City Council on 2026-09-01 7:00 PM

Olathe, KS · · More Olathe, KS meetings · More Kansas meetings

Transcript

Download: Text · SRT
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT

This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.

[0:02] (gavel)
[0:03] >> good evening and welcome to the city of olathe,
[0:04] city council regular meeting at 7:00pm., tuesday,
[0:07] september 1, 2026.
[0:08] >> the first item on the agenda is the pledge of
[0:12] allegiance. Please stand with me for the pledge.
[0:15] I pledge allegiance to the flag of the united states of
[0:17] america and to the republic for which it stands, one
[0:18] nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice
[0:35] for all. We'll now to special business.
[0:39] >> 3(a) special business
[0:40] proclamation recognizing september as deaf awareness
[0:41] month. One guess great things about olathe our home the
[0:47] kansas school.
[0:52] >> proclamation
[0:53] whereas, the city of olathe is proud to recognize and
[0:54] celebrate the varied perspectives, backgrounds and
[0:55] cultures that make up our vibrant and diverse city,
[1:00] including the deaf community; and joining us to expect
[1:02] this year the kansas school for the deaf with you both
[1:09] please join me up front?
[1:13] >> I'll take a minute to read the proclamation and
[1:34] tell us was going on.
[1:37] >> proclamation
[1:38] whereas, the city of olathe is proud to recognize and
[1:39] celebrate the varied perspectives, backgrounds and
[1:40] cultures that make up our vibrant and diverse city,
[1:51] including the deaf community; and
[1:52] whereas, we are better because of our deaf and
[1:53] hard-of-hearing neighbors,individuals with an alternative
[1:56] sensory and social experience who harness the power of
[1:57] visual language, and who come from wide ranging variations
[1:58] in onset of deafness, level of hearing, educational
[1:59] background, communication method, and cultural
[2:12] affiliations; and
[2:13] whereas, olathe has been named one of america's "most deaf
[2:14] friendly cities"in recognition of the opportunities and
[2:15] programs we offer, as well as culture that embraces our
[2:30] deaf and hard-of-hearing residents; and
[2:31] whereas, we are proud to be home to the kansas school for
[2:32] the deaf, the museum of deaf history, arts and culture,
[2:36] and the olathe club of the deaf; and
[2:37] whereas, the lives of all olatheans are enriched by the
[2:38] contributions of our deaf neighbors as well as this
[2:39] opportunity to recognize their achievements within our
[2:47] great city.
[2:48] now, therefore, I, john bacon, mayor of the city of
[2:49] olathe, do hereby proclaim september 2026 as deaf
[2:50] awareness month in olathe, encouraging all citizens to
[2:51] learn about and celebrate the values, culture,
[3:04] heritage,and languages unique to the deaf community.
[3:05] >> (clapping)
[3:20] I just want to say to for recognizing deaf awareness month
[3:25] and kansas school for the deaf is blessed to have it here
[3:35] established a wonderful school for the deaf and many
[3:39] generations throughout the area thank you for your
[3:44] investment. Thank you.
[3:49] >> we also want to thank the mayor for all the
[3:52] collaboration that the city of olathe and look forward to
[3:59] the partnership thank you for thank you for being here for
[4:01] us.
[4:02] >> thank you for all you do.
[4:04] >> thank you, thank you.
[4:12] >> (taking picture).
[4:15] >> (clapping)
[4:29] so over the weekend me 5 yearly granddaughter was showing
[4:37] her ability to do do als what will I do for we have some
[4:47] artwork and poverty line park that spells out olathe with
[4:53] the albeit so. Can do something in september and actually
[5:01] my granddaughter learned this in school so thank you for
[5:08] being here. And what you do for olathe.
[5:10] >> we'll move to the consent agenda.
[5:14] >> consent agenda: the items listed below are
[5:15] considered to be routine by the city council and may be
[5:22] approved in one motion. These may include items that have
[5:23] been reviewed by the city council in a prior planning
[5:24] session. There will be no separate discussion unless
[5:25] council member requests that an item be removed from the
[5:30] consent agenda and considered separately. Are there any
[5:32] such items councilmember creighton and like to pull item
[5:37] g.
[5:38] >> councilmember schoonover thank you, mr. Mayor.
[5:46] pull item h please.
[5:50] item h.
[5:52] >> dr. Felter pass.
[5:53] >> any others?
[5:56] >> okay.>> all right. And so we have a motion to
[6:10] approve the clocking with the exception of items f g and
[6:16] h.
[6:17] >> mr. Mayor, I move we approve as presented less
[6:22] items f g and h.
[6:24] >> we have a motion and a second.
[6:29] >> councilmember deneault, yes.
[6:31] >> councilmember essex, yes.
[6:33] >> dr. Felter, yes.
[6:35] >> mayor bacon, yes.
[6:38] >> councilmember schoonover, yes.
[6:41] >> councilmember vakas, yes.
[6:43] >> councilmember creighton, yes.
[6:45] >> motion passes 7/0.
[6:47] >> item f is.
