[4:10] clock and I'd like to call this meeting

[4:13] to order.

[4:14] Um

[4:15] I will seek a motion that

[4:19] uh

[4:19] the August 13th, 2026 meeting of the

[4:22] Committee of Adjustment be opened, time

[4:24] being 5:00.

[4:26] Catherine.

[4:29] Moves and seconder?

[4:32] Oh, choices, choices. Sarah.

[4:34] >> [laughter]

[4:35] » [laughter]

[4:35] [gasps]

[4:36] >> All those in favor.

[4:38] » All those in favor.

[4:38] Thank you.

[4:40] I'd like to uh let everyone know that

[4:42] this meeting is being video recorded and

[4:45] live streamed.

[4:47] Uh

[4:48] I will seek a motion. Uh wait, second.

[4:54] Yeah. I will seek a motion to approve

[4:57] the agenda unless there are changes.

[5:00] Arnold.

[5:02] Seconder?

[5:03] Sandy.

[5:07] All those in favor.

[5:09] Thank you. That carries as well.

[5:12] All right. Are there any disclosures of

[5:15] interest

[5:18] from the committee?

[5:20] No. Are there any people in the audience

[5:23] that would like to have a deputation at

[5:25] some point?

[5:28] Would like to speak to

[5:31] to something that's coming up?

[5:34] I otherwise I will call I will ask at

[5:36] the during the different

[5:38] uh

[5:40] Speak?

[5:41] Perfect.

[5:42] Maybe?

[5:44] Okay. We will we will see when we get to

[5:46] the uh the motion or the different lot

[5:50] items. Thank you.

[5:52] All right. With that then, we will head

[5:55] into applications and I'm actually going

[5:58] to suggest A, B, C, and D together, yep,

[6:01] which are the Koch

[6:04] lots.

[6:05] Koch.

[6:06] >> Okie dokie. So, four applications have

[6:09] » Okie dokie. So, four applications have

[6:09] been received from Walter Koch, trustee

[6:11] for the estate of Anna Koch, for the

[6:13] property

[6:14] legally described as Concession 7, North

[6:16] Half of Lot 15, being Parcel 1820,

[6:20] located at the intersection of Miller

[6:21] Heights Drive and Sorry Road in Oliver

[6:24] Paipoonge.

[6:25] This parcel of land is naturally severed

[6:27] by Sorry Road and Weeden Road, which

[6:29] already creates three legal parcels of

[6:32] land.

[6:33] Two of those parcels are large enough

[6:34] that they can be subdivided through the

[6:37] Planning Act and the municipal zoning

[6:38] bylaw, which permits

[6:40] two severances each.

[6:43] So, that's the subject of these

[6:44] applications this evening.

[6:46] All applications that we have before us

[6:48] tonight were circulated to neighboring

[6:50] properties within 60 m of the subject

[6:52] lands. Notice was posted on the

[6:54] properties and agencies required through

[6:56] the Planning Act were circulated 14 days

[6:58] prior to this evening.

[7:00] So, the subject property has frontage on

[7:02] Sorry Road, Miller Heights Drive, and

[7:04] Weeden Road. Each of the proposed lots

[7:06] would front on one or two of the three

[7:09] maintained roads with the address

[7:10] ultimately being determined at the time

[7:12] entrance permits are applied for.

[7:14] Subject property is designated as rural

[7:16] in the official plan and zoned rural in

[7:18] the zoning bylaw.

[7:20] So, the subject property is abutted by

[7:22] rural lots to the west, general

[7:24] agriculture and rural residential to the

[7:26] south, and rural and rural residential

[7:28] to the north and the east.

[7:29] The proposed new and retained lots all

[7:31] exceed the minimum frontage requirements

[7:33] in the rural zone on the maintained

[7:35] road,

[7:36] being either Miller Heights Drive, Sorry

[7:37] Road, or Weeden Road. The area of each

[7:39] parcel meets the requirements of the

[7:41] zoning bylaw.

[7:43] Um both the official plan and zoning

[7:44] bylaw of Oliver Paipoonge support the

[7:46] creation of these lots as all related

[7:48] requirements are being met. The

[7:50] provincial

[7:51] The provincial planning statement

[7:52] encourages lot creation in appropriate

[7:54] areas and so this application is

[7:56] consistent with all provincial

[7:57] documents. The applicant has already had

[8:00] the property surveyed which is in your

[8:01] packages this evening.

