[0:08] Greetings to everyone. Today

[0:10] Monday, September 28.

[0:12] It is 19:01. Congratulations on

[0:14] next meeting

[0:15] Jamaica City Council.

[0:17] The first point

[0:18] the agenda is

[0:19] request for any

[0:20] urgent additions

[0:21] . Are there any urgent

[0:22] addition? If

[0:24] no, next

[0:25] the point is

[0:26] approval of a number

[0:27] minutes of meetings.

[0:29] The first is

[0:30] approval

[0:31] duty officer's protocol

[0:33] meeting from 14

[0:34] September 2026.

[0:35] Second.

[0:36] Good. I will abstain.

[0:37] I was not there.

[0:38] present. Are there any

[0:39] remark? If

[0:41] no, who is "for", be it

[0:42] Please say "yes."

[0:43] Yes.

[0:43] Perfectly. Thank you.

[0:45] Accepted. Next—

[0:48] approval

[0:49] protocol

[0:49] extraordinary

[0:50] meeting from 1

[0:51] September.

[0:53] Second.

[0:53] Thank you. Everyone who is "in favor"

[0:55] please say "

[0:56] Yes". Yes.

[0:58] The next point

[1:00] the agenda is

[1:01] approval

[1:02] protocol

[1:02] extraordinary

[1:03] meeting from 18

[1:04] September. Thank you. THERE ARE

[1:07] remark? If

[1:08] no, who is "for", be it

[1:09] Please say "yes."

[1:11] Yes. Further-

[1:12] approval

[1:13] protocol

[1:13] extraordinary

[1:14] meeting from 20

[1:15] September.

[1:16] Good. Any comments?

[1:18] If not, who is "for"?

[1:19] please say "

[1:21] Yes".

[1:21] And finally,

[1:22] approval

[1:23] protocol

[1:24] extraordinary

[1:25] meeting from 23

[1:26] September.

[1:28] Thank you. Any comments?

[1:30] If not, who is "for"?

[1:31] please say "

[1:32] Yes". Yes.

[1:33] OK. I am going

[1:35] to make a few

[1:36] transfers. I want

[1:40] change order:

[1:41] first you, then

[1:43] JBS. So, the next one

[1:46] point of order

[1:47] daytime was number seven

[1:48] . Now this will be the number

[1:50] three—approval

[1:51] agreements with owners

[1:53] Jambo lands. I will give you

[1:55] a minute to explain

[1:56] of this agreement. I will add

[1:59] something to your words,

[2:01] so that it is better

[2:01] inform the Council.

[2:04] I'm Dave Marks. Currently I

[2:06] Vice-Chairman of the Alliance

[2:08] mountain bikes

[2:09] Jamaicans. We concluded

[2:11] access agreement

[2:12] landowners from

[2:13] school district

[2:14] regarding training

[2:15] mountain trails

[2:16] bicycles near

[2:17] Jamaica schools. This is 10-

[2:21] annual agreement, but

[2:22] after change of ownership

[2:23] need to conclude

[2:24] new. I took the existing one

[2:27] agreement, reviewed it

[2:29] and tried to update,

[2:30] to make it

[2:31] clearer and

[2:32] more relevant. It was

[2:34] a few moments that

[2:35] were not quite

[2:36] accurate or clear.

[2:38] Sent this to Tom,

[2:40] probably a week and a half

[2:41] ago.

[2:44] Perfectly. Yes. Therefore,

[2:45] the only principled one

[2:46] the difference is

[2:48] in that now the deal

[2:49] must be concluded with

[2:50] the city of Jamaica. Um, and

[2:53] if we can do it

[2:54] to settle, we

[2:55] let's send this to our

[2:56] main organization

[2:57] , we will sign and

[2:58] we will have a final

[3:00] document, a copy of which

[3:01] everyone can get it.

[3:04] Are there any questions?

[3:05] regarding the agreement or

[3:06] Well, I think some

[3:08] members of our board

[3:09] there was no then

[3:11] when, uh, when, uh, Jamba

[3:12] , this project, well,

[3:14] you know, it was born.

[3:17] Good.

[3:17] Um, so I just

[3:18] I will share mine.

[3:19] point of view. I draw attention to that

[3:23] the fact that Jamba

[3:24] created these trails and

[3:25] takes care of them.

[3:26] They are on the territory

[3:27] cities. We are talking

[3:29] about the trails that

[3:29] are on

[3:30] city property. Ahem

[3:31] , Jamba liberates the city

[3:33] from responsibility

[3:34] . Um, in exchange for this

[3:37] trails are open for

[3:38] the general public. Ahem,

[3:43] we are free from

[3:44] responsibility and,

[3:46] you know, trails

[3:47] open to the public,

[3:48] and we provide a 10-year

[3:49] validity period. Hmm, we have,

[3:54] like in a city, there are certain

[3:55] obligation, well,

[3:56] you know, on a sign

[3:58] recognition of efforts and

[3:59] expenses incurred by Jamba.

[4:02] We are like a city if

[4:03] we are going to spend

[4:05] any activity,

[4:06] what will interfere

[4:07] using Jamba, we will notify Jamba.

[4:10] Of course. Um, so we have

[4:11] commitment to

[4:13] message that

[4:14] will mostly lie down

[4:15] on Tom. Um, and, uh,

[4:23] the only thing I can do

[4:24] to say: when will it be

[4:26] finally determined

[4:27] using

[4:28] property,

[4:29] assuming that the city

[4:30] will continue with it

[4:31] have. I can't

[4:38] imagine what it would be like,

[4:40] but my only opinion

[4:41] is that we

[4:42] , perhaps, you will have to

[4:44] change it. Not

[4:45] sure how exactly,

[4:47] but it is possible.

[4:48] Of course.

[4:50] Um, so it's just, you know

[4:52] , the terms of this agreement

[4:53] can be changed

[4:54] parties. So this is

[4:57] will be what we want,

[4:58] maybe you will have to

[5:00] make. But the pros and cons

[5:01] disadvantages

[5:03] um, you know, there are advantages

[5:04] and disadvantages for both

[5:06] parties. And finally,

[5:07] school district

[5:08] felt that it was in their

[5:10] interests, and I think

[5:11] that we, as an elected council,

[5:13] could even

[5:13] approve this. Me

[5:15] It seems so, we

[5:17] officially approved it.

[5:18] Right.

[5:19] Okay. So I just

[5:21] wanted to share this.

[5:22] Ahem.

[5:23] Okay. Yes. This sounds

[5:24] It's perfectly normal.

[5:27] Jason was here.

[5:28] last time, and we

[5:29] communicated. I know,

[5:31] that we all had

[5:32] questions that

[5:33] needed

[5:33] solution, but

[5:35] yes, I think there is

[5:35] general consensus,

[5:37] but we just wanted

[5:38] make sure that this

[5:39] was reviewed

[5:40] higher authorities.

[5:42] So,

[5:42] right.

[5:44] So, whatever, I'll contribute

[5:45] proposal

[5:46] approve the agreement

[5:47] landowner from Jamba

[5:49] and the city. Second.

[5:51] OK. Are there any

[5:53] discussion? Good.

[5:54] Well, I guess I don't.

[5:55] it was necessary

[5:56] to speak, but

[5:57] I hope that was it.

[5:58] useful for everyone.

[5:59] I ask everyone who is "in favor"

[6:00] to say "yes". Yes.

[6:02] No objections. Perfectly.

[6:04] OK. Well, you can stay

[6:07] longer.

[6:09] And, uh, as for the actual

[6:10] signing the agreement,

[6:12] just give us

[6:13] know.

[6:13] I, I, I will sign it as,

[6:15] Yes. Like a head.

[6:16] I can come to the office.

[6:18] city council. Or me

[6:19] I can send you

[6:20] scanned copy

[6:21] by email,

[6:23] Shall I send him, or

[6:24] just, me, yes, me,

[6:25] I'll probably be in the office.

[6:26] tomorrow. So, perhaps,

[6:27] I'll just sign it.

[6:29] there.

[6:30] You need

[6:31] original?

[6:32] Uh, I don't think so.

[6:33] needed.

[6:34] I will sign two

[6:35] copies so that we have

[6:36] was I know that

[6:38] not legally required.

[6:40] You are not, for example, a court

[6:41] no need for original,

[6:42] isn't that right?

[6:43] Yes. Just ours

[6:44] executive director

[6:46] sign it, we will provide

[6:47] you a copy with all

[6:48] signatures. Yes.

[6:49] Ideally. Ideally.

[6:51] Outstanding result.

[6:52] OK. Thank you. Thank you.

[6:54] Of course. Of course.

[6:57] Enjoy.

[6:58] See you later.

[6:59] OK.

[7:04] Um, so we have

[7:05] Chrissy's connection

[7:06] Goskins and Chris M. So

[7:07] I will move the point.

[7:08] number five in place

[7:10] point number four,

[7:11] um, discussion about

[7:12] property of the village school

[7:14] Jamaican. It

[7:18] normally? The numbers, um,

[7:22] and, um, uh, Chrissy, no

[7:27] I know how you are.

[7:28] sometimes. Would you like to start and discuss,

[7:33] um, the intersection between, um,

[7:38] this, don't we have

[7:39] there was a question here somewhere

[7:40] about wastewater? It was

[7:42] Well, right? C, point C? Yes, Um, Chrissy, you

[7:47] would like, like,

[7:48] to show yours

[7:49] face on the screen, or

[7:51] you will speak

[7:51] anonymously?

[7:54] Uh, I'll talk

[7:55] anonymously, because now

[7:56] I walk around my kitchen.

[7:57] Ahem,

[8:05] so, um, yes, I can

[8:06] tell me exactly how

[8:07] sewage project

[8:09] waters can

[8:09] intersect with

[8:11] owned by JDS now. Ahem

[8:14] , and to do this

[8:15] as clearly as possible, I want to take a step.

[8:18] back and explain, on

[8:19] What stage are we at now?

[8:21] we are about

[8:22] sewage project

[8:23] waters, which is now

[8:24] status. We have 90%

[8:27] report, which is mainly

[8:28] means that we have

[8:30] the report is ready, and it is in the form of a draft. Um, and

[8:35] this is necessary

[8:36] to present

[8:37] public,

[8:38] community, as well as

[8:39] state to get

[8:40] their comments. Hmm, yes.

[8:45] some more tasks in

[8:47] initial volume

[8:48] projects that have not yet

[8:49] were fulfilled.

[8:54] Detailed

[8:54] archaeological analysis

[8:56] , um, soil drilling

[8:57] along the road and, um,

[8:58] legal and

[8:59] easements or, um,

[9:00] legal and boundary

[9:02] geodetic works,

[9:03] related to

[9:04] by purchasing land. Ahem.

[9:10] So, these are the things that

[9:12] have not yet been made.

[9:14] Um, last winter

[9:15] Jessica and I started

[9:16] to talk about

[9:17] planning, you know

[9:18] , about the appointment

[9:19] presentations. Hmm, ah

[9:23] then the town

[9:24] voted for

[9:25] buying a school bag

[9:26] territory, and this, according to

[9:27] essentially stopped any

[9:28] what presentations and

[9:30] completion of work,

[9:31] because school

[9:32] the area can be

[9:33] suitable place

[9:34] for accommodation

[9:35] public system

[9:36] wastewater. And, in principle, this

[9:40] would happen on that

[9:41] field, um, between

[9:42] basketball

[9:43] playground and

[9:43] a playground.

[9:46] Um, this is the area that

[9:47] we are considering. So

[9:49] to evaluate this

[9:50] property with us

[9:51] remained certain

[9:52] funding funds,

[9:54] which we already have. Ahem,

[9:57] I think we counted.

[9:58] what's left

[9:59] about 40,000 dollars,

[10:00] if we remove all

[10:01] money from those things that

[10:03] I mentioned and which ones I haven't yet

[10:04] were made. Um, and

[10:06] then we could

[10:07] to evaluate the school

[10:08] territory, so that

[10:09] to see if it is

[10:10] appropriate there and what

[10:11] there would be power. Ahem,

[10:15] we haven't done this yet

[10:16] did it because

[10:17] the school grounds are

[10:18] easements that can

[10:19] to influence

[10:20] the feasibility of this

[10:21] option. So, now

[10:26] this question

[10:27] is being studied. Um, and

[10:29] just waiting until

[10:30] this will be explained

[10:32] and updated. Um, and

[10:34] then if we can

[10:35] to bypass these easements,

[10:37] we will be able to move

[10:38] further with the assessment of this

[10:39] option. Hmm, so how

[10:41] I already said, we have

[10:43] some left

[10:44] funding funds,

[10:45] which we already have, and we can use

[10:47] them for further

[10:48] school grades

[10:49] territories and add

[10:51] this is for the report. Um, under

[10:54] last cycle time

[10:55] state funding

[10:57] took the free ones

[10:58] money. I call it

[11:01] free of charge

[11:01] money, um, what are they

[11:03] provided in the form of

[11:04] loans for planning

[11:05] rural projects with

[11:06] wastewater treatment.

[11:09] However, in the latter

[11:10] report, the last one, um,

[11:11] cycle report

[11:12] financing, which

[11:14] he just came out

[11:15] called "Plan

[11:16] target

[11:16] use for

[11:17] Revolving fund

[11:19] of clean water in the state."

[11:22] They returned

[11:23] funding for

[11:24] rural projects with

[11:25] wastewater treatment.

[11:27] They also increased

[11:28] amount of funding.

[11:29] So now we can

[11:31] to get a loan that

[11:32] is written off at 100%, at

[11:34] amount up to $150,000.

[11:38] Um, so we could

[11:39] use this for

[11:41] completion of any

[11:42] what kind of planning.

[11:43] If we are going

[11:44] to take money from others

[11:46] tasks, um,

[11:46] archaeological

[11:47] research and

[11:48] soil drilling, and

[11:49] direct them to

[11:50] completion, you know,

[11:51] school grades

[11:52] areas, then we will be able to get

[11:53] more money.

[11:54] Free money

[11:55] cost nothing

[11:56] taxpayers in

[11:57] Jamaicans, except

[11:59] federal taxes

[12:00] that you pay and

[12:01] who go to

[12:01] financing this

[12:02] programs. But, uh, but,

[12:09] uh, we could get

[12:10] more money to

[12:11] complete this:

[12:12] archaeology, drilling

[12:13] soil, and, and execute

[12:15] part of the project

[12:16] works. Well, so this, this

[12:19] update on

[12:20] financing. Well, this is

[12:21] kind of how these

[12:23] things related to each other

[12:24] yourself. Idea

[12:25] placement, eh,

[12:26] consideration of the joint

[12:28] municipal

[12:28] sewerage in the city,

[12:30] on, uh, JBS property,

[12:31] is that

[12:32] the city already owns it

[12:33] , so we don't need

[12:35] to spend money on

[12:36] land acquisition.

[12:39] So I will be glad,

[12:40] I hope that was it.

[12:42] of course. Well, here

[12:43] many parts. Well, by the way

[12:45] , I will be glad

[12:46] to answer any

[12:47] what questions about

[12:48] this.

[12:49] Well, so I have

[12:50] short question.

