[0:13] Welcome to

[0:15] Tuesday, September 15,

[0:17] Council meeting

[0:18] voters of the middle class

[0:19] gender. Kind regards

[0:20] We invite guests to

[0:21] audience. Um, we announce the meeting

[0:25] at 5:01 p.m. Hello, Larry. IN

[0:27] we have Larry online. AND

[0:29] we have several people

[0:30] online. And for those who

[0:32] interested

[0:33] to speak, simply, uh

[0:34] , make sure you

[0:35] Say your name, huh?

[0:36] -eh, and raise yours,

[0:38] uh, virtual hand

[0:39] or your hand here. AND

[0:40] we will try to follow

[0:41] behind you, if you have

[0:42] questions will arise.

[0:43] Um, so our first

[0:45] task - to congratulate

[0:46] and present

[0:47] our new

[0:48] urban

[0:48] administrator,

[0:49] Liam Abeit. So we

[0:51] very excited.

[0:52] Liam, you started it.

[0:54] yesterday.

[0:56] Hello everyone.

[0:57] Yes. And why would you?

[0:58] just don't tell

[1:00] we have two seconds

[1:01] who are you, where are you from?

[1:02] Um, yes, I started.

[1:03] to work as a city worker

[1:04] administrator

[1:05] yesterday. I have

[1:06] four years of experience

[1:07] regional work

[1:08] planner in

[1:08] Northeastern

[1:09] Kingdom, and I

[1:10] Glad to be here.

[1:10] Perfectly.

[1:11] Incredible.

[1:12] Thank you. Thank you very much and

[1:13] Welcome. Ahem,

[1:15] so, we are going

[1:16] approve the protocol

[1:18] regular meeting

[1:19] board from 1

[1:20] September 2026. Ahem,

[1:22] is there a proposal for

[1:23] approval

[1:24] protocol for 1

[1:25] September? I contribute

[1:26] proposal.

[1:27] Zara's offer. THERE ARE

[1:28] offer?

[1:30] And Stacey's suggestion.

[1:31] Everyone who supports

[1:32] approval

[1:33] protocol for 1

[1:34] September, they say...

[1:35] I...

[1:37] OK. Eyes not yet

[1:38] saw. Hmm, here we go.

[1:40] approval of the order

[1:41] daytime on

[1:42] today, 15

[1:43] September 2026. AND

[1:45] consideration of any

[1:46] amendments to the order

[1:47] daytime. Are there any

[1:48] amendments to the order

[1:49] daytime? I think

[1:52] just like

[1:53] reminder, we

[1:53] Let's write this down in our notes.

[1:55] in the correspondence section,

[1:56] to discuss, um,

[1:57] email from

[1:58] Elliott about tennis

[1:59] courts and what we know approximately about

[2:02] tennis courts.

[2:03] Yes.

[2:04] Um, I got it too

[2:05] today electronic

[2:06] letters that I even

[2:07] didn't look, um, they

[2:09] regarding the update

[2:10] regarding the.org migration

[2:11] on gov. So we can

[2:13] just quickly

[2:13] view them and

[2:14] look at them

[2:15] also. Hmm, is there

[2:16] proposal regarding

[2:17] approval of the order

[2:18] daytime on September 15?

[2:19] All offer. Sarah

[2:21] walks. Any second thoughts?

[2:22] Everyone second thoughts.

[2:23] And Paul second opinion. All

[2:25] Those who are "for" say "I do."

[2:27] I.

[2:27] OK. The eyes have it.

[2:29] OK. So, we

[2:32] received a report on

[2:33] highway condition

[2:35] from Eric, um, yes

[2:36] FEMA update from Zara

[2:37] , as well as any

[2:38] update on

[2:40] ANR directives. So,

[2:43] Eric, take it.

[2:44] Of course. So, uh, in

[2:46] mainly we

[2:47] finished, uh, the farm

[2:49] Daniel. Uh, done.

[2:51] there are some grooves and

[2:52] coating restoration

[2:53] last week. Uh, in

[2:55] I had a meeting with, uh

[2:57] -uh, by Jordan with, uh,

[3:02] Fitzgerald and, uh

[3:04] , designers

[3:05] Geotech for the old

[3:06] project. Uh, we

[3:09] finally decided,

[3:10] uh, they had a lot

[3:12] different options

[3:13] projects with which

[3:14] they had

[3:14] concern. So we

[3:15] finally decided

[3:17] with the final

[3:17] a project that

[3:18] will include some

[3:19] nails to the ground. Uh,

[3:21] soil of what?

[3:22] Ground nails. On

[3:23] essentially, gigantic

[3:24] rods into the ground to

[3:25] help keep

[3:26] soil from collapse.

[3:27] O. E-

[3:28] er, and small, er,

[3:29] block wall closer

[3:31] to the top, uh, through

[3:32] The slope, it's so beautiful. THERE ARE-

[3:36] uh, so these final

[3:37] projects will be

[3:38] ready by the end of the week

[3:39] . Um, they still are.

[3:41] preparing for

[3:42] construction in

[3:42] mid-October.

[3:45] Also at the same time

[3:46] working on the farm

[3:48] Daniel.

[3:49] Okay, Daniel.

[3:54] Perfectly.

[3:57] Okay, FEMA.

[3:58] Regarding FEMA, our

[3:59] state representative and,

[4:00] uh, federal

[4:01] representative were in

[4:02] on vacation, so in

[4:03] I have no updates.

[4:04] from FEMA because we don't

[4:05] met one and a half

[4:07] weeks.

[4:07] Good. Uh, and work with

[4:10] Colbert box,

[4:11] repair work.

[4:13] Any updates on

[4:14] this? Uh, we have more.

[4:16] something to work with, uh,

[4:17] edited by Rachel.

[4:19] Good. We hope

[4:21] we will make it

[4:22] to do to

[4:23] snowfall?

[4:24] Yes. Good. Uh, okay.

[4:27] I think we have some

[4:28] question to the city

[4:29] regarding roads or FEMA? Therefore

[4:35] , this year

[4:36] we are finishing

[4:36] farm construction

[4:37] Daniel at Old Brook, a

[4:38] next year we will do

[4:39] in French and

[4:40] bulldog farms

[4:41] . Good. Uh,

[4:44] and I'll just add, uh,

[4:46] as a continuation of, uh

[4:47] , the last

[4:48] council meeting

[4:49] directors when we

[4:50] talked about, uh

[4:51] invoices and

[4:52] engineer's drawing-

[4:54] consultant from Novaya

[4:55] England. Um, Zara and I,

[5:01] Eric and Liam

[5:02] met today

[5:03] during the day, so that

[5:09] to review, uh,

[5:10] invoices and

[5:11] drawings, and we

[5:12] determined what was

[5:13] four drawings that

[5:15] were acceptable, uh,

[5:16] for which they received

[5:17] permission, uh, to

[5:18] work done. Um,

[5:25] so I replied, uh,

[5:26] Nick from New England Consulting

[5:27] Engineer and sent him

[5:29] four drawings

[5:30] along with the bills-

[5:31] invoices that we

[5:33] sent first. AND

[5:37] I said that, uh, we

[5:39] are willing to pay these

[5:40] four bills-

[5:41] invoices, and whether he

[5:42] will recycle, that is, these

[5:43] four, uh, drawings

[5:45] , and will he recycle

[5:46] invoices to reflect intelligently

[5:49] price for four

[5:50] drawing? Um, so,

[5:51] I hope we will receive from him

[5:53] the answer, and we

[5:54] Let's just do it.

[5:57] and we will move on.

[5:59] Um, so we'll see. Yes.

[6:01] For context,

[6:02] the invoice was

[6:03] on the number

[6:04] similar drawings?

[6:05] Well, it was, uh, so in

[6:07] invoices

[6:10] nothing really

[6:11] it was said. There

[6:12] it was simply written

[6:13] "hidden".

[6:14] How much product

[6:15] they sent us and

[6:16] what is the cost

[6:17] product, we say,

[6:18] what we really are

[6:19] do we benefit? Ahem,

[6:21] it's a little more complicated,

[6:22] because he first

[6:23] sent us two

[6:24] accounts in which

[6:25] were actually

[6:26] specified

[6:26] culverts.

[6:28] Yes.

[6:28] No, no numbers or

[6:29] something like that. 44,900

[6:31] , and then the second

[6:32] account, where also

[6:33] it was stated

[6:34] culverts

[6:36] for 9,000. I asked them

[6:37] give a breakdown. IN

[6:39] the breakdown was

[6:40] generally something on

[6:41] like 107,000, but there were percentages

[6:43] completed work. So

[6:47] it was not for

[6:47] hidden amount, and

[6:49] according to the positions that

[6:50] would happen if there was

[6:51] contract used

[6:52] . And since

[6:54] there was no contract, and

[6:55] some of the things that are here,

[6:56] actually weren't

[6:58] completed.

[6:59] Ahem,

[6:59] but let's say this, um, I think that's not quite it.

[7:02] yes, I didn't put that

[7:04] question to the best

[7:05] in a way. For example,

[7:06] they gave us, apparently,

[7:08] 10 projects, 20

[7:09] projects? If there is, then

[7:11] they gave us six.

[7:13] So, if we divide

[7:14] total volume

[7:15] work for six, and they say we pay

[7:18] for four out of six, or

[7:19] it is more difficult,

[7:21] because they build us,

[7:21] as you can see in

[7:22] this list, there are a bunch

[7:23] things for which they

[7:24] build us, and which

[7:25] they never did

[7:26] , as in

[7:26] pre-construction

[7:27] meetings.

[7:28] Of course. Of course.

[7:29] Um, and so on, and

[7:30] designing

[7:31] hidden rooms

[7:32] , which were not, they already are

[7:33] were designed

[7:34] by us.

[7:35] Good. I would just

[7:37] asked if they didn't

[7:38] perceive

[7:39] offer from

[7:40] outstretched

[7:41] hugs, rainbows

[7:42] and the sun, what are we talking about

[7:43] Rob was informed. I

[7:45] assured. But, uh, and

[7:46] I wrote to him in

[7:47] copies of electronic

[7:48] letter. I wrote to him.

[7:49] in a copy of the electronic

[7:51] a letter to all of us and to him.

[7:52] So you guys,

[7:53] copy this from

[7:54] Stacey.

[7:54] Yes. And I hope so. I really hope so.

[7:56] based on my

[7:57] conversations with him. I hope they will come up with something

[8:00] reasonable, why are we will be ready

[8:01] pay. And I said

[8:02] in an email,

[8:03] that we will consider it

[8:04] account on our

[8:05] next meeting.

[8:06] So we can, er, we won't just pay

[8:08] its based on the new

[8:10] account. We also

[8:11] we will consider

[8:11] bill. So, um,

[8:14] to be updated

[8:15] regarding this. Hmm, something

[8:18] yet? There are other questions.

[8:21] of...

[8:22] No. And I am happy

[8:23] I'll figure it out for you.

[8:24] more details offline,

[8:25] if you want.

[8:25] Yes, of course.

[8:27] Sorry. I am not

[8:28] reviewed my

[8:28] emails for

[8:29] the last few days.

[8:30] No. And I just sent

[8:31] it's literally like this:

[8:32] Yes, we just

[8:33] gathered for this.

[8:34] Good.

[8:35] So, um, we

[8:36] a little ahead

[8:37] schedule, but we are here

[8:38] equipment required.

[8:40] Hmm, gentlemen, isn't it?

[8:41] would you like

[8:42] share with us?

[8:46] Good. So, um,

[8:47] total number

[8:48] challenges this year

[8:50] is 68. Um, we have

[8:51] there were only three calls

[8:53] during this period. AT.

[8:54] Hmm, day off

[8:55] mutual aid was

[8:56] zero. Incoming

[8:57] mutual aid was

[8:58] zero. Our

[8:59] maximum

[8:59] number of responses

[9:00] There were four members.

[9:01] Our minimum, um,

[9:03] unfortunately, I got it mixed up

[9:04] their. Sorry. Our

[9:06] The maximum was, um,

[9:07] four. Our

[9:08] was minimal

[9:08] zero, and in

[9:09] average two. Ahem,

[9:10] one engine went out

[9:11] okay once. Engine

[9:13] the sixth one broke down

[9:14] zero times. Ahem,

[9:14] One tanker left.

[9:15] out of order zero times.

[9:16] Rescue machine

[9:17] zero is out of order

[9:18] times. Truck 14

[9:19] zero is out of order

[9:20] times. And we have

[9:21] four challenges

[9:21] personal

[9:22] transport. Uh, on

[9:23] number 820 with us

[9:24] worked

[9:25] alarm on

[9:26] route 2. At 8:23 we

[9:27] worked

[9:28] alarm on

[9:29] North Bear Road

[9:30] Swamp Road, and on 98th, e-

[9:31] Well, we had a good trip.

[9:33] - a traffic accident

[9:34] on route 2, uh, but

[9:35] the call was canceled,

[9:36] because of the actual

[9:38] There was no accident. Uh, in

[9:39] there were nine of us

[9:40] emergency calls

[9:41] departments, eight of

[9:42] which were only

[9:42] medical, and this

[9:43] we have passed the month

[9:44] updating

[9:45] briefing with

[9:46] fire hydrant.

[9:48] Perfectly. Uh, Sam and

[9:50] Brendan, you're here.

[9:51] to get acquainted with

[9:52] Liam, our new

[9:53] urban

[9:53] administrator?

[9:54] No.

[9:55] Good. Greetings. Greetings.

[9:56] So, uh, uh, that is

[9:58] Sam and Brendan

[9:58] working in our

[10:00] voluntary

[10:00] fire department, and, eh

[10:02] -eh, maybe you will someday

[10:03] visit the fire station

[10:04] part. Perhaps,

[10:05] any of you guys,

[10:07] I don't know if he wants to.

[10:07] guide him

[10:08] a tour or something

[10:09] similar.

[10:10] Yes. Yes.

[10:11] Uh, and just

[10:12] to introduce him to

[10:13] the world of firefighting

[10:15] . And maybe he is too

[10:16] wants to become

[10:16] voluntary

[10:17] firefighter. Liam,

[10:20] I won't be with you for now.

[10:21] to throw this.

[10:22] Good. Hmm, thank you,

[10:25] guys. Hmm, does anyone have one?

[10:28] question to

[10:29] fire department?

[10:32] Thank you. Thank you.

[10:34] I appreciate it. Um, we

[10:35] just moving

[10:37] further. Um, Mark again

[10:38] no.

[10:39] Matt will take over

[10:40] management.

[10:40] Oh, Matt will take over.

[10:42] management. Good. Ahem,

[10:44] he was going

[10:44] join or something

[10:45] like this? We shouldn't

[10:47] wait. Good. Therefore,

[10:48] hm, you have something for us

[10:49] sent, right?

[10:50] It's right here.

[10:51] I can do it. Yes

[10:53] . So

[10:53] I suggest to you,

[10:54] Guys, put

[10:55] question. We have

[10:56] four points that we

[10:57] would like to discuss with

[10:58] you. What I am

[10:59] sent, maybe

[10:59] one of the points on

[11:00] which we want

[11:01] concentrate, maybe

[11:02] and no. But

[11:02] good,

[11:03] from the point of view of what

[11:04] we hoped

[11:05] to discuss,

[11:05] let me

[11:06] outline four

[11:07] points.

[11:08] One of them is a sheet,

[11:09] which I was talking about, the capital plan,

[11:11] some big expenses,

[11:13] what do we have for the next

[11:14] 15 years. You know, we have

[11:15] there is enough ahead

[11:16] big bill. But

[11:18] apart from this,

[11:19] maybe we should

[11:20] start discussing,

[11:21] seems to be the past

[11:22] previous meeting

[11:23] we talked about whether

[11:24] should budget

[11:25] committee to take a bigger one

[11:26] participation in the process

[11:27] budgeting,

[11:28] to hold seminars

[11:29] and meetings with

[11:30] departments,

[11:31] considering that we already

[11:32] early

[11:33] budget season.

[11:35] If that's what he wants

[11:36] from us, the electoral council,

[11:37] we will need this

[11:38] to know and start

[11:39] act. Hmm, so I wanted to

[11:40] would start with further

[11:41] conversations, and then,

[11:42] after we are

[11:43] this will clarify, we can do more

[11:45] to talk about

[11:45] interesting topics,

[11:46] related to capital

[11:47] .

[11:47] Good. So now you

[11:48] would like us to

[11:49] spent it

[11:50] discussion? I would

[11:51] said "yes".

[11:52] Yes. That is, you ask if it is possible

[11:55] budget committee

[11:56] to participate more in

[12:02] working with

[12:03] departments to

[12:04] present budgets

[12:05] or even

[12:06] prepare them for

[12:07] press presentations. AND

[12:11] just as historical

[12:12] Wait a minute, Liam.

[12:13] starting in October,

[12:14] we invite us

[12:16] to have such a schedule

[12:17] meetings of our

[12:18] electoral council. So,

[12:20] like, okay, we

[12:21] let's meet this

[12:22] Tuesday with the fire department

[12:24] service and, uh,

[12:25] committee on

[12:26] rest, right? AND

[12:28] they will come, they

[12:29] will be a point

[12:30] agenda for

[12:31] meeting of our

[12:32] elected council, and they

[12:33] present to us

[12:34] your budget, and it's not

[12:36] when we, you know, him

[12:37] Are we confirming something?

[12:38] like this. We just

[12:39] we listen and say: "

[12:40] Okay, that sounds...

[12:41] you know, okay", or in

[12:43] we may arise

[12:44] question. But then

[12:45] this money they gave us

[12:47] they say how they

[12:48] want to spend on

[12:49] articles, then

[12:50] are invested in

[12:50] bigger, larger

[12:51] city budget. Um, so what?

[12:55] so budget

[12:56] committee, and then,

[12:57] at the end, after

[12:58] the way we have it,

[12:59] budget committee

[13:00] looks at these numbers and

[13:02] , uh, looking at things

[13:03] and finds out where we are

[13:04] we can reduce, and

[13:05] where we can add,

[13:07] or what we need

[13:08] to do with our

[13:09] budget. So they

[13:11] asking if they can

[13:12] they be more

[13:13] involved in this

[13:14] process? Um, I would too.

[13:17] said, of course,

[13:18] you know, I think that's

[13:19] it would be useful,

[13:23] and how do you imagine it?

[13:24] For example, whether

[13:25] Do you imagine that you

[13:26] meet them

[13:28] separately?

[13:28] Yes, I think we offer and what we

[13:30] discussed, this is what shall we start

[13:31] invite

[13:32] department heads

[13:33] to the meeting

[13:34] budget committee.

[13:35] We can

[13:35] plan more

[13:36] budget meetings

[13:37] committee so that we

[13:38] could catch them

[13:38] to spend earlier. We

[13:39] also probably

[13:40] we will spend more

[13:41] seminars on

[13:42] the coverage we

[13:43] let's discuss so that we

[13:44] could spend some

[13:46] the conversations we had

[13:47] this year from certain

[13:48] topics as early as possible.

