Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:04]
All righty. Let's see if we can get up.
And I don't know if y'all will be able
[0:08]
to see it or not. That'll tell us
whether or not we're uh the public's
[0:12]
going to be able to see it or not. Our
internet's down. Our web page is down.
[0:16]
» Is that what this is for?
[1:00]
We're up.
All right.
[1:05]
We're up. Uh, good morning everyone.
Today is Tuesday, November 4th, 2025.
[1:11]
It's now 10:01. We're here for a special
session of the Hunt County
[1:15]
Commissioner's Court. At this time, I'll
call the meeting to order. And we have
[1:19]
Commissioner Money, Monroe, Smith, and
Harrison Pres. Present. I'm Judge
[1:24]
Stovoff presiding over the meeting
today. At this time, we'll have public
[1:28]
testimonies.
Uh speakers are limited to three minutes
[1:31]
and should conduct themselves in a civil
manner. The commissioner's court cannot
[1:36]
take action on items not listed on the
agenda in accordance with the Texas
[1:40]
Opens Meetings Act. Concerns will be
addressed by county staff. They may be
[1:45]
placed on a future agenda or addressed
by some other course response. Is there
[1:50]
anybody
I know our web page is down so
[1:55]
» it's emailed in?
>> Okay. All right. Anybody here wish to
[2:01]
speak?
Being none, I'll close the public
[2:05]
testimony. Uh at this time,
uh we have no old business, no new
[2:11]
business consent. We'll go to B under
new business action items. Approval of
[2:18]
accounts payable.
[2:23]
» Second.
>> Got a motion second. All in favor say I.
[2:26]
» All opposed.
>> Motion carries. Approval of budget
[2:30]
amendments.
>> Make a motion to approve budget
[2:32]
amendments.
>> Second.
[2:34]
» Got a motion second. All in favor say I.
>> I.
[2:37]
» All opposed.
Motion carries. Uh at this time we're
[2:42]
going to move move to item number two
and we're going to go into executive
[2:48]
session under 571 071.
>> 551 071 and 074.
[2:56]
» 551 071 and 074.
>> Yes.
[3:00]
» Okay. At this time we're going into
executive session under 551074
[3:05]
and 71. I'll ask everybody to leave the
courtroom except for HR and Chris and
[3:13]
the for work.
[1:19:10]
We don't need any.
>> Okay.
[1:19:17]
» All right. We got
[1:19:24]
» Oh, well, I thought you were checking it
earlier.
[1:19:26]
» Oh,
[1:19:30]
okay. Well, I hope we're back up. It's
11:21. We're back in regular session. Uh
[1:19:36]
under action item number one in budget
fiscal year 2627.
[1:19:41]
Commissioner, we talked about uh getting
a plan together, talk about reviewing
[1:19:47]
some of uh our procedures and all uh
before we get into next year's budget.
[1:19:54]
So we uh Gary, you have you passed all
yours out or
[1:20:13]
This was nothing more than just a start
conversation.
[1:20:36]
When when we had
when when we had gone through the budget
[1:20:42]
process, we were we were talking about
how to prepare for for next year, you
[1:20:47]
know, starting today. uh you know
looking at you know various types of
[1:20:51]
cost and things like that and and um
what we could do to prepare ourselves
[1:20:56]
today so that we're not having a fire
drill you know whenever we hit you know
[1:21:01]
June of next summer and start the
process again as far as what what the
[1:21:04]
costs were. Uh I believe Commissioner
Monroe had asked for this meeting just
[1:21:10]
to make sure that we were you know
headed down headed down a path uh and to
[1:21:15]
start trying to get everybody rowing in
the same direction. So, so what I I put
[1:21:20]
in front of you, you gentlemen, uh is
just uh things to start the conversation
[1:21:25]
with. These are things that are kind of
overhead in nature. Uh things things
[1:21:30]
that are bigger ticket items. Uh and but
it's truly nothing more than a starting
[1:21:35]
point, but I believe it's things that
that we could set out as a court and say
[1:21:39]
we want to go look at these one, lead
the way, start addressing the the larger
[1:21:44]
ticket items. uh too, but then start
asking the rest of our uh county,
[1:21:49]
whether it's elected officials,
department heads, uh guys that uh you
[1:21:53]
know dump the trash cans, guys that mow
the ditches, whatever it is, and say,
[1:21:57]
"What do you see out there as
opportunities, and we can kind of
[1:22:00]
prioritize those and go look at them uh
overall. So, just to throw out starting
[1:22:05]
points, uh the communications
assessment, that's already underway.