[6:54] >> I believe dr. Felter and jump in the black bob
[7:00] water tower was amazing and under biggest.
[7:04] >> and talk about that?
[7:06] [off mic.]
[7:10] >> nate baldwin so, yes we on the consent agenda
[7:15] with the pay estimate but the good news black bob number
[7:20] 2, water tower for the black bob park they came in under
[7:27] budget to make the change order like to see that that is
[7:31] good news and happen that happy and it is done and matches
[7:36] the other water actuary.
[7:38] >> the compliments thank you.
[7:41] did a wonderful job.
[7:45] >> thank you, thank you.
[7:46] >>. Questions or comments?
[7:50] >> a motion will be in order.
[7:51] >> I I move to approve item f.
[7:53] >> we have a motion and a second. Would the city
[7:56] clerk call the roll.
[7:57] >> councilmember essex, yes.
[7:59] >> councilmember vakas, yes.
[8:02] >> councilmember deneault, yes.
[8:04] >> councilmember creighton, yes.
[8:06] >> dr. Felter, yes.
[8:08] >> councilmember schoonover, yes.
[8:09] >> mayor bacon, yes.
[8:10] >> motion passes 7/0.
[8:12] >> item g.
[8:17] >> 4(g) consideration of agreement no. 636-25 with
[8:18] the kansas department of transportation (kdot) for funding
[8:29] the k-10 and lone elm bypass project, pn 3-c-096-26.
[8:30] >> I believe that was councilmember creighton yes
[8:33] and mr. Baldwin you could have gotten more steps in the
[8:40] 30,000-foot pole for two reasons number one, this is a
[8:45] project that we as a city were concerned about for safety
[8:49] and our friends along with kdot pushed forward so would
[8:56] you please talk about how this will enhance safety number
[9:00] one, and second, a little bit about the funding of that.
[9:05] we're going to the budget process are staff is telling you
[9:09] we're to be going on a diet and cutting the cip and
[9:15] looking at a number of things to save money and talk about
[9:19] that funding that is what it will impact.
[9:23] >> and nate baldwin city engineer so we had
[9:30] conversations about the project as a whole. And a lot of
[9:35] of our our concerns and the concerns of many of us the
[9:39] safety along eam lone elm road and the pickleball court
[9:45] and that is a thought of putting a truck bypass route that
[9:52] safely gets trucks to college boulevard up to k-10 without
[10:00] the going to the school it accomplishes that a
[10:05] consideration dot will fund the full amount of that
[10:09] project is $18.7 million no city fund or for this project.
[10:16] >> very good.
[10:17] >> councilmember schoonover thank you, mr. Mayor,
[10:20] and councilmember creighton. And I want to just set what
[10:25] we're actually voting on not voting on. Does the city
[10:31] council think that interchange is necessarily a good idea;
[10:32] correct.
[10:43] the exchange a vote vote from kdot to build the by pass
[10:49] road will make the city of olathe safer when the
[10:54] interchange opens. That is a dumb idea, a waste of money
[10:59] and still vote "yes" to get k dots money to mitigate the
[11:05] risk? We -- from this idea.
[11:08] >> two things both of those.
[11:12] >> thank you for that for that clarification any
[11:17] other questions on item g?
[11:21] >> a motion will be in order. And move approval.
[11:26] >> we have a motion and a second. Would the city
[11:27] clerk call the roll.
[11:28] >> councilmember essex, yes.
[11:29] >> dr. Felter, yes.
[11:31] >> mayor bacon, yes.
[11:32] >> councilmember schoonover, yes.
[11:33] >> councilmember vakas, yes.
[11:36] >> councilmember creighton, yes.
[11:39] >> councilmember deneault, yes.
[11:40] >> motion passes 7/0.
[11:42] >> item h.
[11:46] >> 4(h) consideration of a professional services
[11:47] agreement with hntb corporation for design of the k-10 and
[11:56] lone elm bypass project, cpn 3-c-096-26. Councilmember
[11:57] schoonover you yeah-
[11:58] >> (multiple voices).
[12:00] >> would you you like to make a motion to approve
[12:03] this.
[12:04] >> I'll be honored I move to approve h as presented.
[12:09] >> h excuse me -
[12:11] >> I second that motion.
[12:14] >> we have a motion and a second. Would the city
[12:15] clerk call the roll.
[12:16] >> councilmember creighton, yes.
[12:21] >> councilmember vakas, yes.
[12:24] >> councilmember schoonover, yes.
[12:26] >> dr. Felter, yes.
[12:28] >> councilmember essex, yes.
[12:30] >> councilmember deneault, yes.
[12:34] >> motion passes 7/0.
[12:38] >>> we are now on.
[12:42] >> 5. General issues and concerns of citizens. So we
[12:43] have several folks signed up to speak to reads did
[12:48] guidelines and call on the first speaker.
[12:51] >> have established the policy for meeting for
[12:54] people that work in olathe to address the concerns to the
[12:59] city council and speakers should address to council
[13:03] councilmembers are not to respond and the council has
[13:08] allocated 3 minutes for each speaker and 30 minutes and 5
[13:14] speakers will get 3 minutes come to the podium and state
[13:24] your name and address for the record.