[12:53] So the decision, uh, to submit

[12:55] application, uh, for

[12:56] additional 150,000

[12:57] dollars is the solution,

[12:58] which the council adopts, or

[13:00] wrong? What is the role

[13:03] planning commission?

[13:06] Brian here, by the way,

[13:07] Chrissy, Brian is here.

[13:08] .

[13:10] This, uh, application is required

[13:12] would be to sign for, for another one

[13:15] loans, the application would have

[13:16] sign selected

[13:17] council.

[13:18] Good. Of course.

[13:22] Brian, do you think

[13:23] you, that the commission with

[13:24] would carry out planning,

[13:25] would conduct an assessment

[13:26] this or discussed

[13:28] would this be first, first

[13:29] than it will get to

[13:32] advice?

[13:34] We would, of course, do this.

[13:35] done.

[13:36] OK.

[13:37] As required

[13:38] statutory process, that is,

[13:40] who asks us

[13:40] make an elected council.

[13:42] Of course. You are not

[13:46] express none

[13:47] desire or preference in

[13:49] one side or the other. Well, I mean,

[13:51] obviously as a volunteer

[13:52] for the city, we just

[13:54] we are trying to collect

[13:55] facts,

[13:55] isn't that right?

[13:56] We are trying

[13:57] promote projects

[13:58] forward. Well, I'm trying.

[14:00] to push aside one's own

[14:01] personal aspirations

[14:02] aside while doing this. But

[14:04] if something arises where,

[14:05] Well, you know, we

[14:06] need something

[14:07] to do, well, we,

[14:08] obviously, let's take it

[14:10] for this.

[14:10] Yes. Yes. Yes. And if

[14:13] this is what complements, uh,

[14:14] technical and economic

[14:15] justification

[14:16] sewerage, then

[14:17] let's do it.

[14:20] Yes. I mean,

[14:24] Chrissy, I think

[14:25] what would it be

[14:26] significant positive,

[14:28] if, if it turns out,

[14:29] what is this now city

[14:30] property is

[14:31] a suitable place.

[14:36] Right.

[14:37] That would be it. Well, I have.

[14:39] I mean, we could,

[14:41] if possible, we would

[14:42] were able to place

[14:43] public septic tank

[14:44] sewer

[14:45] system on earth that

[14:47] belongs to the city. Then,

[14:48] Well, we won't have to.

[14:50] buy land. It

[14:51] makes the process a little

[14:52] faster, saves

[14:53] We have some money. Eh, and

[14:56] I still wanted to remember, I, didn't mention that.

[14:58] before, we wouldn't

[14:59] managed to do this

[15:00] financing cycle.

[15:03] But for this cycle

[15:04] financing, and I, and I don't know how.

[15:06] will look like in the future, they

[15:08] actually increased

[15:10] your subsidy for

[15:11] construction up to 75%. What

[15:14] means if you

[15:16] take 2 million

[15:18] dollars, you only get back 500,000.

[15:21] Um, so it's a 75% grant.

[15:26] we would need

[15:27] to be ready for

[15:28] construction somewhere

[15:29] next summer, that,

[15:30] probably impossible,

[15:31] but in the future

[15:32] it is quite possible that

[15:33] they will leave it like this,

[15:35] and we want to be

[15:36] ready if they will do it.

[15:40] Good. And, uh,

[15:42] so it's kind of

[15:43] a way to encourage

[15:47] the city to move on in

[15:48] this direction,

[15:49] using

[15:50] free money for

[15:51] planning,

[15:52] isn't that right?

[15:54] What may appear

[15:56] good option

[15:57] financing, you know,

[15:58] when we are ready

[15:59] , well, maybe somewhere behind

[16:00] year.

[16:02] Good. We have two here.

[16:04] committee members, and in

[16:05] Both have questions, right?

[16:07] Yes. Chrissy, I have

[16:08] there was a question about

[16:09] existing easements

[16:10] in the territories that

[16:11] call

[16:12] anxiety or

[16:13] are being processed. Or

[16:14] are they in

[16:16] that area between

[16:16] basketball

[16:17] playground and

[16:18] playground,

[16:19] are they

[16:21] Am I too much?

[16:22] I delve into the details.

[16:23] about where

[16:24] Are easements in place?

[16:25] Can we get around

[16:26] these easements? Are these

[16:27] easements large or

[16:28] a small problem?

[16:30] Yes. I think that this

[16:31] problem being solved.

[16:34] Chrissy, do you want

[16:35] explain why

[16:35] easement in general is

[16:37] problem, regardless

[16:38] from him

[16:38] arrangement?

[16:41] Yes. So, there is

[16:44] several easements on

[16:45] area, and they

[16:46] belong to two different

[16:47] to the owners. One of

[16:53] has owners

[16:54] easement of access

[16:55] through the ground, as well as

[16:56] rights to the source, which

[16:57] is located on

[16:58] school grounds. AND

[17:03] other property, which

[17:05] not even on

[17:06] JVS territory, has

[17:07] rights to the same

[17:08] source. I don't know

[17:13] exactly where this leads

[17:14] easement of access, because

[17:15] no map,

[17:18] truth,

[17:18] which one before that

[17:19] was added. Therefore, we

[17:21] would have to spend

[17:22] money for surveying

[17:24] ALTA survey to

[17:25] determine where this

[17:26] easement,

[17:27] unless, if

[17:28] easement will be

[17:28] canceled, in such a way

[17:30] we don't need it

[17:31] to do this, in

[17:32] ideals

[17:34] all three simply

[17:35] are canceled for

[17:36] by agreement with

[17:36] land owners.

[17:39] Good. We know that

[17:40] the source is located

[17:41] directly next to

[17:42] with the place where we want to install

[17:44] cleaning system

[17:45] wastewater,

[17:46] and that would be a problem,

[17:47] and no one

[17:48] uses these

[17:49] sources, and these are old

[17:50] easement rights. So

[17:52] I suspect that they

[17:54] will be canceled.

[17:57] Siobhan,

[17:58] I will add an extra.

[17:59] question before this

[18:01] point, and then I have

[18:02] there are a few more questions

[18:03] regarding other matters,

[18:04] related to

[18:05] re-profiling

[18:06] schools. So, is

[18:10] negotiations are underway

[18:11] with those owners

[18:12] land regarding

[18:13] discussion of refusal

[18:14] from rights?

[18:17] Not yet. I don't think so.

[18:19] They're getting married, Chrissy.

[18:20] ? I thought that

[18:21] I am going

[18:22] I was forwarding this.

[18:23] question for you. Therefore,

[18:25] yes, too. Agreement on

[18:27] real estate just now

[18:28] closed

[18:28] one of the objects

[18:29] recently sold.

[18:31] So there is an owner there. So

[18:32] , this is

[18:33] Yes, but I will turn to

[18:34] them. I worked on that one.

[18:34] document on the right

[18:35] property and everything else

[18:36] , so I can get

[18:36] information.

[18:37] Yes. Yes. Please.

[18:38] Thank you.

[18:39] Yes. But it is possible.

[18:40] to do enough

[18:41] promptly.

[18:41] If they agree,

[18:43] it will take a few

[18:43] weeks.

[18:44] Well, of course. I just

[18:45] I mean Yes. Yes.

[18:48] I have on

[18:49] attention, especially now

[18:50] because Chrissy

[18:51] gave us such

[18:52] great information. I forgot when you

[18:54] came, Siobhan, but

[18:56] a new one has appeared, oh,

[18:57] OK. OK. Therefore,

[18:59] there is something new, right? So with that,

[19:02] I am sure, fire

[19:03] fired up, and yes, I want to do all this.

[19:05] simultaneously. Now,

[19:07] when the agreement on

[19:08] real estate is closed,

[19:10] and so.

[19:12] my next

[19:13] question: what are the terms

[19:15] submitting an application for

[19:16] loan subject to

[19:17] Forgive me, Chrissy? As

[19:21] we need it quickly

[19:23] submit this application?

[19:25] If I am correct

[19:26] I remember you said,

[19:27] that it is in order of the queue.

[19:32] That's right. This is in order of the queue.

[19:36] Usually we

[19:37] it would be necessary

[19:38] to complete the work that

[19:39] is currently ongoing, but,

[19:40] maybe I can

[19:47] to work with

[19:48] by state to submit

[19:49] application earlier. If

[19:53] we will rearrange some

[19:54] task to evaluate

[19:56] JVS, then I can say,

[19:57] what we do

[19:58] additional planning

[20:00] the first stage, and

[20:01] then we move on to

[20:02] planning the second

[20:03] stage. And so that this

[20:07] the loan covered

[20:08] both stages, we

[20:09] could, you know,

[20:10] apply

[20:11] immediately.

[20:13] OK,

[20:13] I just need this.

[20:15] verify.

[20:15] Okay, that's great.

[20:16] useful. And the reason,

[20:19] why is this so critical,

[20:20] is that we

[20:21] all that's left

[20:23] a few days before,

[20:24] how do we know if

[20:25] we received

[20:26] invitation to

[20:26] grant program

[20:28] conservation fund. AND

[20:30] we can talk

[20:31] more about this.

[20:34] But these two things

[20:34] interconnected,

[20:36] because they exist

[20:37] restrictions on what we can do on

[20:39] site or in a building

[20:40] if we are participants

[20:41] programs as long as they

[20:43] will not complete

[20:43] ecological

[20:44] examination. This can

[20:48] to be completely out of it

[20:49] outside these limits.

[20:51] I don't want to ask.

[20:55] until there is nothing left

[20:56] two weeks before

[20:57] receiving a notification

[20:58] . We don't want

[21:00] create any

[21:01] problems, and if they

[21:03] were here, we would say

[21:04] they are the same, it's no big deal

[21:05] not

[21:07] well, good news in

[21:08] because we

[21:09] shared with them

[21:10] the fact that it is possible,

[21:11] and, in the end, to me

[21:12] it seemed that they are very correct,

[21:15] it was positive

[21:17] discuss the terms,

[21:18] when we can

[21:19] to do the work,

[21:20] compared to when

[21:21] they give out grants,

[21:22] so

[21:23] oh, work, Chrissy, I mean, when would

[21:25] work actually

[21:26] took place

[21:27] no, not the whole project. I mean even

[21:30] just immediately

[21:31] testing the first

[21:32] stage and so on.

[21:33] Oh, okay.

[21:34] So, we need

[21:35] make test holes,

[21:36] but what we should

[21:38] to do according to our

[21:39] funding for

[21:40] test pits, this

[21:41] to reconcile them with

[21:42] archaeology. Oh, no,

[21:43] Sorry. We are more

[21:44] no need

[21:45] to coordinate them with

[21:46] archaeology. We have

[21:47] to go through one's own

[21:48] procedure for

[21:49] wastewater project.

[21:50] We have to go through our

[21:51] own full

[21:52] ecological,

[21:52] archaeological and

[21:53] historical review.

[21:54] OK.

[21:55] Hmm, so this could be

[21:56] what we can do about it

[21:57] to work with them

[22:00] because our project,

[22:01] if he

[22:02] will move forward

[22:03] , will have enough

[22:04] intensive inspection

[22:05] for SRF funding.

[22:11] Hmm, but it exists

[22:12] memorandum of understanding

[22:13] mutual understanding between

[22:14] SRF program and

[22:15] conservation department

[22:16] historical heritage,

[22:18] which allows us

[22:19] to make test holes

[22:20] soil specially

[22:21] for septic tank evaluation

[22:23] without archaeological

[22:24] expertise. So this is

[22:27] could be something over which

[22:28] we can do it with them

[22:29] to work.

[22:30] OK. So I would just

[22:34] asked Chrissy,

[22:35] Jessica and the council

[22:36] selected: if you

[22:37] Do you want me to?

[22:38] turned to the trust,

[22:39] or for our committee

[22:41] turned to the trust,

[22:42] someone has clearly

[22:43] write what we are talking about

[22:44] please. I don't want to

[22:48] undertake

[22:49] responsibility for

[22:50] it

[22:50] for for Mrs. M Mrs.

[22:52] and then we will have to

[22:53] ask if the terms

[22:55] such that we cannot

[22:56] wait until October 16,

[22:57] when should we be

[22:59] I don't think so, Chrissy.

[23:01] , yes, I mean

[23:03] we are not there yet, we

[23:04] first you need to

[23:05] learn about

[23:06] possibility, we haven't yet

[23:07] there

[23:09] yes, and I'm going

[23:10] to propose to Chrissy

[23:11] to work side by side

[23:13] with whoever it is with

[23:14] committee, who

[23:14] communicates with

[23:15] trust with

[23:16] heritage preservation

[23:17] regarding this issue.

[23:18] This will probably be

[23:20] Chrissy.

[23:20] This will probably be

[23:21] Chrissy, I think.

[23:22] Right.

[23:23] Chrissy.

[23:24] That's right. That's right.

[23:25] OK. This is very

[23:28] it is useful to

[23:29] understand sensitivity

[23:30] terms from different

[23:31] sides. This is great.

[23:34] Um, any other

[23:35] question for Chrissy,

[23:36] or Chrissy, is there one? Yes.

[23:38] please.

[23:39] Chrissy, I'm a little

[23:40] newbie and naive in

[23:41] this. When you say

[23:42] about a loan that can be

[23:43] forgive, what are the conditions

[23:45] such a loan?

[23:45] Usually you should

[23:47] to do something. That is,

[23:49] if we are halfway

[23:50] before digging holes or

[23:51] test pits

[23:52] shall we sell the plot of land?

[23:53] the loan will still be there

[23:54] written off, do we have

[23:56] to complete this project?

[23:57] What are we signing up for?

[23:58] when you say "

[23:59] loan subject to

[24:00] "write-off"?

[24:02] Uh, we'll do it.

[24:04] here's the thing: we already have

[24:05] one, um, we already have

[24:06] loan subject to

[24:08] write-off, for, um,

[24:09] current work. Therefore

[24:11] , we have to do

[24:12] our scope of work. By the current agreement we are evaluating, um,

[24:19] public system

[24:20] wastewater. If

[24:23] it turns out that there is no

[24:25] suitable places,

[24:26] So, they don't exist. We write a report about it,

[24:28] we get money, and

[24:30] We get paid for everything. Ahem,

[24:36] if we move on to

[24:37] design and

[24:38] something will happen that

[24:39] stop the project, they

[24:40] will pay for everything we

[24:42] done before

[24:43] moment. Um, and then

[24:48] they will redistribute

[24:49] funding somewhere

[24:51] elsewhere. So actually

[24:54] nothing special

[24:55] there are no conditions. The city has

[24:57] to sign a credit agreement. Although the loan

[25:01] if there is no such thing, you

[25:02] sign the agreement, and

[25:03] when we finish

[25:05] project, they

[25:05] close what

[25:07] called "closing"

[25:08] credit. Hmm, that's right

[25:11] then usually

[25:12] begins

[25:13] loan repayment,

[25:14] but instead

[25:15] they just write off

[25:16] the entire amount.

[25:17] Yes.

[25:18] Up to $150,000.

[25:20] Because in the process

[25:22] engineering work

[25:23] the company sends

[25:24] bills and receives

[25:25] payment, that's the amount.

[25:28] This is a debt. We can't

[25:30] just go and

[25:31] say: "Oh, we are more

[25:33] we don't want this

[25:34] engage in". But,

[25:36] you know, if the project

[25:37] is not viable, then

[25:39] no one will demand

[25:40] refund.

