Agenda
[0:56]
OFFICIAL OPENING OF MEETING
[1:00]
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
[1:22]
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
[1:58]
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
[5:07]
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
[7:32]
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS Those persons wishing to address the Board may do so at this time and are asked to complete a Speaker Card. All public comments are to be directed to the Board President. Individual speakers shall be allowed three (3) minutes to address the Board on each agenda or non-agenda item. However, in exceptional circumstances when necessary to ensure full opportunity for public input, the president may, with Board consent, adjust the amount of time allowed for public input and/or the time allotted for each speaker. Any such adjustment shall be done equitably so as to allow a diversity of viewpoints. The president may also ask members of the public with the same viewpoint to elect a few individuals to address the Board on behalf of that viewpoint. In order to ensure that non-English speakers receive the same opportunity to directly address the Board, any member of the public who utilizes a translator shall be provided at least twice the allotted time to address the Board. Please refer to the complete text of Oxnard Union High School District Board Bylaw 9323:Conduct of Board Meetings - Public Participation. Due to the Brown Act that governs public meetings, the Board cannot respond directly to public comments. The Board can direct the Superintendent and Staff to meet with members of the public to better understand their concerns or points of view.
[13:06]
CLOSED SESSION During this time, the Board may adjourn to Closed Session to discuss confidential material relating to the following items:
[2:46:02]
RECONVENE IN PUBLIC: REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION ACTION
[2:47:15]
PUBLIC COMMENTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES Those persons wishing to address the Board may do so at this time and are asked to complete a Speaker Card. All public comments are to be directed to the Board President. Individual speakers shall be allowed three (3) minutes to address the Board on each agenda or non-agenda item. However, in exceptional circumstances when necessary to ensure full opportunity for public input, the president may, with Board consent, adjust the amount of time allowed for public input and/or the time allotted for each speaker. Any such adjustment shall be done equitably so as to allow a diversity of viewpoints. The president may also ask members of the public with the same viewpoint to elect a few individuals to address the Board on behalf of that viewpoint. In order to ensure that non-English speakers receive the same opportunity to directly address the Board, any member of the public who utilizes a translator shall be provided at least twice the allotted time to address the Board. Please refer to the complete text of Oxnard Union High School District Board Bylaw 9323:Conduct of Board Meetings - Public Participation. Due to the Brown Act that governs public meetings, the Board cannot respond directly to public comments. The Board can direct the Superintendent and Staff to meet with members of the public to better understand their concerns or points of view.
[2:54:35]
SUPERINTENDENT?S REPORT
[3:04:37]
CONSENT CALENDAR
[3:09:16]
Consideration of Approval of Agreement Between Oxnard Union High School District and Effective School Solutions for Mental Health Services for the 2026-2027 School Year - Special Education Fund
[3:18:06]
ACTION ITEMS
[3:18:08]
Consideration of Approval of the 2026-27 Adopted Budget and 2025-2026 Estimated Actuals
[3:53:18]
Consideration of Approval of Contract Award to KoninEizenberg Architecture for Workforce Housing Feasibility Study and Advisory Services, RFQ-P 728, Measure E Funded
[4:14:37]
Consideration of Approval for Contract Award to Bernards for future as-needed Construction Management Services
[4:39:56]
Consideration of Approval of the 2026-2027 OUHSD Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) and Presentation of 2026-2027 California School Dashboard Local Indicators
[4:46:27]
Consideration of Approval of Job Description Revision: Adult School Secretary [Second Reading]
[4:48:54]
Consideration of Approval of Job Description: Adult School Coordinator [Second Reading]
[5:04:12]
Consideration of Approval of Job Description: Athletic Trainer [First Reading] and Consideration of Waiving of the Second Reading
[5:27:20]
Consideration of Approval of a Letter of Support for the Extension of Prop 55
[5:46:10]
STAFF REPORT
[5:46:12]
RIC Program Update
[6:38:11]
ACTION ITEM
[6:41:50]
Discussion/Approval of employment agreement with Dr. Virginia Kelsen
[6:49:54]
BOARD DISCUSSION
[6:51:58]
BOARD REPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS
[7:20:09]
ITEMS FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION
[7:23:12]
ADJOURNMENT
Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
[0:39]
>> good evening and welcome to
[0:44]
oxnard-it is june 24, 2026.
[0:49]
we will open the meeting with
[0:53]
the pledge of allegiance.
[0:56]
dr. Mccoy, would you please lead
[0:58]
us in the pledge?
[1:01]
>> I pledge allegiance to the
[1:02]
flag of the united states of
[1:03]
america and to the republic, for
[1:04]
which it stands, one nation,
[1:05]
under god, indivisible, with
[1:06]
liberty and justice for all.
[1:18]
>> thank you.
[1:19]
we are going to move the land
[1:21]
acknowledgment.
[1:22]
a land acknowledgment is a
[1:23]
commitment to acknowledge and
[1:25]
learn about the native people
[1:27]
within your surroundings.
[1:28]
today as we gather together on
[1:32]
land we acknowledge the native
[1:34]
lands we stand sit work and
[1:36]
live.
[1:37]
collectively, we honor the
[1:38]
native people, the animals, and
[1:40]
the plant life of today, and the
[1:42]
past which benefit us in the
[1:45]
future.
[1:46]
commit honoring native rights
[1:48]
and cultural equity through
[1:49]
education where our journey
[1:50]
among these lands take us and
[1:53]
where you are on the continent
[1:56]
you are on indigenous peoples
[1:58]
land.
[1:59]
we are going to move to pursuant
[2:01]
to government code section
[2:06]
54953.8, a request is received
[2:09]
by board member dr. Estrada to
[2:12]
participate in the meeting
[2:16]
remotely and the reason falls
[2:19]
within the provision of just
[2:22]
cause pursuant to 54953.8.3.
[2:25]
trustee estrada is that
[2:30]
information correct?
[2:31]
>> correct.
[2:33]
>> thank you.
[2:37]
are there any other individuals
[2:39]
18 or older present in the room
[2:41]
at your remote location?
[2:45]
>> no.
[2:47]
>> thank you.
[2:48]
is there a motion to approve the
[2:50]
request?
[2:51]
>> I make the motion.
[2:53]
>> second.
[2:54]
>> thank you.
[2:55]
we have a first and second.
[2:56]
any comments or questions?
[2:58]
all those in favor please say
[3:00]
aye.
[3:01]
opposed say no.
[3:04]
abstentions?
[3:05]
motion passes-4-0.
[3:10]
thank you.
[3:12]
moving to the adoption of the
[3:13]
agenda.
[3:14]
item 4, any suggested changes to
[3:18]
the agenda?
[3:21]
trustee flores-haro.
[3:23]
>> yes, thank you.
[3:24]
I like to pull one check off
[3:25]
consent 12 a and consent item
[3:29]
ff.
[3:30]
check 5016935442 for $12.128.75
[3:38]
and item ff for renewal
[3:40]
agreement between oxnard union
[3:43]
high school district and micop.
[3:45]
related to micop for
[3:47]
interpretation and I need to
[3:49]
recuse myself voting on the item
[3:50]
and request the board consider
[3:52]
separately from consent
[3:53]
calendar.
[3:54]
>> thank you.
[3:55]
any other changes to be made?
[3:56]
trustee baker torres.
[3:58]
>> I want to pull item kk for
[4:02]
discussion.
[4:03]
I have a couple questions.
[4:04]
and item tt, I just have a
[4:07]
question.
[4:13]
ww just have a question.
[4:15]
>> thank you.
[4:18]
we are going to pull consent 12
[4:21]
a, consent ff, consent kk, tt
[4:28]
and ww.
[4:30]
is that correct?
[4:31]
>> yes.
[4:32]
>> any other-okay.
[4:33]
could I have a motion to adopt
[4:34]
the agenda with the recommended
[4:37]
changes?
[4:38]
>> move to approve with
[4:39]
recommended changes.
[4:40]
>> I'll second.
[4:44]
>> thank you.
[4:45]
first and second.
[4:46]
any comments or questions?
[4:48]
all in favor say aye.
[4:49]
opposed?
[4:51]
any abstentions?
[4:54]
I see trustee estrada had a
[4:56]
thumbs so that is a yes.
[4:58]
the motion passes 5-0.
[5:04]
now we are approving the
[5:07]
minutes.
[5:09]
approving the special board
[5:11]
meeting minutes may 24, 2026.
[5:14]
the regular board meeting
[5:16]
minutes dated may 27, 2026.
[5:18]
and the special board meeting
[5:20]
minutes dated june 7, 2026.
[5:23]
do I have a motion for approval?
[5:26]
>> move to approve.
[5:29]
>> thank you.
[5:30]
we have a second?
[5:35]
I'll second.
[5:36]
for questions?
[5:38]
>> if I wasn't here for that
[5:40]
meeting should I note vote on
[5:41]
the meeting?
[5:42]
>> what we could do is--
[5:44]
>> I watched it.
[5:47]
>> we could take them separately
[5:49]
for the items that you were here
[5:51]
for and then the one you were
[5:53]
not we could vote on
[5:54]
individually.
[5:55]
if there objections to that.
[5:57]
any objections to that?
[6:00]
trustee baker torres which would
[6:02]
you like to vote on separately?
[6:04]
>> I wasn't here for the regular
[6:07]
board meeting of may 27.
[6:09]
>> okay.
[6:10]
we are going to vote on that one
[6:12]
separately and so, trustee
[6:16]
botello lopez, if you would
[6:17]
amend your motion to approve the
[6:19]
special board meeting minutes
[6:20]
dated may 24 and also june 7.
[6:25]
>> I amend my motion to only
[6:27]
approval the special board
[6:29]
meetings for may 24 and special
[6:34]
board meeting on june 7.
[6:38]
>> may 24, june 7.
[6:40]
and will amend the second.
[6:41]
any other comments or questions?
[6:44]
just waiting for trustee
[6:46]
estrada.
[6:47]
okay.
[6:48]
all in favor say aye.
[6:49]
any opposed please say no.
[6:51]
I see trustee estrada had thumbs
[6:54]
up so the motion passes 5-0.
[6:56]
now we are going to adopt the
[6:57]
board meeting minutes for may
[7:02]
27, 2026.
[7:03]
do I have a motion for approval?
[7:05]
>> move to approve.
[7:07]
>> second.
[7:08]
>> first and second.
[7:09]
any comments or questions?
[7:12]
all those in favor say aye.
[7:14]
any opposed please say no.
[7:17]
any abstentions?
[7:18]
>> one.
[7:20]
>> I saw trustee estrada had
[7:22]
thumbs up so motion passes 4-0
[7:26]
with 1 abstention.
[7:27]
we are moving on to public
[7:29]
comments for closed session
[7:30]
items.
[7:31]
I have one speaker card.
[7:32]
mr. Sturgeon are there any other
[7:34]
speaker cards?
[7:36]
thank you.
[7:37]
so, those persons wishing to
[7:38]
address the board may do so at
[7:40]
this time and asked to complete
[7:41]
a speaker card.
[7:42]
all public comments are to be
[7:44]
directed to the board president.
[7:46]
individual speakers are allowed
[7:48]
3 minutes to address the board
[7:50]
on each agenda or non agenda
[7:52]
item.
[7:56]
however, in circumstances when
[8:00]
necessary to insure full
[8:01]
opportunities for public input,
[8:02]
the president may with board
[8:04]
consent adjust the amount of
[8:06]
time allowed for public input
[8:07]
and/or the time allotted for
[8:09]
each speaker.
[8:10]
any such adjustments shall be
[8:13]
done so to allow diversity of
[8:15]
viewpoints.
[8:16]
the president may also ask
[8:17]
members of the public with the
[8:18]
same viewpoint to elect a few
[8:22]
individuals to address the board
[8:23]
on behalf that viewpoint.
[8:25]
in order to insure that non
[8:26]
english speakers receive the
[8:27]
same opportunity to directly
[8:29]
address the board, any member of
[8:31]
the public who utilizes
[8:36]
interpret it is allowed twice
[8:37]
the allotted time to address the
[8:39]
board.
[8:40]
refer to complete text of board
[8:43]
bylaw, 9323 conduct of board
[8:46]
meetings public participation.
[8:48]
due to the brown act the board
[8:50]
cannot respond directly to
[8:51]
public comment.
[8:52]
the board can direct the
[8:53]
superintendent and staff to meet
[8:55]
with members of the public to
[8:56]
better understand their concerns
[8:58]
or points of view.
[9:00]
I have one speaker card from mr.
[9:03]
tim allison.
[9:04]
welcome.
[9:06]
>> madam chair, members.
[9:07]
tim allison, executive director
[9:09]
oxnard federation of teachers
[9:11]
and school employees.
[9:12]
first of all, procedural issue
[9:13]
just for clarity.
[9:15]
the board has approved the
[9:17]
agenda.
[9:18]
they adopted the agenda and I
[9:19]
want to make sure that it is
[9:21]
clear in everyone's mind that
[9:23]
the ability of this board to
[9:25]
amend an agenda after approval
[9:27]
or pull items just because you
[9:29]
adopted the agenda doesn't mean
[9:31]
you can't at the time of consent
[9:33]
calendar or the time that you
[9:36]
are moving through an agenda you
[9:37]
can still amend an agenda.
[9:39]
I bring that up because I think
[9:40]
it is important that this board
[9:42]
understands it has the ability
[9:44]
and there is a legal necessity
[9:46]
for the ability to amend an
[9:47]
agenda later, because the board
[9:50]
agenda is adopted before public
[9:53]
comment has been given for both
[9:55]
closed session and open session.
[9:57]
so, there is often a
[10:01]
misconception that once an
[10:02]
agenda is adopted it can't be
[10:04]
amended and items can't still be
[10:06]
pulled at the time they come up
[10:09]
later.
[10:10]
I'm here to talk specifically
[10:11]
about today's closed session.
[10:13]
the board will be determining
[10:14]
whether to finalize a contract
[10:16]
with dr. Kelsen and if so what
[10:18]
the terms and provisions of the
[10:20]
contract should be.
[10:21]
while we have concerns over the
[10:24]
process what turned out to be a
[10:26]
less fully transparent process
[10:28]
in the selection of a new
[10:29]
superintendent, this doesn't
[10:31]
seem to be the time nor place
[10:32]
for that conversation, so I want
[10:34]
to talk specifically about
[10:36]
provisions of the contract.
[10:38]
we have now received the current
[10:40]
superintendent contract, which
[10:42]
seems to be kind of a wish list
[10:44]
of what an administrator might
[10:47]
want in a contract, and I want
[10:48]
to focus on just three
[10:50]
provisions.
[10:51]
number one, you will have a
[10:52]
determination to make in terms
[10:53]
of what the compensation will be
[10:55]
for the new superintendent and
[10:57]
whether there will be automatic
[10:59]
pay increases for that
[11:00]
superintendent.
[11:03]
you'll have a decision to make
[11:04]
as to balancing what new
[11:11]
superintendent compensation will
[11:12]
be compared to the new
[11:14]
superintendent with six years of
[11:16]
experience on the job.
[11:17]
you have a decision to make of
[11:18]
longevity.
[11:19]
I was surprised to find the
[11:20]
current superintendent receives
[11:22]
a longevity bonus right from day
[11:26]
one and if that is it the case
[11:27]
the new superintendent contract
[11:29]
I will want that for all our
[11:31]
members.
[11:32]
our teachers have to wait 15
[11:33]
years to get a longevity bonus
[11:35]
and if the new superintendent
[11:37]
gets that day one, more power to
[11:39]
him or her, that is great, but
[11:41]
now we want that for all of our
[11:42]
members.
[11:43]
and then the third issue is the
[11:45]
length of time of the contract.
[11:48]
when our classified employees
[11:50]
start on the job they have a 6
[11:53]
month probationary period and
[11:56]
teachers have a 1 year and 2
[11:58]
year probationary.
[12:01]
whoever is the next
[12:04]
superintendent whether dr.
[12:06]
kelsen or someone else we want
[12:08]
to make sure it is good fit and
[12:10]
think probationary period should
[12:12]
be a short one so we are working
[12:14]
together and heading in the
[12:15]
right direction and look forward
[12:16]
working with the new leadership
[12:18]
team moving this district
[12:20]
forward.
[12:21]
thank you.
[12:22]
>> thank you.
[12:23]
okay.
[12:24]
we are moving--no other speaker
[12:26]
cards.
[12:28]
sorry, I lost my place.
[12:31]
we are moving to closed session.
[12:34]
during this time the board may
[12:36]
adjourn to closed session to
[12:37]
discuss confidential material
[12:39]
relating to the following items,
[12:41]
public employee discipline
[12:45]
dismissal release resignation.
[12:51]
government code section 54957.
[12:55]
public employee appointments.
[12:58]
the title is superintendent.
[13:00]
conference with labor
[13:02]
negotiators.
[13:03]
student personnel.
[13:05]
consideration of confidential
[13:07]
student issues other then
[13:09]
expulsion and suspension and
[13:12]
conference with legal counsel
[13:14]
and that is it.
[13:15]
we intend to be back from closed
[13:16]
session as close to 6:30 as
[13:19]
possible.
[13:20]
I want to say that that might be
[13:22]
a little bit past 6:30, just
[13:24]
fair warning.
[13:26]
for everybody else, we are
[13:27]
adjourned to closed session.
[13:30]
[board in closed session]
[2:13:15]
[captioner on standby]
[2:46:01]
>> we are going togo through the
[2:46:04]
agenda.
[2:46:05]
go through all the items in the
[2:46:07]
agenda.
[2:46:09]
accept we are going to
[2:46:13]
move-after item 17, which is
[2:46:14]
items for future consideration,
[2:46:16]
we are going to return to closed
[2:46:18]
session.
[2:46:20]
at which time we will then
[2:46:22]
return to open session to
[2:46:24]
address item 10 a and provide an
[2:46:28]
opportunity for the public to
[2:46:29]
make comments with regard to the
[2:46:32]
item at that time if anyone
[2:46:34]
would like to.
[2:46:35]
so, and then we'll adjourn.
[2:46:37]
for the sake of the public, we
[2:46:39]
are going through the agenda
[2:46:42]
accept for we will move 10 a to
[2:46:45]
after item 17.
[2:46:50]
if there is any question, we can
[2:46:53]
make sure everybody has an
[2:46:55]
understanding of what we are
[2:46:56]
doing.
[2:46:57]
are the trustees in agreement
[2:46:58]
with that?
[2:47:02]
okay.
[2:47:06]
we have nothing to report out of
[2:47:07]
closed session at this time.
[2:47:10]
and so we are moving on-I will
[2:47:13]
ask if trustee baker torres has
[2:47:17]
a motion to make.
[2:47:19]
sorry.
[2:47:20]
public comment.
[2:47:21]
we'll do public comment.
[2:47:22]
nothing to report on closed
[2:47:24]
session.
[2:47:25]
thank you dr. Mccoy.
[2:47:26]
and we are going to-do public
[2:47:27]
comment to address the board of
[2:47:28]
trustees.
[2:48:51]
I have two speaker cards.
[2:48:53]
the first is mr. Tim allison,
[2:48:55]
the second is mrs. Maria
[2:49:00]
saldana.
[2:49:01]
are there other speaker cards at
[2:49:02]
this time?
[2:49:03]
thank you.
[2:49:04]
so, there allison, welcome.
[2:49:08]
>> madam chair, members of the
[2:49:10]
board.
[2:49:11]
tim allison oxnard teachers.
[2:49:16]
I will not take 10 minutes.
[2:49:19]
want to say thank you to matt
[2:49:23]
the assistant superintendent
[2:49:24]
with hr working with him we were
[2:49:26]
able to revise language on board
[2:49:28]
policy xx administration of
[2:49:31]
medication to the satisfaction
[2:49:33]
of our members and the revision
[2:49:37]
of board policy you have in
[2:49:39]
front of you is something oftsc
[2:49:42]
is fine with.
[2:49:43]
similarly, 13g, which is the
[2:49:46]
change in job description for
[2:49:48]
athletic trainers, the members
[2:49:51]
are fine with that as well.
[2:49:52]
in terms of the board policy of
[2:49:55]
ric counselors, we received last
[2:49:56]
week and not yet had the
[2:49:58]
opportunity to run by our
[2:49:59]
members, so glad it only here
[2:50:02]
for first read ing.
[2:50:03]
by the time it comes back for
[2:50:05]
second reading, we will make
[2:50:06]
sure our members are fine with
[2:50:07]
that.
[2:50:08]
in terms of ww on the agenda,
[2:50:13]
12ww artificial intelligence, I
[2:50:15]
don't have-our folks don't
[2:50:17]
really have any problems with
[2:50:19]
the board policy as presented,
[2:50:20]
accept to note that that will be
[2:50:22]
a subject of collective
[2:50:24]
bargaining.
[2:50:25]
we do have a entire article that
[2:50:28]
we will be proposing after july
[2:50:33]
6 for collective bargaining
[2:50:34]
agreement which is more
[2:50:35]
comprehensive and addressing
[2:50:37]
specifically some member
[2:50:38]
concerns on issues of artificial
[2:50:40]
intelligence and the use in the
[2:50:42]
workforce and making sure that
[2:50:44]
it doesn't replace humans.
[2:50:47]
and then the only other thing I
[2:50:48]
wanted to note is, 13c on the
[2:50:51]
agenda, which is consideration
[2:50:53]
of approval for contract award
[2:50:54]
for bernards for future as
[2:50:56]
needed construction management
[2:50:58]
services.
[2:50:59]
I guess from the district
[2:51:00]
standpoint, third time is a
[2:51:02]
charm coming back, trying yet
[2:51:04]
again to pay additional folks
[2:51:08]
for services that is just not
[2:51:11]
something that we think should
[2:51:13]
be expended out of measure e
[2:51:15]
funding.
[2:51:16]
thank you.
[2:51:17]
appreciate it.
[2:51:18]
>> thank you.
[2:51:19]
maria saldana.
[2:51:25]
welcome.
[2:51:27]
>> good evening president of the
[2:51:29]
board dr. Karen sher and
[2:51:31]
respective board
[2:51:33]
members,currently present, linda
[2:51:34]
baker torres, flores-haro, dr.
[2:51:39]
mccoy and-botello and estrada.
[2:51:47]
I like to make it quick, as a
[2:51:50]
female a chicona and academic
[2:51:53]
guidance counselor having
[2:51:55]
experience at various levels in
[2:51:57]
those assignments I come before
[2:51:58]
you this evening to remind each
[2:52:01]
of you as elected officials and
[2:52:03]
soon to be and not in the room,
[2:52:06]
dr. Virginia kelsen, soon to be
[2:52:12]
appointed superintendent you
[2:52:14]
have a moral ethical and legal
[2:52:15]
responsibility to all students
[2:52:18]
families and employees of the
[2:52:20]
district.
[2:52:21]
each had experiences in the area
[2:52:22]
of teaching whether as a
[2:52:24]
paraprofessional, a teacher or
[2:52:26]
administrator.
[2:52:27]
with this being said, it is
[2:52:29]
expected that the delivery of
[2:52:31]
services to all students and
[2:52:33]
families be delivered in a
[2:52:34]
timely and effective manner.
[2:52:36]
all stakeholders are part of the
[2:52:38]
decision for making process for
[2:52:40]
decision making process with new
[2:52:43]
positions, programs and projects
[2:52:45]
are being considered for
[2:52:48]
implementation.
[2:52:49]
all voices are to be heard.
[2:52:50]
we matter, thank you.
[2:52:51]
I also wish to quickly address
[2:52:53]
the other agenda item in regards
[2:52:55]
to human resources and
[2:52:57]
consideration of approval of job
[2:52:58]
description for the restorative
[2:53:01]
intervention counselor.
[2:53:02]
I will ask this board that you
[2:53:05]
please look at the job
[2:53:07]
descriptions of the counselor
[2:53:09]
for counselor and this district.
[2:53:11]
you look at what I see as a
[2:53:15]
possible description for the ric
[2:53:18]
counselor and I want you to look
[2:53:21]
at that and compare those
[2:53:24]
responsibilities of those job
[2:53:26]
descriptions.
[2:53:27]
now, I just want to-I'm sure you
[2:53:31]
have noted that the counselor
[2:53:34]
job description is quite
[2:53:37]
out-dated as per the date.
[2:53:41]
I don't know how often you look
[2:53:43]
at the job description, but in
[2:53:46]
looking and reviewing the roles
[2:53:49]
and responsibilities, I need you
[2:53:52]
need to take a good look at
[2:53:54]
that.
[2:53:55]
also, I will pose the question,
[2:53:56]
I understand ric's were
[2:53:59]
introduced to the district, 2, 3
[2:54:01]
years ago.
[2:54:02]
where is the job description?
[2:54:04]
I find it very difficult to
[2:54:05]
understand that a employee in
[2:54:08]
such capacity would not have a
[2:54:10]
job description, unless I fail
[2:54:12]
to see it on the website.
[2:54:14]
thank you and have a good
[2:54:15]
evening and dr. Mccoy, I have 11
[2:54:17]
seconds.
[2:54:18]
congratulations and the best to
[2:54:19]
you and your new endeavor.
[2:54:23]
>> thank you.
[2:54:24]
okay.
[2:54:27]
we are moving on to-move 10 a to
[2:54:31]
the end after item 17.
[2:54:37]
and we are moving on to the
[2:54:39]
superintendent's report.
[2:54:41]
dr. Mccoy.
[2:54:45]
>> thank you president sher,
[2:54:46]
thank you trustees, staff and
[2:54:48]
guests.
[2:54:49]
we will welcome you to the
[2:54:51]
superintendent's report for june
[2:54:53]
24, 2026.
[2:54:56]
next slide, please.
[2:55:00]
refer to my notes.
[2:55:05]
our good news continues into the
[2:55:06]
summer and we were recently
[2:55:09]
alerted that we have two teach
[2:55:13]
democracy 2026 multimedia
[2:55:17]
contest winners.
[2:55:18]
we have aubrey bates and--from
[2:55:24]
rio mesa high school engaging in
[2:55:26]
the community through tennis and
[2:55:28]
this was the seal of civic
[2:55:30]
engagement award that preceded
[2:55:32]
up the tiers of review and given
[2:55:36]
a multimedia contest award and
[2:55:39]
honorable mention from hueneme
[2:55:48]
high school.
[2:55:49]
we like to thank instructional
[2:55:51]
service and teacher leader evans
[2:55:53]
who has been our quarterback and
[2:55:55]
point person on civic engagement
[2:55:58]
and seal of civic engagement to
[2:56:00]
the point it is taught across
[2:56:02]
the county where the work she
[2:56:04]
has done for the kids in the
[2:56:06]
projects so congratulations to
[2:56:07]
the student and thank you to
[2:56:11]
rico and all the teachers who
[2:56:12]
supported the kids through civic
[2:56:14]
engagement.
[2:56:16]
I know all got the participate
[2:56:20]
first week in june late may and
[2:56:22]
I think if we count them up we
[2:56:24]
were up to 17 graduation
[2:56:28]
ceremonies we conducted this
[2:56:29]
year, including our adult
[2:56:32]
education students.
[2:56:33]
it was just a wonderful time.
[2:56:35]
I was able to attend several
[2:56:38]
graduations and book-ended
[2:56:41]
anacapa adult transition with
[2:56:43]
oxnard adult school.
[2:56:45]
we had a gentlemen who I believe
[2:56:48]
I can't remember the numbers, 69
[2:56:51]
years old receiving his ged and
[2:56:53]
just give an amazing graduation
[2:56:55]
speech, so we are so excited for
[2:56:58]
our graduates from 17 to 69
[2:57:03]
years old and great work by our
[2:57:05]
site staff, ground folks and
[2:57:08]
operation folks making each
[2:57:11]
ceremony look amazing and the
[2:57:12]
students speeches this year were
[2:57:15]
outstanding.
[2:57:16]
thank you to everybody for all
[2:57:18]
your good work and that is more
[2:57:19]
then 3900 students graduating
[2:57:21]
from oxnard union this month.
[2:57:24]
next slide, please.
[2:57:28]
continuing with the good news, I
[2:57:31]
want to be the first to thank
[2:57:34]
the fiscal team and they are
[2:57:35]
here to present for your
[2:57:37]
consideration a positive adopted
[2:57:38]
budget.
[2:57:40]
this has been a huge teamwork
[2:57:42]
throughout the school year and
[2:57:43]
that starts with our employees,
[2:57:45]
our union partners, our fiscal
[2:57:48]
team, our administrative team,
[2:57:51]
everybody pulling in the same
[2:57:52]
direction to address the issues
[2:57:55]
of revenue decline through
[2:57:57]
declining enrollment, everybody
[2:58:00]
working hard to preserve as many
[2:58:02]
jobs as possible including this
[2:58:04]
job is to be thanked for that.
[2:58:06]
we are really thankful to end
[2:58:09]
the year on positive net with
[2:58:11]
positive adopted budget and just
[2:58:13]
so--hear this more in the
[2:58:15]
report, this budget was positive
[2:58:17]
without the influx of new money
[2:58:19]
from the governor.
[2:58:20]
we had gotten to a positive
[2:58:22]
budget and now there are new
[2:58:24]
income streams coming in.
[2:58:25]
the cola is settling in at about
[2:58:29]
3.8 percent.
[2:58:30]
we heard it was be as high as
[2:58:34]
4.3 but the best number we have
[2:58:36]
today is 3.8 which is over the
[2:58:38]
expense of 2 percent and that is
[2:58:40]
ongoing money which is great
[2:58:42]
news.
[2:58:43]
we stand to receive significant
[2:58:44]
amount.
[2:58:45]
the dollar amount isn't
[2:58:46]
finalized in another one time
[2:58:47]
student support professional
[2:58:49]
development block grant.
[2:58:51]
that number will be finalized
[2:58:53]
probably in the june 30 final
[2:58:55]
adopted state budget but it
[2:58:57]
looks to be significant for
[2:58:58]
oxnard union.
[2:59:00]
again, fiscal discipline this
[2:59:02]
year included implementing new
[2:59:04]
over time procedures pay roll
[2:59:07]
approval form and this budget
[2:59:08]
presents--I don't know if you
[2:59:11]
want to quote the number, 2
[2:59:13]
million, $3 million in contract
[2:59:16]
savings or more?
[2:59:17]
we looked at every contract and
[2:59:19]
every outside provider and for
[2:59:21]
example on consent tonight there
[2:59:23]
is a couple item related to
[2:59:25]
special ed counseling.
[2:59:27]
the updated special council
[2:59:31]
saving more then $2 million
[2:59:33]
alone so we think all the
[2:59:35]
contracts looked at probably
[2:59:36]
saving north of 4 to $5 million
[2:59:39]
on going money.
[2:59:40]
that means teachers looking at
[2:59:43]
software programs and special
[2:59:44]
education working to look at
[2:59:47]
counseling costs and it is
[2:59:49]
really a testament to everyone's
[2:59:55]
hard work.
[2:59:56]
our budget is built on the
[2:59:57]
budget stabilization plan that
[2:59:59]
the board passed, which does
[3:00:02]
include future personnel
[3:00:03]
reductions.
[3:00:04]
those can be addressed in
[3:00:05]
different ways, but those are
[3:00:07]
included in the savings over
[3:00:09]
time as we continue to work
[3:00:12]
through declining enrollment and
[3:00:13]
the subsequent declining income.
[3:00:15]
so, one challenge ahead for the
[3:00:17]
new superintendent and the board
[3:00:20]
is to measure, yes we have new
[3:00:21]
income sources, but we also have
[3:00:23]
to continue to be have fiscal
[3:00:25]
discipline and stay the course
[3:00:27]
when it comes to the budget
[3:00:29]
stabilization plan.
[3:00:30]
I can't thank the fiscal team
[3:00:31]
enough and you will hear from
[3:00:33]
them tonight.
[3:00:34]
next slide, please.
[3:00:38]
for public comment, any member
[3:00:39]
of the public wishing to address
[3:00:44]
the board may do so.
[3:00:47]
speakers are allowed three
[3:00:49]
minutes to address the board on
[3:00:50]
each item and with board consent
[3:00:52]
the president may increase or
[3:00:54]
decrease the time for public
[3:00:56]
presentation.
[3:00:58]
refer to the board policy 9323
[3:01:02]
meeting conduct.
[3:01:03]
held in person at district
[3:01:05]
office 1800 solar drive oxnard
[3:01:07]
and due to the brown act the
[3:01:10]
board cannot respond directly to
[3:01:11]
public comment but can direct
[3:01:13]
superintendent and staff to meet
[3:01:14]
with members of the public to
[3:01:15]
better understand and hear their
[3:01:17]
concerns and points of view.
[3:01:19]
and next slide, please.
[3:01:21]
thank you everybody.
[3:01:22]
that is the superintendent's
[3:01:23]
report for june 24, 2026.
[3:01:26]
(applause)
[3:01:30]
>> thank you dr. Mccoy.
[3:01:32]
does anyone have comments they
[3:01:34]
would like to make at this time
[3:01:35]
since we reorganized a little
[3:01:37]
bit and the meeting will go out
[3:01:38]
of order.
[3:01:39]
we have something for you dr.
[3:01:40]
mccoy.
[3:01:52]
>> you guys are way too kind.
[3:01:58]
>> just back story.
[3:01:59]
when you informed us of your new
[3:02:03]
adventures we have come together
[3:02:06]
to think of different ways to
[3:02:07]
honor you and celebrate your
[3:02:09]
work so some students cte
[3:02:15]
program with wood working made
[3:02:17]
you that wonderful varsity
[3:02:19]
letterman jacket to hang and
[3:02:21]
trustee botello lopez organized
[3:02:27]
the choice between the ring and
[3:02:29]
letterman jacket and dr. Kelsen
[3:02:32]
helped with the final thing,
[3:02:33]
which is I asked that the art
[3:02:35]
students from all of the high
[3:02:37]
schools and all the art
[3:02:38]
departments had a opportunity to
[3:02:42]
contribute to something for you
[3:02:43]
to hang in your home or next
[3:02:45]
office and so I really haven't
[3:02:47]
laid on them.
[3:02:48]
only seen pictures, so thank you
[3:02:50]
to dr. Kelsen and all of the
[3:02:52]
students who helped make this
[3:02:53]
artwork possible.
[3:02:55]
this is a representation that is
[3:02:57]
from the kids.
[3:02:59]
this is really from the students
[3:03:00]
and so we want to honor you with
[3:03:02]
two pieces.
[3:03:09]
if you can take off the bow
[3:03:11]
maybe.
[3:03:12]
I will help you.
[3:03:14]
>> save the bow.
[3:03:15]
>> I do want everyone to have
[3:03:17]
the opportunity to see them.
[3:03:20]
>> that is hueneme high school.
[3:03:25]
>> where dr. Mccoy started his
[3:03:26]
career with oxnard union high
[3:03:28]
school district back in the day
[3:03:29]
and so again, all of the student
[3:03:31]
had a opportunity to participate
[3:03:33]
and they designed the artwork
[3:03:35]
themselves, so this is-
[3:03:36]
>> I think our engineering
[3:03:39]
program [inaudible]
[3:03:44]
>> and then this one and again I
[3:03:48]
haven't seen these either.
[3:03:50]
this is a little different.
[3:03:53]
they made their way to different
[3:03:54]
art departments at different
[3:03:56]
high schools.
[3:03:58]
>> rio mesa shout out.
[3:04:00]
very cool.
[3:04:02]
thank you guys.
[3:04:03]
>> something for you to take
[3:04:04]
with you and want you to always
[3:04:06]
remember oxnard union and every
[3:04:08]
day thinking about all the
[3:04:10]
amazing things you have done.
[3:04:12]
>> thank you so much.
[3:04:13]
appreciate it.
[3:04:14]
(applause)
[3:04:16]
>> maybe we can put them it
[3:04:18]
below so the audience has a
[3:04:20]
opportunity to see them.
[3:04:22]
I thought that would be really
[3:04:23]
nice.
[3:04:24]
thank you to all the amazing
[3:04:25]
students and faculty and dr.
[3:04:27]
kelsen who helped arrange that
[3:04:30]
and make it happen and honoring
[3:04:31]
you and will honor with more
[3:04:33]
words later on.
[3:04:34]
dont think you are getting out
[3:04:35]
of here that easily.
[3:04:38]
okay.
[3:04:39]
now, consent calendar.
[3:04:42]
I think trustee baker torres did
[3:04:44]
you have an adjustment to make?
[3:04:47]
>> I would like to-I had pulled
[3:04:50]
item tt, but as tim allison
[3:04:56]
said, it will be brought back
[3:04:57]
for second reading and that was
[3:04:58]
my only question.
[3:04:59]
I just wanted to confirm that.
[3:05:02]
I will also take away item ww
[3:05:06]
because I had a couple questions
[3:05:08]
regarding what staff was-what
[3:05:12]
was their thoughts on this.
[3:05:13]
we can pull both of them.
[3:05:15]
thank you tim for your answers.
[3:05:18]
>> I want to be clear, from the
[3:05:23]
consent calendar, trustee
[3:05:25]
flores-haro asked to pull 12 a
[3:05:27]
and ff and has read her piece
[3:05:30]
about that.
[3:05:31]
and then trustee baker torres
[3:05:33]
the one you would like to have
[3:05:34]
still pulled for discussion is
[3:05:36]
kk?