[1:22:09]
That was the free assessment by Spy
Glass. And I believe uh here in the next
[1:22:13]
week or two we're going to kind of get a
a brief on you know where that where
[1:22:18]
that's headed just as opportunity to
look at our our internet our phone usage
[1:22:22]
and uh rate applications and you know
are there opportunities to save there.
[1:22:27]
Um
you know since I've been in the court
[1:22:30]
we've had conversation about enterprise
lease lease you and all those things. Is
[1:22:35]
it good? Is it bad? U I think it's one
of those things it's it's a large ticket
[1:22:39]
item. I think it provides benefit to the
county. Does it still provide the
[1:22:43]
benefit that it was originally intended
to? Uh is there a different structure of
[1:22:47]
that agreement? You know, is there a
different way to approach that? You
[1:22:50]
know, or should we leave it alone? Um
now, what I would do is drop over to the
[1:22:55]
right side on your next steps associated
with that. Uh what what you what you
[1:23:00]
have to do is have an independent team.
You have you have people that like it,
[1:23:03]
you have people that don't like it,
people that use it, people that don't
[1:23:05]
use it, people that understand it,
people that think they understand it. Um
[1:23:10]
uh and and I really think we should we
should go get a team and on that one
[1:23:14]
there ought to be an independent leader.
Someone who doesn't have a a stake a
[1:23:18]
stake in the ground on on on that just
other than is the financial best answer
[1:23:23]
overall. Uh utility cost uh this is one
of those legacy things for me. Uh
[1:23:29]
historically went in I mean I I go to a
lot of rooms a lot of buildings in
[1:23:33]
various places in the county. Uh we
don't we don't have automated sensors.
[1:23:37]
We don't have uh any regulatory on the
on a lot of the HVAC stuff. Uh we don't
[1:23:43]
have LED lights in in a lot of places. U
I won't make this a prior job for me. I
[1:23:49]
actually from result of what I did at
that job. I was talking to another
[1:23:53]
business owner. They went in and much
smaller. I mean this is a you know it's
[1:23:59]
a it's a a small manufacturing facility
employee about less than 100 people.
[1:24:05]
uh they they went in and changed out
everything to LED and it resulted in
[1:24:09]
about $1,000 a month light savings on
the utilities. So just little things
[1:24:13]
where we start just the things that you
do every day that actually run the bills
[1:24:18]
up. uh copier lease agreement. I mean I
mean these things are notorious. Uh they
[1:24:23]
evolve lease companies, copier
companies, they all have different
[1:24:26]
approaches at them. Uh and you also have
all the um horror stories about how
[1:24:31]
expensive things are, you know, where
toner cartridges uh cost more than a new
[1:24:36]
printer for your desktop. I I I'm not
taking that as folk I'm taking that as
[1:24:40]
folklore, but I think we should go
assess those things because it's
[1:24:44]
countywide. um you know the uh other
ideas is the is the key point. That's
[1:24:49]
where we're asking everybody else to go
hey tell us what we do that's stupid you
[1:24:53]
know just to be honest that that's
really the idea and uh and so anyway
[1:24:57]
those were to get started. You guys have
a lot of other things that you know uh
[1:25:01]
but this was just to start a
conversation and and hopefully judge
[1:25:05]
that on these ones that require a group
of people to get together and pull
[1:25:09]
information.
