24] villages. Do you understand what it's about?

[44:25] I? So, sorry.

[44:27] Just if you

[44:28] were going to ask

[44:29] traffic report

[44:31] here, on

[44:31] quadripartite

[44:32] stop, which, as that

[44:33] the part that reaches

[44:35] to the grain, this is what,

[44:36] I think, So. And I think you probably

[44:38] need a little lower

[44:39] in size.

[44:40] Good.

[44:41] You want to take them off,

[44:41] when they

[44:42] approaching

[44:43] grains, most likely,

[44:44] from the foot of the hill,

[44:45] because that's where they are not

[44:45] see.

[44:46] I can put

[44:47] a few marks on the road. 50 feet below

[44:49] in size. 100 feet

[44:50] lower in size.

[44:51] Somewhere in this

[44:52] range.

[44:53] Good. Um, no. I have

[44:54] try to see,

[44:55] Where are they now?

[44:56] our cameras, but we, I think we definitely could,

[44:58] that is, get you

[44:59] the data we already have,

[45:00] and then, if there are any

[45:01] a few, we could do this

[45:02] make. Um, and then I think I can

[45:05] to say about something

[45:06] engineering work or

[45:07] speed tables,

[45:08] but I can just

[45:09] to give you more, um,

[45:11] information. Um, yes.

[45:13] a lot of standard

[45:14] information, this is how it is

[45:15] should look like this

[45:17] What are the rules? I will

[45:18] happy to send you

[45:19] all this information,

[45:20] to help

[45:21] to make a decision

[45:22] and see which ones

[45:23] data is for West-

[45:24] Village. I think that

[45:26] A lot of time has passed, and,

[45:28] um, if you still have it

[45:29] data...

[45:31] We must have,

[45:33] you know, 20, that is, but I think it's over.

[45:36] a lot...20 years. I think that immediately

[45:40] after the fire

[45:41] station, between this and

[45:42] grain platform

[45:43] , will be your equal

[45:44] place. Yes, I would, I would

[45:46] I said it again, I would

[45:48] said where are you going to

[45:49] place a table

[45:50] speed. So, if

[45:53] this is because people who

[45:54] exceed

[45:55] speed,

[45:55] will cross

[45:56] speed table, and

[45:58] then they will sit down again

[45:59] her.

[46:00] The word "table"

[46:02] speed".

[46:02] At the moment

[46:03] literally no movement, this

[46:05] there will be tables

[46:05] speed.

[46:06] Oh, okay. Right.

[46:08] OK.

[46:08] It's simple.

[46:09] discussion of tables

[46:10] speed, or

[46:11] wrong? Discussion

[46:12] speed tables.

[46:13] But if you have

[46:14] overview

[46:15] about where, on your

[46:16] opinion, you get

[46:17] most complaints and where,

[46:19] in your opinion, you

[46:20] want to place

[46:21] some device,

[46:22] for example,

[46:22] blinkers or something

[46:24] ...Yes.

[46:25] Um, you know, I think that

[46:26] this is a beautiful place and we

[46:28] could inform them

[46:29] . Um, so in

[46:32] I don't see the future.

[46:34] to make it happen very

[46:35] quickly. So, um, I think... We have time,

[46:40] to get

[46:41] relevant data, and, um

[46:43] , and I don't want to say,

[46:44] I don't care where.

[46:45] they want them

[46:46] to place. I have on

[46:49] meaning that it will not affect

[46:51] for everything that has been done,

[46:52] paving and all that

[46:53] other.

[46:54] Good.

[46:55] Sounds good. Thank you,

[46:57] who came.

[46:58] No, thank you. I will contact you.

[47:01] by you and will give you

[47:03] additional information

[47:04] .

[47:05] Thank you. That's right.

[47:07] You said that

[47:08] received four things.

[47:09] Yes.

[47:10] Cross out one.

[47:11] Thank you. Good.

[47:13] So, uh, the construction

[47:15] completed, but this is the one,

[47:16] which, um, collapsed,

[47:18] and the water flowed under

[47:19] with it, and we reworked

[47:20] her from Belco, um, on the road

[47:22] Stoney Brook, and it was

[47:23] that account. Good.

[47:26] So, we, um,

[47:27] sift a little

[47:28] more sand on

[47:29] next year. Um, and,

[47:33] um, let's do a little

[47:34] planning, we carry

[47:35] some gravel on

[47:37] roads. Hmm, let's fall asleep.

[47:41] a few potholes. We

[47:44] heard about, um, the back

[47:45] bridge, they say that

[47:46] in October for the new

[47:47] rear axle,

[47:50] but it seems nothing

[47:51] arrives on time. So

[47:53] , or

[47:53] we are going

[47:54] to gather together to

[47:55] push...home in

[47:56] garage?

[47:57] No.

[47:59] Unless you want

[48:00] push.

[48:01] What do you say?

[48:02] November is for that.

[48:04] October. October.

[48:05] While it is connected

[48:07] to the tractor.

[48:07] And then I think that this

[48:09] it will be better than one

[48:10] ton.

[48:11] Good. Two-year-old

[48:12] prescription.

[48:13] One ton or a year

[48:14] ago. I don't know which one.

[48:16] year.

[48:16] So, um, it's not yet

[48:17] came out of the workshop.

[48:20] So, um, for a while

[48:21] so, I think they said that in October

[48:24] this could be

[48:25] refined, but, um,

[48:26] it was, I don't know, 6

[48:28] months ago.

[48:29] So, you may not have

[48:30] be this for plowing

[48:32] .

[48:32] I doubt it.

[48:33] Oho.

[48:33] IN

[48:34] Why is there a problem?

[48:36] Um, it's simple, um,

[48:37] body dealers. THERE ARE

[48:39] only one dealer

[48:40] bodies, sorry.

[48:41] So, you will have to. AND

[48:44] this is the first truck,

[48:45] which we didn't know about.

[48:48] So the next

[48:49] truck on

[48:50] next year we

[48:51] ordered two years

[48:52] ago,

[48:52] and we got ours

[48:54] a place in line to

[48:55] install the body

[48:56] next year. So

[48:58] here is this...

[48:59] then the chassis cab

[49:00] stood in

[49:01] workshops to get out

[49:02] to retire.

[49:03] That's right. Yes.

[49:06] Is it prepared?

[49:08] for the plow? Is it possible?

[49:10] to bet on him

[49:11] plow? You just don't have

[49:12] there will be weight. IN

[49:13] we still have Dodge, he

[49:14] still drives well.

[49:15] Good. Hmm, that's simple.

[49:17] question...So I'm completely

[49:18] I'm not worried.

[49:19] Ahem,

[49:20] hmm, it's just a question,

[49:22] you know, this one

[49:23] depreciation

[49:24] value, honestly

[49:25] speaking. If you

[49:26] will continue

[49:27] every, you know, if it's

[49:28] will last 2 years

[49:29] longer than one year,

[49:31] then it will be

[49:31] to decrease, I would

[49:32] said.

[49:33] Well, you have, um, people,

[49:34] who plow for you, yes

[49:36] ?

[49:37] Uh, private

[49:38] contractors.

[49:38] No.

[49:39] Or private individuals,

[49:40] which, you know, plow

[49:41] roads?

[49:42] No. No.

[49:43] Good. Residents.

[49:44] Only four of

[49:45] half of us.

[49:46] Good. Just this

[49:48] residence

[49:49] Connecticut.

[49:55] Well, you know, they

[49:56] wonderful residents who

[49:57] concerns people with

[49:58] plows during

[49:59] major storms, etc.

[50:01] They will help us,

[50:02] just because they do too

[50:03] need somewhere

[50:04] to get there, but we don't

[50:08] we carry

[50:08] responsibility.

[50:10] Oh, no. We are not for anyone.

[50:11] we pass on. And if so

[50:12] we pass on, then they

[50:14] everyone should have

[50:15] relevant insurances

[50:16] in sight. Something else?

[50:18] Hmm, all four.

[50:20] Well, we submitted, um,

[50:22] grant and assistance. Hmm,

[50:24] so we hope that

[50:26] we will get some

[50:27] reimbursement through

[50:28] a couple of months.

[50:29] That's all.

[50:30] While you are here for

[50:31] correspondence, which there

[50:33] little.

[50:33] Next week

[50:34] they spend

[50:35] information meeting

[50:36] in Patna regarding the bridge on

[50:37] Landing Road. Patni-

[50:38] road. Bridge to Landing-

[50:40] road in Patna. I think

[50:42] what is this that

[50:43] next to the old...

[50:44] I know if anyone wants

[50:45] to join this,

[50:46] what is happening under

[50:46] meeting time in Patna,

[50:47] which takes place in

[50:48] the same time as

[50:49] our. Do you want to leave? Not

[50:50] Do you want to go?

[50:52] This is an interstate bridge.

[50:54] So

[50:54] I'll just tell her that

[50:55] There will be no one there.

[50:56] Everything is fine.

[50:57] Yes, I'm fine.

[50:58] Good.

[50:59] He says, "I'm fine."

[51:00] . Yes. Good.

[51:01] Uh, there are some more

[51:04] question about the section

[51:05] information for

[51:06] information? Good.

[51:08] No correspondence. AT

[51:09] , we...Discussion Action

[51:11] by correspondence. Therefore,

[51:12] we must sign

[51:13] or appoint

[51:14] someone for

[51:15] voting for

[51:16] insurance for which

[51:17] they manage BLCT for

[51:18] board of directors.

[51:19] This year we are doing

[51:20] this is by mail, not on

[51:22] meeting. So, we

[51:23] need to be assigned

[51:24] someone for

[51:25] voting. Both

[51:27] these options have

[51:28] the appropriate amount

[51:29] directors for

[51:30] each of them as

[51:31] options and

[51:31] maintenance. So, uh, this is

[51:33] just a question

[51:33] filling out the form, and

[51:34] then we decide,

[51:35] do we want

[51:36] to vote for someone,

[51:37] or just stay,

[51:38] or not at all

[51:38] send them back.

[51:39] Which directors?

[51:41] Director. So, BLCT

[51:42] has a passive state and

[51:43] verb

[51:44] non-profit

[51:45] insurance.

[51:46] Um, so we can

[51:47] to do with them whatever. Does it have

[51:49] anyone have an advantage?

[51:53] What do you usually do?

[51:55] ?

[51:55] We never

[51:57] meet at

[51:58] the county fair or

[51:59] city fair.

[52:00] Good. So this year

[52:01] they decided

[52:02] do it by mail.

[52:03] AT.

[52:03] So if no one was

[52:04] at the city council meeting

[52:05] fair, to

[52:06] vote for us, in

[52:07] We have a vote.

[52:08] Right. Right.

[52:10] We can write in

[52:11] voting, or not

[52:12] Yes?

[52:12] There is no room for

[52:13] letters.

[52:14] No, there are only four of them.

[52:15] I know. But you can

[52:17] just mark them and

[52:18] send.

[52:19] Yes, that's true.

[52:21] Yes, we can. AND

[52:22] I agree with this.

[52:23] Good.

[52:24] I don't care.

[52:26] This is me.

[52:27] I don't care.

[52:27] So I'll tell you what. I will make a proposal.

[52:29] to entrust Paul

[52:30] do these two. I support this. It

[52:32] good.

[52:33] That's good. I don't mind.

[52:35] to do this.

[52:36] Good. Perfectly. We have

[52:37] second word. I support him. All,

[52:40] who supports that

[52:41] Paul was

[52:42] representative for

[52:42] voting for

[52:43] passive and verb

[52:44] board of directors,

[52:45] they say: "I am." Ya. Ya. All

[52:46] against. You can

[52:53] to speak out against, eh-

[52:55] Well, let's see.

[52:56] . Therefore,

[52:57] I want to move.

[52:57] local tax on

[52:59] options at the end and

[53:00] do a few more

[53:01] things before we

[53:02] let's start this

[53:02] discussion. Therefore,

[53:04] regarding appointments, uh,

[53:05] I will make a proposal.

[53:06] to appoint Marsha

[53:07] Dowie to the commission on

[53:08] planning, and Julie

[53:10] Johnson to the committee on

[53:11] cemetery issues.

