Agenda
Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
[0:02]
(gavel)
[0:03]
>> good evening and welcome to the city of olathe,
[0:04]
city council regular meeting at 7:00pm., tuesday,
[0:07]
september 1, 2026.
[0:08]
>> the first item on the agenda is the pledge of
[0:12]
allegiance. Please stand with me for the pledge.
[0:15]
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of
[0:17]
america and to the republic for which it stands, one
[0:18]
nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice
[0:35]
for all. We'll now to special business.
[0:39]
>> 3(a) special business
[0:40]
proclamation recognizing september as deaf awareness
[0:41]
month. One guess great things about olathe our home the
[0:47]
kansas school.
[0:52]
>> proclamation
[0:53]
whereas, the city of olathe is proud to recognize and
[0:54]
celebrate the varied perspectives, backgrounds and
[0:55]
cultures that make up our vibrant and diverse city,
[1:00]
including the deaf community; and joining us to expect
[1:02]
this year the kansas school for the deaf with you both
[1:09]
please join me up front?
[1:13]
>> I'll take a minute to read the proclamation and
[1:34]
tell us was going on.
[1:37]
>> proclamation
[1:38]
whereas, the city of olathe is proud to recognize and
[1:39]
celebrate the varied perspectives, backgrounds and
[1:40]
cultures that make up our vibrant and diverse city,
[1:51]
including the deaf community; and
[1:52]
whereas, we are better because of our deaf and
[1:53]
hard-of-hearing neighbors,individuals with an alternative
[1:56]
sensory and social experience who harness the power of
[1:57]
visual language, and who come from wide ranging variations
[1:58]
in onset of deafness, level of hearing, educational
[1:59]
background, communication method, and cultural
[2:12]
affiliations; and
[2:13]
whereas, olathe has been named one of america's "most deaf
[2:14]
friendly cities"in recognition of the opportunities and
[2:15]
programs we offer, as well as culture that embraces our
[2:30]
deaf and hard-of-hearing residents; and
[2:31]
whereas, we are proud to be home to the kansas school for
[2:32]
the deaf, the museum of deaf history, arts and culture,
[2:36]
and the olathe club of the deaf; and
[2:37]
whereas, the lives of all olatheans are enriched by the
[2:38]
contributions of our deaf neighbors as well as this
[2:39]
opportunity to recognize their achievements within our
[2:47]
great city.
[2:48]
now, therefore, I, john bacon, mayor of the city of
[2:49]
olathe, do hereby proclaim september 2026 as deaf
[2:50]
awareness month in olathe, encouraging all citizens to
[2:51]
learn about and celebrate the values, culture,
[3:04]
heritage,and languages unique to the deaf community.
[3:05]
>> (clapping)
[3:20]
I just want to say to for recognizing deaf awareness month
[3:25]
and kansas school for the deaf is blessed to have it here
[3:35]
established a wonderful school for the deaf and many
[3:39]
generations throughout the area thank you for your
[3:44]
investment. Thank you.
[3:49]
>> we also want to thank the mayor for all the
[3:52]
collaboration that the city of olathe and look forward to
[3:59]
the partnership thank you for thank you for being here for
[4:01]
us.
[4:02]
>> thank you for all you do.
[4:04]
>> thank you, thank you.
[4:12]
>> (taking picture).
[4:15]
>> (clapping)
[4:29]
so over the weekend me 5 yearly granddaughter was showing
[4:37]
her ability to do do als what will I do for we have some
[4:47]
artwork and poverty line park that spells out olathe with
[4:53]
the albeit so. Can do something in september and actually
[5:01]
my granddaughter learned this in school so thank you for
[5:08]
being here. And what you do for olathe.
[5:10]
>> we'll move to the consent agenda.
[5:14]
>> consent agenda: the items listed below are
[5:15]
considered to be routine by the city council and may be
[5:22]
approved in one motion. These may include items that have
[5:23]
been reviewed by the city council in a prior planning
[5:24]
session. There will be no separate discussion unless
[5:25]
council member requests that an item be removed from the
[5:30]
consent agenda and considered separately. Are there any
[5:32]
such items councilmember creighton and like to pull item
[5:37]
g.
[5:38]
>> councilmember schoonover thank you, mr. Mayor.
[5:46]
pull item h please.
[5:50]
item h.
[5:52]
>> dr. Felter pass.
[5:53]
>> any others?
[5:56]
>> okay.>> all right. And so we have a motion to
[6:10]
approve the clocking with the exception of items f g and
[6:16]
h.
[6:17]
>> mr. Mayor, I move we approve as presented less
[6:22]
items f g and h.
[6:24]
>> we have a motion and a second.
[6:29]
>> councilmember deneault, yes.
[6:31]
>> councilmember essex, yes.
[6:33]
>> dr. Felter, yes.
[6:35]
>> mayor bacon, yes.
[6:38]
>> councilmember schoonover, yes.
[6:41]
>> councilmember vakas, yes.
[6:43]
>> councilmember creighton, yes.
[6:45]
>> motion passes 7/0.
[6:47]
>> item f is.
[6:54]
>> I believe dr. Felter and jump in the black bob
[7:00]
water tower was amazing and under biggest.
[7:04]
>> and talk about that?
[7:06]
[off mic.]