If uh if everybody agreed that those
[1:25:12]
would be good things to do, we could go
slate those off with a with a schedule.
[1:25:16]
I know we're not used to always deadline
and things, but I did the next page put
[1:25:20]
a timeline. If we're going to do
something, we need to do it now. This is
[1:25:23]
about getting new things done
implemented so that next budget season,
[1:25:28]
if you get benefit from them, you can
actually incorporate those into forecast
[1:25:33]
rather than just always using last
year's number.
[1:25:39]
» Okay.
[1:25:43]
questions of him, question comments.
>> I like it.
[1:25:49]
» And so, so rumors don't get going and
stuff because we had talked about this
[1:25:53]
in the last meeting. When you start
talking about budget cuts or looking at
[1:25:57]
ways to operate more efficient, people
automatically think, "Oh, we're about to
[1:26:01]
lose our job or we're going to come in
and cut manpower or whatever." That's
[1:26:06]
not the intentions of these meetings.
the meetings are to is just like
[1:26:10]
Commissioner Smith was saying, we're
looking for ways to be more efficient.
[1:26:14]
Just because we've always done things a
certain way doesn't mean that's always
[1:26:18]
the best or the most efficient way. So,
that's just things that we're wanting to
[1:26:22]
talk about. So, I just kind of wanted to
lay the groundwork on that of people
[1:26:26]
don't have to worry about losing their
jobs. That's what we're not that's not
[1:26:30]
not what our intentions are right now
for that.
[1:26:33]
» I think we also have to look into, you
know, somehow or another
[1:26:38]
you know, how do we direct the elected
officials, the department heads, make
[1:26:42]
sure that they understand kind of
Commissioner Smith, what you were
[1:26:45]
talking about in here. How do they how
do they need to look at their budget
[1:26:49]
going forward as well? What do they need
to be looking for? Ways to cut, ways to
[1:26:53]
reduce, ways to save money as well. Uh
because it's going to it's going to take
[1:26:58]
everybody, department heads and elected
officials to help make this work. Uh we
[1:27:02]
can't just have certain departments
working on this and trying to come up
[1:27:06]
with ways to help us save money. It's
got to be everybody at the county level.
[1:27:14]
» I agree.
>> I agree.
[1:27:19]
» Well, I you know, Gary, I appreciate
what you've done. I think this is a a
[1:27:24]
good start, a good idea to start. It's
uh
[1:27:29]
it's certainly some of the biggest
ticket items we have uh
[1:27:34]
that we we can see some improvement on.
Uh
[1:27:39]
you know, of course, I've always, you
know, complain, fuss, or whatever the
[1:27:46]
right word is about. You know, we all we
got is 100-y old buildings around here
[1:27:49]
we're trying to maintain all the time,
which is extremely difficult. and and
[1:27:54]
with uh you know trying to improve them
is it makes it even more difficult
[1:28:00]
because you you don't have good bones on
a lot of things you're starting with you
[1:28:04]
know one of the things that you know
we've wanted to do for since I've been
[1:28:08]
here is replace the windows at the
courthouse would save us probably more
[1:28:12]
money than all the le LED lights you can
put in but uh the cost number on that
[1:28:17]
thing is so high because of the uh being
a historical building the historical
[1:28:23]
commission is making it so difficult and
expensive that it's going to be millions
[1:28:28]
of dollars to replace or fix the windows
in the courthouse.
[1:28:33]
» They won't let us do a replica of it.
They're going to we're going to have to
[1:28:38]
take it out,
sand it down the frame, replace any part
[1:28:43]
of it or fix it, repaint it back the
original cutter color. And they say they
[1:28:48]
want us to put in the the re original
paints that were in it. Well, I can I've
[1:28:52]
told them over and over I can I can tell
you the first floor there's not original
[1:28:57]
window paint on that first floor.
