[0:01] All right. I'd like to call the meeting of the city of huber heights, property maintenance review board order.

[0:08] madam secretary, would you please call the roll? All right,

[0:12] ms. Kromer? Here. Mr. Darren? Here. Ms. Hess?

[0:17] mr. Roberts? Here. Mr. Vaughn? Mr.

[0:21] shack. Man madoff. Here. Mr. Winkler here. And

[0:25] I did hear from the other two that they would not be here.

[0:30] okay. So if

[0:34] there's no objection without objection, I will accept

[0:38] the agenda for tonight's meeting. So

[0:42] approved. Alright. In accordance to the rules,

[0:46] I need to swear in whoever is speaking tonight. Mr. Lar,

[0:50] would you raise your right hand? You need to hold

[0:55] on. We're gonna back up. I need a motion to approve. Oh, I thought just

[0:59] speaking it was good. Alright. I need a motion to approve the agenda

[1:04] from july the 10th, or I'm sorry, for this evening,

[1:09] I believe we approve the agenda. Okay. I second. Okay. We don't have to

[1:13] take a vote. No vote. That's it. Okay. Now in accordance, we

[1:17] swear in. Yeah. And I shall ask,

[1:21] let's see. Do you hereby swear or affirm on a

[1:26] threat of perjury to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help you god? I

[1:30] do. Alright. Thank you.

[1:36] alright. And I see there is no pending business. So we'll

[1:41] get right into our new business, which is our first

[1:45] case. Tonight is pmrb case 25 dash 24.

[1:49] property owner gault property holdings. Llc is in violation

[1:54] of section 1313 of the property maintenance code at property. Located

[1:58] at 57 37 harshman mill road.

[2:03] mr. Chairman, thank you. Good evening. Good everyone glad you're here. Good

[2:07] evening. Give jerry just a moment to catch up. I really apologize.

[2:11] this just isn't working greatly. Yeah. So we're, we wanna make

[2:15] sure you get to see the, the photos. Okay.

[2:20] property at 5 7 3 7 harshman road is in violation

[2:25] of city code pertaining to junk stored on the property under a carport.

[2:31] this consists of discarded doors and drywall section

[2:35] 13, 13 0 4 states. All permissible items stored

[2:40] outside must be in good condition and usable as intended

[2:44] by the manufacturer. No such items that are broken,

[2:48] dilapidated, or discarded shall be stored outside. Inspection,

[2:53] verifies the property does not meet the standard set forth in the code, therefore the

[2:57] property is in violation. Your attached case review illustrates the

[3:01] violation process and non-compliance of the property.

[3:05] the city's zoning letter mailed to the owner of record have not been

[3:09] returned. There has been no communication from the owner to the code enforcement

[3:13] office. Tax records shows property

[3:17] taxes are traditionally paid. If declared a nuisance by

[3:21] the board, the property will be abated by the city's contractor. Any costs

[3:26] incurred by the city will be invoiced to the property owner. Staff

[3:30] recommendation is as follows, the board to declare the property a nuisance,

[3:35] the board orders staff to have the city contractor abate the property.

[3:39] if so ordered, the city contractor will bring the property into compliance by removal

[3:44] of nuisance. Alright,

[3:48] thank you. Anyone have any questions?

[3:53] looks, this is probably a rental home. Not sure sir.

[3:57] uh, we assume there's at least been some remodeling

[4:01] done, but we're not sure what the status is of the occupant,

[4:06] whether it's unoccupied or not. You have anything from anyone in regards to

[4:10] this one? No. Nothing.

[4:14] alright. Do anyone else have a question?

[4:19] entertain a motion please. You, you'll make a motion to

[4:23] declare the property a nuisance and have the city abate it.

[4:27] I have a second. Second.

[4:31] and vote please. Alright. Mr. Darren? Yes. Mr.

[4:35] sch mangrove. Yes. Mr. Kromer? Yes. Mr. Roberts?

[4:40] yes. Mr. Winkler? Yes. Passes five to zero. Alright.

[4:45] motion carries for pmrb case 25 dash 24.

[4:52] the next case is pmrb case 25 dash 25.

[4:58] wg dome is in violation of section 1313

[5:02] of the property maintenance code at property located at 65 38

[5:07] glen ivy drive.

