[0:02] You are watching the Access channel

[0:04] LaPorte County Channel 97. Next

[0:05] will take place

[0:06] Council meeting

[0:07] LaPorte County 28

[0:09] September. You can

[0:10] find more

[0:12] information about this

[0:13] meeting on the site

[0:15] www.accesslaportecounty.org.

[0:21] Good. Good evening

[0:23] . Welcome to

[0:24] regular meeting

[0:25] council in September. Uh,

[0:27] please turn off

[0:28] all mobile

[0:28] phones and stand up

[0:30] for the Pledge of Allegiance.

[0:32] Ms. Heath, please.

[0:33] I swear allegiance.

[0:36] flag of the United

[0:38] States of America and

[0:39] the republic that he

[0:40] symbolizes, the only

[0:41] nations under God,

[0:42] indivisible, with

[0:43] freedom and

[0:44] justice for

[0:45] everyone.

[0:54] Mr. Arndt, is there

[0:55] vote, be

[0:56] affection?

[0:56] Mr. Pressel.

[0:57] Present. Mr

[0:58] Nigalsky.

[1:00] Present.

[1:00] Mr. Kessler.

[1:02] Present.

[1:02] Mr. Klonowski.

[1:04] Present. Mr

[1:05] Shill. Present.

[1:07] Mrs. Heath.

[1:07] Present.

[1:08] And Mr. Mollenhauer.

[1:09] Present.

[1:10] Everyone is present. Do you have

[1:12] quorum.

[1:12] Thank you. At this time I want to consider

[1:14] question about

[1:15] approval

[1:16] protocol

[1:16] special

[1:17] meeting on August 20 and

[1:18] public hearings.

[1:19] You want to consider

[1:20] agenda.

[1:21] First

[1:21] approval of the order

[1:22] daytime.

[1:22] Oops.

[1:23] I missed one.

[1:23] item.

[1:24] You are right.

[1:25] Then let's move on to

[1:26] approval of the order

[1:27] daytime.

[1:27] Mr. President, I propose a proposal for

[1:30] approval of the order

[1:31] daily, adding

[1:32] next to

[1:32] transfers and

[1:33] spending authorizations.

[1:35] We unintentionally

[1:35] missed the coroner

[1:37] Swanson. She asks

[1:40] $325 per night

[1:41] in Indianapolis for

[1:43] training new

[1:44] sheriff's deputies. Ahem

[1:47] , and this will be removed from

[1:49] account 2053.

[1:52] Where on the agenda

[1:53] do you want...

[1:54] Uh, under the legends and

[1:55] spending authorizations

[1:56] and appropriations...

[1:59] Bottom of the list?

[2:01] Yes, she can...

[2:03] There is already a section with corners,

[2:04] that is, at the bottom of its three

[2:06] ...

[2:06] For two?

[2:07] Or so, under

[2:07] appropriations.

[2:09] although he wants to do

[2:10] transfers.

[2:12] Good. We will deliver

[2:14] this is at the end of the narration

[2:16] . Are there any other points?

[2:25] Okay, so we have

[2:26] offer. I have

[2:28] second offer?

[2:29] Second.

[2:30] Mr.'s proposal

[2:30] Kessler, friend

[2:31] Ms. Heath's suggestion.

[2:32] Everyone who is "for"

[2:33] approval of the order

[2:34] daytime, mark,

[2:35] saying "yes". Yes.

[2:36] Against? Thank you. Good,

[2:39] so now let's move

[2:40] further. Come on, me too

[2:41] I think we probably

[2:42] it's worth breaking it down into...

[2:43] Let's take a look

[2:44] approval

[2:45] protocol

[2:45] special

[2:46] meeting from 20

[2:47] August. I suggest this,

[2:48] President. Therefore,

[2:49] Mr.'s proposal

[2:50] Igalsky.

[2:51] Second.

[2:52] Supported by Mr.

[2:53] Kessler. Everyone who is "in favor"

[2:54] confirm,

[2:55] saying "yes".

[2:56] Yes.

[2:56] Against? Thank you. Uh, in

[2:59] we have approval

[3:00] regular meeting

[3:02] August 24th, and we have

[3:04] joint seminar 24

[3:05] August. I will consider.

[3:09] offer for one

[3:10] either both, or the council

[3:11] will allow me

[3:13] approve both.

[3:15] Mr.'s proposal

[3:16] Mollenhauer. I have

[3:17] Is there a second word?

[3:18] Second.

[3:19] Supported by Ms. Heath.

[3:20] Everyone who is "in favor"

[3:21] confirm,

[3:22] saying "yes".

[3:23] Yes.

[3:23] Against? Thank you.

[3:26] Public

[3:26] discussion.

[3:27] Public

[3:28] discussion now

[3:29] open.

[3:32] Good evening. Steve

[3:33] Hall from the Board of Commissioners

[3:35] district. Small

[3:36] renewal. Uh,

[3:37] elimination of harm from

[3:38] The storm is still ongoing.

[3:39] If anyone of

[3:39] your voters

[3:40] problems will arise,

[3:41] they will call

[3:41] you will be asked

[3:42] questions, contact

[3:42] with the road department,

[3:43] will be added to the list,

[3:44] and they will pick him up

[3:45] . The work is moving.

[3:46] slow. There

[3:46] much more

[3:47] thickets than people

[3:48] thought. And, uh, but

[3:49] they are still working

[3:50] during the day. And also,

[3:51] because budget

[3:51] The hearing is coming to an end.

[3:52] and you guys,

[3:53] are you going to

[3:53] approve the budget, I still want you to

[3:55] remembered about

[3:55] district employees,

[3:56] Please. If we

[3:57] will have to refuse any

[3:58] what increases for

[3:59] elected in the district, then

[3:59] make sure that we will take care of

[4:00] employees. We are not

[4:01] we can allow

[4:02] to lose everything

[4:02] the experience that we have. Thank you.

[4:04] Thank you. Are there any more?

[4:10] someone from

[4:11] the public, who

[4:12] Want to speak? Not

[4:19] seeing no one,

[4:20] public discussion

[4:21] is now closed.

[4:23] Let's move on to reports.

[4:24] heads of departments.

[4:35] Good evening. Dan

[4:36] Barney, Treasurer

[4:38] La Porte County. Uh, me

[4:39] I just want to

[4:40] consider a few

[4:41] things. Uh, we

[4:42] approved our

[4:44] claims in the amount of 414,963.28

[4:47] dollars. This is ours

[4:49] personal income tax

[4:50] property. Uh, we

[4:52] received 59,131.21

[4:55] dollars. So, 1

[4:57] October we will witness

[5:00] court $355,832.07. THERE ARE-

[5:07] uh, we also got

[5:08] our first check for

[5:09] tax on

[5:09] service

[5:10] hotels for the district

[5:11] almost $8,000.

[5:12] So it seems that this

[5:13] the first check that

[5:13] district ever

[5:14] received from this

[5:15] reason. This is related

[5:16] with that new one

[5:16] by resolution, where we can show them

[5:18] account for delays.

[5:19] So almost $8,000.

[5:28] Good.

[5:30] So, we also have

[5:31] item in the section "

[5:32] "Old business", which we will raise, expecting

[5:34] your, uh, letter,

[5:35] which you sent us

[5:37] everyone. Uh, is there anything that

[5:38] you want to consider

[5:39] about this now

[5:40] , do you want

[5:40] consider this in

[5:41] section "Old cases"

[5:42] "?

[5:42] Oh, I'm here. Let's just do it.

[5:47] Good. So, uh, uh, I assume that everyone

[5:51] had the opportunity

[5:52] review

[5:53] documents that, uh,

[5:54] Mr. Barney sent

[5:55] to all of us.

[5:56] Hmm, Mr. Yale,

[5:57] maybe not, because it

[5:57] e-mail address

[5:58] returned, and I

[5:59] took advantage of

[5:59] by email,

[6:00] which is on the website

[6:01] district, so I ask

[6:02] Sorry about that. All

[6:03] OK. I didn't see.

[6:04] this. Is there

[6:05] electronic is written

[6:06] district address?

[6:07] No, it's Comcast, I guess.

[6:08] .

[6:08] Yes, I...That's it,

[6:10] What do I have? He could

[6:11] specify dot com instead

[6:12] dot net. I don't know. But,

[6:14] good.

[6:15] Sorry. I...I understand.

[6:17] I copied and pasted

[6:18] this, so...Okay.

[6:20] I didn't see this. Yes,

[6:22] let's continue.

[6:24] So, at the moment,

[6:25] because most

[6:26] of us at least has

[6:27] document i don't know

[6:28] did everyone have

[6:29] opportunity carefully

[6:29] read it, uh,

[6:30] let's think

[6:31] about taking it off

[6:33] for consideration. Hmm, it seems

[6:34] unofficially

[6:35] pushed him on

[6:36] this meeting, but

[6:37] technically he still is

[6:38] should be on the table.

[6:39] Offer to remove

[6:40] him from consideration.

[6:41] Good. Offer

[6:42] Mr. Yale.

[6:43] Second.

[6:44] the proposal

[6:45] Mr. Casperson. Everyone,

[6:46] Who is "for" the removal?

[6:47] hiring permit

[6:48] workers for

[6:48] Treasurer's office,

[6:49] confirm this

[6:50] with the words "yes".

[6:51] Yes. Yes.

[6:52] Against? Good. Word

[6:55] Yours, sir.

[6:56] Well, I think, having

[6:57] documents in hand, I

[6:59] listed all

[7:00] responsibilities of each of

[7:01] my positions in the office.

[7:02] So, I mean,

[7:03] that each of them has

[7:04] many things, and that one,

[7:05] Who do I want to hire?

[7:06] this is the second deputy.

[7:07] Not a deputy

[7:07] a scout, and another

[7:08] second deputy. It

[7:09] the one I don't

[7:10] worked, I don't know,

[7:11] five or six

[7:12] months. Hmm, that's very

[7:13] important work that

[7:14] supports our

[7:15] deputy

[7:16] scout. And I have to

[7:19] I mean, you know, there is

[7:20] really should be

[7:21] responsible for

[7:22] arrests and, um, moving

[7:23] property, the seizure of which

[7:25] there is also enough

[7:26] important matter,

[7:27] because we need

[7:28] to go through each

[7:29] city, every state

[7:31] institution in the district

[7:32] Laporte. So, that's all.

[7:35] schools, all cities, all

[7:36] villages. So, with all this

[7:38] employees who

[7:40] delay payment

[7:41] taxes, we must

[7:42] send documents

[7:43] Excel, make sure that

[7:44] they are still working

[7:45] to this organization, and

[7:46] then find out whether

[7:47] one of them hired

[7:48] other people about whom

[7:49] we didn't know yet, but

[7:50] then we need

[7:51] view this

[7:51] list. So, this is

[7:52] big process

[7:53] arrest settings

[7:54] for this. Fortunately,

[7:55] we need to do

[7:57] it's only once a year,

[7:58] but this is another big one

[7:59] work. So, of course,

[8:00] we would also like

[8:01] to work on

[8:02] our personal

[8:03] property and

[8:03] improve this

[8:04] process, and we can

[8:05] There is a lot to do.

[8:06] We don't need any

[8:07] solution for this. We,

[8:08] um, we just have

[8:10] clear our data.

[8:12] So every time we send a letter-

[8:14] requirement, computer

[8:15] system automatically

[8:16] clicks on the surcharge in

[8:17] amount of 5 dollars. Well,

[8:18] people get their

[8:19] letter, receive yours

[8:20] tax bill,

[8:21] pay it, but

[8:21] never pay 5

[8:22] dollars. So, unfortunately,

[8:23] the system does not return

[8:25] these 5 dollars, so there is

[8:26] a lot of that

[8:27] the collectors call

[8:28] garbage. Um,

[8:29] junk accounts.

[8:31] So, for example, we send them

[8:32] $5 bills.

[8:33] Well, they never

[8:34] will charge the bill for 5

[8:35] dollars. And the district

[8:36] sent thousands and

[8:37] thousands of these for

[8:38] penalty. So this is

[8:39] just some of the things,

[8:40] which, I think,

[8:41] hindered part

[8:42] our process

[8:42] collection, because we send them things,

[8:44] which they cannot

[8:45] to pull. So this is

[8:46] makes them spend

[8:47] their time, and they don't

[8:48] like...Nobody

[8:48] doesn't like to spend

[8:49] your time, especially

[8:50] because, I think,

[8:51] the pullers are working

[8:52] for a commission. So they

[8:53] really don't want to work on our

[8:54] things through all

[8:55] bad data we eat

[8:56] provided. I mean

[8:57] probably over 8000

[8:58] documents for

[8:59] the last 10 years. So

[9:00] this is necessary

[9:01] to fix. All this

[9:02] a big process, it

[9:04] takes time. Uh, we are ending 2016,

[9:06] because it lasted 10 years,

[9:08] so we no longer

[9:09] we can do anything

[9:10] to be charged since 2016.

[9:11] So, I mean, is

[9:12] Do you have any?

[9:13] questions about

[9:14] the position I am applying for

[9:14] I am hiring or want

[9:15] to hire?

[9:16] Just for clarity,

[9:17] Sir, what position are you applying for?

[9:18] Are you hiring?

[9:18] Second Deputy.

[9:20] This is the second deputy.

[9:22] This will be a comment, right?

[9:25] Five.

[9:26] Good. I think that,

[9:28] Mr. President, um,

[9:30] again, I would

[9:31] said if we

[9:32] 5 months have passed, still

[9:33] one month, no

[9:34] I am going to interrupt.

[9:35] this process directly

[9:36] now. We already

[9:37] talked about the process

[9:38] attempts to close

[9:39] Michigan City on

[9:40] a few days on

[9:40] week. I think that

[9:41] we still have to continue what

[9:43] we are trying

[9:44] make. And again

[9:45] Yes, it's been 5

[9:46] months. So, one more

[9:47] month, I don't think so

[9:48] this will lead to

[9:50] that we can pass

[9:51] through our budget to

[9:52] discuss 100 points

[9:53] , as well as the closure

[9:54] some days in Michigan

[9:56] -City. Not only him

[9:57] office, many

[9:58] offices. Yes, I already have.

[9:59] talked about it with

[10:00] clerical. She is already...

[10:01] I discussed this with her.

[10:02] I discussed this with

[10:03] other managers

[10:04] departments, and all

[10:05] understand in which

[10:06] direction we are moving. So we

[10:07] should, you know,

[10:08] to grit one's teeth or something

[10:10] like this. You know, we don't

[10:11] can...we should

[10:12] decide that we want to do it because there is

[10:14] the only way

[10:15] save money. We all know that the 27th

[10:18] approaching. Therefore...

[10:20] What is your decision?

[10:22] As far as I hear yours

[10:23] comments, so the only thing,

[10:24] What do I need for?

[10:27] to all of us

[10:28] attention, this is what it is not

[10:30] just one office, but

[10:31] several offices, and how we can move

[10:33] go ahead with this

[10:34] in parallel. Emm,

[10:35] well, this position will be

[10:36] the one that I like

[10:36] needed at the port.

[10:37] She won't disappear anywhere.

[10:38] . Only Michigan City.

[10:40] Responsibilities

[10:40] spread throughout the

[10:41] county.

[10:41] That's true, but

[10:42] Michigan staff-

[10:43] City will go to the port. So

[10:44] we are not anyone

[10:44] we release. They

[10:45] are going to the port. This will be 5

[10:47] -year process. We

[10:48] explained it to everyone. It

[10:49] no one was surprised,

[10:51] because I had long

[10:52] discussion with everyone

[10:53] employees

[10:54] department regarding

[10:55] this conversation.

[10:56] Yes, no one

[10:57] discussed with me

[10:58] Michigan closure-

[10:59] City, just so you

[11:00] knew.

[11:00] Good. So,

[11:03] People, remind us?

[11:04] How many people do you have?

[11:05] currently working in La-

[11:06] Porti, including you?

[11:12] Four.

[11:12] So, you have

[11:13] Are there four full ones?

[11:14] someone is incomplete

[11:15] working day?

[11:16] That's four full ones. We attract a little

[11:18] less incomplete

[11:18] employees,

[11:19] starting from this

[11:19] moment, because

[11:20] collection of contributions.

[11:20] And remind me again

[11:21] once when this

[11:22] will begin.

[11:22] Well, collection of contributions

[11:23] starts now.

[11:24] it is gaining

[11:25] revolutions.

[11:26] Good.

[11:26] So, approximately through

[11:28] 40 days. So, four

[11:30] in La Porte, and then

[11:31] one in Michigan City.

[11:32] Or, well, there should be two.

[11:34] Yes.

[11:34] But now only one?

[11:36] Um, well, I'm there.

[11:39] Last time, when

[11:41] you were here and

[11:41] spoke out against this

[11:42] question, I violated

[11:43] a few questions about

[11:44] how this additional

[11:45] position, or this position,

[11:47] if it is replenished,

[11:48] can help with

[11:49] by collection

[11:49] unpaid bills

[11:51] . I haven't had it yet.

[11:52] opportunities

[11:52] view all that

[11:53] you sent, but

[11:54] it seems like this

[11:55] mostly descriptions

[11:57] positions. Will you have

[11:59] opportunity to

[11:59] next meeting

[12:00] potentially

[12:01] view this

[12:02] questions and how they

[12:03] will be able to provide

[12:04] us additional income?