[8:03] Um so the application is

[8:05] showing the actual measurements and full

[8:07] proposals for the original parcel.

[8:10] Um no interdepartmental comments were

[8:11] received. Agency comments were received

[8:13] from the Lakehead Region Conservation

[8:15] Authority as well as the Ministry of

[8:17] Mines.

[8:18] Um both stating no objections or

[8:20] concerns with the proposed. Those

[8:22] comments were sent to the um applicant.

[8:25] Uh no public comments have been received

[8:28] so far and council resolution um council

[8:31] has not had a meeting. They're having a

[8:33] meeting next Wednesday so they were not

[8:35] um able to review these the applications

[8:37] tonight. Um nevertheless, it is my

[8:40] recommendation that each of the four

[8:41] applications be approved with our usual

[8:43] conditions.

[8:47] » Thank you. Uh there is there any

[8:51] um

[8:52] input from those attending the meeting

[8:54] tonight?

[9:01] All right. Is there any discussion from

[9:03] the committee on this?

[9:09] All right. With that then, not seeing

[9:11] any comments from either, I will

[9:15] potentially seek a motion and as normal,

[9:18] we will go through each one one at a

[9:20] time.

[9:21] Um so seeking a motion that application

[9:25] for consent 1B 1526

[9:28] Kutch for the new property on the

[9:30] property

[9:31] for the new lot on the property legally

[9:34] described as concession seven north half

[9:37] lot 15, PCL 1820, located at the

[9:42] intersection of Miller Heights Drive and

[9:44] Sorry Road in the municipality of Oliver

[9:47] Paipoonge, geographic district of

[9:49] Thunder Bay, be approved with

[9:51] conditions. Sandy.

[9:53] Moving it.

[9:54] Arnold will second that.

[9:56] Is there any further discussion on the

[9:58] motion?

[10:01] Seeing none, all those in favor.

[10:04] Thank you. That carries.

[10:10] Seeking a motion that application for

[10:12] consent 1B 1626

[10:15] Kuch

[10:16] for the new lot on the property legally

[10:18] described as concession 7, North half

[10:21] lot 15

[10:24] parcel 1820. It's parcel

[10:27] Yep. Located at the intersection of

[10:29] Miller Heights Drive and Sorry Road in

[10:31] the municipality of Oliver Paipoonge,

[10:33] geographic district of Thunder Bay, be

[10:36] approved with conditions.

[10:39] Catherine and Sarah.

[10:45] Any further discussion on the motion?

[10:48] Catherine.

[10:49] >> Um I'm just

[10:50] » Um I'm just

[10:50] on the

[10:51] surveys

[10:53] which says the following roads will be

[10:55] transferred to the municipality of

[10:57] Oliver Paipoonge, Miller Heights Drive

[10:58] and Sorry Road being

[10:59] >> Yep.

[11:00] » Yep.

[11:00] >> This has been pre

[11:03] » This has been pre

[11:03] pre

[11:04] >> approved.

[11:05] » approved.

[11:05] >> Yeah. Uh yeah, so it's circulated to all

[11:07] » Yeah. Uh yeah, so it's circulated to all

[11:07] the

[11:08] internal managers for comment if they

[11:10] have any roads. It has no issues.

[11:13] >> Okay, so they're

[11:14] » Okay, so they're

[11:14] >> It's the same as kind of accepting road

[11:16] » It's the same as kind of accepting road

[11:16] frontage anytime we do a severance if

[11:18] the road doesn't already belong to us

[11:19] legally.

[11:20] Um so yeah, the roads are already

[11:22] maintained by the municipality.

[11:27] » Any further discussion on this one?

[11:30] All right.

[11:32] Then will call the

[11:35] call it. All those in favor?

[11:39] Thank you. That carries.

[11:42] >> I think the paper was sent to the

[11:43] » I think the paper was sent to the

[11:43] weekend this one.

[11:44] >> Okay. We'll come back to that one.

[11:47] » Okay. We'll come back to that one.

[11:47] And they're still the same

[11:48] >> Yeah, they're both in the same spot.

