[0:01] I'd like to thank you for being here.

[0:35] Thank you for all you've done and had an advance for the thing you're about to do.

[0:39] God bless this council and our families. God bless us that we may govern.

[0:45] We may hound of the business that we see. God we love you and your gracious family.

[0:49] We pray.

[0:51] Amen.

[0:54] Amen.

[0:55] And you had a speech with Dr. Perkish.

[0:58] Amen.

[1:01] Any emergency items?

[1:02] No, sir.

[1:03] No, sir.

[1:04] Any request by the Council for the future agenda item or excuse the absence of recognition?

[1:13] All right, Council discussion regarding our charter propositions for the May 4 general election.

[1:20] All right.

[1:21] Thank you.

[1:23] But sometime back, we had, we had convened the my annual meeting of the charter review committee

[1:30] to discuss any potential charter items that they would recommend to Council to be put

[1:35] before the public for consideration. At the time, if you were calling me to discuss that,

[1:39] the one item that was out-person consideration as recommended by the charter review committee

[1:44] was to look at council compensation. And the charter review committee had made a recommendation

[1:49] that we change the compensation from the $25 a meeting that is currently given through the charter to a monthly stipend of $250 per council member and $500 to the mayor.

[2:02] We discussed it. I don't really recall if there was a strong opinion one way or the other.

[2:06] There was an openness to it from the council, but I think there was also a little bit of hesitation.

[2:11] At the time, the direction from the council was to bring it forward in a future date to consider if we wanted to put it on the ballot.

[2:19] And so we, we bring this forth tonight to discuss and get some

[2:23] counsel direction on the side of it, because if we are going to put it on the

[2:26] May ballot, then it needs to be approved later in February, to say 15th, 15th, 15th,

[2:32] and that, so that would be what we call the meeting, would be full.

[2:36] So we need to make that formal decision that the council meeting.

[2:40] And so it's kind of wanted to throw that out there and have discussion with

[2:43] council if there was still interest in pursuing that, or if we just want to leave

[2:47] line for now and revisit, believe in the next charter review, committee will convene this fall.

[2:54] And so, you know, certainly something that we could revisit again, but also that was a recommendation of the last charter room.

[3:01] If it's so pleased as the council, we could certainly prepare that language to bring it forward for a formal,

[3:06] for formal consideration from you to be at the next council meeting, and then that item would be placed on the May original elections.

[3:13] Robert, do all charter cities handle household stipends in their charter?

[3:21] No, some of them simply are, I just say, the council, some are silent on council compensation.

[3:29] Some of them say the council comes in set by ordinance.

[3:32] But I'd say probably 60 to 70% do set it by charter.

[3:39] And quite frankly, there have been quite a few charter amendments in cities where they have increased that.

[3:46] I will tell you, I think if you went out, if the sole issue on the charter is just a way to count for it.

[3:53] My friend that pulled the, it passes probably easier if it's folded in with a bunch of other things.

[4:02] It's pretty common to have compensation set by charter.

[4:06] I mean, when we do charter reviews for new cities, you know, we kind of recommend against it

[4:11] because it's said it's done, it's so hard to change, and you may have, in 1970, when I

[4:17] have compensation that just can't get changed for political reasons, so the kind of conventional

[4:22] thinking is you just don't address it all, or you have it just addressed it by awarding it.

[4:27] But if it's in the charter, the only way you can change it, obviously, is to do it by charter

[4:30] amendment.

[4:35] That's up to you guys, if it passed without language speaking to that, it would take place immediately.

[4:41] But we spoke about it once before and it was possibly making it passed.

[4:45] But yeah, you guys have the total authority to set what that time, what that implementation would be,

[4:54] and that could be put in the ballot language.

[4:56] So if it was something that you saw and said, oh, this is something that,

[4:59] because I mean, if you recall back to the chart we looked at,

[5:02] you know, little of me is on the lower end of compensation most,

[5:05] I wouldn't say most, the lower end of a full moon, the lowest.

