Commission Meeting 1-15/2025

Henry County, MO · · More Henry County, MO meetings · More Missouri meetings

Transcript

Download: Text · SRT
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT

This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.

These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[20:20] AL
[20:34] analysis lay everything out clearly for the public. If after that the data shows
[20:40] that this was truly a good deal for Henry County, then so be it. I'll be
[20:46] honest, I still personally wouldn't agree with it, but the numbers wouldn't
[20:50] be lying. You know, they wouldn't be lying.
[20:53] At the very least, I think you owe it to your voters to make decisions based on
[20:58] facts, not assumptions. Because right now, the decisions that were made over a
[21:03] year ago were based on assumptions that this would probably be a a good deal.
[21:09] And without those impact studies, it's just an assumption. and it's just taking
[21:13] the word of the solar panel company and obviously they have a reason to give you
[21:20] certain information right now. A lot of people feel like
[21:24] Beavertail's interests were put ahead of theirs.
[21:27] This is here's a chance you guys can correct it. You represent the people of
[21:32] Henry County and not the solar panel company.
[21:38] Jim, Jim, you may not even known that these things needed done over a year
[21:43] ago. Did I mean did I even tell you that normally an impact economic impact study
[21:49] should be done? Did he let you know that?
[21:51] » We had a list of all the studies we had to do and that's what they followed
[21:56] through with. >> Okay. Was it the lawyer who gave you
[21:59] that list or the >> attorney more than one?
[22:03] » Yeah. So this it might not even be your fault that you didn't know this needed
[22:08] done. the lawyer didn't tell you then you didn't know
[22:13] but and then Jake's not here but to Jake these are the things you probably
[22:18] discovered in recent months so Jake's probably also now discovering in the
[22:23] last months during this litigation that this is something that should have been
[22:27] done that wasn't done but we have a second chance to get it
[22:32] right so I'm asking you two things today First, I request that you direct the
[22:39] county attorney to tell the judge that this commission wants the contract set
[22:44] aside so proper studies can be completed. By proactively asking the
[22:49] court to set aside the contract for proper review, the commission shows
[22:53] leadership and good faith rather than reacting after a decision is imposed.
[22:58] So, we don't have to wait for the judge to say yes or no. You can actually tell
[23:03] the judge on this new information, we'd actually like to have it back so we can
[23:09] actually make a better deal for the county. It can only benefit the county.
[23:13] The solar company's not going to like it, but that doesn't matter. They're not
[23:16] the ones who you guys represent. So, it's not going to hurt anyone but
[23:22] the solar panel company. Um, I have a motion prepared that you
[23:28] guys can actually vote on for that purpose.
[23:34] What it says is the motion would be I make a motion that the Henry County
[23:38] Commission direct county council to notify the court that based upon
[23:42] information established through ongoing litigation commission requests that the
[23:46] tax abatement agreement entered into with Beaver's Tale Solar and its
[23:50] associate entities be set aside. Purpose of this request is to allow the county
[23:56] to complete an independent economic study and environmental impact review
[24:00] that were not conducted prior to the agreement's approval. This action is
[24:05] requested to ensure that any tax abatement granted by the county is
[24:09] supported by documented analysis demonstrating a clear public benefit and
[24:15] is consistent with the recognized best practices in public sector financial
[24:19] oversight. Normally, that's what counties, county
[24:23] commissioners would do before tax abatement. They would do those impact
[24:26] studies because it just gives you the data that you need to show the community
[24:32] that this was a good deal or it's not a good deal.
[24:36] Goes on to just say upon completion of the economic and environmental studies,
[24:40] the commission shall review the findings in a duly notice public meeting and
[24:44] thereafter determine whether to reaffirm, amend, or decline the tax
[24:49] abatement agreement.
[24:52] So that's the first thing I'm asking you guys to do. Bring it back to you. Get a
[24:58] better deal done. You're laying tens of millions on the on the line that could
[25:02] be given, you know, brought in through a better agreement.
[25:08] Um, and second, if you choose not to do that, then I believe you owe it to the
[25:13] public to discuss on record explaining why you believe it's physically it's
[25:18] fiscally responsible to move forward about those studies.
[25:23] Either way, the people you represent deserve to know where you stand and why.
[25:29] That's the very least arrowed. That's all I have. Thank you. and I will
[25:36] give you guys a copy of the motion
[25:41] and I'll leave one here for Jake and here's one for Kelly as she wants to
[25:48] look at it.
[25:58] And the reason I also wanted to talk today and I would have loved for Jake to
[26:02] have been here. You can watch it on the video, but I think it's important that