[53:12] I support this.

[53:13] Good. Are there any

[53:14] discussion on this

[53:16] reason? Good. All,

[53:17] who supports, uh,

[53:18] Marcia's destination

[53:19] Dowie to the commission on

[53:20] planning, Julie

[53:21] Jones to the committee on

[53:22] cemetery issues,

[53:23] they say: "I am." Me. Okay.

[53:27] To all those who are against, I will send them

[53:29] emails, and

[53:31] then, uh, Priscilla,

[53:32] Can you hear us?

[53:39] She can ask.

[53:41] her to contact Julie,

[53:42] so that she knows. She

[53:43] will receive from me

[53:44] emails. But

[53:45] then who is the boss

[53:47] cemetery committee?

[53:48] I think it's Priscilla.

[53:49] Good. So she

[53:50] need to contact

[53:52] you. So what about me?

[53:53] need to do?

[53:55] I will send

[53:55] email, and

[53:57] then I will send a copy,

[53:58] I am just reporting about

[53:59] appointment. Perfectly.

[54:01] Thank you very much.

[54:02] Greeting card and

[54:03] I will let her know when

[54:04] to be here.

[54:05] Perfectly. Thank you.

[54:06] Contact us

[54:07] Marcia. This would be

[54:09] perfectly.

[54:10] Uh, contract for

[54:11] heating

[54:11] community center.

[54:13] I see that Linda

[54:14] online.

[54:17] Greetings. You are enough.

[54:18] weak, but it

[54:19] normally. Uh, everyone

[54:21] reviewed the contract

[54:22] ? What do you think, us?

[54:23] need it

[54:23] sign, are you happy?

[54:24] directors has it

[54:25] sign?

[54:26] Oh, we need

[54:27] sign it, so

[54:28] What are we doing, uh,

[54:29] payments.

[54:31] Okay, in

[54:32] I have a question.

[54:34] Please allow me.

[54:35] I need to get my...This

[54:36] not a contract. He

[54:40] doesn't even fix the price

[54:41] . So the price, how much

[54:47] I understand, we buy,

[54:48] they want to buy 600

[54:49] with a few gallons

[54:50] fuel for 5 or more

[54:52] gallons, but this

[54:55] floating market

[54:56] price that is being adjusted

[54:57] depending on daily

[54:59] market conditions. So we can get to

[55:01] December, and who knows what

[55:02] this can happen, this

[55:04] unpredictable

[55:05] budget, it's not a budget.

[55:07] That's right.

[55:08] We only get

[55:10] fact. Yes, we are

[55:12] we will get a discount of 10

[55:13] gallons per

[55:14] automatic payments,

[55:15] but that's not what I would

[55:16] called monthly

[55:17] budget.

[55:19] It's not even what I

[55:21] received.

[55:23] Right. So, this is,

[55:27] of course, worksheet

[55:28] .

[55:29] Good. So, when I

[55:31] talked to them, we

[55:32] discussed

[55:33] budget plan

[55:36] and calculated

[55:37] total number

[55:38] gallons used

[55:40] , multiplied by the price of

[55:45] the moment when we

[55:46] agreed to this

[55:47] to do, divided into

[55:48] 12.

[55:49] Yes. At the moment

[55:52] it was about 5.39

[55:54] dollar a gallon, and, um,

[55:59] we evaluated all of this to

[56:01] try to find

[56:02] way to smooth out

[56:03] payments, instead

[56:05] to receive

[56:06] blows, hmm,

[56:08] right. So, I don't

[56:10] made fuel oil, I have

[56:11] it is not there, but

[56:12] companies do

[56:13] previous purchase,

[56:14] oh, of course,

[56:15] and that's what we want

[56:16] to record, and which

[56:18] risk of significant

[56:18] price reduction after

[56:20] the way you do it

[56:20] recorded? How is this?

[56:22] working? For

[56:23] some of them you can buy a plan

[56:24] price protection.

[56:25] So if she

[56:26] your price will decrease.

[56:28] That's what I do.

[56:29] November.

[56:30] We will need

[56:31] wait until

[56:32] November.

[56:33] Well, for many of them

[56:34] in June.

[56:36] This should have been done.

[56:37] still in the elections,

[56:38] to get

[56:39] free purchase.

[56:40] Yes. Yes. I get

[56:41] mine in June, and mine

[56:42] fixed. I am not

[56:43] I can raise the price.

[56:44] higher than she is, but I will get a lower price,

[56:46] isn't that right?

[56:46] Yes. I mean, I

[56:47] recorded his, but

[56:48] this is what I used to do

[56:49] community center.

[56:50] They used to buy

[56:51] previous purchase,

[56:52] and this was done in

[56:53] August, or

[56:53] wrong? So we really

[56:55] we want again

[56:56] to talk to

[56:57] Roberts and

[56:57] see if we can

[56:58] We will calm them down. Who

[56:59] Can you calm down?

[57:01] Oh, and look what

[57:01] they can do.

[57:02] It depends on...

[57:03] trust.

[57:04] It depends on them.

[57:06] But we sign,

[57:06] let's see if we want

[57:07] we sign

[57:07] contract.

[57:08] Yes, that's right. Yes. AND

[57:09] for this price, I think they

[57:10] need to receive

[57:11] prices from...I think that

[57:13] they must do

[57:14] it's up for auction. I really want to, because

[57:16] this...I made...numbers,

[57:17] um, on that...if you

[57:19] added what kind of oil it is

[57:20] ...I don't...I don't understand...

[57:22] I don't think...I don't know

[57:23] Are you guys

[57:24] you understand...but that one

[57:25] the sign we just saw

[57:27] paid today

[57:28] in the evening,

[57:30] that this money was

[57:31] deposited in

[57:32] May. So it went.

[57:34] on our surplus.

[57:35] Good. So I'm watching.

[57:37] now for how much

[57:38] they spent plus

[57:40] oil at a price of 8600, and

[57:41] the other half of the sign,

[57:43] on which they

[57:43] are, minus

[57:45] the income they

[57:46] received, we already

[57:47] we have...if we

[57:48] let's take this oil into account

[57:50] at a price of $11,566 with

[57:52] rows with a value of 16,000

[57:54] dollars.

[57:55] Hmm.

[57:56] This is oil for 8600

[57:57] dollars is oil, which

[57:59] bought.

[58:00] This is what they are

[58:01] called...evaluation, or

[58:03] wrong? now. So, I say that this

[58:08] importantly. I understand.

[58:10] your point of view, and, um,

[58:12] you know, this is the world, in

[58:13] which we are living now

[58:14] , where oil prices

[58:16] just oscillating.

[58:18] So we just

[58:19] tried to cope

[58:20] so that, um, a little

[58:21] to smooth out expenses. Ahem,

[58:24] I really don't have any.

[58:26] um, answers for you.

[58:28] This is my first time doing this.

[58:29] Of course. IN

[58:30] I'm not even here.

[58:32] fuel oil at home, so I

[58:33] not quite sure.

[58:35] Good. So,

[58:36] Can I suggest?

[58:37] Yes, give it. I just

[58:40] I will say that

[58:41] it was a brutal year

[58:42] for...

[58:43] And to you guys,

[58:44] lucky, honestly

[58:46] speaking. Or you should

[58:47] to do something else

[58:48] business. You have chosen

[58:49] June for

[58:49] pre-sale

[58:51] , isn't it?

[58:51] If you look at

[58:52] futures markets, this

[58:53] was a month for

[58:54] purchases. Um, but we buy every year, and I know many people,

[58:59] which are purchased every year, and

[59:01] most people, with

[59:02] what we all are

[59:03] talked, I have

[59:04] meaning that they gave

[59:06] business advice,

[59:07] They said, "Hold on,

[59:08] hold on, hold on,

[59:09] because they thought that

[59:11] crisis

[59:12] "so it will be, so it will be"

[59:13] .

[59:13] So in any case,

[59:14] my opinion is

[59:15] because it was

[59:16] a cruel year. No one

[59:17] doesn't really know what

[59:18] will it happen, or what, or

[59:20] that, and it was just

[59:21] hard. Um, and then this

[59:23] becomes something

[59:26] philosophical, but

[59:27] also financial

[59:28] bet on this

[59:29] moment: yes, the price is like this

[59:31] as high as it is now.

[59:33] So you record everything?

[59:36] You pay a little

[59:37] more to get

[59:38] protection against decline?

[59:40] Because they always

[59:40] They take more from you,

[59:41] if you are going

[59:42] to receive protection from

[59:43] decrease.

[59:43] Are you buying half?

[59:45] That's right, and

[59:46] I am not going.

[59:47] to tell you that

[59:48] to do, because I don't know,

[59:49] than

[59:51] this could end.

[59:53] So, Linda, how about

[59:54] so that we are with you

[59:55] turned to

[59:56] several companies

[59:57] and looked to see if

[59:58] Can we be with someone?

[59:58] to offer something

[59:59] pleasant. I know that

[1:00:00] it's too late, and

[1:00:01] let's see what we can do

[1:00:02] to receive from others

[1:00:03] companies. We will make

[1:00:04] list.

[1:00:04] Yes.

[1:00:05] I'll take half of it.

[1:00:06] them, and you will take

[1:00:06] half, and we

[1:00:07] let's put something together

[1:00:08] kind of simple

[1:00:08] scenario, and we

[1:00:09] let's see what they are

[1:00:10] they will say.

[1:00:10] Of course. Sounds

[1:00:12] perfectly. Hmm, looks like "

[1:00:13] "yes", because, in my opinion

[1:00:14] Maria, this is more

[1:00:16] half of the budget. So

[1:00:18] ,

[1:00:19] yes, in

[1:00:20] us really bad

[1:00:21] state. Hmm, what

[1:00:22] regarding this, we

[1:00:23] tried to use

[1:00:24] measures for

[1:00:25] further protection

[1:00:26] buildings from the weather.

[1:00:27] Hmm,

[1:00:29] Did you see that, um,

[1:00:30] blanket on the first

[1:00:31] floor, were

[1:00:32] fitted blankets

[1:00:33] on the windows, and, um, we have

[1:00:35] there were several...we had

[1:00:36] there were three companies,

[1:00:37] to look at

[1:00:38] windows. Hmm, a lot

[1:00:43] windows on the upper floor

[1:00:44] floors do not work,

[1:00:45] because the cords on the

[1:00:47] frames. They are needed

[1:00:51] reboot. Emm,

[1:00:53] companies we work with

[1:00:55] arrived, talked

[1:00:56] about repairs and

[1:00:57] restoration, and

[1:00:58] priorities that we

[1:00:59] they were given, were

[1:01:00] value,

[1:01:01] functionality and

[1:01:02] cost. Um, they are still

[1:01:05] didn't send it to me

[1:01:06] your estimates. We

[1:01:08] also considered,

[1:01:09] um, the estimate, what

[1:01:11] made by W&W

[1:01:12] Building Supply for replacement

[1:01:14] windows

[1:01:15] without taking into account

[1:01:16] workforce, which

[1:01:18] comes out to 60,000

[1:01:19] dollars

[1:01:20] just for the windows themselves.

[1:01:22] Those on top.

[1:01:24] Yes.

[1:01:24] I thought that was it.

[1:01:25] closer to...There is another one

[1:01:27] version. There were two

[1:01:28] different ways in which

[1:01:29] they did these

[1:01:30] estimates. And, um,

[1:01:31] because one of them is

[1:01:33] a certain point, therefore

[1:01:34] that it was supposed to be ARPA, and

[1:01:35] they understood that this

[1:01:36] not so, that's why they

[1:01:37] applied for

[1:01:38] grant, did not receive

[1:01:39] him, and mainly

[1:01:41] there were two different

[1:01:42] ways to do it. AND

[1:01:43] if I'm not mistaken,

[1:01:44] because I was in this

[1:01:45] involved. One

[1:01:47] cost about 150,

[1:01:48] when they counted

[1:01:49] the whole installation, and the other-

[1:01:51] making smaller ones

[1:01:52] windows or some

[1:01:53] another way, was

[1:01:55] over 130,000 to

[1:01:56] replace these windows.