[13:25] >> welcome.
[13:27] >> thanks sir.
[13:29] >> okay. My name is horse miles I reside -
[13:49] >> olathe and I have currently lived here 45 years
[13:58] on the west side and subdivision backs up to the r-3
[14:15] zoning to the east. For the non-apartments in our area is
[14:29] r-1 or r-2 and go to the south have the court and r-1 and
[14:39] r-2 goes to the east and have the let me oaks and those
[14:49] are all just r-1, r-2s. Okay.
[14:53] >> I'm not against the developments. That I would
[15:01] hope that the apartments and like the one on rage view and
[15:08] college are too good and I hope the one has been approved
[15:14] for the zoning for college and then the one on the other
[15:21] side of highway. This is to it be 5 hundred and 50 parking
[15:29] stalls with 1,000 people and about three hundred and 33
[15:34] apartment units. The major part of this traffic that is
[15:40] coming out of this apartment complex is going to hit
[15:45] straight and middle lanes down sunnybrook drive.
[15:50] >> there is the middle lane school and there is
[15:55] olathe northwest and it is all right. If the school time
[16:02] is very dense with cars. And this situation. Also, if you
[16:09] go east hit st. Paul grad schools and numerous daycare
[16:19] centers in that area as everything to the north and to the
[16:22] east is c-1 or c-2 and many I'm not opposed to develop.
[16:29] but I am opposed to over development. Which is screw as
[16:34] didn't fit our neighborhood
[16:37] (bell ringing)
[16:40] >> okay.
[16:41] >> thank you.
[16:45] >>
[16:46] >> can you please come to the podium and state your
[16:50] name and address for the record.
[16:51] >> good evening brian I experienced homelessness. I
[17:07] walked and struggle I've slept and hunger and theatre any
[17:15] church opened their doors to me.
[17:18] >> I started advocating for my brothers and sisters
[17:21] in the homelessness and in may b-4 I stood over 40 public
[17:30] comments not about me but that but the people living on
[17:34] the streets every single day.
[17:35] >> homelessness was brought up a lot and highland a
[17:41] lot during our special use permit. That came before you
[17:47] guys I wish it didn't have to be. I want to thank the
[17:53] police chief was intentional with that presentation.
[17:59] >> appreciate the breaking down and the explanation
[18:02] of the point and time in count I on the committee and part
[18:08] of another committee and with the d c s.
[18:11] >> the unhoused communities are human beings that
[18:16] might happen to passive their own decisions at the end of
[18:26] the day, homelessness community on unhousing communities
[18:31] are still communities I wish several of you that advocated
[18:36] for this project didn't have to. I wish more passion and
[18:43] in our nation and too often we try to over explain roams.
[18:50] >> we walk, talk and bring and eat and breathe and
[18:55] put our pants on the same way that everyone else does.
[19:01] and our nation continues with with stipulations shorter
[19:08] conversation and more direct meaningful and intentional
[19:12] planning decision that produce positive outcomes we can
[19:17] show leadership in our community. Everything is possible
[19:23] until it is done and have a great opportunity to show true
[19:27] leadership and asking to be part of it thank you.
[19:30] >> k c come to the podium and state your name and
[19:37] address for the record.
[19:38] >> hi, I'm casey not from kansas but from fort wayne
[19:51] idaho this is one of the anti bye sexual assault we're the
[20:02] umbrella crossed the united states and supported three
[20:08] hundred centers and for victims of domestic violence to
[20:14] make that easy for survivors and adults and kids to go to
[20:20] one place we have centers in 25 crises but this week we
[20:27] plan for the first center in kansas in olathe no johnson
[20:31] county I want to say hello and say a special thanks to dr.
[20:37] felter for 2 days of planning and thank you very much. Ms.
[20:42] essex we appreciate we are so honored to have the support
[20:46] of this it committed group of leaders and not how you
[20:55] intense but I grew up in a home on domestic violence we
[21:03] created the first center in san designee we break
[21:16] generation is cycle I'm joined by people katrina johnson
[21:22] is the leader and brings successor agency act and sarah
[21:27] part of our justice center team and johnson county
[21:33] prosecutor and now douglas county with business leaders
[21:41] and other leaders from the da's office and very involved
[21:49] we have people coming up with more than 1 hundred I want
[21:53] to say thank you for your commitment to public safety we
[21:57] are going to create the first family justice center in
[22:02] kansas I believe we will be the model for the rest of
[22:06] state and for generations. And oprah winphrey said I
[22:15] changed the rest of her life I have a wife and kids she
[22:20] was right openly practices profile led george gush to
[22:28] launch this movement not just in the united states we have
[22:34] bipartisanship for so thank you for your commitments and
[22:41] help us in the journey as we move forward. Thank you very
[22:45] much.
[22:46] >> craig miller please come to the podium and state
[22:54] your name and address for the record.
[22:55] >> good evening. My name is greg miller.