They've all been broken sometime through
[1:29:00]
the years and probably on a lot of the
other floors. There's probably not any
[1:29:04]
original
pl panes of glass. So, they won't even
[1:29:07]
let us put in energy efficiency
glass.
[1:29:12]
So, that that's another one that's on
the list. Uh you know, Gary, that we can
[1:29:17]
talk about. I don't know how we attack
that deal, but
[1:29:19]
» facilities.
>> Facilities. Yeah, there's, you know,
[1:29:22]
that's one major deal. I know at the
courthouse, I know they've had a program
[1:29:26]
going to replace all of the lights with
LEDs
[1:29:30]
in the courthouse floor by floor. Now, I
don't know how far along that has
[1:29:35]
gotten. I'm pretty sure they've done it
in my office. I don't know if they've
[1:29:39]
done it in the commissioner's office or
not, but
[1:29:41]
» I don't think so.
>> No, still. But I know they they had a
[1:29:43]
program going where they were replacing,
you know, on they had a schedule where
[1:29:47]
they were trying to do so many offices
at a time and put LA. Has your clerk's
[1:29:52]
office been replaced?
>> I think they have.
[1:29:54]
» Yeah, I think some of the courtrooms
have been done and all. So, they've got
[1:29:57]
some of that.
>> Was that all done through facilities?
[1:30:00]
» Yes, they did on their own.
>> Maybe we could ask Commissioner Monroe
[1:30:03]
to ask for a status of that and then
maybe get it expanded across all
[1:30:07]
buildings and
>> Yeah. see where they're at on it cuz I
[1:30:09]
know I know Chris had a plan and they
were working it at one point in time of
[1:30:13]
replacing them
>> uh on some kind of schedule. I just
[1:30:17]
don't remember what that schedule looked
like.
[1:30:21]
Um,
>> I will say on the enterprise side, I've
[1:30:24]
spoken to them and asked them in the
next coming month or so to actually come
[1:30:28]
to court and give us a presentation of
where we started, where we're at, what's
[1:30:34]
benefited us, where we're at
financially, vehicle-wise, and all that.
[1:30:38]
So, everybody has an update on that
program as well. So, hopefully here here
[1:30:43]
pretty soon we'll get them in court and
can can uh look at that presentation.
[1:30:48]
Well, I my com I guess my comment would
be if with them doing that, I think we
[1:30:53]
should get somebody talking to every
department that has the vehicles and see
[1:30:57]
if they're happy with what's going on.
>> Yeah, the the biggest thing on on the
[1:31:01]
enterprise thing is getting a total cost
of ownership. You you you have to you
[1:31:06]
have to get it beyond just the price of
the car. You got to get into the
[1:31:09]
maintenance. You got to get how it's
maintained. Uh you know, there's a fleet
[1:31:12]
management aspect of it, you know. So
making sure that we when we're comparing
[1:31:16]
apples to apples, they're not apples and
oranges. And so because I I there's
[1:31:21]
probably a lot of cost that we gain out
of having that program that if you don't
[1:31:26]
include that, if you didn't have that
program, it's not a fair comparison.
[1:31:29]
That's why I I think that I agree with
you that it's just we we got to make
[1:31:34]
sure we're getting all the cost in or it
looks lopsided,
[1:31:36]
» right? Yeah. And it's uh you know the
there's so many elements to that that it
[1:31:41]
it's'll be it'll be kind of a everybody
may have a different opinion whether
[1:31:48]
it's good or bad because right
>> what's what's important
[1:31:51]
» to somebody might not be important to
somebody else but if it's important it
[1:31:57]
could be really important to to do it.
Uh so we just need to
[1:32:02]
» and there might be some places that it's
the best answer for them, but it's not
[1:32:05]
the best answer for somebody else.
>> It may not be all-encompassing. That's
[1:32:08]
correct. Uh
>> so judge, I guess my my my question from
[1:32:16]
trying to understand how the process
would go in something like this, the the
[1:32:20]
three items there in the middle, you
know, you're really talking about groups
[1:32:23]
of teams that are pulling data, you
know, and compiling things and and
[1:32:26]
information. How do we go about that? Do
we do we appoint names? Do we ask for
[1:32:31]
volunteers? I mean, I
>> I think we'd have to ask for volunteers.