[3:05:37]
>> yes.
[3:05:38]
that is correct.
[3:05:39]
>> trustee botello lopez are you
[3:05:42]
willing to amend the motion?
[3:05:43]
>> yes, I amend the motion.
[3:05:45]
>> we don't need to take a vote?
[3:05:47]
>> you need to approve the
[3:05:48]
consent now with k only-
[3:05:52]
>> only k 12 a and ff.
[3:05:57]
>> would you please amend the
[3:05:58]
motion?
[3:05:59]
>> I amended to have 12 a
[3:06:04]
pulled.
[3:06:05]
ff and kk.
[3:06:08]
>> okay.
[3:06:09]
are there comments or questions
[3:06:11]
as the consent item is
[3:06:18]
presented?
[3:06:21]
>> I amend the motion.
[3:06:24]
>> mr. Sturgeon do you know who
[3:06:26]
seconded the consent calendar?
[3:06:29]
>> [inaudible]
[3:06:30]
>> I believe it was-- first and
[3:06:34]
second s. And you amended the
[3:06:37]
motion.
[3:06:38]
at this point, any other
[3:06:39]
comments or questions?
[3:06:41]
>> let me help clarify so the
[3:06:43]
board is going to consider the
[3:06:44]
question on approval of the
[3:06:46]
consent calendar without the
[3:06:50]
check referred to in item 12 a,
[3:06:55]
without ff and without kk.
[3:06:58]
that is the question before the
[3:06:59]
board.
[3:07:00]
>> thank you.
[3:07:01]
any question or comments?
[3:07:03]
all those in favor say aye.
[3:07:05]
any opposed say no.
[3:07:08]
any abstentions?
[3:07:10]
trustee estrada, would you like
[3:07:12]
to cast your vote?
[3:07:13]
>> I was an aye.
[3:07:15]
>> the motion passes 5-0.
[3:07:17]
okay.
[3:07:18]
so, now consent.
[3:07:28]
item 13.
[3:07:29]
do we have a motion-
[3:07:31]
>> we need to excuse-
[3:07:34]
>> we excuse trustee flores-haro
[3:07:36]
as her request to vote on check
[3:07:38]
number 5016935442 in the amount
[3:07:44]
of $12.128.75 and item ff.
[3:07:51]
these items are related to micop
[3:07:53]
for interpretation services and
[3:07:55]
she is the associate director of
[3:07:56]
micop.
[3:07:57]
is there a motion to approve the
[3:07:59]
check warrants?
[3:08:01]
>> I make the motion.
[3:08:03]
>> second.
[3:08:04]
>> thank you.
[3:08:05]
I have a first and second.
[3:08:07]
are there comments or questions?
[3:08:10]
all those in favor say aye.
[3:08:14]
any opposed say no.
[3:08:15]
abstentions?
[3:08:17]
motion passes 4-0.
[3:08:19]
is there a motion to approve the
[3:08:21]
consent item ff?
[3:08:25]
>> move to approve.
[3:08:27]
>> second.
[3:08:28]
>> thank you.
[3:08:29]
first and second.
[3:08:30]
are there any comments or
[3:08:31]
questions?
[3:08:34]
all those in favor please say
[3:08:35]
aye.
[3:08:38]
any opposed please say no.
[3:08:41]
any abstentions?
[3:08:44]
trustee estrada voted yes?
[3:08:46]
>> yes.
[3:08:47]
>> okay.
[3:08:48]
motion passes 4-0.
[3:08:50]
could you please ask trustee
[3:08:52]
flores-haro to come back?
[3:09:07]
>> you want me to begin with kk?
[3:09:11]
>> of course.
[3:09:12]
that would be great.
[3:09:13]
kk trustee baker torres asked to
[3:09:15]
have pulled for question.
[3:09:16]
dr. Mccoy.
[3:09:18]
>> thank you.
[3:09:20]
item kk consideration of
[3:09:22]
approval of agreement between
[3:09:23]
oxnard union high school and
[3:09:25]
effective school solutions for
[3:09:27]
mental health services for 26-27
[3:09:30]
school year from special
[3:09:31]
education funds effective school
[3:10:51]
I know that dr. Kelsen was the
[3:10:56]
primary person on this contract.
[3:11:00]
happy to take your questions.
[3:11:02]
>> I'm glad you are back.
[3:11:04]
>> let's have a motion really
[3:11:05]
quick.
[3:11:06]
is there a motion to approve?
[3:11:10]
I make the motion.
[3:11:11]
>> second.
[3:11:13]
>> thank you.
[3:11:14]
first and second.
[3:11:15]
any comments or questions?
[3:11:16]
trustee baker torres.
[3:11:19]
>> the agreement states that it
[3:11:20]
is a cost of $12 thousand per
[3:11:23]
month, so I'm assuming this is
[3:11:26]
for is it three full time
[3:11:30]
clinicians for 11 months?
[3:11:36]
>> yes.
[3:11:37]
the contract needs to cover the
[3:11:38]
time when students are receiving
[3:11:42]
service.
[3:11:43]
>> okay.
[3:11:45]
I figured $12 thousand divided
[3:11:49]
by 396.
[3:11:50]
11 months for 3.
[3:11:51]
I wanted to make sure that-what
[3:11:54]
specific schools will these
[3:11:55]
clinicians be assigned to?
[3:11:57]
and approximately how many
[3:11:59]
students are expected to be
[3:12:01]
served?
[3:12:02]
>> thank you.
[3:12:04]
we are partnering with effective
[3:12:06]
school solutions to provide
[3:12:07]
services called coeds.
[3:12:10]
the services are tier 2, tier 3
[3:12:18]
in terms of intensity and many
[3:12:20]
students and families receive
[3:12:21]
services whether they are in a
[3:12:25]
non public school, whether they
[3:12:27]
are preparing to return to a
[3:12:31]
district comprehensive high
[3:12:33]
school or one of the smaller
[3:12:36]
campuses.
[3:12:37]
so, we have this year 37
[3:12:40]
students who receive
[3:12:42]
coed services across the
[3:12:43]
district.
[3:12:44]
we estimate the number will be
[3:12:46]
similar next year and as we
[3:12:48]
complete transition iep we know
[3:12:52]
exactly the number, assuming it
[3:12:55]
stays pretty steady throughout
[3:12:56]
the year.
[3:12:57]
>> perfect.
[3:12:58]
thank you.
[3:12:59]
and then my last question, for
[3:13:00]
item gg, which was city impact
[3:13:03]
and this item, kk, has the
[3:13:06]
district considered if it would
[3:13:08]
be more cost effective building
[3:13:10]
our own in-house mental health
[3:13:12]
services which would include the
[3:13:15]
license therapist, counselor,
[3:13:16]
social workers, other mental
[3:13:18]
health professionals rather then
[3:13:19]
contracting out with all these
[3:13:21]
multiple agencies?
[3:13:24]
>> I think what we are doing
[3:13:26]
here in year one, so this was
[3:13:28]
previously a contract with
[3:13:30]
ventura county office of
[3:13:32]
education for 1.3 to $1.5
[3:13:34]
million.
[3:13:36]
>> the coed contract to loan,
[3:13:37]
yes.
[3:13:38]
>> so, with this contract we are
[3:13:40]
cutting about 55 to 60 percent
[3:13:45]
of the current year cost going
[3:13:46]
into next year.
[3:13:47]
one of the challenges and also
[3:13:50]
with city impact support as well
[3:13:52]
is, there is a very small number
[3:13:55]
of these folks that are out and
[3:13:58]
about, and whether they come as
[3:14:01]
certificated or classified, it
[3:14:03]
is difficult for us to reach the
[3:14:05]
competitive price points for
[3:14:07]
these type of higher end
[3:14:10]
counseling services, so the
[3:14:11]
district goal this year in which
[3:14:12]
we achieved was to save upwards
[3:14:15]
of 2 and a half million on the
[3:14:20]
contract to new contract
[3:14:21]
proposal with city impact and
[3:14:23]
effective school solutions and I
[3:14:25]
think in year one of these two
[3:14:27]
new providers, outside of vcoe,
[3:14:31]
the special ed staff and dr.
[3:14:33]
kelsen are going to be
[3:14:35]
monitoring if the service and
[3:14:37]
performance is the same then the
[3:14:39]
savings is a true value and then
[3:14:41]
we can look at drafting job
[3:14:43]
descriptions, but again, as you
[3:14:45]
know, sometimes with
[3:14:48]
occupational therapist, speech
[3:14:49]
language therapist, asl
[3:14:53]
interpreters the market is super
[3:14:55]
tight.
[3:14:56]
one reason we didn't recommend
[3:14:58]
that course of action is we
[3:14:59]
didn't know we are able to staff
[3:15:00]
to the point to serve the 37
[3:15:03]
students with coeds and iep.
[3:15:06]
>> but if it looks like after
[3:15:08]
the first year it looks good
[3:15:11]
then you will look into if it
[3:15:13]
would be cost effective?
[3:15:14]
>> I don't want to put new
[3:15:15]
things in a future
[3:15:16]
superintendent's in basket but
[3:15:19]
what I say is, what we have done
[3:15:23]
with these type of positions in
[3:15:24]
the past is draft a job
[3:15:25]
description and see if we can
[3:15:26]
start with someone and then
[3:15:30]
slowly transition into the
[3:15:32]
number of people we would really
[3:15:36]
need to run the program
[3:15:37]
effectively.
[3:15:39]
>> okay.
[3:15:40]
thank you.
[3:15:41]
>> just noting we have a lot of
[3:15:42]
renewals and contracts under
[3:15:45]
special education and I think it
[3:15:46]
has to be noted that there is a
[3:15:47]
lot of external partnerships you
[3:15:50]
can say dr. Mccoy with different
[3:15:53]
programs or just entities we
[3:15:56]
need to serve our students with
[3:15:57]
disabilities and I know it
[3:15:59]
crosses all our campuses but it
[3:16:01]
looks like and there is a large
[3:16:03]
price tag but that included in
[3:16:06]
the iep so love for us in the
[3:16:09]
future see the programming and
[3:16:11]
different job descriptions
[3:16:12]
coming in, but grateful and
[3:16:14]
happy we have these individuals
[3:16:15]
that we can lean on.
[3:16:17]
thank you for thinking ahead and
[3:16:18]
pulling away from vcoe and
[3:16:20]
seeing what we could do to
[3:16:21]
really price-point and budget
[3:16:24]
better for oxnard union and I
[3:16:26]
think the superintendent report
[3:16:27]
thank you mr. Urias and anna
[3:16:30]
campbell and team are working
[3:16:32]
diligently and see it between
[3:16:34]
like the invisible data or these
[3:16:37]
agenda items, so appreciate it
[3:16:39]
and seeing we are still
[3:16:40]
supporting all our students with
[3:16:41]
disabilities because that is our
[3:16:44]
mission and vision.
[3:16:46]
>> thank you.
[3:16:47]
any other comments or questions?
[3:16:51]
we have a first and second and
[3:16:54]
will call the question.
[3:16:55]
trustee flores-haro.
[3:16:57]
>> before you call the question,
[3:16:58]
wanted to underscore, as one
[3:17:00]
trustee, if we get to that point
[3:17:02]
I welcome us to in-house that
[3:17:05]
type of mental health program
[3:17:07]
and offering.
[3:17:08]
I know it is difficult for that
[3:17:10]
hiring piece, but wouldn't it be
[3:17:13]
wonderful to do that?
[3:17:14]
I had conversations outside of
[3:17:16]
my scope as trustee and with my
[3:17:19]
non profit with [inaudible]
[3:17:20]
around the medi-cal billing
[3:17:22]
piece, so I don't can know what
[3:17:24]
we have done, but welcome
[3:17:26]
conversations with new
[3:17:27]
superintendent on what that
[3:17:29]
could look like at oxnard union.
[3:17:31]
thank you.
[3:17:32]
>> thank you.
[3:17:33]
I would agree for the record.
[3:17:34]
you have a very supportive board
[3:17:35]
with regard to bringing
[3:17:36]
something like that in-house.
[3:17:37]
any other comments or questions?
[3:17:40]
okay.
[3:17:41]
all in favor say aye.
[3:17:44]
any opposed please say no.
[3:17:47]
abstentions?
[3:17:48]
trustee estrada you are muted.
[3:17:52]
>> aye.
[3:17:53]
>> thank you.
[3:17:54]
the motion passes 5-0.
[3:17:56]
okay.
[3:17:58]
moving on to the consent
[3:18:02]
calendar.
[3:18:03]
minus the other items.
[3:18:05]
we already did.
[3:18:06]
thank you.
[3:18:08]
13 a.
[3:18:09]
thank you dr. Mccoy.
[3:18:11]
13 a business services.
[3:18:13]
mr. Urias.
[3:18:15]
>> thank you dr. Sher.
[3:18:17]
background education code
[3:18:18]
section 42130 and 42131 amended
[3:18:25]
require each district
[3:18:26]
superintendent to prepare and
[3:18:27]
submit interim financial
[3:19:11]
presented. And tonight we have
[3:19:29]
anna campbell director of fiscal
[3:19:31]
services and zachary our fiscal
[3:19:34]
compliance supervisor to present
[3:19:36]
the budget this evening.
[3:19:38]
>> thank you mr. Urias.
[3:19:41]
>> good evening.
[3:19:43]
we'll present the 26-27 adopted
[3:19:45]
budget and I'll have our fiscal
[3:19:47]
compliance superintendent zach
[3:19:49]
do the heavy lifting for you
[3:19:51]
tonight.
[3:19:52]
>> thank you.
[3:19:53]
welcome.
[3:19:54]
thank you for all your heavy
[3:19:55]
lifting and hard work on behalf
[3:19:56]
of the board.
[3:19:57]
>> good evening.
[3:20:00]
so, our first slide here is
[3:20:02]
normal timeline we bring to you
[3:20:03]
every interim budget.
[3:20:05]
it is the adopted budget cycle
[3:20:08]
here for june 2026.
[3:20:10]
it is the first of six budget
[3:20:13]
cycles for new fiscal year.
[3:20:15]
it includes the budget estimates
[3:20:17]
based on information and final
[3:20:19]
details from the state of
[3:20:20]
california during this specific
[3:20:22]
period.
[3:20:23]
as we move along, we have more
[3:20:26]
information through september
[3:20:27]
15, which we can bring updates
[3:20:29]
to that during the first interim
[3:20:30]
budget coming up in december of
[3:20:33]
this year.
[3:20:34]
next slide, please.
[3:20:38]
so, in the 2026-27 adopted
[3:20:42]
budget, this looks different
[3:20:44]
then our normal interims as we
[3:20:46]
not only are bringing the
[3:20:47]
adopted budget but have to bring
[3:20:49]
the estimated actuals for 25-26.
[3:20:52]
in the 26-27 adopted, we are
[3:20:54]
looking at projected revenues,
[3:20:57]
expenditures and staffing as
[3:20:58]
well as reserves based on the
[3:21:04]
state funding.
[3:21:05]
estimated actual this is how we
[3:21:09]
finished picture so the estimate
[3:21:11]
of revenue, expenditure and most
[3:21:15]
current data available from the
[3:21:16]
third interim we brought last
[3:21:18]
meeting.
[3:21:19]
this is our budget progress and
[3:21:20]
it includes any updates going
[3:21:22]
forward.
[3:21:24]
next slide, please.
[3:21:30]
so, this slide we are looking at
[3:21:32]
our adopted budget revenue
[3:21:35]
unrestricted versus restricted
[3:21:37]
totals.
[3:21:38]
we have $250 million under
[3:21:41]
unrestricted which is part of
[3:21:42]
the lcff revenue.
[3:21:45]
we also have our federal
[3:21:47]
revenues under restricted of 10
[3:21:49]
million, $36 million under state
[3:21:55]
and other local revenues of 17.
[3:21:58]
if you notice we do have $36
[3:22:00]
million as projected revenue
[3:22:03]
under other state revenues.
[3:22:05]
it is higher then normal because
[3:22:07]
we have the projected $12
[3:22:08]
million coming from the state
[3:22:10]
and one time funding.
[3:22:13]
in total projecting $325 million
[3:22:17]
in revenue for fiscal year
[3:22:20]
26-27.
[3:22:21]
the lcff takes around 77 percent
[3:22:23]
of the total revenue for the
[3:22:24]
district.
[3:22:26]
325 is compared to 311 we
[3:22:31]
receive this year in 25-26.
[3:22:35]
in this budget it includes the
[3:22:38]
statutory cola, which is 2.87
[3:22:41]
percent and super cola of 1.44
[3:22:47]
percent.
[3:22:48]
we have to continue looking at
[3:22:49]
decline in enrollment through
[3:22:51]
2030-31 and focus on attendance
[3:22:53]
and attendance recovery in this
[3:22:56]
adopted budget.
[3:22:58]
major differences between what
[3:22:59]
we bring now versus what we
[3:23:01]
brought last time is we have
[3:23:02]
added the super cola of 1.44
[3:23:06]
approved june 15 update from the
[3:23:08]
state.
[3:23:09]
as well as the unfunded
[3:23:11]
pregnancy disability leave that
[3:23:14]
came starting 7-1-26.
[3:23:17]
we also got additional sped
[3:23:21]
funding.
[3:23:22]
we are happy for that as it
[3:23:23]
helps our programs as well.
[3:23:26]
reiterating one time state grant
[3:23:27]
of the projected $12 million
[3:23:29]
that will be coming to us.
[3:23:32]
next slide, please.
[3:23:36]
this is just another look at the
[3:23:38]
same information from the
[3:23:39]
previous slide.
[3:23:41]
we want to point out that the
[3:23:43]
lcff is the biggest chunk of
[3:23:47]
revenue and what funds most of
[3:23:49]
the things that go on around the
[3:23:51]
district.
[3:23:52]
that is roughly 77 or more
[3:23:54]
percent of overall revenue
[3:23:55]
comparatively to the other state
[3:23:57]
and federal local dollars we
[3:23:59]
also receive.
[3:24:00]
next slide, please.
[3:24:07]
so, as we take a switch from
[3:24:09]
looking revenues to looking at
[3:24:12]
expenditures for 26-27 adopted
[3:24:16]
budget, one of the biggest areas
[3:24:19]
is certificated and classified
[3:24:20]
salaries and benefits.
[3:24:22]
we are projecting $256.7 million
[3:24:26]
in total cost of certificated
[3:24:28]
salaries.
[3:24:29]
we also have the $6 million in
[3:24:32]
books and supplies between
[3:24:34]
restricted and unrestricted and
[3:24:36]
$47 million in services and
[3:24:38]
other operating expenditures. Of
[3:24:40]
the $311 million of expenditures
[3:24:43]
projected, 83 percent is related
[3:24:46]
to salary and benefits.
[3:24:47]
in the other operating side,b
[3:24:50]
things like transportation cost,
[3:24:52]
athletics software, maintenance
[3:24:54]
utilities and insurance, all
[3:24:57]
make up the 6 million and $47
[3:24:59]
million the district has.
[3:25:01]
just like the previous slide, we
[3:25:03]
wanted to talk about the cola we
[3:25:05]
received, 2.87 with the super
[3:25:08]
cola we also get and then just
[3:25:10]
continually watching decline in
[3:25:12]
enrollment for 2030-31 and
[3:25:15]
continuing that we focus on the
[3:25:17]
attendance and attendance
[3:25:19]
recovery portions.
[3:25:22]
and then again we have our same
[3:25:23]
major differences from now
[3:25:25]
versus what we brought last
[3:25:26]
time.
[3:25:28]
next slide, please.
[3:25:34]
so, as we look multi-year from
[3:25:37]
26-27 to 28-29, as we can we
[3:25:42]
project $325 million in revenue
[3:25:45]
as well as projecting $311
[3:25:48]
million expenditures.
[3:25:50]
and then if we look to 27-28 we
[3:25:52]
see go from $325 million to 315
[3:25:57]
and then our expenditures
[3:26:00]
increase from $311 million to
[3:26:02]
317.
[3:26:03]
and then the same pattern
[3:26:05]
continues to 28-29.
[3:26:07]
we have $319 million projected
[3:26:09]
revenues as well as $323 million
[3:26:12]
in projected expenditures so we
[3:26:14]
just see a pattern through the
[3:26:16]
years as the one time funding
[3:26:18]
comes and we are spending it
[3:26:20]
out.
[3:26:22]
we want to focus on declining
[3:26:25]
enrollment and a d a recovery
[3:26:27]
and continued work towards
[3:26:28]
future year deficit spending and
[3:26:34]
plans for future years without
[3:26:36]
one time funding.
[3:26:38]
next slide, please.
[3:26:40]
>> to summarize, our 26-27
[3:26:43]
adopted budget, we are
[3:26:45]
projecting currently that we
[3:26:46]
will end unassigned undesignated
[3:26:51]
balance in 26-27 of
[3:26:52]
approximately $6 million.
[3:26:54]
I put asterisk on that $6
[3:26:56]
million as reflected in the
[3:26:58]
previous slide, that is part of
[3:26:59]
the one time funding increase in
[3:27:01]
cola that we then project we
[3:27:03]
will be spending in the two
[3:27:06]
future years in order to smooth
[3:27:09]
out expenditures because we will
[3:27:11]
immediately deficit spend next
[3:27:13]
year because we will no longer
[3:27:14]
have a new pot of one time
[3:27:18]
money.
[3:27:19]
I wanted to make that note.
[3:27:20]
for the grant and one time
[3:27:22]
restricted balances we predict
[3:27:24]
$9 million.
[3:27:26]
our pregnancy disability leave
[3:27:28]
act which we are happy about
[3:27:29]
starts 7-1.
[3:27:30]
I think we have employees who
[3:27:32]
are about to be eligible in 6
[3:27:34]
days.
[3:27:35]
the super cola provided the
[3:27:38]
district with $3.4 million that
[3:27:40]
is potentially acting like a one
[3:27:43]
time fund and gives to us once
[3:27:47]
and wants to integrate the plan
[3:27:48]
into the district so I set it
[3:27:50]
aside in the assigned reserves
[3:27:52]
so we can look at it and talk
[3:27:53]
about it.
[3:27:54]
at this time, if the pattern of
[3:27:58]
usage we are projecting maintain
[3:28:02]
this will last a couple years
[3:28:03]
and need to integrate the costs
[3:28:04]
to the regular expenditure plan.
[3:28:07]
so, just to keep that in your
[3:28:09]
mind.
[3:28:10]
we were also able to restore our
[3:28:12]
summer school reserve as planned
[3:28:14]
as we discussed which we are
[3:28:17]
very very happy about and also
[3:28:19]
able to restore the local
[3:28:21]
economic reserve we are also
[3:28:22]
happy about.
[3:28:23]
we also took additional step as
[3:28:25]
discuss would the board about
[3:28:27]
reserves with one time funding
[3:28:29]
and talking through our
[3:28:30]
continued plans for future
[3:28:33]
years, so we go ahead and put $5
[3:28:34]
million extra dollars into that
[3:28:37]
reserve.
[3:28:38]
at this time, we may need that
[3:28:40]
funding in the third year but we
[3:28:42]
have the next couple years to
[3:28:43]
continue that hard work of
[3:28:45]
looking at different ways to
[3:28:46]
deliver services in a now light.
[3:28:51]
going through the software,
[3:28:54]
finding wears to deliver the
[3:28:55]
services for students just maybe
[3:28:58]
with a different model or
[3:28:59]
different method.
[3:29:01]
we are going to continue that
[3:29:02]
work with the board and staff
[3:29:04]
and with the district so we just
[3:29:06]
put that money into that pot if
[3:29:08]
we need it we need it and if
[3:29:11]
able to preserve it and bolster
[3:29:13]
our reserve in the long run,
[3:29:14]
that will help the district in a
[3:29:17]
variety of aspects, including
[3:29:19]
things such as borrowing cash
[3:29:22]
every year because we don't have
[3:29:23]
reserves that support us with
[3:29:26]
that, all the other actions we
[3:29:27]
are taking in the short run in
[3:29:30]
order to address those needs.
[3:29:31]
so, we were able to make a
[3:29:33]
deposit that then will come back
[3:29:35]
to the board with discussion in
[3:29:37]
the future.
[3:29:39]
our last two items is warehouse
[3:29:42]
stores, this is just the value
[3:29:43]
of the pencil we talk about in
[3:29:45]
the warehouse we have to keep a
[3:29:47]
reserve for, and then because
[3:29:49]
our expenditures are projected
[3:29:51]
to be higher next year that also
[3:29:53]
increased the 3 percent reserve.
[3:29:55]
we are at $9.6 million for
[3:30:00]
reserve for 26-27 out year.
[3:30:02]
next slide, please.
[3:30:04]
and then back to our budget
[3:30:06]
cycle.
[3:30:07]
we of course will wait for the
[3:30:08]
governor and legislature to
[3:30:09]
finish their negotiations and
[3:30:11]
trailer bills they have until
[3:30:16]
september 15.
[3:30:20]
we do not have updates on one
[3:30:22]
time money.
[3:30:23]
we will most likely have to
[3:30:25]
update first interim in
[3:30:27]
december.
[3:30:28]
we will be looking forward to
[3:30:29]
anything else that comes out of
[3:30:31]
the state in order to bring that
[3:30:33]
to you.
[3:30:34]
last slide, please.
[3:30:35]
thank you.
[3:30:36]
if there are questions we are
[3:30:38]
happy to answer questions and
[3:30:39]
appreciate all the hard work
[3:30:40]
that everyone has put into
[3:30:42]
making us positive and moving
[3:30:44]
forward in a positive way and
[3:30:46]
taking that little of pressure
[3:30:48]
off so we can continue the hard
[3:30:50]
work and conversations we need
[3:30:52]
to have, but with just that
[3:30:53]
little less pressure, which I
[3:30:55]
appreciate immensely.
[3:30:57]
>> lot less pressure.
[3:30:58]
>> yes.
[3:30:59]
>> thank you.
[3:31:00]
any questions at this time?
[3:31:02]
trustee baker torres.
[3:31:15]
>> I will start by saying, under
[3:31:16]
the fiscal implications on the
[3:31:19]
first page you talk about the
[3:31:22]
subsequent years reflect a
[3:31:24]
surplus allowing--
[3:31:26]
>> yes.
[3:31:27]
>> doesn't this show-unless I
[3:31:30]
read it wrong, which is quite
[3:31:33]
possible the expenditures are
[3:31:35]
more then the revenues on year
[3:31:37]
27-28 and 28-29.
[3:31:39]
>> yes.
[3:31:41]
>> we are getting in a bunch of
[3:31:42]
one time money and got increase
[3:31:44]
and not turning down a dime of
[3:31:47]
it.
[3:31:48]
we will get all that money in
[3:31:49]
and not spend all this year but
[3:31:52]
next year our expenditures will
[3:31:55]
exceed but we will have a little
[3:31:58]
extra money.
[3:32:04]
we need that as we deficit spend
[3:32:07]
next year and the following year
[3:32:12]
is the same.
[3:32:13]
it gives breathing room, but we
[3:32:15]
are going to be deficit
[3:32:16]
responding in that next two
[3:32:17]
years and it will be drawing the
[3:32:19]
money down when we run out that
[3:32:21]
money we'll be in the position
[3:32:23]
again where those decisions come
[3:32:26]
hard and fast, which is why we
[3:32:28]
prefer to have those
[3:32:29]
conversations now and to
[3:32:30]
continue this work to continue
[3:32:32]
the reductions we have been
[3:32:33]
working because we don't want
[3:32:36]
that to come as fast as it felt
[3:32:39]
this last time.
[3:32:40]
>> okay.
[3:32:49]
>> we are not going to have a
[3:32:51]
surplus then, correct?
[3:32:52]
>> it is technically a surplus
[3:32:54]
coming from old years while we
[3:32:56]
deficit spend it, so we are
[3:32:58]
spending it down.
[3:32:59]
it is a I understand that is a
[3:33:01]
confusing--
[3:33:02]
>> if you say it is surplus, I
[3:33:04]
believe you.
[3:33:06]
>> we are positive and have
[3:33:07]
money at the bottom of the
[3:33:09]
balance.
[3:33:10]
it is just coming from older
[3:33:11]
years, so we will be deficit
[3:33:15]
spending the money down.
[3:33:16]
>> the next question, on the
[3:33:21]
page-you have couple times, page
[3:33:23]
5 and 7.
[3:33:24]
it says there is the $12 million
[3:33:28]
grant funding.
[3:33:29]
>> yes.
[3:33:30]
>> how much of the $12 million
[3:33:36]
supports expenditures and what
[3:33:38]
happens when the funds are done.
[3:33:42]
>> excellent question.
[3:33:43]
now we are in discussion to put
[3:33:46]
towards compensation $5 million
[3:33:48]
that to address furlough
[3:33:52]
conversations and other issues.
[3:33:56]
this $12 million is a estimate
[3:33:59]
and the remainder of the money
[3:34:00]
we immediately look at next year
[3:34:03]
that is deficit spending to try
[3:34:06]
to maintain programs as we work
[3:34:08]
through the long-term reduction
[3:34:09]
goals, so it will be there.
[3:34:11]
if we are able to achieve larger
[3:34:14]
savings in the long-term
[3:34:15]
reduction goals, then that money
[3:34:18]
may become available for other
[3:34:19]
uses so may still be available,
[3:34:21]
but I can't make those
[3:34:23]
decisions, the board makes those
[3:34:24]
decisions.
[3:34:25]
I am leaving that for the board.
[3:34:27]
>> of course.
[3:34:29]
>> I have a related question to
[3:34:31]
this $12 million and the one
[3:34:33]
time grant funded spending.
[3:34:37]
not right now, but in the
[3:34:39]
future, could staff provide a
[3:34:41]
schedule showing when the one
[3:34:43]
time funding sources are going
[3:34:44]
to sunset, and as part that,
[3:34:48]
unless you know now, what
[3:34:50]
portion of our current staffing
[3:34:51]
is supported by this temporary
[3:34:53]
funding?
[3:34:54]
>> so, by sunset do you mean
[3:34:57]
when I will run out of it?
[3:34:59]
or do you mean by which I have a
[3:35:00]
timeline when we have to address
[3:35:02]
it by?
[3:35:04]
two different-
[3:35:05]
>> maybe-for example, my non
[3:35:09]
profit brain.
[3:35:10]
for us when we have a grant
[3:35:12]
usually there is a grant period
[3:35:13]
so grant terms and ends.
[3:35:16]
>> performance period is-
[3:35:18]
>> your performance period is my
[3:35:22]
grant period so is it possible
[3:35:24]
to get a schedule of when the
[3:35:26]
one time monies run out and what
[3:35:28]
portion of the current staff is
[3:35:29]
supported by the temporary
[3:35:30]
funding?
[3:35:31]
>> the current year 25-26 has
[3:35:34]
about $4 million worth of
[3:35:39]
staffing supported in current
[3:35:41]
one time, so those people will
[3:35:43]
then immediately transfer to one
[3:35:45]
time again next year for 26-27,
[3:35:49]
but we do have like every day
[3:35:51]
someone retires, matt tells me I
[3:35:55]
guess to maybe get through
[3:35:57]
tomorrow and then so that comes
[3:35:59]
like right off that one time
[3:36:01]
fund.
[3:36:02]
I can give you a schedule with a
[3:36:03]
estimated spend-out is probably
[3:36:05]
what you are after.
[3:36:07]
>> I would say no.
[3:36:08]
thank you.
[3:36:09]
>> no problem.
[3:36:15]
>> on page 8, it has other state
[3:36:17]
revenues.
[3:36:18]
this year or the 26-27, so next
[3:36:22]
year, the $41 million and at
[3:36:26]
28-29 it goes down to 27.
[3:36:29]
>> yep.
[3:36:30]
>> which programs or what is
[3:36:32]
ending on those?
[3:36:33]
>> one time money is only coming
[3:36:35]
26-27 once and we are
[3:36:37]
immediately coming back down to
[3:36:39]
lower revenues.
[3:36:40]
so, that is part of the are we
[3:36:43]
able to sustain it or spend over
[3:36:45]
multiple years or make other
[3:36:47]
reductions.
[3:36:48]
that is part of the overall
[3:36:50]
conversation as we get the money
[3:36:52]
once.
[3:36:55]
>> what that speaks to is the
[3:36:56]
issue at the state.
[3:36:58]
when the one time money is one
[3:37:01]
time because they shorted prop
[3:37:03]
98, the actual $900 per student
[3:37:06]
ongoing revenue and so the
[3:37:10]
state's put us in this position
[3:37:12]
and this current budget and next
[3:37:15]
budget year where instead of
[3:37:17]
applying the statutory
[3:37:19]
california constitution approved
[3:37:23]
floor they shorted the floor and
[3:37:25]
said we'll give to you one time
[3:37:27]
because we have it right now,
[3:37:28]
but not ongoing and so the
[3:37:30]
things you are pointing out are
[3:37:33]
greatly effected by the
[3:37:36]
continued short of prop 98 to
[3:37:38]
local districts.
[3:37:39]
for example, instead of $12
[3:37:41]
million in one time, we would
[3:37:44]
have received $12 million or
[3:37:48]
more ongoing we could then apply
[3:37:50]
through those years in addition
[3:37:51]
to putting in reserves.
[3:37:54]
all local districts are
[3:37:56]
navigating the one time payments
[3:37:59]
and they make it enticing
[3:38:01]
because the number is healthy,
[3:38:02]
but the exact problem you noted
[3:38:04]
is that we don't know if we are
[3:38:06]
getting another infusion of one
[3:38:08]
time a year from now, so we have
[3:38:09]
to mark this one time to cover
[3:38:11]
costs through declining
[3:38:12]
enrollment for the next three
[3:38:13]
years.
[3:38:15]
>> I think you experience that
[3:38:17]
maybe more viscerally 23-24, we
[3:38:21]
got $23 million one time and we
[3:38:24]
expended it and it was gone and
[3:38:26]
then so we are getting this kind
[3:38:27]
of whip lash if you will and to
[3:38:31]
dr. Mccoy's point, the districts
[3:38:34]
are not super excited and not
[3:38:36]
going to turn down money, but it
[3:38:38]
makes it hard to plan, makes
[3:38:40]
hard to long-term decisions,b it
[3:38:42]
turns us into this more reactive
[3:38:46]
kind of response and so and that
[3:38:48]
becomes difficulty.
[3:38:50]
that is why we advocate like
[3:38:52]
this feels like a breath of
[3:38:54]
fresh air and not saying it
[3:38:56]
isn't, but if we don't continue
[3:38:57]
the conversations if this isn't
[3:38:59]
going come back, we'll get
[3:39:01]
caught off guard in that out
[3:39:03]
year because we will be that
[3:39:05]
much lower.
[3:39:06]
suddenly and that is what
[3:39:09]
happened in 23, 24, they gave a
[3:39:12]
bunch of money and it was gone.
[3:39:14]
>> and my last question, where
[3:39:16]
in here-I thought the reserve-I
[3:39:20]
was looking for the unit share
[3:39:22]
reserve, but I don't thought
[3:39:24]
that was that local reserve, but
[3:39:27]
I guess-where is unit share
[3:39:29]
reserve shown in here?
[3:39:30]
>> so, my understanding with the
[3:39:32]
unit share reserve as part that
[3:39:34]
is in negotiations to address
[3:39:39]
furloughs so in conservation.
[3:39:42]
>> the $5 million from the $12
[3:39:43]
million isn't for the furlough
[3:39:47]
days?
[3:39:48]
>> it is combination of influxes
[3:39:51]
of resources to address employee
[3:39:53]
compensation.
[3:39:57]
>> the $5 million set aside from
[3:39:59]
the one time money that is
[3:40:00]
coming to the district and
[3:40:04]
that--I just don't want to make
[3:40:06]
sure mr. Allison is okay saying
[3:40:09]
this, there is a vote conducted
[3:40:11]
of the oftsc the membership
[3:40:15]
wanted to restore all three
[3:40:17]
furlough days for next year so
[3:40:18]
the 5.something million will
[3:40:21]
cover that and there is
[3:40:23]
specially bonus within that and
[3:40:25]
then the unit share reserve is
[3:40:28]
in conversation related to how
[3:40:31]
the district and union are
[3:40:32]
working together to cover
[3:40:33]
retiree health benefit cost and
[3:40:35]
that is ongoing conversation.
[3:40:38]
that is also we want to be
[3:40:39]
mindful something that is at the
[3:40:42]
table very soon and don't want
[3:40:44]
to negotiate away from the
[3:40:47]
table.
[3:40:48]
>> sorry tim.
[3:40:49]
didn't mean to bring anything up
[3:40:52]
I shouldn't have.
[3:40:53]
>> are you set?
[3:40:54]
>> yes.
[3:40:55]
>> thank you.
[3:40:56]
trustee botello lopez.
[3:40:57]
>> I wanted to circle to a line
[3:40:59]
item, which is age consideration
[3:41:01]
of approval of letter support
[3:41:03]
for extension of prop 54 in the
[3:41:05]
tax.
[3:41:06]
how does that tie in?
[3:41:07]
>> absolutely.
[3:41:08]
so, the prop 55 extension is
[3:41:11]
that tax on top earners that
[3:41:13]
california has put twice through
[3:41:16]
at this point.
