Board of Review Meeting

Board Of Review · Greenfield (city), WI · · More Greenfield (city), WI meetings · More Wisconsin meetings

View original source →

Transcript

Download: Text · SRT
AI TRANSCRIPT

This transcript was generated automatically from audio using AI and hasn't been reviewed by a person — it can contain mistakes, including plausible-sounding sentences that were never actually said. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record.

[1:10] Good evening. Today is Monday, September 21st. It is 5.08 p.m., and we're going to call it order the board of review.
[1:20] Okay. And if everyone is a reminder, if everyone makes sure that your green lights are on on your microphones. Okay. And I'll go ahead and take the role. It is 5.08 p.m. Michael Braswell is excused. Amanda O'Day. Here. Donald Reed. Here. John Graber. Here. Jared McFarland. Here.
[1:45] So the first item is a selection of a chair person and we're going to open that up to the floor for anyone.
[1:55] I think John Graber you would be a great person.
[1:58] If you'd like to be nominated as a chair person, are we able to do that without Michael President or no?
[2:03] Yeah, I don't agree with that.
[2:04] Okay, all right, I nominated John Graber.
[2:07] I'll accept the nomination.
[2:15] Second here.
[2:16] Okay,
[2:22] so we have a motion by Amanda O'Day to nominate John Graber as our chair.
[2:29] Do we have a second a second by Jared McFarland, Amanda O'Day, I don't read.
[2:40] Hi, John Graber, I, Jared McFarland, I motion carries unanimously next we have
[2:49] selection of a vice chair. I would like to formally nominate Amanda O'Day as
[2:55] vice chair of the board of review.
[2:59] Okay, so we have a motion by John Graber to
[3:02] nominate Amanda O'Day as a vice chair. Do we have a second? A second. Second by
[3:11] Jared McFarland. Amanda O'Day? Aye. Don Reed? Aye. John Graber? Aye. Jared McFarland? Aye.
[3:19] Motion carries unanimously.
[3:24] Next on the agenda, we have verified compliance with mandatory training requirements in Wisconsin statutes 70.46 subsection 4.
[3:34] Yes, we are in compliance and the PA 107 form was filed with the Department of Revenue on May 4th, 2026, and again on September 3rd, 2026, once all members were trained.
[3:50] Thank you. Next in the agenda is Verify Adoption of Ordnance for the confidentiality of income and expense information provided to the assessor per Wisconsin statutes 70.477.
[4:11] Yes, we did adopt an ordinance.
[4:14] It's ordinance number 2599 and it was adopted on October 16th, 2007.
[4:22] Number six, receive an examin assessment roll, certify corrections, verify with the
[4:26] assessor that open book changes are included in the assessment roll.
[4:31] Yes, I did receive the affidavit from the City Assessor today, and then taxpayers may
[4:41] examine the assessment role now as it's posted to the website at this time if the City
[4:47] Assessor has anything to share.
[4:50] I do.
[4:51] I have some information for each of the board members that I'll pass out at this time now.
[4:55] Thank you.
[4:56] In
[5:22] front of you is just a packet of our assessor summary for you of what we've done for the 2026 assessment year.
[5:32] The attached document is called 2026 summary of reasons for change, which is what I'm going to refer to in the first bullet point.
[5:42] The summary of assessed values as of September 21, 2026.
[5:48] The total is $356 million, $726,500, and the starting value is actually on the left-hand side of that spreadsheet.
[6:06] It is the ending for the 2025 year, which is also the start for the 2026 year.
[6:13] and that total was $4,335,840,300 and if you follow the chart across from left to right you'll
[6:23] see the plus and minuses of changes that our office performed for the 2026 assessment year.
[6:31] We're not in a revaluation year in what's referred to as the maintenance year, so all of these
[6:36] changes were based on permit work, maybe a sale review, and some information if the property owner requested us to review their property.
[6:47] Some various things, but not bringing anything up to market value that will be done in a revaluation year.
[6:54] So actually, when you go across, the column that you probably would be most interested in would be towards the right under increases
[7:03] It's referred to as column with two and three, that would be your new construction increase for the year and that's a $24 million, $99,500.
[7:15] So with the plus and minuses on here for the year, the total gain for the city was at $20,886,200.