[7:10]
>> nate baldwin so, yes we on the consent agenda
[7:15]
with the pay estimate but the good news black bob number
[7:20]
2, water tower for the black bob park they came in under
[7:27]
budget to make the change order like to see that that is
[7:31]
good news and happen that happy and it is done and matches
[7:36]
the other water actuary.
[7:38]
>> the compliments thank you.
[7:41]
did a wonderful job.
[7:45]
>> thank you, thank you.
[7:46]
>>. Questions or comments?
[7:50]
>> a motion will be in order.
[7:51]
>> I I move to approve item f.
[7:53]
>> we have a motion and a second. Would the city
[7:56]
clerk call the roll.
[7:57]
>> councilmember essex, yes.
[7:59]
>> councilmember vakas, yes.
[8:02]
>> councilmember deneault, yes.
[8:04]
>> councilmember creighton, yes.
[8:06]
>> dr. Felter, yes.
[8:08]
>> councilmember schoonover, yes.
[8:09]
>> mayor bacon, yes.
[8:10]
>> motion passes 7/0.
[8:12]
>> item g.
[8:17]
>> 4(g) consideration of agreement no. 636-25 with
[8:18]
the kansas department of transportation (kdot) for funding
[8:29]
the k-10 and lone elm bypass project, pn 3-c-096-26.
[8:30]
>> I believe that was councilmember creighton yes
[8:33]
and mr. Baldwin you could have gotten more steps in the
[8:40]
30,000-foot pole for two reasons number one, this is a
[8:45]
project that we as a city were concerned about for safety
[8:49]
and our friends along with kdot pushed forward so would
[8:56]
you please talk about how this will enhance safety number
[9:00]
one, and second, a little bit about the funding of that.
[9:05]
we're going to the budget process are staff is telling you
[9:09]
we're to be going on a diet and cutting the cip and
[9:15]
looking at a number of things to save money and talk about
[9:19]
that funding that is what it will impact.
[9:23]
>> and nate baldwin city engineer so we had
[9:30]
conversations about the project as a whole. And a lot of
[9:35]
of our our concerns and the concerns of many of us the
[9:39]
safety along eam lone elm road and the pickleball court
[9:45]
and that is a thought of putting a truck bypass route that
[9:52]
safely gets trucks to college boulevard up to k-10 without
[10:00]
the going to the school it accomplishes that a
[10:05]
consideration dot will fund the full amount of that
[10:09]
project is $18.7 million no city fund or for this project.
[10:16]
>> very good.
[10:17]
>> councilmember schoonover thank you, mr. Mayor,
[10:20]
and councilmember creighton. And I want to just set what
[10:25]
we're actually voting on not voting on. Does the city
[10:31]
council think that interchange is necessarily a good idea;
[10:32]
correct.
[10:43]
the exchange a vote vote from kdot to build the by pass
[10:49]
road will make the city of olathe safer when the
[10:54]
interchange opens. That is a dumb idea, a waste of money
[10:59]
and still vote "yes" to get k dots money to mitigate the
[11:05]
risk? We -- from this idea.
[11:08]
>> two things both of those.
[11:12]
>> thank you for that for that clarification any
[11:17]
other questions on item g?
[11:21]
>> a motion will be in order. And move approval.
[11:26]
>> we have a motion and a second. Would the city
[11:27]
clerk call the roll.
[11:28]
>> councilmember essex, yes.
[11:29]
>> dr. Felter, yes.
[11:31]
>> mayor bacon, yes.
[11:32]
>> councilmember schoonover, yes.
[11:33]
>> councilmember vakas, yes.
[11:36]
>> councilmember creighton, yes.
[11:39]
>> councilmember deneault, yes.
[11:40]
>> motion passes 7/0.
[11:42]
>> item h.
[11:46]
>> 4(h) consideration of a professional services
[11:47]
agreement with hntb corporation for design of the k-10 and
[11:56]
lone elm bypass project, cpn 3-c-096-26. Councilmember
[11:57]
schoonover you yeah-
[11:58]
>> (multiple voices).
[12:00]
>> would you you like to make a motion to approve
[12:03]
this.
[12:04]
>> I'll be honored I move to approve h as presented.
[12:09]
>> h excuse me -
[12:11]
>> I second that motion.
[12:14]
>> we have a motion and a second. Would the city
[12:15]
clerk call the roll.
[12:16]
>> councilmember creighton, yes.
[12:21]
>> councilmember vakas, yes.
[12:24]
>> councilmember schoonover, yes.
[12:26]
>> dr. Felter, yes.
[12:28]
>> councilmember essex, yes.
[12:30]
>> councilmember deneault, yes.
[12:34]
>> motion passes 7/0.
[12:38]
>>> we are now on.
[12:42]
>> 5. General issues and concerns of citizens. So we
[12:43]
have several folks signed up to speak to reads did
[12:48]
guidelines and call on the first speaker.
[12:51]
>> have established the policy for meeting for
[12:54]
people that work in olathe to address the concerns to the
[12:59]
city council and speakers should address to council
[13:03]
councilmembers are not to respond and the council has
[13:08]
allocated 3 minutes for each speaker and 30 minutes and 5
[13:14]
speakers will get 3 minutes come to the podium and state
[13:24]
your name and address for the record.
[13:25]
>> welcome.