[13:50] Good,

[13:51] perfectly.

[13:55] And then, uh, what's yours?

[13:56] vision, uh, meetings

[13:58] elected council and our

[13:59] past, uh, role in

[14:00] listening to these

[14:02] committees and

[14:03] meetings with

[14:03] committees? I think

[14:07] that the elected members of the council,

[14:08] obviously,

[14:09] are invited to any

[14:10] what sessions, what we are conducting. We must

[14:12] provide updated

[14:13] information, I think,

[14:14] after each session,

[14:15] which we then

[14:16] regular

[14:17] we will send you in writing. You

[14:19] we don't need to

[14:20] performed, but we will provide it.

[14:22] Good. And then

[14:25] budget committee,

[14:26] probably,

[14:27] present to us

[14:32] actual budget,

[14:33] which one will we sit down next?

[14:34] and consider how

[14:35] elected council. Yes, I am.

[14:36] I think we will try.

[14:37] do it as much as possible

[14:38] faster, but partly

[14:39] this will be a conversation with

[14:40] all leaders

[14:41] departments and

[14:42] as soon as possible this

[14:43] let's find out whether

[14:44] wrong? This is probably

[14:45] will be earlier than in

[14:46] January. Yes, because

[14:47] publishing and

[14:49] all that.

[14:49] Yes, because the book

[14:50] it turns out.

[14:51] Yes. And we need,

[14:53] so that she gets in

[14:54] to the printing house to

[14:56] end of January. Yes.

[14:58] Good. Um,

[15:00] I also think that we

[15:01] let's meet with

[15:02] election commissions,

[15:03] if they have any.

[15:06] Um, I don't know if Liam

[15:07] will bring this up for consideration.

[15:10] He will try to be

[15:11] present at all

[15:12] budget meetings

[15:14] , but, uh, do you have

[15:15] any plans for that?

[15:16] what would you like

[15:17] see in the budget? Or

[15:20] Do we want this? Or

[15:21] Do we want that? What are you

[15:23] eagerly

[15:24] waiting for something

[15:25] similar. However, if

[15:27] you change the way,

[15:28] what will we be

[15:29] to assign personnel

[15:30] ,

[15:31] that was the main thing

[15:32] a matter of the past

[15:33] the year when it was

[15:34] added at the end. So,

[15:36] Okay, I predict,

[15:37] that this will also be

[15:38] meeting with the election commission

[15:40] by commission. They had

[15:41] something is okay

[15:42] daytime, about what

[15:43] We don't know.

[15:45] Good. List of everything,

[15:46] what do we need,

[15:47] for example, a bridge

[15:48] Woodrow, what are we doing?

[15:49] maybe we can

[15:50] find a grant, but what,

[15:51] if not?

[15:52] Good. So, these are the ones

[15:53] things that

[15:53] will be useful

[15:54] to the budget committee.

[15:57] So I'm wondering if there is

[15:58] committee on

[15:59] good group of roads

[16:00] for a meeting with

[16:01] budget committee?

[16:02] Yes, I think we should.

[16:03] at least it is necessary

[16:04] to invite. Hey, you have

[16:06] there is an answer to this

[16:07] question? I think that

[16:08] if the committee on

[16:09] The road answered "yes",

[16:10] That's okay.

[16:10] I mean, this is

[16:11] main event, who

[16:13] We will know about all this. Em

[16:14] , I don't know if it has

[16:15] to be a matter for the committee

[16:16] on road issues, but,

[16:17] of course, Eric has

[16:18] sit down with the budget

[16:19] committee, and I will...and

[16:20] I'll go with Eric as

[16:21] chairman of the committee on

[16:22] road issues,

[16:23] Yes? Because another thing,

[16:25] about which we also

[16:26] need to talk,

[16:27] It almost sounds like this,

[16:28] like it's Liam or Liam,

[16:29] and someone from the council

[16:30] directors will come

[16:31] especially for the evening

[16:33] council meeting

[16:33] directors. Yes.

[16:35] Because we need

[16:36] will talk about

[16:37] circle and

[16:38] absolutely everything like that.

[16:40] Yes. I don't think we can take all your

[16:42] work, but we want

[16:42] take as much as possible

[16:43] previous work.

[16:44] Of course.

[16:45] Yes. Please,

[16:48] if you could just

[16:50] give us five things,

[16:51] and we could.

[16:54] Um, if you need

[16:55] suggestion, I would make

[16:56] a proposal that

[16:57] so that the budget

[16:58] the committee expanded

[16:59] my, uh, sphere

[17:00] activities to

[17:01] embrace it.

[17:01] Yes, that sounds right.

[17:02] fun.

[17:03] Of course.

[17:03] Indeed, I think that

[17:04] we just...

[17:05] Yes, I don't think we should.

[17:05] need...I don't think so

[17:06] what do we need

[17:07] vote on this

[17:07] reason. I think

[17:08] we didn't want the council

[17:09] state

[17:09] management shouted

[17:10] on us.

[17:10] Yes. Like you

[17:11] Are you doing? This was ours.

[17:12] work. You took this.

[17:13] with us.

[17:13] What do you think, guys?

[17:15] with this.

[17:15] Um, yes, I agree. IN

[17:17] I had a question.

[17:18] regarding the survey, which

[17:19] is that okay with you

[17:20] daytime.

[17:21] Yes.

[17:21] Hmm, so what are your plans?

[17:23] on this?

[17:24] Good. So, if

[17:25] you can go back to

[17:25] that I...it seems,

[17:26] I sent...I

[17:27] sent

[17:27] email

[17:28] today, and probably

[17:29] no one had time

[17:30] look at this, but

[17:31] each of you must

[17:32] have it under your back

[17:33] this

[17:33] thing.

[17:33] Yes. Yes. This

[17:34] double-sided sheet.

[17:36] So that everyone is on

[17:37] one wave.

[17:40] I don't know how it is.

[17:44] to name.

[17:46] I think I'm out of

[17:47] home. On high

[17:50] levels, during

[17:51] the last two or

[17:52] three meetings

[17:53] budget committee,

[17:54] one of the topics we

[17:56] discussed, was that

[17:57] how we finance

[17:58] large assets and things

[17:59] , which we, we, you know, whether

[18:01] then road

[18:02] trucks, fire trucks

[18:03] cars, um, all kinds

[18:04] assets that are simply

[18:05] need to be done regularly

[18:06] update. What is certain?

[18:09] way emphasized on

[18:10] the first diagram, yes

[18:11] this is what during

[18:13] the next 15 years for us

[18:14] need to spend

[18:15] about 5.9 million

[18:17] on these various assets. Ahem

[18:18] , only the next one

[18:19] year, if we

[18:20] adhered to

[18:21] the graphics we have

[18:22] in our inventory

[18:24] capital assets,

[18:25] which includes the fire department

[18:26] car and some others

[18:27] assets, we need

[18:29] would be to spend 1.44

[18:30] a million dollars, that,

[18:31] uh, now, everyone

[18:32] our funds with us

[18:33] only 340 thousand; ago

[18:35] for this

[18:35] will require considerable

[18:36] number of loans. To

[18:38] things I don't

[18:39] I want to spend now.

[18:40] too much time, that's what

[18:41] that it seems to us not

[18:42] need to repeat

[18:43] , or maybe we don't

[18:44] need to be replaced

[18:45] a fire engine, and this

[18:46] the conversation we had

[18:47] need to lead with

[18:48] fire. So some of

[18:49] those that are marked

[18:50] next year,

[18:51] may not be

[18:52] next year. They

[18:53] may be in three

[18:54] years. They can

[18:55] be any. But

[18:56] let's leave it

[18:57] aside some

[18:58] question. Uh, because there is

[19:00] 5.9 million dollars,

[19:01] which, I am sure,

[19:02] will be spent

[19:03] within the next 15

[19:05] years. This does not include

[19:06] city garage, city

[19:09] town hall or something, about

[19:11] what we don't have

[19:12] exact numbers. It

[19:13] simply assets that

[19:14] there are us, like ours

[19:16] trucks and everything

[19:17] something else that arises. It

[19:19] quite big

[19:20] score. Uh, now,

[19:23] if excluded

[19:23] interest on debts for

[19:25] floods and payments for

[19:26] loans, I think that

[19:27] about six

[19:28] percent of our

[19:29] of the budget will go to

[19:30] interest payments. It

[19:33] True. In context

[19:34] that the Bank

[19:35] Vermont bonds

[19:36] recommends that cities

[19:37] such as, not

[19:38] exceed this amount.

[19:40] And so, now we have

[19:41] question: can we

[19:42] continue as is, and

[19:43] can we

[19:44] continue that

[19:45] will have consequences for

[19:47] percent. And if we

[19:49] Let's turn this around, I

[19:50] made a breakdown,

[19:51] modeled on

[19:52] based on these 15 years

[19:53] down. We can

[19:54] borrow only 4.5

[19:55] a million dollars.

[19:57] In the end we will pay

[19:58] 1.1 million percent

[19:59] . We can borrow

[20:00] 2.9 billion dollars,

[20:01] that is 100 thousand

[20:02] percent. We have

[20:03] several different

[20:04] options for that

[20:05] How much will we start?

[20:06] increase our

[20:07] taxes now, so

[20:08] they went to ours

[20:09] capital funds,

[20:10] so that we either borrow

[20:11] more or less. Uh,

[20:13] and so it seems that this

[20:14] the big question is,

[20:15] will affect tax

[20:17] everyone's obligation

[20:18] a city dweller as

[20:19] next year, yes

[20:20] and after 10 years. Um, we

[20:23] wanted to

[20:23] the discussion was

[20:25] like this: we wanted to

[20:26] you spent

[20:27] survey to get a certain

[20:28] information and

[20:29] understand what they think

[20:31] people about to keep one's own

[20:33] tax expenses

[20:34] as long as possible, for

[20:35] unlike that

[20:36] pay more to

[20:37] avoid paying

[20:38] percent, and so on

[20:40] ...here

[20:40] my short

[20:41] story about

[20:42] conversation. Stacy, I don't

[20:43] I know if I answered.

[20:44] to your question. Ahem,

[20:46] but that was the introduction

[20:47] the word I wanted

[20:48] hear before we

[20:49] moved to

[20:49] poll. Of

[20:50] survey details,

[20:51] the budget committee still

[20:52] undecided about

[20:53] to say: "This is the one

[20:54] survey option,

[20:56] which we want." On

[20:57] our meeting

[20:57] earlier today we

[20:59] discussed that two of

[21:00] we will be united by our

[21:01] thoughts and will move on to

[21:02] of a different form. There are some

[21:03] reviews about what is in

[21:04] ideals we want to have

[21:05] a few basic

[21:06] questions, two or

[21:07] very short chapters,

[21:08] to get as much as possible

[21:09] more reviews, but

[21:11] then probably have

[21:12] some more content that

[21:13] is in some of these

[21:14] questions like

[21:14] additional things, to

[21:15] which people are increasing

[21:16] your knowledge. Because

[21:18] we suspect that

[21:19] there will be letters, different

[21:20] equal percentages, and

[21:21] some expenses for

[21:22] loans that have

[21:23] cities, can be

[21:24] a surprise for

[21:25] news, so you want

[21:26] structure them so that we can get

[21:28] answers to

[21:29] questions that we put, and also

[21:31] to provide more for...this

[21:35] it was a long time, it was

[21:36] many words for me,

[21:38] but it's a certain feeling

[21:39] how budgetary

[21:40] the committee is thinking about this

[21:41] problem

[21:41] capital

[21:42] financing and how

[21:43] receive a contribution from

[21:44] cities. We would like

[21:46] to invite, I think,

[21:47] less, we are interested in

[21:49] feedback on issues

[21:50] survey, but we also want

[21:52] understand what he is thinking

[21:53] election commission about

[21:54] conducting such

[21:55] kind of survey. AND

[21:56] when we talk about

[21:57] survey coverage

[21:58] , this is really important,

[21:59] and getting as much as possible

[22:00] more quantity

[22:01] responses from

[22:02] as much as possible

[22:03] number of different

[22:04] people is very important. THERE ARE-

[22:05] e, mailing list

[22:06] would be ideal. You

[22:07] send this

[22:08] to every voter in

[22:09] city, you get

[22:10] answer, then no

[22:11] there are questions about

[22:12] who can get up to

[22:13] this access.

[22:13] It is obvious that for

[22:14] some people online

[22:15] easier. I think we

[22:17] happy to do it. But

[22:18] if we did this

[22:19] online only, occurs

[22:20] question, how are any of them

[22:21] is leaving. Therefore,

[22:22] if you send this

[22:23] by mail, you need

[22:24] send this

[22:25] in about an hour and a half

[22:26] a month before you

[22:26] do you want them to do this

[22:27] received.

[22:30] And I only have a quick one

[22:31] questions about

[22:32] interest rates. You know what we

[22:35] return interest

[22:37] for the flood of 2023. We

[22:39] already received checks for

[22:40] it's by mail. And the only one

[22:41] the reason why we don't

[22:43] paid for 4810 for 2024

[22:44] year, is that

[22:46] what do we need

[22:47] to repair more roads. So in

[22:51] it has a number, I don't

[22:52] I know how much we

[22:53] took out loans now.

[22:55] But you are talking about

[22:56] future. You are not

[22:58] rule this out, I think, except, perhaps,

[23:00] interest payments

[23:01] for the next year or

[23:02] two where we have "

[23:03] OK".

[23:04] So this month 5.9 is not

[23:05] has nothing in common

[23:07] with "

[23:07] OK". Just wanted to make sure that, on

[23:11] my opinion,

[23:12] the most important thing is that

[23:13] need to be conveyed to

[23:14] people, this is an opportunity

[23:15] to convey interest in

[23:16] short-term

[23:17] stay

[23:18] compared with

[23:19] long-term

[23:20] a larger payout,

[23:21] because, in my opinion,

[23:22] everyone who sees this

[23:23] in front of you, maybe

[23:24] to see this

[23:25] correlation. So for

[23:28] This is huge for me.

[23:29] advantage. We would like

[23:30] reduce our annual

[23:31] budget. How many of us

[23:32] we save in the future, or what

[23:34] is this the cost?

[23:35] I think it's complicated.

[23:36] question. Yes,

[23:37] we know what we will hear

[23:39] from people in the city who

[23:40] , perhaps not planning to live here for a long time, or,

[23:42] maybe they just

[23:43] think that they already

[23:44] paid for all this and

[23:46] don't want to pay for

[23:47] all this in advance.

[23:48] So this is one of the really

[23:49] important reasons why

[23:50] we want to spend

[23:51] survey, is

[23:52] understand whether everyone

[23:53] agree, and whether

[23:54] we really don't

[23:55] need a lot

[23:56] to worry about it,

[23:57] are there more topics for

[23:58] discussion.

[23:59] Well, and I think that now

[24:00] there is also concern

[24:01] regarding interest

[24:02] pond, right?

[24:03] Bond market

[24:04] quite volatile, and

[24:05] then loans, you know,

[24:06] loan rate

[24:07] for banks.

[24:08] We talked about this with

[24:09] many people, and we believe that this

[24:11] conservative, but,

[24:12] probably,

[24:13] conservative estimates

[24:14] , taking into account everything in today's dollars

[24:16] , I think it's great. Yes.

[24:21] I mean that

[24:22] public

[24:23] the publication of this,

[24:24] well, you know, any

[24:26] means, I have

[24:27] mind you, I think that

[24:28] mailing list

[24:29] wonderful only because

[24:31] it involves everyone. It

[24:33] involves everyone

[24:34] much more.

[24:36] The cost in the end

[24:38] is growing, and

[24:39] I think that if we

[24:39] made a postal

[24:40] mailing list, then perhaps

[24:41] we could add

[24:42] more information,

[24:43] for example, about our

[24:44] new addresses

[24:45] email,

[24:46] or about some others

[24:47] the main things we want you to know

[24:48] the wider community, we

[24:49] could just go to them

[24:51] add.

[24:51] And I think if you,

[24:52] guys, open to

[24:53] this, if there are others

[24:54] options

[24:54] use, I think

[24:55] that is worth thinking about

[24:56] which one is correct

[24:57] the way we want

[24:58] begin? We can

[24:59] somehow add

[25:00] poll. But, one

[25:01] of things that I also

[25:02] I would like to avoid this.

[25:03] what I don't know about

[25:04] what others think

[25:05] committees on

[25:05] meetings, gatherings

[25:06] reviews. We are not

[25:07] we want the city

[25:08] sent 20

[25:09] surveys. So,

[25:10] just make sure

[25:11] that there is some kind of serum

[25:12] if we do this,

[25:13] to contact

[25:15] people, make sure

[25:16] that it is connected with everything

[25:17] to others, that I...therefore, I think the question is,

[25:25] which one I would like

[25:25] get an answer,

[25:27] if it's okay,

[25:28] is: Can

[25:29] Special date advice

[25:30] we have an idea about your

[25:31] objection to

[25:32] poll? I think

[25:33] what is our process

[25:34] the thinking was

[25:35] so that two members

[25:36] the councils united

[25:37] around the project. We will hold a meeting

[25:39] budget committee,

[25:39] to say that everyone

[25:40] to members of the budget

[25:41] the committee likes it

[25:42] this project. Then we

[25:43] Let's share it with you.

[25:44] . I think we are a perfect match

[25:46] to the process, and yet you,

[25:47] guys, it seems

[25:48] we agree to

[25:49] open meeting

[25:50] and decide how to do it

[25:51] send out. What

[25:51] related to logistics

[25:53] , I believe that

[25:53] logistics here

[25:54] important. There is a separate

[25:55] question by mail, which I

[25:56] I'll leave it to you guys. Or

[25:57] The city is ready for this.

[25:58] pay from the point

[25:59] from the perspective of the workforce? We can become

[26:01] volunteers. I will do it.

[26:03] everything necessary for this

[26:04] happened. Another question

[26:06] : November 5, if

[26:07] we could, perhaps,

[26:08] should have

[26:09] survey when people

[26:10] they will come, this is another one

[26:12] a platform for

[26:13] so that people know about it,

[26:14] what could be good

[26:15] a goal that can be achieved

[26:16] strive.

[26:17] So, I think that's what scares the cycle? Well,

[26:21] at least for me,

[26:22] one of the common

[26:24] the topics we heard

[26:25] last year, was

[26:26] transparency, right?

[26:27] And this is very common.

[26:28] term, but

[26:29] transparency and how we make these decisions

[26:32] as a group. So for me

[26:34] it's like this: if people or

[26:35] worried, or

[26:36] want to have more

[26:37] information about this,

[26:38] quote, transparency and

[26:40] the direction in which we move, then this

[26:42] Now is your chance. And we can only

[26:44] to impose this on people

[26:45] possibility so much

[26:47] as far as we

[26:48] physically able. And I would

[26:49] said that on this day

[26:50] this moment

[26:51] most comprehensive

[26:52] the way we can do it.