[7:26] And so if you just refer to the report you can take a look at that if you have questions
[7:31] you can always just ask at any time we're here tonight the 2025 assessment ratio for the
[7:38] city is determined by the Department of Revenue and that was at 88%.
[7:42] The 2026 ratio is not available until after the Board adjourns and they receive the final
[7:51] assessment role from our department which will file after the Board of Review.
[7:57] 2026, again, was not a revaluation year.
[7:59] The last revaluation year was in 2023.
[8:03] So for this year's changes, we sent out 422 real estate assessment change notices.
[8:10] They were mailed on July 28th, 2026.
[8:14] We held the open book, which was officially on August 18th of 2026.
[8:19] However, that's the official date for the Department of Revenue.
[8:25] We start working with property owners right after they receive their notices.
[8:29] So whether they email us or call us or stop in, we're working with them and we work with
[8:34] them right up to the board to review.
[8:37] So ours is not really just one date, we work with them for several weeks.
[8:43] And there was, I apologize, I have a typo on there, we had sent out determination letters
[8:57] from the contacts that we received on September 1st.
[9:01] We sent out five denied letters and seven granted letters, and then we also had five waivers,
[9:08] which the waivers were sent between the determination letter date and the border review date,
[9:15] meaning that many of times, 99% of the time, they've contacted us after our open book officially closed.
[9:26] But we still work with them. And then if there are any sort of adjustments, then we refer to as a waiver
[9:32] which gives them notice of saying it's less than the Department of Revenue's standard date of time
[9:42] from when they get their notice to the time that the Board of Review meets. So, they're waving
[9:47] that right of the notice, but they're still able to have that change made. And if they disagree
[9:53] with the change on that waiver, still gives them the right to appear at the Board today.
[9:59] And there should be an open book actions summary along in your packet in which you can see the contacts that we had a little bit of a summary of the reason they contacted us as well as some of what the outcome would have been.
[10:14] We didn't have any parcels that were subject to the ag use conversion fee.
[10:20] The new laws, there was a law effective January 1st of 2026.
[10:25] It was the Wisconsin Act 15, which was passed in 2025.
[10:30] It exempts all radio cellular and telecommunication towers.
[10:36] There weren't any correction of errors, which is a 7043 or
[10:42] We don't have any of those to report the assessor's affidavit was signed today on the 21st by myself and the clerk.
[10:52] And once the Board of Review is adjourned, we will be filing that final municipal assessor's report.
[10:59] And then once that's reviewed by the Department of Revenue, they will inform you as to what your level of assessment is.
[11:07] Throughout the year, our office has been adjusting and maintaining the assessment schedule in duties that are expected of our office.
[11:16] We review sales permits, we maintain an update assessment data and reports, as well as we're always assisting property owners and the general public.
[11:26] Thank you.
[11:32] Is there any further discussion?
[11:36] Anyone have any questions?
[11:41] We're going to move on, number seven, review objections, assessor believes may not comply with statutory requirements and schedule a procedural hearing for the assessor and objector to be heard.
[12:17] was contacted for the record here.
[12:19] I was contacted by Attorney Cible earlier today.
[12:21] She's indicated that she's actually preparing for-
[12:28] preparing for trial, so she asked if she could appear by telephone for her argument or
[12:33] any position she needed to take, so we're going to get her on the phone.
[13:52] I can hear you just fine yeah can you hear me good okay sounds good on
[14:06] our
[14:07] Board of Review meeting agenda today and it says review objections assessor believes may
[14:13] not comply with statutory requirements in schedule procedural hearing for the assessor
[14:17] and objector to be heard.
[14:21] There are two objections that just came in.
[14:26] One is Wal-Mart.
[14:27] They did a notice of intent, but then they filed their full objection form just recently and
[14:32] then the other one is MNAC.
[14:36] I am still working with the assessor.
[14:38] We probably will ask the board to subpoena information, so we don't have any information
[14:45] at this time to say, hold the hearing on whether the objection forms are complete or
[14:52] not, because we want to issue subpoenas to get more information.
[14:58] Okay one moment Amy
[15:00] One minute. Sure. Can you put the phone up on the ledge, maybe? Sure, is it the highest? We're trying to make sure our reporter can hear okay? There's some some feedback. You might have to have to do need us to hurt or repeat any of that. Okay. Can we just do a test, Amy? Can you say something? Sure. Can you hear me okay now? It's better. You have to talk up. Thank you. Okay.