[5:12] just wanted to let you get a full view of the

[5:16] property. So the property at 6 5 3 8

[5:21] glen ivy is on via violation of city code

[5:25] pertaining to many miscellaneous items stored throughout the yard.

[5:31] there is also substantial trimming of vegetation needed.

[5:35] the house is unoccupied and apparently visited on rare occasions by the owner

[5:39] who now lives elsewhere. This has been a nuisance property for years.

[5:44] it has previously been before this board section

[5:48] 13, 13 0 4 states. All permissible items stored

[5:52] outside must be in good condition and usable as intended by the

[5:56] manufacturer. New as such. Items that are broken, dilapidated

[6:01] or discarded shall be stored outside inspection

[6:05] verifies the property does not meet the standard set forth in the code. Therefore the

[6:09] property is in violation. Your attached case review illustrates the

[6:13] violation process and non-compliance of the property.

[6:17] city zoning letters mailed to the owner of record have not been returned.

[6:21] there's been no communication from the owner to the code enforcement office.

[6:27] additionally, the posting was placed on the front door advising my intent

[6:31] to bring the property to this board. The posting is attached

[6:35] to the report file. That tax record shows property taxes

[6:40] are traditionally paid. If declared a nuisance by the board, the

[6:44] property will be abated by the city's contractor. Any costs incurred by the city

[6:48] will be invoiced to the property owner. Staff recommendation as

[6:52] this follows the board declare the property a nuisance. The board offers

[6:56] staff to have the state contractor abate the property. If

[7:00] so ordered, the city contractor will bring the property into compliance by removal

[7:04] of the nuisance. This will include removal of all items regardless of

[7:08] the condition and trimming of all vegetation. Um,

[7:14] additionally, I had the zoning officer go by today. There's been no improvement at the

[7:18] property. Okay. Okay.

[7:22] anyone have a question? Mr.

[7:27] lar, can you tell me when the last time it was brought to us?

[7:31] you said it's been before, it has been before the board.

[7:36] this will be a guess on my, I would say a couple of years ago. Same thing?

[7:41] same thing. Pretty much. And, um, yes. And the,

[7:45] at that time the owner was living there. There was a language barrier.

[7:49] uh, had a zoning officer last year that was working

[7:53] with her. He's no longer with us, but trying to

[7:58] move her along. Um, she would make some very slight improvements

[8:02] to the front yard. Uh, vietnamese

[8:06] lady, culturally quite different from us as far as what

[8:10] you do in your yard or don't do. Right. And, uh,

[8:14] he worked with or to no avail. And uh, we've had a couple

[8:18] of very concerned neighbors. One living next door as you can imagine. Right. So

[8:23] enough's enough where, you know, we're not even looking to see if the,

[8:27] the garden tools that are being stored outside our

[8:31] serviceable or not. We're taking everything that's not bolted down.

[8:36] is that including the bags of soil I saw on the picture as well, sir. Is

[8:40] that including the bags of soil? Soil I saw on the pictures? Yep. Because you're not supposed to

[8:44] store anything in the front yard according to our outdoor storage and use

[8:49] code, regardless of what it is or what is intended to use sis.

[8:53] so we'll take, we'll take everything.

[8:57] I was just curious as to, nobody's

[9:02] complained for two years or oh no, no. We, I get calls periodically.

[9:08] the problem is there would be a little bit of an improvement. The zoning

[9:12] officer who was working with her, um,

[9:17] I believe gave her too much time. It was too considerate.

[9:22] and sometimes you just enough's enough. We're

[9:27] we're there that this as a repeat offender so to speak? Uh, yes. Absolutely. Yeah.

[9:31] we've been to this property many times. Not this bad

[9:35] before. It comes before us. Well we're, we're hoping that since she is

[9:39] no longer living at the property, 'cause she had been previously living there,

[9:44] um, that once we clear all of this up, clean up all of this yard

[9:48] mess, all of the vegetation that we will have this occur again.

[9:52] but we'll be watching it, believe me. Okay. Alright. Cool.

[9:56] thanks. Anybody else

[10:02] have a motion please? I move for the property of nuisance and have staff

[10:07] abate it and I second, I'll second that. Okay.

[10:12] then we'll have a vote please. Mr. Kromer? Yes.