[13:27]
>> thanks sir.
[13:29]
>> okay. My name is horse miles I reside -
[13:49]
>> olathe and I have currently lived here 45 years
[13:58]
on the west side and subdivision backs up to the r-3
[14:15]
zoning to the east. For the non-apartments in our area is
[14:29]
r-1 or r-2 and go to the south have the court and r-1 and
[14:39]
r-2 goes to the east and have the let me oaks and those
[14:49]
are all just r-1, r-2s. Okay.
[14:53]
>> I'm not against the developments. That I would
[15:01]
hope that the apartments and like the one on rage view and
[15:08]
college are too good and I hope the one has been approved
[15:14]
for the zoning for college and then the one on the other
[15:21]
side of highway. This is to it be 5 hundred and 50 parking
[15:29]
stalls with 1,000 people and about three hundred and 33
[15:34]
apartment units. The major part of this traffic that is
[15:40]
coming out of this apartment complex is going to hit
[15:45]
straight and middle lanes down sunnybrook drive.
[15:50]
>> there is the middle lane school and there is
[15:55]
olathe northwest and it is all right. If the school time
[16:02]
is very dense with cars. And this situation. Also, if you
[16:09]
go east hit st. Paul grad schools and numerous daycare
[16:19]
centers in that area as everything to the north and to the
[16:22]
east is c-1 or c-2 and many I'm not opposed to develop.
[16:29]
but I am opposed to over development. Which is screw as
[16:34]
didn't fit our neighborhood
[16:37]
(bell ringing)
[16:40]
>> okay.
[16:41]
>> thank you.
[16:45]
>>
[16:46]
>> can you please come to the podium and state your
[16:50]
name and address for the record.
[16:51]
>> good evening brian I experienced homelessness. I
[17:07]
walked and struggle I've slept and hunger and theatre any
[17:15]
church opened their doors to me.
[17:18]
>> I started advocating for my brothers and sisters
[17:21]
in the homelessness and in may b-4 I stood over 40 public
[17:30]
comments not about me but that but the people living on
[17:34]
the streets every single day.
[17:35]
>> homelessness was brought up a lot and highland a
[17:41]
lot during our special use permit. That came before you
[17:47]
guys I wish it didn't have to be. I want to thank the
[17:53]
police chief was intentional with that presentation.
[17:59]
>> appreciate the breaking down and the explanation
[18:02]
of the point and time in count I on the committee and part
[18:08]
of another committee and with the d c s.
[18:11]
>> the unhoused communities are human beings that
[18:16]
might happen to passive their own decisions at the end of
[18:26]
the day, homelessness community on unhousing communities
[18:31]
are still communities I wish several of you that advocated
[18:36]
for this project didn't have to. I wish more passion and
[18:43]
in our nation and too often we try to over explain roams.
[18:50]
>> we walk, talk and bring and eat and breathe and
[18:55]
put our pants on the same way that everyone else does.
[19:01]
and our nation continues with with stipulations shorter
[19:08]
conversation and more direct meaningful and intentional
[19:12]
planning decision that produce positive outcomes we can
[19:17]
show leadership in our community. Everything is possible
[19:23]
until it is done and have a great opportunity to show true
[19:27]
leadership and asking to be part of it thank you.
[19:30]
>> k c come to the podium and state your name and
[19:37]
address for the record.
[19:38]
>> hi, I'm casey not from kansas but from fort wayne
[19:51]
idaho this is one of the anti bye sexual assault we're the
[20:02]
umbrella crossed the united states and supported three
[20:08]
hundred centers and for victims of domestic violence to
[20:14]
make that easy for survivors and adults and kids to go to
[20:20]
one place we have centers in 25 crises but this week we
[20:27]
plan for the first center in kansas in olathe no johnson
[20:31]
county I want to say hello and say a special thanks to dr.
[20:37]
felter for 2 days of planning and thank you very much. Ms.
[20:42]
essex we appreciate we are so honored to have the support
[20:46]
of this it committed group of leaders and not how you
[20:55]
intense but I grew up in a home on domestic violence we
[21:03]
created the first center in san designee we break
[21:16]
generation is cycle I'm joined by people katrina johnson
[21:22]
is the leader and brings successor agency act and sarah
[21:27]
part of our justice center team and johnson county
[21:33]
prosecutor and now douglas county with business leaders
[21:41]
and other leaders from the da's office and very involved
[21:49]
we have people coming up with more than 1 hundred I want
[21:53]
to say thank you for your commitment to public safety we
[21:57]
are going to create the first family justice center in
[22:02]
kansas I believe we will be the model for the rest of
[22:06]
state and for generations. And oprah winphrey said I
[22:15]
changed the rest of her life I have a wife and kids she
[22:20]
was right openly practices profile led george gush to
[22:28]
launch this movement not just in the united states we have
[22:34]
bipartisanship for so thank you for your commitments and
[22:41]
help us in the journey as we move forward. Thank you very
[22:45]
much.
[22:46]
>> craig miller please come to the podium and state
[22:54]
your name and address for the record.
[22:55]
>> good evening. My name is greg miller.