[15:32] think we're good, Amy. Sorry about that, and thank you for seeing.
[15:38] All right, so with, and I don't know, I didn't take a quick look at the agenda, but with
[15:46] those two objections, the two commercial objections, we would ask the board to issue a subpoena.
[15:53] I've been working on them today. I will have them finish tonight, but I would ask the board
[15:58] to authorize the issue of the subpoena for pertinent information that may tend that they're
[16:04] light on the value of the property.
[16:06] And then I can, I'll get them to the city and then the perhaps the chairperson can come
[16:13] in and sign them tomorrow and we will, you know, serve them on the property owner.
[16:20] And in the case of one of the property owners, the medical office building that's on Cyrilay
[16:25] and there will be two subpoenas.
[16:27] This one will go to the property owner
[16:29] and the other will go to the tenant, which is the rural.
[16:36] And then a subpoena to Wal-Mart also.
[16:45] Okay, so this is Chris Gary.
[16:46] I just want to make sure
[16:47] that we're clear here on the procedure.
[16:48] So you on behalf of the assessor
[16:50] are requesting that the board authorize
[16:52] the issuance of subpoenas by the chair.
[16:55] Presumably tomorrow,
[16:56] once you get those finalized,
[16:58] that would then be served under the rules
[17:01] that the board adopted.
[17:02] the applicants would then have 10 days to compile that information and then the assessor would have seven days to review it. Is that correct?
[17:12] That's correct. That's my understanding.
[17:14] Okay. So essentially so the board is clear if you authorize the subpoenas what we'll end up doing is picking a new dates approximately three weeks, four weeks down the line.
[17:24] when we'll then decide at that point, if the assessor thinks they've gotten subpoenas complied with at that point, then we would take up, I know there's at least one hearing waiver that's out there, there may be more than one, I don't call a hand, but in that event, the substantive action would take place at the next date in October.
[17:42] Okay, can we make a motion to have the attorney issue of subpoenas?
[17:50] I can make the motion.
[17:54] Motion by John Graber, is there a second?
[17:57] A second it.
[17:59] Second by Jared McFarland to issue the subpoenas.
[18:03] Amanda O'Day,
[18:06] John Reed, John Graber, Jared McFarland, motion carries unanimously.
[18:13] All right. Thank you, members of the board. Thank you. Thank you.
[18:30] Okay, so for the board's
[18:32] edification and for the record as well. Before we adjourn today, we will pick a date that's
[18:35] going to work for everybody that accommodates those timelines. Then we'll go from there.
[18:43] All right. Number eight, review objections filed and decide to grant or deny evaluation hearings.
[18:52] So then for on our list, everyone would have received the spreadsheet. We received the three objections.
[18:59] That first one is a residential objection for Michael M. Assad, tax key 691-011-5000.
[19:10] For the address of 2935 Westbridge Street Greenfield, Wisconsin, 53221.
[19:17] So the board of our rules require that the board of review and the assessor discuss all
[19:25] objections that have been received and decide a, whether they'll grant the hearing or
[19:30] b, whether they'll deny it, and then c, will it be a procedural hearing or d in objection
[19:36] hearing? So we would have to decide, the board would have to decide for number one, Michael
[19:43] Assad's objection.
[19:49] All right, and we're all in receipt of the, I think we all have it.
[19:53] Is Michael present tonight?
[19:56] Yes.
[19:56] Okay.
[19:57] Thank you.
[19:57] Hi. Welcome. Yes. All right.
[20:05] Upon review, it appears as if everything was filled out correctly. So thank you for that. Does the objector have any or does the assessor have any objection to the form?
[20:15] No, not at this time. Okay.
[20:20] Yes.
[20:23] Pardon me, one moment. I believe Mr.
[20:31] Satter, are you the list up forward?
[20:33] Thank you.
[20:44] Okay, thank you for reminding me.
[20:47] Excuse me, members of the Board and Attorney and Clerk, we've found that there is a discrepancy that the
[20:57] form has not been completely filled out.
[21:01] Item D, the property owner indicated that there has been an appraisal in the last five years but
[21:09] It did not provide the information as far as the date of the appraisal, the value of the appraisal,
[21:16] nor the purpose of the appraisal.