[11:49] » Yeah, they're both in the same spot.

[11:49] >> We missed one.

[11:51] » We missed one.

[11:51] Um

[11:51] that appli- I'm seeking a motion again.

[11:53] That application for consent 1B 1426

[11:58] Puch for the new lot on the property

[12:00] legally described as Concession 7 North

[12:03] Half Lot

[12:04] uh 15 Parcel 1820 located at the

[12:08] intersection of Part Miller Heights

[12:10] Drive and Sorry Road in the Municipality

[12:13] of Oliver Paipoonge

[12:15] Geographic District of Thunder Bay be

[12:17] approved with conditions.

[12:19] Sandy

[12:21] and Arnold.

[12:24] Any further discussion on the motion?

[12:28] All those in favor?

[12:30] Thank you. That carries.

[12:33] And

[12:35] that application for consent 1B 1726

[12:39] Puch for the new lot on the property

[12:41] legally described as Concession 7 North

[12:44] Half Lot 15 Parcel 1820 located at the

[12:48] intersection of Miller Heights Drive and

[12:50] Sorry Road in the Municipality of Oliver

[12:52] Paipoonge Geographic District of Thunder

[12:55] Bay be approved with conditions.

[12:58] Moved by Catherine

[13:00] seconded by Sarah.

[13:04] Any further discussion from the

[13:05] committee?

[13:09] Hearing none. All those in favor?

[13:12] Opposed none. That carries.

[13:18] Thank you. We will move on to the next

[13:21] two lots.

[13:22] Uh Toiger

[13:24] page 68 in the package.

[13:28] >> Okay. Uh two applications have been

[13:29] » Okay. Uh two applications have been

[13:29] received from Andre Toyger for the

[13:31] property legally described as concession

[13:33] four

[13:34] NW 1/4 north half lot 10 locally known

[13:39] as 127 Wrigley Drive in the municipality

[13:41] of Oliver Paipoonge. These applications

[13:43] are each for the creation of one new lot

[13:45] with four hectares in area leaving a

[13:47] retained lot of eight hectares.

[13:50] >> [clears throat]

[13:51] » [clears throat]

[13:51] >> The portion of the subject property

[13:52] » The portion of the subject property

[13:52] subject to these applications is

[13:53] designated as natural resources in the

[13:55] official plan and zoned general

[13:57] agriculture in the zoning bylaw.

[14:00] >> Woah.

[14:01] » Woah.

[14:01] >> The subject property is abutted by

[14:02] » The subject property is abutted by

[14:02] additional rural rural residential and

[14:04] general agricultural lots in all

[14:07] directions.

[14:08] >> Just a moment, Carrie. Can you be a

[14:09] » Just a moment, Carrie. Can you be a

[14:09] little bit quieter in the crowd?

[14:13] Thank you.

[14:14] Continue.

[14:15] >> Thank you.

[14:16] » Thank you.

[14:17] The proposed new lots will meet all area

[14:18] and frontage requirements of the zoning

[14:20] bylaw and an entrance permit is required

[14:22] from the municipality of Oliver

[14:23] Paipoonge if one does not already exist

[14:25] for each of the new lots.

[14:28] We did not receive any interdepartmental

[14:29] comments. Agency comments were received

[14:32] from the Lakehead Region Conservation

[14:33] Authority as well as the Ministry of

[14:35] Mines again stating no objections or

[14:37] concerns

[14:38] and Council did not meet so there's no

[14:41] comments from Council.

[14:43] So it would be my recommendation that

[14:44] these applications both be approved with

[14:46] the usual conditions.

[14:50] >> Thank you.

[14:53] Any comments from those in attendance?

[14:56] >> I think you have a question.

[14:58] » I think you have a question.

[14:58] >> You're welcome to come to the mic and

[14:59] » You're welcome to come to the mic and

[14:59] just state your name, push the button to

[15:02] say

[15:03] to make the mic turn on and state your

[15:05] name before you start.

[15:09] » Okay, I'm Andy Toyger, I'm the

[15:10] applicant. I

[15:12] I'm not I'm unsure of where my west

[15:15] property line is.