[23:16]
>> I've been a olathe resident since 1979 on my
[23:22]
third home here. We moved here when olathe had a
[23:27]
population of 26 thousand and was south of charlton and 51
[23:34]
street was a dirt road. I watched the city grow over the
[23:41]
years for 50 years that's for the growth has to be smart
[23:45]
and after my wife passed a few years I downsized and
[23:51]
choose my home carefully and it was single-family and our
[24:02]
neighborhood a r-1 all single-family couped homes I want
[24:11]
you to understand I don't oppose the development of the
[24:15]
sunnybrook property I look forward to that will be bring
[24:21]
to our neighborhood.
[24:22]
>> strongly oppose rc 26 zero, zero, zero 6 and
[24:29]
oppose the 3 story apartment collection to sit in our r-1
[24:39]
neighborhood just to be clear, not simply a development
[24:43]
this is a major change no density and tint and traffic and
[24:48]
character and placed next to the single-family
[24:59]
neighborhood and those are fundamentally different from
[25:02]
the homes that surround this property. The question for
[25:07]
you is can this property be responded and the question
[25:11]
should be is as the right to build this density in the
[25:17]
location I believe the answer to no and asked to have a
[25:22]
staff study will impact will not be significant enough to
[25:28]
require additional lanes or redesigned intersections but
[25:33]
the store is not there the three hundred and 36 apartments
[25:42]
are no there how can you adequately judge with all the
[25:53]
additional traffic around that area and surrounding
[25:56]
schools and churches. The city should evaluate the impact
[26:02]
from grouping this restoring I respecting ask the council
[26:07]
to deny this project as opposed and require complete
[26:12]
valuation
[26:13]
(bell ringing)
[26:15]
before you make your decision please don't let one
[26:20]
rezoning decision compromise and establish the
[26:23]
neighborhood that is already been a great value as part of
[26:26]
the olathe for many years and growth should strengthen our
[26:30]
neighborhoods not peter marsh.
[26:43]
>> state your name and address for the record.
[26:45]
>> mayor and members, I'm pete marsh, I live in
[27:03]
gatewood. Thank you for your time and my comments in
[27:08]
regards to the zoning we'll be voting on september 15th.
[27:11]
we have been olatheans and 9 years ago we built our land
[27:19]
we reasonably expect our styles are to be built
[27:23]
underdevelopment to be continued. We didn't buy in the
[27:28]
3 story apartments. The presentation you'll be looking at
[27:35]
does not accurately describe the neighborhood you're asked
[27:39]
to change. This is a single-family under the umbrella
[27:45]
mixed or r-1 or rp 3 west of this site that is not a small
[27:56]
labor issue, that was on page 8 of the staff cites 6
[28:05]
townhomes as a compliment to the homes on the south side
[28:12]
to treatment in the report of gate wood to the west.
[28:16]
staff has conceded the townhomes are - gate wood is
[28:27]
single-family homes this is making it worse. The planning
[28:35]
commission had to walk the site with a measuring wheel.
[28:40]
my driveway is - 995 feet and 60 feet east of the okay.
[28:50]
creek and under the development zone is 1,00010 and
[28:54]
halfway to the proposed site moving towards the ridge is
[28:58]
1,000 plus 14 and are to 24-foot from the homes this is a
[29:08]
3 story development will be a 4 or 5 story structure from
[29:13]
our homes that is not a minor detail this is against a
[29:21]
single-family neighborhood not on a recommendation that
[29:25]
one mischaracterizes the neighborhood and too omits it is
[29:32]
- and 3, leaves valuation concerns ongoing answered we
[29:38]
have that from our backyard don't be deceived with the
[29:43]
trees and the leaves go away in the wintertime we would
[29:53]
welcome the development and owner occupied townhomes
[29:57]
attached homes under the objectives and ownership is
[30:05]
building the long term residency. Thank you for your time.
[30:19]
>> thank you for all the speakers and now move to
[30:24]
planning section.
[30:29]
>> 6. Convene for planning session. Report on any
[30:33]
questions on this? Or any a need for a presentation?
[30:37]
>> move to the report number 2, a report regarding
[30:41]
the proposed amendments to the title vi of the olathe
[30:49]
municipal code and so - just a brief explanation of this.
[30:56]
I did read in the report that this is necessary for us to
[31:04]
work for the county to I guess inspect if we don't adopt
[31:16]
the codes the county -- whoever enforces those rules will
[31:22]
be able to do it inside the city limits?
[31:25]
>> is that correct?
[31:26]
>> the city attorney. It is correct, mayor. We
[31:31]
have those codes adopted I think the last in 2004. They
[31:38]
were single and johnson county updated them a couple of
[31:41]
years ago and they went into effect. But for us to keep
[31:48]
current on the latest, we have to readopt the updated
[31:53]
version to continue the current version of the county code
[31:59]
as --
[32:02]
>> is it stuff we already do in the park?
[32:07]
>> I think that ryan told me that there is a sanitary
[32:12]
part of code that governs private sewerage. It is
[32:19]
essentially unchanged the aquatic code is semi public
[32:28]
aquatic swimming pools the changes allow the city to
[32:34]
implement the regulations on this part. So it gives the
[32:39]
city more room to regulate.
[32:42]
>> that for our faculties not hoa; is that correct?
[32:49]
and they apply to the hoa and semi public pools but not to
[32:55]
the back that is the back pool.
[32:57]
>> okay. And that's all the questions I have bob.