[21:22] Mr. Asad, would you do you have that information?
[21:23] Would you like to complete that now?
[21:25] Oh, yeah, absolutely.
[21:26] Okay.
[21:28] And then, I'm Mr. Asad.
[21:31] Could we have you take a seat next to the court reporter?
[21:33] Maybe she would share the microphone with you, make sure the green light is on.
[21:38] Yes, and then are we doing testimony at this time or not?
[21:42] That's not because of the formal, my thought was that you would supplement the information that's missing from the sheet, the board would then decide whether or not you think that's sufficient compliance.
[21:52] And then we would decide whether we want to have a hearing tonight or set it up for a different day.
[21:56] And if there's no need, I'll spare him.
[21:58] Correct.
[21:59] Okay, okay, you may proceed, thank you.
[22:01] Thank you, all right, so part of the form, it was July 17th, 2025, a value was not actually
[22:11] provided for me, the purpose of the appraisal was actually for the bank to approve my loan.
[22:19] Okay, so you know there was an appraisal completed, but you don't necessarily have a copy of the appraisal?
[22:23] No, okay, but you know it was sufficient to have satisfied your loan?
[22:27] Yes, and do you recall how much the loan was for?
[22:30] The loan was 369,000, okay.
[22:37] Okay, so now-
[22:44] The Board can decide whether you think there's been sufficient compliance with the requirements of the statute.
[22:50] So vision information provided by the objector to go to hearing.
[22:55] Could you repeat the date, please, I'm sorry, I was in.
[22:58] 717-2025.
[23:01] 717-2025.
[23:03] And you said 369,000?
[23:06] Roughly, yes.
[23:07] Yeah, and the purpose of the appraisal was it was for the actual bank of my home
[23:12] mortgage union home mortgage to basically allow through my at the time my broker
[23:17] cream city mortgage. Okay, and then can I ask you know is this an arms length sale?
[23:23] Thank you. I wish I did. It was not okay. It's definitely on the market for about only three days.
[23:28] Okay, and did you so the seller was unknown to you? You didn't know the seller? I didn't know.
[23:35] No. Okay.
[23:36] It's time to look on the house on the list.
[23:41] So procedurally does the board have a sense of,
[23:44] I will have to send me a lot to make motion obviously,
[23:46] but the options would be some sort of a procedural hearing
[23:49] to decide whether or not the application is sufficient
[23:51] or if the board feels that the application
[23:53] that's been provided is sufficient
[23:54] within the margin of error that we allow.
[23:57] And again, it's with respect to residential properties
[24:00] that there's a more forgiveness
[24:01] than there would be generally on the commercial side.
[24:04] Then the motion could be to proceed directly to a hearing
[24:07] if the applicant and the assessor are prepared to do that type?
[24:10] I would say it's possible to adjourn this proceeding just because you paid for that appraisal.
[24:16] So you would be able to get a copy of that appraisal to see, and it did satisfy the loan,
[24:21] but I would be interested to see if it came in right, you know, to value for the loan,
[24:27] or if it appraised over or something to.
[24:31] So, if you could get in contact with Union Home Bank, you paid for it, so you should have gotten a copy.
[24:39] I know sometimes the mortgage tax that all comes in, you know, it looks foreign, but maybe if you can still access that somehow, through a link,
[24:47] it likely expired, but or contact Union Home mortgage or your mortgage loan officer should be able to provide that to you.
[24:53] That would be helpful.
[24:54] Yeah, and that being the case, we could, as we talked about earlier, we are going to have to have another meeting sometime in October to deal with the procedural issues on the subpoenas.
[25:05] We could have your hearing at that time, that would allow you time to get a copy of the appraisal if you wanted to, it may help you prepare your case.
[25:12] Is that the board's pleasure?
[25:13] I would say in my opinion that makes the most sense.
[25:16] Yeah.
[25:17] Okay.
[25:18] All right.
[25:18] Yeah, I'll be able to see.
[25:19] I'll give a call to my cream city mortgage and see, you know, I don't see that then.
[25:25] It'd be helpful.
[25:28] You know, the prazer will, a lot of times outline the subject properties.
[25:34] And I know you included some as well, but to see if there's a better idea, people take a look at that.
[25:39] All right.
[25:40] So motion to have you, do we set a date now then?