[12:05] Because I think that this

[12:06] justifies this

[12:06] position and helps

[12:07] to prove that we get an additional

[12:09] income that is otherwise

[12:10] would stay

[12:10] unassembled. I wanted

[12:11] would like to see more

[12:12] information from this

[12:13] reason.

[12:16] Good. Is there

[12:17] proposal to make

[12:18] this is under consideration

[12:19] next month?

[12:20] Proposal to take

[12:21] this is for consideration by

[12:22] Mr. Jagelsky.

[12:27] Second. The second from Mr.

[12:29] Keel. Everyone who is "for"

[12:30] to bring this up for consideration

[12:31] , confirm,

[12:32] saying "yes". Yes.

[12:33] Against? No. Good.

[12:37] But, just so you

[12:38] knew, our office in

[12:39] Michigan City in

[12:39] Friday made on

[12:40] amount over 3000 dollars

[12:41] from our office in La-

[12:42] Porti. So, income

[12:43] Michigan City sharply

[12:44] increased over the last

[12:45] a year or so.

[12:46] people found out,

[12:47] that the office is still

[12:47] open. What are they

[12:49] didn't know. Or

[12:50] they are coming

[12:50] personally? Do they pay?

[12:51] they? Do they pay?

[12:53] personally?

[12:53] So

[12:54] Let's

[12:54] make sure that we

[12:55] everything is understood, simply

[12:56] to be careful,

[12:56] isn't that right? So, we

[12:57] postponed this issue

[12:58] for consideration. Let's make sure that I will take into account the additional

[13:00] information, but I don't

[13:01] I think we are more

[13:02] we can put

[13:02] questions and

[13:03] answer.

[13:03] Thank you.

[13:04] Please provide

[13:05] us an additional

[13:05] information

[13:06] in advance to

[13:07] next meeting,

[13:07] so that we have time for her

[13:08] to consider.

[13:09] I persist.

[13:10] I call on everyone

[13:10] to contact

[13:11] treasurer to

[13:12] next meeting,

[13:13] so that we can get

[13:14] answers to all our

[13:15] question of the day...

[13:16] I will.

[13:17] Thank you. Good. Emm,

[13:19] I continue reporting.

[13:20] department heads

[13:22] or managers

[13:22] departments.

[13:27] Good evening. Eric

[13:29] Window maker,

[13:29] ambulance service

[13:30] La-District Assistance

[13:31] Port. I appeal to

[13:32] you to ask

[13:33] about support. Um, we

[13:34] discussed

[13:34] re-installation of machines

[13:35] ambulance under

[13:36] time of hearings on

[13:37] budget. We have

[13:37] ambulance

[13:38] assistance that was

[13:39] damaged in February, if you

[13:40] remember her

[13:41] encountered

[13:41] damage,

[13:42] returned to the manufacturer

[13:43] for repair. All

[13:44] done. So I have

[13:45] opportunity to take

[13:46] first set for

[13:47] remounting

[13:48] next year already

[13:49] this week when we will take away

[13:51] renovated

[13:52] kit. It

[13:53] will deprive us

[13:54] necessary separately

[13:55] to go on his

[13:56] dismantling. They,

[13:57] will probably start

[13:58] repair during

[13:59] the next 3 weeks.

[14:00] So we have a little time.

[14:01] , but I just thought

[14:02] that can be saved,

[14:03] if we analyze

[14:04] him, while we still

[14:05] we are going to pick up

[14:06] this ambulance

[14:07] help. Uh, I don't.

[14:08] I want to drag this out.

[14:09] but just so you

[14:11] knew, new car

[14:12] ambulance

[14:13] now costs about

[14:14] $420,000 and we don't

[14:15] we will see it through to the end

[14:17] 2029. We can

[14:18] to remount two

[14:19] ambulances

[14:20] help next

[14:21] year for 460,000 dollars,

[14:22] so almost two in

[14:23] for the price of one. Simply

[14:26] for general

[14:26] known, process

[14:27] remounting

[14:28] consists in removing

[14:29] chassis body. Chassis

[14:31] is replaced with a new one.

[14:32] They correct

[14:33] any damage,

[14:34] polish the paint,

[14:35] polish the inside

[14:36] part, make it

[14:38] quite new. Uh,

[14:39] any problems with

[14:40] corrosion, etc.

[14:41] are being resolved. Hmm, and this,

[14:42] obviously enough

[14:43] significant savings

[14:44] funds, but I just

[14:46] I want to know if

[14:47] can I get

[14:48] resolution on

[14:49] support for

[14:50] not to exceed 460,000

[14:51] dollars from the budget

[14:52] next year on these

[14:54] two repairs. So I could

[14:55] would remove this setting

[14:57] this week and

[14:57] start the process.

[15:01] Before we take a moment

[15:02] let's move on to

[15:03] acceptance, sir

[15:04] auditor, does it create

[15:05] are there any problems with

[15:06] the way our budget

[15:07] submitted to the state?

[15:10] Not right now, because, um,

[15:12] you would not pay

[15:13] ambulances

[15:14] assistance with

[15:17] ordinary expenses that

[15:18] we have, what are you,

[15:19] guys, already

[15:19] approved on

[15:20] next year. You

[15:22] would have to take it from

[15:23] one of the capital

[15:25] funds, or you

[15:25] would have to take it from

[15:27] whether there are any

[15:28] lighting that can

[15:29] to be available at that time.

[15:31] Good.

[15:33] Mr. President.

[15:34] Resolution on

[15:35] support. Me too

[15:36] I should add that, um, we

[15:37] not only about this

[15:38] we talk, but when I am installing lights.

[15:39] panels during

[15:40] replenishment of stocks

[15:41] and all that other stuff, that's

[15:42] actually more expensive

[15:42] things we don't

[15:43] let's include this.

[15:44] So, the offer for

[15:45] support for the same.

[15:46] Second.

[15:47] Offer for

[15:48] support from Mr.

[15:49] Yeske, second from

[15:49] Mr. Kessler. Is there

[15:50] further discussion

[15:52] from the council?

[15:53] And this is for payment

[15:54] next year.

[15:55] Right.

[15:56] Yes.

[15:58] Everyone who is "in favor"

[15:59] confirm,

[16:00] saying "I". «

[16:01] I". «

[16:02] Against"? Thank you.

[16:04] Have a nice trip

[16:06] .

[16:17] Oh, Jeremy Smeki from

[16:18] Parks Department.

[16:20] Uh, I just wanted to

[16:21] a few updates. Uh,

[16:22] as the commissioner said

[16:23] Holyfield, we,

[16:24] obviously, still

[16:25] we clean. Uh, we have

[16:26] were Pioneer Days

[16:27] this weekend, so

[16:28] we had a lot

[16:29] preparatory work

[16:30] for this. Uh,

[16:31] about 1500, uh, 1600

[16:32] people came to this

[16:33] within 2 days,

[16:34] pretty good

[16:36] number. Hmm, we

[16:38] today we found out,

[16:39] what Google AI advertises

[16:40] next weekend,

[16:41] so please don't

[16:43] look at AI to

[16:44] find dates for your

[16:45] things. Hmm, no

[16:47] trust everything that

[16:48] you see there.

[16:49] Come to the truth

[16:51] sites that can

[16:52] to tell you for sure,

[16:53] when are these days Hmm, I don't.

[16:56] I say that some of their

[16:57] materials

[16:58] false, but

[16:59] go to the website

[17:00] Laporte County Parks

[17:02] or on the Facebook site to

[17:03] find our website at

[17:04] Facebook to find these

[17:05] dates. What's over?

[17:09] So, um, yeah. In any case. Hmm, In any case, we still

[17:13] we clean in Bloom. IN

[17:15] We are trees, uh,

[17:16] trails that are still

[17:17] closed in Lura, this

[17:18] overhanging branches, with

[17:19] which our staff and

[17:20] equipment cannot

[17:22] to cope. Uh, in

[17:24] Bloomie still has hundreds

[17:25] trees on one side

[17:26] the park, and the whole forest

[17:28] closed. Stitches for

[17:29] mountain bikes

[17:30] , horse trails, everything

[17:31] like this. Now that Days

[17:32] the pioneers are over

[17:34] , we are going

[17:34] start doing this.

[17:36] Um, don't drag it.

[17:37] a lot of this, because

[17:38] it's in the forest and we can

[17:40] just clear up

[17:41] path and allow

[17:42] let nature do its thing,

[17:44] but, uh, it will be,

[17:45] you know, there are many more

[17:46] work. Uh, we have

[17:47] several are planned

[17:48] volunteer days with

[17:49] people who are

[17:50] qualified, and

[17:51] which will also help

[17:52] us in this.

[17:53] So, before you

[17:53] go to

[17:54] next point,

[17:55] because people

[17:56] are listening to this meeting,

[17:57] what to do if you

[17:58] looking for volunteers,

[17:59] Who are you looking for? Which

[18:00] workforce?

[18:01] Yeah, you know, obviously,

[18:02] we need people,

[18:03] who know how

[18:04] safe to work with

[18:05] saw, etc. So we

[18:06] quite picky about

[18:07] this. I mean,

[18:09] I don't want anyone to

[18:10] suffered, and, uh,

[18:11] obviously, uh, we don't

[18:12] we want someone

[18:13] suffered on our

[18:14] property. Uh, but we can, you know, people,

[18:16] which we know that

[18:18] have these skills and

[18:19] skills, we can

[18:20] to work with you. AND,

[18:21] you know, the person is here and

[18:23] there, which is simply

[18:23] will help pull out

[18:25] bushes, that's all

[18:26] another matter. You know,

[18:27] after that, we

[18:28] may be needed

[18:29] people from

[18:29] blowers and

[18:30] similar equipment

[18:31] to come and

[18:32] to do this, that

[18:33] useful. And the mountains

[18:34] cyclists

[18:34] came and did

[18:35] this is last time

[18:36] after we have

[18:37] it was a great day

[18:38] volunteering. So,

[18:39] yes, there are several

[18:40] opportunities, so

[18:41] call me at

[18:42] office at 325-831-5,

[18:44] and we will try

[18:45] to register you where

[18:46] we can.

[18:47] Okay, so.

[18:48] Um, and then, um, I know, I think I am.

[18:51] contacted several

[18:52] of you last week.

[18:54] Um, my, um, new one

[18:55] electric

[18:56] truck, I

[18:57] got into an accident. Um,

[18:58] I was hit from the side and

[19:00] crashed into the back of

[19:01] Michigan City. So I

[19:02] I'll take this.

[19:03] truck to

[19:04] get, um, an estimate

[19:05] costs and, you know,

[19:07] repair. She is on the move,

[19:09] but the whole back part

[19:10] in a pretty bad way

[19:11] condition. But, um, yes, I

[19:13] I'll get, um, a grade.

[19:14] the cost of this,

[19:15] working with Monique,

[19:16] working with

[19:16] insurance company,

[19:18] and it wasn't my fault,

[19:19] so it shouldn't

[19:20] to be none

[19:21] expenses for the district.

[19:22] She is completely

[19:23] damaged? He

[19:24] completely broken? No

[19:25] , no, that's not true. This is not

[19:27] That's bad enough. It

[19:28] one back corner, and

[19:29] then everything else

[19:30] the side where the person

[19:31] hit me from the side.

[19:32] Um, but

[19:33] about your truck

[19:34] there are?

[19:34] This is a 2015 Ford Lightning. IN

[19:37] him

[19:37] was aluminum

[19:38] platform, right?

[19:39] Yes, well,

[19:40] Someone knocked me down.

[19:41] parking lot, and I thought,

[19:42] you know, $1,000.

[19:43] Oh, it will be.

[19:44] 15,000.

[19:45] I appreciated this.

[19:46] approximately 10-12 thousand,

[19:47] apparently.

[19:48] Specialist in

[19:49] aluminum.

[19:49] Well, one way or another, but

[19:51] 139 does it, but yes.

[19:53] The platform has yet to be

[19:55] ready.

[19:57] So, we also have

[19:58] another car,

[20:00] which we had, uh,

[20:01] approved, uh, on

[20:02] which we replaced

[20:04] Chevy. He is ready, but

[20:07] Ford has installed

[20:08] wrong, uh, VIN-

[20:09] number. So now they

[20:12] can't give us

[20:13] this car, while

[20:14] he will not have

[20:15] correct VIN number

[20:16] . So, I'm waiting, waiting

[20:18] on this, and then our

[20:19] Chevrolet will go to

[20:20] building renovation, as

[20:21] only this will happen,

[20:22] but

[20:24] good.

[20:24] Yes. Um, and finally, this,

[20:29] uh, I had, uh,

[20:31] that Dodge we're talking about

[20:32] you talked.

[20:35] Yes, sir.

[20:40] Um, so we had a Dodge.

[20:41] 2000 model year, we have

[20:43] two failed

[20:44] collectors, and me

[20:45] had to him

[20:47] to repair, uh,

[20:48] for the amount of, uh, 3157

[20:49] dollars, 78 cents, and in

[20:51] I don't have any of those.

[20:52] money in the budget, and I was hoping I could

[20:55] get a resolution

[20:57] in support, uh, to

[20:58] pay them to

[20:59] next meeting.

[21:05] Okay, this is a repair.

[21:06] engine of the existing

[21:07] trucks, not

[21:08] request for a new one

[21:09] truck.

[21:10] Right. And I would

[21:12] usually didn't ask,

[21:13] but in March we

[21:14] had to pay

[21:15] 5000 dollars, a few

[21:16] dollars to

[21:17] repair that one

[21:18] Chevrolet that will go

[21:19] for building repairs.

[21:21] So when I did that

[21:22] , the council said

[21:23] to return, and if

[21:24] we will need something,

[21:25] to return and

[21:26] to ask for it.

[21:27] Good. What was yours?

[21:28] ...And what was yours?

[21:29] budget for repairs?

[21:30] 3200.

[21:32] Good.

[21:32] Therefore. And then, when we

[21:34] he was returned,

[21:35] battery too

[21:35] discharged. So, this is

[21:37] there was another $218.

[21:39] So, my overall

[21:40] the amount is, hmm,

[21:42] $3776.34, that's what I ask for support.

[21:46] resolutions.

[21:51] Any questions or

[21:52] action from the council? Or

[22:00] there is an offer

[22:01] approve the proposal

[22:02] regarding support

[22:03] car expenses

[22:05] and the truck?

[22:06] Good. On-

[22:07] second.

[22:07] So, the proposal

[22:08] Mr. Ugolski approved,

[22:09] second, Mr. Kessler.

[22:11] Any further

[22:12] comments?

[22:12] Discussion. All who

[22:14] supports the proposal

[22:15] , confirm,

[22:16] saying "yes".

[22:17] Yes.

[22:17] Against? Thank you.

[22:20] I just wish, um,

[22:21] I know that Mr.

[22:22] Director Subeki already

[22:23] remembered Creek-

[22:25] Ridge, um, yes, on

[22:26] weekend, and just

[22:27] wanted it to be in

[22:28] my, um, little one

[22:30] agenda for

[22:31] our comments, and,

[22:32] hmm, my wife and I were

[22:34] there on Sunday yesterday and

[22:35] saw everyone there. Uh, and

[22:37] he...It was just...

[22:38] So, every year it

[22:39] just great, and,

[22:40] of course, the weather

[22:41] was really wonderful.

[22:43] There are horses there with

[22:43] Clydesdale, and

[22:44] cart riding, and I just want to say and

[22:47] not to tell anyone,

[22:48] if you haven't been yet,

[22:49] please come

[22:50] next year.

[22:52] Yes, not the following ones

[22:53] weekend?

[22:55] It was in my

[22:55] calendars from Google.

[22:56] Yes. Yes. Uh-huh.

[22:58] But it was wonderful.

[22:59] work. You guys,

[23:00] really do this

[23:01] just great every year,

[23:02] and this year it's again

[23:03] It was just wonderful.

[23:04] This year was the 29th year

[23:06] , so next year

[23:07] We have the 30th.

[23:08] It is also educational as

[23:09] for adults, as well as

[23:10] for children, you know.

[23:12] Mr. Auditor, you have

[23:13] Did something happen?

[23:13] It's simple.

[23:14] correction. He

[23:15] remembered that the electric

[23:16] the truck was 2015

[23:17] year of manufacture, it is 2025

[23:19] year.

[23:19] Yes, sorry. Sorry,

[23:20] I just went for the sake of it.

[23:21] minutes when I leave,

[23:22] when I change the date. I am not

[23:24] I want someone to

[23:24] said that I move things.

[23:26] I don't think they have

[23:27] that time will be

[23:28] electric

[23:28] trucks. Thank you.

[23:30] Mr. Auditor.

[23:32] And we are working on

[23:33] these loans.

[23:34] Yes.

[23:35] Thank you.

[23:38] Are there any more?

[23:38] department heads?

[23:42] Are there any leaders?

[23:44] departments with Zoom or Teams?

[23:46] You see. No, I have

[23:48] one. I don't see any.

[23:52] Managers' reports

[23:53] departments are closed.

[23:55] Let's move on to reports.

[23:56] about connections. Mona?

[24:00] Uh, just, uh, I have

[24:02] there were two things. And with, uh,

[24:04] the one that concerns

[24:06] Creek Ridge, was the first,

[24:07] but, uh, just want to comment, uh,

[24:10] Sheriff Heath spent, uh,

[24:12] annual, uh,

[24:13] memorial ceremony

[24:14] Neil Thompson this

[24:16] year, uh, on

[24:17] cemetery there in New

[24:18] Carlisle, September 21, e

[24:20] -er, in honor of, er, Nila

[24:21] Neil Thompson, uh, 46

[24:23] years since its

[24:24] deaths at

[24:25] performance of official duties

[24:27] responsibilities. Uh, uh,

[24:29] he was a patrolman in

[24:30] at that time and died under

[24:32] time of persecution

[24:33] on state road 39

[24:34] where the stolen car

[24:36] ambulance, uh,

[24:37] stolen from Nappanee,

[24:38] Indiana state. So, uh,

[24:40] thank him for that

[24:41] he does it every year.