[3:41:17]
this is our third time or second
[3:41:20]
extension.
[3:41:21]
if I can remember which prop I'm
[3:41:23]
on.
[3:41:24]
that is part that revenue
[3:41:25]
funding into the state so the
[3:41:27]
state is putting away reserves
[3:41:29]
without that tax my impression
[3:41:30]
is they will start drawing from
[3:41:32]
reserves.
[3:41:33]
they have other financial
[3:41:34]
commitments we are already
[3:41:36]
shorted in the regular funding.
[3:41:38]
it is just going to put more
[3:41:40]
financial pressure on the state
[3:41:41]
which will then intern
[3:41:42]
immediately put financial
[3:41:47]
pressure on us because we are
[3:41:48]
creatures of state funding.
[3:41:50]
>> my other question was related
[3:41:52]
to, del sol high school mulhart
[3:41:55]
and partnership and monies that
[3:41:57]
come back due to the contract.
[3:41:59]
can you relate that back to the
[3:42:02]
budget?
[3:42:03]
>> yes.
[3:42:04]
so, as part of the off site
[3:42:05]
agreements which the board
[3:42:07]
recently approved the third
[3:42:09]
amendment so there is a very
[3:42:10]
little out there with off site
[3:42:12]
one stoplight and solar panel I
[3:42:14]
think is what is left, the
[3:42:18]
mulhart group is in entering
[3:42:21]
third year with city oxnard
[3:42:24]
navigating the planning process
[3:42:25]
for development that is just
[3:42:26]
north of del sol high school in
[3:42:28]
the large open field.
[3:42:30]
when that development is
[3:42:31]
approved by the city to be sold
[3:42:33]
to a developer by the mulharts
[3:42:37]
the district is owed $55 percent
[3:42:40]
of the off site improvement cost
[3:42:42]
we estimate about $13 million
[3:42:45]
and that money goes back into a
[3:42:47]
construction related fund and so
[3:42:50]
that money is we have a really
[3:42:53]
great agreement with the
[3:42:54]
mulhart's.
[3:42:56]
they have been great partners
[3:42:58]
throughout the del sol project
[3:42:59]
in terms of taking-they know
[3:43:03]
this is their responsibility and
[3:43:04]
accountability and never shied
[3:43:06]
away from it, so it is a matter
[3:43:09]
of waiting for the development
[3:43:10]
to have approval to proceed from
[3:43:12]
oxnard which triggers our
[3:43:13]
agreement for the district to be
[3:43:15]
repaid that approximately 13.
[3:43:18]
it might be little more by the
[3:43:19]
time we finish calculating out
[3:43:22]
all the cost, but that is where
[3:43:23]
we are in that amount right now.
[3:43:26]
>> thank you for that.
[3:43:27]
and thank you for all your work.
[3:43:28]
this was a huge lift this year
[3:43:30]
so it is a relief to go to
[3:43:32]
summer to finally finish on
[3:43:35]
positive.
[3:43:36]
that's a credit to you and the
[3:43:38]
team so thank you for all your
[3:43:39]
hard work.
[3:43:41]
>> appreciate that.
[3:43:42]
>> trustee baker torres.
[3:43:45]
>> because this is bothering me.
[3:43:47]
can you tell me, on the
[3:43:49]
expenditures on page 8 at the
[3:43:51]
last line it says, services and
[3:43:54]
other operating expenditures.
[3:43:56]
is that like utilities and-okay.
[3:43:59]
that is what I assumed.
[3:44:01]
>> I think zach made a list.
[3:44:03]
utilities, insurance, our
[3:44:06]
liability insurance I believe
[3:44:07]
just went up 11 percent.
[3:44:10]
we love that.
[3:44:12]
he did made me a list.
[3:44:14]
transportation for athletics,
[3:44:16]
normal things, software
[3:44:19]
maintenance.
[3:44:20]
we also have to do anything that
[3:44:23]
is not like directly in the
[3:44:24]
classroom will end up here.
[3:44:26]
the service agreements with our
[3:44:27]
sped providers, all those things
[3:44:29]
are in this grouping, so the
[3:44:30]
grouping looks large.
[3:44:33]
if you look it is split between
[3:44:34]
restricted and unrestricted
[3:44:37]
because grants are also doing
[3:44:38]
things and have contracts with
[3:44:39]
providers and doing tutoring and
[3:44:41]
all that stuff that is all in
[3:44:43]
that space.
[3:44:44]
>> okay, thank you.
[3:44:45]
>> it is like the kitchen sink a
[3:44:50]
bit.
[3:44:54]
>> thank you for all the work.
[3:44:56]
it truly is a heavy lift to get
[3:44:58]
us back to positive.
[3:44:59]
I was thinking what is my
[3:45:04]
instagram post going to be.
[3:45:06]
so long the public is inundated
[3:45:08]
about oxnard union and
[3:45:10]
qualitative and drama.
[3:45:12]
really happy to be able to
[3:45:15]
report back out to our
[3:45:16]
constituency about having a
[3:45:18]
positive certification.
[3:45:20]
here is my question and so it is
[3:45:22]
two-parter.
[3:45:25]
now we are showing positive
[3:45:26]
certification and healthy
[3:45:27]
reserves, but in your thoughts
[3:45:30]
and open to mr. Urias and dr.
[3:45:32]
mccoy as well, what are the top
[3:45:35]
three financial risks that could
[3:45:37]
cause us to fall out of
[3:45:38]
structural balance over the next
[3:45:40]
3 years even with the budget
[3:45:42]
stabilization plan, and what
[3:45:43]
actions are we taking to
[3:45:44]
mitigate those three risks?
[3:45:47]
>> absolutely.
[3:45:48]
if I am going first, I don't
[3:45:51]
want to harp, but I have been
[3:45:55]
harping for three years.
[3:45:57]
there is so much federal
[3:45:59]
instability and we didn't bring
[3:46:00]
it up in this particular budget
[3:46:02]
because I am a little burned out
[3:46:03]
about it and couldn't handle it
[3:46:05]
so that is a personal--that we
[3:46:08]
are because the state of
[3:46:09]
california filed a lawsuit the
[3:46:11]
next day we are kind of taking a
[3:46:12]
little breath pause but that to
[3:46:15]
me is going to be number one.
[3:46:17]
number two is general economic
[3:46:20]
down-turn because we are so
[3:46:22]
cyclical and dependent on income
[3:46:25]
tax, because all the things
[3:46:27]
happening in the world are
[3:46:29]
causing so much economic
[3:46:31]
distress.
[3:46:32]
we are very very very sensitive
[3:46:33]
to that, so that would be my
[3:46:37]
personal second concern.
[3:46:38]
I would say that probably keeps
[3:46:39]
me awake the most.
[3:46:43]
and then third I think is just I
[3:46:46]
think we started the work and
[3:46:47]
the work is hard, I think
[3:46:49]
everyone has engaged in the work
[3:46:51]
and as long as we continue the
[3:46:53]
work I think it helps us be
[3:46:54]
maybe more thoughtful and have
[3:46:56]
more discussions and can spend
[3:46:58]
more time diving deeper to
[3:46:59]
topics and really decide who we
[3:47:01]
want to be when we are smaller
[3:47:03]
because we will be a smaller
[3:47:06]
organization and I think that's
[3:47:08]
really where the heart of the
[3:47:09]
work is because we don't have
[3:47:10]
control over the other things.
[3:47:12]
that is my personal opinion and
[3:47:14]
sorry I'm really burned out on
[3:47:17]
the federal.
[3:47:18]
it is really hard to-that is
[3:47:21]
whip lash at different level.
[3:47:24]
it is something different every
[3:47:27]
day.
[3:47:28]
that is where I see it but I
[3:47:29]
think the district made as
[3:47:31]
difficult as has been immense
[3:47:37]
strides of coming of we will be
[3:47:41]
smaller and a different
[3:47:43]
organization and just coming to
[3:47:45]
terms with that is hard.
[3:47:47]
we are grieving in a way.
[3:47:51]
>> thank you.
[3:47:52]
>> I have a question comment and
[3:47:55]
question.
[3:47:56]
thank you.
[3:47:57]
huge thank you.
[3:47:58]
reiterate what the other
[3:47:59]
trustees said.
[3:48:00]
thank you dr. Mccoy and mr.
[3:48:02]
urias and director campbell and
[3:48:05]
can't remember your last name.
[3:48:08]
sorry about that.
[3:48:09]
thank you this is just has been
[3:48:11]
a extraordinarily heavy lift for
[3:48:13]
everybody for everyone, so thank
[3:48:16]
you for your perseverance and
[3:48:18]
your willingness to do the hard
[3:48:20]
things as gently as possible.
[3:48:23]
I do have a question about the
[3:48:28]
paid pregnancy leave.
[3:48:30]
>> yes.
[3:48:31]
>> I want to give a shout out to
[3:48:33]
california teacher association
[3:48:34]
and secretary treasurer erica
[3:48:38]
lynn jones.
[3:48:39]
thank you to her because it is a
[3:48:41]
long time coming.
[3:48:42]
as a teacher myself, I had three
[3:48:45]
children.
[3:48:46]
we teachers for the public, you
[3:48:48]
know but for the public,
[3:48:50]
teachers pay for our substitutes
[3:48:53]
when we have children and that
[3:48:54]
isn't the case for men for
[3:48:56]
example when they go on
[3:48:59]
paternity leave it is different
[3:49:01]
structure and women retire from
[3:49:04]
teaching with about hundred
[3:49:07]
thousand less in retirement then
[3:49:09]
male counterparts, so it is a
[3:49:11]
extraordinarily heavy burden in
[3:49:13]
many ways and so I think it just
[3:49:15]
incredible accomplishment that
[3:49:17]
we have gotten here so I want to
[3:49:18]
say thank you to my own labor
[3:49:21]
organization for their tenacity.
[3:49:23]
however, I do think it-you
[3:49:27]
probably are thinking about it,
[3:49:28]
but because we teachers we do
[3:49:30]
not pay into state disability
[3:49:33]
and so for those teachers who
[3:49:36]
and for prior to now for example
[3:49:38]
when I was pregnant and went on
[3:49:41]
leave I was able to go out and
[3:49:44]
collect disability because I
[3:49:45]
have my own private disability
[3:49:47]
insurance.
[3:49:50]
I feel there is a connection
[3:49:51]
that we need to make as district
[3:49:53]
with our employees with regard
[3:49:55]
to disability insurance.
[3:49:57]
because we don't pay into the
[3:49:59]
state system, but that doesn't
[3:50:00]
mean we couldn't offer it.
[3:50:03]
>> we do offer private third
[3:50:05]
party, it is just expensive and
[3:50:07]
I think the average person who
[3:50:10]
is looking at it might be too
[3:50:12]
much so last year we worked with
[3:50:15]
cbo to offer another version
[3:50:17]
more affordable and so we really
[3:50:19]
tried to advertise that because
[3:50:21]
we want to have our employees
[3:50:24]
have what they need at an
[3:50:26]
affordable price, so we have
[3:50:28]
been working to push not only to
[3:50:33]
offer that but other districts
[3:50:35]
can join in so we were
[3:50:37]
successful in that last year.
[3:50:38]
this will go a long way also to
[3:50:40]
help people because they are
[3:50:44]
trying to use 6 or 7 different
[3:50:47]
leave types.
[3:50:48]
they are cobbling something
[3:50:50]
together that makes it hard to
[3:50:51]
make decisions and so this will
[3:50:53]
streamline down into just it
[3:50:55]
looks like 6 months paid and we
[3:50:57]
can take a breath and think
[3:50:59]
about what that looks like
[3:51:01]
after, so I think that will
[3:51:03]
help.
[3:51:04]
the offerings we have been
[3:51:05]
pushing at the district level
[3:51:06]
more affordable I are think will
[3:51:08]
help.
[3:51:09]
outside that, I hear you.
[3:51:11]
I would be open to suggestions
[3:51:13]
of what you think we could
[3:51:14]
support employees with.
[3:51:16]
>> it is just a work in progress
[3:51:19]
just putting it out there.
[3:51:20]
a lot of people in the public
[3:51:21]
don't know we are not part of
[3:51:23]
the state disability system we
[3:51:25]
pay for our substitutes and this
[3:51:28]
is coming but it is a unfunded
[3:51:32]
mandate.
[3:51:33]
one time funds to trustee baker
[3:51:35]
torres point with all the other
[3:51:36]
things and this is for
[3:51:37]
everything in education and why
[3:51:40]
can can't plan for anything
[3:51:41]
because we always have one time
[3:51:44]
funds and start these amazing
[3:51:45]
things and how do we sustain
[3:51:47]
them?
[3:51:48]
even school resource officers
[3:51:50]
started like that.
[3:51:51]
started with a grant and became
[3:51:52]
our responsibility.
[3:51:55]
all these programs fall under
[3:51:57]
that and it is really doesn't
[3:51:59]
help us serve students in any
[3:52:01]
way shape or form.
[3:52:02]
>> but I never want to turn down
[3:52:04]
money.
[3:52:05]
I don't want anyone to hear me
[3:52:07]
as if I turned it down.
[3:52:09]
>> for the putting out there for
[3:52:10]
the future and thank you for
[3:52:12]
your work around disability
[3:52:14]
insurance and are helping our
[3:52:16]
pregnant employees to be able to
[3:52:19]
pursue that and not have a
[3:52:22]
deficit on the other end.
[3:52:23]
thank you.
[3:52:25]
any other comments or questions
[3:52:26]
with regard to this?
[3:52:28]
do we have a motion?
[3:52:30]
>> move to approve.
[3:52:33]
>> thank you.
[3:52:34]
first and second.
[3:52:35]
any other comments or questions?
[3:52:41]
on behalf of board thank you
[3:52:44]
very much.
[3:52:45]
all in favor aye.
[3:52:47]
any opposed say no.
[3:52:49]
any abstentions?
[3:52:52]
trustee estrada you are muted:
[3:52:55]
>> aye.
[3:52:57]
>> it passes 5-0.
[3:52:58]
thank you very much.
[3:53:04]
very exciting news.
[3:53:05]
we are officially positive.
[3:53:07]
that deserves a round of
[3:53:08]
applause.
[3:53:09]
thank you very much.
[3:53:10]
that is amazing.
[3:53:11]
we are so grateful.
[3:53:12]
okay.
[3:53:13]
now we are moving to item 13b,
[3:53:18]
which is consideration of
[3:53:19]
approval of contract.
[3:53:23]
mr. Urias.
[3:53:26]
>> thank you dr. Sher.
[3:53:28]
consideration of approval of
[3:53:29]
contract award to education
[3:53:30]
housing partners, inc. For
[3:53:32]
workforce housing feasibility
[3:53:33]
study and advisory service
[3:53:38]
rfk-p728 measure e funded.
[3:53:40]
background:the district issued a
[3:55:01]
presented. Mr. James ketchum
[3:55:03]
our director of measure e and
[3:55:05]
workforce housing here tonight.
[3:55:08]
>> I move to approve.
[3:55:11]
>> good evening.
[3:55:13]
>> hold on a second.
[3:55:14]
>> second.
[3:55:15]
>> thank you.
[3:55:16]
first and second.
[3:55:18]
go ahead.
[3:55:21]
>> my apologies.
[3:55:23]
>> welcome.
[3:55:24]
>> good evening president dr.
[3:55:25]
sher, board members, dr. Mccoy.
[3:55:30]
>> do you have questions?
[3:55:34]
trustee baker torres.
[3:55:36]
>> before committing to the $195
[3:55:38]
thousand, have we looked into
[3:55:41]
whether the non profit
[3:55:45]
affordable housing developers
[3:55:47]
such as people's self-help
[3:55:50]
housing or any other housing
[3:55:51]
partner can provide us that same
[3:55:53]
analysis for free?
[3:55:57]
>> so, this is a non profit
[3:56:01]
company that we are dealing with
[3:56:03]
and none of the non profits do
[3:56:04]
this work for free.
[3:56:07]
but this is non profit company
[3:56:09]
we are going with.
[3:56:13]
>> okay.
[3:56:16]
>> then, is this a not to exceed
[3:56:19]
amount?
[3:56:20]
>> correct.
[3:56:21]
it is up to 195.
[3:56:23]
>> okay.
[3:56:24]
>> as he said, it is non profit
[3:56:26]
fee for service, no equity stake
[3:56:29]
or development profit.
[3:56:31]
only advise and advocate for the
[3:56:33]
district.
[3:56:34]
>> perfect.
[3:56:35]
thank you.
[3:56:36]
and then, will this feasibility
[3:56:37]
study will it provide a
[3:56:39]
financial analysis, such as will
[3:56:42]
they tells projected cost to
[3:56:45]
build the units and cost per
[3:56:47]
unit?
[3:56:48]
will they tell the projected
[3:56:49]
rental rates or purchases prices
[3:56:54]
or if the staff can actually
[3:56:56]
truly afford these places?
[3:57:00]
will we know if there is enough
[3:57:04]
demand.
[3:57:05]
will we do another survey?
[3:57:07]
>> it has been a few years.
[3:57:09]
>> will we know if there is
[3:57:10]
enough demand to keep the units
[3:57:12]
full?
[3:57:13]
what is the long-term financial
[3:57:15]
picture including operating
[3:57:17]
cost, maintenance, repairs,
[3:57:20]
management and any other ongoing
[3:57:24]
expenses and whether the general
[3:57:26]
fund could ever be at risk of
[3:57:28]
supporting this project?
[3:57:30]
>> I would say those are all
[3:57:33]
excellent question and why we
[3:57:34]
are recommending this
[3:57:36]
feasibility study because it
[3:57:38]
will provide answers to all
[3:57:39]
those questions and allow us to
[3:57:42]
look at that feasibility study
[3:57:43]
and results to determine what
[3:57:45]
next steps if any we want to
[3:57:47]
take as a result.
[3:57:48]
>> okay, perfect.
[3:57:49]
that was the last question.
[3:57:50]
after the workforce housing
[3:57:52]
study the feasibility study is
[3:57:54]
done, what would be our next
[3:57:55]
step?
[3:57:57]
>> we would present the results
[3:57:58]
to the board, and we would
[3:58:03]
do-james and his team and myself
[3:58:05]
would do an analysis of the
[3:58:06]
results, so we could advice the
[3:58:09]
board on the information being
[3:58:11]
presented to them, and then make
[3:58:13]
a determination, is there a
[3:58:15]
pathway to success for workforce
[3:58:17]
housing at this time, and is the
[3:58:19]
board interested or are there
[3:58:24]
additional hurdles that need to
[3:58:28]
be overcome before we identify a
[3:58:30]
successful pathway to this
[3:58:31]
project in which case we want to
[3:58:33]
work on the barriers.
[3:58:34]
that is what we are looking for.
[3:58:38]
identify the barriers and can we
[3:58:40]
overcome the barriers and
[3:58:41]
provide the information to the
[3:58:42]
board for their input.
[3:58:44]
>> okay.
[3:58:45]
good.
[3:58:46]
thank you.
[3:58:47]
>> thank you.
[3:58:48]
trustee botello lopez.
[3:58:52]
>> I want to go back to measure
[3:58:53]
e because we had earmarked a
[3:58:56]
amount of money for workforce
[3:58:57]
housing specifically.
[3:58:58]
do you remember that number?
[3:59:00]
>> 4 million and little change,
[3:59:03]
but approximately $4 million.
[3:59:05]
>> we haven't spent that money
[3:59:06]
yet.
[3:59:07]
this is the first big item?
[3:59:09]
>> correct.
[3:59:11]
>> and then with that mr. Urias
[3:59:15]
and dr. Mccoy, brittany,
[3:59:17]
president sher and I, I think it
[3:59:19]
was 2024 in february to see
[3:59:21]
housing units that are pictured
[3:59:22]
on this, so I don't know there
[3:59:25]
is still the option for this
[3:59:26]
coming year because maybe
[3:59:28]
trustee baker torres would be
[3:59:29]
interested because a lot of
[3:59:30]
questions coming forward are
[3:59:32]
very long-term and I know I have
[3:59:35]
some of the information and
[3:59:36]
president sher has some of the
[3:59:40]
knowledge too which we will
[3:59:42]
share because you had questions
[3:59:43]
regarding how much does it cost.
[3:59:45]
we go into details absolutely
[3:59:47]
and I think that information is
[3:59:50]
available, but I think long-term
[3:59:52]
goals is feasibility study.
[3:59:54]
we are using if we approve it
[3:59:55]
education housing partners, so I
[3:59:57]
had a question whether there is
[3:59:59]
any other district in this
[4:00:00]
county that used education
[4:00:02]
housing partners as well?
[4:00:05]
>> off top of my head, I know
[4:00:09]
ventura isn't using them.
[4:00:11]
they do have references.
[4:00:13]
I don't have that with me.
[4:00:16]
>> they have strong references
[4:00:17]
with pasadena unified, san jose
[4:00:20]
unifies, san mateo, marin county
[4:00:27]
and support from the state
[4:00:29]
senator and veteran developer.
[4:00:33]
18 thousand multifamily homes
[4:00:34]
delivered.
[4:00:35]
>> okay, it is just the plethora
[4:00:40]
of california up and down.
[4:00:42]
last year was ventura
[4:00:45]
county-someone had a meeting.
[4:00:46]
you went to it mr. Urias?
[4:00:51]
>> the housing trust.
[4:00:52]
>> are they having something
[4:00:53]
similar this year that we can be
[4:00:56]
flies on the wall and trustees
[4:00:58]
can hear the information because
[4:00:59]
I think a lot of the questions
[4:01:01]
like trustee baker torres is
[4:01:02]
mentioning are discussed there
[4:01:04]
in full and I know one of the
[4:01:06]
projects the san mateo or one in
[4:01:12]
san francisco, jefferson union
[4:01:14]
we had a panel of the board
[4:01:16]
members as well as some
[4:01:17]
community that were talking
[4:01:19]
about like the same questions
[4:01:20]
you had like how do we do this,
[4:01:22]
what is the rent price, who gets
[4:01:24]
to choose whether they want to,
[4:01:25]
did you survey your entire staff
[4:01:28]
and district l. Those questions
[4:01:29]
were answered and it is a big
[4:01:31]
process and a long-term goal, so
[4:01:34]
it is just-there is a lot of
[4:01:36]
layers but I think curious if
[4:01:40]
still offering something for
[4:01:42]
that and what it could look like
[4:01:43]
for the trustees growing in
[4:01:44]
their knowledge base.
[4:01:45]
>> yes.
[4:01:46]
a couple things related to that.
[4:01:48]
the california school board
[4:01:49]
association is still a excellent
[4:01:51]
resource and they still do
[4:01:54]
cohort work but they evolved the
[4:01:55]
process so they actually also do
[4:01:57]
one day workshops that a board
[4:01:59]
member could attend.
[4:02:02]
they host-
[4:02:03]
>> boot camps.
[4:02:06]
>> board members could attended.
[4:02:07]
if the feasibility study comes
[4:02:10]
back and shows a pathway to
[4:02:11]
success, then I think and it is
[4:02:14]
something a consideration that
[4:02:15]
comes to the board, I think at
[4:02:18]
that time it would be wise for
[4:02:19]
people to look at the resources
[4:02:21]
available, we are happy to
[4:02:22]
provide some of those and
[4:02:23]
potentially attend a boot camp
[4:02:26]
and we would be happy to attend
[4:02:27]
with the board members so we can
[4:02:29]
continue to sharpen our
[4:02:33]
knowledge.
[4:02:34]
happy to keep the board aware of
[4:02:36]
ventura county opportunities
[4:02:38]
because there will be some so
[4:02:39]
we'll keep the board informed on
[4:02:41]
the opportunities and encourage
[4:02:43]
attendance.
[4:02:45]
>> I love that.
[4:02:46]
lastly, if we approve this, when
[4:02:48]
is the start time and when do
[4:02:51]
anticipate being the deadline
[4:02:54]
and when do you think we could
[4:02:56]
have the information back?
[4:02:58]
>> probably start immediately
[4:03:00]
reach out to them to get the
[4:03:02]
program started so we have a
[4:03:06]
plan moving forward and find
[4:03:08]
from them each step and how we
[4:03:09]
begin to do it.
[4:03:12]
>> could we anticipate by the
[4:03:13]
end of 2026?
[4:03:15]
>> they said in my research
[4:03:17]
could take 3 to 6 months.
[4:03:19]
>> okay.
[4:03:20]
thank you.
[4:03:21]
>> also, if I want to add, there
[4:03:24]
is available grants if we choose
[4:03:27]
this--we are then eligible to
[4:03:30]
get a scag grant that would pay
[4:03:32]
partially for the cost.
[4:03:33]
we get reimbursement.
[4:03:36]
what was the amount?
[4:03:38]
>> up to $50 thousand.
[4:03:39]
if the board approves we can go
[4:03:42]
to them for grant funding.
[4:03:43]
>> I think trustee estrada had
[4:03:45]
mentioned few meetings ago,
[4:03:47]
maybe redoing or revamping the
[4:03:50]
survey we had done and seeing
[4:03:51]
where the need is.
[4:03:52]
what type of is it one bedroom
[4:03:55]
or two.
[4:03:56]
what does it mean so maybe
[4:03:57]
looking at it again and sending
[4:03:58]
it out.
[4:03:59]
>> they will conduct a new
[4:04:00]
survey with a more experienced
[4:04:03]
at it and will be able to
[4:04:05]
really-do several things before
[4:04:06]
they do the survey.
[4:04:07]
they want a list of employees
[4:04:10]
and how many we have and ages
[4:04:12]
and wages and looking at the
[4:04:13]
median income for the area
[4:04:16]
because all the data is
[4:04:18]
important when you talk about
[4:04:19]
educator workforce housing and
[4:04:20]
using affordable houses
[4:04:23]
resources to fund some that.
[4:04:24]
but they will then finalize that
[4:04:26]
with a very detailed survey that
[4:04:28]
is more detailed then what we
[4:04:30]
provided to get specific
[4:04:32]
information from the staff on
[4:04:33]
what it is they would like to
[4:04:37]
see.
[4:04:38]
>> we are anticipating because I
[4:04:39]
saw principal martin here the
[4:04:41]
space near rancho campana?
[4:04:43]
>> now we are focused on that
[4:04:46]
space.
[4:04:47]
we think the oxnard high school
[4:04:48]
space can be a viable space in 4
[4:04:50]
to 5 years as development moves
[4:04:51]
out toward that farm land.
[4:04:53]
>> perfect.
[4:04:54]
thank you.
[4:04:56]
>> thank you trustee
[4:04:59]
flores-haro.
[4:05:00]
>> thank you president sher.
[4:05:01]
my colleagues snatched up my
[4:05:02]
questions.
[4:05:03]
as a trustee who is a renter, I
[4:05:06]
really appreciate the
[4:05:09]
thoughtfulness of previous
[4:05:10]
boards and this board looking
[4:05:11]
into workforce housing for our
[4:05:14]
staff.
[4:05:16]
I'll share that before covid the
[4:05:19]
apartment complex I was renting
[4:05:21]
I was paying less for more
[4:05:23]
apartment and then post covid
[4:05:25]
I'm paying more for less
[4:05:27]
apartment if that makes sense.
[4:05:31]
I'm sure many staff are in that
[4:05:34]
situation so I think it is
[4:05:36]
important we redo the survey to
[4:05:39]
get a sense of the landscape,
[4:05:41]
especially since we implemented
[4:05:44]
the srp imagine it is swinging
[4:05:47]
younger so good to hear from
[4:05:49]
staff some questions I was going
[4:05:50]
to ask was what trustee baker
[4:05:53]
torres touched on of the cost,
[4:05:55]
because when I went through the
[4:05:56]
packet I saw that scale of 185
[4:06:00]
to 280 and like, that is a big
[4:06:02]
scale.
[4:06:03]
that is a lot.
[4:06:04]
I'm glad you locked in at 195
[4:06:07]
not to exceed.
[4:06:08]
my other question was, trustee
[4:06:10]
botello's question around when
[4:06:12]
we get the report back because I
[4:06:14]
read 5 months.
[4:06:16]
hopeful we can get something
[4:06:17]
before the end of the year.
[4:06:19]
thank you.
[4:06:21]
>> thank you.
[4:06:23]
thank you.
[4:06:24]
this is a dream.
[4:06:25]
so grateful for your work and
[4:06:27]
your perseverance and I think
[4:06:29]
the boot camps I have always
[4:06:31]
said the california school board
[4:06:33]
association and the workforce
[4:06:34]
housing boot camps are so
[4:06:37]
incredible.
[4:06:38]
I think anybody any trustee with
[4:06:42]
the opportunity to participate
[4:06:43]
will learn so much so I really
[4:06:45]
encourage anyone to do that.
[4:06:48]
for those people and I'm
[4:06:49]
learning about this too for
[4:06:50]
those that don't know,
[4:06:52]
california law makers have
[4:06:53]
agreed to place a historic
[4:06:57]
$11.25 billion veteran
[4:07:00]
affordable housing bond act on
[4:07:03]
the november 2026 ballot, so
[4:07:05]
this is just like work in
[4:07:07]
progress.
[4:07:08]
enough signatures are gathered
[4:07:09]
to be on the 26 november ballot
[4:07:13]
and designed to tackle the
[4:07:16]
housing crisis and fund
[4:07:18]
construction of affordable homes
[4:07:20]
and provide down payment
[4:07:21]
assistance to thousands of
[4:07:22]
buyers, especially through the
[4:07:24]
cal vet home loan program and
[4:07:26]
also aims to approve funds to
[4:07:31]
finance the construction
[4:07:34]
rehabilitation and preservation
[4:07:35]
of affordable rental and
[4:07:36]
supportive housing for lower
[4:07:37]
income californians as well as
[4:07:39]
providing down payment
[4:07:40]
assistance.
[4:07:41]
that is as much as we know about
[4:07:43]
the bond but it is $11.25
[4:07:47]
billion bond on the november
[4:07:49]
ballot so I hope everyone is
[4:07:51]
thinking about where the votes
[4:07:53]
are going to be cast with regard
[4:07:54]
to that.
[4:07:56]
I think that trustee estrada
[4:08:02]
hasn't had a opportunity to
[4:08:03]
weigh in and give her a
[4:08:04]
opportunity.
[4:08:06]
she is muted.
[4:08:07]
any comment or question you have
[4:08:08]
with regard to this?
[4:08:10]
>> thank you president sher.
[4:08:12]
I do appreciate the direction of
[4:08:15]
the new study.
[4:08:17]
I think a lot of concerns I
[4:08:20]
previously raised have been
[4:08:22]
addressed with this new
[4:08:25]
proposal, and I appreciate that
[4:08:28]
the proposal explores multiple
[4:08:30]
funding models that reduce
[4:08:36]
reliance on local dollars and
[4:08:38]
protect the general fund and
[4:08:39]
some examples included how other
[4:08:42]
colleges and cities have pursued
[4:08:44]
partnerships and funding
[4:08:47]
opportunities to collaborate on
[4:08:50]
something like housing that
[4:08:52]
impacts everyone not just the
[4:08:54]
school district.
[4:08:57]
that said, my position on
[4:08:59]
workforce housing with the bond
[4:09:02]
dollars has not changed.
[4:09:05]
I think until every one of the
[4:09:06]
school sites has functional
[4:09:08]
library, I can't support
[4:09:11]
continued investment using
[4:09:13]
measure e our bond dollars
[4:09:15]
should be directed towards
[4:09:17]
educational facilities that
[4:09:19]
benefit students, teaching and
[4:09:22]
learning.
[4:09:23]
but I thank you for the work and
[4:09:24]
for keeping those integrating
[4:09:27]
those into this new proposal.
[4:09:30]
>> any other comments or
[4:09:31]
questions?
[4:09:33]
I would just like to remind the
[4:09:34]
public $4 million plus dollars
[4:09:40]
designated in the bond for this
[4:09:41]
particular work and so we need
[4:09:42]
to be true to the bond with
[4:09:44]
regard to how we are using our
[4:09:46]
monies and what the voters have
[4:09:47]
approved.
[4:09:48]
this is part that approval.
[4:09:50]
the voters have approved this
[4:09:51]
part of our bond measure, this
[4:09:53]
money couldn't necessarily be
[4:09:55]
used for libraries so I don't
[4:09:57]
want anyone to get the wrong
[4:09:58]
idea that this is a separate pot
[4:10:02]
of money and so this is
[4:10:05]
designated for our workforce
[4:10:06]
housing, feasibility studies,
[4:10:08]
this was written into the bond
[4:10:10]
and so now by adopting this
[4:10:13]
measure we are actually living
[4:10:15]
what we actually promised the
[4:10:17]
voters.
[4:10:18]
>> yes.
[4:10:21]
maybe you are ready to call for
[4:10:22]
the vote.
[4:10:23]
I want to add one more thing,
[4:10:24]
there is a rising tide of
[4:10:26]
support occurring throughout the
[4:10:27]
state for workforce housing and
[4:10:29]
affordable housing, so we do
[4:10:31]
anticipate in the next couple
[4:10:33]
years potential grant fund and
[4:10:35]
other funds that may come
[4:10:38]
available and we want to be
[4:10:39]
ready to take advantage of
[4:10:40]
those, knowing we got a
[4:10:41]
potential shovel ready project.
[4:10:46]
we can overcome barriers and as
[4:10:49]
the tide continues to occur
[4:10:51]
around funding for the projects,
[4:10:54]
we will be poised to take
[4:10:56]
advantage of funds that come
[4:10:58]
available through things like
[4:10:59]
the bond you are mentioning
[4:11:00]
because we are seeing that trend
[4:11:01]
and do expect there will be
[4:11:03]
financial assistance for
[4:11:04]
district like ours in the future
[4:11:06]
to pursue these options.
[4:11:08]
>> thank you.
[4:11:09]
and then to that point and I
[4:11:11]
forgive me I don't remember
[4:11:13]
where I heard this with regard
[4:11:14]
to housing, but I know it was
[4:11:16]
with the district.
[4:11:17]
within the next 10 years or over
[4:11:19]
next 10 years maybe ventura
[4:11:21]
county housing authority,
[4:11:23]
perhaps the meeting we went to.
[4:11:29]
the price of housing will go up
[4:11:31]
125 percent in the next 10 years
[4:11:34]
so unless we plan on raising
[4:11:36]
salaries 125 percent, we have
[4:11:37]
teachers and staff that can't
[4:11:39]
afford a home now so for us to
[4:11:41]
be thinking about the future,
[4:11:42]
especially something as close
[4:11:44]
and as far as the same time as
[4:11:47]
10 years, really important.
[4:11:48]
I want to make sure the public
[4:11:50]
understands this money measure e
[4:11:52]
is for lots of things.
[4:11:56]
$4 million plus dollars of
[4:11:57]
measure e is specifically
[4:11:59]
designated for a feasibility
[4:12:01]
study and beginnings of what
[4:12:05]
will be workforce housing.
[4:12:07]
this is not money that could be
[4:12:09]
spent on something else.
[4:12:11]
we asked the voters to approver
[4:12:14]
a bond measure and this was
[4:12:15]
written and they approved the
[4:12:16]
bond measure so I don't want
[4:12:18]
anyone to think the two pots of
[4:12:20]
money can be used for the same
[4:12:21]
thing.
[4:12:22]
any other comments or questions
[4:12:23]
before I call the vote?
[4:12:27]
mr. Sturgeon would you take a
[4:12:30]
roll call vote, please?
[4:12:33]
>> estrada, no.
[4:12:39]
baker torres, yes.
[4:12:42]
botello, yes.
[4:12:44]
flores-haro, yes.
[4:12:45]
sher, yes.
[4:12:47]
>> thank you.
[4:12:48]
motion passes 4-1.
[4:12:49]
thank you very much for being
[4:12:51]
here and for your dedication to
[4:12:52]
this work.
[4:12:53]
thank you.
[4:12:54]
okay.
[4:12:57]
just for the public and
[4:12:58]
everyone's notice, we thought we
[4:13:00]
were going have to go back to
[4:13:01]
closed session at some point, we
[4:13:03]
don't need to adjourn to closed
[4:13:05]
session, so any point again this
[4:13:09]
evening and so 10 a we are going
[4:13:13]
to go through item 14, complete
[4:13:16]
the staff report on the ric
[4:13:18]
program update and then before
[4:13:20]
the board discussion, we are
[4:13:21]
going to have item consideration
[4:13:24]
of 10 a.
[4:13:27]
between 14 and 15 just if you
[4:13:29]
want to put it on the agenda
[4:13:30]
everyone.
[4:13:31]
that is when we will consider 10
[4:13:33]
a for the public, the contract
[4:13:36]
that will be presented in 10 a
[4:13:39]
has been posted to the website
[4:13:41]
mr. Sturgeon.
[4:13:42]
it is posted or working on it?
[4:13:44]
>> it isn't posted but there are
[4:13:46]
copies available on the dais.
[4:13:48]
>> thank you.
[4:13:49]
there are printed copies in the
[4:13:50]
board room for those that are
[4:13:52]
interested in looking at it
[4:13:53]
before we get to 10 a.
[4:13:55]
there are printed copies here
[4:13:57]
and we are working on posting it
[4:13:59]
currently.
[4:14:00]
is that correct mr. Sturgeon?
[4:14:01]
>> correct.
[4:14:02]
speaking about that.