[1:32:35]
And of course, we you know, we can't
have but you know, two people from the
[1:32:38]
court on it.
>> I think a lot of this is outside the
[1:32:40]
court, right? There might be
>> Well, I think you're going to have to
[1:32:42]
have one member of the court at least
give them
[1:32:44]
» a PLC.
>> Give them some leadership, get tell them
[1:32:47]
what we're looking for. May not have to
be involved in all of it, but they're
[1:32:50]
going to have to be some kind of a a
go-to person to answer questions that
[1:32:54]
they have.
>> Yep.
[1:32:56]
So the one that might be controversial,
does anybody have any issue if that if
[1:33:00]
we could uh identify an independent
leader, maybe even not part of the
[1:33:04]
county government
on enterprise?
[1:33:09]
» Sure. I
>> as long as they had a resume that
[1:33:11]
matched the
>> I don't know who that would be off top
[1:33:14]
of my head, but that's a good idea. I
mean,
[1:33:16]
» you got somebody in mind.
>> Well, I I wanted to make sure that the
[1:33:19]
idea was good and then we'll see if we
can bring names to
[1:33:22]
» starts with a J on a lot of this. I
think a lot of times outside vision is
[1:33:27]
better than internal vision sometimes
because you have a different perspective
[1:33:31]
of it and so I think outside source is
great great idea.
[1:33:36]
» I'll check on that one. Like I said that
one I thought is so large and so
[1:33:39]
complicated an independent look might be
the others are the internal expertise is
[1:33:44]
the best.
>> So then you then if you had an outside
[1:33:48]
lead would be leading it. Is that what
you're thinking? Be leading it. So then
[1:33:51]
we had to make sure that his team
members are some that have a lot of
[1:33:55]
insight in their department with the
vehicles and how it operates. Okay.
[1:33:59]
» Absolutely.
>> I think that's all great ideas.
[1:34:04]
» So when you're you're saying on the
18th, are you saying that on the 18th
[1:34:09]
we'll have the the announcement of all
the members?
[1:34:12]
» Here's who it is and and and what and
what their charter is. And then we'll I
[1:34:16]
assume that somebody from the court if
they're not on the team would have to
[1:34:22]
give them some direction or we're going
to have to ask them to come to court to
[1:34:26]
give them the direction from the court
is what are you thinking of that?
[1:34:31]
» Um
I think we could do it either way.
[1:34:34]
Probably the individual uh you know that
gets the intent just so it doesn't
[1:34:38]
become a something tied to a court date.
Um, you know, the the whole thing is
[1:34:43]
like on the enterprise. Well, I guess
the big thing is the court would
[1:34:47]
probably like to see what the charter
would look like, I would imagine.
[1:34:50]
And everybody just be in agreement about
what what it is that's going to be
[1:34:53]
looked at, how they're going to go about
it. So, we would we would need to bring
[1:34:57]
them to court to to say, "Here's what
we're doing. Make sure everybody's on
[1:35:00]
the same page." And that's and that's
really what that 129 date would get you.
[1:35:09]
We identify everybody by the 18th.
Everybody goes and and does
[1:35:12]
Thanksgiving. The the people that were
identified, you know, write down what it
[1:35:16]
is that we're going to go after by 129.
And then we ask them by the end of
[1:35:20]
January there on the 27th to report out
what they found.
[1:35:24]
» Okay.
>> Would you be willing to be the head of
[1:35:27]
that team, Gary?
>> What team's that?
[1:35:31]
» Over the budget team.
>> Oh, just getting this organized for
[1:35:34]
everybody. I'm happy to do that. I'm
happy to do that.
