Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
Copy of a YouTube video held by the Internet Archive.
Captions were copied from the YouTube video.
Captions were copied from the YouTube video.
[0:08]
I should be
[0:09]
ready by now.
[0:10]
OK. I would like to
[0:11]
declare this meeting
[0:13]
open on Saturday,
[0:15]
September 26th, at approximately
[0:16]
2:00 p.m. Hmm, this is the first
[0:18]
half hour of our
[0:19]
first informational
[0:20]
meeting, where we'll
[0:22]
tell you what we've
[0:23]
been up to and
[0:24]
discuss how you'll
[0:25]
include articles on the
[0:26]
ballot for the
[0:27]
March election. And I
[0:29]
can also provide some
[0:30]
schedule details. Hmm,
[0:34]
Nick will start by reviewing the
[0:35]
procedures.
[0:37]
Hmm, yes. I mean,
[0:38]
we don't have that
[0:39]
many people on Zoom, but
[0:40]
just if you
[0:41]
need to leave
[0:41]
a comment, please
[0:42]
use the
[0:43]
hand icon that
[0:44]
says "Racing"
[0:45]
that's
[0:45]
down there, down there, where it
[0:51]
says "React"
[0:53]
on the bottom bar, or
[0:54]
jump up and down,
[0:55]
or send me a
[0:57]
comment in the comments
[0:58]
and I'll put you in the
[0:59]
queue, and everyone
[1:00]
does, but, um,
[1:01]
okay. Yes. Just, um,
[1:09]
tell me your name.
[1:10]
Well, this is for the people who are
[1:12]
here. Hmm, when you
[1:13]
say...
[1:14]
Yes.
[1:16]
Whenever
[1:17]
you say something, say
[1:18]
your name, because that
[1:20]
way the transcript
[1:21]
records who is
[1:22]
speaking.
[1:23]
Good.
[1:24]
Thank you.
[1:25]
Good. So, regarding
[1:27]
future meetings,
[1:28]
we have
[1:30]
another Saturday meeting
[1:31]
similar to this one on November 14th. And at
[1:34]
this meeting we
[1:35]
will present the
[1:36]
city budget. So
[1:37]
this will be really
[1:38]
important. Rebecca will be
[1:40]
here and she has, um, something
[1:41]
similar to what she
[1:43]
had last year,
[1:44]
she's working on very
[1:45]
detailed details
[1:46]
so we can
[1:47]
understand what's
[1:48]
going on. Then the
[1:54]
next meeting
[1:56]
will be on December 10th,
[1:57]
Thursday evening at
[1:58]
our regular
[2:00]
board meeting
[2:01]
from 6:00 PM to
[2:02]
8:00 PM at the community
[2:03]
center to
[2:05]
accommodate more
[2:06]
people, and at
[2:07]
that meeting, um,
[2:09]
Andrew will present the
[2:10]
road budget, right?
[2:16]
And then, um, the
[2:17]
recording continues.
[2:21]
Good. Um, so the
[2:24]
only meeting after that is
[2:26]
scheduled for February,
[2:27]
before, um, the
[2:30]
last Saturday of
[2:31]
February before
[2:32]
the elections. Um, so in order for
[2:38]
the article to be
[2:39]
put to
[2:40]
a vote for the
[2:42]
general
[2:42]
public, a
[2:43]
petition with,
[2:45]
um, 45-50 signatures is required, which
[2:46]
will then be filed with the
[2:47]
election board, and
[2:49]
then forwarded to the
[2:50]
city clerk
[2:51]
for inclusion in,
[2:52]
actually, just
[2:57]
filed with the city
[2:58]
clerk.
[2:58]
Good. Submitted to the
[3:00]
city clerk.
[3:01]
Yes. If there are 50
[3:02]
signatures, it's the election
[3:03]
commission. No, there
[3:06]
are no problems with the election commission.
[3:07]
Yes. And there was some
[3:09]
discussion about
[3:10]
how we, um,
[3:11]
represent
[3:12]
charitable donations
[3:13]
in the newsletter. Several
[3:15]
people came up and
[3:16]
said they would
[3:17]
prefer they
[3:18]
were separate again.
[3:21]
But, um, we all
[3:22]
think that, um,
[3:23]
counting would take
[3:24]
more time and more
[3:25]
pages, and therefore
[3:26]
more
[3:27]
postage. So, I think
[3:30]
we'll probably
[3:31]
stick with the way
[3:32]
we have it now,
[3:33]
which is you can
[3:34]
vote
[3:34]
individually every
[3:36]
three years on certain
[3:37]
issues. So we'd
[3:39]
be happy to hear it
[3:41]
from people if it's
[3:42]
really important. Um, the
[3:47]
energy
[3:48]
committee is coming tomorrow
[3:49]
to discuss one thing,
[3:50]
but it seems like they're
[3:52]
not here. They are very excited about
[3:56]
their energy
[3:57]
fair, which
[3:58]
will be held here at the
[3:59]
community center on
[4:01]
October 24th. This will be a
[4:05]
practical idea that will
[4:06]
help have fun
[4:08]
finding ways to
[4:09]
improve
[4:10]
energy efficiency in the
[4:11]
city, and also
[4:12]
perhaps stimulate
[4:13]
more commercial
[4:14]
growth so we
[4:15]
can drag
[4:17]
some of the business from
[4:18]
Bradeau into Wilmington.
[4:26]
Some people have
[4:27]
applied for a grant to
[4:28]
buy the old silver
[4:30]
skates that are now
[4:31]
used by
[4:32]
Marbor College as
[4:33]
dorms and rentals
[4:34]
during the ski
[4:35]
season, where there is a
[4:36]
professional kitchen, and
[4:37]
some people want to
[4:38]
put a
[4:39]
co-op or a
[4:40]
coffee shop or something there.
[4:46]
It will depend on
[4:47]
whether the group
[4:48]
working on it can
[4:49]
get a grant, and whether the
[4:51]
Marlborough Music Festival is willing to
[4:52]
give up that
[4:54]
building. So
[5:00]
lately we've been working on getting
[5:01]
everyone in the office to
[5:02]
try to
[5:03]
streamline and
[5:04]
develop clear
[5:05]
policies. So,
[5:08]
the treasurer develops
[5:09]
many rules on how
[5:10]
they manage
[5:11]
different parts of the
[5:13]
financial movement. The
[5:15]
clerks and assistant
[5:16]
clerks also
[5:17]
try to
[5:18]
codify their
[5:19]
processes so that it's
[5:20]
really clear so that
[5:21]
people who
[5:22]
come in later and
[5:23]
take on this
[5:24]
job don't have to start from
[5:25]
scratch. Um, and the select
[5:29]
board is working on
[5:30]
communication with all
[5:31]
commissions and
[5:32]
committees. Um, they
[5:36]
clarify some things
[5:38]
like how and when to
[5:39]
access
[5:40]
lawyers, how and when to
[5:42]
get a budget, and,
[5:43]
you know what, what are some
[5:44]
ways to save
[5:45]
some money on this.
[5:50]
So it's in
[5:50]
draft form right now, but we'll be
[5:51]
publishing it
[5:53]
for public
[5:54]
discussion soon.
[5:56]
That's right, a matter of
[5:57]
politics. Um, we also
[6:03]
finally finalized
[6:04]
our road
[6:05]
standards, which
[6:05]
were originally
[6:06]
presented as a
[6:07]
road ordinance, and
[6:08]
we got a lot of
[6:09]
feedback from
[6:10]
the public. Um, and
[6:13]
then we
[6:14]
watched it. Which,
[6:15]
you know, were
[6:16]
good remarks.
[6:18]
It was unclear whether
[6:19]
these
[6:20]
road regulations applied
[6:21]
to both private and
[6:22]
public roads
[6:23]
, which would be
[6:25]
ridiculous. So, we
[6:27]
took care of that, and we
[6:28]
took it out for, uh,
[6:29]
review and, uh,
[6:31]
review, and we
[6:31]
think it's
[6:33]
pretty good now. But
[6:35]
instead of
[6:36]
calling it a
[6:38]
regulation now, we're
[6:38]
calling it, uh,
[6:39]
road
[6:40]
standards, which gives
[6:41]
us a little more
[6:42]
flexibility for
[6:43]
individual situations. So
[6:45]
it's not exactly
[6:46]
clear cut, but you
[6:47]
need to have
[6:48]
this much gravel,
[6:49]
you need to have
[6:50]
this much space
[6:51]
between this, that, and the other. Uh
[6:52]
, so I think
[6:53]
this process has been very
[6:54]
positive, and we're
[6:55]
open to
[6:56]
further comments
[6:57]
, but I think
[6:58]
since it's a standard,
[7:00]
we can just
[7:01]
publish it.
[7:02]
But
[7:03]
as soon as I get the
[7:04]
official
[7:05]
wording from
[7:06]
Bob, it will be
[7:07]
posted.
[7:08]
Published. Good.
[7:10]
So, the other issue that
[7:12]
we're
[7:13]
dealing with right now is the
[7:14]
recycling center, where, uh, there's
[7:15]
obviously been some
[7:18]
security issues. Now the liability
[7:20]
is our insurance
[7:21]
group. A representative of the
[7:22]
passive group
[7:23]
came and agreed
[7:24]
that, uh, there are some
[7:25]
safety concerns with,
[7:26]
uh
[7:27]
, residents driving
[7:29]
cars between
[7:31]
giant, uh,
[7:33]
cars. And it seems like it's
[7:35]
only a matter of
[7:36]
time before someone
[7:37]
gets hit or someone
[7:38]
gets hurt. People don't
[7:39]
drive
[7:40]
slowly enough. They don't
[7:41]
pay attention to what's
[7:42]
happening.
[7:44]
The guys are trying
[7:45]
to do their
[7:46]
job. Also,
[7:47]
there is a big
[7:48]
problem with
[7:49]
people throwing away
[7:50]
trash, although we have a
[7:51]
volunteer
[7:52]
recycling committee
[7:53]
that cleans up, the
[7:54]
situation has gotten worse
[7:56]
. The city sent out,
[7:58]
I think, seven letters to
[7:59]
residents because their
[8:00]
post office was there. And the
[8:03]
letter says, "You can't
[8:04]
do this,
[8:06]
and if it happens
[8:07]
again, you will be fined
[8:08]
, X, Y, and Z." But still, the way
[8:11]
people
[8:12]
treat it is somewhat
[8:13]
discouraging. Due to
[8:17]
insurance issues with the state,
[8:18]
we are trying
[8:19]
to find another place to do
[8:20]
this. We don't want
[8:22]
to close it because it's
[8:23]
much more convenient
[8:24]
than driving all the way to
[8:25]
Bradmore, and we want to
[8:26]
make sure people
[8:28]
recycle. So we're
[8:30]
thinking about different
[8:31]
places where the city
[8:32]
owns land. And
[8:35]
one of the ideas is a school that used to
[8:36]
be a
[8:37]
recycling center. But
[8:40]
we have
[8:41]
security problems. So we're
[8:42]
going to meet with Dan
[8:44]
and
[8:45]
Kayla
[8:47]
to see if there's a
[8:49]
way to make it so that the
[8:50]
buses
[8:51]
come in on one
[8:52]
side and leave on the
[8:53]
other, and so that the only
[8:54]
way to get to the
[8:55]
recycling center is
[8:57]
inside, not
[8:58]
where the buses
[8:59]
or the kids go. I'm not
[9:02]
sure if we have the
[9:03]
space for that or if it's
[9:04]
...I looked at
[9:05]
it and it seems to me
[9:06]
that if we took off
[9:07]
about 12 feet of
[9:08]
that rabbi netting, we
[9:10]
could do it.