[26:56] So I support everything,

[26:58] What will you guys do?

[26:59] together to make it happen

[27:00] people have the opportunity to

[27:01] make. Yes. Because

[27:05] I think it will be

[27:06] important, and I think that

[27:07] people will hear their

[27:08] thoughts, they will have

[27:10] a small contribution,

[27:11] you know. Yes. Um, I would too.

[27:16] also said that

[27:17] people's attention level

[27:18] extremely low,

[27:20] therefore in this

[27:20] the survey you

[27:22] spent, many words.

[27:26] Yes.

[27:26] And we talked about

[27:27] how to simplify it.

[27:28] So, I think that one

[27:29] from the tricks on which

[27:30] we will focus on

[27:31] reviews that we

[27:32] they said it would be,

[27:33] probably two or three

[27:34] questions, these are: "

[27:35] Learn about

[27:36] survey that we

[27:37] "We ask you," and then,

[27:38] if you are interested

[27:39] respond to

[27:39] additional questions

[27:40] or do you want to read

[27:41] more, there will be something on

[27:42] like a continuation,

[27:43] but it has to be

[27:44] page of two

[27:46] questions.

[27:48] Yes, it is.

[27:50] not an easy topic to

[27:51] do it right,

[27:52] we just know that

[27:53] is happening,

[27:54] for example, how would you

[27:55] summed it up at

[27:56] one page.

[27:58] But I mean that

[27:59] me, and I didn't have

[28:00] possibilities...I even

[28:01] I didn't see this letter.

[28:02] still. But the point is,

[28:05] borrow now,

[28:06] pay later or

[28:07] pay now,

[28:08] borrow less

[28:09] later?

[28:11] I think that when this

[28:12] more than three questions,

[28:14] this is what you think, how

[28:15] the city pays for it

[28:16] now? Just so

[28:18] to understand that, on

[28:19] people's opinion,

[28:20] is happening, and what would

[28:21] you would prefer to have lower

[28:23] payments during

[28:24] a longer period

[28:25] and potentially

[28:26] to spend more than

[28:27] something. Um, but then,

[28:28] if and what happened, then

[28:29] okay, here are a few

[28:30] different ways, like

[28:31] we could actually

[28:32] to do this with

[28:33] actual figures from

[28:34] actual purchases

[28:35] , and you know, do you want

[28:37] Are you doing this now?

[28:37] later. Uh, I think

[28:41] what from the point of view

[28:42] tax accounts,

[28:43] for me it's what we

[28:44] let's try to do this

[28:46] when we get to

[28:47] a specific amount,

[28:48] you know, it's the sum of x times 100

[28:49] 000 or some other

[28:50] the easiest way

[28:52] consideration, you know,

[28:53] when there is another way

[28:54] cost of media housing

[28:56] equals x, media-

[28:57] housing–this is it

[28:57] increase for this

[28:59] factory compared to

[29:00] this factory, and we are in

[29:01] ultimately

[29:02] we spend x on

[29:03] percent, and in

[29:04] the result is

[29:05] something general. Yes, I am.

[29:09] I think we still have

[29:10] a lot is needed

[29:11] to make it so

[29:12] liked the most

[29:13] interested, but this

[29:15] what we are asking.

[29:17] This is what the council

[29:18] directors throughout my life

[29:19] history in the council

[29:20] directors, this is one of

[29:22] those things that we

[29:23] weighed over time,

[29:24] because it is also

[29:25] depends on

[29:26] what interest rates,

[29:27] isn't that right? So, when

[29:28] interest rates for

[29:30] low loans, loan

[29:31] is acceptable for

[29:33] people because you know what you will get

[29:35] fixed rate on x

[29:36] number of years,

[29:37] for example, at the level of 2%.

[29:40] As soon as it starts

[29:42] to grow, to arise

[29:43] dilemma: "Do I want

[29:44] pay this higher

[29:45] interest rate?

[29:50] Or, you know, because

[29:51] we do not invest our

[29:53] money when we take

[29:55] bank account,

[29:57] isn't that right?

[29:57] And this, I think, is completely

[29:59] another conversation we had

[30:00] must lead. Now

[30:01] we have money that

[30:02] stay afloat,

[30:03] and they constitute

[30:04] about 5%or 5%, and we

[30:05] could translate them

[30:06] somewhere and get 3%,

[30:07] so we have to do this

[30:08] to do, forgetting about

[30:10] poll,

[30:10] there are some basic

[30:12] mechanisms.

[30:13] And in general, I think that

[30:14] the whole point of the plan

[30:15] raising capital

[30:16] is to know what will happen next, and

[30:18] then plan like this,

[30:19] so that we can

[30:20] to equalize taxes

[30:21] rates. We don't want to

[30:22] so that taxes increase

[30:23] one year, and

[30:24] the next fell;

[30:25] the presence of a certain

[30:26] amount of money in reserve

[30:27] gives us a choice

[30:28] to borrow money or not.

[30:29] If in

[30:30] We don't have any money.

[30:30] funds, we don't have

[30:32] choice. We are in debt.

[30:33] Yes. And that's why I think that

[30:35] if everything looked like

[30:37] , you know, from 2011 to 2020

[30:38] year, that's not very

[30:40] conversation, right?

[30:41] Good. We borrow,

[30:43] This is normal. Doesn't have

[30:44] value.

[30:45] As for your opinion, Liz,

[30:46] we never had

[30:48] so many extras

[30:49] funds. We didn't have

[30:50] CIP funds that we have five today

[30:53] years ago. I have on

[30:55] mind, we built, we

[30:57] added to them, and we are trying

[30:59] accumulate these funds.

[31:01] I think that's all.

[31:02] goal. So, when we are going to buy

[31:04] a fire engine or

[31:06] road truck,

[31:07] instead of

[31:08] borrow 350,000, you know,

[31:12] we can either

[31:13] to pay for it

[31:14] immediately, or even

[31:15] reduce the amount we borrow, you know, this

[31:18] its purpose.

[31:18] And there are government programs

[31:20] , isn't it? I think that

[31:21] he doesn't remember what it is

[31:22] Secretary of State

[31:23] or something like that. If in

[31:24] you are there, you can

[31:25] to borrow, I think, to

[31:26] 200 thousand; they have

[31:27] zero percent.

[31:28] If we have

[31:29] enough of these funds,

[31:31] then we will have a better

[31:32] position for

[31:32] making purchases from

[31:34] ...that is, it increases

[31:37] opportunities, but for

[31:38] our account...one

[31:41] the moment I wanted

[31:42] would like to point out regarding

[31:43] point of 2011, this is what are we considering

[31:45] the remaining interest

[31:46] pond; never them

[31:47] actually it wasn't, or

[31:48] wrong? So we just

[31:49] we don't want

[31:50] use very

[31:51] low interest rates

[31:52] bets, right?

[31:53] And you made a comment

[31:55] , I just want

[31:56] to make sure that

[31:57] I understand this correctly.

[31:58] mathematics, which, um,

[31:59] for the city budget, 6%-

[32:01] this is a kind of

[32:02] the maximum you

[32:03] must have from your

[32:04] budget that should go

[32:06] for interest payments

[32:07] for bonds,

[32:08] loans

[32:08] in general.

[32:10] Yes. Um, and I can

[32:11] to provide you with accurate

[32:12] the wording of this

[32:13] questions, but there are certain

[32:14] instructions,

[32:14] and we are at it now,

[32:16] although we get...we

[32:17] we know that we are coming back.

[32:18] Yes. I don't know. I am not

[32:20] I know. I don't have

[32:21] an idea of why we still have loans. I think because we have it was necessary, but we will receive soon

[32:26] a million dollars.

[32:27] No, no, but even

[32:28] if not taken into account

[32:29] FEMA matters, I know, in

[32:29] we have loans for

[32:30] trucks that we

[32:31] bought. We have loans

[32:32] that are burning. We have

[32:34] just eat

[32:35] debt service

[32:36] .

[32:36] Yes. You said somewhere,

[32:37] What percentage are we may be in debt,

[32:40] if we just borrow

[32:41] everything that awaits us, or

[32:42] wrong? Isn't it? Yes,

[32:44] it would be above 10%, I think. Well, and then with

[32:48] growth

[32:48] interest rates this

[32:49] the number will be slow

[32:51] or quickly,

[32:52] and I don't think mine

[32:53] main idea

[32:53] is that we don't want to try

[32:56] to fight with

[32:56] financial years

[32:57] around maximization

[32:58] , you know, ours

[32:59] compromise and

[33:00] percent, because in

[33:01] We also have inflation.

[33:02] We want to talk.

[33:03] about things that really

[33:04] we will be hit,

[33:05] but inflation

[33:06] trucks, inflation

[33:07] heavy equipment,

[33:08] simply

[33:08] postponing it

[33:10] per year can cost

[33:11] we have 10%, because the prices

[33:12] growing so fast.

[33:13] Uh, so I think that

[33:14] these are all wonderful things,

[33:15] if we could sit down

[33:16] yes indeed

[33:17] optimize them, but

[33:18] we should have more

[33:19] fundamental

[33:19] the question of whether

[33:20] wrong?

[33:21] Well, I also think that

[33:22] maybe something

[33:23] average, right?

[33:24] It seems like the best thing

[33:25] what's there, you can

[33:26] to do both

[33:27] at the same time and be

[33:28] financially

[33:29] responsible.

[33:30] This could be the case if

[33:32] we returned to

[33:33] that list, we don't have

[33:34] there would be these costs

[33:35] in advance. But if in

[33:37] we have expenses upfront

[33:38] where we are meeting

[33:39] spend, you know, 2

[33:40] millions of dollars

[33:41] during the next

[33:42] three to five years, in

[33:44] there won't be many of us

[33:45] options if we don't

[33:46] Let's begin.

[33:47] Well, we saw

[33:47] result of failure

[33:48] from the chest. Here

[33:50] We are here.

[33:51] And how many do we have in

[33:53] our CIP for, um, for

[33:54] savings? Not

[33:56] How many?

[33:57] 340. It's nothing.

[34:00] We asked...How much?

[34:01] we asked for the past

[34:02] year? It was just

[34:03] about 50? I

[34:05] more than that.

[34:06] Good.

[34:08] Um, okay. Are there any more?

[34:13] something about

[34:14] you want to talk,

[34:15] Matt?

[34:16] I think we all

[34:17] considered. Question

[34:18] regarding your thoughts on

[34:19] surveys? This is something.

[34:22] Yes.

[34:22] How about a timeline?

[34:24] ? What about you guys, of course?

[34:26] , now we are preparing for you

[34:27] a certain forecast. What are you

[34:29] thinking about time

[34:30] framework? I think that in

[34:32] ideal scenario

[34:33] we would appoint our

[34:34] the next budget

[34:35] meeting until October 6th.

[34:37] We would consider some

[34:39] recommendations from the NCA

[34:40] for budget

[34:41] committee. Then we would

[34:43] also identified them to

[34:44] this week. This is what

[34:47] we would like to do,

[34:48] if in

[34:49] Larry has a question.

[34:53] Yes. Matt, where are you?

[34:54] suggest, hmm,

[34:55] publish

[34:56] poll? It's simple.

[34:58] forum on the main page, do we have,

[35:00] as I have noticed in some

[35:01] surveys that we

[35:03] spent with others

[35:04] topics or

[35:04] committees, where,

[35:05] you know, we get

[35:07] on average from 50 to

[35:08] 100 people. Do we have

[35:09] some way

[35:10] promote it more

[35:11] or attract more

[35:12] people to participate?

[35:14] I think the question is

[35:15] how do we get

[35:16] good

[35:17] representative

[35:18] sample? I really wanted to

[35:19] would that the selection

[35:20] the commission said that

[35:21] we can do

[35:21] mailing list, and if there is

[35:22] other information that

[35:23] you want to send,

[35:24] I think we should

[35:25] to do it. I think

[35:26] what if we sent

[35:27] by mail to everyone, and then

[35:28] conducted online

[35:29] informational

[35:29] explanatory

[35:30] work that does nothing

[35:31] costs, it is probably

[35:32] would provide us

[35:33] best coverage

[35:34] .

[35:34] Also regarding October 6, and

[35:36] if you guys

[35:37] you can approve up to 5

[35:38] November, if we

[35:39] could have here

[35:40] hard copies, hmm,

[35:42] when people come

[35:43] vote, we too

[35:44] we have, you know, something

[35:46] this is it, and we ask people

[35:47] to remember about

[35:48] poll. It,

[35:49] probably between mailings

[35:50] by mail and

[35:51] informational

[35:52] explanatory

[35:53] work per day

[35:53] elections, I think it's

[35:55] will give us the best

[35:56] chance to get on

[35:57] Olympics.

[35:57] What is in

[35:58] middle box?

[36:00] It depends. I have on

[36:02] meaning that postal

[36:03] expenses constantly

[36:04] are growing. So, I think that postcards

[36:06] even too much

[36:07] expensive. Well,

[36:12] Yes,

[36:13] I brought,

[36:14] and I don't know if it is

[36:15] preferably, but if you

[36:16] want to lower

[36:16] postage cost, you

[36:17] could have a postcard

[36:18] with information about

[36:19] what are we doing

[36:20] survey, and online

[36:21] -link and say

[36:22] that if you want

[36:23] a paper copy, you can visit

[36:25] city

[36:25] administration.

[36:26] Good.

[36:27] Or asked,

[36:28] Yes? Or

[36:29] call us. IN

[36:31] you may also be QR-

[36:32] code, perhaps for

[36:33] people. I mean,

[36:34] because most

[36:35] people have expensive

[36:36] phones.

[36:37] We talked about it. IN

[36:38] you are also there for

[36:39] large group

[36:40] population that does not

[36:41] uses

[36:42] electronics. They are not

[36:43] know what a QR code is.

[36:45] I know that I always

[36:46] has to explain on

[36:47] exhibition. So,

[36:49] you know, I think we want to be able to cover everyone.

[36:54] Therefore, I think we,

[36:55] maybe you will have to

[36:56] do more

[36:57] one option.

[36:58] I mean, online

[37:00] I really can if

[37:01] everyone is comfortable, I can

[37:02] post online. I can do this.

[37:04] available. I can

[37:05] post this on

[37:06] affiliated website.

[37:08] I will pay 10 dollars.

[37:09] per domain, for example,

[37:10] this is electronic

[37:11] the side that does nothing

[37:12] it won't cost us anything,

[37:14] but to cover enough

[37:15] number of people and

[37:16] to make sure that we cover the correct

[37:19] distribution

[37:19] demographic groups,

[37:20] This is the hardest part, I think.

[37:22] that it is small

[37:22] vulnerable or

[37:23] most affected

[37:25] population group is that

[37:26] , which probably

[37:29] it will be the hardest

[37:30] to convey this, yes, yes,

[37:31] Well,

[37:32] and explain this too, I mean, this is

[37:34] difficult for anyone

[37:36] . Right.

[37:37] Yes.

[37:37] I think the explanation is,

[37:38] which we can

[37:39] to get if

[37:40] we can reach

[37:41] to the people, we will do

[37:41] everything possible to

[37:42] explain this, and I think

[37:43] that there is an opportunity for

[37:44] feedback from

[37:45] about this. Um, we

[37:46] Sam and I will

[37:47] hard

[37:48] to work for something

[37:49] get.

[37:50] And then you are going

[37:52] professionally

[37:52] print them somewhere,

[37:54] these postcards, or this

[37:55] something we can

[37:56] do it now? So I have no idea.

[37:58] We could, that is, yes,

[38:00] we could, this,

[38:01] probably,

[38:01] will cost more.

[38:03] Yes. I don't see us

[38:04] created postcards

[38:05] from here. Yes.

[38:06] Is the city, uh, that is, we send things

[38:08] by mail from the city? So,

[38:09] do we get one

[38:11] of these, uh,

[38:11] non-profit

[38:12] postal services that

[38:13] we pay

[38:14] to the post office

[38:15] ?

[38:15] Our car is not

[38:16] set up for this.

[38:17] You will have to address, uh, you can use

[38:20] postal service, which

[38:21] will do it for you, or

[38:23] something like that. And this

[38:24] maybe

[38:24] the simplest

[38:25] way.

[38:26] So you just

[38:26] send things

[38:27] through our mail

[38:28] service. Yes, that's right.

[38:30] you do this because the whole

[38:31] our mail goes through our little

[38:34] postal counter

[38:35] below, and this...Hers

[38:36] counting, I think

[38:37] , we pay, perhaps,

[38:39] three cents less,

[38:40] than the usual rate,

[38:41] or 5 cents less,

[38:43] than the usual rate,

[38:44] something like that.

[38:45] I would also ask

[38:46] your printing house, is it

[38:47] something that they

[38:48] provide, for example,

[38:50] they would give it something

[38:51] there, and...

[38:52] Yes, we did that.

[38:53] You worked in the mail,

[38:55] Sandy, right? Yes.

[38:56] I think we can...we can

[38:58] come, we can

[38:59] find the cheapest

[39:00] way to do it...

[39:01] important, and we can

[39:02] to give you this rating.

[39:03] I haven't decided yet,

[39:04] I think it's more like...yes,

[39:05] we would like to do

[39:06] mailing list, but

[39:07] we need an assessment,

[39:08] you know, we need

[39:10] cost.

[39:10] I would appreciate it if this

[39:11] will cost

[39:12] at least 1800 with all

[39:14] expenses, postcard

[39:15] and mailing,

[39:18] it would seem

[39:19] intelligent,

[39:19] actually yes, I am

[39:20] I think it will be

[39:22] Less,

[39:22] Well, I'm just saying that.

[39:23] because before I

[39:24] sent by mail to

[39:25] autumn lunch with

[39:26] harvest, and I

[39:27] sent to everyone in the city

[39:28] , and I did it through

[39:30] post office,

[39:31] it was a cheap way

[39:32] , and for this you need

[39:33] there was permission. I have on

[39:34] mind you, it was from

[39:35] hands, it was about 10

[39:37] years ago, and this

[39:38] It cost 1400 dollars.

[39:40] Yes.

[39:40] So, I don't think that's it.

[39:41] will be so,

[39:42] two thousand.

[39:43] A couple of thousand. Yes.

[39:44] I would...I don't think so.

[39:45] there should be much

[39:46] more than two thousand,

[39:47] but

[39:48] Yes. Well, I mean

[39:49] that I am completely for it,

[39:51] because, you know, we want to be

[39:52] maximum

[39:53] transparent. Well, we

[39:56] also planned, and you

[39:57] just talked about

[39:58] this, um, to spend

[39:59] public meetings,

[40:00] you know something like

[40:02] : "Come to our

[40:03] public meeting regarding

[40:04] budget", but something on

[40:05] like: "We will have

[40:06] community forum with

[40:07] cookies, and we

[40:08] let's talk about

[40:09] budget". Kind regards

[40:14] please. We are very happy.