[15:17] My neighbor to the west, Rick McDonald,

[15:19] he He a property severed off his,

[15:22] adjacent to mine,

[15:24] and it seems they left a road allowance

[15:29] or

[15:29] a lot between the between the two lots.

[15:31] Now, I asked at the planning department

[15:33] here, and they said there was no road

[15:35] allowance.

[15:39] » That's correct.

[15:41] Yeah, I pulled up his survey when you

[15:43] were with me, and there's no road

[15:45] allowance.

[15:45] >> Yeah.

[15:47] » Yeah.

[15:47] Okay, it's just that the on there was

[15:49] there was a lot directly

[15:51] lot that was severed directly behind my

[15:53] place on John Street Road, and there it

[15:56] showed a road allowance.

[16:00] » Okay.

[16:01] >> Their survey actually showed a road

[16:02] » Their survey actually showed a road

[16:02] allowance, and they had acquired the

[16:03] road allowance from the municipality.

[16:06] >> Okay, a road allowance doesn't exist

[16:08] » Okay, a road allowance doesn't exist

[16:08] between you and your neighbor.

[16:10] >> Okay, that's that's the only question I

[16:12] » Okay, that's that's the only question I

[16:12] had.

[16:13] Wonderful. Thank you.

[16:14] >> Yeah.

[16:16] » Yeah.

[16:16] All right, any further

[16:19] uh

[16:20] comments? Yes, if you do come to the

[16:23] mic, and state your name.

[16:26] And please ensure that the green light's

[16:28] on.

[16:31] » [clears throat]

[16:43] » Yes.

[16:55] Yeah.

[16:55] Um so, because the committee voted in

[16:58] favor of each of your applications,

[16:59] you're going to receive the notice of

[17:01] decision. It's It's going to outline all

[17:02] of those for you.

[17:04] Yeah. Yeah, it'll it'll include things

[17:06] like uh

[17:07] an executed transfer deed of land form,

[17:10] and a photocopy for our records, etc.

[17:13] But, you will receive that in a package.

[17:19] » Yeah, everything's listed as part of

[17:20] your survey and and everything like

[17:22] that. Yeah. No worries.

[17:26] Anything further on the Toyger property?

[17:31] All right, I'll go to our table then. Go

[17:33] ahead, Sandy.

[17:34] >> Did we I

[17:35] » Did we I

[17:35] just

[17:37] Who did we get comments from?

[17:40] Did we get comments from Lakehead

[17:43] Conservation?

[17:45] >> Uh Lakehead Region Conservation

[17:46] » Uh Lakehead Region Conservation

[17:46] Authority and the Ministry of Mines. No

[17:48] one had any concerns or objections.

[17:49] >> Okay.

[17:50] » Okay.

[17:50] That's all I wanted to know.

[17:53] Thank you.

[17:54] >> Anything further from the committee?

[17:59] All right.

[18:02] Then, I am potentially seeking a motion

[18:06] that application for consent 1B 1826

[18:10] Toyger for the creation of one new lot

[18:13] on the property legally described as

[18:15] concession four, northwest quarter

[18:19] uh north half lot 10, known locally as

[18:22] 127 Wrigley Drive in the municipality of

[18:26] Oliver Paipoonge, geographic district of

[18:29] Thunder Bay, be approved with

[18:30] conditions.

[18:32] Do I have a mover?

[18:35] Catherine and Arnold.

[18:38] Mover and seconder.

[18:40] Any further comments?

[18:42] >> Motion.

[18:44] » Motion.

[18:44] It was two.

[18:45] >> Yes. Yes. We we must do them one at a

[18:48] » Yes. Yes. We we must do them one at a

[18:48] time.

[18:49] All good. Yeah.

[18:51] Uh

[18:53] seeing no other questions from the

[18:54] committee. All those in favor.

[18:57] Thank you. That carries.

[18:59] And I'm also seeking a motion that

[19:03] application for consent 1B 1926

[19:07] Toyger for the creation of one new lot

[19:10] on the property legally described as

[19:12] concession for Northwest quarter North

[19:15] half lot 10 known locally as 127 Wrigley

[19:19] Drive in the municipality of Oliver

[19:21] Paipoonge geographic district of Thunder

[19:23] Bay be approved with conditions. Thank

[19:26] you Sandy and Arnold seconds that.