[9:11]
It's not going to be great because
[9:13]
people will still, you know,
[9:16]
drive to where the
[9:17]
school
[9:18]
buses pull in and then
[9:19]
say, "Oh my God, I
[9:21]
can't," but it's our
[9:22]
best option.
[9:24]
Another thing is the place where the
[9:25]
dog shelter used to be
[9:27]
, at
[9:27]
the foot of Town Hill,
[9:29]
but, uh, that's going
[9:29]
to cost a lot
[9:31]
because it would require, um,
[9:32]
rezoning and
[9:33]
probably demolishing the
[9:34]
building, and
[9:35]
getting the
[9:36]
cars off the road.
[9:39]
Also, we're not
[9:40]
sure if
[9:41]
we're in wetlands there
[9:43]
. So maybe
[9:46]
it's not really worth
[9:48]
it because, um, we might
[9:49]
not get a
[9:50]
wetland... Yeah, a
[9:52]
permit or something.
[9:54]
Yes, we may not have the
[9:56]
opportunity. So I
[9:57]
joked about
[9:58]
putting it in
[10:00]
Marlborough City Park, but I think
[10:01]
that's absolutely
[10:02]
forbidden.
[10:04]
Not an option.
[10:05]
So we think,
[10:06]
you know, school is the
[10:07]
best option. Uh
[10:09]
, you know,
[10:11]
but the working hours
[10:12]
are going to be tough, are
[10:13]
n't they? We will
[10:16]
only have to restrict public access when
[10:16]
we make sure there
[10:18]
is one entrance and exit
[10:19]
for recycling, and it
[10:20]
does not intersect with
[10:21]
buses. We could
[10:22]
leave it
[10:23]
open all the time.
[10:24]
Of course.
[10:25]
I mean, it would be
[10:26]
interesting to see if there
[10:28]
is one, because it's, you know,
[10:29]
downstairs and away from the
[10:31]
school. Is there
[10:33]
another way,
[10:34]
you know, can we
[10:35]
cut another
[10:36]
entrance?
[10:36]
Yes, good point
[10:38]
.
[10:38]
We might, you know, have to
[10:39]
cut down
[10:40]
a couple of trees and put
[10:41]
some gravel in, but it's
[10:42]
a lot cheaper than a
[10:44]
dog
[10:44]
than what's going to be there and,
[10:46]
um,
[10:47]
it might work. I
[10:48]
just think it would be
[10:50]
difficult to restrict access that much.
[10:51]
We talked about
[10:52]
not allowing
[10:53]
hours. Yes. No, I
[10:54]
think that's hard to
[10:56]
do.
[10:57]
We have a lot, I think,
[10:58]
the main thing,
[10:58]
plus we need to
[10:59]
buy another
[11:00]
camera, which costs
[11:01]
$5,000.
[11:02]
Yes. The main thing, I
[11:03]
think Molly echoes
[11:05]
, is there are a lot of options
[11:06]
that we explore and
[11:10]
what they do for
[11:14]
me.
[11:15]
Good. Uh, other things,
[11:16]
I have five or
[11:18]
six more things. Um, we
[11:19]
apply for a
[11:20]
municipal
[11:22]
planning grant, which
[11:23]
we submit in October, and
[11:24]
in December we find out
[11:26]
it's a
[11:28]
$50,000 grant,
[11:29]
$50,000 max
[11:31]
, which we then
[11:32]
hope to
[11:33]
spend on Mike
[11:34]
McConnell at the WRC to
[11:35]
help us
[11:36]
revise the basic
[11:38]
zoning regulations,
[11:39]
which are almost
[11:39]
incomprehensible.
[11:40]
Yes. Or, you know, we'll,
[11:42]
depending on the amount
[11:43]
we need,
[11:43]
put out a request for
[11:44]
proposals, and, you know,
[11:45]
that might be
[11:46]
validated to some extent.
[11:47]
Yes. Truth.
[11:48]
Over 25,000 we
[11:49]
need to get
[11:51]
three requests
[11:52]
for things. Yes.
[11:53]
So, Nancy Anderson,
[11:54]
I'm just asking, what are
[11:55]
your general ideas
[11:57]
for using
[11:58]
this money?
[11:59]
Uh, we're thinking about
[12:00]
reviewing the
[12:01]
zoning regulations.
[12:02]
A.
[12:04]
Because they, uh,
[12:05]
exist...I've been doing
[12:06]
this work since January,
[12:08]
and I've found a lot of
[12:09]
things that are just
[12:10]
incomprehensible.
[12:12]
Wow. I don't think we
[12:14]
necessarily need to
[12:16]
change the rules,
[12:17]
but we need to
[12:18]
change the way they are
[12:19]
presented so that everything is
[12:20]
clear.
[12:23]
For example, the
[12:24]
Natural History Museum
[12:25]
wanted to expand its
[12:26]
parking lot, and it
[12:27]
states that
[12:29]
charities are or
[12:30]
are not exempt from the
[12:31]
following list.
[12:34]
You know, it was like
[12:35]
madness. So,
[12:39]
even just
[12:40]
walking around, and I think the
[12:42]
rules themselves,
[12:43]
like setbacks,
[12:44]
lot size and, uh, different
[12:47]
size restrictions, and, uh, you
[12:48]
know, wildlife corridor
[12:49]
, all these things that
[12:50]
I've come across,
[12:52]
the rules themselves
[12:52]
seem pretty
[12:53]
good to me; although
[12:54]
an expert could
[12:55]
suggest some
[12:57]
changes that might make it
[12:58]
easier for residents
[12:59]
to do what they
[13:00]
want. Um, so that's
[13:05]
one of the things
[13:06]
we thought about
[13:07]
spending money on.
[13:08]
Can we spend
[13:09]
them on more than one
[13:11]
thing?
[13:11]
Um, actually you
[13:12]
can apply for
[13:13]
more
[13:14]
than one
[13:15]
municipal
[13:15]
planning grant.
[13:19]
And so I already asked,
[13:21]
uh, Mike, what
[13:22]
the estimate is, and you're
[13:23]
asking for the amount
[13:25]
you need. You
[13:27]
need it. Good. And, um,
[13:29]
I know that
[13:31]
in the past, um, when
[13:32]
they were looking at
[13:33]
doing a
[13:35]
city septic tank or
[13:36]
something, they
[13:37]
got $50,000
[13:38]
and they spent it all.
[13:40]
What's nice about the Mineral Planning Grant is that
[13:43]
it's not a
[13:44]
subsidy. In
[13:45]
other words, you
[13:46]
just get all the
[13:48]
money. And if you
[13:49]
read the booklet,
[13:50]
the first thing you
[13:51]
can use the
[13:52]
initial
[13:53]
planning grant for,
[13:54]
written in big 18-
[13:55]
point font, is to
[13:56]
rewrite the zoning
[13:57]
.
[13:58]
Yes.
[13:59]
That is, they are created for this
[14:01]
.
[14:02]
Yes. So
[14:04]
also in the office there is, you
[14:05]
know, I'm sure you're
[14:07]
familiar with the
[14:07]
citywide
[14:12]
property value revaluation. So we had a
[14:16]
lot of people
[14:17]
calling
[14:18]
the police to ask
[14:19]
why, from the
[14:20]
Air
[14:21]
Force's perspective, we had two
[14:23]
hearings at the Civilian Board of
[14:25]
Tax
[14:26]
Abatement, one
[14:26]
involving Potach
[14:27]
Hill and the other involving a
[14:28]
North Pond resident.
[14:32]
Um, that's another thing
[14:33]
we're working on. Um,
[14:36]
the treasurer and the
[14:38]
road crew chief
[14:39]
are working on a
[14:40]
way
[14:40]
to forecast costs
[14:42]
so that we can save
[14:43]
money when we
[14:44]
need to buy
[14:45]
new equipment,
[14:46]
instead of
[14:47]
suddenly spending
[14:48]
$400,000 on a new
[14:49]
grater or something. And
[14:51]
they call it a
[14:53]
capital
[14:54]
equipment replacement plan. And they
[14:55]
decide that this
[14:56]
document was really
[14:57]
useful. We
[14:59]
will publish it someday. Um,
[15:00]
what kind of equipment do
[15:02]
we have? How
[15:04]
old is he? What is its
[15:05]
expected
[15:06]
lifespan and
[15:07]
how much will it cost
[15:08]
to replace it? And then,
[15:11]
according to those
[15:12]
things, how much will we
[15:13]
need to
[15:14]
set aside from the budget
[15:16]
for which years so that we
[15:17]
are prepared, so that we have
[15:18]
money
[15:19]
consistently, um, yes, um,
[15:20]
consistently, so that, um
[15:21]
, be prepared so that
[15:23]
we don't have to
[15:24]
borrow as much to
[15:25]
save on
[15:26]
interest. I don't know.
[15:29]
This is, you know,
[15:30]
an increase in the budget,
[15:31]
borrowing money. I am not a
[15:34]
financier. So,
[15:36]
another little thing–DV Fiber
[15:37]
approached us
[15:39]
asking if
[15:40]
they could, uh, run
[15:41]
their internet
[15:42]
connection underground
[15:44]
along North
[15:45]
Pond. And it was
[15:48]
a little controversial,
[15:49]
but in the end we all
[15:50]
agreed that they
[15:51]
could, so they wouldn't have to
[15:52]
cut down
[15:53]
trees and
[15:54]
put up poles
[15:55]
. They could have just
[15:57]
laid it
[15:58]
underground. They actually
[15:59]
had to install
[16:00]
some poles across the
[16:02]
ledge. They simply could
[16:03]
n't get through.
[16:05]
Yes. So, another thing
[16:08]
we're working on
[16:09]
is, uh, a
[16:11]
facility use agreement related to the
[16:12]
activities at Hogback.
[16:16]
So, uh, we found out
[16:17]
that our insurance,
[16:18]
if something bad
[16:19]
happens during the
[16:20]
activity there, the city
[16:21]
will be
[16:22]
liable. Uh
[16:25]
, and there
[16:26]
's a slot in the facility use agreement for
[16:27]
insurance, but they've
[16:29]
always refused
[16:30]
it.
[16:31]
They always refused her.
[16:32]
So we're working on
[16:33]
who really
[16:34]
should have
[16:35]
insurance. For example,
[16:36]
what activities,
[16:38]
like one person
[16:39]
walking around and counting birds
[16:40]
, probably don't
[16:41]
need insurance
[16:42]
, but if you have 30
[16:43]
people, you know,
[16:45]
wielding chainsaws
[16:46]
,
[16:46]
no, just doing
[16:47]
something active, you know,
[16:48]
uh, that
[16:49]
requires insurance. And
[16:51]
then we also
[16:52]
realized that the people on
[16:53]
HBC and HMC8 actually
[16:54]
go out and
[16:55]
maintain the trails with
[16:56]
chainsaws and
[16:57]
heavy equipment, and
[16:59]
they have to be
[17:00]
insured for that
[17:01]
time. So we're working with
[17:05]
both of these
[17:06]
committees to
[17:07]
find, uh, affordable
[17:08]
and equitable
[17:09]
ways to do this.
[17:12]
So those were disputes
[17:14]
. We have ways of doing things.