[4:14:05]
>> we have a little time, but
[4:14:06]
just for the public who is
[4:14:08]
waiting it will be posted
[4:14:09]
shortly, so thank you.
[4:14:10]
I want to make sure everything
[4:14:12]
is aware.
[4:14:13]
did I miss anything?
[4:14:14]
okay.
[4:14:15]
good.
[4:14:16]
now we are moving on to
[4:14:19]
item-yes?
[4:14:20]
>> [inaudible]
[4:14:23]
>> public comment.
[4:14:24]
>> we will allow the public to
[4:14:28]
comment prior to the
[4:14:29]
presentation.
[4:14:30]
>> did you say that?
[4:14:31]
>> I don't can know if I did, if
[4:14:33]
I didn't thank you for reminding
[4:14:34]
me.
[4:14:36]
anything I missed?
[4:14:37]
moving on to 13c.
[4:14:40]
which the consideration of
[4:14:41]
approval for contract.
[4:14:43]
mr. Urias or dr. Mccoy.
[4:14:46]
>> thank you.
[4:14:47]
consideration of approval for
[4:14:48]
contract award to bernards for
[4:14:50]
future as-needed construction
[4:14:51]
management services. To ensure
[4:17:04]
district, as presented. If I
[4:17:05]
may, I know this is the third
[4:17:06]
time we bring the item to the
[4:17:08]
board.
[4:17:09]
partly due to the fact we
[4:17:10]
haven't had a full board present
[4:17:12]
for a vote, so we thought it is
[4:17:14]
important to hear from all the
[4:17:15]
board members on a vote.
[4:17:17]
we are bringing this to the
[4:17:19]
board because we believe it is
[4:17:21]
necessary for us to continue to
[4:17:23]
maintain the quality of our
[4:17:25]
projects to have this support.
[4:17:28]
we are asking the board for this
[4:17:30]
support so we can continue to
[4:17:32]
manage our cost, find savings on
[4:17:36]
the buildings and insure the low
[4:17:38]
bidders who all providing the
[4:17:39]
lowest bid are held accountable
[4:17:42]
for the project requirements and
[4:17:44]
they are doing everything the
[4:17:46]
project requires and not trying
[4:17:48]
top find ways to save money on
[4:17:50]
their low bid.
[4:17:51]
additionally, you heard from me
[4:17:53]
on this topic at nauseam and mr.
[4:17:57]
ketchum, we have mr. Rising here
[4:17:59]
from district advocates group
[4:18:02]
who is a company you approved
[4:18:04]
for us to work with helping us
[4:18:06]
with the bond program.
[4:18:07]
he has 40 years of experience in
[4:18:09]
the construction school
[4:18:12]
construction and so, he has a
[4:18:14]
few slides to share with you but
[4:18:17]
thought it is better if you
[4:18:18]
heard from someone you hadn't
[4:18:20]
heard from yet on the matter who
[4:18:22]
is a expert in the field.
[4:18:24]
>> thank you mr. Urias.
[4:18:27]
madam president, board members,
[4:18:28]
staff, community, again my name
[4:18:31]
is allen rising, executive vice
[4:18:33]
president with district
[4:18:34]
advocates group.
[4:18:35]
I have more then 40 years of
[4:18:37]
experience working both in
[4:18:40]
schools as well as helping to
[4:18:42]
support schools.
[4:18:44]
in that time managed well excess
[4:18:47]
$5 billion in school
[4:18:49]
construction and continue to
[4:18:50]
assist schools and school
[4:18:52]
districts such as oxnard as we
[4:18:53]
move forward.
[4:18:54]
today, mr. Urias and are mr.
[4:18:57]
ketchum asked to talk about
[4:18:59]
value of effective construction
[4:19:01]
management and how that
[4:19:03]
construction management helps
[4:19:05]
safeguard public funds and
[4:19:07]
insure delivery of projects on
[4:19:09]
time and on schedule.
[4:19:11]
if we can go to the next slide,
[4:19:13]
please.
[4:19:14]
it is important we start with
[4:19:15]
really for the community to
[4:19:16]
understand the scale of the type
[4:19:19]
of projects we are looking at.
[4:19:23]
we have projects currently in
[4:19:25]
the program that are being
[4:19:27]
worked on and some version of
[4:19:29]
construction whether
[4:19:30]
pre-construction work which
[4:19:31]
means designers are working on
[4:19:33]
projects, it is bidding and bid
[4:19:37]
procurement and bringing on
[4:19:39]
contractors, some form of
[4:19:42]
execution where work is
[4:19:43]
happening at school sites or
[4:19:45]
various levels of close-out to
[4:19:47]
insure all the money has been
[4:19:49]
spent appropriately and we
[4:19:50]
accounted for that work both not
[4:19:52]
only locally, but also at the
[4:19:53]
state level as well to insure
[4:19:55]
our schools are as safe and
[4:20:00]
effect.
[4:20:02]
$93 and a half million is in the
[4:20:07]
queue with the measure e program
[4:20:08]
so a lot of work and moving
[4:20:10]
parts happening same time and
[4:20:11]
all the work is happening over
[4:20:12]
the next 12-18 month as various
[4:20:15]
projects move to the process.
[4:20:19]
it is also important to
[4:20:20]
understand that school
[4:20:22]
construction is some of the most
[4:20:24]
complex construction we have in
[4:20:26]
the state.
[4:20:27]
it is one of the most regulated
[4:20:28]
areas of construction in the
[4:20:30]
state.
[4:20:31]
largely because these are our
[4:20:32]
schools.
[4:20:33]
these are where we put our
[4:20:34]
children and expectations our
[4:20:35]
schools are safe effective clean
[4:20:37]
functional is pervasive across
[4:20:40]
the community.
[4:20:41]
the state recognize that, but we
[4:20:44]
deal with various different
[4:20:45]
agencies that all have component
[4:20:47]
part of what we do.
[4:20:48]
everything from dsa.
[4:20:50]
division of state architect
[4:20:54]
california of education and
[4:20:55]
toxic control.
[4:20:56]
the public contract code.
[4:20:58]
various different labor
[4:20:59]
standards and requirements we
[4:21:01]
deal with.
[4:21:02]
mr. Urias just mentioned office
[4:21:05]
of public school construction.
[4:21:06]
they work with us to insure our
[4:21:08]
plans meet the state
[4:21:10]
requirements and that we can
[4:21:12]
receive state funding.
[4:21:13]
we have ceqa, california
[4:21:15]
environmental quality act
[4:21:16]
requirements that we manage.
[4:21:19]
we various hazard materials and
[4:21:21]
substance regulatory agencies
[4:21:24]
from aqmd-and local
[4:21:32]
requirements.
[4:21:33]
all these create challenges.
[4:21:35]
the little chart on the right
[4:21:37]
helps to understand that.
[4:21:38]
we have both the hard services
[4:21:40]
we provide the construction,
[4:21:44]
nuts and bolts and concrete and
[4:21:46]
nails, electrical to fire life
[4:21:49]
safety, lighting, construction.
[4:21:51]
plumbing, concrete, all those
[4:21:54]
things happening in the field
[4:21:55]
with our contractors, but there
[4:21:57]
is another side of the work our
[4:21:59]
construction management team
[4:22:00]
does, which is the soft services
[4:22:02]
where we work your staff in the
[4:22:05]
district.
[4:22:06]
work with the district
[4:22:08]
leadership, administrative
[4:22:10]
component and school site staff
[4:22:11]
because these are very
[4:22:13]
disruptive projects happening at
[4:22:15]
school sites so collaborate with
[4:22:17]
teachers and your community to
[4:22:20]
insure all projects are
[4:22:22]
effectively managed and brought
[4:22:25]
together.
[4:22:26]
important to understand these
[4:22:27]
are important to our community.
[4:22:28]
if we can bring these project
[4:22:31]
quicker in a effective way and
[4:22:33]
save the construction dollars
[4:22:35]
that is better for all our
[4:22:36]
communities.
[4:22:38]
the challenge we really face is
[4:22:39]
managing multiple projects, 3,
[4:22:43]
6, 10 projects at the same time
[4:22:45]
stretches capacity of internal
[4:22:47]
staff.
[4:22:48]
one person or two people
[4:22:49]
internally to manage a workload
[4:22:52]
of $50-90 million happening at
[4:22:54]
all at the same time stretches
[4:22:57]
the capability beyond what they
[4:22:59]
can effectively manage and has
[4:23:00]
nothing to do with individual
[4:23:02]
capability, it is just one
[4:23:04]
person can't be in multiple
[4:23:05]
places at the same time.
[4:23:06]
it is impossible to do that when
[4:23:08]
you have this much work going
[4:23:10]
on.
[4:23:11]
there is description of the
[4:23:19]
projects are small and easy.
[4:23:22]
some of the smaller are more
[4:23:24]
complicated.
[4:23:25]
you typically generate or
[4:23:26]
attract smaller contractors that
[4:23:28]
are less sophisticated that need
[4:23:30]
a lot more hand holding and
[4:23:32]
support to make sure all these
[4:23:33]
projects come together at the
[4:23:35]
right time.
[4:23:37]
the pitfall are that, you end up
[4:23:40]
having this fragmented component
[4:23:43]
multiple different contractors
[4:23:45]
working.
[4:23:46]
it extends your staff and really
[4:23:50]
compound or creates potentials
[4:23:52]
for additional change orders.
[4:23:54]
contractors are working on
[4:23:55]
school sites and if we are not
[4:23:57]
watching what they are doing
[4:23:59]
contractors sometimes are
[4:24:00]
looking out for their own bottom
[4:24:01]
line and for their own profit
[4:24:04]
margin.
[4:24:05]
making sure we are the eyes and
[4:24:07]
ears on the field to make sure
[4:24:08]
we are getting what we paid for
[4:24:10]
and everything we paid for is
[4:24:12]
very very important.
[4:24:14]
the solution is making sure you
[4:24:15]
have appropriate and adequate
[4:24:19]
construction management service
[4:24:20]
on each project.
[4:24:21]
we can move to the next slide,
[4:24:23]
please.
[4:24:24]
there is a lot about risk
[4:24:25]
avoidance.
[4:24:26]
we have to think about there is
[4:24:28]
a risk that the district has in
[4:24:30]
construction.
[4:24:31]
not only the risk of non
[4:24:33]
compliance things like dsa
[4:24:35]
bottlenecks and are contractor
[4:24:38]
moving forward with unapproved
[4:24:40]
work or building out of
[4:24:43]
compliance with contract
[4:24:44]
documents that can cause months
[4:24:45]
of project delays as we have to
[4:24:47]
get approvals for that work,
[4:24:49]
sometimes it may require to get
[4:24:51]
redesigns for components of
[4:24:54]
work.
[4:24:55]
may require to go out to bid to
[4:24:56]
actually make some of the
[4:24:57]
changes depending on the
[4:24:59]
severity of the non compliance.
[4:25:01]
all that risks our ability to
[4:25:04]
occupy improvements.
[4:25:05]
delays the time our community
[4:25:07]
has these resources available
[4:25:08]
for their use, and displaces
[4:25:10]
students beyond what they would
[4:25:13]
expect to be delayed.
[4:25:14]
we have a lot of compliance
[4:25:17]
related issues.
[4:25:18]
we have to make sure we follow
[4:25:21]
title 24.
[4:25:23]
>> any questions at this point?
[4:25:25]
okay.
[4:25:26]
thank you.
[4:25:30]
>> compliance related issues.
[4:25:32]
the construction managers insure
[4:25:33]
all our title 24 which is
[4:25:37]
acronym for california building
[4:25:39]
code.
[4:25:40]
this is the requirements we have
[4:25:41]
in the state statute that we
[4:25:43]
follow the title 24 of the state
[4:25:45]
statute to insure structural
[4:25:47]
fire life safety and
[4:25:48]
accessibility improvements are
[4:25:50]
done according to the
[4:25:51]
requirements of the state.
[4:25:53]
various different close-out
[4:25:55]
requirements.
[4:25:56]
certification drives the funding
[4:25:57]
from the office of public school
[4:25:59]
construction.
[4:26:00]
if we don't society the project
[4:26:01]
we don't insure the timely
[4:26:03]
certification happens it could
[4:26:05]
jeopardize additional resources
[4:26:06]
for the district.
[4:26:08]
and lastly, we have labor
[4:26:10]
standards so insure we comply
[4:26:12]
with both the labor requirements
[4:26:13]
at the state level, but also the
[4:26:16]
requirements with our labor
[4:26:17]
unions, the partners helping us
[4:26:20]
with this.
[4:26:21]
we don't want to get into labor
[4:26:23]
disputes with unions or trade
[4:26:26]
partners across the program so
[4:26:28]
we make sure we comply with all
[4:26:29]
the labor requirements.
[4:26:32]
if we move to the next slide.
[4:26:35]
>> just for the sake of time,
[4:26:38]
just wondering how many-
[4:26:40]
>> just a couple more.
[4:26:42]
in fact I will go this one and
[4:26:45]
get to the next which is
[4:26:46]
important to see.
[4:26:47]
there is a lot of financial
[4:26:48]
savings that construction
[4:26:49]
managers can help us with.
[4:26:51]
both procurement, conflict
[4:26:55]
prevention, value engineering,
[4:26:57]
managing and tracking change
[4:26:58]
orders to insure change orders
[4:27:00]
are within reason and as
[4:27:04]
expected and insuring we have a
[4:27:05]
lot of financial savings.
[4:27:06]
we can go to next slide.
[4:27:09]
I think this is very very
[4:27:11]
important to give understanding
[4:27:12]
of why it is important for us to
[4:27:13]
move the projects forward as
[4:27:14]
quickly as possible.
[4:27:15]
delaying of work is a very
[4:27:18]
costly decision to be made.
[4:27:20]
if you recognize that in the
[4:27:22]
california market in the
[4:27:23]
southern california market,
[4:27:25]
construction escalating at 7 to
[4:27:28]
10 percent per year.
[4:27:29]
if you look at a theoretical $50
[4:27:31]
million project portfolio, over
[4:27:35]
6 months that is $1.75 million
[4:27:37]
of lost buying power the
[4:27:39]
district would absorb.
[4:27:41]
putting little more factual
[4:27:46]
terms, that is excess over $250
[4:27:50]
thousand per month of potential
[4:27:52]
buying power lost by delaying
[4:27:55]
bidding and contract award
[4:27:56]
delaying the projects that are
[4:27:58]
really important to our
[4:27:59]
communities to insure the
[4:28:03]
projects move forward so there
[4:28:05]
is a hidden cost people don't
[4:28:07]
see or recognize.
[4:28:08]
if we don't move projects
[4:28:10]
forward it cost money and lose
[4:28:12]
capability for the students.
[4:28:14]
next slide and all most done.
[4:28:16]
just quickly just what is the
[4:28:18]
return on investment?
[4:28:19]
if you look at on average this
[4:28:21]
is industry average.
[4:28:23]
without adequate super vision
[4:28:25]
and management you can see 8 to
[4:28:26]
15 percent change orders.
[4:28:29]
with adequate controls and
[4:28:31]
processes you can reduce down to
[4:28:33]
less then 3 percent.
[4:28:35]
this is effectively documented
[4:28:36]
over time.
[4:28:38]
dsa close out sped up and
[4:28:40]
continuous and real time so
[4:28:43]
closing out the projects as they
[4:28:45]
complete and not waiting for 6
[4:28:46]
to 12 months to close the
[4:28:51]
project.
[4:28:52]
working with staff to insure we
[4:28:53]
dont have staff burn-out and
[4:28:55]
high stress as we manage.
[4:28:57]
mr. Ketchum does a great job
[4:28:59]
trying to bounce around but it
[4:29:01]
is big job to hit the jobs at
[4:29:03]
and high stress situation.
[4:29:05]
I talked about the exposure, the
[4:29:07]
financial exposure of over
[4:29:09]
payments or lost potential on
[4:29:11]
projects.
[4:29:12]
>> if I could interrupt, the
[4:29:15]
board has been provided with the
[4:29:16]
presentation and I know mr.
[4:29:18]
rising has a lot of knowledge
[4:29:19]
and wisdom he wanted to share.
[4:29:22]
I know the board reviewed this
[4:29:24]
item several times.
[4:29:26]
maybe we can open up to
[4:29:28]
questions the board may have at
[4:29:29]
this time on this matter.
[4:29:31]
>> thank you.
[4:29:32]
I will ask for a motion.
[4:29:34]
thank you for being here and the
[4:29:35]
information.
[4:29:36]
I will ask for a motion before
[4:29:37]
we take questions or comments.
[4:29:40]
>> move to approve.
[4:29:43]
>> thank you.
[4:29:44]
I second for questions and
[4:29:45]
comments.
[4:29:46]
if there are any.
[4:29:48]
anybody have a question or
[4:29:49]
comment?
[4:29:50]
trustee baker torres.
[4:29:52]
>> for this $241 thousand, how
[4:29:56]
many months is summer and fall?
[4:29:58]
is summer and fall 6 months or
[4:30:03]
three months?
[4:30:04]
>> it isn't to exceed amount
[4:30:05]
originally our estimates were
[4:30:08]
through january for the projects
[4:30:10]
we would need support, because
[4:30:13]
of the number of projects.
[4:30:14]
we still have projects ongoing,
[4:30:17]
but that is without delays or
[4:30:18]
any issues such as rain.
[4:30:21]
if we have substantial rain that
[4:30:23]
drives the project longer.
[4:30:25]
people are not working when it
[4:30:27]
is raining so may drive the
[4:30:29]
projects longer but wouldn't
[4:30:31]
expend funds when it is raining.
[4:30:33]
we would push the projects out.
[4:30:35]
>> just wondering if
[4:30:39]
it's-figuring $241 thousand in 6
[4:30:44]
months and in one year it is
[4:30:46]
$482 thousand.
[4:30:48]
or if it was three months, that
[4:30:50]
is all most a million dollars in
[4:30:52]
one year just for a manager.
[4:30:56]
>> this is a one time contract
[4:30:59]
for that amount.
[4:31:00]
we are not asking for million
[4:31:02]
dollars we are asking for
[4:31:03]
support through these on the
[4:31:05]
list of numerous projects that
[4:31:07]
you see.
[4:31:08]
when we had just del sol and
[4:31:11]
channel islands we managed that,
[4:31:13]
but with the number of projects
[4:31:14]
going on and number of sites we
[4:31:17]
are asking for additional
[4:31:18]
support to get through that, but
[4:31:20]
we are not looking at this right
[4:31:22]
now as a permanent person that
[4:31:25]
will be a full time employee for
[4:31:26]
the district.
[4:31:27]
>> okay.
[4:31:28]
so, before I vote, I want to
[4:31:30]
first thank my fellow trustees
[4:31:32]
for their willingness to
[4:31:34]
postpone this item from the may
[4:31:36]
meeting.
[4:31:37]
I appreciate you allowing me the
[4:31:38]
opportunity to review the
[4:31:40]
information, ask questions and
[4:31:42]
are participate in the vote so
[4:31:45]
thank you for your
[4:31:47]
consideration, it means a lot.
[4:31:48]
I also want to thank mr. Ketchum
[4:31:51]
for taking the time to answer
[4:31:53]
all my questions and providing
[4:31:54]
additional information.
[4:31:55]
your responses helped me better
[4:31:57]
understand the work involved and
[4:31:59]
overseeing our measure e
[4:32:00]
projects and the
[4:32:02]
responsibilities that come with
[4:32:03]
this oversight.
[4:32:04]
I understand the reasoning
[4:32:06]
behind this request and I
[4:32:08]
appreciate the work being done
[4:32:09]
to identify savings and pursue
[4:32:12]
additional funding opportunities
[4:32:13]
for the district.
[4:32:15]
however, when I first saw the
[4:32:17]
not to exceed amount of nearly
[4:32:19]
$241 thousand, I had concerns
[4:32:24]
and I wanted to understand the
[4:32:25]
need for this contract.
[4:32:27]
so, while I appreciate the
[4:32:29]
information that was provided, I
[4:32:31]
still have concerns about
[4:32:36]
spending measure e bond funds
[4:32:39]
for administrative support
[4:32:40]
rather than directly projects
[4:32:42]
promised to the voters.
[4:32:43]
as trustees, we have a
[4:32:46]
responsibility to be good
[4:32:49]
steward said of taxpayer dollars
[4:32:51]
and make sure the bond funds are
[4:32:53]
spent responsibly.
[4:32:56]
I keep coming back to the fact
[4:32:58]
taxpayers approved measure e to
[4:33:02]
improve our schools and complete
[4:33:03]
the projects we committed to the
[4:33:05]
community, so I understand the
[4:33:06]
project of project oversight,
[4:33:10]
however my decision keeps coming
[4:33:12]
back to my belief measure e
[4:33:14]
funds should be directed as much
[4:33:16]
as possible towards the projects
[4:33:18]
that the voters were promised.
[4:33:22]
thank you.
[4:33:23]
>> any other comments or
[4:33:24]
questions?
[4:33:25]
trustee botello lopez.
[4:33:27]
>> thank you for coming.
[4:33:29]
this has come up to the board
[4:33:31]
several times but here we are.
[4:33:32]
I appreciate on page 3 just the
[4:33:34]
projected project list because
[4:33:38]
while we want our students to be
[4:33:40]
in safe and stable environments
[4:33:42]
and spaces and we are creating
[4:33:45]
the spaces for them too like the
[4:33:47]
aquatic center and roofing, all
[4:33:49]
those things are necessary to
[4:33:50]
safe school sights or we will be
[4:33:54]
out of compliance which isn't
[4:33:55]
something we want and these are
[4:33:56]
different items taxpayers have
[4:33:58]
been wanting for us to do so it
[4:34:02]
is the collective.
[4:34:03]
it is all the stakeholders
[4:34:05]
saying there is a necessity and
[4:34:06]
there is timelines.
[4:34:07]
I was here doing covid as well
[4:34:10]
president sher and we saw huge
[4:34:12]
number of just ticket items
[4:34:16]
coming through and projects that
[4:34:17]
needed to be done quickly and
[4:34:18]
greatly able to do with schools
[4:34:20]
being closed, but I know
[4:34:22]
everything has earmarked monies
[4:34:25]
and with time and inflation can
[4:34:27]
keep going up so I appreciate
[4:34:30]
the long conversation about
[4:34:31]
money and budget and measure e,
[4:34:33]
but also know these are
[4:34:36]
things--these are facilities and
[4:34:38]
buildings and spaces and places
[4:34:40]
that are necessary for students
[4:34:41]
to have great learning
[4:34:44]
experiences whether inside the
[4:34:46]
classroom or in the athletic
[4:34:47]
field or replacing the fire line
[4:34:49]
replacement.
[4:34:50]
that is important.
[4:34:51]
we have a safety plan for all
[4:34:52]
our school sites and we need to
[4:34:53]
abide by it.
[4:34:55]
and security cameras is
[4:34:57]
something of concern for all of
[4:34:58]
us as well and bells.
[4:35:01]
of course every site is
[4:35:03]
different.
[4:35:04]
exterior painting like rio mesa
[4:35:06]
and oxnard high school.
[4:35:08]
we are up to date with agenda
[4:35:09]
items but everything is
[4:35:11]
important and comes down to
[4:35:12]
students and the safety and down
[4:35:13]
to the staff too feeling sense
[4:35:16]
of belonging, so there is many
[4:35:18]
layers of course, but I just
[4:35:20]
appreciate the report and heavy
[4:35:23]
conversations we continue to
[4:35:24]
have in order to make sure these
[4:35:25]
projects are completed in a
[4:35:28]
timely fashion.
[4:35:29]
we are in summer, the students
[4:35:30]
are coming back in august so to
[4:35:32]
me time of the essence as one
[4:35:34]
trustee.
[4:35:35]
thank you.
[4:35:37]
>> thank you.
[4:35:38]
I would reiterate a lot of what
[4:35:39]
trustee botello said.
[4:35:42]
thank you for your work on this.
[4:35:43]
I think again what trustee baker
[4:35:45]
torres said, it is all our
[4:35:47]
responsibilities to make sure
[4:35:48]
that our bond measure funds are
[4:35:51]
directed towards the things that
[4:35:52]
are important for kids.
[4:35:54]
safe and secure facilities I
[4:35:56]
think are very important for
[4:35:58]
kids and for our staff and
[4:36:00]
faculty, so I am in support of
[4:36:02]
this and if there-any other
[4:36:05]
questions or comments at this
[4:36:06]
time?
[4:36:07]
trustee flores-haro.
[4:36:12]
>> I remember when she was a new
[4:36:13]
trustee, a lot of what we had to
[4:36:15]
do was immerse in the
[4:36:19]
construction management language
[4:36:22]
change orders and there was a
[4:36:24]
lot.
[4:36:25]
there was a lot of 2022-2023 and
[4:36:29]
so what my hope as one trustee
[4:36:32]
between the lease, lease back
[4:36:35]
protocols implemented, possibly
[4:36:40]
this position that we are not
[4:36:41]
going to have that issue
[4:36:44]
anymore, because to trustee
[4:36:46]
baker torres point, we have this
[4:36:48]
fiduciary responsibility
[4:36:50]
especially to the taxpayers
[4:36:51]
entrusting us with their money
[4:36:53]
to make sure we are edifying the
[4:37:00]
facilities in the way students
[4:37:02]
deserve.
[4:37:03]
come january if we are in a
[4:37:04]
place where we are spending more
[4:37:06]
money I think we will have to
[4:37:08]
have another conversation but I
[4:37:12]
recall the days every board
[4:37:14]
meeting for the long part, what
[4:37:16]
is this and that and what is
[4:37:18]
this and how come and so, I just
[4:37:21]
wanted to name that that I think
[4:37:23]
this board has seen a lot in
[4:37:25]
terms of construction management
[4:37:27]
and understanding the nuances
[4:37:28]
and so, with this position I
[4:37:34]
understand the need.
[4:37:35]
and especially to free up mr.
[4:37:39]
ketchum's time as well.
[4:37:41]
>> I don't want--we know none
[4:37:44]
have mentioned but each of these
[4:37:47]
over half billion dollars in
[4:37:49]
bond measure funds the taxpayers
[4:37:52]
entrusted with, all the dollars
[4:37:54]
are tried to project labor
[4:37:55]
agreements and for us what a
[4:37:58]
important and special thing we
[4:37:59]
are able to do for our community
[4:38:00]
to keep those high paying union
[4:38:02]
jobs close to home local.
[4:38:05]
that is a important thing, but
[4:38:06]
also there is a auditing piece
[4:38:09]
to make sure we are being
[4:38:11]
transparent and make sure we are
[4:38:12]
living up to that promise we
[4:38:14]
made to the voters, so to this
[4:38:16]
position as well, there is a
[4:38:17]
component to that.
[4:38:18]
it isn't just a fund, it is over
[4:38:23]
half billion dollars, 22
[4:38:28]
projects including del sol high
[4:38:30]
school still being finished in
[4:38:32]
addition to 2 projects and
[4:38:36]
project labor agreements.
[4:38:39]
if I forget anything, if I left
[4:38:42]
anything out remind me, but I
[4:38:44]
think the piece about project
[4:38:45]
labor agreements we have done
[4:38:48]
something so incredibly special
[4:38:49]
for our community and families
[4:38:51]
but we also have a
[4:38:52]
responsibility to the taxpayers
[4:38:54]
to make sure we are doing the
[4:38:55]
work.
[4:38:56]
to that point, there is more
[4:38:57]
then a fund, it is lots of
[4:38:59]
different layers and commitments
[4:39:01]
we made.
[4:39:03]
from one trustee.
[4:39:05]
any other comments or questions
[4:39:07]
at this time?
[4:39:10]
we have a first and second.
[4:39:11]
I will call the question.
[4:39:13]
all those in favor please say
[4:39:14]
aye.
[4:39:16]
any opposed please say no.
[4:39:21]
was that no trustee estrada?
[4:39:23]
>> correct, that is no.
[4:39:24]
>> thank you.
[4:39:25]
motion passes 3-2.
[4:39:28]
thank you for being here.
[4:39:30]
okay.
[4:39:32]
we are moving on to the lcap
[4:39:36]
consideration ed services.
[4:39:38]
dr. Kelsen.
[4:39:40]
and dr. Mccoy.
[4:39:42]
>> dr. Kelsen.
[4:39:43]
>> thank you.
[4:39:44]
good evening everyone.
[4:39:45]
at the may 27, 2026 board
[4:39:47]
meeting, the draft 26-27 budget
[4:39:50]
overview for parents local
[4:39:52]
control accountability plan lcap
[4:39:54]
and corresponding local
[4:39:57]
indicators were presented for
[4:40:00]
partner feedback and board
[4:40:01]
review.
[4:40:02]
this public hearing provided a
[4:40:05]
opportunity for comment and
[4:40:06]
recommendation from educational
[4:40:07]
partners regarding planned
[4:40:08]
actions, measurable outcomes and
[4:40:11]
local indicators.
[4:40:12]
now, at this june 24 meeting,
[4:40:15]
the board is asked to formally
[4:40:17]
adopt the final 26-27 lcap.
[4:42:05]
local indicators, as presented.
[4:42:06]
>> move to approve.
[4:42:07]
>> I'll second.
[4:42:08]
>> thank you.
[4:42:09]
first and second.
[4:42:10]
any comments or questions?
[4:42:12]
trustee baker torres.
[4:42:13]
>> happy to see the improvements
[4:42:15]
in the graduation rate.
[4:42:17]
english language art scores and
[4:42:18]
math scores.
[4:42:19]
I want to recognize the work of
[4:42:20]
our students, teachers and
[4:42:22]
support staff who contributed to
[4:42:26]
the progress.
[4:42:27]
while the graduation rate is
[4:42:30]
92.5 percent, I also want to
[4:42:33]
recognize that only 44.78
[4:42:35]
percent of students are meeting
[4:42:37]
or exceeding standards in
[4:42:40]
english and 19.29 are meeting or
[4:42:42]
exceeding standards in math.
[4:42:46]
while the numbers show progress,
[4:42:47]
they also show we have a lot of
[4:42:49]
work to do.
[4:42:50]
one of my priorities as a
[4:42:52]
trustee this year is to be sure
[4:42:56]
every student graduate said
[4:42:58]
prepared for college career and
[4:43:00]
life.
[4:43:01]
I want our diploma to represent
[4:43:02]
not only completion of
[4:43:04]
requirements or earning credits,
[4:43:06]
but also academic readiness,
[4:43:09]
mastery of essential skills, and
[4:43:11]
mastery of course standards.
[4:43:14]
I support helping student
[4:43:15]
graduate and I support the
[4:43:17]
opportunities for credit
[4:43:19]
recovery, however, as we expand
[4:43:21]
credit recovery opportunities,
[4:43:24]
how are we going to insure
[4:43:26]
academic rigor and mastery are
[4:43:30]
maintained so diploma continues
[4:43:32]
to represent readiness for the
[4:43:33]
future?
[4:43:36]
>> any other comments or
[4:43:39]
questions?
[4:43:42]
thank you.
[4:43:43]
I just have one and which is
[4:43:44]
with regard to high stake
[4:43:46]
testing.
[4:43:47]
I do-I appreciate according to
[4:43:51]
the dashboard there are varying
[4:43:54]
opinions on where our students
[4:43:56]
fall, I am not a believer high
[4:44:01]
stakes testing is end all be
[4:44:03]
all.
[4:44:04]
it is measure of student success
[4:44:05]
on any particular day and it is
[4:44:07]
very often an unfair comparison
[4:44:11]
to those students who are not
[4:44:14]
native born english speakers and
[4:44:17]
parents who are college
[4:44:18]
educators.
[4:44:19]
that alone can throw off the
[4:44:23]
scores.
[4:44:24]
it is an assessment we rely upon
[4:44:27]
and people look to, so I just
[4:44:29]
for what it is worth I think our
[4:44:31]
graduation rates are reflection
[4:44:34]
of our maslow before bloom mind
[4:44:40]
set.
[4:44:41]
the fact we feed every child 4
[4:44:42]
meals a day and that our
[4:44:45]
students all have access to
[4:44:47]
mental health support and
[4:44:48]
services but a community school
[4:44:51]
model in two schools we are
[4:44:53]
looking to expand.
[4:44:54]
I think those are things that
[4:44:56]
help boost graduation rates.
[4:45:00]
with regard to attendance and
[4:45:01]
want mentioned much here but
[4:45:02]
mentioned earlier of the budget
[4:45:05]
and I think that is where my
[4:45:06]
focus is as a trustee in terms
[4:45:08]
of not only the budget and how
[4:45:11]
much it means our students are
[4:45:13]
here every day, but what it
[4:45:14]
means for their education too
[4:45:16]
and so that they have every
[4:45:19]
opportunity.
[4:45:20]
for what it is worth I thank you
[4:45:21]
for all the work you did to
[4:45:24]
reach out to our community and
[4:45:25]
our stakeholders because as a
[4:45:27]
board over the years that is
[4:45:28]
something we all have been
[4:45:30]
saying multiple trustees over
[4:45:32]
the years that the lcap is the
[4:45:35]
place for parents and families
[4:45:36]
and community members to come
[4:45:37]
and give their input and to tell
[4:45:39]
us what they think is important
[4:45:41]
for our district and so we had
[4:45:43]
years where they were not well
[4:45:45]
attended and had years where
[4:45:46]
they were extraordinarily well
[4:45:48]
attended, so the more effort we
[4:45:50]
put there to really draw our
[4:45:56]
stakeholders will help improve
[4:45:59]
more then any high stakes test
[4:46:02]
score could show on a dashboard
[4:46:07]
for my opinion.
[4:46:08]
any comments or questions? We
[4:46:09]
have a first and second.
[4:46:10]
I will call the question.
[4:46:11]
all those in favor say aye.
[4:46:14]
any opposed?
[4:46:18]
abstentions?
[4:46:20]
motion passes 5-0.
[4:46:21]
thank you everyone for all your
[4:46:22]
work.
[4:46:26]
we are moving to item 13e, which
[4:46:30]
is mr. La belle.
[4:46:34]
>> mr. La belle.
[4:46:35]
>> consideration of approval of
[4:46:36]
job description revision adulate
[4:46:38]
school secretary second reading.
[4:48:16]
there is no fiscal
[4:48:17]
http://implication.it is recommendation
[4:48:18]
of district administration the
[4:48:19]
revisions to the job description
[4:48:21]
adult school second reading be
[4:48:23]
approved by the board of
[4:48:24]
trustees as presented.
[4:48:26]
>> thank you.
[4:48:27]
we have a motion?
[4:48:29]
>> I make the motion.
[4:48:31]
>> second.
[4:48:32]
>> thank you.
[4:48:33]
first and second.
[4:48:34]
any comments or questions?
[4:48:38]
okay.
[4:48:39]
all those in favor please say
[4:48:40]
aye.
[4:48:41]
any opposed say no.
[4:48:44]
abstentions?
[4:48:46]
trustee estrada, do you want to
[4:48:48]
cast your vote?
[4:48:49]
>> yes, aye, please.
[4:48:51]
>> thank you.
[4:48:52]
motion passes 5-0.
[4:48:54]
thank you.
[4:48:55]
mr. La belle and dr. Mccoy.
[4:48:58]
item f.
[4:48:59]
>> mr. La belle.
[4:49:01]
>> consideration of approval
[4:49:03]
adult school coordinator second
[4:49:04]
reading.
[4:51:14]
board of trustees, as presented.
[4:51:15]
>> thank you mr. La belle.
[4:51:18]
we have a motion for approval?
[4:51:26]
>> move to approve.
[4:51:27]
>> second.
[4:51:28]
>> thank you.
[4:51:29]
first and second.
[4:51:30]
are there any comments or
[4:51:31]
questions?
[4:51:36]
trustee botello lopez.
[4:51:40]
>> thank you for joining us.
[4:51:43]
I just had a question
[4:51:44]
regarding-we got a lot of
[4:51:45]
e-mails regarding this specific
[4:51:47]
agenda item so thank you to
[4:51:48]
everyone who reached out.
[4:51:50]
I read all your e-mails and I
[4:51:51]
appreciate your feedback.
[4:51:53]
I did have a question about the
[4:51:55]
credential where it says current
[4:51:56]
administrator credential is
[4:51:59]
preferred t. Is a certificated
[4:52:00]
management work year and the
[4:52:03]
salary is certificated
[4:52:04]
management salary schedule, so
[4:52:06]
my question and I would want to
[4:52:08]
have that changed from preferred
[4:52:10]
to required since it technically
[4:52:12]
falls under that piece, but that
[4:52:15]
is my question and my comment.
[4:52:19]
>> great question.
[4:52:20]
>> dr. Mccoy.
[4:52:21]
>> that is aligned to the
[4:52:23]
district current requirement for
[4:52:24]
coordinators so the current
[4:52:25]
coordinator on the general
[4:52:28]
ed side and in educational
[4:52:30]
services as well as this
[4:52:33]
potential position, coordinator
[4:52:36]
positions are administrative
[4:52:38]
credential preferred.
[4:52:39]
that's why the job description
[4:52:41]
is coming to you with that
[4:52:42]
requirement.
[4:52:45]
>> so, it falls in line with the
[4:52:47]
others?
[4:52:48]
that is what I heard you say
[4:52:49]
yes?
[4:52:50]
>> that is correct.