[10:17] mr. Shack. Madoff. Yes. Mr. Darren? Yes. Mr. Roberts?

[10:22] yes. Mr. Winkler? Yes. Object to zero five to zero. Motion

[10:26] carries for pmrb case 25 dash 25.

[10:31] next case is pmrb case 25 dash 26. The

[10:35] property owner silver bears real estate is in violation of section 1189

[10:40] of the property maintenance code at property located at 76 31

[10:45] dash or through 77 77 old troy pike.

[10:50] yeah. Mr. Chairman board members of the property also known as

[10:54] wayne town za, is in violation of city code as it pertains

[10:58] to sign maintenance. The south facade of the old

[11:03] troy pike multi-tenant sign that's a large one out by the road

[11:07] is so deteriorated that the wayne town letters have actually peeled away from

[11:11] the facade. They're also birds living in it. So, uh, section

[11:15] 11 89 0 4 states every sign whether

[11:19] requiring a sign permit or not, shall be maintained in a safe, presentable,

[11:24] and good structural condition at all times, including replacement

[11:28] of a defective part, painting, cleaning, and other acts

[11:32] required for the maintenance of the sign. Inspection verifies

[11:36] the property does not meet the standards set forth in the code, therefore the property is

[11:41] in violation. Your attached case review illustrates the violation

[11:45] process and non-compliance of the property. The attached photo shows

[11:49] the deterioration city's own letters mailed to the owner

[11:53] of record have not been returned. There has been recent communication

[11:57] from the owner of the code enforcement office. The owner's

[12:02] representative states they have contracted with a signed company to make repairs,

[12:06] but this is after months of no communication nor

[12:10] action regarding this violation. The tax record shows

[12:14] property taxes are traditionally paid. If declared a nuisance by the

[12:18] board, the property will be abated by the city staff. Recommendation

[12:23] is as follows. The board declare the property a nuisance. The board orders

[12:27] staff to have the city abate the property. If so ordered,

[12:31] the city will bring the property into compliance by removal of the nuisance. This

[12:35] will involve obtaining quotes from signed vendors to determine the price

[12:40] for making the needed repair and moving forward with repairs. Now

[12:44] this report was written for last month's meeting. I

[12:48] have an update. Uh, the sign face that was there has been removed,

[12:53] completely removed. The uh, owner

[12:58] has contracted with fast signs, a signed company in

[13:02] huber heights. Spoke with them today because I

[13:06] had issued a permit for it. And they currently have the production

[13:11] done in their, uh, in their building.

[13:15] but they have to attach clips because they have to reattach

[13:19] the sign panel. So it's ready to go back up as soon as they, everything's

[13:24] fastened. And it will be a nicer sign 'cause it'll have led lighting in inside.

[13:28] so, uh, what if you would look at it today, you would see

[13:32] that panel is gone. The one that says wayne town, it's empty and that's the reason

[13:37] why. So there, there in my report.

[13:41] so you're saying it's in the midst of being repaired? Yes.

[13:45] I talked, talked to the sales rep at, uh, fast signs who I deal with on

[13:49] a regular basis. She went back to their manufacturing area and said

[13:54] yes, it's back there. We're just waiting for the tip, the clips to

[13:58] be attached so we can reattach it to the sign

[14:02] once we have the led lighting in place. So

[14:07] she's telling me by the end of october it should be in place.

[14:13] um, and so my question is, you still want to, your recommendation

[14:17] is still declare a nuisance and have it abated when it's in the process or

[14:22] do we yes. Would you recommend no? Yes.

[14:26] so she told me today we are gonna finish this up when we get

[14:30] paid by the, by the customer. She was going to

[14:34] contact the customer and verify that the check's in the mail,

[14:38] for lack of a better word, I have not heard back from her. So I'm going to go on the

[14:42] premise. This is still a violation. This is still in the work. So

[14:46] yes. Declare it a nuisance. Order me to have it abated. I'll handle the

[14:51] abatement with the signed contractor. 'cause I'm quite certain it's

[14:55] going to be taken care of. But I don't think we make an exception to this case just because

[14:59] we have a promise of them fixing it. 'cause it's

[15:03] not fixed as of the date of the meeting. Okay,

[15:07] fair enough. That makes questioning, that makes sense to

[15:11] me. Alright, anybody

[15:15] else have any questions? Alright, uh,

[15:20] question. Okay, you have a motion please.