[17:16]
And that's actually, if I
[17:18]
, uh, yeah, if people
[17:19]
remember that
[17:20]
often people
[17:21]
use our
[17:22]
roads for bike races and
[17:26]
so on, and it was always
[17:27]
assumed that
[17:28]
because it's a public road
[17:30]
, it's a
[17:31]
public road
[17:33]
, but, uh
[17:34]
, in the process we
[17:35]
found out on the passive
[17:36]
side that they needed, in
[17:37]
other words,
[17:39]
whoever sponsors
[17:40]
the bike race has to
[17:41]
have an insurance policy
[17:42]
and make the city
[17:43]
secondary to it. Uh
[17:46]
, and this is something
[17:47]
we've never
[17:48]
done,
[17:50]
. And I have a new
[17:51]
bike race, people,
[17:52]
the grandstand is over,
[17:53]
but there's
[17:54]
another guy coming next July,
[17:56]
and I've already talked to them
[17:57]
, and they
[17:58]
said, "Oh, yeah,
[17:58]
sure." No problem
[18:00]
. Never, you know, so,
[18:02]
um, it's interesting that when you
[18:04]
look at one
[18:05]
corner of what we
[18:06]
did, you find
[18:07]
all these things that we did
[18:09]
n't do. So,
[18:11]
fortunately, it didn't
[18:12]
affect us." So, I
[18:14]
guess you might have
[18:15]
read about it in
[18:16]
the comments, but, um, the
[18:19]
Grunam County Sheriff's Department, um, what's
[18:20]
their name?
[18:23]
Mark Anderson is working
[18:24]
on a pilot
[18:25]
program related
[18:26]
to, um, regional
[18:28]
policing, for example,
[18:29]
so that instead of his people being
[18:33]
hired by different cities
[18:34]
for a certain amount of time, they would be
[18:35]
stationed around
[18:36]
those different cities so that
[18:37]
they could be
[18:38]
ready to respond
[18:39]
faster and more
[18:40]
effectively. And it's
[18:42]
called, and K's
[18:44]
volunteered to be
[18:45]
our, um,
[18:48]
representative on
[18:49]
this committee. It's
[18:50]
called the
[18:53]
Windham County Law Enforcement Management Board. Uh, five
[18:55]
cities, nine cities,
[18:57]
WCGC.
[18:59]
Yes, that's nine.
[19:02]
of the 27 cities in
[19:03]
Windham County
[19:04]
are on
[19:05]
this committee, and
[19:06]
their job
[19:07]
next year is
[19:08]
to figure out what can be
[19:10]
added, you know, what
[19:11]
new services can the
[19:13]
sheriff's department provide us,
[19:14]
beyond just
[19:15]
traffic enforcement. Is there a
[19:20]
way to
[19:21]
use this
[19:22]
agency instead of the
[19:23]
state police,
[19:24]
which are often very
[19:25]
slow and don't
[19:26]
show up very well?
[19:29]
So do you want
[19:30]
to add anything about what
[19:31]
we're working on?
[19:32]
No, it's just
[19:33]
beginning. We have had
[19:34]
two or three
[19:35]
meetings, and so far we are
[19:36]
talking about developing a
[19:37]
document that would
[19:38]
regulate the work of
[19:39]
this council, for example, a
[19:40]
charter. What we
[19:41]
can expect and not
[19:42]
expect from these
[19:43]
meetings, so there's no
[19:45]
specific report yet
[19:46]
, but we're
[19:47]
meeting
[19:48]
every week now to
[19:48]
try to
[19:49]
figure it out so we
[19:50]
can all have something to
[19:51]
bring to
[19:52]
the cities and see
[19:53]
who would like to
[19:54]
participate. The idea is
[19:56]
that without
[19:57]
increasing the cost of what
[19:58]
we already
[19:59]
pay them, we can
[20:00]
get more
[20:01]
services.
[20:02]
And in fact, from the
[20:03]
initial figures
[20:04]
you gave us, it
[20:05]
may turn out to be
[20:06]
cheaper for us than our
[20:08]
current contract. That's exactly what
[20:10]
we think.
[20:11]
Yes. And that
[20:12]
by distributing this to
[20:13]
communities and
[20:14]
creating a system, rather
[20:15]
than just
[20:16]
calling us, we
[20:17]
need, um,
[20:18]
help so we
[20:19]
can cut
[20:20]
costs. So we'll
[20:22]
find out more
[20:23]
later. Two more
[20:24]
items on my list of
[20:25]
things on the table.
[20:26]
The first one is four
[20:27]
minutes.
[20:28]
The first is, um, school,
[20:29]
what to do with the school
[20:31]
building. There is a committee
[20:32]
called "What to do
[20:33]
with the school building."
[20:35]
We haven't given it a
[20:36]
name yet. Hmm, we had our
[20:37]
first meeting at the
[20:38]
next meeting.
[20:39]
They will meet on the
[20:41]
first
[20:41]
Monday of every month. The
[20:43]
first Monday of the
[20:44]
month. First or
[20:45]
Yes. First Monday
[20:47]
, or first Wednesday. Hmm,
[20:49]
and Dan MacArthur will be
[20:50]
involved, as well as
[20:51]
Kayla, who has
[20:52]
been working at this school for a long time. And,
[20:57]
um, one of the things that I
[20:59]
suggested to them, and
[21:00]
they were actually
[21:01]
interested in, was, um,
[21:03]
setting aside, um, a section
[21:04]
that could become an
[21:05]
urban emergency
[21:09]
shelter for the night.
[21:11]
Yes. A place to stay in
[21:12]
case
[21:13]
Irene attacks again or
[21:14]
something. And that will mean
[21:15]
having a place where
[21:16]
we can store a
[21:17]
bunch of cribs, blankets,
[21:18]
and pillows. They have a
[21:20]
fully equipped
[21:21]
kitchen. Hmm, you'd
[21:22]
have to
[21:23]
figure out, you know,
[21:24]
generators or
[21:26]
batteries, you know,
[21:27]
but they're open to
[21:29]
the idea, and that's something the
[21:30]
city,
[21:32]
um, was shying away from, not
[21:33]
shying away from, but
[21:34]
working with
[21:36]
emergency management. Hmm,
[21:40]
you know, they gave us
[21:41]
some permission to
[21:42]
put a
[21:43]
heating center here during
[21:44]
daylight hours, but
[21:46]
that doesn't really
[21:46]
solve the problem of
[21:47]
overnight accommodation.
[21:51]
Good. So, last thing on
[21:54]
my list, and then
[21:55]
we have:
[21:57]
Nick?
[21:57]
Tomorrow or
[21:58]
Tamara?
[21:59]
Good.
[22:00]
Tamara. Tamara and Nick.
[22:01]
You have to say it with a New
[22:03]
York
[22:03]
accent. There's
[22:06]
Long Island. So, the
[22:09]
last thing on my
[22:10]
list is that
[22:11]
a few weeks ago,
[22:13]
the administrator of the Marlboro
[22:14]
Volunteer
[22:15]
Fire Department approached us
[22:16]
asking us
[22:20]
to stop being a
[22:21]
nonprofit
[22:21]
and
[22:22]
become, uh,
[22:24]
city-run. So we're
[22:25]
trying
[22:26]
to figure out, uh, if there's
[22:27]
another town in Vermont that's
[22:29]
done this. So,
[22:31]
uh, the fire department people
[22:33]
consulted with
[22:34]
this city, this is Berlin,
[22:35]
Vermont. And it
[22:39]
seems to me that the main
[22:40]
change would be that, uh
[22:41]
, the money that we often
[22:43]
give to the fire
[22:44]
department would not be
[22:45]
given to it
[22:46]
upfront. It will
[22:47]
simply be part of
[22:48]
our city
[22:49]
budget so that we can then
[22:51]
pay for the expenses. Er
[22:53]
, the same goes for
[22:54]
equipment and
[22:55]
upgrades. So
[22:56]
two
[22:58]
paid positions will be needed. Uh
[23:00]
, these will be
[23:01]
additional costs. Uh
[23:03]
, one will be a
[23:03]
professional
[23:04]
administrator,
[23:05]
maybe a
[23:06]
fire chief, uh,
[23:08]
part-
[23:09]
time, and the other will be an
[23:10]
assistant
[23:11]
administrator who will
[23:12]
help out,
[23:13]
you know, 15 hours,
[23:14]
you know, real part-
[23:17]
time,
[23:18]
keeping track of everything that
[23:19]
needs to be
[23:19]
kept track of without
[23:20]
volunteers. So, this is a
[23:22]
pretty
[23:23]
important matter for us. Uh,
[23:24]
we're trying to
[23:25]
move slowly,
[23:26]
but they're really
[23:27]
interested in getting
[23:28]
it done
[23:29]
quickly because they're
[23:30]
exhausted. Uh, then
[23:32]
the last thing I want to
[23:33]
do is
[23:34]
go back to the
[23:35]
energy
[23:36]
fair
[23:37]
and ask Tamara and
[23:39]
Nick about
[23:40]
their plans for
[23:41]
fun on October 24th.
[23:44]
Good.
[23:45]
So, yes. So we're here to, you
[23:47]
know,
[23:47]
continue to
[23:48]
invite people,
[23:51]
but should I
[23:52]
just do it from
[23:53]
my seat, or
[23:54]
should he...
[23:55]
So you want to
[23:56]
introduce yourself, because not
[23:57]
everyone might know you.
[23:58]
Oh, yes. Of course. I'm the
[24:01]
big sheriff...uh,
[24:02]
Donald Trump's son,
[24:04]
who might know...
[24:05]
just finished...my
[24:06]
doctorate
[24:08]
from Stanford...
[24:08]
moved here from San
[24:10]
Jose...this story...you're
[24:17]
Dr. Nick...Dr.
[24:18]
Yes, yes. Yes. Don't
[24:20]
call me
[24:21]
anything else. No. No. Uh, you're
[24:23]
applying for
[24:24]
academic positions.
[24:26]
Now the
[24:26]
academic job season
[24:28]
has begun, but
[24:29]
I still have some time...
[24:30]
And, uh, Tamara gave
[24:31]
me this opportunity
[24:32]
to volunteer and
[24:33]
help. And I'm
[24:34]
starting to understand what's
[24:35]
happening. And thank you
[24:36]
for inviting me.
[24:40]
You know.
[24:42]
Yes. And he also
[24:43]
gets paid through a grant,
[24:44]
which is very nice.
[24:45]
This is true. This is not
[24:46]
volunteering. This is clearly
[24:48]
selfish. Uh
[24:49]
-huh. Uh
[24:49]
-huh.
[24:50]
Okay, continue.
[24:53]
Tell us how to
[24:54]
get an
[24:55]
energy committee
[24:56]
. That's why you
[24:57]
need us when
[24:58]
the energy goes out. So,
[25:00]
yes. So, we're here to
[25:02]
talk about
[25:05]
doing something behind
[25:06]
you on October 24th.
[25:06]
This is the wind.
[25:07]
Oh, yes.
[25:08]
You will have to
[25:09]
wait until he
[25:10]
returns.
[25:11]
No. So, and also
[25:12]
thank you to Kate, who
[25:13]
did the work to
[25:14]
get the grant, you know
[25:16]
, to the energy
[25:17]
committee when Kate
[25:18]
was on the committee with
[25:19]
us. Thank you very much. And
[25:20]
so, we
[25:21]
can use
[25:23]
this grant money
[25:24]
to organize a big event to discuss community ideas
[25:25]
in this room on October 24th from 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM
[25:30]
. So, we're
[25:31]
looking at what Marbo
[25:33]
can do with
[25:34]
energy? And now we
[25:35]
live in a time when we
[25:36]
have so many
[25:37]
opportunities. We have a
[25:39]
Marlo campus. We
[25:41]
lost him, which, um,
[25:43]
has
[25:44]
a lot of
[25:46]
movement, a lot of
[25:47]
possibilities, but what
[25:48]
will it be, right?