[4:52:52]
our coordinators and educational
[4:52:54]
services have the same minimum
[4:52:57]
requirements and the same salary
[4:52:59]
schedule placement.
[4:53:01]
>> okay, thank you.
[4:53:02]
trustee botello.
[4:53:03]
>> just question dr. Mccoy, the
[4:53:05]
other coordinators do they have
[4:53:07]
admin credential on top of mind?
[4:53:12]
the majority?
[4:53:14]
>> and don't believe so.
[4:53:15]
I think some are in progress
[4:53:18]
toward one, because it is
[4:53:20]
preferred we have two that are
[4:53:21]
without the credential right
[4:53:23]
now.
[4:53:24]
>> okay.
[4:53:25]
thank you.
[4:53:26]
>> thank you.
[4:53:27]
trustee estrada.
[4:53:29]
>> hello.
[4:53:30]
so, I am excited about the
[4:53:33]
position.
[4:53:34]
last time we talked about it, I
[4:53:36]
mentioned that there was hundred
[4:53:39]
million dollars planned for dual
[4:53:42]
enrollment and it's quite common
[4:53:45]
that folks don't understand that
[4:53:48]
it includes adult school and
[4:53:50]
includes any student working on
[4:53:52]
a high school diploma or high
[4:53:55]
school equivalency so I
[4:53:59]
recommend this come back for a
[4:54:00]
third reading so that dual
[4:54:02]
enrollment is part of the job
[4:54:05]
description in case there are
[4:54:08]
potential dollars in the future
[4:54:09]
that would be able to support
[4:54:11]
the position, because you would
[4:54:14]
have to say who would be working
[4:54:15]
on it.
[4:54:17]
to the point raised earlier
[4:54:20]
about the qualifications, on
[4:54:22]
first reading we also talked
[4:54:24]
about the importance of having
[4:54:26]
it be able to be a classified
[4:54:29]
management, because that opens
[4:54:32]
up the pool and that was
[4:54:34]
something I really liked about
[4:54:35]
it, because [inaudible] and we
[4:54:38]
might get really good candidate
[4:54:41]
in the future that has higher
[4:54:43]
ed dual enrollment cte, so that
[4:54:46]
would be my recommendation that
[4:54:49]
we have a third reading, include
[4:54:51]
the dual enrollment and have it
[4:54:54]
be a classified management.
[4:54:57]
>> thank you.
[4:54:58]
dr. Mccoy.
[4:54:59]
>> thank you trustee estrada.
[4:55:00]
so, staff might recommend with
[4:55:03]
the board's approval of the
[4:55:05]
second reading that we could
[4:55:07]
include language on dual
[4:55:09]
enrollment responsibility.
[4:55:11]
also, because the position is
[4:55:14]
preferred for administrative
[4:55:16]
credential, it could be held by
[4:55:21]
somebody on the classified
[4:55:22]
management side.
[4:55:24]
so, that's really the only
[4:55:26]
difference between hiring a
[4:55:29]
classified manager in this
[4:55:31]
position and certificated
[4:55:32]
manager is the credential
[4:55:34]
itself, so I believe we could
[4:55:35]
meet both of those tests if we
[4:55:37]
were to with the discretion of
[4:55:41]
the rest of the board include
[4:55:42]
those in the motion.
[4:55:46]
that was considering approval of
[4:55:47]
second reading.
[4:55:49]
>> she gave a thumbs up so if
[4:55:51]
someone is willing to amend the
[4:55:53]
motion.
[4:55:54]
who made the motion?
[4:55:57]
trustee estrada are you willing
[4:55:58]
to amend the motion?
[4:56:00]
>> yes, I amend the motion to
[4:56:04]
approve the job description with
[4:56:08]
language of dual enrollment and
[4:56:09]
flexibility for the classified
[4:56:11]
management.
[4:56:13]
>> dr. Mccoy is saying yes, so
[4:56:15]
the person who seconded-
[4:56:17]
>> I'll comfort to amend the
[4:56:20]
second.
[4:56:21]
>> thank you trustee
[4:56:22]
flores-haro.
[4:56:23]
we amended the first and second.
[4:56:24]
any other comments or questions?
[4:56:25]
trustee baker torres.
[4:56:27]
>> I want to thank everyone who
[4:56:29]
took the time to e-mail us
[4:56:30]
regarding this item.
[4:56:31]
I received e-mails from staff
[4:56:33]
members with different
[4:56:35]
viewpoints and I appreciate
[4:56:36]
hearing all perspect ives.
[4:56:38]
that said, the concerns I heard
[4:56:40]
most consistently centered
[4:56:42]
around instructional capacity,
[4:56:45]
leadership needs, and whether
[4:56:47]
this position is the best use of
[4:56:49]
resources at this time.
[4:56:51]
several employees shared
[4:56:52]
concerns that within the past
[4:56:54]
couple years we eliminated 3 or
[4:56:57]
4 positions and instructional
[4:56:59]
hours have been reduced over the
[4:57:01]
years due to budget constraints
[4:57:03]
while workloads increased.
[4:57:06]
at the core, the primary
[4:57:09]
responsibility of the schools is
[4:57:10]
to teach and serve students.
[4:57:12]
because that, I question whether
[4:57:15]
creating a new management
[4:57:16]
position should be our priority
[4:57:18]
right now.
[4:57:19]
the consistent message I
[4:57:21]
received was many adult
[4:57:22]
education employees don't
[4:57:24]
believe this coordinator
[4:57:26]
position is the right solution
[4:57:27]
for the challenges the school is
[4:57:29]
facing.
[4:57:30]
instead, they like to resources
[4:57:35]
restoring instructional support
[4:57:37]
and leadership capacity,
[4:57:39]
possibly such as an assistance
[4:57:41]
principal position.
[4:57:42]
they believe that would better
[4:57:44]
support staff, strengthen
[4:57:47]
programs and better serve the
[4:57:48]
students.
[4:57:49]
so, if the administrative
[4:57:52]
credential isn't required and
[4:57:54]
appears to provide the same
[4:57:57]
supervisor authority as
[4:58:01]
assistance principal what is the
[4:58:03]
rational placing on management
[4:58:05]
salary schedule?
[4:58:06]
you said it is the way it is?
[4:58:11]
>> we tried to align with the
[4:58:13]
district salary schedule and in
[4:58:15]
regards of like the ap verses
[4:58:19]
the coordinator, I really think
[4:58:21]
the coordinator would really
[4:58:23]
have much more impact, because
[4:58:27]
there is a limited pool for
[4:58:30]
adult education with knowledge
[4:58:31]
and expertise that even have an
[4:58:34]
administrative credential but
[4:58:36]
there are great candidates with
[4:58:37]
so much specific expertise and
[4:58:42]
are very innovative and bring
[4:58:45]
that to the school.
[4:58:46]
it is just one salary replaced
[4:58:48]
by--I'm not adding ap and this
[4:58:54]
position will be much more
[4:58:55]
impactful and I think it is very
[4:58:58]
key not only for this coming
[4:59:00]
year but for the next 5 years
[4:59:02]
and trajectory we I envision the
[4:59:06]
school going as far as expanding
[4:59:08]
cte and aligns with workforce
[4:59:10]
development board which we work
[4:59:13]
very closely with with their
[4:59:14]
goals and also the state goals.
[4:59:18]
>> okay.
[4:59:19]
can you clarify-thank you for
[4:59:20]
that.
[4:59:21]
can you clarify if this position
[4:59:23]
is funded through a specific
[4:59:25]
grant or not?
[4:59:26]
>> no.
[4:59:27]
>> okay.
[4:59:28]
>> this will be in our
[4:59:31]
combination of cape, which is
[4:59:32]
state and federal funding.
[4:59:34]
>> okay.
[4:59:35]
I was told that they thought it
[4:59:36]
might be through a grant one
[4:59:38]
employee said so I wanted to be
[4:59:40]
sure on that one.
[4:59:42]
okay, thank you.
[4:59:43]
>> thank you.
[4:59:45]
go ahead trustee flores-haro.
[4:59:48]
>> thank you president sher.
[4:59:49]
I want to add I want to thank
[4:59:52]
everyone that reached out as
[4:59:53]
well and I also just want to
[4:59:57]
sides of the spectrum and
[4:59:59]
including today feel the e-mails
[5:00:01]
received were much more in favor
[5:00:03]
of the position, so just wanted
[5:00:05]
to name that out loud.
[5:00:07]
>> thank you.
[5:00:08]
I did as well receive varying
[5:00:10]
opinions, however this is not
[5:00:12]
permission to hire, this is job
[5:00:13]
description.
[5:00:14]
I want to make sure that we are
[5:00:16]
talking about the same thing.
[5:00:17]
this isn't a permission to hire.
[5:00:19]
this is job description.
[5:00:22]
>> just to clarify that, if
[5:00:24]
trustees approve this, this is
[5:00:27]
built into the proposed budget
[5:00:28]
for the adult education program.
[5:00:30]
if it isn't had approved that
[5:00:31]
money is released to other needs
[5:00:34]
of the adult school.
[5:00:37]
the permission to hire comes
[5:00:39]
with approval of the budget
[5:00:41]
because if we brought this in
[5:00:43]
november and want to hire
[5:00:44]
someone in january then we also
[5:00:46]
bring permission to hire for the
[5:00:47]
current school year, but because
[5:00:50]
we had a opportunity to
[5:00:52]
research, build into the budget
[5:00:54]
that is proposed for oxnard
[5:00:55]
adult, we would be able to
[5:00:57]
recruit if this position is
[5:00:58]
approved but the money is set
[5:01:01]
aside.
[5:01:02]
it would be released again if it
[5:01:03]
isn't approved.
[5:01:04]
>> okay, thank you.
[5:01:06]
then my other question is with
[5:01:07]
regard to
[5:01:15]
supervisor--[inaudible] this
[5:01:17]
person is going to be
[5:01:18]
responsible for evaluating
[5:01:20]
teachers?
[5:01:21]
>> no, I will be doing all that.
[5:01:23]
which I--yeah.
[5:01:25]
>> that is written-not part-of
[5:01:28]
the part job description?
[5:01:31]
>> it is not.
[5:01:32]
>> because this person doesn't
[5:01:33]
have a admin credential they are
[5:01:35]
not qualified in any way to
[5:01:37]
evaluate?
[5:01:38]
and they can supervise, but not
[5:01:41]
evaluation, just like the
[5:01:42]
coordinators at the district
[5:01:44]
office.
[5:01:45]
they have supervisor.
[5:01:47]
they wouldn't evaluate.
[5:01:48]
>> I understand you are saying I
[5:01:50]
want to make sure it is written
[5:01:52]
that way.
[5:01:53]
>> the job description is
[5:01:54]
written all the coordinators do
[5:01:55]
not directly supervise any
[5:01:59]
employee, they provide program
[5:02:01]
support for district initiative
[5:02:04]
so that grant writing and
[5:02:06]
finding new funding sources and
[5:02:09]
developing career technical
[5:02:10]
education programs, but that is
[5:02:12]
also they do also provide direct
[5:02:15]
support to the teaching staff of
[5:02:17]
professional development, new
[5:02:19]
techniques and learning and then
[5:02:20]
they would assist in the
[5:02:22]
recruitment of for example if we
[5:02:24]
launched a new career technical
[5:02:26]
education program, this person
[5:02:28]
would assist the principal in
[5:02:29]
identifying experts in the
[5:02:32]
community that can come and
[5:02:34]
teach at oxnard adult school in
[5:02:35]
the new field.
[5:02:36]
adult school one of the coolest
[5:02:38]
things about adult school is
[5:02:40]
when we teach cte at adult
[5:02:42]
school these are typically
[5:02:43]
people practicing in the field
[5:02:45]
that come in and work with our
[5:02:47]
adults and those folks would be
[5:02:50]
supported by this person.
[5:02:52]
>> thank you.
[5:02:53]
thank you.
[5:02:54]
just for clarification.
[5:02:55]
trustee baker torres.
[5:02:56]
>> so, go further on that, so if
[5:03:00]
they don't have a supervisory
[5:03:03]
position, why are they paid as
[5:03:05]
management?
[5:03:07]
>> because they are not teaching
[5:03:11]
and they are working on
[5:03:13]
administrative functions at the
[5:03:15]
coordinator level.
[5:03:16]
that is grant writing,
[5:03:17]
developing curriculum, working
[5:03:19]
with employers across the
[5:03:22]
community and those are not
[5:03:23]
typically assigned to teaching
[5:03:25]
staff.
[5:03:26]
>> thank you.
[5:03:27]
>> do they have a longer work
[5:03:29]
year?
[5:03:32]
>> [inaudible]
[5:03:34]
>> 213 days.
[5:03:36]
>> it is longer then a
[5:03:37]
certificated employee?
[5:03:39]
>> yes.
[5:03:41]
>> to trustee baker torres
[5:03:43]
point, it is longer work year.
[5:03:47]
any other questions?
[5:03:49]
or comments?
[5:03:50]
we had a motion.
[5:03:51]
first and second.
[5:03:52]
I will-right?
[5:03:55]
thank you.
[5:03:56]
I am going to call the question.
[5:03:57]
all in favor say aye.
[5:03:59]
opposed?
[5:04:03]
trustee estrada you voted aye?
[5:04:06]
>> aye.
[5:04:07]
>> thank you.
[5:04:08]
motion passes 4-1.
[5:04:10]
thank you very much for being
[5:04:11]
here.
[5:04:13]
now we are on to item g.
[5:04:16]
before we go on, I want to make
[5:04:17]
sure mr. Sturgeon that the
[5:04:20]
contract could you let me know
[5:04:21]
if the contract has been posted
[5:04:23]
on the website?
[5:04:25]
>> I can't add to the agenda
[5:04:28]
while in session because of the
[5:04:31]
recording.
[5:04:32]
I can post under the
[5:04:33]
superintendent page if you like.
[5:04:34]
>> let's go ahead and do that.
[5:04:36]
>> I think that is important so
[5:04:37]
however we can post it so it is
[5:04:38]
on the superintendent's page,
[5:04:40]
right?
[5:04:41]
>> under superintendent's
[5:04:44]
search.
[5:04:45]
this is the final piece for that
[5:04:46]
and has all the information
[5:04:47]
there fully disclosed.
[5:04:49]
>> that is happening shortly?
[5:04:51]
>> I will work on that.
[5:04:56]
>> if mr. La belle needs to make
[5:04:58]
minutes is that okay?
[5:04:59]
>> of course.
[5:05:00]
>> I want to make sure the
[5:05:01]
public has a opportunity to see
[5:05:03]
the contract before we get there
[5:05:04]
and we are getting close.
[5:05:06]
anybody need a break?
[5:05:10]
let's go to g.
[5:05:12]
let's do g because athletic
[5:05:14]
trainers are here.
[5:05:15]
shout out to you.
[5:05:16]
thank you for staying.
[5:05:17]
we are doing item g and then
[5:05:20]
take a break and come back and
[5:05:23]
do h and the rest.
[5:05:24]
okay.
[5:05:25]
ath letic trainers.
[5:05:29]
>> mr. La belle.
[5:05:31]
>> consideration of approval
[5:05:38]
athletic trainer and
[5:05:44]
consideration of waiving of the
[5:05:46]
second reading.
[5:06:20]
reading be waived.
[5:06:21]
>> move to approve.
[5:06:22]
>> second.
[5:06:23]
>> thank you.
[5:06:24]
first and second.
[5:06:27]
any other comments or questions?
[5:06:29]
>> first, I want to thank the
[5:06:31]
athletic trainers from years of
[5:06:34]
being around athletics, I know
[5:06:36]
the important roles you play for
[5:06:39]
our students athletes so thank
[5:06:41]
you.
[5:06:42]
but I have a couple questions.
[5:06:43]
this position is listed as a 208
[5:06:47]
day employee, so is that 10
[5:06:49]
month or 12 month or what is
[5:06:52]
that?
[5:06:54]
>> that is roughly 11 months.
[5:06:56]
>> 11 months.
[5:06:57]
okay.
[5:06:58]
so, which month will they get
[5:07:01]
off?
[5:07:02]
>> it will revolve around the
[5:07:05]
dead periods the programs have
[5:07:07]
where they are not allowed to be
[5:07:08]
on campus.
[5:07:09]
there is some things in and out
[5:07:13]
and play-off games on a saturday
[5:07:16]
so flexibility building the
[5:07:17]
schedule.
[5:07:18]
>> okay.
[5:07:19]
how does the district insure
[5:07:20]
that athletic trainer coverage
[5:07:24]
during summer winter breaks,
[5:07:27]
spring break, all that?
[5:07:29]
and also other athletic event
[5:07:31]
outside traditional school
[5:07:32]
calendar?
[5:07:33]
>> we do that currently.
[5:07:36]
the only change here is they are
[5:07:39]
our employees opposed to working
[5:07:41]
for common spirit as a
[5:07:42]
contractor.
[5:07:43]
we do that on the sites.
[5:07:44]
our directors with help from the
[5:07:47]
principal, coordinate dates,
[5:07:50]
they keep in contract because
[5:07:52]
each schedule can change.
[5:07:54]
that flexibility is very
[5:07:55]
important.
[5:07:57]
we appreciate the athletic
[5:07:58]
trainers all the reasons you
[5:08:00]
said and because they just love
[5:08:02]
our kids, so they will be there
[5:08:03]
when it is time to be there and
[5:08:05]
so that is always been no issue.
[5:08:08]
>> exactly.
[5:08:09]
like you said, they love our
[5:08:10]
kids and doing everything they
[5:08:11]
can for our kids, but we got to
[5:08:14]
remember that they have families
[5:08:16]
and lives too so we can't expect
[5:08:19]
them to be-as it is, you know
[5:08:22]
how it is.
[5:08:23]
they are 6:30 a.m. Till 10
[5:08:27]
o'clock at night if lucky.
[5:08:30]
will there be limits on required
[5:08:32]
weekends and holidays and will
[5:08:35]
additional staffing support such
[5:08:37]
as the per diem coverage last
[5:08:40]
year be able when needed?
[5:08:41]
>> we will have-respect the
[5:08:44]
boundaries for sure, but there
[5:08:46]
is also opportunities as needed
[5:08:48]
like as example I gave with
[5:08:52]
play-offs we may have extra day
[5:08:54]
so they are supported.
[5:08:56]
>> thank you.
[5:08:57]
is this intended to be a 40 hour
[5:09:00]
work week position and how will
[5:09:03]
overtime or additional hours be
[5:09:05]
handled when schedules require
[5:09:07]
evening, weekends, holidays,
[5:09:11]
extended days?
[5:09:12]
I don't think they only work 40
[5:09:13]
hours.
[5:09:15]
how do we deal with that?
[5:09:18]
>> operation ally there won't be
[5:09:20]
a change to the way we are
[5:09:23]
implementing the training
[5:09:24]
program.
[5:09:26]
each campus varies a little bit,
[5:09:28]
some of the athletic trainers
[5:09:32]
also are certificated employees
[5:09:35]
teaching a class and the unique
[5:09:37]
schedule needs and program
[5:09:39]
itself and relates to seasonal
[5:09:42]
sport, so the model compensation
[5:09:46]
is 5 day, 40 hours but we know
[5:09:50]
that's got to be flexible so may
[5:09:53]
come in now, some days they come
[5:09:55]
at 1 working through 9 o'clock
[5:09:58]
and may come other days if no
[5:10:00]
contests early to meet kids
[5:10:03]
before school, so the good news
[5:10:06]
for us is we have great group of
[5:10:08]
trainers that we are trying to
[5:10:10]
recruit to stay through these
[5:10:11]
positions if approved, and we
[5:10:13]
are not going away from the best
[5:10:15]
practices that we had this
[5:10:17]
position now for about 8 years
[5:10:19]
and I think we learned a lot in
[5:10:21]
that time and many trainers that
[5:10:23]
are with us have been us with
[5:10:24]
the entire time and came over
[5:10:26]
from booster funded and came
[5:10:28]
over from fundraising to have a
[5:10:31]
trainer into these full time
[5:10:33]
positions with common spirit and
[5:10:37]
we have been just so the public
[5:10:40]
knows and spoken with trainers
[5:10:42]
about this, we have been hearing
[5:10:44]
this might happen for a couple
[5:10:47]
years, and we have been
[5:10:49]
preparing in the background so
[5:10:50]
the job description we prepared
[5:10:53]
some time ago is just to be
[5:10:55]
ready to act as soon as the
[5:10:57]
common spirit went in a
[5:10:59]
different direction and that all
[5:11:02]
happened within about the last
[5:11:04]
20days from the time the
[5:11:06]
trainers were informed to the
[5:11:08]
time we were able to bring the
[5:11:11]
item to the trustees.
[5:11:12]
>> so, back to the how are they
[5:11:17]
going to handle overtime when
[5:11:20]
they go over 40 hours?
[5:11:23]
>> just like all our overtime we
[5:11:26]
will have pre approved overtime
[5:11:28]
set aside.
[5:11:31]
>> what staff have to have now 2
[5:11:33]
or 3 weeks prior or whatever
[5:11:35]
crazy number it is.
[5:11:38]
will they be able to get it
[5:11:40]
quicker?
[5:11:41]
>> with all staff last year
[5:11:43]
reimplemented the pay roll
[5:11:44]
approval farm so this is no
[5:11:46]
different.
[5:11:47]
we look at potential overtime
[5:11:50]
needs of the trainers and do pay
[5:11:52]
roll approval in advance any
[5:11:56]
overtime goes against the
[5:11:57]
approval form.
[5:11:58]
>> if a coach decides to have a
[5:12:01]
some saturday game friendly game
[5:12:03]
or whatever and they haven't
[5:12:06]
gotten that approval do they go
[5:12:09]
to the athletic director or--?
[5:12:12]
>> what I say as incoming
[5:12:13]
employees, new employees we
[5:12:16]
would work with them to
[5:12:19]
understand our process for time
[5:12:21]
sheets and other things because
[5:12:22]
they have been through dignity,
[5:12:24]
so there is a learning curve and
[5:12:28]
the schedules do a good job
[5:12:30]
flexing the schedule to meet
[5:12:31]
demands of the school site to
[5:12:32]
limit that overtime and we
[5:12:34]
expect that to continue, but in
[5:12:36]
cases where there is overtime
[5:12:38]
needed, we would anticipate that
[5:12:41]
in advance, payroll approval
[5:12:44]
form and have the funds ready so
[5:12:46]
we can immediately pay it.
[5:12:49]
>> and then you said for the
[5:12:52]
have safeguards in place to
[5:12:54]
insure a reasonable work/life
[5:12:57]
balance and they have guaranteed
[5:12:59]
time off during dead periods.
[5:13:02]
right?
[5:13:03]
okay.
[5:13:05]
in section b, g and h of the
[5:13:13]
description it says, students.
[5:13:17]
could we consider changing it to
[5:13:18]
student athletes?
[5:13:20]
so this job description
[5:13:23]
correctly reflects the primary
[5:13:24]
role of athletic trainer, this
[5:13:30]
says students and could be any
[5:13:32]
student and the trainers don't
[5:13:34]
have consent to treat forms for
[5:13:36]
all students.
[5:13:38]
so, on b, g and h could we
[5:13:43]
change it to student athletes?
[5:13:46]
>> with consent of board we
[5:13:48]
could amend the motion.
[5:13:49]
>> perfect.
[5:13:50]
we do that at the end I guess?
[5:13:52]
>> any time is good.
[5:13:55]
>> okay.
[5:13:56]
I have a couple.
[5:13:57]
under item k, could we clarify
[5:14:02]
that-right now it says, they
[5:14:05]
evaluate conditions that cause
[5:14:07]
athletic injury inadequate
[5:14:12]
equipment to make modifications
[5:14:13]
or recommendations that could
[5:14:15]
reduce the risk of injuries.
[5:14:17]
could we change that to, the
[5:14:20]
athletic trainers when they see
[5:14:23]
these conditions, they then
[5:14:25]
report it to site administration
[5:14:28]
or maintenance and facilities
[5:14:30]
who they are then responsible
[5:14:32]
for the evaluation, correction
[5:14:34]
and follow-up because the way it
[5:14:35]
is written here looks like our
[5:14:38]
trainers are the ones who are
[5:14:40]
supposed to be correcting and
[5:14:43]
following up.
[5:14:46]
can we change that in item k?
[5:14:48]
that is another one we need to
[5:14:50]
vote on.
[5:14:53]
can you clarify why this
[5:14:55]
position is classified and the
[5:14:58]
rational for that when our
[5:15:00]
trainers have specialized
[5:15:02]
education training and
[5:15:04]
certifications required?
[5:15:06]
why are they not on
[5:15:08]
certificated?
[5:15:10]
>> just like we have been
[5:15:13]
discussing tonight if this were
[5:15:16]
a certificated position
[5:15:19]
requiring a teacher credential
[5:15:21]
that limits the amount of
[5:15:22]
persons eligible to apply,
[5:15:24]
because most of our athletic
[5:15:26]
trainers grow into a teaching
[5:15:28]
credential if they have been
[5:15:29]
with us for a while, so if we
[5:15:31]
make them certificated I think
[5:15:35]
three or more of the three of
[5:15:37]
the folks we currently employee
[5:15:39]
wouldn't be able to apply, so at
[5:15:43]
typical districts we researched
[5:15:45]
this is a classified position
[5:15:47]
across the state and across the
[5:15:49]
region when it comes to athletic
[5:15:51]
training and so we also aligned
[5:15:54]
the salary to industry standard
[5:15:56]
with some input from the
[5:15:58]
trainers.
[5:15:59]
>> so, I was think-on this, do
[5:16:02]
the school nurses have teaching
[5:16:04]
credentials?
[5:16:05]
no, right?
[5:16:06]
but they have-
[5:16:08]
>> but they have a certificate
[5:16:13]
for school for california school
[5:16:15]
nurse that they have to earn in
[5:16:19]
order to be employed because
[5:16:20]
they are certificated, but at
[5:16:23]
this time staff wouldn't
[5:16:24]
recommend making this a
[5:16:25]
certificated position because we
[5:16:26]
would not be able to consider
[5:16:28]
keeping some of the current
[5:16:30]
training staff.
[5:16:31]
>> we don't want to do that.
[5:16:33]
okay.
[5:16:35]
and then the last one, in the
[5:16:37]
ability to section, the first
[5:16:42]
line it says, read analyze and
[5:16:45]
understand... For physician and
[5:16:49]
physical therapist orders but
[5:16:51]
the trainers are on the same
[5:16:53]
level as fiscal therapist so
[5:16:57]
wouldn't take orders from a
[5:17:00]
physical therapist?
[5:17:01]
could we say collaboration with?
[5:17:04]
>> what would happen in the case
[5:17:07]
such as this, even though they
[5:17:08]
are on equal terms one is maybe
[5:17:11]
seeing the patient over time and
[5:17:12]
advice here is the workout to
[5:17:14]
do, can you please supersize
[5:17:16]
that.
[5:17:17]
that is where they read that and
[5:17:18]
adapt. The trainers are not
[5:17:20]
making a diagnosis, but a
[5:17:21]
doctors gives a diagnosis to the
[5:17:23]
therapist and that goes to the
[5:17:24]
training to help them on site as
[5:17:26]
opposed to having go to the
[5:17:28]
medical office.
[5:17:29]
>> I could add that orders
[5:17:31]
doesn't mean I order to do this,
[5:17:34]
it is doctor order and which
[5:17:36]
then they would use their
[5:17:37]
training skills to implement.
[5:17:39]
>> saying collaboration with
[5:17:42]
physical therapist would sound
[5:17:45]
different?
[5:17:46]
>> this is language typical to
[5:17:48]
the industry and I think all the
[5:17:51]
professionals involved would see
[5:17:53]
it as such.
[5:17:55]
>> just speaking on my own
[5:17:57]
child's behalf that is what
[5:17:58]
happened.
[5:17:59]
she was given a workout routine
[5:18:02]
and the athletic trainer helped
[5:18:04]
her to fulfill that.
[5:18:09]
>> that isn't a big deal.
[5:18:11]
okay.
[5:18:13]
>> how does the board feel
[5:18:14]
entering into making sure I have
[5:18:16]
all your points so you let me
[5:18:18]
know if I forget anything.
[5:18:20]
first, I like to actually ask
[5:18:21]
dr. Mccoy,b is there any reason
[5:18:24]
why we wouldn't change that to
[5:18:27]
student athlete as the
[5:18:29]
suggestion made?
[5:18:30]
>> no, we can go through the
[5:18:31]
document and make sure it is
[5:18:33]
consistently reading as student
[5:18:35]
athlete.
[5:18:36]
>> the other trustees is there
[5:18:37]
objection to that?
[5:18:40]
>> I just had a question.
[5:18:44]
you reviewed a lot of other job
[5:18:47]
duties, responsibilities
[5:18:49]
regarding the position, does it
[5:18:52]
do all have students and just
[5:18:54]
want to double check with
[5:18:55]
jessica asking have you treated
[5:18:57]
student in general and not just
[5:18:59]
athletes?
[5:19:00]
always student athletes?
[5:19:04]
>> [inaudible] if there is a
[5:19:05]
emergency and-
[5:19:06]
>> can we have come to the mic?
[5:19:13]
>> she was certified teacher of
[5:19:15]
the year.
[5:19:16]
asking her and mr. La belle to
[5:19:17]
get insight from the field.
[5:19:19]
>> the only time I had to do
[5:19:20]
that is if there is a medical
[5:19:22]
emergency during a game or at a
[5:19:24]
practice where a bystander is
[5:19:27]
there and might have a medical
[5:19:28]
emergency.
[5:19:29]
outside that, if somebody from
[5:19:32]
pe hurts themselves you have to
[5:19:36]
go to the school nurse.
[5:19:38]
>> for those instances where you
[5:19:39]
might go to the stands, it is
[5:19:41]
like I don't want to-I want to
[5:19:43]
put students and athletes versus
[5:19:45]
one over the other because I
[5:19:47]
want umbrella everybody if it
[5:19:50]
makes sense.
[5:19:53]
>> I would tell you all our
[5:19:55]
employees have duty of care in a
[5:19:57]
emergency, so for the specific
[5:19:59]
job description I believe it is
[5:20:01]
fine to put student athletes and
[5:20:04]
same if the assistance principal
[5:20:08]
or superintendent and someone
[5:20:10]
has a medical emergency we need
[5:20:12]
to act.
[5:20:13]
we are all included, it just
[5:20:16]
general employee responsibility.
[5:20:17]
>> thank you.
[5:20:18]
that is the first one.
[5:20:19]
we are good with that.
[5:20:20]
the second one that you asked
[5:20:21]
was that we change or amend
[5:20:23]
language around--
[5:20:26]
>> on item k to clarify it that
[5:20:31]
it is the athletic trainers who
[5:20:33]
will be identifying it but they
[5:20:34]
are going to be reporting it to
[5:20:37]
site administration or
[5:20:39]
maintenance and facilities
[5:20:41]
because are responsible for the
[5:20:43]
evaluation correction and
[5:20:44]
follow-up.
[5:20:45]
and, the chain of command?
[5:20:46]
>> yes.
[5:20:47]
>> dr. Mccoy, is there a reason-
[5:20:50]
>> we can update the language
[5:20:52]
but we know that at times the
[5:20:55]
trainers do problem solving for
[5:20:57]
us that isn't the demand of the
[5:20:58]
job description, but that is
[5:21:00]
just general good practice that
[5:21:01]
is employed by the trainers.
[5:21:04]
but we can update the language
[5:21:06]
so there is a understanding that
[5:21:09]
they are not the facilities
[5:21:11]
department or risk management
[5:21:12]
department.
[5:21:13]
>> I think that's--mr. La belle.
[5:21:17]
>> help me out matt.
[5:21:18]
>> I think the idea of this is
[5:21:20]
more of there is things beyond
[5:21:22]
like the athletic field
[5:21:23]
condition where something
[5:21:24]
happens and tell the official or
[5:21:26]
something else.
[5:21:27]
it has to do with equipment.
[5:21:28]
if somebody has equipment faulty
[5:21:31]
they have to make modifications
[5:21:34]
to get the athlete in play.
[5:21:37]
I like them to have the ability
[5:21:39]
to be able to make the safety
[5:21:41]
decisions on had run if easy
[5:21:43]
fixes.
[5:21:44]
>> I would agree.
[5:21:45]
I would-is there way to do both
[5:21:47]
of those things though?
[5:21:49]
>> we can craft language so
[5:21:51]
essentially there are going to
[5:21:53]
help with the broken chin strap
[5:21:55]
and help tighten a face mask.
[5:21:59]
not responsible for buying new
[5:22:01]
chin straps or order chin
[5:22:03]
straps.
[5:22:04]
that falls to athletic director
[5:22:05]
and head coach.
[5:22:06]
>> is that amenable to you?
[5:22:08]
>> yeah.
[5:22:09]
>> yes?
[5:22:11]
>> can I ask them?
[5:22:14]
I don't know how often they have
[5:22:17]
to do this.
[5:22:18]
they know how--
[5:22:20]
>> dr. Mccoy, how often do you
[5:22:23]
think the athletic trainers are
[5:22:26]
out there doing the facilities
[5:22:28]
and are equipment and fixing?
[5:22:30]
>> I think my answer is it
[5:22:33]
depends.
[5:22:35]
equipment heavy sports have this
[5:22:37]
issue.
[5:22:40]
girls flag and helmets and
[5:22:43]
football equipment.
[5:22:47]
our sports we hope are non
[5:22:50]
contact we have less equipment
[5:22:52]
to manage.
[5:22:55]
I think it varies.
[5:22:56]
also varies on the levels so
[5:22:58]
sometimes the freshman come out
[5:23:00]
with stuff on backwards and the
[5:23:02]
athletic trainer says you pants
[5:23:05]
go the other way.
[5:23:08]
what we are not doing is
[5:23:09]
mandating the trainer to take
[5:23:12]
the responsibility of another
[5:23:15]
supervisor, but in a practical
[5:23:19]
sense, trainers are problem
[5:23:22]
solvers with help with some of
[5:23:23]
the issues in real time that are
[5:23:29]
reported back.
[5:23:31]
rather then have a job
[5:23:32]
description saying you can only
[5:23:34]
report, we'll write with
[5:23:36]
language that is understanding
[5:23:38]
there is real time assistance
[5:23:41]
they provide but they are not
[5:23:42]
the responsible supervisor when
[5:23:45]
it comes to field condition that
[5:23:47]
is reported to their supervise.
[5:23:50]
er.
[5:23:51]
>> yes, everyone agrees to that?
[5:23:54]
is there anything we missed?
[5:23:57]
I think that was it too.
[5:24:00]
trustee botello lopez.
[5:24:02]
>> I want to thank you to mr. La
[5:24:09]
belle pushing this forward and
[5:24:10]
looking at other job
[5:24:12]
descriptions to keep the
[5:24:15]
trainers ready to go.
[5:24:16]
if we approve this and
[5:24:18]
anticipate we will we are
[5:24:19]
looking to do this for 26-27 and
[5:24:21]
my question is, with that where
[5:24:24]
will the funding come from?
[5:24:27]
>> currently the original plan
[5:24:29]
was for the contract to go
[5:24:32]
through december 31 and then
[5:24:34]
like we talked in matter days
[5:24:38]
this flipped.
[5:24:39]
as of august 3 is the last day
[5:24:41]
on contract, so we want to try
[5:24:44]
to push this through and we
[5:24:46]
think the partners from oftsc
[5:24:50]
helping and believing in the
[5:24:51]
importance of this, but we will
[5:24:53]
but those together to hopefully
[5:24:55]
open and get people hired right
[5:24:56]
away.
[5:24:57]
the funding is basically the
[5:24:58]
same.
[5:24:59]
we were just paying common
[5:25:02]
spirit instead.
[5:25:03]
we are going to bring employees
[5:25:06]
on as our own.
[5:25:07]
>> what funding source?
[5:25:09]
>> that is--lcap expense.
[5:25:15]
>> how many trainers do we have
[5:25:17]
now?
[5:25:19]
currently we have five I think.
[5:25:24]
and two vacancies so we will be
[5:25:26]
getting those two filled as
[5:25:28]
well.
[5:25:30]
>> okay.
[5:25:31]
thank you for your work on this.
[5:25:36]
>> I think the last unless else
[5:25:39]
I want to say thank you.
[5:25:40]
the athletic trainers are so
[5:25:42]
important and the kids rely on
[5:25:43]
you just knowing you are there
[5:25:45]
is such a important piece of
[5:25:47]
their safety and security and
[5:25:49]
allowing them to pursue the
[5:25:51]
sports they love and having two
[5:25:53]
children student athletes and
[5:25:55]
the direct recipients of
[5:25:56]
athletic trainers and their
[5:25:58]
kindness and generosity, I want
[5:26:00]
to say thank you and how
[5:26:01]
exciting they are will be
[5:26:04]
hopefully part of team ouhsd.
[5:26:08]
we are really excited to have
[5:26:09]
them be a part of our team
[5:26:12]
authentically opposed to someone
[5:26:14]
who is coming to be here from
[5:26:17]
someplace else.
[5:26:18]
I think it is going to make us
[5:26:20]
stronger to have as part of the
[5:26:22]
team in-house.
[5:26:24]
any other questions or comments?