[5:10] There are some, there are some councils that,

[5:12] I don't believe giving any snipe instead.

[5:16] So it certainly not putting council in the upper echelon for that area.

[5:22] But if it wasn't something that moved for you could certainly say,

[5:25] you know, we just wanted to go ahead and take place immediately,

[5:27] or, you know, we want to wait and, you know, send the message to the public, well, this is something that we need to address, but we don't want it to appear that it's, you know, self-serving, so this goes into effect, you know, and 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, you know, whatever is the, you know, the desire of the council really as far as how the ballot line would just craft it.

[5:45] What else on the ballot this time is just the two places and if there's anything that you put on

[5:56] You know what this issue there's not a there's not a sales tax renewal or anything like that

[6:02] It's simply and I think that may have been the hesitation for last May the world

[6:06] So I'm not sure I know it's been a hesitation in the past is not wanting to to muddy the street tax renewal up with any tournaments

[6:14] But currently there's nothing else on the ballot from the town other than the two places that are normally up that time of year

[6:20] So, unless you're in those districts, you're not going to be able to go anyway

[6:24] Well, everyone from the public would be able to come vote on the way

[6:27] The charter, exactly, I know that.

[6:29] And they're not going to be really looking to come vote

[6:32] Correct.

[6:32] It'd be very low turnout.

[6:36] So there would be nothing other than this item to draw, you know, in the one outside of those two district seats

[6:43] you know, to the polls, but they would have the ability, but that would be the only thing

[6:46] that they would be going to vote for.

[6:48] The last conversation that we've asked, and this has come up, and we decided not to do it

[6:53] because we didn't want it to, but it waters, this would probably be most of our tone, especially

[6:59] saying that it's just going to get voted down with.

[7:08] Yeah.

[7:10] My focus.

[7:11] I mean, being a easy, I mean, I mean, I just never go to put it together.

[7:16] Just the one, the one, the title.

[7:19] I'm probably the old fashioned guy.

[7:21] I just have no desire to increase the cycle.

[7:26] That's just my personal feeling.

[7:28] My guess is it would probably not pass just standing by itself.

[7:39] I don't think we're going to do it with the small amount of people that are voting on this one.

[7:48] Yeah, we know what it will happen.

[7:50] But I'm good either way.

[7:51] If we do it, we do it.

[7:52] I'm fine with it.

[7:53] If we don't do it, I really have no.

[7:57] I have no.

[7:57] Well, you can't say you all.

[8:09] Where is the street sales tax up for renewable again?

[8:13] It's not next year.

[8:14] I do not know what you're saying.

[8:20] It's also that there's not a street renewable in the ballot next year either which is a large

[8:26] election.

[8:28] So it's really, really, however you want to send this forward, again, I believe we're scheduled

[8:33] to have the charter review committee reconvening in next fall.

[8:36] I think it would be about the two-year mark, and we could be in that committee every two years.

[8:42] So it's certainly something that could be revisited at the end, but also something that we could put on this file.

[8:46] So I'm going to put on this ballot, something that I'm making.

[8:48] It's really up to you how and when and what frequency you want to ask the public about this question.

[8:54] I don't want to recommend going back to the church and ask you to bring me from the church.

[9:01] If, by chance, two and four were not opposed.

[9:07] We might not have the watch.

[9:09] Then the only thing is when I have owners of this position.

[9:15] I'm just...

[9:16] I don't know.

[9:17] Well, he doesn't have to be elected either way.

[9:23] So it's not in combat, doesn't his position have to have a selection either way?

[9:28] Not all one person's type.

[9:29] Now, it's only one person.

[9:32] Files for the position in both positions.

[9:35] You certify him and you cancel the election.

[9:38] So that happened.

[9:39] You would be having the calls for the election, simply for the ballot proposition.

[9:46] That's fine.

[9:46] No, that passed well, wouldn't it?