[32:58]
thank you.
[33:02]
>> and we'll move to.
[33:06]
>> 6(b) discussion items
[33:07]
discussion on the santa fe, ridgeview to mur-len,
[33:12]
improvements project, pn 3-c-025-18.
[33:13]
>> teresa city engineer joins us for a presentation.
[33:19]
>> thank you mayor and city council I'm teresa the
[33:35]
assistant engineer I'm here to talk about the I-35 work
[33:40]
project and the aesthetics. In july I presented about a
[33:49]
deep scope and the schedule and phasing and by today, I
[33:57]
want to bring you an overview of the aesthetics we're to
[34:05]
talking about 9 and lighting and while this interchange
[34:13]
not a gay way to like 119th street or one and 59 and I-35
[34:20]
the interchange is a vocal point to the downtown area we
[34:28]
move through the presentation we'll see key pieces that
[34:34]
tie to the downtown areas as it stands today and the
[34:41]
aesthetics of this project are focusing on the experience
[34:45]
of driveway driver and pedestrian we want the vocal point
[34:56]
not on the experience of I-35 as a reminder this is being
[35:00]
constructed as a stable point interchange that is similar
[35:04]
to I-35 and the big the vocal point is the signal and in
[35:13]
the middle as all of traffic unit at that signal so really
[35:20]
the trucks structure is the vocal point and the wave that
[35:26]
you can see on that truck structure is on the support on
[35:32]
either side bring this element to the.
[35:35]
>> clerk, call the roll. Aspect of the design here.
[35:39]
you can see there is a double fencing on the bridge
[35:45]
barriers that matches the fencing on 119th street over the
[35:50]
railroad at the interchange and will be installed on the
[35:54]
119th street bridges over the any portion of 119th street.
[36:02]
little brick portion of medians the pattern on those brick
[36:07]
that is mimic the downtown streetscape ties those into the
[36:14]
element of the downtown as well. And heavy landscaping
[36:19]
provides added experience for vehicles and pedestrians as
[36:23]
they move through the space. And looking closer at the
[36:29]
decorative trust supports it, it is hard to depict on the
[36:35]
visual, but if you look at the picture feel person walking
[36:39]
underneath the trust structure you feel the scale how that
[36:44]
will be and really will be a large and impactful element
[36:50]
people will be passing through on this bridge. The trust
[36:55]
supports the medal panel on each side to the space and
[37:03]
again, as you can see with the double fencing and the
[37:07]
decorative patterns on the elements to olathe.
[37:16]
>> this is a view from the interstate, as I
[37:21]
mentioned, want the experience on santa fe but tie oig
[37:26]
elements on the intrastate that wave pattern on the
[37:32]
retaining walls as you continue on the intrastate at the
[37:35]
same feel with the decorative wave patterns throughout.
[37:43]
moving on to the medium landscaping this is just an
[37:46]
overview of where our medians will be located throughout
[37:50]
the project and everything this is heavy dashed black
[37:55]
lines will be mediums on santa fe and on the side street.
[37:59]
and creating the interchange as vocal point we want to
[38:05]
focus on the medians on the interchange bridge itself and
[38:10]
to the interchange to everything in red is where we'll
[38:15]
will focus our heavy landscaping and mediums and the
[38:24]
remainder will be more toward the standards for the trees.
[38:39]
any mediums 18 feet wide will be more narrow so you can
[38:47]
see and the wave pattern continues throughout the planning
[38:52]
bed and the decorative bridge on the mediums as well.
[38:56]
>> to give you a glimpse of the interchange at
[39:06]
night. The flood lighting inside the support creates a
[39:11]
vocal point for the.
[39:13]
>> and under the caps will guide them along the route
[39:17]
as they move across the bridge. Looking at the interchange
[39:22]
from the perspective of the intrastate we really are
[39:27]
highlighting the column lighting and the flood lighting
[39:31]
one little trust will be a vocal point but as a reminder
[39:37]
we want this on top of of the bridge as opposed to to the
[39:43]
experience on the interchange itself. As a summary of what
[39:49]
we discussed will have a large trust support and will
[39:53]
provide the vocal point on the bridge and have the fencing
[39:58]
that matches 119th street and the decorative bring that
[40:04]
ties the interchange into the downtown landscape and the
[40:08]
heavy landscaping adjacent to the interchange and then the
[40:12]
lighting will focus on the experience along santa fe with
[40:15]
the experience and then the lighting for I-35 and the
[40:27]
flood lights and with that, leave you with the overview of
[40:32]
the property interchange and I'm here to answer any
[40:36]
questions.
[40:37]
>> thank you, teresa councilmember vakas thank you,
[40:41]
mr. Mayor.
[40:42]
>> super presentation and the is only point
[40:49]
interchange makes sense. As I envision I-35 and a-37 is
[41:00]
overwhelming it looks great but in reality will be
[41:06]
overwhelming do we envision bicycle traffic on the
[41:11]
sidewalks.
[41:12]
>> bicyclists will be accommodated and 10-foot walk
[41:16]
on the north side of the bridge and - so could be on the
[41:23]
streets themselves but at their own risk will want them to
[41:31]
be on the sidewalks.
[41:32]
>> right.
[41:33]
>> the vehicle landscape is irrigated.
