Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:35]
I'm just finding this committee meeting
[0:36]
order at 6:38. Chair Cameron Beck, I am
[0:41]
with special person.
[0:43]
Are you just saw Sonic?
[0:45]
Um
[0:46]
We got to get a full presentation from
[0:48]
the city manager here.
[0:49]
You want to hear too give us your
[0:51]
presentation there on the special
[0:53]
projects coordinator and what you want
[0:54]
to do?
[0:55]
>> What we originally put out in the
[0:57]
staffing orders the special projects
[0:59]
coordinator at an hourly at $22 an hour.
[1:02]
Um and with further review of
[1:05]
how the job will go is more of a salary
[1:08]
position instead of an hourly um due to
[1:12]
um
[1:14]
the place that she will be or he will
[1:15]
be, whoever is coming into the position.
[1:18]
So um
[1:19]
we are just taking the 22 times the 30
[1:23]
45,760.
[1:25]
What you want to
[1:27]
45,008 but it's the same amount of
[1:29]
45,000 but doing it as a salaried
[1:31]
position versus an hourly.
[1:34]
>> That doesn't change what the city spends
[1:36]
in terms of benefit premiums or anything
[1:38]
like that. Okay.
[1:39]
>> Nothing else changed. It's the structure
[1:41]
of how they're being paid.
[1:44]
» So she answered my question on
[1:47]
and I I wouldn't be able to do it on the
[1:48]
same problem.
[1:52]
Uh making a motion to adopt the city
[1:55]
manager's recommendation for the special
[1:58]
projects coordinator salary.
[2:00]
>> I'll second. All in favor.
[2:02]
>> I.
[2:05]
>> And what's
[2:06]
What was the uh
[2:08]
second one that we had there, ma'am? Oh,
[2:09]
was there update on the discussion about
[2:11]
the Village of Post Police contract?
[2:13]
>> Um it's yes. So, um it was
[2:18]
We basically drafted up a document of
[2:21]
our um which is basically old contract.
[2:25]
Um and sent it off to them to review.
[2:27]
What they proposed was that it would
[2:30]
stay with $30,000 that they put um
[2:34]
per year right now and it go up in
[2:35]
increments. So, the second year it'd be
[2:37]
higher up to 40, cuz off the third year
[2:39]
at $40,000 is the proposal to them. So,
[2:43]
we're just waiting for them to review it
[2:45]
and to get back to us as to whether or
[2:47]
not they would accept it.
[2:49]
>> Any questions about
[2:50]
>> How long do they have to respond?
[2:54]
>> [snorts]
[2:54]
>> Since they've been holding them around
[2:55]
for
[2:56]
>> Uh we we were hoping that we'd hear
[2:58]
something, but they didn't It was some
[3:01]
Uh Devon went to their last council
[3:03]
meeting, was there for 2 hours.
[3:04]
Um and didn't quite get everything
[3:06]
resolved, and that's what came out of
[3:07]
it. So,
[3:09]
uh they have until our next meeting to
[3:11]
get it resolved, or it doesn't it does
[3:14]
not
[3:15]
go.
[3:16]
Well, there's been some misinformation
[3:18]
going around, but I do think that
[3:19]
they're showing an interest in working
[3:22]
with us um and they're actively
[3:25]
you know, And there's [clears throat] a
[3:26]
lot of talk around and I think um
[3:29]
the council president and I think the
[3:31]
um
[3:32]
There was three of them I think that
[3:33]
were more in were very much wanting to
[3:35]
work with everything, including the
[3:37]
mayor. So, there was some or not, but
[3:38]
that that's what we had going for us is
[3:40]
that they were they really wanted it to to to to
[3:42]
>> Now, are we providing them service with
[3:45]
no contract?
[3:47]
>> No.
[3:47]
>> Okay. [snorts]
[3:49]
>> I'm going to make sure.
[3:50]
>> No, the sheriff's department right now
[3:51]
is covering it.
[3:56]
» Was there any more questions about the
[3:58]
book and contract negotiations? Was
[3:59]
there any further updates made?
[4:01]
>> Not until I hear back from them, but
[4:03]
other than that
[4:04]
You said they have until their next
[4:06]
meeting or August?
[4:07]
>> Their next meeting is August 6th, I
[4:09]
believe, and then ours is August 10th,
[4:11]
so
[4:12]
>> Perfect.
[4:12]
>> Yeah.
[4:15]
» All right, you guys with that then I'll
[4:17]
go ahead and call this meeting to a
[4:18]
close as we only had the two items that
[4:20]
we had
[4:21]
>> Nancy, did you have something? Okay.
[4:24]
>> Anything else?
[4:25]
>> No, I thought she was going to say
[4:27]
something.
[4:27]
>> All right, she was going to say
[4:28]
something.
[4:29]
Uh I'll go ahead and call this meeting
[4:30]
to a close at 6:42
[4:33]
p.m.