[25:50]
We have assets there.
[25:52]
We have, um, a school and a
[25:53]
school campus that
[25:54]
is currently an
[25:54]
unused,
[25:55]
more or less
[25:56]
unused
[25:57]
space. We
[25:58]
also have the
[25:59]
Ninth Highway asset that
[26:00]
runs right
[26:01]
through our city.
[26:02]
If you think about it,
[26:03]
starting with our
[26:04]
village
[26:04]
deli, you know,
[26:06]
every weekend there's
[26:07]
police directing traffic
[26:08]
while everyone tries to
[26:09]
get a sandwich. What
[26:10]
if we had a
[26:11]
sandwich place here,
[26:12]
right? Hundreds of thousands of
[26:14]
people walk along
[26:15]
this corridor every day to
[26:16]
their
[26:17]
vacation homes, who
[26:18]
need to buy
[26:19]
groceries,
[26:20]
get settled, right?
[26:21]
We have ski
[26:22]
slopes. This is the gateway to
[26:23]
Vermont. Well, we
[26:24]
could be the first
[26:25]
stop at this
[26:26]
gateway to Vermont.
[26:28]
So how do we get
[26:29]
people to stop, right
[26:30]
? How do we attract
[26:31]
people to Marlboro and
[26:32]
keep Marblehead as a
[26:33]
separate identity
[26:35]
and not a bedroom for
[26:36]
Brattleboro, right?
[26:37]
Here's what we're looking at
[26:38]
. And the last time such an idea
[26:40]
was implemented was in
[26:42]
2010. And we had
[26:45]
representatives from
[26:46]
rural Vermont come to us,
[26:47]
and they had, well,
[26:48]
several, you know,
[26:49]
day-long, well, conversations where
[26:50]
all the community members
[26:52]
came up with ideas of what
[26:53]
could be done
[26:54]
based on this. We
[26:55]
came up with the idea for this
[26:57]
space, didn't we?
[26:58]
Because it used to
[26:59]
be just, well,
[27:00]
services every Sunday
[27:03]
in the summer, right? And we
[27:05]
came up with the idea of
[27:06]
making this space
[27:07]
bigger in the library
[27:08]
and cafe. We came up with the
[27:10]
energy committee
[27:12]
, which emerged from
[27:13]
planning sessions in 2010.
[27:16]
And we came up with the idea of
[27:17]
expanding our
[27:18]
trails, which eventually
[27:19]
turned into
[27:20]
ski slopes. So we
[27:21]
can
[27:23]
do a lot when we all
[27:24]
come together and
[27:24]
think about what
[27:26]
we have. And that's what we
[27:27]
do. As we were just
[27:28]
talking about, you know,
[27:29]
so
[27:31]
many things have happened since then.
[27:33]
Solar energy valuation is
[27:34]
probably what's
[27:35]
happening.
[27:37]
Forward.
[27:38]
OK. So, yes. We
[27:40]
just want to
[27:40]
create a place where
[27:41]
people can
[27:42]
bring all the
[27:43]
projects
[27:44]
they've been working on, the ideas they have
[27:45]
. The main thing
[27:47]
Nick will work on is information and
[27:48]
educational work
[27:49]
. So we want to
[27:50]
call different
[27:51]
representatives,
[27:51]
call, you know,
[27:53]
rural Vermont,
[27:54]
call those
[27:54]
who have money, right?
[27:56]
Who has projects? What is
[27:57]
happening?
[27:58]
Invite them to be here
[27:59]
. So while we're
[28:00]
generating and
[28:01]
coming up with new ideas,
[28:02]
we also have people
[28:04]
who can say, "
[28:05]
I can help with
[28:06]
this," or "There's money here
[28:07]
," or "Sure, this
[28:09]
fits into the XYZ project
[28:10]
we're starting."
[28:11]
Because, um, yeah,
[28:13]
because I think we have
[28:14]
a lot that we
[28:15]
can do, and that
[28:16]
we've done over the last
[28:18]
15 years, and now is the
[28:19]
time to bring it all
[28:20]
together. OK.
[28:21]
So, that's our goal. Hmm,
[28:24]
our request
[28:24]
is that
[28:26]
people participate,
[28:27]
that people come, and
[28:28]
that you bring
[28:29]
two or three
[28:30]
other guests with you.
[28:32]
Solar energy.
[28:33]
Switch to
[28:34]
solar energy.
[28:35]
Switch to
[28:36]
solar energy. Yes.
[28:37]
Well, you know, like, a
[28:38]
mustard field has
[28:39]
more than enough
[28:41]
space to house an
[28:42]
entire battery that
[28:43]
can, you know,
[28:44]
serve
[28:45]
our entire community,
[28:46]
right? And the city has
[28:48]
half of the
[28:49]
roadside garage
[28:50]
on solar power,
[28:52]
and we wanted to spend
[28:53]
some of that money on,
[28:54]
um, ARPA, but we
[28:55]
spend it on other
[28:56]
things before we
[28:58]
get to that, but that
[28:59]
could be upgraded
[29:00]
and doubled,
[29:03]
which would reduce the cost
[29:04]
, um, for the city.
[29:07]
What is ARCA?
[29:08]
ARPA was, um,
[29:10]
American.
[29:12]
It was the IRA.
[29:15]
Recording is in progress. But
[29:16]
we had, you know,
[29:17]
over $300,000
[29:18]
to allocate to things
[29:20]
that would
[29:21]
benefit the city.
[29:22]
Hmm. And it's spent.
[29:24]
Good.
[29:24]
Yes. I don't feel like
[29:26]
saying this, just
[29:27]
for people online,
[29:28]
if you can
[29:29]
give a quick
[29:31]
summary, a
[29:31]
summary, because they have
[29:32]
n't heard it.
[29:34]
Absolutely. Yes. So,
[29:36]
about the Olympics, do you want
[29:37]
to join?
[29:39]
Uh, I-I'm worried I
[29:40]
won't do everything right.
[29:42]
Hmm, okay. I think it's
[29:45]
, uh, so feel
[29:46]
free to correct
[29:48]
me for any
[29:49]
mistakes I make, but it looks like
[29:50]
we're trying to, uh, have
[29:52]
some kind of
[29:53]
community,
[29:54]
uh, event or
[29:55]
coordinate ideas,
[29:56]
resources, and people
[29:57]
interested in
[29:58]
energy and
[29:59]
energy
[30:00]
systems in Marrow. This is
[30:02]
modeled after
[30:03]
, uh, a very
[30:04]
successful community
[30:06]
service and
[30:06]
organizing event that we
[30:08]
did in 2010. Yes
[30:09]
, it, uh, led to
[30:10]
things like ski
[30:12]
slopes or the
[30:12]
community center where
[30:13]
we are now.
[30:17]
Uh, thematic and
[30:18]
focused
[30:19]
mostly on
[30:20]
energy, but
[30:21]
willing to consider
[30:22]
it in a broader sense. Uh
[30:26]
,
[30:27]
a lot of work has been done on
[30:28]
thinking about solar
[30:29]
energy. My dad
[30:31]
remembers that, uh, they did some
[30:32]
work
[30:33]
trying
[30:34]
to figure out, like, the
[30:35]
total
[30:36]
energy demand of Marrow. What
[30:38]
type of solar panel will
[30:39]
you need to
[30:40]
accommodate all of this?
[30:41]
Uh, are there any places where
[30:43]
charging
[30:44]
stations for
[30:44]
electric cars could be installed? Hmm,
[30:49]
anyway, it's
[30:50]
been a decade and a half of
[30:51]
, uh,
[30:52]
lots of ideas, and trying to, uh
[30:53]
, get these ideas out
[30:55]
to the public,
[30:56]
figure out what's behind the
[30:57]
most energy,
[30:59]
and especially, uh, the names of
[31:00]
people and organizations
[31:02]
that could
[31:03]
support it, uh, both
[31:04]
organizationally and,
[31:06]
uh, financially.
[31:09]
Right. Did I
[31:10]
miss it?
[31:11]
Yes, that was good.
[31:13]
So, on October 24th, the date is
[31:15]
2 to 4, we will have
[31:17]
BCTV here. We will have food here.
[31:19]
We will have childcare
[31:20]
. So we want to
[31:22]
make it so that
[31:23]
everyone can
[31:24]
participate, and so, right now
[31:25]
our main
[31:26]
request is—you know,
[31:27]
bring a friend,
[31:28]
bring two
[31:29]
friends. Uh, yeah,
[31:32]
because it's a chance to implement
[31:33]
a lot of ideas, a lot of,
[31:34]
you know, something
[31:35]
like what Nick was saying
[31:37]
, a lot of projects have
[31:38]
come up, right?
[31:40]
But we don't all know about them
[31:41]
, and they haven't been
[31:42]
implemented,
[31:43]
right? And times have changed,
[31:44]
and we have
[31:45]
many more
[31:46]
assets now. So, we have
[31:47]
Marble College,
[31:48]
which gives us a lot of
[31:49]
opportunities. We have
[31:51]
school buildings,
[31:53]
yes, which are now
[31:54]
open. This gives us
[31:55]
opportunities. And we have
[31:57]
Route 9. This is what I was
[31:58]
talking about when the
[32:00]
power went out. But,
[32:01]
you know, we have this
[32:02]
big corridor, so
[32:03]
there's a lot of opportunity
[32:04]
for businesses to
[32:05]
bring new people
[32:06]
into the community to
[32:07]
stop by for a bite to
[32:08]
eat, right?
[32:09]
Instead of, um,
[32:11]
Vermont Country Deli blocking
[32:12]
all the roads, why do
[32:13]
n't we invite them all
[32:15]
here? We have a building
[32:16]
owned by the campus
[32:17]
that they're willing to
[32:18]
provide, you know, for a
[32:20]
restaurant or a
[32:20]
co-op out
[32:21]
west, right? Why
[32:24]
can't the Brattleboro Food Co-op
[32:26]
expand, ahem, and
[32:27]
serve the
[32:28]
community? And also where
[32:29]
we are,
[32:30]
we have Hogback Mountain and
[32:31]
we have Wilmington. So there
[32:33]
are two communities we
[32:34]
can serve. The
[32:35]
Brattleboro community, the
[32:36]
Wilmington community,
[32:37]
three communities, because
[32:38]
we have a
[32:39]
recreation community, right? And we
[32:40]
are the gateway to
[32:41]
Vermont. So how do we
[32:42]
get people
[32:43]
to stop, right? So,
[32:45]
that's one part. And
[32:46]
the other part is how do we
[32:48]
make better use of
[32:49]
the resources we have,
[32:50]
right? So, looking
[32:51]
at the space that we
[32:52]
have, the solar energy,
[32:53]
and the campus, like
[32:54]
during our board meeting
[32:56]
on Thursday,
[32:57]
we talked about all the
[32:58]
opportunities on campus
[32:59]
and how we
[33:00]
can offer
[33:02]
more educational
[33:03]
programs. You know why
[33:04]
we can't become a
[33:05]
technology
[33:06]
hub on campus?