[24:43] It's just what we don't always want to be there,

[24:45] and in the department, and,

[24:46] I hope no one

[24:47] will never want to

[24:48] forget it. He was

[24:51] a wonderful person, and

[24:52] we really don't like it

[24:53] enough, and, hmm, that's all

[24:54] . Thank you for this again.

[24:57] done.

[24:59] Thank you. Mr. Geet.

[25:00] There is no report.

[25:01] Mr. Kill.

[25:02] Mr. Mollenhauer

[25:03] remembered that later

[25:04] there will be a Bears game, and

[25:05] I wouldn't want to bother you.

[25:06] him to do it. So I wave mine too.

[25:08] report.

[25:10] Thank you.

[25:10] I don't think you

[25:11] a fan of the "Bears".

[25:12] I didn't say I was one.

[25:14] I just said that

[25:15] he is.

[25:17] Mr. Pressel.

[25:18] Well, nothing to report.

[25:20] I just want

[25:20] to make sure that we

[25:22] discussed the old

[25:23] matters in the committee on

[25:24] staff. Brian

[25:25] Monaghan will address

[25:26] to Mr. Banek.

[25:27] Good.

[25:28] So we'll do it there.

[25:29] Good. Mr. Ugalesby.

[25:32] Yes. Very quickly, I

[25:34] was at the IIC conference,

[25:35] and I think the common theme

[25:37] -this is, of course, all on

[25:38] 2028, when they have

[25:39] all these things happen

[25:40] abbreviation. And they said that

[25:42] the most important thing is that

[25:43] county commissioners,

[25:44] the county council really

[25:46] agreed and

[25:47] collaborated in

[25:48] this ocean. I know,

[25:49] new ones coming

[25:50] election. I hope so.

[25:52] everyone will arrive with an idea,

[25:53] that this has to happen because

[25:54] I spoke to Mr.

[25:55] Haney after the meeting,

[25:57] because he was on another one. AND

[25:59] he told him that

[26:00] exactly. So, this is

[26:01] repetition of what

[26:02] we need

[26:03] to understand each other, and that's it

[26:04] what else will we experience

[26:05] failures. Yes. The last one,

[26:07] this is the technical department

[26:09] service. We have

[26:10] here, in the courthouse,

[26:12] everything works. We

[26:13] turned on the heating

[26:14] last Monday.

[26:15] That was good, because

[26:16] Tuesday morning everyone

[26:17] came and

[26:17] complained that it was too

[26:18] it's hot. So that was it.

[26:20] good. Uh, with some

[26:23] little things, such as

[26:25] some air

[26:25] norms and other things. We fix small

[26:28] mistakes, but they

[26:29] insignificant compared to

[26:30] what happened in some

[26:31] moment. Therefore,

[26:31] the heating is working

[26:32] as of Monday.

[26:34] So, that's all.

[26:35] Good. Thank you, sir.

[26:37] Kessler.

[26:38] Nothing at the moment.

[26:39] Good. So, one thing I want to break this.

[26:42] last special

[26:44] a meeting where you are not

[26:45] gave me opportunities

[26:46] to meet the little ones

[26:47] cities and

[26:48] towns regarding

[26:49] mandatory

[26:50] decision. So it was

[26:52] rather informative

[26:53] meeting. This is not

[26:55] official, uh, meeting

[26:56] strategic working

[26:57] municipal groups

[26:59] units like this

[27:00] defined in

[27:00] state statute.

[27:05] This is optional.

[27:06] exercise, but after

[27:07] meetings,

[27:07] joining this

[27:09] meeting, I got

[27:10] many reviews about

[27:11] of what she has on

[27:13] to provide

[27:13] feedback

[27:15] to the legislature

[27:16] regarding that

[27:17] will work, and what not,

[27:18] mainly with new

[27:19] the structure of LIT, and how it

[27:21] affects the entire district

[27:22] , cities and towns. Ahem,

[27:29] and after many,

[27:30] let's say so,

[27:31] enthusiastic conversations

[27:32] because of different, um, different

[27:39] problems and various

[27:40] structures that

[27:41] affect the city and

[27:42] village. Um, I said

[27:47] to this group that I will come

[27:48] to all of you and, uh,

[27:49] I will ask.

[27:50] vote for

[27:51] recommendation regarding

[27:52] official

[27:53] MANDATORY

[27:53] decision. Our

[27:55] the restrictions are

[27:57] in that we must

[27:58] to announce

[27:59] MANDATORY meetings

[28:00] in 48 hours, and the first

[28:01] the meeting cannot

[28:02] to happen later 1

[28:04] October, that is, in

[28:05] Thursday. So, um, mine

[28:07] the recommendation is that if you all

[28:13] agree,

[28:14] authorize us

[28:15] to convene MANDATORY

[28:16] meetings. Structure

[28:22] the one I have

[28:23] to manage, but

[28:24] the auditor must be

[28:25] our financial

[28:26] representative, because

[28:27] all colleagues from the city

[28:28] and villages will be

[28:29] treasurers. So it has

[28:34] to be someone who will

[28:35] closest to

[28:36] accounting, income and

[28:38] costs for each of

[28:39] them. So, sir

[28:40] Jagelsky,

[28:41] if you don't

[28:41] Do you deny it, can I?

[28:42] Should I add a little? I

[28:43] also visited one of

[28:45] them with all our

[28:48] municipalities,

[28:49] which we are talking about. AND

[28:50] they are going

[28:51] to talk about what to

[28:52] end of this year for

[28:53] all of them will be rated

[28:54] . If they get

[28:55] four in any

[28:56] from our villages, they

[28:57] should automatically

[28:58] to unite with others

[28:59] villages that

[29:00] are there. If

[29:01] is a volunteer if

[29:02] he wants to voluntarily

[29:03] to participate in

[29:03] united on this

[29:04] stage, he can do it if you want

[29:06] go through this process.

[29:06] Some people know that

[29:07] their fours will be

[29:08] in fours, they

[29:09] will know what they are.

[29:10] Uh, but then that's not true.

[29:12] a lot, and then in

[29:12] some time

[29:13] commissioners must

[29:14] will accept this

[29:15] decisions, and they

[29:16] will respond

[29:17] for the process. But, uh, this

[29:19] would be what

[29:19] worth talking about,

[29:20] they also have

[29:21] discuss this idea

[29:22] association, because it is

[29:23] it will happen anyway

[29:24] next year.

[29:25] Yes, both of these two

[29:26] parallel paths that

[29:27] they are considering between

[29:28] the village government, and

[29:29] then municipal

[29:30] by the government together with

[29:31] district. So yes, sir.

[29:33] auditor.

[29:34] Uh, just for

[29:35] clarification, villages

[29:36] technically not included

[29:38] to MANDATORY

[29:39] parts. They will be invited.

[29:40] before that, but they don't

[29:42] included because it is

[29:43] must be what they are

[29:44] considered tax

[29:45] organ, and they are called

[29:47] united

[29:47] municipalities.

[29:48] But I meant that

[29:50] they are allowed

[29:50] to take voluntarily

[29:51] participation in this.

[29:53] Yes, that's a different topic, but

[29:54] I wanted to tell you,

[29:55] What did you mention?

[29:56] their participation in

[29:57] discussion, and that

[29:58] they actually

[29:59] outsiders

[30:00] observers.

[30:00] Yes.

[30:01] This is all I wanted.

[30:02] to disturb. Thank you.

[30:04] Good.

[30:05] So, if

[30:07] Mr. President, well,

[30:08] first of all, thank you for

[30:09] participation in MANDATORY

[30:10] meeting and for the fact that

[30:11] you represented us

[30:12] there. Hmm, I'm sure.

[30:13] Madam Councilor, you

[30:14] can you understand that

[30:15] in small towns

[30:16] a lot is connected

[30:17] uncertainties with

[30:18] this whole process. Hmm,

[30:19] for any small

[30:20] city local

[30:21] income tax is

[30:22] a significant part

[30:23] budget. Uh, I know,

[30:24] what will they appreciate if

[30:26] the district will move

[30:27] in this matter. So I

[30:28] would make a proposal

[30:29] to appoint a head

[30:30] for the sake of our Karanja

[30:32] emissary and send

[30:33] ...Is this the word that

[30:34] Do you want?

[30:35] I think so.

[30:36] Whatever the word is

[30:37] emissary or whatever

[30:39] he wasn't, and...

[30:39] send the gentleman

[30:40] Rosenbaum as his

[30:41] environment, right?

[30:43] So let's say I would

[30:44] said

[30:44] accounting body

[30:46] , official body,

[30:47] official

[30:47] representative...Regarding

[30:49] me, I'll just be

[30:50] host of the meeting.

[30:51] I will support this.

[30:52] Good. Therefore,

[30:53] Mr. Keel's proposal,

[30:55] second offer

[30:56] Mrs. Geet. Any

[30:57] other discussions?

[30:58] No, sorry.

[31:00] Everyone who is "in favor"

[31:00] please confirm

[31:02] , saying "yes".

[31:03] Yes.

[31:03] Against? Thank you. Hmm,

[31:06] Can I add one more?

[31:07] Of course.

[31:08] The main thing was not

[31:09] to reach an agreement, therefore

[31:10] that it will be very difficult

[31:11] to do during

[31:12] the next 30 days,

[31:13] because it has to be

[31:14] ready for November,

[31:15] at the very beginning

[31:17] November. The main thing—

[31:19] to be able to

[31:19] list all

[31:20] question, and this is it

[31:22] wanted

[31:22] municipalities, to

[31:23] we could send these

[31:24] question as part

[31:26] report to

[31:26] legislative body

[31:27] . Hmm, and one of the key

[31:30] numbers, which, um, Michigan-

[31:31] The City stated that

[31:32] regardless of whether

[31:34] what will they do for

[31:35] new rules, them

[31:36] 4.5 will not be enough

[31:38] a million dollars.

[31:39] So, I know that we

[31:40] talked about some

[31:41] numbers that we don't know

[31:42] will be enough. They are for us.

[31:44] said.

[31:47] Good. Hmm, for now,

[31:49] thanks to

[31:50] pushing Mr.

[31:51] Coal miner, hmm, before

[31:52] we will continue, I want

[31:54] to mark the class of the lady

[31:55] Dolsk from the South

[31:56] Central

[31:57] university. Uh, me

[31:59] I see 1 2 3 six or

[32:01] eight participants. Or

[32:02] Could you all please?

[32:03] Would you please stand up? It

[32:05] the largest group that

[32:06] we have seen for a long time. Thank you.

[32:13] This was the loudest

[32:14] a promise I once made

[32:15] Have you ever heard of it?

[32:19] Good. Oh, so let's go.

[32:24] ...So, from the gallery,

[32:25] good. So, this is actually

[32:27] Yes. We have grandchildren.

[32:29] former advisor,

[32:30] who are present, so this

[32:31] pretty cool. Good.

[32:40] So, moving on to

[32:41] correspondence, you will see three points,

[32:43] listed in your

[32:45] on the agenda, with

[32:46] one additional,

[32:47] which was on the list, but

[32:49] was not on the list, but

[32:50] exactly, by copy

[32:51] Michigan resolutions-

[32:52] City regarding the related

[32:54] with PILOT payment instead

[32:55] taxes, uh, over,

[32:56] which is essentially a discount.

[33:03] So, they are not

[33:04] will receive discounts, but

[33:05] will receive payment

[33:06] immediately, which

[33:07] compensates for this. So, uh-

[33:10] uh, these details

[33:11] contained in your

[33:12] package. Mr. Otters,

[33:14] Is there anything else you want to know?

[33:15] you should pay attention

[33:16] regarding correspondence?

[33:17] No, actually everyone

[33:18] received everything

[33:19] by email.

[33:20] So, the thing is,

[33:21] this was published

[33:22] without the last one

[33:23] item that arrived

[33:24] after publication. So

[33:25] we didn't add it, and I

[33:26] didn't bother

[33:27] ask you to add

[33:28] very long name to

[33:29] this.

[33:30] Yes.

[33:33] So, you know, the key

[33:34] the fact that the city takes all

[33:35] money in advance, and, uh,

[33:37] the district of this is not

[33:38] will see.

[33:44] And that's all for

[33:45] protocol,

[33:46] listed as

[33:47] city ordinance

[33:49] Michigan, uh, from

[33:50] Public Council 4806.

[33:54] And this can be discussed.

[33:55] now, or,

[33:56] uh, we can

[33:57] discuss this.

[33:58] I just want to declare

[33:59] that the council says that it

[34:01] takes a pretty good

[34:02] position on the 10-year

[34:03] benefits. This is a 20-year-old

[34:05] privilege, so I just

[34:06] I say this because of a certain

[34:07] period of time, and I

[34:08] just more against

[34:09] time period than

[34:11] the need for

[34:12] Is this a good project?

[34:13] bad.

[34:14] Of course. Any

[34:17] further comments?

[34:19] Okay, Mr. Otters.

[34:21] We need

[34:22] approve contributions to

[34:23] health insurance,

[34:24] because as of

[34:25] Friday we have

[34:26] salary, and these amounts

[34:27] needs to be changed. And there is

[34:30] an increase of 4.44%, which

[34:32] it was agreed, uh,

[34:34] commissioners, and, uh, this

[34:36] now their 15%, uh, or

[34:38] 20%, depending on

[34:40] how many people were there

[34:42] hired. THERE ARE-

[34:45] uh, they should, uh,

[34:46] to keep from them

[34:48] salaries, and you have

[34:49] new ones in front of you

[34:50] rates, what are they?

[34:51] include. So, be

[34:52] please, this is needed

[34:53] approve today

[34:54] in the evening. And they too

[34:58] were sent

[34:59] earlier.

[35:01] So, I contribute

[35:01] proposal regarding

[35:02] approval of rates

[35:03] in the presented

[35:04] in form. Offer

[35:06] Mr. Ugelski. I have

[35:07] Is there a second phrase?

[35:11] Supported by Mr.

[35:11] Pressel. Any

[35:13] discussion? If so

[35:17] , then everyone who is "for"

[35:18] approval of rates

[35:19] medical contributions

[35:20] insurance,

[35:21] confirm that

[35:21] they say "yes".

[35:22] Yes. Against?

[35:25] Thank you.

[35:26] Good. We have

[35:29] there is nothing for

[35:30] resolutions and

[35:31] resolutions. By

[35:33] old things,

[35:35] Mr. Pressel, you

[35:36] remembered something about

[35:37] township assessor

[35:38] Michigan. Therefore,

[35:39] yes, so I will invite

[35:40] Mr. Bannik. I am not

[35:42] I remember whether we

[35:43] raised this issue

[35:44] last time, or

[35:45] just asked

[35:46] his return

[35:47] this month.

[35:48] So ask him.

[35:49] come up, but we're not there yet

[35:50] that we will refrain from

[35:51] any comments.

[35:52] Let's go quickly.

[35:53] Let's check. Then

[35:54] please remove this from

[35:56] consideration. On-

[35:57] second,

[35:57] make a proposal,

[35:58] that

[35:59] I left the table.

[36:00] Well, then that will do it.

[36:01] official.

[36:01] Suggestion to remove this from

[36:02] consideration from Mr.

[36:03] Pressela, supported

[36:04] Mr. Ugelski. All,

[36:05] who is "for",

[36:05] confirm,

[36:06] saying "yes".

[36:07] Yes.

[36:07] Against? Thank you. Sir

[36:09] Bannik.

[36:10] Mr. Brent Bannick,

[36:11] township assessor

[36:12] Michigan. As said

[36:13] Mr. Pressel, I'm out.

[36:15] before the committee on

[36:16] work evaluations. I

[36:18] met with Mr.

[36:19] Pressel, Mrs. Heath,

[36:20] commissioner, department

[36:22] personnel and office

[36:23] county assessor

[36:24] Laporte, to

[36:24] discuss this position,

[36:26] Deputy for

[36:27] commerce and income.

[36:29] Hmm, that was already on

[36:31] table. Hmm, I was able to do that.

[36:33] to present some

[36:34] data on duties

[36:35] all of mine

[36:36] employees, but

[36:37] exactly about the scope of work

[36:38] which they perform.

[36:40] Uh, almost a quarter

[36:41] our areas

[36:42] processed by a deputy from

[36:43] commercial issues and

[36:44] income. Um, so I

[36:46] was able to clarify this role

[36:48] and any others

[36:49] the questions they have

[36:50] arose. Um, they

[36:51] have their support.

[36:53] So, uh, I'm here to ask permission for

[36:56] hire

[36:56] Good. So I'm going

[36:58] to address two

[36:59] my appointees.

[37:00] So, Ms. Sit, some

[37:01] comments you want

[37:02] add about

[37:03] results of this

[37:04] meeting?

[37:05] I was surprised,

[37:06] How far is this office?

[37:07] overloaded

[37:08] the absence of one

[37:09] employee. If

[37:11] you don't mind

[37:11] share this with

[37:13] Anyway, uh,

[37:14] How far is your office?

[37:16] lags behind due to

[37:17] the absence of this

[37:18] one position.