[19:31] Any further comments?

[19:35] Right. All those in favor.

[19:38] Thank you. That carries.

[19:40] All right.

[19:41] We are on to

[19:43] pages 69 to 82 new lot Husain.

[19:49] >> Okay. So an application has been

[19:51] » Okay. So an application has been

[19:51] received from Stephen Husain for the

[19:53] property um known locally as 5034 Dawson

[19:56] Road in Oliver Paipoonge. Um this

[19:59] application is proposing the creation of

[20:00] one new lot being approximately 2.9

[20:03] hectares in area leaving a retained lot

[20:05] of 6.4 hectares as well as an easement

[20:07] through the proposed new lot for a

[20:09] shared driveway being approximately 150

[20:11] m by 10 m.

[20:13] Um the subject property is designated as

[20:15] rural in the official plan and zoned

[20:17] rural residential in the zoning bylaw.

[20:20] Uh the subject property is abutted by

[20:21] additional rural residential to the

[20:23] south and the west general agriculture

[20:25] to the north and the city of the Thunder

[20:27] Bay to the east.

[20:28] Uh the proposed new lot meets all area

[20:30] and frontage requirements of the rural

[20:32] residential zone in our zoning bylaw. Um

[20:35] an entrance permit is required from the

[20:36] Ministry of Transportation for the

[20:38] shared driveway.

[20:39] Um no interdepartmental comments were

[20:42] received. Agency comments again were

[20:44] received from the Lakehead Region

[20:45] Conservation Authority as well as the

[20:47] Ministry of Mines both stating no

[20:49] objections or concerns to the proposed

[20:52] um and no council resolution this

[20:53] meeting. Um so it would be my

[20:55] recommendation that the application be

[20:58] approved with usual conditions

[21:01] um also including a condition with

[21:03] respect to

[21:04] um I'm confirmation from the MTO uh in

[21:07] writing that a shared driveway is

[21:09] acceptable

[21:11] on the property as well as a condition

[21:13] with respect to that easement being

[21:15] registered as well.

[21:17] >> Thank you.

[21:19] » Thank you.

[21:19] Are there any comments or questions from

[21:22] our audience?

[21:25] Or guests?

[21:27] All right.

[21:29] Hearing none.

[21:31] To the committee, are there any comments

[21:32] or questions? Catherine.

[21:34] >> Um, there's two different maps in this

[21:36] » Um, there's two different maps in this

[21:36] package. Um,

[21:38] one called the site plan service with

[21:41] the yellow

[21:42] and one with the blue called two map.

[21:45] And they don't have

[21:47] uh, 74 and 77.

[21:52] >> You mean the actual application?

[21:53] » You mean the actual application?

[21:53] >> Yeah.

[21:57] Yes. Um, and I just it's it they read

[22:00] differently when you look at the

[22:04] um,

[22:07] they say 254 on the west limits.

[22:11] And then on this um,

[22:15] jagged line on the other side, the first

[22:17] one says 77 m and then 77 and then 100.

[22:22] And the

[22:23] blue one says 96, 77, and 100, which

[22:27] adds up

[22:28] to a lot more than

[22:30] 254. So, which one's correct when the

[22:33] driveway's represented differently on

[22:34] both of these drawings?

[22:37] >> So, the

[22:38] » So, the

[22:38] the in my planning report, we're going

[22:41] with that sketch.

[22:42] >> Which one?

[22:44] » Which one?

[22:44] >> In the planning report.

[22:46] » In the planning report.

[22:46] >> AJB.

[22:46] » AJB.

[22:46] >> Okay.

[22:48] » Okay.

[22:49] >> So, that's the proposed when we actually

[22:51] » So, that's the proposed when we actually

[22:51] go to our program and measure, they

[22:53] don't match up with the numbers that

[22:54] were provided by the applicant, which is

[22:56] fairly common.

[22:58] Um, it's when the surveyor goes through,

[23:00] those numbers will likely change again.

[23:03] Um,

[23:03] but it's

[23:04] it's well within what is required, the

[23:07] 2.9 acres, so it's not really a concern.

[23:10] At least that's why we always say

[23:11] approximate.

[23:12] >> Okay, cuz I just I was just getting

[23:14] » Okay, cuz I just I was just getting

[23:14] different information in different

[23:15] graphics. So, okay.