[33:07]
My son was in
[33:08]
high school and
[33:08]
had to go to
[33:09]
Amherst to
[33:10]
attend a
[33:11]
programming academy because there isn't one in
[33:12]
Vermont
[33:13]
. But why
[33:14]
can't Malgo become a
[33:16]
programming academy now? So,
[33:17]
you know, that's what we're
[33:18]
looking for: to engage
[33:19]
people in conversations,
[33:21]
to engage them in
[33:21]
coming up with ideas, and
[33:23]
then to connect those
[33:24]
ideas to action. So that's why
[33:25]
we want
[33:26]
people who know
[33:28]
where the
[33:28]
resources are and who work with
[33:30]
planning to be
[33:31]
here with us as well. The
[33:35]
Energy Committee
[33:37]
has a lot of energy and
[33:38]
it will be contagious and
[33:39]
we will all do our
[33:40]
best to
[33:41]
show up and bring
[33:42]
our own markers, paper
[33:44]
and stuff. We will have
[33:48]
markers and paper. And
[33:50]
then, once we have
[33:51]
the ideas ready, we'll
[33:52]
continue to keep
[33:53]
them in the lobby here for
[33:55]
a few more weeks so that
[33:56]
other people who
[33:56]
may not have been able to
[33:57]
attend
[33:59]
can still participate
[34:00]
. And we'll also have an
[34:01]
online element so that
[34:02]
we really get
[34:03]
full, um,
[34:04]
engagement because
[34:05]
so many new
[34:06]
people have moved into
[34:07]
our community.
[34:08]
Yes? So, the whole community
[34:10]
has changed a lot, and that's what
[34:11]
we really want to
[34:12]
celebrate and
[34:13]
unite.
[34:15]
Yes. There's another idea
[34:16]
that just occurred to me
[34:17]
, because I
[34:19]
do
[34:20]
zoning work as an
[34:21]
acting
[34:22]
zoning officer, and I
[34:24]
know that there are four,
[34:25]
five, or six
[34:26]
potential new
[34:27]
homes, like on AI. You
[34:28]
can see where
[34:30]
driveways, etc. have been made. Maybe
[34:32]
we could develop
[34:33]
some, um,
[34:34]
energy-efficient
[34:35]
building rules that
[34:36]
could be passed on to
[34:38]
potential, sorry,
[34:40]
builders so
[34:41]
people know they don't
[34:42]
have to build a
[34:43]
4,000
[34:45]
square foot house. So
[34:46]
they can
[34:47]
build a
[34:48]
1,400 square
[34:49]
foot house and they can
[34:50]
use, I
[34:51]
mean, I don't
[34:52]
know if you knew about the
[34:53]
house on Town Hill.
[34:54]
Max and, uh, Iris
[34:55]
just built an
[34:57]
extremely, um,
[34:58]
energy-efficient
[34:59]
house with new
[35:00]
technology, with, you
[35:01]
know, cement and
[35:03]
insulation, cement
[35:04]
and windows that
[35:05]
face, uh,
[35:06]
mostly south,
[35:07]
I think. And, um, it might
[35:09]
be helpful if
[35:11]
someone came along and
[35:11]
looked into these
[35:12]
things to put together
[35:14]
something like a
[35:14]
guide on how
[35:16]
you can build a
[35:17]
house or how you can
[35:18]
remodel your
[35:19]
house.
[35:20]
Yes.
[35:21]
Uh, one thing I
[35:22]
remember, it was
[35:23]
actually many
[35:24]
years ago when I lived
[35:25]
in Manchester Center. Uh
[35:27]
-huh. Um, they
[35:29]
built a house, and it
[35:31]
had these
[35:32]
blinds
[35:36]
that, when the sun
[35:37]
came in,
[35:37]
would open up to
[35:38]
full power for
[35:39]
solar
[35:40]
radiation,
[35:41]
you know, for passive
[35:42]
solar
[35:43]
radiation. And
[35:46]
then, when
[35:47]
the temperature
[35:48]
cooled at night, the
[35:49]
blinds would close. Yes, yes
[35:50]
. And it was really
[35:53]
cool, you know, and
[35:54]
they kept
[35:55]
the heat in, you know, and
[35:56]
of course you had
[35:58]
insulation, all that stuff.
[35:59]
But I don't know if it's like
[36:01]
old technology, but
[36:02]
30 years ago it was
[36:04]
very new.
[36:06]
Yes. For example, those
[36:07]
wonderful blankets,
[36:08]
window coverings, and
[36:09]
more. And do you know what that is
[36:11]
?
[36:11]
Yes.
[36:12]
I wonder if there's
[36:13]
anyone here who
[36:14]
makes them? Is
[36:15]
n't there someone in town
[36:16]
who makes them? And
[36:17]
we did this whole
[36:18]
project with a
[36:19]
nonprofit in
[36:20]
Maine, you know, where they
[36:21]
come in and
[36:21]
measure your windows
[36:22]
and then they make,
[36:23]
um, inserts.
[36:25]
double-sided inserts.
[36:26]
We did it, and the
[36:27]
energy committee
[36:28]
took it to court. What about
[36:29]
last year? I
[36:30]
think we had this a
[36:32]
year earlier.
[36:33]
Yes. Peggy, Peggy
[36:35]
just had a comment
[36:40]
that, um, you need to
[36:42]
include in everything that you
[36:43]
do, is, um, a
[36:44]
reflection of how
[36:45]
all of this can help
[36:47]
low-income
[36:48]
seniors,
[36:49]
and so, is there a
[36:52]
grant that they
[36:53]
can, you know, in
[36:54]
other words,
[36:55]
help
[36:55]
low-income
[36:56]
seniors,
[36:57]
um,
[36:58]
no, it was a question of
[36:59]
how we're doing, how are the
[37:02]
low-income plans working in
[37:03]
Marlborough and also the
[37:04]
seniors,
[37:05]
because those are two different
[37:07]
categories.
[37:08]
Good. Sorry.
[37:10]
Yes. And that's what you
[37:11]
know, so we
[37:12]
need everyone to come
[37:13]
together at the table
[37:15]
so we can hear
[37:16]
those voices and also
[37:17]
have ideas because that's what
[37:18]
we're
[37:20]
thinking about with
[37:20]
transportation as well. How do people
[37:22]
move? We're
[37:23]
just talking about
[37:24]
, you know, do we have,
[37:25]
you know, a community
[37:26]
car that people
[37:27]
can borrow,
[37:28]
you know, during
[37:29]
mud season, or,
[37:30]
you know, we do
[37:31]
n't have a truck
[37:32]
that stops
[37:33]
by the school anymore. Yes, they
[37:34]
actually just
[37:35]
wanted to
[37:36]
let you do it
[37:37]
on demand again.
[37:37]
Yes, Mover, you can
[37:38]
call
[37:39]
Mover. Good.
[37:40]
And they have
[37:41]
something similar to
[37:43]
what Marvel Alliance does,
[37:44]
but what's nice about Mover,
[37:45]
if anyone ever
[37:46]
wants to do that, is that
[37:47]
they
[37:48]
pay for your mileage
[37:49]
.
[37:49]
Good.
[37:50]
For the fact that you are driving,
[37:52]
picking someone up and
[37:53]
taking them somewhere, etc. So,
[37:56]
um, you know they're
[37:57]
connected to this.
[37:59]
Good. Something like
[38:00]
Uber for transportation.
[38:02]
Yes. Movie with Uber.
[38:03]
That's good.
[38:05]
But it's more
[38:05]
planned than
[38:06]
just making a phone call.
[38:08]
But, and if there were
[38:09]
more stores here,
[38:10]
like a
[38:10]
grocery store, it would be
[38:11]
a lot
[38:13]
easier for people to buy food,
[38:14]
right? Because it
[38:15]
will be closer. They won't
[38:16]
have to go all the way
[38:17]
to the city. And, you know, it would
[38:19]
also be a way to
[38:20]
bring in people from
[38:21]
Wellington who do
[38:22]
n't have a lot of
[38:22]
options, you know,
[38:24]
for co-op style food
[38:24]
. But yes,
[38:26]
but I think yes, it's
[38:27]
important to consider
[38:28]
all of that. And I also
[38:30]
thought, when you
[38:30]
were talking about building,
[38:32]
that there are people in our community
[38:33]
who are working with,
[38:34]
um, new styles of
[38:35]
building. Yes.
[38:36]
Right. People on, hmm
[38:38]
, what is this? Not on High
[38:39]
Hill. This is, um, on
[38:40]
Bear Road.
[38:41]
Yes.
[38:42]
They have a location downtown
[38:43]
.
[38:44]
Yes.
[38:44]
Um, where they're
[38:44]
pushing, you know,
[38:45]
these new
[38:47]
plug-and-play building models
[38:48]
that are actually
[38:48]
designed
[38:49]
for new
[38:50]
construction and for
[38:50]
retrofits.
[38:51]
Yes.
[38:52]
I mean, because
[38:53]
reconstruction
[38:54]
will save people. I
[38:55]
mean, my house is a
[38:56]
perfect example.
[38:57]
He's like Swiss
[38:58]
cheese. And, you know, it would be
[39:01]
good to figure out what
[39:02]
steps we could
[39:03]
take to
[39:05]
simplify this a little bit.
[39:07]
Yes.
[39:08]
And I'll just say one thing
[39:10]
that we're doing with the rest of the
[39:12]
MERP,
[39:14]
um, mini-mini, is that
[39:16]
the city is going to
[39:17]
buy two, um,
[39:19]
Flur infrared readers. Emm.
[39:22]
Portable. And they
[39:23]
will be stored in the
[39:24]
city
[39:24]
administration. Someone
[39:26]
can come in, sign
[39:28]
it, and in the winter they
[39:29]
can stand
[39:30]
outside and see
[39:31]
where
[39:32]
the heat from their
[39:33]
house is coming from. And in the summer
[39:35]
they can stand
[39:35]
inside and
[39:36]
see where
[39:37]
the heat is coming into
[39:38]
their house from,
[39:39]
right?
[39:39]
Um, you know, it's just,
[39:41]
you know, infrared,
[39:42]
and it's pretty cool.
[39:44]
We also, didn't we
[39:45]
buy a drainage
[39:46]
pump that can be
[39:47]
written out?
[39:48]
Um, not yet.
[39:51]
Yes, it is included in
[39:52]
the budget.
[39:53]
Good. So the fire
[39:54]
department asked
[39:55]
the city to buy a
[39:56]
drain pump that
[39:57]
could be written off,
[39:58]
right? Yes. So if your
[39:59]
basement is flooded,
[40:00]
you didn't have to
[40:01]
buy your
[40:02]
own. You could
[40:03]
just ask and
[40:04]
borrow it.
[40:04]
Yes.
[40:05]
Hmm, that's cool. Okay,
[40:07]
great. Well, we started.
[40:08]
We had fun on
[40:09]
Thursday, we
[40:10]
had fun on Saturday,
[40:11]
and we will have fun
[40:12]
in October.
[40:13]
We can do what
[40:14]
we're just
[40:15]
going to do,
[40:16]
which is connect Tamara
[40:17]
to the city grid and
[40:19]
just let her
[40:20]
energy flow. Well,
[40:23]
something we could
[40:24]
do is a
[40:25]
library, right? This is
[40:26]
something we put together in
[40:27]
Brattleboro. Oh, yes.
[40:29]
It was, you know, I
[40:30]
needed a blender. What
[40:31]
if I
[40:31]
needed a
[40:32]
juicer? What
[40:33]
if I
[40:33]
needed a
[40:34]
bread maker? You know,
[40:35]
just tools,
[40:36]
right?
[40:36]
Snowshoes. I saw
[40:37]
someone
[40:38]
returning
[40:39]
snowshoes to
[40:39]
the library last year. I thought
[40:41]
: what?
[40:41]
Yes. Yes. They also have
[40:42]
electric bikes. And
[40:43]
electric bikes are
[40:44]
great. Yes.
[40:45]
You know, you can take an
[40:46]
electric bike and
[40:47]
go anywhere you
[40:47]
want.