[41:37]
>> yes or no some will be irrigated and so will be
[41:44]
water?
[41:46]
>> will be this is full of sun and the beautify
[41:53]
landscaping will be look great with adequate water but if
[41:59]
it doesn't we don't want to not maintain this and you're
[42:09]
assuring we we have enough water.
[42:12]
>> yes. Those islands will be irrigated.
[42:17]
>> you mentioned not a gateway to olathe explain to
[42:22]
me what what makes 119th street the gateway and this not a
[42:27]
gateway.
[42:28]
>> 119th street street and think the north side and
[42:32]
159 on the street.
[42:35]
>> (multiple voices.)
[42:36]
>> and. Okay.
[42:37]
>> so we're in the city here so got it.
[42:39]
>> okay. Good. Thank you very much. I appreciate
[42:42]
that.
[42:43]
>> you're welcome.
[42:44]
>> councilmember schoonover.
[42:45]
>> thank you and great preservation I was going to
[42:51]
pull on what similar councilmember vakas was asking about
[42:54]
the heavy.
[42:56]
>> clerk, call the roll. Element associated with
[42:58]
that. And with this project can you walk you through this
[43:04]
looks great I want it accommodate those folks that do need
[43:08]
to walk or be on their bikes and have a safe way to do
[43:15]
that but not concern we need to encourage people walking
[43:23]
later than santa fe and I-35 I'm thinking about the now
[43:28]
and 87 street and I just I I can't imagine I know we're
[43:37]
make it safe as we can but the safer opposite not to walk
[43:42]
there.
[43:43]
>> currently.
[43:44]
>> clerk, call the roll. Accommodations across santa
[43:47]
fe and we're ultimately providing with this a we're not
[44:00]
trying to increase.
[44:01]
>> not trying to there.
[44:03]
>> clerk, call the roll. Traffic but providing a safe
[44:08]
method to so prettyer than today.
[44:13]
>> I noticed in the slide paving to match the
[44:19]
downtown olathe how far will this is we're not going to
[44:26]
downtown; right?
[44:27]
>> this project will continue to ridgeview currently
[44:30]
the downtown streets for little kansas city road this
[44:36]
project takes us to the santa fe bridge and one day in the
[44:40]
future maybe money-
[44:41]
>> (multiple voices).
[44:42]
>> connect the two?
[44:43]
>> okay. My final question has to do with with the
[44:48]
left-hand turn access. If looks like we are going to ends
[44:54]
up restricting some of the and with those mediums and
[44:57]
perhaps now I can turn west on santa fe we have one
[45:02]
left-hand turn access to the buildings those businesses I
[45:06]
guess on the south side on the north side getting rid of
[45:12]
some of that.
[45:13]
>> a big portion is the big d one way to accommodate
[45:17]
a safer corridor to control the access points. This is
[45:22]
really what we're doing closing off that medium, as well
[45:26]
as, closing off and cul-de-sacking with the interchange
[45:32]
need to pull those access points as far away as we can
[45:36]
that's what we're trying to accomplish and getting those
[45:41]
folks to the signalized page to move through that. And
[45:49]
will they - you mentioned cul-de-sacking push them on park
[45:55]
and have -
[45:57]
>> that is all have the option to do both.
[45:59]
>> uh-huh and if we're pushing more traffic on
[46:07]
ridgeview and park that is already band is there any plan
[46:12]
to do a type of stop or -
[46:15]
>>
[46:16]
>> (multiple voices).
[46:17]
>> not part of this project.
[46:18]
>> thank you very much. Councilmember vogt.
[46:23]
>> thank you, mr. Mayor.
[46:25]
>> along the lines thinking about pedestrians I was
[46:29]
thinking with santa fe being in the middle, and we have a
[46:34]
lot of west traffic including walking and biking might -
[46:40]
how long will this bridge structure will it last and
[46:46]
replace it again 50 years.
[46:48]
>> it is about 50 years before we do that and we do
[46:54]
design this for a 20/40 we starred in 2018 and with the
[47:06]
2040 traffic counts.
[47:07]
>> I'm wondering if we have more people that are
[47:12]
wanting to walk and bike they need to walk and bike that
[47:18]
are going to walk across santa fe that maybe we should
[47:23]
make sure make it have better buffers and safer so those
[47:30]
are where. Any questions? Are and one are we are talking
[47:35]
about increasing with the sidewalks the width all the way
[47:40]
to bridge.
[47:41]
>> yes. Have a 10 sidewalk.
[47:52]
>> fantastic.
[47:53]
>> I lost design it look really, really great and not
[47:57]
final by any means; right?
[47:59]
>> right.
[48:00]
>> I'll be curious to see what the measures can be
[48:04]
done to make that calm traffic more and feel more safe to
[48:12]
pedestrians I think a lot of people will want to walk and
[48:16]
bike. I'm not sure I would want to encourage them not to
[48:22]
but maybe people that have kids with bikes and strollers
[48:28]
admit comfortable.
[48:39]
>> we pulled the sidewalks as far away you have a
[48:44]
fair amount of sidewalk and landscaping between those.