[40:15] to do it. I think

[40:16] what are we planning

[40:17] to hold some

[40:18] seminar like

[40:19] this. I think that

[40:22] the budget committee does not

[40:23] wants to decide how

[40:24] tell people, here

[40:26] where should they come from,

[40:27] here is the place, here is how

[40:28] to provide

[40:29] food, etc.

[40:31] Yes. Not to mention

[40:32] this time of year. Sorry.

[40:34] We have a long way to go.

[40:35] November and December, and

[40:36] then January, when we have to develop

[40:37] budget.

[40:38] No, no. I think that in

[40:39] We will be gone,

[40:41] but

[40:41] I think you want

[40:42] to be a little later,

[40:43] when we will have,

[40:44] for example,

[40:45] preliminary budget.

[40:46] Yes, you have a previous one.

[40:47] planning,

[40:48] and then, and then,

[40:49] their invitation, and that's it

[40:50] then they can

[40:51] discuss this and

[40:52] provide feedback or

[40:53] something like that, and then

[40:54] decisions committee

[40:55] helps to plan

[40:56] west, or

[40:57] wrong?

[40:57] But it's not far,

[40:59] guys.

[41:00] That's why we're here.

[41:01] the following.

[41:02] It's something like

[41:03] what we should

[41:04] to plan backwards, or

[41:05] wrong? For example,

[41:06] when should it be

[41:07] Has the budget been approved?

[41:08] When we, you know,

[41:09] need to be warned

[41:10] about this and all that, and

[41:11] yes, that's why I think that

[41:12] bottleneck now

[41:13] will be what we want

[41:14] will have to sit down with

[41:15] department, or not

[41:16] Yes? So now, when

[41:17] we will be the ones who do it

[41:18] come on, we can do anything

[41:19] plan it, then

[41:20] easier to achieve

[41:20] perfection. I like it.

[41:22] Good,

[41:23] so just hold on

[41:24] let us know when, on

[41:26] in your opinion, you will

[41:27] ready for one, or

[41:28] invite a selection

[41:30] I'm glad to come and

[41:30] to share,

[41:31] for example, oh, us

[41:32] need a cola and everything

[41:33] like this. Um, and then, after-

[41:35] second, when will you be

[41:36] ready, come to

[41:38] us and present that,

[41:39] What do you have?

[41:40] us too

[41:40] will be useful

[41:41] financial reports. Um,

[41:44] we will have to contact you,

[41:46] Guys, you are not

[41:47] you will receive from

[41:48] We have news. I think

[41:50] that there will be a lot of things, and

[41:52] this

[41:52] idea for you too.

[41:54] So earlier Cheryl

[41:54] just small

[41:55] spreadsheet

[41:56] and entered the numbers. You,

[41:57] Guys, are you going to do this?

[41:59] do?

[42:00] I'll talk to Cheryl,

[42:01] but yes. I think that

[42:02] she will be too

[42:03] satisfied. I think

[42:04] that's right.

[42:05] Okay, great. Good.

[42:07] Still have questions? Larry, in

[42:08] Do you have any more questions? No.

[42:10] Good. There are still questions.

[42:12] from someone? Good. What

[42:14] Well, thank you very much. It was

[42:15] very useful.

[42:16] And thank you, guys,

[42:17] for coming out,

[42:18] you know, supported

[42:19] us in this way. I think it will be very

[42:22] useful.

[42:23] Um, okay. Um,

[42:26] now we are back.

[42:28] You can stay,

[42:29] while we talk

[42:30] about the price of improvement

[42:32] premises.

[42:33] Wait, we wanted to

[42:35] know, Liam, and I

[42:36] wanted to know what

[42:37] means "T".

[42:38] Improvement Team

[42:39] premises.

[42:40] So the team from

[42:40] pull-ups, about which

[42:42] Zara told me

[42:42] this morning, I didn't

[42:43] remembered.

[42:44] Good.

[42:45] From suitability. Good.

[42:48] So, who is this...Oh, this, um,

[42:50] we...we

[42:52] got the name you

[42:54] came up with.

[42:54] I will ask. Good,

[42:58] You can take it.

[42:59] Okay, we have Dave here.

[43:00] Makita. He is old.

[43:04] city volunteer. Liam,

[43:06] and he enters

[43:07] committee on

[43:08] suitability, and he

[43:09] going a little

[43:10] tell us about it

[43:11] . He is the chairman of the committee.

[43:12] from suitability.

[43:14] Thank you. I will ask.

[43:15] Erica help me.

[43:17] Before we move on

[43:18] to the details, I want

[43:19] to talk about

[43:20] recommendations that we

[43:21] developed for themselves, and

[43:22] about how we approach

[43:23] projects and

[43:24] we determine

[43:24] priorities. Security

[43:25] life activities are

[43:26] number one. Number two-

[43:28] these are problems with norms

[43:29] . Building damage or

[43:32] her absence.

[43:35] Equipment failure

[43:36] or lack thereof.

[43:38] So unique

[43:39] opportunity to decide

[43:40] problems for

[43:41] at an attractive price.

[43:43] Nevertheless, we are a little

[43:44] the last ones had fun

[43:45] several months. We

[43:49] learned that

[43:50] expansion

[43:51] swampy

[43:51] garage areas already

[43:53] provided for by the project

[43:54] . So, the entire territory,

[43:59] which we are considering,

[44:00] no longer open

[44:03] for expansion.

[44:04] Eric tomorrow

[44:05] meets with

[44:06] state representatives

[44:08] about what we can do

[44:10] legally. One of

[44:12] questions that I

[44:13] I'm going to her.

[44:13] to put, that's what

[44:14] because our

[44:15] the building is located

[44:16] in the buffer zone,

[44:20] how much we care

[44:21] about conservation

[44:22] buildings there and

[44:22] use...This

[44:26] one of the questions, one of the

[44:27] many questions that

[44:28] I can have it.

[44:32] Just hypothetically,

[44:33] can you demolish

[44:34] building and

[44:35] build a new one on

[44:36] in the same place? I am not like that.

[44:38] I think because

[44:39] part of the building

[44:40] is in

[44:41] buffer zone, therefore

[44:42] right.

[44:44] Plus it's unnecessary,

[44:45] because the building is in

[44:46] order. We need

[44:48] more space for

[44:49] more quantity

[44:49] vehicles

[44:51] .

[44:51] Yes.

[44:52] So now we are working

[44:53] above the plan

[44:54] consider the existing

[44:55] a building that we really like

[44:56] examined in detail,

[44:57] some engineers

[44:58] inspect it to

[44:59] get a price for

[45:00] repair and

[45:01] modernization

[45:02] existing garage, so that

[45:03] to make it

[45:04] safe and well

[45:05] ventilated.

[45:07] Solve problems with

[45:08] norms, and then

[45:09] create a working

[45:10] environment that

[45:11] much better for

[45:12] employees. They are not

[45:13] must work in that environment, in

[45:15] who they work for

[45:16] now. It's simple.

[45:17] dangerously. It

[45:18] need to be decided.

[45:19] So we quickly

[45:20] we continue working

[45:21] over this. Our plan

[45:22] is to

[45:23] Eric made a list,

[45:27] some prices, got

[45:28] some requests

[45:29] suggestions and time to

[45:30] you included this in,

[45:31] sorry, voting

[45:33] city council for

[45:36] improvement of the existing

[45:38] garage.

[45:40] Do we need

[45:41] to do it on city roads

[45:42] meeting, can we

[45:43] Is it advisable to do this?

[45:44] I think that this

[45:44] depends on the price.

[45:46] Yes,

[45:46] it depends on

[45:47] money, or

[45:48] wrong? I think that

[45:49] the minimum that we need to do this

[45:51] to resolve the issue with

[45:53] doors and gaping

[45:54] the holes that are there.

[45:56] Seal everything,

[45:57] so that we don't lose

[45:58] warm.

[45:59] I have to believe in

[46:00] head that we

[46:01] exceeded this threshold.

[46:04] What is the threshold?

[46:05] Er, 25,000

[46:09] not in order to go to the city.

[46:11] No, that would just be

[46:12] for the chosen ones.

[46:13] Yes.

[46:14] This is only for

[46:15] of what the city has

[46:16] approximately 200. You

[46:17] remember that in our

[46:18] procurement policy,

[46:19] what, um,

[46:20] Oh, what does it require?

[46:21] conducting auctions?

[46:22] Yes.

[46:22] What? No. What does it require?

[46:25] special meeting

[46:26] for the whole city, so that,

[46:27] um...

[46:30] Well, I don't know. I don't think so.

[46:31] , that...

[46:32] I thought it was 30,000. This is

[46:36] to approve the choice.

[46:38] Yes. for approval

[46:39] choice

[46:46] from this.

[46:46] But money can be

[46:48] taken from the construction site

[46:49] fund. I mean,

[46:50] What do you take away from

[46:52] any money that

[46:53] postpone for

[46:54] future building. But

[46:56] we need

[46:57] do this first

[46:58] building safe.

[46:59] Yes.

[47:00] Before we begin

[47:01] construction of a new

[47:02] buildings. So without any

[47:04] what approval,

[47:05] except yours, on

[47:06] spending these

[47:07] money, they can

[47:08] to get out of control,

[47:11] and that's it, and that's it,

[47:14] How much is in this fund?

[47:15] ? Um,

[47:16] I'm thinking about it.

[47:18] even if it's simple

[47:19] about...

[47:21] Um, I have

[47:23] numbers.

[47:26] Well, she's considering it.

[47:28] Some of you have already heard

[47:29] about the project we are working on

[47:30] we want to attack

[47:30] existing garage, but I think Eric should

[47:32] to spend time to

[47:33] he you because of this

[47:34] spent. So, the main

[47:35] things we want

[47:37] solve.

[47:37] Yes. Therefore,

[47:39] priority will be

[47:40] door and entrance, and

[47:41] make sure that they

[47:42] hermetic. Past

[47:46] Larry came every week.

[47:47] with several members

[47:48] energy

[47:49] committee and spoke

[47:50] about adding

[47:51] additional insulation

[47:52] to the walls, not to the ceiling, but

[47:53] to the walls. And, perhaps,

[47:57] about installation

[47:58] fan, which would

[48:04] cleaned the air, um, and,

[48:06] in fact, made it easier

[48:07] heating so that we don't

[48:08] spent so much

[48:09] energy. Currently we can't anymore

[48:14] to insulate the ceiling

[48:15] through structural

[48:16] problems. But I think

[48:20] that the very shell of the walls

[48:21] could be strengthened

[48:22] so that we don't waste

[48:24] so much energy.

[48:26] Yes. But we,

[48:27] considering that

[48:29] we spend,

[48:29] we save a lot

[48:31] heat that just blows

[48:32] from holes in the building.

[48:33] Yes. And regardless of what will happen to

[48:36] this building, if

[48:37] we will build a new one, this

[48:39] anyway three years from

[48:40] too much.

[48:40] Yes.

[48:41] So until then something

[48:43] It has to happen. And, on my

[48:45] view, in any

[48:46] In this case, this area

[48:47] now considered

[48:48] outside our borders

[48:49] opportunities to build

[48:50] further. So this building

[48:52] has value for us,

[48:53] even with a new one

[48:54] building on another

[48:55] place. This is true because if

[48:56] we need

[48:57] remote building,

[48:58] you know, remote

[48:59] place,

[48:59] additional storage.

[49:01] Yes. I mean,

[49:02] for me, regardless

[49:02] from the circumstances,

[49:03] real estate has

[49:04] serious value. We own buildings.

[49:06] I am 100%.

[49:08] And that also helped.

[49:09] we would reduce the size

[49:10] any new

[49:11] buildings, or

[49:12] wrong? So we don't

[49:13] need to build

[49:13] some massive

[49:14] design so that everything

[49:15] to accommodate. We can

[49:16] build small, but

[49:17] then finish building. IN

[49:18] there may be us

[49:19] heated storage,

[49:20] which you will not be

[49:20] to keep things to oneself

[49:21] , which are not

[49:22] use every day

[49:23] . IN

[49:23] one of the other areas

[49:24] I want to decide

[49:24] electricity issue.

[49:25] Yes,

[49:26] we have a very hard time for

[49:27] them now it

[49:27] use.

[49:28] Constantly disappearing

[49:29] documents.

[49:30] Yes, this indicates

[49:31] problems.

[49:32] Some problems.

[49:34] So what is this we have?

[49:35] figure? Um, as of

[49:38] the end of December was 36

[49:39] 000, and then we, uh,

[49:41] contributed 5,000 to the budget

[49:43] CIP for the current year.

[49:45] Probably not yet. And I don't

[49:48] I know, is any of this

[49:50] it came out from that time,

[49:52] but this, you know,

[49:53] the last digit I

[49:54] had, was for December

[49:55] 40-41, maybe. Yes. Unless

[49:58] that something happened

[49:58] spent

[49:59] in advance. So

[50:00] everything would just go away

[50:01] regular budget

[50:03] on the highway.

[50:03] Yes. Nothing worked out.

[50:05] from the budget to

[50:05] construction, or

[50:06] wrong?

[50:09] I want to take a chance.

[50:10] to guess how much

[50:12] this could cost us

[50:13] . Engineers not yet.

[50:14] A lot will depend

[50:15] from how much

[50:16] construction work

[50:17] necessary. This is expensive.

[50:22] So we plan to

[50:24] mid-December.

[50:25] Oh, I hope so.

[50:26] before, or

[50:27] wrong? So the final

[50:28] midterm

[50:29] December, if you

[50:29] do you want this

[50:30] taken to the city

[50:31] meeting. Right.

[50:32] I, again, I don't

[50:33] I think we should

[50:34] need to take this out

[50:35] at the town meeting. I think that's it.

[50:39] just at your discretion. I think it's simple.

[50:41] one of those things that

[50:42] are included in our

[50:43] powers regarding

[50:44] expenses. We may

[50:45] will have to get

[50:46] competitive

[50:47] offers through

[50:48] amount. If she

[50:48] exceeds 30,000, we have

[50:50] requirement to participate in

[50:51] tender. Yes. But is

[50:52] We ask the voters

[50:54] approve of this, it's like this

[50:55] or not. You know, if we

[50:58] let's post this as ours

[50:59] bulletin if we

[51:00] let's put this on

[51:01] floor plan, uh,

[51:02] but remember, uh, and

[51:04] I don't remember why.

[51:05] we had to do this

[51:06] make. We had to put an excavator

[51:09] . The city had to approve

[51:11] excavator.

[51:17] This is a big loan.

[51:18] And this is not...We are not

[51:19] we are talking about such

[51:20] big expenses. No. AT,

[51:21] no, no, no.

[51:23] Oh, okay.

[51:23] Or

[51:24] are not considered

[51:25] improvement of urban

[51:26] garage capital

[51:27] expenses?

[51:28] No, they are considered.

[51:30] But the question here is

[51:31] so, will it be, I think it will be

[51:33] at least over 75

[51:35] thousands. Maybe 200. That's

[51:36] loan exhibition or

[51:38] something like that. I think this is

[51:41] loan because we

[51:42] borrowed this 250,000 or

[51:44] How many were there?

[51:45] And we spent money

[51:47] to separate us.

[51:48] Oh, that's right. So, these

[51:50] The money has arrived. I am not

[51:51] I remember how much it is.

[51:52] was, but

[51:53] 35,000.

[51:54] So we probably just

[51:56] close

[51:56] 35,000.

[51:59] So, we need

[52:00] determine the amount to do as much as possible

[52:02] more work on this

[52:03] scale.

[52:05] 35,000 if you don't

[52:06] you will find money

[52:07] elsewhere, but this is what it is

[52:09] in this fund.

[52:10] Or, should we

[52:11] get the price

[52:12] execution of all this

[52:13] work? Are we too?

[52:16] include in your

[52:17] budget, for example,

[52:18] repair work that

[52:19] exceed normal

[52:20] to add, to

[52:21] mitigate this?

[52:22] will be necessary...Yes

[52:23] , it will be in the budget

[52:24] next year.

[52:25] In the budget of the next

[52:27] year, right? So you

[52:28] are you trying to do this?

[52:29] in the current year,

[52:31] certainly, that much,

[52:32] as much as we can

[52:33] make. Interesting.

[52:34] So, in essence, we take from

[52:35] our construction

[52:37] fund,

[52:37] and then from what

[52:38] anything else,

[52:39] or maybe we have

[52:40] there are still some

[52:41] freedom of action or not

[52:42] freedom of action, but, hmm,

[52:44] reserve fund, in case there is

[52:47] cheaper to do

[52:48] as many jobs as possible

[52:49] and just put them aside

[52:50] at different stages.

[52:52] We have open

[52:53] things, and it's time

[52:54] to resolve the issue

[52:55] electricians, as well as

[52:56] wall structures.

[52:57] That was the question I asked.

[52:58] Dave about

[52:59] electricians. Did you want

[53:01] would we have a full update?

[53:02] I think, no, I don't think so.

[53:03] what we need

[53:04] full update. I think we need to

[53:06] for an electrician to come

[53:08] and said, "Okay, this one

[53:09] section needed

[53:10] to recycle".

[53:10] Good. In the shield, maybe

[53:12] , something like that, or us

[53:13] the volume is suitable

[53:14] service. I don't even know.

[53:16] How many amps do we have?

[53:17] for maintenance.

[53:18] Service, I think it's normal. I think that on our

[53:25] far walls from

[53:26] shield needed

[53:27] to recycle the cable-

[53:28] channel.

[53:28] Yes.

[53:30] Leading equipment.

[53:32] Yes.

[53:34] Good.

[53:36] So you can't

[53:37] connect nothing, no

[53:38] charging it. So

[53:42] this renovation at the town hall,

[53:44] in our opinion, it is worth

[53:45] several dozen

[53:46] thousands.

[53:50] Perhaps,

[53:51] even less, maybe

[53:53] and less.

[53:54] I wanted to say that

[53:56] everything is worth it today

[53:57] so expensive, 000. Just

[54:00] tell us what it is

[54:01] wetlands.

[54:02] Yes.

[54:05] I think you

[54:06] exceeded 50. Me too

[54:07] I think so, and that's why I want to worry about whether

[54:10] this will cost

[54:11] more expensive than what we have in

[54:12] our construction

[54:14] fondue, because we have

[54:15] and other things,

[54:16] for example, ours

[54:17] the town hall needs

[54:18] another fund.

[54:20] Oh, right?

[54:20] Yes.

[54:21] Good. I thought that was it.

[54:22] also in construction

[54:23] fondue. This is the town hall.

[54:25] My plan is to

[54:26] in order to collect this

[54:27] list with

[54:28] prices so that you have

[54:29] exact number.