[40:48]
So, yes. So how
[40:49]
can we bring
[40:50]
some of these resources here?
[40:51]
Perfectly. Well,
[40:52]
thank you very much for coming. And
[40:54]
now we'll move on to the
[40:55]
divisions, which, uh, has
[40:57]
anyone had a
[40:57]
chance to
[40:58]
review them? There's
[41:05]
, uh, Nick did this
[41:07]
wonderful thing.
[41:09]
There is such a thing as a
[41:10]
unit.
[41:12]
No. Yes, this is a long thing.
[41:14]
Sorry. May I
[41:15]
know your name?
[41:16]
Donald. Oh, you are him.
[41:21]
Sorry. I know your
[41:23]
face. I just
[41:24]
missed the name.
[41:25]
So, Nick did this
[41:27]
thing. I don't know if it's
[41:28]
published or if
[41:29]
we can make it
[41:30]
available for
[41:31]
comparison between the
[41:31]
old and new
[41:32]
units.
[41:33]
Oh, yes. I mean, would
[41:35]
you rather I bring this
[41:36]
up, or a subsection
[41:39]
with actual
[41:39]
rules? Does
[41:40]
anyone else want one?
[41:41]
I think that would be more
[41:43]
useful.
[41:43]
Oh, thank you.
[41:45]
I'll take a few. This is
[41:46]
a comparison of something
[41:47]
you printed out.
[41:48]
Yes,
[41:50]
I...
[41:51]
You were going to...
[41:53]
Okay. So,
[41:54]
let me
[41:55]
find this. Wait a
[41:56]
second.
[41:56]
Thank you for coming.
[41:58]
I could...
[42:00]
Oh, you...you were involved
[42:02]
in this.
[42:02]
Yes. Yes. I was very
[42:04]
involved in this. I
[42:05]
can tell you a little bit
[42:06]
. Do
[42:06]
you want to give us an
[42:07]
introduction?
[42:09]
What we...the old patterns of
[42:11]
division were
[42:11]
mostly
[42:12]
formulaic. They were
[42:15]
probably taken from
[42:16]
cities much
[42:17]
larger than Marlborough.
[42:19]
So our task
[42:20]
was twofold. One
[42:25]
was to
[42:26]
make it more
[42:27]
relevant to
[42:28]
this city, and the other was to
[42:29]
make it
[42:30]
legible and
[42:31]
understandable. And to that
[42:38]
end, we...we created
[42:43]
a chart that gives you
[42:44]
kind of a
[42:45]
step-by-step
[42:46]
guide on
[42:47]
page six...anytime
[42:51]
you need to
[42:52]
do any
[42:53]
division, small or
[42:54]
large, it gives you a
[42:56]
flowchart that
[42:56]
shows you the
[42:57]
step-by-step process.
[42:59]
Of course.
[43:00]
Um,
[43:01]
that's good. So our
[43:04]
goal was to make it
[43:05]
clear and
[43:06]
simple, and also
[43:07]
align it with how the
[43:09]
city actually
[43:10]
functions. Hmm, the
[43:14]
zoning administrator is a key
[43:15]
person because they are the
[43:16]
first person
[43:18]
you talk to to
[43:19]
figure out whether
[43:20]
you are doing a minor or
[43:21]
major subdivision. And if
[43:24]
it's minor, very
[43:25]
often it can go through a
[43:26]
fairly simple
[43:27]
process. For example,
[43:29]
adjusting boundaries.
[43:30]
Wait. I've already
[43:32]
reached this point.
[43:35]
And then, um, we also
[43:36]
simplified it a little bit
[43:37]
for everyone. We used to have a
[43:40]
restriction that
[43:41]
said anything
[43:42]
more than three
[43:43]
plots. If you
[43:44]
divide your plot
[43:45]
into more than three, that
[43:46]
automatically meant a
[43:48]
large television.
[43:49]
We increased that to
[43:50]
four. You can
[43:51]
have four. Did
[43:52]
you mean that?
[43:53]
Yes. Hmm.
[43:54]
You can have four
[43:56]
before you
[43:56]
have to go
[43:58]
to five to
[43:58]
trigger the
[43:59]
grand division view.
[44:02]
It's in the right column. Is
[44:03]
it all at once, or
[44:05]
can you do it
[44:06]
over a
[44:07]
period of time?
[44:08]
You have that all of this should
[44:10]
be within 5 years.
[44:11]
Good.
[44:12]
Maximum
[44:13]
number for 5
[44:14]
years. This has not
[44:15]
changed. Another thing
[44:18]
that we've implemented that's
[44:19]
new is that,
[44:21]
uh, we have something called a
[44:23]
conservation
[44:24]
unit.
[44:27]
Most of the city is now
[44:29]
zoned for 2 acres per
[44:30]
residential building.
[44:34]
And we, uh, through the
[44:35]
conservation
[44:36]
unit, we
[44:37]
modeled a lot of
[44:38]
this after
[44:40]
how Bradborough did
[44:41]
most of what
[44:42]
Brad is now, which is the
[44:43]
conservation
[44:44]
unit. And this
[44:48]
process says that
[44:50]
if you allocate 50% of
[44:51]
your land, uh, you
[44:56]
can build the
[44:58]
same number of
[44:59]
apartments as you did, uh,
[45:00]
before, but it doesn't have to
[45:02]
be two large
[45:03]
plots.
[45:04]
You can build on
[45:06]
much smaller
[45:06]
plots. You can
[45:08]
group houses
[45:09]
together, much
[45:10]
cheaper to build,
[45:11]
uh, and much, uh, more
[45:12]
environmentally friendly,
[45:14]
of course. Uh, this is a
[45:16]
section, I think it's in
[45:17]
chapter three, that
[45:19]
talks about the
[45:20]
conservation process
[45:21]
.
[45:24]
Chapter three.
[45:26]
The
[45:27]
third one,
[45:27]
which starts, uh,
[45:29]
at 13, I think.
[45:32]
Yes.
[45:34]
And could you
[45:36]
just give your
[45:38]
name again for the transcript so it can be
[45:39]
recorded.
[45:41]
D. Sherin.
[45:43]
Thank you. And the printout
[45:49]
doesn't actually
[45:50]
show up,
[45:51]
perhaps in your PDF
[45:52]
file. Uh, if you
[45:56]
look at
[45:57]
the examples, you'll see
[45:59]
examples shown with
[46:00]
little
[46:00]
illustrations. If you
[46:02]
scroll down,
[46:04]
um, okay, look
[46:05]
at the screen and tell
[46:06]
me when I
[46:07]
got close. I'll let you
[46:08]
know.
[46:09]
Is this it? Is this it?
[46:10]
Yes.
[46:11]
Good.
[46:12]
This page. It will be,
[46:13]
um,
[46:16]
3.10. That's it. Yes.
[46:19]
Good. Let's start.
[46:22]
So, this is an example. Um,
[46:28]
each major subdivision
[46:29]
will have, in addition to what
[46:30]
we normally do with
[46:32]
the survey, an
[46:32]
additional
[46:33]
environmental review map
[46:35]
that will highlight any
[46:36]
environmentally sensitive
[46:37]
areas. Those areas where
[46:42]
you
[46:43]
can't build anyway.
[46:45]
So, you will subtract those
[46:47]
areas that you
[46:48]
cannot build on to
[46:49]
determine how much you
[46:50]
can build on.
[46:52]
So in this
[46:53]
example there were 50 acres
[46:54]
, 20 acres were
[46:55]
undeveloped
[46:56]
. 30 acres
[46:57]
divided by two will
[46:58]
give you 15 apartments.
[47:02]
Thanks to the division into
[47:03]
conservation
[47:04]
areas, you can
[47:05]
create a plot of land the
[47:06]
size of an acre, right
[47:07]
? Er, 3/4 acre.
[47:10]
The main thing is that you
[47:11]
have enough land
[47:12]
to develop, that
[47:13]
you have a
[47:14]
functioning
[47:15]
septic system.
[47:17]
If you go to the
[47:19]
next page, I
[47:20]
think it shows an
[47:21]
example of several
[47:22]
smaller sections.
[47:23]
So can you
[47:24]
do something
[47:25]
like condominiums
[47:26]
and,
[47:26]
um,
[47:27]
residential clusters?
[47:29]
We, as we, uh, have been doing,
[47:33]
as we're just
[47:34]
developing the
[47:35]
subdivision rules, we're suggesting
[47:36]
that the next step
[47:38]
for the
[47:38]
planning commission is to
[47:39]
review the zoning,
[47:42]
and we're going to
[47:43]
strongly
[47:43]
encourage the permitting
[47:44]
of apartment
[47:46]
buildings.
[47:49]
I think that now it is
[47:50]
possible to build two
[47:52]
families. Uh
[47:52]
-huh. But we believe
[47:54]
we should be
[47:55]
more lenient
[47:56]
when it comes
[47:57]
to this,
[47:59]
especially when it comes to
[47:59]
creating affordable
[48:01]
housing.
[48:02]
So there's an example that
[48:04]
shows much
[48:07]
smaller plots, um,
[48:09]
instead of
[48:10]
trying to do
[48:11]
two acres. I
[48:12]
mean, if you're
[48:14]
zoning for two acres
[48:15]
, you're essentially
[48:16]
converting the land
[48:17]
into suburbanization. And that's
[48:18]
obviously something that I
[48:20]
think
[48:20]
most people wouldn't
[48:22]
want to do to
[48:23]
our city.
[48:24]
I have a question.
[48:25]
Yes.
[48:27]
Can
[48:28]
conservation
[48:29]
zoning be applied in a rural
[48:30]
area?
[48:32]
It can be
[48:32]
used
[48:34]
anywhere. Yes.
[48:34]
Good.
[48:35]
If, well, the majority...
[48:36]
Yes, rural housing
[48:37]
development is a principle.
[48:39]
So not just in
[48:40]
wildlife or
[48:41]
conservation. So oh
[48:43]
no, you can
[48:44]
use this
[48:45]
really anywhere. It is
[48:46]
commercial,
[48:47]
available for any
[48:48]
commercial meeting
[48:49]
and commercial
[48:50]
event. This is a commercial
[48:52]
area to the east where there is a
[48:56]
barbecue area, and the
[48:57]
commercial area to the
[48:58]
west is a Hogback and a
[49:00]
pizzeria. Yes. Yes. I
[49:02]
think it's mainly
[49:04]
for housing. Uh, but
[49:06]
I'll have to
[49:07]
figure it out.
[49:09]
You can have detached
[49:10]
houses in commercial areas.
[49:11]
Oh, you can. Good. Yes.
[49:13]
The only thing you can't
[49:14]
have is a primitive
[49:15]
camp. Oh, okay. So,
[49:17]
this is a problem for
[49:18]
some people who
[49:18]
buy land just
[49:19]
along the road and
[49:20]
can't
[49:21]
do anything about it. Well, there's that
[49:23]
tiny guy with
[49:24]
the house who
[49:25]
lives there now. Which one exactly?
[49:26]
I don't know. He works
[49:28]
at NECA.
[49:29]
He has Oh, Joe Baker.
[49:30]
Yes. Yes.
[49:32]
He doesn't live in that
[49:33]
little house
[49:34]
. This is his rehearsal
[49:36]
area. He lives in a
[49:37]
trailer.
[49:39]
So, in any case
[49:40]
, to answer
[49:41]
your question, you
[49:42]
can use
[49:44]
territory preservation services in any
[49:45]
area. Good.