[25:43] Yes. Are there any more questions?

[25:45] to Chrissy? OK.

[25:47] Thank you, Chrissy. You can stay,

[25:50] if you want, of course,

[25:51] if you don't want to

[25:52] add something else from

[25:53] about this.

[25:55] No, I have everything. Thank you.

[25:57] Okay, great.

[25:58] news.

[26:03] Um, since we have

[26:04] critical mass of people,

[26:05] who attended the meeting

[26:06] conservation fund, who

[26:08] wants to talk about

[26:09] it?

[26:13] Okay, not all at once.

[26:15] You, you, you?

[26:17] I nominate Siobhan.

[26:18] Oh, you're nominating Siobhan.

[26:20] Do you agree, Siobhan?

[26:21] Just so that somehow...

[26:22] Proposes Punishment, Punishment

[26:23] puts forward.

[26:25] We had, er, I will

[26:26] briefly, and all that

[26:27] good news.

[26:29] We had a wonderful time.

[26:30] attendance. All members of our

[26:32] elected council were

[26:34] are present. Besides Kate,

[26:35] which was busy. We

[26:37] had the majority

[26:38] members of our

[26:39] steering committee.

[26:46] Um, and two officers from

[26:48] Vermont Preservation Trust, of Vermont and

[26:50] Housing Councils

[26:51] and nature conservation

[26:52] Vermont, which

[26:53] will manage the grant

[26:55] , were there, and also

[26:56] professional photographer

[26:57] who filmed all this,

[26:59] I hope that we

[27:00] could be right

[27:01] introduce yourself,

[27:02] when we receive the grant.

[27:10] Um, and we divided

[27:11] program for several

[27:12] parts. They started

[27:14] from a series of questions about

[27:15] our community and about

[27:17] what are we hoping for

[27:18] . Then Robert spent

[27:21] quick but thorough

[27:23] excursion

[27:23] internal

[27:24] premises, and Tom

[27:25] led us outside and

[27:26] impressed us

[27:27] a walk

[27:28] territory. And they

[27:32] really put

[27:33] difficult questions,

[27:34] but they gave up,

[27:35] um, very much

[27:36] interested and, I would

[27:37] said,

[27:37] tuned

[27:38] positively. Um, others

[27:42] also have

[27:42] to express myself, but as I already mentioned, we have to get

[27:46] reply by October 16

[27:47] . If we are elected for

[27:49] participation in the program, we will send

[27:51] cover letter from

[27:52] with the words: "Please,

[27:53] Give us money.

[27:54] Please be

[27:55] please, please, give us

[27:57] money". Um, and

[28:00] thank them for

[28:01] allotted time. So,

[28:03] we haven't heard anything yet,

[28:07] why don't we

[28:07] expected. We don't

[28:09] We are waiting.

[28:10] Oh, and then Karen

[28:11] planted them in her

[28:12] the car and drove

[28:13] city,

[28:15] showed them all

[28:16] landmarks and

[28:17] did everything she could.

[28:19] And so I think that everything

[28:21] It went very well.

[28:22] isn't that right? I think we

[28:24] explained to them,

[28:24] how important

[28:26] this project is for everyone

[28:27] city and how much it

[28:34] will do...what I

[28:35] am I trying to say?

[28:38] How big is it?

[28:39] this will make an impression

[28:40] on different aspects

[28:41] city life, as well as

[28:42] on the surrounding

[28:43] communities. If we can open there

[28:47] kindergarten, this

[28:48] will help people with

[28:49] surrounding towns

[28:50] .

[28:51] Right. Exactly.

[28:53] Not only here.

[28:54] Any questions about this?

[28:57] OK. Um, I still want

[28:59] add that the building

[29:00] looked great. Volume

[29:03] worked with

[29:04] Therefore,

[29:04] By Greg Soen, Greg

[29:06] ,

[29:06] and he did great

[29:08] , supported by Chrissy.

[29:09] The water was turned on. Tom and

[29:11] Chrissy is over it.

[29:12] worked. Um, and honestly

[29:14] saying, it was

[29:15] really...it looked like

[29:16] great, and Robert has

[29:18] in-depth knowledge of

[29:19] the history of the building. Um, and

[29:22] I just hope

[29:23] that it found a response.

[29:25] This is exactly what I found.

[29:26] I have a review. So I think: well, I hope,

[29:29] They are not callous, are they?

[29:31] Yes? So yes, I want to,

[29:33] you know, personally

[29:34] thank everyone who

[29:35] worked so hard,

[29:36] to bring the building

[29:37] okay, and just

[29:39] to structure

[29:39] meeting, so let's hold it

[29:41] fists. Hmm, one more thing

[29:49] relatively ordinary

[29:50] the question that

[29:51] will need

[29:52] council vote,

[29:53] is that to

[29:54] how we got

[29:55] ownership of

[29:56] property, school district

[29:58] ordered an offer

[29:59] regarding maintenance

[30:00] and repair

[30:01] generator, which are

[30:02] quite significant. Volume

[30:13] unofficially found out,

[30:14] what was passed on to us

[30:15] message: if we

[30:17] as the council officially

[30:18] let's ask for school

[30:19] the district to cover these

[30:20] expenses that are essentially

[30:21] arose before we

[30:22] became owners...

[30:24] about 100 dollars.

[30:29] Yes.

[30:29] That's right. So, this is

[30:31] about two thousand.

[30:32] Yes.

[30:34] What is the advice, rather than

[30:35] everything, agree

[30:36] pay. Therefore I

[30:40] would like to contribute

[30:41] proposal that this

[30:42] officially

[30:43] turned to

[30:44] United

[30:45] educational district

[30:46] West River from

[30:46] asking to pay

[30:48] repair bill

[30:49] generator, which was

[30:50] made before

[30:51] our acquisition.

[30:53] Good. Thank you. Is there

[30:55] some discussions

[30:56] about this?

[30:56] How much, how much is this?

[30:58] is it worth?

[30:58] 21 with something.

[31:00] 2100 and a little more.

[31:02] Good.

[31:04] Um, yes.

[31:05] This figure may increase.

[31:06] This is an old assessment. So

[31:09] can the council

[31:10] allow

[31:11] We just ask them

[31:12] to pay for it. We are not

[31:13] we indicate a specific

[31:14] amount.

[31:15] Right. Right.

[31:16] We simply say:

[31:17] pay for it.

[31:18] Right.

[31:19] I was told that we

[31:20] asked them to perform

[31:21] this work

[31:21] perform. Yes. Yes.

[31:23] That's right.

[31:24] You supported.

[31:25] Good. Are there any more?

[31:26] discussion?

[31:27] Since there is none, I bet on

[31:29] voting. Everyone,

[31:30] Who is "in favor", please?

[31:31] to say "yes". Yes.

[31:32] Perfectly. Another question,

[31:37] that needs

[31:38] council approval,

[31:39] is that with

[31:40] many reasons for us

[31:42] worth getting

[31:42] official assessment

[31:43] the value of this property.

[31:52] And, sorry, my brain

[31:53] ...I can't do it.

[31:54] remember, but we, Tom,

[31:56] talked about it.

[31:59] But I wasn't talking about

[32:01] It's up to you. No, it's not.

[32:02] Yes.

[32:02] Oh, okay. I am trying.

[32:04] remember where it came from

[32:05] it worked. Maybe this

[32:06] was

[32:07] My God. I really like it.

[32:08] Sorry, friends. I have on

[32:10] mind,

[32:10] Is there a reason for this?

[32:11] to do, or

[32:12] Yes, there is. Because...oh,

[32:13] good. Sorry.

[32:16] For the committee. Here in

[32:17] What is the idea?

[32:19] Sorry in advance.

[32:19] committee members who

[32:21] are present here. Will be

[32:23] formulated

[32:24] discussion about

[32:25] whether to sell

[32:26] This is our property. Or

[32:29] leave him? For

[32:30] why do we have it

[32:31] will we use?

[32:33] Now we actually have

[32:35] there is no independent

[32:36] understanding of the real

[32:37] the value of this property.

[32:41] So, this is too much—like

[32:43] for the committee

[32:43] unofficially, and for

[32:45] the board officially—

[32:46] to ask for the city

[32:47] to express, um, without

[32:48] this. Um, it's not...I...I

[32:52] I will get some.

[32:53] cost estimates. Ahem,

[32:55] we can get,

[32:57] you know, very cheap

[32:58] valuation through a broker

[32:59] or order

[33:00] official commercial

[33:02] assessment. Um, you know, this

[33:05] little money, but I will return to

[33:07] board with this,

[33:08] but I would like to

[33:09] hear from members

[33:10] board, is it worth it?

[33:11] I have to spend it.

[33:14] Do you know if there is

[33:15] general consensus,

[33:17] Is this a smart move? AND

[33:18] if so, I can

[33:19] to work with Tom,

[33:21] and we can get

[33:22] a few suggestions.

[33:23] Yes.

[33:24] I think that this

[33:24] definitely worth it

[33:25] to put up for auction. IN

[33:26] we, I mean, are

[33:28] very good option

[33:29] on the table, but I think

[33:30] what we all want to have

[33:31] options if it is

[33:32] possible to evaluate

[33:33] decision.

[33:34] Perfectly.

[33:35] And what about, um, now that

[33:36] we own

[33:36] property, can I

[33:38] sell it anytime,

[33:39] Is there any time limit?

[33:40] interval, duration

[33:41] which we must

[33:42] wait?

[33:43] In fact, such

[33:44] no. So, statutory

[33:46] documents require,

[33:47] so that if we sell

[33:48] her during a certain period of time in which

[33:51] we are still here, because

[33:52] it's been a few years...

[33:54] and there is a bond,

[33:55] so if school

[33:56] the county borrowed money

[33:58] for school improvement,

[33:59] we should pay off

[34:00] bond, but

[34:01] actually none

[34:02] There is no bond.

[34:05] no. School district

[34:06] , in fact, simply

[34:07] brought the building to

[34:08] destruction. They,

[34:09] certainly not

[34:10] invested nothing in it

[34:11] capital

[34:12] investments. So,

[34:13] actually, no penalties if

[34:15] we will sell it.

[34:16] Good.

[34:18] Robert, is there anything to add?

[34:20] before that, or...

[34:20] You know, I think we

[34:22] should keep all

[34:23] options on the table.

[34:24] So this is one of our

[34:25] options.

[34:26] Okay. Good. Perfectly.

[34:27] So I think it's...me

[34:29] I think that this

[34:29] reasonably. Yes.

[34:31] I really think that this

[34:32] should be done as much as possible

[34:33] faster because we

[34:34] let's learn about this

[34:35] grant and other grants,

[34:37] and...

[34:37] the solution should be

[34:38] accepted

[34:39] very soon. I am not

[34:42] I agree. In this regard,

[34:47] we...information gathering is

[34:49] very important, but in

[34:50] no way

[34:51] the steering committee does not

[34:52] gives no

[34:52] recommendations regarding

[34:53] whether we should

[34:55] to do something or not.

[35:00] If we are accepted to

[35:01] grant program,

[35:02] we will spend

[35:03] official public

[35:04] hearing, so that

[35:05] to find out what he wants

[35:06] community, as well as

[35:07] let's start large-scale

[35:08] business and

[35:09] development

[35:10] research to

[35:11] understand, or at all

[35:12] possible to keep

[35:13] this object is in status

[35:14] non-profit

[35:15] organizations. Therefore,

[35:19] That's right.

[35:21] I hear it, but so does Jason.

[35:23] can confirm this.

[35:26] They are not easy to find, and

[35:27] this can go

[35:28] a lot of time. Therefore I think we need

[35:32] to act quickly to

[35:33] when will you be

[35:34] contact the city and

[35:35] discuss these

[35:36] question, we already have everything

[35:38] was, because it will take

[35:39] a certain time.

[35:40] Of course.

[35:41] Right. Ready

[35:43] to do any

[35:44] notes. This...this is not

[35:48] will lead to no

[35:49] actions. It's just data.

[35:52] This is a data point.

[35:54] Yes. And again, sorry,

[35:56] I mean, I heard,

[35:58] What did you say about time?

[35:59] necessary for

[36:00] search for an appraiser. It could be that we

[36:03] at least it has already started

[36:05] to do, and then if

[36:06] that loan or

[36:07] the grant will be awarded, this

[36:08] just perfect

[36:09] will fit into the process.

[36:10] Right.

[36:11] Exactly about

[36:12] That's what I'm saying. But

[36:13] At least we have everything.

[36:14] will be ready. I have on

[36:14] mind you, this may

[36:15] take half a year. I am not

[36:16] I know. No matter what

[36:17] was. I mean,

[36:18] we

[36:18] You could ask. I mean, well, we don't

[36:20] we want them about something

[36:21] ask. We don't want

[36:22] to ask them for something.

[36:23] No, don't ask, we

[36:24] let's just start

[36:25] to look for someone

[36:25] We will not be mistaken. IN

[36:27] we are not there

[36:28] something. Would it be

[36:30] I don't...No, because what now?

[36:31] will it happen? We will receive offers

[36:34] , and this will form

[36:35] Yes. I just wanted to

[36:36] get directions.

[36:37] Yes.

[36:38] And would it be

[36:38] commercial valuation, or

[36:40] also potential

[36:41] housing assessment, if

[36:42] someone wanted

[36:43] build there

[36:44] mansion or something

[36:45] similar? I mean,

[36:46] either one or the other.

[36:47] Yes, exactly. This would be

[36:49] to be both. I have

[36:50] I mean, this

[36:50] commercial

[36:51] real estate, because it

[36:52] building. You understand, this

[36:53] falls under

[36:54] commercial? You

[36:55] Do you understand what I mean?

[36:56] This is not a house now.

[36:57] So will it be?

[36:58] a developer or someone,

[36:59] Do you understand? I suppose that very

[37:02] a wealthy person could

[37:04] want to buy only

[37:05] the ground, and, you know, I think it's worth it.

[37:07] to take into account.

[37:09] I think it's worth doing.

[37:10] both, to have

[37:12] full assessment

[37:13] potential.

[37:14] Yes. Perfectly. OK.

[37:17] Thank you. Thank you. Um, and uh,

[37:21] oh, first of all,

[37:22] talk about the volume

[37:23] work and

[37:24] organizational

[37:25] committee structure,

[37:26] including the process

[37:27] approval regarding

[37:28] for the sake of the chosen ones. I have on

[37:31] mind you, I think that this

[37:32] It was a bit difficult.

[37:34] But this is in order to

[37:35] clarify or

[37:36] specify everything,

[37:37] which is incomprehensible. I think today's

[37:42] the meeting is a kind of

[37:43] a perfect example

[37:44] approval process

[37:46] , you know, things

[37:46] coming to the council,

[37:47] but we have enough here

[37:49] many council members.

[37:53] Um, to talk

[37:54] about the volume.

[37:59] Do you want me to?

[38:00] told about

[38:02] Yes, I think it arose

[38:03] some conflict, and

[38:04] the boundaries of who is who

[38:05] does, were

[38:06] unclear about

[38:07] administrative

[38:08] positions for which

[38:09] The committee is responsible.

[38:12] And I seek clarity in

[38:13] this.