[54:30] Good. And maybe this

[54:31] something that you...Yes. I have

[54:32] I mean, I don't know.

[54:33] And hire an electrician,

[54:34] also give us...In

[54:35] there are many of us

[54:36] electricians in the city.

[54:37] Yes, there is. But we have

[54:38] a few good ones...

[54:39] I'm not asking now.

[54:40] to make a decision, but

[54:41] I just

[54:41] I agree.

[54:42] I inform you that we will work on

[54:44] list,

[54:44] but we are going

[54:45] attack and evaluate

[54:46] cost...

[54:47] Yes. And are we getting warm?

[54:48] Are we fuel oil?

[54:49] Propane.

[54:49] Because mine

[54:51] friend paid 6 dollars

[54:52] per gallon.

[54:52] Yes. For oil.

[54:53] Yes.

[54:54] No, it's propane.

[54:56] Eric, could you

[54:56] committee to give you

[54:57] rough estimate

[54:58] that, on their part

[54:59] opinion, in percentage

[55:00] they can do

[55:02] for improvements,

[55:02] for example, what are they

[55:04] can achieve?

[55:05] He really doesn't

[55:06] called the number. Good.

[55:08] Um, but there were types

[55:09] settings that we

[55:10] could add etc.

[55:14] You know, maybe we

[55:16] could do something

[55:17] from this and with a few

[55:18] volunteers.

[55:20] I believe there is 10%

[55:22] values.

[55:24] You just need

[55:25] know

[55:26] all day, because

[55:27] insulation on walls

[55:28] very...

[55:29] Yes.

[55:30] Ventilation today-

[55:31] these are targets in the wall.

[55:32] Right.

[55:33] Please. No, I have

[55:35] I mean, I'm looking at

[55:37] it. I'm just kidding. I see that there is some

[55:41] profitability

[55:42] investments in

[55:43] heating. You know,

[55:44] when Liz talks about

[55:46] $6 per gallon,

[55:47] so I think 10 is 15

[55:49] %. Start sharing this.

[55:50] I bet that

[55:51] there are many. Yes,

[55:52] I would put

[55:53] at least 10-12%.

[55:55] Yes, I agree.

[55:56] Because I have

[55:56] Time is running out.

[55:57] No, sorry.

[55:58] Good. It's just important.

[56:01] to know that if there are any

[56:02] more than 30, we

[56:03] need 30

[56:04] competitive

[56:05] proposals, where it is

[56:06] perhaps. So, if you can only get

[56:09] two, okay, but in

[56:10] ideals, you know, we want to see

[56:12] at least three.

[56:13] Ahem,

[56:13] let's see what's up

[56:14] This will work.

[56:15] But it's like one job.

[56:16] I wanted to say that we

[56:17] hired two or three

[56:19] , for example, if we

[56:20] hired an electrician,

[56:21] the price would be the same, but

[56:22] someone else. So you don't

[56:24] would be a company with

[56:25] selling doors, was

[56:26] someone else would. So

[56:27] materials we would

[56:28] received. This is not that.

[56:29] we are hiring project

[56:31] worth $75,000.

[56:33] We are hiring 10.

[56:34] Let's see what's up.

[56:35] This will work.

[56:36] Yes. Good.

[56:37] Maybe for us

[56:38] best to work

[56:39] as one channel.

[56:42] Well, no, if we do it

[56:43] let's do it, you know,

[56:44] electrician, and then in

[56:46] we are not there

[56:46] general

[56:47] contractor, it can

[56:48] be easier.

[56:50] We don't really

[56:50] we want the city

[56:51] was general

[56:52] contractor. Hmm,

[56:54] maybe I would prefer

[56:55] consider it as

[56:56] peaceful option

[56:57] solution, for example,

[56:59] to attract small

[57:00] contractors to

[57:01] execution of this

[57:02] work. Hmm, I don't know.

[57:06] I think so, but I don't.

[57:07] I like the idea that

[57:08] 5000 here, 6000 here

[57:09] keep it within limits

[57:11] expenditure threshold, so that

[57:12] avoid the tender. Hmm,

[57:15] me too

[57:16] like

[57:16] responsibility for

[57:18] what will go wrong.

[57:20] It is obvious that if

[57:21] you are a general

[57:22] contractor, that is, someone,

[57:23] who can

[57:24] translate yours

[57:25] risk for the performed

[57:26] work and equipment,

[57:27] for example, for quality

[57:28] performance of work, not

[57:30] the one who controls and

[57:31] improves work. If

[57:33] we have an electrician who

[57:35] will come and do it,

[57:36] if we have a volunteer,

[57:37] who will come and do

[57:39] this...Hmm, so from the point

[57:40] vision loss

[57:41] risk

[57:41] responsibility, I would

[57:43] preferred

[57:44] general

[57:44] to the contractor, but,

[57:45] obviously, it can

[57:47] to be more expensive than

[57:48] to patch, to patch. Here

[57:50] this is how we do things, like

[57:51] volunteers and, um,

[57:52] adhesive tape. Hmm,

[57:54] so that's okay.

[57:58] If that's the case, then so be it.

[57:59] will be. I just want

[58:00] make sure that everyone

[58:02] are aware of the risks

[58:03] and the consequences of such

[58:04] approach, and that I would

[58:05] did not support that

[58:06] normally. I only

[58:07] one person. Hmm, but

[58:09] it looks like a repair

[58:10] really important, and I appreciate the work you do.

[58:13] to determine

[58:14] what needs to be done.

[58:17] Also, please don't

[58:18] ask no one

[58:19] nothing to do until

[58:20] you will not get

[58:21] written contract,

[58:22] signed by everyone.

[58:24] Hmm, so we can, uh,

[58:25] to make sure that we

[58:26] all on the same wavelength

[58:27] about what we are talking about

[58:29] we agree. IN

[58:30] We are a good team.

[58:31] Yes, of course. Our

[58:33] The team is experienced.

[58:35] Hmm,

[58:36] continue if you

[58:37] There is something else for you.

[58:38] Sorry. IN

[58:39] Is there anything else for you?

[58:40] discussion? Yes,

[58:43] this is also important. But

[58:45] about the things you

[58:47] want to have, what are we want to have...

[58:49] Well, basically, yes, I am.

[58:50] I mean that

[58:51] Eventually, we outgrew it.

[58:52] building, regardless

[58:53] from its shape. Just in

[58:54] we are not less

[58:55] places. Uh, us

[58:56] must have

[58:57] possibility of safety

[58:58] work with our

[58:59] equipment. We are not

[59:00] we can do this.

[59:01] So this is the conversation that

[59:02] need to be taken out

[59:03] consideration of the city. This is what are we in

[59:08] We live now.

[59:14] So, having in

[59:15] mainly two places,

[59:22] Where is everything in your mouth?

[59:23] OK.

[59:24] Oh yes, the district. I think

[59:27] that would make sense. Yes, it is.

[59:29] would certainly be

[59:31] the cheapest and

[59:31] most accessible

[59:32] the option they have.

[59:37] Yes, I don't think so.

[59:38] you will arise

[59:39] permission problems,

[59:40] which is a big question

[59:42] , you know, just for

[59:43] start of laying

[59:44] foundation.

[59:45] This may sound like

[59:46] discussion of sensations

[59:47] because it's a sand quarry.

[59:48] Are there any concerns?

[59:50] regarding wetlands

[59:51] lands?

[59:51] No.

[59:51] Okay, okay.

[59:53] No, it's such a big area.

[59:55] This is such a large area.

[59:56] gravel and sand. Yes.

[59:59] I think we probably should

[1:00:00] will have to spend

[1:00:01] public hearings,

[1:00:02] because it changes

[1:00:04] the nature of the road and its

[1:00:05] using,

[1:00:06] neighbors, etc.

[1:00:08] Oh, of course. So this is

[1:00:09] also worth taking

[1:00:10] attention,

[1:00:11] but I just, you know,

[1:00:12] I share ideas. This is what do we know?

[1:00:17] And Dave, is there

[1:00:17] potential for

[1:00:18] inclusion of a new

[1:00:19] town hall to this

[1:00:20] plots?

[1:00:22] Let's talk about this.

[1:00:23] Good. Because that's what

[1:00:24] about what

[1:00:25] we are not going yet

[1:00:26] give recommendations.

[1:00:27] Doctor,

[1:00:28] Carol, can you

[1:00:29] include in

[1:00:30] something about the protocol

[1:00:31] necessity

[1:00:32] public hearings?

[1:00:33] Because,

[1:00:36] if we really

[1:00:36] we are considering March

[1:00:38] as time for

[1:00:38] voting for...What are we voting?

[1:00:41] March...

[1:00:42] We can't

[1:00:43] vote for

[1:00:43] bond...No, we still

[1:00:44] this one hasn't gone far

[1:00:45] way.

[1:00:46] We are not that we don't

[1:00:46] passed, or

[1:00:47] wrong? So I don't think so.

[1:00:48] what do we really need

[1:00:49] something needs to be done

[1:00:50] at the town meeting

[1:00:51] of...

[1:00:51] I thought we were just

[1:00:52] let's raise this issue,

[1:00:53] you know, like a conversation.

[1:00:54] This could be possible.

[1:00:55] to bring up as a conversation.

[1:00:56] This may be in our

[1:00:59] council report

[1:01:00] directors or in

[1:01:01] status report

[1:01:01] highways, but

[1:01:03] if we want to have

[1:01:04] this place and explore

[1:01:05] its as a place, it is

[1:01:06] should be public

[1:01:07] hearing. And then,

[1:01:13] Eventually, we will move on.

[1:01:14] to, you know,

[1:01:15] potential

[1:01:16] association with...

[1:01:17] we have an idea about

[1:01:20] a new garage, or

[1:01:22] wrong? I mean,

[1:01:23] that there is a lot between this

[1:01:24] steps before we can reach

[1:01:25] at this moment.

[1:01:26] Yes. Good. Only

[1:01:28] earthworks and

[1:01:29] engineering, and

[1:01:30] yes, just to know, on

[1:01:31] what we really are

[1:01:32] we will get a bond,

[1:01:34] because we are not

[1:01:36] we will be a bond,

[1:01:37] but you can

[1:01:38] need money

[1:01:39] during the next

[1:01:41] year for some design

[1:01:42] , well, this is another one

[1:01:43] thing, municipal

[1:01:44] planning grant

[1:01:45] must be paid 30

[1:01:46] October 15th, Liam or

[1:01:47] On the 31st,

[1:01:48] I think the 31st,

[1:01:49] okay, so this can

[1:01:50] be like this when we

[1:01:51] were engaged in the city,

[1:01:52] remember when we

[1:01:53] were engaged in urban

[1:01:53] building, we did

[1:01:54] something from

[1:01:55] municipal

[1:01:55] grant for

[1:01:56] planning as ours

[1:01:57] first step with BIA, right?

[1:01:58] They spent, um,

[1:01:59] scoping study

[1:02:00] works.

[1:02:00] Yes.

[1:02:01] So, if you do this

[1:02:02] Do you want to?

[1:02:02] you only get them once

[1:02:04] for a year, right now

[1:02:05] time to do it-

[1:02:06] use this

[1:02:06] municipal grant

[1:02:08] on planning as

[1:02:09] scoping study

[1:02:10] works for the city

[1:02:11] garage.

[1:02:12] Um, basically,

[1:02:14] this will be for Town

[1:02:16] at the Sand, new. Yes,

[1:02:19] new, completely new

[1:02:20] construction.

[1:02:21] So, Liz, I don't

[1:02:22] I'm trying to stir up trouble.

[1:02:24] water. But let me

[1:02:27] I should continue.

[1:02:32] This would mean that we want to use

[1:02:34] money for something, about

[1:02:36] we have not yet reported

[1:02:37] city. For example,

[1:02:41] if we were going to do this

[1:02:42] to do, it would be great if the city

[1:02:44] agreed that this is the one

[1:02:45] the direction in which we want to move.

[1:02:47] Now let's

[1:02:48] we will spend

[1:02:48] scoping study

[1:02:49] works. What worries me is that we haven't reached yet

[1:02:52] the moment when we,

[1:02:53] probably not even

[1:02:54] we know if it is already

[1:02:55] decision?

[1:02:56] Well, isn't it? I feel like we took

[1:02:58] city to our attention

[1:02:59] problem. Let's,

[1:03:01] Sandy.

[1:03:04] Um, I suggest if

[1:03:05] you are going

[1:03:06] to apply for

[1:03:07] planning grant,

[1:03:08] take a step back and

[1:03:10] to look at where in the city it can be, and

[1:03:12] not to assume that this

[1:03:13] will be in this place.

[1:03:18] Yes, it is.

[1:03:20] if nothing else,

[1:03:21] um, this place is not

[1:03:22] a place that is designated

[1:03:23] in our city

[1:03:24] plan where we want

[1:03:26] place

[1:03:26] municipal buildings

[1:03:28] ,

[1:03:30] and how something

[1:03:31] corresponds to the city

[1:03:32] plan, is one of

[1:03:33] criteria for

[1:03:34] receiving

[1:03:34] municipal

[1:03:35] grant,

[1:03:36] the main criterion.

[1:03:38] Yes. So I'm curious,

[1:03:40] can you have

[1:03:41] just a plan

[1:03:46] expenses. I mean

[1:03:50] , which I wonder if there is,

[1:03:52] um, momentum for

[1:03:53] carrying out

[1:03:53] volume research

[1:03:55] works, or is there

[1:03:56] opportunity for

[1:03:57] cost determination

[1:03:58] the building itself, the place

[1:03:59] whose location is still

[1:04:00] not defined. But I mean that

[1:04:06] one of the advantages

[1:04:07] planning grant

[1:04:09] is that it includes

[1:04:10] work and experts,

[1:04:11] which will perform

[1:04:12] part of this work,

[1:04:13] to spend

[1:04:13] informational

[1:04:14] explanatory

[1:04:15] work. I mean

[1:04:16] the work you do

[1:04:17] you will hear from me,

[1:04:17] the work we do for this

[1:04:19] public forum,

[1:04:20] largely

[1:04:20] performs regional

[1:04:21] planning commission.

[1:04:22] They spent

[1:04:23] poll. They

[1:04:24] organize

[1:04:25] public forum.

[1:04:26] So I

[1:04:28] could join because

[1:04:29] this is part

[1:04:30] next step. To us

[1:04:32] This needs to be resolved.

[1:04:34] Yes,

[1:04:34] but it will take some time. I think that if

[1:04:37] you will apply to

[1:04:38] October, there will be no grant

[1:04:39] granted until spring. So

[1:04:40] no, it will be sooner. IN

[1:04:42] December. Good. Work

[1:04:43] begins in the spring.

[1:04:45] Good.

[1:04:45] Work begins

[1:04:46] already January 1st.

[1:04:47] Good. And then you have

[1:04:48] a year to complete it,

[1:04:49] or two years to complete it.

[1:04:51] I mean, I mean, what is this, I think 10%

[1:04:54] co-financing for

[1:04:55] of this grant.

[1:04:56] Yes.

[1:04:57] And if you can

[1:04:58] receive $30,000,

[1:05:00] otherwise we

[1:05:00] will have to wait

[1:05:01] all year long. Good. So

[1:05:03] I think we really

[1:05:04] it is worth using this

[1:05:05] for this, if people

[1:05:06] agree that this

[1:05:07] worthy use.

[1:05:08] Hmm, Zara, and then Matt,

[1:05:10] I will say: yes, it is worthy.

[1:05:11] using. And also

[1:05:17] , Larry is cooking now,

[1:05:18] hmm, some words to

[1:05:19] we could start

[1:05:20] warn the community

[1:05:22] about what he does

[1:05:23] improvement team

[1:05:24] objects, hmm, where are we,

[1:05:25] you know why,

[1:05:26] stopped at the Notch,

[1:05:28] because we own it and

[1:05:29] other places, we

[1:05:31] would have to buy

[1:05:32] land, hmm, and start

[1:05:33] conversation with

[1:05:34] the public, hmm, and

[1:05:35] keep doing

[1:05:36] this is regular. So I know that Mary is now

[1:05:44] is preparing something. Mette,

[1:05:47] simply put how

[1:05:48] city representative, I think the idea of

[1:05:51] that we found a place,

[1:05:52] which is suitable for

[1:05:53] receiving a grant for

[1:05:54] planning, and we can just

[1:05:56] to implement it,

[1:05:57] taking into account all

[1:05:58] uncertainty and

[1:05:59] question here. I like it.

[1:06:01] seems very

[1:06:02] optimistic.

[1:06:03] It seems

[1:06:04] optimistic. Yes.

[1:06:05] Well,

[1:06:06] seems

[1:06:06] optimistic,

[1:06:07] probably in a bad way

[1:06:08] meaning.

[1:06:08] Yes. Yes. I just

[1:06:10] I would like the city to

[1:06:11] was able to do this year. I just

[1:06:14] I don't know if I'm 100%

[1:06:15] sure that

[1:06:16] city garage

[1:06:17] need more

[1:06:18] places, and I think there are

[1:06:19] the general task that

[1:06:21] this particular place is

[1:06:22] the right place

[1:06:23] for starters

[1:06:24] spending money on

[1:06:25] planning.

[1:06:26] It seems

[1:06:27] optimistic,

[1:06:28] but I still think that

[1:06:29] we could

[1:06:30] use this

[1:06:31] planning grant

[1:06:32] just for

[1:06:32] scoping study

[1:06:33] construction,

[1:06:34] regardless of whether

[1:06:35] Where is it located?

[1:06:36] This is great.

[1:06:37] If possible,

[1:06:38] I would anyway

[1:06:40] started working there

[1:06:41] , or

[1:06:41] wrong? Yes. Um, I

[1:06:42] tried

[1:06:43] to call, and

[1:06:44] I had to me

[1:06:45] include, but unfortunately

[1:06:46] , I couldn't

[1:06:47] to call. Um, me too

[1:06:48] I didn't do much with it,

[1:06:49] but when I spent

[1:06:50] research on

[1:06:52] plots for

[1:06:52] burial, where we do all the work

[1:06:55] with lifts, uh,

[1:06:56] the plot belonged to

[1:06:57] city, and I don't

[1:06:58] sure how many of

[1:06:59] left side

[1:07:00] flower shop

[1:07:01] ...I don't know if it's an acre

[1:07:02] or two. Is this something that

[1:07:04] Can it be built?

[1:07:06] They just bought this,

[1:07:08] and I think they

[1:07:09] bought this so that no one

[1:07:10] I didn't build there. Not

[1:07:11] worth talking about

[1:07:15] left.

[1:07:16] Good. On the other hand.