[5:26:28]
okay.
[5:26:29]
we have a first and second.
[5:26:30]
call the question.
[5:26:31]
all those in favor say aye.
[5:26:33]
opposed?
[5:26:34]
abstentions?
[5:26:42]
trustee estrada was that a aye?
[5:26:45]
thank you.
[5:26:46]
motion passes 5-0.
[5:26:47]
welcome to team ouhsd everyone.
[5:26:50]
(applause)
[5:26:51]
very exciting and thank you for
[5:26:52]
your work on this.
[5:26:54]
we are going to maybe take a 5
[5:26:57]
minute break?
[5:26:59]
it is 10:30 so need to make a
[5:27:01]
decision about continuing.
[5:27:07]
in favor of continuing.
[5:27:10]
you want to do age before.
[5:27:11]
absolutely.
[5:27:12]
item h is consideration of
[5:27:13]
approval of letter of support
[5:27:16]
for the extension of prop 55.
[5:27:18]
dr. Mccoy.
[5:27:19]
>> thank you before the board
[5:27:20]
consideration of approval letter
[5:27:22]
support for extension of
[5:27:23]
proposition 55.
[5:27:55]
the extension of prop 55.
[5:28:32]
>> thank you.
[5:28:33]
I make the motion to approve.
[5:28:36]
>> I second.
[5:28:37]
>> thank you.
[5:28:38]
first and second.
[5:28:39]
I actually asked dr. Mccoy to
[5:28:40]
put this on the agenda so thank
[5:28:43]
you.
[5:28:44]
and thank you to cta especially
[5:28:46]
for collecting signatures again
[5:28:48]
for this measure.
[5:28:49]
they were instrumental in this.
[5:28:52]
I want to give a dollar value.
[5:28:54]
according to the california
[5:28:56]
teacher association, the ventura
[5:28:59]
county community college
[5:29:00]
district is at risk of losing
[5:29:03]
this amount, so 21 million, 833
[5:29:07]
thousand, 933 dollars according
[5:29:13]
to cta, the community colleges
[5:29:19]
ventura county community college
[5:29:21]
district is at risk of losing 21
[5:29:24]
million, 833 thousand, 933
[5:29:26]
dollars.
[5:29:27]
just putting a dollar value to
[5:29:29]
what this extension could mean
[5:29:31]
for our own county.
[5:29:34]
we have a first and second.
[5:29:36]
any other questions or comments?
[5:29:40]
all those in favor say aye.
[5:29:43]
opposed say no.
[5:29:45]
abstentions?
[5:29:46]
thank you.
[5:29:47]
motion passes 5-0.
[5:29:49]
okay.
[5:29:51]
now we are going to take 5 but I
[5:29:53]
want to make sure everyone who
[5:29:55]
is online watching understands
[5:29:57]
that the contract has been
[5:29:59]
posted to the superintendent's
[5:30:03]
search page and it is the first
[5:30:05]
item on the website as I am
[5:30:08]
told.
[5:30:09]
anyone out there who would look
[5:30:11]
like to look at the contract
[5:30:13]
before we vote check out the
[5:30:14]
website or in the audience there
[5:30:16]
are printed copies along the
[5:30:18]
side wall.
[5:30:19]
we'll take a 5 minute break and
[5:30:21]
be back at 937.
[5:30:27]
1038.
[5:30:28]
[recess]
[5:45:49]
>> okay.
[5:45:50]
alright.
[5:45:51]
welcome back everybody.
[5:45:54]
we are reconvening.
[5:45:55]
we have board approval to go
[5:45:57]
past 10:30.
[5:45:59]
and we are starting with-I lost
[5:46:04]
my place.
[5:46:05]
the ric program.
[5:46:06]
dr. Mccoy.
[5:46:07]
>> we'll go to dr. Kelsen and
[5:46:10]
data dudes to come down for the
[5:46:12]
ric program update.
[5:46:14]
thank you.
[5:46:15]
>> hello everybody.
[5:46:16]
welcome.
[5:46:17]
>> thank you good evening
[5:46:19]
everyone.
[5:46:20]
the team is here to present to
[5:46:21]
you a year two progress update
[5:46:25]
on the restorative intervention
[5:46:27]
campus program known as the ric
[5:46:30]
program.
[5:46:31]
this work had positive impact on
[5:46:34]
students and families while
[5:46:37]
supporting staff.
[5:46:40]
presenting are daniel cook and
[5:46:42]
john gonzalez that includes dr.
[5:46:48]
gil, coordinates aaron ferguson
[5:46:50]
and jay sorenson.
[5:46:52]
are we advancing our own slides?
[5:46:55]
>> no.
[5:46:56]
>> okay.
[5:46:57]
understood.
[5:46:58]
next slide, please.
[5:46:59]
on the next slide you see what
[5:47:01]
has become known as the ric
[5:47:05]
wheel.
[5:47:06]
this is the work of educational
[5:47:10]
services in ouhsd.
[5:47:12]
if you added two spokes, career
[5:47:15]
prepared and college ready, this
[5:47:17]
is a unifying effort that guides
[5:47:20]
the work of the restorative
[5:47:23]
intervention campus program.
[5:47:26]
we like to start the
[5:47:27]
presentation officially with a
[5:47:29]
story that really is a one
[5:47:32]
example of a tremendous
[5:47:34]
testimony for this program.
[5:47:36]
if you advance the next slide.
[5:47:38]
using multiple layered databases
[5:47:42]
we found a number of student who
[5:47:44]
had in the 12 grade had not
[5:47:46]
applied to attend 4 year college
[5:47:49]
or not admitted to 4 year
[5:47:50]
college or hadn't necessarily
[5:47:54]
applied for financial aid.
[5:47:57]
on a really spontaneous effort
[5:48:00]
in partnership with the cal
[5:48:01]
state university channel island
[5:48:04]
admission department we put
[5:48:06]
together with staff a number of
[5:48:11]
guaranteed admission events and
[5:48:14]
one hosted here at the district
[5:48:15]
office.
[5:48:16]
the student and parent came in
[5:48:19]
the room and we overheard them
[5:48:21]
clearly saying they were going
[5:48:23]
do this on their way to costco
[5:48:26]
just across the street.
[5:48:27]
as it turns out the student
[5:48:28]
applied for csu admission,
[5:48:31]
applied for financial aid and
[5:48:34]
has been admitted and last I
[5:48:36]
heard plans to attend.
[5:48:38]
over and over and over again
[5:48:41]
those anecdotes whether from a
[5:48:43]
student who is finishing the
[5:48:45]
high school career or just
[5:48:48]
starting as the quotes on the
[5:48:49]
screen show here, waiting for
[5:48:52]
someone to find them to ask them
[5:48:55]
how to improve their experience
[5:48:56]
in the district through further
[5:48:59]
support has been the earmark of
[5:49:01]
this program.
[5:49:02]
next slide, please.
[5:49:04]
the translated mission of the
[5:49:06]
restorative intervention campus
[5:49:08]
program is to find the students
[5:49:09]
in the academic middle who often
[5:49:12]
get missed not just in this
[5:49:13]
system, but in systems across
[5:49:17]
education and to help them get
[5:49:20]
back on track.
[5:49:23]
we worked on a number of
[5:49:27]
innovative programs and
[5:49:28]
initiatives.
[5:49:29]
next slide, please.
[5:49:31]
they are categorized here.
[5:49:34]
we have a more robust
[5:49:37]
institutional research
[5:49:39]
initiative that includes a
[5:49:40]
number of dashboards for
[5:49:42]
teachers, counselors,
[5:49:43]
administrators.
[5:49:45]
we are creating one for students
[5:49:46]
and families that we will be
[5:49:49]
rolling out beginning of next
[5:49:51]
school year.
[5:49:52]
our screeners which we'll talk
[5:49:54]
more about in a few slides.
[5:49:56]
the restorative interventions in
[5:49:58]
place both in terms of the
[5:49:59]
monitoring list, the
[5:50:02]
intervention response team
[5:50:05]
process, predictive analytics
[5:50:07]
tied to things as the prosperity
[5:50:11]
screener and climate survey and
[5:50:13]
on the spot admission event I
[5:50:15]
mentioned.
[5:50:16]
we also have continued the good
[5:50:17]
work with the board direction on
[5:50:19]
grading for mastery and equity.
[5:50:22]
insuring our students get more
[5:50:24]
regular feedback on how they are
[5:50:26]
doing in class while also
[5:50:30]
norming our assignment types,
[5:50:31]
grading bands and empower sites
[5:50:34]
with additional information so
[5:50:37]
they too can monitor progress.
[5:50:40]
the additional projects we
[5:50:42]
supported as a team are at the
[5:50:44]
bottom of the slide.
[5:50:45]
they include finding greater
[5:50:47]
efficiencies across the system.
[5:50:50]
if you advance next slide, it is
[5:50:54]
important to say as I pass the
[5:50:56]
mic to daniel and john that we
[5:51:00]
share on behalf of many staff
[5:51:02]
tremendous gratitude to dr.
[5:51:04]
mccoy for your vision in
[5:51:06]
bringing this program to the
[5:51:07]
district and enthusiastically
[5:51:13]
challenging us to carry it out.
[5:51:14]
thank you.
[5:51:15]
with that, I like to turn it
[5:51:17]
over to daniel.
[5:51:19]
>> thank you.
[5:51:20]
welcome.
[5:51:21]
congratulations.
[5:51:23]
>> thank you very much I
[5:51:24]
appreciate that.
[5:51:26]
so, the first thing we will talk
[5:51:28]
about is student check in
[5:51:29]
process and this was established
[5:51:31]
to solve several problems and it
[5:51:34]
is in collaboration with several
[5:51:35]
departments.
[5:51:37]
the initial was to address
[5:51:41]
saturday school check in process
[5:51:42]
and also to validate check ins
[5:51:44]
and support related to title 1.
[5:51:47]
our first order of business was
[5:51:48]
collaborating with business
[5:51:49]
services and dr. Houston scott
[5:51:52]
to work on establishing a system
[5:51:54]
that allows for an adult and
[5:51:57]
student verification of check
[5:51:58]
ins which allows us to produce
[5:52:01]
documents to tie to time sheets
[5:52:03]
and allows to really verify we
[5:52:05]
are serving the correct kids
[5:52:06]
with the correct unduplicated
[5:52:09]
check boxes so to speak, so that
[5:52:11]
started with saturday school.
[5:52:14]
mrs. Pike and mr. Nelson were
[5:52:17]
instrumental and critical as
[5:52:19]
well as aaron ferguson and jay
[5:52:23]
sorenson.
[5:52:24]
this started there and expanded
[5:52:25]
immediately.
[5:52:26]
we used to use qr codes
[5:52:30]
independently managed, google
[5:52:32]
forums and nothing against
[5:52:34]
google forums but something this
[5:52:37]
scale and magnitude and
[5:52:38]
departments touching it, it was
[5:52:40]
important we implemented
[5:52:41]
something streamlined into
[5:52:45]
synergy because we want
[5:52:48]
everybody documented and
[5:52:49]
available to understand what
[5:52:50]
points of contract or
[5:52:53]
interventions are supporting and
[5:52:54]
it is critical in a really tight
[5:52:57]
situation we understand where
[5:52:59]
the system is supported them or
[5:53:00]
has not and they have been
[5:53:02]
missed.
[5:53:03]
we establish with saturday
[5:53:04]
school.
[5:53:05]
wellness centers, thanks to mr.
[5:53:07]
ortegerra and her team were
[5:53:08]
really on board with
[5:53:10]
streamlining this.
[5:53:11]
the wellness centers are a model
[5:53:15]
of documentation because they
[5:53:16]
are more recent additions to the
[5:53:18]
district and some are grant
[5:53:19]
funded so always been really
[5:53:21]
efficient with that and been the
[5:53:22]
model citizens.
[5:53:27]
we expanded to counseling halls.
[5:53:32]
we pilot with a small group and
[5:53:34]
get a lot of stakeholder
[5:53:37]
feedback and adjust and
[5:53:38]
implement wider scale.
[5:53:40]
counseling halls and welcome
[5:53:42]
centers and coordinator verdine
[5:53:44]
reached about community schools
[5:53:46]
and understand the services
[5:53:47]
provided there so customize
[5:53:49]
menus.
[5:53:51]
also tutoring check in and in
[5:53:53]
classrooms that is really
[5:53:55]
critical because some are
[5:53:56]
supported with specialized
[5:53:58]
funds, so for business office it
[5:54:00]
is really important we have a
[5:54:02]
streamline process that also
[5:54:04]
understands what student are
[5:54:05]
interacting with the system all
[5:54:07]
over.
[5:54:08]
we know good things are
[5:54:09]
happening.
[5:54:10]
I think one of the silver lining
[5:54:12]
to covid was we had this part of
[5:54:13]
the contract that forced us to
[5:54:15]
have 12 hours of documented
[5:54:17]
student facing interventions.
[5:54:19]
if we were not able to do our
[5:54:21]
pre service days.
[5:54:23]
what we found is at one site at
[5:54:25]
camarillo high school when we
[5:54:27]
developed it we found 6500
[5:54:31]
interventions that were provided
[5:54:32]
to students in the form of
[5:54:34]
tutoring.
[5:54:35]
those were never documented in
[5:54:36]
synergy before.
[5:54:38]
that told us good things were
[5:54:39]
happening all over but didn't
[5:54:40]
know about it.
[5:54:41]
a teacher want necessarily
[5:54:43]
sending e-mail to the counselor,
[5:54:44]
just so you know, johnny showed
[5:54:47]
up for math tutoring.
[5:54:48]
it is always johnny and feels
[5:54:50]
bad about it.
[5:54:51]
so that was a really important
[5:54:53]
aspect but also like again from
[5:54:55]
a fiscal responsibility
[5:54:56]
standpoint is really important
[5:54:58]
to understand that we are
[5:54:59]
actually service students when
[5:55:00]
we give a time sheet and from a
[5:55:03]
support standpoint we need to
[5:55:05]
understand where we failing
[5:55:06]
student to connect with services
[5:55:08]
we know exist everywhere.
[5:55:09]
on the horizon and reached out
[5:55:11]
college and career centers which
[5:55:13]
pushes into the cte space, minga
[5:55:16]
data is used because of the
[5:55:18]
efficiency of checking with a
[5:55:21]
bar code with a student phone
[5:55:23]
where they have their id and
[5:55:26]
those high traffic areas like
[5:55:28]
libraries which house homework
[5:55:30]
centers.
[5:55:31]
we want to make sure that is
[5:55:33]
incorporated and additional
[5:55:34]
counseling therapy.
[5:55:35]
we started to explore partnering
[5:55:37]
with special education
[5:55:38]
department.
[5:55:39]
it is little tricky because some
[5:55:41]
of these systems are built into
[5:55:43]
our system and outside service.
[5:55:49]
they are not district employees.
[5:55:53]
coordinating that has been a
[5:55:55]
pretty large undertaking with a
[5:55:57]
lot of different meetings.
[5:55:59]
in the end we work with a
[5:56:02]
outside agency to help with back
[5:56:04]
end coding and we show them the
[5:56:06]
process developed and better
[5:56:08]
understand we designed this
[5:56:10]
thing, this is how it integrates
[5:56:12]
into the system, here is how it
[5:56:15]
is syncing to the system and
[5:56:19]
visible.
[5:56:20]
what does it look like and they
[5:56:21]
said something this robust
[5:56:23]
estimated retail cost is in the
[5:56:25]
hundred thousand dollar range
[5:56:27]
and built in-house with our own
[5:56:29]
team with the voice of employees
[5:56:31]
to better inform it.
[5:56:32]
we are really proud of this
[5:56:34]
check in process and this is one
[5:56:36]
of the bigger under takings this
[5:56:38]
year.
[5:56:40]
>> thank you.
[5:56:41]
>> next slide, please.
[5:56:43]
what you see is our survey
[5:56:45]
calendar and one way we like to
[5:56:48]
think about institutional
[5:56:51]
research is better understanding
[5:56:53]
one, our programs, but we always
[5:56:55]
design these surveys around
[5:56:57]
understanding our students and
[5:56:58]
what dr. Kelsen spoke about
[5:57:00]
earlier with the csuci event
[5:57:03]
there is a element essential in
[5:57:05]
the climate survey and it was a
[5:57:06]
question about what do you
[5:57:08]
intend to do right after high
[5:57:10]
school.
[5:57:11]
how student answered that
[5:57:12]
provided a key pivot point for
[5:57:15]
how we identify students that
[5:57:16]
might be good fit so not just
[5:57:19]
all call to all students even
[5:57:21]
though advertised to all
[5:57:22]
students we had very specific
[5:57:24]
invitations.
[5:57:28]
something daniel was saying a
[5:57:29]
bit, the surveys the student
[5:57:30]
check in it is for us and by us.
[5:57:33]
these are our things.
[5:57:35]
these surveys are replacement
[5:57:36]
for things we used to pay for
[5:57:38]
and so that's one element but we
[5:57:41]
get to decide what goes in the
[5:57:43]
survey that answers the
[5:57:44]
questions we want to know about
[5:57:46]
our programs and students.
[5:57:50]
another piece I want to point
[5:57:51]
out here is, if you look at the
[5:57:53]
numbers in italics the
[5:57:57]
completion rates you don't see
[5:57:58]
those from third party surveys.
[5:58:01]
the most recent survey the
[5:58:02]
senior survey the class 2026,
[5:58:07]
93.7 percent seniors.
[5:58:11]
we know a lot about the senior
[5:58:13]
class and use that to inform
[5:58:15]
next year's programs.
[5:58:18]
another piece in the spirit of
[5:58:20]
for us and by us, the climate
[5:58:22]
survey questions we could have
[5:58:23]
paid for a third party and get
[5:58:28]
what we get.
[5:58:29]
the questions organized into
[5:58:31]
categories and domains so we
[5:58:33]
understand basic climate
[5:58:35]
categories that might be
[5:58:37]
familiar but there is something
[5:58:38]
else.
[5:58:39]
the district values are inquiry,
[5:58:41]
equity and wellness and made the
[5:58:44]
meta domains so questions across
[5:58:45]
the survey we grabbed those and
[5:58:48]
created sort of a meta
[5:58:49]
understanding of how do our
[5:58:51]
students, staff and families
[5:58:54]
perceive inquiry.
[5:58:56]
dr. Mccoy speaks a lot about
[5:58:59]
empathy and expectations.
[5:59:00]
we had questions sprinkled
[5:59:02]
throughout the survey that
[5:59:03]
addressed that.
[5:59:04]
we put those together and able
[5:59:05]
to understand what are the
[5:59:07]
perceptions of expectations in
[5:59:09]
the district or empathy in the
[5:59:11]
district.
[5:59:12]
so, the other piece of it on
[5:59:15]
surveys is we never just do it
[5:59:21]
the survey.
[5:59:22]
we try to turn it back around to
[5:59:23]
have when possible road level
[5:59:27]
inside data for better
[5:59:28]
understanding our students.
[5:59:30]
in that way, we own the data and
[5:59:33]
that is something we never
[5:59:34]
really got from our third party
[5:59:36]
and the other piece, the savings
[5:59:38]
that is yearly and ongoing
[5:59:40]
because now we have the surveys
[5:59:42]
they are ours and we get to run
[5:59:43]
back again and modify and make
[5:59:46]
them better but what we are able
[5:59:49]
to do is save on a yearly basis.
[5:59:52]
>> trustee botello lopez.
[5:59:55]
>> I had a question.
[5:59:56]
if you go back, the survey had
[5:59:58]
successful from faculty.
[6:00:00]
can you talk about that?
[6:00:01]
>> this started as a site pilot
[6:00:04]
and it's the short version that
[6:00:07]
survey is, it is the nuts and
[6:00:10]
bolts of a course expectation
[6:00:11]
list.
[6:00:12]
we asked teachers series of
[6:00:14]
questions, and what we are able
[6:00:15]
to do with that is two things.
[6:00:17]
we better understand teacher
[6:00:19]
grading practices and teacher
[6:00:20]
policies.
[6:00:21]
but, there is automation we can
[6:00:24]
run to turn that into a
[6:00:25]
individualized handout for every
[6:00:27]
teacher so they can post it to
[6:00:30]
their lms and classroom and put
[6:00:33]
on the door.
[6:00:34]
here is how to be successful in
[6:00:35]
my class and grading policy and
[6:00:37]
tutoring policy, the retake
[6:00:39]
policy, because standard
[6:00:41]
practice is go over class
[6:00:44]
expectation in the first week
[6:00:45]
and go in a drawer and never
[6:00:47]
talk about them again but it is
[6:00:50]
there and public and key pieces.
[6:00:53]
there is something for the
[6:00:55]
teacher and handout is created
[6:00:56]
and something for programs in
[6:00:57]
that we can understand where
[6:00:59]
some of the policies are for
[6:01:00]
what is implemented, and the
[6:01:02]
other side is, every row of data
[6:01:06]
we can cut that up and then a
[6:01:10]
counselor can look up a specific
[6:01:12]
teacher when the council a
[6:01:14]
student and say here is the
[6:01:16]
grade bands and retake policy
[6:01:18]
have you tried this?
[6:01:19]
it allowed to give the
[6:01:21]
personalized support to students
[6:01:22]
and all one survey that takes
[6:01:24]
the teachers anywhere from 2 to
[6:01:26]
5 minutes but has all the
[6:01:29]
downstream effects.
[6:01:31]
>> wow.
[6:01:32]
amazing.
[6:01:34]
just like amazed.
[6:01:36]
I want to say amazing and thank
[6:01:37]
you so much.
[6:01:39]
I hope that like this the screen
[6:01:43]
we are looking at is so powerful
[6:01:45]
and I do hope in some way that
[6:01:47]
the trustees are able to see the
[6:01:50]
results of the surveys and
[6:01:52]
whether highlights if different
[6:01:54]
kind of report if it is friday
[6:01:56]
update however that happens but
[6:01:58]
I do think it would be really
[6:02:00]
interesting for me to see some
[6:02:04]
of the results you think are
[6:02:06]
more important for trustees to
[6:02:07]
see.
[6:02:08]
>> absolutely.
[6:02:11]
>> thank you for letting me jump
[6:02:13]
in for a minute john.
[6:02:15]
the lcap the board voting on
[6:02:17]
this evening is a direct result
[6:02:19]
that climate survey and 11.840
[6:02:24]
responses we received this year.
[6:02:26]
we took that data from our
[6:02:28]
students, staff, families and
[6:02:30]
community and incorporated it
[6:02:32]
into the revisiting of the
[6:02:34]
actions and services aligned to
[6:02:37]
board and lcap goals and we'll
[6:02:44]
share more data.
[6:02:45]
we are pleased as a team with
[6:02:46]
the community response to us
[6:02:48]
through that one particular
[6:02:51]
tool.
[6:02:52]
it also informs how we design
[6:02:53]
the budget.
[6:02:55]
>> I love how you pointed out
[6:02:57]
that our mission is inquiry,
[6:03:01]
equity wellness and those pieces
[6:03:04]
of information that highlight
[6:03:05]
the work done around those
[6:03:07]
initiatives.
[6:03:10]
that would be exciting to see
[6:03:12]
what do our stakeholders have to
[6:03:14]
say about this.
[6:03:15]
>> we can do that.
[6:03:16]
>> any comments or questions at
[6:03:18]
this time?
[6:03:19]
before we keep going?
[6:03:20]
thank you.
[6:03:21]
>> more surveys.
[6:03:22]
this is a little of detail for
[6:03:24]
you on the prosperity screen.
[6:03:29]
the wellness screener,
[6:03:34]
prosperity.
[6:03:36]
a few points, we did test it
[6:03:39]
last spring in the previous
[6:03:41]
academic year and we got a nice
[6:03:43]
bell curve distribution and
[6:03:45]
matched that against what we did
[6:03:48]
in the fall with over 13
[6:03:50]
thousand responses and the data
[6:03:52]
roughly tracks between pilot of
[6:03:54]
500 responses and then 13
[6:03:56]
thousand.
[6:03:58]
we feel confident in the
[6:04:00]
reliability of it and then as
[6:04:02]
our wellness specialist meet
[6:04:03]
with the students and ric
[6:04:05]
counselors meet with the
[6:04:07]
students we feel a strong
[6:04:09]
validity to the data as well.
[6:04:11]
what I point out on the right is
[6:04:12]
the percentage distribution of
[6:04:14]
the prosperity levels where
[6:04:16]
students would fall into.
[6:04:19]
the most top two levels of
[6:04:21]
concern were referred to
[6:04:25]
wellness specialist and gave
[6:04:26]
resources to filter just their
[6:04:28]
list and they could also cross
[6:04:30]
filter by other academic
[6:04:32]
measurements.
[6:04:33]
again, underscore the point when
[6:04:35]
it our data we can do more with
[6:04:40]
it.
[6:04:41]
we can take the data and attach
[6:04:42]
all the other data we have and
[6:04:44]
present to the wellness
[6:04:45]
specialist a whole child
[6:04:46]
understanding who this student
[6:04:47]
is not just what the survey
[6:04:50]
responses are.
[6:04:51]
the other part is the level 3
[6:04:53]
struggling student we refer to
[6:04:55]
the ric counselors and that
[6:04:58]
extra capacity within the ric
[6:05:01]
program to have another
[6:05:02]
counseling resource that they
[6:05:06]
can meet with the students and
[6:05:08]
triage and figure what the
[6:05:10]
student needs so if you look at
[6:05:12]
the numbers, a good chunk of the
[6:05:16]
students were seen and served by
[6:05:19]
the support services and I think
[6:05:21]
it is a really nice testament to
[6:05:23]
not only our ability to take
[6:05:26]
data and connect with our people
[6:05:28]
that really do so many great
[6:05:29]
things for our students.
[6:05:31]
rather then having to wonder who
[6:05:33]
I talk to, it is very specific.
[6:05:42]
>> this is bit of our senior
[6:05:44]
survey and I think what is
[6:05:46]
powerful about this is we are
[6:05:47]
able to understand not based on
[6:05:49]
state metrix or some report
[6:05:52]
provided that is maybe few years
[6:05:53]
old or comparing us to another
[6:05:56]
district or collection of
[6:05:58]
charters or private schools,
[6:06:00]
understanding where our students
[6:06:02]
are going to school what the
[6:06:04]
enrollment or acceptance rate
[6:06:06]
is, which dr. Mccoy immediately
[6:06:08]
pointed out we are above the
[6:06:11]
state average on that school and
[6:06:13]
it is so cool to be proud that
[6:06:14]
and we get to celebrate and
[6:06:18]
understand and look across the
[6:06:19]
system how it is doing and dual
[6:06:23]
enrollment comes up a lot so how
[6:06:26]
many are taking a p and ib is
[6:06:29]
different that needs to be
[6:06:30]
transfixed to better understand
[6:06:32]
they are not perfectly similar,
[6:06:35]
so does take more work on that,
[6:06:37]
but ib will be included.
[6:06:40]
also dual enrollment.
[6:06:41]
to understand what the average
[6:06:44]
gpa of a student is to go to
[6:06:46]
some of the schools like what
[6:06:49]
was expected when I was a
[6:06:50]
student I think it is different
[6:06:53]
then students now.
[6:06:54]
it is competitive field out
[6:06:56]
there, but also all schools are
[6:06:57]
different.
[6:06:58]
all uc and csu with csu are the
[6:07:02]
cal poly which are extremely
[6:07:04]
competitive and understanding
[6:07:06]
for our students that are
[6:07:07]
sitting in front of the
[6:07:08]
counselors what does it mean as
[6:07:10]
a sophomore if your goal is
[6:07:12]
this, what does it mean to get
[6:07:13]
there to help really guide them
[6:07:15]
on this is the dual enrollment
[6:07:18]
path you should consider.
[6:07:19]
you don't need to take 9 a p.
[6:07:21]
it is a sprinkling of a p and
[6:07:24]
dual enrollment and striking the
[6:07:27]
balance but also understanding
[6:07:28]
not every school is created
[6:07:29]
equal and you don't have to go
[6:07:32]
that extreme rigorous route to
[6:07:34]
get into a great school.
[6:07:37]
we also part of doing the senior
[6:07:39]
survey and not represented here,
[6:07:41]
is understanding the california
[6:07:44]
college initiative is helping
[6:07:47]
students understand with that
[6:07:49]
data as well the large spray of
[6:07:52]
like if you are interested in
[6:07:56]
these majors and schools,
[6:07:57]
connecting more intentionally
[6:07:59]
with what paths are next.
[6:08:01]
sometimes we take in the
[6:08:02]
information and don't actually
[6:08:04]
make connection.
[6:08:06]
as john spoke to, combining all
[6:08:09]
those different dot sets if to a
[6:08:12]
more meaningful outcome for a
[6:08:14]
student and help them
[6:08:15]
understand.
[6:08:17]
dr. Kelsen spoke to it.
[6:08:18]
student and parent facing tool.
[6:08:21]
our intention we are waiting for
[6:08:24]
I think exclusively just a p
[6:08:26]
exam scores for seniors.
[6:08:28]
once we have the data from
[6:08:30]
college board we just got sat
[6:08:31]
yesterday so start incorporating
[6:08:33]
that since the uc's are maybe
[6:08:35]
wanting to introduce high stakes
[6:08:39]
test again but whole picture of
[6:08:41]
a p test and outs.
[6:08:45]
are you passing the test and
[6:08:46]
what it mean for the college
[6:08:50]
admission and putting together
[6:08:51]
for public facing because we
[6:08:53]
want to empower student and
[6:08:54]
parents with all these data sets
[6:08:57]
without-little more here is how
[6:09:00]
it looks for ouhsd for all these
[6:09:02]
different schools in the system
[6:09:04]
and we don't just measure our
[6:09:05]
state schools and uc, we measure
[6:09:08]
the most popular private
[6:09:10]
schools.
[6:09:11]
the private schools we settled
[6:09:14]
on 21 and 22 based on
[6:09:16]
clearinghouse data you just
[6:09:18]
approved in the ed tech budget
[6:09:20]
clearinghouse data is valuable
[6:09:23]
to understand where student are
[6:09:25]
ending up and reported 4 to 6
[6:09:26]
years out but what is powerful
[6:09:28]
is we get to understand where
[6:09:30]
our students go and are not just
[6:09:32]
the anecdotal evidence where
[6:09:34]
they go.
[6:09:36]
>> can I interrupt for a
[6:09:38]
question?
[6:09:39]
I thought about it since the
[6:09:40]
previous slide with regard our
[6:09:41]
redesignation and I know those
[6:09:44]
rates have gone up substantially
[6:09:47]
from a report previously.
[6:09:49]
I don't remember the exact
[6:09:50]
numbers but I know we have all
[6:09:52]
done a really-made a concerted
[6:09:55]
effort to help redesignate
[6:09:57]
student and it is paying off and
[6:10:00]
if it isn't represented if I get
[6:10:03]
ahead of you and if it isn't
[6:10:07]
somehow we could understand how
[6:10:10]
those students -
[6:10:12]
>> we have that incorporated the
[6:10:14]
first gen status.
[6:10:16]
if they are avid student or not
[6:10:18]
is incorporated.
[6:10:19]
our avid program which got
[6:10:23]
nationally recognized program
[6:10:25]
that is actually a big part of
[6:10:27]
why we ask what we ask.
[6:10:30]
john and I do sit down and come
[6:10:31]
up with a lot of crazy ideas,
[6:10:33]
but we get to talk to smart
[6:10:35]
people and the avid line of
[6:10:41]
questioning of what we want to
[6:10:42]
understand about our students,
[6:10:45]
all that is incorporated.
[6:10:48]
will all that be on the public
[6:10:50]
facing document?
[6:10:51]
not necessarily based on
[6:10:53]
population size said of schools,
[6:10:56]
just like on the state data if
[6:10:58]
under a certain percentage they
[6:11:00]
just put asterisks, but we do
[6:11:03]
disaggregate all those things
[6:11:04]
and we also do that for our
[6:11:06]
prosperity screener and also do
[6:11:08]
that to understand if we make
[6:11:10]
sure we sample enough of the
[6:11:12]
students because we want to make
[6:11:13]
sure we are not representing
[6:11:15]
certain populations and
[6:11:17]
representing and sampling all
[6:11:18]
populations represented within
[6:11:19]
the district.
[6:11:20]
we also disaggregate further to
[6:11:24]
1 through 4 not just all
[6:11:26]
students.
[6:11:27]
you can be first or second
[6:11:29]
grader and that is a very
[6:11:30]
different experience then a
[6:11:32]
student in secondary education
[6:11:33]
particularly the 7-10 grade is a
[6:11:36]
at risk population.
[6:11:37]
>> that's why I ask.
[6:11:40]
I think that long-term for us as
[6:11:43]
trustees or whoever is a trustee
[6:11:46]
to see how those students how
[6:11:49]
this particular program the ric
[6:11:52]
counselors how they have not
[6:11:54]
only helped to redesignate our
[6:11:56]
students and able to do dual
[6:11:57]
enrollment or a p classes or cte
[6:12:01]
programs they wouldn't
[6:12:02]
necessarily be available to them
[6:12:04]
because of the language
[6:12:07]
acquisition requirements they
[6:12:10]
would be participating in.
[6:12:12]
how that effects the college
[6:12:14]
bound.
[6:12:15]
how it effects like the college
[6:12:17]
and career prepared and that
[6:12:20]
correlation for us if we are
[6:12:21]
making a concerted effort to
[6:12:24]
redesignate is great to see.
[6:12:26]
>> providing the data like the
[6:12:27]
data requested and also doesn't
[6:12:29]
come up in detail in later
[6:12:32]
slides, but there is a really
[6:12:34]
huge concerted effort around all
[6:12:36]
of this work around the ric
[6:12:37]
program to really closely
[6:12:39]
monitor recently classified
[6:12:41]
reclassified students.
[6:12:44]
not just senior survey but
[6:12:46]
everything we are doing we
[6:12:47]
created filters that allow us to
[6:12:48]
get down into categorical and
[6:12:51]
specifically title 3.
[6:12:55]
and 4.
[6:12:56]
1 and 3 for our year 1-4.
[6:13:00]
that is new addition this year
[6:13:02]
is really getting down because
[6:13:04]
our data does allow us to look
[6:13:06]
at what year they are, but we
[6:13:10]
hadn't prior done filters on
[6:13:13]
wellness academic to make sure
[6:13:15]
we focus on the year 1 through
[6:13:18]
4.
[6:13:19]
that is big concerted effort
[6:13:20]
around all this.
[6:13:21]
not just senior survey data but
[6:13:23]
also closely monitoring early
[6:13:25]
years.
[6:13:26]
>> we haven't gotten to the
[6:13:28]
college and career part yet so I
[6:13:30]
think thinking of the future
[6:13:31]
that would be nice to see.
[6:13:34]
because I'm sure there will be
[6:13:36]
growth we can brag and be
[6:13:38]
excited about.
[6:13:40]
>> next slide, please.
[6:13:41]
one of the core values of what
[6:13:43]
we do in institutional research
[6:13:45]
is democratizing data and the
[6:13:48]
dashboards are a key piece that.
[6:13:51]
it is taking data that exists in
[6:13:54]
various places of our ouhsd data
[6:14:00]
ecosystem and repackage so
[6:14:03]
actionable and available to
[6:14:04]
those that need them.
[6:14:05]
we have a couple tools here.
[6:14:06]
teachers but it is teachers and
[6:14:08]
counselors.
[6:14:10]
these things that you can see
[6:14:13]
described and not going into too
[6:14:15]
much detail on them, but again
[6:14:17]
it takes data like for example,
[6:14:21]
a teacher could see their entire
[6:14:23]
roster of students and their
[6:14:25]
grades in all of their classes.
[6:14:27]
that doesn't exist in our
[6:14:28]
student information system for
[6:14:30]
the whole roster to see all the
[6:14:32]
class periods.
[6:14:34]
those type of views we create
[6:14:36]
and then the other piece of it
[6:14:38]
is we might take current grades
[6:14:40]
and then attach to graduation
[6:14:42]
progress and put it in a single
[6:14:44]
view.
[6:14:45]
that allows for different
[6:14:47]
questions to be asked of the
[6:14:48]
data to find different students.
[6:14:53]
when we planned this
[6:14:54]
presentation, I asked the
[6:14:57]
question, should we include the
[6:14:58]
slide because we talked about
[6:15:01]
dashboard before and dr. Mccoy
[6:15:02]
said this is the thing, because
[6:15:04]
if we don't have data we are
[6:15:06]
just talking about feelings or
[6:15:08]
vibes.
[6:15:10]
he is cooler and said vibes I
[6:15:11]
think.
[6:15:21]
all this is taking data and
[6:15:23]
getting to the people that can
[6:15:25]
really impact students and that
[6:15:27]
leads us to our next part of the
[6:15:28]
program.
[6:15:29]
next slide.
[6:15:30]
this is one of the key elements
[6:15:32]
of the ric program as it relates
[6:15:34]
to the ric counselor and I know
[6:15:37]
those three letters are the
[6:15:39]
same.
[6:15:40]
the ric campus program is this
[6:15:43]
whole thing you are seeing
[6:15:45]
today.
[6:15:46]
the ric counselor is one piece
[6:15:49]
of it.