[9:52] It is also something where it doesn't necessarily have to be on a council election.

[10:00] I believe the last time we changed the charter, it was on a November General election.

[10:05] It was one of those questions.

[10:07] So it's not limited.

[10:09] It's just, there is a cost factor involved.

[10:11] We go alone.

[10:12] It saves the town of cost when we're able to piggyback on an already developing balance.

[10:16] What we bring is back in amateur open up,

[10:22] to me it makes more sense, we're going to have stuff on the ballad anyway.

[10:26] Yeah, shared costs, still run a risk right now of having it the only eye to run the ballad.

[10:34] And you're going to pay a good 13,000 to have the election.

[10:37] You're going to have a slight victory.

[10:39] Yeah, and I'll say that it.

[10:41] I personally don't think it's good.

[10:43] It's going to pass.

[10:45] So I'm not even messing with it.

[10:51] I'm finding either way y'all want to do, to me, we're not here here rich anyway, so this is, oh, I don't think I do that.

[10:59] Yeah, and what some of the cities have done that have been working with what they've done and it versus what they've made for you set up a charterman that basically kind of sets up a process that basically,

[11:10] you don't have been to charter basically, it says council compensation, there's a council compensation,

[11:16] committee, they make recommendations, you have two public hearings as adopted by

[11:22] ordinance. And that way, you know, if things, if you want to public input,

[11:27] want to public notice, you know, if the people feel that the council

[11:32] rather than no necessary can address it the ballot box, but you would have to go

[11:37] back to to a charter change every four or five or six years when the cost

[11:42] live and change is or whatever. You just create a committee that's studied just like

[11:47] this. I mean, they make it a recommendation. It's publicly vetted. It's very transparent.

[11:54] And it's, you can counsel that time besides here, they want to adopt or adopt or adopt

[11:58] something different. But it certainly is significantly cheaper than a charter election, having

[12:05] to try to teach this thing up every four to six years. So that may be something that we might

[12:09] I want to consider the next charter committee.

[12:11] I agree with you.

[12:13] I'm, well, I'm more concerned with the size of the districts over in the name of

[12:18] Council Compensation.

[12:20] But I'd rather see something with that going.

[12:21] Well, that will be taken care of through the redistricting process, which,

[12:25] I believe we have a rest for it.

[12:28] We've got to get a game for that.

[12:30] We've got to get a game for that.

[12:36] What's the, we have to basically engage an outside person to be part of that process and it takes, it takes probably about 10 months to year to get completely redone and go through the research and make sure the district serves.

[12:55] Specifically, you wouldn't work for the 2020 Census, right?

[12:59] I mean, you wait for the decennial Census.

[13:01] That's the kind of the official number.

[13:04] I mean, you can do the dues,

[13:06] cog numbers, all of that, tremendous growth and imbalance.

[13:09] But most folks, they wait to get the 2020 decennial census,

[13:14] and that's the most reliable information.

[13:16] And that's the one that, today, said that you need to get

[13:18] any free clearance or adjust the cost of one,

[13:21] they tend to rely upon two in order to better find the redistricting

[13:24] Yeah, but it's a good one.

[13:26] Yeah, I have a last one.

[13:27] I think I came through to think about the idea

[13:30] that it's actually, thanks.

[13:32] We are definitely due, for a redistricting,

[13:34] because since the last time we're since the districts

[13:38] were established in the current form, that was all done

[13:40] before there were residents of Little Island,

[13:42] on 380, and it does make up.

[13:45] So it is definitely something that needs to happen,

[13:47] but being this close to the census,

[13:49] you would want it to be exactly as possible

[13:50] so that the district's in the form is possible.

[13:52] It's definitely something that is, we are in need for that to happen within the next year too.

[13:59] We have a consensus.

[14:01] What do you think would it be off the line?

[14:07] Because it has come up so many times and it's a recommendation.

[14:11] It most, I'd like to see it on the general election, since it's less close.