[1:07:17] Yes. Because I know that

[1:07:19] we own

[1:07:20] property on the left

[1:07:21] side of what you bought

[1:07:22] Balen, but we also

[1:07:23] we own through

[1:07:24] road, for example, from

[1:07:25] left side

[1:07:26] flower shop,

[1:07:27] hmm, where was it once

[1:07:28] police station, and

[1:07:29] you received

[1:07:30] flower shop, and

[1:07:31] then when we

[1:07:32] conducted

[1:07:32] research, there was,

[1:07:33] I don't know if it's an acre or not.

[1:07:35] two. I would include this,

[1:07:39] but I don't know if it is

[1:07:40] something for us, because in

[1:07:44] you will arise

[1:07:45] problems with that

[1:07:46] they bought a flower garden,

[1:07:47] bought warehouses

[1:07:48] buildings and all that, and

[1:07:50] the only way, in my opinion, get

[1:07:52] access to property,

[1:07:53] which belongs to the city

[1:07:54] behind her, it's to pass

[1:07:56] through other property,

[1:07:57] to see her from

[1:08:03] road, looking at

[1:08:04] that mountain. You need

[1:08:05] will get permission.

[1:08:06] You will have to. Yes.

[1:08:08] But I don't know, because

[1:08:09] an acre or two will do

[1:08:10] sufficient property

[1:08:11] ,

[1:08:12] because you have to ride one's own

[1:08:14] trucks.

[1:08:15] Yes. Another thing I want to point out that this is

[1:08:17] that Liam and I

[1:08:18] today

[1:08:18] met with

[1:08:19] Mike Klein, and

[1:08:20] when we talked about

[1:08:21] municipal

[1:08:21] water supply and

[1:08:22] municipal

[1:08:23] sewerage, this,

[1:08:24] most likely, the place,

[1:08:25] where we will place

[1:08:25] municipal

[1:08:26] sewerage

[1:08:27] and housing

[1:08:30] for housing, so that we have

[1:08:31] there was more housing in

[1:08:32] the village, right there,

[1:08:33] probably will be

[1:08:34] a septic tank is located.

[1:08:38] Yes, Liam. Then

[1:08:39] What?

[1:08:42] No. Um, that is.

[1:08:44] the consensus is

[1:08:46] because the grant for

[1:08:47] planning will be on

[1:08:48] volume research

[1:08:49] construction of the city

[1:08:50] garage, without specifying

[1:08:51] location?

[1:08:54] Yes. So, if this

[1:08:56] possible to determine,

[1:08:58] Is it possible? Yes,

[1:08:59] Sandy,

[1:09:01] I would also advise you

[1:09:02] look at the place

[1:09:03] arrangement,

[1:09:04] discuss where it is located.

[1:09:06] This may be part of

[1:09:07] volume determination

[1:09:08] works.

[1:09:09] Yes. Yes. Of course.

[1:09:10] That's a good idea. So

[1:09:12] let me

[1:09:13] to quickly ask if there is

[1:09:14] near the fire station

[1:09:15] parts place? Or

[1:09:16] we own the land,

[1:09:17] which is enough for

[1:09:18] buildings?

[1:09:20] We own the land.

[1:09:21] all the way to the river,

[1:09:23] Where is the park?

[1:09:25] behind her.

[1:09:28] I'm not quoting myself, but,

[1:09:29] as far as I understand,

[1:09:30] there were some

[1:09:31] Native American artifacts

[1:09:33] . I don't think so.

[1:09:36] flooding zone,

[1:09:37] Eric? What do you think?

[1:09:38] that lower field where

[1:09:39] there are gazebos

[1:09:40] ? I have never seen

[1:09:41] to flood it.

[1:09:43] This does not mean that it is not

[1:09:44] worth remembering,

[1:09:45] for example, I know that

[1:09:47] the fire station is already

[1:09:48] there, but with all

[1:09:49] oil and others

[1:09:50] things that come out of

[1:09:52] our trucks,

[1:09:53] next to the building,

[1:09:54] but

[1:09:56] I don't know if it's there.

[1:09:58] will be,

[1:09:59] Yes,

[1:10:00] and you probably want to,

[1:10:01] so that there is room

[1:10:02] enough to be able to

[1:10:03] was to put it there

[1:10:05] sand, right? I have

[1:10:06] meaning that it has

[1:10:07] be

[1:10:08] Eric, and I...Sorry.

[1:10:10] Yes,

[1:10:10] this very conversation for us

[1:10:11] need to be held in

[1:10:12] future.

[1:10:13] Yes,

[1:10:14] look at the others

[1:10:15] possible places.

[1:10:16] Additional small

[1:10:17] area is that,

[1:10:18] how far are we now

[1:10:19] big. Let's

[1:10:20] we will get the exact

[1:10:21] information about

[1:10:22] what the building will be like,

[1:10:23] what size

[1:10:23] room for us

[1:10:24] needed for

[1:10:25] placement of this

[1:10:26] social

[1:10:26] trucks.

[1:10:30] Maybe that's where we are

[1:10:31] now we will.

[1:10:33] Are you going?

[1:10:33] call to

[1:10:34] school ever? Are you

[1:10:36] were not going to

[1:10:36] call us,

[1:10:37] to learn about

[1:10:38] tennis courts? Well,

[1:10:39] let's also

[1:10:40] we'll find out how long

[1:10:41] we will be there because it

[1:10:43] will be

[1:10:43] last on the list.

[1:10:44] You will talk about

[1:10:45] school.

[1:10:46] I spoke.

[1:10:47] Yes. If you want

[1:10:48] just a few minutes,

[1:10:49] so that we can, then we

[1:10:51] let's also talk about

[1:10:52] improvement for

[1:10:53] city council.

[1:10:55] The committee reached

[1:10:55] conclusion that we are not

[1:10:56] we will build

[1:10:57] the nearest town hall

[1:10:58] sometimes. So, we have

[1:11:00] good luck in

[1:11:01] implementation of projects with

[1:11:02] split in this

[1:11:03] buildings with the help of

[1:11:04] volunteers. It

[1:11:05] worked very well

[1:11:06] good. People have fulfilled

[1:11:08] a lot of work. Big

[1:11:09] the credit goes to

[1:11:10] Kevin.

[1:11:11] Yes.

[1:11:12] And Lowry and ours

[1:11:13] a team of volunteers. THERE ARE

[1:11:14] another list of things,

[1:11:15] what we want to do

[1:11:16] , and we can do

[1:11:18] separately. If possible, I

[1:11:19] I'll tell you something. I know where we found it.

[1:11:23] Um, one thing I

[1:11:24] talked to Liam, and I think you passed.

[1:11:26] would this be a committee of

[1:11:27] eligibility, this is a grant

[1:11:28] Paul Brun, who

[1:11:29] it would be possible

[1:11:30] use for...uh,

[1:11:31] this is a grant for

[1:11:32] preservation

[1:11:32] historical heritage.

[1:11:33] These grants include

[1:11:35] a lot of money, but, uh-

[1:11:36] eh, they could be

[1:11:37] use. Larry

[1:11:38] looked at it and

[1:11:39] thought: you know, this is in

[1:11:40] registry, right?

[1:11:41] Sandy? I think we

[1:11:42] agreed, right?

[1:11:43] Or

[1:11:44] I thought the town hall wasn't

[1:11:45] in the registry, but the garage-

[1:11:46] This is a garage year.

[1:11:48] I don't know.

[1:11:49] I remember that it was

[1:11:51] opportunity when we

[1:11:52] worked with BIA, so

[1:11:53] what I think they are

[1:11:54] considered this

[1:11:55] question. But if this

[1:12:01] insulation hire

[1:12:02] the lower part, because

[1:12:04] this is one of the parameters

[1:12:05] grant, hmm, uh,

[1:12:06] is that

[1:12:07] it can be

[1:12:08] use for

[1:12:09] insulation, and work,

[1:12:10] which was not fulfilled,

[1:12:12] it was, um,

[1:12:12] excavation

[1:12:13] outer part

[1:12:15] and installation

[1:12:16] insulation, hmm, what was it

[1:12:17] a kind of hope

[1:12:18] Lowry and volunteers,

[1:12:19] that it could be

[1:12:21] to do, but it's not

[1:12:22] was only done

[1:12:23] because of time, weather and

[1:12:24] resources we will provide

[1:12:26] grant application for

[1:12:27] insulation, if, if

[1:12:28] The stars will align and, hmmm,

[1:12:29] parameters

[1:12:30] will respond.

[1:12:33] We will also consider

[1:12:34] this is because I have

[1:12:35] mind you, we can't

[1:12:36] to paint this place,

[1:12:37] because the tree was so rotten.

[1:12:39] I don't know if you

[1:12:40] understood.

[1:12:40] No, we need

[1:12:41] new siding.

[1:12:43] Look at that one.

[1:12:44] wooden frame,

[1:12:45] which one are they talking about

[1:12:46] they said, what was

[1:12:47] fully connected with

[1:12:48] tree. Everything you need to have this

[1:12:50] brand, it's absolutely

[1:12:51] new building, and it

[1:12:52] completely wooden.

[1:12:53] Yes. So, this building

[1:12:55] need a new one

[1:12:55] siding.

[1:12:57] Yes.

[1:13:00] On the spot. Yes.

[1:13:01] The wood is rotten.

[1:13:02] It takes a lot

[1:13:03] work. Yes.

[1:13:04] If you want, I'll be quick.

[1:13:04] I'll run along this one.

[1:13:05] buildings? I can

[1:13:06] send to you

[1:13:06] by email,

[1:13:07] if you,

[1:13:08] maybe you can send this

[1:13:08] by email,

[1:13:09] because we are running out

[1:13:10] time. We have a VCA meeting.

[1:13:11] Um, uh, or, you know, if

[1:13:12] we want to add you

[1:13:14] until next time

[1:13:14] agenda, so that

[1:13:15] discuss the city

[1:13:16] town hall. That's good too,

[1:13:18] if you want it for 2

[1:13:19] October. Good. I will send you a copy.

[1:13:22] documents. I think

[1:13:23] That's enough. They

[1:13:24] did not return.

[1:13:25] Okay, that sounds good.

[1:13:27] IN

[1:13:27] you had a question

[1:13:29] about the run.

[1:13:31] Oh, just if you know that Zara and I

[1:13:33] always chatted about

[1:13:34] that if this school

[1:13:36] not used,

[1:13:37] this is a great place for

[1:13:38] city council.

[1:13:39] Yes.

[1:13:40] And city offices and everything

[1:13:41] such,

[1:13:42] and a little space for

[1:13:43] sand and trucks,

[1:13:44] and

[1:13:46] good.

[1:13:47] But we don't know.

[1:13:48] future Romney,

[1:13:49] Yes? So you will call,

[1:13:51] Yes?

[1:13:51] Well, they won't say.

[1:13:52] me, what will it be like

[1:13:53] future. I am not

[1:13:54] I'm worried about this. I have

[1:13:55] I mean, yes.

[1:13:58] I mean, we

[1:13:59] could turn to

[1:14:01] boss

[1:14:01] management,

[1:14:02] for example, do you have

[1:14:03] room for

[1:14:04] rent for something. They won't allow it

[1:14:06] for small children

[1:14:07] to run there, to carry

[1:14:08] large trucks and

[1:14:09] piles of sand.

[1:14:10] Perhaps.

[1:14:11] I think they are with this.

[1:14:12] will agree.

[1:14:13] This is for children

[1:14:14] will like it.

[1:14:17] That's right. So thank you,

[1:14:20] Dave,

[1:14:21] for your, um,

[1:14:22] information, and we

[1:14:23] impatiently

[1:14:24] we will wait for

[1:14:25] opportunity to read

[1:14:26] more about, um,

[1:14:28] city hall, but I don't think we should.

[1:14:29] worth...I think we should

[1:14:30] still needed

[1:14:31] continue

[1:14:31] to talk about it and

[1:14:32] discuss

[1:14:33] at least that job,

[1:14:34] which one is needed

[1:14:34] to perform, especially

[1:14:35] during the budget

[1:14:36] season, right? I mean, there is

[1:14:38] serious work that

[1:14:39] need...I have to

[1:14:39] meaning that outside

[1:14:40] looks terrible, yes

[1:14:41] ?

[1:14:41] Robots define

[1:14:42] for correction.

[1:14:44] Good. Yes. Yes.

[1:14:46] So yes,

[1:14:47] I think that's a request.

[1:14:48] will consist in the fact that

[1:14:49] so that from the 5th

[1:14:50] met us as

[1:14:51] budget committee,

[1:14:52] when we really want to

[1:14:53] have numbers before

[1:14:55] we will summarize,

[1:14:56] Yes?

[1:14:56] Oh, of course.

[1:14:58] Uh, really, what

[1:14:59] applies to any

[1:15:00] what kind of worker

[1:15:01] the point that we

[1:15:02] determined, of course,

[1:15:03] we will do it.

[1:15:05] Good. So, Dave,

[1:15:07] if you can

[1:15:08] send this price list-

[1:15:09] letter also to the budget

[1:15:10] What is this? Budget middle sex.org.

[1:15:16] question now. Good.

[1:15:19] So, I want to go

[1:15:21] to Sandy from the commission on

[1:15:22] planning. Thank you.

[1:15:23] Good evening to you,

[1:15:24] guys.

[1:15:26] Good.

[1:15:27] Thank you. I'm just sitting.

[1:15:29] there to see you,

[1:15:30] The guys are from here.

[1:15:31] Thank you.

[1:15:32] I'm Sandy Lavin, the chairman.

[1:15:34] planning commissions.

[1:15:37] Um, to all the floods

[1:15:38] planning commission

[1:15:39] periodically

[1:15:40] met with

[1:15:41] the electoral council, and we

[1:15:42] considered it useful to

[1:15:43] the electoral council knew,

[1:15:44] what we do, and

[1:15:46] received your feedback from

[1:15:47] about this. Were

[1:15:50] floods, occurred

[1:15:52] other things, and it was

[1:15:53] something we haven't done in a long time

[1:15:54] met you

[1:15:55] everyone. Therefore, I would like to be able to

[1:15:59] reconnect and

[1:16:00] try

[1:16:00] to meet with

[1:16:01] electoral council

[1:16:02] quarterly or

[1:16:03] about that. I would especially like

[1:16:06] meet now,

[1:16:07] because the commission with

[1:16:08] planning works

[1:16:10] over community forum 13

[1:16:12] October. I hope

[1:16:13] what are you all

[1:16:14] register and

[1:16:15] come to the forum.

[1:16:17] This year we have

[1:16:18] planning grant,

[1:16:19] to consider

[1:16:20] issues of both housing and, uh, resistance to

[1:16:23] climate change. We have

[1:16:25] There were floods in the city. IN

[1:16:27] we were erosion zones,

[1:16:28] especially along the Brook-

[1:16:30] road. Quite likely

[1:16:32] that this once

[1:16:33] It will happen again. We don't know when. And what

[1:16:36] we can do,

[1:16:37] to protect

[1:16:38] health, safety and

[1:16:39] people's property, and in the future, you know,

[1:16:42] zoning and

[1:16:42] planning is not

[1:16:43] will solve everything, but

[1:16:44] can decide

[1:16:45] some of these questions. AND

[1:16:50] to be a little

[1:16:50] proactive,

[1:16:51] thinking about it and

[1:16:52] combining sustainability

[1:16:54] with housing, which is also

[1:16:55] great need for

[1:16:56] in the city. And we also heard

[1:17:00] how people flooded

[1:17:01] houses, or they,

[1:17:02] maybe they will want to move, because

[1:17:04] concerned that

[1:17:05] are located like this

[1:17:06] close to rivers, but

[1:17:07] They have nowhere to go.

[1:17:09] So, where in the city are we?

[1:17:10] can think about

[1:17:11] adding more housing?

[1:17:14] What can we do?

[1:17:15] with our rules

[1:17:16] zoning, our

[1:17:17] documents

[1:17:18] planning to provide more

[1:17:20] housing and more dense

[1:17:21] development in some

[1:17:22] places that

[1:17:22] located closer

[1:17:23] to the roads where there is less

[1:17:24] probability

[1:17:25] flooding and

[1:17:26] blurring in

[1:17:27] future. Therefore,

[1:17:28] That's what this is all about.

[1:17:29] directed. On the forum

[1:17:31] communities will

[1:17:32] experts are present,

[1:17:33] which will discuss

[1:17:34] housing issues. It

[1:17:35] good composition, but this

[1:17:37] there won't be just a bunch

[1:17:38] talking heads. It will be half an hour

[1:17:41] short presentations

[1:17:42] so that people know which

[1:17:43] The resources are there. AND

[1:17:48] next hour we,

[1:17:50] hmm, let's split into

[1:17:51] small groups that

[1:17:52] will consider,

[1:17:53] in particular, Brook Road and

[1:17:54] Great Brook, question

[1:17:56] housing in Great Brook, and

[1:17:57] you know about the risks,

[1:17:58] what are there, and what we

[1:17:59] Can we do something about this?

[1:18:04] And then another group

[1:18:05] will consider the issue

[1:18:07] housing and what we can do

[1:18:08] to do with this. We really want

[1:18:10] get reviews

[1:18:11] communities from this

[1:18:12] reason and hear that

[1:18:13] people think. I think

[1:18:15] what is long-term

[1:18:17] conversation. Hmm, but we have

[1:18:19] there are, you know, some ideas

[1:18:21] about what we can do

[1:18:23] next year, to

[1:18:24] start gradually

[1:18:25] work on this. Hmm,

[1:18:27] precisely for this and

[1:18:28] designated forum

[1:18:29] communities. I sent

[1:18:33] letters or...I added

[1:18:34] a copy of the flyer to

[1:18:35] your package. I

[1:18:39] sent a copy of that

[1:18:40] flyer with order

[1:18:41] daytime everyone

[1:18:42] residents along

[1:18:43] Brook Road. So I was

[1:18:44] I'm sure they are.

[1:18:45] they will know about it. Um,

[1:18:48] and separately we do

[1:18:49] forum posts

[1:18:51] Front Porch Forum, and, um, in

[1:18:52] I have an approximate

[1:18:53] list of electronic

[1:18:54] addresses of many people

[1:18:56] in the city, not everyone. I will send it to them. IN

[1:18:59] I have one too.

[1:19:00] emails from

[1:19:01] many people

[1:19:02] along Brook Road. I am this.

[1:19:03] I will do it. Um, you know,

[1:19:04] everyone who tried

[1:19:06] to hold a public

[1:19:07] work, knows that

[1:19:08] need to do this

[1:19:09] a lot and, you know,

[1:19:10] encourage people

[1:19:11] come. We will have

[1:19:12] free pizza, so

[1:19:13] I hope people

[1:19:14] will come hungry.

[1:19:16] Um, we will also have

[1:19:17] demonstration table

[1:19:18] , which will show how water

[1:19:20] moving down the river, and that

[1:19:21] happens when in

[1:19:23] you have a pinch point, and

[1:19:24] Where does this water go?

[1:19:25] Do you know? That's it.