[23:19] So, when that gets reviewed when it gets

[23:22] processed or it gets

[23:23] >> That's right.

[23:27] » Thank you. Any further comments or

[23:30] questions?

[23:36] Would you

[23:38] just come to the mic and say your name.

[23:40] >> She's going to talk about the glitch.

[23:45] » No.

[23:47] I don't even know what lot you're

[23:48] talking about by this description. You

[23:50] I know this I would have wondering.

[23:52] >> Hi darling.

[23:54] » Hi darling.

[23:54] Hi.

[23:55] >> Okay. I'm wondering

[23:56] » Okay. I'm wondering

[23:56] >> Are you talking about the Kutch about

[23:58] » Are you talking about the Kutch about

[23:58] the Kutch severance?

[24:01] >> Yes, that's what we're here to visit.

[24:02] » Yes, that's what we're here to visit.

[24:03] >> We've We did. We did that one already.

[24:05] » We've We did. We did that one already.

[24:05] >> Okay, so can I actually ask a question?

[24:07] » Okay, so can I actually ask a question?

[24:07] I just wondered the size. Are these like

[24:09] 5-acre lots?

[24:10] >> Well,

[24:11] » Well,

[24:12] we'll go through it after the meeting.

[24:13] We've already gone through them. Um,

[24:16] they have been approved, but you're

[24:17] welcome to come and ask afterwards.

[24:20] Right now we're going we're working

[24:21] through a different lot.

[24:23] >> Just hang hang there, darling.

[24:27] » Thank you.

[24:29] All right. Any further comments on the

[24:31] Husain property?

[24:36] All right.

[24:37] Hearing none, then I will seek a motion

[24:41] potentially that application for consent

[24:44] 1B 2026 Husain for the creation of one

[24:48] new lot on the property legally

[24:50] described as Concession 7 part north

[24:53] half lot 1 parcel 3998

[24:57] known locally as 5034 Dawson Road in the

[25:01] municipality of Oliver Paipoonge

[25:04] geographic district geographic district

[25:07] of Thunder Bay be approved with

[25:09] conditions. And that includes the

[25:11] condition of the MTO and permit, yes.

[25:17] Arnoulds is

[25:19] making that motion. Sandy is seconding

[25:21] it.

[25:22] Any further discussion from the

[25:23] committee?

[25:27] Hearing none. All those in favor.

[25:31] Thank you. That carries.

[25:33] All right. And we are up to a

[25:35] cancellation certificate for Le Page.

[25:40] >> Okay, so as everyone here is aware at

[25:42] » Okay, so as everyone here is aware at

[25:42] the last

[25:44] meeting we discussed the approval of a

[25:46] new lot for Le Page,

[25:48] which is conditional on

[25:50] getting a certificate of cancellation.

[25:53] There was a lot that was created

[25:55] previously

[25:57] in 2009 that was registered incorrectly.

[26:01] So it was registered as a new lot rather

[26:03] than a lot addition.

[26:05] This certificate of cancellation will

[26:08] remove that initial consent

[26:10] so that the parcel is one larger parcel

[26:13] which was required in order for that

[26:14] severance to be approved.

[26:16] Um

[26:18] So if anyone has any questions about it,

[26:20] I'm happy to answer. But I did

[26:23] Um I think everyone is mostly aware of

[26:26] what's happening there. Um and again

[26:28] this doesn't get uh

[26:30] uh sent out [clears throat] to anyone.

[26:31] There's no notification period or

[26:33] anything like that. So

[26:35] >> Thank you.

[26:36] » Thank you.

[26:36] Is there any

[26:38] uh

[26:39] input from our audience?

[26:44] Thank you. Then from the committee any

[26:48] questions or comments?

[26:53] All right.

[26:54] Then I will seek a motion.

[26:57] Uh this is a long one.

[27:01] Um

[27:02] that seeking a motion that the Committee

[27:05] of Adjustment receive the planning

[27:07] report dated August 6th respecting an

[27:10] application for a cancellation of

[27:12] consent for the property directly west

[27:15] of municipally addressed

[27:17] uh

[27:19] 4th 4010 Oliver Road legally known as

[27:23] Oliver Concession 2 part lot 1 RP 55R

[27:29] 13040

[27:31] part 2 Oliver Papoong.