[25:46] The motion would be to lay this over to the board's next meeting for our hearing on the substance all right. I'll make the motion. Thank you.
[25:54] I'll second that motion.
[25:58] Okay motion made by John Graber second by Amanda O'Day and this would be to grant the hearing and it will be an
[26:07] objection hearing for the board's next meeting.
[26:10] Amanda O'Day.
[26:11] Hi.
[26:12] Donald Reed.
[26:13] Hi.
[26:14] John Graber.
[26:15] Hi.
[26:15] Derek McFarland.
[26:16] Hi.
[26:17] Motion carries unanimously.
[26:23] So, if I may ask a question, is that okay?
[26:26] So, will I be getting an email about when that hearing would be?
[26:29] Yeah, you can stick around.
[26:30] You can stick around if you want.
[26:31] We'll, we'll set that before the, I probably pretty quickly here actually.
[26:35] Otherwise, we would send out a notice at least 48 hours in advance.
[26:38] Okay.
[26:38] But yeah.
[26:39] All right.
[26:40] I appreciate you.
[26:40] question. Is this a two family? No, it is a family home. It's a single family home.
[26:47] Okay. And being using a big family home. Okay. Thank you.
[26:51] All right. Appreciate you guys. Thank you so much for that time.
[26:54] Thank you. Thanks for your time.
[26:57] Did you shut the door when you think about it?
[26:58] And did you want me to go on the next one on this?
[27:01] And so the next objection number two on our list was commercial.
[27:06] It is M-M-A-C-150 Greenfield Wisconsin-L-L-C-A-A-A-A-S group, P-O-Box 92129 South Lake, Texas.
[27:19] Ryan Miller is the agent on record, tax key 606-998-01013, address 9,000, West Surreline
[27:30] Greenfield Wisconsin-53228.
[27:33] So this
[27:39] would be the opportunity, I know Amy already spoke to this, I think to a certain extent with respect to the assessor, but if the board has any concerns or questions about the application materials, we could address those here or we can set it recommend setting it forward for hearing or for further review of the spinners.
[28:03] All right,
[28:08] so motion to carry this over, issue subpoenas, and have it on the future agenda.
[28:18] I'll second.
[28:21] Motion by Amanda O'Day, second by John Graber.
[28:24] Amanda O'Day.
[28:26] Hi.
[28:27] Don Reed.
[28:28] Hi.
[28:29] John Graber.
[28:29] Hi.
[28:30] All right.
[28:30] Derek McFarland.
[28:31] All right.
[28:32] Motion carries unanimously.
[28:38] And the third objection on our list that was filed is Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust
[28:43] PO Box 8050 Bentonville, Arkansas 72716, Agent Mallory SC 731 North Jackson Street, Jackson
[28:55] Johnson Street, Suite 900, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 5302, with authorized agents, Stray
[29:02] Bomb, Carnes, Rodriguez, Wenzel, and Wenzel.
[29:07] Tax Key 608-995-010, for the address of 1060-00 Wesley, Tenabanyu, Greenfield, Wisconsin,
[29:18] 532-28.
[29:24] Okay, likewise, I think these testers are already indicated that there may be subpoenas
[29:27] Those are the very least that they want to lay over a consideration of the waiver request.
[29:32] Is anyone here from Walmart?
[29:36] I just had one question for you and it may just be a technical glitch entirely.
[29:40] But my version of the Asian authorization form, the text isn't coming through correctly.
[29:45] It's showing as kind of gobbledygook.
[29:48] And so I guess, I don't know if everyone else, are you seeing what I'm seeing or?
[29:53] I have.
[29:58] As city clerk, I did have-
[30:00] It received that filing by email, and that is exactly how the PDF showed up when I opened it.
[31:23] It's this one here, like this is a cover sheet on that.
[31:29] Oh, yeah.
[31:30] Yeah.
[31:31] Okay.
[31:32] Yeah, okay.
[31:33] So just check out your end and see if it's, you know, it may be,
[31:39] it's only just a technical thing between EDF and the scan and whatnot,
[31:42] but you
[31:46] just make sure that on your end it may be even good old-fashioned, you know, scanning.
[31:53] Okay, so aside from that issue, does the board have any concerns about any sort of procedural
[31:58] matters of this one?