[23:16] >> I've been a olathe resident since 1979 on my
[23:22] third home here. We moved here when olathe had a
[23:27] population of 26 thousand and was south of charlton and 51
[23:34] street was a dirt road. I watched the city grow over the
[23:41] years for 50 years that's for the growth has to be smart
[23:45] and after my wife passed a few years I downsized and
[23:51] choose my home carefully and it was single-family and our
[24:02] neighborhood a r-1 all single-family couped homes I want
[24:11] you to understand I don't oppose the development of the
[24:15] sunnybrook property I look forward to that will be bring
[24:21] to our neighborhood.
[24:22] >> strongly oppose rc 26 zero, zero, zero 6 and
[24:29] oppose the 3 story apartment collection to sit in our r-1
[24:39] neighborhood just to be clear, not simply a development
[24:43] this is a major change no density and tint and traffic and
[24:48] character and placed next to the single-family
[24:59] neighborhood and those are fundamentally different from
[25:02] the homes that surround this property. The question for
[25:07] you is can this property be responded and the question
[25:11] should be is as the right to build this density in the
[25:17] location I believe the answer to no and asked to have a
[25:22] staff study will impact will not be significant enough to
[25:28] require additional lanes or redesigned intersections but
[25:33] the store is not there the three hundred and 36 apartments
[25:42] are no there how can you adequately judge with all the
[25:53] additional traffic around that area and surrounding
[25:56] schools and churches. The city should evaluate the impact
[26:02] from grouping this restoring I respecting ask the council
[26:07] to deny this project as opposed and require complete
[26:12] valuation
[26:13] (bell ringing)
[26:15] before you make your decision please don't let one
[26:20] rezoning decision compromise and establish the
[26:23] neighborhood that is already been a great value as part of
[26:26] the olathe for many years and growth should strengthen our
[26:30] neighborhoods not peter marsh.
[26:43] >> state your name and address for the record.
[26:45] >> mayor and members, I'm pete marsh, I live in
[27:03] gatewood. Thank you for your time and my comments in
[27:08] regards to the zoning we'll be voting on september 15th.
[27:11] we have been olatheans and 9 years ago we built our land
[27:19] we reasonably expect our styles are to be built
[27:23] underdevelopment to be continued. We didn't buy in the
[27:28] 3 story apartments. The presentation you'll be looking at
[27:35] does not accurately describe the neighborhood you're asked
[27:39] to change. This is a single-family under the umbrella
[27:45] mixed or r-1 or rp 3 west of this site that is not a small
[27:56] labor issue, that was on page 8 of the staff cites 6
[28:05] townhomes as a compliment to the homes on the south side
[28:12] to treatment in the report of gate wood to the west.
[28:16] staff has conceded the townhomes are - gate wood is
[28:27] single-family homes this is making it worse. The planning
[28:35] commission had to walk the site with a measuring wheel.
[28:40] my driveway is - 995 feet and 60 feet east of the okay.
[28:50] creek and under the development zone is 1,00010 and
[28:54] halfway to the proposed site moving towards the ridge is
[28:58] 1,000 plus 14 and are to 24-foot from the homes this is a
[29:08] 3 story development will be a 4 or 5 story structure from
[29:13] our homes that is not a minor detail this is against a
[29:21] single-family neighborhood not on a recommendation that
[29:25] one mischaracterizes the neighborhood and too omits it is
[29:32] - and 3, leaves valuation concerns ongoing answered we
[29:38] have that from our backyard don't be deceived with the
[29:43] trees and the leaves go away in the wintertime we would
[29:53] welcome the development and owner occupied townhomes
[29:57] attached homes under the objectives and ownership is
[30:05] building the long term residency. Thank you for your time.
[30:19] >> thank you for all the speakers and now move to
[30:24] planning section.
[30:29] >> 6. Convene for planning session. Report on any
[30:33] questions on this? Or any a need for a presentation?
[30:37] >> move to the report number 2, a report regarding
[30:41] the proposed amendments to the title vi of the olathe
[30:49] municipal code and so - just a brief explanation of this.
[30:56] I did read in the report that this is necessary for us to
[31:04] work for the county to I guess inspect if we don't adopt
[31:16] the codes the county -- whoever enforces those rules will
[31:22] be able to do it inside the city limits?
[31:25] >> is that correct?
[31:26] >> the city attorney. It is correct, mayor. We
[31:31] have those codes adopted I think the last in 2004. They
[31:38] were single and johnson county updated them a couple of
[31:41] years ago and they went into effect. But for us to keep
[31:48] current on the latest, we have to readopt the updated
[31:53] version to continue the current version of the county code
[31:59] as --
[32:02] >> is it stuff we already do in the park?
[32:07] >> I think that ryan told me that there is a sanitary
[32:12] part of code that governs private sewerage. It is
[32:19] essentially unchanged the aquatic code is semi public
[32:28] aquatic swimming pools the changes allow the city to
[32:34] implement the regulations on this part. So it gives the
[32:39] city more room to regulate.
[32:42] >> that for our faculties not hoa; is that correct?
[32:49] and they apply to the hoa and semi public pools but not to
[32:55] the back that is the back pool.