[1:01:57] Linda,

[1:01:58] Yes. Um, they already

[1:02:00] replaced the ones below.

[1:02:02] Yes, that was part of it.

[1:02:04] ARPA.

[1:02:05] Yes. So, we just

[1:02:06] We are talking upstairs. Um,

[1:02:09] other, uh,

[1:02:12] other than me

[1:02:13] I wonder if this is in

[1:02:15] you protocol for

[1:02:16] heating return,

[1:02:17] because, um, always

[1:02:19] was 55 °, all

[1:02:20] thermostats were

[1:02:21] are on. Do you have

[1:02:23] protocol for this? AND

[1:02:24] the question is what

[1:02:25] it concerns me to contact

[1:02:27] electricians, protocol

[1:02:29] for lighting, so

[1:02:30] that we discover that

[1:02:31] the light remains

[1:02:32] turned on since Saturday

[1:02:33] until Monday.

[1:02:34] Good. Yes, we have

[1:02:36] protocol. Um, there are signs.

[1:02:39] about 55 ° on

[1:02:42] thermostats, and then

[1:02:43] signs regarding

[1:02:44] lighting.

[1:02:45] Um,

[1:02:46] I think this person,

[1:02:48] we must find

[1:02:49] way to provide

[1:02:50] this or check this.

[1:02:52] Um,

[1:02:53] good.

[1:02:53] Yes, us too

[1:02:54] asked someone

[1:02:55] go up to the attic and

[1:02:56] look at

[1:02:57] the insulation that is there.

[1:02:58] Um, it looks like this

[1:03:00] original insulation

[1:03:01] from the 50s, or

[1:03:03] they need

[1:03:04] to see a doctor

[1:03:05] at this stage. Yes,

[1:03:06] it will be based on ASUS.

[1:03:08] Yes,

[1:03:09] there is such a thing. So, this is what is worth paying attention to?

[1:03:11] attention. So, when

[1:03:12] estimates will arrive

[1:03:13] on the windows, send

[1:03:14] them to us. We them

[1:03:15] Let's consider. We

[1:03:16] let's find out what

[1:03:16] is happening.

[1:03:17] Of course. The essence of it all

[1:03:19] this is that we do everything possible,

[1:03:21] to make a building

[1:03:22] maximum

[1:03:23] thermally efficient,

[1:03:24] considering the current

[1:03:25] conditions. But yes, we

[1:03:26] definitely should get

[1:03:27] more tender

[1:03:28] suggestions, how do you

[1:03:29] proposed. So I

[1:03:30] ready, you know, if

[1:03:31] will you send me

[1:03:32] list of companies, we can definitely do this

[1:03:34] make. And there is money for

[1:03:35] asbestos waste,

[1:03:36] which we used

[1:03:37] for our house. THERE ARE-

[1:03:38] eh, if you replace

[1:03:38] asbestos ordinary

[1:03:39] insulation, then it's still

[1:03:40] something we can do

[1:03:41] pay attention. Good

[1:03:42] . Er, fuel oil, windows, er,

[1:03:45] it's all falling apart.

[1:03:47] No, I'm kidding. Uh,

[1:03:48] good. Well, when you

[1:03:49] get these things,

[1:03:50] send them to us so that

[1:03:51] we had them.

[1:03:52] Good. Yes. As soon as

[1:03:54] I will get them, I will send them to you.

[1:03:56] Thank you.

[1:03:57] We also do everything

[1:03:58] it is possible that

[1:03:59] hold a meeting

[1:04:00] funds. Um, us

[1:04:02] lucky on

[1:04:03] weekend, hmm, on the Day

[1:04:04] Columbus, leave for

[1:04:06] respite on

[1:04:07] stop for

[1:04:08] rest and on the 91st.

[1:04:10] So we will collect

[1:04:11] funds in this way. Ahem,

[1:04:13] you know, and it was

[1:04:14] made big

[1:04:15] push to get

[1:04:16] more income.

[1:04:17] Good. Thank you for everything.

[1:04:19] your work. IN

[1:04:22] I was just

[1:04:23] questions about

[1:04:23] diesel fuel and

[1:04:24] another. Is this it?

[1:04:26] diesel fuel, but

[1:04:27] it's the same as there.

[1:04:28] Hmm, so who are you?

[1:04:29] hired for our

[1:04:31] company? IN

[1:04:32] I have Dead River

[1:04:33] and Maria

[1:04:34] Sandra. Sandre's.

[1:04:36] Good. Um, so if we are going

[1:04:40] to set prices

[1:04:41] on diesel fuel...

[1:04:44] Well, you send a check

[1:04:46] for the price.

[1:04:50] We would need 13

[1:04:52] 000 per year,

[1:04:53] hmm, diesel fuel

[1:04:55] . They're already talking about this.

[1:04:56] several years. We are not

[1:04:57] we can find no one,

[1:04:59] Who would do that?

[1:05:00] Right. I think that

[1:05:01] this will also be a problem

[1:05:03] . Hmm, but I know that

[1:05:05] when I understood that,

[1:05:07] , hmm, it seems like it will be 20

[1:05:08] 000 more in

[1:05:09] next budget.

[1:05:11] I don't even want to.

[1:05:12] know the next

[1:05:13] week.

[1:05:13] Right. Right.

[1:05:15] But I just thought that

[1:05:16] if anyone remembered

[1:05:17] maybe it was me

[1:05:19] Terry. I should have

[1:05:20] invest.

[1:05:20] Someone asked me,

[1:05:22] should I

[1:05:22] invest. I would

[1:05:23] checked the prices

[1:05:24] elsewhere. The only one

[1:05:26] the problem is that

[1:05:27] they change

[1:05:28] daily. So if you don't

[1:05:29] call each

[1:05:30] companies in one and the same day,

[1:05:34] You don't know. So

[1:05:36] number

[1:05:37] used oil

[1:05:38] totally worth it

[1:05:40] but then add

[1:05:41] community center. I mean, you could

[1:05:44] would get, you know, I mean, more

[1:05:47] city price,

[1:05:48] because we are now

[1:05:49] moving on to thousands

[1:05:50] gallons.

[1:05:51] I just don't believe that.

[1:05:52] they will do it. But

[1:05:54] I think that if someone

[1:05:55] wants...

[1:05:56] Well, you check.

[1:05:58] Yes. Hmm, and if you

[1:05:59] Are you going to work?

[1:06:00] with three companies

[1:06:01] what are you doing there

[1:06:02] are you going to do,

[1:06:03] Paul bypasses from

[1:06:04] door to door to

[1:06:05] costume.

[1:06:08] Donation advice if

[1:06:09] it will shrink.

[1:06:13] Yes. Last year it was

[1:06:14] there was a diesel field,

[1:06:15] which was about to be reduced.

[1:06:16] I remember hearing that.

[1:06:17] on budget

[1:06:18] meetings.

[1:06:19] Good. Committee

[1:06:20] Senators, you have two

[1:06:21] things. Suggestions regarding

[1:06:22] care rules

[1:06:23] trees. So, you have

[1:06:24] is there something you want

[1:06:25] cast out? Look,

[1:06:26] Will it take root?

[1:06:27] Probably not. So care

[1:06:32] behind the trees, I think,

[1:06:33] these are two parts of the work

[1:06:35] . Five at 10,000 each

[1:06:37] . One Baptist

[1:06:38] church, that's what it's about

[1:06:38] she sent

[1:06:39] email. AND

[1:06:40] they left

[1:06:41] look at the hill

[1:06:42] Dston. Maybe they

[1:06:43] will need

[1:06:43] delete some

[1:06:44] trees.

[1:06:45] Hmm, they still are

[1:06:46] working on the price.

[1:06:47] Yes, everything is fine. So

[1:06:49] somewhere between five and

[1:06:50] ten for each.

[1:06:51] Lee, have we ever

[1:06:52] received a report from

[1:06:54] caretaker

[1:06:54] trees?

[1:06:55] No. Not yet. Good. Good

[1:06:57] . This is what

[1:06:58] We are waiting.

[1:06:59] Yes.

[1:07:00] Right.

[1:07:00] Well, we have a lot of people

[1:07:01] who are engaged in

[1:07:01] tree care,

[1:07:02] in this city and

[1:07:02] near. So

[1:07:03] you should be able to

[1:07:04] get a few

[1:07:05] pond.

[1:07:05] Uh, so we know that

[1:07:07] it will happen. Uh, and

[1:07:08] proposed

[1:07:09] regulations. I think

[1:07:10] Priscilla contributed

[1:07:11] changes. Terry, I

[1:07:12] I'm sure it's you.

[1:07:13] read.

[1:07:13] Yes, I read it. The only one

[1:07:15] , what she doesn't

[1:07:15] crossed out, and that was it

[1:07:16] would just

[1:07:17] by crossing out, this is what does she have

[1:07:18] powers

[1:07:19] increase these fees.

[1:07:20] This line is similar to

[1:07:21] may change the price

[1:07:22] for funeral services and

[1:07:23] to set prices,

[1:07:24] because they can't

[1:07:25] to do this. So,

[1:07:27] if you cross it out,

[1:07:28] everything else

[1:07:30] looks good.

[1:07:32] Then we can

[1:07:33] cross this out and

[1:07:34] vote, um, for

[1:07:36] amendment?

[1:07:36] Good. Good.

[1:07:38] What is it?

[1:07:39] I just want this.

[1:07:40] was done.

[1:07:41] This is page three.

[1:07:43] Yes. Good.

[1:07:44] I know where it is.

[1:07:47] Make a suggestion

[1:07:48] about acceptance

[1:07:48] proposed

[1:07:49] rules for the committee

[1:07:50] cemeteries.

[1:07:51] With amendments.

[1:07:52] Good.

[1:07:54] I will support this.

[1:07:55] Uh, is there any more?

[1:07:56] discussion on this

[1:07:57] reason?

[1:07:59] Good. All who

[1:08:00] supports approval

[1:08:02] proposed

[1:08:03] amended rules,

[1:08:04] I say.

[1:08:05] I.

[1:08:06] Anyone against?

[1:08:07] No.

[1:08:07] I'm holding back. I am not

[1:08:09] I think I...I think

[1:08:10] I missed another one.

[1:08:10] meeting where are you

[1:08:11] talked about it. I am not in

[1:08:12] course. So, here it is.

[1:08:14] Sounds good.

[1:08:15] Yes.

[1:08:16] Good. Uh, something else from

[1:08:17] cemetery committee?

[1:08:21] No, except that we are going to demand

[1:08:23] from you budget

[1:08:24] funds, but it's not on

[1:08:25] this meeting.

[1:08:26] Good. Good luck with this.

[1:08:29] . Good.

[1:08:31] Thank you.

[1:08:31] Uh, the last one is yours.

[1:08:32] device for

[1:08:33] speed checks

[1:08:34] on Beaver Pond Road. IN

[1:08:35] we don't have yours

[1:08:35] device for

[1:08:36] speed checks,

[1:08:36] but maybe he will be

[1:08:37] in the future. No. Yes

[1:08:38] .

[1:08:39] Yes, but now with this

[1:08:40] there is little that can be done

[1:08:41] . Um, but it will be

[1:08:43] considered within the framework

[1:08:44] general consideration,

[1:08:45] we can ask

[1:08:46] sheriff's department,

[1:08:48] which one do they have?

[1:08:49] You want to ask,

[1:08:50] Is that so? When he

[1:08:52] will return, his

[1:08:53] the deputy has

[1:08:54] get the device,

[1:08:55] he appoints him

[1:08:56] deputy, and

[1:08:57] The deputy is the one who

[1:08:58] whom

[1:08:58] towed to his

[1:08:59] personal

[1:09:00] cars,

[1:09:01] I think. I don't know.

[1:09:02] Well, we can, as

[1:09:03] only he will be with us,

[1:09:04] I can take it.

[1:09:05] if he wants.

[1:09:06] Allow me to do this.

[1:09:07] make. Good. IN

[1:09:09] within the framework of the new

[1:09:10] local variant

[1:09:11] tax for business.