[37:19] Right. Uh, so we ask for no more,

[37:22] just trying

[37:23] to stay afloat

[37:24] So, this position is ours.

[37:25] already was. So, this, uh,

[37:27] The position has its own

[37:29] permissions, uh,

[37:30] is engaged in, uh,

[37:31] a significant part

[37:32] organizations with

[37:33] rental questionnaires, uh,

[37:35] along with calculations.

[37:37] Many of them are needed

[37:38] do it every year. Ahem,

[37:40] therefore, since this

[37:42] The position is already vacant.

[37:43] almost 5 months, um, in

[37:45] we have 100 appeals or,

[37:46] um, permissions that

[37:47] need to do before

[37:49] end of the year. These are things,

[37:50] which need to be done

[37:51] by the end of the year, to

[37:52] bring this to

[37:53] tax list

[37:54] for next year. So,

[37:55] um, I am, um, my

[37:56] chief deputy

[37:57] went out, um, worked out

[37:58] obtaining permits,

[37:59] um, together with the team from

[38:01] residential

[38:01] construction, um,

[38:02] also performed

[38:03] your work. So, yes,

[38:04] we have a lot of work,

[38:06] which needs to be done,

[38:07] and, um, we really

[38:07] need a person who

[38:08] completed the training, and

[38:09] this matter was

[38:10] done to the end

[38:11] year so that we can

[38:12] bring this to

[38:12] tax list. THERE ARE

[38:14] -uh, we have, like you know, in Michigan-

[38:15] There are many cities, um,

[38:16] real estate,

[38:17] that generate income, and

[38:19] we get them

[38:19] annually. To us

[38:20] a lot is coming

[38:21] investors. So, um,

[38:23] this work on this

[38:24] specific position not

[38:25] is slowing down.

[38:26] So there was this part,

[38:27] and the fact that it is already

[38:28] was a position that

[38:29] existed, that it is not

[38:30] there was a new position that

[38:31] needs

[38:32] approval or something

[38:33] other. I'm not sure.

[38:34] why is it small

[38:34] return to

[38:35] committee on

[38:36] staff to

[38:36] come back here.

[38:37] It just seems that

[38:38] it was a lot of work

[38:40] in vain on the part of Mr.

[38:41] Bannock. And it would be great if we could.

[38:45] to move forward in order to

[38:46] they made up for it,

[38:46] so that we can begin,

[38:47] you know, write these

[38:48] tax invoices.

[38:49] I agree.

[38:50] Yes. I can

[38:51] agree.

[38:52] Mr. Pressel, is there

[38:53] something you would like

[38:54] add to this? You

[38:55] do you understand that

[38:56] the only thing I would like

[38:57] to clarify, this is what we

[38:57] talked to Mr.

[38:58] Schulz, so that

[38:59] to find out if there is something,

[39:00] what can we do with

[39:01] help with it

[39:01] office. In fact, he

[39:02] did the same

[39:03] remark that he

[39:04] will have to hire

[39:05] your office for

[39:06] supporting this role.

[39:07] So, despite

[39:08] that, at the moment, we are very late with

[39:10] this, and we need

[39:11] to resolve this issue

[39:12] pretty quickly.

[39:13] Mr. Helski, am I am wrong in saying that

[39:15] it was ours

[39:16] recommendation

[39:17] send them to

[39:18] committee on

[39:19] staff?

[39:19] No, it wasn't ours.

[39:20] recommendation.

[39:21] Good.

[39:22] I don't believe it. I am not

[39:23] I believe in this.

[39:24] Good. So, what's up?

[39:26] wants? Proposal

[39:28] approve.

[39:29] Second.

[39:29] The proposal was approved by

[39:30] Mr. Molenaar,

[39:31] supported by Ms. Geet.

[39:32] Any further

[39:33] comments? Good. I

[39:36] I'll just add one thing:

[39:38] appraisers positions

[39:39] villages–this is what

[39:40] left after

[39:41] legislative changes

[39:43] the body where it happened

[39:44] government downsizing

[39:45] villages, and this is what

[39:46] is under, um, I don't want to call it that.

[39:48] with close attention, but

[39:50] this is one of those things,

[39:51] which are being discussed

[39:52] about whether it is worth

[39:53] to keep this position,

[39:54] was she

[39:55] absorbed in the office

[39:56] appraiser. Currently this

[39:58] still viable

[39:59] part of the government, and we don't

[40:00] we can just

[40:01] shorten it. Um, I understand the point, but

[40:04] sometimes we need

[40:05] to ask

[40:06] legislature,

[40:07] as we want

[40:08] to consider it

[40:09] structure further,

[40:10] you know, in the future

[40:11] . And everyone who supports

[40:15] proposal,

[40:15] mean that I.

[40:18] Against?

[40:18] No. No.

[40:21] Thank you.

[40:22] And just for

[40:23] protocol, its

[40:24] first introduced

[40:24] Yegilsky, and

[40:25] supported Kiel. Therefore,

[40:26] it was entered on

[40:28] last meeting.

[40:29] Good. Good move.

[40:30] Thank you. Thank you.

[40:33] Good. Continuing...

[40:36] We looked at the old one

[40:37] office work

[40:38] treasurer. We

[40:39] let's move on to the new one

[40:40] matters, namely

[40:41] rental permit Uh,

[40:44] starting with permission

[40:46] for hire for a position with

[40:47] service for

[40:48] Parks and Recreation Department

[40:49] rest. Um, sir.

[40:51] Sebeki, if you are again

[40:52] join us...

[40:53] I hope you have

[40:54] something as interesting as

[40:55] your comment on

[40:56] the last day, but

[40:58] okay...yes, I am

[40:59] I comment. No, I have

[41:00] no, but, uh, more

[41:01] It's gloomy out there.

[41:02] reason. We just

[41:03] hired for this position

[41:04] this year, she

[41:05] not even

[41:05] lasted 6

[41:06] months. This is already

[41:07] third or fourth

[41:08] once when we

[41:09] has to be repeated

[41:10] to hire for this position.

[41:11] Salary, insurance

[41:12] tariffs, things like that

[41:14] reasons why people

[41:15] are being released. We get especially

[41:18] people with families,

[41:19] insurance cost

[41:20] high, and you know it

[41:21] . I know that this is already

[41:23] was discussed, and we

[41:24] tried, but, uh, I

[41:25] just wanted this

[41:27] say.

[41:27] Good.

[41:28] Uh, yes.

[41:31] Any comments or

[41:33] action by the council?

[41:34] Proposal about

[41:35] approval.

[41:36] Second.

[41:36] Proposal about

[41:37] approval from the gentleman

[41:38] Kessler, second from

[41:39] Mrs. Geet. All who

[41:40] supports approval

[41:41] hiring a specialist

[41:42] service

[41:43] parks and areas

[41:44] rest, mark,

[41:45] saying: I am.

[41:46] I.

[41:46] Against?

[41:47] Thank you.

[41:48] Good. Uh, on

[41:51] this moment, and I see

[41:52] , what, uh, clerk

[41:53] joined us

[41:55] via Teams. So, which one

[41:56] great time. Uh,

[41:58] rental permit...

[41:59] comment on

[41:59] deputy clerk

[42:01] for the clerk's office.

[42:02] Mrs. Stevens. You

[42:08] turned on the sound.

[42:09] Let's see,

[42:10] can we do this

[42:11] fix it for you.

[42:15] How are you? Good. Good.

[42:18] Greetings.

[42:18] Good evening.

[42:23] So, this position, uh, in

[42:24] my office

[42:25] chief, three

[42:26] clerk. My girls,

[42:31] my team is there, they

[42:32] really wanted

[42:33] try not to

[42:34] fill this

[42:35] position, but they

[42:36] receive by

[42:37] buttocks.

[42:41] Good. Hmm, I think so.

[42:44] we all know this

[42:45] thing, so I'm looking for

[42:47] lawyer for

[42:48] petition.

[42:54] for

[42:55] approval.

[42:56] Second.

[42:57] Petition for

[42:58] approval from the lady

[42:59] Geet, second from Mr.

[43:00] Kila. All who

[43:01] supports hiring

[43:02] deputy clerk

[43:03] for the third level,

[43:04] confirm,

[43:05] saying "yes".

[43:06] Yes.

[43:07] Against?

[43:08] Yes.

[43:09] Good. Thank you.

[43:11] very much. I know that

[43:13] my team appreciates it.

[43:15] Absolutely. Good. AND

[43:19] now we have

[43:20] discussion of funds

[43:22] 4700 vs. 4700 and 4701 from

[43:25] Mr. Auditor.

[43:28] We are going

[43:29] ask Joey to lead

[43:31] conversation, but before

[43:32] today I sent

[43:33] email from

[43:34] explanation. Not all

[43:35] were able to see him,

[43:37] so I made sure

[43:38] that you have a printed copy. Now that's a bit

[43:40] more pages. And, uh-

[43:42] Well, with a few of you I

[43:43] already discussed this.

[43:45] So we are going

[43:46] let her take over

[43:47] initiative itself.

[43:48] Good. Mrs. Wolensky.

[43:51] Uh, good evening.

[43:54] Sorry, I can't.

[43:55] to be with you, but, um, I

[43:57] sent to you all

[43:58] explanation of how it is

[43:59] happened. Hmm, in 2000 or 24

[44:06] In 2024. Hmm, let me.

[44:10] I need to come back.

[44:11] Hmm, how can that be?

[44:16] tell you Mark, because,

[44:17] I think he was there.

[44:19] the longest and, probably,

[44:20] was there when it happened

[44:21] it started, hmm, we

[44:23] always, hmm,

[44:23] tracked ours, hmm

[44:25] , self-insurance in

[44:26] various funds. Hmm,

[44:33] when is the council

[44:34] voted for

[44:35] self-insurance,

[44:36] they came up with

[44:37] way, um, to make

[44:38] money to the general

[44:45] budget fund

[44:46] commissioner, and then

[44:48] every year on January 2

[44:49] auditor

[44:50] listed these

[44:52] money for 4700 and 4701. 4700–

[44:54] this is medical

[44:55] insurance, 4701–

[44:57] responsibility. Hmm,

[45:07] in 2024 this happened,

[45:08] that the then auditor

[45:10] and the staff is not

[45:11] understood how glad

[45:12] arranged it like this,

[45:14] so that we can control

[45:15] every spent

[45:16] a penny. In return

[45:26] they left it in

[45:28] the commissioner's budget, and, e

[45:29] -eh, there were funds

[45:30] spent not for

[45:31] purpose, and we do not

[45:32] added none, hmm,

[45:33] income to these funds,

[45:35] how we do it now and

[45:36] as they did before. Or

[45:41] couldn't

[45:41] Mrs. Gkey to ask

[45:43] you for a second

[45:44] stop?

[45:44] Of course.

[45:46] So, as for

[45:47] money, please

[45:48] let me try

[45:49] to paraphrase what

[45:50] you have here, then without

[45:51] immediate transfer

[45:53] to direct accounts, which

[45:54] have a specific

[45:55] purpose,

[45:56] they remain as

[45:57] budget opportunity

[45:58] commissioner to be

[45:59] used for

[46:00] other appropriations,

[46:01] other accounts,

[46:02] all sorts of things.

[46:05] That's right, and that's it.

[46:06] happened.

[46:07] Good. Therefore,

[46:13] some funds were

[46:14] transferred to others,

[46:16] hmm, bills, hmm, and, and

[46:17] so, hmm, I don't know if

[46:19] Does anyone of you remember?

[46:21] that in the summer of 2024, hmm,

[46:22] I was the treasurer, and

[46:24] I got a call.

[46:26] with First Source Bank, where we have

[46:27] our medical bill,

[46:29] and, um, we were, and we

[46:30] were significantly

[46:31] exceeded. Um,

[46:41] lawyer, whom Guy

[46:43] DiMartino called for

[46:44] meeting with the council,

[46:45] commissioners,

[46:46] auditor,

[46:47] treasurer, some

[46:48] former

[46:49] treasurers and

[46:50] former auditors

[46:51] , er, staff, and er

[46:52] , we met and

[46:54] tried to find out,

[46:55] What happened. Um, we

[47:01] even invited

[47:02] Karl Sender, who

[47:03] tried us

[47:04] help. Unfortunately, I

[47:11] could not see

[47:12] auditors, uh,

[47:13] our side

[47:14] software

[47:15] provision, so I

[47:16] could not understand that

[47:17] happens until

[47:19] took office

[47:20] chief deputy

[47:21] I didn't see the auditor.

[47:22] in LAO, what happened, and

[47:24] then it was like

[47:25] bulb. Um, so, uh

[47:38] , we tried

[47:39] fix it

[47:40] best

[47:41] at the end of the past

[47:42] year, but only, uh,

[47:43] during the last

[47:45] a few months, uh,

[47:46] my, current

[47:47] auditor staff and

[47:49] me, uh, along with LAO and

[47:50] State accounting

[47:51] council, checked

[47:53] accounting books,

[47:54] uh, and saw where, what

[47:55] was, uh, where, where we

[47:57] were negative, and

[47:58] what do we need

[47:59] to make it so

[48:00] to fix. Now

[48:09] let me

[48:10] add to everything

[48:11] this, that this year

[48:12] we had some very

[48:13] large insurance companies

[48:14] cases, very

[48:15] big ones. Not only that,

[48:20] but also, um, ours

[48:21] insurance rates

[48:22] have grown significantly. Therefore,

[48:29] all this added up to

[48:31] the fact that, um, this

[48:32] shortage, um, at the moment

[48:34] the deficit is

[48:35] about 1.5 million,

[48:37] plus-minus, and, um, our

[48:39] cash balance

[48:40] negative, um, 934,000

[48:42] a little bit of the rest. Um, when

[48:51] we made the order

[48:53] daytime, um, it was

[48:54] proposed

[48:55] ask for 1.75, um,

[48:56] a million, um, because

[48:58] we still have a few

[48:59] months, and as I already

[49:00] said, our insurance

[49:02] payments were

[49:03] extremely high

[49:04] . Um, I was talking to

[49:10] insurance, um, um,

[49:12] representative. I

[49:15] talked to, um,

[49:16] head of department

[49:17] personnel. Hmm, I have

[49:21] it feels like

[49:22] our indicators

[49:23] contract renewal

[49:24] this year too

[49:25] will be higher. So, eh

[49:30] -eh, if we could

[49:31] adhere to 1,750,000,

[49:32] uh, that would be, I think,

[49:34] what we really need

[49:35] it would be necessary

[49:37] to finish this year.

[49:41] And even if we have

[49:42] money will remain,

[49:43] they are moving to

[49:45] this account. Problem

[49:48] in the liabilities account

[49:49] . With the security account

[49:51] Health is fine.

[49:52] Good.

[49:56] So, uh, it's me...me

[49:57] tried my best

[49:58] explain what happened.

[50:04] Uh, hopefully after

[50:06] this meeting, uh,

[50:07] Mr. B. G. will be able to meet or with

[50:14] auditor, or with me, or with both of us

[50:16] , and we will be able to write, uh,

[50:18] a resolution that

[50:19] will prevent

[50:20] repeating this. Uh,

[50:24] You know, I don't know.

[50:25] no other

[50:26] way to prevent

[50:27] this again. If there is

[50:33] question, I'll try it on

[50:35] answer them.

[50:36] I will turn to my

[50:38] colleagues here on the council.

[50:39] I would like to add that

[50:40] on our last

[50:42] seminars on

[50:43] we increased the budget

[50:44] net amount for 2027

[50:46] another 1.5 million

[50:47] dollars because of

[50:48] how high

[50:49] there were insurance premiums.

[50:51] We are actually

[50:51] increased them by 2

[50:52] millions to cover

[50:54] new awards. And this is only

[50:55] at the current rate,

[50:56] and we don't know what

[50:57] they will be

[50:58] next year. And we

[50:59] said about

[51:00] commitment, we

[51:00] Let's cross our fingers that

[51:02] the situation was not

[51:02] as bad as

[51:03] this year, but we can never

[51:05] to say for sure But

[51:06] this is the moment when,

[51:07] How are you?

[51:08] will need, um,

[51:09] now that this is over

[51:10] follow a lot

[51:11] Be careful, we don't

[51:12] we will move on to

[51:13] negative direction.

[51:14] We will ask, uh

[51:15] , or, uh, at the commissioners,

[51:17] we will ask

[51:18] funds for coverage

[51:19] any

[51:20] excessive demands,

[51:21] which can be.

[51:22] Good. So, one thing I appreciate this

[51:25] suggestions or

[51:26] recommendations, this is to have

[51:28] something systemic that

[51:31] guarantees that we do this

[51:32] we will do it. If this

[51:33] the right step for

[51:34] account funding

[51:35] , and then this transfer

[51:36] takes place in

[51:37] first working day

[51:38] year, that's normal. THERE ARE-

[51:40] uh, but to something that is

[51:42] in the system, to the point that

[51:43] is, when it happens

[51:45] change of position, with

[51:46] elected office or

[51:47] assigned position.

[51:51] Um, what do we still have?

[51:52] rulebook,

[51:53] manual, not

[51:54] definitely, um,

[51:55] tribal knowledge.

[51:59] That's right. IN

[52:00] You were something else, sir.

[52:01] auditor?

[52:02] Um, yes, if you

[52:03] looking for someone, in

[52:04] who has many rules

[52:05] and all that is listed

[52:06] , St. Joe County-one

[52:07] from those we are with, you know

[52:09] , regularly

[52:09] we communicate. So we are going

[52:11] to see if there is anything,

[52:12] what can we get

[52:13] from another district.