[6:15:50]
this is one of those pieces
[6:15:52]
where how we find our students
[6:15:54]
that we wouldn't normally find.
[6:15:57]
we use monitoring lists and our
[6:16:00]
ric counselors have gone through
[6:16:01]
about 6 different phases over
[6:16:03]
the course of the year and they
[6:16:05]
have different filters each
[6:16:07]
phase and they are trying to
[6:16:09]
find student that are showing
[6:16:10]
signs of slipping away from
[6:16:12]
success, but not quite so
[6:16:16]
notable that our traditional
[6:16:18]
systems of support would catch
[6:16:20]
them.
[6:16:21]
there is all kinds of really
[6:16:24]
amazing stories that we hear
[6:16:26]
from our counselors about the
[6:16:28]
students they find and stories
[6:16:30]
they have.
[6:16:31]
from a top level program
[6:16:33]
standpoint, we identified about
[6:16:34]
1800 students this year that
[6:16:36]
received strategic specific
[6:16:39]
support that they might have
[6:16:40]
otherwise just been walking down
[6:16:42]
the hallway during a passing
[6:16:44]
period.
[6:16:45]
that is a increase from about
[6:16:46]
1200 the previous year.
[6:16:47]
there is good growth in the
[6:16:50]
program and the type of
[6:16:51]
interventions run the gamut.
[6:16:55]
the counselors are impressive
[6:16:56]
how they support students and
[6:16:59]
the range of support they
[6:17:02]
provide.
[6:17:03]
a subset that is the
[6:17:05]
intervention response team.
[6:17:06]
it is more of a higher level of
[6:17:09]
intervention and more on the
[6:17:11]
tier 3 category.
[6:17:13]
these are students where the ric
[6:17:15]
counselor identified them as
[6:17:19]
needing something extra so team
[6:17:21]
is convened that is the full
[6:17:23]
gamut of our helping people as
[6:17:28]
dr. Kelsen calls them, so we get
[6:17:30]
counselor in the room, the ric
[6:17:33]
counselor and administrator and
[6:17:35]
wellness specialist and teacher
[6:17:36]
and run through the students and
[6:17:37]
try to understand how to best
[6:17:39]
support the student who isn't
[6:17:40]
really connecting with our
[6:17:43]
curriculum.
[6:17:45]
what happens is they have a
[6:17:49]
decision, off-boarding means
[6:17:52]
they are doing okay and on their
[6:17:54]
way.
[6:17:55]
to your question about el, the
[6:17:57]
different statuss, that is on
[6:18:01]
this the data table you see is a
[6:18:04]
lot bigger, just doesn't fit on
[6:18:06]
the slide but we track that for
[6:18:08]
the type of making sure we are
[6:18:10]
reaching all the students that
[6:18:12]
need to.
[6:18:13]
next slide, please.
[6:18:20]
>> this is another tool we are
[6:18:21]
doing.
[6:18:22]
what we are trying to do for the
[6:18:24]
sites is help them understand
[6:18:25]
this isn't another thing it is
[6:18:27]
integrated in their the things
[6:18:29]
they need to do all the time for
[6:18:31]
all students.
[6:18:32]
what you see here is snapshot on
[6:18:34]
new view of what the goals are
[6:18:37]
as and feedback from the team on
[6:18:40]
critical areas to follow up.
[6:18:43]
a team will come outside
[6:18:46]
unbiased and say we really think
[6:18:49]
you should focus on these three
[6:18:51]
or four things, which you can
[6:18:54]
see on the top.
[6:18:55]
they are listed horizontally,
[6:18:57]
vertical on had left and this is
[6:18:58]
a very snapshot of much larger
[6:19:01]
tool is all the different
[6:19:03]
components you saw.
[6:19:04]
the dashboard, intervention
[6:19:06]
tools, irt, the grading for
[6:19:08]
mastery equity work, all that
[6:19:10]
and it shows where there is
[6:19:13]
align.
[6:19:16]
and next step is provide
[6:19:17]
resources linked here and as
[6:19:19]
they go through the
[6:19:20]
accreditation visit they can see
[6:19:22]
all the ed service work
[6:19:25]
happening and how it aligns with
[6:19:27]
site specific goals and allows
[6:19:28]
the site voice to remain
[6:19:31]
important and the district
[6:19:32]
support of those goals to be
[6:19:35]
more easily connected and we are
[6:19:37]
trying to-the guy with the red
[6:19:40]
string between all the pictures
[6:19:41]
and trying to connect as many
[6:19:43]
dots as possible so this is a
[6:19:44]
fool we wanted to show you.
[6:19:47]
we talked about the csu on the
[6:19:50]
spot admission.
[6:19:56]
you can see from pacifica and
[6:19:59]
oxnard and ci.
[6:20:00]
in the end, we sit down and look
[6:20:02]
at a lot of spread sheets and
[6:20:05]
data and write a lot of code.
[6:20:07]
john writes code better then I
[6:20:09]
do and are then I write code and
[6:20:11]
he corrects it and said you
[6:20:12]
should have done my way to begin
[6:20:14]
with in and end that work
[6:20:16]
doesn't mean anything until you
[6:20:18]
are in front of students and
[6:20:20]
watch power things happen like
[6:20:23]
them getting accepted to college
[6:20:25]
and they say there is a still a
[6:20:27]
chance because it is march
[6:20:29]
senior year and wrote themselves
[6:20:31]
off as community college
[6:20:32]
students and that sounds maybe
[6:20:34]
not like a positive light about
[6:20:35]
community college.
[6:20:36]
I was a community college
[6:20:38]
student myself, but I would have
[6:20:40]
gotten into a career faster if I
[6:20:42]
had gone to csu and I think
[6:20:44]
there is a lot of power in
[6:20:46]
putting students on a pathway of
[6:20:48]
prosperous future which is
[6:20:50]
literally our tag line and so it
[6:20:52]
is important to identify the
[6:20:54]
students and give them the
[6:20:56]
opportunity.
[6:20:57]
it was a really no pressure but
[6:20:59]
because it was so targeted, you
[6:21:00]
could see these rooms are not
[6:21:04]
gym fill would all the senior
[6:21:06]
class, because not all the
[6:21:07]
senior class needed the extra
[6:21:10]
push.
[6:21:11]
we needed to find the student
[6:21:12]
based on data points john will
[6:21:15]
point out and the stories that
[6:21:16]
came out are truly impactful and
[6:21:20]
I think this is what makes all
[6:21:21]
the work worth it and all the
[6:21:23]
spreadsheet blur worth it.
[6:21:30]
>> I think this is one of the
[6:21:32]
most important part of the
[6:21:33]
presentation today because this
[6:21:36]
program didn't exist in our
[6:21:39]
initial construction of the ric
[6:21:40]
program.
[6:21:41]
it is that we have been
[6:21:43]
gathering data understanding how
[6:21:44]
it connects, talking with
[6:21:47]
students and counselor and
[6:21:49]
teachers what students need and
[6:21:50]
put all this together in a new
[6:21:52]
novel way that leads to
[6:21:55]
something special.
[6:21:56]
not going through all this, but
[6:21:58]
these are data points that
[6:21:59]
pretty much everybody in the
[6:22:01]
state has.
[6:22:02]
these are commonly available
[6:22:04]
data points.
[6:22:05]
the exception may be the climate
[6:22:10]
survey where we ask what do you
[6:22:12]
want it do immediately after
[6:22:13]
high school and combining the
[6:22:14]
question with all the other one
[6:22:16]
produce the group of 639
[6:22:19]
students that were identified as
[6:22:21]
potentially able to go to 4 year
[6:22:24]
but hadn't applied.
[6:22:31]
>> one adjustment is we were
[6:22:33]
just highlighted at vcoe as the
[6:22:35]
ccgi network which is a
[6:22:38]
california college initiative.
[6:22:41]
we are the leading district in
[6:22:44]
implementing that, and in doing
[6:22:46]
so, having and to be fair to
[6:22:49]
pacifica they are number one.
[6:22:51]
walking to success.
[6:22:53]
thanks to mrs. [inaudible] but I
[6:22:56]
think it goes to show that the
[6:22:58]
work dr. Chavez and the a p
[6:23:00]
align to the work and counselors
[6:23:02]
align to the work, that is a
[6:23:04]
huge undertaking to be number
[6:23:05]
one in the county and then that
[6:23:07]
was able to inform this data
[6:23:09]
more and further.
[6:23:10]
next slide.
[6:23:12]
you take 3700, 3200 seniors and
[6:23:17]
synthesize down to 639
[6:23:19]
identified that got personalized
[6:23:21]
invitations and some sites I
[6:23:23]
want to shout out mr. Jimenez at
[6:23:27]
rio mesa, he did a pre meeting
[6:23:29]
before the actual meeting to say
[6:23:30]
this is important and real thing
[6:23:31]
because we get a lot of parent
[6:23:33]
squares the personalized touch
[6:23:35]
made a huge difference and had a
[6:23:38]
really good rate.
[6:23:39]
sites with a huge presence from
[6:23:41]
counselors and teams you felt
[6:23:43]
difference from student because
[6:23:44]
they know those people and these
[6:23:47]
people were strangers and it
[6:23:49]
felt powerful and real impact
[6:23:51]
happening real time.
[6:23:52]
397 students attended.
[6:23:54]
there is attrition there.
[6:23:56]
that is for a variety of
[6:23:58]
reasons.
[6:23:59]
athletic dismissal and absences.
[6:24:03]
after the invitation it isn't
[6:24:05]
for me and 120 attended the
[6:24:07]
second room which the first room
[6:24:09]
is here is why you should
[6:24:11]
consider csu uci and the
[6:24:15]
favorite student who said we was
[6:24:18]
going to community college and
[6:24:19]
found he could get the teaching
[6:24:21]
prejudicial and degree in four
[6:24:22]
years because they have the
[6:24:26]
integrated program in four years
[6:24:29]
and said I can be a teacher in
[6:24:31]
four years and he was excited
[6:24:33]
and went to the career center
[6:24:34]
applied there.
[6:24:35]
120 from the 639 actually filled
[6:24:38]
out applications.
[6:24:43]
>> this is the bottom line
[6:24:44]
summary of this program and
[6:24:47]
there was a little line on the
[6:24:49]
slide with the pictures I just
[6:24:51]
want to highlight, which is,
[6:24:52]
this was a idea at the end of
[6:24:55]
february and by the middle of
[6:24:56]
april all this had happened.
[6:24:59]
our district is able to do
[6:25:01]
really incredible things when
[6:25:04]
they organize around a vision
[6:25:06]
and do something for students.
[6:25:07]
I just want to make that really
[6:25:09]
clear.
[6:25:10]
it was really just wonderful to
[6:25:13]
be a part of and so, what did we
[6:25:15]
end up with in the end?
[6:25:17]
140 students started a college
[6:25:19]
application.
[6:25:20]
even that is a big number.
[6:25:24]
98 students had one more life
[6:25:27]
option available.
[6:25:28]
they don't have to go there, but
[6:25:29]
had the choice.
[6:25:30]
they are having as many life
[6:25:35]
options available as we can
[6:25:36]
provide.
[6:25:37]
41 are going to a 4 year college
[6:25:39]
that were not otherwise in the
[6:25:42]
system at all.
[6:25:43]
that number we expect to grow.
[6:25:47]
we will get more organized.
[6:25:50]
this was a idea february 28.
[6:25:53]
we backward plan, get more
[6:25:56]
organized and I think this could
[6:25:59]
be something special and lot of
[6:26:00]
lives changed and families
[6:26:02]
impacted in a positive way and
[6:26:04]
so that is why this didn't exist
[6:26:07]
and why the ric program I think
[6:26:09]
is special and love being a part
[6:26:11]
of it, is this program didn't
[6:26:13]
exist when we left for president
[6:26:16]
week or ski week.
[6:26:19]
but now we got 41 kids going to
[6:26:21]
college and that wouldn't be
[6:26:23]
possible without the support to
[6:26:25]
innovate.
[6:26:26]
we called dr. Kelsen sunday
[6:26:28]
night and said we have a idea.
[6:26:30]
she took our call and listened
[6:26:31]
to us and asked questions, let's
[6:26:33]
go.
[6:26:38]
that is the leader we are
[6:26:39]
getting and the leader in dr.
[6:26:42]
mccoy.
[6:26:45]
thank you we have couple more
[6:26:46]
but that's it.
[6:26:50]
>> briefly key take away's, the
[6:26:53]
restorative intervention campus
[6:26:55]
program we work with improvement
[6:26:57]
science, plan do study act
[6:27:00]
design measurement tools to
[6:27:02]
drive insight and innovation
[6:27:03]
using student staff families
[6:27:05]
voice to make it happen.
[6:27:07]
we produced new innovations we
[6:27:10]
strengthened site district
[6:27:11]
communication, coherence and
[6:27:15]
time after time story after
[6:27:19]
story the feedback is telling us
[6:27:21]
students lives are being
[6:27:22]
impacted for the good because of
[6:27:24]
the work of the team.
[6:27:26]
thank you for letting us share a
[6:27:28]
bit about the restorative
[6:27:31]
intervention campus program.
[6:27:32]
>> thank you
[6:27:33]
(applause)
[6:27:39]
thank you so much for staying
[6:27:41]
and all you have done and on
[6:27:44]
behalf of the district and
[6:27:47]
student.
[6:27:48]
>> to echo comments made by the
[6:27:50]
team.
[6:27:51]
this is not something we are
[6:27:52]
seeing in any other system now.
[6:27:54]
especially this robust local
[6:27:55]
data system and as someone who
[6:27:58]
oversaw the youth truth survey
[6:28:01]
we were lucky to get 6, 700
[6:28:04]
student responses total and
[6:28:08]
looking at 13 thousand student
[6:28:09]
responding the response to
[6:28:11]
senior survey, a key data point
[6:28:13]
from the senior survey and dan
[6:28:16]
and john are cut for time in all
[6:28:18]
the things they do, but we had a
[6:28:21]
slide in the senior survey that
[6:28:23]
indicated 51 percent of the
[6:28:24]
students responded they are
[6:28:27]
first gen in the senior class
[6:28:30]
and so that was a eye popping
[6:28:32]
number as we were reviewing the
[6:28:34]
data in advance of this report,
[6:28:37]
so when we say we are serving a
[6:28:38]
community that we create access
[6:28:42]
for, that was supported in the
[6:28:44]
data and we see that real time.
[6:28:47]
this is just in infancy and has
[6:28:50]
a growth potential, but also we
[6:28:53]
want to appreciate the board's
[6:28:55]
support of this innovation.
[6:28:57]
not all boards would provide the
[6:28:59]
trust and the level of
[6:29:01]
commitment for us to invest in
[6:29:04]
teacher leadership and invest in
[6:29:06]
a new type of counseling
[6:29:08]
position to invest in internal
[6:29:12]
data base work.
[6:29:13]
it is a money saver and also
[6:29:14]
creates these pockets of
[6:29:17]
innovation that continue to be
[6:29:19]
found as the program continues
[6:29:20]
to grow and I think dan and john
[6:29:22]
have been tireless in the
[6:29:24]
support of the program so I
[6:29:25]
thank them personally.
[6:29:27]
>> thank you.
[6:29:28]
(applause)
[6:29:31]
>> I have one question.
[6:29:32]
are both going to stay next year
[6:29:35]
continuing on with us?
[6:29:36]
>> mr. Cook will be assistant
[6:29:38]
principal.
[6:29:40]
>> I could answer that for them.
[6:29:42]
if I may, mr. Cook earned a
[6:29:45]
promotion to serve as assistance
[6:29:47]
principal at a district high
[6:29:49]
school, and mr. Gonzalez will be
[6:29:53]
continuing the good work and
[6:29:55]
also staying connected in the
[6:29:56]
classroom couple periods.
[6:29:58]
>> thank you.
[6:30:00]
>> congratulations;
[6:30:05]
>> thank you.
[6:30:06]
>> I will be quick.
[6:30:07]
I remember doing I think the
[6:30:08]
first site visit at camarillo
[6:30:11]
with mr. La belle and getting a
[6:30:14]
preview of ric and what it was
[6:30:15]
and when I heard we were going
[6:30:17]
to implement it on district
[6:30:19]
level I excited and didn't know
[6:30:21]
what it meant so last year when
[6:30:24]
we got the presentation to get a
[6:30:26]
taste what it is was cool and
[6:30:29]
this year to see it, that is
[6:30:31]
incredible and I know I talk my
[6:30:37]
dad a lot and it is 1130 so not
[6:30:39]
trying to get emotional, but my
[6:30:42]
dad says, when a student earns a
[6:30:44]
college degree, it changes not
[6:30:47]
just one life, but it changes a
[6:30:49]
generation.
[6:30:51]
that's 41 families, 41
[6:30:56]
generations.
[6:30:58]
that's impactful.
[6:31:00]
that is incredible.
[6:31:04]
amazing.
[6:31:05]
thank you.
[6:31:06]
>> thank you.
[6:31:07]
I will cry.
[6:31:08]
trustee botello lopez.
[6:31:13]
>> dr. Kelsen this work started
[6:31:15]
with you too.
[6:31:16]
I remember when we hired you in
[6:31:18]
that position and ed services
[6:31:21]
has been the place innovation
[6:31:23]
happened for ouhsd, so I think
[6:31:24]
it was with great pride that you
[6:31:26]
had brought it originally.
[6:31:29]
and see it the growth and just
[6:31:31]
the key members of dan and john
[6:31:34]
and what they have done to
[6:31:35]
really wrap their arms around
[6:31:38]
this and extending it out.
[6:31:39]
I remember reading all the
[6:31:40]
friday updates and saying, now
[6:31:42]
we are doing this with our
[6:31:44]
seniors and they are doing the
[6:31:47]
application process and just
[6:31:48]
seeing the numbers coming live.
[6:31:50]
that just is very thoughtful
[6:31:53]
work and comes with a lot of
[6:31:54]
heart and I can hear it in
[6:31:57]
everything you are saying
[6:31:58]
through the slides so I want to
[6:32:00]
thank you and we continue this
[6:32:03]
good work and know it will be
[6:32:04]
john so hope we find the
[6:32:06]
complement to him which is a new
[6:32:08]
dan maybe in that respect or
[6:32:09]
what that might look like.
[6:32:10]
I want to make sure this
[6:32:11]
continues to grow.
[6:32:13]
and what it looks like.
[6:32:15]
just keep moving forward and
[6:32:17]
doing the good work and see what
[6:32:18]
happens year 3 because now we
[6:32:20]
have fall and we have a game
[6:32:22]
plan and like the idea working
[6:32:24]
backwards and moving forward.
[6:32:27]
thank you.
[6:32:28]
>> agreed.
[6:32:30]
would you do me a favor and go
[6:32:31]
back to the slide that had the
[6:32:34]
41 but the number of
[6:32:37]
applications started?
[6:32:41]
that one.
[6:32:42]
so, this one actually stuck out.
[6:32:46]
the 41 the new confirmed and
[6:32:48]
intend to enroll, but also what
[6:32:51]
stuck out to me is 140 new
[6:32:54]
applications and the 98 new
[6:32:56]
completed applications.
[6:32:58]
those students have the ability
[6:33:00]
to go back and finish an
[6:33:02]
application or if they completed
[6:33:06]
one and accepted but chose not
[6:33:07]
to go, they can change their
[6:33:09]
mind again, right?
[6:33:10]
so, it isn't only the 41, the 41
[6:33:13]
committed.
[6:33:14]
but it is also 140 that had a
[6:33:18]
opportunity to engage in the
[6:33:20]
process to have someone to hear
[6:33:22]
more then one person say this is
[6:33:24]
actually an opportunity for you,
[6:33:26]
this is real for you.
[6:33:27]
it might not be the right time
[6:33:30]
for 140, it is right time for
[6:33:32]
41, but it doesn't mean the
[6:33:34]
other hundred students don't
[6:33:35]
have the opportunity to go back
[6:33:37]
and because they experienced it,
[6:33:39]
I don't want to discount that.
[6:33:41]
just because they chosen not to
[6:33:43]
now, doesn't mean they won't in
[6:33:44]
the future.
[6:33:45]
I think that again to dr.
[6:33:47]
mccoy's credit, the hundred
[6:33:49]
percent fafsa and trying to make
[6:33:51]
sure every child has the
[6:33:53]
opportunity not just for now but
[6:33:54]
for next year or the year after
[6:33:56]
when they decided okay I, I have
[6:33:58]
been in the world for a year or
[6:34:00]
two and I do want to go to
[6:34:02]
college and then they have that
[6:34:04]
process tart started and that
[6:34:07]
also will be a really
[6:34:09]
interesting point of data to see
[6:34:10]
how many kids need a gap year
[6:34:14]
and go and how many have to work
[6:34:15]
a while to earn money and live
[6:34:17]
at home in order to go.
[6:34:18]
or need the confidence or for
[6:34:21]
whatever life reason needed a
[6:34:22]
break before they go, but those
[6:34:24]
140 students we have data on
[6:34:27]
them and somehow to maybe
[6:34:30]
hopefully with these but maybe
[6:34:31]
in the future have that data to
[6:34:34]
see how many students you have
[6:34:36]
given the opportunity to do do
[6:34:39]
that at some point I think would
[6:34:41]
be really special.
[6:34:43]
because it is more then just 41.
[6:34:46]
not to mention siblings and
[6:34:51]
parents to hear about their
[6:34:53]
child and their sibling gives
[6:34:55]
everybody encouragement.
[6:34:56]
I think that is a really
[6:34:57]
important piece of it too.
[6:35:00]
any-
[6:35:02]
>> there is some benefits that
[6:35:05]
are hidden within this and
[6:35:07]
couple.
[6:35:08]
one is, the 41 confirmed intent
[6:35:12]
to enroll at csuci there were
[6:35:18]
students that asked can I also
[6:35:20]
apply to this or that school and
[6:35:21]
they helped them apply to
[6:35:23]
different csu and what we don't
[6:35:25]
have is the csu system wide data
[6:35:28]
to know how many of those 140
[6:35:30]
might also plan to enroll at a
[6:35:33]
different school.
[6:35:34]
I don't want to make some sort
[6:35:36]
of faulty assumption, but the
[6:35:37]
number could be higher and again
[6:35:41]
I think the navigational capital
[6:35:43]
that happens from breaking
[6:35:45]
the-here is how it works, here
[6:35:46]
is how the system works can have
[6:35:49]
second order type benefit.
[6:35:51]
I think there is more to it then
[6:35:54]
just the numbers.
[6:35:55]
>> interesting next year with
[6:35:57]
guaranteed admissions and how
[6:35:59]
that rolled out.
[6:36:02]
mr. Cook would you like to talk
[6:36:03]
about that.
[6:36:05]
>> a lot of students choose
[6:36:06]
community college and we have a
[6:36:08]
huge college going rate then the
[6:36:11]
local district but they choose
[6:36:13]
for financial reasons.
[6:36:14]
you said maybe a gap year due to
[6:36:16]
financial and wanting to work.
[6:36:17]
a lot of the students didn't
[6:36:19]
know and staff didn't know that
[6:36:21]
there is a actually a promise
[6:36:25]
and give free tuition for those
[6:36:29]
that qualifies and now we know
[6:36:32]
the deadlines there are students
[6:36:36]
with free tuition at csu.
[6:36:39]
when you think of pell grant
[6:36:42]
people didn't know about this
[6:36:44]
because it is such a new thing
[6:36:46]
and dominges hills has one.
[6:36:49]
it is targeted and local and
[6:36:51]
that is powerful because the
[6:36:52]
students say I can go free
[6:36:54]
there, I will do that.
[6:36:56]
getting the opportunities in
[6:36:57]
front of students requires
[6:36:59]
navigation and john having the
[6:37:02]
connection with csu ci and
[6:37:04]
getting the data we wouldn't
[6:37:06]
know the application and
[6:37:08]
completed applications what
[6:37:09]
california colleges gives us is
[6:37:11]
just they applied which is
[6:37:13]
helpful because we can target,
[6:37:14]
but knowing the process allowed
[6:37:16]
to give ric counselors here are
[6:37:19]
12 kids who showed up and didn't
[6:37:21]
finish the application, see what
[6:37:22]
help they need and sometimes it
[6:37:24]
was a ric councilor and
[6:37:25]
sometimes a college career tech
[6:37:26]
and every site had the autonomy
[6:37:31]
to assign the work.
[6:37:32]
that was powerful to have it
[6:37:34]
data through partnership with
[6:37:36]
k-8 and with local university
[6:37:39]
that are way more expanded that
[6:37:40]
allow this to be more powerful.
[6:37:43]
>> thank you.
[6:37:44]
thank you.
[6:37:46]
anybody else have questions or
[6:37:47]
comments?
[6:37:49]
thank you.
[6:37:50]
we look forward to the future.
[6:37:54]
okay.
[6:37:55]
getting towards the end folks.
[6:37:58]
public comments.
[6:38:00]
before we do 10 a we are going
[6:38:02]
to take an opportunity to allow
[6:38:04]
the public to address the board.
[6:38:07]
dr. Mccoy do I need to read this
[6:38:09]
again?
[6:38:10]
we only have one speaker card.
[6:38:13]
mr. Sturgeon unless there are
[6:38:14]
others.
[6:38:17]
you have the opportunity to
[6:38:19]
speak to the board for three
[6:38:21]
minutes.
[6:38:27]
>> [inaudible]
[6:38:31]
>> we are glad too.
[6:38:34]
>> [inaudible] I'm glad I sat
[6:38:35]
through this 5 hour
[6:38:37]
presentation.
[6:38:39]
can you speak into the
[6:38:40]
microphone?
[6:38:43]
>> virginia can you turn on the
[6:38:46]
mic?
[6:38:47]
>> sorry.
[6:38:54]
>> I want to share that I really
[6:38:56]
appreciated the information that
[6:38:58]
was shared.
[6:39:00]
I am a visual auditory learner
[6:39:06]
and this helped me because I
[6:39:07]
didn't get all the information
[6:39:13]
reading this.
[6:39:14]
I have some questions and
[6:39:15]
comments to the board.
[6:39:18]
when you take another look at
[6:39:21]
this program and I do commend
[6:39:22]
for all the information the
[6:39:24]
stats, but this program ric, not
[6:39:29]
talking about the campus
[6:39:31]
intervention, but ric I like to
[6:39:35]
ask, what if you take a look
[6:39:38]
board, I understand this is the
[6:39:40]
third year you take a look at
[6:39:41]
the initial plan that was asked
[6:39:46]
of my understanding some of the
[6:39:48]
comprehensive site academic
[6:39:50]
guidance counselors.
[6:39:52]
I kept hearing the word
[6:39:54]
counselor repeated during this
[6:39:55]
presentation.
[6:39:57]
I would like to ask and know you
[6:40:01]
can't answer, that in reference
[6:40:03]
to counselors, were we just
[6:40:06]
talking about the ric
[6:40:07]
counselors?
[6:40:08]
now, when I missed the earlier
[6:40:12]
session in which the job
[6:40:15]
description was shared to the
[6:40:17]
board.
[6:40:18]
I missed that.
[6:40:19]
but, in reviewing the
[6:40:22]
information of the
[6:40:23]
responsibility and roles of a
[6:40:25]
ric, and I looked at the role of
[6:40:27]
the academic guidance counselor
[6:40:29]
and mentioned earlier in the
[6:40:31]
meeting that the original-the
[6:40:33]
revision hasn't been made since
[6:40:35]
2013 for the guidance and
[6:40:38]
academic counselor, when I
[6:40:39]
looked at that and I looked at
[6:40:41]
this presentation and I heard I
[6:40:44]
see similarities.
[6:40:47]
I want you to take a look at
[6:40:48]
that, and the reason is, I
[6:40:53]
didn't hear and like to also ask
[6:40:55]
you board to ask all counselors
[6:41:00]
academic, the student wellness
[6:41:03]
if they participated in any
[6:41:05]
input feedback in regards to
[6:41:08]
what is presented this evening.
[6:41:11]
I am also going to suggest board
[6:41:15]
that you all go to the campuses
[6:41:22]
and you meet with the ric
[6:41:23]
counselors and ask them and I
[6:41:25]
know now it is june 24 they are
[6:41:27]
all on vacation.
[6:41:29]
when school starts, go to the
[6:41:32]
respective school sites and ask
[6:41:34]
the rics what are you doing,
[6:41:37]
what have you done these past
[6:41:39]
three years.
[6:41:41]
thank you.
[6:41:42]
>> thank you.
[6:41:44]
okay.
[6:41:45]
we are moving 10 a.
[6:41:50]
thank you.
[6:41:51]
I have a script here.
[6:41:58]
this is the board discussion and
[6:42:07]
approval of a contract for a new
[6:42:10]
superintendent dr. Virginia
[6:42:12]
kelsen.
[6:42:13]
the proposed contract contains
[6:42:15]
the following material
[6:42:18]
items:number one, the term is
[6:42:20]
three years from july 1, 2026 to
[6:42:25]
june 30, 2029.
[6:42:27]
the annual base salary is $285
[6:42:31]
thousand.
[6:42:33]
the board may increase the base
[6:42:35]
salary if the superintendent
[6:42:37]
receives a satisfactory
[6:42:40]
evaluation.
[6:42:41]
number three, the superintendent
[6:42:43]
is entitled to a stipend for
[6:42:47]
earned doctorate degree in the
[6:42:51]
same amount as granted to other
[6:42:53]
certificated management
[6:42:54]
employees.
[6:42:56]
number four, the superintendent
[6:42:58]
is entitled to receive the same
[6:43:01]
health and welfare benefits as
[6:43:03]
other certificated management
[6:43:06]
employees.
[6:43:07]
and number five, the board may
[6:43:09]
terminate the contract without
[6:43:11]
cause at any time in which case
[6:43:13]
the superintendent shall be
[6:43:14]
entitled to the base salary from
[6:43:17]
the date of termination until
[6:43:20]
the expiration of the contract
[6:43:22]
for a period not to exceed 12
[6:43:26]
months which ever is less.
[6:43:28]
that concludes the summary of
[6:43:30]
the contract.
[6:43:32]
a complete copy of the contract
[6:43:34]
may be reviewed on the district
[6:43:37]
website as an attachment to this
[6:43:39]
agenda and is also available
[6:43:41]
here in the board room in
[6:43:43]
printed form.
[6:43:45]
is there a motion for this item?
[6:43:51]
>> move to approve.
[6:43:52]
>> second.
[6:43:53]
>> thank you.
[6:43:54]
we have a first and second.
[6:43:55]
are there any comments or
[6:43:57]
questions?
[6:44:01]
trustee baker torres.
[6:44:05]
>> first I want to say I support
[6:44:08]
dr. Kelsen.
[6:44:09]
and I want you to be successful.
[6:44:11]
however, as a new superintendent
[6:44:13]
coming into a district that is
[6:44:16]
facing significant challenges, I
[6:44:18]
believe a two year contract
[6:44:22]
would have been more
[6:44:23]
responsible.
[6:44:24]
this gives the board an
[6:44:25]
opportunity to evaluate progress
[6:44:26]
and gives dr. Kelsen an
[6:44:28]
opportunity to determine whether
[6:44:31]
ouhsd is the right fit for her
[6:44:33]
as well.
[6:44:34]
a longer contract may be
[6:44:36]
appropriate in the future, but I
[6:44:38]
believe it should be earned
[6:44:39]
through demonstrated success,
[6:44:41]
not granted before we had the
[6:44:43]
opportunity to work together.
[6:44:45]
I want you to know that up
[6:44:47]
front.
[6:44:48]
>> any other comments or
[6:44:49]
questions?
[6:44:53]
trustee estrada.
[6:44:56]
>> thank you.
[6:44:57]
I think it is important to
[6:45:02]
distinguish between the
[6:45:04]
[inaudible] employment contract
[6:45:05]
before us now.
[6:45:06]
I where supported the
[6:45:07]
appointment of dr. Kelsen and
[6:45:09]
I'm committed to supporting her
[6:45:11]
success as superintendent,
[6:45:13]
however I cannot support a three
[6:45:15]
year employment contract.
[6:45:17]
the search process moved very
[6:45:19]
quickly.
[6:45:20]
we had limited time for
[6:45:21]
community engagement.
[6:45:22]
we didn't have the opportunity
[6:45:24]
to fully discuss the
[6:45:25]
superintendent's vision,
[6:45:28]
transition plan or board
[6:45:32]
expectation before making the
[6:45:33]
three year commitment.
[6:45:34]
a two year contract would have
[6:45:36]
provided the board with a
[6:45:37]
appropriate opportunity to
[6:45:38]
assess progress and reevaluate a
[6:45:44]
longer term contract.
[6:45:45]
my position is based on the
[6:45:46]
process and length of the
[6:45:48]
contract, not dr. Kelsen.
[6:45:50]
under the same circumstances my
[6:45:52]
vote would be the same
[6:45:53]
regardless who was appointed
[6:45:55]
superintendent under these
[6:45:57]
circumstances, so I just wanted
[6:46:00]
to share that before the vote.
[6:46:02]
thank you.
[6:46:04]
>> any other comments or
[6:46:05]
questions?
[6:46:07]
mr. Sturgeon would you please
[6:46:08]
take a roll call vote?
[6:46:11]
>> baker torres, no.
[6:46:15]
estrada, no.
[6:46:18]
flores-haro, yes.
[6:46:21]
botello, yes.
[6:46:23]
sher, yes.
[6:46:24]
>> thank you.
[6:46:25]
motion passes 3-2.
[6:46:26]
congratulations dr. Kelsen.
[6:46:29]
(applause)
[6:46:30]
we are very happy and excited
[6:46:33]
for you and we are going to
[6:46:35]
celebrate you and give you all
[6:46:36]
the compliments and credit at
[6:46:38]
our board meeting at your first
[6:46:40]
board meeting in august.
[6:46:44]
and you have a couple remarks
[6:46:45]
but we'll hopefully save ours
[6:46:47]
when we come together as a unit
[6:46:50]
for you in august.
[6:46:51]
you have the floor dr. Kelsen.
[6:46:54]
>> thank you trustees and ouhsd
[6:46:57]
community for selecting me to
[6:46:58]
serve as superintendent and for
[6:47:00]
your trust and confidence in my
[6:47:02]
leadership.
[6:47:03]
serving students and families as
[6:47:05]
we work together to bring more
[6:47:07]
prosperous futures brought me
[6:47:11]
here in 2024 and will continue
[6:47:13]
to be the focus of my work as
[6:47:14]
superintendent.
[6:47:15]
I respected and value the
[6:47:17]
individuals and diverse
[6:47:20]
communities that make up the
[6:47:21]
district and culture of care
[6:47:22]
created by this dedicated
[6:47:25]
diligent team.
[6:47:26]
this is a momentous evening for
[6:47:28]
my family and I me and would be
[6:47:31]
remiss if I didn't they think my
[6:47:34]
husband casey for encourage and
[6:47:36]
support.
[6:47:37]
casey, thank you.
[6:47:38]
to mentors colleagues friends
[6:47:39]
students and families, thank you
[6:47:41]
for enhancing my understanding
[6:47:43]
of what is absolutely possible
[6:47:46]
when people work together for
[6:47:47]
the greater good.
[6:47:50]
[speaking spanish]
[6:47:51]
thank you for this opportunity.
[6:49:15]
I will work hard daily and serve
[6:49:19]
students and families well
[6:49:20]
together with staff.
[6:49:21]
>> thank you.
[6:49:22]
(applause)
[6:49:28]
on behalf of the board
[6:49:30]
congratulations, we are so
[6:49:32]
excited and looking forward to
[6:49:33]
the future.
[6:49:34]
anyone would like to comment or
[6:49:37]
save it had celebration for dr.
[6:49:38]
kelsen at the first meeting in
[6:49:40]
august however you like to move
[6:49:42]
forward?
[6:49:44]
okay.
[6:49:45]
we'll make comments.
[6:49:48]
we are very excited so thank
[6:49:50]
you.
[6:49:51]
we are moving on to our
[6:49:55]
discussion about our board
[6:49:58]
retreat topics.
[6:49:59]
this is item 15.
[6:50:01]
dr. Mccoy.
[6:50:05]
>> yes.
[6:50:07]
typically at this meeting it is
[6:50:10]
late in the evening, we would do
[6:50:14]
a little of discussion and
[6:50:17]
polling on important topics for
[6:50:20]
the retreat and I know that dr.
[6:50:22]
kelsen would be the person to
[6:50:24]
lead that discussion with the
[6:50:26]
board, so what given the hour
[6:50:28]
what we may want to consider is
[6:50:30]
that if trustees would send
[6:50:34]
ideas to dr. Kelsen and board
[6:50:36]
president as a cc that we could
[6:50:40]
collect the ideas and dr. Kelsen
[6:50:42]
could put out to trustees as a
[6:50:44]
list starts to develop.
[6:50:46]
not for discussion and when the
[6:50:49]
comes to agenda setting for
[6:50:51]
those meetings then the board
[6:50:52]
could president and vice
[6:50:56]
president with input from
[6:50:58]
trustees can narrow the agenda.
[6:51:00]
I think this would be half hour
[6:51:03]
to 45 minutes and that's
[6:51:07]
tomorrow.
[6:51:10]
in 7 minutes.
[6:51:13]
>> is there a timeline?