[15:24] I'll make a motion to declare the property a nuisance and to have the city contractor abate

[15:28] the property. Alright. And a second. Second,

[15:35] and then a vote, please. Mr. Roberts? Yes. Ms. Cromer?

[15:39] yes. Mr. Shack. Madoff. Yes. Mr. Darren?

[15:43] yes. Mr. Winkler? Yes. All

[15:47] right. Motion carries for pmrb case 25 dash 26.

[15:54] nick case is pm rrb 25 dash 28

[16:03] property owner susan gordon is in violation of section 1313 of the

[16:07] property maintenance code at property located at 71 58 mandrake

[16:11] drive. Excuse me. Yes sir.

[16:15] the property at 71 58 manda mandrake drive is

[16:19] in violation of city code as it pertains to exterior maintenance

[16:24] of the house. The vacant house has several issues that are abundantly

[16:28] clear, falling, softening, deteriorated, garage

[16:33] door molding, loose downspouts and mold on the siding

[16:37] section 13 13 0 4 states. The exterior of a structure

[16:42] shall be maintained at good repair, structurally sound, and san

[16:46] sanitary. So as not to pose a threat to the public health, safety, or welfare,

[16:51] the owner shall keep the exterior of all premises and every structure there

[16:55] on in good repair. All exterior surfaces shall be maintained

[17:00] free of conditions, reflective of deterioration or inadequate maintenance.

[17:04] maintenance inspection verifies the property does

[17:08] not meet the standards set forth in the code. Therefore, the property is in violation.

[17:13] your attached case review review illustrates the violation process

[17:18] and non-compliance of the property. The attached photo shows negligence

[17:22] and deterioration city's owner enter may for the owner

[17:26] of record have not been returned. There has been no communication

[17:30] from the owner to the code enforcement office. The tax record shows

[17:35] property taxes are traditionally pla paid if declared a nuisance by

[17:39] the board or the property will be abated by the city. Any costs incurred

[17:43] by the city will be invoiced to the property owner. Staff.

[17:47] recommendation is is as follows, the board declare the property a nuisance.

[17:52] the board orders staff to have the city abate to the property. If so ordered,

[17:56] the city will bring the property into compliance. By removable of nuisance,

[18:01] the city's contractor will make any necessary repairs to bring the

[18:05] property into a proper state of exterior maintenance.

[18:11] thank you. Are those windows broken?

[18:16] a couple of 'em. Yes sir. Or is it just a reflection? I think it's a combination of, I

[18:20] think you have both situations there. Okay.

[18:27] any idea if the owner is deceased or not? No idea sir.

[18:36] anybody else have any questions?

[18:42] alright. I obtain a motion. Please make a motion

[18:46] to declare the property of nuisance and have staff abate it. Alright, second,

[18:51] second. And vote please. Ms. Kromer?

[18:56] yes. Mr. Darren? Yes. Mr. Shack man.

[19:00] rob? Yes. Mr. Roberts? Yes. Mr. Winkler? Yes.

[19:05] motion carries for pmrb case 25 dash 28.

[19:10] next case is pm rrb 25 dash 30. The property owner,

[19:15] shirley criswell, is in violation of section 1313 of the property maintenance

[19:19] code. The property located at 59 0 1 pennywell

[19:23] drive. Yes sir. The property at 59 0 1

[19:28] pennwell is in violation of city code as it

[19:32] pertains to the maintenance of the landscaping. Specifically

[19:36] noxious weeds not being trimmed and removed from the property, particularly along

[19:41] the house and fence line's. Looks like that picture might

[19:45] be a little over scanned. I can't kidding. Take my word for it.

[19:49] the sky's really. There we go. There we go. And go to

[19:54] the other side. Jerry, bring the house the other way. I'm sorry other way.