[52:14] But also, um, we have

[52:15] documentation from

[52:17] other auditors. We

[52:18] also addressed to

[52:19] some auditors.

[52:20] Another auditor put

[52:21] similar question. AND

[52:23] so some others

[52:24] the auditors shared.

[52:25] And we also have

[52:26] document from Lori

[52:27] Rogers, who is exactly

[52:28] shows that they should

[52:29] to do people with

[52:29] self-insured

[52:30] account. This is also

[52:31] was part of

[52:32] email,

[52:33] which I sent you. IN

[52:34] I don't have a copy of

[52:35] yourself, because it was

[52:36] for another district,

[52:37] so there will be

[52:38] various listed

[52:39] expenses from various

[52:40] other funds that are not

[52:40] correspond to ours. AND

[52:42] they do not respond

[52:43] our departments.

[52:44] So, it was simple.

[52:45] in order to

[52:46] show, and in fact

[52:47] on the reverse, on the other

[52:48] SBOA page, was

[52:49] the person's name is given.

[52:50] She's still there. With her

[52:51] easy to contact. Emm,

[52:53] so we know that

[52:54] This is how it should be.

[52:56] done. AND,

[52:57] talking to our

[52:59] colleagues, um, so,

[53:00] You know, we really,

[53:01] um, we think that, um,

[53:03] adoption of a resolution

[53:04] –this is the best way

[53:06] to move forward.

[53:08] Good. Sir

[53:09] Jagelsky.

[53:10] I know what we said.

[53:11] about this last time,

[53:13] about error and mess

[53:14] in advertising, um, money

[53:19] which we were going to spend on the department

[53:21] technical

[53:22] service where not

[53:23] was standard

[53:24] operating room

[53:24] procedures (SOPs). And SOP

[53:25] –this is the best procedure,

[53:27] than the one they have,

[53:28] because on the back

[53:29] SOP documentation everything,

[53:31] what is reported,

[53:32] is recorded there. Therefore

[53:33] if this happens in

[53:35] 2014, who did it?

[53:36] who signed it and

[53:37] all that. And what? AND

[53:39] many people in the industry

[53:40] for amateur activities

[53:41] use these

[53:42] procedures.

[53:42] Yes.

[53:43] I think this is better.

[53:44] documentation than that,

[53:45] what I saw in the district

[53:46] still.

[53:46] Good. Enough

[53:48] good.

[53:49] Well, can I?

[53:49] answer this? THERE ARE,

[53:53] That's a good idea, Mark.

[53:54] and we should have

[53:55] some booklet from

[53:56] instructions, which would

[53:58] explained exactly what

[53:59] to do, but the State

[54:00] accounting board

[54:03] requires that we have

[54:04] was originally

[54:05] resolution, and then,

[54:06] maybe standard

[54:08] operating procedure

[54:09] .

[54:09] That's good.

[54:10] Well, thank you.

[54:11] Mr. Kelly, do you have something?

[54:12] was it?

[54:12] Yes, that is, 4700 is ours

[54:14] group fund

[54:14] medical

[54:15] insurance, right?

[54:16] Yes.

[54:17] Right.

[54:17] And we are self-insured

[54:18] for this, right?

[54:19] Yes. We

[54:20] self-insured

[54:21] for both.

[54:22] other

[54:23] is also commercial

[54:24] insurance.

[54:25] Commercial

[54:25] insurance

[54:26] responsibility,

[54:27] that is, we have

[54:27] responsibility.

[54:28] So we don't pay for

[54:29] award, we are completely

[54:30] insured for

[54:31] this yourself.

[54:31] No, it's not...No, we pay for premiums,

[54:33] but we have a higher one

[54:34] premium level. THERE ARE

[54:35] maximum amount,

[54:36] so you can't

[54:37] to suffer from

[54:38] this.

[54:38] Yes, we have

[54:41] there is a stop loss, but then,

[54:42] what's more

[54:43] complicates the situation,

[54:45] due to losses in this

[54:46] buildings due to flooding

[54:47] On the 23rd, we just

[54:48] let's call it, uh,

[54:50] they should have

[54:51] get layers only

[54:52] for these risky

[54:53] losses. So, we have

[54:55] three or four different

[54:56] insurance companies.

[54:58] If the amount reaches X

[54:58] millions of dollars,

[55:00] it stops here.

[55:01] Then we have another one,

[55:02] which says: "Okay, we can add two more

[55:04] millions of dollars." AND

[55:05] because we

[55:06] had to add layers,

[55:08] it became

[55:08] problematic and

[55:09] it cost more.

[55:12] So, we have a stop loss,

[55:13] so it's not the same as

[55:14] health insurance,

[55:15] because in medical

[55:17] insurance we also

[55:18] we lay down to

[55:19] budget share

[55:20] district. And a year ago

[55:21] one of the reasons why

[55:22] everything is fine this year

[55:24] , is that we

[55:25] added to this two

[55:26] millions of dollars. AND

[55:27] this year with a new

[55:28] increase, as we

[55:30] spoke in the past tense

[55:31] seminar, we added, eh

[55:33] -uh, 500, I'm about 560

[55:34] 000. I know it was

[55:36] less, but approximately.

[55:38] So, while things are going on

[55:38] will go like this,

[55:40] we should have everything

[55:41] OK. The problem that

[55:42] is to some extent

[55:43] a good problem,

[55:44] is that we

[55:45] no need to wait until

[55:46] January to find out,

[55:47] What are our new rates?

[55:48] for the most part

[55:49] next year, so

[55:50] that the insurance has changed

[55:52] from October 1.

[55:52] Hmm. And these two funds, 4701

[55:54] and 4700, are stored

[55:56] on separate

[55:57] bank accounts

[55:59] . They are isolated from

[56:00] the rest of our districts

[56:01] funds, right?

[56:03] So, yes, the reason,

[56:04] why is it nice that these

[56:05] other funds

[56:05] isolated, consists of

[56:07] because no one says

[56:08] : "Hey, I have this here

[56:09] money. I can

[56:10] transfer money." AND

[56:13] so, also, you know,

[56:18] one of the things about

[56:19] procedures,

[56:19] standard

[56:20] operating procedures

[56:21] , one of the things that in

[56:23] we are, is that, nothing

[56:25] translated without

[56:26] second signature or

[56:27] signature from Joey or

[56:28] me. So we stopped.

[56:30] people who

[56:30] are trying something

[56:31] change. And even

[56:34] stop people from

[56:35] try...hmm...I don't want to

[56:36] use

[56:37] the word "abuse",

[56:39] but we have resolutions

[56:40] about salaries, and sometimes

[56:41] we don't have a full

[56:42] working day, so we fill them with staff.

[56:46] So we allow

[56:48] to translate for people

[56:49] small amounts of money,

[56:50] not all, but large amounts

[56:51] part-time

[56:52] day, because otherwise

[56:53] why at all

[56:54] resolution on

[56:55] salary? So that was it.

[56:57] part of the story.

[56:58] So now we have

[56:59] some control to

[57:01] prevent this. And this

[57:02] again

[57:03] is happening,

[57:04] moving 4700, all

[57:05] are looking at this, and everyone

[57:06] know that this is all that

[57:08] can be spent with

[57:09] this account. We are not

[57:10] we can translate it.

[57:11] Good. And there are none

[57:13] other insurance

[57:14] contributions that

[57:15] are combined into this 4701,

[57:16] which are not

[57:17] self-insurance. It

[57:18] simply

[57:18] self-insurance

[57:19] responsibility

[57:20] commercial

[57:20] responsibility.

[57:21] There is

[57:22] everything we cover

[57:23] medical

[57:24] insurance. There is also insurance

[57:26] the life we live

[57:27] we pay as a group, and

[57:29] which also

[57:29] refrains from

[57:30] employees for their

[57:31] choice if they

[57:32] want higher

[57:33] insurance. So, this is

[57:35] includes this, and it was

[57:36] included and rated

[57:37] as part of the amount that

[57:39] paid.

[57:40] So no one can

[57:41] try to take

[57:42] something related to

[57:43] payments

[57:44] for medical

[57:45] insurance and others

[57:46] payments. So things

[57:47] are paid from there,

[57:48] but this is also

[57:49] financed.

[57:50] I guess I'm asking because

[57:51] we are allowed

[57:52] to create funds

[57:52] self-insurance, but

[57:53] I don't believe that we can just

[57:55] to move money from

[57:56] one place and

[57:57] transfer them to

[57:57] another for something that is not

[57:58] is self-insurance.

[58:00] No, you're right.

[58:02] Yes.

[58:02] That's right, we don't

[58:03] we can do this.

[58:04] I can show you,

[58:06] that what we have from

[58:08] SBOA, it does. Good. I can, you know, it's in

[58:11] email,

[58:11] which I sent

[58:12] today, and I know that

[58:13] this is done in a nutshell

[58:14] terms. So let's

[58:15] we will return and

[58:16] let's review, but here

[58:17] What are we doing? You know,

[58:18] in this resolution we are going

[58:20] to make sure that we cover these things.

[58:22] Good.

[58:22] And then, you know, what would

[58:24] there were no guards

[58:25] barriers in 27 that we

[58:26] need to install,

[58:27] we will install them there

[58:29] to control

[58:30] smaller amounts and

[58:31] avert

[58:31] moving things

[58:32] people.

[58:33] Yes.

[58:33] So for the sake of economy

[58:34] I just want time.

[58:35] consider this.

[58:36] Let's try.

[58:37] to limit oneself to what is in

[58:38] agenda, not

[58:39] what will be in

[58:40] future

[58:40] resolution, if

[58:41] we can.

[58:41] Yes.

[58:42] But

[58:42] if I can catch you by surprise...

[58:44] Another question about

[58:45] comment that was

[58:46] said earlier. You

[58:47] mentioned that the funds

[58:49] were spent, I think it's an office.

[58:51] Commissioner improper

[58:52] in a way that is small

[58:54] go to 4701. Under

[58:55] improper

[58:56] spending, you,

[58:57] Joey, they're gone. Good.

[59:00] Can you hear us?

[59:01] I am here.

[59:02] OK, your camera

[59:03] disappeared.

[59:04] Yes, I'm here.

[59:05] Oh, sorry.

[59:06] But under improper

[59:07] you had to spend

[59:08] meaning that it was

[59:09] spent on something that

[59:10] it was impossible

[59:11] to spend, or simply

[59:12] spent on others

[59:13] government goals that

[59:14] were,

[59:14] Joey,

[59:15] legal, but not

[59:16] those that we

[59:16] planned in

[59:17] budget.

[59:18] Joey.

[59:19] Yes, can you hear me?

[59:20] Can I...Can I...

[59:22] to take the floor

[59:23] a second?

[59:25] She did her thing.

[59:26] the first statement, because

[59:27] we usually put

[59:28] these funds for this

[59:29] score. Because

[59:31] there was no account, they

[59:32] spent from this

[59:33] account. It wasn't...

[59:34] It was spent not

[59:35] as intended, in those terms in which

[59:37] you say that...

[59:38] Just on this foundation

[59:39] there was no money, so

[59:40] that they are not

[59:41] transferred the money

[59:42] you're welcome...So,

[59:42] because they

[59:43] spend from this

[59:44] account,

[59:45] use

[59:45] terminology "

[59:46] spent not for

[59:47] purpose, therefore

[59:48] that it is because we have

[59:49] no money for

[59:50] account.

[59:50] Yes.

[59:51] They were spent.

[59:52] not as intended.

[59:53] They were spent.

[59:54] on illegal

[59:55] goals.

[59:55] Okay, that's what I

[59:56] tried to clarify.

[59:58] I know some of you

[59:59] ...I know it's subtle

[1:00:00] hair, you know, but

[1:00:01] a thin hair...but

[1:00:02] to clarify. Thank you.

[1:00:04] Good.

[1:00:04] Hey, Mr. G...

[1:00:06] No.

[1:00:06] There was something...

[1:00:07] Are you okay? And someone

[1:00:09] yet? I know that we

[1:00:10] let's get to the question,

[1:00:11] for which we will

[1:00:12] vote, so I want to finish.

[1:00:14] discussion. Can

[1:00:16] to think that everything is fine.

[1:00:18] Good. Uh, come on.

[1:00:19] let's move on to

[1:00:20] appropriations where we have

[1:00:22] , uh, Mr. Parker from

[1:00:23] Director of Public

[1:00:24] Wanake libraries, e-

[1:00:26] Well, a request to the council

[1:00:27] approve of it

[1:00:28] additional

[1:00:29] appropriation for

[1:00:30] cash reserves

[1:00:31] libraries in size

[1:00:32] $10,000.

[1:00:34] Mr. President and

[1:00:35] council members, very

[1:00:36] Thank you for taking the time.

[1:00:37] listen to our

[1:00:38] request today

[1:00:39] in the evening. Uh, I'm Don.

[1:00:41] Parker. I am the director.

[1:00:42] Public library

[1:00:44] Wanake, and, uh, me

[1:00:45] I will be out soon.

[1:00:47] retirement after 14 years

[1:00:48] work. And therefore,

[1:00:51] planning this and

[1:00:51] trying

[1:00:52] to ensure as much as possible

[1:00:53] smoother transition, we

[1:00:55] found a good one

[1:00:56] candidate. Uh, we invite a candidate

[1:01:01] until my departure, uh,

[1:01:02] because in such a

[1:01:03] small library

[1:01:05] , like ours, except, uh,

[1:01:06] independent, uh,

[1:01:07] accountants, which we use, by

[1:01:10] In essence, the director does

[1:01:12] all. Engaged

[1:01:14] budget planning,

[1:01:15] keeps all records, etc.

[1:01:17] There are many things

[1:01:18] to learn. And we

[1:01:19] wanted, um, our

[1:01:20] new director

[1:01:21] Come while I'm still there.

[1:01:23] , so that, um, as much as possible

[1:01:24] to learn more smoothly

[1:01:25] foundations. Hmm, we don't, hm,

[1:01:29] we expect that this

[1:01:30] will cost something

[1:01:31] like 10,000 dollars,

[1:01:33] but we ask

[1:01:34] spend 10 mm from

[1:01:35] our own

[1:01:36] cash reserves, not

[1:01:37] asking in the district

[1:01:39] extra money, and,

[1:01:40] hmm, there will be more of this,

[1:01:41] than needed.

[1:01:45] And they have enough

[1:01:46] cash reserves. I

[1:01:47] had to repeat that,

[1:01:48] because I don't like it

[1:01:49] liked it.

[1:01:49] Good. Mr. Egge

[1:01:51] asked me.

[1:01:52] Can I ask,

[1:01:53] How much does he earn?

[1:01:54] library director?

[1:01:56] Hmm, I repeat again,

[1:01:57] you must remember,

[1:01:59] that Vanata is public

[1:02:00] friend's library

[1:02:01] town, so-called

[1:02:03] Class C library.

[1:02:04] Hmm, payment standards

[1:02:05] The work is not the same as in

[1:02:06] large libraries,

[1:02:08] where the director has

[1:02:09] master's degree

[1:02:10] Library Science

[1:02:11] activities. Hmm, I

[1:02:14] received a 15-hour,

[1:02:15] hmm, certificate from

[1:02:17] library

[1:02:18] activities at, um, Ivy Tech

[1:02:19] after

[1:02:20] got a job at this

[1:02:22] work 14 years ago.

[1:02:23] Hmm. Uh, current

[1:02:26] the payment is 30-35

[1:02:27] dollars per week

[1:02:29] at 35 hours of operation

[1:02:30] per week and 20

[1:02:31] dollars per hour on

[1:02:33] my position. Uh, we have

[1:02:34] I'm the only one in the library.

[1:02:35] I work full time.

[1:02:36] working day and two

[1:02:37] employees on terms

[1:02:38] part-time worker

[1:02:39] day. So, uh, mine

[1:02:40] payment somewhere

[1:02:41] approximately, it seems,

[1:02:43] when was the last time I saw them

[1:02:44] viewed, 31,000

[1:02:45] dollars per year.

[1:02:46] I simply stated that

[1:02:48] actual salary

[1:02:49] Laporte County

[1:02:50] exceeds 130,000. Therefore,

[1:02:51] this...yes, this is significant

[1:02:52] lower.

[1:02:52] Yes, we would like to think that we give

[1:02:54] you have some value.

[1:02:55] Yes, absolutely. Good.

[1:02:57] The proposal was approved.

[1:02:59] Mr. Yegge asked

[1:03:00] me.

[1:03:00] Second place.

[1:03:01] Race for second

[1:03:02] place between Mrs. Heath

[1:03:02] and Mr....

[1:03:03] Thank you very much.

[1:03:04] Everyone who supports

[1:03:05] proposal,

[1:03:05] confirm this

[1:03:06] with the words "yes".

[1:03:07] Yes.

[1:03:08] Against?

[1:03:09] Leave it to the members

[1:03:10] councils of two cities or

[1:03:11] former council members

[1:03:12] bridge.

[1:03:13] These are small towns.

[1:03:14] That's right, exactly.

[1:03:15] Good. Uh, let's move.

[1:03:17] further. We have a request.

[1:03:19] from the director of

[1:03:20] objects, Angela

[1:03:21] Davis, regarding

[1:03:22] appropriations that are not

[1:03:23] exceeds 125,000

[1:03:24] US dollars, on

[1:03:25] replacement of two boilers in

[1:03:27] prison and

[1:03:28] district complex.

[1:03:31] We voted 7-0.