[32:57] >> okay. And that's all the questions I have bob.
[32:58] thank you.
[33:02] >> and we'll move to.
[33:06] >> 6(b) discussion items
[33:07] discussion on the santa fe, ridgeview to mur-len,
[33:12] improvements project, pn 3-c-025-18.
[33:13] >> teresa city engineer joins us for a presentation.
[33:19] >> thank you mayor and city council I'm teresa the
[33:35] assistant engineer I'm here to talk about the I-35 work
[33:40] project and the aesthetics. In july I presented about a
[33:49] deep scope and the schedule and phasing and by today, I
[33:57] want to bring you an overview of the aesthetics we're to
[34:05] talking about 9 and lighting and while this interchange
[34:13] not a gay way to like 119th street or one and 59 and I-35
[34:20] the interchange is a vocal point to the downtown area we
[34:28] move through the presentation we'll see key pieces that
[34:34] tie to the downtown areas as it stands today and the
[34:41] aesthetics of this project are focusing on the experience
[34:45] of driveway driver and pedestrian we want the vocal point
[34:56] not on the experience of I-35 as a reminder this is being
[35:00] constructed as a stable point interchange that is similar
[35:04] to I-35 and the big the vocal point is the signal and in
[35:13] the middle as all of traffic unit at that signal so really
[35:20] the trucks structure is the vocal point and the wave that
[35:26] you can see on that truck structure is on the support on
[35:32] either side bring this element to the.
[35:35] >> clerk, call the roll. Aspect of the design here.
[35:39] you can see there is a double fencing on the bridge
[35:45] barriers that matches the fencing on 119th street over the
[35:50] railroad at the interchange and will be installed on the
[35:54] 119th street bridges over the any portion of 119th street.
[36:02] little brick portion of medians the pattern on those brick
[36:07] that is mimic the downtown streetscape ties those into the
[36:14] element of the downtown as well. And heavy landscaping
[36:19] provides added experience for vehicles and pedestrians as
[36:23] they move through the space. And looking closer at the
[36:29] decorative trust supports it, it is hard to depict on the
[36:35] visual, but if you look at the picture feel person walking
[36:39] underneath the trust structure you feel the scale how that
[36:44] will be and really will be a large and impactful element
[36:50] people will be passing through on this bridge. The trust
[36:55] supports the medal panel on each side to the space and
[37:03] again, as you can see with the double fencing and the
[37:07] decorative patterns on the elements to olathe.
[37:16] >> this is a view from the interstate, as I
[37:21] mentioned, want the experience on santa fe but tie oig
[37:26] elements on the intrastate that wave pattern on the
[37:32] retaining walls as you continue on the intrastate at the
[37:35] same feel with the decorative wave patterns throughout.
[37:43] moving on to the medium landscaping this is just an
[37:46] overview of where our medians will be located throughout
[37:50] the project and everything this is heavy dashed black
[37:55] lines will be mediums on santa fe and on the side street.
[37:59] and creating the interchange as vocal point we want to
[38:05] focus on the medians on the interchange bridge itself and
[38:10] to the interchange to everything in red is where we'll
[38:15] will focus our heavy landscaping and mediums and the
[38:24] remainder will be more toward the standards for the trees.
[38:39] any mediums 18 feet wide will be more narrow so you can
[38:47] see and the wave pattern continues throughout the planning
[38:52] bed and the decorative bridge on the mediums as well.
[38:56] >> to give you a glimpse of the interchange at
[39:06] night. The flood lighting inside the support creates a
[39:11] vocal point for the.
[39:13] >> and under the caps will guide them along the route
[39:17] as they move across the bridge. Looking at the interchange
[39:22] from the perspective of the intrastate we really are
[39:27] highlighting the column lighting and the flood lighting
[39:31] one little trust will be a vocal point but as a reminder
[39:37] we want this on top of of the bridge as opposed to to the
[39:43] experience on the interchange itself. As a summary of what
[39:49] we discussed will have a large trust support and will
[39:53] provide the vocal point on the bridge and have the fencing
[39:58] that matches 119th street and the decorative bring that
[40:04] ties the interchange into the downtown landscape and the
[40:08] heavy landscaping adjacent to the interchange and then the
[40:12] lighting will focus on the experience along santa fe with
[40:15] the experience and then the lighting for I-35 and the
[40:27] flood lights and with that, leave you with the overview of
[40:32] the property interchange and I'm here to answer any
[40:36] questions.
[40:37] >> thank you, teresa councilmember vakas thank you,
[40:41] mr. Mayor.
[40:42] >> super presentation and the is only point
[40:49] interchange makes sense. As I envision I-35 and a-37 is
[41:00] overwhelming it looks great but in reality will be
[41:06] overwhelming do we envision bicycle traffic on the
[41:11] sidewalks.
[41:12] >> bicyclists will be accommodated and 10-foot walk
[41:16] on the north side of the bridge and - so could be on the
[41:23] streets themselves but at their own risk will want them to
[41:31] be on the sidewalks.
[41:32] >> right.