[6:51:14]
>> with all do respect the first
[6:51:18]
regular board meeting is august
[6:51:20]
12.
[6:51:21]
there is discussion of a special
[6:51:23]
meeting to accommodate hiring
[6:51:24]
that might occur that trustees
[6:51:26]
are polled on a date so you
[6:51:28]
could bring the item to the
[6:51:31]
special meeting which enables to
[6:51:33]
set agenda for the 12 or meeting
[6:51:35]
between.
[6:51:36]
>> that sounds good.
[6:51:37]
>> that would be my
[6:51:38]
recommendation on this item at
[6:51:39]
this time.
[6:51:40]
>> thank you.
[6:51:41]
anyone opposed to that?
[6:51:42]
okay.
[6:51:43]
dr. Kelsen, you are not opposed
[6:51:46]
to that?
[6:51:47]
>> I approve.
[6:51:48]
>> okay.
[6:51:49]
thank you.
[6:51:50]
in the mean time if you have any
[6:51:51]
please send to myself trustee
[6:51:57]
flores-haro and [inaudible] we
[6:51:59]
are moving to board reports and
[6:52:02]
communications.
[6:52:03]
would anyone like to begin?
[6:52:05]
trustee estrada would you like
[6:52:06]
to begin online?
[6:52:10]
>> sure.
[6:52:11]
I'll start with none.
[6:52:13]
>> okay.
[6:52:15]
trustee baker torres, would you
[6:52:18]
like to go next?
[6:52:19]
>> sure.
[6:52:25]
my commitment to this district
[6:52:27]
students staff and community has
[6:52:28]
always guided my services as a
[6:52:31]
trustee and why I ask questions,
[6:52:33]
seek clarification and work to
[6:52:35]
fully understand the issues
[6:52:37]
before us while promoting
[6:52:39]
transparency.
[6:52:40]
while I may not always accept
[6:52:42]
recommendations at face value,
[6:52:44]
it is only because I care so
[6:52:46]
deeply about this district and
[6:52:47]
the people we serve.
[6:52:49]
dr. Mccoy I appreciate all you
[6:52:51]
have taught me during this time
[6:52:53]
on the board.
[6:52:55]
serving ooze a trustee has been
[6:52:57]
a tremendous learning experience
[6:52:59]
and great honor and I am
[6:53:01]
grateful for the knowledge,
[6:53:02]
insight and perspective you
[6:53:05]
shared.
[6:53:06]
thank you especially for your
[6:53:07]
accessibility, patience and
[6:53:10]
willingness to answer questions.
[6:53:14]
I appreciate all the time you
[6:53:15]
took to meet with me in person
[6:53:19]
and over the phone.
[6:53:20]
I wish you and your family all
[6:53:21]
the best in the next chapter and
[6:53:23]
every success in your new
[6:53:25]
position in burbank.
[6:53:27]
thank you for all your service
[6:53:29]
to ouhsd.
[6:53:30]
I want to thank matt la belle
[6:53:31]
for your service to oxnard union
[6:53:35]
high school both as a principal
[6:53:38]
and assistants superintendent
[6:53:41]
with homan resources. You
[6:53:42]
played a important role in
[6:53:45]
supporting our schools, our
[6:53:47]
staff and students and truly
[6:53:50]
appreciative of the work
[6:53:51]
dedication and leadership you
[6:53:53]
contributed to this district.
[6:53:54]
I wish you continued success in
[6:53:56]
your new role in burbank.
[6:53:58]
may the next chapter bring you
[6:54:00]
and your family all the very
[6:54:02]
best as you continue your work
[6:54:04]
in educational leadership.
[6:54:06]
I want to congratulate dr.
[6:54:09]
virginia kelsen as our new
[6:54:11]
superintendent.
[6:54:13]
my commitment as a trustee is to
[6:54:15]
continue asking questions and
[6:54:16]
doing everything I can to help
[6:54:18]
insure we continue moving
[6:54:21]
forward towards fiscal stability
[6:54:23]
while rebuilding trust with our
[6:54:25]
staff and community.
[6:54:27]
the success of our district
[6:54:28]
depends on all of us remaining
[6:54:31]
focused what is best for
[6:54:32]
students, staff and the
[6:54:33]
community that we serve.
[6:54:35]
I want you to be successful in
[6:54:37]
this role because when our
[6:54:39]
superintendent succeeds, our
[6:54:41]
students employees and district
[6:54:43]
are better positioned to
[6:54:46]
succeed.
[6:54:47]
I am committed to doing my part
[6:54:48]
by working collaboratively
[6:54:50]
supporting positive progress and
[6:54:53]
helping move the district
[6:54:54]
forward.
[6:54:55]
I look forward working with you
[6:54:57]
dr. Kelsen.
[6:54:58]
>> thank you.
[6:54:59]
trustee botello lopez.
[6:55:08]
>> so, dr. Mccoy, where to
[6:55:10]
begin?
[6:55:11]
you first.
[6:55:12]
my story began with dr. Mccoy
[6:55:14]
before I knew him actually in
[6:55:16]
1999.
[6:55:17]
the vice principal and principal
[6:55:20]
at hueneme high school my
[6:55:25]
husband graduated.
[6:55:26]
that is why it brings us
[6:55:27]
together and for me the vikings
[6:55:29]
is home for my family and for
[6:55:31]
you too.
[6:55:33]
I was the a sb director at
[6:55:36]
oxnard high school I had my
[6:55:38]
students partner with ucla on a
[6:55:41]
project on civic engagement.
[6:55:44]
asked to present on saturday and
[6:55:46]
we needed a bus.
[6:55:48]
you know how those things go,
[6:55:50]
buses are hot commodities on the
[6:55:52]
weekend especially during sports
[6:55:54]
season but I e-mailed dr. Mccoy
[6:55:55]
and shared our story.
[6:55:57]
my why for the program and he
[6:56:00]
made sure we got a bus to go to
[6:56:02]
ucla and present.
[6:56:03]
that dr. Mccoy the man in front
[6:56:06]
who does all the madge behind
[6:56:09]
the scenes.
[6:56:10]
a couple years later he was
[6:56:15]
surprised when I interred the
[6:56:17]
race-that day after the election
[6:56:20]
he was the first person to call
[6:56:21]
and congratulate me.
[6:56:25]
I recognize then it was
[6:56:28]
uncharted territory but spoke
[6:56:34]
volume of his character.
[6:56:36]
that [inaudible] the last 6
[6:56:41]
years carried triumphs to del
[6:56:44]
sol high school has absolutely
[6:56:45]
one of the most incredible feats
[6:56:47]
of our careers at ouhsd.
[6:56:50]
and the establishment of solid
[6:56:52]
and robust cte pathways ethnic
[6:56:55]
studies a course for 9 graders
[6:56:57]
and, civic engagement,
[6:57:01]
championship for outstanding
[6:57:03]
teams, california distinguish
[6:57:07]
schools and list goes on.
[6:57:08]
it has had heartache and some
[6:57:13]
still never disappear.
[6:57:15]
at least not for me.
[6:57:17]
and dr. Mccoy you might not show
[6:57:21]
it but they [inaudible] seen you
[6:57:24]
lean as a teach er and trustee.
[6:57:26]
I think you can see it is a
[6:57:28]
unique experience and one I
[6:57:29]
truly value.
[6:57:31]
your calm wisdom and ability to
[6:57:34]
lead in challenging of times and
[6:57:35]
still display so much humility
[6:57:37]
and professionalism even when I
[6:57:39]
know you and we as a board are
[6:57:41]
being tested.
[6:57:44]
but we rocked through so many
[6:57:47]
situations and gotten through
[6:57:48]
it.
[6:57:49]
we go positive in the fiscal
[6:57:51]
budget we find the light.
[6:57:52]
the sun comes up.
[6:57:54]
now you will be navigating a new
[6:57:56]
district and I'm excited for
[6:58:00]
this chapter in your life so
[6:58:02]
wish you nothing but the best
[6:58:04]
and your family as you continue
[6:58:07]
your career.
[6:58:08]
I will be reaching out as a
[6:58:11]
principal so thank you for
[6:58:14]
always being my mentor and guide
[6:58:17]
and leading the district so many
[6:58:18]
years coming to us and coming
[6:58:20]
back to us again.
[6:58:22]
no one holds the institutional
[6:58:25]
knowledge you bear for ouhsd and
[6:58:29]
can't be replicated and I know
[6:58:30]
and see it and you will be very
[6:58:32]
greatly missed.
[6:58:34]
to mr. Matt la belle, I wish you
[6:58:37]
the very best in your new
[6:58:38]
position as a [inaudible] I wish
[6:58:41]
we had more time with you.
[6:58:43]
it has been a pleasure seeing
[6:58:46]
start your career with ouhsd as
[6:58:47]
the principal of camarillo high
[6:58:50]
school and strive for excellence
[6:58:53]
and got a believe mentality that
[6:58:55]
was infectious.
[6:58:57]
I was still a teacher when you
[6:58:58]
began at cam high and you took
[6:59:01]
it from the bottom and raised to
[6:59:03]
such high levels and then that
[6:59:04]
is where a lot of beautiful
[6:59:05]
programming started with our two
[6:59:08]
duos dan and john and seeing
[6:59:12]
grow the school site and just
[6:59:14]
sense of belonging and where
[6:59:16]
this school site is now, it is
[6:59:19]
thanks to good work you have
[6:59:20]
done and laid the foundation and
[6:59:22]
I truly wish you the very best.
[6:59:28]
I wish we had your time with you
[6:59:30]
but seen the good work you done.
[6:59:33]
wishing the very best.
[6:59:34]
dr. Kelsen, I will keep it short
[6:59:36]
and sweet.
[6:59:37]
elated to see you take on the
[6:59:39]
helm for oxnard union high
[6:59:42]
school district as the new
[6:59:45]
superintendent.
[6:59:46]
it is great pride we selected
[6:59:47]
you as the new superintendent
[6:59:48]
and excited to see the good
[6:59:51]
work.
[6:59:52]
when you started we had high
[6:59:54]
expectations and you met that
[6:59:55]
and innovation you provided in
[6:59:56]
ed services is what we needed
[6:59:59]
and know you will propel us
[7:00:01]
forward so I wish you and the
[7:00:03]
rest of our ouhsd staff and
[7:00:08]
students and community we are on
[7:00:12]
summer break june 25 and wishing
[7:00:15]
a reflective summer and looking
[7:00:18]
ahead and always proud to be a
[7:00:20]
trustee of this great district.
[7:00:30]
>> good morning.
[7:00:38]
I will not look over there.
[7:00:39]
I choked up once.
[7:00:45]
it was tonight when I wrote it.
[7:00:47]
now it is morning.
[7:00:49]
this meeting is bitter sweet as
[7:00:52]
we recognize dr. Mccoy's final
[7:00:54]
board meeting with oxnard union
[7:00:56]
high school district.
[7:00:57]
for me it is especially
[7:01:00]
meaningful when dr. Mccoy first
[7:01:03]
interviewed for the district my
[7:01:04]
mom was on the hiring panel.
[7:01:07]
while I didn't understand the
[7:01:09]
significance of the moment at
[7:01:11]
the time, I was a child, it is
[7:01:17]
remarkable to think years later
[7:01:19]
I had to sorry, but not sorry.
[7:01:24]
it remarkable to think years
[7:01:27]
later I find serving on the
[7:01:28]
board as he concludes his tenure
[7:01:30]
with the district.
[7:01:31]
I had to do humor because if I
[7:01:34]
don't laugh I cry.
[7:01:36]
I had the opportunity to know
[7:01:39]
dr. Mccoy as our superintendent
[7:01:40]
but also as community partner.
[7:01:42]
through the work at micop I sat
[7:01:45]
across the table on issues
[7:01:47]
effecting student and families
[7:01:48]
in ventura county and what stood
[7:01:52]
out is willingness to engage the
[7:01:58]
community.
[7:01:59]
someone who works with
[7:02:00]
indigenous and [inaudible] needs
[7:02:03]
of students and families from
[7:02:04]
all backgrounds.
[7:02:05]
he understands public education
[7:02:07]
is strongest when every student
[7:02:09]
feels seen, supported and
[7:02:11]
connected to the school
[7:02:12]
community.
[7:02:13]
leading district as large and
[7:02:15]
complex as oxnard union is never
[7:02:17]
easy.
[7:02:18]
it requires navigating
[7:02:19]
challenges making difficult
[7:02:21]
decisions and balancing many
[7:02:22]
competing priorities and through
[7:02:24]
it all dr. Mccoy voted years of
[7:02:32]
commitment and it deserves
[7:02:33]
recognition.
[7:02:34]
personally I remember his
[7:02:36]
thoughtfulness, accessibility
[7:02:38]
and the respect he showed
[7:02:41]
engaging with community
[7:02:42]
organization and partners and
[7:02:43]
those relationships matter.
[7:02:44]
that is what we heard in the
[7:02:46]
superintendent search is
[7:02:47]
relationships and community
[7:02:49]
matters.
[7:02:50]
they help strengthen the
[7:02:51]
connection between our schools
[7:02:52]
and the community we serve.
[7:02:54]
dr. Mccoy, thank you for your
[7:02:56]
years of dedication to oxnard
[7:02:57]
union, thank you for the
[7:03:00]
countless hours, difficult
[7:03:02]
decisions and the commitment to
[7:03:03]
the role.
[7:03:04]
I wish you and your family
[7:03:07]
happiness and fulfillment in the
[7:03:12]
years ahead and like to close
[7:03:14]
with a quote from ralph emerson,
[7:03:18]
to know one life is to breathe
[7:03:20]
easier to have lived to
[7:03:21]
succeeded.
[7:03:22]
thank you dr. Mccoy for your
[7:03:23]
service to students and families
[7:03:25]
of oxnard union high school
[7:03:27]
district.
[7:03:28]
I also like to recognize matt la
[7:03:33]
belle.
[7:03:34]
played a important role
[7:03:35]
supporting the district
[7:03:36]
employees and strengthening
[7:03:39]
human resources.
[7:03:40]
ment that work happens behind
[7:03:42]
the scenes, but has meaningful
[7:03:45]
impact.
[7:03:47]
he was pulling double duty
[7:03:49]
because we hadn't had a hr
[7:03:52]
director so thank you for that.
[7:03:53]
want to particularly acknowledge
[7:03:54]
your commitment to work
[7:03:56]
collaborative with the labor
[7:03:58]
partners.
[7:03:59]
that is something and heard loud
[7:04:00]
and clear from the labor
[7:04:02]
partners how that partnership
[7:04:04]
has been really key and crucial
[7:04:08]
over the last year.
[7:04:09]
thank you mr. La belle for your
[7:04:10]
service your dedication to
[7:04:14]
employees and contributions made
[7:04:19]
and wish success and fulfillment
[7:04:21]
in your next endeavor and like
[7:04:23]
to take a moment to congratulate
[7:04:25]
dr. Kelsen as the next
[7:04:26]
superintendent of the oxnard
[7:04:28]
union high school district.
[7:04:31]
tonight is ending and beginning
[7:04:34]
as we recognize dr. Mccoy year
[7:04:35]
of service we look ahead to a
[7:04:37]
new chapter under dr. Kelsen
[7:04:40]
leadership.
[7:04:41]
throughout the process of the
[7:04:42]
last couple months have been
[7:04:44]
impressed by dr. Kelsen's
[7:04:46]
commitment to students, depth of
[7:04:48]
experience and clear
[7:04:49]
understanding strong schools are
[7:04:50]
built through strong
[7:04:51]
relationships, public education
[7:04:53]
is a people centered endeavor
[7:04:55]
and our success depends on the
[7:04:58]
ability to listen, collaborate
[7:04:59]
and work together on behalf of
[7:05:01]
students.
[7:05:02]
as a trustee excited about the
[7:05:04]
opportunity to partner with dr.
[7:05:05]
kelsen and service to the
[7:05:07]
district as a community member
[7:05:09]
hopeful about the relationship
[7:05:10]
we builds with students families
[7:05:13]
educators staff labor partners
[7:05:15]
and community organizations.
[7:05:17]
as someone who spent much of
[7:05:23]
career working along families,
[7:05:25]
trust [inaudible] oxnard union
[7:05:29]
is remarkable district.
[7:05:30]
students bring talent diversity
[7:05:33]
to the school every day and
[7:05:34]
deserve leaders who believe in
[7:05:36]
their potential and committed
[7:05:37]
creating opportunities for every
[7:05:38]
student to thrive so dr. Kelsen,
[7:05:41]
congratulations on your
[7:05:42]
appointment and look forward
[7:05:43]
working alongside you in support
[7:05:45]
of student and families and
[7:05:46]
communities we serve and wishing
[7:05:48]
great success in the role.
[7:05:50]
I was going to talk about
[7:05:51]
graduation, but it is midnight.
[7:05:56]
I went to 8 and they were great.
[7:06:00]
I'll skip skip skip.
[7:06:02]
skip skip skip.
[7:06:06]
congrats to class of 2026.
[7:06:13]
last thing because reclaim my
[7:06:17]
time--it is late.
[7:06:21]
before we adjourn and are for
[7:06:22]
the 4th year in a row you are
[7:06:23]
friendly neighborhood lgbtq
[7:06:25]
trustee is here to say plainly,
[7:06:27]
happy pride.
[7:06:31]
I made the joke last year too.
[7:06:34]
diversity isn't something we
[7:06:35]
acknowledge more then the
[7:06:37]
progress pride flags we proudly
[7:06:40]
fly at each site.
[7:06:41]
it is something we protect and
[7:06:43]
celebrate and stand behind and
[7:06:44]
every student and staff member
[7:06:46]
deserves to feel seen safe and
[7:06:48]
affirmed in school and something
[7:06:50]
the board remains firm in
[7:06:53]
commitment so hope everyone has
[7:06:55]
a restful summer.
[7:06:57]
congratulations to class of 2026
[7:06:59]
and see you in august.
[7:07:09]
>> attended many graduations and
[7:07:11]
they are always wonderful
[7:07:12]
celebration.
[7:07:17]
congratulations dr. Kelsen we
[7:07:18]
are thrilled to have you as the
[7:07:19]
next superintendent.
[7:07:21]
it is happy sad moment but
[7:07:23]
sometimes those are the best.
[7:07:24]
my favorite thing is your maslow
[7:07:28]
before bloom mind set.
[7:07:31]
you know and I know you embody
[7:07:33]
the spirit of students need to
[7:07:35]
be socially emotionally safe
[7:07:37]
before they can learn and grow
[7:07:38]
and then help them to learn and
[7:07:40]
grow and we are excited.
[7:07:42]
I will save the rest of the
[7:07:43]
comments for the next board
[7:07:45]
meeting when we are officially
[7:07:46]
together but congratulations and
[7:07:49]
thank you for choosing ouhsd.
[7:07:52]
to mr. La belle, my gosh, thank
[7:07:56]
you for all you have done.
[7:07:59]
ours has not always been a easy
[7:08:01]
relationship because I'm the
[7:08:03]
only person on the dais who's
[7:08:05]
children you were the principal
[7:08:06]
to my children and I want to say
[7:08:08]
thank you for that being a
[7:08:10]
parent being responsible for a
[7:08:12]
child is takes a village and so,
[7:08:17]
there were times when maybe I
[7:08:19]
was the loudest parent at the
[7:08:21]
table and begging or asking for
[7:08:25]
something you were always
[7:08:26]
willing to listen, willing to
[7:08:28]
help and you have served our
[7:08:30]
district so well.
[7:08:32]
I want to echo what the trustees
[7:08:37]
said especially with the labor
[7:08:39]
partners who have the upmost
[7:08:42]
respect to you and willing to
[7:08:43]
partner because that is where
[7:08:44]
the magic happens when everyone
[7:08:47]
feels listened to and feeling
[7:08:49]
like they have a seat at the
[7:08:50]
table.
[7:08:51]
that's where we the magic
[7:08:53]
happens and just to get there I
[7:08:55]
want to say thank you for that.
[7:08:57]
and again thank you for sharing
[7:08:59]
your time and talents and we
[7:09:01]
wish you all the best in your
[7:09:02]
next journey.
[7:09:05]
I do want to say very much huge
[7:09:09]
thank you to mr. Urias and your
[7:09:11]
team with regard to the budget
[7:09:14]
and ending the year on a
[7:09:15]
positive note.
[7:09:16]
a very heavy lift and not
[7:09:20]
possible without dr. Mccoy but
[7:09:24]
we thank you for your leadership
[7:09:25]
and helping us make tough
[7:09:27]
choices and come out on the
[7:09:29]
positive side.
[7:09:31]
no punt intended.
[7:09:33]
I want to wish everyone a happy
[7:09:35]
summer because I don't know I
[7:09:37]
will be able to see it by the
[7:09:39]
time I'm done.
[7:09:40]
I will not look at you dr.
[7:09:42]
mccoy.
[7:09:43]
tonight marks the end of a
[7:09:44]
extraordinary chapter.
[7:09:46]
I'm already crying for oxnard
[7:09:47]
union high school district.
[7:09:49]
I had the pleasure and privilege
[7:09:52]
of working alongside dr. Tom
[7:09:54]
mccoy for the past 10 years.
[7:09:57]
I can't do it.
[7:09:59]
as he served as assistant
[7:10:02]
superintendent of ed service,
[7:10:05]
interim superintendent and
[7:10:06]
superintendent of the oxnard
[7:10:08]
union high school district.
[7:10:10]
it was my honor to serve as
[7:10:11]
board president when this board
[7:10:13]
appointed superintendent mccoy
[7:10:16]
in 2020.
[7:10:17]
it was dr. Mccoy's dream to
[7:10:19]
serve a superintendent of ouhsd
[7:10:22]
and it was my honor to help make
[7:10:24]
that dream reality.
[7:10:26]
we are incredibly fortunate he
[7:10:29]
has chosen to lead the district.
[7:10:31]
looking back I can say without
[7:10:32]
hesitation that it was one of
[7:10:34]
the most important decisions I
[7:10:37]
ever made and I think this board
[7:10:40]
ever made.
[7:10:41]
I have four pages, sorry
[7:10:44]
everyone.
[7:10:45]
the truth is, dr. Mccoy
[7:10:50]
inherited neither easy
[7:10:51]
circumstances nor easy decisions
[7:10:52]
because after all it was covid
[7:10:55]
and he took on the position
[7:10:58]
willingness.
[7:10:59]
he lead the district through a
[7:11:01]
global pandemic, unprecedented
[7:11:03]
challenge, changing
[7:11:05]
expectations, especially in the
[7:11:06]
political landscape and some of
[7:11:08]
the largest construction
[7:11:10]
projects in our district
[7:11:12]
history.
[7:11:13]
yet through it all never lost
[7:11:14]
sight what matters most,
[7:11:16]
students.
[7:11:17]
when future generations look at
[7:11:19]
the history of this district
[7:11:21]
they will see dr. Mccoy's
[7:11:25]
fingerprints and emerged from
[7:11:26]
challenges of the pandemic,
[7:11:27]
stronger then before, they will
[7:11:29]
see graduation rates that reach
[7:11:32]
93 percent the highest in
[7:11:35]
history.
[7:11:37]
I'm sorry.
[7:11:40]
and among the highest in ventura
[7:11:44]
county.
[7:11:45]
the most diverse student
[7:11:46]
populations making the great
[7:11:47]
escapes.
[7:11:50]
they will see 10s of thousands
[7:11:52]
of students and I think more
[7:11:54]
then a hundred possibly more
[7:11:55]
then 200 thousand students who
[7:11:57]
lives were changed because dr.
[7:11:59]
mccoy believed that they
[7:12:01]
deserved every opportunity to
[7:12:02]
succeed and he built teams to
[7:12:05]
make that happen.
[7:12:07]
this is leadership.
[7:12:09]
this is what a district that
[7:12:11]
chooses--this is a district that
[7:12:15]
chooses courage over
[7:12:18]
convenience.
[7:12:19]
as dr. Mccoy reminds us, go slow
[7:12:21]
to go fast, and that what is
[7:12:23]
good for kids is not always
[7:12:25]
convenient for adults.
[7:12:27]
under his leadership ouhsd
[7:12:28]
became the first district in
[7:12:30]
ventura county to align
[7:12:32]
graduation rates with uc and
[7:12:36]
csu a-g and first to require
[7:12:39]
ethnic studies for graduation.
[7:12:41]
constantly challenged to think
[7:12:42]
beyond what was easy and focus
[7:12:46]
on what was right for students.
[7:12:49]
people looking at ouhsd will see
[7:12:52]
a district that understands
[7:12:53]
learning cannot happen unless
[7:12:55]
students, teachers, staff and
[7:12:58]
school communities feel safe,
[7:13:01]
healthy and supported.
[7:13:02]
dr. Mccoy reminded at ouhsd we
[7:13:06]
are a maslow before bloom
[7:13:08]
district and these awards are
[7:13:10]
more of a philosophy they then a
[7:13:13]
philosophy, they became a
[7:13:14]
promise.
[7:13:15]
a promise students have access
[7:13:17]
to wellness supports, promise
[7:13:20]
mental health matters, a promise
[7:13:30]
before students can learn they
[7:13:32]
must feel safe, healthy
[7:13:35]
connected and valued and because
[7:13:36]
of his leadership every high
[7:13:39]
school has a health center,
[7:13:41]
mental health support expanded,
[7:13:43]
community school said reality,
[7:13:45]
farm to school program became a
[7:13:46]
model throughout the state, and
[7:13:48]
his commitment to the whole
[7:13:50]
child transformed our district
[7:13:52]
and changed countless lives.
[7:13:54]
but they also see physical
[7:13:56]
reminders of his leadership
[7:13:58]
across the community.
[7:13:59]
dr. Mccoy successfully guided
[7:14:00]
the completion of more then a
[7:14:02]
half billion dollars in bond
[7:14:03]
measure projects and including
[7:14:06]
project labor agreement that
[7:14:09]
insure trade and construction
[7:14:11]
jobs stayed in the community.
[7:14:13]
this work brought improvement to
[7:14:15]
every campus included the
[7:14:17]
opening of del sol high school.
[7:14:19]
a state of the art facility that
[7:14:21]
serve generations of students
[7:14:24]
continuing to expand
[7:14:25]
opportunities for both students
[7:14:27]
and employees for years to come.
[7:14:30]
but numbers buildings and
[7:14:31]
programs only tell part of the
[7:14:33]
story.
[7:14:34]
what I will remember most is the
[7:14:37]
trust he built.
[7:14:38]
trust with the board, trust with
[7:14:41]
labor partners, trust with
[7:14:43]
staff, trust with families and
[7:14:45]
most importantly, trust with
[7:14:47]
students.
[7:14:55]
trust built through consistency,
[7:14:57]
trust strengthened by integrity,
[7:15:00]
and trust earned by showing up
[7:15:02]
every day year after year even
[7:15:05]
when decisions were difficult.
[7:15:08]
there is a saying here that all
[7:15:10]
roads-there is a saying all
[7:15:12]
roads lead to rome, but in ouhsd
[7:15:15]
all roads lead to dr. Mccoy.
[7:15:18]
whether it was a student concern
[7:15:20]
labor issue construction
[7:15:21]
project, community partnership,
[7:15:24]
curriculum question or crisis
[7:15:27]
there was one constant, dr.
[7:15:29]
mccoy showed up.
[7:15:30]
he listened cared and found a
[7:15:33]
way forward.
[7:15:34]
leadership isn't about a tite 8,
[7:15:35]
leadership is about earning the
[7:15:37]
confidence of others and
[7:15:39]
inspiring people to work toward
[7:15:41]
a common vision.
[7:15:43]
dr. Mccoy has done that well
[7:15:46]
through challenges crisis
[7:15:47]
celebrations and change he lead
[7:15:50]
with integrity, steadi ness,
[7:15:52]
humility and unwavering
[7:15:54]
commitment but what makes
[7:15:56]
tonight especially meaningful
[7:15:58]
for me is it feels like a full
[7:16:01]
circle moment.
[7:16:02]
it was my honor to serve as
[7:16:03]
board president when this board
[7:16:05]
appointed you as superintendent
[7:16:06]
in 2020 and looking back I do
[7:16:09]
believe that was one of the best
[7:16:11]
decisions we ever made.
[7:16:13]
now years later it is my honor
[7:16:15]
once again to serve as board
[7:16:16]
president as we recognize your
[7:16:18]
departure and celebrate all you
[7:16:22]
accomplished here at ouhsd.
[7:16:24]
between those two moments, we
[7:16:25]
have lived through the most
[7:16:27]
challenging and consequential
[7:16:30]
years in district history.
[7:16:31]
we navigated a global pandemic,
[7:16:34]
fought through uncertainty and
[7:16:35]
difficult decisions, celebrated
[7:16:38]
victories and carried the weight
[7:16:40]
of heartbreaking moments
[7:16:41]
together.
[7:16:42]
tom I can say that there is not
[7:16:44]
another man on this planet that
[7:16:46]
I shed more tears next to.
[7:16:50]
for real.
[7:16:52]
some of the tears were from
[7:16:54]
exhaustion, from frustration and
[7:16:56]
some from disappointment but
[7:16:58]
most of the tears were tears of
[7:17:01]
joy and pride as we watched our
[7:17:03]
students succeed and our
[7:17:06]
district accomplish things
[7:17:07]
people said could not be done.
[7:17:11]
thank you.
[7:17:12]
thank you.
[7:17:15]
all most done.
[7:17:16]
everyone of the moments was
[7:17:18]
grounded in shared belief our
[7:17:19]
student deserve the very best.
[7:17:23]
together we fought to deliver on
[7:17:26]
the promises it the community
[7:17:28]
the accomplishment I'm the most
[7:17:30]
proud of is successfully
[7:17:33]
delivering the bond program and
[7:17:34]
construction of del sol high
[7:17:35]
school.
[7:17:36]
once existed only as a vision of
[7:17:38]
equity facilities became the
[7:17:41]
reality of equitable facilities
[7:17:44]
under your leadership.
[7:17:46]
this is not a small feat.
[7:17:48]
those countless challenges you
[7:17:51]
never lost sight of goal because
[7:17:54]
commitment and determination and
[7:17:56]
our work together at del sol
[7:17:58]
high school open on time and
[7:18:00]
stand today as a lasting symbol
[7:18:02]
of what is possible when vision
[7:18:03]
is matched by leadership,
[7:18:05]
teamwork and action.
[7:18:07]
as you began your next chapter
[7:18:09]
as superintendent of burbank
[7:18:10]
unified school we wish nothing
[7:18:14]
but success.
[7:18:15]
gaining a leader, thoughtful
[7:18:19]
educator and superintendent who
[7:18:20]
never loses sight why the work
[7:18:22]
matters.
[7:18:23]
while we are sad to see you
[7:18:24]
leave ouhsd, we are grateful for
[7:18:27]
all you have given this district
[7:18:29]
and proud others now have the
[7:18:31]
opportunity to benefit from your
[7:18:32]
leadership.
[7:18:34]
we know you will make the same
[7:18:35]
lasting impact in burbank then
[7:18:39]
here in oxnard because public
[7:18:42]
education is stronger because of
[7:18:44]
your service and oxnard union is
[7:18:46]
stronger because of your
[7:18:47]
leadership and countless student
[7:18:49]
have a brighter future because
[7:18:52]
tom mccoy chose to dedicate his
[7:18:54]
career serving them.
[7:18:55]
congratulations and best of luck
[7:18:57]
in everything you do.
[7:18:59]
thank you dr. Mccoy.
[7:19:01]
thank you.
[7:19:02]
thank you.
[7:19:04]
(applause)
[7:19:07]
one last thing.
[7:19:08]
I didn't write it down.
[7:19:10]
this is by dissertation.
[7:19:12]
it is title teachers at the
[7:19:15]
table impact of teachers on
[7:19:17]
school boards and I do
[7:19:19]
acknowledge dr. Mccoy and I
[7:19:21]
acknowledge his beautiful
[7:19:23]
wonderful brilliant wife dr.
[7:19:26]
tiffany morris who was the
[7:19:28]
editor for my dissertation so I
[7:19:31]
want to thank you for helping me
[7:19:32]
be the best version of myself
[7:19:34]
for being the sound of reason
[7:19:36]
when I was about to jump off a
[7:19:41]
cliff.
[7:19:42]
he would no, you are going to
[7:19:44]
finish.
[7:19:45]
I haven't given to him and give
[7:19:47]
it now and say thank you
[7:19:49]
allowing teacher leadership to
[7:19:51]
shine here.
[7:19:52]
we are all examples what that
[7:19:53]
means and you have been a
[7:19:55]
incredible leader and teacher to
[7:19:57]
me and I just want to say thank
[7:19:58]
you for that as well.
[7:20:01]
>> thank you.
[7:20:04]
>> okay.
[7:20:05]
everyone with that being said we
[7:20:09]
will move to items for future
[7:20:10]
consideration.
[7:20:11]
we can go in the same order.
[7:20:13]
trustee estrada if you have
[7:20:15]
any-happy to take your items for
[7:20:18]
consideration.
[7:20:20]
>> no thank you.
[7:20:22]
>> thank you.
[7:20:24]
trustee baker torres.
[7:20:26]
>> we talked about this one
[7:20:27]
before, but I like to request
[7:20:30]
that we add union time as a
[7:20:33]
reoccurring item on the agenda
[7:20:34]
and place it near the
[7:20:35]
superintendent's report and
[7:20:37]
student trustee report.
[7:20:39]
this keeps all the standing
[7:20:41]
reports grouped consistently.
[7:20:44]
the next, I like to again
[7:20:47]
request that the september
[7:20:48]
meeting date change place on the
[7:20:50]
october agenda.
[7:20:52]
these are board meetings for
[7:20:53]
trustees.
[7:20:54]
I have now made three separate
[7:20:57]
attempts to have this matter
[7:20:59]
considered.
[7:21:00]
I first notified president sher
[7:21:02]
and superintendent mccoy of this
[7:21:04]
scheduling conflict by e-mail in
[7:21:06]
april.
[7:21:07]
I then raised it publicly at the
[7:21:09]
april board meeting and most
[7:21:11]
recently I requested it be
[7:21:14]
placed on tonight's agenda
[7:21:16]
during last week's agenda
[7:21:17]
setting meeting.
[7:21:19]
despite providing several month
[7:21:21]
notice, and making three
[7:21:23]
separate requests, we still
[7:21:25]
haven't been given the
[7:21:27]
opportunity to discuss this
[7:21:28]
matter to change the date.
[7:21:30]
I have been advised we are
[7:21:32]
waiting for a legal opinion.
[7:21:35]
quite frankly, I find it
[7:21:36]
concerning that nearly 3 months
[7:21:38]
later we still don't have a
[7:21:40]
answer to a straight forward
[7:21:41]
governance question regarding
[7:21:43]
the board's own meeting
[7:21:46]
calendar.
[7:21:47]
it is my understanding that the
[7:21:48]
brown act allows the board to
[7:21:51]
consider changing a future
[7:21:52]
meeting date as a properly
[7:21:55]
noticed public meeting.
[7:21:57]
if that is incorrect, I would
[7:21:59]
appreciate receiving the legal
[7:22:01]
guidance.
[7:22:02]
if it is correct, I question why
[7:22:04]
this matter has taken months to
[7:22:06]
resolve and why district
[7:22:08]
resources continue to be spent
[7:22:10]
pursuing a answer.
[7:22:12]
because we don't meet in july,
[7:22:14]
the august meeting is my last
[7:22:17]
opportunity to address this
[7:22:18]
issue before the september
[7:22:19]
meeting.
[7:22:20]
so, I respectfully request that
[7:22:23]
this item be placed on the
[7:22:24]
august agenda so we can discuss
[7:22:26]
it and make a determination.
[7:22:37]
>> I want to add if we can put
[7:22:38]
the workforce housing staff
[7:22:40]
update november or december just
[7:22:44]
on the calendar.
[7:22:45]
that's it.
[7:22:46]
>> thank you.
[7:22:48]
>> I would second trustee baker
[7:22:51]
torres request for consideration
[7:22:55]
of union time on upcoming
[7:22:57]
meeting agendas and like request
[7:23:02]
for update from peace and
[7:23:03]
respect committee.
[7:23:05]
>> trustee estrada, I didn't
[7:23:07]
mean to skip over you.
[7:23:10]
did I ask you?
[7:23:11]
I don't have anything for items
[7:23:13]
for future consideration.
[7:23:15]
so, with that, is there any
[7:23:17]
final comment?
[7:23:20]
>> I want to say thank you to
[7:23:21]
everybody for all the wonderful
[7:23:22]
comment and the opportunities to
[7:23:23]
be part of ouhsd.
[7:23:26]
>> that's it?
[7:23:30]
>> that's it.
[7:23:32]
thank you everybody.
[7:23:34]
>> that's it.
[7:23:35]
it is 12:25 and again, on behalf
[7:23:38]
of the board congratulations dr.
[7:23:40]
kelsen, we wish you all the
[7:23:42]
best.
[7:23:43]
mr. La belle and dr. Mccoy,
[7:23:45]
congratulations on your new
[7:23:47]
adventures and on behalf of the
[7:23:49]
board wish you all the best.
[7:23:50]
with that, we are adjourned
[7:23:55]
everyone.
[7:23:56]
happy summer.
[7:23:57]
[meeting adjourned]