[1:03:32] for the offer

[1:03:33] support on

[1:03:35] meeting on August 24.

[1:03:36] So, Director Davis

[1:03:40] could not meet

[1:03:42] with us today

[1:03:43] in the evening, how is it

[1:03:43] is obviously on board.

[1:03:45] Any comments,

[1:03:46] any

[1:03:47] recommendations from

[1:03:48] Mr. Pressel or Mr

[1:03:49] Egge?

[1:03:52] Well, yes, the reason why

[1:03:53] She didn't come because we

[1:03:54] It has already been approved. So

[1:03:56] she knew that we are going to divide

[1:03:58] 50/50. We talked about

[1:04:00] to remove it from

[1:04:01] WinTax.

[1:04:01] And Riverboat.

[1:04:02] so we

[1:04:03] let's divide.

[1:04:04] Good. So, this is

[1:04:06] offer?

[1:04:06] Yes, there is.

[1:04:07] Okay, so the proposal

[1:04:09] divide the amount

[1:04:11] equally between, uh, 1191

[1:04:13] Riverboat and 4220 WinTax. I have

[1:04:14] Do you have a second?

[1:04:16] Supported by Mr.

[1:04:17] Castellano. Any

[1:04:18] discussion? All who

[1:04:20] supports the proposal

[1:04:21] , confirm that

[1:04:22] say "yes".

[1:04:23] Yes.

[1:04:23] Against? Thank you. Uh,

[1:04:26] moving on, we

[1:04:28] reached the coroner,

[1:04:29] Mrs. Swanson, who

[1:04:30] requests additional

[1:04:31] appropriation in

[1:04:32] amount of 42,000 dollars

[1:04:34] USA for execution

[1:04:35] contract with

[1:04:36] pathologists,

[1:04:37] related to

[1:04:38] autopsies.

[1:04:40] Good evening.

[1:04:42] I ask for the remainder.

[1:04:44] of what is or was for

[1:04:45] contract. Uh, on

[1:04:47] beginning of budget

[1:04:49] past hearings

[1:04:50] year they gave me 150

[1:04:51] dollars in my

[1:04:52] budget when

[1:04:53] the contract was 192. So,

[1:04:55] I'm here for the remaining 42,000.

[1:04:56] Good. Any

[1:05:01] questions or actions from

[1:05:02] advice?

[1:05:05] Proposal about

[1:05:06] approval.

[1:05:07] Proposal about

[1:05:07] approval from the gentleman

[1:05:09] Pressela.

[1:05:09] Uh, River River. Yes,

[1:05:11] divide again.

[1:05:12] Do you want to share?

[1:05:13] Good. So, I have

[1:05:15] proposal about

[1:05:15] approval of separation

[1:05:16] river tax

[1:05:17] ships and

[1:05:17] wind energy. IN

[1:05:18] Do you have a second?

[1:05:20] Supported by Mr. Keel.

[1:05:21] Any discussions?

[1:05:23] Everyone who supports

[1:05:24] proposal,

[1:05:24] confirm this

[1:05:25] with the words "yes".

[1:05:26] Yes.

[1:05:27] Against? Good.

[1:05:29] Thank you.

[1:05:30] Can I add

[1:05:31] comment? Budget

[1:05:31] next year

[1:05:32] designed for

[1:05:33] full 192.

[1:05:34] Yes.

[1:05:35] Good. Good. And then

[1:05:37] we will get you in

[1:05:38] end of the narrations,

[1:05:39] since there is only...In

[1:05:39] there is one more of us...

[1:05:40] Oh, we have payment.

[1:05:41] the work of the deputy.

[1:05:42] Good. Last in

[1:05:43] application. Good.

[1:05:45] I am here for...

[1:05:45] Thank you. I appreciate it.

[1:05:47] I need it.

[1:05:48] partner. Good.

[1:05:49] Please add more.

[1:05:50] pay 25,000

[1:05:51] dollars for

[1:05:51] professional services-

[1:05:52] this is wages

[1:05:53] deputy. Um...Um...

[1:05:55] proposed

[1:05:56] accounts-1191 and 14 and 4220

[1:05:57] river tax

[1:05:59] ships and wind.

[1:06:00] Okay, I would like to

[1:06:01] change this amount if

[1:06:02] Can I please?

[1:06:03] You can reduce,

[1:06:04] you can't

[1:06:04] increase.

[1:06:05] I'm lowering.

[1:06:06] Good.

[1:06:06] I like it.

[1:06:08] Up to 15,000, after

[1:06:09] I'll look at some of mine.

[1:06:12] numbers and accounts, I think I can.

[1:06:14] do it with another 15,000. In

[1:06:16] I am the only one left.

[1:06:17] 4,700 on account to

[1:06:18] end of the year. I hope that others

[1:06:21] 15,000 is enough for me.

[1:06:22] end of the year.

[1:06:23] Good. So, she

[1:06:24] independently contributes

[1:06:25] changes to your amount.

[1:06:27] Offer

[1:06:27] support 7,500 each tax on

[1:06:29] river vessel and

[1:06:30] wind energy on

[1:06:31] MP's salary.

[1:06:32] Do you want to support?

[1:06:33] whether to approve,

[1:06:34] considering that this

[1:06:35] a smaller amount?

[1:06:35] Good.

[1:06:36] So, the proposal

[1:06:37] approve the distribution of 15

[1:06:38] 000 between tax on

[1:06:39] river vessel and

[1:06:40] wind energy.

[1:06:41] Second,

[1:06:42] I am asking a question.

[1:06:43] to the auditor. Do you want to

[1:06:44] so that we can continue

[1:06:45] to divide these funds,

[1:06:46] does this create for you

[1:06:47] a lot of extra

[1:06:48] work for no reason?

[1:06:49] This creates a certain

[1:06:50] work, but it doesn't have

[1:06:51] value.

[1:06:53] Hmm, the idea is

[1:06:54] because, uh, we're not...we

[1:06:55] not really...hmm,

[1:06:57] we suffer because we

[1:06:58] approaching

[1:06:59] the end of these traditions

[1:07:00] for these accounts. So

[1:07:03] good.

[1:07:04] So, I have

[1:07:05] Mr.'s proposal

[1:07:06] Kessler, which

[1:07:07] Mr. Keel supports.

[1:07:08] Everyone who supports

[1:07:09] proposal,

[1:07:10] confirm,

[1:07:10] saying "yes".

[1:07:11] Yes. Yes.

[1:07:12] Against?

[1:07:13] No.

[1:07:15] 5-2. Good.

[1:07:18] Hey, I'll be back for "

[1:07:20] "Yes," when we get there

[1:07:21] to transfers. Thank you.

[1:07:28] Good. Moving on to

[1:07:30] The Council of Commissioners, which

[1:07:32] requests additional

[1:07:33] appropriation in

[1:07:34] amounting to 1.75 million

[1:07:37] dollars for expanded

[1:07:38] discussion about which

[1:07:40] we talked. It

[1:07:41] concerning the fund

[1:07:42] insurance

[1:07:43] civil

[1:07:43] responsibility

[1:07:44] district. This, as explained

[1:07:45] auditor, but this

[1:07:46] responsibility

[1:07:47] commissioners.

[1:07:48] As you all know, how

[1:07:49] you all know,

[1:07:50] insurance premiums

[1:07:50] grow on everything that

[1:07:51] costs more and more and

[1:07:52] more money every year.

[1:07:54] A lot has come out of

[1:07:55] these four

[1:07:55] accounts.

[1:07:56] Yes, but we have some

[1:07:57] things that seem like we fix it.

[1:08:00] Let's fix it.

[1:08:02] Okay, so we

[1:08:02] discussed in detail

[1:08:04] it. Are there any more?

[1:08:06] question from the council?

[1:08:08] The proposal follows

[1:08:10] from our offer

[1:08:11] approve

[1:08:12] River division

[1:08:13] boat and MED

[1:08:14] economic

[1:08:15] development for 875 each.

[1:08:16] IN

[1:08:17] I have a suggestion.

[1:08:18] approve

[1:08:19] separation 1191

[1:08:20] Riverboats and

[1:08:21] 1112 MED economic

[1:08:23] development from Mr.

[1:08:24] Kessler. I have

[1:08:25] second?

[1:08:27] Supported by Mr.

[1:08:28] Mollenhauer. Are there any

[1:08:29] discussion? Good.

[1:08:34] Everyone who supports

[1:08:35] proposal,

[1:08:35] confirm this,

[1:08:36] saying "yes".

[1:08:37] Yes.

[1:08:38] Against?

[1:08:39] No.

[1:08:40] Thank you.

[1:08:41] Okay, now we are dealing with the fact that

[1:08:47] Planning and

[1:08:48] county zoning

[1:08:49] Laporte demands

[1:08:50] additional 15,000

[1:08:51] US dollars for

[1:08:52] additional coverage

[1:08:54] salaries,

[1:08:54] voted by the council

[1:08:56] in 2025, for a salary

[1:08:57] 2026. So, sir

[1:08:58] auditor, we already

[1:08:59] talked about it

[1:09:01] previously by SBOA or

[1:09:02] DLGF. They explained that

[1:09:04] were accepted

[1:09:06] new rules, and this

[1:09:07] was at the conference

[1:09:08] auditors at the beginning

[1:09:09] year, and it happened

[1:09:10] immediately after

[1:09:12] we approved it

[1:09:13] withdrawal

[1:09:13] registration fees

[1:09:15] contractors from

[1:09:15] register of contractors.

[1:09:18] So, the real

[1:09:19] the proposal is to

[1:09:20] in order to reduce

[1:09:22] registration fees

[1:09:23] contractors to him

[1:09:24] it was impossible for them

[1:09:25] pay, and then

[1:09:26] return them to

[1:09:27] general fund. Well,

[1:09:28] uh, it doesn't matter where you're from

[1:09:30] they will take on

[1:09:31] that moment, but this

[1:09:32] once upon a time

[1:09:33] stock,

[1:09:34] um, of these two, so that we

[1:09:36] could pay him

[1:09:37] his actual

[1:09:38] salary. Because first

[1:09:40] a year ago you could do this

[1:09:41] to do, but not now

[1:09:42] you can.

[1:09:43] Good.

[1:09:44] Then I will add what I will contribute

[1:09:46] changes to this statement.

[1:09:47] There is a possibility

[1:09:48] receiving part

[1:09:49] salaries, but we

[1:09:50] must justify

[1:09:51] every hour he

[1:09:52] spends on everything

[1:09:53] applications, and I still have

[1:09:54] this data is not available. When

[1:09:56] I will have this data,

[1:09:57] we can

[1:09:58] to adjust

[1:09:59] payment structure

[1:10:00] labor. So, for

[1:10:01] clarity when we

[1:10:03] reviewed budgets

[1:10:04] for 2025 for 2026,

[1:10:06] in general

[1:10:08] we took 15,000 dollars

[1:10:09] USA separately

[1:10:10] salary from the account,

[1:10:11] which has different rules

[1:10:13] regarding salary. Here's to

[1:10:16] What are we returning to?

[1:10:18] We are adjusting

[1:10:19] appropriation in

[1:10:20] budgets to be

[1:10:21] confident in

[1:10:22] compliance with the rules.

[1:10:27] Mr. Russell, I wanted to

[1:10:28] would declare that he

[1:10:29] stated that the money

[1:10:31] will be...if he doesn't

[1:10:33] will be able to compensate

[1:10:34] this money is due

[1:10:35] meetings, he himself

[1:10:36] will compensate. Yes.

[1:10:37] I just want

[1:10:38] make sure that you

[1:10:39] understood.

[1:10:40] Of course.

[1:10:40] I don't...I don't think you will find it

[1:10:42] problem.

[1:10:44] Good.

[1:10:44] Just make sure

[1:10:46] that

[1:10:46] Everything is fine. So, what does the council mean?

[1:10:52] Proposal about

[1:10:53] approval from

[1:10:53] Riverboat.

[1:10:54] Proposal about

[1:10:55] approval from

[1:10:56] Riverboat from Mr.

[1:10:56] Kila. I have a friend.

[1:10:58] opinion?

[1:10:58] Second opinion.

[1:10:59] Supported by Mr.

[1:11:00] Pressel. Any

[1:11:01] further discussion

[1:11:02] ? Everyone who is "for"

[1:11:04] allocation 15,000 from

[1:11:06] river vessel 1191,

[1:11:08] confirm,

[1:11:09] saying, “I.

[1:11:11] I.

[1:11:12] Against".

[1:11:13] And I just

[1:11:14] need

[1:11:14] make sure that you

[1:11:15] also agree

[1:11:16] exclude this from the fee

[1:11:17] for services

[1:11:18] contractors.

[1:11:19] Simultaneously.

[1:11:20] So why should we just

[1:11:20] not to make a separate one

[1:11:21] proposal, simply

[1:11:22] so that...Whatever you do

[1:11:23] done.

[1:11:23] Just interrupted to

[1:11:25] we could

[1:11:25] both.

[1:11:26] So, we are looking for

[1:11:27] proposal about

[1:11:28] abolition

[1:11:28] initial 15,000

[1:11:29] US dollars from

[1:11:30] registration fees

[1:11:31] contractors. Such

[1:11:33] way, it will cleanse them

[1:11:34] from the budget article.

[1:11:35] So, it is proposed.

[1:11:36] So, the proposal of Mrs.

[1:11:37] Hit. I have a friend.

[1:11:38] opinion?

[1:11:38] Second opinion.

[1:11:39] Supported by Mr. Keel.

[1:11:40] Everyone who is "in favor"

[1:11:41] confirm,

[1:11:41] saying, “I.

[1:11:42] I.

[1:11:42] Against".

[1:11:43] No. Thank you. Thank you.

[1:11:48] Good. Moving on to

[1:11:51] transfers and

[1:11:52] permits for

[1:11:52] relevant costs.

[1:11:55] Director

[1:11:55] Department of Security

[1:11:57] county health

[1:11:58] Laporte, Mrs. Leiners,

[1:11:59] asks for permission

[1:12:01] spend from 1159 in

[1:12:02] amount of 175,000 dollars

[1:12:03] for part

[1:12:04] building construction

[1:12:06] at the fairground

[1:12:07] the site. And you have

[1:12:09] shadow. I have

[1:12:11] support. I

[1:12:13] I'm confused. What is this not?

[1:12:14] must exceed

[1:12:16] 175,000. School medical

[1:12:18] help is provided

[1:12:19] expansion of your

[1:12:20] object there, on

[1:12:21] fairground

[1:12:22] the site. They

[1:12:24] I was asked if I

[1:12:26] knowing that I

[1:12:27] need space,

[1:12:28] asked if I wanted

[1:12:29] join in on this.

[1:12:31] School medical

[1:12:32] help. That's why we

[1:12:34] here. Ask for funds,

[1:12:35] to help

[1:12:36] pay my share

[1:12:37] buildings.

[1:12:38] Good. So what do we want?

[1:12:39] to do in this building

[1:12:40] ? This is obviously

[1:12:41] partially or it

[1:12:42] satellite base

[1:12:42] ambulance

[1:12:43] assistance for

[1:12:44] fairground

[1:12:45] the site.

[1:12:45] Looking at the gentleman

[1:12:46] Finstermaker, to

[1:12:48] he agreed.

[1:12:49] Yes. So that settles it.

[1:12:50] a big problem for

[1:12:51] us. So, now our

[1:12:53] plumbing on

[1:12:54] outer wall. So

[1:12:55] we can't

[1:12:56] to use it

[1:12:57] all year round, because she

[1:12:58] will freeze. So,

[1:13:00] adding also for her

[1:13:01] goals–keep it

[1:13:02] trailer etc.–she

[1:13:03] will place the entire

[1:13:04] plumbing on

[1:13:05] the inner wall, which

[1:13:06] will allow us both

[1:13:07] to use it

[1:13:08] all year long. Hmm, there will also be room for

[1:13:14] storage,

[1:13:15] for example, during COVID

[1:13:16] , all of our

[1:13:17] medicines on

[1:13:18] warehouse, dressing gowns,

[1:13:19] masks, boots–all of that

[1:13:21] kept in our

[1:13:22] buildings. So between them

[1:13:26] there will be a separate space

[1:13:28] just for this

[1:13:28] inventory. We have, uh

[1:13:31] , obligations from

[1:13:32] some local

[1:13:33] trade unions

[1:13:34] to perform with us

[1:13:35] free work.

[1:13:36] Carpenters' Union

[1:13:37] and trade union

[1:13:38] finishers

[1:13:38] agreed, uh,

[1:13:39] help us with

[1:13:40] some of these issues.

[1:13:41] We will do it.

[1:13:42] similarly, uh, on

[1:13:43] sorry, Mr. Iglesias

[1:13:44] was the only one who

[1:13:45] remembers this from the time

[1:13:47] being on the council,

[1:13:48] when we were building ours

[1:13:49] main building in 2015

[1:13:51] year. We worked

[1:13:52] through Lowe's for their

[1:13:52] participation in life

[1:13:53] communities, and they also

[1:13:54] donated a lot

[1:13:55] workforce for

[1:13:56] this. They also

[1:13:57] agreed to help

[1:13:58] with this. So this will be

[1:13:59] really a project

[1:14:00] community building.

[1:14:01] Good. OK. And I would

[1:14:03] said that even

[1:14:04] regardless of whether

[1:14:05] Will this be approved?

[1:14:06] Is it not approved, I think I know, to

[1:14:08] what will this lead to, but,

[1:14:09] uh, I like it

[1:14:10] to see cooperation, which

[1:14:12] occurs between

[1:14:13] departments here.