[41:33] >> the vehicle landscape is irrigated.
[41:37] >> yes or no some will be irrigated and so will be
[41:44] water?
[41:46] >> will be this is full of sun and the beautify
[41:53] landscaping will be look great with adequate water but if
[41:59] it doesn't we don't want to not maintain this and you're
[42:09] assuring we we have enough water.
[42:12] >> yes. Those islands will be irrigated.
[42:17] >> you mentioned not a gateway to olathe explain to
[42:22] me what what makes 119th street the gateway and this not a
[42:27] gateway.
[42:28] >> 119th street street and think the north side and
[42:32] 159 on the street.
[42:35] >> (multiple voices.)
[42:36] >> and. Okay.
[42:37] >> so we're in the city here so got it.
[42:39] >> okay. Good. Thank you very much. I appreciate
[42:42] that.
[42:43] >> you're welcome.
[42:44] >> councilmember schoonover.
[42:45] >> thank you and great preservation I was going to
[42:51] pull on what similar councilmember vakas was asking about
[42:54] the heavy.
[42:56] >> clerk, call the roll. Element associated with
[42:58] that. And with this project can you walk you through this
[43:04] looks great I want it accommodate those folks that do need
[43:08] to walk or be on their bikes and have a safe way to do
[43:15] that but not concern we need to encourage people walking
[43:23] later than santa fe and I-35 I'm thinking about the now
[43:28] and 87 street and I just I I can't imagine I know we're
[43:37] make it safe as we can but the safer opposite not to walk
[43:42] there.
[43:43] >> currently.
[43:44] >> clerk, call the roll. Accommodations across santa
[43:47] fe and we're ultimately providing with this a we're not
[44:00] trying to increase.
[44:01] >> not trying to there.
[44:03] >> clerk, call the roll. Traffic but providing a safe
[44:08] method to so prettyer than today.
[44:13] >> I noticed in the slide paving to match the
[44:19] downtown olathe how far will this is we're not going to
[44:26] downtown; right?
[44:27] >> this project will continue to ridgeview currently
[44:30] the downtown streets for little kansas city road this
[44:36] project takes us to the santa fe bridge and one day in the
[44:40] future maybe money-
[44:41] >> (multiple voices).
[44:42] >> connect the two?
[44:43] >> okay. My final question has to do with with the
[44:48] left-hand turn access. If looks like we are going to ends
[44:54] up restricting some of the and with those mediums and
[44:57] perhaps now I can turn west on santa fe we have one
[45:02] left-hand turn access to the buildings those businesses I
[45:06] guess on the south side on the north side getting rid of
[45:12] some of that.
[45:13] >> a big portion is the big d one way to accommodate
[45:17] a safer corridor to control the access points. This is
[45:22] really what we're doing closing off that medium, as well
[45:26] as, closing off and cul-de-sacking with the interchange
[45:32] need to pull those access points as far away as we can
[45:36] that's what we're trying to accomplish and getting those
[45:41] folks to the signalized page to move through that. And
[45:49] will they - you mentioned cul-de-sacking push them on park
[45:55] and have -
[45:57] >> that is all have the option to do both.
[45:59] >> uh-huh and if we're pushing more traffic on
[46:07] ridgeview and park that is already band is there any plan
[46:12] to do a type of stop or -
[46:15] >>
[46:16] >> (multiple voices).
[46:17] >> not part of this project.
[46:18] >> thank you very much. Councilmember vogt.
[46:23] >> thank you, mr. Mayor.
[46:25] >> along the lines thinking about pedestrians I was
[46:29] thinking with santa fe being in the middle, and we have a
[46:34] lot of west traffic including walking and biking might -
[46:40] how long will this bridge structure will it last and
[46:46] replace it again 50 years.
[46:48] >> it is about 50 years before we do that and we do
[46:54] design this for a 20/40 we starred in 2018 and with the
[47:06] 2040 traffic counts.
[47:07] >> I'm wondering if we have more people that are
[47:12] wanting to walk and bike they need to walk and bike that
[47:18] are going to walk across santa fe that maybe we should
[47:23] make sure make it have better buffers and safer so those
[47:30] are where. Any questions? Are and one are we are talking
[47:35] about increasing with the sidewalks the width all the way
[47:40] to bridge.
[47:41] >> yes. Have a 10 sidewalk.
[47:52] >> fantastic.
[47:53] >> I lost design it look really, really great and not
[47:57] final by any means; right?
[47:59] >> right.
[48:00] >> I'll be curious to see what the measures can be
[48:04] done to make that calm traffic more and feel more safe to
[48:12] pedestrians I think a lot of people will want to walk and
[48:16] bike. I'm not sure I would want to encourage them not to
[48:22] but maybe people that have kids with bikes and strollers
[48:28] admit comfortable.
[48:39] >> we pulled the sidewalks as far away you have a
[48:44] fair amount of sidewalk and landscaping between those.