[27:34] Number two, that the Committee of

[27:35] Adjustment approve the application to

[27:37] cancel consent 1B 2709

[27:42] in accordance with subsection 5345

[27:45] of the Planning Act RSO 1990.

[27:50] Number three, that the Committee of

[27:51] Adjustment deem that the land that is

[27:54] the subject of the consent cancellation

[27:56] certificate is not land that was

[27:59] previously conveyed by way of a deed or

[28:01] transfer with a consent and that the

[28:04] Committee of Adjustment deem that

[28:06] subsection 53 part 12 of the Planning

[28:10] Act RSO 1990 does not apply in respect

[28:14] to Oliver Concession 2 part lot 1 RP 55R

[28:20] 13040

[28:22] part 2 Oliver Papoong and that section

[28:25] 53

[28:27] applies to a subsequent conveyance or

[28:30] other transaction involving Oliver

[28:33] Concession 2 part lot 1 RP 55R

[28:38] 13040 part 2 Oliver Papoong.

[28:42] Number five, that the cancellation of

[28:44] consent 1B 2709

[28:47] be subject to the following condition.

[28:49] Number one, a submission to the

[28:52] secretary-treasurer

[28:54] written confirmation

[28:57] Let me repeat that.

[29:00] A

[29:01] submission to the secretary-treasurer

[29:04] written confirmation that all of our

[29:06] concession two part lot one RP 55R 13040

[29:12] part two

[29:13] Oliver Papoong and concession two part

[29:16] south half lot one RP 55R 4486

[29:22] part two Oliver Papoong are in common

[29:26] ownership. And finally, that the

[29:28] secretary-treasurer is hereby authorized

[29:30] and directed to execute a certificate of

[29:33] cancellation.

[29:37] Thank you. That's moved by Catherine.

[29:41] Oh, seconded by Arnold.

[29:44] All right. We're open to questions.

[29:47] >> Um

[29:48] » Um

[29:48] recommendation number three

[29:50] um

[29:53] it is not land that was previously

[29:55] conveyed by way of deed or transfer with

[29:58] a consent. How was it conveyed?

[30:00] >> Well, it wasn't. We're eliminating that.

[30:03] » Well, it wasn't. We're eliminating that.

[30:03] Historically, it will be removed. It

[30:05] never happened.

[30:06] That's the intent.

[30:07] >> So, we're erasing history.

[30:10] » So, we're erasing history.

[30:10] >> Yes.

[30:11] » Yes.

[30:11] >> Okay.

[30:14] » Um

[30:15] following wording

[30:17] I totally understand that.

[30:20] >> It came directly from a lawyer.

[30:23] » It came directly from a lawyer.

[30:23] That's No, I just didn't know that's why

[30:25] it's reading that way because

[30:27] >> legal reasons.

[30:28] » legal reasons.

[30:28] >> Yes.

[30:28] » Yes.

[30:28] >> That wasn't you.

[30:29] » That wasn't you.

[30:29] >> [laughter]

[30:31] » Any further questions from the

[30:33] committee?

[30:35] All right. Then

[30:37] um all those in favor.

[30:41] Thank you. That carries.

[30:44] We are up to the minutes of July 9th.

[30:47] And hopefully you've had a chance to

[30:49] review them as well in your package.

[30:52] Uh, are there any errors or omissions?

[30:57] All right, hearing none. I'll seek a

[30:59] motion that the minutes of July 9th,

[31:01] 2026 meeting be approved as presented.

[31:04] Arnold.

[31:10] Thank you, Sarah.

[31:11] All in favor.

[31:13] Thank you, that carries.

[31:16] And we I believe

[31:19] there is no new business or unfinished

[31:21] business.

[31:24] Then I seek a motion that the August

[31:27] 13th, 2026 meeting of Committee of

[31:29] Adjustment be adjourned. The time being

[31:32] 5:27.

[31:35] I saw you, Arnold.

[31:38] And Sandy.

[31:40] All in favor.

[31:42] Thank you, that carries.

[31:44] Thanks, guys.

Committee of Adjustment - 13 Aug 2026

Transcript