[1:14:14] So thank you for this.

[1:14:15] example.

[1:14:16] This will also happen.

[1:14:17] much more.

[1:14:18] Just so you know,

[1:14:19] that, uh, EMS will be back

[1:14:20] to subordination

[1:14:21] Department of Security

[1:14:22] Indiana's health to

[1:14:23] end of the year. No, she is

[1:14:24] will not be mine

[1:14:25] boss. We

[1:14:27] let's be together

[1:14:28] equal, but, uh, there are

[1:14:29] much more

[1:14:30] continuity thanks to

[1:14:32] EMS together with

[1:14:32] department

[1:14:33] health care. Uh,

[1:14:35] and some better ones

[1:14:36] opportunities

[1:14:36] funding, I think

[1:14:38] , that's why they

[1:14:39] do it at the level

[1:14:40] state.

[1:14:40] Good. Fantastically.

[1:14:42] And such an extension

[1:14:43] also allows us

[1:14:44] to have constantly

[1:14:45] electricity in

[1:14:46] our trailer. Ahem,

[1:14:50] we need this

[1:14:51] worked for 7 days

[1:14:52] in a row before we can go to

[1:14:54] road, um, before

[1:14:55] we will be able to place

[1:14:57] any vaccine there

[1:14:58] . So now we have

[1:15:01] there is no such thing

[1:15:02] opportunities, but this

[1:15:03] It will help a lot.

[1:15:05] So, for

[1:15:05] the public is

[1:15:06] refrigerated

[1:15:07] trailer, intended

[1:15:08] for storage and

[1:15:09] use of others

[1:15:10] medical materials,

[1:15:12] who need

[1:15:12] of a certain kind

[1:15:13] cooling.

[1:15:15] Right. It

[1:15:15] mobile medical

[1:15:16] clinic, and it has

[1:15:18] freezer

[1:15:19] for vaccines.

[1:15:19] Good.

[1:15:22] One more comment.

[1:15:23] They got to

[1:15:25] commissions. So that was it.

[1:15:26] fully approved

[1:15:27] them, so you don't

[1:15:28] need to go there-

[1:15:30] here.

[1:15:30] Good.

[1:15:34] Balance of funds...

[1:15:35] sorry, I didn't name it

[1:15:36] you have a balance of funds,

[1:15:37] but there is more than

[1:15:38] a significant amount of money.

[1:15:39] This was before

[1:15:40] highlighted, or...

[1:15:45] So, the funds that...Yes

[1:15:46] and no...Costs

[1:15:47] returning from

[1:15:48] compensation funds

[1:15:49] COVID we received

[1:15:50] for insurance

[1:15:51] compensation that we

[1:15:52] did for these

[1:15:53] vaccination. This money

[1:15:56] were intended for

[1:15:57] of Dr. Box on that

[1:15:59] time for them to go to

[1:16:03] equipment, buildings

[1:16:04] or transport

[1:16:05] means that

[1:16:06] security department

[1:16:07] health is usually not

[1:16:08] could do.

[1:16:09] So it's something like

[1:16:10] government grant?

[1:16:12] It was

[1:16:12] reimbursement

[1:16:13] insurance costs.

[1:16:15] The state took everyone

[1:16:16] insurance documents, and

[1:16:17] as soon as they

[1:16:18] received money from

[1:16:19] insurance companies,

[1:16:20] they distributed them

[1:16:21] between districts on

[1:16:22] based on quantity

[1:16:23] vaccinations that he had

[1:16:24] this district.

[1:16:25] So these are not tax

[1:16:26] funds.

[1:16:27] So they still

[1:16:28] will be allocated,

[1:16:29] if they are in our

[1:16:29] at your disposal.

[1:16:30] You are allocating now.

[1:16:32] You don't need

[1:16:32] additional

[1:16:33] allocation. We can consider this

[1:16:35] again after the meeting

[1:16:36] , and if we

[1:16:37] will be useful

[1:16:37] additional

[1:16:38] appropriation, we will bring them in

[1:16:39] next month,

[1:16:40] but I think we should

[1:16:41] needed. And I think,

[1:16:43] that our lawyer is there,

[1:16:45] if you want

[1:16:46] ask, but we

[1:16:47] can free us

[1:16:48] all and

[1:16:55] next question.

[1:16:57] I am filing a petition.

[1:16:58] about their appropriation. I mean, here

[1:17:00] this is advertised as

[1:17:01] permission to spend {

[1:17:02] slash} is appropriate. Therefore,

[1:17:03] I propose to highlight

[1:17:05] 175,000 from fund 1159.

[1:17:06] Second.

[1:17:07] So, the proposal of Mr.

[1:17:08] Kila, friend

[1:17:09] Mr.'s proposal

[1:17:10] Castle. Any

[1:17:11] further discussion

[1:17:12] ?

[1:17:12] This is not to be exceeded,

[1:17:13] Yes?

[1:17:13] Not to exceed 175,000.

[1:17:16] Right. I don't see.

[1:17:18] so that it is marked here.

[1:17:19] Do you agree with this as

[1:17:20] a friendly amendment?

[1:17:21] Not to exceed 175?

[1:17:23] Yes, that's good.

[1:17:24] Do you agree?

[1:17:25] Yes. Good.

[1:17:27] Everyone who supports

[1:17:29] allocation 175,000 or

[1:17:31] less than 1159, mark,

[1:17:33] saying: I am.

[1:17:36] I.

[1:17:37] Against? Another

[1:17:40] comment, again

[1:17:41] bravo for what you are

[1:17:43] found partners in

[1:17:44] community who are ready

[1:17:45] help with this. But

[1:17:47] whether it's Lowe's or

[1:17:48] trade unions, whether

[1:17:49] anyone else

[1:17:50] large employer

[1:17:51] in the district. Therefore. Beautiful

[1:17:53] work. Or

[1:17:54] could we too

[1:17:55] get advice on

[1:17:56] how it will turn out...

[1:17:58] Good...

[1:17:58] with money, I have

[1:18:00] attention.

[1:18:00] Good. Now we

[1:18:03] moved to a shelter

[1:18:04] for animals of La-

[1:18:05] Port.

[1:18:08] I'm fine.

[1:18:09] Need help?

[1:18:10] With the community, if you

[1:18:11] Are you going to leave?

[1:18:12] Brook. If you

[1:18:13] are you going to help

[1:18:13] me with yours

[1:18:14] last name, thank you.

[1:18:15] Okay, goodbye.

[1:18:16] Thank you.

[1:18:17] How are you doing?

[1:18:18] No, not at first. 21 years old,

[1:18:21] but it's still hard

[1:18:22] for me. Good. Uh,

[1:18:24] I ask permission.

[1:18:25] spend 20,000

[1:18:26] dollars for

[1:18:27] veterinary and

[1:18:27] hospital expenses from

[1:18:30] fund fees for

[1:18:31] control over

[1:18:32] animals.

[1:18:33] Proposal about

[1:18:33] approval, sir

[1:18:34] President.

[1:18:35] Second.

[1:18:36] I want to know if

[1:18:37] Are you going to...

[1:18:39] Thank you. Good,

[1:18:40] Mr.'s proposal

[1:18:41] Igelsky, friend

[1:18:42] Ms. Heath's suggestion.

[1:18:43] Regarding the discussion, whether

[1:18:44] are there any other details,

[1:18:46] which ones would you like

[1:18:47] to provide?

[1:18:50] Uh, about these expenses, I mean, they...This

[1:18:53] made you come

[1:18:54] here. I just wanted to make sure. Yes, I am.

[1:18:57] I mean, by this

[1:18:58] almost everything has been said.

[1:19:00] Good. Who is "for"?

[1:19:01] means saying "yes"

[1:19:03] . Who is "against"? Thank you.

[1:19:06] Now you ask: "

[1:19:08] Do we have a minute?

[1:19:09] correction regarding

[1:19:09] this? It says there

[1:19:11] 10,000 20, and it should be 10,000 and

[1:19:13] 10,000.

[1:19:14] Right. I think

[1:19:16] what is our advertising

[1:19:18] good.

[1:19:19] She is below,

[1:19:21] perfect. Therefore,

[1:19:22] we ask permission

[1:19:23] spend 10,000 on

[1:19:24] services and fees from

[1:19:25] donation fund for

[1:19:26] animal shelter.

[1:19:29] Proposal about

[1:19:29] approval, sir

[1:19:30] President.

[1:19:31] Proposal about

[1:19:32] approval from the gentleman

[1:19:33] Igelsky.

[1:19:34] Second.

[1:19:35] The second from Mr.

[1:19:36] Molitor and Mr.

[1:19:37] Kessler. All who

[1:19:38] support

[1:19:38] proposal,

[1:19:39] confirm,

[1:19:40] saying "yes". Against?

[1:19:41] Thank you. Thank you,

[1:19:42] guys.

[1:19:43] Thank you. See you in

[1:19:45] Thursday.

[1:19:47] Good. We have a sheriff.

[1:19:50] The hit that asks

[1:19:51] permission to spend

[1:19:52] funds from the Fund

[1:19:53] misdemeanors on

[1:19:54] purchasing a replacement

[1:19:55] washing machine for

[1:19:56] prison. Mr. Sheriff.

[1:19:58] Good evening. I am Ron

[1:20:00] Hit, sheriff. Yes, we have

[1:20:02] recently in prison

[1:20:03] The washing machine broke down.

[1:20:04] machine. She was 23 years old.

[1:20:07] . He was

[1:20:08] established in 2003

[1:20:10] . Uh, we were considering

[1:20:11] possibility of repair

[1:20:12] washing machine, but

[1:20:13] they said that

[1:20:14] better to buy a new one

[1:20:15] because of her age. We would

[1:20:17] wasted

[1:20:18] a lot of money, making

[1:20:19] repair. So, we

[1:20:21] please allow

[1:20:22] to spend from the Fund

[1:20:23] misdemeanors 22,500

[1:20:24] dollars for a new one

[1:20:25] prison or

[1:20:26] washing machine for

[1:20:27] prison.

[1:20:28] Proposal about

[1:20:29] approval.

[1:20:29] Second.

[1:20:30] Proposal about

[1:20:31] approval from the gentleman

[1:20:31] Kessler. Second

[1:20:32] proposal from Mrs.

[1:20:33] Hit. Are there any

[1:20:34] discussion? All in favor

[1:20:36] $22,500 for a new one

[1:20:38] washing machine,

[1:20:39] confirm,

[1:20:41] saying "I". "

[1:20:42] Against? Okay. Now

[1:20:45] you are asking for 46,000 from

[1:20:46] Misdemeanors Fund

[1:20:47] annual payment

[1:20:48] renewal

[1:20:49] software

[1:20:50] provision for

[1:20:51] prison management.

[1:20:53] Right. This is ours

[1:20:54] software

[1:20:55] provision for

[1:20:55] prison booking,

[1:20:56] when we register

[1:20:57] someone in prison, where

[1:20:58] we are taking their pictures

[1:20:59] fingerprints,

[1:21:00] we take photos,

[1:21:01] other information. And this

[1:21:02] just our annual

[1:21:03] license for

[1:21:04] software

[1:21:04] provision for

[1:21:05] prison management.

[1:21:06] Good. Uh, and we

[1:21:08] traditionally paid

[1:21:09] this is from the Misdemeanor Fund

[1:21:11] . This is not traditional.

[1:21:12] Well, usually we choose the Foundation

[1:21:14] misdemeanors, while

[1:21:15] they use

[1:21:16] Misdemeanor Fund,

[1:21:16] some commission,

[1:21:17] something like that

[1:21:18] pay for it.

[1:21:19] Good.

[1:21:19] So, yes. Well, we are quite

[1:21:21] agree to take this from

[1:21:22] Misdemeanor Fund. There

[1:21:23] enough money for

[1:21:25] this.

[1:21:28] Any thoughts?

[1:21:29] The proposal was approved,

[1:21:30] second.

[1:21:31] The proposal was approved by

[1:21:32] Mr. Presley, second-mr.

[1:21:33] Kessler. Any

[1:21:34] discussion? All who

[1:21:35] supports the proposal

[1:21:37] , mark by saying

[1:21:38] I.

[1:21:38] Me. Thank you. Thank you.

[1:21:42] Good. Returning

[1:21:44] to parks and areas

[1:21:45] rest, please

[1:21:46] spend or

[1:21:47] transfer 3700

[1:21:48] dollars from the account for

[1:21:49] donations.

[1:21:50] The proposal was approved,

[1:21:51] Mr. President.

[1:21:52] The proposal was approved by

[1:21:53] Mr. Dugalski.

[1:21:54] Second.

[1:21:55] Mrs. Heath. Any-

[1:21:56] what discussions?

[1:21:57] This is Santa Claus,

[1:21:58] Be careful.

[1:21:59] This is Santa Claus.

[1:22:01] Just be.

[1:22:01] careful.

[1:22:02] Is this fund before?

[1:22:03] stood out?

[1:22:04] What is it?

[1:22:04] Is this fund before?

[1:22:06] stood out? That's why

[1:22:07] I am here. This is because for

[1:22:08] to spend

[1:22:10] donations, I have

[1:22:10] to get approval

[1:22:11] from the council.

[1:22:12] Yes.

[1:22:12] To appropriate them.

[1:22:14] Yes, yes.

[1:22:16] Good. All who

[1:22:17] supports the proposal

[1:22:19] , mark it with the words:

[1:22:20] I.

[1:22:21] Against? Thank you.

[1:22:23] Moving on

[1:22:26] .

[1:22:27] Charming, Jeremy.

[1:22:28] The third time–

[1:22:29] charm. Good. Uh-huh

[1:22:37] , now we have

[1:22:38] trial

[1:22:38] term for adults,

[1:22:40] uh, from Mr.

[1:22:40] The President.

[1:22:41] Don't be shy.

[1:22:42] Thank you. Okay, Steve, no.

[1:22:43] was able to come. He

[1:22:44] asked me if I can speak. We

[1:22:46] already had a meeting with

[1:22:47] on this occasion, their

[1:22:49] computers were

[1:22:49] acts of measures

[1:22:50] security, we are going to update

[1:22:52] them to Windows 10, so this

[1:22:53] necessary for our,

[1:22:55] um, so that we could be

[1:22:56] covered by our

[1:22:56] insurance.

[1:22:58] Good.

[1:22:59] So the amount is $

[1:23:01] 12,744.95, um, with Windows 10 for

[1:23:05] computer and Spirit, and

[1:23:07] Spirit Court three.

[1:23:09] Upgrade to Windows 10.

[1:23:12] WITH?

[1:23:13] This is from Windows 10.

[1:23:15] Yes.

[1:23:15] Update to 11 or 11

[1:23:17] or 12, yes.

[1:23:19] Good. Thoughts from the council.

[1:23:22] The proposal is approved.

[1:23:23] The proposal was approved by

[1:23:24] Mrs. Geet. Friend

[1:23:25] supported the proposal

[1:23:27] Mr. Mormon. Are there any

[1:23:28] discussion? Everyone who

[1:23:30] supports approval

[1:23:31] $12,744.95 per

[1:23:32] trial

[1:23:33] term for adults

[1:23:34] for the computer,

[1:23:35] confirm that

[1:23:36] they said "yes".

[1:23:37] Yes.

[1:23:38] Against? Thank you. Now in

[1:23:43] We have a secretary.

[1:23:44] district court, which

[1:23:45] asks for permission

[1:23:46] spend the appropriate

[1:23:48] funds from transferred

[1:23:49] funds. I don't remember.

[1:23:50] so that earlier

[1:23:51] used this

[1:23:52] stock. Hmm, 89 88 99

[1:23:53] consumables

[1:23:56] for the amount of $97.73

[1:23:58] USA for payment

[1:24:00] invoices. IN

[1:24:02] we are also from the same

[1:24:04] fund, but on other

[1:24:05] services and fees, 14,000

[1:24:06] US dollars for

[1:24:07] bill payment-

[1:24:09] Malcon's invoices. This, and

[1:24:11] I see that the secretary

[1:24:13] still in place. So, uh

[1:24:14] -e, who accounts

[1:24:15] Malkon? Or who who

[1:24:17] Malcon?

[1:24:18] they process a lot

[1:24:23] money 4D. Things like that.

[1:24:27] They keep us in

[1:24:28] course.

[1:24:30] Of course. Sir

[1:24:31] Jagelsky. Heather,

[1:24:33] quickly, um, I know that

[1:24:34] you take it off

[1:24:35] your fund, but not

[1:24:36] it would be better this

[1:24:37] to appropriate, because we do not

[1:24:38] we take enough

[1:24:39] money from 4D, because they have

[1:24:41] many redundant

[1:24:42] funds?

[1:24:44] But with 4D we can

[1:24:45] take only interest.

[1:24:47] If so, I thought,

[1:24:48] because I worked with them

[1:24:50] earlier,

[1:24:50] I can't, sorry.

[1:24:52] Good.

[1:24:54] I can't withdraw funds.

[1:24:56] 4D and spend them on

[1:24:57] something like folders

[1:24:58] for the office

[1:25:00] a clerk, or, it seems,

[1:25:01] you know, big ones

[1:25:02] marriage folders, books

[1:25:03] orders and all that.

[1:25:06] We can't do this.

[1:25:07] make. So part,

[1:25:09] and Kerry is better at this

[1:25:11] understands better than me.