[48:50] >> and the drivers as well. So as much as we could to
[48:54] the corridor we offer set that sidewalk to provide that
[48:58] separation and that distance. Sounds good I have a
[49:03] question that maybe answered. And we know how busy it is
[49:15] and give everyone a better feel of driving through that
[49:19] but I noticed is speed limit is what 35 on santa fe and I
[49:25] believe that is 35 between downtown and intrastate and
[49:31] increases not east. I don't know we have any intention of
[49:36] changing the speed limit I - I see many people drive
[49:41] farther my question will be what part of the aesthetics or
[49:47] landscaping could help people to slow down and is that
[49:54] something you're thinking about for the purpose of.
[49:57] >> sure. That's a great question.
[50:03] >> this is maybe not a speed rouser but the traffic
[50:10] in and of itself will provide people to get there there
[50:14] and on a more reliable basis is a lot of people kind of
[50:20] get upset or agitated so they speed up but if we give them
[50:29] a better experience may help with the calming.
[50:34] >> look forward to more conversation.
[50:37] >> councilmember creighton and pretty sure has but
[50:46] said I like the way we're incorporating the useful
[50:52] elements navigates I don't want to sound anti but have a
[50:57] very nice fences rather than chain linked fence and sculpt
[51:08] and that is a conversation for another day how much we
[51:14] acceptance spend on the art I'm not opposed to it but a
[51:21] time the budget is on our mind and want to I want to put
[51:25] that out there so thank you for making the elements
[51:29] useful. And as long as we're on aesthetics I want to beat
[51:35] the same drum for the next 4 years a lot of work doing
[51:43] everything we can to mitigate try to say it not but not
[51:52] look like a truck stop we have semis and I was driving
[51:59] here tonight and spent a lot of time with the kid
[52:03] herbicides were used and my grandpa will really over in
[52:11] his grave any comments we need to - meantime let's do what
[52:20] we can to make that look as nice and possible until we're
[52:25] done.
[52:26] >> thank you for that.
[52:27] >> dr. Felter thank you, mr. Mayor.
[52:30] >> teresa it is great I lost pretty vision the metal
[52:39] component the railing will be different at an what we have
[52:43] on one 27 overpass that is chipping off and college.
[52:52] >> yes. We mean a different design element will be
[52:57] balance in his steel I'm sorry steel unions with the.
[53:06] >> one hundred and 27 street is paint on the paint
[53:13] should last longer and in college.
[53:19] >> before workload over the train tracks it was
[53:24] terrible and is that the same scenario there as well?
[53:30] >> this should last longer.
[53:33] >> fix that because they're nice rails but just
[53:39] wearing out. I love the planting it is beautiful like the
[53:43] incorporates of pedestrians and traffic by a the we're
[53:48] olathe it is hot or cold and a extreme we is where people
[53:53] walking and ryan talking about the experience of
[53:56] homelessness and I'm sensitive of that and seeing the
[54:02] barriers and making to safer as well so teresa you mention
[54:07] in the last preservation if you if you don't mind taking
[54:11] us back to the 119th street I saw that presentation the
[54:19] one meeting owe missed in a long time and surprised to
[54:25] hear I department of motor vehicles didn't hear any
[54:28] dialogue is new piece for kdot adding on 119th street and
[54:34] closing lanes there?
[54:36] >> yeah the southbound the work on the southbound
[54:41] ramp 119th street and piece that was added as a matter of
[54:45] fact what they trying to fix the left turning move to
[54:52] accommodate the semitrailer trucks and at closure of that
[54:57] I guess the inside left-hand turn.
[55:00] >> and again, the northbound the closure; right?
[55:04] >> northbound 119th street reconstructing that paste
[55:08] to tie into that.
[55:09] >> I why think the people understand that is heavy
[55:17] traffic.
[55:18] >> the - will have another public meeting closer to
[55:24] the hearing and we'll get to information out.
[55:27] >> thank you very much. And absolutely.
[55:29] >> councilmember schoonover.
[55:30] >> thank you I'm sorry for the follow-up I mentioned
[55:35] we designed this for 20/40.
[55:38] >> that was what we did the traffic study when owe
[55:42] started the project.
[55:44] >> did that mean I want to make sure does that mean
[55:47] that in 2040 be the capacity.
[55:54] >> no lasts us there 2040 that is our minimum design
[56:00] and okay. Okay good deal sorry.
[56:03] >> councilmember essex.
[56:04] >> thank you, mr. Mayor.
[56:05] >> it is beautiful I'm kind of and looks so simple to
[56:12] do a task and turning around left here that looks like we
[56:21] not continue drivers I love and as much as you love the
[56:28] topic of 119th street on the lighting bridge good or bad
[56:33] or ugly necessary lighting on this bridge or have a
[56:38] simple.
[56:39] >> the plan to leave it whole and not match those
[56:42] elements on the street to have a separation.
[56:45] >> nice thanks.
[56:48] >> thanks teresa it looks nice and it is very taste
[56:57] full and some of the comments trying to make maybe more
[57:03] barriers torpedos and give them more safer sprays
[57:08] eastbound extends under the columns in of the barriers
[57:17] appears to be more safe for pedestrians and then at night.
[57:22] >> uh-huh.