[49:50]
And you said that
[49:50]
boundary
[49:52]
line adjustments can be
[49:52]
done by the
[49:54]
zoning administrator on their own
[49:56]
, or does it all have to go to the
[49:57]
DRB? That's something
[49:59]
I could
[50:00]
figure out.
[50:03]
Uh, you still
[50:04]
need to provide a
[50:05]
land
[50:06]
survey and
[50:07]
supporting documents
[50:08]
to submit your subdivision permit application to the
[50:11]
zoning administrator for
[50:12]
approval.
[50:13]
Notification of
[50:14]
any interested
[50:15]
parties.
[50:16]
This doesn't necessarily have to
[50:17]
go to the
[50:18]
project review board.
[50:22]
Yes. The administrator
[50:24]
can take care of this.
[50:28]
page is 11
[50:30]
six six.
[50:32]
Yes.
[50:34]
So this
[50:35]
zoning administrator can
[50:36]
handle a
[50:37]
minor division on their own.
[50:39]
Yes, but you can always
[50:41]
contact the DRB if
[50:42]
something happens.
[50:43]
Yes. And of course, all of
[50:45]
these overlapping areas
[50:47]
are still part of the
[50:48]
review process.
[50:48]
Yes,
[50:56]
this is very useful.
[50:57]
Yes, I like
[50:59]
how it's written.
[51:00]
The writing is much
[51:01]
clearer.
[51:02]
Yes, we removed
[51:03]
a lot of the boiler, the stove
[51:04]
was pretty rough.
[51:06]
Fish, when it
[51:07]
came to,
[51:07]
like, the
[51:09]
curb cuts, and I'm like, where's the
[51:10]
curb?
[51:11]
Yes.
[51:14]
Um, yeah, a lot of
[51:15]
this was written,
[51:16]
you know, for the development of
[51:17]
suburban New
[51:18]
Jersey and
[51:19]
Sure.
[51:19]
I hope this
[51:21]
gets here someday. Does this
[51:23]
apply to our
[51:24]
zoning regulations?
[51:25]
No.
[51:26]
I think we
[51:28]
worked on them
[51:29]
recently, and it's...Yeah,
[51:30]
I think
[51:31]
we reviewed them in 2018.
[51:33]
Yeah, I think these,
[51:34]
they were originally from
[51:36]
2010, and then they were... there
[51:37]
were a few changes,
[51:40]
but they really
[51:41]
need updating
[51:42]
, especially because
[51:44]
they still have educational,
[51:45]
um, areas, you know, that
[51:49]
don't apply,
[51:50]
but it still makes it
[51:51]
difficult
[51:52]
when you're trying
[51:53]
to read the rules.
[51:54]
Yes. And there are just some
[51:55]
things that I
[51:56]
told people
[51:56]
before you came
[51:57]
here, there are just some
[51:58]
places where it's just
[51:59]
unclear. This makes decision making very
[52:00]
difficult
[52:01]
for people.
[52:02]
They are asking for something that is
[52:04]
simply not clear in the
[52:05]
rules.
[52:07]
And I've been very fortunate to
[52:08]
talk to different
[52:09]
people in the state. I have
[52:11]
three or four
[52:12]
people who have been very
[52:13]
helpful with
[52:14]
issues of
[52:16]
river neighborhoods,
[52:17]
waterfront and
[52:18]
other things, commercial
[52:20]
zoning and other things. But it's
[52:21]
useful, but I think
[52:23]
it could really be
[52:24]
revised
[52:25]
for, well,
[52:26]
you know, consistency.
[52:28]
If you can keep
[52:29]
track of these...Oh, sure.
[52:30]
I think this would be
[52:31]
very valuable for the
[52:32]
next client.
[52:34]
I'll look over my
[52:35]
notes. There are a few
[52:36]
things where I just
[52:37]
can't figure out what it
[52:39]
means. Are
[52:40]
they exempt from payment? Aren't
[52:41]
they released?
[52:42]
You know,
[52:43]
charities are
[52:44]
exempt or
[52:45]
maybe not exempt
[52:46]
from the following things.
[52:47]
It's like: oh my God.
[52:49]
Yes, you need a
[52:50]
lawyer. Yes.
[52:52]
So, we're planning to
[52:53]
hire...er, you
[52:54]
weren't here when we
[52:55]
talked about this
[52:56]
earlier to apply for a
[52:58]
municipal
[52:59]
planning grant.
[53:01]
Oh, great.
[53:02]
Which would be
[53:02]
specifically to
[53:03]
pay for the
[53:04]
zoning review.
[53:05]
Well, that's what the
[53:07]
planning commission does. It would be
[53:09]
great to have,
[53:10]
you know, a consultant,
[53:11]
but, um, yeah,
[53:12]
I mean, I
[53:13]
just let you know
[53:15]
that I talked to the WRC, and,
[53:18]
um, they can
[53:20]
do pretty much anything if we
[53:21]
get a planning grant
[53:25]
and then present
[53:26]
it to the
[53:27]
planning commission, and
[53:27]
let the
[53:29]
planning commission evaluate
[53:30]
and make changes and
[53:31]
adjustments.
[53:31]
Right. I think it would make
[53:33]
sense
[53:33]
to cooperate with the
[53:34]
planning commission.
[53:35]
Well, yes. I'm just saying
[53:37]
we would have a
[53:38]
professional like
[53:39]
Mike McConnell or
[53:41]
some other company
[53:42]
that, you know, really
[53:43]
knows the laws and so on. Um,
[53:45]
of course.
[53:46]
To give you guys, you
[53:47]
know, to
[53:49]
write it and then
[53:50]
sit down with you and
[53:51]
review it.
[53:52]
Of course.
[53:53]
You can always
[53:54]
pay us.
[53:56]
So, were there a lot of,
[53:57]
um, at your
[53:58]
public hearings, were there a
[53:59]
lot of
[54:00]
proposed
[54:01]
fixes? Just a
[54:03]
few that I
[54:03]
edited into
[54:04]
our new
[54:05]
document. So we
[54:08]
waited for these hearings
[54:09]
earlier, in case
[54:10]
we needed to
[54:11]
add anything else.
[54:12]
Well, the only thing I asked for,
[54:14]
and I think the chart
[54:15]
clearly shows, is that
[54:16]
people are sometimes
[54:17]
surprised that they
[54:18]
need to do a
[54:19]
survey.
[54:20]
Oh, the survey
[54:22]
I wrote to Jim about, and I
[54:23]
said, just
[54:24]
put that first
[54:25]
. You
[54:26]
mean every
[54:27]
survey has to be
[54:28]
conducted, meaning
[54:29]
every district has to have a
[54:30]
survey, which
[54:31]
costs a lot of money.
[54:32]
Absolutely. But
[54:34]
Malcolm Moore
[54:34]
was actually at
[54:35]
our hearing and, uh
[54:37]
, made it very clear
[54:38]
that the
[54:39]
survey is an
[54:39]
important document.
[54:41]
Yes. So this, uh, is clearly
[54:43]
visible in this diagram
[54:45]
.
[54:45]
Yes. Um, but I didn't see
[54:48]
that in the opening
[54:49]
comments, just so
[54:50]
you know, because it
[54:51]
makes the city staff's job easier
[54:53]
if they don't have to
[54:54]
argue about it
[54:55]
.
[54:58]
One of the things that, um, has
[55:00]
obviously been a
[55:00]
problem in the past,
[55:02]
and we're trying
[55:03]
to emphasize here, is that
[55:05]
everyone has to have a
[55:06]
registered title deed
[55:07]
.
[55:08]
It’s not enough to just
[55:10]
go ahead and
[55:10]
get the job done. You
[55:12]
actually have to
[55:13]
get permission. Yes.
[55:15]
They have 180 days
[55:16]
to register
[55:17]
the plan and the title deed
[55:19]
,
[55:19]
right?
[55:20]
And if they don't
[55:21]
do it, it's
[55:22]
canceled.
[55:23]
They can't start
[55:24]
until all this is
[55:25]
done, right?
[55:26]
Uh, when it's
[55:27]
finished, uh...Oh, that's
[55:29]
true. They have to
[55:30]
get...
[55:31]
It's not realistic until it's
[55:32]
done
[55:33]
over a
[55:33]
period of time.
[55:34]
That's good. Um, I would
[55:36]
advise Molly to
[55:37]
maybe just
[55:38]
write something on her
[55:39]
own and
[55:40]
send it to
[55:41]
Donald, and
[55:43]
I don't want to
[55:44]
go through the 30-
[55:45]
day, 45-day, 30-
[55:47]
day, 45-day series of
[55:48]
public hearings again.
[55:51]
If we were to
[55:52]
propose a
[55:52]
review of this,
[55:54]
we would be back at the
[55:55]
beginning of the legal
[55:56]
process, which would be another
[55:57]
six months away.
[55:59]
Yes. Yes.
[56:00]
So,
[56:01]
but if this is
[56:01]
editing,
[56:03]
I don't know. Are you talking
[56:04]
about reviewing or
[56:05]
just editing?
[56:07]
Well, would it be
[56:08]
an edit if you
[56:09]
added somewhere at the top
[56:10]
that every unit
[56:12]
requires a survey?
[56:13]
Oh. Oh, you don't
[56:14]
see that when you read
[56:16]
...We tried
[56:26]
to make sure that this
[56:28]
text and the diagram are
[56:29]
consistent. Uh...uh, by
[56:34]
the way, there's also a
[56:35]
checklist. Have
[56:38]
you seen the
[56:38]
checklist?
[56:40]
Yes, that's good. I
[56:41]
like the old one,
[56:42]
where it was written who was supposed to
[56:43]
do what, but this one is
[56:45]
much
[56:46]
clearer. And here is
[56:47]
where the
[56:48]
inspection check,
[56:50]
,
[56:50]
inspection check. So,
[56:51]
in the end, it's clear
[56:53]
. But if it were in the
[56:57]
reporting requirements
[56:58]
for separation procedures
[57:00]
and
[57:00]
approval procedures,
[57:01]
maybe that's where it
[57:03]
is.
[57:05]
Yes. Are you looking for
[57:28]
information about
[57:29]
the application? Oh, you got it
[57:31]
.
[57:32]
You
[57:32]
are considering 180 days.
[57:34]
No, I just thought it
[57:35]
meant somewhere that
[57:36]
every division requires a
[57:37]
period of examination.
[57:42]
Yes, this is not in the
[57:43]
drawing record.
[57:45]
These are the 180 days.
[57:48]
Hmm, the division flowchart
[57:50]
explains it very clearly
[57:51]
. It is
[57:53]
spelled out very clearly here. So that would be
[57:55]
enough.
[57:56]
Table 2.2
[57:57]
lists all
[57:58]
the information you
[57:59]
need to provide, and
[58:01]
under the plot plan column
[58:02]
it says "
[58:03]
surveyed." So all
[58:06]
this information
[58:07]
comes during the
[58:08]
examination. Yes, it
[58:11]
says that one is the
[58:12]
initial conversation with the
[58:14]
zoning administrator, and the second
[58:15]
section for each
[58:17]
party is
[58:17]
the survey and
[58:18]
supporting documents
[58:19]
, the initial survey,
[58:21]
and written descriptions.
[58:24]
Yes.
[58:25]
That's good. So
[58:27]
there's no need for this
[58:28]
other thing,
[58:29]
right?
[58:30]
Or in the disputes of
[58:31]
certain people.
[58:32]
should read.
[58:34]
Yes. or listening,
[58:36]
you know,
[58:37]
because both are very
[58:38]
difficult.