[1:25:13] Part comes from

[1:25:15] 4D fund. And part

[1:25:18] comes from our

[1:25:19] perpetuation fund. If

[1:25:20] with

[1:25:20] You're fine.

[1:25:22] There is none

[1:25:22] transfer from the fund,

[1:25:23] I don't care, but I know we don't take

[1:25:26] enough money from 4D,

[1:25:27] and that's the problem, and

[1:25:28] this is an excessive amount

[1:25:29] money.

[1:25:30] Yes.

[1:25:31] So I would just like to see if we

[1:25:33] Let's split this or something.

[1:25:34] like this, because it doesn't matter

[1:25:36] transfer of funds. No, I think yours

[1:25:41] good comment

[1:25:42] taken into account, let's

[1:25:44] just consider

[1:25:45] other sources

[1:25:45] financing,

[1:25:46] at least on

[1:25:47] future. Mr. Otter.

[1:25:49] So this is not the only fund,

[1:25:50] who has to pay

[1:25:52] Malcolm's account. Yet

[1:25:54] 11,300 USD

[1:25:55] came from

[1:25:56] fees

[1:25:56] professional

[1:25:57] employees. It was

[1:25:59] from the commissioner's budget.

[1:26:02] What do they do for

[1:26:04] these 11,300 dollars, yes

[1:26:05] they get it

[1:26:06] information from my

[1:26:08] office where listed

[1:26:09] 4D work done with

[1:26:15] office clerk with

[1:26:16] actual 4D, and then

[1:26:17] make up

[1:26:18] reimbursement. They

[1:26:20] carry out the process

[1:26:21] cost allocation, and

[1:26:22] then we get

[1:26:23] compensation for this.

[1:26:24] Mr. Fagan could

[1:26:25] talk more with

[1:26:26] about this. I

[1:26:27] asked him

[1:26:28] pay this bill.

[1:26:29] I will let him.

[1:26:30] resolve this issue.

[1:26:32] You know, I'll finish this.

[1:26:34] later, but,

[1:26:35] let me

[1:26:36] try again.

[1:26:37] Ms. Stevens, is there

[1:26:39] some way if

[1:26:40] we will divide it between the two of them, it's 4D, and your

[1:26:43] ported number, or

[1:26:44] will this be for you

[1:26:45] consent or not?

[1:26:50] While I can, while I can spend this.

[1:26:52] from there, I can't see

[1:26:53] problems.

[1:26:56] Good. I will contribute

[1:26:57] a proposal that

[1:26:58] so that we can adopt this as

[1:26:59] conditions that if you

[1:27:00] can you share this,

[1:27:01] if not, then the entire amount

[1:27:02] will be taken from

[1:27:03] transferred amount. I support this conversation.

[1:27:05] Good. I will accept.

[1:27:06] petition. You can

[1:27:07] to do everything that

[1:27:08] whatever, you can

[1:27:08] to do everything that

[1:27:09] whatever. You can

[1:27:10] to do it. Good.

[1:27:12] So, the petition. IN

[1:27:13] Do we have a second?

[1:27:16] Supported

[1:27:16] at the request of Mr.

[1:27:17] Ugalsky,

[1:27:18] supported by Mr.

[1:27:18] Pressel. So, I will ask our

[1:27:20] lawyer to express

[1:27:21] your opinion. Sir

[1:27:23] Badges.

[1:27:24] Greetings.

[1:27:25] Yes.

[1:27:29] If we introduce

[1:27:30] proposal regarding

[1:27:31] transfer, expenses or

[1:27:33] appropriation of funds

[1:27:34] on the account of which

[1:27:35] we are not today

[1:27:36] mentioned, but Mr.

[1:27:37] Ugalsky asks

[1:27:38] to offer us

[1:27:39] Mrs. Stevens

[1:27:40] to explore the possibility

[1:27:41] divide this

[1:27:42] invoice between

[1:27:43] this transferred to

[1:27:44] the next period and

[1:27:45] 4D score. Do we have

[1:27:51] Are we entitled to this?

[1:27:54] I think so. It

[1:27:56] just a transfer. It

[1:27:57] not additional

[1:27:58] allocation. Therefore I don't think it's necessary.

[1:28:01] some kind of advertisement. I think you can

[1:28:03] set it up as

[1:28:04] whatever.

[1:28:04] Good. Thank you for

[1:28:06] advice.

[1:28:06] Can I too?

[1:28:07] add?

[1:28:08] Yes, sir.

[1:28:09] Now you need

[1:28:10] advertise only

[1:28:11] additional

[1:28:11] appropriations, and they are in

[1:28:13] basically

[1:28:13] advertised through

[1:28:14] Gateway. We also did

[1:28:16] kindness,

[1:28:17] publishing this in

[1:28:18] newspapers. Actually

[1:28:21] we found this useful

[1:28:22] to do, and we are working on a complete

[1:28:24] compensation, because

[1:28:26] You know, you turned

[1:28:27] our attention to

[1:28:28] problem. We also have

[1:28:29] were technical

[1:28:30] problems. We were leading

[1:28:31] conversations. I don't want to

[1:28:33] now get into it,

[1:28:34] but to move on

[1:28:36] , you received

[1:28:36] the answer to that

[1:28:37] you need.

[1:28:38] Perfectly. So, is it

[1:28:40] Can you tell me?

[1:28:41] Who is second? Excuse me, I

[1:28:42] missed. Thank you,

[1:28:43] Mr. President.

[1:28:45] Yes. Good. So, in

[1:28:46] I have a suggestion,

[1:28:47] friend. Everyone who is "in favor"

[1:28:49] confirm,

[1:28:49] saying "yes".

[1:28:50] Yes. Yes.

[1:28:51] Against? Thank you. Now we transfer funds

[1:28:57] from the Riverboat, sir

[1:28:58] Auditor.

[1:29:00] Yes, it's simple. We get money

[1:29:02] quarterly according to

[1:29:03] with a resolution. To us

[1:29:04] need to be divided

[1:29:06] 50% of them. Unfortunately, they

[1:29:07] always come in

[1:29:08] inconvenient time, so

[1:29:09] we can't get

[1:29:11] them quickly. And here we are

[1:29:12] received this money

[1:29:13] about a month ago,

[1:29:14] but they arrived

[1:29:15] after time,

[1:29:16] established for

[1:29:17] publications, so we

[1:29:18] wanted to make sure

[1:29:19] that we just don't

[1:29:20] we will publish this through

[1:29:22] amount. And that's it.

[1:29:24] So, I'm looking for

[1:29:25] petition for

[1:29:27] transfer 179,059.74

[1:29:28] US dollars with "

[1:29:30] Riverboat" on "

[1:29:31] "a black day."

[1:29:33] So it's postponed.

[1:29:34] Second.

[1:29:35] The petition of the gentleman

[1:29:36] Kessler, second lady

[1:29:37] Hit. Any

[1:29:38] discussion?

[1:29:39] One thing struck me.

[1:29:40] when I was reading

[1:29:40] resolution on this

[1:29:41] about, um, and there

[1:29:42] It is said that our

[1:29:43] the percentages that we earn from the fund for

[1:29:45] rainy day, must

[1:29:46] to stay there. Are we tracking this?

[1:29:51] I will talk to someone,

[1:29:52] because I know this is not

[1:29:53] identified as in

[1:29:54] fund for a rainy day

[1:29:56] now. So we are

[1:29:59] Let's decide.

[1:30:00] Good.

[1:30:00] You know, easy.

[1:30:01] get a number

[1:30:02] retroactively, and then

[1:30:03] if we need

[1:30:03] to tell, we can

[1:30:04] to do this.

[1:30:05] Yes.

[1:30:06] Thanks for breaking this.

[1:30:07] question.

[1:30:07] Good point. IN

[1:30:09] I had this thought, until

[1:30:10] which I had

[1:30:11] to return, but not

[1:30:12] was able to do it.

[1:30:13] Any other

[1:30:13] comments? Everyone who is for

[1:30:15] legend,

[1:30:16] confirm this

[1:30:17] with the words "yes".

[1:30:17] Yes. Yes. Yes.

[1:30:19] Against? Thank you. Good.

[1:30:22] Now we move on.

[1:30:23] to the district attorney

[1:30:24] Mr. Finer's Porter,

[1:30:26] who asks

[1:30:27] transfer to

[1:30:28] total amount 20,000

[1:30:29] US dollars from

[1:30:30] next. Um, with

[1:30:32] fund 2500 district,

[1:30:34] user fees,

[1:30:35] to the fund 2501 on

[1:30:37] pre-trial

[1:30:37] redirection and

[1:30:39] postponement. Hmm, this is

[1:30:45] will allow you to send

[1:30:46] or donate 5000

[1:30:48] dollars to

[1:30:49] Emergency fund

[1:30:50] board of trustees

[1:30:51] Coolspring town,

[1:30:53] $5,000 to

[1:30:54] "We are on" program

[1:30:55] recovery", also

[1:30:56] known as the program

[1:30:57] WAR, and $10,000 for

[1:30:59] judicial and office

[1:31:00] operations. Um, first.

[1:31:06] a question I have.

[1:31:10] User collection

[1:31:12] district 2500 and

[1:31:12] postponement

[1:31:13] pre-trial

[1:31:14] redirection

[1:31:15] Prosecutor 2501. Mr.

[1:31:17] Finer, can I?

[1:31:18] use these

[1:31:19] bills

[1:31:20] directly for

[1:31:21] criminal

[1:31:22] persecution?

[1:31:26] Yes. Um, 2500 is it

[1:31:28] unallocated fund.

[1:31:31] So, all the money,

[1:31:33] received from

[1:31:34] pre-trial

[1:31:34] redirection and

[1:31:36] from violations, all these

[1:31:37] the money goes to the fund

[1:31:39] 2500. 2501–this is, um,

[1:31:40] assigned version

[1:31:41] this. So, our

[1:31:44] claims, um,

[1:31:45] staff for payment

[1:31:47] etc. So, uh, regarding

[1:31:48] PTD fund exists

[1:31:49] set set

[1:31:51] rules that require

[1:31:52] how can this money

[1:31:53] be spent. This is in

[1:31:56] within your

[1:31:57] question, yes.

[1:31:59] Good. Therefore,

[1:32:01] considering these, uh,

[1:32:03] donations to external

[1:32:04] and auxiliary

[1:32:05] organizations, uh, we do not expose ourselves to

[1:32:08] danger because of

[1:32:09] that we can't

[1:32:10] to conduct properly

[1:32:11] How are you, uh, right?

[1:32:17] Good. What

[1:32:19] Is the council happy?

[1:32:25] Question? You can

[1:32:26] question.

[1:32:29] I will ask one thing.

[1:32:30] Mr. Yugalsky.

[1:32:31] Mr. Fagan, uh, every

[1:32:33] the last two months we start working,

[1:32:35] I know you will soon.

[1:32:37] You will resign. And you

[1:32:38] are you working

[1:32:39] reduce some of these

[1:32:40] digits. I know that you

[1:32:42] they said you would have

[1:32:43] enough money. I don't want to be the one who

[1:32:46] believes that this fund

[1:32:47] not good enough,

[1:32:48] This one is there, but I don't like it.

[1:32:49] I like that you

[1:32:50] reduce this amount by

[1:32:52] every meeting, because

[1:32:53] this is not what you are

[1:32:54] were engaged in for

[1:32:55] the last 3 years.

[1:33:01] Is this a comment or

[1:33:02] question?

[1:33:03] It will be both.

[1:33:05] Good. Good. Any

[1:33:07] other questions,

[1:33:08] comments or actions from

[1:33:10] advice?

[1:33:10] I just got

[1:33:11] comment on the heel,

[1:33:12] we are going

[1:33:13] group them all

[1:33:14] together, so that in general

[1:33:15] add up to 20,000, right? What would

[1:33:16] you didn't want to.

[1:33:17] Uh, but in any case, and I today

[1:33:19] called, hmm,

[1:33:20] Well, I called.

[1:33:21] her, uh, trusted

[1:33:22] to the person of the town of Kul-

[1:33:23] Spring, Lois Zasonski

[1:33:24] , and informed her about

[1:33:25] this is because I know that she

[1:33:26] wrote

[1:33:26] email

[1:33:27] Mr. Fagan regarding

[1:33:28] this request, and, uh, I

[1:33:29] told her that if

[1:33:30] he will be approved

[1:33:30] tonight,

[1:33:31] of course, she

[1:33:32] hopes so

[1:33:33] and it will be, because it is very important to her

[1:33:34] will help.

[1:33:35] Good. This is useful

[1:33:36] information. Thank you.

[1:33:37] Proposal about

[1:33:38] approval of three sums

[1:33:39] for a total amount of 20,000

[1:33:40] dollars.

[1:33:41] Proposal about

[1:33:42] approval from the gentleman

[1:33:43] Kila.

[1:33:44] I support.

[1:33:45] Second. Supported by Mr.

[1:33:46] Molinaro.

[1:33:47] Everyone who supports

[1:33:48] proposal,

[1:33:49] confirm this,

[1:33:50] saying "yes".

[1:33:51] Yes.

[1:33:52] Against?

[1:33:52] No.

[1:33:53] Good.

[1:33:56] Proposal about

[1:33:57] transfer approval 14

[1:33:58] dollars.

[1:33:59] Proposal about

[1:34:00] transfer approval 14

[1:34:01] dollars from Mr.

[1:34:02] Kessler.

[1:34:03] Second.

[1:34:03] Supported by Ms. Heath.

[1:34:05] Regarding the discussion, I

[1:34:06] promised Mr. Fagan,

[1:34:07] what will we be

[1:34:07] discuss this with

[1:34:08] nausea. Sorry for "

[1:34:09] Bears, but we have

[1:34:10] What to work on.

[1:34:11] Everyone who supports

[1:34:12] proposal,

[1:34:13] indicate by saying: "I

[1:34:14] ".

[1:34:15] I-"

[1:34:15] Against". Thanks for that.

[1:34:18] Corner. Thank you all.

[1:34:20] Good. So, now we

[1:34:23] moved to the query

[1:34:24] corner about the transfer

[1:34:26] the amount of 325

[1:34:27] dollars.

[1:34:29] 325.

[1:34:30] More than

[1:34:31] enough.

[1:34:32] Ha?

[1:34:33] More than

[1:34:34] enough.

[1:34:34] Yes.

[1:34:36] Good. IN

[1:34:37] Does anyone have a question about this?

[1:34:38] No.

[1:34:39] IN

[1:34:40] Does anyone have any?

[1:34:40] suggestions?

[1:34:41] Offer.

[1:34:42] Proposal about

[1:34:42] approval.

[1:34:43] Offer.

[1:34:44] And a proposal from Mr.

[1:34:45] Ugalsky.

[1:34:45] Second.

[1:34:46] Supported by Ms. Heath.

[1:34:47] And a question from Mr.

[1:34:48] Molinaro.

[1:34:48] Training, right?

[1:34:49] Yes. I have two.

[1:34:50] Deputies who are leaving

[1:34:52] to class, hmm, 6

[1:34:53] October.

[1:34:53] Good.

[1:34:54] This is an offer for

[1:34:55] support, right?

[1:34:56] Yes.

[1:34:57] No, it's her money. This is not

[1:34:59] tax

[1:34:59] taxation.

[1:35:00] They are listed.

[1:35:01] So, you could say,

[1:35:03] What is it

[1:35:03] from my inevitable

[1:35:04] funds.

[1:35:05] Previously allocated?

[1:35:08] Good.

[1:35:09] Everyone who supports

[1:35:10] offer, mark,

[1:35:11] saying, "I am." "I". «

[1:35:13] Against". Thank you. Thank you

[1:35:16] for your patience.

[1:35:18] Good. Moving on to

[1:35:19] council comments and

[1:35:20] lawyer. Mrs. Heath. IN

[1:35:23] I am no more.

[1:35:23] comments.

[1:35:24] Mr. Molinaro.

[1:35:25] Go ahead, Bears.

[1:35:26] Mr. Peel.

[1:35:27] One quick question.

[1:35:29] If you are a manager

[1:35:30] department and you have

[1:35:31] request or something that you

[1:35:32] are you going to break

[1:35:33] question about the meeting,

[1:35:34] I would like to ask you.

[1:35:35] send it

[1:35:36] earlier than the day

[1:35:37] meetings. Today

[1:35:38] need to review

[1:35:39] many electronic

[1:35:40] letters, and, uh, to you

[1:35:41] need them

[1:35:42] sort into a specific

[1:35:43] moment. Uh, just

[1:35:44] send us this

[1:35:45] earlier. That's all. Thank you.

[1:35:47] We appreciate it. Thank you.

[1:35:48] Mr. Brussels.

[1:35:49] No comments.

[1:35:50] Mr. Ugalski.

[1:35:51] Forward, Southern

[1:35:52] Central.

[1:35:53] Sir

[1:35:54] Kessler. All

[1:35:55] good.

[1:35:55] Mr. Biggie.

[1:35:56] Nothing, sir.

[1:35:58] And I have nothing.

[1:35:59] So, uh, thank you all,

[1:36:00] who came. I am looking for

[1:36:01] your favorite

[1:36:02] part of the meeting.

[1:36:03] Proposal about

[1:36:04] closing.

[1:36:04] Mr.'s proposal

[1:36:05] Iglesias, friend

[1:36:06] Ms. Geet's suggestion.

[1:36:07] Everyone who is "in favor"

[1:36:07] confirm,

[1:36:08] saying "yes".

[1:36:09] Yes.

[1:36:11] Thank you.

LaPorte County Council September 28, 2026

Transcript