[57:23] >> I'm okay would not fancy lights but as much as -
[57:29] >> you can light up did walkways it is will be
[57:37] helpful and crossing over I-35 is pretty dark at night we
[57:41] have one light that helps a lot but I just as much as
[57:49] electricity.
[57:51] >> what is difficult to show on this exhibit is we
[57:56] have all of the street lighting and on that trust.
[58:00] >> and it is very difficult to show own the exhibit
[58:04] we want to kind of.
[58:06] >> (multiple voices).
[58:07] >> but more down lights and you can kind of see all
[58:12] the street lights in the background there and just muted
[58:16] in the exhibit by will be - I mean a standard lit street
[58:22] as well.
[58:23] >> and with the led you can do more.
[58:26] >> I misspoke early the design was 20/50.
[58:32] >> currently
[58:33] (laughter).
[58:35] >> so the brick veneer I don't want to have things
[58:41] popping off because of the water might creep in behind it
[58:49] what kind of safeguards for the veneer.
[58:53] >> we conduct all and stain perfect.
[58:57] >> that eliminates that issue.
[58:59] >> all right.
[59:00] >> well, it looks great I think that your coming
[59:05] back with more final designs at some point.
[59:09] >> let's talk about the big thing we have not talked
[59:12] this is the first time I've seen it saving the state
[59:17] $75 million. They pledged one hundred and $40 million and
[59:22] now the states contribution is - how did we do that.
[59:27] >> where did that information.
[59:29] >> that is in the council agenda item talks about
[59:32] the $65 million so on page 770 a year savings to the
[59:41] state.
[59:42] >> this budget it is outlined is the original budget
[59:48] we authored this only included the I-35 interchange
[59:54] interchanging and the auxiliary we added scope and kdot
[1:00:01] increased they're finland's as you can see with the kdot
[1:00:04] and the consideration dot are are money and the grant
[1:00:07] funding is not shown on that.
[1:00:09] >> so the one hundred million dollars is not shown.
[1:00:13] >> (multiple voices).
[1:00:14] >> yeah.
[1:00:15] >> all right. This is. Okay. I missed that okay.
[1:00:19] thank you.
[1:00:20] >> absolutely.
[1:00:21] >> all right.
[1:00:22] >> thank you I don't see any other questions and the
[1:00:24] presentation and. Thank you for your time.
[1:00:27] >> we'll move to additional items.
[1:00:31] >> thank you, mr. Mayor.
[1:00:32] >> and what is it not september. And construction
[1:00:37] road construction I want to thank the infrastructure now
[1:00:41] starting to see some of the projects in the summer will
[1:00:46] wrap and great to drive on you knew paste going back.
[1:00:52] >> councilmember essex and thank you, mr. Mayor.
[1:00:53] >> I wanted to make a comment I'm sure many have seen
[1:00:59] on the some site talking about issues with trains. And we
[1:01:04] have a grant from the federal rail administration super
[1:01:09] existed we want our opinion on "what looks like go the
[1:01:16] kansas back slash railroads when the in-person engagement
[1:01:23] events are and we've been waiting for many years so I'm
[1:01:27] excited to see that inch forward a little bit more and I
[1:01:34] would be remiss if I didn't talk about kevin yellowing was
[1:01:39] promoted to integral - I'm trying to find my notes.
[1:01:44] >> I a s chief international association of the fire
[1:01:52] chief and represented olathe at the international level
[1:01:57] and I'm super excited to have him represent us so
[1:02:05] congratulations pete.
[1:02:08] >> councilmember vakas.
[1:02:09] >> thank you, mr. Mayor. First of all, thank you,
[1:02:12] mr. Perkins and second I look forward to cooler weather.
[1:02:13] thank you.
[1:02:21] >> councilmember schoonover thank you, mr. Mayor.
[1:02:22] a couple of quick items thank you to the city staff outer
[1:02:26] working in the heat on the infrastructure projects on our
[1:02:31] public works everything doing outside during those hot
[1:02:36] days to help keep the city running thank you to the star 6
[1:02:41] didn't get to enjoy air conditioning during the day and
[1:02:47] september is natural suicide awareness and prevention
[1:02:52] month so just a reminder for everyone to check in with our
[1:02:56] friends he loved ones and see how things are going.
[1:03:01] >> councilmember creighton nothing.
[1:03:04] >> city manager susan sherman.
[1:03:06] >> have one quick remembered holding the public
[1:03:10] hearing for the 2027 budget it 5:30 in the council
[1:03:15] chambers at city hall and you can I'm or call the city
[1:03:19] clerk's office and sign up to speak or show up if you like
[1:03:23] to address the council on the budget. The council will
[1:03:29] vote on september 15th. And you can read all the budget
[1:03:34] documents -- confident and our calendar is on the website
[1:03:39] as olathe/date. Thank you to everyone that takes the time
[1:03:46] to give us input on one of the most important things we do
[1:03:55] each year. A reminder about the activities. And thank
[1:04:09] you, thank you for being here. We are adjourned.
[1:04:11] [meeting adjourned]