[1:09:13] Oh yes. Good. THERE ARE

[1:09:21] PowerPoint presentation or

[1:09:23] something like that? Yes. Hmm, so

[1:09:27] , first of all, thank you

[1:09:29] to everyone who contacted

[1:09:30] me regarding the option

[1:09:31] sales tax. I

[1:09:36] already had a few

[1:09:37] wonderful, um, conversations with

[1:09:38] people from this

[1:09:39] reason. Hmm, I, hmm,

[1:09:42] You know, I would like to raise this issue

[1:09:44] now that we

[1:09:45] approaching

[1:09:46] budget season. I,

[1:09:50] hmm, I completely understand,

[1:09:51] and when I heard about

[1:09:52] local tax on

[1:09:54] a choice that, um,

[1:09:55] promotes VLCT, and several

[1:09:56] people across the state

[1:09:58] , I thought, you know, more

[1:09:59] one tax, which

[1:10:01] he is needed. And, hm,

[1:10:06] then I am a lot

[1:10:07] found out about it, and I think that actually,

[1:10:09] hmm, it's really worth it

[1:10:11] discussion. Apparently,

[1:10:15] It is worth noting to everyone,

[1:10:17] who is listening that this is not

[1:10:18] what we would decide

[1:10:20] today. Well,

[1:10:23] today I would like

[1:10:24] to talk about it,

[1:10:25] to gather a bunch

[1:10:26] questions we have

[1:10:27] may arise, and

[1:10:28] ask to put

[1:10:30] questions to others

[1:10:31] to people in the city. And then

[1:10:33] I'll get, um, good ones.

[1:10:34] answers to them,

[1:10:36] thorough answers,

[1:10:37] and then we again

[1:10:38] Let's talk about it. AND

[1:10:40] then we could

[1:10:41] solve

[1:10:42] vote for

[1:10:43] passing this

[1:10:43] questions on the city council

[1:10:44] meeting, and you know what

[1:10:46] we are still very far from

[1:10:47] decision on this

[1:10:48] question. But now, hmm

[1:10:50] , there are some resources from

[1:10:54] about this. On

[1:10:55] state website

[1:10:56] Vermont has some

[1:10:57] resources from this

[1:10:57] reason. THERE ARE

[1:10:58] PowerPoint presentation,

[1:10:59] what can I give you

[1:11:00] send. THERE ARE

[1:11:04] electronic

[1:11:05] correspondence that I

[1:11:06] shared with the election

[1:11:07] advice from

[1:11:08] Department

[1:11:09] Vermont taxes, where

[1:11:10] assessment is offered

[1:11:12] based on

[1:11:12] numbers

[1:11:13] population, not very

[1:11:14] accurate assessment, but, hmm,

[1:11:16] I think you know that.

[1:11:17] there are, um, four wide ones

[1:11:19] categories to which we belong

[1:11:20] we can apply 1%

[1:11:21] local tax on

[1:11:23] choice. Um, to any-

[1:11:29] which of them or their

[1:11:30] combinations. Tax from

[1:11:32] sales, which adds 1% to

[1:11:34] 6% state tax

[1:11:36] from sale. Tax on

[1:11:37] food that adds 1

[1:11:39] %to nine. Alcohol

[1:11:41] in the premises that

[1:11:43] adds, um, 1% to 10, and

[1:11:44] numbers that add 1%

[1:11:46] to nine. Um, you know,

[1:11:53] 1% tax, um, you know,

[1:11:55] nobody wants to pay

[1:11:57] 1% more for nothing,

[1:11:58] but many things

[1:11:59] exempt from payment.

[1:12:03] Most clothes,

[1:12:04] food products

[1:12:06] , medicines and

[1:12:07] medicine, well, I don't think so,

[1:12:08] what medicine in general, but

[1:12:09] majority

[1:12:10] medicines, things,

[1:12:11] which people really

[1:12:12] very necessary, no

[1:12:13] are taxable

[1:12:14] according to this list.

[1:12:17] There is a list that I can

[1:12:19] to send to you. AND

[1:12:21] in fact they are,

[1:12:22] probably a long time

[1:12:23] worked on this

[1:12:24] a list, because all the clothes,

[1:12:26] who is exempt from

[1:12:27] taxation, this

[1:12:28] really necessary

[1:12:30] things, and then the whole

[1:12:31] clothes that

[1:12:31] taxable,

[1:12:33] you know, like wallets,

[1:12:34] watches and wigs,

[1:12:35] you know, things that

[1:12:37] a little, uh, you know, I don't know. Not all of them all

[1:12:41] are wearing. I won't tell you.

[1:12:44] , which one am I on?

[1:12:45] signed, but, uh, in

[1:12:47] anyway, uh,

[1:12:54] you probably already

[1:12:55] pay local

[1:12:56] tax from another city,

[1:12:58] if you buy something from

[1:12:59] Brattlebrough, Marlo,

[1:13:00] you know, uh, Lello, uh,

[1:13:02] Wordsboro,

[1:13:03] Wilmington,

[1:13:04] Willisti, you know, there is a big long

[1:13:07] list. You can

[1:13:10] see the whole map. AND

[1:13:12] Patni, for example,

[1:13:13] pays this only for

[1:13:14] numbers. So, this is

[1:13:17] version. Hmm, this is the way

[1:13:20] get some

[1:13:21] money from Airbnb. And that,

[1:13:25] what I like about

[1:13:26] this tax,

[1:13:27] as far as someone

[1:13:28] might like

[1:13:29] tax, which, um, I don't really like it.

[1:13:32] you know who does, hmm

[1:13:33] , they stink,

[1:13:34] you know, it's worth saying

[1:13:36] . I hope that everyone,

[1:13:38] who wrote to me,

[1:13:39] contacted me and

[1:13:40] is watching this,

[1:13:41] I hope you will not follow

[1:13:43] not only for this, but also for

[1:13:44] all budget

[1:13:45] process, and we

[1:13:45] can we talk

[1:13:47] about all kinds of ways

[1:13:48] save money for

[1:13:49] cities and all that. I

[1:13:50] very much in this spirit, and

[1:13:51] therefore I present

[1:13:53] This is for you. Um, it's a tax,

[1:13:55] which will not be

[1:13:56] to be paid

[1:13:57] exclusively residents

[1:13:58] Dumerston. This is the way

[1:14:00] taxation

[1:14:01] from other cities. If we will establish a 1% tax

[1:14:04] on Airbnb, which

[1:14:05] people will pay,

[1:14:06] who don't live here, we will get from this

[1:14:09] a little money. So, in the narrow case of Airbnb,

[1:14:14] I think this is, um,

[1:14:15] pretty good idea. Not

[1:14:18] I think it's difficult for me.

[1:14:20] imagine that more than

[1:14:21] several residents

[1:14:22] Dumerston when-

[1:14:23] will pay for

[1:14:24] Airbnb in Dumbarton, right?

[1:14:26] Yes? It's just money.

[1:14:28] from them, from

[1:14:29] Vermont

[1:14:29] tax

[1:14:30] management. Perhaps,

[1:14:34] someone is looking at this.

[1:14:35] They calculated that

[1:14:37] these rooms in a year

[1:14:38] will bring in $8,600.

[1:14:42] I just watched

[1:14:43] city report. We are for 2027

[1:14:46] fiscal year, we believe,

[1:14:48] proposed

[1:14:49] get $600,000

[1:14:51] from property taxes

[1:14:53] . We just

[1:14:55] voted for

[1:14:56] tax increase

[1:14:57] on property, it's more,

[1:14:59] but if we do

[1:15:00] everything is possible, they

[1:15:04] think that we can get 78

[1:15:07] thousand dollars per year.

[1:15:10] It seems to me so.

[1:15:11] too big of different

[1:15:12] reasons. In Dumsterton,

[1:15:14] probably per person

[1:15:15] population is not so

[1:15:16] many businesses,

[1:15:17] like in other cities

[1:15:18] similar size.

[1:15:20] So even, you know, we

[1:15:21] Let's say it's 50 or 60.

[1:15:26] And that's it, tax on

[1:15:28] no sale

[1:15:28] applies to

[1:15:29] most categories

[1:15:30] things. If you

[1:15:32] buy in the store,

[1:15:33] this does not apply

[1:15:34] your tax,

[1:15:35] you know, you're going to

[1:15:36] gas station,

[1:15:37] refueling. No. Uh-huh

[1:15:39] , food, snack. No.

[1:15:42] Beer? Yes. So, uh,

[1:15:45] some people never

[1:15:46] will pay this

[1:15:47] tax through their own

[1:15:49] consumer habits. He

[1:15:50] applies to

[1:15:52] online sales. He

[1:15:53] applies to

[1:15:54] the things you buy

[1:15:56] in the town of Dummerston. AND,

[1:15:59] uh, I fell asleep on

[1:16:00] opinion about Airbnb. I, uh,

[1:16:03] especially on the road, in

[1:16:04] I have problems with

[1:16:05] trucks

[1:16:06] deliveries that

[1:16:07] constantly traveling

[1:16:08] up and down. I have

[1:16:09] it feels like

[1:16:10] they tear

[1:16:10] roads and violate

[1:16:11] order. Perhaps,

[1:16:12] You know, I live here.

[1:16:13] not long, but one

[1:16:14] the change I saw was

[1:16:16] much more

[1:16:17] delivery trucks,

[1:16:18] and they all now

[1:16:19] contractors, and they

[1:16:20] ride in these

[1:16:21] rented

[1:16:21] trucks, and

[1:16:22] boyfriend—temporary

[1:16:23] employee, and

[1:16:24] trucks, uh,

[1:16:25] rented, and, uh,

[1:16:26] they drive quite a bit

[1:16:27] quickly. In any

[1:16:29] In that case, we could

[1:16:29] set 1 cent on

[1:16:31] all those purchases that,

[1:16:32] you know, there is no

[1:16:33] exempt from

[1:16:34] taxation

[1:16:34] goods, and I even

[1:16:36] I don't think so.

[1:16:36] most people

[1:16:37] get their food,

[1:16:38] as in a FedEx truck.

[1:16:40] Are you eating something?

[1:16:41] truly exquisite. Hmm,

[1:16:43] Yes. This works like this:

[1:16:44] if you buy

[1:16:45] 1 cent or 1%, 1%.

[1:16:48] Yes, sorry. 1%. Yes,

[1:16:50] I really hope that

[1:16:51] they do not deliver

[1:16:53] you get a product for 1 dollar,

[1:16:54] it should be rolled up

[1:16:55] above.

[1:16:58] Hmm, this is a review. Hmm, yes.

[1:17:05] map. A lot, uh,

[1:17:09] taxes or a lot

[1:17:11] the city adds this to

[1:17:12] Lello, again, in

[1:17:13] a very different city, in

[1:17:15] they have ski traffic,

[1:17:16] they discovered, they told me that

[1:17:18] found that, uh, income

[1:17:20] from this local

[1:17:21] option tax

[1:17:22] was 18 dollars,

[1:17:24] which non-residents

[1:17:25] paid for each 1

[1:17:26] dollar paid

[1:17:27] residents.

[1:17:30] Good. So, Dummerson,

[1:17:34] probably completely different

[1:17:35] equation, but 2:1

[1:17:37] sounds good for

[1:17:38] me. I mean,

[1:17:40] you know, even if

[1:17:41] we, uh, very much

[1:17:42] let's lower this indicator,

[1:17:43] this is a way to force

[1:17:44] visitors pay

[1:17:46] in our city. And more

[1:17:50] one thing that I really like this.

[1:17:52] what it creates for

[1:17:54] us a cool way

[1:17:55] greater participation in

[1:18:01] budget. I know that we can vote for

[1:18:04] budget, but we could

[1:18:06] take this money and

[1:18:07] just use

[1:18:08] them to compensate

[1:18:09] tax increase

[1:18:10] on property that would be

[1:18:11] great, but, you know,

[1:18:13] nobody wants this

[1:18:14] to worry We also

[1:18:16] could connect them with

[1:18:17] project in West-

[1:18:18] Summery. They want

[1:18:20] build a children's

[1:18:21] ground. Part

[1:18:22] this money could

[1:18:23] go for it. We could

[1:18:24] pay for work

[1:18:25] traffic.