[48:50]
>> and the drivers as well. So as much as we could to
[48:54]
the corridor we offer set that sidewalk to provide that
[48:58]
separation and that distance. Sounds good I have a
[49:03]
question that maybe answered. And we know how busy it is
[49:15]
and give everyone a better feel of driving through that
[49:19]
but I noticed is speed limit is what 35 on santa fe and I
[49:25]
believe that is 35 between downtown and intrastate and
[49:31]
increases not east. I don't know we have any intention of
[49:36]
changing the speed limit I - I see many people drive
[49:41]
farther my question will be what part of the aesthetics or
[49:47]
landscaping could help people to slow down and is that
[49:54]
something you're thinking about for the purpose of.
[49:57]
>> sure. That's a great question.
[50:03]
>> this is maybe not a speed rouser but the traffic
[50:10]
in and of itself will provide people to get there there
[50:14]
and on a more reliable basis is a lot of people kind of
[50:20]
get upset or agitated so they speed up but if we give them
[50:29]
a better experience may help with the calming.
[50:34]
>> look forward to more conversation.
[50:37]
>> councilmember creighton and pretty sure has but
[50:46]
said I like the way we're incorporating the useful
[50:52]
elements navigates I don't want to sound anti but have a
[50:57]
very nice fences rather than chain linked fence and sculpt
[51:08]
and that is a conversation for another day how much we
[51:14]
acceptance spend on the art I'm not opposed to it but a
[51:21]
time the budget is on our mind and want to I want to put
[51:25]
that out there so thank you for making the elements
[51:29]
useful. And as long as we're on aesthetics I want to beat
[51:35]
the same drum for the next 4 years a lot of work doing
[51:43]
everything we can to mitigate try to say it not but not
[51:52]
look like a truck stop we have semis and I was driving
[51:59]
here tonight and spent a lot of time with the kid
[52:03]
herbicides were used and my grandpa will really over in
[52:11]
his grave any comments we need to - meantime let's do what
[52:20]
we can to make that look as nice and possible until we're
[52:25]
done.
[52:26]
>> thank you for that.
[52:27]
>> dr. Felter thank you, mr. Mayor.
[52:30]
>> teresa it is great I lost pretty vision the metal
[52:39]
component the railing will be different at an what we have
[52:43]
on one 27 overpass that is chipping off and college.
[52:52]
>> yes. We mean a different design element will be
[52:57]
balance in his steel I'm sorry steel unions with the.
[53:06]
>> one hundred and 27 street is paint on the paint
[53:13]
should last longer and in college.
[53:19]
>> before workload over the train tracks it was
[53:24]
terrible and is that the same scenario there as well?
[53:30]
>> this should last longer.
[53:33]
>> fix that because they're nice rails but just
[53:39]
wearing out. I love the planting it is beautiful like the
[53:43]
incorporates of pedestrians and traffic by a the we're
[53:48]
olathe it is hot or cold and a extreme we is where people
[53:53]
walking and ryan talking about the experience of
[53:56]
homelessness and I'm sensitive of that and seeing the
[54:02]
barriers and making to safer as well so teresa you mention
[54:07]
in the last preservation if you if you don't mind taking
[54:11]
us back to the 119th street I saw that presentation the
[54:19]
one meeting owe missed in a long time and surprised to
[54:25]
hear I department of motor vehicles didn't hear any
[54:28]
dialogue is new piece for kdot adding on 119th street and
[54:34]
closing lanes there?
[54:36]
>> yeah the southbound the work on the southbound
[54:41]
ramp 119th street and piece that was added as a matter of
[54:45]
fact what they trying to fix the left turning move to
[54:52]
accommodate the semitrailer trucks and at closure of that
[54:57]
I guess the inside left-hand turn.
[55:00]
>> and again, the northbound the closure; right?
[55:04]
>> northbound 119th street reconstructing that paste
[55:08]
to tie into that.
[55:09]
>> I why think the people understand that is heavy
[55:17]
traffic.
[55:18]
>> the - will have another public meeting closer to
[55:24]
the hearing and we'll get to information out.
[55:27]
>> thank you very much. And absolutely.
[55:29]
>> councilmember schoonover.
[55:30]
>> thank you I'm sorry for the follow-up I mentioned
[55:35]
we designed this for 20/40.
[55:38]
>> that was what we did the traffic study when owe
[55:42]
started the project.
[55:44]
>> did that mean I want to make sure does that mean
[55:47]
that in 2040 be the capacity.
[55:54]
>> no lasts us there 2040 that is our minimum design
[56:00]
and okay. Okay good deal sorry.
[56:03]
>> councilmember essex.
[56:04]
>> thank you, mr. Mayor.
[56:05]
>> it is beautiful I'm kind of and looks so simple to
[56:12]
do a task and turning around left here that looks like we
[56:21]
not continue drivers I love and as much as you love the
[56:28]
topic of 119th street on the lighting bridge good or bad
[56:33]
or ugly necessary lighting on this bridge or have a
[56:38]
simple.
[56:39]
>> the plan to leave it whole and not match those
[56:42]
elements on the street to have a separation.
[56:45]
>> nice thanks.
[56:48]
>> thanks teresa it looks nice and it is very taste
[56:57]
full and some of the comments trying to make maybe more
[57:03]
barriers torpedos and give them more safer sprays
[57:08]
eastbound extends under the columns in of the barriers
[57:17]
appears to be more safe for pedestrians and then at night.
[57:22]
>> uh-huh.