[1:19:26] one of those sandy ones

[1:19:28] tables? Yes. They

[1:19:29] simply amazing when

[1:19:31] you see how much it is

[1:19:32] realistic.

[1:19:33] I'm glad you said that.

[1:19:34] takes a lot

[1:19:35] work for

[1:19:35] installation, but I think it will be

[1:19:37] really good.

[1:19:38] Huge. He

[1:19:39] huge. Show

[1:19:40] people speed of movement

[1:19:41] compared to

[1:19:42] in volume–this is probably

[1:19:43] the largest part

[1:19:44] this.

[1:19:44] Yes. Yes.

[1:19:46] Hmm, yes. That

[1:19:48] takes place in

[1:19:49] October. Result

[1:19:52] this we will do later

[1:19:53] we will use for

[1:19:54] work on new

[1:19:55] zoning plans,

[1:19:56] changes to the city

[1:19:57] plan. Hmm, and yes, these

[1:20:00] parts for the most part

[1:20:02] is our final

[1:20:06] product if

[1:20:07] you want, and we must

[1:20:08] to be completely

[1:20:09] finished with it

[1:20:10] almost to the end

[1:20:11] year. Hmm, and this is probably

[1:20:15] most of our

[1:20:16] work during

[1:20:17] the next 6 months-

[1:20:19] year. Other work on

[1:20:21] the future is

[1:20:21] viewing our

[1:20:22] urban plan. He

[1:20:24] valid until 2030.

[1:20:26] Hmm, that's what it takes

[1:20:28] a certain time to put everything together. Uh-huh

[1:20:31] ,

[1:20:33] I would like the choice

[1:20:34] new place for

[1:20:35] city garage or

[1:20:36] the city office was

[1:20:37] quick update

[1:20:38] urban plan, but

[1:20:39] This is not true. I

[1:20:40] reviewed the city

[1:20:41] plan. It is in several

[1:20:42] in different places. But,

[1:20:44] you know, of course, this

[1:20:45] can be done. It

[1:20:46] requires participation

[1:20:47] public and

[1:20:48] communities. This is not what

[1:20:49] planning commission

[1:20:51] and the electoral council

[1:20:51] do it yourself.

[1:20:53] Um, so we're planning

[1:20:54] do it after that

[1:20:55] how do we end this

[1:20:56] grant for

[1:20:57] planning. Then,

[1:20:58] we hope you have

[1:20:59] there will be a grant for

[1:21:00] planning a place where

[1:21:01] there will be a city garage and,

[1:21:03] you know, maybe

[1:21:04] city offices. So

[1:21:05] next year we will look for a grant for

[1:21:07] planning for

[1:21:08] plan update

[1:21:09] cities. Hmm, so this is

[1:21:11] in a couple of years. Ahem,

[1:21:15] and other work, on

[1:21:17] which we, um, work on.

[1:21:21] I shared with you

[1:21:22] with all our drafts

[1:21:23] worksheet

[1:21:24] project. I would be happy.

[1:21:26] to answer any

[1:21:27] what questions about

[1:21:28] this. I would like to

[1:21:29] quickly tell you

[1:21:30] one, some of you,

[1:21:31] maybe they remember,

[1:21:32] what we considered

[1:21:33] demonstration

[1:21:34] a project that we would

[1:21:38] allocated to one

[1:21:39] short month.

[1:21:41] I remember that.

[1:21:43] My God.

[1:21:43] Where are they in Europe?

[1:21:45] everywhere.

[1:21:45] I know. I know.

[1:21:47] And that was just for one

[1:21:49] month, and it was

[1:21:50] looks like plastic

[1:21:51] barricades that are

[1:21:52] temporary, and

[1:21:53] how much is the main thing

[1:21:54] morning sickness.

[1:21:55] Yes. Finally, you know,

[1:21:59] in two years we

[1:22:00] came up with a design.

[1:22:02] They came up with

[1:22:03] design that

[1:22:04] absolutely nothing

[1:22:05] did. And we just, and

[1:22:07] they forced us

[1:22:08] to do a lot

[1:22:09] work, so that at all

[1:22:10] to do it. And the commission

[1:22:11] from planning simply

[1:22:12] said that it wasn't that

[1:22:13] worth it. So we

[1:22:14] postponed this issue.

[1:22:15] I thought, what happened?

[1:22:17] with this project. I

[1:22:18] thought: aren't we

[1:22:19] should have a sidewalk

[1:22:20] this summer?

[1:22:21] This should have been in the past.

[1:22:22] summer. This should have been

[1:22:23] this summer. So we,

[1:22:24] planning commission,

[1:22:26] decided to postpone

[1:22:27] this is a question.

[1:22:29] We hope this

[1:22:30] can be included

[1:22:31] to much more

[1:22:33] Med-

[1:22:34] River, which

[1:22:34] extends from

[1:22:35] Warren to Middle-

[1:22:36] Sex. You know, this

[1:22:40] in five years, but

[1:22:41] it would be great if this

[1:22:43] could help you

[1:22:44] to find out about it. So

[1:22:46] in

[1:22:46] They have a big impulse.

[1:22:47] IN

[1:22:48] They have a big impulse.

[1:22:50] That's where it is. Um, then

[1:22:51] the only other aspect-

[1:22:52] this is what from the point of view

[1:22:53] budget, in our

[1:22:54] the budget has always been

[1:22:55] provided

[1:22:56] co-financing for

[1:22:57] municipal

[1:22:58] planning grant,

[1:22:59] and we expect that

[1:23:00] someone in town wants

[1:23:01] apply for

[1:23:02] municipal grant

[1:23:03] for planning. So,

[1:23:04] we're probably doing this again

[1:23:05] let's turn it on. Um, just

[1:23:07] know what it is

[1:23:07] usually goes for

[1:23:08] budget limits of the commission

[1:23:09] from planning.

[1:23:10] Oh, okay.

[1:23:11] Um, and

[1:23:13] when will this happen,

[1:23:14] Liam knows that the commission

[1:23:16] planning has

[1:23:17] approve

[1:23:17] municipal grant.

[1:23:19] So just give us

[1:23:20] him, outline what it is

[1:23:21] like this, and I will be happy

[1:23:22] to cooperate with

[1:23:23] Liam over this.

[1:23:24] How often do you guys

[1:23:25] Are you meeting?

[1:23:26] Once a month.

[1:23:27] How many

[1:23:27] municipal

[1:23:28] grants for

[1:23:28] planning you can

[1:23:29] to receive within

[1:23:30] year? You know,

[1:23:31] maximum two

[1:23:32] active simultaneously.

[1:23:33] That's why I...that's why I

[1:23:35] relied on you,

[1:23:36] so that you get rid of 25, because

[1:23:38] We will have a grant for 26.

[1:23:40] We now have 25 and 26.

[1:23:41] Yes, in

[1:23:42] There are 25 and 26 of us now. I think 25

[1:23:45] ends. Yes,

[1:23:47] we are in the middle of 26. So far

[1:23:48] we are working on 26, we can apply

[1:23:51] and get 27.

[1:23:52] Good. They are with more

[1:23:53] will likely provide

[1:23:55] him, if 25 will be

[1:23:55] closed.

[1:23:56] Yes, it is...Trust me.

[1:23:57] Yes, we will do it.

[1:24:00] I can't sign them,

[1:24:01] like me. You don't need to,

[1:24:03] for me to sign these

[1:24:04] documents for 2025,

[1:24:05] isn't that right?

[1:24:06] I have no idea who

[1:24:07] signs them,

[1:24:08] because this

[1:24:09] that website.

[1:24:10] This is a complex website,

[1:24:11] which is difficult

[1:24:12] press the button.

[1:24:14] Yes, that website. Well,

[1:24:16] very. Yes. Well, well, well,

[1:24:17] they definitely did

[1:24:18] his best. But

[1:24:19] then, it seems,

[1:24:20] The plan was to prepare

[1:24:22] Liam so he can

[1:24:22] to be a budget employee.

[1:24:23] Good. But we really

[1:24:24] need to find out

[1:24:25] because I think that to

[1:24:26] expiration date

[1:24:27] planning grant

[1:24:28] for 2025? I am not...

[1:24:29] culverts.

[1:24:31] These were mostly

[1:24:32] culverts

[1:24:33] and a 5-year plan, so

[1:24:34] What do I remember...Yes. I remember that I

[1:24:36] had to

[1:24:36] sign these

[1:24:37] documents at the beginning,

[1:24:38] and I did it all the time

[1:24:39] wrong or something

[1:24:40] like this.

[1:24:40] And then you need

[1:24:41] sign documents

[1:24:43] on the 26th, which is here

[1:24:44] like this...Okay. It

[1:24:45] housing and...and

[1:24:46] right, add this

[1:24:47] to your to-do list

[1:24:48] which we must

[1:24:49] to do together We

[1:24:50] could do this

[1:24:51] tomorrow when I arrive.

[1:24:52] We could go in and

[1:24:53] just look where

[1:24:54] we are here because it is

[1:24:55] also requires

[1:24:55] final report, or

[1:24:56] Is this already done?

[1:24:57] We don't know about

[1:24:58] Colbert grant. No, this is

[1:25:00] not done. The cat would do it.

[1:25:01] did. The cat would do it.

[1:25:02] did.

[1:25:03] Wait, Kit,

[1:25:04] I sent you...

[1:25:05] So, I sent you

[1:25:06] email

[1:25:07] from Keith and all that.

[1:25:09] He looks pretty.

[1:25:10] completed.

[1:25:10] He also looked

[1:25:11] quite complete.

[1:25:12] So Eric was going

[1:25:13] ask Keith, but

[1:25:14] if you talk to

[1:25:14] By the time the whale was

[1:25:15] you ask him,

[1:25:16] will this be completed, this

[1:25:17] It would be great, right?

[1:25:18] wrong? Because, perhaps,

[1:25:19] everything we need

[1:25:20] to do, this

[1:25:20] download plan

[1:25:21] Culver and some other

[1:25:22] a trifle from him, and

[1:25:23] that's all

[1:25:23] will end, and we will also get our

[1:25:25] final payment,

[1:25:26] apparently,

[1:25:26] Yes? Yes. You don't know.

[1:25:28] I don't know either, but I don't

[1:25:29] I can remember. Good.

[1:25:31] Yes. Good. So, Liam

[1:25:32] learns from Keith,

[1:25:33] What is this? We...

[1:25:34] let's do this,

[1:25:35] and then we too

[1:25:36] Let's set you up for this.

[1:25:37] system on Gears. Yes.

[1:25:38] Perhaps. You already

[1:25:40] Do you use Gears? I, probably work at

[1:25:42] your account,

[1:25:43] but I bet,

[1:25:44] what can you do

[1:25:45] move it to

[1:25:46] your new account

[1:25:47] record.

[1:25:48] Now you are ours.

[1:25:49] I know, but I think...

[1:25:49] I will need it.

[1:25:50] new account

[1:25:51] record.

[1:25:51] Good. OK.

[1:25:53] Liz, I have one more.

[1:25:54] question for Sandy.

[1:25:55] So, Sandy,

[1:25:56] question about chicken

[1:25:57] and an egg. Average

[1:25:59] sex recently

[1:26:01] very good

[1:26:01] tries

[1:26:02] to rely on

[1:26:03] politics and the like

[1:26:04] things about existence

[1:26:05] which we did not know. Therefore

[1:26:08] , chicken and egg in relation to

[1:26:09] city garage and

[1:26:10] potential location, and

[1:26:12] It's great to have Dave here.

[1:26:16] My question

[1:26:17] is that

[1:26:18] because we are at a very

[1:26:20] early stages that we

[1:26:21] everyone needs

[1:26:22] remember that

[1:26:23] will depend on

[1:26:24] urban plan, when

[1:26:25] we will move

[1:26:26] go ahead, just

[1:26:27] opening conversations

[1:26:28] about places and

[1:26:29] potential locations

[1:26:30] etc. What are you up to?

[1:26:34] are conditions added? Yes.

[1:26:36] Of course. And that's why I think: "So, what do we

[1:26:39] Are we obligated to do anything?

[1:26:40] chained because of our...I

[1:26:42] no...I'm not waiting, but

[1:26:43] because of how our...

[1:26:45] it's hard...

[1:26:46] even people in the city

[1:26:47] they said they wanted

[1:26:48] so that their city offices

[1:26:49] were in the village."

[1:26:50] Yes, that's right.

[1:26:50] It is written that the city

[1:26:52] the garage is different

[1:26:53] from city offices.

[1:26:55] City garage now

[1:26:56] not located in the village

[1:26:57] . Therefore, I think that on

[1:27:00] garages are smaller

[1:27:00] restrictions or, you know,

[1:27:02] borders than on urban

[1:27:03] offices. But when you

[1:27:06] started talking about

[1:27:08] what, perhaps, this is

[1:27:09] good place for

[1:27:10] city offices, here

[1:27:11] then it will probably be

[1:27:12] problem with the current

[1:27:13] urban plan.

[1:27:14] Good.

[1:27:15] So, basically, this is

[1:27:16] also applies

[1:27:19] receiving grants,

[1:27:20] for example, they demand from you

[1:27:22] to follow your

[1:27:23] urban plan, right?

[1:27:24] Yes? And therefore, if we

[1:27:26] decided that we wanted to

[1:27:27] so that the city no longer

[1:27:28] used this

[1:27:29] building, us,

[1:27:30] It would probably be very

[1:27:31] it's hard to get a brand.

[1:27:34] Um, if we said,

[1:27:35] what we want to transfer

[1:27:36] this, you know, to

[1:27:37] city garage or

[1:27:38] somewhere else,

[1:27:39] we could write this off

[1:27:40] to the city council. I was thinking rather:

[1:27:42] we know what

[1:27:43] let's see, approximately

[1:27:44] for the next three years,

[1:27:45] from about three

[1:27:47] up to five years. And if

[1:27:48] our plan is not even

[1:27:50] ends by 2030

[1:27:51] year, we need

[1:27:52] to conduct real

[1:27:53] conversations about what

[1:27:55] our previous plans

[1:27:56] on

[1:27:57] What? Well, when...what?

[1:27:58] zoning for Knox-

[1:27:59] road, right?

[1:28:00] Well, I don't think so.

[1:28:01] city...city

[1:28:01] exempt from

[1:28:02] zoning, I think.

[1:28:03] Oh, yes. OK. Wow.

[1:28:06] It,

[1:28:06] I think municipal

[1:28:07] buildings. Yes.

[1:28:09] Oh, well, that's convenient. Well,

[1:28:11] the area is enough

[1:28:12] big,

[1:28:13] you just don't know...i

[1:28:14] I think the residents

[1:28:15] this road exactly

[1:28:16] will resist.

[1:28:18] Well,

[1:28:19] residents of any

[1:28:20] the roads where we do this

[1:28:21] we want.

[1:28:23] You know, I think that

[1:28:24] all this speaks about

[1:28:25] a broader conversation in

[1:28:26] community. We need

[1:28:28] more space. We are not

[1:28:29] we can build on

[1:28:30] swampy

[1:28:30] territories where now

[1:28:31] garage.

[1:28:32] So let's look at this. I know,

[1:28:33] that the committee of

[1:28:34] suitability

[1:28:34] considered this. I know,

[1:28:36] what have you all been considering

[1:28:37] this, but the rest of the people in

[1:28:38] To the right...And that's why,

[1:28:39] when Larry...that's why,

[1:28:40] when Larry writes this,

[1:28:41] I mean that

[1:28:42] people will understand that

[1:28:43] committee on

[1:28:43] suitability

[1:28:44] is already going

[1:28:45] months and says

[1:28:46] just about that. So I know it's so annoying.

[1:28:48] when any

[1:28:49] committee, right? You

[1:28:50] come to

[1:28:51] presentation, and people

[1:28:52] It's like everyone is asking you

[1:28:54] these questions that we already

[1:28:55] found out during

[1:28:56] the first month or

[1:28:57] our two meetings.

[1:28:59] And I...it's annoying

[1:29:00] process, but yes, you

[1:29:02] just need

[1:29:03] respond to

[1:29:03] question, so I think, Larry, you know,

[1:29:06] continued monthly

[1:29:07] when our committee

[1:29:08] tells people that

[1:29:10] we do, then this

[1:29:11] will be useful from the point of

[1:29:12] in terms of selling the idea "it's

[1:29:13] what we need" and

[1:29:15] "this is where we decided

[1:29:16] "place it."

[1:29:21] Yes.

[1:29:23] Sandy, would you like

[1:29:24] share with us

[1:29:25] more information?

[1:29:26] Good. Yes.

[1:29:27] I am interested.

[1:29:28] learn about

[1:29:29] residential complex,

[1:29:30] which fills the area,

[1:29:31] development

[1:29:31] state toolkit

[1:29:32] with visualization

[1:29:33] ADU samples for

[1:29:34] Middle Sex. Or

[1:29:35] Can you do a little?

[1:29:35] tell us about it

[1:29:36] ?

[1:29:37] Yes, we did that.

[1:29:37] a few years ago.

[1:29:39] The state developed

[1:29:39] toolkit. They have

[1:29:41] there is a big package

[1:29:42] documents, you know,

[1:29:43] about housing and ADUs, and one

[1:29:45] from such examples

[1:29:46] was in the Middle Ages

[1:29:47] Sexy. He's on Shady Real.

[1:29:50] Hmm, it was there.

[1:29:51] highlighted. Hmm,

[1:29:53] we considered

[1:29:54] development opportunity

[1:29:55] this and the conduct

[1:29:56] conversations about this in

[1:29:57] city-wide, and we

[1:29:58] as if they turned this on

[1:29:59] work before this

[1:30:00] planning grant,

[1:30:01] and I see part

[1:30:02] our work with

[1:30:03] residential

[1:30:03] construction, which we

[1:30:04] ...So this is

[1:30:05] part...Okay,

[1:30:06] understood. Good,

[1:30:08] steeply. Can

[1:30:09] ask a question?

[1:30:11] I mean, I don't

[1:30:12] I know if this is relevant.

[1:30:13] or not, but somehow in Galaxy

[1:30:15] one guest said

[1:30:16] about construction

[1:30:17] housing, but I don't have anything

[1:30:18] I heard it was happening.

[1:30:21] It...

[1:30:22] I don't know. Perhaps,

[1:30:23] it would be good

[1:30:24] invite Russ

[1:30:25] Bennett.

[1:30:26] We're actually...Oh, God.

[1:30:27] He was here with us, hmm,

[1:30:28] only a few months

[1:30:30] so, and he for hours

[1:30:31] talked about his

[1:30:32] projects. Hmm,

[1:30:33] but is everything going well, that is

[1:30:34] nothing

[1:30:35] is happening?

[1:30:36] Nothing.

[1:30:36] is happening.

[1:30:37] No. No.