[1:35:39]
I would like any input though on various
people that you know you know have
[1:35:44]
experience in with this or that. Just
make sure
[1:35:47]
» Steve has been the most involved in
enterprise. He understands it probably
[1:35:49]
better than anybody. So
>> I think Steve ought to be
[1:35:54]
» you all right with that Steve?
>> I'm fine.
[1:35:56]
» Yeah.
>> Especially if Gary's got a good
[1:35:58]
recommendation from an outside person to
recommend.
[1:36:03]
But I think you understand the overall
>> workings of it.
[1:36:09]
» I think I can get them into context with
with everybody and all that.
[1:36:13]
» I I think you know it's you know
accounting and how to pull information
[1:36:17]
and data on that. Uh any legal
interpretations on the enterprise lease?
[1:36:22]
You probably have most of that on your
own. Uh I'm sure the sheriff would have
[1:36:26]
an interest in somebody being part of
that if I had to guess.
[1:36:29]
» I would think so.
But Steve's been through a cycle of it
[1:36:34]
where he's had lease, sold them, kept
one, kept one. They recommend not to
[1:36:39]
sell. So he he knows the workings of it.
So he'd be real valuable, I think.
[1:36:45]
» So I I've kind of already started just
as I'm just talking about as far as
[1:36:49]
court PC's. I've already started
obviously on the comm on the
[1:36:53]
communications assessment. I would just
stay tied to that unless somebody wanted
[1:36:58]
to step in and
>> and pick it up where it's at.
[1:37:01]
» Um
the only other one at this point I'm
[1:37:06]
going to say that Commissioner Monroe uh
basically is the the utility cost
[1:37:11]
because that's tied through facilities.
If if if he would be good with that,
[1:37:16]
» that'd be fine.
>> And Darren, I know I know you're you're
[1:37:21]
new to the to the court. uh the the copy
lease. Would would you be interested in
[1:37:26]
doing that? And I would provide any
assistance.
[1:37:28]
» And I I can assist you on that, too.
>> Okay, good deal.
[1:37:31]
» I'll help him cuz
>> Yeah,
[1:37:33]
» I was the one that got started.
>> Help.
[1:37:34]
» Yeah.
>> Yes.
[1:37:35]
» I'm the one that kind of got that
started. So,
[1:37:40]
» I'll kind of tell you where we came from
and what what we've done, what we're
[1:37:43]
looking for.
>> Okay.
[1:37:46]
And so the so the big thing would be for
to to help identify who the uh who the
[1:37:51]
players are that would be on those teams
and then make sure we all understand
[1:37:55]
what we're asking each other to go do.
The big thing on on these teams is is
[1:38:00]
really two questions. Why and what if? I
mean that that's that that's really why
[1:38:05]
do we do it this way? And what if we did
something different? I mean, that that's
[1:38:09]
really what we want to start asking all
of our folks in the county to do is when
[1:38:13]
we when we do something, why do we do it
that way? What if we did it this way?
[1:38:18]
Would it make it better? Would it make
it, you know, more efficient to go do?
[1:38:21]
Just the things we want to start asking
oursel, but we don't want to say ever
[1:38:25]
because that's the way we've always done
it.
[1:38:27]
» Correct.
An example that uh Gary is just a couple
[1:38:31]
things I've dealt with in maintenance
since I've kind of inherited that for a
[1:38:35]
little bit as of now is a lot of things
uh they were I noticed that they were
[1:38:40]
subbing work out a lot and I so I asked
why are we doing this and that's that's
[1:38:45]
the way we've always done it. So I'm I'm
like okay well can our team not do that?