[38:14] Oh, about the building itself.

[38:16] This is true. That's where it's from

[38:18] it's coming. So, I have to

[38:19] I mean, obviously, I come to the building.

[38:22] every day or two to

[38:23] check it out. Now

[38:24] I have humidifiers.

[38:26] on the main system.

[38:27] Thank you, Karen, for

[38:28] recommendation.

[38:29] Ahem,

[38:29] so I don't

[38:30] has to

[38:31] Yes. No, no. And even

[38:32] things like keys,

[38:34] but I keep them so

[38:35] make sure that with

[38:35] there is no problem with that. I am sure that she

[38:38] locked,

[38:38] truth?

[38:39] I'm checking to see if

[38:40] My children play there.

[38:41] . I'm coming in too.

[38:42] I'm checking. Young

[38:44] teenagers.

[38:46] Besides, you know,

[38:48] I don't want anyone.

[38:49] to step on one's feet,

[38:50] but I want clarity

[38:51] from the council. That's why,

[38:52] Actually, I'm talking about this.

[38:53] asked.

[38:54] OK. Ahem,

[38:57] and I think that's it too

[38:58] very important because

[39:00] Tom's role is new

[39:01] role in the city, but under

[39:02] very specific there

[39:04] as supervision or

[39:05] technical

[39:06] service

[39:07] city building,

[39:08] Yes?

[39:09] Um, so this is new in this

[39:10] a large part,

[39:11] You know, a big number.

[39:13] But, uh, and then the role

[39:14] Toma would let him

[39:15] to seek experts to say: "I

[39:17] someone needs to

[39:19] fixed the heating,

[39:20] someone looked at

[39:21] water, someone else" that

[39:22] whatever. It is impossible.

[39:23] to have five people in

[39:24] committee, which all

[39:25] are trying

[39:26] to make sure that

[39:27] The building is in order.

[39:28] truth?

[39:29] This should be public.

[39:30] plan. I think

[39:31] this is what is called

[39:32] physical

[39:33] infrastructure,

[39:34] truth? This is what I imagine: I control

[39:36] physical

[39:36] infrastructure,

[39:37] right?

[39:38] I don't give any

[39:39] recommendations regarding

[39:40] what we do with

[39:41] building. I just

[39:42] I support

[39:42] life activity

[39:43] buildings until we

[39:44] Let's decide what to do with her.

[39:45] do.

[39:45] Uh, and we have something to talk about

[39:46] speak. And I know,

[39:48] that they were not warned,

[39:48] but the system

[39:49] alarms,

[39:49] fire alarm

[39:50] , fire monitoring

[39:51] alarms—this

[39:52] things that

[39:52] you probably

[39:53] need to be agreed with

[39:54] board. To us

[39:55] need to be approved

[39:56] these expenses. And we

[39:56] can we discuss this

[39:57] on the next one

[39:58] meetings. I will have

[39:59] to-do list.

[40:00] Budget, right?

[40:00] I really organized

[40:02] game check

[40:03] company sites

[40:04] DLCT. So, we know that

[40:05] there are a few small ones

[40:06] disadvantages, but nothing

[40:07] serious.

[40:08] shortcomings

[40:09] there was no.

[40:09] Uh, so the children

[40:10] safe to play on

[40:11] the site. You know,

[40:12] these are the things that

[40:13] the city can carry

[40:14] responsibility,

[40:14] if no one is behind this

[40:15] follows,

[40:16] truth? Therefore I

[40:16] I'm trying to follow.

[40:17] these things and

[40:18] to support everything in working condition,

[40:20] you know,

[40:20] making sure that,

[40:21] again, none

[40:21] water pipe

[40:22] will not break through

[40:23] buildings, no one

[40:23] we will go there

[40:24] a week, and then everything

[40:25] will flood, and we will

[40:26] thinking: "What happened?"

[40:27] You know, because

[40:27] does anyone actually have

[40:28] to be there

[40:29] every day or two, or

[40:30] probably every day,

[40:31] just so

[40:31] look around, and I walk around the entire building,

[40:33] just so

[40:33] make sure that everything

[40:34] Right. Simply

[40:35] I'm going around. Yes. Yes.

[40:38] Uh, are there any more?

[40:39] questions about

[40:40] object or things that

[40:41] need to be done on

[40:43] object? I would like to

[40:44] the committee also issued

[40:45] this is under consideration

[40:46] rule. Also,

[40:47] I think we just

[40:48] we want to understand about

[40:50] that we can also

[40:51] ask Tom. He

[40:52] takes on a lot

[40:53] responsibilities. Therefore, uh,

[40:55] It is important for us to understand,

[41:01] if something arises, like

[41:02] Should we act, Tom?

[41:03] This sounds like part of it.

[41:05] your official

[41:06] instructions, or us

[41:07] need to contact

[41:08] to someone else?

[41:10] Right. I have on

[41:11] meaning, of course, any

[41:11] what a big expense

[41:12] must be agreed upon

[41:13] with the board, but

[41:13] if you need

[41:14] help with anything,

[41:14] Call me. I have

[41:15] I mean, Chrissy

[41:16] now you have my number

[41:17] phone. You have mine.

[41:18] phone number. IN

[41:18] Karen has my number.

[41:19] phone. If

[41:20] problems arise,

[41:21] if you say, "Well,

[41:21] you know,

[41:22] we think that there is

[41:23] problem". I, again

[41:24] yes, not an expert in

[41:24] systems

[41:25] alarm system. I am not

[41:26] expert in matters

[41:27] water supply. I am not

[41:28] systems expert

[41:29] heating. I work.

[41:30] over Irving

[41:31] came and checked

[41:32] it. So, my job

[41:34] is to work with

[41:35] suppliers and

[41:37] specialists in these

[41:38] areas, in order to

[41:38] guarantee: if we work in the winter,

[41:41] the generator has

[41:41] work, electricity

[41:43] must be, systems

[41:44] water supply—in

[41:45] normal, and Chrissy now

[41:46] is engaged in the transmission

[41:48] these duties. Ahem,

[41:52] again, I am here,

[41:53] to help, but

[41:54] Tom is the contact person,

[41:56] and he should himself

[41:57] decide what he

[41:58] can really do

[41:59] within its limits

[42:00] current role,

[42:01] because he has

[42:02] double duties.

[42:10] Um, and if he

[42:11] need help

[42:12] or an expert, and this

[42:13] will cost more,

[42:14] than we laid in

[42:15] budget, then this

[42:16] the question is put

[42:17] for the council's consideration.

[42:23] That's right. Yes. And what's more, we

[42:27] done with this

[42:28] building: several

[42:29] years ago, probably

[42:30] because of what has passed

[42:31] a lot of time, too much

[42:32] many people had

[42:34] the keys to it. Therefore I know it's mine...me

[42:38] insisted that

[42:40] Tom limited

[42:41] handing out keys to

[42:42] a large number. It

[42:44] , you could say, my "

[42:45] "dot". So I think,

[42:48] if there is a need for

[42:49] keys or access,

[42:50] discuss this with Tom

[42:52] . He will be the one who...well

[42:53] you know.

[42:54] Greg got

[42:55] set of keys. I

[42:56] gave him one

[42:56] kit. I said:

[42:57] Give it back to me,

[42:58] When

[42:58] you gave Greg a kit

[42:59] keys.

[43:00] Oh, he needed to enter and exit. I

[43:02] asked why he

[43:03] got it back? I am not

[43:05] I am going to allow

[43:06] him to leave them in

[43:07] himself.

[43:07] Yes. Yes. Yes. No, but I

[43:09] said: okay, just

[43:10] ...you know.

[43:11] Yes.

[43:12] We couldn't

[43:13] to meet.

[43:13] Good. Yes. But this, I mean...

[43:16] and then, yes, whatever

[43:17] what a student...

[43:20] the main thing is that someone

[43:21] understood who exactly

[43:22] the keys are there.

[43:25] Yes. But this is certainly

[43:27] , my...

[43:29] yes, my sore subject.

[43:31] Hmm, are there any more?

[43:32] questions about this?

[43:34] Anyone else? No? Perfectly.

[43:38] I have to say that,

[43:39] seeing the work that

[43:40] was performed in order to reach this stage

[43:42] ...Even if we don't

[43:43] we will receive a grant that

[43:45] It would be a bit of a shame,

[43:46] the work itself,

[43:47] done for

[43:48] application submission, I think it was

[43:50] extremely useful

[43:51] . This is really...Karen

[43:56] can confirm that

[43:57] woman in charge

[43:58] kindergarten in...or

[43:59] hers in Wyndham, or

[44:01] she...

[44:02] grew up here, in

[44:03] Jamaicans,

[44:04] truth? But isn't it?

[44:05] she is in charge now

[44:06] one of them?

[44:06] Manages.

[44:07] At Wyndham School in

[44:08] Worsborough.

[44:08] No, at home.

[44:10] Oh, she's at home. In her

[44:11] home. And she lives in Dumbarton. OK. I

[44:14] none of this

[44:15] I understand.

[44:16] Nothing. But Brian I

[44:18] heard. She went to

[44:19] school and met with

[44:20] you. So even

[44:21] just getting,

[44:22] you know, a certain one like that

[44:23] experience. I mean,

[44:25] just all of this,

[44:26] crystallization

[44:27] message and,

[44:28] of course, work with

[44:29] Chissy. Glad

[44:30] to join. So

[44:32] next Tuesday

[44:33] we will do

[44:34] priority

[44:35] discussion of how

[44:36] to attract more

[44:37] volunteers to help them

[44:38] there was more.

[44:40] Right.

[44:42] Many reviews even before

[44:43] official project.

[44:45] Right. Right.

[44:47] I think that's great.

[44:48] OK. Anything else on JBS?

[44:50] Okay. It was wonderful.

[44:52] Honestly,

[44:53] incredible.

[44:54] Um, now

[44:56] You are here. You are here because

[44:59] LT13 or just because

[45:01] love

[45:02] to go to meetings

[45:04] Any advice, Brian? No,

[45:05] seriously, because I want

[45:06] go to you

[45:07] next, if

[45:08] I was here.

[45:09] via LT13.

[45:10] Any support

[45:11] was needed there.

[45:12] Yes.

[45:13] OK. So, um, I

[45:14] I'll move on. What was

[45:16] point six to 1 2 3 4

[45:18] five. Now, point

[45:19] five.

[45:21] Hmm, so, hmm,

[45:22] present

[45:23] landowner, um, oh, me

[45:24] didn't actually specify

[45:26] address. This, and I should,

[45:29] 585 Pleasant Valley Road,

[45:33] um, did, um,

[45:34] official request. Am I

[45:37] forgot who he is

[45:38] arrived first.

[45:41] And then I, Brian Misko

[45:42] , came to me with

[45:47] please, I asked

[45:48] send it

[45:49] by email

[45:50] improvement plan

[45:52] LT13 from the homeowner,

[45:53] which I then forwarded

[45:54] , um, Brian and

[45:55] planning commissions,

[45:57] as we did with others

[45:58] paths and things,

[45:59] which we discussed.

[46:02] OK. Therefore,

[46:03] first I have

[46:04] to reveal that I

[46:05] represented the seller

[46:06] this property before

[46:07] current owner

[46:09] who made the request.

[46:10] So I don't, I don't

[46:11] I present

[46:12] owner, but I

[46:13] familiar with this

[46:14] property, and because of this

[46:15] I just won't, I will refrain from any

[46:17] which vote,

[46:18] which we ultimately

[46:19] let's spend this

[46:20] reason. Um, I, um,

[46:21] contacted Ryan

[46:22] Mayoscom, which

[46:23] represented the buyer

[46:25] during the sale. Um, and

[46:26] just a lot

[46:27] worked with him. And, um,

[46:30] I, you know, I said

[46:32] him, I thought, um, I

[46:33] really simple, um,

[46:35] he, this landowner

[46:36] actually owns

[46:37] property on Stratton.

[46:40] It is not adjacent,

[46:41] Absolutely not. So here

[46:44] there is none

[46:45] real plan. I

[46:46] asked him if he had

[46:48] Do you know if there is anything behind

[46:49] hereby? or, you know, is there,

[46:50] well, not that he

[46:51] had to answer,

[46:53] but I wanted to ask.

[46:54] Um, and he said no. I mean that,

[46:56] as far as he knows,

[46:58] his client does not have

[46:59] nothing special

[46:59] plans for this

[47:00] property. There is, I think,

[47:02] over time there were several

[47:03] washed away the roads

[47:04] Pleasant Valley Road.

[47:06] Um, Pleasant Valley-

[47:07] The road leads nowhere.

[47:09] It simply forms

[47:10] horseshoe, um, from, um, e-

[47:12] Hey, what is this?

[47:13] Well, this is Pleasant Valley-

[47:15] road, and then she

[47:16] becomes LP13.

[47:17] No. No. Really?

[47:19] Yes, I think that's right.

[47:21] This is in

[47:22] Basically, it's Plez...

[47:30] So this is a plot, and

[47:31] here is Pleasant Valley-

[47:33] road.

[47:34] This is L13 Pleasant Valley-

[47:35] road, exit from, um,

[47:37] Mountain Road from here.

[47:40] Oh, this, and then this

[47:41] comes from the side

[47:42] city, from the city of Strata.

[47:43] Of course.

[47:44] And then it becomes LP13 in

[47:46] Jamaicans.

[47:46] Of course. Of course.

[47:48] But this is small

[47:49] horseshoe from Pleasant-

[47:50] Valley Road

[47:50] at the very end

[47:51] Pleasant Valley.

[47:52] Right. Right.

[47:53] And this area, the one that is not

[47:55] includes a bet

[47:56] Forester, it is

[47:57] the area that is the one

[47:58] by myself

[48:00] I don't know for

[48:02] Yes. Here. On

[48:03] north of the pond

[48:04] Forester. This is this one. IN

[48:06] it has a small loop

[48:07] like this.

[48:08] Of course.

[48:09] No, you can.

[48:10] to see the border

[48:11] plots. You see

[48:12] square?

[48:12] Yes.

[48:13] Yes. But if you

[48:15] look,

[48:16] actually, how much

[48:17] I remember, and I think,

[48:18] that this is true. Here

[48:21] It is shown that the area

[48:22] goes around the pond

[48:23] Forester.

[48:24] Of course.

[48:25] Yes. What do you think?

[48:27] It seems so, but

[48:29] I'm not sure, and that

[48:30] The deal was a long time ago,

[48:31] so I forgot the exact one

[48:32] description in the documents.

[48:34] But in any case

[48:36] it's here. This is at the top.

[48:38] This is above 2,500 feet.

[48:40] Right.

[48:41] Part of it. part

[48:43] its. So, any

[48:49] buildings above 2500

[48:50] feet requires, you know

[48:52] , is subject to

[48:54] Act 250. So, although she herself

[49:00] Jamaica, city, no

[49:02] has zoning, if

[49:07] the landowner began

[49:08] to develop a plot

[49:10] above 2500 feet, this

[49:11] the owner would have

[49:12] to get approval

[49:14] according to Act 250. And

[49:21] Brian found the application

[49:23] from Green Mountain, as then

[49:25] was called Green Mount, or

[49:26] was it CVPS or Green Mountain

[49:28] ? I can't remember. Though

[49:34] whatever this would be

[49:35] the company at that time,

[49:37] for installation

[49:38] electric support along

[49:39] LT13 what should have been, well,

[49:44] somewhere around 800 feet,

[49:46] somehow like that. feet

[49:48] power lines

[49:49] ,

[49:50] Yes?