[14:18] Opposed as if you want to just make a election.

[14:21] Okay, so if we, if we do it, put it on a general election and the other way, you get more

[14:26] input from the people of sure people have, that's the only way we get so long as I'm

[14:31] up.

[14:31] Now we are, we are kind of back and out to a time frame to where, you know, we are due for the

[14:36] next, because we do review the charter every, every other year, per the charter, but

[14:41] that.

[14:42] And so do we want to, um, do we want to continue forward with this specific recommendation

[14:47] an issue or see if it's the recommendation of the next charter for you to make it

[14:51] which will convene the early fall late summer. I would love to present the options to them and

[14:59] let them.

[15:08] So what I'm hearing is that we shouldn't move forward with it, you know, to have something prepared for consideration next meeting, you know, to place on the ballot area.

[15:21] That's just how I've been able with that.

[15:23] That's fine.

[15:24] Got it.

[15:25] Thank you, guys.

[15:26] I appreciate the guidance.

[15:29] Oh, here we go.

[15:31] Nick, you're on.

[15:34] Revisit the start time hours of construction heavy equipment.

[15:37] Use operations on Saturday and Sunday.

[15:40] Now, Fred, I know he's to do up.

[15:42] You can let him make the whole presentation.

[15:44] I'm just going to pull up the chart.

[15:57] This is the current chart, correct?

[16:02] In the past, as you were called last August, it was about, I think it was August of 2017,

[16:13] I believe we have dated the planning, the planning ordinances and the zoning ordinances.

[16:18] And if you're called one of the items that we've paid particular attention to was the noise ordinance,

[16:23] for several years prior to that, we had had discussions with residents around the Lakefront of how we can best implement

[16:28] noise ordinance that you know keeps that balance of the the business community and also

[16:32] neighborhood community and so the noise ordinance update was was a big part of our zoning

[16:36] update in 2017 and prior to that if you're called back before you must have a lot of

[16:42] questions and issues as a as a citizen that you can't afford with this body was working on behalf of

[16:48] some of his neighbors and folks in the area to change the time that people could start their law

[16:53] hours of weekends, seven o'clock to eight o'clock.

[16:57] And that was an ordinance that was adopted and put in place for the council on three

[17:00] of the 14th time frame.

[17:03] And so this was an item of discretion when this noise ordinance came up because, you know,

[17:08] as we know with the zoning ordinance, it pretty much undid all the previous ordinances and

[17:12] then replaced it with the movement.

[17:14] At the time, that change that it didn't make to be long here on weekends is not reflected in the ordinance.

[17:24] And so that was an item of discussion with the council.

[17:27] There was some back and forth on which way the council wanted to go is if they wanted to leave it at the A&M or not.

[17:32] Ultimately, when it was approved, the council left it at A&M as a start time for lawmakers.

[17:37] How are the specific only to the lawnmowers and what's come up since then, there's been some

[17:43] some area that comes where commercial construction occurring on the weekends, you know,

[17:47] by ordinance commercial construction can be done in A& as well.

[17:51] And so this means all days of the week and so there are some areas of, you know,

[17:56] commercial construction that do back up to neighborhoods and we heard some concern from residents

[18:02] when that occurs, you know, prior to A&Clock on weekends.

[18:05] And I think there's some confusion from some of the residents that I thought you know, we can start time for this type of activity with ADAM

[18:11] That's not the case with anything other than long care and so currently commercial construction is allowed to begin at 7 a.m.

[18:18] And so there was a request from Councilman Mustang to revisit that and see if that time should be changed to 8 a.m. on the weekends.

[18:27] You're on the pitch.

[18:29] So

[18:30] Please, Lord.

[18:33] So, the commercial construction that's going on, the reason I'm bringing this up is

[18:39] a block that's reached out to me, that's almost on sunny side, because they're starting,

[18:45] you know, they started at 6.451 morning, and that's when I wouldn't have on that.