[1:18:27] Even with the help of

[1:18:28] other people we could

[1:18:30] would direct money to

[1:18:31] some infrastructure

[1:18:32] , which brings money,

[1:18:35] for example, on

[1:18:36] municipal service

[1:18:37] storm sewer

[1:18:38] or something like that.

[1:18:39] You know, I think that

[1:18:40] it might be possible,

[1:18:42] or maybe not, but I

[1:18:43] would like

[1:18:43] offer

[1:18:44] discussion of what

[1:18:46] we would do with, um,

[1:18:47] such income. AND

[1:18:50] again, we could

[1:18:52] would get about 60

[1:18:53] 000 dollars, um,

[1:18:54] taxing

[1:18:56] sales, hm, and numbers

[1:19:00] . We could get

[1:19:03] about 8,000 dollars,

[1:19:04] just buying a home

[1:19:06] on Airbnb. That is, one of

[1:19:09] main issues

[1:19:10] is how it is

[1:19:11] applied as it is

[1:19:12] actually

[1:19:13] is happening.

[1:19:15] So, uh, the income that

[1:19:17] we get, 75%, 25% goes

[1:19:18] to the tax

[1:19:20] department, because

[1:19:22] they administer

[1:19:23] all of this. They

[1:19:25] contact everyone

[1:19:26] suppliers, with

[1:19:28] everyone

[1:19:28] suppliers,

[1:19:29] such as Amazon and Walmart,

[1:19:31] to contact Bigfoot

[1:19:32] Coffee, you know, from

[1:19:33] the largest to

[1:19:34] the smallest. So, here it is.

[1:19:36] what they tell me. IN

[1:19:38] I have reasons,

[1:19:39] Do you know if it's true?

[1:19:40] Are they doing this? Well,

[1:19:41] they say that they really do it.

[1:19:43] If not, we will be in touch.

[1:19:45] with them. In any

[1:19:46] case, uh, for something

[1:19:47] like Airbnb it really is

[1:19:49] quite simple

[1:19:49] apply. Are there two or

[1:19:51] three big ones

[1:19:51] suppliers. There is Airbnb,

[1:19:53] and there is one called VBO,

[1:19:55] you know. Yes.

[1:19:56] Right. So, there are two

[1:19:58] suppliers. You

[1:19:59] contact them.

[1:20:01] Uh, you know, we all

[1:20:02] let's discuss this and

[1:20:03] we decide, and then these

[1:20:06] the money comes to

[1:20:07] cities, and we can

[1:20:08] get two "

[1:20:09] speed bumps

[1:20:10] "or, you know, something like that"

[1:20:12] like uh, what are we

[1:20:13] Let's decide. But, as I already said, I beg you.

[1:20:21] your suggestions and

[1:20:23] questions. And, uh, if

[1:20:26] your question

[1:20:27] causes despair or

[1:20:30] horror at the idea yet

[1:20:31] one tax, then I

[1:20:32] completely with you

[1:20:33] I agree, but

[1:20:34] I hope that we

[1:20:35] can we talk

[1:20:36] More about this later. Uh, what?

[1:20:42] concerns how

[1:20:43] they behave with

[1:20:44] sellers, sir

[1:20:45] Normale sent

[1:20:46] I have a few good ones,

[1:20:47] thoughtful questions, and

[1:20:49] I'll, uh, look into them. On

[1:20:51] I can do one or two.

[1:20:52] know the answer, but

[1:20:53] I need the rest.

[1:20:54] contact them. IN

[1:20:58] otherwise I can

[1:20:59] to share with you

[1:21:01] PowerPoint presentation

[1:21:02] from VCT, which also has

[1:21:03] reviews from other cities.

[1:21:06] I could, uh, excuse me,

[1:21:07] I could contact

[1:21:09] you. I really

[1:21:12] need a small

[1:21:13] help. What is ours?

[1:21:14] most equal

[1:21:16] city? You know, this

[1:21:17] Marlo? Is this Hartford?

[1:21:19] Which one exactly?

[1:21:20] Apparently.

[1:21:20] Marlo is our most

[1:21:21] an equal city,

[1:21:22] about which we could

[1:21:23] talk to them. Uh,

[1:21:24] they are not similar to

[1:21:25] tourists.

[1:21:31] Renting a home in South

[1:21:32] Pondy, right? All

[1:21:33] want.

[1:21:34] Well, no, they have Airbnb. Airbnb

[1:21:36] . This is really an excess.

[1:21:38] from

[1:21:38] good. Yes. So with Marbor

[1:21:40] actually it wouldn't.

[1:21:42] So the topic is, um, just me

[1:21:44] asked Roger, um,

[1:21:46] how much did we have

[1:21:47] Airbnb.

[1:21:48] Yes. Me too.

[1:21:50] Um, okay. So you have

[1:21:51] everything was fine.

[1:21:53] What number is it?

[1:21:54] Yes? Is that about 30? Yes.

[1:21:57] He told me, uh,

[1:21:58] he really...

[1:21:59] This is strange.

[1:22:00] Let me

[1:22:01] remember this. But yes,

[1:22:02] more than you think.

[1:22:04] Airbnb is bigger than you think, and they, uh,

[1:22:06] some from time to time

[1:22:07] are approved. We

[1:22:09] just happy with

[1:22:09] zoning is simple

[1:22:10] approves of them,

[1:22:12] and this...

[1:22:13] but they are curious.

[1:22:19] I need

[1:22:20] to understand, me

[1:22:21] need to talk

[1:22:23] today or yesterday.

[1:22:24] Good. But I hear that

[1:22:26] they jump from

[1:22:27] platforms and do it

[1:22:28] in others, through the back

[1:22:30] doors, others

[1:22:31] ways,

[1:22:31] so that they don't have to

[1:22:32] seem.

[1:22:33] So that they don't have to

[1:22:34] abandon

[1:22:35] your Airbnb. So it's not

[1:22:37] always a way

[1:22:37] track this if

[1:22:39] they are leaving...I have to

[1:22:40] I mean everything, you know,

[1:22:41] I would never do that.

[1:22:42] did with his

[1:22:43] landlord in New York.

[1:22:44] Right. But here

[1:22:45] Yes.

[1:22:48] So, I think this is

[1:22:49] comparison of cities. I think it will be

[1:22:53] big cities. Um, if

[1:22:56] my mom is 60, because I don't even know what's there.

[1:23:02] more. The college is working

[1:23:03] .

[1:23:04] No, no, but they have, but

[1:23:05] they have a surplus, that's

[1:23:07] like in New

[1:23:08] Baini is much

[1:23:09] more Airbnb.

[1:23:11] So I would say that

[1:23:12] if Airbnb is about

[1:23:14] equal, then we would be

[1:23:15] quite even.

[1:23:16] This is probably similar.

[1:23:20] on, um, tax from

[1:23:21] sale, perhaps. Yes,

[1:23:25] maybe that's all

[1:23:26] case.

[1:23:28] Guilford, maybe. I mean, you have, Alers, these

[1:23:31] enterprises, but

[1:23:32] besides that, right?

[1:23:33] Yes?

[1:23:34] So, Lori can

[1:23:35] be better data on

[1:23:37] sales tax,

[1:23:38] than, uh, score

[1:23:39] population. So I can do that too.

[1:23:42] . Hmm, she might, or maybe

[1:23:44] and no. This was advised to me.

[1:23:46] VCT. But in any

[1:23:50] case, you know, there are many

[1:23:55] reasons, as with any

[1:23:56] what, why they can

[1:23:57] disregard this,

[1:23:58] may not

[1:23:59] take into account that, but

[1:24:00] this is their payment, this

[1:24:01] also their work.

[1:24:03] They, you know, are ours.

[1:24:04] tax agency.

[1:24:06] They, of course,

[1:24:07] correspond with me

[1:24:08] regarding tax payment.

[1:24:09] So I expect them to

[1:24:10] they treat the same

[1:24:12] to other people. And, by

[1:24:16] In essence, this is a way

[1:24:17] attract people who

[1:24:19] don't live here, to

[1:24:20] paying taxes in

[1:24:21] city. They

[1:24:22] use our

[1:24:23] roads and ours

[1:24:24] services while they

[1:24:25] here. And I would like to

[1:24:28] you know, research this

[1:24:29] thus, rather than, we will find out when

[1:24:31] we will learn, unfortunately,

[1:24:33] but unlike

[1:24:34] everything else that we hear things like, "Oh, we will find out which one

[1:24:38] cost when we are behind

[1:24:39] We will pay for it. We will find out which one

[1:24:42] cost, we will find out which one

[1:24:43] the cost when we

[1:24:44] "will pay". So how do you

[1:24:46] like this?

[1:24:46] So let me

[1:24:47] to ask a question

[1:24:48] regarding this data, which

[1:24:49] she sent. That is

[1:24:51] , data for the whole year, yes

[1:24:52] ? Let's skip it

[1:24:53] nine months, because it

[1:24:55] Yes.

[1:24:55] So, according to the data for

[1:24:56] all year round, mostly

[1:24:57] two-thirds of the money

[1:24:58] coming from

[1:24:59] sales.

[1:25:00] Hmm.

[1:25:01] Right. We have

[1:25:02] Not so with Dumerston.

[1:25:03] many sales.

[1:25:04] So think about

[1:25:06] something

[1:25:06] other than Amazon, where

[1:25:08] the tax is 10%.

[1:25:10] Right. Not

[1:25:11] exclude the term "

[1:25:12] "regressive". Sorry

[1:25:13] , which is not yet

[1:25:14] arrived.

[1:25:14] So, we have a few

[1:25:15] gas stations,

[1:25:16] Yes?

[1:25:17] But without gasoline. This is not

[1:25:18] ...

[1:25:19] That's what I mean.

[1:25:20] So, no gasoline.

[1:25:21] So, carbonated drinks,

[1:25:22] sweet bars. I don't know. Or

[1:25:23] this is taken into account

[1:25:24] apple? If you buy an apple from them

[1:25:26] There are apples.

[1:25:26] No, it's not alcohol,

[1:25:31] Yes? Therefore,

[1:25:32] we can't drink

[1:25:33] carbonated water, not

[1:25:34] making food,

[1:25:34] Yes? AND

[1:25:35] how about...But the question is

[1:25:36] in that it is alcohol with

[1:25:37] discount or seat in

[1:25:38] restaurant for

[1:25:38] table? You can

[1:25:41] drink alcohol without

[1:25:42] alcohol. You must

[1:25:44] eat. This is what I

[1:25:46] specifically...This is what I thought. Oh, wait.

[1:25:49] No, sorry. Good.

[1:25:53] Yes, you were talking about

[1:25:54] that food at the gas station

[1:25:56] will be exempt from

[1:25:57] taxation as

[1:25:58] selling.

[1:25:59] Alcohol at the gas station.

[1:26:00] No, alcohol is

[1:26:02] gas station. And I, probably,

[1:26:03] I will think about selling

[1:26:05] food. I understand that food

[1:26:06] and alcohol

[1:26:07] are considered, it seems,

[1:26:08] a restaurant where you can

[1:26:09] to sit down. Alcohol is

[1:26:10] me, and I will have to

[1:26:11] check again because

[1:26:12] if you ask

[1:26:13] me enough times

[1:26:15] about something, I'll start

[1:26:15] doubt, but I

[1:26:17] will have to

[1:26:17] check again. I

[1:26:20] was almost certain,

[1:26:21] that alcohol is out

[1:26:23] the premises is beer,

[1:26:24] which I sometimes buy at, uh-

[1:26:26] uh, Circle K, over there in Irving Irving.

[1:26:29] Yes, in Irving.

[1:26:30] You need

[1:26:31] remember only two

[1:26:32] gas stations in the city,

[1:26:33] dude. Many reasons.

[1:26:39] So how about

[1:26:39] nurseries?

[1:26:42] If people leave

[1:26:43] to buy plants or

[1:26:44] trees, it won't be...

[1:26:46] So, no to that.

[1:26:47] tax.

[1:26:47] I don't know.

[1:26:48] Well, I don't think we should.

[1:26:50] need before this

[1:26:51] reach.

[1:26:51] Yes. So, two-thirds

[1:26:52] this number is

[1:26:53] sales.