[49:50] Ahem

[49:52] it's been quite a while.

[49:54] Along the entire length of the road

[49:55] .

[49:55] Actually, for the whole

[49:56] the length of the road. Yes.

[49:59] Thousands.

[50:00] Of course. And that's not enough.

[50:03] to be at an altitude of 2500

[50:04] feet or higher, and this

[50:06] was rejected. It was quite a long time ago.

[50:12] Well, those are two different things.

[50:18] First, the current

[50:20] request—improve LT13

[50:27] by means of

[50:28] technology

[50:28] construction, that is

[50:29] add crushed stone

[50:30] material,

[50:34] to equip

[50:35] culverts,

[50:36] create trips

[50:37] etc. Hmm, so what?

[50:40] concerns the current

[50:41] request, then he

[50:42] asks to receive

[50:48] access to the city

[50:49] exclusion zones that

[50:50] possible only with

[50:51] permission of the council. JBC does not

[50:53] has none before

[50:55] relationship. We take

[50:56] participation only then

[50:57] when it comes to

[50:58] retraining

[51:00] trails. So now,

[51:01] or if it was

[51:03] statement under law 250,

[51:04] yes, we would help with

[51:06] technical inspection.

[51:08] Previous work, about

[51:10] which I mentioned

[51:11] Jessica, was there back in 2005

[51:13] year.

[51:15] Yes.

[51:15] Previous owner

[51:21] wanted to share

[51:22] plot for two

[51:23] parts, build

[51:24] two residential buildings,

[51:26] what did he have the right to

[51:27] but at that time it

[51:28] needed

[51:28] easement for

[51:29] communications. This is it.

[51:37] would in itself cause

[51:38] the effect of law 250, as well as

[51:39] would affect the length

[51:41] the road that was going

[51:42] change, and for the length

[51:44] legal path. Was

[51:47] still ecological

[51:49] aspect of law 250, which

[51:50] also acted. So

[51:55] the check was based

[51:56] on ecological

[51:57] factors, change

[51:58] roads and easements

[51:59] for laying

[52:00] communications and

[52:01] power grids up to

[52:02] the area itself.

[52:07] Yes? So, refusal

[52:09] was based on the fact that

[52:11] what am I trying to do

[52:22] download long

[52:23] report with many

[52:24] documents, but the essence

[52:25] in what we have

[52:26] environmentally sensitive

[52:27] areas related to

[52:28] migration corridor

[52:30] bears, which

[52:30] shown on the map

[52:32] on the left, as well as ours

[52:33] picturesque mountains

[52:34] ridges, regarding which in

[52:35] the urban plan is

[52:36] relevant provisions

[52:38] . In short,

[52:49] the city of Stratton also

[52:50] expressed from this

[52:51] drive, because LT13

[52:53] starts in the city

[52:54] Stratton, and then

[52:55] it is clear where she is

[52:56] crosses the city border

[52:57] and turns back.

[53:01] Yes. This is the area,

[53:02] What are we talking about?

[53:04] Is this a place where

[53:04] conducted

[53:05] reconstruction of times

[53:06] the Vietnam War? It

[53:07] and area

[53:08] Forrester? No,

[53:09] she is a little

[53:10] further south.

[53:12] Of course,

[53:13] she is a little

[53:14] further south, and there is

[53:15] access from

[53:16] Forrester.

[53:18] Brian, do you remember?

[53:20] you, or the requirement of the Law

[53:21] 250 from the environmental

[53:22] points of view

[53:23] only concerned

[53:24] the road itself, or

[53:25] road combinations and

[53:26] easement on the line

[53:28] power transmission? So

[53:29] Will this affect our

[53:31] decision?

[53:31] Only on

[53:32] power grid. Me

[53:33] it seems that

[53:34] comments and review by law 250, which I

[53:37] read, related

[53:38] namely communal

[53:39] easement.

[53:41] OK,

[53:41] I understood exactly that.

[53:43] Yes. You said it, and

[53:44] now I think they are

[53:45] were united.

[53:46] But

[53:47] there is a certain moment

[53:48] regarding modification

[53:49] road that has a certain

[53:53] length. Good, because this

[53:55] modification

[53:56] is about 3500

[53:57] feet. So then it was

[54:00] a certain aspect, for

[54:01] what is this too

[54:02] was associated with

[54:04] By Law 250. Of course.

[54:06] I don't know if that's true.

[54:07] now.

[54:08] I don't think so. I think

[54:10] now has them

[54:10] to worry about the height above

[54:12] sea level,

[54:14] height.

[54:15] This is the Law 250

[54:17] if you are building something,

[54:22] anything above 2500 feet in

[54:24] this area. Um,

[54:27] if you walked

[54:28] any part

[54:29] Jamaicans above 2500

[54:30] feet, you would end up

[54:32] in the forest on

[54:33] picturesque ridge.

[54:35] And so, if you're going

[54:36] by the way, you see

[54:37] much more fragile

[54:38] ecosystems,

[54:41] corridors of wildlife

[54:42] nature, a lot

[54:43] habitats

[54:44] animals,

[54:44] isn't that right? And it was, and,

[54:48] as far as I understand

[54:50] refusal, the emphasis was

[54:51] largely

[54:52] made under the influence

[54:53] wild project

[54:54] nature. This was, this was

[55:00] it was simple, that's it

[55:01] went on and on,

[55:02] referring to the report,

[55:03] prepared

[55:04] Stratton and

[55:05] Department

[55:06] security

[55:06] surrounding

[55:07] environment. So, us

[55:13] now they are asking

[55:14] allow the owner

[55:15] land to carry out

[55:16] improvement of that

[55:17] is actually urban

[55:18] property, right? It,

[55:26] this is us, you know,

[55:27] approved as a council

[55:29] reclassification LT13

[55:30] from the 4th class road to

[55:32] legal route. AND

[55:37] we did it. Oh my god,

[55:38] When was that? You

[55:39] presided.

[55:40] It was...No, this one

[55:41] the object never existed

[55:42] nothing like that.

[55:42] Wasn't it?

[55:43] part of that? This is not

[55:44] was part of that

[55:45] recent case.

[55:45] It was not at all

[55:46] newly. This

[55:47] the route was

[55:47] legal for a long time.

[55:48] Oh, of course. OK.

[55:50] I take back my words.

[55:51] back. I'm taking mine.

[55:52] words back. I thought,

[55:53] that this is part of that

[55:54] groups. But I don't think so.

[55:57] what he needs

[55:58] to apply for permission for

[56:00] By law 250, in order to carry out the described

[56:02] actions. They,

[56:07] if they want

[56:08] improve this

[56:09] legal route, then

[56:13] this is what is possible

[56:14] to allow,

[56:17] The elected council will say: we grant you the right

[56:20] access to our

[56:21] public land, and

[56:24] was it

[56:27] and here I would have been, I should have been

[56:28] be, there was a request for that,

[56:30] what I described, and all that,

[56:31] yes, he was, but it's not

[56:33] means that we definitely have

[56:35] to grant an easement.

[56:37] So I would call

[56:38] Ryan and said: "

[56:39] Okay, where's the easement?

[56:40] You must

[56:41] prepare a project

[56:42] easement." You know,

[56:43] well, I think it's important

[56:45] that it is legal

[56:46] path. We would like

[56:49] get more

[56:50] information.

[56:52] Is the ultimate goal

[56:53] classification change?

[56:57] If in this area

[56:58] will not be held

[57:00] no work, then

[57:01] it seems that this

[57:02] too much

[57:02] money and work only

[57:04] in order to say:

[57:05] "Hey, this is legit

[57:06] the path now

[57:07] improved".

[57:10] It's great to have a good

[57:11] expensive, but it's all

[57:12] the same affects

[57:13] violation

[57:16] which long-term

[57:17] perspective, right?

[57:18] Yes? change, for example,

[57:20] what are the actual details,

[57:21] if you are going

[57:23] change specification

[57:24] , width, length hm, I think there is.

[57:30] I can't do this here.

[57:31] to decipher, I have

[57:32] not all

[57:33] it was just a list

[57:34] out of five steps, I have

[57:36] I mean, it wasn't

[57:37] but um

[57:38] Well, this is more like it.

[57:39] on um, it seems to depend

[57:44] from classification

[57:45] road or from the fact that

[57:46] is this a legal trail.

[57:49] She has certain

[57:50] restrictions on

[57:51] width. And therefore, if

[57:54] you will change something

[57:55] so much so that it

[57:56] no longer responding

[57:58] definition of legal

[57:59] trails,

[58:01] then that's right. Therefore,

[58:04] I have a list here. 600

[58:05] yards of crushed stone fraction

[58:07] 1.5, 14,000, 12-inch

[58:08] culvert,

[58:09] pipe delivery,

[58:10] installation, ditches

[58:11] where needed,

[58:12] profiling,

[58:13] giving way,

[58:14] rolling and

[58:15] consolidation.

[58:16] Right. Me

[58:17] reported that there are two

[58:18] blurred areas, but

[58:19] necessary ditches

[58:20] will be needed before

[58:21] How can the road be

[58:23] prepare for

[58:24] crushed stone, calculated

[58:25] approximately 600 yards

[58:26] 2500 feet of gravel

[58:27] roads 25

[58:28] 2500 feet of road, so

[58:31] Yes

[58:32] this includes the road,

[58:33] what is the problem

[58:35] Brian is right if

[58:36] they plan

[58:37] to make it and

[58:37] reclassify as

[58:38] city road, then

[58:39] they will have to

[58:40] bring her in

[58:41] compliance with

[58:42] our traffic rules

[58:43] Ahem

[58:44] and then the city will be

[58:45] carry

[58:45] responsibility

[58:46] thereafter.

[58:47] So, we keep

[58:48] right.

[58:49] We can do it.

[58:49] to deny

[58:50] Well, we would argue

[58:51] journey.

[58:53] And I, you know, here, so

[58:54] hmm, I think the answer is

[58:56] , which will return,

[58:57] will be: "I just we just want to have

[58:59] opportunity to drive

[59:00] "We want to

[59:02] enjoy

[59:03] own property. and

[59:07] my answer would be:

[59:08] "Okay, prepare

[59:09] servitude project GM with

[59:11] details about what

[59:12] you are going

[59:13] to do, when and where,

[59:14] recognizing that this is not possible

[59:15] does not change

[59:16] "city's obligations."

[59:20] This will be expensive. Ahem

[59:24] well, when you say "

[59:25] easement", then I see

[59:26] this is it: now this

[59:27] legally formalized

[59:28] the path, and we are going to provide

[59:30] someone has the right, or

[59:31] selection council,

[59:33] or the council can

[59:33] to appoint

[59:34] road commissioner

[59:37] I reviewed the statutes,

[59:38] I'm not sure if we can, I don't think so

[59:40] the council can do this

[59:41] delegate

[59:42] I don't think we can

[59:44] good

[59:44] but I

[59:47] um, so, glad to hear from you

[59:47] will accept questions of choice

[59:49] decision whether to provide

[59:50] they are someone's right

[59:51] to go to the city hall

[59:52] territory and do

[59:53] improvement.

[59:56] I just call it that.

[59:57] easement. Easier

[59:58] to format it as

[59:59] easement, because

[1:00:00] this way we can

[1:00:01] to say exactly that

[1:00:02] they have the right

[1:00:03] to do and during

[1:00:05] what period of time,

[1:00:06] this is recorded in

[1:00:07] land registers, and

[1:00:08] you know

[1:00:08] then this means that

[1:00:10] this is not permanent

[1:00:11] basis? This is not

[1:00:12] permanent easement.

[1:00:13] So, it's simple.

[1:00:14] easement, which

[1:00:15] covers the time during

[1:00:16] which they perform

[1:00:17] work

[1:00:18] like what you give

[1:00:19] anytime

[1:00:20] the state requires from

[1:00:21] us to have an easement for

[1:00:22] performance of work.

[1:00:23] We signed

[1:00:24] temporary easement,

[1:00:25] which only covers

[1:00:26] work.

[1:00:27] Yes.

[1:00:27] This is essentially your

[1:00:28] method of providing

[1:00:29] permission to execute

[1:00:31] works.

[1:00:31] Yes.

[1:00:32] And it will have all

[1:00:33] legal

[1:00:34] obligations regarding

[1:00:35] reimbursement

[1:00:36] losses, you know.

[1:00:38] Yes.

[1:00:40] Field,

[1:00:41] Does this require a statement?

[1:00:42] about who will be

[1:00:43] to maintain the road

[1:00:44] for travel and

[1:00:45] things like that? Well, in

[1:00:48] easement will be clear

[1:00:49] It is said that, um,

[1:00:50] the recipient acknowledges that

[1:00:52] the provider does not take

[1:00:53] myself none

[1:00:54] obligations, except

[1:00:55] those that exist for

[1:00:56] legally formed

[1:00:57] trails

[1:01:00] and still specially

[1:01:01] to point out that this

[1:01:02] remains

[1:01:03] legal path and

[1:01:04] that it falls under

[1:01:05] these instructions,

[1:01:06] parameters or something

[1:01:07] whatever, but still

[1:01:08] allows public

[1:01:09] access. They are not

[1:01:10] can put

[1:01:11] gate or something else,

[1:01:12] who have already tried

[1:01:13] to do in the past.

[1:01:14] Therefore,

[1:01:14] True.

[1:01:15] That's right. And this is what

[1:01:16] comes to mind: we have

[1:01:17] there were people who

[1:01:18] they put up a gate

[1:01:18] across the legal

[1:01:19] trails and started it

[1:01:20] serve

[1:01:21] True

[1:01:21] and, in fact,

[1:01:22] to serve her

[1:01:23] and that would be true

[1:01:25] and this is city property

[1:01:29] Where is the city property?

[1:01:30] , and where

[1:01:31] so, everything you see on this map,

[1:01:33] this is a city law firm

[1:01:34] path, but

[1:01:35] all this dotted

[1:01:36] what comes in here is

[1:01:37] path

[1:01:38] on the lower half,

[1:01:39] what comes from

[1:01:40] Stratton as a road

[1:01:41] this is a legal path

[1:01:42] cities

[1:01:42] I think it's legal.

[1:01:44] path, something on

[1:01:44] kind of property.

[1:01:46] OK,

[1:01:47] we own, you know,

[1:01:48] if you think about

[1:01:49] property rights as a

[1:01:50] package,

[1:01:51] we own

[1:01:52] part of this

[1:01:53] package.

[1:01:53] OK,

[1:01:54] we have, you know, any-

[1:01:56] Who in the city can

[1:01:57] to cross it, um,

[1:01:58] indefinitely. Them

[1:02:01] it is forbidden to block

[1:02:02] her, interfere with her,

[1:02:03] and, actually, to do

[1:02:05] any actions, therefore

[1:02:06] they turned to

[1:02:07] council with a request for

[1:02:09] permission. So what?

[1:02:14] part of the way they

[1:02:17] completely all?