[19:59] there we go. Holy goodness. Section

[20:04] 13 13 0 4 h four states. All land shall be

[20:08] properly maintained with lawns, hedges, bushes, trees, and other vegetation

[20:13] to be trimmed and kept from becoming overgrown and unsightly. Where exposed to

[20:17] public view or such vegetation may constitute a

[20:21] lighting influence on adjoining property inspection. Verifies

[20:25] the property does not meet the standards set forth in the code. Therefore,

[20:29] the property's in violation city's own letters mailed to the owner

[20:33] of record have not been returned. There has been no communication to the owner to the code

[20:37] enforcement office. Tax records show property

[20:41] taxes are traditionally paid. If declared a nuisance by the board,

[20:46] the property will be abated by the city. Any costs incurred

[20:50] by the city will be invoiced to the property staff. Recommendation

[20:54] is as follows, the board declare the property a nuisance. The board orders

[20:58] staff to have the city abate the property. If so ordered, the city will bring the

[21:02] property in compliance by removal of the nuisance.

[21:07] if you have any questions, you may have answered this already, but

[21:11] is the property vacant? No. No, no. Just ignored

[21:18] all. Any other questions? Anyone?

[21:22] alright. Entertain a motion please. I make a motion to

[21:26] declare the property a nuisance and have the city abate it. Alright,

[21:31] second. Second. Unanim a vote please.

[21:35] alright, mr. Shack madoff. Mr. Darren? Yes.

[21:39] mr. Roberts? Yes. Mr. Kromer? Yes. Mr. Winkler? Yes.

[21:45] motion carries for pmrb case 25 dash

[21:49] three zero. Mr. Chairman, I realize

[21:53] the same thing gets said over and over and over in these case reviews,

[21:58] but for the records, I think we need to, we need to make that

[22:02] same statement with each case. That's why you hear the same

[22:07] verbiage in each, in each case. So it seems unnecessary, but I

[22:11] I think it probably is necessary for legal records. Yeah, I agree.

[22:17] alright, next case is pmrb case 25 dash 31.

[22:21] the property owner, danny caldwell, is in violation of section

[22:26] 1313 of the property maintenance code located at property.

[22:30] uh, look property located at 62 19 apache street. The

[22:34] picture does tell the story here.

[22:39] the property at 62 19 apache street is a violation of the city's outdoor

[22:43] storage code. Numerous junk and discarded

[22:47] items have accumulated on this property. The property has

[22:51] been a nuisance for years and has appeared before this board. Previously.

[22:57] we've also done numerous trash abatements at the property, which don't require

[23:01] board hearings. Uh, there are, uh,

[23:05] as stated, uh, section 13 13 0 4 states.

[23:09] any items a user stored outside of an enclosed building or structure

[23:13] shall be limited to items manufactured for, intended for

[23:18] or customarily used in outboard environments. No items

[23:22] manufactured for, intended for or customarily stored or used

[23:26] indoors may be placed or stored outside. Lawn

[23:30] and power equipment must be kept in the backyard even when used on a regular

[23:34] basis. All permissible items stored outside must be in

[23:38] good condition and usable is intended by the manufacturer.

[23:43] no such items that are broken, dilapidated or discarded shall be

[23:47] stored outside. Investigate, inspection, verifies the

[23:52] property does not meet the standards set forth in the code. Therefore the property is in

[23:56] violation. You attach case review illustrates the violation process

[24:00] and noncompliance of the property. The attached photo shows

[24:04] the items stored on the property as of august 19th, 2025.

[24:10] it has been, reinspected has not gotten any better. City

[24:14] zoning later made. The owner of record have not been returned.

[24:18] there has been no communication from the owner occupant to the code enforcement

[24:23] officer. While the listed owner has been deceased for several years,

[24:27] his son occupies their property and has been spoken to by an

[24:31] officer and is well aware of the violation. His normal

[24:35] practice is let the city clean up the property as he knows fees will be

[24:39] accessed to property taxes. The tax record

[24:44] shows property taxes are not traditionally paid. They are years in

[24:48] arrears. If declared a nuisance by the board, the property will be

[24:52] abed by the city. Any costs incurred by the city will be invoiced

[24:56] to the property. Enter staff recommendation is as follows, the board

[25:00] declare their property a nuisance. The board orders staff to have the city

[25:05] abate the property. If so ordered, the city will bring their property in compliance

[25:09] by removal of the nuisance.