[1:26:54] I can write off a lot.

[1:26:54] from this, because we have

[1:26:55] just not that much

[1:26:56] sales. We are not

[1:26:57] tourist city. IN

[1:26:58] We don't have any restaurants.

[1:26:59] We don't have any places where

[1:27:00] You can sit down. We are

[1:27:01] we do not sell

[1:27:01] little things that

[1:27:02] whatever.

[1:27:03] Right?

[1:27:03] So, if in the first

[1:27:04] Next time we're talking about Airbnb

[1:27:05] , but all indicators

[1:27:07] sales, I would say,

[1:27:08] that at least 2/3, 3/4 of

[1:27:09] they will be paid

[1:27:10] residents of Dumerston

[1:27:11] . These will be online-

[1:27:12] sales.

[1:27:13] Delivery will be by

[1:27:14] your house.

[1:27:15] So, if three quarters

[1:27:17] two-thirds of this

[1:27:18] total amount

[1:27:19] will be sales, then

[1:27:20] for Dumbrstone she

[1:27:21] will be higher because

[1:27:22] the only sales are

[1:27:23] online delivery.

[1:27:24] So, I think if

[1:27:25] to see if

[1:27:26] take into account sales,

[1:27:27] What you can and can't do

[1:27:27] take into account, then you can

[1:27:28] only Airbnb should be considered. I understand.

[1:27:30] Yes.

[1:27:30] But if we consider

[1:27:31] sales, then Dmerson

[1:27:32] pays for it. This is not

[1:27:34] tourists.

[1:27:34] Yes.

[1:27:35] So Dmerson pays

[1:27:36] 100% taxes for now. I mean the whole

[1:27:39] property tax.

[1:27:40] Who else do we

[1:27:41] taxed?

[1:27:42] Including a third

[1:27:43] others...I would like to

[1:27:44] we could

[1:27:44] tax

[1:27:45] a third of the inhabitants

[1:27:45] Brother for theirs

[1:27:46] real estate. I have on

[1:27:47] I mean, no. This would be

[1:27:48] unfair. But

[1:27:50] they also want

[1:27:50] tax us.

[1:27:51] Yes. Yes. I know. But

[1:27:53] they tax

[1:27:54] us, because when I go to

[1:27:56] Rattle Bro and buy, I have

[1:27:57] meaning another

[1:27:58] example than alcohol

[1:27:59] , which is sold for

[1:28:00] recipe.

[1:28:03] When I buy something on

[1:28:04] like a toy for

[1:28:05] your child, your

[1:28:12] first PBR, I just

[1:28:13] I'm kidding. But yes,

[1:28:16] I think you have

[1:28:17] radio. And I am ready.

[1:28:20] to argue that, um,

[1:28:21] a significant part of this

[1:28:23] –this is exactly what they are

[1:28:23] sales, but we are talking about

[1:28:25] sales of goods,

[1:28:27] who are not exempt from

[1:28:28] taxation. They will get me because I buy so much.

[1:28:35] belts for your

[1:28:36] lawn mowers, so I

[1:28:37] I'm constantly breaking something and

[1:28:38] I have to order,

[1:28:39] for example, specific

[1:28:41] details for your

[1:28:42] an old car or

[1:28:43] old lawn mower

[1:28:44] . Right. So I make a big contribution.

[1:28:49] into this. And I have

[1:28:51] three people on the road,

[1:28:52] households with

[1:28:53] three or four people and

[1:28:54] three or four

[1:28:55] delivery trucks,

[1:28:56] who travel every day

[1:28:57] her here and there. And if

[1:28:59] you spend your

[1:29:00] money for medicine

[1:29:01] whether it's medicine or what is

[1:29:03] for the most part

[1:29:04] delivery, it doesn't matter

[1:29:05] concerns. This, um,

[1:29:06] actually, I think,

[1:29:08] pretty good

[1:29:09] designed for, um, well

[1:29:10] ,

[1:29:11] I don't know exactly what not.

[1:29:12] is an "exception", but has

[1:29:13] value.

[1:29:14] It's not important.

[1:29:15] discussion. You just

[1:29:16] buy something from

[1:29:17] home delivery.

[1:29:18] Whatever percentage

[1:29:18] there were no things

[1:29:19] exempt from

[1:29:20] taxation or not,

[1:29:20] It doesn't matter.

[1:29:21] Why not? Because we are not going to walk.

[1:29:24] around town and buy

[1:29:25] things that you

[1:29:26] Order released

[1:29:27] from taxation or

[1:29:28] No.

[1:29:28] Well, we order them.

[1:29:29] almost all of our...

[1:29:30] No, we...No. So we don't do this.

[1:29:32] Tax

[1:29:33] Department of Vermont

[1:29:34] connects with

[1:29:35] seller. You

[1:29:36] Look who it is.

[1:29:37] pays.

[1:29:37] Everyone pays for the goods

[1:29:38] that are not exempt from

[1:29:40] taxation, or

[1:29:41] wrong?

[1:29:41] So, it's just equals

[1:29:42] game conditions. Doesn't have

[1:29:43] meaning, or

[1:29:44] Are you ordering 100?

[1:29:44] dollars not

[1:29:45] exempt from

[1:29:45] taxation

[1:29:46] goods, and 100 dollars

[1:29:46] exempt from

[1:29:47] taxation.

[1:29:48] These are just goods, with

[1:29:49] which people pay

[1:29:50] taxes. So no way, neither you

[1:29:52] , no I'll find out for sure,

[1:29:54] when everyone orders

[1:29:55] things. It can't be like that.

[1:29:56] to say: "I order

[1:29:57] only food, and someone

[1:29:57] another only orders

[1:29:58] diapers." I don't know,

[1:29:59] or diapers

[1:29:59] exempt from payment

[1:30:00] taxes. It doesn't matter.

[1:30:01] It was bad.

[1:30:02] example. They order beer.

[1:30:03] That's it. IN

[1:30:05] them alcohol

[1:30:05] sold home, as

[1:30:07] and me. AND

[1:30:07] What about tobacco? Again

[1:30:10] well, no, not from

[1:30:11] paying taxes.

[1:30:16] Well, I don't understand why.

[1:30:18] it doesn't have any at all

[1:30:19] value. If you

[1:30:20] buy food,

[1:30:21] medications and

[1:30:21] necessary things that,

[1:30:23] you know, like

[1:30:23] call

[1:30:24] people's concerns

[1:30:25] regarding the crisis

[1:30:26] accessibility, these things

[1:30:27] exempt from payment

[1:30:28] taxes, and this

[1:30:29] tax on them is not

[1:30:30] will affect.

[1:30:31] It will not affect their

[1:30:32] order that does not

[1:30:32] exempt from payment

[1:30:33] taxes.

[1:30:34] Right.

[1:30:34] He does not exempt from

[1:30:35] paying taxes

[1:30:36] an order that is not

[1:30:36] exempt from

[1:30:37] paying taxes.

[1:30:38] Maybe I can try.

[1:30:39] simplify this? I have on

[1:30:40] mind,

[1:30:42] um, one of the things you

[1:30:44] said, and I believe,

[1:30:45] what exactly is that

[1:30:46] Of course, that's what

[1:30:47] license plate tax

[1:30:48] mainly

[1:30:49] will be paid

[1:30:50] non-residents, or not

[1:30:51] Yes? Right.

[1:30:53] And I think Todd has

[1:30:54] meaning that

[1:30:55] tax category with

[1:30:56] sales mainly

[1:30:57] will be paid

[1:30:58] residents. Exactly so

[1:31:00] . I think that's all that

[1:31:01] he says.

[1:31:02] I would agree with that. I would agree with that. But

[1:31:05] to some extent, someone who

[1:31:06] just, uh, you know, I

[1:31:08] heard from people who

[1:31:09] talked about what

[1:31:10] have a fixed

[1:31:11] income,

[1:31:15] and, uh, you know, I think,

[1:31:16] that they have already laid out

[1:31:17] your wallets,

[1:31:18] watches and wigs,

[1:31:20] maybe they too,

[1:31:21] you know, to some extent,

[1:31:22] that it depends on

[1:31:24] your consumers

[1:31:25] habits. Many people

[1:31:30] will go very far,

[1:31:31] paying little of this

[1:31:33] tax, and then others

[1:31:34] people in the end

[1:31:35] will pay a lot. That,

[1:31:36] what I heard from everyone in

[1:31:37] Lello, Wilmington and

[1:31:39] Dover, this is what no one

[1:31:40] doesn't notice that

[1:31:41] Will taxes go away, uh?

[1:31:42] , no, prices in general

[1:31:44] will increase by 1%

[1:31:44] next year,

[1:31:45] regardless of whether we do it or not.

[1:31:48] They will grow more

[1:31:50] than 1%. So no one

[1:31:51] notices. People who

[1:31:52] live in cities with

[1:31:53] local tax on

[1:31:55] choice, they don't notice,

[1:31:56] when they go to another

[1:31:57] cities. It's like, oh my God,

[1:31:59] it says 1% here

[1:32:00] cheaper. How, uh, I agree with you on

[1:32:05] overall, and that it is almost

[1:32:07] It is probably true that

[1:32:08] most of the residents

[1:32:09] Dmerson would be paid

[1:32:10] so much. But you

[1:32:14] impose this

[1:32:15] standard, for example,

[1:32:16] tax, which

[1:32:17] will pay

[1:32:18] Dummerston residents

[1:32:19] . Let me

[1:32:20] show you this book

[1:32:21] . It has a lot of

[1:32:22] taxes that

[1:32:23] are questioned.

[1:32:24] Everyone who owns

[1:32:26] real estate, pays

[1:32:27] taxes.

[1:32:27] Yes.

[1:32:28] Everyone who owns

[1:32:29] real estate and lives in

[1:32:30] Dummerston, pays

[1:32:31] taxes.

[1:32:33] This is not the level that

[1:32:34] installed for

[1:32:35] everyone. Not everyone pays

[1:32:36] the same amount.

[1:32:37] Right.

[1:32:38] They

[1:32:39] pay something else.

[1:32:40] So, essentially, you

[1:32:41] charge extra

[1:32:42] tax, or

[1:32:43] wrong? So, at 60,000

[1:32:44] dollars, say, 60,000

[1:32:46] dollars of tax, which

[1:32:47] we will charge from

[1:32:48] income per year, this is

[1:32:50] will be in

[1:32:51] average 33 dollars

[1:32:54] for our 1800

[1:32:55] residents. But then,

[1:32:57] of course, some

[1:32:58] out-of-town residents

[1:32:59] will pay it.

[1:33:00] So it was, you know,

[1:33:02] who knows, you know, somewhere

[1:33:03] $25 per resident

[1:33:06] . So yes, it will be

[1:33:08] unevenly. It

[1:33:10] tax with another

[1:33:11] structure. The point is

[1:33:12] because it is a tax on

[1:33:14] another structure,

[1:33:15] which in different ways

[1:33:16] affects people. And I think that according to

[1:33:20] those liberations,

[1:33:21] which we have already

[1:33:22] there are significant

[1:33:23] exceptions for people,

[1:33:25] which, well, you know,

[1:33:26] just get

[1:33:29] medicine, food,

[1:33:30] medicine, medicine, medicine. Well,

[1:33:32] You understand, I understand,

[1:33:33] What are you talking about, but I have to say, and I already said

[1:33:36] to you today, what is this

[1:33:37] was the largest

[1:33:38] the number of people who

[1:33:40] contacted me

[1:33:41] or in fact

[1:33:42] came to see me

[1:33:43] home because they found out

[1:33:44] about this 1%. OK? IN

[1:33:47] I haven't had that since.

[1:33:48] ARPA times. So, you have

[1:33:50] was, and none of them

[1:33:51] supports this. And I

[1:33:52] I'll tell you why. Ago

[1:33:54] that most people, with

[1:33:55] which I spoke,

[1:33:57] have a fixed

[1:33:58] income, are elderly

[1:33:59] people who are now

[1:34:00] They rarely go out in the winter.

[1:34:01] outside, because

[1:34:02] They drive a car.