[18:48] So I called, and I saw that, and the officers responded were absolutely brilliant.

[18:54] They gave you guys credit for that, they even said it was clear that our intent was

[18:59] probably to make it at 8 a.m. to match the lawn care to the lawn service, and it's, I can imagine

[19:06] being in some of the sections that we're going to let, you know, the commercial buildings

[19:09] go up that are going to be bordering on houses. And, you know, seven o'clock in the morning,

[19:15] you're going to start hearing dirt work turning, because we're, you know, we're on that

[19:17] cuss, we're going to have a lot of that started. So I believe we should align it with the lawn

[19:22] because well, 8 a.m. at a way there's no ifans or butts.

[19:28] And.

[19:33] I've dealt with it in my front for the last three years.

[19:37] My thoughts.

[19:37] Same thoughts I have with the long care.

[19:42] You have to look at the other side.

[19:44] These guys trying to get a start, especially in the summertime.

[19:48] We're pushing them back to eight o'clock.

[19:49] And it's already 100 degrees and then the human, they're intractive trying to get here to

[19:56] set up a, when they can try to beat some traffic and mean all the sudden it's set up by seven.

[20:03] So we have a difference of weekend and weekday.

[20:06] We don't, and that we did with the previous long-going ordinance in this current chart in the zoning.

[20:12] There's not a difference.

[20:14] Currently, between weekends and weekdays.

[20:16] It's technically, it doesn't matter if it's Wednesday or Saturday, while I'm going can't

[20:21] begin until eight.

[20:23] So, commercial construction in general, maybe we should put something in and says weekend

[20:28] started eight, weekdays and started seven, most people are up and moving by seven to go

[20:34] to work.

[20:35] It's fun.

[20:35] Not that big deal.

[20:36] You're only pushing them back by an hour once a week, maybe twice a week.

[20:41] Yeah.

[20:42] It shouldn't deter their work too much.

[20:45] Yeah, that's all on what I'm, that's what exactly I'm looking for, is 8 a.m. on Saturday and Sunday.

[20:51] I'm fine with that.

[20:53] I would recommend that if we do move forward with some sort of change that it does, that we do limit it to the weekends,

[20:58] because it is, you know, especially, well, even this time of year, but especially during the summer and the warm months,

[21:03] the construction crews are out there lined up.

[21:06] that's six forty five ready to go in there you know oftentimes needing to get started as soon as possible

[21:11] so it would certainly it could

[21:14] call us some concern and some some heartache with the commercial community if it was limited all throughout the week

[21:20] so I would recommend that if we do make a change that it is limited to the weekends

[21:23] I think the issue is that if we pushed it out of the ATM every day

[21:28] we wouldn't have cruise out here working all that much so we're going elsewhere to work

[21:32] we're already having trouble getting cruise out here

[21:34] The only comment that I've had at all is during this time of year when there's so it's dark, so it's only just starting it later with short in the time that I've performed.

[21:45] I'm going to give her talking Saturday and Sunday.

[21:47] I just wanted to...

[21:48] No, I heard you.

[21:51] I mean, there's dark at that time too.

[21:52] I mean, there's so much dark.

[21:55] Yeah.

[21:56] This time of year there.

[22:00] Yeah, it was still dark. I used flashlight. It was about lighted them up.

[22:07] So really, if this meeting were just over that?

[22:09] Yeah, the weekends are all on concern.

[22:10] Seven a.m. on the road, you'll look.

[22:13] By seven a.m.

[22:14] I just don't agree.

[22:16] I mean, thinking about construction guys.

[22:19] They're trying to get in here as far as possible.

[22:22] And the problem is the construction guys are on different

[22:25] for two to three weeks, maybe six weeks of the most.

[22:28] The rest of us have to actually live that.

[22:30] And they're just going to keep going and going.

[22:32] I'm going to live there for five, you know.