[1:30:38] OK. I just

[1:30:39] wanted to buy

[1:30:40] real estate near

[1:30:41] Center Road.

[1:30:44] I mean, I think that in some

[1:30:46] moment, yes, there is something there will be, but I don't know what.

[1:30:49] No, I just thought,

[1:30:50] when you said about

[1:30:51] dwelling.

[1:30:53] And another problem for

[1:30:54] me with this project

[1:30:55] specifically consists of

[1:30:56] because he says

[1:30:57] about, um, family,

[1:30:58] for example, about large

[1:31:00] families, at least

[1:31:01] three-room families. And I think we should too.

[1:31:05] needed

[1:31:06] one-room

[1:31:06] apartments for young people,

[1:31:08] to have it available here

[1:31:09] housing, and when they

[1:31:10] are expanding their family

[1:31:11] , they can

[1:31:12] buy bigger ones

[1:31:13] houses that sell

[1:31:14] such

[1:31:15] people like me who

[1:31:16] are dying.

[1:31:17] Right.

[1:31:18] Well, in old age

[1:31:21] our pensioners

[1:31:22] can also

[1:31:22] want

[1:31:23] one-room

[1:31:24] apartments.

[1:31:26] Yes. So, in short

[1:31:27] saying yes,

[1:31:29] we need smaller ones,

[1:31:30] than three-room ones.

[1:31:31] Perhaps none of

[1:31:32] families will not want to live

[1:31:34] here if they

[1:31:34] will close Rome.

[1:31:37] Good. So, if

[1:31:39] no more questions,

[1:31:40] Are there any more questions?

[1:31:41] Sandy regarding the commission

[1:31:43] planning? Thank you for

[1:31:45] all your work,

[1:31:46] Sandy. I know how much

[1:31:47] the time you put into this and

[1:31:49] into the organization, and you

[1:31:50] very,

[1:31:51] Thank you.

[1:31:52] are an attentive member. So

[1:31:53] Thank you.

[1:31:54] Okay, so I just

[1:31:56] I will briefly tell you about

[1:31:57] program

[1:31:57] extraordinary

[1:31:58] situations with

[1:31:59] catchment. So, um,

[1:32:03] I like that

[1:32:04] this is happening, mmm,

[1:32:06] emails

[1:32:07] are coming now, but

[1:32:08] In the end we had to

[1:32:10] m-m write a letter about

[1:32:11] continuation of the project

[1:32:13] until November 2027

[1:32:14] as our ultimate

[1:32:16] term instead of

[1:32:17] November 2026.

[1:32:24] So now we are in such a situation

[1:32:26] condition, um, that all

[1:32:27] homeowners who

[1:32:28] want to participate,

[1:32:29] signed their agreements

[1:32:31] about land ownership.

[1:32:39] There is, um, permission. So there is

[1:32:43] something like that some engineering

[1:32:45] firms require

[1:32:46] permissions, some not, or

[1:32:47] they don't charge for

[1:32:48] them a fee. In any case, one of

[1:32:54] owners

[1:32:54] real estate, that is

[1:32:55] one of them has

[1:32:56] pay 200 dollars, and

[1:32:58] actually the city is

[1:32:59] sponsor of these

[1:33:00] projects. So we

[1:33:06] agreed that the city

[1:33:08] carries

[1:33:08] responsibility for

[1:33:10] payment of this 25%, but we pay for it not with

[1:33:12] own funds. We pay for it with

[1:33:16] owner's funds

[1:33:17] real estate. So we expect the owner

[1:33:20] real estate, when

[1:33:21] The time will come, and we know how much

[1:33:22] we need money

[1:33:24] for the project, send

[1:33:25] this 25%, which the owner

[1:33:26] real estate will send

[1:33:27] check to the town of Middlesex.

[1:33:28] City

[1:33:29] will pay, and then

[1:33:30] it will receive

[1:33:31] compensation from

[1:33:32] of the EWP project. Hmm, well,

[1:33:33] Middlesex city

[1:33:35] will pay all 100%, but

[1:33:36] they will be reimbursed

[1:33:38] 75%. Hmm, and 25% will arrive

[1:33:40] from the owner of the house.

[1:33:43] So, besides

[1:33:43] administrative

[1:33:44] costs and shipping

[1:33:45] checks, city

[1:33:46] actually won't have

[1:33:47] no costs. Hmm, yes.

[1:33:50] permit fee in

[1:33:51] amount of 200 dollars. Ahem

[1:33:54] , and it seems that

[1:33:54] homeowner, um,

[1:33:55] willing to pay this

[1:33:57] fee, and from my

[1:33:58] emails

[1:33:59] it follows that we do not

[1:34:00] we expect to continue

[1:34:01] collection of several

[1:34:03] permit fees of 200

[1:34:04] dollars, and then

[1:34:05] expectation that

[1:34:06] homeowners, you know,

[1:34:07] will have such

[1:34:08] unforeseen

[1:34:09] costs. But in mine

[1:34:10] the last one

[1:34:11] email

[1:34:12] it sounded like

[1:34:13] homeowner

[1:34:13] corresponds to this

[1:34:14] collection. So,

[1:34:16] assuming that this

[1:34:17] will happen, and the gathering

[1:34:18] will be paid, they

[1:34:20] hope that, um,

[1:34:21] it really is, I think,

[1:34:22] um, I don't want to say,

[1:34:24] fantasy, but I don't

[1:34:25] I think that's it.

[1:34:26] will happen this fall,

[1:34:28] but, um, because

[1:34:29] need to get

[1:34:30] too many permissions.

[1:34:32] Request for proposals, um,

[1:34:33] not yet prepared,

[1:34:35] but it is in ours

[1:34:36] on the agenda for

[1:34:37] meeting on October 5. We

[1:34:39] included the item

[1:34:39] agenda for,

[1:34:40] um, Regional

[1:34:41] planning commissions

[1:34:42] Central

[1:34:43] Vermont. We will prepare a request

[1:34:44] proposals. Ahem,

[1:34:46] and we just have time,

[1:34:47] isn't that right? It's like

[1:34:48] the month that you

[1:34:49] need to be carried out,

[1:34:50] to request a quote

[1:34:51] within X days. Yes.

[1:34:54] Before you can

[1:34:55] accept them. And that's why I think that's it.

[1:34:57] postponed if

[1:34:59] we will not be great

[1:35:00] snowless weather,

[1:35:01] you know, until December. Ahem,

[1:35:05] this means that we,

[1:35:06] probably will have to

[1:35:07] put it off until

[1:35:08] next summer, because

[1:35:09] again, how about

[1:35:10] bats? Like, or

[1:35:13] is it possible at all

[1:35:14] to work when

[1:35:15] Are bats settling in?

[1:35:16] No, this work has already been done.

[1:35:17] We already have it.

[1:35:19] done. But I thought,

[1:35:20] What is this supposed to be?

[1:35:21] was done before,

[1:35:22] how bats settled.

[1:35:23] April 7,

[1:35:24] Yes? So, but how?

[1:35:25] only bats

[1:35:26] are settling in, is it possible

[1:35:27] still working?

[1:35:28] Not that it's not on

[1:35:29] root ball. You can't cut

[1:35:31] tree. Tree,

[1:35:32] appropriate cut

[1:35:34] there should have been trees already

[1:35:36] done. So no worries.

[1:35:38] This only applies to

[1:35:39] what I just did

[1:35:40] remembered about

[1:35:40] a serious crime of wood.

[1:35:42] Crime because I

[1:35:42] just went and

[1:35:43] looked at something on

[1:35:44] at the place of preparation.

[1:35:45] They had to do

[1:35:46] cut before it

[1:35:47] will become bad.

[1:35:47] Good. So we all do this.

[1:35:49] done. So, all of this

[1:35:50] was it done, right?

[1:35:51] what, you know, don't give

[1:35:51] Oh my God, there's more.

[1:35:52] one tree that

[1:35:53] it was necessary

[1:35:54] cut down what is possible.

[1:35:55] The root ball, which

[1:35:56] remained, deleted.

[1:35:57] Um, well, it's not a tree.

[1:35:58] This is not a treehouse. It

[1:36:00] as deletion.

[1:36:01] But they need this

[1:36:02] make.

[1:36:02] Well, this...No, this

[1:36:03] there was no...Oh, them

[1:36:04] need to do this

[1:36:05] earlier. I don't know whether

[1:36:06] they need to do this

[1:36:07] . Yes, we wanted that.

[1:36:08] make the past

[1:36:09] year, but then

[1:36:10] bats knocked us down

[1:36:11] confusion. So, by

[1:36:13] In fact, this root

[1:36:14] the lump will stop

[1:36:15] every tree, and then in

[1:36:16] we will be real

[1:36:17] stone on this

[1:36:18] root ball. All

[1:36:20] What I know is that

[1:36:21] engineers, I think,

[1:36:22] know about this

[1:36:23] root ball and

[1:36:24] took it into account in any

[1:36:26] what plan,

[1:36:27] or

[1:36:28] I don't see it in this.

[1:36:29] nothing bad for

[1:36:31] anyone, knowing that

[1:36:32] you can apply

[1:36:33] on competitive

[1:36:34] offers, immediately

[1:36:35] start the next one

[1:36:36] summer, and in any

[1:36:38] in this case you will receive

[1:36:39] good turnout. I just

[1:36:42] I don't think you

[1:36:42] get a good one

[1:36:44] turnout at this time of year.

[1:36:46] They may not

[1:36:47] allow you

[1:36:47] to perform such

[1:36:48] work, as, in my opinion,

[1:36:50] last year,

[1:36:51] rivers and streams, I have to believe that

[1:36:53] after this moment

[1:36:54] you will not be allowed

[1:36:55] to perform any

[1:36:56] work.

[1:36:57] Well, they're all, uh,

[1:36:58] communicate with each other

[1:37:00] one. Uh, and so on,

[1:37:02] but I agree. I am not

[1:37:04] I think that's it.

[1:37:05] will happen.

[1:37:06] I don't give the owners

[1:37:07] houses hope that this

[1:37:08] will happen this winter.

[1:37:10] Uh, but now that's all

[1:37:11] ready for request

[1:37:13] proposals. So we

[1:37:14] we're going anyway

[1:37:15] approve request

[1:37:16] offers on

[1:37:16] next meeting,

[1:37:17] to consider and

[1:37:18] approve it. Uh,

[1:37:20] and, uh, and then we

[1:37:21] let's do the next one

[1:37:23] step. When we do this

[1:37:24] were doing in 2024, was

[1:37:26] one person who

[1:37:27] submitted an application.

[1:37:28] We didn't have it, and I have

[1:37:29] meaning that now

[1:37:30] other times. Maybe in

[1:37:31] there will be a lot of us

[1:37:32] more participants

[1:37:33] bidding, but we have

[1:37:33] one person who

[1:37:34] submitted an application. So, eh

[1:37:35] -eh, here's an update on

[1:37:36] this. Um, we have

[1:37:38] update from

[1:37:38] city clerk. Ahem,

[1:37:40] Bridget provided us with

[1:37:41] report. Um, Bridget,

[1:37:42] if you don't

[1:37:43] you deny, um, you

[1:37:44] also sent to us

[1:37:45] electronic report

[1:37:46] by mail?

[1:37:46] We sent.

[1:37:47] Good. Because I will add

[1:37:49] it to the files, and when

[1:37:50] it's time to serve

[1:37:52] protocol, I will have

[1:37:53] another PDF file that

[1:37:54] you can add to

[1:37:55] protocol.

[1:37:56] Good. Um, so, um, I

[1:37:59] I'll tell you quickly. Ahem,

[1:38:01] so, as I said,

[1:38:02] written report in

[1:38:03] your package. He, um

[1:38:06] , incorrect. If

[1:38:08] someone needs it

[1:38:10] copy, I can have it

[1:38:11] send. Um, uh, in

[1:38:12] basically

[1:38:13] focused on 3

[1:38:14] November. Hmm, but

[1:38:16] returning to

[1:38:17] Wait a minute, uh,

[1:38:18] land records, uh,

[1:38:19] continue

[1:38:20] to be updated. Um, so

[1:38:23] we are processing now

[1:38:24] them when they

[1:38:25] arrive at the office.

[1:38:28] Hmm, I still have it.

[1:38:29] there are problems with

[1:38:31] NUMO availability by

[1:38:32] link from our

[1:38:33] website. Um, and therefore,

[1:38:37] um, I'm working on it.

[1:38:41] Um, one minute I can find

[1:38:43] documents, and the next

[1:38:44] —I can't, and there are two

[1:38:45] individual links, and,

[1:38:46] um, so I'll be there tomorrow

[1:38:47] I'll talk to Cheryl from

[1:38:49] about this. Of

[1:38:52] elections, we have, um,

[1:38:54] ballots for the state,

[1:38:55] which have already been sent

[1:38:56] by mail, um, or

[1:38:57] are sent. Ahem,

[1:38:58] deadline

[1:38:59] submitting applications for

[1:39:00] absentee voting—5

[1:39:02] November. Ahem,

[1:39:08] next term for

[1:39:09] me now—this is the term

[1:39:13] submitting applications for

[1:39:13] absentee voting

[1:39:14] for the military and

[1:39:15] civilians who

[1:39:16] live in

[1:39:17] across the border. So this is

[1:39:18] another step than

[1:39:19] just for the state. Ahem,

[1:39:20] this will happen this

[1:39:22] Fridays. This is the final

[1:39:23] term. There will be three

[1:39:25] bulletins. I turned on

[1:39:26] one of each

[1:39:27] ballot in a package. Ahem,

[1:39:29] I just got one.

[1:39:30] from school

[1:39:31] ballots. They

[1:39:32] will look like-

[1:39:33] different. Two schools,

[1:39:35] career center and

[1:39:36] ballots for U32,

[1:39:37] will look like-

[1:39:39] different, on which there will be

[1:39:40] third banner. Hmm, and, hmm

[1:39:44] , warnings have

[1:39:45] be placed up to 4

[1:39:47] October. Um, um,

[1:39:49] the question that now

[1:39:51] stands before us,

[1:39:52] is what

[1:39:53] will be our procedure

[1:39:54] processing requests for

[1:39:55] absentee voting in

[1:39:57] these school

[1:39:58] ballots? Um, and how are we?

[1:40:00] will send them

[1:40:02] people? I understood from

[1:40:04] other clerks who

[1:40:05] they do it on

[1:40:06] request. Um, but I

[1:40:08] thought we could

[1:40:09] start a conversation

[1:40:10] about automatic

[1:40:11] mailing list, just to

[1:40:13] choose one of

[1:40:14] options. Um, one of

[1:40:16] questions that I would like

[1:40:18] to deliver today

[1:40:19] in the evening, this, um, it

[1:40:20] will arise on, um,

[1:40:21] BCA meetings, um, or

[1:40:23] can we handle

[1:40:24] absentee ballots

[1:40:25] earlier than, um,

[1:40:26] the night before.

[1:40:29] Um, and, um, I'm open.

[1:40:30] for any

[1:40:31] committee decision. Um,

[1:40:34] meeting with the State

[1:40:36] not yet a secretary

[1:40:37] planned. Their

[1:40:38] invited to be

[1:40:39] present today

[1:40:40] in the evening. Um, but they

[1:40:41] really loaded,

[1:40:43] um, trying

[1:40:44] send all this

[1:40:45] mail. So, um,

[1:40:46] Sean is going

[1:40:47] come back to us.

[1:40:48] Another thing about which

[1:40:49] spoke parentally

[1:40:51] association: it was, uh-

[1:40:52] e, a box for

[1:40:53] the vote we

[1:40:54] would place, perhaps

[1:40:55] , along the wall

[1:40:56] buildings so that people

[1:40:57] could make a loop

[1:40:58] and come here, and

[1:40:59] then lower yours

[1:41:01] bulletin, as if you

[1:41:02] put it in

[1:41:02] mailbox, and

[1:41:04] just continue

[1:41:05] voting. Hmm, and

[1:41:07] there was a lot

[1:41:08] phone tags with

[1:41:09] state, and I haven't yet

[1:41:10] decided on this. So,

[1:41:12] if BCA today

[1:41:13] Will look into this tonight.

[1:41:15] question, I just

[1:41:16] I will ask you.

[1:41:16] consider it on

[1:41:18] subject to approval.

[1:41:19] If we him

[1:41:20] we will get it, great. I don't think we should.

[1:41:22] you need to do everything

[1:41:23] it is possible that it

[1:41:24] get, but, um, I think that ideally in

[1:41:26] there would be a moment

[1:41:27] It's very good to have this.

[1:41:30] Hmm, and that's almost it. Hmm,

[1:41:34] again, my

[1:41:35] reports, uh, a lot

[1:41:37] longer than this one. Hmm, yes.

[1:41:42] some new news about

[1:41:43] that, uh, Supreme

[1:41:45] The court voted, uh,

[1:41:46] and, uh, this is the last time

[1:41:48] was it last night or

[1:41:49] the day before yesterday, uh, and

[1:41:50] left the block

[1:41:52] new rules

[1:41:52] voting by mail, e

[1:41:54] -uh, exactly as it is

[1:41:55] was. No requirements for

[1:42:00] our envelopes,

[1:42:01] no list for

[1:42:02] submission, none

[1:42:03] rejected ballots

[1:42:04] . And, um, our

[1:42:05] Attorney General

[1:42:06] was a party to this

[1:42:08] case,

[1:42:08] so I am from

[1:42:09] with pleasure

[1:42:09] I will answer any

[1:42:10] question.

[1:42:11] Perfectly. Thank you,

[1:42:12] Bridget. Um, we

[1:42:13] let's discuss all this

[1:42:14] regarding the elections for

[1:42:15] British Council meetings

[1:42:17] Colombia. Hmm, is there

[1:42:19] some other, um, no

[1:42:20] election-related

[1:42:21] Question for Bridge?

[1:42:24] Good. Thank you, Bridget.

[1:42:26] Yes. Um, and we don't have any

[1:42:28] treasurer's report, because

[1:42:29] she is not here today

[1:42:31] . Um, just quickly,

[1:42:32] cemetery commission...

[1:42:33] seems to be a problem

[1:42:34] decided on her own

[1:42:35] myself, but I think that

[1:42:37] we just need

[1:42:38] know about it. What, um,

[1:42:39] this also happened with

[1:42:40] some FEMA property,

[1:42:42] which belongs to us, where in

[1:42:43] there were, um, people who

[1:42:45] they pitch tents,

[1:42:46] um, on the territory. AND

[1:42:48] exactly on FEMA territory

[1:42:49] no permission; you are not

[1:42:51] you can do anything

[1:42:52] on FEMA property, um. AND

[1:42:54] Zara and I, Zara,

[1:42:55] were able to solve this

[1:42:57] problem. It was

[1:42:58] last summer, right?

[1:42:59] Yes? And then this

Middlesex Selectboard - September 15, 2026 [MSB]

Transcript