[1:34:04] OK? They are not

[1:34:05] can get what they need,

[1:34:07] a lot of this in

[1:34:08] Bradborough, and they don't

[1:34:09] can reach

[1:34:10] Keane or Greenfield or

[1:34:11] anywhere. So

[1:34:12] they do everything

[1:34:13] more and more

[1:34:14] orders, and this

[1:34:15] just not medicine or

[1:34:16] other things that

[1:34:17] exempt from

[1:34:18] taxation. Them

[1:34:19] have to do

[1:34:20] much more.

[1:34:23] Now you have

[1:34:24] fixed income, and

[1:34:25] now you suddenly hear

[1:34:26] , that, my God, is that it,

[1:34:28] What should I do to live because I can't

[1:34:30] to get out. And now you mean: okay

[1:34:35] , let's give you 1 more

[1:34:37] %. They are in pain. These people

[1:34:40] are really suffering. AND

[1:34:43] I mean,

[1:34:44] sorry, but that was

[1:34:45] a difficult day for me,

[1:34:46] when I listened to the stories

[1:34:48] about this, about that

[1:34:49] people think, and how

[1:34:50] you can simply say:

[1:34:51] "Well, you can do

[1:34:53] this is for medicine. You

[1:34:54] can you do this for

[1:34:55] "anything you want." No, they

[1:34:57] it hurts. People are hurting.

[1:34:59] Well, I would like these

[1:35:00] people talked to

[1:35:01] by me. I would like to

[1:35:02] they came to me

[1:35:03] home. You can

[1:35:04] connect them with me. I will talk to them and

[1:35:07] I will listen to them. I want

[1:35:08] hear from these people.

[1:35:10] But you don't have them.

[1:35:10] you will receive. In this

[1:35:12] the whole thing.

[1:35:13] You know what? I

[1:35:14] I'll see where I can find them.

[1:35:15] I'll take it. I will talk to

[1:35:16] people. Good. And to

[1:35:17] things we don't need

[1:35:19] to collect tax from

[1:35:20] sale. We can

[1:35:21] to skip completely

[1:35:22] sales tax, and

[1:35:23] we can do it

[1:35:24] numbers. I thought I already told you when you

[1:35:26] I was told that before.

[1:35:28] . I said okay.

[1:35:29] to be in touch with these

[1:35:30] people. I am grateful.

[1:35:31] to the people who contacted

[1:35:33] to me, to

[1:35:33] talk about it and

[1:35:35] share with me

[1:35:36] this point of view. I, I don't have...uh, I would like to hear from people,

[1:35:40] if, uh, tax on

[1:35:41] sales, I think...but

[1:35:42] also, you can...you

[1:35:44] can you do

[1:35:45] more cool things,

[1:35:46] such as children's

[1:35:47] playground, and a larger one

[1:35:48] The number is interesting, but

[1:35:50] for me tax on

[1:35:51] the numbers are really...uh,

[1:35:53] tax on noreiner-

[1:35:54] it's an obvious choice,

[1:35:56] and if I knew for sure,

[1:35:57] as you said about

[1:35:58] a vocal minority,

[1:35:59] if I knew for sure that

[1:36:00] this will really hit home

[1:36:01] people with fixed

[1:36:03] income from all these

[1:36:04] ways,

[1:36:05] then I would be, uh, me

[1:36:06] would be against this, and

[1:36:08] you know, this is fast

[1:36:09] solution for me. But

[1:36:11] I would like

[1:36:12] to make sure that

[1:36:13] each of these people, uh-

[1:36:14] Well, you know we're all on the same wavelength, and we know about everyone

[1:36:18] exceptions, and we all

[1:36:19] we have the same

[1:36:20] information, etc.

[1:36:22] No, no, no. I don't want to offend you, okay?

[1:36:26] But I think we are

[1:36:27] Maria (Todd is already here)

[1:36:29] some time), but we are

[1:36:30] We know Mary

[1:36:31] many people,

[1:36:32] OK? And them

[1:36:34] comfortable talking

[1:36:35] with us, because we were in

[1:36:36] councils. We lived here, in

[1:36:40] city, and therefore I do not

[1:36:41] I will call you names,

[1:36:43] because they came to

[1:36:44] me personally. I am not

[1:36:46] I'm going to sit and

[1:36:47] to say: "

[1:36:48] Call Alex

[1:36:49] ", because I know that they won't do this.

[1:36:52] So you will have to respect that which

[1:36:54] I passed by today, and

[1:36:56] don't think that you

[1:36:57] can you take these

[1:36:58] people and push them out

[1:36:59] their. This is unfair.

[1:37:01] regarding these people. And I don't

[1:37:02] I'm going to give them this.

[1:37:03] speak.

[1:37:04] That's not what I said.

[1:37:05] And I would be grateful,

[1:37:06] if we could just,

[1:37:08] I think to make things right. I think it's important,

[1:37:12] how I responded to those who

[1:37:13] said that

[1:37:16] I don't remember the name, and I

[1:37:17] answered.

[1:37:19] Yes. Um, important.

[1:37:21] remember that if you

[1:37:23] you're managing this, obviously

[1:37:25] that the first step is

[1:37:26] five people who

[1:37:27] are sitting here.

[1:37:28] Yes. Right.

[1:37:29] So, people

[1:37:30] in the city they realize,

[1:37:32] that doesn't matter, that

[1:37:33] we say.

[1:37:34] Yes.

[1:37:35] We can simply

[1:37:36] vote for it.

[1:37:37] If they say: "

[1:37:38] We don't want that.

[1:37:39] They don't want that.

[1:37:40] So your first goal is–

[1:37:42] we.

[1:37:42] You must get

[1:37:43] the three of us,

[1:37:44] Yes? And that's all, otherwise

[1:37:46] everything will be lost.

[1:37:47] Yes.

[1:37:47] Even if you

[1:37:48] get three of

[1:37:49] The city knows us.

[1:37:50] Make sure that everyone

[1:37:51] know that

[1:37:52] we are just the first

[1:37:52] step. The second step is

[1:37:53] special meeting or

[1:37:54] town hall, and people

[1:37:55] may appear,

[1:37:56] can discuss this,

[1:37:57] can do anything

[1:37:58] they will want. Will be

[1:37:58] a show of hands, and this

[1:37:59] there will be a solution. So, I would simply present

[1:38:02] that's right,

[1:38:02] how do I do it

[1:38:03] constantly, and sorry,

[1:38:04] if I don't do this,

[1:38:05] if you have already been here

[1:38:06] before, but it's just

[1:38:07] my military

[1:38:07] preparation. There are

[1:38:08] different types

[1:38:09] presentations.

[1:38:10] Informational is not the same

[1:38:11] what you are looking for. You

[1:38:13] trying

[1:38:13] to convince people. So

[1:38:14] you must

[1:38:15] convince me.

[1:38:16] I don't have the information.

[1:38:17] suitable. You must

[1:38:18] convince me. Your

[1:38:19] the presentation should be

[1:38:20] convincing, not

[1:38:21] informative. I know

[1:38:22] , do you think that there

[1:38:23] information is received

[1:38:24] , and that's true, but you

[1:38:25] trying

[1:38:26] to convince people. So

[1:38:27] look at this from

[1:38:28] this side and go,

[1:38:29] I need to

[1:38:30] three people here

[1:38:30] agreed with me.

[1:38:31] Maybe not everything

[1:38:32] okay, but

[1:38:33] Yes. No, listen.

[1:38:34] Good.

[1:38:35] I am mine, uh, I am not like that,

[1:38:37] uh, I have

[1:38:39] such...I appreciate...

[1:38:41] I quickly think that everyone

[1:38:42] here...Well, not everyone is here. I

[1:38:44] b...room tax

[1:38:46] obviously for me

[1:38:47] obvious. There are a lot

[1:38:49] things on Airbnb,

[1:38:52] so again,

[1:38:53] find out the target

[1:38:54] audience

[1:38:55] and find out what

[1:38:56] will interest the target

[1:38:57] audience.

[1:38:57] Yes. And if the tax on

[1:38:59] sales will not reach

[1:39:00] target indicator,

[1:39:01] they just don't

[1:39:02] They talk about it. IN

[1:39:03] I have a problem with that.

[1:39:04] What

[1:39:05] many people now

[1:39:06] buy cars in

[1:39:08] Caravans.

[1:39:10] Good. Such a tax

[1:39:12] from sales would be

[1:39:13] destructive.

[1:39:14] I don't think so.

[1:39:14] cost of cars

[1:39:16] included.

[1:39:16] I just don't care.

[1:39:18] . Yes.

[1:39:19] You know what? This is good.

[1:39:20] remark.

[1:39:21] Good. And I also think that

[1:39:25] alcohol and cigarettes

[1:39:26] should not be 1%,

[1:39:27] if this too

[1:39:28] regarding numbers,

[1:39:33] because we have

[1:39:34] are opening

[1:39:35] breweries.

[1:39:36] Oh yes,

[1:39:37] that would be great

[1:39:38] okay, that would be it

[1:39:39] alcohol. I don't know,

[1:39:40] how can we...I don't

[1:39:42] I know, cigarettes.

[1:39:43] back on the list.

[1:39:44] Yes. Again, this is"

[1:39:46] sugar "when Maple Valley

[1:39:47] will open again.

[1:39:49] There was a restaurant.

[1:39:52] Yes. Yes. It's worth it.

[1:39:53] pay attention. There

[1:39:55] it was written that you can add

[1:39:56] and subtract every year.

[1:39:57] Just need every year,

[1:39:58] isn't that right? You just

[1:39:59] must report

[1:40:00] in 90 days, what are you doing?

[1:40:01] approved, right?

[1:40:02] There should be a meeting.

[1:40:03] So, if we decide to add

[1:40:04] food and alcohol,

[1:40:05] we can

[1:40:05] not necessarily dishes

[1:40:07] , but alcohol.

[1:40:07] You should do them.

[1:40:09] together.

[1:40:09] Yes. Their

[1:40:11] a little...In

[1:40:12] us them actually

[1:40:14] no.

[1:40:14] I think this is a good idea.

[1:40:16] . I understand that

[1:40:17] the situation is becoming more

[1:40:18] fierce.

[1:40:18] I think they are

[1:40:19] should combine them

[1:40:21] together.

[1:40:21] I have already convinced you.

[1:40:22] Food and rooms are what I wanted. Good.

[1:40:25] So, here it is. IN

[1:40:28] I have a question. If

[1:40:29] you do local

[1:40:31] hack options with 1%. You

[1:40:33] do you mean that

[1:40:34] you can very

[1:40:35] specifically to say,

[1:40:36] which of the three options

[1:40:37] Will you charge?

[1:40:39] Yes.

[1:40:39] Numbers are one.

[1:40:41] Sales. Sales.

[1:40:42] Food and drinks and

[1:40:43] restaurant.

[1:40:44] Good. And these are the only three.

[1:40:46] Good.

[1:40:46] And, uh, you know, to

[1:40:48] from your point of view, this

[1:40:49] normally. Uh, me

[1:40:50] glad you have it

[1:40:51] people close to you

[1:40:53] trust and so on

[1:40:54] They are talking to you, and I hope that one

[1:40:57] I will meet you someday.

[1:40:58] them, and

[1:40:59] the more you there are

[1:41:00] on the forum. So, me too

[1:41:03] I would like to, uh, you know,

[1:41:04] potentially divide

[1:41:05] this is for a vote

[1:41:07] different categories,

[1:41:08] or, you know, any

[1:41:10] degree of expression,

[1:41:11] which people want,

[1:41:12] or, uh, getting

[1:41:14] maximum, uh,

[1:41:15] participating in this, uh, this

[1:41:16] my interest in everything

[1:41:18] this. And, uh, you know, uh

[1:41:23] -uh, I mean, what is it?

[1:41:25] many ways

[1:41:26] to go beyond the law

[1:41:27] , local tax

[1:41:28] for redemption, right?

[1:41:29] So, let's say we

[1:41:30] Let's deal with this.

[1:41:31] Then there are other things that

[1:41:32] you can start

[1:41:33] to consider, this

[1:41:34] short term

[1:41:35] rent, all sorts of things.