[58:41]
There are a few units in the future
[58:43]
that look
[58:44]
pretty complicated, but
[58:45]
we'll see. Um, we
[58:51]
lost, we
[58:52]
basically only have one
[58:53]
person on the line,
[58:54]
Gussie. Gussie, I think,
[58:56]
you know, if you
[58:57]
know, I mean
[58:58]
, I think we can
[59:00]
just open up
[59:01]
for closing questions
[59:02]
and then we...
[59:03]
Thank you very much, Tom.
[59:05]
Yes, thank you for coming
[59:06]
. I really appreciate it.
[59:07]
Thank you for all your work.
[59:12]
Any final
[59:13]
questions, comments?
[59:16]
My final question would be that
[59:19]
I like how
[59:20]
you summarize
[59:21]
everything that the
[59:22]
Board of Elections and
[59:23]
other city commissions do.
[59:26]
And I just hope
[59:27]
that everything gets
[59:28]
recorded in
[59:29]
the minutes so that everyone
[59:30]
can read it
[59:32]
if they're not here yet,
[59:33]
because I'm amazed at the amount of
[59:34]
work that you all
[59:35]
do. I thought
[59:37]
we should do something
[59:39]
like a
[59:39]
quarterly report
[59:40]
, just a list of
[59:42]
something on the MRO Mixer or
[59:43]
something
[59:44]
on the website so people
[59:46]
know. We are also
[59:47]
starting to develop a
[59:48]
system. Nick came up with
[59:50]
this so that, you know, you have a
[59:51]
meeting, you
[59:52]
discuss a certain
[59:54]
topic, and then some
[59:55]
things we do and
[59:56]
some things we put off until
[59:57]
later. And Nick
[1:00:00]
suggested that
[1:00:01]
we have a physical
[1:00:02]
folder with the
[1:00:03]
agenda, minutes, and the to-
[1:00:04]
do list that
[1:00:05]
came out of that. And then,
[1:00:07]
when we think
[1:00:08]
we have nothing to do, we
[1:00:09]
turn around and
[1:00:10]
say, "Oh, the traffic
[1:00:11]
situation." My God.
[1:00:14]
Um, what I put on the
[1:00:15]
screen, uh, so you can
[1:00:17]
see it. This is, um,
[1:00:19]
a comparison between
[1:00:20]
the old
[1:00:21]
Okay.
[1:00:21]
charges for units
[1:00:22]
and new charges for
[1:00:24]
units. Um, and what
[1:00:26]
I'll do is put it
[1:00:32]
on the record, that it
[1:00:33]
will be...I'll put it on the
[1:00:40]
record, um, this
[1:00:42]
wonderful
[1:00:43]
two-page
[1:00:44]
statement.
[1:00:47]
Um, and it probably doesn't
[1:00:49]
cover everything, but, um, but it'll, um,
[1:00:59]
it's pretty good.
[1:01:01]
This really, I think,
[1:01:03]
can help people
[1:01:04]
... oh, well, you know, um, in
[1:01:09]
general it makes
[1:01:10]
development easier, it provides a little bit
[1:01:11]
more
[1:01:14]
housing, and it, um, gives
[1:01:15]
people the right to put
[1:01:16]
land under protection and
[1:01:17]
then reduce
[1:01:18]
the size of the lot. This is
[1:01:21]
really good. We
[1:01:23]
could have some kind of, um
[1:01:24]
, you know, community,
[1:01:25]
you know what they
[1:01:27]
call them? Shared
[1:01:30]
gardens.
[1:01:30]
Yes. What can I do
[1:01:32]
...
[1:01:32]
Yes. For example,
[1:01:34]
five
[1:01:35]
houses share a front
[1:01:36]
center building where
[1:01:37]
all the water, kitchen, etc. are located.
[1:01:39]
Good. Cool housing.
[1:01:40]
What could I do...That's all.
[1:01:42]
Yes. What could I do with this
[1:01:44]
, since it's
[1:01:45]
not, uh, a
[1:01:46]
regulation or anything,
[1:01:48]
uh, before we get
[1:01:50]
to the individual items, could I
[1:01:51]
just add,
[1:01:52]
please,
[1:01:53]
a note
[1:01:56]
that any
[1:01:57]
subsection requires
[1:01:58]
a poll before
[1:01:59]
I bold it
[1:02:00]
, you know, and
[1:02:01]
that way it's
[1:02:02]
added to the
[1:02:03]
record. And if so,
[1:02:06]
that will make me
[1:02:07]
happy. Uh, if
[1:02:08]
you want, uh, Don, I
[1:02:09]
can, uh,
[1:02:10]
email it to you
[1:02:11]
in advance.
[1:02:12]
I would like to
[1:02:13]
see that. Yes,
[1:02:14]
let me
[1:02:15]
share.
[1:02:15]
Make sure everything is
[1:02:16]
correct. Yes.
[1:02:17]
No.
[1:02:18]
Good.
[1:02:19]
Critical errors.
[1:02:20]
So until I hear back
[1:02:21]
from you, I'll
[1:02:22]
post the minutes,
[1:02:23]
but when I hear
[1:02:25]
back from you, I
[1:02:25]
can...
[1:02:26]
Great.
[1:02:26]
Uh, amend the
[1:02:28]
protocol and add
[1:02:29]
it.
[1:02:29]
Perfectly. And I...
[1:02:32]
Well, if there's
[1:02:33]
nothing else, Nick,
[1:02:37]
questions, comments,
[1:02:39]
I...uh, I'll probably
[1:02:40]
print out this list of what
[1:02:42]
you didn't get to
[1:02:43]
hear, everything
[1:02:44]
we've been working on at some
[1:02:46]
point, and
[1:02:47]
share it somehow. Uh, that
[1:02:49]
will be in the record.
[1:02:51]
Oh, it will be in these
[1:02:51]
minutes, because there are
[1:02:52]
some things on which
[1:02:54]
we will need
[1:02:55]
public opinion. An
[1:02:57]
important matter with the
[1:02:58]
fire department. An
[1:02:59]
important matter with the
[1:03:00]
regional
[1:03:01]
police. The recycling center thing is important
[1:03:03]
as we
[1:03:04]
learn more.
[1:03:05]
We need to
[1:03:06]
get more
[1:03:07]
feedback.
[1:03:08]
So, if everyone here
[1:03:09]
agrees...
[1:03:10]
Oh, yeah.
[1:03:11]
Oh, quick question. I
[1:03:12]
noticed on the website
[1:03:14]
that it was either under
[1:03:15]
revision
[1:03:16]
or
[1:03:17]
we had a technical
[1:03:19]
glitch and now we're, uh,
[1:03:20]
changing its language.
[1:03:23]
This website we had was
[1:03:25]
hosted by someone
[1:03:26]
from
[1:03:28]
WordPress and GoDaddy, and it
[1:03:29]
crashed,
[1:03:32]
and when it crashed,
[1:03:34]
we found that their
[1:03:35]
customer support
[1:03:36]
and everything else was terrible.
[1:03:39]
So, we're completely
[1:03:40]
redesigning the website with a
[1:03:44]
Vermont company
[1:03:46]
that creates
[1:03:46]
municipal
[1:03:47]
websites and
[1:03:48]
specializes in
[1:03:49]
this. And we will make
[1:03:52]
sure that every group
[1:03:53]
has access. They won't
[1:03:55]
have to
[1:03:56]
come to me for
[1:03:57]
everything.
[1:03:58]
Hmm, and of course it
[1:03:59]
will grow
[1:04:01]
as people
[1:04:01]
add their
[1:04:03]
pages and all that
[1:04:04]
, but
[1:04:05]
it's a blow to the budget.
[1:04:07]
$6,800 is the cost,
[1:04:09]
but annually it is
[1:04:10]
cheaper than what we
[1:04:12]
pay now.
[1:04:13]
And this year we are over
[1:04:14]
budget in
[1:04:15]
many different
[1:04:16]
places. So people have
[1:04:17]
been very positive about the
[1:04:24]
current website,
[1:04:25]
if you look at
[1:04:27]
what really caused the
[1:04:28]
crash–it was the drop-down
[1:04:29]
menus. So if you
[1:04:32]
use the
[1:04:33]
search bar, you can
[1:04:34]
find what I do, which is that
[1:04:35]
periodically when I
[1:04:37]
go through the
[1:04:38]
website, I put a
[1:04:39]
post on the
[1:04:40]
main page.
[1:04:42]
So if you
[1:04:43]
click on Marboro Vtus, you'll
[1:04:44]
be taken to the home
[1:04:45]
page, and there will be
[1:04:47]
a post with
[1:04:48]
links,
[1:04:48]
for example, to the
[1:04:50]
document list, to the
[1:04:52]
board selection page, to the HPC page.
[1:04:54]
So I'm trying to
[1:04:55]
make it so that I can't
[1:04:56]
restore the
[1:04:57]
dropdown menus, but
[1:04:58]
that doesn't allow me to
[1:05:00]
do it without
[1:05:01]
spending a huge
[1:05:02]
amount of money on these
[1:05:03]
people. So, I'm
[1:05:06]
basically adding a
[1:05:07]
post where I just
[1:05:08]
add links
[1:05:09]
that you just
[1:05:10]
click on, you
[1:05:11]
go there, and
[1:05:12]
then if you
[1:05:13]
go to the list of
[1:05:14]
documents, they're all
[1:05:16]
active. You can
[1:05:17]
click on the
[1:05:18]
link and get
[1:05:19]
any document,
[1:05:20]
everything is there. All you
[1:05:22]
need is a
[1:05:23]
driver to
[1:05:24]
take you there.
[1:05:25]
OK. And so I'm
[1:05:26]
working around
[1:05:28]
this night.
[1:05:28]
Do we know what the
[1:05:29]
timeline is for the new
[1:05:31]
website?
[1:05:31]
Hmm, I don't know...I don't
[1:05:32]
want to
[1:05:34]
commit. And
[1:05:35]
Rebecca is
[1:05:35]
doing it. Hmm, I
[1:05:38]
think they are
[1:05:38]
working very quickly
[1:05:40]
because this is a problem
[1:05:41]
because we also
[1:05:42]
need it to be up and
[1:05:43]
running before the
[1:05:44]
election.
[1:05:46]
OK.
[1:05:46]
So
[1:05:47]
oh.
[1:05:47]
What company
[1:05:48]
does this? Do you know
[1:05:50]
It's called, uh,
[1:05:52]
Civil.
[1:05:52]
OK. And you can
[1:05:56]
go to their
[1:05:57]
website and see,
[1:05:58]
you know, all of this. And
[1:06:00]
then I...I can't
[1:06:01]
remember the name of the city.
[1:06:04]
Westford, I think
[1:06:05]
Westford...
[1:06:07]
when they came to give us
[1:06:08]
a presentation, they
[1:06:09]
showed us the website for
[1:06:10]
Westford, this is a
[1:06:11]
small rural
[1:06:12]
town in Vermont.
[1:06:13]
So, I mean,
[1:06:14]
perfect example. And,
[1:06:16]
uh, both Forrest and
[1:06:17]
Rebecca really
[1:06:18]
liked him. And they
[1:06:19]
said, "Nick, do you
[1:06:20]
really need to
[1:06:21]
see this?" Guys, I
[1:06:22]
know if you
[1:06:23]
like it, that's
[1:06:24]
fine.
[1:06:25]
OK. So, I think it's
[1:06:26]
time to close this
[1:06:27]
meeting. I move to
[1:06:29]
close this meeting at
[1:06:31]
312.
[1:06:33]
Second.
[1:06:34]
All in favor?
[1:06:35]
1. So I hope that
[1:06:40]
...