[1:02:18] Completely, that is, she

[1:02:19] goes from the road to

[1:02:20] mountains

[1:02:21] Pleasant Valley, up to

[1:02:22] the end, yes. Yes. Therefore,

[1:02:24] in Stratton they

[1:02:25] should get this

[1:02:26] the very permission.

[1:02:27] But I don't know if it is

[1:02:28] the answer to this

[1:02:29] question.

[1:02:30] AT

[1:02:30] because if they

[1:02:31] only have this one

[1:02:32] plot, they are not

[1:02:33] will continue

[1:02:34] the road to the very

[1:02:35] end. They will arrive.

[1:02:36] only to your own area

[1:02:38] .

[1:02:38] Yes. But I think that

[1:02:40] they...I heard from the edge

[1:02:41] ears that they too

[1:02:42] are turning to

[1:02:43] Stratton, because I think

[1:02:45] that there are some

[1:02:46] rights where they have

[1:02:47] access to

[1:02:48] Jamaicans, but

[1:02:49] mountain road

[1:02:50] but I suppose that

[1:02:51] they just

[1:02:52] will finish their

[1:02:54] We don't know, they don't

[1:02:55] will do nothing

[1:02:56] here and on someone else's

[1:02:57] territories, no, I think

[1:02:58] , Karen asks how

[1:02:59] they are far away

[1:03:00] are going to come in

[1:03:01] if they do

[1:03:02] all the way

[1:03:04] from so, as far as I understand, there are rumors.

[1:03:09] that there are certain areas,

[1:03:11] which make it difficult for them

[1:03:12] access, and they are not on

[1:03:13] their property, so

[1:03:14] they are trying

[1:03:15] fix these too

[1:03:16] moments.

[1:03:20] This is not under our control.

[1:03:21] including

[1:03:22] this part, which would be

[1:03:24] , or this part.

[1:03:27] I think it's different.

[1:03:28] parts that...Yes.

[1:03:30] Well, that's probably it.

[1:03:32] part

[1:03:32] Well, actually, that's how it is.

[1:03:34] That's right. That's right. They...

[1:03:36] are trying

[1:03:37] improve the area

[1:03:38] outside of your own

[1:03:39] They, as far as I know.

[1:03:41] They are trying...

[1:03:42] they probably

[1:03:43] are trying

[1:03:44] improve part

[1:03:45] Pleasant Valley Roads,

[1:03:46] where do you call from

[1:03:47] Mountain Road

[1:03:49] and you go through

[1:03:50] Stratton Park.

[1:03:51] They

[1:03:52] to get to

[1:03:53] Jamaica Park. What

[1:03:55] leads to the fact that,

[1:03:56] in my opinion,

[1:03:57] next step

[1:03:58] will be: okay, we

[1:03:59] understand the basis

[1:04:00] what you want

[1:04:01] to do, before

[1:04:02] the council will provide

[1:04:03] easement on

[1:04:04] performance of work, we

[1:04:05] need more

[1:04:06] details

[1:04:08] right

[1:04:12] come to the meeting

[1:04:13] and I...we have

[1:04:14] understand that if we are going to give them

[1:04:17] easement, this affects

[1:04:18] neighboring

[1:04:18] landowners who

[1:04:20] we have requirements for

[1:04:21] notification, I'm quick

[1:04:22] looked at...Yes, I think so,

[1:04:23] we must notify

[1:04:25] you about it.

[1:04:25] I was just about to ask

[1:04:27] I'm almost sure that

[1:04:28] we must have

[1:04:29] notice period

[1:04:30] and comments. I...I...I

[1:04:31] I'll discuss this with Nick and

[1:04:33] Alan Hamilton. IN

[1:04:35] there are us

[1:04:36] Hamilton from one

[1:04:37] side, and I forgot which one

[1:04:39] Fitzpatrick.

[1:04:40] that, well, Vietnam

[1:04:43] who? Yes. Yes. Where, where

[1:04:44] Forester? Yes. Yes.

[1:04:46] He was

[1:04:48] he handed it in

[1:04:49] rent, I don't know

[1:04:50] details. I only know,

[1:04:52] what he probably wanted

[1:04:53] use this

[1:04:54] like a gravel pit.

[1:04:57] Well, he's been doing this for a long time.

[1:04:58] , but he wants

[1:04:59] to return and

[1:05:00] to make it

[1:05:01] I think it is.

[1:05:01] put up for sale.

[1:05:03] It is now

[1:05:03] for sale.

[1:05:04] His law 250 restricts

[1:05:06] his, it is closed.

[1:05:08] No more

[1:05:09] gravel.

[1:05:09] Yes.

[1:05:10] True.

[1:05:10] Yes, that's completely true.

[1:05:11] another story.

[1:05:12] True.

[1:05:13] And as for the broader

[1:05:14] context, why they

[1:05:15] do these roads

[1:05:16] work, do we ask

[1:05:17] to provide them with more

[1:05:18] details? I asked

[1:05:21] Ryan, and he said,

[1:05:22] because they just want to

[1:05:23] enjoy

[1:05:24] property.

[1:05:26] I mean, this

[1:05:27] interesting, but

[1:05:28] I have never seen

[1:05:30] I think that would be

[1:05:31] perfectly. I can only

[1:05:32] to say that I never

[1:05:33] I didn't see anyone

[1:05:34] invested

[1:05:34] six-digit amounts in

[1:05:36] a road to walk

[1:05:37] field.

[1:05:39] Yes. It seems that behind this

[1:05:41] there must be something that

[1:05:42] It's worth knowing.

[1:05:44] I can drive to

[1:05:45] any field and

[1:05:46] walk.

[1:05:47] Ha? We need

[1:05:48] know

[1:05:49] to walk legally

[1:05:50] along the path.

[1:05:51] Yes.

[1:05:52] We need, we need

[1:05:53] really need

[1:05:54] register.

[1:05:55] Do we know who this is?

[1:05:57] I don't know who MD is,

[1:05:58] can he say,

[1:05:59] Who are you?

[1:06:00] Just for

[1:06:00] public record that

[1:06:02] he is present.

[1:06:02] Yes, we have

[1:06:06] MD is silent.

[1:06:07] Hello.

[1:06:09] MD joins Zoom.

[1:06:13] I, I saw it, I didn't

[1:06:15] I know. and you do nothing

[1:06:17] you see from your side,

[1:06:18] so that we can lead

[1:06:20] record

[1:06:22] True. Um, MD, if you

[1:06:25] Can you hear us?

[1:06:26] you, please,

[1:06:27] turn on the microphone and

[1:06:28] to say your name,

[1:06:30] because we are leading

[1:06:31] accounting of all participants

[1:06:32] meetings and we will

[1:06:36] forced to remove you

[1:06:39] from a Zoom meeting if

[1:06:40] we won't hear if we don't know yours

[1:06:43] name. Good. Something that

[1:06:45] they say.

[1:06:47] Michael Oh, this is Mike.

[1:06:48] Oh, Mike. Thank you, Mike.

[1:06:51] Thank you.

[1:06:51] Mike.

[1:06:53] Ahem,

[1:06:56] OK. Any, I think

[1:06:58] he doesn't have

[1:06:59] microphone. Mike's

[1:07:00] there is no microphone. I

[1:07:02] always had

[1:07:03] so once in

[1:07:04] one of your letters

[1:07:05] , I think that's good, you

[1:07:07] said they would be glad if

[1:07:08] you wish, we

[1:07:09] can we ask for this

[1:07:12] planning commission

[1:07:14] has no official role

[1:07:15] in this, but we can

[1:07:16] to ask you about

[1:07:17] advice, how are you?

[1:07:18] we can always

[1:07:19] to ask for advice

[1:07:20] but to provide this in

[1:07:21] more formal

[1:07:22] in a sense, have we reached

[1:07:23] that we are going to

[1:07:24] landlord, and we already

[1:07:26] we know what we need to know

[1:07:28] we, we don't know that,

[1:07:30] what do we need to know

[1:07:31] , so the commission with

[1:07:32] planning.

[1:07:33] O. Oh, I think we have

[1:07:34] enough data to contact

[1:07:37] the owner of the land.

[1:07:38] I will do it, I can do it.

[1:07:39] make. I can do it.

[1:07:40] make. I am happy.

[1:07:41] I will do it.

[1:07:42] And the research that

[1:07:43] conducted by Brian.

[1:07:43] I will do this through

[1:07:44] Ryan.

[1:07:45] This is great.

[1:07:46] Yes. Yes.

[1:07:48] Um, if only Ryan

[1:07:50] doesn't want me to

[1:07:50] worked with this

[1:07:51] directly by the client,

[1:07:53] what he probably doesn't

[1:07:54] wants to, but I just

[1:07:55] I want to clarify a little.

[1:07:56] legal analysis

[1:07:57] regarding whether it can

[1:07:58] electoral council

[1:07:59] delegate

[1:08:00] powers. My

[1:08:03] personal interpretation

[1:08:04] the statute consisted of

[1:08:06] because I don't see it in

[1:08:07] us the authority to do this

[1:08:08] .

[1:08:08] Ahem.

[1:08:09] Well, we probably wouldn't.

[1:08:10] wanted this. I have on

[1:08:11] mind you, we still

[1:08:12] we accept it ourselves

[1:08:13] decision. I think there is.

[1:08:14] many...

[1:08:15] I think so, me too.

[1:08:17] I think, but it's worth it

[1:08:18] to ask.

[1:08:22] I also just want to

[1:08:24] get examples

[1:08:25] from our external

[1:08:26] lawyers. I can

[1:08:30] get them in your

[1:08:31] to the company regarding these

[1:08:32] easements. Simply

[1:08:39] to see the type,

[1:08:40] volume, level

[1:08:41] detailing that was

[1:08:42] provided, and how much we want to open

[1:08:45] to the owner of the land,

[1:08:46] understanding that if

[1:08:47] they are going

[1:08:48] build on this

[1:08:49] area,

[1:08:50] most likely, this

[1:08:51] above 2500 feet. So,

[1:08:58] although WW permission is there, I don't

[1:09:00] I think there is still permission.

[1:09:02] I think it's just

[1:09:03] part, northern

[1:09:04] the part that goes up.

[1:09:07] Oh, yes.

[1:09:08] Where are you really?

[1:09:09] rise above 2500

[1:09:10] feet.

[1:09:11] And I know that they

[1:09:12] can...

[1:09:14] look at

[1:09:15] topographic map.

[1:09:16] If

[1:09:17] they wanted

[1:09:17] build two

[1:09:18] houses, they could

[1:09:19] just build

[1:09:20] below 2500 feet. It

[1:09:27] becomes difficult when

[1:09:29] you start

[1:09:29] to connect this um, with

[1:09:34] what is needed

[1:09:35] to bring down communications

[1:09:37] , electricity, communications, and

[1:09:38] to consider the length

[1:09:39] the road that needs to be taken

[1:09:41] improve. Ahem,

[1:09:42] in fact, what we can do as JPC—

[1:09:48] is to contact

[1:09:49] our contact

[1:09:51] representative from Act 250 in

[1:09:52] state, to

[1:09:53] present the basic

[1:10:01] the scenario of what

[1:10:02] types of things

[1:10:02] are offered, and we have

[1:10:04] there are new offers,

[1:10:05] which may include

[1:10:06] expansion of their

[1:10:07] wishes. What

[1:10:12] concerns

[1:10:13] building codes. So

[1:10:14] what are the real and

[1:10:16] real applications

[1:10:17] Act 250 to this

[1:10:18] property?

[1:10:20] Isn't that right?

[1:10:21] Is it the height,

[1:10:22] easement on

[1:10:23] communications, length

[1:10:24] roads—anything,

[1:10:25] need to find out what it is

[1:10:27] actually it is.

[1:10:29] Yes. What factors

[1:10:30] trigger an action

[1:10:31] jurisdiction? Yes.

[1:10:32] So, improvement

[1:10:34] roads included

[1:10:35] as an activity that

[1:10:36] contributes

[1:10:37] not like that by itself. No, it should be

[1:10:40] canceled.

[1:10:41] I'm not even sure.

[1:10:43] , what is the problem with

[1:10:44] length.

[1:10:45] This is a foggy area.

[1:10:49] Law 250, as I find out, continues

[1:10:52] to change regarding

[1:10:53] of what actually

[1:10:55] is used, and what

[1:10:56] No. And, um, the length

[1:11:02] road improvement—

[1:11:03] this is what went into

[1:11:05] Law 181 on roads.

[1:11:08] So, this is how, this is how

[1:11:09] constant

[1:11:11] and their interpretation

[1:11:12] road works

[1:11:14] work can be

[1:11:15] combined with influence

[1:11:16] on the environment. You know,

[1:11:18] of course, if she

[1:11:19] passed through

[1:11:19] wetlands

[1:11:21] or something like that, then

[1:11:22] yes, but it is an existing one

[1:11:23] legal path. Therefore,

[1:11:25] but I mean,

[1:11:25] if they are going

[1:11:26] to say that we will hold large-scale

[1:11:28] grooving work

[1:11:29] etc., that's enough

[1:11:29] serious intervention.

[1:11:30] Yes.

[1:11:31] Assuming that there is

[1:11:33] jurisdiction,

[1:11:34] assuming that it is in

[1:11:35] within the jurisdiction

[1:11:36] law 250, and that's great,

[1:11:38] but if not, we have

[1:11:39] there is no zoning, which

[1:11:40] would this cover.

[1:11:41] And if there are restrictions

[1:11:43] regarding parameters

[1:11:45] a small path.

[1:11:47] M-hm.

[1:11:47] What is the width? If

[1:11:49] they want to go out

[1:11:50] these boundaries and they

[1:11:51] are going to do this

[1:11:52] to do, to eat

[1:11:52] will have to change

[1:11:53] classification. And whether

[1:11:55] they provided a plan where

[1:11:56] they were going to

[1:11:57] install the covers and

[1:11:59] where it would be important

[1:12:00] part?

[1:12:02] Nothing, nothing.

[1:12:05] It just seemed like it.

[1:12:06] on what exactly

[1:12:08] estimate, list, I think.

[1:12:11] Yes.

[1:12:11] As a representative

[1:12:13] city, if you

[1:12:14] are you going to provide

[1:12:15] permission for someone to enter

[1:12:16] to your territory and

[1:12:17] to start something

[1:12:18] change, you,

[1:12:19] probably needed

[1:12:20] detailed list.

[1:12:21] Yes.

[1:12:22] This information,

[1:12:23] isn't that right?

[1:12:24] And write yours

[1:12:25] list of comments.

[1:12:27] That's right. That's right.

[1:12:30] OK. Hmm, thank you,

[1:12:32] Brian, what

[1:12:33] joined. You can

[1:12:34] to stay if

[1:12:36] you want.

[1:12:36] A little. Ahem,

[1:12:38] returning to

[1:12:39] initial number

[1:12:41] three, which is now 1, 2, 3, 4,

[1:12:43] 5, 6. Six.

[1:12:47] I'll try this.

[1:12:48] These are, therefore, problems with

[1:12:49] parking on the road. Um, I

[1:12:51] met, I got up

[1:12:52] and met with Mike

[1:12:54] Dated last week,

[1:12:55] and we were a little like

[1:12:56] around. I saw where

[1:12:57] were current signs.