[1:41:36] Second homes,

[1:41:37] owners of the second

[1:41:38] housing, you know, people,

[1:41:39] who live in the city

[1:41:40] house.

[1:41:43] Well, that's what today is about.

[1:41:44] was broken again.

[1:41:47] That would be great.

[1:41:48] You know, if you

[1:41:49] did it, but

[1:41:50] earned 10,000 on this

[1:41:52] , reduce the budget by

[1:41:53] 10. No, before that

[1:41:54] moment, okay, we are talking about

[1:41:56] potential tax,

[1:41:58] which will force

[1:41:59] residents to pay

[1:42:00] additional $33. AND,

[1:42:02] you know, from this

[1:42:03] drive gears

[1:42:04] big conversations. How am I?

[1:42:05] already said, I think that

[1:42:07] the more conversations,

[1:42:08] the better. I hope to take

[1:42:10] this participation

[1:42:10] as much as I can, and

[1:42:11] to learn as much as possible

[1:42:12] more, and perhaps

[1:42:13] Will they convince me?

[1:42:14] wrong? I am not a fanatic,

[1:42:15] who says that everyone

[1:42:16] must go their own way

[1:42:18] by. But we just

[1:42:19] voted for

[1:42:20] tax increase

[1:42:21] on property that beats on

[1:42:22] all of them are even worse.

[1:42:23] It hits them all.

[1:42:25] even worse. And from this

[1:42:27] You won't get anywhere. And I didn't hear a single squeak,

[1:42:30] and I didn't hear you say anything

[1:42:31] were they talking about a squeak or

[1:42:32] something like that. We are beating.

[1:42:34] much more than all of them

[1:42:35] worse every year. And then

[1:42:38] this thing with tax from

[1:42:39] sales becomes

[1:42:40] starting point, and

[1:42:42] for good reasons, such as

[1:42:43] you mentioned it, and I completely respect that.

[1:42:45] and I hope that with

[1:42:47] sometimes, uh, you know, I will participate in this

[1:42:49] conversation. But

[1:42:52] budget cuts,

[1:42:53] as you said,

[1:42:54] the reason why people

[1:42:55] are talking to you about

[1:42:56] the accessibility crisis,

[1:42:58] is not about

[1:42:58] hypothetical 1%,

[1:43:00] maybe next time

[1:43:01] year. This is because of the

[1:43:04] they have already happened

[1:43:08] now.

[1:43:09] So let's start with this. I

[1:43:11] their ally in this

[1:43:12] . I am their big ear, and

[1:43:14] they are not talking

[1:43:15] with me directly,

[1:43:16] indirectly,

[1:43:17] you know, uh, you know,

[1:43:19] nothing but bricks

[1:43:20] in my window. I hear about the decrease.

[1:43:23] prices for the people who are here

[1:43:24] live. When I

[1:43:26] recently left and

[1:43:27] submitted his, uh,

[1:43:29] petition, each of these

[1:43:30] The name was as follows:"

[1:43:32] What about taxes? ""

[1:43:34] Truth? So this is the only one,

[1:43:35] what, uh, you know,

[1:43:37] I can do it.

[1:43:39] I hope, Cumbay,

[1:43:40] that doesn't look like me.

[1:43:42] Uh, I don't know what.

[1:43:43] happened before that

[1:43:44] led to this night

[1:43:46] . Uh, I came here from

[1:43:48] the expectation that this

[1:43:50] just an idea for

[1:43:51] discussion. So I don't

[1:43:53] I want to go back.

[1:43:54] Um, that's why I believe that every idea

[1:43:58] should be discussed.

[1:44:00] Some for a short time

[1:44:01] , some for a long time.

[1:44:03] Um, I don't support it.

[1:44:06] taxes. Any

[1:44:07] taxes. I don't think so.

[1:44:08] someone really

[1:44:09] supports. In addition

[1:44:10] the fact that, you know,

[1:44:10] We need taxes.

[1:44:11] They are useful for

[1:44:12] certain things.

[1:44:13] Um,

[1:44:13] if you asked me

[1:44:15] , you know, with a gun

[1:44:16] in your head, you know, or

[1:44:17] Do you want to make 1%? I

[1:44:18] would answer: "No, not in any case. Here

[1:44:20] reasons why not, or

[1:44:21] not

[1:44:21] Yes?"

[1:44:23] But I would skip: "Well,

[1:44:24] you could do this,

[1:44:26] but not that, or you

[1:44:27] could do it."

[1:44:29] So I still think,

[1:44:30] What is healthy?

[1:44:31] discussion, and perhaps

[1:44:32] another step that

[1:44:33] Alex wants to do,

[1:44:35] it is his prerogative,

[1:44:36] because, obviously,

[1:44:37] no one else, um,

[1:44:38] actively not

[1:44:39] interested, is

[1:44:41] get these again

[1:44:42] damn data.

[1:44:43] I mean that

[1:44:44] if possible, state

[1:44:45] Sorry, we don't

[1:44:45] we can deliver to you

[1:44:47] this, until you

[1:44:47] Agree to this. I am not

[1:44:49] I know, I don't.

[1:44:49] I'm working, then

[1:44:50] sorry, we don't

[1:44:51] we are going this

[1:44:52] do. Um, but if

[1:44:53] there will be some

[1:44:54] there is no data that

[1:44:55] can force us

[1:44:56] view one of

[1:44:57] three or two of

[1:44:58] three or three, that is, on

[1:45:00] In my opinion, it's fine.

[1:45:02] So on this I would

[1:45:03] finished. I would think,

[1:45:04] that if you want,

[1:45:05] you know, return it,

[1:45:06] or, you know, who knows?

[1:45:08] But

[1:45:08] Yes,

[1:45:09] I just wanted to give

[1:45:10] such a perspective that

[1:45:12] I am quite easy

[1:45:13] I am worried and

[1:45:14] I'm upset. Um, and this

[1:45:16] It's quite difficult when I

[1:45:18] on this side...

[1:45:19] Yes. For me.

[1:45:20] And therefore in any

[1:45:21] In that case, I just wanted to say that, in my opinion

[1:45:23] I think it was good.

[1:45:24] discussion.

[1:45:24] There is a short deadline,

[1:45:25] if you want to take

[1:45:26] participation in these city

[1:45:26] meeting. I don't know,

[1:45:27] What day is it? You

[1:45:28] need to submit

[1:45:29] a petition or something like that.

[1:45:30] I think this year

[1:45:30] It's too early to take it.

[1:45:31] participation, but it's mine

[1:45:32] task, just to

[1:45:32] You knew. I have on

[1:45:33] meaning that you can

[1:45:34] to convene special

[1:45:35] city council.

[1:45:35] If you want

[1:45:36] attract more

[1:45:36] people, you probably

[1:45:37] would you like to do this?

[1:45:38] at town meetings.

[1:45:39] Special city

[1:45:40] fees are not collected

[1:45:40] many people.

[1:45:41] So I don't know which one.

[1:45:42] deadline for

[1:45:43] presentation

[1:45:44] suggestions for

[1:45:45] city duty officers

[1:45:46] fees,

[1:45:46] city duty officers

[1:45:47] fees, yours

[1:45:48] budget. I have on

[1:45:49] meaning that it is usually

[1:45:54] end of December, not

[1:45:55] February, so there are temporary

[1:45:57] framework, I believe that with

[1:46:04] rooms, in my opinion, you know how, eh

[1:46:07] -eh, we have enough

[1:46:08] good data from this

[1:46:09] reason. I spoke.

[1:46:13] with Roger, and I

[1:46:14] talked to Lori, and I

[1:46:15] talked to V FHA,

[1:46:16] Do you understand? I

[1:46:18] talked to everyone

[1:46:19] these people, and we have

[1:46:20] quite significant

[1:46:20] reasons to believe that

[1:46:21] it just seems

[1:46:22] very clean

[1:46:23] by a shot, not by

[1:46:24] What were you worried about?

[1:46:25] your people, or people,

[1:46:26] who sent

[1:46:27] emails to

[1:46:28] election commission.

[1:46:29] Nobody mentioned it.

[1:46:30] it's like about

[1:46:30] concern. So I feel completely fine.

[1:46:33] ready for this. But

[1:46:34] then I just think,

[1:46:38] Do I want to disassemble?

[1:46:39] it's in parts, but

[1:46:40] then, perhaps,

[1:46:41] to separate

[1:46:42] efforts later. Yes.

[1:46:43] You know what? I probably

[1:46:44] I will do that. Apparently,

[1:46:46] so far simple

[1:46:46] I will move the topic from

[1:46:47] numbers. I will spend more

[1:46:50] several studies

[1:46:51] regarding sales, and, um,

[1:46:52] sales questions

[1:46:54] always was, you know,

[1:46:55] much more difficult

[1:46:56] and harder for

[1:46:57] calculations. I just

[1:47:02] I'll take a bet on

[1:47:03] numbers are the ones that got me

[1:47:05] arranged.

[1:47:05] You can share

[1:47:07] by number? I don't care.

[1:47:08] What is the approximate

[1:47:09] idea of

[1:47:10] number of rooms on

[1:47:11] every photo? Can you

[1:47:13] Do you share it?

[1:47:14] Income for the whole year.

[1:47:16] No, the number of Airbnb in

[1:47:17] our city. This is 40, 60,

[1:47:20] 100, 20?

[1:47:21] I think it's somewhere around 30-40.

[1:47:23] Yes, I think so.

[1:47:25] That's all.

[1:47:26] I mean. You can almost

[1:47:28] calculate in your head.

[1:47:29] I think that in

[1:47:29] most of these places

[1:47:30] staying 15 nights,

[1:47:31] maybe 20 a month.

[1:47:32] 20 is pretty good.

[1:47:33] Yes.

[1:47:34] So, 15 nights

[1:47:35] multiply by 30.

[1:47:37] That's strange, 000. I have

[1:47:40] there is...I know I have it

[1:47:41] good friend who is here

[1:47:43] lives on Airbnb, but if

[1:47:44] do you want to stop

[1:47:45] in Vermont, in this

[1:47:47] area, you know, you don't

[1:47:48] belong to the 1%.

[1:47:53] People don't even

[1:47:54] do this time from

[1:47:56] time. We are going somewhere.

[1:47:57] instead of

[1:47:58] look at the bottom of the web

[1:47:59] pages, for example,

[1:48:00] What is the tax on options?

[1:48:01] . It's like, "Oh my God, they

[1:48:03] charge 30%. You know,

[1:48:05] for

[1:48:05] my family is like

[1:48:06] really tough

[1:48:07] term. This is like: good

[1:48:08] , we need

[1:48:09] clean the house. IN

[1:48:10] We have two days, we

[1:48:11] should be good

[1:48:12] clean the house.

[1:48:13] You know,

[1:48:14] you would be surprised. I mean, I

[1:48:16] quite a few

[1:48:17] I am traveling.

[1:48:18] California, and we stop at

[1:48:19] hotels. There it is.

[1:48:21] many locals

[1:48:22] taxes on the number.

[1:48:25] You know, it's like

[1:48:26] travel for 1%.

[1:48:28] No, that's not true. It

[1:48:29] expensive when you arrive

[1:48:30] to the end. Yes.

[1:48:31] This is approximately 4 and 12%. IN

[1:48:33] Motel 6 has a resort fee.

[1:48:35] Yes. What do you have on?

[1:48:36] mind?

[1:48:40] I think it's worth it.

[1:48:41] continue this

[1:48:42] question. Give

[1:48:43] answers to

[1:48:44] people's questions.

[1:48:44] Discuss this with

[1:48:45] all these people.

[1:48:46] Yes. Well, I'll allow...

[1:48:48] I will allow this.

[1:48:48] to lie down. I will focus on

[1:48:50] regarding rooms. For more

[1:48:51] several meetings we

[1:48:53] let's get back to the topic

[1:48:54] rooms, and no one

[1:48:55] not really

[1:48:55] answers yes

[1:48:56] quickly regarding tax with

[1:48:57] sale. So, perhaps,

[1:49:00] with this will have to

[1:49:01] wait for.

[1:49:03] Good.

[1:49:05] But thank you again.

Dummerston Selectboard Mtg 9/30/26

Transcript