[31:59] Or are we going to lay this one over for subsequent hearing as well?
[32:07] Is there anything that you would like to add for this evening?
[32:11] I know you took the time to come here, so I'm just checking.
[32:13] Okay.
[32:14] All right.
[32:17] Well, I'll make a motion then to hold this over.
[32:23] motion by Amanda O'Day, second by
[32:28] Jeric McFarland, Amanda O'Day.
[32:30] Hi.
[32:31] Donald Reed.
[32:33] John Graber.
[32:34] Hi.
[32:34] Jeric McFarland.
[32:35] All right.
[32:36] Motion carries unanimously.
[32:41] All right.
[32:41] Next on the agenda is to create a new hearing schedule for written objections file but not
[32:45] heard.
[32:47] Okay.
[32:48] So under the board's rules, we know that there will be at least some subpoenas that are
[32:51] issue. It's not like tomorrow. Under the rules, the property owners have 10 days to provide
[32:59] the information that's been subpoenaed. Let me get to that rule. It's rule number no.
[33:04] Nope.
[33:07] Let me get there. Rule number 18 allows property owner 10 days from the day the subpoena
[33:14] served. And then the assessor has seven days after that to review the board doesn't need to
[33:20] to meet in between that period of time but so we need to allow at least 17 days for
[33:26] that to happen.
[33:27] They're actually, the rules do actually allow if the property owner indicates they need
[33:31] some more time to comply.
[33:33] The chair outside the board here can actually grant one reasonable extension if it comes
[33:36] to that but we are kind of coming to the end of the tax assessment season here as well.
[33:41] So I'd say we shoot for a date three weeks out plus see what works for everybody.
[33:49] Yeah. Third week of October for everyone's ref was not third week. Three weeks
[33:55] out would be the second week of October. Well it's the first full week of
[33:59] October. I should clarify. It's October 4th through October 10th I think is
[34:03] what I'm getting at. So that's why I think we should be looking at for days.
[34:08] Okay. That makes sense to everybody.
[34:12] I don't have a specific day in mind. We could
[34:15] do the Monday October 5th. I want to say calendar look like Jennifer. Okay. So our
[34:20] Our calendar starts getting pretty tight with elections and meetings.
[34:25] The fifth is not open.
[34:26] We could do Tuesday, October 6th, between 5 and 6.30, maybe say, or earlier.
[34:34] We do have a 7 p.m. common council meeting that night in this room.
[34:38] So if we did even 4 or 5, if we think that an hour, hour and a half is sufficient.
[34:48] We've got the following, the 12th is not available due to training in this room.
[34:54] We have the 13th is open, between 4 and 5.30, there's a 6 o'clock meeting that night for plan commission.
[35:03] Otherwise, if we look the week before the 8th of October, that's a Thursday, that's open the entire evening.
[35:11] Otherwise, the 14th, that's a Wednesday, that's open from 4 to 5.30, there's usually a finance meeting in here.
[35:20] The 15th, we've got training.
[35:24] October 8th, you said is completely open, though.
[35:27] October 8th is completely open in the evening.
[35:31] How does that look for everybody?
[35:33] Let's see, here's that given us enough time.
[35:42] I feel like it's a little tight with the timeline just because if the property owner were to take the full 10 days, and then if the assessor needed a full 7 days, no, maybe they wouldn't.
[35:53] But I feel like maybe going to the following we may be a little safer just in case they do need a couple more days to get things gathered up.
[35:59] What was Jenna for the 14th or the 15th?
[36:03] The 14th, I could probably, that's open from 4 to 5.30 and I could probably work with our human resources to see if they could take the finance meeting to another room or reschedule it.
[36:18] What time would finance normally be?
[36:20] Finance is at 6.
[36:21] Okay, I suspect, based on past practice anyhow, I suspect that we'll have the one hearing for Mr.
[36:29] But the I suspect, based on Prash practice, the other two may end up being waved, or at least one or both parties may end up.
[36:35] I know Walmart's already indicated that they prefer a waiver in a circuit court.
[36:38] But I don't think historically, once the assessor gets the information they're looking for, they usually don't object to the waiver either.
[36:44] So I suspect both those two will probably end up being waved.
[36:47] So it may just be the one hearing.
[36:49] So an hour and a half probably would be sufficient.