[26:06] you guys looking into this do this well in advance of January 30th here.
[26:38] Oh, okay. All right. All right. Okay. All right. All right. Byebye.
[26:51] » Are we done? I think Mark was >> Mark was here for a second.
[26:57] » Oh,
[27:00] is he still out here?
[27:17] » Was he out there?
[27:22] here.
[27:25] » Take care. Have a good weekend. >> Yep.
[27:29] » Okay. >> You said he was out there.
[27:31] » I didn't see him. >> He had something to bring to us.
[27:37] » You calling? >> Yeah.
[27:38] » All right.
[27:41] [snorts]
[27:59] Come back.
[28:03] All right, that'll work. All right, bye. He'll be here in a minute. Bathroom.
[28:10] You're like a jerk. >> I knew he was standing. I saw I saw him
[28:16] come in.
[28:32] » [snorts]
[30:42] » Got cold last night. >> It got cold last.
[30:45] » Yeah, cold. Now it's supposed to warm up now. Next week, have another little day
[30:50] or two. [clears throat] Waiting for the snow.
[31:00] We need one good snow.
[31:57] » [snorts]
[32:44] » Good.
[32:49] » Huh?
[32:52] » It's on.
[32:56] » It says it is.
[33:01] » I don't know.
[33:05] » [clears throat]
[33:12] » Hey, like your new LPC.
[33:18] » He's a mighty cranky old man.
[33:24] » You think he's qualified? >> I think he's over. [clears throat]
[33:29] » He's definitely got resume. He reminded me of Todd Shy. That's who. And he came
[33:36] from a libraryman. >> Really?
[33:38] » Let me tell you something. Pretty well know what they're talking about.
[33:43] » Anyways, >> yes,
[33:45] » we had our lovely state meeting yesterday
[33:48] and we need to fix our budget. [laughter]
[33:52] » So, we have the flood plane in there. It just says flood pl, but it doesn't say
[33:57] flood plane personnel expenses.
[34:01] The problem that with that, well, the reason they wanted to say that they
[34:05] wanted to ensure that we're not using the EM money, the EPG money to pay
[34:12] flood plane personnel. So, it has to be separated out.
[34:21] I asked why this wasn't a problem in the past and they said, "Well, FEMA is under
[34:26] new leadership and they are cracking down on wasteful spending." So
[34:34] » that's just administrative. That's not something that actually changes your
[34:38] budget. >> So we need to change that from flood
[34:41] planes. We need a flood plane personnel expenses.
[34:48] questions, concerns, motion out.
[34:53] » That's that's that's really something that you just need to come talk to my
[34:56] office about. >> You need to change that. Just shuffle it
[35:02] around.
[35:07] » It's We're just renaming the budget line. It's not
[35:09] » Yeah. I talked to >> Johnson County and Pettis County.
[35:14] Johnson County, they they just have somebody completely different in the
[35:17] county.
[35:20] » And then Pettis County, they contract
[35:26] their flood plane administrator who happens to be their emergency management
[35:30] director, but they have they contract they have a separate contract with her
[35:34] to get around that. So question.
[35:39] So if it's has to say
[35:43] personnel or whatever we've got
[35:48] whatever we've got budgeted for that. >> Yeah.
[35:52] » So would that say it's $1,000 this I guess this I'm asking you right now
[35:58] » there's 1 1500 in >> Okay. So there's 1,500. So that
[36:02] basically for personnel that's going to be their wages. So if you've got to keep
[36:06] it separate and I don't know if you have to do anything with flood plane
[36:13] stuff other than personnel that would have to be kept separate also
[36:18] » right so like >> so you can't use your money for
[36:21] emergency management >> right for so that 1500
[36:25] mainly office supplies in the conference because they have a conference every
[36:29] year but what so >> so
[36:36] I guess I guess what I'm >> I can't use the emergency management
[36:40] like we have postage built into I can't use that postage for
[36:44] » that's let's see and that's that >> we have we have to keep it separate
[36:47] » so then the 15 so what you're gonna I guess Amy I'm asking you what you're
[36:53] going to do is you're going to take that 1500 but it will be all of it under
[36:57] personnel or is it gonna you see what I'm saying because I don't know how
[37:02] » I I don't have a copy of it in front of me. So, I can't see exactly what's where
[37:06] and where he needs it to be, but it's something we can figure out.
[37:09] » Okay. Okay. >> I I It sounds like it just needs to be
[37:14] named differently, which really isn't like an amendment. It's just a
[37:20] » Okay. >> I think it's I think it sounds like
[37:23] fairly minor thing, but I would have to look into it.
[37:27] » We're not going any more statements. >> Huh? [laughter]
[37:31] » We decide we're not going to do more state. We're just gonna play dumb.
[37:40] That
[37:43] was our big thing yesterday.
[37:49] » I'll come visit you or we wait till Kelly comes back or is she gone?
[37:53] » She's at a meeting and they're supposed to be at a meeting right now.
[37:56] » They only came in to sign bills and then got
[37:59] » Oh, sorry. [snorts] I entertain a motion.
[38:03] » I'll make a motion to adjourn. >> I'll second that motion made and second
[38:08] to adjurnn. All in favor say I. >> I.
[38:11] » We just come up to sign checks. >> I'm trying to save you from going to
[38:14] your next meeting. >> I'll be there for
[38:20] I took at least five minutes of that meeting for you.
[38:24] Mine's after yours.