[1:38:51]
Well yeah but we've just always subbed
it out. So I said well let's start doing
[1:38:54]
this this and this in house. I don't
want to put anybody in over their level,
[1:38:59]
you know, skill of level skill, but we
have got a lot of projects taken care of
[1:39:04]
in house and and I imagine that's saved
us a lot of money because we're not
[1:39:09]
subbing out, you know, the work. We're
already paying maintenance guys to be
[1:39:13]
here doing work. And uh so those are
just little things. I was always told
[1:39:18]
you take care of pennies and the dollar
will take care of theirel. And so if we
[1:39:22]
start looking at little things and not
focus so much on the big things all the
[1:39:26]
time. I think that's where we get into a
lot of trouble sometimes. We focus on a
[1:39:31]
we go after the big things and we do
need to take care of big things. But if
[1:39:34]
you take care of the little things and
start there, those little things start
[1:39:37]
adding up and turn into big things. But
I think that's the goal of this whole
[1:39:42]
whole meeting is just to start focusing
on the little things and then let those
[1:39:47]
go into bigger things and just be more
efficient. But that was just one example
[1:39:52]
of like just one thing we changed in the
maintenance department is just start
[1:39:56]
doing things in house and talking about
the why do we do it or what you know
[1:40:01]
what if you know so we went from that's
because we always did it to the what if
[1:40:06]
and we're saving money. So,
>> well, I think something else we also
[1:40:10]
need to look at going forward with this
budget stuff is is department heads as
[1:40:15]
well. uh you know I can't remember how
many departments we actually have or
[1:40:19]
department heads that work under the
court's discretion you know be it
[1:40:24]
veterans or health department it whoever
it is but I think we need to you know
[1:40:29]
somehow break that down as well maybe
amongst commissioners and judge as well
[1:40:33]
but try to try to get uh some more more
appointment there with the department
[1:40:40]
heads so we understand and we have a
point of contact with that department
[1:40:44]
head of what do they really need and
what are they really doing? Uh, you
[1:40:48]
know, and I'm not picking on Ted or the
veterans by any stretch of the means,
[1:40:53]
but I don't know if we if we have
monthly meetings with him or buy by
[1:40:57]
monthly meetings with him and knows
what's going on or, you know, how many
[1:41:01]
veterans are we serving, what are we
doing here or what are we doing there?
[1:41:04]
And I think that's another way that we
might be able to, you know, understand
[1:41:08]
the budget side of it is when they do
come in there with a budget or what they
[1:41:11]
actually do and what what are we
>> what are we paying for?
[1:41:14]
» What are we paying for? Yeah, there you
go. And again, Rodney at the health
[1:41:17]
department, you know, how many
inspections, you know, we don't we don't
[1:41:20]
ever see any of that type stuff. And so,
it's hard for us to understand the
[1:41:24]
budget as well whenever it comes to us.
So I think somewhere along the line
[1:41:29]
maybe we need to sit down and look at
you know Gary take a department and you
[1:41:34]
know the judge and David and Peanut me
you know we I think we all need to look
[1:41:37]
at that as well and have more of a a
more of a direction from the court to
[1:41:43]
the department heads as well and let
them know you know hey this is if you've
[1:41:47]
got a problem or send a reports to us or
something like that as well.
[1:41:52]
» Sound like a good phase two. Yeah,
>> especially if we're going to start
[1:41:56]
moving to a more merit type system, you
know, merit based or goal based and
[1:42:02]
things like that. Though that that would
alignment would help.
[1:42:05]
» Yeah.
>> All right. Anything else? Any other
[1:42:09]
comments?
[1:42:12]
» All right.
[1:42:16]
So, we don't have any action on this uh
other than just organize and to, you
[1:42:21]
know, bring back
>> Yep. you bring bring back the the
[1:42:24]
leaders and and who's going to be on the
teams by the next
[1:42:28]
» Correct. Yep. So, I think everybody's
got their assignment.
[1:42:31]
» I think so.
>> Yep. All right. Daniel, we got anything
[1:42:35]
else?
>> Comments.
[1:42:38]
» Okay. If there's not anything else, uh I
entertain a motion to adjurnn.
[1:42:44]
» Motion.
>> Second.
[1:42:46]
» A motion second. All in favor say I.
>> I.
[1:42:49]
» All opposed. Motion carries. We're
journed at