[57:23]
>> I'm okay would not fancy lights but as much as -
[57:29]
>> you can light up did walkways it is will be
[57:37]
helpful and crossing over I-35 is pretty dark at night we
[57:41]
have one light that helps a lot but I just as much as
[57:49]
electricity.
[57:51]
>> what is difficult to show on this exhibit is we
[57:56]
have all of the street lighting and on that trust.
[58:00]
>> and it is very difficult to show own the exhibit
[58:04]
we want to kind of.
[58:06]
>> (multiple voices).
[58:07]
>> but more down lights and you can kind of see all
[58:12]
the street lights in the background there and just muted
[58:16]
in the exhibit by will be - I mean a standard lit street
[58:22]
as well.
[58:23]
>> and with the led you can do more.
[58:26]
>> I misspoke early the design was 20/50.
[58:32]
>> currently
[58:33]
(laughter).
[58:35]
>> so the brick veneer I don't want to have things
[58:41]
popping off because of the water might creep in behind it
[58:49]
what kind of safeguards for the veneer.
[58:53]
>> we conduct all and stain perfect.
[58:57]
>> that eliminates that issue.
[58:59]
>> all right.
[59:00]
>> well, it looks great I think that your coming
[59:05]
back with more final designs at some point.
[59:09]
>> let's talk about the big thing we have not talked
[59:12]
this is the first time I've seen it saving the state
[59:17]
$75 million. They pledged one hundred and $40 million and
[59:22]
now the states contribution is - how did we do that.
[59:27]
>> where did that information.
[59:29]
>> that is in the council agenda item talks about
[59:32]
the $65 million so on page 770 a year savings to the
[59:41]
state.
[59:42]
>> this budget it is outlined is the original budget
[59:48]
we authored this only included the I-35 interchange
[59:54]
interchanging and the auxiliary we added scope and kdot
[1:00:01]
increased they're finland's as you can see with the kdot
[1:00:04]
and the consideration dot are are money and the grant
[1:00:07]
funding is not shown on that.
[1:00:09]
>> so the one hundred million dollars is not shown.
[1:00:13]
>> (multiple voices).
[1:00:14]
>> yeah.
[1:00:15]
>> all right. This is. Okay. I missed that okay.
[1:00:19]
thank you.
[1:00:20]
>> absolutely.
[1:00:21]
>> all right.
[1:00:22]
>> thank you I don't see any other questions and the
[1:00:24]
presentation and. Thank you for your time.
[1:00:27]
>> we'll move to additional items.
[1:00:31]
>> thank you, mr. Mayor.
[1:00:32]
>> and what is it not september. And construction
[1:00:37]
road construction I want to thank the infrastructure now
[1:00:41]
starting to see some of the projects in the summer will
[1:00:46]
wrap and great to drive on you knew paste going back.
[1:00:52]
>> councilmember essex and thank you, mr. Mayor.
[1:00:53]
>> I wanted to make a comment I'm sure many have seen
[1:00:59]
on the some site talking about issues with trains. And we
[1:01:04]
have a grant from the federal rail administration super
[1:01:09]
existed we want our opinion on "what looks like go the
[1:01:16]
kansas back slash railroads when the in-person engagement
[1:01:23]
events are and we've been waiting for many years so I'm
[1:01:27]
excited to see that inch forward a little bit more and I
[1:01:34]
would be remiss if I didn't talk about kevin yellowing was
[1:01:39]
promoted to integral - I'm trying to find my notes.
[1:01:44]
>> I a s chief international association of the fire
[1:01:52]
chief and represented olathe at the international level
[1:01:57]
and I'm super excited to have him represent us so
[1:02:05]
congratulations pete.
[1:02:08]
>> councilmember vakas.
[1:02:09]
>> thank you, mr. Mayor. First of all, thank you,
[1:02:12]
mr. Perkins and second I look forward to cooler weather.
[1:02:13]
thank you.
[1:02:21]
>> councilmember schoonover thank you, mr. Mayor.
[1:02:22]
a couple of quick items thank you to the city staff outer
[1:02:26]
working in the heat on the infrastructure projects on our
[1:02:31]
public works everything doing outside during those hot
[1:02:36]
days to help keep the city running thank you to the star 6
[1:02:41]
didn't get to enjoy air conditioning during the day and
[1:02:47]
september is natural suicide awareness and prevention
[1:02:52]
month so just a reminder for everyone to check in with our
[1:02:56]
friends he loved ones and see how things are going.
[1:03:01]
>> councilmember creighton nothing.
[1:03:04]
>> city manager susan sherman.
[1:03:06]
>> have one quick remembered holding the public
[1:03:10]
hearing for the 2027 budget it 5:30 in the council
[1:03:15]
chambers at city hall and you can I'm or call the city
[1:03:19]
clerk's office and sign up to speak or show up if you like
[1:03:23]
to address the council on the budget. The council will
[1:03:29]
vote on september 15th. And you can read all the budget
[1:03:34]
documents -- confident and our calendar is on the website
[1:03:39]
as olathe/date. Thank you to everyone that takes the time
[1:03:46]
to give us input on one of the most important things we do
[1:03:55]
each year. A reminder about the activities. And thank
[1:04:09]
you, thank you for being here. We are adjourned.
[1:04:11]
[meeting adjourned]