[22:35] And they don't, when you tell them eight a.m.,

[22:37] they're going to start, you're still going to have to remind them

[22:39] at seven, they're, I mean, six, 45 a.m.

[22:41] on a Saturday morning.

[22:44] I'm sorry, I work during the week.

[22:46] And everybody, I want to sleep.

[22:48] That is my time.

[22:49] That's my neighbor's time.

[22:50] I mean, I've never seen all my neighbors at one time.

[22:53] I mean, the only person I was missing was Jeanette.

[22:55] I mean, it's pretty good chance that we're doing it.

[22:58] I don't agree with you.

[23:01] I don't agree with you.

[23:02] It's no different from the reason I leave earlier in the morning to be traffic.

[23:08] I'm doing it to be traffic.

[23:10] These guys are doing it to give that extra hour of working hand.

[23:15] As I don't agree with it, especially for two days.

[23:19] Almost Saturday and Sunday.

[23:20] I think that's the reality of when we come and bring items like this when there's not a voting item, it is really just to kind of get a sense.

[23:36] And in an item like this where there's not a clear consensus, I think that's kind of the best that we can do is put something together for, you know, the vote because that's what ultimately will need to determine it is what the official vote is.

[23:47] But we do want to kind of do as much as we can to address the different concerns with the process before we write the ordinance, and I don't know how difficult it would be either, but it would be a little difficult to enforce, but it's something that could be a consideration of that time to be a starting time when it's in a certain proximity to a residential area.

[24:12] That's another rank that makes the ordinance a little trickier for them to write, but it is something.

[24:18] Because we want to have that balance because obviously we care very much about the comfort and the happiness of our residents,

[24:24] but we're also a very pro-business community.

[24:26] We want to make sure we balance those.

[24:29] And so we could also look to a solution.

[24:31] We could look and see if there's a way to word it to where I would like that.

[24:34] If there was our seminaries where people will be building imperial commercial areas.

[24:38] Because if there's not residents, I mean, the reason it was an issue over in the area where it was

[24:42] is because the construction site literally shared a borderline with the street full of neighbors,

[24:47] there probably wouldn't have been a concern for anybody if it would have been out in open

[24:50] field where there wasn't a resident for, you know, a quarter mile.

[24:53] And construction is construction.

[24:55] Right.

[24:55] So this residential commercial.

[24:57] It's all same.

[24:59] Commercial construction does have, I mean,

[25:06] of the same.

[25:07] There was going to be a very nice question, but you've got to check it, because if you

[25:11] can start a house in front of it, there is an interval of budding up against the

[25:14] Resvisor, which will apply it.

[25:16] That's another thing on the land, where we talk to the Desperate, we talk to the Desperate

[25:20] Resvisor, we talk to the Desperate.

[25:22] I think he was waiting for a new type of instruction, where it started in a certain

[25:26] part of the minute.

[25:26] Yeah, I think we need to make it the half of the solution, not just that.

[25:29] What does that affect the like we would our group who's go out to do this stuff like they're doing with the roads that we're placing slabs and stuff like that right so does that keep them from also working until that time as well currently now they're they're not allowed to start until seven now we do have a caveat there that

[25:52] I can give them an early poor waiver, which we do quite frequently, especially in the summer when there's such a demand for concrete.

[25:59] When we do that, it's oftentimes not without complaint from some residents, but we kind of have to weigh that on a case-by-case basis.

[26:07] This is probably going to have set a group of residents on this day, but if it doesn't happen, they're probably not going to get concrete for this project for another three weeks.

[26:14] So sometimes we have to use our judgment.

[26:17] We do have that flexibility in the ordinance to allow them in an early poor way, but I

[26:21] don't think that extends to grading and digging and all those.

[26:24] It's pretty much limited to the concrete floors.

[26:26] Yeah, we get it.

[26:28] Because there's, I mean, not everything in construction causes a lot of holes.

[26:32] Right.

[26:32] I mean, we get the nestles.