[1:12:59] That's why Mike was on

[1:13:00] zoom.

[1:13:02] And, um, he really is

[1:13:03] showed me where they were

[1:13:04] problems, the corner where

[1:13:05] people are parking,

[1:13:06] a small road that

[1:13:08] leads the way out.

[1:13:09] Ahem,

[1:13:10] I am going to develop

[1:13:11] plan for signs that

[1:13:12] you can bet, we are going to put

[1:13:15] , my thoughts, ours

[1:13:16] initial thoughts—

[1:13:16] put two signs,

[1:13:18] parking area between

[1:13:19] signs, somehow like that.

[1:13:20] Put a few

[1:13:21] parking signs in

[1:13:22] the other side. We also

[1:13:23] talked about that

[1:13:24] to lay logs or

[1:13:25] railway sleepers, or

[1:13:26] something like that, so that

[1:13:27] people did not move out

[1:13:28] roads in the middle of the road;

[1:13:29] probably better than logs,

[1:13:30] because they look

[1:13:31] more natural. But I am currently developing

[1:13:34] design. Me too

[1:13:36] I work, of course, with

[1:13:37] Charlie Peck on West-

[1:13:38] Wind Road, and all that

[1:13:40] will take place in the spring.

[1:13:42] I will do nothing.

[1:13:43] until winter, until

[1:13:43] snowfall, and

[1:13:44] because in winter these

[1:13:45] places visited

[1:13:46] much less often than

[1:13:47] in the summer, we don't have

[1:13:48] problems with

[1:13:49] parking. So,

[1:13:50] when spring comes, in

[1:13:51] we will have projects

[1:13:52] for both places. We

[1:13:53] Let's order signs. We

[1:13:54] let's set them up enough

[1:13:55] quickly.

[1:13:56] So that's all. AND

[1:13:57] Thank you, Mike, for that.

[1:13:58] met me,

[1:13:59] showed everything and

[1:14:00] told how everything was there

[1:14:02] works. Ahem,

[1:14:03] we need to talk

[1:14:05] about Patriot. As you know,

[1:14:06] next month [

[1:14:07] expires],

[1:14:08] so I try

[1:14:10] move everything from

[1:14:10] server. One of them,

[1:14:12] we have...Neick now

[1:14:13] not on the server at all.

[1:14:15] We are independent of

[1:14:16] this. The next one was

[1:14:18] Patriot. This will be

[1:14:19] increase in value

[1:14:20] for 2000 dollars a year,

[1:14:21] to stay on

[1:14:22] our...Yes. Because

[1:14:24] now it works like this:

[1:14:25] they share one

[1:14:26] license that goes to

[1:14:27] server that

[1:14:27] connects

[1:14:28] direct

[1:14:29] to a database in the cloud.

[1:14:30] To each of them

[1:14:31] will need its own

[1:14:31] entrance to

[1:14:32] connect to

[1:14:33] servers in the cloud. Ago

[1:14:34] we have to buy two

[1:14:35] additional.

[1:14:35] So, it's 2004. Just

[1:14:37] I inform you that this

[1:14:38] like this. We can

[1:14:39] approve this other

[1:14:40] once.

[1:14:40] Can we just

[1:14:41] to go completely into

[1:14:42] cloud? I

[1:14:43] said that we move on completely

[1:14:45] into the cloud.

[1:14:45] Oh, we are moving, we

[1:14:46] licenses are required,

[1:14:47] to completely go

[1:14:48] into the cloud. They are not

[1:14:48] can share

[1:14:49] license. Only

[1:14:50] way to divide

[1:14:51] license—this

[1:14:51] to go back to that

[1:14:52] server, and then

[1:14:53] back into the cloud. Then we have expenses for

[1:14:55] server. So this...this,

[1:14:59] Guys, pretty clever.

[1:15:02] That's the stage I'm at.

[1:15:04] I have prices. If you,

[1:15:06] Guys, approve this, I can do it in a few

[1:15:11] weeks. Ahem,

[1:15:12] it depends on you.

[1:15:14] But this...

[1:15:14] you do, but we don't

[1:15:15] we know how much it is

[1:15:16] now, or...

[1:15:17] this is for 2000 dollars

[1:15:18] more expensive. Each

[1:15:19] the license costs 1000

[1:15:20] dollars per year,

[1:15:21] essentially. There is also

[1:15:22] other expenses,

[1:15:23] related to this, on

[1:15:23] data maintenance

[1:15:24] and all that other stuff. Now

[1:15:26] it's somewhere around 5200 or

[1:15:27] about that.

[1:15:27] Is there any suggestion?

[1:15:29] or something like that? Is there...

[1:15:36] Um, Dalewood Health Farm project

[1:15:37] completed, and looks

[1:15:39] he is great. I drove.

[1:15:40] there, made a few

[1:15:42] photos. That's all.

[1:15:43] for Bransonade. Hey, ours

[1:15:45] farm gradually

[1:15:46] is developing.

[1:15:48] They work hard.

[1:15:49] tonight.

[1:15:50] Yes, Mike Fitzpatrick,

[1:15:51] It's like three days. Yes.

[1:15:53] So they are there.

[1:15:54] I hope I said

[1:15:55] him that it should be

[1:15:56] done by Wednesday.

[1:15:57] So I think they have time. Therefore

[1:16:00] they literally were

[1:16:01] there tonight.

[1:16:02] Oh yes.

[1:16:03] On the way I passed

[1:16:04] past the dump truck, they

[1:16:05] are actively working.

[1:16:06] Good.

[1:16:07] Update on

[1:16:08] town hall. Hey, we

[1:16:09] finished. We her

[1:16:10] painted. She

[1:16:11] looks great. It

[1:16:12] Yes. She looks

[1:16:13] perfectly.

[1:16:14] Looks very, very

[1:16:15] good. Ahem,

[1:16:15] This is over. I am going to ask.

[1:16:17] road crew

[1:16:18] to work a little, because

[1:16:19] when they

[1:16:20] used

[1:16:20] lift, there

[1:16:21] remained

[1:16:21] damage to the grass.

[1:16:22] So I'm going

[1:16:23] to see if they are different

[1:16:25] lamps and more. Um, I am also working on

[1:16:27] lighting

[1:16:27] inside the building,

[1:16:28] trying to install

[1:16:29] new lamps on top.

[1:16:30] Half of them

[1:16:31] burned out. They

[1:16:32] different colors.

[1:16:33] It looks terrible. AND

[1:16:35] at the same time a chandelier

[1:16:36] ahead now too

[1:16:37] has different light bulbs

[1:16:38] colors. So I want

[1:16:39] get more

[1:16:40] effective, you know,

[1:16:41] LED lamps

[1:16:42] and do everything

[1:16:43] standardized. AND

[1:16:44] when we have it there will be fans,

[1:16:46] we can turn on

[1:16:47] light and mother again

[1:16:48] normal lighting

[1:16:49] , because now in

[1:16:49] some lamps

[1:16:50] four lamps each, and

[1:16:51] only one works.

[1:16:52] Good.

[1:16:52] So, I'm working on this.

[1:16:54] . I just need

[1:16:55] I have to order them. I

[1:16:56] talked to Keith. IN

[1:16:58] we have the opportunity

[1:16:59] replace them, he has

[1:17:00] high enough

[1:17:01] ladder.

[1:17:02] Oh, please.

[1:17:04] You can climb.

[1:17:05] there. I do this.

[1:17:06] I won't. Renewal

[1:17:07] regarding elections. Karen,

[1:17:08] you said that

[1:17:09] ballots will be on the 2nd

[1:17:10] numbers, what do you think?

[1:17:11] It

[1:17:11] I think it's October.

[1:17:12] I also think that 2

[1:17:14] October. People

[1:17:15] come and ask

[1:17:16] absentee ballots.

[1:17:17] Everyone who was in

[1:17:18] voter list

[1:17:19] as of September 5,

[1:17:20] will receive a ballot

[1:17:21] by mail from the state. So

[1:17:23] you don't need

[1:17:23] to come and

[1:17:24] request a bulletin.

[1:17:25] You automatically

[1:17:26] receive a newsletter

[1:17:27] for general

[1:17:27] elections. To anyone,

[1:17:29] who is added to

[1:17:30] list after that, I will send a newsletter. And I check it every day, and

[1:17:34] I am sending—I already

[1:17:35] sent, it seems,

[1:17:36] eight or nine on

[1:17:38] this time, so I'm holding

[1:17:39] it's under control.

[1:17:40] The elections will be held on 3

[1:17:42] November. Again

[1:17:43] yes, elective

[1:17:44] polling stations are open from

[1:17:46] 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. And that's why

[1:17:48] you missed the uh

[1:17:49] advertisement.

[1:17:50] Oh, yes.

[1:17:52] delay from

[1:17:53] by the way. Delay in

[1:17:54] works, delay with

[1:17:55] by the way. Yes. Um, in

[1:17:57] Hunter's company

[1:17:58] there were problems with

[1:17:59] their people on

[1:18:00] another project. So

[1:18:01] they want

[1:18:02] to move this,

[1:18:03] probably in the spring

[1:18:04] next year. They

[1:18:05] won't have time

[1:18:05] finish this this

[1:18:06] year. Properly speaking.

[1:18:08] I think we are from the very

[1:18:09] initially expected that

[1:18:10] it may not be

[1:18:10] completed this year.

[1:18:11] Our grants are valid until

[1:18:13] end of the next

[1:18:13] year.

[1:18:14] That's right. When

[1:18:15] he asked me

[1:18:16] answer him. I

[1:18:17] just wanted

[1:18:17] confirm this with you

[1:18:18] , and we discussed it

[1:18:19] . That's why he says that

[1:18:20] they just don't

[1:18:21] they have time. Um, they have

[1:18:22] there was another project, and they

[1:18:24] very helpful from the side

[1:18:25] state. So.

[1:18:27] Yes, I hope we don't

[1:18:29] we will get there.

[1:18:32] Sorry, I can't.

[1:18:33] believe that I just

[1:18:34] said it out loud.

[1:18:35] Okay, I know.

[1:18:36] We check our

[1:18:38] systems here.

[1:18:39] Oh, Karen. Yes.

[1:18:41] I would like to add more.

[1:18:42] something about elections: if

[1:18:43] someone didn't send

[1:18:44] your absentee

[1:18:45] coupon and wants

[1:18:46] vote on the day

[1:18:47] elections,

[1:18:50] they can

[1:18:51] send two

[1:18:51] justices of the peace, to

[1:18:53] they delivered

[1:18:53] bulletin. They

[1:18:54] fill out the form, and

[1:18:55] two justices of the peace

[1:18:57] bring it back.

[1:18:58] True. True.

[1:19:00] Just so people know

[1:19:01] , you understand.

[1:19:03] I know, right? Glory

[1:19:05] To God.

[1:19:06] That's right. Thank God.

[1:19:08] Other than that, I don't know.

[1:19:09] This, this.

[1:19:10] OK. Next

[1:19:14] point of order

[1:19:15] daytime: research

[1:19:16] The whale was discovered

[1:19:17] offer to buy

[1:19:18] our excavator, which

[1:19:20] not working, for

[1:19:20] a round sum of 5000

[1:19:22] dollars. I don't

[1:19:28] It is quite clear whether

[1:19:29] we need this

[1:19:30] approve. So I

[1:19:33] I'd rather be safe.

[1:19:34] and I will make a proposal

[1:19:36] approve the sale

[1:19:37] municipal

[1:19:38] excavator, which

[1:19:39] is not functioning now.

[1:19:42] Second.

[1:19:42] I support.

[1:19:43] Good. For the amount of 5000

[1:19:45] dollars. Second

[1:19:46] The offer is accepted.

[1:19:47] Is there a question whether

[1:19:48] comments?

[1:19:49] I will only add that we are

[1:19:50] everyone talked about

[1:19:51] our excavator

[1:19:52] last summer. To us

[1:19:54] offered 2500

[1:19:55] dollars for trade-in.

[1:19:57] Um, and also Keith

[1:19:58] investigated whether

[1:19:59] can we do it

[1:20:00] repair.

[1:20:01] The arrow seems to

[1:20:02] collapsed. I have on

[1:20:03] mind, we have

[1:20:05] He is already 12 years old. IN

[1:20:06] he still has enough

[1:20:07] small amount of work

[1:20:08] hours, so that added

[1:20:09] of some value to him.

[1:20:10] Um, and we have a resident

[1:20:11] Jamaica, which

[1:20:12] going to buy

[1:20:13] his and, probably,

[1:20:14] to disassemble into

[1:20:15] spare parts or something

[1:20:16] like this, but this.

[1:20:18] I took it apart twice.

[1:20:19] more than us

[1:20:20] we get from the trailer.

[1:20:22] Better than that. Exactly

[1:20:23] Yes. That's right. Yes. I...

[1:20:25] thank you for this.

[1:20:26] said, because you know,

[1:20:28] The cat is also very

[1:20:29] worked on this. So,

[1:20:31] Thank you, Keith.

[1:20:32] Yes. Um, okay, on

[1:20:33] I hereby declare

[1:20:34] voting. Who is "for"?

[1:20:36] please tell me

[1:20:37] "Yes".

[1:20:38] Yes. Perfectly. Um, and this

[1:20:40] takes us to

[1:20:41] usual order

[1:20:42] daytime. I contribute

[1:20:45] proposal

[1:20:45] approve timesheets

[1:20:47] working hours for

[1:20:48] office staff,

[1:20:49] city

[1:20:49] administration,

[1:20:50] appraisers,

[1:20:51] road crew and

[1:20:52] stations

[1:20:53] overload.

[1:20:55] Thank you. Are there any

[1:20:57] discussion about

[1:20:58] this? If any comments

[1:20:59] no, who is "for", be it

[1:21:00] Please say "yes."

[1:21:01] Yes.

[1:21:05] The only small thing

[1:21:06] update: our

[1:21:07] Deputy Jody Rowe

[1:21:08] for the station

[1:21:09] overload already

[1:21:10] spent about 7

[1:21:11] hours with Ernie, and we

[1:21:12] him tomorrow

[1:21:13] let's discuss a few

[1:21:14] moments. OK.

[1:21:19] Mainly, um,

[1:21:20] fees for

[1:21:21] unloading and

[1:21:22] his thoughts on this

[1:21:23] ,

[1:21:23] and his other ideas. So

[1:21:25] Wait for the news. AT,

[1:21:26] Please.

[1:21:27] You mentioned the meeting.

[1:21:28] for unloading. Yes

[1:21:29] , there are um postcards on

[1:21:30] in the city, at the post office and here

[1:21:31] , at the city office. You

[1:21:34] voted last

[1:21:35] a week or two days

[1:21:36] therefore for the increase

[1:21:37] construction fees

[1:21:39] garbage, and it will gain

[1:21:40] effective November 1

[1:21:41] for the council. So

[1:21:42] it was only two

[1:21:43] weeks ago, right?

[1:21:44] Two weeks ago.

[1:21:45] Two weeks have passed.

[1:21:46] Yes, I wasn't here.