[25:14] so I think you may have partially answered this already, but I know this has been before our board several times before

[25:18] the both the name and the address sound familiar to my years. Yes. Um,

[25:22] essentially the same thing keeps happening. It is, it is picked up and then trash is new. Trash

[25:27] is thrown out there essentially. He, so it's a, it is an unfortunate

[25:31] situation. The, the person who lives there is the son of the owner. He is disabled

[25:36] in a couple of different ways now physically as well.

[25:41] um, he will go to

[25:45] properties. This is in the miami villa's development, which is down off rip

[25:49] rap road. Yep. He'll go around the development cleaning people's yards

[25:53] up for remuneration. Um,

[25:58] and then just brings it home and dumps it on his property. And

[26:02] he knows at some point we will come by and say,

[26:07] I'm gonna get it cleaned up. Nothing ever happens. It's, it's a repeat.

[26:11] he's lived there before with no electricity in that area. That means no water

[26:15] because they're on wells. So we've had issues before at

[26:19] that property,

[26:23] um, where there were five gallon buckets being used

[26:28] for purposes that they're not

[26:32] intended to. That had to be removed. And we have been notifications from the board of health at

[26:37] that time. So this, as long as this man is living

[26:41] there, we'll be dealing with this property. We have to go in occasionally

[26:45] and just clean it up. And that's where we are at this time.

[26:50] and he knows we will. And he's, he knows that we will send a bill

[26:55] and he knows he has no money to pay it. So it'll go onto the property taxes. And

[26:59] because of where this is and the net worth of that property

[27:03] to begin with, the taxes are probably already

[27:08] owed on it or more than what the property's worth in all likelihood. Yes. So,

[27:12] and we don't want, that's not a property that I'm interested in

[27:16] the city taking possession of and tearing down because of what I'm afraid

[27:21] we might find inside as far as the condition of the

[27:25] property and the sanitary conditions and so forth. So we're going to continue to

[27:30] clean it up until such a time as is goes away naturally,

[27:34] if, if you understand what I mean. Mm-hmm . And giving the amount back

[27:38] property taxes is, is any likelihood the county might foreclose on it eventually?

[27:43] um, I, we could probably have it reevaluated on though. I'm

[27:47] guessing the property since it's been in this relative condition for years,

[27:51] as long as I've worked here that it's probably,

[27:55] I would imagine the taxes at least equal or outweigh.

[28:00] I'd have to look through the folder here. The, the tax records are in your, in

[28:04] your reports. But, uh, it, it may be something we wanna look

[28:08] at in the future. So there about 10 k less than the auditor's value looks like.

[28:13] yeah. So my guess is that the auditor went by there and looked

[28:17] at it right now, I don't know if the condition on the outside would make a difference.

[28:21] probably the clutter probably would not make a difference at the property value. It would

[28:26] be a matter of if it had, you know, if the, if it had been partially burned,

[28:30] something like that, that really made it unlivable.

[28:36] you don't do anything with like, uh, I know you as far as evading

[28:40] the property, you go and remove all the junk and stuff that's in the yard.

[28:44] do anything about cleaning the house, the front of the house, washing it down from

[28:48] the mold or anything like that? Or is that the owner's responsibility? I mean as far as

[28:52] I'm concerned, that's the owner's responsibility. Um,

[28:57] at this point in this situation, getting the yard cleaned

[29:01] up and getting all the junk removed,

[29:05] uh, is I think what a priority should be. It's

[29:09] not saying we couldn't spray down the house with, um, a

[29:14] deterrent that would kill it. Sim you know, something that will just eventually

[29:18] cause all the stuff to die. But, but cleaning or

[29:22] spraying a house is something I'm not sure the city's I got. It is,

[29:26] you know what I mean? Yeah, yeah. I was just curious if never been

[29:31] done, but not to my knowledge. Okay. I noticed one of the, uh, gutters

[29:35] like it's hanging. Is that included in this or is this just the junk? Um,

[29:39] I think that we better leave that. At least there's a gutter.

[29:44] so yeah, it's hanging down. That's certainly not the worst of the problems

[29:48] of that property. No. My, my primary concern, the impact

[29:52] this is having on the neighbors 'cause they've been living around this gentleman for years. Everybody

[29:57] knows him is getting the yard cleaned up again.