[26:34] I mean, if it's not something that's extremely loud, they can start it at 6 o'clock.

[26:38] Yeah, because that's also, maybe when you're letting them back up, B, B, B, that's

[26:45] And then so that's when we have 45 to 50 hours of beat beat and going every week.

[26:53] And also the reality is that if there is a, you know, construction activity that's happening that's not making noise.

[27:00] No one's going to cause no one's going to call in or the ordinance to really be enforced.

[27:04] You know what I mean?

[27:05] It's kind of one of the self.

[27:06] Well, we're also trying to make it pro commercial and pro business.

[27:12] If there is part of their business, they could do, they could start as early as they want, as long as it's time, but you can only score some of the trepophils up at the next one.

[27:20] Yeah.

[27:21] How do we need to do a little more research?

[27:24] I know.

[27:25] How you might handle those areas where you're not residential and you're residential and you districts are.

[27:32] But it is interesting.

[27:32] There we go.

[27:33] Instruction.

[27:34] Because again, which will reach you real fast.

[27:37] Well, I think from, you know, just like that, from an important standpoint.

[27:41] you know, the SDF construction, the here at the adjacent to a residential subdivision or

[27:50] a garden, the subdivision or commercial, and it's a big, thank you.

[27:57] And the back comes back to the number of jettinors doing one of the regulations to the

[28:01] residential or commercial standpoint.

[28:03] If you look at all our vacant lots and almost all of them, a lot of them are adjacent

[28:08] I mean, it's done and said, everybody within two months of loss or it's just done at the other end of the album from an important standpoint.

[28:19] That's a little bit of a challenge for the future.

[28:21] You know, we can hear directly adjacent to the construction, whether it's commercial or it's literally started this year.

[28:29] That's pretty clear that we know that everybody is predictable.

[28:32] Contracts.

[28:33] And they're in, and it's pretty good, and they're on expectation.

[28:38] Why don't you do a little research?

[28:39] And bring something back for another workshop, and then we take a camera.

[28:45] So it certainly start crafting something that sounds like, you know, the thing that needs to be up for the counsel to vote on, you know, upper down is that there is some component of 8 a.m. on the weekends that will be considered.

[28:56] And then again, I'm something I clarify when it comes.

[29:00] And I think that when we have an issue like this,

[29:03] whether it's not clear consensus from the council,

[29:05] I think that's the best for us to do is to put it together

[29:08] so that you guys can actually have the boat on it

[29:09] and then it passes their fails,

[29:11] because we certainly don't want to try to push it

[29:13] one way or the other.

[29:17] We certainly don't want to push it one way or the other.

[29:19] Yeah, that's pretty much the same.

[29:21] And then the seven is the column that we're currently

[29:22] forward.

[29:23] That's very, those are pretty common for access to the eight.

[29:36] We can put something together then kind of, you know, that takes into account as much of the consensus as we have heard and then, you know, some of the other items, and then, you know, those can be addressed by the council, you know, actually has consideration of the item.

[29:51] Perfect. All right. Good afternoon.

[29:56] We'll see.

[30:00] Presentation of any monthly updates from the Department of Health, concerning law and person activities, etc.

[30:10] Oh, I don't know.

[30:11] I don't have a person.

[30:15] So this is our new purchasing manager, Rebecca Hunter. She started on December 26th.

[30:20] Yes, sir.

[30:28] Council, Highlight, any items on the agenda need to further discuss your comments?

[30:32] We do, we would request a council convene into executive session before consideration of item nine, so that we can go over.

[30:42] It's something that's been discussed before, but we would like to talk about the final points of the development agreement to ensure that there's no questions or any changes that need to occur with the attorney before.

[30:53] I'm about to take it on that item.

[30:56] All right, so I'll load it.

[30:58] All right.

[30:59] Wait, that's for this one.

[31:01] You're not going to do that.

[31:02] Oh, no.

Jan 15, 2019 Town Council

Transcript