[36:51] I'm not sure what availability is that early for everybody.
[36:53] But October 14th,
[36:59] so work for you down.
[37:00] Wednesday, October 14th.
[37:02] Okay, and Mr. Assad.
[37:09] So our finance meetings at six would four o'clock for Board of Review work to give us an hour and a half if we need.
[37:17] Okay, 4 p.m.
[37:19] 4 o'clock,
[37:24] 10, 14.
[37:25] And that's, yep, that's Wednesday, October 14th in this room, room 100 Board of Review at 4 p.m.
[37:34] Okay, next. Thank you.
[37:39] Number 10, hear written objections properly filed with the City Clerk regarding property assessments.
[37:46] Okay, so we don't have anything tonight then.
[37:49] We've discussed everything that's been filed, so nothing to hear this evening.
[37:55] Number 11, discussion and decision about waving the 48-hour notice of intent for objections filed with good cause.
[38:01] Yes.
[38:02] And at this time we don't have any people who have come forward to be heard after the
[38:10] deadline and we still would have until seven this evening if anyone was coming in, so nothing
[38:16] at this point.
[38:17] Correct.
[38:17] We have to wait just in case.
[38:18] And then we'd have to take up that item if anyone was coming.
[38:25] Number 12, discussion and decision regarding requests for waivers of border review hearing
[38:29] allowing the property owner and appeal directly to circuit court.
[38:36] Okay.
[38:37] Okay, so Wal-Mart did file requests for waivers, but I think we've already discussed their
[38:45] objection.
[38:46] So we wouldn't take action at this point.
[38:48] Yeah, the assessors indicated that they are withholding their position on whether they're
[38:52] going to oppose the waiver until the next hearing.
[38:55] There may be a subpoenaid as well, and I'm not sure if that's been decided, but-
[39:02] Number 13, discussion and decision regarding requests to testify by telephone or submit
[39:06] written statement.
[39:08] I believe Walmart also had filed a request to testify by telephone.
[39:20] And number 14 discussion and decision regarding annual updates to the city of Greenfield border review rules and procedures manual.
[39:30] I don't think anyone has anything on that.
[39:32] I don't.
[39:36] Number 15, other matters properly before the board.
[39:46] Nothing at this time, I think at this point, we just have to wait now.
[39:49] We can't get to that last item until at least 7 o'clock because by state statute, we have to allow that to our period.
[39:58] So do we stay on record or go off the record?
[40:01] I think we lost record for that.
[40:03] Okay, so it is 5.47 pm.
[40:07] The board has taken care of its business items that they can at this point.
[40:12] So we will go off the record, but the board will still be in session until 7 o'clock.
[40:25] I'm just going to go back on the record. It's 6.16 pm.
[40:31] Just want to go back on the record to say two things and then we'll go back off while we remain in session until a little after 7.
[40:38] But I wanted to mention that Michael Breswell,
[40:42] Our another member of our Board of Review is now present.
[40:46] He was present at 6.14 pm, so he will be here until the end of the meeting.
[40:51] And Attorney Chris Geary is going to be heading out because we finished most of our business.
[40:58] Now we're just waiting to see if anything comes in.
[41:01] So he will be leaving at 6.17 pm and we will now go back off the record and wait.
[41:11] 55 p.m. Michael Braswell will be leaving at the 0.655 and we will I'm going to go off
[41:21] the record and we will still be in session until 707, a minute to boot up. Okay, we're
[41:27] on air. We're going back on the record. It is 708 p.m.
[41:33] Number 11 discussion and decision about waving the 48 hour notice of intent for objections
[41:38] and filed with good cause.
[41:40] We were in session during this whole time
[41:42] and we did not have anyone come in
[41:45] to file objections with good cause.
[41:49] Number 16, I'm gonna make a motion
[41:51] to adjourn the meeting.
[41:53] I'll second.
[41:59] Oh, we're going to adjourn until October 14th at four
[42:04] for our next board of review meeting.
[42:07] And that was a motion by Amanda O'Day,
[42:10] second by John Graber.
[42:12] Okay. All in favor?
[42:14] Aye.
[42:16] Opposed?
[42:16] Aye.
[42:17] Aye.
[42:18] Motion carries.
[42:19] We are adjourned until October 14th at 4.
[42:23] It is 7.09 p.m.