[30:02] cool. Interesting. Anybody else have any

[30:06] questions, comments? Alright,

[30:10] entertain a motion please. I'll make a motion to declare the

[30:14] property new since and have the ct contractor abate it. Okay. Have

[30:19] a second. Second. And vote please.

[30:23] mr. Darin? Yes. Mr. Roberts? Yes.

[30:27] ms. Kromer? Yes. Mr. Shack. Madoff. Yes. Mr. Winkler?

[30:32] yes. Motion carries pmrb case 25 dash 31.

[30:38] uh, next case is pmrb case 25 dash

[30:42] 32. The property owner isha jones

[30:46] is in violation of section 1313 of the property maintenance code. That

[30:50] property located at 61 33 faulkland avenue

[30:55] answer the property at 61 33. Faulkland drive is in violation

[30:59] of city code as it pertains to maintenance of gutters and downspouts.

[31:03] the entire front section of spouting has become disconnected from the house and

[31:07] must be repaired or removed. Spouting is not a requirement,

[31:12] but if installed it must be property maintained. Section

[31:17] 13 13 0 4 states the exterior of a structure shall

[31:21] be maintained in good repair, structurally sound and sanitary. So as not

[31:25] to pose a threat to the public health, safety or welfare.

[31:29] the owner shall keep the exterior of all premises and every structure there on in good

[31:34] repair. All exterior surfaces shall be maintained free

[31:38] of conditions, reflective of deterioration or inadequate

[31:42] maintenance inspection. Verifies the property does not meet the

[31:46] standards set forth in the code. Therefore the property is in violation.

[31:50] you attach case review illustrates the violation process and non-compliance

[31:55] of the property. The attached photo shows negligence and deterioration.

[31:59] city zoning letters mailed to the owner record have not been returned. There

[32:04] has been no communication from the owner to the code enforcement office. The

[32:08] tax record shows property taxes are traditionally paid. If

[32:12] declared a nuisance by the board, the property will be abated by the ci by the city.

[32:17] any costs incurred by the city will be invoiced to the property

[32:21] owner. Staff recommendation is the board declare the property a

[32:25] nuisance. The board order staff to have the city abate to the property.

[32:30] if so, order, the city will bring the property into compliance by removal of the

[32:34] nuisance. The city's contractor will make the repair needed to reattach

[32:39] the spouting. We're not going to remove it, we're going to reattach it.

[32:46] alright. Questions? Anyone?

[32:51] we have a motion please. I move the

[32:55] third property of nuisance and have staff abate it. Second. I'll second that

[33:00] and a vote please. Mr. Shack. Mangrove? Yes. Ms.

[33:04] kromer? Yes. Mr. Darren? Yes. Mr. Roberts?

[33:08] yes. Mr. Winkler? Yes. Five to zero. Alright. Pmr case

[33:12] 25 dash 32. Motion is carried.

[33:17] and I see we don't have any additional business for tonight. That was our last case.

[33:23] and without objection, the minutes of july the 10th, 2025 pmr

[33:27] beating pmr beating meeting is approved.

[33:31] no objections. It's been approved. So I guess our next meeting

[33:35] then is oct or november the 13th. So I can

[33:39] tell you that the november meeting will still be here at this city

[33:43] hall. The december meeting will probably be at the new building,

[33:47] but that's not confirmed just yet. They are scheduling like an open house.

[33:52] I hope you all come. That's gonna be a little bit before that. A couple days before that. So

[33:56] in november? Uh in december. Oh december. Okay. So we're all getting kind

[34:00] of excited. Okay. I'm ready to, will we be the first board to meet there?

[34:04] of course not. Um, council will be the first. Those are the other reasons. Ceremonial

[34:09] meeting with city council. I'm sure council will be first. Um, bza usually meets before

[34:13] you guys do, but they meet before council also so they'll

[34:17] get missed. So it might be you guys after council. Awesome.

[34:21] cool. Yeah. Alright. That's when the open house is gonna be at.

[34:26] yeah. I think the open house is the ninth. No, but they're

[34:30] supposed to be getting something out. Perfect. There you go. Alright.

[34:35] anything else? If not, I'll entertain a motion to adjourn.

[34:39] do we adjourn? We are so adjourned. Thank you all.

Oct 09, 2025 Property Maintenance Review Board

Agenda

Transcript