[1:21:48] a few weeks ago,

[1:21:49] but if someone

[1:21:50] interesting, I can provide

[1:21:51] this information, or I

[1:21:52] posted a lot

[1:21:53] ads around the city,

[1:21:54] because it is essential

[1:21:54] increase. And again

[1:21:56] yes, we don't do this

[1:21:57] in order to rip people off, and

[1:21:58] just trying

[1:21:59] to cover the costs. Our

[1:22:01] the expenses were

[1:22:01] extremely low

[1:22:02] , and we spend

[1:22:03] a lot of money for

[1:22:04] debris,

[1:22:05] so we just

[1:22:06] we are trying to get out

[1:22:07] zero. So,

[1:22:08] clean up your own

[1:22:09] garages now.

[1:22:10] Yes. Do it now.

[1:22:14] Oh, this...yes, we don't actually operate in

[1:22:16] own interests.

[1:22:17] OK. Next

[1:22:18] point of order

[1:22:19] daytime—

[1:22:20] approval

[1:22:20] payment orders,

[1:22:22] submitted for consideration

[1:22:23] council.

[1:22:23] I support.

[1:22:24] Are there any discussions?

[1:22:25] If there are no comments,

[1:22:26] Who is in favor, please?

[1:22:27] say "yes".

[1:22:28] Yes.

[1:22:28] OK. Appeal

[1:22:30] citizens. Karen, you have

[1:22:31] Do you have a list?

[1:22:32] Um, can I, can I...

[1:22:33] Yes.

[1:22:34] Do we want to at all?

[1:22:35] to talk about

[1:22:35] possible change in volume

[1:22:37] works at the station

[1:22:37] overload?

[1:22:38] I think we...well, we all are.

[1:22:39] met, just

[1:22:40] can we update this

[1:22:41] information. Yes, we...

[1:22:42] met there.

[1:22:44] We organized

[1:22:44] meeting to

[1:22:45] visit the facility, and

[1:22:46] considered specific

[1:22:47] moments that

[1:22:48] need

[1:22:49] improvement, and that

[1:22:50] can be improved. Ahem,

[1:22:52] Tom and I, and all of us,

[1:22:53] I think we still want to announce a tender to

[1:22:56] potentially

[1:22:57] to install a fence

[1:22:58] in the processing area, this

[1:22:59] would be one of

[1:23:00] security issues.

[1:23:02] Greg and I were dating.

[1:23:04] When was that?

[1:23:05] Last week.

[1:23:06] Very quickly. Yes, but

[1:23:08] we haven't done anything yet

[1:23:09] made up. But another idea

[1:23:10] also consists in the fact that we change our

[1:23:13] recycling tariffs

[1:23:14] construction waste,

[1:23:15] which, we hope,

[1:23:16] will reduce the number

[1:23:18] waste that goes there

[1:23:19] get in, and we can reduce

[1:23:21] number

[1:23:21] containers. So this is

[1:23:24] will also allow

[1:23:25] reduce the volume

[1:23:26] necessary work. So

[1:23:28] , um,

[1:23:31] we all seem to

[1:23:32] agreed not to advance with

[1:23:33] current volume

[1:23:34] works, and again

[1:23:35] announce a tender.

[1:23:38] And the idea was to

[1:23:39] in order to move

[1:23:40] metal to where it is now

[1:23:41] stands second

[1:23:42] container. So we don't

[1:23:43] it will have to be like this

[1:23:44] to mess around with a lot

[1:23:45] by repairing the place where

[1:23:46] lies the metal that is

[1:23:47] problem,

[1:23:48] and improve drainage

[1:23:49] there, that we may,

[1:23:50] we can do it ourselves

[1:23:51] even this fall.

[1:23:52] Fantastically. OK.

[1:23:54] With the help of our

[1:23:55] new excavator.

[1:23:57] Of course. Good.

[1:23:58] Thank you for

[1:23:59] this public

[1:24:00] comment. I intervened.

[1:24:01] and just started

[1:24:02] to speak, perhaps,

[1:24:03] ahead of everyone

[1:24:04] others.

[1:24:05] Yes. I just wanted to

[1:24:06] record this in

[1:24:07] protocol.

[1:24:08] Perfectly. Ideally.

[1:24:10] Karen.

[1:24:11] Yes. Um, first of all, I

[1:24:13] I'm sure you noticed.

[1:24:14] flowers on the bridge and such

[1:24:16] other. They were

[1:24:17] beautiful this

[1:24:18] year. Not that they

[1:24:19] were not like this in other

[1:24:20] years, but thank you for

[1:24:21] what they did was

[1:24:23] possible. And Martin

[1:24:24] To Venus and his son

[1:24:25] Matthew, who do

[1:24:26] such a wonderful job.

[1:24:30] Um, I have a request.

[1:24:33] I would like you to

[1:24:34] considered

[1:24:35] possibility

[1:24:36] postponement of the evening

[1:24:37] board meetings, so that

[1:24:38] people could

[1:24:38] visit

[1:24:39] school meeting

[1:24:40] council.

[1:24:43] This is serious. It

[1:24:44] important question. So

[1:24:45] think about it. I am not

[1:24:47] ...I'm just suggesting

[1:24:48] this is now, but first

[1:24:56] meeting, which is

[1:24:57] second...this is the second and

[1:24:58] fourth, you...and

[1:24:59] the second Monday is

[1:25:00] school board, and people

[1:25:01] it is very difficult to keep up

[1:25:03] for both. Chrissy

[1:25:09] tried to get in

[1:25:11] for two meetings

[1:25:12] weeks ago, but

[1:25:13] remained on

[1:25:13] school board meeting

[1:25:15] councils, and um, they

[1:25:16] immediately went to

[1:25:17] closed session on

[1:25:18] 45 minutes, and um, in any-

[1:25:19] in any case, this

[1:25:20] important because I don't

[1:25:26] I feel like Jamaica

[1:25:28] well presented.

[1:25:30] Pretty good, in

[1:25:31] there are two of us

[1:25:32] representatives, and

[1:25:33] both of ours

[1:25:34] The representatives are wonderful,

[1:25:35] Drew and Dana. Right.

[1:25:37] But from the past

[1:25:43] meetings

[1:25:44] one gets the impression

[1:25:45] that few people

[1:25:46] are interested in feelings

[1:25:47] Jamaica or Windom,

[1:25:49] or not just feelings, but

[1:25:50] and our worries.

[1:25:56] So, whatever, I just want you to

[1:25:58] thought about it. Ahem.

[1:26:02] We are today

[1:26:03] published our

[1:26:04] new list of events.

[1:26:07] So, on Wednesday, as well as

[1:26:08] earlier, evening

[1:26:10] gatherings. We

[1:26:12] gathering in front of Peacock

[1:26:14] Outfitters every Wednesday from 6:00 p.m.

[1:26:16] until 8:00 p.m. Ends

[1:26:18] submission deadline

[1:26:19] applications for titles

[1:26:20] poet laureate. Is there

[1:26:21] Are there any poets among you? Let

[1:26:24] there as, applications

[1:26:26] are accepted to

[1:26:27] Wednesdays for the period from 2027

[1:26:29] until 2029 for the position

[1:26:33] poet laureate, and this

[1:26:35] organizes

[1:26:35] Memorial

[1:26:36] Jamaica library.

[1:26:37] Erica Bowman was

[1:26:39] our poetess-

[1:26:40] laureate,

[1:26:42] and she, but we also have

[1:26:44] other talented

[1:26:45] authors in the city. So.

[1:26:48] I hope they

[1:26:49] see their extreme

[1:26:50] deadline in the calendar.

[1:26:52] So.

[1:26:53] OK. Yes, I am.

[1:26:54] saw.

[1:26:55] Yes.

[1:26:55] Thursday—Running

[1:26:57] Jamaica club, he

[1:26:58] starts at 5:30 PM at West

[1:27:00] River Provisions. Friday-

[1:27:03] this is, of course, again

[1:27:04] bingo. And the first

[1:27:05] every Friday

[1:27:06] moon at the door

[1:27:08] number three in jamaica-

[1:27:09] house from 6:00 PM to 9:00 PM—ours

[1:27:11] local artists.

[1:27:12] Galleries are open

[1:27:13] late, so this

[1:27:14] interesting entertainment. And in

[1:27:18] Friday will be alive

[1:27:19] music with jill sax at

[1:27:20] River and Ry. On Saturday it will be

[1:27:23] Luminous Crush. From 9:00 to 11:00

[1:27:27] in the morning—yoga and

[1:27:28] acupuncture with Jill

[1:27:30] Sax at Be Well Homestead. And in

[1:27:34] Sunday at 9:00—yoga at

[1:27:35] city hall with

[1:27:36] Mike McKee. These

[1:27:39] weekends from 9:00 to 17:00

[1:27:41] autumn passes

[1:27:42] open studios, and you can visit

[1:27:45] local artists.

[1:27:47] This seems to be the Council.

[1:27:49] Vermont Arts.

[1:27:51] It seems like it.

[1:27:52] That's right. On the website

[1:27:54] There is also a calendar.

[1:27:55] In the library too

[1:27:56] some are expected

[1:27:57] events. Production

[1:27:59] mini brooms, cutting

[1:28:01] pumpkins. And then in

[1:28:03] us Halloween, that is "

[1:28:04] Jamaica Spooktacular".

[1:28:07] And Jamaica is very

[1:28:08] popular place. Children

[1:28:11] from other cities

[1:28:12] come here because

[1:28:13] We have a great route.

[1:28:14] and very generous people who

[1:28:15] really care

[1:28:17] in the spirit of Halloween. First

[1:28:21] than we will depart from

[1:28:22] this topic, I just

[1:28:23] I want to say about

[1:28:24] Bingo evenings. Yes.

[1:28:26] Which passes

[1:28:27] every Friday.

[1:28:29] This Friday

[1:28:30] half of the profits

[1:28:31] from the lottery 50/50 will go

[1:28:33] on Solar.

[1:28:35] Yes.

[1:28:38] I was in the past.

[1:28:38] Fridays with my son and

[1:28:40] I'm very glad I went.

[1:28:41] because there was a lot of things

[1:28:42] to learn. So

[1:28:47] I feel that

[1:28:47] next Friday

[1:28:49] I will be there soon.

[1:28:49] prepared.

[1:28:52] Former boss

[1:28:53] fire department in Vin

[1:28:54] -Holly was the host

[1:28:56] last time. He

[1:28:57] quite wonderful. He

[1:28:58] so wonderful. He

[1:28:59] unbelievable. He is mine.

[1:29:01] I just like it.

[1:29:02] So, uh, it's just

[1:29:03] high. This is a blast, everyone.

[1:29:05] so cute, and the food

[1:29:07] wonderful. You can take

[1:29:09] popcorn, soda, and

[1:29:10] it's quite inexpensive.

[1:29:12] Besides,

[1:29:13] if you stay, then

[1:29:14] you can eat well.

[1:29:15] There is a complete meal there,

[1:29:17] uh, and it's simple

[1:29:18] a real thrill.

[1:29:20] So, I will be there on Friday.

[1:29:23] Therefore,

[1:29:23] the money they

[1:29:24] gather, go to

[1:29:25] Oh, that's all.

[1:29:26] charity.

[1:29:27] That's right. Uh, yes.

[1:29:28] scholarship for children,

[1:29:30] who are graduating from school,

[1:29:31] students of Great Jamaica.

[1:29:33] Uh, I don't do it.

[1:29:34] students of the building.

[1:29:36] Maybe this is for everyone.

[1:29:37] students.

[1:29:37] Oh, this is for all students.

[1:29:38] It seems for everyone

[1:29:39] students. Yes. Yes. And, uh,

[1:29:41] It seems like there are three days,

[1:29:42] three different weeks when

[1:29:44] the money goes to Solar.

[1:29:46] Yes. Yes. So

[1:29:47] the nearest Friday—

[1:29:48] this...Yes.

[1:29:49] And what time is it?

[1:29:50] At 6 o'clock.

[1:29:52] The doors open at

[1:29:53] 6th, and there is a game that

[1:29:54] you can play while

[1:29:56] people are gathering. Uh,

[1:29:58] that's not what they call it

[1:30:00] ...And then at 7:00

[1:30:00] the first one begins

[1:30:02] a series of games, and then

[1:30:03] break. I actually

[1:30:04] passed out on

[1:30:05] break. I was like,

[1:30:07] I am tired. I have on

[1:30:08] mind you, I'm still recovering from

[1:30:09] colds. Uh, me

[1:30:10] I will try to stay until

[1:30:11] end on Friday. It

[1:30:13] simply, it's real

[1:30:14] high. This is a complete thrill.

[1:30:16] It's like

[1:30:16] people like it.

[1:30:18] Yes. Yes. I mean,

[1:30:19] if you want

[1:30:20] to win, you must have

[1:30:21] many games before

[1:30:22] yourself. So, really

[1:30:24] strategy is needed and

[1:30:25] all that. But this

[1:30:26] perfectly. This is great. We

[1:30:28] took their markers.

[1:30:29] We are like this,

[1:30:30] You are ready.

[1:30:31] Yes. Yes. So, I am very

[1:30:33] I recommend. Uh, in

[1:30:34] I have three more.

[1:30:35] advertisement. Friendly

[1:30:37] gatherings, that is

[1:30:38] Thanksgiving with friends

[1:30:40] , uh, we spend in

[1:30:41] city hall every year on Sunday

[1:30:43] , November 22. So

[1:30:44] come and

[1:30:45] bring some

[1:30:46] dish. This will be

[1:30:47] shared table. Uh, me

[1:30:49] I still don't know whose it is.

[1:30:50] hour. It seems we

[1:30:52] still trying

[1:30:53] to decide on time.

[1:30:55] Santa Claus will come to

[1:30:57] Sunday, December 6.

[1:30:59] Sorry. We need this.

[1:31:00] plan. And, uh,

[1:31:04] later, what day is it?

[1:31:06] Santa will arrive on Sunday.

[1:31:08] , December 6. Firefighter

[1:31:11] the service brings

[1:31:12] Santa, and then

[1:31:13] takes it away, and...

[1:31:15] uh, firefighters

[1:31:17] are coming. Firefighters,

[1:31:18] rescuers.

[1:31:20] Yes, there are many women there.

[1:31:22] Yes,

[1:31:22] We have a wonderful fire department.

[1:31:23] service.

[1:31:24] We have a fantastic

[1:31:25] fire department.

[1:31:26] Great boss.

[1:31:28] Excellent administration

[1:31:29] . Honestly, we Oh,

[1:31:31] we are like that

[1:31:32] happy, and people

[1:31:33] constantly involved

[1:31:34] .

[1:31:34] You get

[1:31:35] additional

[1:31:36] certificates, all that

[1:31:37] . It's simple.

[1:31:38] life-giving.

[1:31:39] That's right. Hmm, festive

[1:31:42] craft fair

[1:31:43] there will also be 12 and 13

[1:31:45] December. Just so you

[1:31:47] could have planned everything

[1:31:49] in the city council.

[1:31:51] with new lighting.

[1:31:54] and just now

[1:31:54] painted new.

[1:31:58] OK. Thank you very much

[1:32:01] Thank you. Anything else good?

[1:32:03] OK. Um, I'll bring it in.

[1:32:04] proposal to complete

[1:32:05] meeting. I support.

[1:32:07] Who is for it?

[1:32:08] I

Jamaica Selectboard Mtg 9/28/26

Transcript